1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 1: What two three breaks down in the middle of the 2 00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: failing Hello's football down in the one yard line? How 3 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: about that? 4 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:25,639 Speaker 2: That is the ultimate kabash and we are underway. 5 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 1: Hello everyone, welcome back to another episode of the Action 6 00:00:29,400 --> 00:00:33,159 Speaker 1: Networks NFL podcast. I'm Matt Friedman, the editor in chief 7 00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 1: of Fantasy Labs. Free agency is approaching, and just last 8 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:39,559 Speaker 1: night we were recording this on Sunday. Just last night, 9 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:42,559 Speaker 1: news broke of the Antonio Brown trade. We're going to 10 00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:45,280 Speaker 1: break down that transaction what it might mean for fantasy 11 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen, and we will also preview free agency 12 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:51,920 Speaker 1: and look at the biggest names on the market. Here 13 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 1: to help me break all of it down is Ian Heart. 14 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 1: It's the director of the Fantasy Labs NFL platform and 15 00:00:57,040 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: an Action Network analyst. You can follow Ian in the 16 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:02,720 Speaker 1: Act Network app at Iheartitz. Also use the app to 17 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 1: get real time odds and track your bets for free. Ian, 18 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:08,479 Speaker 1: how is it going? I don't even know what to say. 19 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:11,840 Speaker 1: I'm still shocked about this Antonio Brown trade. What's up 20 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:13,840 Speaker 1: with you the whole week man? 21 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 2: But my one takeaway from this week is that I 22 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 2: truly believe Antonio Brown is the best Bowls receiver of 23 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 2: all time. 24 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, probably except for Kelvin Benjamin, a close second to 25 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:28,680 Speaker 1: Andre Reid. Okay, we will have another episode this week 26 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: in which we preview week six of the Alliance of 27 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 1: American Football. And by the way, what a game last night. 28 00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 1: I'm sorry you probably don't want to talk about it, 29 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:38,919 Speaker 1: but the Stallions at the Fleet. You had the money 30 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:41,199 Speaker 1: line for the Stallions that didn't work out. I had 31 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 1: the spread, So winner I am. Stallions came from behind 32 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 1: to get the epic back to recover. The Fleet got 33 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: the field goal however at the end as the clock 34 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 1: expired to get the victory. Great game. So we will 35 00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 1: talk about all the Alliance action you want later this week. 36 00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 1: But Ian, right now, let's get to that Antonio Brown trade. 37 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:02,480 Speaker 1: Well to my thoughts in try not to jump on 38 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 1: Twitter and rage give us some notes. 39 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 2: Yeah. So, the biggest thing with this, like, first of all, 40 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 2: props Antonio Brown, because the dude just pretty much threw 41 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 2: NonStop fits for the last three months and got exactly 42 00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 2: what he wanted. He got more guaranteed money, He gets 43 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 2: to go live in Oakland and Vegas soon enough. I mean, 44 00:02:19,880 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 2: it's awesome to see some of these guys get what 45 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 2: they want. With that said, I don't think there's any 46 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,000 Speaker 2: case to be made that he's entering a significantly worse 47 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:30,800 Speaker 2: like fantasy situation in Oakland. I mean, look, Derek Carr 48 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 2: is not the worst quarterback in the league, but he 49 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,000 Speaker 2: might be the worst quarterback in the league that's paid 50 00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 2: to be an actually good quarterback. I mean, we have 51 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:41,040 Speaker 2: twenty quarterbacks making at least fifteen million dollars per year. 52 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 2: He is dead last in yards per a tenth among 53 00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:46,560 Speaker 2: that group, and even just looking at his entire career, 54 00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:48,880 Speaker 2: like we've had forty three quarterbacks make at least sixteen 55 00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 2: starts since twenty fourteen, car ranks thirty eighth and yards 56 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 2: per attempt twenty eighth, and completion rate twenty six and 57 00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 2: touchdown rate. I mean, there are guys worse than him, 58 00:02:57,120 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 2: but when he's being paid to, you know, be an 59 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 2: actually good court, it's just tough to kind of have 60 00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 2: that takeaway with the numbers he's put up. I understand 61 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,720 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen he had a pretty good year, but even 62 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 2: then we were talking before the podcast star his numbers 63 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:13,040 Speaker 2: in twenty eighteen were pretty comparable to that. So it 64 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 2: seems like cars ceiling to this point is as an 65 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:19,119 Speaker 2: above average quarterback. We'll see if ab can you bring 66 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 2: out the best in him. I think that would make sense, 67 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 2: but it's tough to get around. Man. 68 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:27,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the trade, and 69 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 1: it actually has nothing to do with the third and 70 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,600 Speaker 1: fifth rounder that Oakland gave up. I think totally fine 71 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: to give that up. I think the bigger thing is 72 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 1: that it's a lot of money, a lot of guaranteed money, 73 00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 1: especially for a guy who is thirty one and who 74 00:03:43,320 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 1: I think pretty objectively speaking, this is not, like for me, 75 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:49,880 Speaker 1: a subjective thing, although people will say it is like 76 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:53,560 Speaker 1: objectively based on a number of metrics, had one of 77 00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:59,120 Speaker 1: the lesser seasons of his career, so I understand that 78 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:01,560 Speaker 1: if you look over what he's done for the last 79 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:05,080 Speaker 1: five years, you have a guy who is legitimately the 80 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 1: best wide receiver in the league. But I think that's 81 00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:10,280 Speaker 1: not the best way to view a guy who's going 82 00:04:10,320 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: to be thirty one and who is coming off the 83 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:15,920 Speaker 1: season in which he declined. So I'm thinking they are 84 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 1: paying him as if he is the best receiver in 85 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:20,919 Speaker 1: the league, and I don't think he's going to be 86 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: the best receiver in the league for the next three seasons. 87 00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 1: I don't think he's even going to be a top 88 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 1: five receiver for the next three seasons. So I don't know. 89 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:31,919 Speaker 1: I mean, I think like two years from now, he 90 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:34,200 Speaker 1: might not even be in the top ten. We'll see, 91 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,360 Speaker 1: what are your thoughts for twenty nineteen. 92 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:39,440 Speaker 2: I think he's still capable of putting together a couple 93 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 2: more big years. And I think Matt Harmon made a 94 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 2: good point too that, look, he does have the perfect 95 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 2: skill set to move inside into the slot during the 96 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 2: later years. He really could thrive there. So that's something 97 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 2: we got to keep in mind. But I'm just I'm 98 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:54,560 Speaker 2: not sure if we're going to see the same just 99 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:57,039 Speaker 2: game breaking numbers, which is to be expected. He's aging, 100 00:04:57,080 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 2: it's like any other guy. But it just comes down 101 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:02,800 Speaker 2: to Roethlisberger. Last four years, he's always been a top 102 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,760 Speaker 2: ten quarterback in like percentage of passes that are deep balls. 103 00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 2: You know, Steelers are constantly taking chances downfield. Derek Carr 104 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 2: is basically the anti Roethlisberger when it comes to that. 105 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 2: I mean, the only quarterback with a lower percentage of 106 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,799 Speaker 2: passes that went twenty yards downfield last season was Cam Newton. 