WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - March 1st, 2024

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend Podcast.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>A deluge of US economic reports this past week, including

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>durable goods orders falling more than forecast, consumer confidence decreasing

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in four months, the US economy

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>expanding at a slower rate at the end of last year,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as consumer spending grew at a faster pace that initially estimated,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and inflation was revised higher.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And then we got the big report of the week.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>The Fed's favored inflation gauge rose in January at the

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>fastest pace in nearly a year, although it did come

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>in exactly this forecast. Inflation adjusted consumer spending dropped for

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the first time in five months after a robust holiday

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>shopping season, and real disposable income, the main supporter of spending,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 3>was little changed. More on that latest inflation print and

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the US economic backdrop in just a moment, Carol, you

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>were not joking when you said at deluge with economic data.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It was hard to keep up, all right. Also this hour,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we got another check on the US economy and really

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>US consumers thanks to Whirlpool CEO Mark Bitzer, who continues

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to see consumers changing their shopping ways post pandemic.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Plus, as US home buying demand nears its worst level

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen ninety five, as mortgage rates hold above seven percent,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>we got a check at the housing market with Kate Kaminski,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 3>COO at the real estate investment company Walton Global, and.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Folks, yes we may be a couple of months in,

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but there are still those who are making calls for

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the new year. We have the ten outrageous predictions for

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>private equity in twenty twenty four.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>And speaking of that, we check out the Peback studio

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>behind everything from a tour driven oscar bait such as

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>uncut Gems to Theman Award winning hit Beef. It's the

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>BusinessWeek cover story.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>All of that to come. We begin with the NonStop

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>US economic data this week, and in particular the report

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the big one and the latest read on

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>US inflation, which also happens to be the Fed's preferred

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation gauge. We're talking about the core Personal Conception Expenditures

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>gauge or CORE PCE, which increased by the most in

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a year.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 3>For more, we checked in with Bloomberg News International Economics

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and Policy correspondent Michael McKee.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 4>The sigh of relief was it wasn't worse. The numbers

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 4>came in on a month over month basis higher than

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 4>they had in previous months. The core rate was up

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 4>on a month over month basis four tenths, which was

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>the highest in a year. And it sounds terrible, but

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 4>because of base effects in the progress they've made on

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 4>disinflation on the year over year basis, we continued to

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>see the PCE and the CORE go down, and that's

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 4>what people want to see, because that's what the Fed

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 4>wants to see. We're still a ways from two percent

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>if you're using CORE as sort of your measuring stick,

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 4>at two point eight percent, but there was progress and

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the economy is not doing badly.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>People.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 4>What personal income went up one percent and wages still

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 4>went up four tents on a percent, which is healthy.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Spending was a little weak, but remember there was a

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of storms in January, people didn't go out. We

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 4>know they didn't buy cars and things like that. So overall,

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 4>this is the Goldilocks soft landing story continues.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So break up in the Champagne.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 5>In other words, I knew you'd get around it.

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So Mike remind us why this is the Fed's preferred

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 3>measure of inflation. Why do we care so much about

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>pc and over CPI.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 4>For well, basically, the PCE is a bit broader, but

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>it also is a little bit more reflective of what

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 4>people are spending on. It includes a lot of imputed data,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>which is data that they try to figure out by

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 4>measuring parts of the economy rather than just prices, because

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>they don't have prices on things like financial portfolio management

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>was one of the biggest movers, up five percent of

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>the month because the markets are doing so well. So

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 4>they're looking at the markets and they're looking at the

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 4>gain in the markets, and they're guessing sort of what

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the commissions would be, etc. And the fees, and they

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 4>impute a number from that, but that's not counted in

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the CPI. And for example, the CPI will measure what

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 4>you pay for your monthly car insurance, whereas the pc

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 4>will measure what you pay, and it also measures what

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>value you get, In other words, how much will your

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 4>policy pay if you're in an accident. And of course

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>that has to keep likely going up because cars keep

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 4>getting more expensive.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 5>So that's the kind.

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Of thing that's the difference between them, and so the

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 4>FED just prefers it. They normally don't run very far apart,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 4>but they have been running far apart over the last year.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>As an economist, I mean, what do you trust as

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>really kind of telling the true picture of of inflation,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Because I do feel like there's a bit of a

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>debate when it comes to some of the economic statistics

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that are out there about whether they not, you know,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>accurately reflect what's going on in the US economy. How

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do you see because I feel like, Mike, you're so

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>good at kind of pulling in yes, government statistics, real words,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>real world statistics.

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 4>There are so many different measures, and even though there's

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 4>a wedge between the PCE and CPI, it's about one

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred basis points now, it's normally somewhere between thirty five

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 4>and fifty, so it's not very wide. And really we

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 4>can't say, given all the different measures, exactly what inflation

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 4>is so the CPI has the most categories, it's the

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>most up to date. The PPI and the CPI feed

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 4>into PCE, so PCE depends on CPI. So I guess

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I would go with the CPI. That doesn't mean I

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 4>think that three point nine percent is where we should be.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of talk of the FED maybe changing

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 4>its inflation target to maybe three percent or something like that,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 4>but overall maybe the CPI.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, that's just talk.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>The FED has denied that they're going to do that

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>many many times over the last year.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're denying it now because if you do it

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>now when you have you're moving the euation, You're moving

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>the goalposts.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 4>They do now have a procedure so that every five

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 4>years they look at their monetary policy framework, and that's

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 4>coming up in twenty twenty five.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So do you think that given what we've had we've

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 3>seen over the last eighteen months with the data MIC,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>that they would consider actually changing it when there is

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 3>a time to do that.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 4>I think they would. Two percent was never a number

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 4>written in stone. It was what the New Zealand Central

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Bank adopted number of years ago, and it sort of

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 4>became a de facto standard, and the idea was basically,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 4>what's not too high and not too low, because if

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 4>you're too number, you have no way to lower rates

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 4>if you're at zero, and if you're too high, then

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 4>people get mad because you have inflation. So they picked

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 4>two percent they could eat usually pick three percent, and

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 4>people have been urging that on them for years, so

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 4>it's something I'm sure they'll talk about, all right.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So the data this week, we all were kind of

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>leading up, I feel like in a big way to

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>this Thursday report of pc core and the read on

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation that the Fed follows the narrative if you put

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it all together, including some of the other data points,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is there one clear narrative or a bit of a

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>mixed narrative.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 4>It's a mostly clear narrative that the economy is doing well.

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Interesting number we haven't mentioned and didn't get a lot

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>of attention because of the PCEE was pending home sales

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 4>really tanked in the last month, and that's maybe a

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 4>sign that we're seeing the higher mortgage rates bite, which

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>is despite Elizabeth Warm's desires, that's what the FED wants

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to see. So we seem to be doing and getting

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 4>what the FED is looking for.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>That was Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>and staying with the US economy data great for reading

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the temperature on how the economy and consumers are doing.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>So too, is going straight to the CEOs of companies

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that sell directly to US shoppers.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we get great reads right and what's going on?

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>One such company as Whirlpool, which saw explosive demand as

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, during the pandemic when we were all stuck

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at home, and has really been going through a reset

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like so many other consumer facing companies as the world

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has moved back to pre pandemic levels of activity and

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>wanting to kind of get out and do things.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Mark Bitzer is the chairman, president, CEO and COO of Whirlpool.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 3>We asked him how the consumer is doing following this

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>week's US consumer confidence which decreased for the first time

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 3>in four months, as Americans used deteriorated about the outlook

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 3>for the economy, the job market, and financial conditions.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 7>I mean, obviously, our purchase, like endurable appliance, is heavily

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 7>driven by consumer confidence and housing general. So what we

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 7>did see already the last here is that actually our

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 7>replacement side of a business where people just replace a

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 7>product under the rest. But it has been very strong

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 7>even up. But the discretionary side we actually already lost

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 7>year saw coming back coming down large as a result

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 7>of if interest rates rising, housing kind of being very

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 7>slow and slowing down throughout the year. That ultimately depressed

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 7>the discretionary side.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 8>So what you're.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 7>Describing we saw already last year, and we probably I

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 7>mean in our earnings call also we said it's probably

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 7>going to be around us, certainly for Q one and

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 7>Q two, and then we need to see what happens

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 7>if interest and mortgage rates and everything else. But I

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 7>think where we need to be a catalyst from wet

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 7>side to really lift consumer seentering.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, what would that catalyst be, Mark, Like, what are

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>you looking for at the perch of worldpool?

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean in particularly our North American business, which

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's a strong correlation with existing home sales

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 7>and housing market in general.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 8>We always we shouldn't forget that.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 7>You know, the average mortgage rates which are right now

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 7>locked in with homeowners is three point seven percent. So

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 7>I think to really bring supply on the market and

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 7>get people ready to sell their existing homes. I think

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 7>you need to see mortgage rates, you know, a certain

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 7>those six percent, probably more like five and a half

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 7>percent to really kind of unfreeze the market again, because

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>you know what we saw the last two years is

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 7>the market pretty much dropped from six point four million

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 7>existing home sales to three point eight That's a dramatic drop.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 8>We call it a shot freeze. And it takes that momentum.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 7>Of a catalyst on the interest rates side to kind

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 7>of unfreeze a fall the market. And that's what we

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we don't see it short term. I mean,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 7>and of course, well everybody's got to watch what the

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 7>FED will do, but I think over time it will

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 7>kind of be a key catalyst for growth.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>So make that connection for our investor audience about that

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>key catalyst here and why a person who is sitting

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 3>at a three point five US three point seventy five

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 3>percent mortgage won't necessarily go out and buy a new

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>appliance from Whirlpool. But if they were to sell that

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 3>home to somebody at a favorable mortgage rate, that person

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 3>moving in would then buy a new appliance from Whirlpool.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Why would't the person who lives there now end up

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 3>buying it if it actually need if they actually need

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 3>a new washer dryer.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so so again I mean if it just needs

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 7>a new wash and dryer, we would see a better

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 7>a replacement market. And you know it's again if you

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 7>break down and let me zoom out a little bit,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 7>break down our fundamental demand. Our demand has, replacement has

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 7>discretionary and new homes. These are basically our fundamental free demand.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 7>Driver replacement is very strong because of what we've seen

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 7>in post COVID and of certainly during COVID, people spend

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 7>more time at home, so the appliant's usage is higher.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 7>High usage rates drive early replacements. So that side of

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 7>business is very strong we see by today. But what

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 7>is right now soft is the discretionary side, which particularly

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 7>comes with existing home scenes and over many decades, what

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 7>we typically saw kind of the month before and the

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 7>month after people buying a new home or existing home.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 8>That's when you have.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Increased purchase and appliance and everything. So because of what

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 7>we typically see were people moving in, one of the

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 7>first things we might do is replace the kitchen or

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 7>at least replace the appliances, so that part of the

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 7>demand is today missing And again it's think about yourself.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 7>If you're a homeowner, you're locked in at three point

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 7>seven rate. I mean, it's are you willing to kind

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 7>of refine and buy a new home mortgage rate right

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 7>now on six point eight or six point nine percent?

