WEBVTT - Inside Coverage: Depth Draft

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Inside Coverage was recorded before the news

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of Brian Robinson Junior on behalf of Braham, myself and

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Commander's media team. We wish him the best

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of health and a full speedy recovery. Yes or no?

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to take me to the hospital? Get

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>out of here? That is cheating. No, I don't. I

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that. Let me do that I want all Right,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome into the latest edition of The Unnamed Show with

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Logan Halson by Brand Whitstein. Today, let's focus in on

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the team, and we're gonna do so

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>in draft version. So we're gonna have to set some

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>rules here that you can't pick a starter, or at

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>least a known starter, right, Okay, we're looking for spots

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on this team to showcase the depth and the importance

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of those players that we believe they're going to have

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the course of the year. Right, And let me

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just start with this. As you're watching camp, right, what

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>are you looking for, you know, outside of the players

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that we know are going to be out there for

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the first series against Jacksonville. Yeah, I think like camp

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting time of year obviously because there's

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>really forty four guys that are pretty well established. You know,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>probably after the first week at camp, you know who's

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the team, and like, having been

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a player, you kind of can flesh the roster out.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's like, I don't know, ten spots that are

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really up for grabs and yeah, right, So for those guys,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like what it's the little things, right, It's like

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>how do they work at practice, how do they study

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom, and those things that people might not

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>see because you know, when we watch practice it's like, oh,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>here's a big explosive play. That guy's gonna make the team.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, like how is he how's he digesting

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the playbook, how's he finishing? How important is it to him?

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>How's he run on special teams? And that's why the

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>evaluation for the bottom half of the roster becomes so

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>challenging because the evaluation parameters are different. Right, You're not

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting if I'm a tight end, I'm not

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>getting evaluated against the other tight ends. If if I'm

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the last tight end, I'm getting evaluated against the sixth linebacker, right,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna basically embody the same role on the team,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so really special team's value. How to me, a big

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is just finish, you know, like how they do

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the things at the position that are not necessarily like

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>glorified or gratified or whatever. It's like, you know, does

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>he finish his blocks? Does he like enjoy doing the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>grit work of the thing. Does he enjoy taking on

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>blocks if he's a linebacker, Like, how does he handle

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>those things? That shows a mindset and a passion for

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing in the position. You know, it's only

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the longer I come out of here, the more years

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to come out here. It really is week to week two.

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>For younger guys, it's really week to week. Like the

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>first week you'll see a player or two and they'll

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>catch your eye and then you'll watch them. You know,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a competitive spot, like on this team the secondary

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>where you know a couple of younger players are definitively

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>going to make the team. So you're kind of watching

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking for these couple of guys. The next week,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll change your mind. It's like consistency, that's where I

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>see it. Yeah, I see consistency and younger players and

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>those are the guys that I think are there for

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the long lall. I think it's like the position that

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>embodies that probably perfectly is tight end position right now, right,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>because it started off and it was like, oh, well,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>these are the three guys. It's you know, Bates cold Turner,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Hodges, and then our money is going to be

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the odd man out looking in. But obviously that's changed dramatically, right,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's just again speaking to your

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>point like consistency, can you stay healthy, can you put

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>good stuff on film? And that's all part of the

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>evaluation process at this point of the off season for sure.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so our objects are to draft a depth team, right,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go in order like a fantasy draft, Okay,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and then somebody somewhere is good determine who got it

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>right the fans correct on social media, they're gonna tell

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>us the producer is going to Maddie will do it.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, right, Here's the deal. Six positions. Two of

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>them have to be skilled position players. Two of them

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be lineman, offensive or defensive. Okay, you could

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do two defensive lineman or two offensive linemen. Up to

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you just have to be lineman, a linebacker or a

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>dB and then one that they're calling wildcard. Okay, right,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so that could be anybody. Yeah, right. I have a

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problem with this start out because I do think, like,

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>take a position like running back, there's no definitive starter

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Well, I was raised my hat to go,

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>can I take Antonio Gibson or can I take McKissick

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>even right, because like talk about a mismatch weapon within

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the context of the offense, right, Like you know he

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would be starting on some teams. He's got a huge role.

