WEBVTT - Part Two: The Last Sam Bankman-Fried Episodes (secretly about Michael Lewis)

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Also media a welcome back to Behind the Bastards, our

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>special edition episodes on Sam Bankman, who is not freed

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because he is still in jail. That's it's the intro

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got. It's the same as the last episode.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>No, you're hilarious. It's still very funny. Sophie's favorite.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the only time I've made Sophie laugh in years.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. Well, okay, Switzerland on this issue. You're

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Swiss on this issue. Swiss you Jamie. Speaking of Switzerland,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you also were neutral in World War Two? Is that correct? Yeah?

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I was sort of like kidding. You made me laugh again.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Congrats two for two, baby, So we took a couple

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of days and tween recording part one and part two.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Really let it sink in. How are you feeling on

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>our technically not a Behind the Bastards on Michael Lewis,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but basically a behind the Bastards on Michael Lewis, author

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of The Big Short.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I So in the interesting days, I've talked about the

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis of it all with a couple of different people,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>just to see if I was like if I had

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>just missed something. But every single person I talked to

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I found had a similar experience to me, where they

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>did not know that he wrote The blind Side. Oh good, okay, yeah,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 2>and then when they found out that he wrote the

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>blind Side, they were like, oh, yeah, I could see

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that he is a you know, he's an honorary bastard.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe he is kind of a hack. Yeah right, well.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were like, yeah, Michael Lewis Moneyball the Big Short,

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And You're like, and another thing, how did that? How

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>how do we collectively forget that he wrote that? It

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>feels like he got away with something.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I guess I've been thinking about what he's

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>doing with Sam Bankman Freed as I think about the

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>upcoming Napoleon movie, which I will have watched by the

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>time this comes out, but it's not out yet. So

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about that time. I'm ready. Everyone, especially like all

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of these history Twitter podcast people, are so livid that

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Ridley Scott's basically like, who can say what the truth

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of Napoleon's life was, which is it is a ridiculous

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to say. He's very well documented. We actually know

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Napoleon. But also, I don't give a shit.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the guy who made Gladiator, like well, and also.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate because all biopics are you know, nonsense, yeah

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>or shit right, And so you're like, well, this is

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the one director who's going to say my biopic is kind.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Of horse, it's just lies, which also very appropriate for Napoleon.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But what is the line with that? Why Why am

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I angry at Michael Lewis for what he's doing? And

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>He's a journalist, there is he's a journalist.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>One he's not the director of fucking Gladiator, the least

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>accurate movie about Rome ever made.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>It's been a great it's been a great week for

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>like weird old guys who we could argue had have

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 2>peaked creatively, although I wouldn't say that for Scorsese. But

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>there was a great quote that was floating around in

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of days where I guess Scorsese said

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>on the Killers of the Flower Moon press stor that

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>he was like always worried about running out of time

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>and he never knew what his last movie would be.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>And Ridley Scott was asked to like react to that,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and he said, since he started Killers of the Flower Moon,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I've made four films. No I don't think about it.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I get up in the morning and say, ah, great,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>another day of stress.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, those are both completely valid answers. Yeah, I refuse

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of some sort of like pretending

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that what Scott is saying isn't as valid as what

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese's saying. There are two ways to deal with mortality,

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Two genders of creative march Yeah.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. One is oh my god, I will die and

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I won't have said everything I need to say, And

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the other is what the fuck I got I got

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>shit to do, I gotta move, I gotta have time

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with the answer to this fucking question. Yeah.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, Robert Paul Schrader is on Facebook, and Paul Schrader's

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>posting about Taylor Swift in a kind of horny way,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>so like, yeah, the old men are just there on

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>one this week, and Michael Lewis walks among them.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>There's only one old, great creative who has taken the reasonable,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>respect like answer to mortality, and it's John Carperdue, who's like, Nah,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm done directing movies. I'm gonna get high, play video games,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>watch basketball the rest of my life, and God, bless God,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bless him. Yeah, God bless them. There's a man who

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>understands what's valuable in life, a thing that Sam Bankman

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Freed never understood. And we're and we're back. Yeah, we're back.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that comes up a lot

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in Michael Lewis's book is he's sort of going into

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the mind and psyche of Sam Bankman Freed, is that

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Sam had this belief that no one ever does anything

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>useful after like age forty to forty five, somewhere around

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there is the last time you have a useful thought

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in your entire life, which I guess is relevant to

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>our discussion of aging aging powerful men.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 2>I will say that that's true of many stand up comedians,

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>but I can't speak of that outside of that.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean I think it's true, especially like

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>once you get really rich, it's you tend to like

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>lose complete touch with the world and go insane. So

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that is somewhat accurate, at least for some

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>creative professions. But Sam is not in a creative profession,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually kind of ridiculous to me the idea

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>that like people in business after age forty four, like

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs did all of his best shit like well

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>after that point, like his most influential like evil things

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and most like really successful businessmen are just kind of

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>getting started by their mid forties, right, because it takes

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that much time to get that's momentum.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 2>You've got a lot of evil like you got.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He's lot of horrible things left to do, plenty of time.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>First is in front of you.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got three to five ethnic cleansings in

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a minimum minimum Jamie, Yeah, maybe eight. You know, I

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>could see him having eight more ethnic cleansings.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>He does seem like someone who just will like have

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>a kissinger like affinity for life.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so bankman Freeds, I understand belief that, like after

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>age forty five, he's not going to be capable of

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>having any useful ideas. This is what pushed him, you know,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>along with his effective altruist idea. This is why he

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like he had to he had to continually gamble

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than like taking the slow, sustainable path making money

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>off of his exchange at like a reasonable pace. No, no, no,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I only have a few more years left before my

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>brain shrivels up. And so if I'm going to do

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>anything good for the world, I have to keep putting

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>every dollar I've made on a fifty to fifty bet endlessly, right,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>mm hmmm, which isn't it? Which is like, I don't know,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you should probably get help if you feel that about

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the world world, because that's a deeply self destructive way

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about yourself and about your assets. This is

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a big part of why FTX did not have a

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>really crucial thing for any company, particularly a financial company,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to have, which is a risk officer.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>A risk officer's job is to analyze the deals the

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>company is doing and go, well, that's an insane risk,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so let's not do that one. Or you know, that's

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>an insane risk. We need to offset it with this stuff.

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They also did not have a chief financial officer or

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other critical executive positions.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no CSOs, that's one I've heard of. You should

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>have that one.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a really basic job, and its job is basically

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to know how much money you have, right, Like, there's

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>other stuff to it, but it's pretty critical. FTX also

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>did not have a board of directors, and they're lacking

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other very basic executive positions, and a

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>big part of why is that the only people Sam

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>feels like he can trust are like his friends, and

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he has this deep aversion to bringing in adults, like

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people who were not in their twenties, like his the

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>friends he went to college with. And shit, he said

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in one interview with Michael, we tried having some grown ups,

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't do anything. This was true for everyone

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>over the age of forty five. All they did was worry, which, like, again,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>given what happened, perhaps they auto have been.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'm just like sort of on one with the

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>idea that very few stand ups have a valuable thought

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>after forty five. But I would say now reflecting on it,

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>like Sam Bankminfried is using the improv troop approach to

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a very high stakes business. Yes, Like he's like, no,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I will only work with people I went to college with,

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>we know best. I don't want no fucking crusties in

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the room, like if he I mean, And we could

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>debate all day about whether Sam bankmdfried would have done

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>more evil in his life so far or in his

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>life as an improv comedian, because I think they should

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>all be in forever jail. So it's kind of like,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>it's difficult, it's difficult.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>This is what Levenworth should be right. Military needs to

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>take stand up comedians into custody. I've always had and

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a lot of lists.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know how many bars have performed in to

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>know people, I'm on a lot of lists.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So Sam's response when he was asked by Michael, like,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>why don't you guys even have a CFO? That seems important?

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>He says, there's a functional religion around the CFO. I'll

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ask them why do I need one? Some people cannot

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>articulate a single thing the CFO was supposed to do.

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>They'll say, keep track of the money or make projections,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, what the fuck do you think I

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>do all day? You think I don't know how much

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>money we have? Which is funny because his whole legal

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>defense in court was I had no idea how much

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>money we had or where it was, and that's why

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I didn't commit a crime, right because I just was incompetent.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know where the money was. But it's all

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere Like, very silly thing to say, given what he's

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>about to say. Okay, So after Sam's life fell apart,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis continued to talk and visit multiple sometimes would

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>call like three or four times a day through the

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>eight months that Sam was on house arrest. And it's

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because, like Michael, if I was a

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>journalist like Michael Lewis, and I had had a conversation

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with somebody when they were one of the biggest names

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in an industry, being like a CFO is useless. I

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>know where the money is, and then their entire life

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>explodes because they didn't know what the money is. I

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>would at some point asked him the question, Hey, was

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that maybe a bad idea? Michael does not bring this

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up to Sam after the collapse in any of the

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>dozens of conversations that they've had, and in fact, and

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this is why that's weird. The actual villain of his book,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Going Infinite, the one person that Lewis is super critical

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of in like a really uncharitable way, is the CEO

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>brought into takeover the FTX after Sam like leaves and

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>declares bankruptcy, a guy named John ray the Third. Now,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I am not going to go to bat for John

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ray the Third because he he's John His name is

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>John ray the Third, Like that name.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>To go to bat Ford, Yeah.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But he Is. You know, he's the guy who got

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>brought into liquidate in Ran and he's he's kind of

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a corporate undertaker, right when a when there's a huge

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>scandal at a company, when it like collapses, goes into bankruptcy,

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and you need someone to kind of do the post mortem.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You bring in John Ray and he's like, as far

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>as I know.

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Not the first or second.