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 7>The chances I know, okayts right now what we see

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>in the market, and you can't blame a consumer for

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 7>that mark.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're describing me. You know, we bought

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a new hot water heater because we had to. We

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a choice, right that was replacement. We thought

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>about maybe purchasing something else new that we didn't need

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to end discretion, and we said, you know, we're going

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to not do it right now. So like, I totally

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get what you say is going on. Having said that,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>then let's talk a little bit about your investor day

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of what you're doing. Our team writing up

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>how you guys are going to focus or are focusing

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on smaller appliances. It seems to be maybe what consumers

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are willing to spend money on the margins are better.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us little bit about that strategy and how

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it can move the needle, especially when it comes to

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>top line growth and margin growth.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so so Carol, what we what we spoke about is,

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, as a company, we've been in a multi

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 7>year what we call portfolio transformation and what base you

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 7>men do is over past decades we've had a fairly

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 7>dispersed global business. We were from China to Chile, in

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 7>all places of the world. And what we've decided on

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 7>the major's business, but we want to focus on the

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>markets where we have an undeniable strong position, which offer

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 7>us the America's North America, South America. We have good

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 7>business in India and that's what we'll focus on. So

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 7>we over the years, we sold off the majority of

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 7>our China business, we sold off Russia, and right now

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 7>we're just in the kind of final weeks before we

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 7>can close our European transaction where we would only have

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 7>a smaller portion of a business. So with that we

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 7>have a fundamentally different business portfolio. One essentially of it's

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 7>the major business in America's in India and we have

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 7>our small domestic appliance business that was in some ways

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 7>we could describe it as a hidden gem from the

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 7>past because it was hidden in a segmentaryport results of

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 7>all the different regions, but if you look at that,

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 7>that is probably it's our strongest brands. It has passion

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 7>across all demographics and age groups, and we feel we

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 7>have a license of robot business certainly from a consumer perspective,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of our resources going forward will go

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 7>into our small domestic appliance business because it's certain one

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 7>which we love, strong margins and an exceptionally strong consumer precision.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>How small what percentages? Is the smaller appliance business mark

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of revenues and how big do

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you think it could become if we look at the

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of revenue pie?

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so today it is quote unquote only a one

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar business, but it has fifty and ebit margins,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 7>so it's a very marg attractive business. But you know,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 7>our presence in if you look at the categories of

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 7>small domestic clianes, it's largely small. It's large stamp mixers

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 7>and associated products. But we have so much opportunity to

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 7>grow in coffee and we just announced that day also

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 7>we will bring a fully automatic expresso maker in maybe

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 7>this year. In other parts of business, so we strongly

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 7>believers ample opportunity to grow at business.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, I want to talk a little bit about the

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>cost cutting that you're targeting right now across the different

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>business lines. After incurring significant increases back in twenty twenty

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>two and in twenty twenty one, mark where within the

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 3>business are you finding these savings.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, first of all, to put it in context

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 7>is you know, in the COVID years, we basically had

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 7>more two and a half billion of additional costs. That

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 7>was a big inflation with not only raw materials in

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 7>all parts of a business. Last year we clawed back

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 7>eight hundred million of that and we see we're targeting

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 7>number five hundred million, so we're not even fully back

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 7>to pre COVID cost levels. The opportunities which we see

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 7>this year, and that's a little bit different from last year.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 7>We don't see a lot of tailwinds from raw materials,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 7>so we pretty much expect steel and oil and everything

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 7>else to remain rather stable for us. But we do

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 7>see opportunity on cost takeout on products. We do see

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 7>further opportunities to reduce logistic costs because it's it's a

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 7>massive cost element for us because we're shipping big, bulky

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 7>products and just drive a lot of cost and logistics side,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.359
<v Speaker 7>but we're also looking at our overall overhead and infrastructure.

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 7>And what I mean with that is, you know, global

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 7>business required a fairly complex global organization. If we're more

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 7>focus on our Americas, we have an opportunity to radically

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 7>also simplify how we organize and that also drive some

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 7>cost savings.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder too, looking at your balance sheet. We

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have this really great story at Bloomberg Exclusive today. It's

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>among our most read about how companies who have been

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so addicted to debt are now seeking equity, so thinking

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about selling shares rather than tapping the debt markets if

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they need money. You, guys, what's your plan to do

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you leverage your balance sheet specifically, which has grown as

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you've done some acquisitions. And I do wonder if investors

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can kind of still count on the dividend going forward,

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the sustainability of the dividend market. And just got about

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a minute or so left.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so let me first start start straight away from dividend.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 7>We paid our dividend for sixty nine years sixty nine

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 7>and in none of the sixty nine years we ever

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 7>had a dividend reduction, actually out of the last of

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 7>the last ten years, and eight years we had a

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 7>dividend increase.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 8>So we we are.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 7>So that's yes, that is well, of course that every

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 7>single dividend payment requires a board approval, but I would

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 7>I would say this statement publicly if I don't feel

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 7>the board feels very strong about it.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 8>So we are. We strong believe in dividend. We have

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 8>a funds to pay the dividend, and.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 7>More importantly, we have a basic guideline internal where we

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 7>say over the last three years, we look at the

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 7>average EPs and we took pay out thirty thirty five

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 7>percent of at the EPs over the last three years

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 7>and we're pretty much on track on this one. So

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 7>so more to a balance sheet is first of all,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 7>keeping our in mind, we have one point six billion

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 7>dollars for cash on hand, that's public number. So what

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 7>we do want to do, and you know, we knew

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 7>exactly when we acquired the insincorator business in Wisconsin, which

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 7>is usually margin attractive of a strong position. We knew

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 7>of course it's it's a heavily ODN boundar sheet. And

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 7>with two or three years to kind of digest that

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 7>acquisition related that we paid last year down five on

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 7>ared million, we'll pay down this year five on a million.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 7>So what we guided today in midmester today is kind

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 7>of yeah, by twenty six we want to be roughly

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 7>in a two times that leverage. We feel I'm a

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 7>right path and on the risk if you want to

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 7>say so, and us with boundary to whatever.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 8>It's what we want to have it.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>So appreciate it covered so much ground, as you always do.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark bitzer Be well, look forward to always our next conversation,

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive Officer.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 2>At World Quoth. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Eastern Listen on Apple car Play and then brought auto

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>with a Bloomberg Business app, or watch us Live on YouTube.

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>We did get a batch of economic news earlier, but

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>one report that we wanted to check out was what

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>happened with sales that previously owned US homes rising in

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>January by the most and nearly a year. Buyer's taking

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>advantage of lower mortgage rates at the start of the

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>new year of twenty twenty four.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, at the start of the year, because just yesterday

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>we reported how US mortgage rates jumped above seven percent

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>for the first time since early December that delta blow

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 3>to the housing markets and recovery. So the rates issue

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 3>is certainly sticking with us.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So let's get to it and what it all means.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Ka Kaminski is chief operating officer of the privately owned

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and asset and real estate investment company. It is Walton Global.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>They've got about three point six billion in assets and

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>over ninety four thousand acres under management here in the

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>United States. She joins us. Kate does from Scottsdale, Arizona. Kate,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Business Week. Nice to have you here

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with Tim and me. How are you and talk to

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>us about your world, because you guys do commercial, industrial,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate. Give us kind of an overview of

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>how things are going better than the last year, better

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>than the last six months. What can you tell us?

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we're pretty excited about twenty twenty four. Here at Walton.

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 9>We really focus on the land space, where we're buying

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 9>land in the path of growth, predominantly to sell to

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 9>public new homebuilders. But we also, as you noted, have industrial, commercial,

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 9>and retail holdings. So the numbers that came out today,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 9>you know, really important in terms of what we're seeing

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 9>in the resale market, which has a direct impact on

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 9>the new home building space, which is where we focus

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 9>with with the resale figures. Seeing you know, the slowest

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 9>year for the last three decades in twenty twenty three,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 9>we're excited that January was finally an uptick in terms

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 9>of the resale market, and you know that continued increase

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 9>in value. I think we were at about five percent

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 9>and in increase in existing home sale value year over years,

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 9>So strong numbers on the resale market, but you know,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 9>still seeing a continued push for buyers to that that

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 9>new home market because of a lot of the lock

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 9>in effect that we're seeing from those mortgage rates, which,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 9>as you noted, are creeping up a bit.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>He Ky, how would you characterize demand from the home

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 3>builders right now? Because you guys have property all over

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the United States. You've got a lot in Colorado, a

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>lot in California, Oklahoma, Texas, Florida, Georgia. How would you

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>characterize the demand that you're seeing from home builders who

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 3>want to buy that land and then build homes on it.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 9>I mean, home builder sentiment is up. I think it

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 9>was at forty four percent. We're seeing more transactions go

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 9>under contract right now than we did is certainly a

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 9>year ago, which twenty twenty three was a good year.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 9>Here at Walton, we've got around two point eight billion

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 9>in deal volume that's at various stages, hoping to move

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 9>that towards closing. So we're still seeing a lot of demand,

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 9>but certainly builders are looking to take positions right now.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Permits are up just across the board.

