WEBVTT - Would You Trade Jaylen Brown For James Harden?

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Tony.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>We are saying goodbye Tony, Tony Wong.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Hello, good mornings, we.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Were all, and welcome to the No Dunks Podcast on

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the Athletic Network. It's Thursday, December thirty first, Happy New

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Year's Eve. I'm Jay Skeets and alongside me as always

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>all year long, Tas Mellice, Hey everybody, Hey Tassy, we

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 2>got the bass Master ripping him lips, Trey Kirby, Hey

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>out hey, the International Man of Mystery taking it to

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 2>the max, Leela's Friend, Last, but not least, making the

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>magic happen all year long. It's JD. Hello, there is,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and here we are. This is our two hundred and

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>ninety eighth podcast the calendar year. Huh. Incredible stuff, classics

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>through and through. Shout out to the stream team. Make

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>sure y'all like and comment and subscribe to what you

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>gotta do. Email us your questions and your comments to

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>No Dunks at the Athletic dot com. Come twenty twenty one,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll be stepping on the beach once again, So get

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>your cues in and go grab yourself some No Dunks

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>merchandise at No dunks dot com. All right, let's make

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>it a classic here to end twenty twenty. Let's do

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 2>this in style. We've got some good Wedgie news. A

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit later, we got tweeted the night, but let's

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>start with a little Is this news? Yeah, I'm gonna

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>throw some headlines at you guys, and we're gonna debate

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>whether or not they're newsworthy. And the first one is

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Brown matches Larry Bird Lee, Remember that guy, streaky shooter.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Brown matches Larry Bird with forty two points in

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine minutes. Trey get a started. Is this news?

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh? This is news if you're in the Jalen Brown

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 4>fan club, and I am, because what a game from JB,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 4>bringing to mind another JB. I think Jalen Brown is

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the next Jimmy Butler and just seeing the way he

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>has exploded out of the gate for the Celtics this season.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>If you're a Bean town boy like me, you gotta

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>be loving at forty two last night and he just

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 4>looks like he's completely seizing the opportunity with Kemba Walker out.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, since he's came into the league, Jalen Brown

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 4>has played with a high usage point guard. Basically his

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 4>entire career. It was Isaiah Thomas, it was Kyrie Irving,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>it was Kemba Walker. But now there's a little bit

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>more space for uh Jalen to get to work out there.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>He's skilled enough, he's strong, he's athletic, and just like Jimmy,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>he's got that desire to be great, to expand his game.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy Maid an All Star team the first time his

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 4>fourth season, age twenty five. Jalen Brown now year five.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Already he's only twenty four, but they feel like they're

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 4>on the same path. They just keep getting better and

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 4>better and better. You see Jalen get into work in

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 4>the mid range game, his playmakings coming along a little bit.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're exactly identical players, but the fact

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that they can they can dominate at the wing position

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 4>using their athleticism and their strength, I think is just

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 4>so huge. It's been so fun to watch Jalen Brown

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 4>early this season. Kemba Walker is gonna come back, and

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be on him to figure out how

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 4>to fit alongside Tatum and Brown because both of those

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>guys deserve to have the ball all the time. Jalen

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 4>has been incredible to start the season, he's better than

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Larry Bird. You set it right there, Skis. Yeah, put

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 4>him in the Hall of Fame now.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like through five games, I think it is. I

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>saw at Brian t rob tweeting this twenty eight points

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>per game for Jalen Brown, fifty six percent from the floor,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>forty four percent from three, and a very respectable six

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>point two free throw attempts per game. So he's doing

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>it everywhere. Ley, I thought last night against the Grizzlies,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, Grizzlies missing a lot of guys

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>with the Celtics took care of business. But he was

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>stepping into like pull up threes in transition, like he

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>did that like three or four times this scheme. He's special.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>And it brings me to the question for you, Lee,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>because we've been sort of throwing it around. Would you

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>trade for James Harden If you're the Celtics, tass you

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about it now, you would say, yeah, let's try

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and tread Camber. But let's say the Rockets are like, sorry, man,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 2>we don't want Camber. We already have an injured point

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 2>code in John Wall. We want Jalen Brown. Would you

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>trade Jalen Brown and let's say Marcus Smart for James Horten.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're Danny Angel and the Celtics Lee.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't do it right now. No, I think Jalen

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Brown is really starting to show the potential that he's

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>shown over these last couple of years, and it's starting

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to come to fruition now because he's a two way player.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He definitely could be in the running for an All

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Defensive nod this season. And the Celtics identity is to

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>work on both ends of the floor and to give

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>up Smart and Jalen Brown. That's two of their critical

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive pieces. And on the offensive end, Marcus Smart, he's

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit hot and cold, but he does contribute.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But what you're seeing I think here from Jalen Brown

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, All Star nomination absolutely is in

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>play right now. He's most improved candidate as well. I mean, again,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a very small ample size, but he's really showing

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>all the hard work that he's put in because he

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been a super reliable or consistent shooter throughout his career.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's starting to come together because he's realizing now

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how to get to his spots and how to find

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the right place to be and to shoot the ball.

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>The only thing oddly about him is he's not a

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>great free throw shooter. He's only shooting sixty seven percent

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>this season, which is right at his career mark. You'd

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think that would sort of creep up a little bit

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but it hasn't. But anyway, that's a minor,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>minor tweak there for his game that he needs to improve.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But I I just feel where the Celtics are that

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with Brown and Smart going forward. I mean, clearly James Harden,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fantastic offensive player and would be you know,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>would he improve the team? I mean yes and no.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think what he gives you offensively, they

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would certainly miss defensively, And that's really what the Celtics

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like to hang their hat on, is to be that

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>rock solid defensive team. So I think right now, I

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Celtics would give up Jalen Brown. I

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>think Marcus Smart. They would if it was to involve

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Kemball Walker, but I think Tatum and Brown are virtually

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>untouchable for the Celtics at this moment. Things could always change,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I don't think Danny Angebols is a trigger

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if it cost him one of those two young stars.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 5>If it costs him one of those two young stars, well,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 5>I definitely think James Harden would be high on the

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>priority list. I know Jaylen Brown is playing out of

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 5>his head right now and it would be hard to

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 5>give him up, no doubt. Jaylen Brown talks an incredible

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 5>game coming up to the postseason every time, and he

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 5>just hasn't been able to do it in the postseason.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 5>I can't wait it's all this postseason because it seems

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 5>like he is growing every single year. He is an

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 5>absolute monster this year. And I liked how they played

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 5>defense last night, how they just destroyed the Grizzlies in

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 5>the first quarter. They absolutely were all up in Memphis

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>and turn them over over and over and again. Twenty

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 5>two turnovers for the Grizzlies. I think they had like

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>eight steals in the first quarter. As Kelly Dwyer pointed out,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 5>that's Celtics basketball, So yeah, they needed that win. It's

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>although Jaylen Brown has been really good, the Celtics haven't

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 5>been overwhelmingly good to start this season. And they basically

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 5>beat the Bucks on a bank three and then they

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 5>came back and beat the Pacers and this was their

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 5>their most emphatic win. And yeah, it's a bad Grizzly team,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 5>so they should do that and that's how they won

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 5>this game. Yeah. I think as far as James Harden goes,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 5>the Celtics keep striking out on superstars every single season.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of talk about going to get a superstar.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Would be hard to give up Jalen Brown, but I

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>think there is there's a lot of desire on Danny

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Aingel's part to get something done. In my opinion, they're

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:40.679
<v Speaker 5>definitely looking at it. Anyway.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, about the Celtics, sort of weird start your advice

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>at the Athletic wrote I thought something that was spot on.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it really touched home as a Raptors fan, because

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>he wrote, the first week of the season has been

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>all over the place for the Celtics, but at least

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Tatum and Brown have made them comfortable that the future