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>No, not the first or second. Those guys are useless.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>No fucking clowns. Okay, you're gonna want to bring in

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>the third.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You need a j R. Three.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, so yes, sir.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting, like the degree to which he has

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>because this guy comes in later and I think because

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he's boring, Michael Lewis finds him disgusting. Like I haven't

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>run into any info that he's like bad at what

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he does. It's certainly not his fault, but Michael is

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>livid because he's this kind of like stodgy old businessman

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't understand sam spe playground or like the

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful thing that he built, and he's just kind of

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>exasperated at how badly it all works.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>See that's fascinating to me because to me that says

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>like Michael Lewis is, I mean, either just hates boring people,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>which fair enough, but you know he should know as

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a journalist that boring people are often and maybe most

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>often tremendously capable of doing bad shit. But it seems

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>like he's looking more for like, well, Bradley Cooper can't

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>play you in a movie. You're useless to me, your garbage,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you're boring.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing. Yeah, there's nothing sexy about him. He's just

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to deal up, like clean up after a disaster.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's some really funny lines in the book because

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things that Lewis has to do

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to kind of defend Sam as a genius

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is explain how he didn't steal nine billion dollars, right,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer that Lewis has come to is that

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>money is all there, that he just didn't know where

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars was. Oh yeah, he didn't steal it

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or gamble it away. He just misplaced it, dude, rank

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and competence that he committed because he was too smart

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of things. And there's a I'm going

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to read you a very uh yeah, there's a really

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fun quote there he describes like Lewis describes FTX as

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a real business, but he says that John Ray, who

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like attacked it as the worst run company I'd ever seen,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was just too much of an idiot to like understand

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it right. He describes Ray trying to figure out what

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>company assets actually existed in what didn't, as quote like

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>an amateur archaeologist who had stumbled upon a previously unknown civilization,

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>unable to learn anything about its customs or language. He

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just started digging, right, Like really, he's too dumb to

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>understand the brilliant thing that Sam built up, so he

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just starts like churning about in the wreckage without really

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciating everything that went into making this monufental edifice.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And I really wonder, like what I mean, this is

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 2>like getting into the weeds a little bit. But I'm

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>very curious, like what, like who on Michael Lewis's editorial

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>team is keeping him in check. It doesn't sound like

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>he's hired a fact checkers to sound like he has

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a personal Jimminy Crickett, So he's just saying shit like

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>his personal biases couldn't be more out.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to rush this thing out, so you don't

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have much time to edit it, right, True? Yeah, a

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>year to write and release a book is not a

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>long time.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>No, not enough time one might, not enough.

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Time, one might argue. And also Michael Lewis has the

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of clout to make that not happen. Right, And again,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I also kind of think that his hatred of Ray

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>here is based on the fact that Ray did not

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>fall for Sam's bullshit the way Michael did. Right. Here's

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what Ray said shortly after taking over and getting a

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>look at ftx's finances, and this is from an our

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>article in Business Insider. At the hearing, Congresswoman an Wagner

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of Missouri asked Ray to elaborate on the specific ways

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>FTX was worse than quote one of the largest corporate

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>frauds in history. Ray explained that FTX was unused and

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>then it had no record keeping whatsoever. He said that

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>employees would exchange invoices and expenses on Slack, the ubiquitous

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>workplace chat room. They used QuickBooks, he added, referring to

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the accounting software quick Books. Congresswoman Wagner asked for clarification,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>QuickBooks very nice tool, not for a multi billion dollar company.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Rake confirmed and that's like basically they're using the kind

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing that you would use if you're like a

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>person keeping track of you, or maybe your small business

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is accounting.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've done that and like that. That's nuts.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is like the close attitude too.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I was like, that's the closest thing I've come to debuting. Like, Wow,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 2>if I was also the tasked with multi billion dollars,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, I don't know, yeah books, Well we

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>go to turbo tax, what do we do? I would

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>hire a CFO.

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would hire someone who's done that before, right.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah QuickBooks. Holy shit.

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So you can decide whose interpretation sounds more realistic

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>John Ray recognize you can. Basically, the two possibilities are

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>like either John Ray just recognizes basic incompetence when he

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>sees it and gets angry, or he's just not brilliant

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and special enough to understand Sam's world, which is is

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what That's what Michael lewis, that's he in caps. That's

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what Michael Lewis refers to FTX as is Sam's world, right,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a He basically treats the whole situation as like, yes,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam's Sam lived in this magical world, and you know,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>his business was actually secretly good, but it encountered this

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>temporary issue and he was forced out. And then John

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Ray came in and he tore it all apart because

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.479
<v Speaker 1>he's just the mean, old, grumpy businessman.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>That's that's really like the thrust of Michael Lewis's book,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and part of how he kind of emphasizes the magical

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>inner world Sam lived in is this kind of obsession

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>with gaming returning to like Lewis is just sort of

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinated with like the fact that Sam was an addict. Right,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam is a gaming addict. That's what when you can't

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like handle your basic functions, but because you're too busy

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>playing Storybook Brawl, that's an addiction, right, yeah. Yeah. And

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting both because Storybook Brawl was made by his

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>childhood friend and he used consumer funds to purchase it.

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It seems to have been a pretty mid game. It

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down after he got arrested, so I can't play

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it to tell you if it's actually good. But Lewis

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't describe it as like a middle brow app game.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>He describes it as like better than chess, like more

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>complex than chess. A greater intellectual expert or exercise than chess,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and he writes this paragraph about it. Sam didn't care

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>for games like chess, where the players controlled everything and

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the best move was, in theory, perfectly calculable chess. He'd

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have liked better if robot voices wired into the board.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Hollered rule changes at random intervals. Nights are now rooks,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all bishops must leave the board, ponds can now fly,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or almost anything, so long as the new rule forced

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>all players to scrap whatever strategy they'd been pursuing and

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>improvise another better one. The game Sam loved allowed for

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>only partial knowledge of any situation. Trading crypto was like that,

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think getting.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Fucking ridiculous, Like is there any chance that Sam Bankman

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Freed paid Michael Lewis to say this shit?

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I maybe I don't know that he was still

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the money one of the things.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Not that there's no proof that he isn't dense, But

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>this is like above and beyond.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I get that a lot that like, well,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis is obviously bribed, but like Michael Lewis is

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>very rich, Like I don't know how you could bribe

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis, especially after you lose your money.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and even and even if he wasn't from money,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>he'd be there.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Yah. Yeah, Yeah, He's always been rich and always will be.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how much I think that's that's likely.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he just this is his first time ever

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing about games, and so he thinks Sam is brilliant

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and special because he played them obsessively. I also think,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just did our episodes on Lord John

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>asked and all, who is like this this British gambling

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>maven who took away who like basically uh got the

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>upper class of the England and like the mid century

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to just gamble away all of their fucking money. And

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a big part of why this kind of like old

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>generation of the aristocracy lost so much is they were

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>into these specifically games of chance like Shamanda fair, which

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of bacca where basically there's no skill involved.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>It's pure it's as close to pure chance as possible.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Because there was this like change in the kind of

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling the upper class like to do that I've heard

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>theorized it's basically just like, well, these people had nothing

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in their life but gambling, right, They've always been rich,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they're born rich, they've always lived these super safe lives.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>The only thrill they had was throwing a bunch of

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>money on like the effectively a complete chance.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And for understand that, because it's like, what's the worst

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that's going to happen. You're going to become marginally less

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 2>rich but still maintain the same quality of life.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>That sounds boring, Yeah, you've just they've they are just

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>insulated from anything thrilling because they're insulated from any real danger, right.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think Sam being this kind of rich,

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sheltered kid that's Lewis interprets. It's like he's too smart

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to play a game like chess. He wants a game

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>where he doesn't actually know what's going on, and a

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of that's random. It's like, well, I just see

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these old British gamblers and Sam Bankman freed, where again,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this kid has nothing but the throw of the dice

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>inside him and that's what he liked, right, and he

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of other people's money on those bets. Yeah, anyway,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a little beside the point, but I did

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>want to read the actual part of the book where

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Lewis describes Magic the gathering because it's it is very boom.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Magic had been created in the early nineteen nineties by

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a young mathematician named Richard Garfield. It was the first

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of a new kind of game, designed perhaps for

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of person. Garfield had started with an

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>odd question, could a strategic game be designed that allowed

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the players to come to it with different equipment? And again,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Games Workshop had started making Warhammer years before Magic came out,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Like all games have existed forever.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't hear you over the sound of imagining Garfield

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the cat saying.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That, Yeah, which Garfield? Bill Murray? Are we talking Chris Pratt?

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>There's also a secret third Garfield Garfield whoever did the

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>voice acting on Garfield and Friends, which is my canonical

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Garfield voice, certainly not Chris Pratt Garfield there. I forget

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>who tweeted this, but there is a vibe with the

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>new Garfield that Chris Pratt has been locked in a

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 2>room forced to voice every major ip. It's like a

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>it's his infinity punishment. He'll be rich, but he can

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>never leave the room.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that. Actually, yeah, let's keep.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Him in the room. He doesn't have any good ideas.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>No, No, keep in the room. Every every six years

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he can come out to do another interminable Jurassic World movie.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>No, the villain was Locus.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>So Lewis is so ignorant of kind of the basic

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of youth culture to this day that he sort of

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>transposes a lot of completely normal millennial and zoomer behaviors

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>As evidence of Sam's unique brilliance. Here's another clip from

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty Minutes where he describes how Sam treated effective altruism.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That that ties into this and this is remarkable.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 4>What it means in Sam's instance is you can go

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 4>out and have a career where you do good. You

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 4>can go be a doctor in Africa, or you can

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 4>go out and make as much money as possible and

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>pay people to be doctors in Africa. If you're a

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 4>doctor in Africa, you get you end up saving a

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 4>certain number of lives.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 5>But you're only one doctor. But if you can.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Pay forty people to become doctors in Africa, you're gonna

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 4>save forty times a number of lives.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>This is like a strategy game.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, you don't understand sammcmcfreed. Unless you understand then he

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 5>turns everything into a game. Everything is gamified.

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>He's describing a pyramid scheme of doctors.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, am I like, And he's.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Saying this on sixty minutes, I like, I cannot put

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>rout my Okay, now I am like taking him being

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>paid off like or paid on or off off the

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>table because you're just like, this is ridiculous.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>This is like you stupid.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like to like the fact that people somehow collectively

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 2>forgot that you wrote the blind Side on fire to

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>say this shit on sixty minutes, it just like, is

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>it's what he's describing a pyramid scheme.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>He sure is, he is describing a fucking pyramid scheme.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And also like this hole he turns everything into a game,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like because.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The through like connection there is like Jigsaw for good.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Sam could have been a doctor in Africa, but

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>by making a lot of money, he could hire a

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of doctors in Africa. And the through line you're

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>meant to make is he was He was the guy

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who was best suited making a lot of money because

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>he turned everything into a game. And man, that's again

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not unique to Sam. A significant percentage of the US economy.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>It's based around taking the logic and addictive strategies game

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>developers use and applying it to every imaginable industry, right,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>like that's fucking everywhere, Like Sam is again not unique

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in this, And also the it's just such a the

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that Lewis seems to have bought into the basic

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>logic of like, well, it's better to pay a bunch

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of doctors than becoming one is silly because like, well,

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a shortage of doctors. We don't have a

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shortage of assholes who gamble with other people's money. There's

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not actually enough doctors for the people who need them.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And also, I mean to that point, it doesn't sound

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 2>like would I trust, knowing what I do, of Sam

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed's ability to multitask that would I trust him

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 2>doing surgery? I don't think I would. I don't think

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I would. I wouldn't trust him doing either of those

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 2>in Africa?

