WEBVTT - China Mostly Views Trump's Latest Salvo As Empty Rhetoric

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Contentions just keep rising between the US

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and China. The latest the US is moving to curtail

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Huahwei Technologies chips supply. This is part of what's been

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>driving down semiconductors shares. But this just builds on a

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>whole host of rhetoric coming out of Washington as well

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as Beijing back and forth, raising the question what's the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>end game? Here? Are we entering a new Cold War?

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Leland Miller joining US now chief executive officer of China

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>beige Book International. Leland, what do you make of this

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in the latest move against Huahwei. Well,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the move itself is quite misunderstood, and for

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>good reason. I mean, almost nobody can figure out what's happening.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think the best way to look at it

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is the United States has extraordinary leverage over the Taiwan

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>semi conductor because it provides inputs that are important for production,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is the largest UH purchaser of of semi conductors,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and so it's extraordinarily important UH customer. And what the

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>United States government has said it will do, starting supposedly

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>today is require any UH any relationships with Huawei to

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>get a license. So in order you can't just sell

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>them to Huawei, if you're using US technology in your

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in your product, you have to actually apply for a

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>license with the Department of Commerce. Now, if this is

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>held to that standard and they don't grant the license,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>then this is an enormously powerful mood. If they do

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>grant the licenses, then this is an empty moot. So

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's less about what this has done and how it's

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to treat this in the future. And

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why this has led to an extraordinary

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of confusion. So Leland, how does China view I

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll call them renewed trade tensions here? What's kind

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of their perspective? Do you think? I think that they're

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at them on several several different levels. Now you

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have some things that are happening. Uh, you know, the

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Phase one trade deal is in real trouble. It's it'll

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be toast by this by September. I think I think

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we were were at the very end of the trade

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>deal talk. On the other hand, you have some very big,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive moves being talked about, like abrogating US debt obligations,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>ripping away sovereign immunities from the Chinese. These aren't serious moves,

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but if they move, you know, if the White House

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>moved in this direction, that there would be severe repercussions.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's certain things where they're just trying to

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>digest these moves piece by piece. What's happening to Huawei,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with the government pension fund cutting off flows

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to China. So there's so much going on that I

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the Chinese government is forced to look at

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this as what's important, what can we live with and

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what is an absolute deal breaker in the relationship where

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start having real serious retribution. What's the end goal?

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just extrapolating forward. Is there a red line?

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And then once we cross that, we move to Phase X,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>where why happens is there something like that that you're

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of foreseeing, not yet, because everybody understands it's so

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>much of what's going on in the U. S side

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is about the election. So President Trump realizes that there

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are domestic difficulties with COVID and and the state of

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy right now, and the safest the platform is

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it to go tough, tough, tough on China. So the

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese understand that what they want to see is how

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>much of this is going to be more than a

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, how much of this is actually a

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>game changer in the relationship. If Phase one is suspended

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>by September, which is our expectation, then that doesn't mean

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they can't pick it up in January. If if President

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump's reelected, that's not going to ruffle the waters too much.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Although you get some loud talk if you ever saw

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>serious movement towards ripping sovereign immunity away from from from

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Beijing for for COVID related lawsuits, I mean that would

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that would that would create financial warfare on a scale

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen. So they're just taking their time to

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>understand if they get most of this is empty rhetoric

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and they're just trying to make sure that they don't

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>overreact as as this stuff just played out before the election.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>How is President Trump's relationship with presidency of China. I

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>mean President Trump has touted it as very strong and

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a you know, really strong relationship. But how how would

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you engage that right now? How important is it to

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have a good relationship? I mean they're best friend. Uh look, look,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if if President Trump is being nice to China, I

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think they get along quite well. If he's not, then

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the relationships allergic. You know, for she

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the same same for Trump. So you know,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an extent that they can get on the phone

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and they do have a some semblance of a personal

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship to diffuse tensions if they want to pull that

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>escape patch. I think there's something to that. But look,

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this is just politics. It's domestic politics right now, where

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the party tries to uh, you know, confuse people about

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>their initial reaction to to COVID and and claim that

0:04:57.960 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing a good job all around that the