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 9>We've seen a year of month over month increases. I

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 9>think right now we're sitting at just over a million

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 9>units at an annualized rate, which is up thirty five

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 9>percent year over year. So you know, permits showing us

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 9>what we can expect for the future, what our forecasts

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 9>are looking like.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>What's land prices look like right now, so you.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 9>Know, like everything else, we continue to see that increase,

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 9>but it's remaining somewhat consistent and where we're really seeing

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 9>a lot of our negotiations take places working with builders

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 9>on understanding what development costs are going to be, timelines

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 9>and working to ensure that everyone's margins are really remaining

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 9>consistent and hitting those targets.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 10>That they're looking for.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But for you, for the acquisition costs, our land price

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is going up, and I'm curious if there's I'm assuming

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>there are geographical differences. I mean, I know, I've got

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of family down south, and it's kind of

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on fire right now. So if you can give us

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>some context as you look across the United States where

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing land values go up a lot, because that's

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that's your bread and butter.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 9>Right Yeah, you know, our assets are really focused in

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 9>the southern half of the United States. Uh. If if

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 9>I were to pull our acquisitions team or or talk

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 9>to any of the builders, I mean, land prices are

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 9>going up right across the board, and it's it's getting

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 9>more and more difficult to find to find any deals.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 9>I would say they're they're few and far between right now.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 9>The markets that we're really focusing on continue to be Florida, Texas, Georgia,

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 9>and the Carolinas and and then you know, of course

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 9>in in the Southwest and West as well. But but

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 9>definitely seeing increases and land values, and a lot of

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 9>that has to do with the lack of supply of

0:23:55.680 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 9>development ready land. We continue to see significant challengees right

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 9>across the country as it retains to land getting approved

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 9>for development. This is a challenge that that builders and

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 9>landowners are basing across the board as we have more

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 9>municipalities really restricting especially that that identity residential.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business podcast Country listening live

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>each week starting at two pm Eastern. Yeah, we could listen.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York State and.

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg as sort of a middle person in this market

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 3>because perhaps some of them are asking themselves, well, why

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 3>why doesn't the landowner go directly to the developer h

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 3>and actually make more money when they sell that. What

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 3>is the what's the value that you bring to the

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 3>transaction by holding onto the land from the landowner to

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the developer.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's a great question, and our entire business is

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 9>really focused right now on feeding builders. You know, demand

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 9>for just in time inventory. Just in time inventory is

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 9>as simple as you know builders post Great Recession where

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 9>we're penalized significantly for holding long term land assets that

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 9>were not income generating that they weren't going to turn

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 9>in call it a two year timeframe. So Walton comes in,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 9>We buy these land assets and we sell them to

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 9>builders typically you know, on a phase by phase basis

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 9>over time as they're ready to take it down and

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 9>start development and ultimately build a home.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 11>And so we're we're.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 9>Kind of in that land banking space for those of

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 9>you familiar with the term, which is something that we're

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 9>seeing right across the board. Every builder is really being

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 9>forced to utilize that tool in their toolbox, right.

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's not kind of stuck on their balance sheet,

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>especially if there's any kind of downturn. Kate got thirty

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seconds left here in terms of what you are seeing.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you setting up for a US economy that's recovering,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that's growing, that might have a recession, And just real

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>quickly twenty five seconds if you.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 9>Could definitely looking at growth. I mean, if you just

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 9>look at the population numbers from last year alone, I

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 9>think it was the largest one year population increase in history.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 9>That plus you know, the builders continuing to buy down

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 9>rates for new home buyers. I think we're going to

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 9>see really strong figures in the balance of this year

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 9>and in the economy in general.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>All Right, going to leave it on that note, Kate,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, really appreciate it. Kai Kaminski, Chief

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>operating officer of the privately owned asset and real estate

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>investment company Walton Global joining us from Scottsdale Arizona Homebuilders.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>As a group, they're up about one and a half

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>percent here in twenty twenty four, and we're seeing yeah,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>them up a little bit higher as well. Today this

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg.

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast live weekday

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen on Apple

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>car Play and then brout Auto with a Bloomberg Business

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 2>act or want us live on YouTube.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, this past week we learned that Leon Black sold

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Apollo Global Management stock for the first time, making the

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>move almost three years after he exited the giant that

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>made him one of Wall Street's richest billionaires.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Black unloaded nearly one hundred and seventy three million dollars

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 3>of stock in the New York based firm last week.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>That's according to a regulatory filing. It's almost two percent

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of his stake in the alternative asset manager, which has

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 3>seen it shares rise about four hundred and eighty percent

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 3>since going public thirteen years ago.

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So Timmy might recall, after a tumultuous period, Leon Black

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>retired as Apollo's chief executive officer. That was in March

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty one, after three decades a top one

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world's most powerful investment firms, which is now

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>run by fellow co founder Mark Rowan.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Private equity it's a huge part of how money moves

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 3>around today, which is why it was a lot of

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 3>fun to catch up with Anton Dream, founder and chairman

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>of Triago. It's a placement agent that's best known for

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 3>assisting private equity firms with fundraising. Since nineteen ninety two,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the company has raised and advised clients on more than

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty billion dollars in capital. That's a going to its website.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Antwan joined us from our New York studios to talk

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 3>about the private equity backdrop, and here's some of its

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>outrageous predictions for PE in twenty twenty four.

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 10>We are going back to reality right after qees, zero

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 10>interest rates, etcetera, etcetera. We're going back to flight to quality. Mostly,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 10>it's obviously tougher out there. It's tougher for exits, as

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 10>you've been saying. It's also tougher on the investment side

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 10>because credit is lacking. So we are I think going

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 10>to what I was what private equity was in the

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 10>early nineties, right, adding value to businesses and being smart

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 10>about investing.

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 3>So does private equity thrive in an environment like that?

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 10>Not all of it. Some of it was just you know,

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 10>riding the wave, I guess, And these guys are in

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 10>trouble because things are now tougher for these who know

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 10>their way within the difficult environments. It's obviously great times.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 10>They can buy great assets at cheaper prices, they can

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 10>have less competition, and they can think about, you know,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 10>great growth bands.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 3>How are you thinking about using leverage when it comes

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to buyouts right now, just because interest rates are so

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>much higher.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 10>I think it's it's obviously part of the game, you know, leverage.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 10>It can leverage and can make people rich. It can

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 10>also hurt or kill. I think you have to use

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 10>it with a lot of you know, skill, and that's

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 10>what most of these guys are doing right now.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of though, kind of it's all

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about private credit right now? Do we continue to see

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you know, traditional Wall Street is saying, wait,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I increasingly want a piece of that. How does that

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>impact the market, How does that, you know, impact some

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the conversations that you're having with the clients.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 5>You deal with.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 10>Most LPs are indeed interested in credit, then I mean

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 10>you go to them, they don't really want to know

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 10>about private equity, nor VC growth, et cetera. They're all

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 10>interested in credit. I guess up to a point. At

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 10>some point there will be probably too much available.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And when you've tracing too many things.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 10>Of course, unlike everything, you know, it's supply and demand.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 10>And when there's a you know, too much supply and

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 10>not enough demand, you're in.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>You're in.

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 10>You're in. You're in trouble.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>When you say trouble, though, does it mean that it

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>results in that we see assets being build up in

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of valuations, and so there's going to be fallout.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and it's going to mean less less. I mean,

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 10>performance is probably going to be hit. I think it's

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 10>not there yet, right, There's going to be a few

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 10>years where the asset class is going to thrive. But

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 10>at some point, I mean, things will go back to

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 10>the mean.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we should know for everybody who has not necessarily

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 3>been keeping up. Hulhan Loki is acquiring Triogra. The deal

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 3>is expected to close in the first half of the year.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>What does this look like for for your life. What

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 3>does it look like for the business? I mean, this

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 3>is a big deal.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you go on vacation.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm not yet dealing close. I'm not yet going on vacation.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 10>The deal is not closed yet. Are we have signed

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 10>an agreement. We are basically done, except that we're waiting

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 10>for regulatory approvals. So we're now much much stronger. I mean,

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 10>we will be much much stronger.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 1>But there is something to write being bigger, like I

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think at some point, because there is so much competition

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that when you can be a house that offers a lot,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there's power in that. And there's there's something about increasing

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>your presence physically that makes it easier.

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, absolutely, I think is this There's going to be

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 10>more consolidiation in this space for that same reason. You

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 10>want to be a giant or nothing.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I'm asuming clients come to you they want

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that they can play with or

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>work with. Hey, you have shared with us your ten

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>outrageous predictions for private equity in twenty and twenty four.

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>What's your most outrageous?

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 10>So I've seen that some of them, you know, in

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 10>the past, some of them did happen.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So maybe not so outrageous.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, I guess the most outrageous is probably Karla

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 10>i Can and Nelson Pels buying all the distressed funds

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 10>out there. I think I put the forty billion number

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 10>in there. There will be lots of fallout from funds.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 10>There has to be some some cleanup, and there aren't

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 10>many players doing that already, So these guys or similar

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 10>entities could probably do a lot in that space.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one thing I was really surprised to see on

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 3>your predictions for twenty twenty four was Amazon creating an

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 3>online private equity exchange, this so called category killer.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Carol and I've.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Spoken about the past couple of years the idea of

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 3>private equity. You know, private equity providers want to access

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 3>to people's farrow one case, they want to make this thing,

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>you know that just not just high net worth individuals

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 3>have access to. What do you mean by Amazon doing this?

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 10>I think the asset class needs fluidity. A few a

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 10>few years ago, it wasn't really needed because the retail

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 10>investors were not playing in that game. Today it's a

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 10>complete different story and they I think these people especially

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 10>need to know that there is a way out right.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's one of the reasons why returns have been

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 3>good is because you get that high return in exchange

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>for locking up your money for you know, ten twelve years.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, but you can still get a very decent return

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 10>even if you leave the show, you know, in the

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 10>in the in between, right, And that's that's an option,

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 10>it's not. I guess that most people stay where they are,

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 10>and ninety nine percent of the paper, the private equity paper,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 10>stays where it is. Trades account for roughly one percent.