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, like Cornelias Lucas, like all those types of

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>guys that are fringe starter for maybe another team, Like

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to shy away from that, but in

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>order to win the game, I'm gonna be really hunting

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>seeking those kinds of players that I just need to seek,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like approval. Right now, my first pick would be a

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Totio Gibson. Am I allowed to take him? I would

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>say sure, just because like I don't really care, But

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>then I would then my first pick would be McKissick. Fine,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>But in order to talk about the depth of a position, obviously,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Williams had a really nice camp so far, probably

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a practice squad type of player, but a guy that

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about. No. Yeah, but I'm saying, like,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason you're not taking Jonathan Williams is because he's

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>not He's not going to have like a role, a

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>starting role or significant role like as an NFL running

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>back today. That's why he's gonna be on the practice

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>squad or rotational piece. So again, just from like just

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to give those the depth guys their due, yeah, yeah,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so right, so all right, So I think then we're

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>even here because we took two guys who really are

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>starters on the team, but because of I don't know,

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some headlines that got a little out of control about Gibson.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, he's gonna play an enormously prominent role

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>on this team, probably a little differently than we like.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>People like me who cover the team probably envisioned it.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.559
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think it's spiraled into He's big bench.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a message being set. Oh my god, he's returning

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>kicks and I'm sitting there watching that preseason gave the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>other day, going, oh, that's where he's going to kill

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody in space when they get him out of the backfield,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>making catches. You call him a backup ball you want,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Gibson is maybe gonna have a bigger effect on games,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>running the ball five to ten times a game instead

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>of twenty and catching five passes a game where he

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>could blow the lid off of the absolute. And that's

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>something like when they drive the guy like Brian Robinson

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that you immediately that that thought comes in your head,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Like even if Brian Robinson isn't the starter technically and

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>he's a rotational piece, like he's a pure runner, So

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that him getting more touches helps Gibson because it helps

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you kind of manufacture touches for him where he is

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in space, where where Gibson is kind of that truly

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>special player. So yeah, even though he might not be

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the starter or whatever, I do think that is a

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think his role in the offense is

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be so much more comprehensive and conducive to

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>his skill set, even on special teams too. Right, him

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>returning kicks, I think that's an outstanding Okay, you took mckissic,

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I mean you should agree with me. Right,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been an enormous impact player, right, right, I also

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that I'm not really sure how much

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>time he's going to see on the field, what his

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>role is. Well, it's the same thing with Gibson though, right, like,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because Gibson in the game was featured heavily in the

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>passing game, right, But in real life, the guy who's

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a better rout runner, the guyho's a more accomplished receiver,

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's got better hands is mkissick. Right, So

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do those touches all of a sudden when mckissicks Helsey

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to be mckissicks touches. That's my question for you. Right,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Gibson in the game gets all these touches in space

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>because McKissick isn't there, But when the when, the when

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the big dog, when the second best receiving back in

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is back in the lineup, how does that

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>shake out? And that's to me a huge storyline is

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can you get all the guys the touches they want

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the context of this offense? So I feel like

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>now and my mind might change about this that on

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>first and second down, you're going to see Gibson because

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a home run hitter, right, mkissick, While he's amazing

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at using other players momentum against them. Yeah, using leverage,

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>great route runner, terrific move the chains type of player.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not a home run hitter, right. That's not to

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>devalue what he does. I think he's amazing at what

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he does, right, But Gibson, on any one given play

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is the player that potentially takes it to the house.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Now on third and short, I think I want Mkissic

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on the field. I don't think I want the certainty

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of what he's doing, and I want to move the chain. Yeah, him,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you, But I think in twenty twenty two,

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's more valuable to an offense is consistent

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>rot runner who can win a matchup. Right. I can

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get an empty I can line them up outside and

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>say hey, you're you're matching with a back or you're

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>matching with a safety. He can win that matchup ninety

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, and I can go with the

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>football there, as opposed to Gibson, where there's a little

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>bit inconsistency with his route running. Yes, he is a

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>homewn hitter, right, You get him the ball on screens,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you get him the ball on like those angle routes