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, no, he would, he would never have right,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like but yeah, anyway, but.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like he I mean, maybe I'm like, you know,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 2>giving him too much credit and he's playing a game

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of forty t but it doesn't seem that way, and

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I like, he sounds ridiculous.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I kind of outside of he's just completely deluded. His

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>two options are he's just so out of touch with

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the youth that he thought Sam was unique in this,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or he he decided from the moment he met him.

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the framing device I want to use for

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Sam's genius in my book because I can think. I

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think they could film it easily, right, because I'm sure

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that way about the books he's written. He's

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>had so many of them adapted, and like, yeah, if

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I you know, there's a lot of fun ways you

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>could film this super genius solving his math problems through

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like imagining games out in the real world, right, hmm, yeah,

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So I my guess is that he just couldn't get

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>himself off of this idea he had for like the

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>inevitable Sam Bankman Freed movie, you know, crafted for the

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang Theory audience.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like sure, he's already he's like, oh yeah, who's

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 2>hot right now, Paul Mezcal, Well, well we'll dye his hair.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be fucking great.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I think they should have had Timothy shallomeh I

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think they should have had Timothy Shallo may do like

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a you know, what's his name the Batman guy where

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>he would like wildly change his appearance in ways that

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are bad for his health every since.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Don't talk about Robbert Pattens in that way.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Or I want to see Timothy do a Christian bale

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to look like Sam Bankman Freed. That's that sounds fun.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I just worry about Timothy shalmy. It looks like if

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 2>you like touch him, he may shatter. I just worry

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>about him. He looks a.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Frail Yeah, that's the right thing. He looks like he's

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>got consumption. Yeah, but like that, they would say that

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about him in the in the in the in the

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>distant past. Yeah.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And it's like if Sam Bankman Freed is looking heartier

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>than you are, like you're in trouble my man.

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh. Yeah, Well I wouldn't say that about Sam.

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But so there's an amusing coda to Lewis's loving descriptions

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of Sam as a compulsive gamer. This paragraph occurs right

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>after the FTX customers pull a run on the bank,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>annihilating its cash reserves and starting its collapse. Is like

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the employees are all huddled inside thirty million dollar Bahamas

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>suites to try to figure out how to fix things.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Nishad was agitated with Sam in a way that Romnik

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>had never seen, at one point, turning on him and screaming,

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>will you please fucking stop playing storybook brawl? And I

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like that anecdote, But it gets to another frustrating issue

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with Going Infinite, which is that Michael Lewis has all

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients for a great modern Icarius story of Hubris

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Fall, but making it work tonally would require

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>him to see these things that are obvious warning signs

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>as warning signs and structure his book that way, right,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you get some Catharsis in the payoffs. But

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>these warning signs are just sort of scattered around. They're

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not given the significance he would give them if he

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>saw them as warning signs, because he's clearly taken with

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff. Another example of a valid through

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>line Lewis seems to have missed is Bankman Freed's complete disregard,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>even distaste, for the competence of the women around him.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Lewis spends a fair amount of time on Sam's relationship

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>with Carolyn, and he he prints these letters between them

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that certainly don't make Sam look great. It began with

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a seriously compelling list titled arguments against this is arguments

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>against her dating him in a lot of ways, I

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a soul. This is a lot more

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious in some context than others. But in the end

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty decent argument that my empathy is fake,

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>my feelings are fake, my facial reactions are fake. I

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't feel happiness. What's the point in dating someone you

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>physically can't make happy. I have a long history of

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>getting bored in claustrophobic. This says the makings of a

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>time when I'm less worried about it than normal, but

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the baseline prior might be high enough that nothing else matters.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel conflicted about what I want. Sometimes I really

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be with you. Sometimes I want to stay

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at work for sixty hours straight and not think about

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>anything else.

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>And so I want to say that I have this

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of self love to not fall for this, but

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't even say that one hundred percent. I just

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>really feel for Carolyn, And at a lot of points

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in this story, because it's oh my god, I feel

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>like there's a version of someone who would be like,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 2>oh I can fix him, where you're like, oh no,

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>this is like it's like queen fiction of like there's

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>only one and she loves me. I know, I know

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>she's a disadvantage.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's difficult because like Lewis come discusses kind

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of Sam's inability to be like functional with the people

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in his life because and he clearly has a thing

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like he lets he funds another another exchange by another

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>woman in Crypto who he tries to date women in CRISTI. Yeah,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he's got this kind of thing going on. But Lewis

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of always writes off his his his behavior is

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like well, you know, he just he was too depressed.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He was too he can't vooe. He's too brilliant to

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like be it's.

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>A torture genius playbook of just like oh, and he's

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>horrible to women, but only because his mind. Like there's

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they did the same and this happens every

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>ten years, like that happened with Zuckerberg. They're like no,

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>he's like he's a rampant misogynist because like his business

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>started off of misogyny because he just had so many

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>good ideas that it was like pressing on the woman

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>respect Like yeah, it's ridiculous kind of.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, when Lewis is describing like why Carolyn did what

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>she did, he includes Lane, which she's like. He's like,

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he quotes someone as saying she would throw away all

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of her principles to be loved, Like she's the only

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the effective altruist kids who doesn't really believe

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in it. She's just so desperate for affection that she

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would like do anything for it, which like, I don't know,

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know the person, but it's it's weird

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that Louis is so cynical about her and so full

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of excuses for Sam.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have I would have a fair amount of

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 2>guesses as to why that may be. Uh, And the

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>way that it seems like in many ways that you

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>know Lewis has seen himself in Sam, and like, if

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 2>you're especially if you're used to like writing profiles of

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>very successful, eccentric people, which he is, if this is

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the precedent you've set for the kind of behavior that

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you would excuse, such as clear racism or sexism, why

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.239
<v Speaker 2>would this be any different? Likes it fucking And then

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>also on the other end of Carolyn being characterized as

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 2>this like desperate for affection. Person I try to like

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 2>tap into that of like God, if any of my

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 2>personal correspondents came out, I'd be fucking cooked.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh it would be devastating so.

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Many people and being singled out. Yeah, of course, Yeah,

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 2>everyone's desperate for affection.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know, anytime you see Lewis writing about Sam,

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he writes in kind of the terms Sam as one

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the people in this weird effective altruism cult. He

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>uses terms like he talks about his priors, which is

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's a way of like bringing Baysian mathematics into

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>personal decisions, and all you all you're saying when you're

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>saying like, well, these are my priors, is like, well,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the shit I believe without any kind of evidence. Right,

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That's largely what that means. These are like my pre

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>existing biases. But saying pre existing biases like doesn't sound

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as smart as my priors. And likewise, Sam would always

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about like, well, every decision I make is like

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical decision, and I calculate what's the expected value

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of this outcomers is this outcome? And then I do

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing with the highest expected value, right, which is

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>another way of saying I do whatever will make me

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>feel good, which is you know, a lot of us

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>are like that a lot of the time. That's human nature.

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>We are.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Creatures of comfort in a lot of ways. But there's

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Sam is just dressing up selfishness in lines like this,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam wanted to do whatever at any given moment, off

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>her the highest expected value, and his estimate of her

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Carolyn's expected value seemed to peak right before they had

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sex and plummet immediately after. And like, oh, that's no

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>different than a lot of guys in their twenties.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 2>It just sounds like a fucking guy.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh so you're saying he got horny and then he

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't care about her afterwards. Well that's not special, Like.

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>How I I can't relate?

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, that is. That's not just millions of men,

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that's millions of people.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Like it's so, I mean, even just outside of his

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>relationships with women, in his relationship with Carolyn, I don't know.

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It gives me sort of like mensa PTSD, where there

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>is this like two hander where it's either, uh, you

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>can't understand what I'm doing because I am a super

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>genius and you are not operating on my level. You

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 2>could never understand why I am fucking up at this

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>tremendous rate. And then if they're challenged enough, it's like, well,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 2>actually I'm you know it. I don't know the correct

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>way to like characterize this, but it almost becomes like

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>internet speak where it's like, no, I'm actually just like

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a shit. It's actually I'm using quick

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>books because I don't give a fuck. It's like either

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I am a genius or I don't care, and there's

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 2>nothing in but and it's like what is in between

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is just the fact that they're full of shit.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, and you know who else is full of

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:22.479
<v Speaker 1>no time to head to ads? Ah? Boy, I sure

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>do love ads. Those were some good ones. So yeah,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're back. We're talking about Sam Bakman Free's issues

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>with women, as chronicled by Michael Lewis, who does, to

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>his credit, make a point of noting that all of

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the company's moves as CEO from the US to Hong

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Kong and then from Hong Kong to the Bahamas were

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>prompted by like he and Ellison would have some big

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship conversation and she would say like, I want to

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have a closer relationship and then he would move the

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>entire company without telling anybody, which, again, like the instant

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>you hear that anecdote, you're like, oh, well, this guy,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing. This guy is not a super genius, Like

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>this guy is just a can't deal with confrontation. Like, yeah,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not special again, millions of us.

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Every conflict avoidant person has their approach. It knows no gender,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>but it skews towards one. Yeah, my last boyfriend bought

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>an upright base. That was how bless is sorry? I

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:25.720
<v Speaker 2>don't think.

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the real shame here is that I don't think

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis draws any sort of connection between how Sam treats

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the women at his company and how like Sam treats

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>adults with the specialized financial knowledge that might have saved

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>his company, because there is a relate. Like, I'm not

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to discount his misogyny, which is certainly a thing,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but like, I think the bigger through line with Sam

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that is present outside of justice dealing with like the

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>women that he was in relationships with and worked with,

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is that Sam doesn't think anyone besides him has worthwhile

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts or ideas, and that anything he doesn't understand is

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>not worth paying attention to, which is a big thing

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in tech guys, right, this attitude that like you're seeing

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it now with these AI freaks where there they don't

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>think that there's any value in the human creation of

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>art because they don't understand it. Like they're willing to

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>like have an AI just like come up with some

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>crap that's vaguely patterned off of a historical See, isn't

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this picture of like, you know, isolation and anomy in

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>modern society? Better now that we've turned it into a

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>bunch of friends having brunch outside of a cafe. Look,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's much brighter now and prettier. It's like, No, that's

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not the point of the art. You don't understand, but

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like they don't. Yeah, it's this thing.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 2>That a computer could come up with the image of

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Hal Walker and Brian the Dog in a convertible. No,

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that's a uniquely human artistically instinct we would created. Only

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>humans would get it.