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 10>My bet is that, especially if such tool exists, you know,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 10>we may go to five percent.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 5>I love this one.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>They're about Michael Jordan, Serena Williams and Blue Owl consolidate

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>private equity sports investments, I mean sports private equity.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Man, it's a love affair.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 11>Prediction.

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 10>Prediction like this one could happen. I don't know about

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 10>the names, I don't know about the people, but but

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 10>there's private equity and sports, as you said, is a

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 10>love affair, and there's a lot to be done in

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 10>the space. And it's still pretty you know, it's it's

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's much more to be done.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Antoine, founder and chairman at Triago.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Antwan just now talking about private equities involvement.

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 3>They're so called love affair with sports. Private equity also

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 3>well known when it comes to content and Hollywood at

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 3>least now. That brings us to the Bloomberg BusinessWeek cover story.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 3>It's about the masters of hipster cringe that now have

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 3>hardware and some Wall Street cash.

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Love the story and in fact it is available in

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week, which is available

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on newstands, now online and on the Bloomberg terminal. It

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gets inside A twenty four, the indie film company behind

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the film's uncut Gems and Ladybird and the award winning

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>TV hits Euphoria and Beef. In twenty twenty two, A

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four rays two hundred and twenty five million dollars

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>from a group of investors, including private equity firm Stripes,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that value the company at two and a half billion dollars,

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a staggering amount in the indie film world.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Felix Gillette wrote the story. He's Media, Entertainment and Telecom

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 3>editor for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. He's also the author of It's

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Not TV, The Spectacular Rise Revolution in Future of HBO.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Felix began by talking about a twenty four bolstered now

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 3>by Wall Street riches as it's making a run, it's

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 3>scaling up its indianess.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's kind of a fascinating time for the company.

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 12>They've had this amazing run over the past year. They

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 12>started as an indie film distributor, which is a very

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 12>unglamorous role, and just by having good taste and picking

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 12>good movies and doing a really good job of hyping movies,

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 12>you know, small budget movies that they picked up at festivals,

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 12>they've grown into this force somewhat of an outsider in Hollywood.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 12>And yet this year, if you look at the Academy

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 12>Award nominations, they again have two nominations for Best Picture,

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 12>Zone of Interest and Past Lives. They've kind of mastered

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 12>the art of these small, you know, five to ten

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 12>million dollars budget movie, you know, original voices, aw tar

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 12>driven and the problem with that is.

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 8>Those movies don't make a ton of money.

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 12>And so, you know, they raised all this money, they

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 12>have this high valuation and the next step in their

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 12>evolution is really to grow into you know, what you

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 12>might call a mini major in Hollywood and try and

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 12>basically start making bigger movies. Maybe not like you know,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 12>Marvel sized movies, but in that range of you know,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 12>thirty forty fifty sixty seventy million dollar budget movies.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 5>And to do that, you know, you have to take

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 5>bigger risks.

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 8>It's not as easy. You have to move into.

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 12>New genres, which they're really trying right now a lot

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 12>of different things. I mean, it's kind of fascinating to

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 12>see all the different intellectual property they're buying up. They're

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 12>working with bigger stars, they have their first movie with

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 12>the Rock is in development.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Felix companies like this, I'm always like, I mean, who

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are the people behind it? Like, how did you know?

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about kind of their origins

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and how it all came up on your radar.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 12>I think the one thing that really distinguishes them from

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 12>a lot of the indie film companies we've seen rise

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 12>and fall over years is that they do have very

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 12>strong roots on Wall Street. So Daniel Katz, who's the

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 12>CEO of the company, before he started A twenty four,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 12>he did a stint at Guggenheim and he was running

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 12>their entertainment investment division. And also but just like not

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 12>talking about their business very often and letting this kind

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 12>of mystery void and filling it with you know, they

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 12>have these, they have a peril that sells for a

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 12>lot of money online. They can do these like sneaker

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 12>drops for like a twenty four hats and a twenty

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 12>four Totacs, which is.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 3>It's all right, So I kind of want to go

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 3>a couple of different directions with this. You mentioned the

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 3>New York angle here, Felix, and I'm wondering how geography

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 3>plays a part in this, because when we think of Hollywood,

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 3>we think of literally Hollywood. Does that geographical distinction matter.

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 11>I think it does.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I think they play up their outsider status

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 12>and they have a lot They've had a lot of

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 12>success with that. I mean, in some ways, the business

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 12>model is very similar to what Mirrormax did in the eighties.

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of yeah.

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's very similar, and I think they did, you know,

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 12>consciously model themselves after that. You know, if you look

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 12>at their mix of movies, it's always been kind of

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 12>like a mix of really high brow kind of oscar

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 12>bait movies and then at the same time they do

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 12>horror films and if you look at a twenty four, yeah,

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 12>they have these two Best Picture nominees this year with

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 12>a zone of interest in past lives, but they also

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 12>their top you know, probably the most lucrative film that

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 12>they had this year was a horror movie Talk to Me.

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 12>So having that kind of high brow mix is very

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 12>much like Mirromax. The difference, obviously, is that Mirrormax with

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 12>the Weinstein brothers. You know, they were very out there

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 12>in the press always throughout their rise before they sold

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 12>to Disney, and A twenty four very much took an

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 12>opposite approach in terms of their company culture and how

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 12>they present themselves of the world.

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 11>Well, the first.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Paragraph alone, we've had been fun reading in the newsroom.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell anything more because there's a

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>movie they made. It was a musical, but it maybe

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't for the family, so can't read it on there.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I always love the stuff you do, Felix. Thanks so much.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Felix de Lap, Media Entertainment and Telecom editor for Bloomberg

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. This is the cover story of the new issue.

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and androyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 2>York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Thirty Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week, including Elon Musk's underground tunnel

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>project that was supposed to be the next generation of

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>hyperspeed mass transit and instead has hit a muddy and

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>dare we say toxic roadblock, while boring companies tiny Las

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Loop is less hyperloop and more stories of chemical burns,

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>broken promises, and a puddle of toxic sludge.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Also ahead well on the topic of Elon Musk, We've

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 3>got everything you need to know about driving Tesla's polarizing

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 3>electric pickup. You know it, it's the cyber truck. Elon

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and Detroit Automaker's got a break this week on the

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg exclusive news of the demise of Apple's car program.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>We got the details from Bloomberg's Mark German, who broke

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the story.

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so We've got a lot on cars in Elon

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and Apple in the next sixty minutes. First up, though

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.399
<v Speaker 1>this hour, Tim, here's a surprising stat almost fifty two

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>percent of recent college grads are working jobs that do

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>not require a college degree. This is what is referred

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to as underemployment.

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of staggering, it is, and I think that's

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 3>why people are questioning whether or not it's worth it

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 3>to go to college.

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good question. And for those who

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 1>do find themselves underemployed after graduation, it can be incredibly

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult to get career earnings on track. It all just

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of builds from there.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So on that theme, and with the cost of

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>attending a time top ranked US college now pushing close

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 3>to ninety thousand dollars a year, Yeah, you heard that right,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 3>it does have many people wondering if a college degree

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 3>is still worth it. Our next guest, well, he says

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 3>it is. Jim Keyes is the former CEO of two

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Fortune five hundred companies, Blockbuster and A seven eleven. Also

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 3>the founder of the nonprofit Education Is Freedom Foundation. He's

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 3>got a new book out. It's called Education Is Freedom.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>The Future Is in Your Hands. He joined Carol in

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 3>our New York studio.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 5>We're in a unique bubble right now with three and

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 5>a half percent unemployment and there are a lot of

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 5>jobs out there that don't require a college degree, that

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 5>are very well paying jobs. The question is where will

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 5>we be when we have seven eight percent unemployment? Because

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 5>of course, these things are cycles and it will happen

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 5>at some point in the future, and that degree will

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 5>help you differentiate yourself. Think of it as your brand.

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 5>At some point, you're gonna have to raise money, You're

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna have to apply for a job, and not having

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 5>that degree will make it difficult to compete with others who.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you know the story about the amount of student

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>debt that's out there, and kids who've gotten college degrees,

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they're indebted and it's taking them years to pay it

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>back because they haven't gotten necessarily a job that has

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>made it easy to manage that debt.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm going to give you a classic business example. Yeah,

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 5>you would never invest in a company based on today's returns.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 5>You basically run a net present value of future earning

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 5>streams and discount it back for today's dollars. I'm not

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 5>sure why we don't look at college as an investment

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 5>in ourselves, because it's not going to pay back in

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 5>today's dollars, but it will pay back over time. If

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 5>you look at all of the statistics about having a

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 5>degree versus not having a degree. Now, this doesn't hold

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 5>for every degree that you get or every job that

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 5>you have, but on balance, that degree does give you

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 5>far more earning power over your life. And here's the

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 5>way I like to look at it. Getting a college

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 5>degree is an investment in yourself that pays dividends for

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 5>the rest of your life. Right, So think of it

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 5>as a business investment in yourself.

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because you are so all in on education.

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, And.

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting when you've got schools now that are sixty

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy eighty ninety thousand dollars a year that automatically make

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it kind of problematic for some people to afford them.

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And again they have to tack on a pile of

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>debt that doesn't go away so easily.

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 5>I had to address the same thing because I've had

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 5>people Now I'm out there on social media, I've got

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 5>kids going, yeah, it's easy for you to say, Boomer,

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 5>you know you had it easy. College was cheap, so

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 5>I ran the numbers and when I graduated from college,

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 5>my tuition was seven five hundred dollars a year in

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 5>today's dollars is fifty five thousand a year. So yes,

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 5>it's a little bit more today, but not extraordinarily higher.

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 5>And this is a really important point. Endowments have been

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 5>massively improved today versus twenty thirty, forty fifty years ago.

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 5>And college discount rates, this is a really important factor

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 5>that no one takes into consideration, are as high as

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 5>forty five, fifty, sometimes sixty percent discount rate. In other words,

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 5>the amount of scholarship money that they provide. So beware

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.439
<v Speaker 5>being intimidated by the sticker price because the actual price

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 5>may be significant.