107 00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:19,920 Speaker 2: Who like literally had shoulder surgery and admitted that he 108 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,480 Speaker 2: could not throw the ball downfield, and Derek Carr was 109 00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,600 Speaker 2: right there with him in terms of that. So even 110 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 2: if AB's getting one hundred and fifty plus targets, I 111 00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:29,520 Speaker 2: still think they're gonna be nearly as fantasy friendly as 112 00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:31,960 Speaker 2: what we were seeing in Pittsburgh. And I mean, if 113 00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 2: he was already getting double team NonStop with Juju Smith, 114 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 2: Schuster and some of these other assault athletes and receivers 115 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:39,320 Speaker 2: on the field, I don't know what's going to happen 116 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,359 Speaker 2: in Oakland when defense has got picked between Antonio Brown, 117 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:44,239 Speaker 2: Seth Roberts, Jared Cook, and these guys. 118 00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:47,640 Speaker 1: So yeah, the one thing I will say is that 119 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:51,320 Speaker 1: he's played, you know, around fifteen games per year for 120 00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 1: the last six years or so. So let's say that 121 00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 1: that is what he does next year. Let's say that he, 122 00:05:57,000 --> 00:06:00,160 Speaker 1: instead of getting like eleven targets, gets maybe ten. I 123 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 1: think that's more realistic, and ten is still a really 124 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,880 Speaker 1: high number, like that is what a top end wide 125 00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:10,839 Speaker 1: receiver gets. And let's say that instead of averaging a 126 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 1: sixty two percent catch rate, which is what he had 127 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 1: in twenty seventeen, and a sixty one point nine percent 128 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 1: catch rate, which is what he had last year, both 129 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,160 Speaker 1: of which are you know, like really low numbers relative 130 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 1: to what he's done when he's been the best receiver 131 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,000 Speaker 1: in the game. Let's say that with Derek Carr throwing 132 00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:31,040 Speaker 1: him shorter passes, that catch rate goes up. Let's say 133 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:33,559 Speaker 1: he goes up to sixty five. Like at that point, 134 00:06:33,560 --> 00:06:36,440 Speaker 1: you have a guy who is catching around one hundred passes, 135 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,800 Speaker 1: you know, per year. And so it is a situation 136 00:06:39,839 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 1: where even though he's not having the fantasy friendly down 137 00:06:43,960 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 1: the field passes because he's maybe getting shorter targets and 138 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 1: he's better at catching those or those are more accurate, 139 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: maybe like in a PPR league, those are still things 140 00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: that can help his value. And maybe the question is, 141 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:03,839 Speaker 1: like is he still able to accumulate yards after the 142 00:07:03,920 --> 00:07:06,680 Speaker 1: catch to where even if he's getting shorter targets, he's 143 00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:10,000 Speaker 1: still able to get you know, like thirteen yards or 144 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:12,280 Speaker 1: so per reception. Last year he had twelve and a 145 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,000 Speaker 1: half yards perception. So we'll just we'll have to see. 146 00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:17,560 Speaker 1: But I mean, he's still a guy who I think 147 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:20,560 Speaker 1: this year he could have one hundred receptions, he could 148 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 1: have thirteen hundred dish yards like that is still really good. 149 00:07:24,440 --> 00:07:26,920 Speaker 1: I think his touchdown number is going to plummet like 150 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,640 Speaker 1: it was fifteen last year. Like touchdown totals, those are 151 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 1: not sticky, like they are not really predictive year to year, 152 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:36,560 Speaker 1: like the year before that he had nine. Like I 153 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 1: think we're closer to six or seven this year than 154 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 1: we are to fifteen. So I think he has a 155 00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:48,239 Speaker 1: probably still like a very respectable but like volume fueled 156 00:07:48,680 --> 00:07:51,720 Speaker 1: campaign from like a reception total in yard ish total, 157 00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:53,880 Speaker 1: but I think his touchdown total is going to be 158 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 1: I don't know. I think nine is probably high in 159 00:07:57,880 --> 00:08:00,320 Speaker 1: terms of a projection, but that's I don't I don't know. 160 00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: I mean, what are your thoughts on it? 161 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 2: No, I think he nailed it the receptions in the yards. 162 00:08:04,480 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 2: I think he can definitely still keep up for these 163 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:10,160 Speaker 2: next few years just on volume alone. But I don't 164 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 2: see him getting these same numbers when he's entering a 165 00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 2: significantly worse scoring offense with a significantly worse quarterback. What 166 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 2: do you think about the rest of these Pittsburgh guys though? 167 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:20,920 Speaker 2: I mean, Juju already had one hundred and sixty six 168 00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 2: targets last year as the number two. I mean, sure 169 00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 2: that could go up to one hundred and eighty, but 170 00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 2: I mean Juju's ceiling is already like a wide receiver one. 171 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,560 Speaker 2: I'm not saying he's not a wide receiver one, but 172 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 2: I don't know if he's necessarily gonna take this massive 173 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 2: next step. I think the guys are really gonna ball out. 174 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 2: Ore James Washington and Vance McDonald. 175 00:08:39,480 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with you, Like Juju's basically already there. 176 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:45,680 Speaker 1: Like for him now, it's just a matter of degree 177 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 1: as opposed to like getting a huge infusion of targets, 178 00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:51,680 Speaker 1: although I think he probably will get more targets, And 179 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:54,280 Speaker 1: I think like the bet is who is more productive 180 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:57,320 Speaker 1: over the next three years, Juju or Antonio Brown. It 181 00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprising that if Juju's the guy. But yeah, 182 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:03,679 Speaker 1: James Washington, I think has a massive opportunity to take 183 00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 1: a step forward. Vance McDonald, I'm a little less sold 184 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,800 Speaker 1: on just because there's so much inconsistency and there's always 185 00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:12,560 Speaker 1: a question of like, is who is the guy who's 186 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:14,559 Speaker 1: even getting a lot of the snaps that tied end 187 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,280 Speaker 1: for that team. But the guy who actually I'm thinking 188 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:19,840 Speaker 1: of is Jalen Samuels, Like I think he could be 189 00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 1: someone who kind of starts to funnel away some of 190 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 1: those targets because I think he is, maybe at this 191 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:30,080 Speaker 1: point behind Juju, like the second best pass catching option 192 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 1: on that team. Like he's a very good receiving threat. 193 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:35,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a good point. I'm thinking. First of all, 194 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 2: I agree with you that Juju is probably gonna see 195 00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 2: more targets, which makes me wonder, is he like the 196 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:41,839 Speaker 2: favorite this year to be the target leader? 197 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:47,160 Speaker 1: It's awesomele Like, I mean that offense last year led 198 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 1: the league. I believe in pass attempts yea, And that's 199 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 1: just kind of the way that they are going. Yeah, 200 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,320 Speaker 1: I mean there are a lot of targets there. Juju 201 00:09:57,400 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: already has a lot of targets, but like he's going 202 00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:03,240 Speaker 1: to get some more. I mean, DeAndre Hopkins, I think, 203 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:05,920 Speaker 1: is always someone who has a good shot of leading 204 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:09,080 Speaker 1: the league in targets, and then Davante Adams has a 205 00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:11,800 Speaker 1: shot at it too, But yeah, I think Juju is 206 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 1: down in the running for it. 207 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,640 Speaker 2: That would be interesting. I'm really excited about Washington in particular. 208 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,800 Speaker 2: We saw some preseason splash plays from him. He's just 209 00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 2: one of those guys that even coming out of Oklahoma State. 210 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 2: I mean, he's known for being able to make those 211 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 2: contested catches and really get downfield, so he was being 212 00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:30,439 Speaker 2: used a little bit more later in the season. At 213 00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 2: the very least, I think he's a guy that can 214 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,640 Speaker 2: give us some splash weeks in DFS, even if he's 215 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,040 Speaker 2: not the most consistent guy. But so I guess Jalen 216 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:40,319 Speaker 2: Samuels would be the number three option in Pittsburgh now 217 00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:42,640 Speaker 2: that you think could at least provide the most consistency 218 00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 2: because we've seen obviously them have a B and juju 219 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 2: support to guys and there's usually been a third, like 220 00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:50,280 Speaker 2: a Mark Davis Bryant type that the very least can 221 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:51,679 Speaker 2: pop off for some big weeks. 