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>is locked in place one percent true. And I bring

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>that as a Raps fan because you can't say the

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>same for the Raps right now with them struggling, not

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>getting a victory. But they're sort of two guys that

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>you look at potential building blocks or stars for them

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in Siakam and Van Vliet, well they haven't been all

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>that great, right where Tatum and Brown are special special

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>players and you say, yeah, go get the superstar. But

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the question is, well, is Brown a superstar? I mean,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>is he going to be like do we consider Jimmy

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Butler a superstar? I don't know. I think some

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>people do, some people don't. But if I'm with you, Trey,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 2>if he's on that trajectory, it looks sort of like

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 2>that you could lead that two way player. Well then

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>are you possibly just giving up a superstar for another

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>superstar who's older and Harden who's obviously limited maybe on

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>one side of the floor a lot more than Jaylen

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Brown is Defensively, I don't know. I'm torn on this

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 2>one because I'm here to interest here to your take, Trey,

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>because you're obviously a huge Harden fan. You've made it

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>clear you're in the gym the You've got me screwed up.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Now now I'm gonna call it Jimmy Brown because you've

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>made this comparison. You're in the Jalen Brown fan club.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Would you make that deal if you're Danny agents Celtics.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's say it's Brown and Smart and whatever else to

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>make it happen for Harden, would.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You do it?

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I can't believe it's Skeets. I think he found the

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 4>first guy I wouldn't trade for James Harden. Wow, even

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 4>I can't believe I'm saying it out loud right now.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I just kind of feel like the Celtics they're not

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 4>one piece away. They're not a James Harden away. If

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 4>you take if you traded Jalen Brown and Marcus Smart,

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Jason Tatum and Marcus Smart, whatever it is, one of

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 4>those two and another guy, that's a really really thin team.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Because we're already talking about Javonte Green playing major minutes

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 4>for the Celtics. He had a nice game a couple

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 4>of nights ago against the Pacers. I was like, who

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 4>is this guy, the number forty three playing for the

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Celtics Green? Is he just a made up player? There

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 4>was no way I was going to look it up

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 4>until after the game Javonte Green. But if you're asking

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 4>for Javonte Green to suddenly become a starter, I think

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 4>that's gonna be tough to me. Right now, Tatum and

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Brown will be I mean, they're already knocking on the

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 4>door of superstardom right now. Tatum for sure, Jalen Brown

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 4>is making his case right now. This is not the

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 4>year that the Celtics are gonna win championship, even if

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 4>they were to add James Harden, I don't think. But

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 4>three years from now, if Tatum and Brown are your

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 4>two best players, you're looking at the new Kawhi Leonard

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 4>and Paul George, which we've all dunked on a lot

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of times after the three to one lead. But still,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 4>if you can have two star wings in today's NBA

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>when there's not a lot of great wings out there,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you want to make a move

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear from you guys out there in the stream

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>team and listening to the podcasts, Jalen Brown and Marcus

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Smart for James Harden, would you do it?

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 5>No way?

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously from the Celtics side of things, I

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>think the Rockets would be ecstatic with that type of return.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's similar to like, well, that's a whole

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>other question. Would you rather have Ben Simmons or Jayalen

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Brown if you were the Houston Rockets. It's interesting as well,

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>so to hear your take on that hypothetical. But he

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>was amazing. He was so good last night, Jalen Brown,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that Brian Scalabrini on the call just kept saying, geez,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 2>he drops like three g's in the game because he

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>can't believe what he's doing. Again, especially those like pull

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>up in transitions threes were like, whoa, okay, you added

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>that to the game. That's that's dangerous, all right. Our

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 2>next one here one headline Spurs Becky Hammond first woman

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to direct an NBA team. Yeah, she made history. Wednesday

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>tasks first woman to act as head coach during an

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 2>NBA regular season game. After Pop got tossed, she took over.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>She's an assistant coach of course with the Spurs. Took

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 2>over in the spurs eventual loss to the Lakers seven.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Is this news, Becky first woman to direct an NBA team?

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not news. Until somebody gives a woman a

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 5>head coaching position where she is the leader of the team,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 5>this won't be news. A woman needs to be given

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 5>that title and not just this title of directed an

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 5>NBA team for a half while the head coach was

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 5>given the acts. Somebody needs to give the proper due

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 5>to somebody who obviously, in Becky Hammond's case, deserves it.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 5>The same headline happened during Summer League, where she was

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 5>the Summer League head coach, first one to direct a

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Summer League head coach in July in Las Vegas in

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 5>the blazing heat. Who cares. Somebody needs to give somebody

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 5>this the title, and it's probably Becky Hammond along the way.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure if it's gonna happen in San Antonio. Uh,

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 5>it's it sure seems like she is going to be

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 5>the one. But we need more women making decisions in

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 5>our lives, just like when the VP is heading the

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Senate very soon, hopefully there this This isn't a headline

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 5>to me. I don't know if you guys are tired

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 5>of reading this. Directed a team and was an assistant

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 5>coach and kind of jumped over to the head coach

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 5>a seat for three quarters. I think I'm tired of it.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 5>Somebody just needs to, uh to give the head coaching position.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm not I'm not into these directing headlines. When did when?

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 5>When did anybody ever direct a team? Anyways? What does

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 5>what does that mean? I mean somebody gives somebody, gives

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 5>somebody the head coaching title. Is she a conductor for

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 5>a half? Cool?

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Run?

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Run? Give her? Give her? Why? Why is it even

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 5>a question here in twenty twenty that a woman have

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 5>gotten ahead. We've seen it obviously in the WNBA, We've

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 5>seen it in the actually in the Big Three, where

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 5>men are being coached by women and are extremely happy

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 5>with the job that they're doing. I mean, I don't

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't see this as a story at all.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think what's interesting. Wasn't there a game in

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>like twenty nineteen where Pop got ejected, right, Himon's on

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the staff. Of course at the time, She's been there

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, and so they all sort of

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>took over. But then after the game, Pop said, well,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>assistant Tim Duncan was the head coach, like he was

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>taking over responsibilities to finish out the game. Before games start,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>do like head coaches have to like put like a

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>little ranking like, well, if I get tossed, then this

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>person is in charge, and then if that person gets

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 2>tost the next person in charge. Like that was always

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a little confusing to me because it was sort of

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>like she was also coaching in that instance too. But

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>you know this one is official because he pointed at her,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 2>as Becky said, which is really funny. And look, all

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the quotes coming out of this are phenomenal. Becky says,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it is substantial. Actually, you know, it's obviously a step

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in in the right direction, a direction you're talking about

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>test that's inevitably going to happen and should DeRozan was like,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I loved his quote. He's like Becky played. She was

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>damn good by the way, and any player who knows

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the history of women's basketball knows what she meant to

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the sport. You don't think twice about it. She's one

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of us when she speaks for all ears. Lebron was

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 2>asked about it. She's been putting in the work and

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>anytime you put in the work, you should get rewarded

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>with opportunities. But yeah, it's this where this this is great.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>But let's she should have a head coaching job by now,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>and maybe she's waiting for in San Antonio Test. Maybe

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>she is waiting for Pop two eventually move on and

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that will be her opportunity there unless another team comes calling.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think, Lely, Yeah, I think because

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually count as a victory for her, well

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>loss actually because I lost again, but it doesn't count

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on her record, is what I'm trying to say this.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>So wow, So it's not official official yet.