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>The thing I will say about scholarships having gone through

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the college route with my own daughter, and that there's

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not a ton of academic scholarships anymore. There's a lot

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on the sports side of things, and then there's a

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lot on depending on your economic well being or not

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so well being. And I'm so glad it's there for that,

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of people in the middle that

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of get stuck with that debt load there is.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 5>The middle is tough, and it's always been tough, and

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 5>I guess if you look back at history, this is

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 5>not unique to today. We've always had that challenge of

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 5>kids that really can't afford it are in a much

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 5>better position to get scholarships. The kids who can afford

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 5>it almost doesn't matter. Is that middle group that are challenged.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 5>But again, I can't stress enough from two perspectives. From

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 5>the individual's perspective, right, it's critical important to differentiate yourself

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:05.320
<v Speaker 5>down the road and make that investment. But for a corporation,

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 5>you know you remember from from a bio I ran

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 5>two fortune five hundred companies, right, we had a hard

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 5>time in employing an educated workforce at that store manager level,

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 5>and that's even more challenging today with three and a

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.919
<v Speaker 5>half percent unemployment. So if we're going to be competitive,

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 5>if our corporations are going to be competitive twenty thirty

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 5>forty years from now, we better step up and recognize

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 5>the importance we'll go there.

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I do feel like before the pandemic, and very

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>much so after the pandemic, the role of the corporation

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of taking care of employees. What do you

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think should be the role of employers when it comes

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to helping to educate their workforce.

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Here's the way I look at it. It's a it's

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 5>a classic can turn everything into a classic business problem.

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 5>It supply and demand, right, Yeah, we're the demand. Businesses

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 5>are the demand for an educated workforce, and yet we

0:45:56.960 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 5>very rarely make the investment in that education state and

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 5>local government that trains public school kids. And so today

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 5>my recommendation in the book, it's a bit of a

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 5>call to action to corporations to see the need for

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 5>investing and how do we do that through technology? You know,

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 5>we've we've got such an opportunity to transform education with

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 5>things like AI.

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>How we do it?

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, digital learning, there's so much opportunity, but that's not

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 5>going to happen at a state and local government level.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So who needs to do it?

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.879
<v Speaker 5>The companies? I think corporation should, and ultimately I think

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.760
<v Speaker 5>they will once they've realized that this supply and demand

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 5>problem is a problem.

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to kind of go back to some of

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you and I were just talking about on air.

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Peter Thiel, who has said, eh, you don't have to

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>go to college wrongs. If Peter was here right now,

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you say to him?

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 5>I would say, please stop. And here's why. If you

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 5>give a young person an excuse and say you don't

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 5>need to go to college, they're going to take it.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 5>They're gonna take it. So just step back from this

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 5>and think about global competitiveness. The United States since about

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty twelve twenty fifteen has gone from high fifties and

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 5>graduates post secondary graduation rates down to forty. Now COVID

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 5>contributed to that, to climb, but we're going in the

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 5>wrong direction. Meanwhile, China has gone exactly opposite. They have

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 5>gone from the forty percent range up to nearly sixty

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 5>and climbing. They're doubling down on the importance of an

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 5>educated populist and an educated workforce. And this issue is

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 5>critically important to corporate America if we dial forward and

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 5>our ability to sustain competitiveness will depend on an educated

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 5>workforce demand for the supply that is lagging right now?

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>What's the answer? And I think about I mean, I'm

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one of seven kids and my parents it was all

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>about getting a college education. That was so important. My

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>dad came out of World War two a GI GI

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>bill went to like, this was from the get go,

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you can do whatever you want after you to college

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the mission here. How have we gotten

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>away from it? In your view, Yeah.

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 5>We're in this weird bubble of the availability of technology,

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 5>but not the application of technology. And some of it

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 5>comes down to how are we funded state and local

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 5>governments the challenges of that. So we spend a lot

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 5>of money, and we are spending a lot of money,

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 5>but we can spend it far more efficiently. I don't

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 5>think the solution will happen leaving it up to state

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 5>and local governments.

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 11>I hope that.

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Corporations will see that they are ultimately the demand and

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 5>want to step up because the technology is available today

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 5>to completely transform the way we teach and the way

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 5>we learn. We saw a little you know and I

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 5>were talking about, you know during cool the pandemic. Yeah, yeah,

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 5>during the pandemic wasn't so great for some. It wasn't

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 5>so great for some. But here's what happened. It was

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 5>a massive improvement in the availability and access that wasn't there,

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 5>particularly for the underprivileged. It's there now. What we haven't

0:48:56.000 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 5>done is integrated those platforms, upgraded the user content to

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:05.240
<v Speaker 5>make it eye popping. So those kids that were hating

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 5>their online class with then play video games for four

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 5>or five hours, right, So you can make school just

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 5>as engaging. That's the challenge, and that will come, that's

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 5>our next step.

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>But do we have to be careful about technology? Yay, great, right, Jim.

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>But I mean I also think about the importance of

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 1>part of school is social skills, learn to communicate, like.

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 5>Exactly what's the balance here? Well, and that's too. You

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 5>just made my point. That's why a formal education still

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.280
<v Speaker 5>is and will be important for quite some time because

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:40.760
<v Speaker 5>it's more than just learning. You can learn online virtually anything, right,

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 5>But it's those meta rights. Yeah, yeah, but it's those

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 5>meta skills, it's those soft skills that I've outlined in

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the book, things like curiosity, creative, creativity, critical thinking. Those

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 5>skills are things that you hone in a classroom working

0:49:58.440 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 5>with others.

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If there's one thing, one thing you could change, or

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>one step that you think and I'm assuming it sounds

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like what you're saying is it's on the side of

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>corporations to really step up here. What would be the

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>step that the world needs to take to improve this?

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, the first step I think is we've got to

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 5>get beyond fear, because I think fear is the big

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 5>culprit here right about that In the book, right about

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 5>a whole chapter on fear and a chapter on confidence,

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 5>because confidence is so important for learning and preparation. But

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 5>fear is the killer because we're afraid of so much.

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:33.240
<v Speaker 5>We're afraid of some of us are afraid of teachers, unions.

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 5>We're afraid that kids are being indoctrinated. We're afraid of

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, this and that and this and that, all

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 5>these horrible things that are buzzing around, and it's contributing

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 5>to this narrative that maybe you don't even need school. Well,

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 5>if we can reverse that fear, and you think about

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 5>the antecdote to fear its knowledge. So if we can, ironically,

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 5>if we can reverse the fear replace it with not

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 5>knowledge and understanding and confidence, then I believe that will

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 5>help us recognize the opportunity because we are there right

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 5>on the cusp of being able to completely transform the

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 5>way we teach and learn.

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 1>If we don't do this, what do you think is

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the outcome or the impact in our country.

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:16.879
<v Speaker 5>I am concerned both for our corporations and global competitiveness

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 5>of America, but also for the country itself. All the

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 5>way back to Jefferson, Alexis Dtopfel came from France and

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 5>said with Jefferson that the sustainability of a democracy depends

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:29.320
<v Speaker 5>on an educated populace.

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And you get into this, this whole idea of the

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>polarization that we see. You believe that this is going

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the way that we get rid of some

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Right, I do. I believe it's ultimately the solution because

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 5>so much of this polarization is fear and going back

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 5>to FDRs and in doctrination speech all we have nothing

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 5>to fear of but fear itself, right, and we are

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 5>in the grips of fear, and it's just taking us down.

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 5>It's just distracting us from so much potential to move

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 5>forward as a people.

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Jim Keyes, former CEO of Blockbuster and

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 3>seven eleven and the founder of the nonprofit Education Is

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Freedom Foundation.

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg BusinessWeek coming up. It was meant

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to provide fast and convenient transportation to the Las Vegas community.

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Instead it's racking up safety violations. How Elon Musk's Vegas

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>tunnel project is causing chemical burns to its workers. That

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 1>story is next.

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg.

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 2>on Apple car Play and then Brout Auto with a

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business act or watch us live on YouTube Jimmy, Elon.

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Musk and EBS check Elon Muskin, satellites and space exploration

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>via SpaceX A check. Then there's the brain Elon's neuralleak project.

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, some news there recently too, so we can go

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 3>ahead and say check I think at this point, but

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 3>don't sign me.

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 7>Up for it.

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What we haven't earned much about in a while is

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Elon's toneling venture the Boring Company, that is, until.

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fair to say uncheck on this one.

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Exactly well, which is why our Bloomberg Business Week team

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>had to take do some digging around no pun intended.

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They found out that the Boring Company's tiny Las Vegas

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 1>loop is all that's come of Musk's promise and his

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>promises overall to build super fast mass transit hyperloops. Workers

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>say it's tunnels, meantime, are packed with chemical sludge. This

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a story by Max Chafkin and Sarah McBride of

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg News team.

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Max is Bloomberg Business Week columnists also contributor to the

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Elon Inc Podcast a new episode dropping tomorrow onto the

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Terminal and on bloomberg dot com slash elon Ing

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 3>maxis here in Art's.

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It called the Sludge Episode.

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a sludge special.

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Since we talked about the sledge, we got to start

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 3>with the sludge because it's actually kind of serious, pretty

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 3>serious laughing but causes some pretty bad health effects.

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean, the genes of this story are these

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 6>documents that we obtained that Sarah McBride and I obtained

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 6>from the state OSHA, that's the Occupational Health and Safety Administration,

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 6>and it basically shows lots of complaints from workers about

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 6>unsafe conditions, including this issue of like these toxic muck,

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 6>which the workers say they've had to wade through. The

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 6>reason it's toxic, it's it's not necessarily like they're doing

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 6>something that's totally outside the norms of tunneling. These chemicals

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 6>are are sort of standard chemicals that are used. But

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 6>the allegation from the workers is that corners are being cut,

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to move too fast, they're doing it on

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 6>the cheap, you know. And the funny thing about this,

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 6>or it's not really funny but these are the things

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 6>that Elon Musk has set out to do to some extent,

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Like the whole point of the Boring Company, like many

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 6>of Musk's companies, has been to cut unnecessary costs. The

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 6>thing that we're hearing with this story, however, and I

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 6>think you see echoes of this elsewhere in Elon Musk's empire,

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 6>actually is that they're not necessarily finding lots of innovations there.