222 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if the targets that have 223 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:57,959 Speaker 1: been going to wide receivers, if some of those get 224 00:10:58,040 --> 00:11:01,239 Speaker 1: shifted a little bit more to one out of the backfield, 225 00:11:01,640 --> 00:11:04,000 Speaker 1: And I think that's Samuels, Like he is just such 226 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 1: a dynamic receiver and I think like a better than 227 00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:10,440 Speaker 1: expected runner. You know. Then people thought he would be 228 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,240 Speaker 1: entering the league last year, like he had a pretty 229 00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,720 Speaker 1: good stretch run in those couple of games where he 230 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 1: was an injury fill in. So I think he's someone 231 00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:21,640 Speaker 1: who could sort of emerge as like not even just 232 00:11:21,760 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 1: a change of pace back, but it's like like a 233 00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: change of pace back plus who is just sort of 234 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:30,280 Speaker 1: like all around, like always on the field, whether he's 235 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: lining up in the backfield or whether they're using him 236 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:35,200 Speaker 1: as a slot receiver or whatever it is. I could 237 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,720 Speaker 1: see them trying to get creative in the way that 238 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 1: they use him. All right, let's talk about some free agents, 239 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:44,320 Speaker 1: and let's start with guys who have already signed or 240 00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:49,199 Speaker 1: who are you like slated to be going someplace. Kareem 241 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 1: Hunt to the Browns, Carlos High to the Chiefs, Andre 242 00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 1: Ellington to the Buccaneers, Larry Fitzgerald returning to the Cardinals, 243 00:11:56,720 --> 00:11:59,160 Speaker 1: tight end Nick Boyle to the Ravens. I don't know 244 00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:01,959 Speaker 1: why we are even talking about these tight ends, Charles 245 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 1: Clay to the Cardinals, Dwayne Allen to the Dolphins, and 246 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 1: then a bunch of pass rushers who have been franchise 247 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: tag to Marcus Loris, David Clooney, Frank Clark, d ford 248 00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 1: Ian thoughts on these guys. 249 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:15,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, we probably could have left the tight ends off, 250 00:12:15,880 --> 00:12:19,680 Speaker 2: that's fair, But yeah, no, I mean, looking at the top, obviously, 251 00:12:19,800 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 2: Kareem Hunt sticks out as the big name. You know, 252 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,520 Speaker 2: we'll no more probably as the offseason progresses. I think 253 00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:28,480 Speaker 2: the big thing is how long his suspension will be 254 00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 2: and if they'll give him time served for last year, 255 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:34,079 Speaker 2: because it's if they give him time served for last 256 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:36,320 Speaker 2: year when he was released. I mean, even a six 257 00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 2: or eight game suspension is going to allow him to 258 00:12:38,160 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 2: be playing games in September. So it seems like from 259 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 2: what John Dorsey's been saying, like Duke Johnson is a 260 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:46,200 Speaker 2: guy that they could look to trade in the future, 261 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:48,439 Speaker 2: So I think they're just waiting to get word back 262 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:51,680 Speaker 2: from the league. But at the very least, I think 263 00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:53,480 Speaker 2: Hunt and Chubb are going to kind of eat into 264 00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:55,679 Speaker 2: each other's worklow a little bit. The Browns offense is 265 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:58,199 Speaker 2: looking pretty awesome at all levels anyway, so there might 266 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,600 Speaker 2: be enough room for both guys to thrive. But in 267 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:03,720 Speaker 2: terms of hunting Traub, I think being two running backs 268 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:05,959 Speaker 2: that we were hoping to see get three down workloads, 269 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:08,640 Speaker 2: I'm not sure if that's realistic anymore, and then the 270 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:11,640 Speaker 2: other one will quickly touch on Carlos Hide. With the Chiefs, 271 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:14,920 Speaker 2: we saw Damian Williams emerges as an RB one. You 272 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:17,960 Speaker 2: know when Hunt was gone last year, but the chief 273 00:13:17,960 --> 00:13:20,000 Speaker 2: said all the right things early on. You know, they're 274 00:13:20,080 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 2: confident and Williams's ability to continue to be that guy. 275 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 2: But then they go out and they signed Carlos Hyde. 276 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:28,320 Speaker 2: So we've seen Andy Reid use committee backfields throughout his career. 277 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:31,839 Speaker 2: Damian Williams is a guy that was pretty much expendable 278 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:33,439 Speaker 2: and kind of a you know, switching from team to 279 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 2: team a little bit up until that stretch run. So 280 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:37,959 Speaker 2: there's so much upside in that spot. But it makes 281 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 2: me nervous to touch out of the guy if it's 282 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:41,240 Speaker 2: going to cost a high fantasy pick. 283 00:13:41,679 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 1: I am really on Damian Williams, and this Carlos Hide 284 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:48,240 Speaker 1: edition doesn't bother me at all. Okay, Hide has been 285 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:52,880 Speaker 1: This is literally his fourth team in just under a year, 286 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 1: going from forty nine ers to Brown's to a Cup 287 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:00,839 Speaker 1: of Coffee in Jacksonville and now in Kansas City. This 288 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,200 Speaker 1: I don't know, like I see him like is a 289 00:14:03,240 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: little more than like just depth. But like you know, 290 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 1: they need they need people like they need bodies. But 291 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:12,360 Speaker 1: I just I don't see Hide being someone who really 292 00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:15,480 Speaker 1: significantly eats into what Damian Williams is doing, especially because 293 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 1: Williams is so much better as a receiver. 294 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:21,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I think that's a that's a fair point there. 295 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 2: So real quick though, Tampa Bay, Andre Allenton getting back 296 00:14:24,400 --> 00:14:26,520 Speaker 2: with Bruce Arians any chance? 297 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: No, I mean I think it's yeah, you know, it's 298 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 1: a tough situation because they actually do need someone to 299 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:36,600 Speaker 1: step up and be a running back there. I just 300 00:14:36,640 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 1: don't know, Like Ellington's older, he's smaller. We're always conversations 301 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: about like are we moving him to wide receiver? So 302 00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:46,920 Speaker 1: I don't know. I think he's just I think he's 303 00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:48,680 Speaker 1: just a guy. Like I think they're gonna give him 304 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 1: a shot. Maybe he can make the roster and he 305 00:14:51,640 --> 00:14:53,720 Speaker 1: can be you know, like a third down back you know, 306 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 1: every once in a while. But I just I don't 307 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:57,200 Speaker 1: really see it. I don't know what would you think 308 00:14:57,200 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 1: with him? 309 00:14:58,200 --> 00:15:00,560 Speaker 2: Probably not, But yeah, I'm just waiting for to see 310 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:02,440 Speaker 2: who's gonna be this leader in Tampa Bay. I mean, 311 00:15:02,520 --> 00:15:05,120 Speaker 2: last time we saw an Arian's offense, we saw David 312 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:07,640 Speaker 2: Johnson pretty much come out of nowhere and dominate fantasy. 313 00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:09,680 Speaker 2: So just kind of depends, I guess who can be 314 00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:12,080 Speaker 2: the starter there. I guess we can move on now 315 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 2: as some of the best available free agents. It's gonna 316 00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 2: be tough to have too much analysis on these guys 317 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 2: until we obviously know what team they land on. But 318 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:21,600 Speaker 2: a couple of these guys already we have a little 319 00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 2: bit of an idea of where they first. Up. Nick Foles, 320 00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:28,960 Speaker 2: we're getting strong Jaguars vibes, and we'll see if Bortles 321 00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 2: is still the backup. But Matt, what are your thoughts 322 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 2: on the Foles era in Jacksonville. 323 00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:35,440 Speaker 1: I think it will be better, better than any of 324 00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 1: the other eras we've seen for the last decade. So yeah, 325 00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:42,600 Speaker 1: it's I mean, they have to do something. I think 326 00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 1: Bortles is clearly not the answer. And as long as 327 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,480 Speaker 1: they're not resigning like Blaine Gabbert or something, I think 328 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:51,560 Speaker 1: almost anything is better than Portles. 329 00:15:52,080 --> 00:15:53,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, and I mean you bring a good point about 330 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,160 Speaker 2: Folds too. A lot of times people we tend to 331 00:15:56,880 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 2: erase Jared Gobb's first rookie season and Todd Gurley is 332 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 2: that terrible year he had because the Jeff Fisher factor. 333 00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 2: And if we did that with Nick Foles, I mean 334 00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:06,920 Speaker 2: he's got a career sixty three percent completion rate, seven 335 00:16:06,960 --> 00:16:09,240 Speaker 2: point three yards per a town, sixty one to twenty 336 00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 2: three touchdown interception ratio. I mean, he's been very legit 337 00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:15,520 Speaker 2: as long as Jeff Fisher is standing on the sideline. 