1
00:00:00,520 --> 00:00:03,760
Speaker 1: When the weather outside is frightful. The hunt Santa Fe

2
00:00:03,960 --> 00:00:07,640
Speaker 1: is what's the word delightful because it's got available h

3
00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,639
Speaker 1: track all wheel drive to make being out together better.

4
00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:13,600
Speaker 1: Enter for your chance to win the newly redesigned Santa

5
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,600
Speaker 1: Fe packed with all the jingle bells and whistles you

6
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:19,119
Speaker 1: need to go dashing through the snow together to winter.

7
00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:22,160
Speaker 1: Visit Amazon dot com slash Hunting, or scan the QR

8
00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:24,919
Speaker 1: code on specially marked bread and green Amazon boxes. No

9
00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:28,000
Speaker 1: purchase necessary. Called five six two three one four four

10
00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:37,159
Speaker 1: six zero three for complete details. The Armstrong and Getty Show, Andy,

11
00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:39,240
Speaker 1: they we're talking with Tim and the lawyer Tim Sanderfer,

12
00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:41,320
Speaker 1: who is joining us on the Armstrong and Getty Show

13
00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:44,000
Speaker 1: as he has for thirteen years, he claims, which is

14
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,520
Speaker 1: a long time. Started as a caller fact check back

15
00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:50,440
Speaker 1: when you used to have calls. Of course, that was

16
00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:54,040
Speaker 1: also because they hadn't yet invented text messaging. So you

17
00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:58,200
Speaker 1: consider yourself a libertarian? Yes, and um, so I wanted

18
00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:00,240
Speaker 1: to ask you this. We were talking about this leer.

19
00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:02,600
Speaker 1: There was an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal

20
00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:07,039
Speaker 1: about the way we've um calculate income inequality, which ends

21
00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:09,320
Speaker 1: up being the talking points for a lot of programs

22
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:13,280
Speaker 1: for wealth redistribution, and they use um, I don't know

23
00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:14,720
Speaker 1: if you heard us talking about, but that's what the

24
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,760
Speaker 1: argument was. You take somebody who makes a million dollars

25
00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:19,360
Speaker 1: and you say, Okay, that person has a million dollars.

26
00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:21,520
Speaker 1: You don't say, well, they actually have five hundred thousand

27
00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:23,640
Speaker 1: dollars after taxes. And then you take someone he makes

28
00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:25,280
Speaker 1: four thousand dollars a year and you say they've got

29
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:27,679
Speaker 1: four thousand dollars. You don't actually say, well, they've got

30
00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,119
Speaker 1: sixty dollars, because that's how much they have after they

31
00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:32,959
Speaker 1: get all the programs they qualify for. And so we

32
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:37,319
Speaker 1: were not comparing the actual realities. And I was just wondering, um,

33
00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:39,640
Speaker 1: from the libertarian sort of point of view, or for

34
00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:41,759
Speaker 1: just from a freedom point of view, what the Founding

35
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:45,600
Speaker 1: fathers would have wanted how much wealth risk redistributions read

36
00:01:46,360 --> 00:01:49,920
Speaker 1: spreading money around should we be willing to accept? Oh,

37
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:54,680
Speaker 1: in principle none? Uh? In reality, well, I don't know,

38
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:58,600
Speaker 1: would you say, would you say none? So the Founding

39
00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:01,760
Speaker 1: Fathers were quite clear that, as the Federalist Papers says

40
00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:05,559
Speaker 1: that the equal protection of unequal ability is the first

41
00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:08,079
Speaker 1: rule of government. And the problem is that if you

42
00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:11,080
Speaker 1: have a redistributionary state, it will not be the equal

43
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:15,520
Speaker 1: protection of unequal abilities. It will be the unequal protection.

44
00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:17,960
Speaker 1: It will be the It will be taking from some

45
00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,919
Speaker 1: who have justly earned those things or justly own those things,

46
00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 1: and giving them to people who don't. And that is

47
00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 1: inherently a violent act. Confiscation by the state is an

48
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,160
Speaker 1: inherently violent act, whether it's done politely through the form

49
00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:32,760
Speaker 1: of bureaucracy or not. In the end, what you're talking

50
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:35,880
Speaker 1: about is government forcibly taking things that rightly belong to

51
00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,480
Speaker 1: people and giving them to those things to other people

52
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:41,200
Speaker 1: in the service of some vision of the ideal state.

53
00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:45,440
Speaker 1: And you're right about this, this problem of calculating inequality,

54
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:47,880
Speaker 1: and it goes further than that, by the way, because

55
00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:50,840
Speaker 1: a lot of the time we don't measure where individuals

56
00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:53,560
Speaker 1: go from those categories. We act as if these people

57
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:56,000
Speaker 1: stay in these categories their whole lives, and they don't.