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 6>They're ultimately ending up with a normal tunneling company essentially

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:54.719
<v Speaker 6>that happens to have.

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 11>A safety record that some would say is troubling.

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So here's here's what's a little puzzling to me.

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Max Elon Musk is guy who's literally putting chips in

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 3>people's heads. He's doing something that only until SpaceX did it,

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 3>governments taking a whole of government approach could do. We've

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 3>been able to dig tunnels for transportation purposes for over

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:16.399
<v Speaker 3>a century. Why is he running into so much trouble here?

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 5>So I think I.

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Wrote one of the first stories about this back in

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 6>early twenty seventeen, talked to Elon Musk at the time

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 6>about this, and just to put a slightly different spin

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 6>on what you just said, and which relates to this,

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 6>which is that SpaceX is not the first company, not

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 6>the first private company to build rockets, right, the shuttle,

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 6>all the things that NASA done were built by government contractors.

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I guess what I'm saying is he's doing

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 3>it in a way that is really innovative anything well

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 3>yeh one hundred percent very much reusable stuff is that

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 3>was a really.

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 11>Innovative contracting process.

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.479
<v Speaker 6>They used contracts, They sold him directly the government at

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 6>a fixed price, which was new. But one of the

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 6>core things that SpaceX did was like go out and

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 6>look for existing technology and find a way to improve

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 6>on it and do it cost effectively. Now, there are

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 6>a lot of potential inefficiencies in the world of aerospace,

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.879
<v Speaker 6>and Musk has had a much harder time in some

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 6>other fields finding similar sort of levels of inefficiency, just

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of low hanging fruit. And I think the tunneling

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 6>example is one you know, he talked about back in

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen. He talked, you know, it costs a billion

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 6>dollars a year, and it takes a mile. It takes

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 6>a year to dig a mile, and it costs like

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 6>a billion dollars a mile. Or some some very large

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:28.400
<v Speaker 6>figure like that, and now Boring is doing maybe a

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 6>little better on cost, although it's hard to know, but

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 6>when you look at the actual pace that they're going,

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 6>it's basically a mile a year. It's it's not that

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 6>much faster than existing tunneling projects. And when you look

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 6>at the end result, we're not talking about mass transit.

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 11>We're not talking about you know, big subway cars full

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 11>of people, which.

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 6>Is actually what many people in Las Vegas, you know,

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 6>would have hoped for, because traffic there is really bad.

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:53.280
<v Speaker 11>We're talking about are Tesla's.

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Just normal cars that can take three people and a driver.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 6>They're not even driverless, and they're limited to forty miles

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 6>an hour. So we're so far away from the kind

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 6>of grand visions.

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:05.760
<v Speaker 11>And just to remind.

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 6>People what Elon Musk originally promised here was New York

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 6>to DC in twenty nine minutes San Francisco, Los Angeles. Yeah,

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 6>in thirty five sounds awesome. You could commute from you know,

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 6>you could like commute halfway across the country, and you know,

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 6>it just hasn't gone that way. And I think, you know,

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 6>in all sorts of different ways across Elon Musk's empire.

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 6>You're seeing maybe fissures, cracks, ways in which the promises

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 6>are not necessarily matching up.

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 11>You know, we saw this ruling with pay in Delaware.

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, of course, lots of problems documented at x

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 6>slash Twitter, and here you just have like a very

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 6>visceral way where you have these grand promises and the

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 6>end what you have is basically a glorified shuttle bus system.

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't take you, you know, from one end of

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 6>the country to the other. It takes you from one

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 6>end to the Las Vegas Convention Center to the other.

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a case of that's all I can

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>do so far there?

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:03.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean to some extent, Yes, I mean the

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:06.880
<v Speaker 6>thing that if you squint and I think the reason

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 6>that this was approved it's partly that was approved because

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas is a low regulation city. These are mostly

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 6>on private property. There isn't a ton of oversight from

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 6>the government as there might be in other places. But also,

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, they're talking about opening these stations throughout the city,

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 6>but you know, when we talk to people on the

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 6>ground there, it is a long way from happening. It's

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 6>also hard to see how this is going to make

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 6>a huge impact on traffic. Again, when you're talking about

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, moving people three at a time, very very slowly,

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 6>a lot of things would have to happen, and there

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 6>are lots of reasons for skepticism. I mean, you know,

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 6>digging underground is hard. There's a reason it costs so

0:58:45.040 --> 0:58:46.959
<v Speaker 6>much money. It costs so much money because there's stuff

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 6>you can run into, complicated property rights, and of course.

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So the company is not going to create a trillion jobs.

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 6>Well yeah, which is what Elon Musk told me back

0:58:55.600 --> 0:58:57.439
<v Speaker 6>in twenty seventeen. They were going to create a trillion jobs.

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 6>I'd say it's a long way from that.

0:59:00.920 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 11>To put it.

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 6>To put it mildly, I mean, there there was sort

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:07.240
<v Speaker 6>of flirtations or talk of various projects. There was one

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 6>in Maryland, one in Los Angeles, one in Chicago. And

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 6>in all these cases, you know, he was bringing along

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 6>some of the most famous politicians in the United States.

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 6>So it was Larry Hogan, you know, governor of Maryland,

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 6>who former governor Maryland, who was you know, at the time,

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 6>a big star of the Republican Party.

0:59:21.920 --> 0:59:23.920
<v Speaker 11>You know Rama Manuel, you know.

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Former chief of staff to President Obama, mayor of Chicago,

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Eric Garcetti, star Mayor of Los Angeles, like a lot

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 6>of people went for this and they just you know,

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 6>they haven't been able to deliver. And I think there's

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 6>probably some element of distraction. Obviously Musk has a lot

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:41.439
<v Speaker 6>going on. And also I think just tunneling this is hard.

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 6>You're dealing with dirt.

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people up in space and stuff

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in space is really hard. Tapping into the autorway industry.

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is like going back to Tim's point, right,

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 1>how many times were like, you know, you count out

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk or whatever, and then he's like, whoa, look

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what he did. And I understand there's a lot on

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>his plate right now and that's to be distracting. But

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>should we not rule him out? Has he not found

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the right boring tool?

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Is?

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Max?

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, I would say, I mean, I think it's there's

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 6>probably a bunch of different factors going on.

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 11>I mean, one thing that was different.

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 6>With SpaceX is you had a very interested buyer, which

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 6>was NASA. You had the US government wanting to finance

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 6>this thing, right looking for somebody just like Elon Musk,

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.200
<v Speaker 6>and Elon Musk sort of finding a way to fit himself,

1:00:26.760 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, to sort of make himself look like the

1:00:28.880 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 6>thing that the US government want.

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 11>Elon Musk is really good at this.

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing this with Starlink as well, where like, you know,

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:37.439
<v Speaker 6>he's this what would seem like a civilian technology, these

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 6>these internet services for as Musks I told it to

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Walter Isaacson, I think he said, you know, it's to

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Netflix and chill.

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 11>Increasingly, this looks like a potential military tool. This is

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 11>gonna this is gonna.

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:49.760
<v Speaker 6>Lead to government contracts and and could be a big

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 6>line of business for SpaceX. You know, I think what

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 6>happened is in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen.

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 11>Donald Trump becomes president.

1:00:57.680 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot of talk about infrastructure, and in general,

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 6>there's been a lot of talk about wanting to spend

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 6>public money on infrastructure, but there hasn't been a ton

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 6>of delivery, right, And I think a big part of

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 6>this was predicated on this, you know, trillion dollar the

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 6>thing that Trump was saying, which is like a trillion

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 6>dollar infrastructure plan. And you know, ultimately infrastructure, whether it's

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:21.240
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk or anyone else, is very expensive. It's politically

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 6>dicey because you have land rights and so on, and

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 6>it it just hasn't come together with the speed that

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX came together.

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Max.

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to dig into something that you said, that

1:01:30.480 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned a little earlier, which is the idea that

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty seventeen twenty eighteen, a lot of politicians

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>were kind of jumping up and down with the idea

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of collaborating with Elon Musk. What I noticed in your

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>piece is that that tone has totally shifted and they

1:01:44.640 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>are now local politicians who are saying hey, thanks, but

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>no thanks.

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, including the mayor of Las Vegas, who is you know,

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas is an interesting place because the city of

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas actually doesn't contain most of the Strip, so

1:01:57.400 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it's not like she has oversight overall this. As I said,

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 6>a lot lot of it is on public property. But

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:05.240
<v Speaker 6>with Caroline Goodman, the mayor, longtime mayor, her husband was

1:02:05.280 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 6>a long time Mayriorg. She's like one of the probably

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 6>the most famous politician in Las Vegas, is essentially criticizing

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:14.200
<v Speaker 6>it and criticizing it on the grounds that it's unpractical. She,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, from the start, has raised these safety concerns

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 6>which I think look prescient when you look at this

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 6>oh shut thing and yeah, and she's essentially saying, you know,

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 6>this would be great if it could actually happen, but

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't see it. And that again, is that does

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 6>represent a bit of a departure for Elon Musk. You

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:34.840
<v Speaker 6>do feel like in Las Vegas at least, you know,

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 6>some of the magic, some of that kind of Elon

1:02:37.240 --> 1:02:40.400
<v Speaker 6>Musk stardust. It just doesn't feel quite you know, shine

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 6>quite as brightly. Maybe that's the lights of the strip

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 6>drowning it out. I don't know, but it definitely feels

1:02:44.720 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 6>like there's something different going.

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:46.919
<v Speaker 11>On there all right.

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Back to the workers though and their conditions. Is this

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>something unusual in terms of infrastructure projects? And I'm always

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>a little wary when there's a line in your story.

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Although no one has been killed at a boring company

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>work site so far in Vegas, it doesn't just speak

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to how tricky it is.

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, as I said, these are not like no one's

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 6>saying they're using chemicals that are worse than anybody else.