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not, it's not. I mean, it's great that

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>she was given the top this time because Tim Duncan

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously is not there either anymore. He didn't come back

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this season. But so it's good that Pop did actually say,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>okay you are, you're filling in for me here. But

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's still until we see Becky as a head coach

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>getting a wins that register to her name. You know,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this is more just sort of like, well, Pop, it

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>only happened because Pop lost his mind for no real

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>reason there, I mean he didn't. He certainly didn't need

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to get two technicals on that call, So it was

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>more circumstance rather than like, we're designating Becky as the

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>head coach tonight. Now, if he did that prior to

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a game, then that would be different, even though again

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the record would still count as Pops because you can't

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just say you know how it works in interim in

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, those those wins and losses don't count to

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a coach. They go to the other coach. So, but

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be good if he said before again one day,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>said tonight, she is the coach and I'm going to

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sit back and just watch her do everything. That would

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>be different, even though again it still wouldn't count on

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>her record and less popular.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Weren't the Spurs doing that in the bubble? Or am

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I mistaken? Wasn't pop Like sort of allowing some of

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the assistant coaches to sort of take over the head

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>coaching duties within those games?

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Honest I really remember to be That's definitely how Tim

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Duncan got his first win last year, right, was that

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 4>pop had a personal reasons game that he missed and

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 4>he said, Tim, you're taking over for this. It's all

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 4>about that point with Popovich when he says you've got him,

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 4>you got to take over. But yeah, you know, it

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 4>was only a matter of time, honestly before Becky Hammond

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 4>gets a job. So many Spurs assistants have gotten jobs

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 4>throughout the league. There's not a great track record of

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 4>success among Spurs assistants, but they all get jobs, which

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I think is huge. And now that we've seen Becky

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 4>Hammon officially coach an NBA game, direct it whatever you

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 4>want to call it. Tim Duncan was the acting head coach.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 4>The headlines are still out there, but now that we've

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 4>seen it in the NBA, like Becky was saying, it

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 4>is momentous. Even though I was trying not to think

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 4>about and just try to win the game. Now that

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 4>we've seen it in a regular season game, maybe that

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>makes it easier for a team to say, Yeah, we're

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 4>going to be the team that hires Becky Hammond. Somebody

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 4>should and it'll be a huge story once it finally happens.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep, for sure. All right. Next headline. Within that same game,

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Lebron extends a record streak of ten point games to

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 2>one thousand.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Lebron celebrated his thirty sixth birthday by becoming the first

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>player in NBA history to have one thousand street games

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>without least ten points. Lee, this is a weird one.

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Is this news? Ten points? Lee? You could put up

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>ten points.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 5>In his NBA?

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is news. I mean, it's a credit to

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's longevity and his health and the fact that he

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>kept his body ready for the last thirteen years. I'm

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of surprised when you go back through his record

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't even a little bit longer, and he

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't broken this record a little bit earlier, because I

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>mean when he came into league, he's averaged twenty points

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in his rookie season. I mean, he seems to be

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>able to score. Last season was the only season ever

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in his career that he hasn't led his team in scoring.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis led the Lakers, which is incredible. But yeah,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this really is one of those things where

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you tip your hat to Lebron and just say, it's

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>incredible that you've been able to stay healthy this entire time,

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>because you know, that's really what often happens, is a

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>player later in his career simply gets injured or misses games,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.239
<v Speaker 1>or gets injured during a game, which happened to Kevin

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Durround that broke his streak. He got injured during a

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>game and couldn't do it. So that's great for Lebron,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. And it's another record that Michael Jordan doesn't have.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It's one that Lebron has, and it's one that's probably

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to be beaten certainly anytime. So I don't know

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>who really would be able to do it. But that's

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's incredible for Lebron. Now, I don't know

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>if you guys saw it or not. Now, Also, I

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>will say the NBA had an article up about it,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and they did note that in two playoff games. Yeah,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he did have two single digit games. So this is

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>only a regular season.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Brought up Yeah, twenty eleven and twenty fourteen with your heat. Yes,

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 2>he did have single point games in the playoffs.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you know, I mean, do you account those? Yeah,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>it's the same game. I don't know who can, but

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>anyway you can. It's a game you can make stats

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>do it and say whatever you want, really when you

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fudge them the right way. But anyway, I'm just wondering

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>if you guys did know, you might have seen it,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>so you might get this quiz pretty quickly. But the

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of top five guys for most consecutive ten point

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>games in NBA history?

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you name them in history or current players in history? Okay?

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>History? Yeah?

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Well mj second, isn't he?

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this according to the NBA dot com article, So

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Jordan was second with eight hundred and sixty six consecutive games,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>three alone, Kareem and Calm alone and then number five,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is it tough like much? Now? I meant I mentioned

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>him already.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned him already.

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I said his name.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Kevin Around, Yeah, Kevin Durround.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>He got injured. So yeah, he had a streak of

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and sixty two, but he got injured in

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the first minute of a game a few years ago

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>there with the with the Warriors, which ended his streak.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So that that again was sort of the point I

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>was making with Lebron, the fact that he never, you know,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in some game, twisted an ankle early on, you know,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or just even had.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 2>A tweet, Well, he does twist an ankle early on,

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and then it looks like he's going to be out

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 2>for ten weeks the way he's selling it, and then

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 2>like blazes his shoe up, Tater, and then he's good

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>to go. Yeah.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Tweet last night skieds about Lebron actually never leaves

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 4>the game, but every time it happens to be like,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 4>oh man, Lebron's down, I don't know, this might be

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the one.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's never the one. Yeah, when he's coming back.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I did ask that. I was like, I know it's happened,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>but I can't recall a game where Lebron got injured

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in the game and then didn't return that game to play,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, outside of let's say a blow it or

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 2>something like that. People did point out, well, Christmas twenty eighteen,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>he heard his growing and he did leave that game

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and didn't return, and then he missed a couple games

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 2>after that, but he had obviously hit his ten points

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 2>by that. It didn't happen early enough in the game,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>that is. It is a pretty astonishing thing that the

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 2>last time he failed to score ten points in a

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>regular season game was January fifth, two thousand and seven. Task.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just, I mean, most of his single

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>digit scoring games so when he was a rookie, if

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you really look at it and you don't count those

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>playoff games, it's pretty wild. Do you think it's newsworthy though?

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 5>Sure, it's a heck of a streak, although all it

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 5>does is make people remember the series against the Dallas

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Mavericks when he had that eight point game in the

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 5>twenty eleven finals, Right, that's what it reminds me of. So, yeah,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 5>it's a nice NBA dot Com article. That's exactly where

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 5>it fits, right. It's it gets aggregated it's like an

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 5>automatic article. It's probably something like a Darryl Morey automatic tweet.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 5>It's just something that like automatically generates when he hits

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 5>a thousand straight games. That's good. It's very good. It's

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 5>very good. It is crazy that he's thirty six frickin

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 5>years old. I can't decide if that's too old or

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 5>too young. It's just he's been around forever.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a weird one.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, but at the same time, it's like, you know,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 5>he's got like a you know, he's still on his

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 5>prime at thirty six years old. He is trying to

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 5>change the game in terms of when an NBA player's

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 5>prime is. That makes sense. But it's also like he's

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 5>forty and he's really old. I don't know, I can't

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 5>tell he's exaccurate.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was very weird. I was telling the girls yesterday,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 4>it's Lebron's birthday. You know, all the greatest things have

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 4>come from nineteen eighty four. Your dad included the only

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 4>thing that's for eighty four, wonder One Woman eighty four apparently.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 4>But it blew Eyla's mind that I would be older

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 4>than Lebron. But it also blows my mind that Lebron

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 4>is the fifth oldest player in the league. Like that

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 4>doesn't seem like it makes any sort of sense, right,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 4>that he's still out there able to dominate at his

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>age the way he has still be the best player

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 4>in the league. What I want to know is, where's

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 4>the assist streak?

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Man?

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 4>You're such a good passer. Where's your assist streak? Or

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 4>are you really a scorer at heart? Is that truly

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 4>your skill.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Be overrated as a passer? Now?

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Is there an assist streak?