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>This idea that like I am smart, and therefore if

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand something, it's not important, right, It's it's

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>something for like people who are less than me to

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>deal with. This is why the company fell apart, And

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to me that like Lewis, he clearly does

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>see aspects of how Sam treats women unfairly, but he

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sort of leaps between the way Sam

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>treats like everybody who's not him and I find that interesting.

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:16.479
<v Speaker 2>I do too.

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, good good stuff. So perhaps the biggest major

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>through line in Going Infinite is Michael Lewis not getting

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the joke. That section where he quotes SBF explaining why

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>CFOs are dumb is a perfect example. On a casual reading,

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>you might even assume that we were supposed to find

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the line what do you think I do? What the

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>fuck do you think I do? All day? Do you

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think I don't know how much money we have? Funny

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 1>because Sam did not know how much money they had.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>At the climax of the book, after FTX is crumbled,

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Lewis goes into detail to discuss all the money that

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was recovered by John Ray quote at the end of

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>June twenty yeah the third. At the end of June

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, John Ray filed a report on his

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>various collections. Today the debtors have recovered an approximate least

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>seven billion in liquid assets, he wrote, and they anticipate

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>additional recoveries seven point three billion to be exact. Ray

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was inching towards an answer to the question I'd been

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>asking from the day of the collapse, where did all

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that money go? The answer was nowhere. It was still there,

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's not true. The reason he's writing this is

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that earlier in Sam's career, a bunch of people leave

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Alameda because he loses four million dollars and they think

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's lost four million dollars in investor money, and

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a dick about it, and later they find it

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like he had just misplaced it, basically, and so Lewis

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>is being like, that's just what happened. They were never

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really in bankruptcy. See, it was a good business. Like

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't have any record keeping, so they lost

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the money. In this meanie, John Ray thinks it's bad

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to lose several billion dollars, but Lewis is saying is

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not true. He is kind of lying here. Maybe he

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just maybe it's an honest mistake. I don't know, but

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not accurate because for one thing, seven ish seven

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>point three billion has been found, almost nine billion is missing.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's one and a half billion dollars unaccounted for. Still,

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that's still one of the largest financial frauds in history.

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Right, significant, that's why maybe as much as two billion, yeah,

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 2>does even if you're trying to get through to someone

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 2>who knows nothing about finance, the second number, the missing number,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is bigger than the first.

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>The number if not good. He tries to cut close

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that hole by being like, and a lot of that

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>money is in these you know, money they paid to

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies that they'll probably get back. And it's like,

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>why would you think that a lot of that money

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>went to other shady crypto people who don't bank in

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the US. Why do you think the money's gonna come back?

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, see, this is interesting because now, ugh, I feel

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>back because I know Michael Lewis is not the bastard

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of the episode. However, he's kind of applying Yeah, Sam,

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 2>if we're applying Sam bankman Free's theory that you do

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 2>not do any valuable work after forty five, that may

0:39:55.719 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 2>in fact apply to Michael Lewis. Yeah, Like, maybe he's

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 2>lost the thread because it's the way that he's talking

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>about money. I mean, and I have not read this book.

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're just.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>That's why they pay you the big buss, But like

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to hear how he talks about money in this book

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 2>and to know that his most famous works have to

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 2>do with finance, with the exception of the of the Blindside,

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 2>which everyone forgets that he wrote like it calls his

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 2>entire body of.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Work in the question yeah yeah, and it's like, yeah,

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just the ridiculousness of being like, well, look, guys, seven

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've recovered seven billion out of nine point

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>three billion, so things are basically good, Like that's insane.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>But also, as we'll get to later, he is he

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that even that doesn't tell the whole truth, Like this

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that everyone's going to get their money back is

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not true. But Lewis in order to continue believing that

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam was a super genius, he has to have this

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of tragic store where like he didn't really lose

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the money, it was a misunderstanding. It's all unfair. And

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because he needs to believe this, I think for the

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>sake of his own ego, bringing up the fact that

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of money missing is a really easy

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>way to piss him off. And I'm going to play

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you this clip. It's the most revealing clip that I

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>found And this is from an interview he did with

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on a YouTube channel called Intelligence Squared after the FTX collapse,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>like after his book came out. So while Sam is

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on trial, basically.

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, seven point three billion, So it's one point three

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 6>billion that's missing plus it, and there's still.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>More to be and it's more than that, it's more thought.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 6>This is where today today the prosecution, the prosecution sent

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 6>a motion to the court saying, can we please not

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 6>talk about the possibility the customers are all going to

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 6>get their money back? And that in particular, can we

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 6>you're gonna let me finish?

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 7>Oh my god, I think, well, I care. Is the

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 7>fact that I do think it's important. I think at

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 7>the very least he's irresponsible.

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 6>Of course, I'm not saying he's not irresponsible. I'm saying

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 6>it's just different than you think.

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay. A few observations. First of all, to pay.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Second of all, uploaded four second that right, his haird

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 2>does not looking real colors. It's not giving matching color.

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Second observation upload date four weeks ago, gnarly. Third observation,

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously he cuts off a woman aggressively to be wrong,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>and then Finally, it's just the because the listeners cannot

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>see the size of that venue. It gave me a

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 2>brief like it. I felt it in my stomach to

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>be like, wow, that many people will gather to be

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to see Michael Lewis just spew bullshit and yet fifteen

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>people show up to watch me but chug a quart

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:00.280
<v Speaker 2>of milk.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous, Yeah, Jamie. Though, here's the thing. This is

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the difference between you know, it's the same. This is

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the difference between what I call vulgar art, which is

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that will be forgotten, you know, within a generation,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and immortal art, right like the Parthenon. You know, you

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>butt chugging the contents of infinite jest was a Parthenon

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>level work of art. It will be with us.

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Years time misunderstood it, just.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Like the Parthenon.

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 2>He's in like a fucking cathedral. Though, I mean it.

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Does look like Sophie. Can you bring up a freeze

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>frame of his face at like twelve fifty seven in

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that because he is doing and I think you should

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>leave face like he is. He is almost a perfect

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>character from one of those fucking sketches.

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Tim Robinson could do this.

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Tim Robinson could do an amazing job of this. There's

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that sketch from the recent season where he's being like

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 1>an on air pundit who like gets on his phone

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and gets real quiet whatever he loses an argument that

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 1>like Lewis is definitely doing that kind of.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Face in this God right there.

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 1>That's he's doing it, Tim Robinson.

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>He's really, oh boy, doubling down on my two on

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the two pay theory.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Right yeah, that hair isn't to.

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 2>See if we've got the if we've got the veneers

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to match.

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's too rich to not have veneers.

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I aspire to the veneers. That's I just want to

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>have exactly that much money.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to you how angry he gets there, because

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to address the actual facts of his claim. Now,

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>even if you take Lewis at his word, which is

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's basically fine because they were covered seven point

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 1>three out of like nine point three billion dollars, he's

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he's obfuscating the truth. It is accurate that Ray has

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>announced FTX customers will see ninety percent of every dollar

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of recovered assets returned, which I would still call that

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>problematic because if somebody stole ten percent of your bank account.

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You'd be kind of miffed. But that is even not

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what it seems like. And I'm quoting from Investipedia here

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, the ninety percent number refers to the

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>funds FTX is able to gain access to, rather than

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>total customer deposits at the time of the exchange's collapse.

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't necessarily mean customers will gain access to ninety

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>percent of their assets that were left on the exchange. Rather,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>customers will gain access to ninety percent of the funds

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>FTX is able to distribute to their creditors. FTX and

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>FTXUS had an estimated eight point seven billion dollars combined

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>shortfall by the time the crypto firm filed for bankruptcy,

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 1>roughly six point nine percent roughly six point nine billion

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars of that shortfall, including a Bahama's real estate portfolio,

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>has been recovered. Let's consider bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency by

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>market capulation, as a capitalization as a proxy for the

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>broader cryptocurrency markets. On November eleventh of last year, the

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>petition date, bitcoin was trading at around seventeen thousand. On Friday,

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it crossed thirty thousand. So simply put, if the current

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>plan goes through, you'd likely get eighty five percent of

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the dollar value of your cryptocurrency had held on FTX

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as a last November, even if the same points have

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>almost doubled in value today. So one of those like both,

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of overestimating the amount that they're going to

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>get back. And also because they lost, like they still

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>lost access to that money for it'll probably turn out

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to be two or three years, Like people have had

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>to sell their homes and shit, because like they had

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>all of their money. Like that, there's harm here, right,

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that's what the courts are taking. Not only is there

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>still money missing and not an insignificant amount, but like

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 1>people suffered in the interim where they didn't have access

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to their money, and yeah, they're crypto gamblers. I'm not.

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the most sympathetic population, but that is not

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>relevant to determining whether or not Sam has legal He's

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stealing fifteen or twenty percent of a bunch of people's

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts is a substantial crime.

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:55.479
<v Speaker 2>The legal question is is it a scam? Which like yes,

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I'm sure that like everyone who understandably

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 2>because I walk amongst them, like everyone who was seeing

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>this happen a couple of years ago up to very recently,

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 2>We're like, yeah, you're what are you talking about? This

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 2>happening is like a very you know, it's like easy

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to cheer it on, but it's also like, yeah, no,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Sam Bankmintrede was taking advantage of every possible mark he could.

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and yeah, and people are still suffering ongoing harm

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as a result of it. He's acting like Lewis is

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>acting as if there wasn't really anyone hurt, and it's like, well, no,

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like even if all of them, which will not happen,

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at least about twenty percent of that money of depositor

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>money is just gone, probably more. But even if he

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 1>hadn't done that, if you're still locked out of your

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>money for two years because a guy illegally gambled with it,

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be fine that it came back eventually. No,

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you still didn't have that money for years, and that's

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem for you. That's a crime, I.

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Mean, And I would be more amenable to that perspective

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 2>if it was coming from someone who isn't as like

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 2>historically fabulously rich as Michael Lewis is, because it's like

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 2>a rich gaming the rich story can be really satisfying,

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 2>but this is not the guy to be making it,

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and he's falling on the wrong side anyways.

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's like gaming the rich, gaming the rich because

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like Larry, you didn't they didn't hire Larry David to

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do a commercial so they could scam billionaires, right, they

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hired Larry David to do a commercial so they could

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>scam your mom, you know, because your mom likes Larry David.

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying the rest of the show. I mean

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>most moms do. Right, He's pretty popular amongst the moms.