58
00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,440
Speaker 1: People move from one category to another. They go from

59
00:02:59,639 --> 00:03:02,200
Speaker 1: modern an income to high income over the course of

60
00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:05,240
Speaker 1: their lives, and these measurements of equality or of income

61
00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 1: inequality fail to account for that, and so it acts

62
00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:10,720
Speaker 1: as though these are permanent things. When they're not, people

63
00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:13,080
Speaker 1: move from one category to another, and that's how it

64
00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:16,480
Speaker 1: should be. Freedom is going to end up in unequal results.

65
00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,399
Speaker 1: That's what freedom does. But if you prioritize freedom, then

66
00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:21,960
Speaker 1: that is not as much a concern, Whereas if you

67
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:25,360
Speaker 1: prioritize equality, you're going to sacrifice freedom and in the

68
00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:29,000
Speaker 1: end not really get equality because people just aren't fundamentally

69
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:30,880
Speaker 1: equal in ever respect. So you're gonna have to go

70
00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:34,639
Speaker 1: back and redistribute and redistribute and redistribute. For example, imagine

71
00:03:34,639 --> 00:03:37,920
Speaker 1: that you have a marathon and everybody starts out at

72
00:03:37,960 --> 00:03:39,800
Speaker 1: exactly the same spot. They're not going to end up

73
00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:41,560
Speaker 1: at the same spot. Some people are gonna come in

74
00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:43,560
Speaker 1: for a second, third and so forth. Okay, so now

75
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:47,240
Speaker 1: you have to shift the ratios in order to equalize them. Right,

76
00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:49,400
Speaker 1: Make some people start way in the in the back,

77
00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:52,000
Speaker 1: and some people wear leg weights and so forth, and

78
00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:54,120
Speaker 1: then you run your next race once again they come

79
00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:56,080
Speaker 1: out unequal. So now you have to go and shift

80
00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:59,200
Speaker 1: them again. And that's why redistribution never ends. It's just

81
00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:01,360
Speaker 1: he has to keep owing and going and going and

82
00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:03,520
Speaker 1: going in order to try and equalize things that are

83
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,640
Speaker 1: inherently unequal, and each step of that redistribution is a

84
00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:10,440
Speaker 1: step of coercion and inherently a step of violence, and

85
00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,040
Speaker 1: a commitment of a committing of an injustice against people

86
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:16,120
Speaker 1: who have not done any unjust thing. Taking away my

87
00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:19,440
Speaker 1: earnings and giving them to some other person because he's poor,

88
00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:22,440
Speaker 1: when I'm not at fault for his being poor, means

89
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,120
Speaker 1: violating my rights, committing an injustice against me. Well, we

90
00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:27,960
Speaker 1: won't even get to white privilege, which is a whole

91
00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:30,320
Speaker 1: different conversation, because you'd make that argument that, of course

92
00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:33,560
Speaker 1: you are. Now Here's another thing is that inequalities will

93
00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,760
Speaker 1: increase as wealth increases. So let's say that I have

94
00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:40,240
Speaker 1: one dollar and you have fifty cents. The inequality is

95
00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,440
Speaker 1: fifty cents. Right now, let's double both of our incomes.

96
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,240
Speaker 1: Now I have two dollars and you have one dollar. Well,

97
00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:49,520
Speaker 1: the inequality has doubled also, right because now the inequality

98
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:52,200
Speaker 1: is a whole dollar instead of fifty cents. And yet

99
00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:54,800
Speaker 1: you are twice as as well off now as you

100
00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,760
Speaker 1: were before. Both of us are vastly wealthier than we

101
00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:01,039
Speaker 1: were to begin with. Now, where what does a humane

102
00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:04,839
Speaker 1: person worry about? A humane person worries about the absolute wealth,

103
00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:08,640
Speaker 1: worries about lifting poor people from the bottom by by

104
00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:11,840
Speaker 1: ensuring that they have more wealth. It's the inhumane person

105
00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:13,599
Speaker 1: who says, oh, no, we can't have that because the

106
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:16,240
Speaker 1: inequality has doubled. We don't like that inequality, so we've

107
00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:18,480
Speaker 1: got to make sure to prevent the inequality. No, your

108
00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,240
Speaker 1: focus is on the wrong thing. You should be on

109
00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:23,200
Speaker 1: the You should be focusing on increasing the wealth, not

110
00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:26,640
Speaker 1: on making sure everybody is equal. And as Margaret Thatcher

111
00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:30,640
Speaker 1: famously said, socialists would prefer that people have less in

112
00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:33,760
Speaker 1: order to ensure that they are more equal, Whereas what

113
00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:36,719
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is, yeah, they're gonna have inequalities, but

114
00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:39,720
Speaker 1: when people are wealthier, they are better off, even if

115
00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:42,120
Speaker 1: they aren't as wealthy as Bill Gates or something like that.