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Though, that's a great question.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 4>He's got one out there somewhere.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Magic Johnson has the double digit

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>assist streak. But I mean Lebron won't get any winny

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. Always think, although, you know what, maybe because

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there's probably not that many, you know, like.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be magic. How many games do you

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>think Magic did it lee in a row?

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean probably like only fifty or something like that.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I would say more. No, I mean that's tough, that's tough.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know. You can look it

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 2>up if you want.

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>There, let's see if I can find it.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, just news worthy enough. We say with the

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Lebron one maybe uh oh, here we go, here we go.

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 2>He's helped that it was on his birthday. I think

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that helps the headliner tes. Yeah, I'll go ahead there, Lea.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's John Stockton with thirty seven games in

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a row.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 2>Wow, all right, Lebron shind set his eyes on this record.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 4>He's got to be thirty seven next year. What a

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 4>perfect time to take it.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>There you go there, all right, next one, here got

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>a photo to show you at this headline. Masked Kawhi

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Leonard dominates in return leads Clippers to the blowout win

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>over the Blazers. There it is for everyone joining us

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube. We're watching on YouTube. Kawhi is a fascinating mask.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>This is awesome. He's obviously playing in this because he

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>had the stitches in his mouth and his jaw is hurting.

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Trey is this news, the masked man Kawhi Leonard.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh Man skeets. This is huge news. We should all

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 4>feel blessed to have seen an all timer NBA mask

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 4>happen in real time, right like these things only come

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 4>about once in a while, like the last notable mask

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 4>sweep scene, or maybe like Lebron's carbon fiber mask. Maybe

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 4>that time Mono Genobili had to wear a pad across

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 4>his nose and it just kind of taped it to

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 4>his face. But this was incredible. I don't think I've

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 4>ever seen a nose out mask period, right, Like when

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 4>you're buying a Halloween mask, a nose is kind of

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 4>like the first thing you cover. I don't know why,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 4>but this was just killing me. It only works for

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Kawhi as well, because it's like, if there's one player

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 4>in the league who doesn't need to move his lips

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 4>very much, it's Kawhi. He might just go to this

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 4>mask from now on. Even when he smiles. You remember

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 4>that clip from when he was with the Raptors and

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>he did that tiny, tiny, tiny little smile, wouldn't even

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 4>show his teeth. This is perfect for Kawhi. Doesn't have

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 4>to say a word, doesn't have to smile. He just

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 4>has to go out there and get buckets like Ziggy

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 4>star Fox says Hannibal Leonard.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 2>What a lost yes or clawise I also saw going around,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>but Hannibal Leonard is good. Yeah, it's a unique mask

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>task because we uh, you know what we do usually

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>see the covering of the nose right or around the

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 2>eyes that's where the injury occurred. But with Leonard's case,

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 2>they're like, no, we gotta we gotta take care of that,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 2>the lips and the jaws, and so we get this

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>crazy sort of hockey like mask here. What do you

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>think of this one?

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 5>It's just it sucks me in. I just can't stop

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 5>looking at him with the hole in his face. I

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 5>think it's ingenious. Really. I think the biggest thing that

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 5>NBA players have a problem with when they wear a

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 5>mask is their nose and just breathing, and you always

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 5>see them adjusting their mask like, oh, this is bugging me.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 5>At some point they toss it to the side. This one,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 5>I think it's perfect. I think, yeah, you can take

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 5>a nice elbow to the nose right there. You don't

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 5>want to be playing Karl Malone in this mask, but

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 5>I think he'll be comfortable breathing in it. And either way,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 5>if he's a mouth breather or a nose breather, I

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 5>think he's good.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 2>It's good.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think Ley, It looks like though we're

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>going backwards with mask technology, because remember Kyrie and Lebron

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>had the cool black moss and I looked awesome. This

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>one looks like someone's just like got big like masking

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>tape and just going like just just stick that plastic

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>thing over his face. That will do well.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Like CJ. Zero, I think tweeted like he basically is

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 2>like Kawai made this himself.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it looks like it looks like he sort of

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>hacked away at that middle part that usually does cover

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the nose. But yeah, it's weird. It just like when

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you think of Kawhi Leonard and someone said here you

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing this tonight. You could just imagine his reaction like

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>what what is that? Give me one of the cool masks?

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Really just like okay, yeah, just slap it on it.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Just it just it that looks like it has been

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>slapped on. Literally, Yeah, it must be uncomfortable.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 4>It does look like a throwback. This looks like a

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 4>mask you would see in the seventies when they're like

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 4>just figuring out mask technology. In the second half, like

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 4>the straps were all twisted on it, and it really

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 4>looked like he's just like whatever, I'm gonna talk to

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 4>anybody anymore, don't hit me in the face.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 2>He said his teammates were jokingly calling them leather face.

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 2>It worked. By the way, he had sixteen points in

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 2>the third quarter. You know, he was a bit of

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a terror in that quarter as they ran away from

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>the Blazers. They got the victory. They helped keep Damian

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Lillard in check. He only went for twenty points on

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 2>three or fourteen shooting, so they got the victory. He's got.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 2>The mask has got to stay. It's got to be

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>like a Rip Hamilton thing here. Now I like it too.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like because we always joked that he's like robotic

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that, it sort of like takes that

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to the next level. I'm all in on Hannibal Leonard.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 4>If they let him make that mask rome, then he

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 4>off like an android, Like let him loose, let him

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 4>off the hook here. Make it like the NHL where

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 4>if you're a goalie, if you have to wear a

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 4>mask in a sport, you should be able to do

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want with it.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you brought up the black like carbon masks.

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Lee I did lead the league say like, you got

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 2>to stop wearing those. I think because Coby had it

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 2>once upon a time, a cool batman vibe, and they

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 2>were like, no, the mask has to be clear, I

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>think is they're ruling.

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so, because I think as well. Kyrie

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>had an awesome nod in Madison Squa Godden where it

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was like, but that's cool, man, I know, and I

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>will encourage people to wear them if they're going.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 6>To be a little bit safer, right, you know, bring

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 6>it back, bring it back, man, I mean it just yeah,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 6>that one looks like that Calvin Murphy one, remember the

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 6>big sort of helmet thing that that he wore back

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 6>in the day. So yeah, I just think, I mean, what,

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 6>what's what's the harm with having the black mask? I mean, like,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 6>why would they ban that? I wonder, Look, you're right,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm with you.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Looks so cool. It's kind of mask to do you

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>think there's like a I don't know, not a band,

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but like a mask dress code for the coaches. Like

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 2>the masks. The masks are very simple, and I was like,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about it, like sometimes they'll have a

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>little team logo on it, like some of them, but

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>not even a lot of them do Like have they

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>been told like you can't go crazy with your mask,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>you can't have like the whidler on your mask and

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Popovich just had like the sort

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of surgeon mask. Yeah, but Steve Nash definitely had the

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Nets one on yeah, and Rick Carlisle had I

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>think was like an NBA one. I think he had

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>some maybe.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Like why does it like tips have like a personalized

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>one that says ace on it.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, or a big smile, a big joke,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a smile yeah, right, Like.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised they haven't gonna create it, but maybe they're

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>not allowed to.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Who knows.

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we're all up on the mask. I'm

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>sure most of you guys are as well. Final headline here,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie Irving gets hot in the fourth as the nets

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>out score of the Hearts, not an overtime game. Leg

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>that was the final score in regulation. Is this news?

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>This is news?