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 2>In the comments. I don't know if my mom knows

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 2>who I.

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Mean, the women in my family Seinfeld fans.

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Does your mom watch curb Message?

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>No? No, no, but Seinfeld?

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, okay, I'm back, come back.

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So anyway, Michael Lewis, Yeah, it's interesting to me,

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that the I the fact that Sam

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>bankmin Freed stole money from depositors, because that that's what

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it is. When you take money out of one company

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>illegally and use it to gamble in another company, that's stealing.

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis never uses the term stolen to describe what

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam did, and he basically goes to great lengths to

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>claim that Sam misplaced all this money. This is again

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wildly inaccurate, and a good example of that is Alameda's

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hashtag fiat account, which is like that was one of

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the names for the account where they were putting all

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the actual US dollars that customers put in the exchange,

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So customers would put US dollars into FTX and then

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>use it to buy cryptocurrency, right, But those US dollars

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to stay in the exchange so that people could

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>cash out their positions, right, Otherwise you're not doing legitimately

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're supposed to do as a business. FTX was

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>not a bank. A bank is allowed only has to

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>keep a certain amount in reserve, right, That's what a

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.760
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency is. This is an exchange. They were supposed

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep enough reserve in there to cover the value

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of their deposits. Sam instead took all that money and

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>put it into Alameda, and there's evidence that it like

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>never it went directly into Alameda. The money people thought

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they were depositing into FTX went into another company entirely,

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I would call that. And in fact, Sam was convicted

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>because this is an example of fraud. Lewis depicts it

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as an honest mistake, and here's the New Yorker quote.

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Lewis finds it not only wholly implausible that this was

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact a gigantic accounting error, explained by ftx's difficulty

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>securing bank accounts. As Lewis concludes, his story implausible as

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it sounded, remained irritatingly difficult to disprove. And Lewis very

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>gently insinuates that Ellison, in over her head, might have

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>made some very bad decisions. And in court, which again

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is a couple of weeks after his book comes out,

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it is proven with data from the company that Sam

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not only did not like not only knew what he

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was doing, but he ordered other people to obscure this

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fact from customers. Right, he ordered his employees to hide

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>from customers that their money going straight into another company.

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:05.399
<v Speaker 1>This was proven when they like actually, during the court case,

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they had the people who programmed the exchange on Sam's

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>behalf like post code. And I found an analysis of

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>ftx's code by Molly White, who does a newsletter called

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Citation Needed, which is quite good. Molly knows code and stuff.

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's her analyzing that, prosecutors questioned Wang, who was

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the guy who was coding the exchange, about the FTX

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance fund, which was ostensibly supposed to protect both FDx

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and its customers from trades that went badly, even more

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quickly than the exchange's risk engine could account for. FTX

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 1>published the funds supposed balance on their website and bragged

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>widely about its existence, including a testimony to US Congress. However,

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:46.399
<v Speaker 1>according to Wang, the numbers showed on the website was falsified.

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And the question is like, is this a real number, Wang, No,

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's a fake number. Yes. Was the real number

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>higher or lower than the fake number? Lower? And yeah.

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>The way that they would do this so like they're

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have this urance fund, which is part of

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what makes FTX safer than the other exchanges is that

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we keep you can't do a run on the bank

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because our entire like like all of our deposits are

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>backed up by cash, right, so we can't collapse the

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>way that other exchanges do. And like to make people

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable they had, they would show them they had,

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like you could see like what the insurance fund was.

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 1>That they would regularly brag, we have this much money

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>in our insurance fund.

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>It can number accurate.

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Like No, all they were doing is so the code

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>snippets show that, like they had Sam ordered Nashad Singing

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to write some code that would update the insurance fund

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>amount randomly by adding it to the daily trading volume,

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like the amount of Basically they would it would calculate

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 1>how much has been traded today, and that would multiply

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that by a random number somewhere around seventy five hundred

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and then divide it by a billion. So it would

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was how it was just describe how you do business.

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>They're like bus, there was never an insurance a real

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:07.319
<v Speaker 1>insurance fund of any like meaningful amount of money. They

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just pretended it was there by having a computer do

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a random equation, so it seemed like it was fluctuating

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 1>over time.

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's not legal to do.

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>No, that's that there.

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like this, like this level of like

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 2>splitting hairs in The New Yorker wouldn't happen unless the

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 2>two main players, Michael Lewis and Sam Bak Midfried, weren't

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 2>tremendously privileged like for any other people, you would be like, yeah,

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:38.799
<v Speaker 2>so this was a lie and then this happened, like

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:40.479
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't be splitting hairs like this.

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:42.919
<v Speaker 1>To be fair. The actual thrust of that New Yorker

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>article is like, Michael Lewis is what the fuck is

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>happening with this guy? Because he's clearly falling, Like the

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 1>New york article is very critical of him. It's bringing

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>up that he is not calling Sam Bankman free to

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 1>fucking con man when he clearly is right.

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 2>So they're like headline, Michael Lewis, low key, he fell off?

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, looking, he fell off, that's right, Molly. I also

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 1>brings up something else that was left out of court,

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but the prosecution published evidence of it, and I found

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this really telling. Elsewhere in the code, it's possible to

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>observe that the amount of FTT, which is the token

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 1>created that represented basically voting shares, was like it was

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>ftx's funny money, was actually represented by a hard coded

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>value in the user interface and was not pulling from

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>an external data source to get a real number. So

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:31.320
<v Speaker 1>again they're lying about how much money is in this fund.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And part of how you can tell is when you

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>would ask to see the insurance fund, it wouldn't consult

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>back to the servers. It was just it was doing

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the calculation on your own machine, right, which is evidence

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that like, there was never any attempt to give people

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>accurate information. Wow, it's fun stuff. There's other fund reveals

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>during the court case, for example, twists.

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 1>During ftx's days as a functioning business, a lot of

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto people notice there was a potential conflict of entr

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 1>between FTX and Alameda. They were like, hey, it seems

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>like you run both these companies, and traders on Alameda

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are our trading on FTX. Is it possible that they're

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>getting preferential treatment on the exchange that you also owned.

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>There's a really telling Twitter conversation on Molly's blog where

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>someone asks this and SBF says, Alameda is the liquidity provider,

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but their account is just like everyone else's, and the

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>respondent rightfully says, I guess we're just supposed to trust you.

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And it turned out they were right to be worried.

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the chief selling points about FTX is that

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's crash proof. Right. Crypto exchanges have this weird habit,

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like twenty years old now, of getting really big and

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 1>then collapsing, taking everyone's money with them. Sometimes this is

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>due to hacks, but also there's a lot of because

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no regulation, a lot of times major traders will

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>go bust and that causes losses for the whole exchange,

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 1>which gets socialized. Right, everybody loses money because one bad

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>gambler gambled too much. One of ftx's like selling points

0:55:59.000 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was that it was different. They had an algorithm to

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.839
<v Speaker 1>automatically freeze trades on an account once that account had

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>suffered losses equal to the amount of money they'd put

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the exchange, right, So you can't lose more money

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>than you put in is the basic idea. So that's

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how it was supposed to work, and that's how it

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>worked initially. But the limit that Alameda had for its

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>gambling to make sure that it couldn't get in over

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 1>its skis, was removed later on Sam Bankman Freed's orders,

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and in court, Gary Wang, Sam's business partner, explained how

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Sam directed them to do this. Wang explained that Alameda

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 1>had not started out with such a high credit limit,

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but that periodically the trading firm had run into issues

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>placing trades because they didn't have enough collateral. Sam Bankman

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Freed kept asking him to increase their credit limit to

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>prevent it from happening. According to Wang, the limit was

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>originally set to a few million dollars, but then it

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was increased to a billion. After they ran up against

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that limit too, bankman freed asked him to set it

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to a number so large they wouldn't likely hit the

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>limit at that point. Wang set it to around sixty

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>five billion. And when I read that, what I see

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is this is a gambler in Vegas who's like taking

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>out loans to keep gambling because he's run out of money.

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Like he's like, hey, you just imagine like someone like

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 2>on their knees in like shitty pinstripe. Ye can't being

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 2>like come on, man.

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, give me, just give me some credit. Man, I'm

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>good for it.

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But he got up to sixty five billion in credit.

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, which is insane. Now, when you pair all

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this with the stories that SBF tells that Lewis tells

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of SBF's gaming addiction, you might conclude was this kid

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just a fucking gambling addict, Which is, by the way,

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that's my interpretation there.

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean there. To me, it sounds like this shit

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is Neo points to him, Like it really is. Like,

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 2>if there's anything that got the millennial generation hooked on

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 2>capitalism and random gambling, it was Neopets. And if anyone

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 2>has proof that Sam Bankminfreed was a Neopets user, he

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 2>just sounds like the worst version of a Neopets user.

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 2>To me, the worst endgame for a neo Pets user

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.960
<v Speaker 2>is what you've been describing to me for for several hours.

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think you and I were not invested in

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankmanfreed ever being particularly smart, So we can see.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 2>This, Lewis, he's a Neopets users. I bet it was

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 2>better at it than him.

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the other thing. He was never very good

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at games. Like people found his like League of Legends

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.439
<v Speaker 1>account and were like, yeah, he was mid Like I'm

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 1>sure he wasn't good at Storybook Brawl, right, Like he's

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just he was never good at this.

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But it was the first time that Michael Lewis had

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 2>heard of story But yeah, so Sam bank Fred said

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 2>he was the best at it. Why not believe him?

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's just the idea. Like again, Lewis can't

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, this kid had a gambling problem and

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he also owned a bank, so it became everyone's issue.

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But like, you're not a bank man. It's hard to

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>portray someone as smart if they're just addicted to gambling, right,

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because that's not a smart person thing. It Actually a

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart people are horrible addicts in a variety

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of ways. But like, but it's a serious press in

0:58:58.240 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood way. Make it look like somebody's a genius

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if they just can't control themselves, right.

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a serious, serious problem.

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, and again no shame on people who have

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that problem. But like that that does not work with

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>how Lewis wants to portray him, right, And yeah, speaking

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of things that don't work.

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Shit, everything you're about to advertise, we.

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Won't have to work if you purchase these products.

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good good self crush. Yeah, I actually will continue

0:59:30.560 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to work more accurate.

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, both both true. We're back. So you know, I

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's clear from the stuff that came out in

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the court case that I just read some of there's

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>no way Alameda NFTX would have done the things that

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I just described if they hadn't meant to disguise the

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>reality of their business from the world, which is fraud. Right.