116
00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:45,400
Speaker 1: So many avidues we could discuss on that topic, and

117
00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:47,040
Speaker 1: I would like to, but we're run a little short

118
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,479
Speaker 1: of time. And I did promise to change people's lives,

119
00:05:49,640 --> 00:05:51,080
Speaker 1: which is a hell of a thing to promise on

120
00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:53,880
Speaker 1: a radio show. So one of my favorite aspects of

121
00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:55,960
Speaker 1: talking to you through the years, Tim is that the

122
00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:58,360
Speaker 1: scales have flown from my eyes. On a couple of

123
00:05:58,360 --> 00:06:01,920
Speaker 1: topics to quote the Good Book Um for instance, the

124
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:07,160
Speaker 1: idea that a government permit. Why is the government even

125
00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:09,279
Speaker 1: being asked to permit me to do something? I'm just

126
00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:12,240
Speaker 1: going to do it unless I'm hurting someone else. So

127
00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:15,160
Speaker 1: a lot of our ideas of liberty or upside down

128
00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,160
Speaker 1: right now, What broad principle of liberty do you think

129
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:20,599
Speaker 1: has gotten turned on its head in modern America that

130
00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,400
Speaker 1: people ought to be reminded of. Oh boy, that's a no,

131
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:25,680
Speaker 1: you've said, a very good one, which is this idea

132
00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:29,359
Speaker 1: that whether you're presumptively free unless there's some good reason

133
00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,400
Speaker 1: to prevent you from being free, versus the idea that

134
00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:34,720
Speaker 1: you are not free unless the government says you are.

135
00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:37,640
Speaker 1: And what what we have done is we're increasingly transformed

136
00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:41,159
Speaker 1: into what I call a permission society, where you are

137
00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:44,360
Speaker 1: not presumptively free unless you first get permission to do

138
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:46,440
Speaker 1: the thing that you want to do. And there are

139
00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:48,120
Speaker 1: all sorts of problems with that. One is that we

140
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:52,880
Speaker 1: can't really imagine the benefits of any new innovation before

141
00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,920
Speaker 1: somebody introduces and tries that experiment. And the idea of

142
00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:58,919
Speaker 1: of having to get a government permit assumes that government

143
00:06:58,920 --> 00:07:02,880
Speaker 1: bureaucracy somehow knows the right answer to something. I mean,

144
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,120
Speaker 1: I've done lawsuits where I did a case in Kentucky

145
00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:08,279
Speaker 1: a few years ago where the question was that there's

146
00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:09,760
Speaker 1: a law that says you're not allowed to run a

147
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:13,360
Speaker 1: moving company until you first get permit from the government,

148
00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:14,720
Speaker 1: and in order to get to permit, you have to

149
00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:16,560
Speaker 1: prove that there needs to be a new moving company

150
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:19,200
Speaker 1: in the state. Well, how do you prove that there

151
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:21,480
Speaker 1: needs to be a movement? You can't prove that there's

152
00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:24,120
Speaker 1: no and and the idea that the government knows how

153
00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:26,040
Speaker 1: many moving companies there ought to be in the state

154
00:07:26,080 --> 00:07:27,880
Speaker 1: of Kentucky. Of course they don't know the answer to

155
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:30,840
Speaker 1: that question, and they can't possibly. So it's very dangerous

156
00:07:30,840 --> 00:07:33,080
Speaker 1: that we've shifted our society from one where you are

157
00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:36,160
Speaker 1: presumed to be free unless there's some good reason to

158
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:39,480
Speaker 1: to limit what you do into a society where increasingly

159
00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:41,920
Speaker 1: you are not free unless you get some form of

160
00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:43,920
Speaker 1: government permission. And think of all the different things you

161
00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:46,920
Speaker 1: have to get permission for, everything from building a house

162
00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:50,880
Speaker 1: to owning a gun, to owning to possessing medicine. That's

163
00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:54,240
Speaker 1: what a prescription is is for. Is a government permission

164
00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:57,120
Speaker 1: slip for you to have a medicine. So I think

165
00:07:57,120 --> 00:07:59,800
Speaker 1: that is that overall is is a very good example

166
00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:03,160
Speaker 1: of how we had a really important principle and and