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This was a good game. This was the game of

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the night. Actually really lived up to the hype, which

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>was great because the Atlanta Hawks have been going in

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>unbeaten and they were going up against the best defensive

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>team in the NBA last night and put one hundred

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and forty one points on them pretty easily too. I thought,

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought they did a great job. What they really

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what stood out to me, though, was just at the

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the game. The Hawks are just missing that

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to close out games. I think that's what it was.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving struggled early on and then just got cooking

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in that fourth quarter. The seventeen gorgeous points because every

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>time he gets hot, he's so much fun to watch

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's just in his zone. Givin around. Had the

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>quietest thirty three points I've ever seen last night. He

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>just I looked at the boxer and I thought, I

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can't believe he finished with thirty three because everyone scored.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Everyone seemed to go out there and get some buckets

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>there last night. But what Ry really sort of stood

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out to me last night was Trey Young here in

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>his third season. He's got little bits of Kyrie Irving

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in his game. He shook him a couple of times

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and went inside and scored the lap. He's got that

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>variety to his game. But he's also got some James

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Hardens qualities of getting free throws.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yes.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is something that's interesting because I think Trey

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Young to this point has flown under a lot of

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>radars because the Hawks haven't been good. He's been good

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he made an All Star team, but seeing him last

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>night when his team needed some buckets and he would

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>do that sort of back into his defender.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's the Chris Paul right there.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, Chris Paul, the embellished.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Yea there the stop go around again and then just stop.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And it'll be interesting to see if how the narrative

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>changes there on Trey Young, because he's absolutely fishing for

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>fouls and he gets them, and you know, he's at

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that stage where it's like he's not a big enough

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>name just yet that everyone's talking about him. But if

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Hawks do continue to keep winning and he keeps

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>playing and putting up you know, thirties and tens, he's

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going to draw more attention. So I'm interested to see

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what the if people change on it, because right now

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I think people love seeing the highlights of Trey Young,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the deep threes and he goes inside. He's got some

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>nice finishes again like Kyrie Irving. But will he start

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>annoying people's That's interesting. Great game, really good game, Really

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>good to see the Hawks in their early season promise

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in a big stage really put it up there against

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the Nets. And I like Steve Nash after the game

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>because he was asking. He said, we came into this

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>game with the best defense that went out the window

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a back and forth game. You know,

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the Nets closed it out, and Steve Nash just said, yeah,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I need a beer after the game.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely need a beer. Said because there are

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of offense task did the Hawks prove anything

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to you that they can sort of hang with some

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of the better teams in there in the East, at

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>least in the Nets because they had beaten up on

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 2>some sort of crappy teams, but you know, they were

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>in this game.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 5>The Hawks have grown since last year, and Trey Young

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 5>has grown since last year. I think it's easy to

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 5>forget because Trey Young had such a phenomenal offensive year

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 5>and that he went to the All Star Game, that

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the Hawks stunk on that end of the floor. They

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 5>just kind of were waiting for Trey Young to do

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 5>something on every possession. They had twenty sixth rank offense

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 5>last year. And I think what Lloyd Pierce has done

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 5>with that team early this season already, how everybody is

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 5>buying in and by that I mean vets on the bench.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 5>They're big signing the big deal that they somehow probe

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 5>bogged in Bogdanovic away from the Sacramento Kings Fingers was

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 5>a big story. He's been on the bench, and Lloyd

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Pierce has decided, you're gonna come off the bench as

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 5>our score. But we need a balanced lineup, very spurs esque.

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 5>We might not start our best five guys, but we're

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 5>gonna start Cam Reddish and DeAndre Hunter on the wings

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 5>because we want a nice balance with our defense in

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 5>the starting line up, and then the offense can come

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 5>off the bench. And then Clint Capella, you're sort of

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 5>our like Javail McGee superpower. You know, are are glorified

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 5>JaVale McGee playing only twenty minutes a game, even though

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 5>you know you were a big acquisition last year. And

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 5>John Collins, you're not going to get the ball when

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 5>Clint Capella is roaming in the in the lane, you're

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of going to be a tertiary guy. But then

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 5>when he's off the floor, you're going to be our

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 5>backup center. And then you got Gallinari coming off the bench,

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 5>so there's there's a perfect balance. I'm shocked with how

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 5>they know what they're doing on every possession. Unlike last year.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 5>It was just watched Trey Young go just just give

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 5>him the ball, and there was a great possession at

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 5>the end of the game that showed last year on

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 5>a broken play they would just get the ball to

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Trey and watch him do something. But it was a

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 5>broken play. DeAndre Hunter had the ball up top and

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 5>it looked like Trey Young was going to come get

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 5>the ball. But as soon as two guys went to

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Trey Young, he turned and went to the basket and

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 5>had a little drop off pass that was a foul.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Because he's improved. Because they all have their roles. And

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 5>again John Collins led the team in shots last night,

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 5>but he didn't force it at the beginning. When Clint

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Capella was on the floor, he took his spot. He

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 5>picked his spots and scored thirty last night. I think

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 5>everybody's just really falling into their role. To watch an

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 5>eighty point quarter in the fourth quarters. Why Steve Nash

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 5>needed that beer forty three to thirty seven for the nets.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 5>They got to do it again on Friday in Brooklyn.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 5>You know one weird thing of this current schedules that

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 5>you got to do it back to back games in

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 5>the same City, so they're going to be playing again,

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 5>which is kind of strange. This is a little baseball esque,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I'm buying the Hawks as a playoff team.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 5>If they're buying in already to knowing their roles and

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 5>doing this, I'm very impressed with all these vets just

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 5>kind of filling in. And you know, Rajon Rondo wants

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 5>to get to the playoffs because he gets a seven

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty thousand bonus if they get there. So

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they're all all pushing in the same direction,

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 5>which is great for a young team. It's shocking. Yeah,

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 5>those three wins. Great teams, but yeah, they held their

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 5>own with the Brooklyn Nets, and yeah it's the Nets

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 5>probably win this game by twenty if Kevin Durant has

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 5>a good game and he shot fifty percent and had

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 5>thirty three points and that's sounds nuts. But he was

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 5>just missing. He was clanking. So the Hawks d has

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to get better.

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>But oh yeah it does.

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 5>They're working. They're working.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Why why that game was awesome and they all agreed

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 4>we're not playing any defense. It was the second hottest

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 4>thing I saw all night after episode five of Bridgerton,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 4>A steamy one.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>My friends. We also had.

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 4>Vince Carter is incredible on the call. He could be

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Tony Romo of the NBA. I would say, you had

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 4>to be listening to this on the Hawks broadcast obviously,

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 4>but his how close he is to his playing career

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 4>right he was playing last season, so he still obviously

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 4>has relationships with these guys, and it's just cool to

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 4>hear his insight being so recently in the NBA. There

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 4>was that take that John Collins had late let that

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 4>late lefty in the in the lane. He finishes with

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 4>the tough left hand, and Vince Carter says, that makes

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 4>me feel good. I taught John Collins that move. It

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 4>makes me feel good that he's going to the left hand,

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 4>trusting the left hand. I just thought he was great

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.919
<v Speaker 4>on the call. And this was just such a fun

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 4>game to watch. When two teams that are actually good

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 4>come in and say we're not playing any defense. We're

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 4>gonna see who can score the most. That is my

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 4>ideal kind of basketball game. It's different when it's like

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the Bulls versus the Wizards, nobody's playing defense because nobody

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 4>can play defense. When it's more of a choice, it's

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 4>fun to watch and those two teams are just bombing away.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 4>O'donovic was great, hitting shots with zero space. Kyrie and

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Durant there in the fourth quarter, You're like basically

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 4>guaranteed to get thirty points from those guys in the

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 4>fourth quarter. That's gonna be tough to beat come playoff time.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you knew the chances of the Hawks winning this

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 2>game were not great when like Kyrie was like I

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know what he was at that point, like three

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 2>or fifteen, like heading into the fourth and they were

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like in the game, and you're like, at some point

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:52.479
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna find his groove here and these are gonna

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>start dropping. Yeah, he just absolutely took over. It's such

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>for the Hawks too. Gallinari made his was that his debut?

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Actually yeah, no, it was the first, but he had

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 2>missed a couple of games. He's back, but then he

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 2>gets injured again, I mean and rolls the ankle. You

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 2>could see he was visibly frustrated. He didn't return to

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 2>this one, So that sucked. That was a bit of

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a bummer. I felt bad for him, and I will

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 2>say this too, You're right, Tray was fun. There's no defense.

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But fourth quarter when Kyrie starts cooking. It would have

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 2>been a nice opportunity if he was available for Lloyd

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Pierce to be like, hey, Chris Nunn, have a go

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>at trying to slow him down. That's what you're known for.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Not known for much else, but you are a great

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 2>defensive player, especially on the perimeter. Slow him down, man,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 2>make make life a little more difficult. Now he's not

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>playing it for the Hawks. That's how deep the Hawks are.

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about guys that weren't even playing, but they

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 2>could have.

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 4>That's what Katie said after the game too, right, He's like,

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 4>there's seven or eight starters on that team. Yeah, And

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 4>I look at him and they definitely are. And like

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Tasa is saying, you know, we're a week and a

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 4>half into the season. They are all bought in right now.

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how it turns out throughout the season. If

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, some some guys start playing well and some

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 4>going and blah blah blah, get me some time here

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 4>and there. But they're all on the same page right

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 4>now and it's working.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 2>It definitely helps when there's w is there even if

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 2>you only played twenty minutes. Let's say, if you're a

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 2>capella but you get the w I know, not last night,

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 2>but up until that point that helps. But absolutely great point.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 2>What happens when the losses start coming and then you're like, hey,

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I could have helped us win that game. Why am

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 2>I only getting X amount of minutes? That'll be the

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 2>real coaching challenge from Bloyd Pierce, but so far he's

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 2>knocked it out of the park. I have to say.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, and that was a bit of a moral victory. Honestly,

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 2>it was for Hawks because they're right there against one

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 2>of the better teams in the Eastern Conference, maybe in

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 2>the league, and they were hanging they were like I

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they did have like a gentleman handshake

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 2>before saying we're not playing, but they were right there

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and that was Go watch the highlights. A lot of

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>fun that game.

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 5>And watch the Hawks broadcast. I can't agree more. Vince

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Carter absolutely phenomenal. A great debut Tom on the broadcast,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 5>like like he's in on Bridgerton. I got to go

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 5>watch Bridgerton. But Dominique will Against has been there forever

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 5>as the color commentator, and then you get a younger

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 5>guy like Vince Carter, it pushes you a little bit.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 5>I think I think it pushed with that yep to

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 5>pick up his game a little bit. And they were,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 5>they were sparring back and forth. They were great. I

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 5>think they're really good. And Bob Rathbund was also great.

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Vince Carter, you know, was basically like every every guy

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 5>on every team was one of is one of his

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 5>former teammates. So Jeff Green is on the Nets, he goes, oh, yeah,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 5>my former teammate. And Bob Rathbund and say, hey, Vince,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 5>we don't have time for that. I mean, we'd be

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 5>here all night if you talk about every one of

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 5>your teammates. But yeah, him and him and Nick were

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 5>we're going back and forth. The only thing about Vince

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 5>like when John Collins had that nice, beautiful euro step

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.919
<v Speaker 5>at the end going left, fantastic stuff, and he said, yeah,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 5>that makes me so happy, And then you start talking

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 5>about it for like three possessions. We got to get

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 5>to the next get the next player quick, let's start.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Just we've just spent the last few years talking about

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how old Vince is and now tested saying young voice

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on the broadcast, which is great. But I actually was

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>watching the Nets broadcast, which is always great with especially

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>when Jared Allen throws down a dunk and mov mo

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and hego says, I throw down right.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Right right, they're they're one of the best, and like

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Bob and Nique, not my favorite deal in the league.

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 2>So I was one hundred percent on board. Adding that

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>that youthful Vince Carter to the broadcast, it did help.

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 2>It made for a more enjoyable watch.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 4>You. It is pretty funny that guy has played with

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 4>like every single player in the get him on some

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 4>national games.

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 2>I think they said he holds the record, right, is

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it like six hundred plus teammates.

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 5>He's yeah, they said that, and I'm not sure if

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 5>they were joking, but yeah, probably right.

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 2>But he's played on a ton of teams.

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 5>He's had a lots literally played the most years the

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 5>history of the NBA, and he played with two teams two.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Hundred and sixty one teammates according to Oh, that's it.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I got's a ton, But yeah, they were joking with

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the six hundred I guess all right, is it a

0:40:58.440 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 2>record though league?

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, yeah, he holds the record. Two hundred and thirty

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>six is next, and then two hundred and thirty. So

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you want any quick trivia or not really shack shut yeah, no, no, no,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>let's do the top five. I'll tell you this. The

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>top five. One of the players is still playing. One

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of them is sort of not officially retired, but he

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was playing in the bubble.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Hmmm, sort of not retired before.

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, he played in the bubble. He was down in

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the bubble, but he didn't No, no, but a Haslam

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>type guy, Kevin wellis on there. This guy, this guy

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is a super high draft pick Chicago bull from my

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>early part of his tyson Chandler's number three. Yeah, yeah.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Number two is a guy who you probably associate with

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Bullets. I think he had the first one

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar contract. Yeah. Number four is the guy

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>who's still playing, and he's he gets traded every year

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 1>two or three times. No, no, no, he's still playing.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He's where is he right now? He's Detroit? I think? No,

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is he Detroit or now? No, No, he got traded.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>He got traded I think three times in the in

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the summer, in the off season. Trevor.

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>While, and he has one more teammate than the guy

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at number five, who very we had him in the

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>start of studio, but never on the show. Very fashionable.

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Sorry okay, yeah, Kevin Willis.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, there we go and make sure you

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 2>gave credit.

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>That was hoopspe hoop type. That's where it came from.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeahsape duckham. I don't know if it's a duck come

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 2>all right. So that's a little is this news, but

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe the biggest news of the night tasks. We got

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 2>our first wedgie, my man.

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, twenty have been a pop year, but at least

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 7>we're ending it in style, as Mark Followell, Derek Harper

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 7>and Jeff skin Wade noted on the.

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Car, great crass owl inside. Oh it's a weggie.

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 2>There's also a foul.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 8>Though you only get to say that a couple of times.

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 7>It's the first ever foul weggie.

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>That might be the first ever foul you like a

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>little kid get.

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen that before.

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't think I have either follow the foul wedgie

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 6>right time for everything.

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 5>So if there were no fowl, then of course, as

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, that's a jump ball in the center cord it.

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 5>But a foul means two pre toes for Powell.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Never see anybody gets so excited about.

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 2>A way I get excited about weird things.

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>That's fun.

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 5>It's a fun thing to get excited about. Follow them,

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Mark follow. We really went for it. He said, that's

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 5>the first ever foul edgie. Well, Jeff skin Wade pulling

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 5>a real no dunks really hedging by saying, I'm not

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 5>sure if that's the first ever foul. That seems like

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 5>the first. I've never seen one of those either. I

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 5>don't think that's the first foul edgie. I'm not gonna

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 5>go back and check, but I'm pretty sure we've had

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 5>a foul weggie before.

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, once or once or twice, it definitely has happened.

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 2>That one was fairly unique. I mean, it's a hell

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of a foul. He gets all hand and then the wedges.

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 2>It's rare. It's definitely rare. We don't have a lot

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 2>of those.

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I like it though, because they showed like

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 4>one hundred replays of the leggy. When it's a foul,

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 4>you got a little bit of time to show stuff

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 4>off before they get to the you know, if it's

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 4>a regular one, they're getting to the jump ball pretty quickly.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to playing, but you're getting some subs

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 4>during a.

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 2>File yeah, take your time.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 4>You talk about letting it breathe.

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 2>They did, Yeah, they did.