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>admitt austration in the United States has the same sort

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of issue. How can we distract from COVID and go

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 1>tough on the Chinese. So a lot of this again

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>politics empty writer, We still need to see what it's

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>going to be durable past the election, regardless of whose president.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about Jim Ping, I wonder how much

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>his power is being challenged, especially given the data that

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we got overnight. Yes, we got factory output surging more

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>than people expected in China, but the services data real bleak,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>not coming back that quickly. What do you foresee economically

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for the China for the foreseeable future? Yeah, I mean

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't surprise us at all that the Chinese

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>want to turn these factories on and start cranking things out.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The problem is their order books are collapsing because there's

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of strength. And domestic economy it's recovering,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but but at a slow pace. And you know, the

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>external environments falling apart because of the slowdowns. Are the

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns in your US and Europe and elsewhere. So there's

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems. You know, this is what we

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>saw on our April survey. We've got our we've got

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>our new May flash YETA coming out and you know

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>about a two weeks Uh, these are the dynamics that

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen too, and it is putting she under severe pressure.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why China sort of you

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>turn from this, let's go out and be global leaders

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and and really just backtracked to convincing their domestic population

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's getting up on China and you have to

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>defend the party. And this is why she's support and

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the party's support is relatively high at home. But why

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone around the world right now is mad at China,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>uh for for very aggressive diplomatic behavior. Leland, thanks so

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We always appreciate your perspective and

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 1>all things China. Leland Miller, chief executive Officer of China

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Beije Book International. At least it's uh, you know, it's

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I always appreciate Lenian's perspective here suggesting here

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of this is just rhetoric from I

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>guess both sides that it certainly it relates to the U.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>S side as it relates to a presidential election coming up,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and here's a topic that has proven to be very

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to President Trump and his base at a time

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>when there's a lot of grim news out there relates

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to the economy and then the pandemic, the interesting thing

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I think is that the Democrats and Democratic candidate Joe

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden is also taking a very hard line. I mean,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's bipartisan, this anger towards China. My question is, at

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what point does the rhetoric go to a place where

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it cannot return? Right? I mean, at what point do

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we cross some line where we do enter some sort

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of escalating spiral to both of Jim Ping and Donald

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump have a hard time backing down from Yeah, exactly right.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We will certainly be paying close attention to that. You know,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen just in a past couple of days, some

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>really brutal data as it relates to the consumer, whether

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a jobless claims yesterday or retail sales today. And

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the question is what does that mean for the real

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>estate market here? I mean, if consumers are out of jobs,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're really word, they're not spending, what are they

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>doing in terms of real estate? That get some good answers,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>We welcome Jonathan Millard, President and chief executive officer of

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Miller Samuel based in New York City. Jonathan, thanks so

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>much for winning is here interest rates you know at

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>or near all time loads, that's generally really good for

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market give us a sense of how

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>consumers are behaving here as it leads to real estate. Well,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, so much about what happens in the real

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>estate market is pragmatic. In the context of real estate

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>agents and brokers can't show properties yet, uh, and virtual

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is certainly uh you know out there, and you know,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are doing zoo calls and and all

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. The problem is that most people

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to pull the trigger, so to speak, on

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a home purchase if they can't physically see it. A

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the contracts that we're seeing now have linkage

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to sort of pre COVID periods or somebody had looked

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>at a property and then you know, lost interest and

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>now they're coming back. Um. Alternatively, on the rental market,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>we're also seeing a sharp drop in new leasing activity

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>as most of the transactions where rents are being negotiated

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lower occurring on the renewal side and not public facing.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're really in a moment where there's just not

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data, um, you know, at the moment.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that will change pretty quickly as shelter and

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>place rolls start to ease and we're starting to hear

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about areas outside of the major metropolitan areas and the

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>coasts picking up traction quickly, even site unseen people trying

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to just buy houses that are outside of the most

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>densely populated areas. Does that give you a hint about

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>a possible exodus from New York City, San Francisco or

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these other areas that have been harder hit. Well,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're already seeing uh, you know, an outbound

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>migration at least in inquiries, but the initial wave is

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>more is predominantly rental inquiries, you know, as urban dwellers

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>are sort of testing the waters for you know, suburban life.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>We've actually seen this before this right after not eleven

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and within two to three years that outbound migration reversed.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Um also too, I have a high competence level in

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability of human beings to forget the recent past

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh and so uh so I'm totally in agreement

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to and are already seeing this

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>suburban or even second home uh search. But I'm not

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>confident about being a permanent structural change in the way

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>people view cities. Jonathan. There is a question, though, is

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this time different given the remote work type situation. The

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that working from home is gaining traction in a

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>way that it never has before. Does that change the equation?