167
00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:05,960
Speaker 1: I think most Americans still hold it. But gradually we're

168
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:08,600
Speaker 1: sliding into a society where you are not free unless

169
00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,280
Speaker 1: some bureaucrat approves of what you're doing well. And the

170
00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:13,560
Speaker 1: other aspect of our conversations through the years that have

171
00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:15,800
Speaker 1: really crystallized in my head that I wish I could

172
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:19,240
Speaker 1: convey to other people is this idea that that the

173
00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:22,040
Speaker 1: government is in general wise and benevolent, and the more

174
00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,680
Speaker 1: government the better um as opposed to the concept of

175
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:30,080
Speaker 1: rent seeking, for instance, that the more powerful and rich

176
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,920
Speaker 1: a government gets, the more awful behavior you're going to

177
00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:36,120
Speaker 1: get because it becomes it becomes economically valuable for me

178
00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:37,800
Speaker 1: to get the government to do my bidding. So I'm

179
00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:39,800
Speaker 1: going to invest my time and money to get the

180
00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:42,160
Speaker 1: government to do that do what I want them too.

181
00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:45,319
Speaker 1: So that's why you have these repeat players of powerful

182
00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:48,760
Speaker 1: private interests that use the government to profit themselves, whereas

183
00:08:48,760 --> 00:08:51,560
Speaker 1: newcomers who don't have that kind of political influence, they

184
00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,520
Speaker 1: can't obtain that, And so everybody talks about what government

185
00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:57,880
Speaker 1: wealth redistribution as if it's going to cure problems, when

186
00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:00,160
Speaker 1: all that does is it that power is going to

187
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:03,280
Speaker 1: fall into the hands of the politically effective, the politically powerful,

188
00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:06,760
Speaker 1: and and it's not going to be exercised to benefit

189
00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:09,120
Speaker 1: those who are most needy or most deserving. And this

190
00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:11,880
Speaker 1: presumption that government is made up of angels, it's just amazing.

191
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:14,080
Speaker 1: There's this a new story I was reading this this

192
00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:16,599
Speaker 1: morning about this guy named Ibram Kendy who published a

193
00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:19,240
Speaker 1: book called How to Be An Anti Racist. All the

194
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:22,280
Speaker 1: talk about this this is a big deal and one

195
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:24,520
Speaker 1: of the most dangerous things that's happened in decades. And

196
00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:27,320
Speaker 1: his big proposally is we have a government bureaucracy that

197
00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:31,720
Speaker 1: he in his words, literally governs absolutely everything to ensure

198
00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:37,040
Speaker 1: that it's anti racist, whatever that means, wellist or anti racist.

199
00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:38,800
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as I'm not a racist, and

200
00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:41,360
Speaker 1: the government bureaucracy is going to ensure that everything is

201
00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:44,000
Speaker 1: anti racist. Now, leaven aside from the vagueness of the

202
00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:46,360
Speaker 1: definitions and all those sorts of problems, he just seems

203
00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:49,160
Speaker 1: to assume that government is going to act in an

204
00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:53,559
Speaker 1: anti racist fashion as if government is staffed by angels, which,

205
00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:56,400
Speaker 1: if anything is there has there ever been an example

206
00:09:56,440 --> 00:09:58,320
Speaker 1: of it doing that? I mean, if anything, it's been

207
00:09:58,360 --> 00:10:01,920
Speaker 1: exactly the reverse throughout all of recorded history. And yet

208
00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:04,720
Speaker 1: we assume that. And Jefferson in his first inagur Justice

209
00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:06,760
Speaker 1: has this great line where he says, sometimes we are

210
00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,240
Speaker 1: told that government that people cannot be trusted to govern

211
00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:12,640
Speaker 1: their own lives. Have we found angels in the forms

212
00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:16,600
Speaker 1: of kings to govern us? Of course we haven't. So

213
00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:18,679
Speaker 1: if you're if we haven't found angels in the forms

214
00:10:18,720 --> 00:10:21,200
Speaker 1: of kings to govern us, then why would we trust

215
00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:23,760
Speaker 1: the government with more power. If people can't be trusted

216
00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:26,040
Speaker 1: to run their own lives and make their own decisions,

217
00:10:26,360 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 1: then they certainly can't be given power to govern other

218
00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:32,800
Speaker 1: people and run their lives and make decisions for them.

219
00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:35,200
Speaker 1: If I'm not we're if I'm not smart enough or

220
00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:38,000
Speaker 1: or moral enough to run my own life, then why

221
00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:40,040
Speaker 1: in the world should I have power to run your life?