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 4>They.

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 2>I love we got to make Harper when he's sort

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 2>of mocking Mark going, it's a Leggie that's going to

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 2>be a drop. I love how he's he's like joking around,

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>but good stuff. I'm glad it was the MAVs broadcast

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 2>getting the first one here to get it started, and

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I saw people asking, look, we got the shortened season tasks,

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventy two game season. Our goal is usually fifty,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 2>but are we changing the goal? Like have we knocked

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it down or we go like forty four forty five?

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Seem like the predictions in the preseason were that we're

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 5>going to get to fifties.

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah they were, but maybe we should change.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 5>That after a week here after starting Weggie, Yeah, yeah, sure,

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 5>we go forty. I mean I guess forty that's uh,

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:20.359
<v Speaker 5>that's a good chunk of games.

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Ten Yeah, Schumann, I asked Schuman.

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 5>Until one hundred and fifty one hundred and fifty less games, right,

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:29.839
<v Speaker 5>So that's ten hundred and eighty games versus twelve hundred

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 5>and thirty games.

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Schuman said, Schumann had it at forty four forty five

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>because the playoffs are the same you know length that

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>he thought that would be maybe. I think forty five

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is perfect if you ask me. But sure, who cares.

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to fifty anyway. Nice to have our first

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>one and they come in buy usually, so yeah, well

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll hopefully get one. I mean we'll get one tonight

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>to really end out twenty twenty in style. We can

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 2>only hope. But a great call from Mark. And by

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the way, shout out to everybody that lets us know

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 2>when they see a weggie. You can't watch all games.

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I actually didn't watch any of the Mavericks Hornets games

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 2>until I caught the highlights this morning. But when you

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 2>let us know on Twitter or Instagram, try and tell

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 2>us like when it happened in the game, because at

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>first there was a bunch of like Weggie, Weggie, Leggie,

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 2>like in Maverick's Hornets. But I'm like, okay, hold on,

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see it until like ten minutes later. I

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 2>wasn't on and then I'm like, okay, now where is

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 2>this and I'm trying to find it. So if you

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>can let us know when it happens in the game,

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 2>that really helps. And the other thing is to ask

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 2>people said, well, hold on, that wasn't a shot attempt

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 2>because it was.

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>A foul, But it is because he went to the line.

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, it's not a field goal attempt.

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>H but but it's it's it's in the play.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree that that is definitely recounting. I tried

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to make it clear to some people, like, we don't

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 2>count ones where like there's a whistle on the floor

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and then somebody chucks it up. Yeah, like a second

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>or two later and then it, you know, wedges, we

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:54.919
<v Speaker 2>don't count those. It's got to be sort of in play,

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 2>which that one.

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Is for sure.

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 5>Okay. Yeah, It's like when coaches review a challenge or

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 5>review of play, it's like, is it part of the play,

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 5>then yeah, it's a wedgie, right. You know, we don't

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 5>want to go all JD saying hey, it's wonder Woman

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 5>nineteen eighty four. The song came out in October. It's

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 5>not chronologically possible that, you know, we don't want to

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 5>get all crazy here. Yeah, it's part of the play.

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 5>It's part of the play.

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It counts. We got one, we got well, either forty

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 2>four or forty nine to go, it's your call. Really Okay, Wait,

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:29.439
<v Speaker 2>let's get to tweet.

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Of the night.

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 5>Tweet over night.

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Wowwitt a lot of pressure here, Lee, Yes, final tweet

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of the night of twenty twenty.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there, it is a lot of pressure. But I

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>think I've got a good one which really sums up

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>what twenty twenty has been for everyone. And it comes

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from Australia's greatest basketballer, Lauren Jackson out in Australia.

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So McDonald's Australia must have been operating a code

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>offering your code for a free coffee and this is

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the one that she got here and she says, thanks

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for the coupon code for my end of year free coffee.

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was appropriate to share considering.

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 2>The year was just pick.

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, yep, that sums up for everybody. Really.

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Everyone wants just to get twenty twenty over.

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>We've already done with it in Australia, they've already moved

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 1>on to twenty twenty one and we were a few

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hours behind. So yeah, very happy that Lauren Jackson. She's

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>been nominated too for the Hall of Fame this year

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think she will get in. She has got

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>quite the resume. I'm just going to quickly run through

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it here. Eight time All WNBA team on a seven

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>time first All NBA team there, five time All Defense,

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>three MVPs, two Championships, Defensive Player of the Year Finals MVP.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've got to meet Lauren when I was in

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Australia actually last year too, and her mum and dad

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 1>were both a bucket as well. They were both a

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>warking bucket.

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 4>They're gone one on one.

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just did the family there, So great to see.

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Great to see Lauren and looking forward to her making

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the trip to Springfield and entering the Hall of Fame.

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a like And yeah, for those lessening,

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the code was FKU two. Yes, that was the redeemed

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 2>code there the Q code we love it or something

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm just glad to see a couple of things

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 4>from that. First of all, maccas is the McDonald's Australia

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 4>official account hilarious. Somehow Lee Ellis has completely taken over

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 4>their country. And number two shout out to McDonald's for

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 4>also not really loving you two because I say FKU

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 4>two as well. Overrated man, you had your time in

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 4>the sun thirty years ago.

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 5>We're off that. Yeah, Lee, it will be a beautiful day.

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Tomorrow is coming up. It'll be bloody Lee. Did you

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 2>you've seen You two?

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Right? Yeah, I've seen you two several times, several times, yeah,

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>across several continents. Yeah. Now, the thing is, You Two's

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>PR really took a hit when they laid at their

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>album in what twenty when was that twenty eleven or

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so when it was just automatically on your phone.

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, on your Yeah, I guess it was your Was

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 2>it your iPod?

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 8>It was definitely on iPod. Yeah, I don't know. I

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 8>thought it was on the iPhone anyway. Yeah, they took it.

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 8>They took a PR hit there for that. But well

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 8>because people like hey, listen if I want your music

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 8>or download. But I will say one of the greatest

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 8>shows in person to see, like Bono puts on an

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 8>incredible show.

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Well worth going to see them.

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Can you know how's how's Ed Edge Edge?

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Great? Great, Larry, it's great, Adam favors great, They're

0:50:29.040 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>all great. In fact, in fact, if you want to

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>hear my five favorite You Two songs, go to the

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Serious Serious FM, Serious xm app right now and go

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to the YouTube channel. See a little top five of

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Leelis in there.

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about?

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got their own channel on Serious XM.

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 2>But how do you have the top favorite?

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, because they said, hey, listen, if you're a fan

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of you two and you want to be on Serious XM,

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>send us an email. So I did, and then I

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>record to my Uh, are you serious right now?

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Check it out? Yeah yeah, bring it up right now?

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me shut.

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this is exciting, like you too, well, you shoot

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 4>after hear my top five?

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, let's have a look here. So hold on.

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 2>So they just set out this calling here, are you

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a YouTube fan? You said, yep, I am serious, and

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:25.399
<v Speaker 2>then emailed in and said these are my top five.

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, let's see if you can see

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this up here to.

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Just read him for us, man, it's a podcast.

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, desires okay, so it's so it's desire right before?

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, well I didn't know we're gonna talk.

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>About yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. Let me just see

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 1>if I can get the hit start.

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:49.760
<v Speaker 2>He just reads what you wanted me to read the songs.

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 4>I like the idea of us trying to figure out

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 4>the songs by showing us a grainy picture the headphones.

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like your fur because.

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>These are all the fans who have done their top

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>five songs, and I'm in there at like number that's me.

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Right there, so number four, yeah, but I mean.

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's not like ranked like that. That's just

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>that's where you go.

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 2>So like, are these celebrities or just random people?