338 00:16:15,560 --> 00:16:17,760 Speaker 2: So I'm interested to see what you can do at 339 00:16:17,760 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 2: Marque's lead, D D Westbrook, DJ Shark and these guys, 340 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:23,320 Speaker 2: because yeah, I have always thought Jacksonville had a nice 341 00:16:23,320 --> 00:16:25,840 Speaker 2: little prop up with skill position players, even if portals 342 00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:27,520 Speaker 2: couldn't really get him consistently going. 343 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, I entirely agree with that. I'm most excited about 344 00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:34,080 Speaker 1: the potential with TD Westbrook because you've said this before. 345 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:37,080 Speaker 1: He has he been Nick Foles has a very good 346 00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:39,520 Speaker 1: deep ball, and I think that is one place where 347 00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:42,240 Speaker 1: Westbrook could really thrive. The one question I really have 348 00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:46,120 Speaker 1: is that we've seen Foles do his best when he's 349 00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: been with I would say fairly innovative play callers, like 350 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:51,960 Speaker 1: say what you want about Chip Kelly, but like the 351 00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: full season with Chip Kelly was like a transcendent type 352 00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:57,160 Speaker 1: of year that was like an all time great type 353 00:16:57,200 --> 00:17:01,840 Speaker 1: of quarterback season. And he was during his postseason run 354 00:17:02,200 --> 00:17:06,160 Speaker 1: with another I think pretty good play caller in Peterson. 355 00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:09,040 Speaker 1: So the question is like do they have someone in 356 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:13,679 Speaker 1: Jacksonville who can help Foles sort of like unlock his potential. 357 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,400 Speaker 1: I don't know if they actually do so. I think 358 00:17:16,480 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 1: it's like as good of a signing as it can be. 359 00:17:19,080 --> 00:17:21,639 Speaker 1: It's just a question of how Foles is going to 360 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:24,440 Speaker 1: fit into the system that they build around him. 361 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:27,359 Speaker 2: Good points, Yeah, and it's looking like Foles, out of 362 00:17:27,359 --> 00:17:30,359 Speaker 2: these remaining free agents, might be the only quarterback that 363 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 2: signs somewhere and is immediately locked in as a starter. 364 00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:36,840 Speaker 2: Other guy that has some potential of those Teddy Bridgewater. 365 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:39,000 Speaker 2: I'm hearing some rumors so that he could probably just 366 00:17:39,040 --> 00:17:41,159 Speaker 2: go back on a one year deal to the Saints 367 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:43,399 Speaker 2: again and kind of maybe get like five million or 368 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:45,480 Speaker 2: something in that range and keep being a backup. But 369 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:47,879 Speaker 2: I'm not really I don't know. I've never been a 370 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 2: huge Bridgewater stand. I feel like even when he was 371 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:53,159 Speaker 2: starting with the Vikings and they made the playoffs, it 372 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:55,280 Speaker 2: was more of a game manager type role and kind 373 00:17:55,280 --> 00:17:57,080 Speaker 2: of just feeding the rung game and that they have 374 00:17:57,160 --> 00:17:58,960 Speaker 2: some good defense they are in that time as well. 375 00:17:59,080 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 2: So like, do you see Teddy Bridgewater ever being kind 376 00:18:02,240 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 2: of an above our NFL quarterback? 377 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: I don't know, not really not at this point, Like 378 00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:08,920 Speaker 1: I don't know what it is that separates him from 379 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,240 Speaker 1: case Keenum. You know, like that might sound like a 380 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:13,359 Speaker 1: hard take, but I just like, I don't know at 381 00:18:13,359 --> 00:18:17,280 Speaker 1: this point, Like they seem to be kind of comparable. So, yeah, 382 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:21,359 Speaker 1: he's someone who maybe will get a shot to start 383 00:18:21,400 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 1: at some point, but yeah, he feels like someone who's 384 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:27,240 Speaker 1: always going to be kind of like straddling the line 385 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:30,840 Speaker 1: between potential future starter and backup for now. 386 00:18:31,480 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a good point, all right. A couple other 387 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:38,640 Speaker 2: notable free agent qbs Tyrod Taylor, Ryan Fitzpatrick, RG three, 388 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 2: Trevor Simmons, Sam Bradford probably still making money from the Cardinals. 389 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:45,480 Speaker 2: I think ty God would be awesome as a Lamar 390 00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:48,960 Speaker 2: Jackson's backup in Baltimore. That'd be a fun little reunion. 391 00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:51,719 Speaker 2: And he just fits that offensive style. And I mean, 392 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:54,960 Speaker 2: Ryan Fitzpatrick was so unbelievable last year. I know it 393 00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:57,879 Speaker 2: was kind of a random blimp and we can't expect 394 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:01,120 Speaker 2: that same level of efficiency moving forward, but the guy 395 00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 2: obviously still play a little bit of ball. Do you 396 00:19:03,560 --> 00:19:05,240 Speaker 2: have any thoughts on this group? 397 00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:09,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I think, as you said, ty God 398 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:13,160 Speaker 1: would be a great fit for the Ravens and Fitzpatrick 399 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:16,040 Speaker 1: Like this might seem weird, but I would actually really 400 00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,280 Speaker 1: like to see him go to the Browns because he 401 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:22,440 Speaker 1: has familiarity with Todd Monkin's system. I think he could 402 00:19:22,480 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 1: be a great like mentor from the bench to Baker Mayfield, 403 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:30,520 Speaker 1: like someone who actually like does a really good job 404 00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:35,320 Speaker 1: of helping Mayfield prepare and become familiar with like the 405 00:19:35,320 --> 00:19:39,840 Speaker 1: subtleties of Monkin's system, and then someone who could It's 406 00:19:39,880 --> 00:19:42,919 Speaker 1: not as if like he has that same like Baker 407 00:19:42,960 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 1: Mayfield type of swag, but he kind of does a 408 00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: little bit like like, I think he's someone that if 409 00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:51,520 Speaker 1: you needed, like if you had a team that had 410 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 1: a real shot in making the playoffs, and I think 411 00:19:53,720 --> 00:19:56,840 Speaker 1: they do with Mayfield, and then Mayfield's injured for a game, 412 00:19:57,119 --> 00:20:00,119 Speaker 1: I think absolutely fitz has a chance of be being 413 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:02,920 Speaker 1: able to win that game for you. So yeah, I 414 00:20:03,119 --> 00:20:06,720 Speaker 1: don't know. I think he's someone if he he fits 415 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:10,000 Speaker 1: I think in a particular way as someone who like 416 00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:12,040 Speaker 1: can win a game and as someone who can help 417 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:16,080 Speaker 1: maybe a young developing quarterback just learn more of the game. 418 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:18,280 Speaker 1: So I would like to see him in a situation 419 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:18,760 Speaker 1: like that. 420 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, it makes sense. I mean, yeah, his teammates seem 421 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,480 Speaker 2: to love him. I forget the uh who sent it out, 422 00:20:24,480 --> 00:20:27,439 Speaker 2: but you know the Ryan Fitzpatrick compilation video of him 423 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:29,720 Speaker 2: just kind of going nuts with his teammates and celebrating. 424 00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 2: It's just full of good time. So yeah, I like 425 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:32,920 Speaker 2: that Cleveland call as well. 426 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:36,639 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean these other quarterbacks I'm not too interested in. 427 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,240 Speaker 1: They're kind of, you know, like veteran guys, older guys 428 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:42,159 Speaker 1: who probably don't perform as well as they used to, 429 00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 1: which of course makes me think long and hard about 430 00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:49,240 Speaker 1: a rectile dysfunction. True story, When I was in college 431 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 1: for an organic chemistry course, we had to do research 432 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:56,119 Speaker 1: reports on various compounds, and to be a smart ass, 433 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,200 Speaker 1: I did my report on edie medication. I don't want 434 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:02,439 Speaker 1: to brag, but my professor was pretty impressed with all 435 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:06,440 Speaker 1: of the research I did on drugs to prevent erectile dysfunction. 436 00:21:06,840 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 1: But he wasn't as impressed as you will be with 437 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:12,399 Speaker 1: the doctors at Roman. Guys are terrible at taking care 438 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:14,640 Speaker 1: of their health, whether it's a knee injury, bad back, 439 00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:17,720 Speaker 1: or something worse. Guys are usually more comfortable rubbing some 440 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 1: dirt on it. Than seeing a doctor. The same is 441 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:22,960 Speaker 1: true for erectile this function. Studies show that seventy percent 442 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:26,400 Speaker 1: of guys who experienced ED don't get treated for it. Thankfully, 443 00:21:26,760 --> 00:21:29,520 Speaker 1: Roman created an easy way to get checked out and 444 00:21:29,560 --> 00:21:32,879 Speaker 1: treated by a doctor online. Roman is a one stop 445 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:36,400 Speaker 1: shop where licensed US physicians can diagnose ED and ship 446 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:38,960 Speaker 1: medication right to your door. With Roman, there are no 447 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:42,879 Speaker 1: waiting rooms, awkward face to face conversations, or uncomfortable trips 448 00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: to the pharmacy. You can handle everything discreetly online. All 449 00:21:46,320 --> 00:21:48,920 Speaker 1: you have to do is visit get Roman dot com 450 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:52,920 Speaker 1: slash nfl pod, fill out a brief medical onboarding, chat 451 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,920 Speaker 1: with the doctor, and get FDA approved ED meds delivered 452 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: to your door in unmarked packaging. Guys, go online and 453 00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:02,560 Speaker 1: get checked out by the doctor. Tackle your problem with Roman. 