222
00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:43,439
Speaker 1: It should be just the opposite. And yet this, this presumption,

223
00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:45,920
Speaker 1: the leftist presumption typically, although you also find it among

224
00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:49,000
Speaker 1: conservatives quite a lot, This presumption that people cannot be

225
00:10:49,200 --> 00:10:51,520
Speaker 1: left to run their own lives is then wedded to

226
00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:54,360
Speaker 1: this sort of mystical notion that somehow government bureaucracy is

227
00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:56,480
Speaker 1: going to be staffed by perfect people, who aren't biased,

228
00:10:56,520 --> 00:10:59,440
Speaker 1: who aren't looking out for their own private interests, and

229
00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:02,400
Speaker 1: who aren't going to do the bidding of their cronies

230
00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:05,720
Speaker 1: and their friends and other than all of human history.

231
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:09,880
Speaker 1: They have an argument. I mean, the most racist societies

232
00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:11,760
Speaker 1: in the world, the most polluted societies in the world,

233
00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:13,959
Speaker 1: the poorest societies in the world, the most oppressive societies

234
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:17,439
Speaker 1: in the world, the most discriminatory these are all collectivist societies.

235
00:11:17,880 --> 00:11:20,520
Speaker 1: Environmentalists think that government is going to act in some

236
00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:23,720
Speaker 1: in some fashion to protect the earth against evil, greedy capitalism.

237
00:11:23,880 --> 00:11:26,679
Speaker 1: Well that's true. Why are the dirtiest places on the

238
00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:29,480
Speaker 1: planet the places with the weakest property rights and the

239
00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:32,319
Speaker 1: biggest government the Soviet the former Soviet Union is a

240
00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:35,800
Speaker 1: toxic waste land. China is a toxic waste land, and

241
00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:37,880
Speaker 1: the government is in charge of everything there. So, if

242
00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,400
Speaker 1: government is going to to protect the earth against the

243
00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:44,200
Speaker 1: evils of the profit motive, it hasn't worked there. Why

244
00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:46,600
Speaker 1: would we assume that it would work here? When in fact,

245
00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,000
Speaker 1: even in the United States, the government was responsible for

246
00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:51,160
Speaker 1: everything from the extinction of the buffalo to the extinction

247
00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:53,800
Speaker 1: of the oh bird of Hawaii. These are things were

248
00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:56,400
Speaker 1: all done by government authorities who had didn't have to

249
00:11:56,440 --> 00:11:59,679
Speaker 1: answer for profit motives, didn't have to answer for the

250
00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:04,959
Speaker 1: safety of private property. As Aristotle said two thousand years ago,

251
00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:07,200
Speaker 1: that which is owned by nobody has the least amount

252
00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:10,280
Speaker 1: of carabis ode upon it. Well, said Tim sand for

253
00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:13,480
Speaker 1: Vice president of Litigation for the Goldwater Institute. You will

254
00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:14,840
Speaker 1: have a link to all of his books and that

255
00:12:14,880 --> 00:12:16,000
Speaker 1: sort of thing if you want to rate them, and

256
00:12:16,040 --> 00:12:18,079
Speaker 1: you probably should. Tim, It's always a pleasure. Thanks. Go

257
00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:19,800
Speaker 1: to Tim the Lawyer dot com for more. Tim the

258
00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:21,840
Speaker 1: Lawyer dot com. You're headed over to Berkeley to lecture

259
00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:24,800
Speaker 1: those people speaking at u C Berkeley in a few hours. God,

260
00:12:24,840 --> 00:12:27,000
Speaker 1: I hope you don't get pelted with rocks and garbage.

261
00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:28,880
Speaker 1: I might stop at the cathedral on the way and say,

262
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:35,560
Speaker 1: if you couldn't hurt right, what's the downside? When the

263
00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:39,520
Speaker 1: weather outside is frightful? The hunt Santa fe is what's

264
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:42,839
Speaker 1: the word delightful? Because it's got available h track all

265
00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:46,079
Speaker 1: wheel drive to make being out together better. Enter for

266
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:49,040
Speaker 1: your chance to win the newly redesigned Santa Fe packed

267
00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:51,679
Speaker 1: with all the jingle bells and whistles you need to

268
00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:54,679
Speaker 1: go dashing through the snow together to winter. Visit amazon

269
00:12:54,720 --> 00:12:57,240
Speaker 1: dot com slash hunting, or scan the QR code on

270
00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,560
Speaker 1: specially marked bread and green Amazon boxes. No perch necessary.

271
00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:03,320
Speaker 1: Called five six two three one four four six zero

272
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:04,480
Speaker 1: three for complete details