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps expand the time frame of the

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>suburban uh you know, the move to suburban but commute times.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think it's a little premature to declare

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that people are going to be buying houses, uh, the mainstream,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not on the margin because they don't have to go

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>into the office. I don't right now when you talk

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to Corporate America and they're talking about expanding, um, you know,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking on going you know, we're having remote workers.

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You have to remember that many of these companies are

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hemorrhaging right now, and they're anxious and desperate for cost

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>saving measures. And so I don't know if that mindset

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to remain in place two or three years

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from now, but it certainly helps expand the time frame

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that you know this potentially can happen. So, Jonathan, Yes,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>we look to the other side of this pandemic, and

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>let's assume there is a vaccine out there in some

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>reasonable period of time. How do you expect and given

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where rates are and a lot of people expect rates

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be lower for longer, even before the pandemic. How

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>do you expect the US kind of real estate market

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>to play out? Well, what we're already seeing in markets

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that have UH allowed the showing of real estate by

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the brokerage community, we're already seeing a real uptick is

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>still far below normal, but we're seeing a rapid UH

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>increase in pending sales. Now, it's not clear whether this

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is a function of just a release of pent up

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>demand over the last couple of months, or this is

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just a market racing to get back to normal. Um.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we certainly have extensive job loss, and you

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know that weighs heavy on how this looks a post

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>post crisis. But at least from what I'm seeing in

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the country, I'm encouraged by the sort

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of return to transactional type activity. UM, and I think

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that bodes well for New York as well. I just

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's we're going to be sort of late to

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the party on that, given the extent of the crisis

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in our region. Jonathan Miller, thank you so much. It

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>is full to have you on. It's really wonderful perspective

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from your decades of experience Jonathan Miller of Miller and Samuel,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just really highlighting the nuance here as we look to

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a post pandemic world of real estate. It was possibly

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the most intriguing column that I read this week by

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Andrea's Cloth of Bloomberg opinion, Your kids may never return

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to normal schooling, And honestly, it was a fascinating column.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Andrea's Cloth he's a member of Bloomberg's editorial board. He

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>also was previously editor in chief of Handel's Blood Global

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and a writer for The Economist. Andrea's this sucked me in.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>As the mother of two children who are homeschooling via

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>computer at home, including a son who is learning coding

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from an eighteen year old in Singapore. I've learned who

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he had found because he enjoyed his codes. I'm just

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>wondering what's the future here of education? Well, the future, hey,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that's that's your mouthful. But the future is, as I

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>said in the column, it could be very dark or

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it could be rather brighter so and and unfortunately could

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be both at the same time for different of us.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Because that the worst thing about these school closures or

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>these partial openings, because for instance, I'm in Berlin I

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have three kids. They've started going back to school this here,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but that just means staggered shifts. They're not you know,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not binary, and they're not totally open. We will

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>probably have very little time in physical schools for a

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>long time, maybe years. And so the downside is in

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this age of inequality, some kids, some families, digital divide,

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything will get left behind. But in this column,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to focus on what I think caught your attention,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which was the positive side, provided that teachers and unions,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>teacher unions and school boards and so forth see this

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as an opportunity and say what can we do different?