454 00:22:02,800 --> 00:22:05,199 Speaker 1: It's really easy, so take care of it. For a 455 00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 1: free online visit, go to get Roman dot com slash 456 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: nfl pod. That is, get Roman dot com slash nfl pod. 457 00:22:11,760 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: For a free online visit, Get Roman dot com slash 458 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 1: nfl pod. One man who doesn't have problems performing when 459 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:23,080 Speaker 1: he's on the field is Leveon Bell. Let's talk about 460 00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: some of these running backs and Bell, of course, is 461 00:22:25,119 --> 00:22:28,040 Speaker 1: the one might say Bell of the ball for this 462 00:22:28,200 --> 00:22:31,680 Speaker 1: year's class. Ian. What are your thoughts on Lebon. 463 00:22:31,800 --> 00:22:34,800 Speaker 2: Another electric advy, Matt, You're just taking over that game. 464 00:22:35,080 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: Uh yeah. 465 00:22:35,640 --> 00:22:38,160 Speaker 2: I feel like all this kind of the whole Leveon 466 00:22:38,280 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 2: saga over the last year, I just distracted from the 467 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:42,919 Speaker 2: fact that this is one of the best players in 468 00:22:42,960 --> 00:22:45,440 Speaker 2: football when he's right and when he's on the field. 469 00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:47,520 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, running backs, I get it. I'm 470 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:49,800 Speaker 2: not saying running backs and the most important position or anything 471 00:22:49,840 --> 00:22:52,399 Speaker 2: like that, but we have seen Leon Bell do more 472 00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:54,199 Speaker 2: at that position than almost anyone else. I mean, he's 473 00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:56,480 Speaker 2: one of only four running backs ever with at least 474 00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:59,439 Speaker 2: three seasons with at least seventy five catches. And I 475 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 2: mean he watched the guy. He lines up as a 476 00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:03,640 Speaker 2: wide receiver, he high points the ball. He's an amazing 477 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:06,440 Speaker 2: route runner. So it's not like he's just getting constant 478 00:23:06,440 --> 00:23:08,400 Speaker 2: dink and dunks. And when he does get to dink 479 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:10,399 Speaker 2: and dunks, he's no one's better as just putting your 480 00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 2: foot down and breaking tackles and making some big plays 481 00:23:12,800 --> 00:23:14,680 Speaker 2: with that. So you know, always one of the top 482 00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:17,879 Speaker 2: guys and both broken tackles and success rate, which you 483 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:19,920 Speaker 2: know he's really saying something because you watch him run. 484 00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:22,119 Speaker 2: He's you know, can't watch one football game without the 485 00:23:22,119 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 2: announcers talking about how patient Le'Veon Bell's running style is. 486 00:23:25,119 --> 00:23:29,199 Speaker 2: But he really does continue to get positive yards despite that, 487 00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:31,800 Speaker 2: and he's been I believe, top eleven and success rate 488 00:23:32,080 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 2: in the last three or four years. So I really 489 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:36,240 Speaker 2: think he's one of these guys that can fit any offense. 490 00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:37,840 Speaker 2: And when he's going to be in there, he's a 491 00:23:37,880 --> 00:23:40,280 Speaker 2: guy that we've seen he's able to handle three hundred 492 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:42,359 Speaker 2: to four hundred touches, you know, as both a runner 493 00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,480 Speaker 2: and receiver. So I think anywhere he goes, he's gonna 494 00:23:45,520 --> 00:23:48,960 Speaker 2: immediately be another top five fantasy back. And I think 495 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:51,040 Speaker 2: maybe New York Jets would be the best case. 496 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean there are rumors, you know, the Jets 497 00:23:54,840 --> 00:23:57,800 Speaker 1: are interested. Some people have linked him to the Colts, 498 00:23:57,960 --> 00:24:00,200 Speaker 1: although I don't I don't know how likely that is, 499 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,439 Speaker 1: but I do agree with the premise that wherever he goes, 500 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,680 Speaker 1: he is going to be a top five fantasy back. 501 00:24:06,800 --> 00:24:10,879 Speaker 1: I think that is very realistic. The question that I 502 00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:14,440 Speaker 1: have primarily with him, well two questions. One, I don't 503 00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:16,480 Speaker 1: want him to go to Oakland because I have a 504 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:18,840 Speaker 1: bet that he and Antonio Brown will not be on 505 00:24:18,880 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: the same team in twenty nineteens a one. I just 506 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: don't want him to go to Oakland, although I think 507 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:26,280 Speaker 1: that actually has a real shot of happening. So anyway, 508 00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:29,200 Speaker 1: that's one thing. But sort of like tied with that 509 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 1: is like Oakland is not a good team. Like I 510 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:34,960 Speaker 1: think that's sort of like objectively speaking, like they will 511 00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:37,359 Speaker 1: probably be better this year than they were last year, but 512 00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:40,040 Speaker 1: they're still not a great team. Is he going to 513 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:43,439 Speaker 1: go someplace where he is in a good offense and 514 00:24:43,560 --> 00:24:46,280 Speaker 1: has the chance of winning a Super Bowl? But if 515 00:24:46,280 --> 00:24:48,480 Speaker 1: that's the case, maybe they have another good running back 516 00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:50,880 Speaker 1: already and he doesn't get the workload that he used 517 00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:53,639 Speaker 1: to get, or is he going to just chase the money? 518 00:24:53,960 --> 00:24:56,639 Speaker 1: And if he does that, which I think is the 519 00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,760 Speaker 1: likelier possibility, that means he will probably be with the 520 00:24:59,800 --> 00:25:02,920 Speaker 1: team that is not as good and he will probably 521 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:06,320 Speaker 1: as a result, be in a less efficient offense, not 522 00:25:06,359 --> 00:25:08,840 Speaker 1: have some of the same opportunities he used to have 523 00:25:09,240 --> 00:25:11,960 Speaker 1: with the Steelers, but he still might get a lot 524 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:13,840 Speaker 1: of action because you have a team that is just 525 00:25:13,960 --> 00:25:16,960 Speaker 1: wanting to, like prove that they were you know, quote 526 00:25:17,040 --> 00:25:20,560 Speaker 1: unquote wise to invest so much money in a running back. So, like, 527 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:23,560 Speaker 1: those are the different situations, the two ways in which 528 00:25:23,560 --> 00:25:26,239 Speaker 1: I could see things playing out with him, And in 529 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:28,919 Speaker 1: the end, I think it's probably a wash. Regardless of 530 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:31,040 Speaker 1: like where he goes, I think he will probably still 531 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:33,680 Speaker 1: end up in that like running back three to running 532 00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:36,040 Speaker 1: back seven type of range, you know what I mean. 533 00:25:36,600 --> 00:25:39,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think his worst case scenario is pretty much 534 00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:42,520 Speaker 2: twenty eighteen David Johnson, where maybe he ends up on 535 00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 2: a team which is bad quarterback, bad offensive system, but 536 00:25:45,640 --> 00:25:47,879 Speaker 2: he's still going to be getting fifteen to twenty touches 537 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:49,919 Speaker 2: per game. I think when that's all said and done, 538 00:25:50,080 --> 00:25:52,159 Speaker 2: we'll look at the ppr RB rankings and he'll be 539 00:25:52,200 --> 00:25:52,760 Speaker 2: towards the top. 540 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree. After him, I think there's a pretty 541 00:25:56,040 --> 00:25:59,040 Speaker 1: steep drop off. But you know, we have a group 542 00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:02,720 Speaker 1: of guys Tivi and Cole, someone who really exhibited a 543 00:26:02,760 --> 00:26:06,720 Speaker 1: lot of explosive qualities in his four years at Atlanta 544 00:26:06,760 --> 00:26:09,320 Speaker 1: but never really got the chance until last year and 545 00:26:09,359 --> 00:26:11,760 Speaker 1: then you know, just injured. It wasn't even a great 546 00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:15,320 Speaker 1: situation all the way around. Mark Ingram J J I. E. 547 00:26:15,720 --> 00:26:18,040 Speaker 1: Those are two guys who are also on the market. 548 00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:19,920 Speaker 1: What are your thoughts on those guys? 549 00:26:20,119 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, he said it with Coleman. I mean, we've had 550 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:24,159 Speaker 2: eighty four running backs have at least one hundred and 551 00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:26,760 Speaker 2: fifty carries since Coleman entered the league in twenty fifteen. 552 00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:29,679 Speaker 2: Coleman's fifth in the highest rate of runs for at 553 00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:32,480 Speaker 2: least fifteen yards. So he's really been popping off big 554 00:26:32,480 --> 00:26:34,840 Speaker 2: plays his whole career. And I mean I put out 555 00:26:35,040 --> 00:26:37,479 Speaker 2: a video on my Twitter of some of these catches 556 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:39,400 Speaker 2: he has when he gets a chance to line him 557 00:26:39,400 --> 00:26:41,679 Speaker 2: as a receiver, and the guy is so smooth and 558 00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:44,400 Speaker 2: really all fasts of the game. He's never had even 559 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:46,840 Speaker 2: fifty targets in the season, which is just criminal. I 560 00:26:46,880 --> 00:26:49,119 Speaker 2: know the Falcons were still awesome. You know, they have 561 00:26:49,160 --> 00:26:51,760 Speaker 2: a bunch of weapons on that offense, but I still 562 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:54,359 Speaker 2: feel like they just did not get Tevin involved enough. 