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like we saw in the game things play he did

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo. Ye, yeah, like that. There's very few people

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in this team that do that correct, but that don't

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>require a high level of rot running, nuance and precision. Yes,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand those situations, But which which players are going

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to be more impactful on the aggregate to the season.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the guy who can consistently win your matchups

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and a guy that is a security blanket for Carson

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>went touchdown all the Oh. I mean you know, like

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the short sided approach by because how many how

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>many adr touchdowns have there been, like there's been one,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and how many third down conversions that have extended drives

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for points? Right, So I'm not anti m kissing. It

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you are, all right pick number two for me.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go defensive back here, Well we can go.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We have to go skill skill, What are the rules? Okay,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>do not have to go in order can fill in

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody at any times mistakes, Go ahead. I am gonna

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>go with someone who I think is going to play

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a prominent role in year two. It is not like

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the definitive starter starter because I believe we look at

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our safeties and go McCain curl, I'm gonna take Derek Forrest.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Short side of I'm gonna take Derek Forrest. Uh. He

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is clearly going to have a large role for them,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of this very famous Buffalo nickel stuff that's

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>going on. I've seen a major difference in his play

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's aggressive, he hits. I think he can

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>be the type of player that can have an impact

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>player on the back end with the way that he hits.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like there's a bit a massive difference

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>for him from last summer to this summer, and clearly

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with the youth around that unit, he's gonna play a lot.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So to me, he plays a pivotal role specifically in

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>three safety set. Yeah. And if you know, you were

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the one who said that, Like it's about consistency, and

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a week to week thing. Like if you look

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at the evaluation this week, the guy who's getting more

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>burned there now is Percy Butler. Who I'm gonna pick.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking Percy Butler for the defensive back inst tell

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>me why, and I'll tell you why. I think Forrest

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ends up playing a more prominent role. Why. What's happening

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is happening, so so again, I if we're just picking

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>off like today, I think your pick is fine, Like

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's five pick because I think right now

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>he's playing better football. But I think over the course

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the season, like and that's part of the thing

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with a draft, as you're drafting for potential, you know

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, You're drafting on opportunity, and I think

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy with more growth potential is Percy Butler. Right,

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>he can play nickel, he runs a four two, He

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>hits when he can like, I think that's an area

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of the game where he needs to improve. He can

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>fit the runs. He gives you that position flex and

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the speed to play the position flex. I think while

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Derek Forrest is a good football player and there's no

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>doubt in my mind that he's going to be a

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>solid pro for a couple of years, his ceiling is

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>not what I'm looking for in my draft. I want

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more upside, and I think this week Percy Butler is

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>shown an opport shown in my opinion, that he can

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>do more in the context of this defense than Derek Forrest.

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Ken I think Derek Forrest is a good football player,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think he's limited, and I think that's why

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Percy. Like right now, I think you're right,

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm thinking Week five, who's gonna be playing better?

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's gonna be Percy Butler. Okay, I

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be Forrest's job for the bulk of

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think Butler is where Forrest was a

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>year ago. It is probably about a year away from

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>playing a more prominent role. If I was taking a

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty depth draft right now, I would take Butler over

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Forrest for all the reasons that you just said that

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>next year or the year after that, I'm hoping that

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a starting safety for them. He's playing a prominent role. Clearly,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be on special teams this year. I think

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he is not that player for them this year short

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of injuries, and therefore, I don't think you're going to

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>see him as much as maybe you're anticipating you're gonna

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>see him. And the other thing about this week, and

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me if I'm wrong about this, right,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the backups are playing a ton. It's Baltimore,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's just getting ready for the amount

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>of reps that he's about to have in a game

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that is not going to really actually carry over to

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what we see on So I'm really glad you brought

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that up because they are doing Baltimore prep, but they're

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>also doing like varsity prep too for Jacksonville at this point, right,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And the guy who's getting the reps with the varsity

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is Percy Butler. It's not the Forrest, right, or it's

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>not Forrest, Excuse me. I always want to call him

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Forest anyway, So I think that there. So what

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is, despite what he's shown in practice and