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:11.120
<v Speaker 6>What what the workers are saying, what you see in

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 6>these ocean complaints are sort of like little things that

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 6>maybe add up to a dangerous situation. And you know,

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 6>we have seen similar stories like this around Tesla's car

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 6>factories around there. You know, Reuter's had a great piece

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 6>some weeks ago about you know, death at a SpaceX site.

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 11>So you know, I mean when you're when you're radically.

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Trying to cut costs, when you're going around telling people

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 6>that the only law that matters are the laws of physics, right,

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 6>I think I think to some extent they're going to

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 6>be costs of that, and we're seeing that, and and

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 6>but we should say, like this isn't This is probably

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:48.959
<v Speaker 6>more an indictment of boring company being less innovative rather

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>than it's like the most dangerous place in the you.

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Know, there's just hasn't been proof rock three yet Max.

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And that, by the way, is the tunnel boring machine.

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Read the story you'll find out more.

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which is you know, promise, over promising and under delivery.

1:04:01.960 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 3>They have good names of home ts Eliot would be crouded.

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Max, Thank you so much. Max Chapkin. Here

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week column a store featured in the

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>new episode of the Elon Inc. Podcast on the Bloomberg

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and ap Bloomberg dot Com slash elon Inc.

1:04:21.840 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting a two pm Easter on Apple Car

1:04:28.720 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Play and Androyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Big News this past week. By big, I mean really

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>big in the tech space, in the car space. It

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was a Bloomberg exclusive by Bloomberg's Mark German. And what

1:04:49.240 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark found out. Apple is abandoning plans for a self

1:04:52.120 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>driving car, giving up on billions in potential revenue and

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the dream of selling what one executive called the ultimate

1:04:58.520 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>mobile device.

1:05:00.160 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Reached this crossroads Tuesday when I told employees it was

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>winding down the car project and reassigned some of the

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>staff to its AI efforts. The decision followed months of

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 3>frenzied meetings between top executives and the company's board over

1:05:12.280 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 3>how to proceed.

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>The sudden demise of Apple's car program is another bleak

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sign for the electric vehicle market. It's also a welcome

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>boon for automakers Detroit. Those in Detroit and Tesla perhaps

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>breathing a sigh of relief. As Apple's exit eliminates a

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>potential threat in an EV market that is slowing and

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>frees up a pool of talented engineers who may be

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out of a job.

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, wasn't shy about commenting, celebrating the

1:05:37.280 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>move by sharing a post on his ex platform with

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a saluting emoji and a cigarette. For more on the

1:05:43.960 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Apple news, we spoke to Mark German, Bloomberg News chief

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>technology correspondent, who broke the story exclusively on Bloomberg.

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 14>Apple officially canceled work on a self driving electric car.

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 14>Jeff Williams, the company's chief operating officer in Kevin Lynch,

1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:04.640
<v Speaker 14>the company's vice president of technology, who was foremost in

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 14>charge of the car project, announced to the team it's

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:11.960
<v Speaker 14>about two thousand people that the project, called Titan internally,

1:06:12.360 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 14>is winding down. There will be layoffs of some hardware people.

1:06:15.920 --> 1:06:19.120
<v Speaker 14>Hardware people will have the opportunity to apply to other teams.

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 14>Other people working on the project are being shifted to

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:25.920
<v Speaker 14>Apple's AI and Machine Learning division to work on generative

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 14>AI products, a key future component of the company. There

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 14>will some There will be some people moved to the

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 14>Vision pro as well, with that focus on spatial computing.

1:06:37.000 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 14>But this is a bombshell development.

1:06:39.320 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 11>This is a very rare retreat for Apple.

1:06:42.520 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 14>This is a project that they've invested over ten billion

1:06:45.920 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 14>dollars in. They've worked on it for over ten years.

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:53.000
<v Speaker 14>It's had many fits and starts, It's had many directional changes.

1:06:53.400 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 14>About a month ago, we reported that Apple had reached

1:06:56.280 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 14>a make or break point for the car project. We

1:06:58.880 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 14>reported at the latest incarnation of the project after several

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 14>meetings with the company's board of directors, was a new

1:07:05.600 --> 1:07:08.920
<v Speaker 14>budget around a Level two plus car that was a

1:07:09.040 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 14>downgrade from the original vision of a Level four or

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:15.560
<v Speaker 14>a Level five fully autonomous vehicle, and they also pushed.

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Back and delayed that.

1:07:16.960 --> 1:07:20.600
<v Speaker 14>Since then, there have been more discussions and executives made

1:07:20.800 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 14>the final decision earlier this month. I'm told to completely

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 14>shutter the project. So again, this is Apple canceling work

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:32.600
<v Speaker 14>on an electric car. This is a significant development for

1:07:32.680 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 14>one of the company's most ambitious attempts at a new

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 14>product category in its history. So this is a very

1:07:39.520 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 14>significant day for the company.

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very significant. It's not like it's just you know,

1:07:43.600 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>an idea on the back of a napkin. I mean

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they had been pursuing, as you said, Mark, for over

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years. The road was rough though, in Apple's pursuit

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of bringing a car to market. I mean,

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know this company, for them to step up the

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of time, money, people, effort that they have put

1:07:59.240 --> 1:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>into something like this, I don't know. How do you

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get your head around it. Does it mean just completely done?

1:08:05.640 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it mean that they could buy into something in

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the future, or they're just saying this isn't a market

1:08:10.160 --> 1:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for us.

1:08:11.800 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 14>Certainly there are considerations on the table to acquire an

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 14>existing car maker. Obviously, you've seen what's happened in the

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:23.639
<v Speaker 14>car industry lately. Rivian has not been doing so hot.

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 14>You've seen other car companies struggling, Lucid being one. Tesla

1:08:28.439 --> 1:08:31.360
<v Speaker 14>has had its own ups and downs. It's a very

1:08:31.520 --> 1:08:34.960
<v Speaker 14>very thin profit margin business. It's not the typical business

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:37.080
<v Speaker 14>that Apple likes to get into. But there is some

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:41.240
<v Speaker 14>risk in abandoning this project. What if Alphabet, Google, Waimo,

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:44.599
<v Speaker 14>Amazon with Zookes, some of these other big technology companies,

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:49.599
<v Speaker 14>certainly the Chinese phonemakers, they're all getting into cars. What

1:08:49.640 --> 1:08:51.479
<v Speaker 14>if one of these companies comes up with a great

1:08:51.479 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 14>car idea One day and successfully creates a new ecosystem

1:08:55.040 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 14>of its own to rival Apples, and they can risk

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.760
<v Speaker 14>pulling people away from Apple into a Google car or

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:04.439
<v Speaker 14>an Amazon car and getting them on their other products

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:07.200
<v Speaker 14>in the ecosystem. So there's certainly some very long term

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 14>risk here, But in the short term this may be

1:09:10.400 --> 1:09:13.320
<v Speaker 14>a good thing for Apple being able to focus resources

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 14>towards perhaps more promising areas in the short term like

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:19.599
<v Speaker 14>spatial computing and generative artificial intelligence.

1:09:19.640 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's exactly where I wanted to go with you

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:23.799
<v Speaker 3>next mark to you. Is this more about Apple saying

1:09:23.960 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 3>no to a car and less about Apple focusing resources

1:09:27.040 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>on AI? Or is it the other way around here?

1:09:29.080 --> 1:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Is it all about Apple saying wait a second, the

1:09:32.040 --> 1:09:34.519
<v Speaker 3>rise in interest in generative AI over the last eighteen

1:09:34.560 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 3>months has just been massive, and we need to go

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>all in on this such that we need to actually

1:09:39.160 --> 1:09:41.479
<v Speaker 3>cancel our work on the car in order to do that.

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:46.040
<v Speaker 14>It's certainly not the latter tim This is Apple making

1:09:46.080 --> 1:09:48.800
<v Speaker 14>a decision to wind down the car project because they

1:09:48.800 --> 1:09:51.799
<v Speaker 14>weren't getting anywhere. It kept getting delayed, it kept getting

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:56.720
<v Speaker 14>more expensive. They have these hundreds and thousands of employees

1:09:57.439 --> 1:10:01.519
<v Speaker 14>that are brilliant people, and we have places for them.

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:04.920
<v Speaker 14>Generative AIS a key area, let's throw them there. There's

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 14>a lot of artificial intelligence machine learning overlap between work

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:11.880
<v Speaker 14>on an autonous vehicle and what needs to be done

1:10:12.240 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 14>for the future of AI on phones and watches and

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:18.200
<v Speaker 14>earbuds and glasses and such, so it makes sense to

1:10:18.240 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 14>reallocate those resources. But don't be mistaken, this is a

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:24.840
<v Speaker 14>decision all about canceling the car. They just happen to

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 14>have an excellent soft landing for the resources that have

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:31.520
<v Speaker 14>been invested in the vehicle project.

1:10:31.280 --> 1:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Mark German, Bloomberg News Chief Technology correspondent.

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tim, so, no Apple cars hitting the road,

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet look around, after a two year delay that

1:10:40.400 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>began with a smashed window gaff, the most anticipated vehicle

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>of the year is out and about in the United States.

1:10:46.800 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 3>It's not easy to get your hands on one, but

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 3>our own Hannah Elliott sure did. She's Bloomberg Pursuits autocolumnist,

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:54.559
<v Speaker 3>and she spent a full day driving the cyber truck

1:10:54.680 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>all around Hollywood, and needless to say, she got plenty

1:10:58.040 --> 1:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of attention. She joined Carol Los Angeles to tell all

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 3>of us why she was surprised that Tesla's futuristic electric

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 3>pickup truck might actually be worth the hype.

1:11:07.439 --> 1:11:10.519
<v Speaker 13>I was surprised because we've been talking and hearing about

1:11:10.560 --> 1:11:14.879
<v Speaker 13>this truck since twenty nineteen when it debuted, and really before,

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 13>So you know, it's just kind of I roll my

1:11:17.920 --> 1:11:20.280
<v Speaker 13>eyes and think, can it really be that great? And

1:11:20.640 --> 1:11:23.639
<v Speaker 13>by now is it even outdated? We've been waiting for years,

1:11:24.160 --> 1:11:28.160
<v Speaker 13>And yes it is polarizing. Yes the brutalist looks may

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.599
<v Speaker 13>not be for you, but I have to say it

1:11:31.680 --> 1:11:35.840
<v Speaker 13>was surprisingly nice. I enjoyed it. It was fun, and

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:39.160
<v Speaker 13>I loved seeing all of the positive reactions that people

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:41.160
<v Speaker 13>had to it, because you don't get that very often

1:11:41.200 --> 1:11:41.719
<v Speaker 13>these days.

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, your pictures which are going out

1:11:44.160 --> 1:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and also on Bloomberg Streaming, when you shared

1:11:47.840 --> 1:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>them with our YouTube producer Elizabeth, I'm like, those are sick.

1:11:51.800 --> 1:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the pictures you took are just gorgeous

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:56.519
<v Speaker 1>in how you set them. But it is a crazy,

1:11:56.600 --> 1:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>crazy car and really interested interesting. So tell us about

1:11:59.760 --> 1:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the outside and then take us inside.

1:12:02.560 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 13>So the cyber truck, as I'm sure you've heard, is

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:09.600
<v Speaker 13>a stainless steel truck and you know, this again is

1:12:09.640 --> 1:12:12.639
<v Speaker 13>not new technology. You might remember the DeLorean from Back

1:12:12.640 --> 1:12:14.080
<v Speaker 13>to the Future in the eighties.

1:12:14.360 --> 1:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Did it feel like a DeLorean in many ways? I

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:18.479
<v Speaker 1>mean not on the inside.

1:12:18.560 --> 1:12:22.559
<v Speaker 13>The inside actually feels really modern and nice, but certainly

1:12:22.600 --> 1:12:25.040
<v Speaker 13>on the outside. It's like if the Dolorian was a truck,

1:12:25.200 --> 1:12:28.320
<v Speaker 13>it would be that. You know, one cool thing I

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 13>really loved about it is that the back of the

1:12:30.520 --> 1:12:34.080
<v Speaker 13>truck bed there's a rolling cover that you can lock,

1:12:34.200 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 13>and that is really it comes.

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>With the truck.

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:38.400
<v Speaker 13>You deploy it at the push of a button, so

1:12:38.439 --> 1:12:40.519
<v Speaker 13>you can lock the truck bed, which is really great

1:12:40.520 --> 1:12:45.840
<v Speaker 13>and practical, and the inside is really modern, clean, very

1:12:45.880 --> 1:12:48.280
<v Speaker 13>well thought out. I have to give props to Tesla.

1:12:48.360 --> 1:12:51.559
<v Speaker 13>Of course we've heard reports about some poor craftsmanship, but

1:12:51.720 --> 1:12:55.080
<v Speaker 13>this particular cyber truck I drove, I didn't detect any

1:12:55.120 --> 1:12:55.840
<v Speaker 13>of that, all right.

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You were kind of renting it for the day, so

1:12:58.120 --> 1:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you had to be probably careful at how much you

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:02.519
<v Speaker 1>good push it because I know you like to check

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it out on like different terrain. But tell us a

1:13:04.400 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the ride and what it was like.

1:13:06.479 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 13>So I wanted to have a very la day with

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 13>this truck, which as you might imagine, would involve a

1:13:13.360 --> 1:13:16.880
<v Speaker 13>photo shoot, a coffee run, maybe a lunch, you know,

1:13:17.000 --> 1:13:20.360
<v Speaker 13>somewhere a little bit fancy in West Hollywood. I even

1:13:20.400 --> 1:13:24.080
<v Speaker 13>went to home depot with it and was practically swarmed there.

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:26.800
<v Speaker 13>The owner of the truck from Touro did ask that

1:13:26.840 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 13>I not take it off road, and that's that's fair.

1:13:29.280 --> 1:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So this truck admittedly was coddled.

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:34.320
<v Speaker 13>We don't actually know how it will do over the

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:36.639
<v Speaker 13>long term, and we certainly don't know how it would

1:13:36.680 --> 1:13:39.880
<v Speaker 13>do off road in a real rugged environment. This truck

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:42.599
<v Speaker 13>weighs almost seven pounds, so it's a lot of weight,

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:45.640
<v Speaker 13>but also a six hundred horsepower and instant torque, so

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 13>it does feel really fast. Of course, it's silent. The

1:13:49.560 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 13>brakes are really great, and the rear wheel steering makes

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 13>it actually pretty easy to park and gives it some

1:13:56.200 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 13>great turning radiuses when you're parking. And the valets I know,

1:14:00.439 --> 1:14:02.880
<v Speaker 13>when I had them park it at the Chateau Marmont.

1:14:02.840 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe you went there. They appreciated it. I

1:14:06.479 --> 1:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>love it. Listen, you pop into a lot of different cars,

1:14:09.720 --> 1:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, similar kind of I don't know,

1:14:12.280 --> 1:14:14.479
<v Speaker 1>trucks with a lot of hef I think about the

1:14:14.560 --> 1:14:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Hummer ev You're right about this in the story the

1:14:16.840 --> 1:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Rolls Royce specter. I mean, how did it compare to

1:14:19.920 --> 1:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>some of the other ones that you might put in

1:14:21.560 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this category.

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:27.240
<v Speaker 13>Very comparable in terms of driving range, in terms of power,

1:14:27.640 --> 1:14:31.719
<v Speaker 13>in terms of driveability, I would say very comparable. I

1:14:31.840 --> 1:14:35.320
<v Speaker 13>actually back to the driving range. You know, Tesla says

1:14:35.360 --> 1:14:37.839
<v Speaker 13>about three hundred and forty miles on a single charge.

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:39.840
<v Speaker 13>Probably in real life driving it's going to be less

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:43.960
<v Speaker 13>than that. But you know, comparable to the Rivian R

1:14:44.080 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 13>one t about the same horse power. But I will

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:53.679
<v Speaker 13>say again back to this nimble maneuverability in small clothes sections.

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:57.720
<v Speaker 13>I actually felt the cyber truck, for its size, really excelled.

1:14:57.760 --> 1:14:59.880
<v Speaker 13>I really did think they did a great job with that.

1:15:00.080 --> 1:15:01.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, But if you're sitting in the rear seat,

1:15:01.680 --> 1:15:03.519
<v Speaker 1>it ain't so comfortable, right because I mean, if you

1:15:03.560 --> 1:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the roof, the pitch is pretty rough.

1:15:06.600 --> 1:15:09.160
<v Speaker 13>Yes, as with any truck, the rear seat is a

1:15:09.200 --> 1:15:12.479
<v Speaker 13>little bit compromised. And with the cyber truck, you've got

1:15:12.520 --> 1:15:16.679
<v Speaker 13>this steep roofline that is almost like a triangle shaped

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:20.840
<v Speaker 13>and it does compromise the rear headroom a little bit,

1:15:21.000 --> 1:15:24.120
<v Speaker 13>especially if you're really tall, you might notice it. So

1:15:24.160 --> 1:15:26.120
<v Speaker 13>you're not going to want to put your tallest friend

1:15:26.280 --> 1:15:28.160
<v Speaker 13>or your kid brother in the back if he's a

1:15:28.160 --> 1:15:32.800
<v Speaker 13>big guy. But you know, it wasn't horrible. I would

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:35.880
<v Speaker 13>say it wasn't horrible. It's a three person bench seat

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:37.520
<v Speaker 13>in the back. It's doable.

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Favorite thing about it, Hannah.

1:15:39.479 --> 1:15:43.720
<v Speaker 13>You know, I actually loved how it really caused an

1:15:43.760 --> 1:15:46.800
<v Speaker 13>emotional reaction for people. And like I said at the

1:15:46.800 --> 1:15:51.080
<v Speaker 13>start of this conversation, so many things look safe and

1:15:51.200 --> 1:15:54.920
<v Speaker 13>ubiquitous and they all just look the same. And whatever

1:15:54.960 --> 1:15:57.240
<v Speaker 13>you think of the cyber truck, at least they have

1:15:57.320 --> 1:15:59.680
<v Speaker 13>a strong point of view and a strong design, and

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 13>least in Los Angeles, people got really excited about it.

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I love seeing the enthusiasm. Really cool, and I love

1:16:05.840 --> 1:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how you finish up your story that when your time

1:16:08.160 --> 1:16:09.639
<v Speaker 1>was up and you had to deliver it, you got

1:16:09.680 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>up early because you wanted, what one more cup of

1:16:11.400 --> 1:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>coffee in LA Are you ready to give it back?

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:14.240
<v Speaker 12>Yeah?

1:16:14.280 --> 1:16:14.920
<v Speaker 10>I have to say.

1:16:14.960 --> 1:16:17.639
<v Speaker 13>You know, some cars I'm actually glad to give get

1:16:17.720 --> 1:16:19.599
<v Speaker 13>rid of and give back this cyber truck.

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I would have kept it for the weekend. At least

1:16:21.800 --> 1:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's fun. I love it. Hey, how much does it cost?

1:16:24.280 --> 1:16:24.839
<v Speaker 1>For quickly?

1:16:25.640 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 13>So the one I drove costs around one hundred thousand dollars.

1:16:29.000 --> 1:16:32.680
<v Speaker 13>Cheaper versions cost about seventy six thousand, and then we're

1:16:32.680 --> 1:16:35.160
<v Speaker 13>going to have some higher performance versions coming out later

1:16:35.479 --> 1:16:37.120
<v Speaker 13>for one hundred and twenty or so.

1:16:37.320 --> 1:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Such great stuff. Love it, love the photos, Love you,

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Love your story. Bloomberg pursuits auto columnist Hannah Elliott out

1:16:43.400 --> 1:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>there in La Hannah, take care.

1:16:45.560 --> 1:16:48.800
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. I've a little

1:16:48.800 --> 1:16:51.479
<v Speaker 2>lot of Apple and Spotify and anywhere else you get

1:16:51.560 --> 1:16:55.479
<v Speaker 2>your podcast. Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five

1:16:55.560 --> 1:16:59.559
<v Speaker 2>pm Easter on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In,

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and the Bloomberg Business And you can also watch us

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:06.280
<v Speaker 2>terminal