563 00:26:54,520 --> 00:26:57,720 Speaker 2: He averaged thirteen point one PPR points per game without 564 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:01,800 Speaker 2: Devonte Freeman nine point seven, So I guess reasonable to expect, 565 00:27:01,840 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 2: you know, wherever he's going to go at the very least. 566 00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:07,159 Speaker 2: I mean, we've seen RB two kind of flexes his 567 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:10,080 Speaker 2: floor even as the number two RB in his offense. 568 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:12,399 Speaker 2: So ideally I'd like to see him up in Philly 569 00:27:12,440 --> 00:27:14,120 Speaker 2: or somewhere where we get to see him have an 570 00:27:14,200 --> 00:27:17,879 Speaker 2: opportunity to be that top guy, because he's one of 571 00:27:17,880 --> 00:27:20,280 Speaker 2: these few backs in the league that can be both 572 00:27:20,280 --> 00:27:23,119 Speaker 2: a really good runner and receiver. Quickly, on mark Ingram, 573 00:27:23,480 --> 00:27:25,520 Speaker 2: I think it's important to note with him, he really 574 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:27,960 Speaker 2: has never had that huge of a workload in New Orleans. 575 00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:29,960 Speaker 2: I mean, he's never had over two hundred and thirty 576 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:32,560 Speaker 2: carries in the season. I was surprised to find he 577 00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 2: only has two hundred and eighty more career carries than 578 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:37,320 Speaker 2: Todd Gurley, even though he entered the league four years 579 00:27:37,320 --> 00:27:40,040 Speaker 2: earlier than Gurley. So even though he's twenty nine years old, 580 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:42,760 Speaker 2: I think Ingram still does have some you know, I 581 00:27:42,760 --> 00:27:44,440 Speaker 2: can see him having they're good year too. I don't 582 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:46,199 Speaker 2: think he's washed up just yet, even though he is 583 00:27:46,400 --> 00:27:49,639 Speaker 2: getting up there in age. And then for Jaya Jaii, 584 00:27:49,920 --> 00:27:51,840 Speaker 2: only thing worries me with him, and I think we 585 00:27:51,920 --> 00:27:54,040 Speaker 2: have enough evidence now that it's going to be tough 586 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:56,600 Speaker 2: for him to be a featured running back anywhere. The 587 00:27:56,640 --> 00:27:59,119 Speaker 2: injuries keep coming back, and we also just have no 588 00:27:59,200 --> 00:28:02,439 Speaker 2: evidence of him being a even okay receiver, He's never 589 00:28:02,520 --> 00:28:05,119 Speaker 2: even gotten to thirty catches or over two hundred receiving 590 00:28:05,200 --> 00:28:07,560 Speaker 2: yards in the season. Yeah, I mean he pops off 591 00:28:07,560 --> 00:28:09,840 Speaker 2: some big runs. I love the you know, two hundred 592 00:28:09,840 --> 00:28:11,639 Speaker 2: plus yard games in the season where he's one of 593 00:28:11,720 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 2: four backs with that. But I just don't know if 594 00:28:14,080 --> 00:28:16,080 Speaker 2: a Gie's gonna a find a team to give him 595 00:28:16,160 --> 00:28:18,639 Speaker 2: enough money to warrant being the feature back and be 596 00:28:18,880 --> 00:28:19,880 Speaker 2: even have that ability. 597 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:25,199 Speaker 1: Okay, I agree with everything you said there, except I 598 00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:28,639 Speaker 1: mean not except, but really I mean, Jage, I grant 599 00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:31,520 Speaker 1: that he's not a good receiving back, but you know, 600 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:35,760 Speaker 1: it's like that situation where if you say one thing 601 00:28:36,119 --> 00:28:38,840 Speaker 1: long enough and you just sort of keep on repeating it, 602 00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:41,400 Speaker 1: eventually at some point it's going to come true, and 603 00:28:41,440 --> 00:28:43,560 Speaker 1: then you know you can be the person who was like, yes, 604 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:46,719 Speaker 1: I was always on this, Jaji. Yeah, in the NFL, 605 00:28:46,800 --> 00:28:48,680 Speaker 1: he hasn't done anything to show that he can really 606 00:28:48,760 --> 00:28:52,120 Speaker 1: be a receiver. But he was actually a very good 607 00:28:52,200 --> 00:28:55,800 Speaker 1: receiving back in college, and like it took mark ingram 608 00:28:55,960 --> 00:28:58,680 Speaker 1: At a few years in the NFL to become a 609 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:02,640 Speaker 1: competent receiving back. But like in Alabama, he was actually 610 00:29:02,680 --> 00:29:05,080 Speaker 1: a decent receiver. Like, I think that there is a 611 00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:08,200 Speaker 1: path for a JII to be a better receiver than 612 00:29:08,240 --> 00:29:10,680 Speaker 1: he has been, but like, I still don't know if 613 00:29:10,680 --> 00:29:12,760 Speaker 1: that's going to matter, because I agree with you, he's 614 00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: not going to be someone who is a lead back. 615 00:29:15,280 --> 00:29:17,640 Speaker 1: And I think the same as true of mark Ingram 616 00:29:17,640 --> 00:29:20,080 Speaker 1: and the same with Tivin Coleman. I don't think any 617 00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:22,600 Speaker 1: of those guys is really going to get the opportunity 618 00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:26,200 Speaker 1: to be a lead back, even if they maybe had 619 00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 1: the like the potential to do it, like they have 620 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:31,360 Speaker 1: the capability of being able to do it just because 621 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:33,720 Speaker 1: of them, I don't think a team is going to 622 00:29:33,800 --> 00:29:36,960 Speaker 1: trust them enough to do it or pay them enough 623 00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:37,360 Speaker 1: to do it. 624 00:29:37,840 --> 00:29:39,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think the paying them is a good point 625 00:29:39,440 --> 00:29:41,760 Speaker 2: you brought up at Levyon earlier. I mean, looking at 626 00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:44,360 Speaker 2: these contracts is going to be important because look, if 627 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:46,160 Speaker 2: the team's paying a running back to be a top 628 00:29:46,160 --> 00:29:48,080 Speaker 2: five guy, Like that's why we were so hyped about 629 00:29:48,160 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 2: Jack McKinnon last year. Yeah, he had he hadn't had 630 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:53,200 Speaker 2: the massive workload in the past, But when the forty 631 00:29:53,240 --> 00:29:55,440 Speaker 2: nine ers are making him a top five paid running 632 00:29:55,480 --> 00:29:57,200 Speaker 2: back in the league, like, why would they not feed 633 00:29:57,280 --> 00:30:00,320 Speaker 2: him if they're investing that much in them. So these 634 00:30:00,320 --> 00:30:02,520 Speaker 2: contracts and the guaranteed money will be some to keep 635 00:30:02,560 --> 00:30:05,360 Speaker 2: a close eye on. There's another group of running backs 636 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:09,560 Speaker 2: who kind of have varying degrees of three down ability, 637 00:30:09,680 --> 00:30:13,840 Speaker 2: and I guess just overall goodness. TJ. Yelden, Mike Davis, 638 00:30:13,880 --> 00:30:18,560 Speaker 2: C J. Anderson, Spencer ware Marshawn Lynch, Adrian Peterson, Darren Sproles, 639 00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:21,760 Speaker 2: Otavius Murray, Quarterell Patterson. A bunch of running backs that 640 00:30:21,800 --> 00:30:24,960 Speaker 2: have showed flashes of a you know, major ability over 641 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:26,960 Speaker 2: the years, but don't really seem to be in a 642 00:30:26,960 --> 00:30:29,960 Speaker 2: position necessarily get a ton of work. Matt Any thoughts 643 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 2: on these guys. 644 00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:35,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean C J. Anderson a generational talent, I 645 00:30:35,680 --> 00:30:39,520 Speaker 1: mean you have I mean, where has had like a 646 00:30:40,080 --> 00:30:43,080 Speaker 1: you know, year and a half of decent production at 647 00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:46,720 Speaker 1: some point in his career. Lynch and Peterson are two 648 00:30:46,760 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 1: guys who are, you know, like Hall of Fame type 649 00:30:49,240 --> 00:30:52,840 Speaker 1: of guys. Sprolls has been one of the best past 650 00:30:52,920 --> 00:30:56,000 Speaker 1: catching backs when healthy of the past, you know, like 651 00:30:56,120 --> 00:31:00,280 Speaker 1: five seven years. The existence of guys like this is 652 00:31:00,320 --> 00:31:03,000 Speaker 1: why I think it's never really smart to spend a 653 00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:05,480 Speaker 1: lot of money on running backs, you know what I mean. 654 00:31:05,800 --> 00:31:09,440 Speaker 1: So although Le'Veon bell is I think one of the 655 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:12,560 Speaker 1: best running backs in the league, I wouldn't want to 656 00:31:12,560 --> 00:31:14,520 Speaker 1: be the team that pays him as if he is 657 00:31:14,560 --> 00:31:15,880 Speaker 1: the best running back in the league. 658 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:18,760 Speaker 2: Agreed. And then another thing to keep in mind with 659 00:31:18,760 --> 00:31:21,840 Speaker 2: these guys too, Tavis Murray for example. I mean, if 660 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:25,760 Speaker 2: they're not getting re signed by their former team, that 661 00:31:25,800 --> 00:31:27,960 Speaker 2: could be a good sign for the incumbent back, you know, 662 00:31:28,040 --> 00:31:30,880 Speaker 2: Dalvin Cook obviously here maybe if the Sprolls is gone, 663 00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:33,480 Speaker 2: that could mean an enhanced receiving role for Corey Clement 664 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:35,680 Speaker 2: or something like that. So always important to keep in 665 00:31:35,760 --> 00:31:38,800 Speaker 2: mind when the person leaves, what who will fill their 666 00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:40,880 Speaker 2: old role on that team? 667 00:31:41,160 --> 00:31:44,800 Speaker 1: Yeah? Great point there. Let's transition to the wide receivers. 668 00:31:45,320 --> 00:31:48,959 Speaker 1: Who do you think is the top guy in this class? Like, 669 00:31:49,040 --> 00:31:51,680 Speaker 1: I have my sense of who the top guy is, 670 00:31:51,760 --> 00:31:53,640 Speaker 1: but who do you think it is? 671 00:31:54,360 --> 00:31:58,479 Speaker 2: Mister John Smokey Brown. We're talking about the wide receiver 672 00:31:58,560 --> 00:32:01,239 Speaker 2: twenty two and PPR before or Lamar Jackson came in 673 00:32:01,240 --> 00:32:05,120 Speaker 2: and just completely nosedive the entire Ravens passing offense. I mean, 674 00:32:05,720 --> 00:32:07,920 Speaker 2: as long as Brown is healthy. I know he has 675 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:10,080 Speaker 2: the sickle cell trade thing that's given him a bunch 676 00:32:10,120 --> 00:32:12,240 Speaker 2: of problems, but it seemed like he was finally able 677 00:32:12,280 --> 00:32:14,280 Speaker 2: to get past that last year, and we have just 678 00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:16,560 Speaker 2: loads of evidence that whenever he's on the field, he's 679 00:32:16,600 --> 00:32:18,560 Speaker 2: one of the best receivers in the game. Pretty much. 680 00:32:18,680 --> 00:32:21,160 Speaker 2: He's only one of eleven guys outaging at least fifteen 681 00:32:21,240 --> 00:32:25,160 Speaker 2: yards per catch since twenty fifteen minimum hundred catches. I mean, 682 00:32:25,200 --> 00:32:27,760 Speaker 2: I'm not saying John Brown's, like, for sure a top 683 00:32:28,040 --> 00:32:30,960 Speaker 2: ten receiver or anything like that, but at the very least, 684 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:33,840 Speaker 2: he's an overqualified field stretcher, and I'd love to see 685 00:32:33,880 --> 00:32:35,600 Speaker 2: him on a team that actually gives him a chance 686 00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:37,520 Speaker 2: to be a legit number one or number two receiver. 687 00:32:38,160 --> 00:32:40,000 Speaker 1: I totally agree with you, And he was the guy 688 00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:42,680 Speaker 1: like for me that I was thinking is the number one. 689 00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:44,440 Speaker 1: I don't know, Like part of me would be like, oh, 690 00:32:44,520 --> 00:32:47,880 Speaker 1: it would be so great if he could reunite with 691 00:32:47,960 --> 00:32:50,560 Speaker 1: Bruce arians in Tampa Bay and kind of play like 692 00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:52,640 Speaker 1: the Deshaun Jackson role. But you know, who knows what's 693 00:32:52,680 --> 00:32:54,920 Speaker 1: going to happen with d Jacks. He's still technically under 694 00:32:54,920 --> 00:32:57,240 Speaker 1: contract and it seems like they want to try to 695 00:32:57,320 --> 00:33:00,760 Speaker 1: keep him. But back to John Brown, totally agree. It's 696 00:33:00,840 --> 00:33:03,320 Speaker 1: always a question of health with him. But when he 697 00:33:03,400 --> 00:33:06,360 Speaker 1: was healthy and when he had Flacco on the field, 698 00:33:06,680 --> 00:33:09,320 Speaker 1: who's someone who's you know, like, say what you want 699 00:33:09,320 --> 00:33:11,240 Speaker 1: about him. I think like, at worst, he's a league 700 00:33:11,280 --> 00:33:15,040 Speaker 1: average quarterback. You know, his style of play suited John 701 00:33:15,080 --> 00:33:18,240 Speaker 1: Brown so much more than Lamar Jackson's style of play did. 702 00:33:18,600 --> 00:33:21,520 Speaker 1: If you put Brown with someone who is, you know, 703 00:33:21,640 --> 00:33:24,840 Speaker 1: just like your typical type of quarterback, I think he 704 00:33:24,920 --> 00:33:28,400 Speaker 1: could be a thousand yard type of receiver with you know, 705 00:33:28,480 --> 00:33:31,040 Speaker 1: I don't know, like five to eight touchdowns and that's 706 00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:35,520 Speaker 1: not like huge, but for someone that you're getting in 707 00:33:35,640 --> 00:33:38,320 Speaker 1: free agency who's not going to cost a lot of money, like, 708 00:33:38,360 --> 00:33:41,240 Speaker 1: that's pretty significant. And I think what he can do 709 00:33:41,440 --> 00:33:43,680 Speaker 1: for the rest of your offense as a field stretcher 710 00:33:44,120 --> 00:33:47,440 Speaker 1: is also pretty important. And like those secondary effects I 711 00:33:47,520 --> 00:33:50,160 Speaker 1: think tend to be undervalued, but that is something that 712 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:51,560 Speaker 1: he really adds to a team. 713 00:33:52,040 --> 00:33:54,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, And I think the secondary effects of what 714 00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:56,600 Speaker 2: makes him the number one guy to me, I mean, 715 00:33:56,760 --> 00:34:00,560 Speaker 2: we got other people Golden Tate, Jamison Crowder, to players 716 00:34:00,560 --> 00:34:03,000 Speaker 2: with the ball in their hand, but only a few 717 00:34:03,040 --> 00:34:05,080 Speaker 2: guys like John Brown. You could probably say Tyroll Williams 718 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:07,360 Speaker 2: is another type of guy, like you need to put 719 00:34:07,400 --> 00:34:09,520 Speaker 2: a safety over top of them, otherwise you run the 720 00:34:09,600 --> 00:34:12,240 Speaker 2: risk of them running straight past your corner and scoring 721 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:15,160 Speaker 2: a long touchdowns, which we've seen Brown do throughout his career. 722 00:34:15,280 --> 00:34:17,520 Speaker 2: So yeah, he's easily my number one guy. What do 723 00:34:17,560 --> 00:34:20,520 Speaker 2: you make of And we got Golden Tape, Devin Funches, 724 00:34:20,560 --> 00:34:22,440 Speaker 2: I mentioned Crowder and Williams. Who do you kind of 725 00:34:22,440 --> 00:34:23,440 Speaker 2: think is the number two guys? 726 00:34:23,840 --> 00:34:27,640 Speaker 1: Williams is probably number two for me, although I do 727 00:34:27,760 --> 00:34:29,600 Speaker 1: have a lot of respect for Golden Tate in what 728 00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:32,680 Speaker 1: he was able to do in his almost five years 729 00:34:32,680 --> 00:34:35,839 Speaker 1: with Detroit, but he is older at this point. Now, 730 00:34:36,120 --> 00:34:37,960 Speaker 1: I think there is a question of kind of like 731 00:34:38,040 --> 00:34:40,239 Speaker 1: where are you going to play Golden Tate. Is he 732 00:34:40,280 --> 00:34:42,839 Speaker 1: a slot only type of guy or does he have 733 00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:45,160 Speaker 1: more versatility where you can put him on the outside, 734 00:34:45,239 --> 00:34:49,560 Speaker 1: Whereas with Williams, he's younger, he's still in peak athletic 735 00:34:49,719 --> 00:34:52,560 Speaker 1: I guess like capability right now, I think you can 736 00:34:52,600 --> 00:34:54,440 Speaker 1: play him a little bit in the slot if you 737 00:34:54,480 --> 00:34:56,080 Speaker 1: need to, but like you can kind of move him 738 00:34:56,080 --> 00:34:59,120 Speaker 1: all over the offense, which is why I probably have 739 00:34:59,239 --> 00:35:01,799 Speaker 1: him a little bit ahead of Golden Tate. But the 740 00:35:01,840 --> 00:35:03,719 Speaker 1: one guy I definitely don't want any part of his 741 00:35:03,760 --> 00:35:06,840 Speaker 1: Devin funches. That's just I know, he's like that big 742 00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:10,839 Speaker 1: physical guy who flashed a little bit, but he's never 743 00:35:10,920 --> 00:35:13,080 Speaker 1: really been able to put it all together. And he's 744 00:35:13,120 --> 00:35:15,960 Speaker 1: still young. But I don't know, man like if a 745 00:35:16,000 --> 00:35:19,360 Speaker 1: guy hasn't really done much through his first four years 746 00:35:19,800 --> 00:35:22,960 Speaker 1: and he wasn't really someone who put up good production 747 00:35:23,480 --> 00:35:26,160 Speaker 1: in college, like, I'm just I don't know, Like I'm 748 00:35:26,160 --> 00:35:27,799 Speaker 1: just gonna be out on him. I would rather have 749 00:35:27,840 --> 00:35:28,480 Speaker 1: a rookie. 750 00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:31,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you're on something there. I was impressed. 751 00:35:31,640 --> 00:35:33,480 Speaker 2: I was watching a little bit of his films this 752 00:35:33,600 --> 00:35:35,839 Speaker 2: last year, and he does have some nice route run 753 00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,520 Speaker 2: He'll show some nice route running at times, and I 754 00:35:38,560 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 2: would like to see him. I mean, I like him 755 00:35:40,520 --> 00:35:42,040 Speaker 2: Newton a lot, but I would like to see him 756 00:35:42,040 --> 00:35:45,000 Speaker 2: in more of a I guess normal pass offense and 757 00:35:45,120 --> 00:35:47,040 Speaker 2: what Carolina does. I don't know if it's the most 758 00:35:47,320 --> 00:35:50,480 Speaker 2: wide receiver friendly offense that he could be in, because 759 00:35:50,480 --> 00:35:53,280 Speaker 2: we have seen him play much better without Greg Olsen 760 00:35:53,520 --> 00:35:55,959 Speaker 2: in the lineup and those figures got skewed a little 761 00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:57,839 Speaker 2: bit towards the end of last season when Cam really 762 00:35:57,920 --> 00:36:01,359 Speaker 2: just couldn't throw the ball downfield at all. Yeah, I'm 763 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:03,719 Speaker 2: not giving up on Funches just yet, but yeah, I'm 764 00:36:03,760 --> 00:36:05,399 Speaker 2: with you. I don't think he's like a number one 765 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:07,560 Speaker 2: by any stretch. He's if a team can get him 766 00:36:07,600 --> 00:36:09,839 Speaker 2: cheap and just have him in that role as a 767 00:36:09,840 --> 00:36:12,680 Speaker 2: red zone threat that you're not forcing eight to ten 768 00:36:12,719 --> 00:36:15,279 Speaker 2: targets a game two, then you know, sign me up. 769 00:36:15,280 --> 00:36:17,239 Speaker 2: But yeah, I don't want him as a number one. 770 00:36:17,280 --> 00:36:19,040 Speaker 2: And I think that's the problem we're going to see 771 00:36:19,040 --> 00:36:21,440 Speaker 2: with Golden Tate and maybe Crowder and some of these 772 00:36:21,480 --> 00:36:23,759 Speaker 2: other guys that I don't think they're going to go 773 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:25,359 Speaker 2: to a new team and all of a sudden see 774 00:36:25,400 --> 00:36:28,359 Speaker 2: eight to ten targets per game. I mean, we saw Tate, 775 00:36:28,520 --> 00:36:31,000 Speaker 2: he was getting nine point nine targets per game in Detroit. 776 00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:33,080 Speaker 2: He gets traded to Philly goes all the way down 777 00:36:33,080 --> 00:36:36,480 Speaker 2: to five point seven. So especially, you know, new quarterback, 778 00:36:36,600 --> 00:36:39,279 Speaker 2: new system, really got to keep our expectations and check 779 00:36:39,320 --> 00:36:41,200 Speaker 2: I think for how involved these guys are going to 780 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:41,839 Speaker 2: be from the get go. 781 00:36:42,080 --> 00:36:43,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, I totally agree with that. The one thing with 782 00:36:43,800 --> 00:36:46,759 Speaker 1: funchs is that he strikes me as a kind of 783 00:36:46,840 --> 00:36:50,279 Speaker 1: Dante Moncrief type of player, just in terms of, like, 784 00:36:50,400 --> 00:36:53,480 Speaker 1: you know, he's big, he has a good athletic profile, 785 00:36:53,840 --> 00:36:56,120 Speaker 1: but was never really able to put it all together. 786 00:36:56,560 --> 00:36:59,799 Speaker 1: So that said kind of like going Dante Moncreef like 787 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:03,480 Speaker 1: career trajectory in reverse. If Devin fun just ended up 788 00:37:03,560 --> 00:37:06,239 Speaker 1: with a team like the Colts, then I would I 789 00:37:06,239 --> 00:37:09,359 Speaker 1: would be much more interested. But I think it's for him, 790 00:37:09,400 --> 00:37:13,239 Speaker 1: it is totally dependent on where he lands, Whereas for 791 00:37:13,320 --> 00:37:16,320 Speaker 1: some of these other players like John Brown, I'm probably 792 00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:20,120 Speaker 1: gonna be interested in him almost regardless of where he lands, 793 00:37:20,200 --> 00:37:23,000 Speaker 1: unless it's like with you know, two or three teams 794 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:25,640 Speaker 1: where the quarterback situation is so bad I just want 795 00:37:25,680 --> 00:37:28,160 Speaker 1: to avoid it. But I will be interested in Funches 796 00:37:28,320 --> 00:37:30,719 Speaker 1: only if he lands with a handful of teams. 797 00:37:31,080 --> 00:37:32,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a good point. I agree with you there, 798 00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:34,799 Speaker 2: speaking of Moncreef. So we have a couple other wide 799 00:37:34,840 --> 00:37:38,360 Speaker 2: receivers that we'll see get picked up by various squads, 800 00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:39,960 Speaker 2: and I'm not sure if they're re signed, but these 801 00:37:39,960 --> 00:37:43,840 Speaker 2: guys include Adam Humphries, Randall Cobb, Moncreef. As we said, 802 00:37:44,120 --> 00:37:48,720 Speaker 2: Michael Crabtree, Philip Dorsett, Chris Hogan, Cole Beasley, and Mike Wallace, 803 00:37:48,760 --> 00:37:52,000 Speaker 2: among some other guys, and his names stick out to you, Matt. 804 00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean Randall Cobb, I guess, but I don't know. 805 00:37:56,719 --> 00:37:58,440 Speaker 1: I mean, he's not as old as you think he 806 00:37:58,480 --> 00:38:02,200 Speaker 1: would be for someone who has seemingly seemed so old 807 00:38:02,560 --> 00:38:06,040 Speaker 1: for the last like five years, but he's still fairly young. 808 00:38:06,360 --> 00:38:09,200 Speaker 1: Crabtree is actually the guy who maybe sticks out to 809 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:11,880 Speaker 1: me the most because, like, I think he's still a good, 810 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:17,680 Speaker 1: like all around professional type of NFL receiver. Like he 811 00:38:17,680 --> 00:38:20,279 Speaker 1: he doesn't separate all that well at this point, but 812 00:38:20,320 --> 00:38:23,240 Speaker 1: he was never really all that great at separating anyway. 