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the games, I think the coaching staff here thinks

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a little bit farther ahead of that where we

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's at. And I've talked to coaches. I think

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they're excited about him for the reasons that I'm excited

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about him, and I think if he can kind of

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>grow up, I think they want to give him the job,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is going to lead to more

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for him, which is why I don't disagree with you.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that this him playing more on

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the starting defense this week shows a thought process that

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is exciting from the staff. And also I think the

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>other thing is has cam Crow performed exceptionally well at

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo nickel? Has he performed to the standard that

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they want? Obviously he had a you know, coverage bust

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>against Carolina, had a coverage bunch against Kansas City. Maybe

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to solidify his role within the defense as

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of post safety or the traditional safety. Yes,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and find a guy who can play the Buffalo nickel.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And in my opinion, after talking to the coaches here,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they say Forrest has a hard time closer to the the

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage and would not be good in that role.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Percy Butler has a skill set to maybe

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>play more as that pure Buffalo nickel. I think that

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>makes cam crowl stuffs an interesting development. This is two

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>years of a row at the safeties where they ended

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>up maneuvering people to finally get them into a position

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>where they were having some effectiveness. I agree with you

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>with Curl. I think he might be one of their

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>best players on defense, that he'd find the right role

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for right absolutely clearly. All right, my next pick, I'm

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go on the line, and I think that this

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>guy's going to play an absolutely massive role for this

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>team this year. And that's West Schweitzer. Okay, Yeah, I

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't disagree at this juncture, like I don't

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think that this team can rely necessarily on, especially on

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the interior, a regular productive starting five, that there's going

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to be rotational pieces that are going to happen. Schweitzer

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>could be a backup center if you need him to be.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He can play either guard. He probably starts against Jacksonville

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>if he's healthy enough to do so. With Trey Turner's injury,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen him all camp. I think that's almost

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a definitive that that's going to happen. And I have

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a feeling he is going to be for them this year.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The Swiss Army Knife. They need to keep the whole

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thing together. He feels like a glue guy to me.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>When he got hurt last week. That was the one

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>where I went, they're in trouble on the line. They

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>need him. Yeah, and I love this pick by you.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great pick because of all the

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons you said. Right, he's basically starting. He's basically been

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>starting for the last two and a half weeks of

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>training camp. He's physical, he's smart, he can play center,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he can play the other guard. He's the guy that's

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of been in there interchangeably with the other pieces.

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I love the pick, but I'm gonna go yeah, yeah,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but if I'm gonna pick somebody, I'm gonna go Cornelius

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Lucas here just because I think the tackle depth, Like,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you can get away, Like if we were

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just drafting guards, I think you can get away. You

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can survive with Ciddy Charles, you can you can survive

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with some of these other backup pieces. I think they

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough tackles on this team, right, And I

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that's why Cornelius is so much more valuable

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>than West. I'm watching the waiver wire next week when

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>teams go down to fifty three. I don't think it's

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the realm at all that there's a potential

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>interior alignment or a tackle to your point, the right

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one somehow doesn't make a team and is available, that

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they take a look at that. Yeah, because I think

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, you've got excellent I think you have excellent

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>depth on the inside, right, And I think even if

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Cosmi can play can play guard, I think that's outstanding also.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So again, it's just it's tackle is more valuable on

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this team in my opinion, because there aren't many of them,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and because he's a high quality start. I mean, he played,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>he practiced two days last week and had not standing game,

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So that just speaks to kind of the caliber of

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>player that he is. And again, I love Wes, but

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this is more just like what I think which position

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think is more valuable. And I'm gonna say tackle. Okay,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stay on the line. I'm gonna go the

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>other side of the ball. But first let me tell

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you where we are. Let's see, we both cheated. I

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>took Antonio Gibson and you took JD. Mckissic, right, which

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we both agree probably are kind of starters. So it's

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of not fair, Derek. I mean, yours is probably

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more cheating than mine. But that's okay, yeah, but you

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>let me do it. It's not cheating if you allow that. Again,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. We then went with I took Derek Forrest.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>You took Percy Butler. You like the upside of Butler.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I think by mid season you might see a lot

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>more of him on the field, especially with the speed.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that I don't like Forest because I

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think he is a physical for all the things you said,

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think I just think the upsides there. And

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then I went with west Schweitzer because I think he's

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>going to play a key role in the interior of

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, probably playing multiple positions this year. You

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>took Cornelius Lucas because you feel like they're gonna need

0:16:58.240 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>help at tall and the tackling is just like there's

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>no there's no tackle depth here, like who's your who's

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the other tackle on the team? Yeah you have obviously

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>um Leno caused me and who correct and the other

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>guys you know, like beat Willie Beavers, all those guys

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that I don't I think they've had good camps. I

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think their NFL caliber swing guys. And so you

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>need a swing guy. Cordeli is the guy. All right,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stay on the line other side of the ball.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And again this is feels like a cheat because he's

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>going to start week one because Chase Young is out.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna take James Smith. Will get out of here.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That is cheating. He's a starter. You gotta pick somebody else,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's starting if Chase Young was on the team.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's not be starting. If my aunt had a beard,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>she'd be my uncle or whatever. That is, right, Like

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when west Schweitzer's healthy, he will be starting that cheating

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if if Trey Turner's healthy, he's not starting, though, that's

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what That's what I'm saying, and he Chase is different

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>because he's on the pup's I could be starting till

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>week five. It's fair, Maddie. You can say that in

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the microphones. Just so why is it fair? It is

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>fair because Chase Young would be the starter of this

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>team and the gay healthy he startin, right. I don't

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's that big of a distant him in a

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>case too anyway, But go ahead, I'll take James Smith Williams. Clearly,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a lot of attention on

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Montes sweat, I would think from offensive coordinators who are

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be protecting because they don't have the other

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>freak on the other side of the line. And therefore

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>James Smith Williams is going to play a big role

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in determining whether this pass rush and this front is

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>as successful as I think we both know they need

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. Because frankly, like I still firmly believe this

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>team goes as far as that unit takes them, which

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is why I think you're hearing Ron Rivera publicly pressure

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>them even in the preseason to say, we want things

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to go this way, we want things to go that way.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>He's pointing out pass rush lanes and that type of stuff.

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>He's coming at them publicly to try to get the

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>message across that they are a big deal, which makes

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>him a big deal for this until Chase comes back,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>whatever date that's going to be. Right. Um yeah, I

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't. I don't deserve I think you're I

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is like cheating kind of because he's basically

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been starting since this start. He started all OTA's all

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of training camp, like you let me pick Gibson. Gibson

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>is there's a rotational element anyway, I'm gonna go Daniel

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Wise here, and I think Daniel Wise because he has

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>shown tremendous potential inside he's flash as a pass rusher. Again,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing the game correctly, so I'm going with a

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>depth player, not a starter at a position. So I

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>understand what it means I win, But I think, no,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I disagree with that. Let me do that.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I want I don't know. Oh, they're gonna pick the

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>team that doesn't have Antonio Gibson on it. Okay, I

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>think mckissi. We just talked about why. I think McKissick

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is a better fit for the twenty twenty two NFL

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>standard of what the NFL is than Gibson is. You

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>want big plays, I want consistency. I want first downs.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to extend drives. I want mismatches and if

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me that flashy touchdowns and yelling touchdown

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>way and how many times but times are going to

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>happen this year? How many times? Once? It happened one

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>time last year on a big, flashy long Touchdow. I'm

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just saying, we're just talking ball. We're just talking ball.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We're just talking ball here. We're just talking ball. So

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go yeah. Daniel Wise, I think a lot

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of potential, a lot upside are gonna be that fourth

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>internal internal piece there. I think he'll play a lot

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>of football for this team, much like James Smith, much

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like Casey two Hill. Obviously, Big Phil is a guy

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that I thought about going with here, but I think

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of cheating because he's you know, he's gonna

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be the starter of the Sinco package. He's your third element.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna play a lot of football. So Daniel Wise,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just to kind of get the name note right out there.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>He's at outstanding camp, outstanding preseason, a ton of pressures,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and seems to be playing with a kind of nice

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>mentality which I enjoy. Okay, this feels like a cheat too,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>so you can I'll let you not let me do

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this if you think this one's unfair. Okay, can I

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>pick Curtis Samuel? He's the third guy, right, so we're

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring Yeah, Maddie, what's the what's the rest?

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I picked the third guy on the depth draft. He's

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>starting it at your f position though, you know what

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's the starter in your as your third receiver.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like Danny is what was the guy's

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>name up in New England who started like Westwelker, He

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>was like the leading receiver in the NFL. But he's

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the third guy on the roster. Like is that that

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem right to me? Do you think they still? Okay,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>hold on before you rule on this, Maddie, teams now

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>start Monday night football, not introducing a second tight end

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>or fullback that introduce a third wide receiver. You know

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, Like he's gonna be on the screen

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>before the game starts, saying I am starting for the Commanders,

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so I can't pick him. I mean, Maddie's Maddie's judging.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with that justification alone, I feel like we

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can't allow it. Okay, that's fine. Can I pick John

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Bates that it is a tough one coach, I'm gonna

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>go yes, Yeah, because you have to because Logan Thomas

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>flex wild card. No, you could be your skill. He's

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your skill skill or your flex wild I guess I'll

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>take skill because then it makes it easier for me

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>because I could pick anybody with flex wild card. Right.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's a skill player, right, you tell me? Yeah?

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And he's also hurt though, So does that impact your No,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because I have a feeling they're just taking it slow

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with him, and I'm hoping that that's what the cases.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Then he's going to be back. I also think, in

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the same way that I talked about Schweitzer, I think

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>he's integral, Yeah, completely totally integral to what they do

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's going to be there by far best

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>blocking tight end that they have on the field. I

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>think with all of the concern I have about the line,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with pieces going in and out, likely some rotational pieces,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's someone that helps them solidified protection. And

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we found out last year he has hands. Yeah, So

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if Logan Thomas has to be on a pitch count

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>or is not coming back really early in the season,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's an integral player here. So that's why

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I took John Bates. No. I think, like John, I'm

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna find a bigger John Bates fan than

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>me in this entire building. He's maybe the most physical

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>blocker in the NFL. And when you're talking about kind

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of building a run game with, you know, kind of

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this diverse backfield, I think that's huge. You mentioned the

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>past protection, which he excels at. You mentioned the hands.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a very well rounded dude, great frame, all the things,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I would actually stay with tight end

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I would go Cold Turner here, and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think col Turner because he has hurt as well.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, this is one of those weird things where

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're going off of just like the roster today,

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I probably go somewhere else. But just based on what

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he showed in training camp, to catch radius, the physical stature,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability to win one on ones. Again, that's a

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>premium for me. Can we create mismatches when we get

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an empty who's matching him? Put that guy and can

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he win in The answer I think is yes, I

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>love Bates and he can win in a different way.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if we're in you know, kind of a running formation.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I know he can be the defensive and I know

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he can be the linebacker in that physical element of

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the game. But if we're trying to find like a

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Gronkowski light type of player who I can line up

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh I get a man zone, tell he

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>can run a deep route, I know he can win

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>catch the fade. I think that's a very valuable skill set.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And again he has hurt. The hamstring thing is is alarming,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>but because it's the second time it's happened, he had

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happened in OTA's But again, that's a

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>guy that I just think he speaks to where the

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>NFL is going from a matchup standpoint. If I can't

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>go him because he's hurt, I would probably go Campsims

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>here like, that's the other guy. Would go with cam Sims, Yeah,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>would be the other if I can't go Cold Turners.

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>He falls into the same category that Mkissock falls in

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with me now where I look at him and I go, well,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be a really valuable player for them.

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how many reps he's gonna get,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>how often he's going to be on the field. I

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think last week we saw what he can be in

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. Yeah. So, but that's one of those

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>guys where I go, I agree with you. I just

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with all of these different pieces this year, I can't

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quite figure out the puzzle yet. Yea. And I think

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>also like his chemistry or lack thereof with Carson Wentz

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is significant, right, they just haven't All of his big

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>plays have come and stem from his time with Heinecke

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on the field, and him and Carson just haven't seemed

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>to jive yet. So that's another thing to keep an

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eye on with him. But yeah, if I'd go Cold Turner,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>if I can't go him, I'd probably go camp Sims.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, wild card, So I can't take Curtis Samuel,

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you finally put your foot down. Yeah, seriously, Oh man,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough one. Oh god. I mean, I

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's part of me that's gonna pick somebody

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that may not make the team for your wild card

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's like, that's a scary move to do. Yeah,

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that is that's ill advised. It is ill advised. That's true.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>A safe A safe pick if someone is going to

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be I don't know, I have no idea where you're

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>going with this. So I'm gonna say Milo Eifler. I

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>like Milo a lot. I'll take him. Milo Eifler. I

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>actually think he might be in contention for the fourth

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>spot right now. He just well that's why I'm picking up.

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming he's gonna make the team, so obviously, like

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and I go off of you know, this is just

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>me watching. He's on all the special teams unit especially,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and therefore like that to me is the ultimate sign

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of he's probably at leases in line to make the team.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think we all know that depth at the

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>linebacker position is a real, real question. So there are

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>three or four guys that I'd be keeping my eyes

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on the entire summer, like Milo Eifler, Trey Walker, who

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>retired him back to John you know, like, yeah, I'm

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>watching these guys that I'm going one or two of

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys are going to make this team. And Eiffler,

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to me, flashes among them the most speed, Right, So

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to play, like because out of necessity,

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to play this year and therefore he could

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not like looking at it like you're looking

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at Percy Butler, go guy, see the upside. I don't

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>know that I see that, but I do know he's

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>going to play, and if he has an impact, it's

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be invaluable to them. I mean, another interesting

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thing here would be to say, like a guy like

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I like your pick, and I think he's gonna make

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the team. I think he's gonna find a role. Like

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he's one of those guys in the in the third

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>preseason game where you're like, oh, like this is your

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the period of the punctuation on the end

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of your very solid offseason. If he plays well, I

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>think he's got the job. But you know, a guy

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like Mayo is another interesting one here. I think I'm

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>not gonna go Mayo, but you know, he's a guy

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that could start for a lot of teams in a

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>situational starter for this team, and I think it would

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>be get certain offenses. Yeah, absolutely, ins Tennessee. I think

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy that's gonna be in there. He's he's

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less um. He's a little bit more

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>specific than Bates, for example, but a guy who's very

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>very good at you know, reading his keys in the

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>run game, getting guys lined up. Obviously lacking a little

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>bit in coverage. But I don't think he's bad there.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't he doesn't like excel. That's why he's

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not starting here. But I'm gonna go with Dax Miln.

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think from my flex guy, and I think because

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the return ability. He knows all the receiver spots. So

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>if there were an injury, I think I could see

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a way where he's playing a little bit um situationally.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's just had an outstanding camp. You know,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he's just been super consistent catching the football, running routes,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has seems to have a good relationship with not only

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>m Heinekey, but also Carson Wentz. So he's a guy

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that I I'm very excited about. All Right, So let's recap.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I got Antonio Gibson, John Bates, West Schweitzer,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>James Smith, Williams, Derek Forrest, Milo Eifler. You've got JD. McKissick,

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>col Turner, Cornelius Lucas, Daniel Wise, Percy Butler, and Dax Milne.

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you really think you're gonna win? Of course,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>because I've drafted better than you, I don't think so.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's see you went. I mean, I have like

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>four starters, so that's a little unfair. But the only

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>one that kind of irks me a little bit is

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the James one. But I think, honestly, I think I

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>have for the offer the type of philosophy that I'm

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to embrace. I feel like I have the correct

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive personnel. You know, I've got a guy in Dax

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>who knows multiple receiver spots can return kicks. You're all

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>upside though, You're all upside here, am I though? Yeah?

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're upside with Gibson. John is consistent West.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm upside with Gibson. He rushed for a thousand yards

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. But I'm saying in the context you're saying.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying upside in the context of the new offense

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with Brian Robinson. You're looking at best case scenario for you.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Should you saying you think he's going to be used

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>more than Mkissic. I think it Mkissics will be used

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more than Gibson, and that's why I like my pick

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>better there, because I don't I don't think Gibson will

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have the same type of pass catching volume that we

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>saw against Kansas City because I think Mkissic will be around.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think there will be plays for him. I'm

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's not gonna make plays. I don't think

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be at the volume that you think you're

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get here. I think he will have in most

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>games as many targets as J. D. McKissick. For I

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know he will definitively have more carries than him

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in every game. I don't, so I think he will

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get more touches than Mkissick will on a week to

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>week basis one way or the other. What he won't

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be is getting the volume of carries that he got

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So that's gonna get limited down to

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what five to ten maybe right on any particular day,

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but on targets, there's no way he doesn't receive three

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to five targets a game. Three to five targets a game,

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But like, where are those targets coming from? You? You're

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to give John like John's get deserves. Probably

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in the context of this offense, I'd say seven to

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>ten Terry probably ten to twelve, right, and then you're

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna allocate. So then where's mckissic getting. But what I'm

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>saying so mkissic at least is in on third downs

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right as a pass protector, He's gonna be running out

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of three wide receiver set more he

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>plays in that set. More, that set's gonna be on

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the field more. So. I mean again, I don't I

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to sound like I'm down on Gibson. The

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm down on is how does he fit in

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this new use? And that's the big question I have

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for him? All Right, Yeah, I am upside with cold Turner.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You are upside with cold Turner who hasn't practiced it

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. And listen, like I saw in

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the spring too. Yeah, I haven't seen him play in

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a NFL game yet. I've seen Bates play, and I

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like Bates a lot. Yeah, I took Schweitzer because I

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>just think he's gonna be Swiss army Knight for them

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and necessary for them to kind of keep the whole

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thing together. I agree with you, though Lucas is going

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to play a lot. It's prominent role, and they are

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>very very thin at down. I kind of feel like

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a wash. I mean, just depending on how you're

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at that. You squint and you say West is

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>more valuable Corn because of the tackle depth. You know,

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of whichever you're whichever you're looking at. I

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>got Chiefs with Williams, who's going to have more sacks

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>than Daniel Wise, so I'm gonna look better. I don't

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>know how many sacks did have last year, and I

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think he had one. So again, Daniel Wise in preseason

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>has already had three or two in a pressure, two

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in three pressures. So a guy who's been able to

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>generate pass rush with limited opportunities now, is his role

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be that in the season. Probably not, But again,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I think has some upside, I got

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Derek Forrest over YouTube Percy Butler. I agree with you

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>about the upside. I feel like this is and again

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that this conversation next year, and I'd go I would

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>take Percy Butler over there. And again, I think this

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes back to the Gibson mckisic thing, just

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of usage. I think you think Gibson's going

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to be used more, and that's why you value him.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think mcisics and more. I think Butler will be

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>used more earlier than I would have thought, even like

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>three days ago. Okay, and then I took Milo Eifler

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and you took Dacks Mill and as we think that

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these are guys who won't have prominent roles but could

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have important roles, right, And I think of the two,

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Dacks will probably be more significant because I think he's

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>returning punts. Okay, what's the rules? People get to vote

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on this thing now? All right? We want fans to

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>decide on our drafts. Man, we got in the weeds

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>today with this is good though, Commanders dot Com the

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Depth Draft. If you vote for him, it's only because

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you favor the player, and it's just not there. WHOA,

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't know about that. It's probably because I

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could do ten pushups. I can do ten push you

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.719
<v Speaker 1>can't do it, right, now you can't do it right now?

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You see I had kiss and you said I can't

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do it. My wrist sharts. So because I had risk surgery,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not my wrist hurts. Can you get push ups?

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes or no? Yes or no? Do you want to

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>take me to the hospital? Is that what you want

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to do? I don't want to do that. Do you

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>want to actually bother our trading staff to fix my wrist?

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We should maybe do something that I shouldn't be to

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>go down and get it taped up and then you

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>do ted push ups. All right, that's it for this show.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>See what happens next time.