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The reality is that Sam Bankman Freed used to positor

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>money to gamble, and he was gambling in part on

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>his own chances. He wasn't just gambling. This is the

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that is important to understand past a certain point.

1:00:10.120 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Most of his gambling was not him betting on cryptocurrencies.

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>The big shit he did that made the news, the

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that he pumped into naming, renaming that stadium

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, to bringing in all these celebrities to these

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>high dollars Super Bowl ads, that was a gamble. He

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was pulling a slot machine on his own chances of

1:00:28.600 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>ascending to the halls of power. Right, sounds like him, Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite aside bits from the court case

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is that on the stand when she was being questioned,

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolyn Ellison told everybody that Sam confided in her he

1:00:41.480 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thought he'd had a five percent chance of becoming president

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the United States.

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Which, well, I mean, it sounds ridiculous, but also like,

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>look at some of the dumbasses we've got. He's probably

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>not wrong that he eman. He at least could have

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>been like, who is that fucking loser from Starbucks? He

1:00:58.960 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>could have only s been.

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That, Yeah, he could have. I think he could have

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>had a failed presidential but no, like yeah, oh yeah,

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they're all dumb, Like Joe Biden and Donald Trump are

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>both have both done very stupid things, different kinds of

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>very stupid things, but they both have charisma.

1:01:14.840 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's true.

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>That's they But like, like you could again say what

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you will about Joe Biden, he wouldn't have been in

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>politics this long if you couldn't make enough people like him.

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And obviously Donald Trump is very charismatic, Sam Bankman free

1:01:27.360 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just isn't like you don't become the president if you

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are avoid of charisma.

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>No, we and we've learned that time and time again.

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, And that's the thing, like he was

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>always all of his his his sudden rise to public

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>prominence was not based on him actually being interesting. It

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was based on him spending tens of millions of dollars

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to get like Bill Clinton, to pretend to be his buddy.

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Like that was all there ever was to it. You know,

1:01:51.320 --> 1:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in my general research on the crypto industry, and if

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for actual good reading, don't buy Going Infinite.

1:01:57.560 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You won't get anything valuable at it. If you do

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get something valuable in a deeper understanding about

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like how grifty this whole industry was, and also how

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>grifty Sam was. There's a book called Number Go Up

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>by Zeke Foe Zeke Faux really good book, Number Go Up,

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which I do recommend to people curious for the dark

1:02:15.920 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>side of crypto. Zeke also spent time with Sam in

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas, and I found this passage from his book

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>relevant to what I just mentioned. A few hours into

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>our conversation, Bankman Freed told me he had to make

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a call. I had asked him if there was anyone

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>who'd support his version of events, and he said I

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>could talk with one of his few remaining supporters. While

1:02:33.880 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I waited, in walked a haughty man with a long,

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>scraggly beard, a pot belly, and mismatched socks, one of

1:02:39.920 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>them with a pac Man design who was an employee

1:02:42.400 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of FTX who'd stuck around to help Bankman Freed try

1:02:45.240 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to find an investor to rescue the exchange. I threw

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>out an easy question, why are you still here? I asked.

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He started off by saying he wanted to help ftx's customers, Then, unprompted,

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>he told me he thought there wasn't much of a

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>risk that bankment freed would ever get in trouble. I

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>firmly believe once somebody he becomes a certain level of rich,

1:03:01.440 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they're never poured again. He said, they don't go to jail,

1:03:04.200 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing bad happens to them.

1:03:06.080 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, he has his own Zuckerberg quote. He has his

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>own You could be unethical and still be lad. That's

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the way I live my life. Haha. Wait, read it

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>again for me so I can really take it in again.

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Sam's friend who stuck by him after his

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>business collapsed. I firmly believe once somebody becomes a certain

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>level of rich, they're never poured again. They don't go

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to jail, nothing bad happens to them.

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Poetry.

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's beautiful. It's a beautiful thing to think in

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that moment too, where all of the smarter people have

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just fled the island, and in that moment he was.

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Infinite that yeah, wow, wow.

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm speechless. It's so funny too, because like I

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, just historically, do you remember, like Marie

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Antoinette was pretty rich and like that didn't end well,

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like there's a lot christ had a

1:03:54.520 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. It didn't go well for him. You know,

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>bad things happened to rich people too.

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's your main political stance, as I recall.

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I will hang out with anybody rich because

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing bad can happen to them, obviously untrue. I kind

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of suspect that that that sort of I don't know,

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact that so much of what was said,

1:04:20.440 --> 1:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like Zeke foe Is probably is clearly someone who's smart

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to like understand when he's being lied to by

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>these people and understand their fundamental absurdity, and that comes

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>across in his book. I don't think Lewis got that right.

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>He believed fundamentally in the fundamental honesty at the center

1:04:36.120 --> 1:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of Sam Bankmin Freed, and I kind of suspect that's

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>why he covered his face with his hands that day

1:04:41.280 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in court. He's not a dumb man, and he must

1:04:44.120 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have realized by that point the evidence that came out

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the trial was undenied and made it undeniable that

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>he got conned too. One of the most remarkable things

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about Going Infinite is how much detail Lewis provides about

1:04:55.200 --> 1:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ftx's collapse without ever calling Sam a liar. The Guardian's

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>review noted this too. He thought Bankman Freed hadn't lied

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to him at all, or at least that he'd only

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:06.439
<v Speaker 1>lied by a mission, not by commission. Late in the book,

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Lewis asks bankman Freed, what would you have done if

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd ask you specifically about FTX customer funds being used

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>by Alameda. Bankman Freed admits that he would have changed

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the subject or rustled up a word salad and whatever

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the facades erected by other effective altruists. Lewis considers bankment

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Freed to be enigmatic, but essentially genuine, and certainly not

1:05:24.560 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out to enrich himself because he has no desire for

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that money can buy. Lewis's refusal to believe

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Bankman Freed is a liar in the most

1:05:32.600 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>venal base sense of the word is based, I think,

1:05:35.720 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on a sense of professional pride. That explains why he's

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so adamant about pushing the line that there was no

1:05:40.720 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>money missing, and it's why he continued to defend Sam's

1:05:43.600 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>dissembling as a fun, quirky character trait while the trial

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was going on. See as part of the Cash in

1:05:49.640 --> 1:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Ongoing Infinite Michael Lewis launched a podcast Judging Sam the

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Trial of Sam Bankman Freed.

1:05:56.840 --> 1:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh it was a dough is he and oho? But

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>everyone on this call knows that the first sign that

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>your life is about to be fucking torched, yes, is

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>starting a podcast.

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, right, it's the last refuse, refuge of fools

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and scoundrels. Yeah, please pay for the cool sound free

1:06:17.960 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>subscription at what do we call it, Sophie so uh.

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The trial Judging Sam is part of Lewis's Against the

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Rules podcast on Pushkin, and I can't speak for the

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>regular episodes of that podcast. I have not listened to

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>any of the other ones, but I can say his

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed Trial podcast is an uneven effort at best.

1:06:37.720 --> 1:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Most of the work is done by Lydia Jean. She's

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, she's okay. I don't have any huge issues

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>with her. I think we get a little too much, like,

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>here's what the court kitchen is like, here's anecdotes from

1:06:48.480 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the fun lives of the journalists covering it.

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>That also gets Yeah. Then it's like my least favorite

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:56.600
<v Speaker 2>part of every public radio and I love public radio,

1:06:56.680 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>but the broadcast where it begins with six minutes of

1:06:59.680 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a guy stepping on leaves, and you're like, oh my god,

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I get it. You're in fucking New Hampshire in.

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>October fall, where you NPR people leave. We understand, yes,

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but every podcast on this trial does something like that.

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just because they have to. They were

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>doing like basically daily episodes and needed to fill run time,

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and like, look, is that lazy? Yes? Have we all

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>been there? Yes? So I simply can't throw stones at

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this classhouse.

1:07:26.640 --> 1:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>What are what are you talking about? As someone who's

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>never had a daily podcast, I condemned this behavior because

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I've never had to do it.

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So LUs Lydia takes most of the have the lifting

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on this show because Lewis was on tour for his book, right,

1:07:45.960 --> 1:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and so he couldn't be there for most of it.

1:07:48.520 --> 1:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He was barely at the trial.

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was screaming at women in cathedrals.

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>He was busy, Yeah, But he does occasionally come on

1:07:57.320 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and one of the episodes that does like he shows

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>up to court on the day that Sam takes the

1:08:03.240 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>trial or it takes the stand in his own defense,

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know during this portion where he's like Sam's

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>being cross examined, he says, I don't recall more than

1:08:11.920 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times. Here's how a right up from the

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:18.599
<v Speaker 1>verge summarizes his time on the stand. Bankman Freed's demeanor

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>suggested a spoiled child complaining he didn't get the biggest

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>scoop of ice cream at his birthday party. He didn't

1:08:23.880 --> 1:08:26.719
<v Speaker 1>want to answer the prosecutor's questions or his lawyer's questions.

1:08:26.720 --> 1:08:29.519
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to answer his own questions, which he liked better.

1:08:29.720 --> 1:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He often replied to yes and no questions with nonsense.

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We were getting introduced to a document where bankman Freed

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>listed his priorities, including getting accounting right on FTX. Cohen

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bankman Fried, Cohens's lawyer and bankman Freed used this

1:08:42.080 --> 1:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to show how devoted bankmn Freed was to getting to

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the general fiasco with Alameda's money. The

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:50.759
<v Speaker 1>idea was to display in real time ftx's revenue in expenses,

1:08:50.760 --> 1:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>where its bank accounts were, how much investor money it had,

1:08:53.160 --> 1:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and so on. This did reveal Bankman Fried's priorities. Getting

1:08:56.360 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>accounting right was ranked ninth oh for the stories Bankman

1:09:01.600 --> 1:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Freed wanted to tell, we had to rely on Bankman Freed.

1:09:04.640 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>We moved on to bankman Freed's argument about hedging, which

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I still do not understand except as a way for

1:09:09.200 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>him to say he's a smarter trader than his ex girlfriend,

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the former Alimeter Research CEO Carolynellis.

1:09:14.640 --> 1:09:16.680
<v Speaker 2>God, this is more stand up behavior.

1:09:17.720 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The actual evidence suggests that Ellison is both a better

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>trader and much savvier than Bankman Freed. She modeled out

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>her risk scenario that matched almost exactly what happened to FTX,

1:09:26.360 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for instance, to try to keep him from sinking two

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>billion into venture investing. And like, what happens is he's putting,

1:09:32.680 --> 1:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, all this money and advertising into like playing celebrities.

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>He's putting like two billion dollars into these random series

1:09:38.840 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of investments. And she's like, hey, we've taken depositor money

1:09:42.320 --> 1:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to gamble with. We have to keep more cash on hand,

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>otherwise the whole exchange could collapse. Sam ignores her, the

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>exchange collapses, and then he blames her for not hedging right.

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And a hedge is when you take like a bet

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that one thing will happen, you take the opposite bet

1:09:57.800 --> 1:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at a smaller amount of money, so that no matter

1:10:01.320 --> 1:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens, you can't lose too much money, right, But

1:10:05.080 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no hedging the kind of risks that FDx was

1:10:07.880 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>taking because the fundamental risk was we don't have enough

1:10:10.320 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>money if there's a run on the bank, you.

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Know, well, it was like there risk goes, We're never

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 2>gonna die, Like you can't, you can't hedge that.

1:10:17.960 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.600
<v Speaker 2>What is wild to me is like everything you're describing

1:10:21.920 --> 1:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>is ridiculous, and it makes total sense that it fucking

1:10:25.880 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>imploded in the catastrophic way that it did. But then

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>you also, I mean, so much of it sounds like

1:10:33.040 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the kind of stuff that, for example, Michael Lewis might

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>report on is a tremendous scam that worked out great

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>for everybody.

1:10:41.479 --> 1:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's so you know, again, that quote from

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the Verge is pretty similar to how most reporters who

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>were there at the trial described it. It is wildly

1:10:53.360 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>different from how Michael Lewis describes how Sam reacts on

1:10:57.320 --> 1:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the stage, right, Oh okay, Yeah, And it's interesting because

1:11:01.160 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like obviously most people were able to see, Oh yes,

1:11:03.280 --> 1:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam is just lying on the stand, he's obfuscating, he's

1:11:06.080 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>refusing to answer the question. But Michael Lewis not only

1:11:09.960 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>does Michael Lewis like being lied to by Sam Bankman Freed.

1:11:13.120 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>He thinks Sam's defensive cloud of bullshit right this like

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>word salad, is better than the truth. And he says

1:11:19.520 --> 1:11:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this in his fucking podcast Jamie, You're gonna love this clip.

1:11:24.040 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 5>Today he didn't get in as much trouble as he

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 5>got yesterday, though.

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Not as nothing, but still a little bit more than

1:11:31.400 --> 1:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>other witnesses.

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:35.760
<v Speaker 5>That's true. The bigger point is the judge is sitting

1:11:35.840 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 5>there listening to see if Sam is actually answering.

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>The question because he knows he doesn't do that yet.

1:11:41.200 --> 1:11:43.559
<v Speaker 5>Or generating a word salad for us all to consume.

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:46.679
<v Speaker 5>And I was thinking about this again to day. Why

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:49.439
<v Speaker 5>Sam's word salads are so.

1:11:49.600 --> 1:11:52.639
<v Speaker 8>Fun, like why he gets waiting Like most people when

1:11:52.640 --> 1:11:55.760
<v Speaker 8>they don't answer a question, your alarm bells go off

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:58.679
<v Speaker 8>pretty quickly, like that you just redirected in some way.

1:11:59.439 --> 1:12:02.600
<v Speaker 8>He's really really good at starting the answer in a

1:12:02.640 --> 1:12:05.080
<v Speaker 8>place where you think, oh, that's where the beginning of

1:12:05.120 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 8>the answer belongs, and then making a little jump into

1:12:09.200 --> 1:12:12.400
<v Speaker 8>things are actually interesting to know about, so you're not bored,

1:12:12.840 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 8>You're actually interested in what he's saying.

1:12:14.360 --> 1:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>You're saying like there's substance to it. He's not just

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>saying nothing. He's saying something that's substantive and makes you

1:12:19.120 --> 1:12:22.160
<v Speaker 3>think it's just not what you asked. But then you're

1:12:22.200 --> 1:12:23.920
<v Speaker 3>thinking and you forget what you asked.

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly what happens.

1:12:26.360 --> 1:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's like he's he's just saying that, like, yeah,

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam's lies. He's really good at lying, like and it's

1:12:35.080 --> 1:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>fun to listen to him lie as if that's a

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>defense right where they're saying, like, well, they really painted

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a different picture of Sam because they you know, he

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>got to get up on the stage and bullshit, that's good.

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a very interesting exchange to listen to as well,

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, you know, because it's very clear that

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis has very little to do with this podcast.

1:12:55.840 --> 1:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, like I can think of a number

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>of examples of a like big name a podcaster coming

1:13:01.920 --> 1:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>on their show to like be combative with the people

1:13:04.080 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>who are actually making the show for them, and that

1:13:06.200 --> 1:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>like exchange too is like no, like I know what

1:13:08.320 --> 1:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, but yeah, and even in what she's describing,

1:13:13.040 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>like the court approaches either he's a genius or he's

1:13:16.320 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>like an incompetent sweetie pie, but you're just like or

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>he's a malevolent dumb ass, or he still seem to

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:23.599
<v Speaker 2>be the.

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>King con Man. Yeah, but like, yeah, I love this

1:13:26.760 --> 1:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>idea that like, yeah, we're getting to see the real Sam,

1:13:31.600 --> 1:13:34.639
<v Speaker 1>who is a guy who never answers your actual question.

1:13:35.000 --> 1:13:37.639
<v Speaker 1>But like I want to continue the clip because Lewis

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>says something very very ridiculous right after this.

1:13:40.560 --> 1:13:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Okay, he's really really good at starting the answer in

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:46.839
<v Speaker 5>a place where you think, oh, that's where the beginning

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:49.880
<v Speaker 5>of the answer belongs, and then making a little jump

1:13:50.120 --> 1:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>into things are actually interesting to know about. So you're

1:13:53.760 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 5>not bored, You're actually interested in what he's saying.

1:13:56.280 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>You're saying like there's substance to it. He's not just

1:13:58.160 --> 1:14:01.000
<v Speaker 3>saying nothing. He's saying something that substantive and makes you

1:14:01.040 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 3>think it's just not what you asked. But then you're

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:05.839
<v Speaker 3>thinking and you forget what you asked.

1:14:06.200 --> 1:14:11.040
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly what happens. It's engaging. It's like, maybe it's

1:14:11.120 --> 1:14:13.960
<v Speaker 5>even better than the answer to the question.

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Right, Maybe it's what you should ask Yes.

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it's not even what you should have asked. That's

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 5>exactly right.

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's Sam. The answer the question Sam answers that

1:14:24.080 --> 1:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't what he's being asked or what you should have asked, right, Like,

1:14:27.040 --> 1:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he's smarter than you, the interviewer, and he knows what

1:14:29.439 --> 1:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually should have asked, which I just thought was

1:14:31.720 --> 1:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a wild thing for a journalist to say. This is

1:14:35.160 --> 1:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're getting to the end here. But the

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>last thing I wanted to bring up was maybe the

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>most interesting case of Michael Lewis following Sam's crap, which

1:14:42.200 --> 1:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is him believing that Sam's outfit, his hairstyle, his poor

1:14:46.000 --> 1:14:49.519
<v Speaker 1>hygien oral evidence of his brilliance. Right, Sam just didn't

1:14:49.560 --> 1:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>have time to like take care of his appearance in

1:14:52.640 --> 1:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>any way. He was too smart to waste any of it,

1:14:55.000 --> 1:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like his brain power on that And that article in

1:14:58.080 --> 1:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacobin gives a really good summary of the actual testimony

1:15:01.280 --> 1:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of Sam's former friends in court blew this idea out

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of the water. The prosecutor followed with questions about Sam's

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>approach to public relations. Ellison explained he was trying to

1:15:11.040 --> 1:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>cultivate an image of himself as a sort of very

1:15:13.080 --> 1:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>smart competence somewhat acentric founder. I was sitting in an

1:15:16.200 --> 1:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>overflow room on that day. So when the prosecutor asked,

1:15:18.800 --> 1:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe the defendant's personal appearance through twenty

1:15:21.400 --> 1:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, the room was allowed to erupt into laughter.

1:15:24.280 --> 1:15:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Ellison replied, he looked like he didn't put a lot

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of effort into his personal appearance. He dressed sort of sloppery, sloppily,

1:15:29.720 --> 1:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and didn't cut his hair often. He said he thought

1:15:31.800 --> 1:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>his hair had been very valuable. He said ever since

1:15:33.920 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Jane Street. He thought he had gotten higher bonuses because

1:15:36.439 --> 1:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of his hair, and it was an important part of

1:15:38.280 --> 1:15:39.879
<v Speaker 1>fdx's narrative and image.

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>God yeah, first embarrassing, but also I think, you know,

1:15:46.600 --> 1:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>clearly predicated on the dipshit billionaires that came before him,

1:15:52.240 --> 1:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Like there is a clear aesthetic and a clear like

1:15:56.840 --> 1:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, slovenly genius thing that he'd like.

1:15:59.360 --> 1:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It's strategic and that's interesting, right, the fact that Sam

1:16:03.040 --> 1:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is standing on the shoulders of giants of Steve Jobs,

1:16:06.360 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>unwashed shoulders like you know, Mark Zuckerberg's hoodie and whatever.

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:14.599
<v Speaker 2>Genocideary that he wears.

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and it's like yeah. Lewis describes it as

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 1>like everything in Sam's appearance felt less like a decision

1:16:20.600 --> 1:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>than a decision not to make it decision and no,

1:16:23.120 --> 1:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what everyone says at FTX is like he was obsessed

1:16:26.040 --> 1:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with like his hair. When they were spending trying to

1:16:28.720 --> 1:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>build their two hundred million dollars or whatever new headquarters.

1:16:31.760 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>His only design note was that it should be shaped

1:16:34.360 --> 1:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so it looked from the side like his hairs do,

1:16:37.280 --> 1:16:39.519
<v Speaker 1>because he thought that, like he thought it was iconic,

1:16:39.720 --> 1:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>right like.

1:16:41.120 --> 1:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Which is also based on the what we were just

1:16:44.320 --> 1:16:48.559
<v Speaker 2>listening to. What the like logo to that podcast is

1:16:48.560 --> 1:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>is the shape of his hair. Everyone's playing into it.

1:16:50.880 --> 1:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, fuck, it's fucking wild. Anyway, Jamie, that's my episode.

1:16:55.040 --> 1:16:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we should fire Michael Lewis into the sun?

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was, I was thinking earlier. I am very

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:03.719
<v Speaker 2>curious because you know, I think it's like a waste

1:17:03.720 --> 1:17:06.439
<v Speaker 2>of time to ask, like, well, Michael Lewis have another

1:17:06.520 --> 1:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to course correct his career. Of course he will,

1:17:09.120 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of course you will.

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes, He's gonna write seventy more books.

1:17:14.240 --> 1:17:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I'm curious about is like where he goes

1:17:17.200 --> 1:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>from here. I feel like it's pretty telling if you've

1:17:19.240 --> 1:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>been con to this fucking degree, because no one clocked

1:17:22.479 --> 1:17:25.559
<v Speaker 2>him in the blind Side, But now he's been pretty

1:17:25.600 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>severely clocked as like giving in to his worst biases

1:17:31.479 --> 1:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and reporting it as fact. And I do wonder, like,

1:17:35.200 --> 1:17:37.880
<v Speaker 2>if that's the position you're in, and you will absolutely

1:17:37.960 --> 1:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>read another book because you're unkillable financially, Like, I wonder

1:17:42.080 --> 1:17:44.559
<v Speaker 2>which direction he's going to go in. Is he going

1:17:44.600 --> 1:17:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to be hyper cautious, is he going to play it safe?

1:17:47.360 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to be self reflective at all? Or

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:52.160
<v Speaker 2>is he going to double down on the falling for

1:17:52.280 --> 1:17:55.120
<v Speaker 2>it kind of stuff? I genuinely don't know, because I

1:17:55.200 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 2>just like it's very hard to discern what kind of

1:17:57.439 --> 1:18:01.400
<v Speaker 2>person Like it seems like he's certainly, you know, like

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>high in his own supply and is like, well, you know,

1:18:04.000 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of course anyone could have fallen for it, but he

1:18:06.640 --> 1:18:09.160
<v Speaker 2>is sort of conceding to the fact that he fell

1:18:09.200 --> 1:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>for it. I just am curious what happens to someone

1:18:11.320 --> 1:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>from there.

1:18:12.120 --> 1:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>My suspicion, and maybe I'll be wrong about this. I

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>think we'll know pretty soon. I think he's going to

1:18:17.040 --> 1:18:20.839
<v Speaker 1>do another SAM. I specifically think he's going to yeah

1:18:20.880 --> 1:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a second, a second SAM has hit the Michael Lewis bibliography,

1:18:25.200 --> 1:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be Sam Altman, like he's going

1:18:27.520 --> 1:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to do with Sam Altman, the open AI guy who

1:18:29.760 --> 1:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just got fired from his job. He's going to do

1:18:32.320 --> 1:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a book on Sam Altman. I suspect you're probably right.

1:18:37.000 --> 1:18:39.519
<v Speaker 2>You're probably because then he'll be like and I would

1:18:39.640 --> 1:18:42.719
<v Speaker 2>know I can see through Sam's now having been conned

1:18:42.720 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>by one. I certainly won't becoming.

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Sammy wants Sam on you, Sam me twice, won't get

1:18:48.520 --> 1:18:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Sammed again. You know, I am just like.

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Other Sam Sammy chit Wow, Yeah no, that.

1:18:55.800 --> 1:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>That's my guess as to where this goes is Sam Altman.

1:18:59.439 --> 1:19:02.599
<v Speaker 2>What why is Michael Lewis being presented with a second

1:19:02.640 --> 1:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Sam doesn't seem fair?

1:19:04.720 --> 1:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Second Sam? Is it that? Well, I've already done that

1:19:06.920 --> 1:19:10.759
<v Speaker 1>joke once and it worked and all. It always works,

1:19:10.840 --> 1:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>j it always works. Yeah.

1:19:13.760 --> 1:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well I don't feel well. You know, I've I

1:19:19.600 --> 1:19:22.479
<v Speaker 2>would say that this is like in the top twenty

1:19:22.520 --> 1:19:26.120
<v Speaker 2>percentile of Bastards episodes. I've come out feeling like, you know,

1:19:26.200 --> 1:19:29.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel that bad. I usually feel like really dire.

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel pretty good. Yeah, he's in forever. He's in

1:19:33.200 --> 1:19:33.880
<v Speaker 2>forever jail.

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He's in he is in forever jail, right, Yeah, speaking

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of forever jail, Jamie talent is like a jail that

1:19:43.800 --> 1:19:48.559
<v Speaker 1>locks you into, for example, making a weekly podcast. And

1:19:49.080 --> 1:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I am happy that you and I are about to

1:19:51.000 --> 1:19:51.759
<v Speaker 1>be cell mates.

1:19:52.680 --> 1:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>We are I'm so excited. Yeah, we get to do

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the fun thing where we're like, we can't talk much

1:19:58.120 --> 1:19:59.280
<v Speaker 2>about it yet, but there's.

1:19:59.080 --> 1:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>A weird podcast about it. But Jamie Loftus Weekly is

1:20:02.360 --> 1:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>coming to the cool Zone Network. You were going to

1:20:05.360 --> 1:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be the cool hand Luke of our podcast.

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Pure welcome God. I would love to be the cool

1:20:12.040 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>hand look of the podcast. I gotta get some new outfits.

1:20:15.160 --> 1:20:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Gotta get some new outfits. Gotta No, that's not the one.

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one where he throws a baseball at

1:20:19.120 --> 1:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the wall or is that the Great Escape?

1:20:22.000 --> 1:20:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that was cool hand a long time.

1:20:24.240 --> 1:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Neither of I not since I was like seven, So

1:20:26.600 --> 1:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:20:27.520 --> 1:20:29.639
<v Speaker 2>Why are you a cool hand look when you were seven?

1:20:30.080 --> 1:20:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my mom loved that movie.

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

1:20:32.880 --> 1:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>My mom had very strict rules on like what I

1:20:35.479 --> 1:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>could watch on as movies as a kid unless it

1:20:38.360 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>was a movie she liked, which is why I was

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in first grade when we watched Alien.

1:20:43.600 --> 1:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So that explains so much about you too.

1:20:49.920 --> 1:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>She was so excited that all the men die and

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and and the woman didn't. But like, yeah, she wanted

1:20:55.439 --> 1:20:57.519
<v Speaker 1>me to see that movie at a very young age.

1:20:57.760 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What a legacy, truly, The sentence because men are stupid

1:21:02.200 --> 1:21:04.599
<v Speaker 1>was uttered two or three times during that.

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Movie, which does unpack a lot of the plot intended

1:21:09.240 --> 1:21:12.360
<v Speaker 2>or not there. My mom would let me watch soap

1:21:12.400 --> 1:21:14.640
<v Speaker 2>operas very young, and would I would be like, what

1:21:14.680 --> 1:21:16.920
<v Speaker 2>do they mean when they say making love? And she

1:21:16.920 --> 1:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>would say, what do you think?

1:21:19.040 --> 1:21:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't know?

1:21:19.600 --> 1:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm seven?

1:21:21.800 --> 1:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you haven't. You have not equipped me to answer

1:21:24.400 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that question.

1:21:25.080 --> 1:21:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Mother.

1:21:28.200 --> 1:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, weekly podcast coming soon early next year? Was

1:21:32.040 --> 1:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>it about you? Guess? But don't contact me about it

1:21:35.240 --> 1:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>because you're wrong?

1:21:36.520 --> 1:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, A second Jamie has hit the cool zone.

1:21:41.600 --> 1:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've done more than two podcasts. This joke

1:21:44.000 --> 1:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>never worked, But.

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:50.519
<v Speaker 2>A first Jamie has hit the cool zone. Weekly. That's right, Amy,

1:21:50.800 --> 1:21:55.120
<v Speaker 2>What podcast is this of ours? Oh? God? How many?

1:21:55.280 --> 1:21:55.679
<v Speaker 2>How many?

1:21:55.720 --> 1:21:56.040
<v Speaker 3>This is?

1:21:56.240 --> 1:21:56.640
<v Speaker 2>This will be?

1:21:56.680 --> 1:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>What?

1:21:56.920 --> 1:21:57.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god?

1:21:57.680 --> 1:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's possible to say it's impossible.

1:22:01.200 --> 1:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like six. Yeah, I think it's like six.

1:22:05.280 --> 1:22:07.880
<v Speaker 2>We've entered the half dozen range. It's getting dangerous.

1:22:08.000 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>That's so cool for us.

1:22:09.640 --> 1:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I know we're forever wives, Sam Bankman freed forever, Jill

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>ever jail us forever wives.

1:22:16.080 --> 1:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh uh so, Jamie, anything else you wanted to plug

1:22:20.280 --> 1:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>before we ride on out of here, like Michael by.

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Raw Dog bitches. Yeah, it's the holidays. Are you looking

1:22:27.120 --> 1:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>for something to get for your loved or hated one?

1:22:30.360 --> 1:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I won't know. Buy a copy of Raw Dog. It's

1:22:33.080 --> 1:22:35.439
<v Speaker 2>my book about hot dogs. And if you don't like

1:22:35.520 --> 1:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>hot dogs, the title's funny, and I think that's you know,

1:22:38.360 --> 1:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>about sixty percent of the purchases I've gotten have been

1:22:41.160 --> 1:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>off that alone, So you should buy Raw Dog.

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, buy raw Dog. And now I'm not going

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to make a raw Dog jake. That's just gonna get

1:22:50.479 --> 1:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>me in trouble anyway. Buy a Cooler Zone Media subscription

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and you won't have to hear ads, Or don't buy

1:22:58.200 --> 1:23:01.519
<v Speaker 1>a Cooler Zone Media subscription and continue to listen to ads.

1:23:02.040 --> 1:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It's I don't care, live your life. I'm not your

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>fucking dad.

1:23:06.200 --> 1:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>If you really want to hear the advertisings that Robert's disparaging,

1:23:10.560 --> 1:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I personally think it's more fun to imagine it. So

1:23:12.800 --> 1:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>you should get a cooler Zone Media subscription.

1:23:15.200 --> 1:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, once everyone's on cooler Zone Media, then we can

1:23:18.160 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>finally get that sweet Lockheed Martin subscription that I've or

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever ad deals that I've been wanting to have.

1:23:26.439 --> 1:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>Robert can finally live inside a grenade like it's always

1:23:29.680 --> 1:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>been his dream.

1:23:30.280 --> 1:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>That's been my dream, that's been my dream, Jamie. Yeah,

1:23:34.880 --> 1:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're done.

1:23:36.200 --> 1:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>We did it. Behind the Bastards is a production of

1:23:41.120 --> 1:23:44.160
<v Speaker 2>cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media, visit

1:23:44.160 --> 1:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>our website cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out

1:23:47.800 --> 1:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

1:23:50.760 --> 1:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>your podcasts.