813 00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:25,840 Speaker 1: But like, I think he could still be a good 814 00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:29,920 Speaker 1: veteran receiver for a team that needs it. But I 815 00:38:29,920 --> 00:38:31,719 Speaker 1: think it's just a question of how expensive is he 816 00:38:31,800 --> 00:38:33,160 Speaker 1: going to be. I don't think he's going to be 817 00:38:33,200 --> 00:38:37,240 Speaker 1: all that expensive. So yeah, of those guys, he's probably 818 00:38:37,239 --> 00:38:39,239 Speaker 1: the one who stands out the most of me. And 819 00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 1: then like I would say, the slot variety like Adam Humphries, 820 00:38:43,680 --> 00:38:46,120 Speaker 1: I'm not really all that interested in him. I maybe 821 00:38:46,400 --> 00:38:49,680 Speaker 1: kind of prefer Cole Beasley a little bit to Adam Humphries, 822 00:38:49,760 --> 00:38:52,080 Speaker 1: but I don't know. Still, neither one of them really 823 00:38:52,080 --> 00:38:54,799 Speaker 1: excites me. Is a slot option. Yeah. 824 00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:57,239 Speaker 2: The one thing I'll say with this group is I'm 825 00:38:57,360 --> 00:39:00,840 Speaker 2: very interested to see how Philly finishes out there receiver groups. 826 00:39:00,840 --> 00:39:03,080 Speaker 2: I mean with the Antonio Brown stuff. I mean, the 827 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:05,560 Speaker 2: reports were saying Philly and Oakland were kind of the 828 00:39:05,600 --> 00:39:09,239 Speaker 2: two top teams buying for his services. And we saw 829 00:39:09,280 --> 00:39:13,160 Speaker 2: that offense last year in twenty seventeen when they wanted all. 830 00:39:13,200 --> 00:39:15,920 Speaker 2: You know, Tory Smith wasn't the number one receiver or anything, 831 00:39:15,960 --> 00:39:17,440 Speaker 2: but he was always out there. It was always a 832 00:39:17,480 --> 00:39:20,200 Speaker 2: deep threat defenses had to respect a little bit. Last year, 833 00:39:20,239 --> 00:39:22,399 Speaker 2: they brought in Mike Wallace to do that. He got hurt. 834 00:39:22,440 --> 00:39:25,600 Speaker 2: Like week two, Mac Collins their poor Man's Smith or 835 00:39:25,600 --> 00:39:27,719 Speaker 2: Wallace he also got hurt. And they really just had 836 00:39:27,719 --> 00:39:29,719 Speaker 2: a lack of speed on the field, which you know 837 00:39:29,840 --> 00:39:32,799 Speaker 2: is a problem when al Sean and zach Ertz are 838 00:39:32,880 --> 00:39:35,239 Speaker 2: kind of limited in what they can do deep down 839 00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:37,600 Speaker 2: the field. You know, Nelson Aglore was able to kind 840 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:39,040 Speaker 2: of come on a little bit towards the end of 841 00:39:39,040 --> 00:39:41,239 Speaker 2: the year, but we've seen him thrive more than the 842 00:39:41,280 --> 00:39:43,480 Speaker 2: slot as well. So I'll be very interested to see 843 00:39:43,520 --> 00:39:45,880 Speaker 2: if a guy like John Brown Tyler Wallon ends up 844 00:39:45,880 --> 00:39:46,360 Speaker 2: on Philly. 845 00:39:46,560 --> 00:39:49,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, John Brown is the one I'm really hoping kind 846 00:39:49,120 --> 00:39:50,960 Speaker 1: of goes to Philly. Not even so much because like 847 00:39:51,080 --> 00:39:53,880 Speaker 1: I like Philly or like I think, I don't know, 848 00:39:53,920 --> 00:39:55,680 Speaker 1: I just like I think it would be like he 849 00:39:55,719 --> 00:39:58,239 Speaker 1: would be the guy that they've been trying to get, 850 00:39:58,239 --> 00:40:00,239 Speaker 1: Like they've been trying to get someone like him with 851 00:40:00,280 --> 00:40:02,640 Speaker 1: his skill set for the last few seasons and it 852 00:40:02,719 --> 00:40:05,360 Speaker 1: just hasn't really worked out where they've been able to 853 00:40:05,400 --> 00:40:08,120 Speaker 1: get a guy who actually does what he does and 854 00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:11,320 Speaker 1: can produce. But I think Brown can produce in that system, 855 00:40:11,400 --> 00:40:12,600 Speaker 1: So I think that would be good. 856 00:40:13,000 --> 00:40:16,120 Speaker 2: Agreed. All Right, We got two tight ends to briefly 857 00:40:16,160 --> 00:40:18,920 Speaker 2: talk about before we wrap this thing up. Mentioned before, 858 00:40:19,040 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 2: I mean, not a lot of huge names on the market, 859 00:40:21,280 --> 00:40:23,560 Speaker 2: but we do have Jared Cook, who just had a 860 00:40:23,600 --> 00:40:26,960 Speaker 2: career year in Oakland amidst that four and twelve season. 861 00:40:27,280 --> 00:40:30,680 Speaker 2: And also Tyler Eifert, who you know has been banged 862 00:40:30,760 --> 00:40:33,120 Speaker 2: up pretty much every single season, but when he's on 863 00:40:33,200 --> 00:40:35,319 Speaker 2: the field, I mean, he scored nineteen touchdowns in his 864 00:40:35,400 --> 00:40:38,279 Speaker 2: last twenty seven games, and we saw him play limit 865 00:40:38,360 --> 00:40:42,439 Speaker 2: snaps and still maintain some fantasy relevance last year before 866 00:40:42,440 --> 00:40:44,719 Speaker 2: he got hurt. So you interested in either of these 867 00:40:44,760 --> 00:40:46,920 Speaker 2: guys from fancy next year? Are just going to kind 868 00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:48,279 Speaker 2: of be one of those things where it depends where 869 00:40:48,280 --> 00:40:48,600 Speaker 2: they land. 870 00:40:49,040 --> 00:40:53,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, just in passing, I think it's great 871 00:40:53,160 --> 00:40:55,400 Speaker 1: for Antonio Brown that Jared cook isn't going to be there. 872 00:40:55,400 --> 00:40:57,840 Speaker 1: He can just get all of his targets. But yeah, no, 873 00:40:58,239 --> 00:41:00,520 Speaker 1: Jared cook Man, I don't know. I think it was 874 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:04,760 Speaker 1: a situation in Oakland where they were just so bereft 875 00:41:04,840 --> 00:41:08,319 Speaker 1: of talent at the wide receiver position that he was 876 00:41:08,360 --> 00:41:11,279 Speaker 1: able to soak up a lot of opportunities that on 877 00:41:11,360 --> 00:41:15,439 Speaker 1: a better team wouldn't be there. So he's someone who's 878 00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:18,319 Speaker 1: always had talent, well let me rephrase that always had 879 00:41:18,360 --> 00:41:21,279 Speaker 1: the potential to produce, And there's been a lot of 880 00:41:21,320 --> 00:41:24,839 Speaker 1: inconsistency with him, and I think last year he kind 881 00:41:24,880 --> 00:41:27,480 Speaker 1: of put it all together in part just because he 882 00:41:27,520 --> 00:41:32,360 Speaker 1: got so many opportunities. But he's older and he's not 883 00:41:32,520 --> 00:41:35,600 Speaker 1: all that great of a blocker. So I don't know, 884 00:41:35,800 --> 00:41:38,280 Speaker 1: Like I just I don't know what team is really 885 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:41,640 Speaker 1: going to want him and use him in such a way. 886 00:41:41,680 --> 00:41:46,680 Speaker 1: To make him really fantasy attractive next year. And then 887 00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:50,560 Speaker 1: Tyler if like so much potential, but yeah, I'm just 888 00:41:50,719 --> 00:41:52,440 Speaker 1: scared that, you know, he's going to be on the 889 00:41:52,440 --> 00:41:55,160 Speaker 1: field for three snaps and then like break his leg 890 00:41:55,239 --> 00:41:55,640 Speaker 1: or something. 891 00:41:56,880 --> 00:41:59,840 Speaker 2: Fair points. Yeah, I mean I don't see Cook finding 892 00:42:00,040 --> 00:42:01,799 Speaker 2: any team where he's going to be like the the 893 00:42:01,880 --> 00:42:05,080 Speaker 2: fact that number one receiver again like he had last year. 894 00:42:05,160 --> 00:42:07,560 Speaker 2: So yeah, I don't know if any of these guys 895 00:42:07,560 --> 00:42:10,400 Speaker 2: are gonna be too high on many fantasy radars. Some 896 00:42:10,440 --> 00:42:13,239 Speaker 2: other free agents c j Uzoma, I mean, we have 897 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:16,279 Speaker 2: seen Cincinnati with it with the tight end has been 898 00:42:16,280 --> 00:42:18,279 Speaker 2: involved in the red zone, so we'll also happen there. 899 00:42:18,600 --> 00:42:21,759 Speaker 2: Austin Safarian Jenkins didn't really work out in Jacksonville last year, 900 00:42:21,800 --> 00:42:24,759 Speaker 2: but still a guy I hold a few I got 901 00:42:24,760 --> 00:42:28,239 Speaker 2: a few shares of asj Stock left. And then we've 902 00:42:28,280 --> 00:42:32,840 Speaker 2: got Jeff Hireman in Denver and Dimitrius Harris, who actually. 903 00:42:32,760 --> 00:42:35,359 Speaker 1: He's the one who's most interesting to say. 904 00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:37,440 Speaker 2: I mean we saw him kind of work as like 905 00:42:37,480 --> 00:42:40,400 Speaker 2: a poor man's Travis Kelcey at times. I mean, super 906 00:42:40,440 --> 00:42:43,000 Speaker 2: athletic guy. If he gets like a number one tight 907 00:42:43,040 --> 00:42:45,560 Speaker 2: end spot somewhere, I'm not quite sure if his blocking's 908 00:42:45,600 --> 00:42:47,759 Speaker 2: a good enough to get that role, but he could 909 00:42:47,760 --> 00:42:48,200 Speaker 2: be the guy. 910 00:42:48,520 --> 00:42:52,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, He's someone who has kind of like Marcellu's Bennett 911 00:42:52,680 --> 00:42:55,160 Speaker 1: type of potential, where like Bennett was with the Cowboys 912 00:42:55,200 --> 00:42:58,240 Speaker 1: for four years just behind Jason Witten doing basically nothing, 913 00:42:58,719 --> 00:43:00,920 Speaker 1: and then you know, went to the Giants for a 914 00:43:01,000 --> 00:43:02,839 Speaker 1: year and was good there and then kind of made 915 00:43:02,840 --> 00:43:05,160 Speaker 1: his way around the league and was always pretty solid. 916 00:43:05,480 --> 00:43:07,960 Speaker 1: I think Harris, like, if it works for him, that 917 00:43:08,120 --> 00:43:10,319 Speaker 1: is the type of player he's he's going to be. 918 00:43:10,840 --> 00:43:14,000 Speaker 1: The obvious difference is that Bennett entered the league as 919 00:43:14,040 --> 00:43:18,600 Speaker 1: a second rounder and Harris entered the league as an 920 00:43:18,719 --> 00:43:23,480 Speaker 1: undrafted free agent. I'm pretty sure, So pretty massive difference, 921 00:43:23,920 --> 00:43:26,359 Speaker 1: just a little bit, But no, I like, I think 922 00:43:26,480 --> 00:43:28,440 Speaker 1: if it works out for him, that is that is 923 00:43:28,480 --> 00:43:30,680 Speaker 1: the way in which it would work as someone who 924 00:43:31,200 --> 00:43:35,000 Speaker 1: kind of learned the position in the NFL for years 925 00:43:35,320 --> 00:43:38,840 Speaker 1: playing behind someone else or alongside someone else who is 926 00:43:38,880 --> 00:43:41,399 Speaker 1: really the guy, and then finally gets his chance when 927 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:42,680 Speaker 1: he goes to another team. 928 00:43:43,239 --> 00:43:46,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, agreed, all good points there. So yeah, that's our 929 00:43:47,040 --> 00:43:50,120 Speaker 2: wrap up. And just so everyone knows, Monday is the 930 00:43:51,040 --> 00:43:54,160 Speaker 2: legal tampering period. I don't I don't get how it 931 00:43:54,200 --> 00:43:56,759 Speaker 2: starts Monday, but we already have these players that have agreements, 932 00:43:56,800 --> 00:43:59,439 Speaker 2: but that's the official rules, and then Wednesday is when 933 00:43:59,680 --> 00:44:02,360 Speaker 2: guy will start getting signed. So at a JIP and 934 00:44:02,400 --> 00:44:04,680 Speaker 2: I and Fantasy Labs Action Network, we'll be rolling out 935 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:08,120 Speaker 2: kind of single article profiles for these bigger names that 936 00:44:08,160 --> 00:44:09,919 Speaker 2: we touched on, and we'll also just have a master 937 00:44:10,120 --> 00:44:12,399 Speaker 2: list of kind of you know, blurbs about the other 938 00:44:12,440 --> 00:44:14,480 Speaker 2: guys and potential Fantasy relevance that they can have. 939 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:18,120 Speaker 1: Yes, so, as Ian said, everyone be sure to check 940 00:44:18,160 --> 00:44:20,759 Speaker 1: out all of those pieces when they come out. When 941 00:44:20,880 --> 00:44:23,560 Speaker 1: guys sign or news breaks that a guy is going 942 00:44:23,600 --> 00:44:29,120 Speaker 1: to sign, Ian will have almost immediate coverage of all 943 00:44:29,160 --> 00:44:33,560 Speaker 1: of those key players for twenty nineteen Fantasy Ian good show, 944 00:44:33,640 --> 00:44:38,360 Speaker 1: good stuff. I am excited for the official opening of 945 00:44:38,440 --> 00:44:41,279 Speaker 1: the twenty nineteen league year. Good stuff for us to 946 00:44:41,760 --> 00:44:44,560 Speaker 1: finally get to cover and dive into. And that is 947 00:44:44,560 --> 00:44:46,680 Speaker 1: going to do it. For this episode of the Action 948 00:44:46,880 --> 00:44:51,719 Speaker 1: Network NFL podcast, Please rate, interview the show and iTunes, subscribe, unsubscribe, 949 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:55,240 Speaker 1: and resubscribe For Ian. I'm Matthew Friedman, Mattath the Oracle. 950 00:44:55,320 --> 00:45:13,640 Speaker 1: See you get next episode