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>No, random just fans, just fans just telling the stories

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, so myke, well i'll tell you, I'll tell

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you a by the five that I put on it,

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't want to just put I did want

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>to put the top five songs that anyone's heard, you know, like,

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>so I went my five. I went with Numb from

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the Zuopa album at number five because it's the edge,

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the edge the lyricist and the vocalist on that one.

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Great video by the way, really good video. What did

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I have at number four? I had number four? I

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 1>had the Fly from Aktung Baby, just an incredible song.

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Bono even had the big fly glasses in that look great.

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 1>That was there. That was a big album coming after

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Rattle and Hum, because that came after the Joshua Tree,

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>which was their biggest album.

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 2>When you start doing things like this turned into rain Man,

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I can.

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 4>See why they put you at number four.

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And then I had a song from the All that

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you Can't Leave Behind albums called it in a Little

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>While Now. The reason why that one is symbolic is

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:16.760
<v Speaker 1>because Bono wrote that for his wife Ali, but also

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Roxanner and I when we first started dating. That was

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>one that we used to slow dance do. We even

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:23.600
<v Speaker 1>had that at our wedding as our as one of

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>our first sort of dance songs. It was a beautiful song.

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Is that why you've been slicking your hair back? More

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 4>to the next episode.

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Was and then and then at number four, I had

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>walk On, which was the actual one after the This

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>was the live studio album one after the nine to eleven.

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Remember they did that big fundraiser. All these bands did

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the big fundraiser and they did walk On, beautiful, beautiful

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>version of it. So I put that one in there

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at number four, and then at number one or number five, which.

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Ranked them five, four, three two on sir, can you

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 5>rank them one, two three? Just take them, would you?

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And then Running to stand Still from the Joshua Tree

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>album was number one. Now the funny thing is the

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Running to stand Still was the first You Two song

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember hearing right off the Joshua Tree album. So

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I heard that and I thought that's a cool song.

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So imagine then what you thought of the band after

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you hear that and then you hear the rest of

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the Joshua Tree album, like, oh my god, this is

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the greatest band of all time. So yeah, I think

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Joshua Tree was the first album I ever actually

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>bought with my own money.

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So where did you hear the song first? On the

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 2>radio and like my brother.

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>My brother was playing it, I think, and I just

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>remember just thinking that's a good song. And then he said, yeah,

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 1>well listen, listen to these other ones from this album,

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, oh ah, this is a great album.

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Some say the Joshua Tree is like the greatest album

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of all time. Some say that some seeing your brother

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick is the greatest el. So yeah, they've had some bangers.

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Acton Baby is an incredible album. All that

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you Can't Leave Behind is an incredible album. How to

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Dismantle In the Tomic Bomb album, Radlingham's good Boy is good.

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 5>I think just let him talk guys.

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Here an hour I really what's that? I think if

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 2>we just let you keep going, we would just hear

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 2>an hour every song that YOUT ever recorded would be mentioned. Wow,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.920
<v Speaker 2>all right, I'm gonna have to go check this out.

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.959
<v Speaker 2>This serious? So is it just is it a video

0:55:28.000 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 2>of you counting it down?

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.839
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just audio. It's just audio. In fact, let

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>me tell you when it's gonna be played today, because

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I've got the it's gonna be it's gonna be on it.

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>So it's on, it's on the it's serious, so.

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I could be on serious extent. And here, Hi, I'm

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Lee Ellis. These are my top five? You two songs?

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, here's I got that you picked deep?

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 2>That would gives you more responsibilities? Roxy, hold on, I'm

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:58.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna five songs?

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was tough to come. Was just five I

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>could have got. I could have gone fifteen or twenty

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:10.359
<v Speaker 1>deep there on the YouTube what ten ten pm, ten

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern tonight, it's going to be a hang on

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what days.

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 2>First?

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, see she's got she says here Thursday, the first

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first, which is Friday. But but it's anyway,

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you go to the go to the YouTube

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>channel channel thirty two on Sirius and then go into

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube desire on X you on X radio and

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you can you can listen to it anytime.

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it sounds a little complicated. What you're look here for?

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 4>Shut up to.

0:56:44.239 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Hang on one second? Concept?

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 2>What the hell are.

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 5>We're still doing a show?

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:55.720
<v Speaker 4>All right? All right? Serious?

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Ex really?

0:56:57.040 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh man? Okay, well I'm tuning in. I got to

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 2>listen to this. How long is it?

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not very long? It's not very I do that.

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, no no.

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>They said to keep the intros like two minutes or less.

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Mine were pretty short.

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Actually there's an intro.

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's an intro. Says Hi, I'm Lee from Atlanta,

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Georgia by way of Melbourne, Australia, and these and for

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the five sons I desire most un serious.

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Exam, why'd you pull out your sexy woe?

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 5>I did?

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I did put the sexiness into it.

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Didn't you? You saw YouTube in Atlanta just a couple

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 5>of years ago, didn't you.

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen them in Atlanta. I don't think we have.

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I have id Wow, I seen them see them in Toronto.

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I remember Roxy talking about it when we were at

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 5>gd's I think it was she went.

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>To she went to New Orleans, she went to a

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago goals. Yeah, yeah, to see. That

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>was the Joshua Tree album, although they played tons of

0:57:55.280 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>other songs off other albums as well.

0:57:57.600 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Which onesley, which are.

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Me?

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Just pull up the New Orleans Let's go on now,

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a good sign to start with. Oh man, that

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 2>is That's awesome, manus, I like them.

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 4>It's the only gar I want to listen.

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. I got right back into them when

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they got their own channel. They're on Serious because you know,

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I sort of drifted off as I haven't heard them

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and then they did on Serious because

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I got hooked on Serious. Yeah uh, And

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they said, you two's got their own channel. A lot

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of other bands have had their own channel, like bon

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Jovi had one, Billy Joel had one. But I don't

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're permanent. You too seems to be permanent. Might

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 1>try to squeeze another five into.

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, All right, bigger results from last night. We

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 2>were We were all wrong, gentlemen. We all took the box.

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 2>We thought they would go back to back in covering

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and victory over the heat. I was looking good for

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 2>there for a minute. By the heat you know, said no, no, no,

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 2>not on our watch, and they got the victory. So

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 2>they easily covered the six and a half line. So

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 2>that's an l for everybody. We all had Milwaukee, someone

0:59:07.320 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 2>should have swerved for sure. Trey, you're two and four

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.439
<v Speaker 2>task and lay your three and three on four and two.

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:15.920
<v Speaker 2>We're going to do this for the rest of January

0:59:16.000 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 2>or when we get into January. So it's not over yet.

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Trey has not lost. And you know what, we won't

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 2>even pick a game tonight because we're not going to

0:59:22.320 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 2>be back till Monday. We're taking tomorrow off of course

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 2>for January first, and then we got the weekend. We'll

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 2>be back on Monday and then we'll start making our

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 2>picks again. We'll have all month of January to battle

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 2>it out in our pickam contest. There, all right, what

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 2>a what a wild weird ending to our twenty twenty podcast.

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Email us your questions and your comments to no dunks

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 2>at the Athletic dot com for our Beach Step in

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we answer all your cues next week. Immaculate

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 2>items available at no dunks dot com. Go grab those

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 2>check out the other great podcast on the Athletic Network.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Love Me Some Daily Ding. Love having that back in

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 2>our life, so go check out that out as well

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 2>as all the other great NBA podcasts. It Happy new

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Year everyone. As I said, we'll be back on Monday.

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Stay safe, Clipper bros.

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.560
<v Speaker 4>You heard it here first, have a great time, turn up.

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Love you guys awesome.

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for joining us, and remember fk U two twenty twenty.

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Embrace the New year.

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>People.

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 5>You could stay ooo every day and that you happy

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 5>every minute. It's been so long with your FUNA wait

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 5>for It's happen already.

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:37.760
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna be goody