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And lee And that brought me to concepts in my

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation that I had well was something called blended or

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>flipped classrooms, you know, and we would we would have

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to go into that a little bit, all right, So

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do go into that. What's kind of a

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>flip classroom? I'm sensing it's a little bit of a

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>mix of physical and virtual. Yes, And nobody, just to

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>be clear, is is ever talking about getting rid of

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>human connections. In fact, the goal here is to make

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>human connections stronger and better, and both the physical even

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>if we have less time in a physical classroom with

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the teacher, we want to make that better. And also

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the in person the classroom or one on one on

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>zoom for instance. So it's not about replacing anybody, it's

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>just about making them better. So what we want to

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do is to use tools online tools. And I happen

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Salcan for this column because I myself

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>when my kids used kind Academy. But there's a out

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of these edge tech tools. So for instance, something like

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or let me get tell you what for the past

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years since the industrial in the since the

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>industrial Revolution, you had a teacher at the front and

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a blackboard. And the innovation is that that's not a

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>white board and he lectures to a passive class, sends

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the kids home their filt a worksheet. A lot of

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>them have no clue what they're doing. They go back

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to class, they keep going anyway, even though some kids

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>are left behind, and at the end they take a

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>standardized test. Okay, so that's not ideal. So what we

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>want to do now is why not flip this so

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you watch the lectures at home. That's pretty active. You posit,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you rewinded, you comment on it the way the kids do.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you do some online exercises to drill it,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and the teacher has already logged on and looking at

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>who's stuck where, And then you go to class and

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>now class is not the lecture, but now class is

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a one on one or small group social are active

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>uh session where where the teacher cook post, where you

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>where this student is, not where the class should be.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Where where this student is and the other helps him

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in with a problem or extends the knowledge if he's

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>doing well. And that's the that's flipping it or blending

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the online and the offline. Andrea is just real quick here.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how parental involvement kind of gets amplified here

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the divide between people who are involved

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>versus those who aren't. I think hugely there's no way

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>around this um because it's a social problem. But I,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I we have three kids, were incredibly involved.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what led me to talk to Salcohn because I've

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for years and sadly many many other

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>parents are not, not because necessarily they're bad parents, but

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're they're they're at working, or they don't have WiFi,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and we have these problems. So the downside and I

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and this was the topic of my previous column, The

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>dark side is. This was the bright side before that

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the dark The dark side is, as a

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>result of this pandemic and the school closures, we will

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>have dramatically more inequality, not just now but for years

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to come. As these kids go to college or in

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>fact don't college, will go less to college and then

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are more unemployed and make less. This will exacerbate inequality.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no way around that. Andreas. Thank you so much

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, and really appreciate your columns. Really thought provoking,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly for those of us who do have some school

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>age children and are kind of kind of weighing these issues.

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Here Andrea's Kluth, columnists for Bloomberg Opinion, joining us on

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Berlin. You know, I can't imagine, Lisa.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got the two young ones kind of

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this for an extended period of time, even beyond

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what we've done this year. Yeah. Well, I think that

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get used to that idea because I

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know when they're going back. I gotta say, after

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>listening uh to Anthony Fauci. He said, you know, who

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>knows September might be premature, exactly waiting for the vaccine.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>If you ask somebody what's the outlook for our municipal

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>finances right now, they might say not great, Bob, not

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so great. Right now we are facing a huge deficit

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in cities across the country. And joining us now with

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive look is Kathleen McNamara, senior municipal bond strategist

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at US Wealth Management, which put out a report highlighting

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>just how bleak the situation is. Kathleen, can you start

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with just an overview, a historical perspective of how bleak

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this is relative to previous difficult times the U. S economy? Ah? Sure, Um,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean in our report, you know, we we do

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fact that this, you know, COVID nineteen

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is really what we look at as an exogenous shock

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to the system. Um. You know, certainly we've been through

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>crises before, the financial crisis just ten years ago, but

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that was really triggered by you know, um, a banking crisis,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and in this scenario, the banks actually were in a

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>strong position going into this crisis. Um. So here we're

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>dealing with something we haven't dealt with before. We're dealing

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with a health crisis M which has turned into a

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, which in turn is weighing on almost every

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>area of the municipal bond market. And we do go through, UM,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the different sectors in the muni market and

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>what we see going forward. So, Kathy, what are some

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of the sectors that are kind of most at risk here?

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I know the pain is pretty broad based, pretty deep,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>but what are some of the sectors that kind of

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>jumped out of you. Yeah, the sectors that we talked

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>about in the report that jumped out to us as

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>UM going to experience the most stress is the private

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>higher ed sector UM, as well as the health care

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sector UM. You know, by contrast, UM, you know, states,

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a lot of UM, you know, negative

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>headlines with respect to states, UM, but we do think

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that UM, you know, states are going to benefit from

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this you know, municipal liquidity facility that the FED has established,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and we also believe that you know, states have more flexibility, UM,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, to manage their finances through the crisis. UM.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's really the you know, the higher education UM

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 1>sector that we do have UM the most concern about,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that in that sector. You know, we

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>believe that we're going to see some you know, substantial

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>NEIA term student enrollment pressures. Um, we're going to see

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some decline in investment portfolios, you know, as well as

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the role of technology. I mean, what we're

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing now is that, um, some of these you know

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>universities have shifted to online classes and that has meaningful

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>implications for the sector. You know. Of course, you know,

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>there's the institutions with large endowments and strong brands. We

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think those will be resilient and easily adapt to the

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>changes and retain their market position. But by contrast, you know,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the smaller liberal arts college is that already

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>faced demographic and financial challenges. We do think that, um,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the impact from COVID nineteen is going to

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be meaningful. We are expecting some sort of financial bailout

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps that's the wrong word, rescue financing from the

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>federal government to states municipalities. But they've made it very

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>clear that they don't want to backstop governments that have

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>been irresponsible with their finances heading into this, and that

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>really speaks to pension under funding which has gotten dramatically worse.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the consequence there for the situation that the pensions

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are in, given the fact that I can't really foresee

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>how some of them are going to meet their upcoming

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>obligations without a traumatic shift in the market. Ah, yeah,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, pensions obviously, you know, are an issue, you know,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for some of the states and local governments, not all.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And actually in our report we do UM rank all

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty states UM in terms of their pension funding metrics.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So we always want everybody to know that. Yeah, I mean,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the states that our experience the most stressed, you know,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are in the headlines, but it's not every single state

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>UM with that, you know, what, what can they do?

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we are hopeful that there will

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be some more UM aid coming to state and local governments.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the House is expected to pass a bill

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>today that will include another trillion dollars in aid to

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>state and local governments. Of course, you know, I don't

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think that that full amount is going to gain approval

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. UM. But on the bright side, it

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is a starting point for negotiations. And the other thing is,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact that the you know, the FED

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>has established the municipal Liquidity facility. I mean, this is

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>something different than what we saw during the financial crisis.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's showing that the FEND is willing

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, you know, whatever it takes to hate to

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>help these state and local governments. UM, you know, move along.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean on the flip side of what you mentioned

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is is you know there's no appetite to bail out

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>certain states that UM have not been managing their pension

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>issue through through the years. UM know that that's really

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the sticking point. It becomes becomes quite political. Kathleen, thanks

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We appreciate your perspective on

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the municipal bond market. Kathleen mcnamar's senior municipal bond strategist

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for UBS Global Wealth Management. And at least it's can

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting to see the political um kind of

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>mechanations here over the next several days and maybe weeks

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>between the Democrats and Republicans as it relates to this

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>new fiscal stimulus plan. The prior fiscal stimulus plans were

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>generally bipartisan passed fairly quickly. This one appears to be

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more contentious, and I think it does

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go in part, as Kathleen was suggesting to, you know,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>funds for state and local municipalities. Yeah, this is the

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bill. It's a three trillion dollar bill.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell, the Senate leader, Majority leader, has said it's

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>dead on arrival, so it's not going to pass the

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Senate in its full form. But he is going to

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>take cues to some degree from j Powell and Steve Mnuch,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who are testifying together in front of the Senate Banking

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Committee next week on Tuesday. Very curious to hear what

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they have to say. Yeah, and when you think about

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the data points we've seen this weeklies in

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the jobs claims and then the retail sales today,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly enough economic data out there to prod both houses,

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>both sides, to move forward with some fiscal steelers, because

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there is real pain out there in the US economy.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. On Paul Sweeney, I'm

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abramloy it's I'm

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramoit's one before the podcast. You

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio