WEBVTT - FinTech Is Game Changer For Small Business Relief: Former SBA Head

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg dot com. At least, it was reported just

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>recently that that three billion dollar program to help small

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses reeling from the COVID nineteen outbreak that could actually

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be exhausted by Thursday, a top White House advisor said,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>but negotiations in Congress to replenish it remains stalled. They

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>get to lay us on what this means for small businesses.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We welcome our next guest, Karen Mills. She's a senior

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>fellow at the Harvard Business School, formerly a small business

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>administrator for President Obama from two thousand nine to two

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen. Karen is so good to speak with you

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the state of the small business

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>owner out there, How tough is it and how quickly

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>can AID get to that small business owner? Nice to

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. Well, you know, this is the worst

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>crisis for small businesses that I've ever seen. And as

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, I was in the seat two thousand nine

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and we thought that was pretty bad. Um. You know,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we lost two million small businesses the first quarter. Well,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when we look at our unemployment numbers, we're seeing six

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>million last week. Most of those are small businesses, UH

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and their employees. As you know, this has a critical

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>impact on the economy because half the people who work

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in this country own or work for a small business.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's actually forty seven percent of the jobs. And these

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>small businesses are now three or four weeks into a

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>crisis and they only have on average three or four

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks worth of cash, so they have had to lay

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>off people. And the question is how are they going

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to get the money from the p p P program

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and the other government relief in time for them to

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>make a decision to keep operating, Because we know if

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we lose them, it's a very long and slow recovery.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It's six months at least to get a new business

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to start up if an old one failed. So the

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks are critical. So these loans, let's talk

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about them and the logistics of it.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We have heard that more than half of the three

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion dollars so so far allocated to

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the SBA program has been distributed. That program is expected

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to run out of cash in the next couple of days.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>What are the parameters around these loans? Do companies have

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to make sure to keep their employees on staff, they

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>have to repay them? What do we know? So it's

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>an actually amazing number. Two hundred and sixty three billion

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as of yesterday, which is seventy of the three hundred

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>nine billion has been approved. Now only a very small

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of that apparently has been funded. So we'll come

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>back to that issue, because until you have the money,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really do you any good. But one thing that

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is amazing in my tenure, the first year we were

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in office, we did all kinds of UH increases in

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the guarantees and we had a record year of thirty billion,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a record year. Now in one month we're trying to

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>get out ten times that much. So it's it's unbelievable

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that banks have have been um actually able to get

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this done. Now, why aren't we getting money into the

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hands of small business owners from the s B a.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>The banks actually have to fund this money into the

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>accounts of the small businesses, and they haven't yet been

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>doing that, in part because the Fed and Treasury have

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>said they will buy all these loans from the bank's

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. There are a hundred percent guaranteed by the government,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and that program has not gotten up and running. And

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the second thing that hasn't quite gotten up yet is

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that a bunch of the new fin techs like Square

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and PayPal and quick books are only just getting their

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>approvals and they are really critical for the smallest small businesses.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they still proprietorships that have been included here.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And folks who are looking for a forty dollar loan,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at ten thousand dollar loan, a six thousand dollar loan, well,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks don't do those small loans. So I am

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that this week will be a turnaround for them.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem. We're going to run out of money tomorrow,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so Congress has to get this pipe refilled so the

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the small businesses can get their money. So, Karen,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of kind of what's really the

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.119
<v Speaker 1>issue here for this next round of small business loans

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard. It's two and fifty billion. Maybe the

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats would like to move it up to five billion,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>include hospital funding and thinking things like that. How do

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you think this is really going to play out? Well,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to a lot of the Senators this afternoon.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been in touched with the House Offices, and you know,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>they're having a fight over um, you know, a whole

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>set of things. But what I'm saying is the matter

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely urgent. We've finally gotten the fire hose attached

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to all the pipes. We have to get this in

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the hands of small business owners. And you asked me

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier how do they get it and what's it used for?

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is the bill is actually pretty smartly

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>crafted to encourage small business owners to keep their people

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on the payroll and instead of being alone. The p

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>p P program actually is a grant. It's a refundable

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>loan that, um, you don't owe if you use the

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>money to pay for eight weeks of payroll or other

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>permitted expenses. And the other permitted expenses are paying your rent,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>which you know is going to come up May first,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's important, and mortgages and interest on your other loans.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's actually a good bill because it understands people

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>need money and they don't need a loan, they need

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a grant, and that it's important that they keep their

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>folks on the payroll so that they can get healthcare

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and that they can be there when hopefully businesses get

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to reopen their doors whenever it's safe to do so.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Karen wouldn't just after Ray Dalio spoke. My mindset is

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>how will this world look after this scenario? And one

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that you pointed to was that fintech lenders, into it, Square,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, have been instrumental in this whole effort to

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>extend credit to small businesses. How will they emerge from

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole event in terms of providing finances going forward? Well,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Quick Books told me that they have spent the last

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>two or three weeks while they were waiting for their

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>SBA approval to you know, taking the turbo tax engine

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and making a user friendly front end. I mean, these

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>poor small business owners are trying to figure out how

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>did they sell out the paperwork and even if it's easy,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to bring different documentation and banks didn't know

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>what documentation they needed for a while. Now this new

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>app is, you know, automated and it asked you a

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of questions. And if you use quick books that

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>uploads your documents, PayPal has a similar user friendly opening

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for these small business owners. So I think this could

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be a game changer for the smaller small businesses who

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have been having trouble getting into their banks and you know,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>getting in the line, because the bigger small businesses are

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>more prepared and they're they're getting to the front of

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the line. And if you see if you have a

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>small business and suddenly a new fintech becomes a trusted

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>provider with a good consumer experience, you could see the

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fin techs doing a lot of good but also ending

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>up with a lot of goodwill because all business customers

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to remember who was there for them in

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this crisis. Karen Mills, thank you so much for being

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with us. Karen Mills, Senior Fellow at the Harvard Business School,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>former Small Business Administrator for President Obama from two thousand

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and nine two thou thirteen, overseeing the efforts during that

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, with some valuable insights into this one. David

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>cast joining us now chief Investment Officer of Matrix Asset Advisors,

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>joining by phone from New York David. When we look

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at the bank loan loss provisions totaling twenty four billion

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars so far from Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP, Morgan,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as City Group, do you feel like the

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>market is inadequately pricing in the carnage that we're expecting

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in this earning season. Uh, we actually don't. We think

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that the banks are the bank prices are far more

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to the current trends than most other companies will be.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason behind that is when you're looking at

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>industrial companies or corporate general corporations, the real concern is

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not how they did this quarter, but are they going

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to survive it? And where are they

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be in six months. When you're looking at

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the banks, there's a concern that they're leveraged, and if

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the loans are this bad now and they get worse later,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are they going to be able to pay the dividends?

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to be able to survive? Is it

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be two thousand and eight, two thousand nine?

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So number one, we'd make that distinction. We don't expect

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>other stocks and other industries and sectors to react like

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the banks that's first number two. We actually think when

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the dust settles, the banks are going to start to

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>do much better. We've been on all of these calls

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and and basically what the banks did is they were

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty draconian way, uh said, these loans. You know,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be an enormous uptick in negative loans

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>or non paying loans. They took a big hit now

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>And because the banks don't want to over promise and

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>under deliver, they and said and if things get worse,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>these numbers are going to get a lot worse. So

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone is looking at the bank numbers and assuming the worst.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We think that they've taken a significant reserve. One thing

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that they did say is that they will get through this.

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>At their balance sheets are in very good shape. They're

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>over reserved. You know. One of the things people are

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a sense of is is this big

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>move up off the bottom. Is it a head fake?

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it real? Are we're gonna retest lows because there's

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of dire data coming out over

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the next several months. Well, we think that the last

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>three weeks is a great lesson in teaching people that

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you simply can't time the market on a short term basis,

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you really shouldn't spend a whole heck of a

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time trying to call a bottom, because the

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>people that were trying to call a bottom all of

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden missed the first. So we think the key

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for investors is take a nine to twelve month time horizon,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going to be happening. By the end

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of this year. The market is going to be looking

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at two thousand and twenty one earnings, and on that basis,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we think stocks are pretty cheap and a that's your mindset,

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're able to do that. You're able to buy

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>some pretty decent companies at very attractive prices that are

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get through this period, and we think that's

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the most important question. We expect a lot of volatility.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>We would be buying in days like today, We would

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not be chasing the rallies of the last few weeks.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But today the newsflow feels horrible. Two days ago, you know,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one day ago the news flow felt great. Don't get

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>caught up in the daily news flow because it'll make

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you crazy. But if you can buy a good business

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's paying a four percent yield that is going to

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>live to fight another day, is going to get through

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this with pretty good economics. You do that, uh, and

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and try not to focus as much on the day

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to day volatility. When you say it's a good time

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to buy certain companies that you think that can withstand this.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Other people seem to think big tech is the place

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to go. We've seen those shares rally with the exceptions,

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>say of Alphabet due to the advertising revenue, which is

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like behind which companies are you really focusing on here?

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at companies like V or Comcast, or

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>CVS or A T and T. All are paying very

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>very healthy dividends. They absolutely will get through this. CVS

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is business has been pretty good. Abby has reaffirmed the dividend.

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They'll be growing the dividend. Their earnings are very good. Uh.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>A T and T is paying over a six and

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a half percent yield while you wait, we think they're

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get through this in pretty good form. All of

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>those are pretty good businesses. We also if again we

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't put too much in, but we also think that

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>banks are going to come through this in very good form.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't mind the additional volatility. Uh, that

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you can buy companies like a Wells Fargo or p

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>n C. P n C announced earnings today. Uh, it

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was it was actually a pretty good call. They really

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have their arms around this. They said that one thing

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come out of this when all said

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and done, is the quality of their loan portfolio, and

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>it's paying over almost a five percent dividend. Uh. So

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>those are the type of companies you can buy a

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>year from now. We think you're gonna be pretty happy

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and feel that you're pretty smart. How concerned are you

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>about balance sheets? A couple of companies you mentioned, most

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>notably A T and T and Comcast carrying a tremendous

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of debt. Now they've got good cash flows, but

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if this thing gets really ugly and for longer, how

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned are you about credit and balance sheets? We're very

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>concerned about balance sheets. If you're in a leveraged business

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or business is going to be impacted by the coronavirus.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So what would that include? That would include the automobile companies,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>hotel chains, restaurants, the cruise lines, airlines. Those companies, if

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got too much debt, are going to have no revenues.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>In terms of Comcast, their revenues are going to be

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely solid. They're going to come through this. They've got

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>great cash flow. People are not going to be cutting

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>off their services. Same with a T and T. We

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think that, um, you know people right now, we're all

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>working from home, so they either need their wireless or

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>they need Internet connections. Uh So A T T will

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get through this. Uh So in both of those cases,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're very, very comfortable that the companies have

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the cash flow to get through this. But your point

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>is exactly right. We would avoid companies and industries that

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>are going to see a cut in revenues and have

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>debt because they can get caught and really hurt. David,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm struggling with the historical reference point to this moment,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and people talk about the numbers and how you can't

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>really look at the numbers. Right now. We're getting, you know,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>horrible retail sales. The Empire Manufacturing Survey dreadful record lows,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>record plunges, record job losses, record this, record that, and

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and how do you sort of create a compass forward.

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It's faith, it's faith that we're going to recover. On

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side is there anything that you're clinging to

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that's beyond faith that things will revert to normal in

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of data. That underscore your point, which is things

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>will essentially eventually go back to the way that they were,

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can count on these previous ideas of stable

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets and companies that seem to have a viable

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>business model. That's that's exactly the point. So basically, the

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the time, the market looks out at

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings twelve to fifteen months out, So if you do that,

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you're really talking about two thousand and twenty one earnings,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's how financial markets work. So the part of

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>faith that our analysis relies on is that right now

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical companies are spending tens of billions of dollars

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to find a solution to the coronavirus. So we think

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point, whether it's three months from now or

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>six months from now or nine months from now, we're

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be in a more normal environment. There will

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be either a treatment for the coronavirus. Uh hopefully Johnson

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and Johnson that said that they're going to have a

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine by next um February or March is successful in

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that endeavor. And if something like that happens, all of

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, people will start to behave more normally. They'll

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be less scared about getting something and dying, which is

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a perfectly rational fear right now. And then the economy

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to open up. And at that point the market

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>looks beyond current earnings and current horrific economic ends, and

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the surviving companies are going to be valued on two

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty one earnings, and on that basis you're

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>able to get a lot of really good businesses at

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve times earnings. And the other part of the equation

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is when the fear factors at and when the world

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>returns to normal, interest rates are essentially at zero, the

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>federal government will have spent trillions of dollars, whether it's

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>two trillion or five trillion dollars, all that money will

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be at their interest rates will be at zero, bonds

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are not offering any reasonable alternative. Stocks will become pretty attractive. Uh.

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And that again leads to looking at IT earnings, looking

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>at its companies, and valuations based on the last one

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>years evaluations. David Kat's President and chief investment officer Matrix

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Asset Advisors, David Thanks so much for staying on the

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>line with us. Well, the horrendous economic data just keeps

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>rolling in this morning. In addition to the Empire manufacturing

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>data that fell u gird at Pace, we also saw

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a record decline in retail sales and joining us to

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really put this in their perspective at a time when

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people don't know what numbers to cling to a Smasha,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>director of consumer and Retail Trends at Credit Intel joining

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Long Island, Seema, so glad

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the phone here. I'm wondering what

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at in terms of the retail numbers

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to give you some gauge of how bad this is

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get. I think the biggest and those obvious

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>trend that came out of the numbers, it just sort

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of highlights the shift away from discretionary spending and two essentials.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You saw grocery stores at a really strong number and

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>ends up. But if you look at what happened to clothing,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>furniture department stores, I think that just at that risk

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>will continue to grow the longer we're in this shelter

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in place situation. Then it begs the question what happens

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>when we come out, how will these discretionary retailers be

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>able to perform, Like what do they need to do

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean for them? I think that's

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest takeaway I'm seeing right now. Yeah, it's interesting

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to seem I think the you know, one of the

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>questions that we we've been one of the areas of

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>discussion most we've had today and over the last several days,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is how do we think the consumer will change, if

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. On the other side of this is is

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there any data that you've seen that suggesting that there

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>will be a fundamental change, or if any of the

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>retailers you've spoken to, if they suggested that they expect

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental change, or will the consumer on the other

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>side of this just kind of go back to kind

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of normal. I think it's more likely you'll see a

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>change in the consumer because now we're going to be

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>going on almost two months pretty soon of sheltering in place,

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>changing your behavior, having six feet between you and anybody

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>else when you go to the grocery store. So I

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like some of those habits will be hard to change,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and it might require retailers to change how they are

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>running their stores. How restaurants. We know that in Hong

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Kong they've set up table six ft away from each

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>other and they're sanitizer everywhere. So I think people be

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>behavior will change, certainly, But I think the bigger question

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 1>is how when their finances will change and what does

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that mean for discretionary retailers When you know over seventeen

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>million people are filing for unemployment claims, retailers across the

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>board have for a loowed many many, if not all,

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of their employees. Other companies are also struggling, So how

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>do these people come back right? And I don't think

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that the stimulus that they're going to get at some

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>point one time check is going to be enough for

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>them to shift their spending back to the way that

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it was. But is actually what I'm concerned about. Well,

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>when people talk about the retail sector, they've talked about

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how Amazon has really consolidated share, and we've seen a

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>shift that's just accelerated to online ordering just because nobody

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to go out and the stores were all closed.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting in your notes you said that actually

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>there is a potential positive outcome from this, that there

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>will be a re emphasis on brick and mortar. Can

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about that. Yeah. Absolutely. I

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that you notice when you

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>come away from this is like when people really need something,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they want something, they want to go and get it themselves.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And you saw with Amazon having these huge supply chain issues,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>despite having one of the best supply chains out there,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they just could not bring in the essential product on time.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not even taking new grocery deliveries. You cannot get

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a spot to get Amazon fresh delivery. Even regular goods

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>were taking a long time up until recently, and they

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>halted essential you know, non essential sales, and I think

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge risk, and it it was a benefit

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>to people like Target and Walmart who are selling some

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of those merchandise, but that you could go and get

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it right away, and I think for them it was

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>even better economically because it's cheaper for a client or

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>customer to go pick up a product from the store

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>than having the retailer ship that product to them. And

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that type of that was really highlighted, I

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think in this crisis, and it shows why you need

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to have an omni channel strategy, not an online strategy,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and not a brick and mortar only strategy seem a

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about the balance sheets some of the retailers you

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>look at. I mean, you know a lot of retailers

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they operate on you know, very tight margins. I'm not

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sure how much cash they carry. How are you thinking

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>about that? Yeah, so credit until we put out a

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of reports recently which we keep updating, and one

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of those the retailers at risk. And you know why

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>are they at risk? Well, first of all, they have

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>most of them with through their guidance. They closed their stores,

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they furloughed their employees, most if not all of them

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>have drawn down and on their revolvers just to make

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>sure they have a bit of a cap cushion, and

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>suspended uh their operating expensive including in some cases not

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>paying their rent for the month of April. And we'll

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>see how long this goes. But the way we're looking

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at it is just like, how long can these companies, uh,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the credit r how long can

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they sustain in this type of environment when you don't

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have a zero revenue environment based on your balance sheet

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and how much cash you're able to get, right, And

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so there are retailers, you know, we're hearing a lot

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>about J C. Penny and we Credit Hill had a

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cash burn analysis on it that, based on certain assumptions,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if they cut their capital spending by uh, they wind

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>down accounts payable and accrude libilities by and a couple

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of other assumptions, including the fact that they paid rent

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that in a good scenario they have liquidity for five

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>point one month. Right, So this has certain assumptions, but

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about we're doing this many of

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>our retailers to see who is at most at risk,

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and so retailers like J. C. Penny who were already

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of struggling, and then you also have like the

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Stage Doors or a g n C or those type

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of players, how did they come out of this um

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>In many cases, I think it's going to be really

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>hard for them because if even you can't even go

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to bankruptcy at this point because you can't liquidate your inventory,

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>right so models and pure One even that is on hold.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think that it just makes it a lot

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for these guys. Take this to back though,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean trying to find a silver lining, just because

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>right now everything looks pretty dismal, and I'm trying to

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be more optimistic here, but I mean,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these retail chains have been struggling for a

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>long time. You talk about J. C. Petty, it's been

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the chopping block for a long time, with a

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of traders betting against that company. There are a

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>number of other retailers as well that have been sort

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the slow burn, and it's been accelerating in the

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>burn over the past few years. We'll just wash out

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the weaker players and allow some of the

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger retailers to actually consolidate share and put up a

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>bitter fight against Amazon and other retailers. I think so.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to say exactly who will make it

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out because companies don't want to fail and people protect

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>them to extend. But I think, yeah, you're gonna see, uh,

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>those that have been struggling and sort of being able

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to muddle along for the last couple of years when

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the consumers quote unquote strong and they

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>were still struggling. Yeah, I think you'll see a shakeout

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see the longer retailers take that share, and

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I think that will also include Amazon, right,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that gives them more leverage because they continue

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to take share as well. So even though they have

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>their own share of problems, they have the whole foods,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they have the relationship with colds and right aids, so

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they are building sort of an omnichannel strategy. So I

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely think you'll see that trend. So it's not like

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 1>all retail go away or everything is going to go online,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but you'll definitely see who the winners are, and it

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>will be most difficult for the smaller retailers who maybe

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any omni channel strategy to begin with, or

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just don't have the balance sheet to sort

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of sustain a zero revenue environment for multiple months. See Michew,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, who really appreciate

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>your insight. As always seems. She's a director of Consumer

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and Retail Trends at Credit Intel. The focus today, in

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to just see incredibly terrible economic data, has been

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>on the banks reporting earnings kicking off the earning season

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and loan lost provisions have been the key indicator of

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>how steep the recession, maybe at least in the eyes

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>of the major banks. And there's no one better to

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>talk to about this than Alison Williams, Senior analyst for

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the Global Investment Banks for Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins us. Now, Allison,

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>now that we've had a couple of hours to process

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the earnings and the twenty four billion dollars of loan

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>loss provisions set aside for souring loans in the in

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the weeks and months ahead by City Group, JP Morgan

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at Wells Fargo, UH and and City Group, what's your

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>big takeaway here? So the takeaway, UM, I think my

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>big takeaway from the border is that we've sort of

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>only just begun, and I think, um, you know, that's

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>probably the main concern among investors. So as you said,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had twenty four billion provisions twenty five

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>if you include UM Goldman UM, that's an increase of

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>about twenty billion compared with a year ago. And you know,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>when the managements are talking, uh, you know, yesterday's managements

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>were quite negatives. You're sort of hearing some mixed comments.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But when we look at some of the expectations that

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are built in and also just hearing from these managements

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that we're only at the beginning, it's it's qualitative in

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a way. It's just a guestiment, so we really, you know,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how bad this can get. Yeah, that's

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you can't really go back to the playbook

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand eight two thousand nine eight very different situations.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're the management team saying, listen, we're kind of

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a best guess here. We're probably gonna you may

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>even see us come back in future quarters with even

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>more Is that kind of the message they're trying to send.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>So JP morgan Um to begin with said very distinctly

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that we were definitely or we're probably going to have

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more reserves in two CUE, being that you know today's reserves,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's reserves took into account, you know, their economic forecast

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>um from their firm of unemployment and over ten percent

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>i'm sorry over drop in g d P over ten

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment rate. Those estimates already are worse down g

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>B g d P unemployment expected for two QUE. So

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>already their estimates are stale. And then the second part

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of it is the government programs. As you said, you

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>know that the OH nine playbook doesn't work, but even

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>at other cycles, we don't really know what the impact

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to be of these government programs of all

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>these deferrals, how much of these deferrals you know we'll

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.239
<v Speaker 1>end up going back to good and how much UM

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>will end up having to get charged off. And so

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we really won't know that until we start to move

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>throughout this quarter. So you know, ten ques, we might

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>get some update may conferences if they go virtual, we

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>make at some update, UM, but we really just don't know.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So one, JP Morgan and Bank of America leading the

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>declines that we're seeing today in the major US banks.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know, when we saw the numbers

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>come out yesterday, UM, I think some investors just sort

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of looked at the top line of reserves and with

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>those numbers, perhaps thought JP Morgan is conservative. Look at

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Wells They're much lower, you know they we take we

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the dollar provisions, but we look at those

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>provisions versus their loan book. JP Morgan with the two

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent ratio, you know, Wells Fargo sort

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of less than half of that. But then we saw

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a city group come out today UM with granted less

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar provision number, but their ratio UM while exceeding that

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>now of JP Morgan, perhaps making JP Morgan who appeared

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>conservative now seeming less so and um, you know a

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America as well. You know, again the question

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is sort of sort of how bad they are going

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to get from here? How all you prepared the card

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>business where all the all three of the banks that

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we just discussed are very big in this wells Fargo

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is less big. Um. You know, that's where we're seeing

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the provisions that that product tends to

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have the highest class rate. It's unsecured, the thing that

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people don't pay first. Um. And so I think that's

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to be the area of focus in

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the coming month or so. So Alis and I know

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to all these conference calls in these big

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>bank ceo s, they really have great visibility in terms

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of they see lots of the global economy around the

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>world that they suggest how long they anticipate a downturn

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to last. I think most people kind of dropped the

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>discussion of a V shaped but now more of a

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you or an L What are they kind of thinking

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Well, I think, um, you know, one

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>contrast maybe and again I think a lot of these

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>managements are sort of calling on their research departments. Um.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And again this goes to the quality of their reserves.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So Bank of America, you know, expecting a big drop

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>into Q like everyone else, but also expecting negative um

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>growth or declines in GDP for several quarters to come

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>versus JP morgan um that is currently factoring in more

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of a rebound in the back half. That being said,

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think all managements do sort of acknowledge um that

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily know how long this is going to

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go on, and so the key risk I think they're

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>two investors. Obviously, yes, it's it's the provisions, but it's

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the dividends where managements are committed. The FED said they

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't see any need for cuts at this time, but

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that this downturn is unprecedented and we

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long it's going to go on. We

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there will um become more pressure, if

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this becomes a prolonged situation. Alison Williams, thanks so much

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really appreciate it. We know you're busy

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>with all these big bank earnings, but we appreciate it

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the time. Alison Williams, she's a senior annals covering

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>all things financials for Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us her perspective

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and kind of Lisa frankly sharing that the management teams

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>really don't know. These are the provisions we have as

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of right now, but there could be more. Yeah, and

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and typically banks do take a conservative approach. The question

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is just how do you even know what a conservative

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of approaches when you have no idea what we're heading into. Yeah,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And I think they're just trying to simply say, um,

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of what we know now. We're relying

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>upon the data we have now. But to the extent

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this thing goes even longer, it could be even worse.

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. M Paul Sweeney, I'm

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyd's I'm

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abram woits one before the podcast,

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio