WEBVTT - Q&A: Part 1 - Are Games Too Long? More Conference Realignment? Optimal SEC Schedule Format?  - College Football Podcast for 2/21

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal.

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Hell that for me. I'm a man, I'm for I've

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>heard so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Edith state is that?

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Woo?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tie welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Boys and girls. My name is Tie, his name is Dan.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining in.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, your voice the register, it's hitting.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a Q and A episode. I did a different

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>intro than I usually do normally. It's true muscle memory

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and boys and girls and no, no, no, no no, we

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>got questions from the verballerhood. Dan, I'm going to play

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the sound right off.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>The right off the congratulation, Skippy, you've got mail, You've

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>got mail?

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>On the solid verbal? Mix it up here a little

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>bit at the top, sir, how are you?

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. We're recording. This is today President's Day? Did

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>I get that right?

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Believe so? Yes? Correct?

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Who's your least favorite president ever?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Tye?

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, right on the spot ty, do you have any

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>John Tyler thoughts.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>No, Why don't we just move on to a different plage.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get in hot water. There is

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a college football show man.

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>That's fair all right, how are you. I'm good, Ty,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. We have a number of really really strong questions.

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I just had a smoothie because I'm trying to do right,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to get tight, get right. I turned forty this year, Ti,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm trying to live my life. So I'm

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>very excited for these questions and I'm a little bit

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 2>bummed out and I'm sure we're going to get into

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>it because we're in that zone. Right it's too far

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the draft. Spring practice isn't really a thing

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>yet because it's what mid to late February as we

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>record this, The National Championship has done, recruiting is done.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>That there seems like there's not a lot to talk about.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>But something that everybody can agree on is things are

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>looking sad for the PAC twelve, even worse than what

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>we thought they would be, and that makes me sad, Ty.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>So I'm trying to stay positive with my outlook here

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>this morning. We've got a lot of good quality college

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>football questions, but I wish there was something more positive

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that we could hang our hats on. In terms of news.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, we put a call out across Twitter, across Instagram,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>across obviously our Patreon over at Theballers dot com, both

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on Discord and on Patreon proper to get some last

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>minute questions to put this show together. We as always

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 1>got great questions that I'm excited to dive into with

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you email as well, still a thing, you know, sliverbo

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. We had questions there that we're

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to try and go as go through as many

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>as we can. If we have to, we'll break it

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>off into two shows, but we won't put the cart

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>before the horse here. We'll see how we do. Don't

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>forget to hit subscribe or follow whatever your podcasting app

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of choice allows you to do. Dan and I will

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be with you all throughout the long cold months of

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the offseason at a minimum twice a week. Of course,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get bonus content if you're going out to

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Verballers dot com. Last, but certainly not least, we got

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a newsletter, quick Slants dot Sliverble dot com. I'm putting

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that out every Thursday if you were ever so inclined.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you want just like a quick wrap up with

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of personality, not too much, I don't

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>want to scare people away, but a little bit of personality,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of college football news every Thursday afternoon. Dan,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're doing, all right.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I love to see you're doing a bang up job

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>with quick slants.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I wrote like seventeen hundred words last week,

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a little great. It's a little long in

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the tooth, But I'll be honest with you, Ty, I

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>thought your fingers were retired, Settle. I thought you were

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>done with that kind of just action. There are a

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people pursuit. There are a lot of we

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people who got their start as

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>writers sports writers and then migrated over into podcasting and

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>just can't write anymore, yeah, or don't have the desired

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>right anywhere video TV.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm trying to I mean, I guess I kind

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of got my start that way, but I'm now trying

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to migrate back in the other direction a little bit.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 3>It.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like you fulfilled the promise and the

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>title of the next great American sports writer circa twenty.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Circle, two thousand and six.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was the honor and title bestowed upon you.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like you attained that you sort of

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>moved in the direction of that potential or no.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>You know that was seventeen years ago.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Somebody has been born and started driving and connected they're

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 2>being recruited. Were born around the.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Same time I won that damn contest. Yeah. Also, on

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a related note, before we get into real questions, Dan

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and I had a lengthy discussion earlier about graying temples.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, with that being said, here's the sound again.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail. You've got mail on the

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 3>solid ruble.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We do this as often as we can, definitely a

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more frequent in the off season, Dan, But

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>why don't we dive right, and we will start with

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some questions that we got regarding the news. We will

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>start with a question from me to you.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm ready.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I sent this one into my own damn show, Dan Rubinstein. Yeah,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are college football games too long?

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I saw this topic this.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>N the news.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Are they too long?

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And how do you feel about any of the proposals

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to try and make them shorter? So a little bit

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of context.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Give me the content. It's Greg Sankye, Yes, it's yeah.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, basically, this is a question that stemmed from

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a tweet from a write up that our friend Rossdellager

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>over at St. Sid dot com put out earlier today.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And it all stems from this growing sense I guess

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that college football games are getting a little bit, a

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit too long. Right, There are four proposals that

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>are currently under consideration to try and shorten games. Number one,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>prohibiting consecutive timeouts, i e. Icing kickers that sort of thing.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Number two, no untimed downs at the end of first

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>or third quarters.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Three the clock runs after first downs except inside of

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two minutes in a half. And four the clock runs

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on incompletions once the ball is spotted. Now, okay, some

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting idea is there for reference, just as a reference point.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Another reference point, the average NFL game takes about three

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hours and twelve minutes. College football games, at least at

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>last check around the end of September this year, were

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about twenty minutes longer three hours thirty two minutes, which

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is a long time. Is as of September, that number

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>probably came down a little bits.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 2>That's the standard window as well, right, the TV window.

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a new Eastern. I mean, obviously things are staggered

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in different ways, but it's a new Eastern. And then

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the next big window is the three thirty eastern right.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And then just as a non football reference point, the

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>average Major League Baseball game last season was a shade

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>over three hours, three hours and three minutes. So look,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing complaints about the length of college football

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>games for a good long time. It seems as if

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some proposals on the table that could be

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>recommended to a rules committee, which could be enacted at

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>some point. But where do you stand as a father

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of two, as a college football full time college football podcaster? Yeah,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously as a college football fan? Or games too long?

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Probably? But the caveat and I tweeted this out. We

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>were I was talking digitally with Andy Stables. Is brag

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>much that I know? Andy Stables? I don't think it's

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the games. I don't think there's too much football. I

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think the football lasts too long. It's the totality

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of the TV broadcast. Like with our exact rules, if

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>there were an untelevised game for whatever reason, if this

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>were nineteen ninety eight and it was a pay per

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>view Oklahoma Kansas State game or something, my guess is

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>we'd be talking about a football game that's closer to

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>two hours and twenty six minutes rather than three hours

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and thirty two minutes because of commercials. The issue with

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>football is that it's an incredibly a rhythmic sport, especially

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in person, right where the game's happening, and then oh,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>there's the TV ref with the Neon orange you know,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>headset and armband sleeve whatever. Who is telling people Nobody

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>on the field until I say it's okay. It's incredibly

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a rhythmic, which does not make for a fun experience

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in person or on TV when you get the touchdown commercial,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>kickoff commercial, and then it's the beginning of a new

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>drive that's you know, that has that CBS feel to it.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>When it would be that huge Alabama LSU game and

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>it would just be commercial sandwiches all the time, it

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>would be a buffet of commercials. And so I just

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>think we need to rethink. With so much money pouring

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>into these TV deals and obviously networks needing to recoup

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:51.599
<v Speaker 2>that money via commercials, what's kind of rethink how I

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know advertisers are charged. Maybe there are fewer advertisers

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's more of a premium because oh, there's only

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 2>going to be two commercials during commercial breaks instead of

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 2>five or something. I don't think college football fans by

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and large have a problem with three and a half

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>hour games per se. If a majority of that is football,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they have a problem with the oh I

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>mana ja Applebee's on a Friday n whatever. Those awful.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 2>And I know I just conflated two different things. A

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>song in an Apple base.

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, it's okay, they're run.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>But w'ah' wah bah blah blah blah, and like having

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>pitball and having Fansville and like it's cute for a

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>week and then all of a sudden, you've you've watched

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>more of Fansville than you have Jake Browning or whatever.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's on the TV networks who

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>now own the sports, to figure out how to make

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the best possible TV product, because, like you mentioned, it's

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>one of those things where it's not necessarily that the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>game is too long. It's that not everybody is like

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>us and consumes the sport the way that we do,

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>which is ten, twelve, fourteen hours each Saturday. It's I'm

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 2>an Arkansas fan. I want to watch the Arkansas game,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and I want to watch USC Oregon or Ohio State Michigan,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're not sitting there for twelve fourteen hours. And

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>so people try to plan their days around the games

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>they care about most. And if they're saying, Okay, this

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>game starts at you know, three point thirty Eastern, dinner

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>should be cool, and then all of a sudden it

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>goes to overtime and it's eight pm or something, it's

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 2>not great. I don't think Again, I think people like,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>or love, or are obsessed with watching football, they're just

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 2>not obsessed with Applebee's commercials and the place that those

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>things have in our life.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one of the notions that I was sensing across

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>social media is, well, if you're a real college football fan,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't matter should mar right, It should't matter how

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>long the game is. If you like the sport, you're

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in it.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 2>It's it's like identity politics, right, Everything is identity politics,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you have to prove that you are the most

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>true college football fan with that kind to take.

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>And I just, I just I don't agree with that.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think attention spans are shorter now than they've ever

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>been before. I think our phones are probably part to

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>blame for that, But that's not the only thing. I

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think surely, if a game is good, if you've got

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a fifty one to fifty two thriller, it doesn't matter

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>how long that game is. Most games aren't like that,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so there has to be a happy medium. What I

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>found notable in the proposals that Ross laid out in

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>his tweet and his article no mention of replay. No

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mention of I mean, replay for sure has played a

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>huge role in lengthening these games. And for as much

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>as I'm a supporter of replay, when they have to

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>keep going back to look at a play and then

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>another play, it seems like it happened more often than

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not this past season, where you had like consecutive plays

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>being reviewed. That tends to be a little bit much.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if there is some way we

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can automate the whole replay to a greater degree to

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe knock a little bit of time off of that.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the other things that Ross called out is

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that eventually they'd like to get to a system where

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a challenge type system like they've got in the NFL,

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>where maybe not everything is automatically replayed, but coaches can

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge and you know, we're familiar with that from the NFL.

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that is the next iteration of replay to try

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and shorten things. But look, I'm in favor of this.

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>People are busy. People are busy the weekends. For the

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of the football loving population, it's a time

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>when you should be able to kick back and relax

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to work, or if you do

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have to work, maybe there's a way that you can

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>follow the game on your phone and like get enjoyment

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>from the game, Like it's supposed to be something that

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we enjoy, and when it starts feeling like it is

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>taking too long, when people stop losing or when people

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>start losing interest in it, that to me sort of

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>defeats the purpose. So to your point, Yeah, if it's

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a TV product, if I think the veils are off here,

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and we all know that college football is being run

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>by the TV networks, then let's find a way to

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>make it as appealing as we can. One other idea

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I know they've they've talked to various

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>TV executives over the years on the topic of commercials.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Let's get creative about how we do in game advertising. Sure,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>right does not everything needs to break away from the action.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got graphics, we got the first and

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tent line can be sponsored by Wendy's. I don't know.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a TV executive, but you get the point.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, after that kickoff, instead of going to commercial

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>as the teams enter the field or something like that,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>then you have brad Nessler, say, introducing Applebee's new you know,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>chicken tinga Nacho's. Boy do they look great? Look at

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>those things? All right, let's get going. It's not the worst.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>It probably affects the bottom line of a bunch of

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, wide and in Kennedy type places, the ad

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>firms that are producing all of these commercials. But also

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 2>if it's a sport owned by TV networks, the onus

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>is on them to make this the best possible TV show.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And so the a rhythmic nature gets people changing the channel.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, it's replay, it's commercials. It's a delay

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>for this, a delay for that. And I think it

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 2>just behooves everybody to even if it's not a demonstrably

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>shorter game, if it's a much more rhythmic experience, I

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 2>think that's the way you capture people and keep them

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 2>locked into your chair.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's a free idea please for the TV people that

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>are watching out.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 2>There, big fat cats with the networks.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dan. That was a great voice for the

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>people that are listening that have any stake in this game,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which is most assuredly nobody. But if you are in

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>any position of influence. We know this in the podcast world,

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but when we read an ad, it does better then

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>when it sort of gets cut in from somebody else.

0:14:58.280 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And there are reasons that you do one versus the

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to go into that. We would encourage

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody to listen to the ads, of course, but we

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know from our numbers that that's what people pay most

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to, So find some way to do that. Can

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you get a player to read it. Can you get

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody from the team to read Can you get Quinn

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Kessenick to read it on the sidelines, to do whatever

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ad reads you have to do. That's one way they

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>keep people sort of engaged and and not lose interest,

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not have people tuning away.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I totally agree. I think priority number one for

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>all of these networks, aside from completely destroying the sport,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 2>which has been the priority in these past couple of years.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Trend a little bit.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>The trend, yeah, is to find a way to make

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>this a TV show that people stay locked in on,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and traditional advertising has not been a super fun watch.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think for a lot of people. As we

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>gravitate towards a more streaming universe, that promises fewer and

0:15:55.160 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>fewer of the visual of taking in doctor or taking

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>in all of these. You know, American Family Insurance congrats

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>on the free pub.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Not a sponsor, could be not sure.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think one of those things is. One

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of the big ideas with this is you can't rest right.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a lot of sports come and go like

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 2>this is the next big thing, this is going to

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>be huge forever, and then ratings take a dip and

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>then they have to rethink where they broadcast and how

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>they broadcast. Right, Nascar was the next big sport. Right.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>You have to be forward thinking with this. You have

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to be three steps ahead with an issue and right

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>now unless something and look, if it's a rules thing,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a rules thing, but you want to say, you

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 2>want to promise that you are concerned about player safety

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and they should have fewer plays. Great, but also the

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>experience needs to be. I mean, the in person experience

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>has suffered and the TV experience has suffered. So what

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>does that tell us? We need to go forward and

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>move forward as a sport, not stay where we are

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>or look backwards. Look if you want to eliminate replay.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of moving backwards, I'll listen to that conversation. I

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>know it's going to cause a whole set of like, well,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>this team lost by three, Well, this toe is clearly

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 2>in bounds dragging through the end zone for the game

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 2>winning catch that was called out of bounds or incomplete

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. I understand that's a whole new host of issues.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. A rhythmic football game might be

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>enough for me, as a jaded college football fan, to

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>be able to make peace with that. I'd be willing

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 2>to listen to the pros and cons of eliminating replay.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>At this point, let's go to Brad from Patreon. Yes, Dan,

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you're a PAC twelve guy.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Mmmm.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Explain to me why George Clavicle's plan George Klee of

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>coough excuse me, Brad? Yeah, to bring SMU and San

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Diego State into the conference would make any sense whatsoever?

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't rumoredly. Yeah, I can't see any real tangible

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>value that justifies adding them. So yeah, this is rumor,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's probably a very poorly kept secret. At

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this point. There was a tweet that you sent me

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>from a gentleman, Jason Sheer said that at Arizona. At

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a Swim and Dive championship banquet in Houston yesterday, the

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>San Diego State Athletic director told people that the Aztecs

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>will be joining the PAC twelve. It will be announced soon.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know this has been reported for a while,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that the rumors have been there for a while. Where

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are you at as a PAC twelve fan? How do

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you feel about all this is it? Does it make sense?

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it good for the conference?

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I feel like as I hear a dog barking in

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the background, who your Your dog must have a lot

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of thoughts. You know, she can go to football. She

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 2>tends to get boisterous. Yeah now she is right now

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>whenever we talk about things that disgruntle us one way

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>or the other. Okay, So this is obviously two major markets,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Dallas Fort Worth market with SMU and

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 2>San Diego, which I don't think is an enormous, enormous market.

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's a big place, bigger than Eugene, Oregon. It's

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>bigger than Palo Alto, bigger than Palwot, I guess is

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>part of the broader Bayry and Silicon Valley, but bigger

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>than Pullman, Washington. And so I look at San Diego

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>State and like, okay, this is an interesting at least,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>right They've had big basketball success, which is not the

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>most there's not the sport we're talking about here, but

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>as it's a huge, huge campus, I think a ton

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 2>of kids. Enrollment's pretty huge at San Diego State. They

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 2>have a history of winning football over the past decade

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>twelve fifteen years. You know, Brady Hope part one, Rocky

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Long and now Brady Hope once again. Big names have

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 2>come out of that program. I didn't realize the number

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of names associated with San Diego State, by the way,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>like a ton of NFL coaches, obviously Marshall Fox going

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 2>back to the nineties. Like it has been a program,

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 2>not a major program, but that has had an impact

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>on the sport at large. They have the new stadium,

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 2>they don't have an NFL team anymore, they have a

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball team, they don't have an NBA team,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 2>And with UCLA and USC leaving, I assume there's still

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a lot of interest in LA and Southern

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 2>California and UCLA and USC football. But if there are

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a host of three star borderline three four star type

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>kids who don't get that USC and UCLA offer but

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to stay in Southern California and go

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.239
<v Speaker 2>to San Diego State, whereas maybe they had otherwise thought well,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll go to Arizona, or I'll go to cal or

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll go to Oregon State or something like that, you

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>can build up the roster to a power five level

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>at San Diego State. Of course, so that to me

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 2>is at least interesting if you're talking about schools to

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>add value to the conference because of its location, because

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 2>it has a winning infrastructure to a certain point, SMU

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>hasn't had that as long in the recent past. And

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 2>I also think where SMU is located, it's like in

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>fourteenth place in terms of interest of team, right because

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about Okay, obviously the Cowboys and Texas football

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and Oklahoma football. You have a playoff team in TCU,

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a small footprint in terms of an alumni base. But

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>you have the MAVs, you have the Texas Rangers right

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that they'd say, a completely saturated market. And so SMU

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>going from big G five conference to smallish medium power

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>five conference whatever, the PAC ten to twelve ends up

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>looking like this is as an outsider, and it's an

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>assumption and it's a guess how much does that actually

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>move the needle for local fans? Are people going to

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>swarm to SMU games because Oregon State or cal or

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Arizona States in town when so much of that area

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>is consumed with fandom too much larger, large organizations, So

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that to me is just sort of there's somebody we

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>can add, but not really And so big picture, I

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>think the PAC twelve is in a lot of trouble.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>If if George Clavicle can find a bunch of money

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 2>via ESPN and streaming services, Amazon obviously is the big name,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 2>so be it. Good on him. But in terms of

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the future of the conference, if you can get that

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty five to thirty million dollars per year, it's you know,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>it's still dwarfed by the big ten in the SEC.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 2>But if you can get around that number and you

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 2>can get Washington and Oregon at least short term on

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>board to see what can happen with the conference. It's

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 2>a big win for those two schools because their path

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of the playoff is super smooth. Right that those are

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the two teams right now that seem to be building

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>towards Okay, we're in a good spot to get into

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a twelve team playoff. We have a smooth sailing through

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>this conference because Cal and Stanford and Washington State and

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State and the Arizona schools will not build up

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>rosters in this way. Utah's right there. I left Utah out. Unfortunately,

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Utah's also there with Oregon and Washington. They're just not

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>that big name, organizational franchise type name that is coveted

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>on a national level. But yeah, it's smooth sailing for

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 2>those schools. But then what is the Big twelve going

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to offer? Right? How much do you want to be

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in on the ground floor of what essentially becomes a startup.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Man, If I'm Oregon and I'm Washington,

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I sign on short term and see how USC and

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 2>UCLA like being on an island in the Big ten.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna make a ton of money. But you know

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that kind of travel is going to become a lot

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>for those schools. And if the Big ten is looking

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 2>to compete with the SEC to have that big Western division,

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you could see that being attractive. I'm sure Oregon and

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Washington would snap up a Big Ten offer in a

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>matter of seconds if it came their way. I just

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to see a PAC twelve existing with San

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Diego State and SMU existing on anywhere near the level

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of the SEC and Big Ten come twenty thirty.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, here's another question for you.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any thoughts as an outsider.

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, my thoughts as an outsider are I don't feel

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if I were a PACK twelve.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm a stakeholder. I want Oregon to succeed. I

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>want Oregon to be on the national stage and keep succeeding.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I like the PAC twelve and I

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want want to see this kind of turmoil surrounding

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the conference. I think it sucks royally that USC and

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>UCLA are leaving. I will always associate USC UCLA with

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve as many people will, you know, as

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>many do with the Houston Astros in the NL. Right,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that type of it's one of those deals. For me

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as a sports fan, my thought is, without any real

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game, is that when I see a

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter posting like the one that we saw about a

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>week ago. Now, the joint statement quote the ten PC

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve universities look forward to consummating successful media rights deals

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in the very near future based upon positive conversations with

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple potential mediaized partners over the past few weeks. We

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>remain highly confident in our future growth. And I'm not

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to read the rest of it. If you have

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that that doesn't leave me feeling confident. I

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>post that at all. That to me was a little

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bit weird. And I do think that they're like the

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>article has been written. This isn't my idea. I think

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.239
<v Speaker 1>there's an outside chance that the whole thing could go

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>bust depending on how these media rites negotiations go. There's

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>a chance the whole thing could go boom that if

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they can't come to an agreement that's beneficial for everybody.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>We're staring down the barrel of more conference realignment as

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a result of PAC twelve or PAC ten or whatever

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this is, you know, inability to get a deal done.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's likely. But I think the fact

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that that's on the table at all, that people have

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>written that article at all in February of twenty twenty three, right,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that doesn't leave me feeling all that

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>confident about where things head next. So, you know, the

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>San Diego state move, you know California better than I do. Right,

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know California much better than I do. Pulling SMU

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>into this potentially, you know, again, it feels a little

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>weird to me. I don't know. It just seems like

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get numbers as opposed to adding real quality,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>no offense to SMU people out there. So I don't know.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>They're in a very awkward spot now because of those

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>two California schools deciding to go and join the Big ten.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 2>I still am a proponent, and I have no idea

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 2>how feasible it is, because all of the sudden, it's

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>not a network necessarily negotiating or it's not, excuse me,

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a conference negotiating with networks. I'm a big proponent of

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the What is it when they unlike the NFL red zone,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 2>never we're.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, we're going four wide, four wide, so many teams.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 2>In the red zone. Yeah one Oregon, Washington, the Bay

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Area schools. I'm still micro conference Dan, That's where I'm at.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Negotiate your deal, have deals with the ACC, have deals

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>with the Big twelve, have deals with the Big ten. Right,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 2>so you get all these matchups. Have a deal with

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame, like an annual rotating Oregon or Washington or

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Stanford with Notre Dame. That seems like a win, Well,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 2>that seems like a huge win. Give Notre Dame two

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 2>home games to your one, fine whatever. Sign all sorts

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 2>of deals and go four wide with those that they're

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in the same geographic footprints, so you can still travel

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>relatively local. You play each other, and you sign deals

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 2>with other conferences, and you get to that number, that

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>magic number, while controlling your own TV deals. Right because

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>right now Oregon and Washington kind of have George Clavicle

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>by the Gonads for lack of a better term. So

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 2>now are they going to get more money like USC

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>probably should have been getting from the PAC twelve under

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Larry Scott. It's entirely possible that they're going to sign

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine million dollar deals and some of the smaller

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve schools are going to sign twenty three million

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 2>dollar deals. So I'm still that micro conference for wid microe.

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Or wide kind of guy. Yeah, this is by the way,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this is directly from Dennis dot article. I was looking

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for it as I was saying it. Quote. Industry sources

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>still project a meteorizes deal split between ESPN and Amazon

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Unbattled conference. However, However, however, the dissolution of

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve is being talked about openly in those

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>same industry circles as a potential consequence if the league

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>does not wrap up its deal soon. Right, the fact

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that it could happen in these tenuous times is enough

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to project what the process might look like. So that

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>does not instill confidence in it.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, look, the most realistic way this all

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 2>falls apart is the Arizona Schools, the Corner Schools, Arizona Schools, Colorado,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Utah joining the Big twelve. So the Big twelve is

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 2>now trying to compete with the other mega conferences without

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the headline names. But in terms of the depth of

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 2>quality teams, they're approaching. They're absolutely approaching. When you add Utah,

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 2>who's been a top ten, twelve to fifteen national program. Lately,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Colorado has more juice because of Dion. You know Arizona.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Both Arizona schools have been to conference championship games, so

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>we know what those look like built up. So then

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve becomes a lot more interesting. And then

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>you're left with the Bay Area schools and the Pacific

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Northwest schools, and so then you're gonna see the sharks,

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>right the sharks are going to be swimming in the

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>water for that chum. And somebody's gonna pick up Oregon

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and Washington. Be it the Big ten, be it you know,

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 2>some sort of affiliation with other conferences, but not fully

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>joining the other conferences. And then where does that leave

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State in Washington STI.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it puts us right back to where we

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>were like a year ago. It brings us right back

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>into the meat of that discussion where you know, honestly,

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about one whole conference shuddering and teams scattering,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking about what happens with Notre Dame. Now

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about what happens for Florida state conferences. It's crazy,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we're starting to have those types of

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations again, and we're right back to square one. People

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>were not happy about that conversation with regard to USC

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and UCLA. Yeah, people were. People were very affected by that,

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and we saw a lot of the emails in the comments.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It left a lot of people feeling like college football

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>was going to a bad, dark place, and you know,

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's still headed there, but we'll see where this goes.

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The PAC twelve definitely interesting to follow.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Would have been interesting. I know there were conversations right

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve and PAC twelve aligning themselves with each other,

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>but they couldn't figure it out in terms of a

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>value add and like is it worth it to add

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 2>these teams into like a semi deal or something like that.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, that would have been a move from the

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve signaling we don't have anywhere else and have

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>no other exit plans, so we're going to take twenty

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>two million dollars each instead of you know, gambling on

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>ourselves in the opening in the open market. And so

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>that would have been a signal that it was waving

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the white flag as a sovereign nation.

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Neat Case Scott on Instagram, what's the best SEC schedule

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>format for the fans? For the fans. So speaking of

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Super conferences, yeah, we got news last week Texas and

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma officially joining the SEC starting with the twenty twenty

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>four season. Twenty twenty four season, by the way, is

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping up to be a pretty monumental season. It's not

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just when I think we're gonna get what USC and

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>UCLA over in the Big Ten, but obviously Texas and

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma now joining the SEC, the start of the new

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>playoff format, the twelve team playoff format also get the

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>video game in twenty twenty four, So a lot happening

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this season after this one that's coming up here at

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty three. But I think as

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a result of going up to what sixteen teams now

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC, they are going to be doing a

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>way with the divisional model that they've had. This is

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the last year for it in twenty twenty three, and

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be changing up how they schedule games.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So there are two formats that it appears the SEC

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is centered around, and it's been this way for a while.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The first is eight conference games with one permanent rival

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or nine conference games with three permanent which is the

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>format that you most prefer.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I like the three permanent rivals. I like three permanent rivals,

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and I like, get me some ping pong balls on TV, right,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>get me some representative from Texas A and M reaching

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>into a big old bag of ping pong balls and

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>having conspiracy theories around it and having to raise up

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and you. And I don't know why they're using a

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>vaguely European accent, but I think that's going to be requirements,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and I am for that. I am for three permanent rivals. Well,

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 2>it was three permanent rivals or what.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Three permanent rivals nine conference games and three permanent rivals

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or eight conference games in one permanent rival?

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, the three? Definitely the three. There's too much bad

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 2>blood and there's too much scar tissue within that conference already.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if it's a thing where you

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 2>split it into microdivisions where it's just four four team divisions,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>if my math is right, sixteen total teams, whatever the

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 2>case is, I want the three. I want, you know,

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I want Alabama to be every year playing Tennessee, Auburn

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and LSU. I just do. And I'm good. I think

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>enough teams can figure out enough permanent rivals that makes sense,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>and then the rest of it is open. The rest

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of it is open. The rest of it's ping pong balls.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>So we got all the teams playing all the teams

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>much more often than we do now, and we have

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>some sort of ceremony, and you know, it's a big

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 2>deal in whatever it is in January or February or

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 2>something like that, when the scheduled are determined FIFA style

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 2>and there's already there's already conspiracy theories. Now why not

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 2>put those conspiracy theories in four K on the SEC?

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I love it, I love it. Yeah, I'm with you.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with nine and three. I think the nine and

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>three model is the one that that I like the most.

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You may not be an SEC fan. I know we

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of Midwesterners that listen to this show.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>May not be a big fan of the of the SEC.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's fine. It's you're right. It is good for

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it is good football. It is I think the highest

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>level conference in college football, and so I want to

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>see more of that. And I like the fact that

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in doing a way with the divisional structure, it means

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a team like Georgia is not going to be locked

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>into playing Vanderbilt in South Carolina and Kentucky every year.

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>No disrespect to those schools, but I'd like to see

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what Georgia can do against some other opponents on a

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>more regular basis. And this would get us to that point.

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>This would get us to the point of not having

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to wait twelve years in between matchups against some other

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>hated rivals or competitive schools on the other side of

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the conference.

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It also more openly integrates Texas and Oklahoma. Absolutely, it

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 2>weaves them into the fabric of the SEC, the quilt

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that is SEC football. So you get Texas and Williams

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Price and in Kneeland and in Sanford and in Tuscaloosa.

0:34:57.920 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 2>Well you get Texas Tuscalosa this year, right, But then

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you get Florida in Norman, you get Ole Miss in Norman,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 2>you get Tennessee at Texas, you get that more often

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>where you get all of the fan bases intermingling a

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, the schools intermingling a little bit more.

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And if it is this new era of SEC football,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you know it's it's, for lack of a better term,

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 2>it's like the positionless idea of sports, right that you're

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 2>just like, no, you're not locked in on a division

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 2>just because that's what the title says you should be.

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing terribly traditional about playing your fourth most hated

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 2>rival in a conference. There just isn't. And I know

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 2>there's scar tissue, and I know there's battle wounds and

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff between these two teams. Because of this

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 2>one game four years ago, You're still gonna play them,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe not every year, but you get those locked in

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 2>three and then you spread it all around and it's

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>novel every year. That's great. That to me is the

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>secret sauce.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I'm for more SEC games. I'm for the

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>spice of life. I'm for the nine and three model

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for sure. YEA, not even a question. All right, let's

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Let's go to Cole Schwartz on Twitter. He says,

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as a diehard wisconstant fan, give me the ceiling for

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>this year's team. Am I an idiot for thinking ten

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and two is realistic?

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Look, we did an episode like last week where we

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 1>talk through our coach draft new coaches, and we picked

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>two teams of five. The first overall pick for me

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>was Luke Fickle. It would have been for you as

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>well if you had the choice. We talked about that

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, but I am on the record saying that

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ten and two is very realistic. That I tend to

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be overly optimistic about new coaches and new places, but

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Luke Fickle a lot. I think Wisconsin is

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>still in a pretty good spot. I like what they

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>did in the transfer portal. The schedule is conducive to it.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things that are that are

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that are very much in their corner. So I think

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's realistic. I don't think you're an idiot. That's not

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the same. I'll get to ten and two, but I

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very high flour for Wisconsin, and I

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think ten and two is there. You weren't quite as

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about Wisconsin, but even you, I think acknowledged that

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if you squint it, if you look at all the

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>factors here going into the twenty three season for the Badgers,

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ten and two, it's not unrealistic, Dan, No.

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 2>It's not unrealistic. It doesn't happen a ton in a

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>scenario in which a new coach wins double digit games

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>in his first season, just because generally speaking, there's a

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>reason why a school has a new coach, right that

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the old coach is bailing for whatever reason. And maybe

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 2>it's lack of confidence in the future of the team,

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 2>or maybe just sees the grass greener elsewhere, or they're

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>bad and need a new coach because they got rid

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 2>of the old guy. That's right, and so this year

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>was an especially good year for new coaches to come

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>in and win double digit games. When you look at Washington,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 2>you look at USC, you look at TCU, Oregon, depending

0:37:57.400 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>on if you count the bowl game, I tend not to.

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.479
<v Speaker 2>They were and three team that won a bowl game,

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 2>but even still flirting with it in that place, so

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it's entirely possible. We talked about their schedule. We talked

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 2>about improvement what we perceived to be improvement at quarterback,

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 2>improvement perhaps in scheme. The defense isn't where it was

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago. But once again, I think

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>they miss Michigan and Penn State. Is that correct on

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 2>their schedule?

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Believe? I believe that's accurate.

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's a great place to start. I know

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>they traveled to Wazoo, right they return that trip, they

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 2>lost to Wazoo. I can't randle last season, but all

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 2>things considered, it's a great schedule for a first year

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 2>coach to get acclimated to a new conference and new program.

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So yes, it's a ten and two with three and

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a half breaks, right, A couple strokes of luck, maybe

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a doinked field goal, an injured quarterback, bad weather or

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 2>something like that. But it's attainable. But it's also you know,

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 2>seven to five is on the table because there was

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 2>a reason why Wisconsin took a downturn, and some of

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that was talent acquisition, some of it was talent, some

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of it was talent not being used correctly. I just

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a lot to ask, but yes, I'll

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 2>stand by three and a half breaks can get you

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to double digit wins if you set, if you gave

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 2>me even money either way, I would go under if

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>you said nine and a half. But it's a universe

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>exists absolutely in which they can get there.

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan, let's move on. Let's talk about the Georgia offense.

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Gary on Patreon asks does Todd Monkin's departure to the

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL set George's offense back? So toddmunkin offensive coordinator hired

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to the same position with the Baltimore Ravens. So he's

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 1>going pro and Mike Bobo a name from George past

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was an analyst on the staff. Was

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he not this past year something like that. I don't know.

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Bobo's back as offensive coordinator.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was most recently a coordinator in the SEC.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 2>As a full time job, does it set their offense

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>back absolutely in a meaningful way, in an appreciable way,

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know. Well, here's the thing.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 2>So we have a new quarterback who's presumably younger than

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty five.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>We have.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 2>A team that's not going to be reliant on scoring

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>forty points to win despite what they lose once again

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>on defense. They are built and they have built themselves

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 2>up in such a way where they scored twenty four

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>points the game to win, and most offensive coordinators, with

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the talent on hand, we'll be able to score twenty

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 2>four points with this team. Now, whoever wins that job

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is probably going to be starting in a better place

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 2>than Stetson Bennett did. With how much Bennett moved around

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and was counted out and didn't have the confidence of

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 2>his coaches, you'd think whoever gets the job this year

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 2>will have will be more empowered at quarterback with the

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 2>job immediately, but it's a lot to start over with

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with a new quarterback and a new coordinator. It has

0:40:58.040 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to be the vision of Kirby, it has to be

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 2>the vision of the guys they do return on the

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive coaching staff. So yes, i think they're going to

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 2>take a step back, but I'm also excited to see

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 2>what Bobo can do. He is still considered be a

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 2>good offensive minus I've had some health issues. I just

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 2>for the short term because of the lack of experience

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 2>on this offense. I think they're going to be more

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 2>conservative than they've been these past couple years. I think

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 2>there are going to be happy to get up to

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>a medium amount, right, to get up twenty seven to

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.919
<v Speaker 2>ten and sit, to get up twenty one to three,

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty one to seven and sit, and just shorten that

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 2>game even more than Greg Sankie already wants to shorten games.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 2>They are going to absolutely crockpot every week in the medium,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 2>short to medium term. So yeah, I think it's going

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 2>to change the complexion of the Georgia offense. I don't

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>think they're going to succeed less in the wins and

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 2>losses column. Yeah, I mean a couple things that I

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.959
<v Speaker 2>point out. Yea, right, Mike Bobo was there for a

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 2>good long time under Mark Rix, so Georgia fans are

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 2>familiar with Mike Bobo. He was there this past season

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 2>as an offensive analyst, and his role on that squad

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 2>really was to do self scouting and to look at

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever Monkin was doing and figure out ways to either

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 2>avoid tipping off plays or make things more efficient or

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 2>make them better. So he's familiar with the offense that's

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 2>been installed at Georgia, he knows the verbiage, and there's

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>been some commentary out there that he doesn't want to

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 2>change it too much. He doesn't want to be like

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.439
<v Speaker 2>he's starting things from square one, because obviously what they've

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 2>done has been really successful.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's the first thing. If I were a Georgia fan,

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd at least feel heartened by that. I don't think

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be any kind of tectonic shift. It

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit more conservative. I think that's

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fair to say. But the second point, the players that

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>are on Georgia's squad now are so much better than

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they were the last time he was there. Right, if

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>he had brock Bauer back in the old day. If

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>he had Darnell Washington back in the old day, like

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we would see a different version of the mic

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Bobo offense as opposed to the one that you know,

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>some would say was all too happy to just run

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>at every play right, to lean too heavily on the

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>on the ground game. So I don't think it's going

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to take any step back in a meaningful way as

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you described. I mean, they're so talented up and down

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that roster that the splits, the run pass splits might

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>look a little different. Maybe they're not as explosive as

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they were under Todd Munkin just because of the play calling.

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, I think George is just such

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in such a good place with their talent that as

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>long as they remain at that really high level on

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side of the ball, which I think we've

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>come to know and expect this point, the offense is

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>always going to be in a position to score points

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and succeed. So I'm not too worried about it. I

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>hate retreads, but I think just given the fact that

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he's been around the program, he's a hell of a motivator.

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>By all accounts, people like playing for him, so I

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be fine.

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Here's the devil's advocate is that Kirby has not hit

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 2>a thousand. Is not bad at a thousand in terms

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of quarterback decisions, quarterback evaluation, offensive coordinators. You know, the

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 2>tail end of the Jim Cheney Jake from experiment wasn't great,

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 2>right that, and they weren't as talented as they are now.

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't get away with mediocrity on offense and the

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 2>way that they could hypothetically now because of where the

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 2>defense is. But this is now the era that it's

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Kirby Smart dealing with attrition as part of the success, right,

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the attrition of coaches in successive years. He's now lost

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 2>a defensive coordinator and an offensive coordinator who wouldn't want

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to coach at Georgia, who wouldn't want to recruit at Georgia,

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 2>who wouldn't want to be responsible for that level of

0:44:56.400 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 2>success at Georgia. Right, it's a crazy enticing of coordinator jobs.

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 2>But also success isn't guaranteed. Success is just not guaranteed.

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 2>We're coming off of a year in which Alabama, who's

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 2>had everything in the world, not make the playoff, not

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 2>even win the sec West, Right, it's entirely possible with

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 2>a roster full of NFL players to not win your division,

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 2>to not win your conference as one of the two

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 2>three four most talented teams in the nation. And so

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anything's guaranteed, but this year, I think

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the train will keep running well next year, So twenty

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty four new teams in the conference, because you know

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>how everybody's scared of Texas right now. Sure, in Oklahoma's defense,

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a question. It's a question what the actual long

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 2>term plan is for Georgia's offense and who that quarterback is.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, they put ever, they put all, They pushed

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>all their chips to the middle for arch Manning and

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 2>it didn't work out. And so again they'll be just fine.

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 2>But what's the next phase. What's Kirby three point zero

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 2>look like at Georgia? That to me is an interesting

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 2>question because again, nothing guaranteed, even with a back to

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 2>back national champion.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll see. They tried to fill that vacancy very quickly.

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>As soon as Munket was gone. It was Mike Bobo's job.

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So clearly continuity is something that Kirby's put a premium

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on and they're going to try to keep this train rolling.

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But like you said, they're gonna be new faces. Success

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>is never guaranteed. Even though the guy had a lot

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of success there before, and he did have a lot

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of success there before, there's no guarantee that this next

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.879
<v Speaker 1>iteration will produce the same result. I think they'll be fine.

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any reason to really doubt it, but

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a fair question.

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's things are looking a little bit better than

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 2>they could just because Florida seems to be a mess,

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 2>seems to be an ice flow on fire headed out

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to see. But other than that, Yeah, Tennessee has improved

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:05.720
<v Speaker 2>but showed itself to be not quite ready for primetime

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 2>last year in Athens, and look, South Carolina is coming up.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky has showed flashes of danger, but that specific division

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 2>as currently constituted, it's got to be Florida and Tennessee

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 2>as the threat. That's a dual threat whatever to George's dominance,

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and right now it's not a twenty twenty three problem

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 2>for the dogs, it seems.

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Is Florida really going to start Graham Mertz as starting quarterback.

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to in Yeah, I as far as I

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 2>can tell.

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sorry, Florida fans, hate to do that to you.

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's close it out on this day. We get a

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other questions. Maybe we'll save those for our

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Thursday show. If you're cool with that, sure, let's do it.

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good ones here. I wanted to close

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this one out with an email that we got from Kevin,

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very specific email. What does Syracuse do with Dino Babers.

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We had one great season, a bunch of five and

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>sevens went seven and five after starting six and oh

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>this past year. I don't think we should extend him

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon, but I don't know who would a better

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 1>hire be. I'm not delusional and think Syracuse should be

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ten and two every season, right, but eight and four

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seems reasonable from Kevin. Thank you, Kaz, A good question.

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We like Dino on the show. We always have a

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>couple reference points, just to throw them out there. In

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of returning production, which is not everything but is

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful number, especially for a school like Syracuse. They're

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty five team in terms of returning production

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy three percent on offense, seventy two percent on defense.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>That's inside the top forty on both fronts, so got

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>enough coming back to hopefully continue some of the momentum

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>from last season. I would also add that the schedule

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>looks beautiful on some level. There is a stretch. There

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is a stretch in the middle of the season last

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>week of September through the middle of October where it's

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Clemson at North Carolina at Florida State. But otherwise it's Colgate,

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it's Western Michigan, It's at Purdue, It's Army at Virginia Tech,

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Boston College home against well the neutral site game, excuse me,

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>against pitt the one that they're playing in Yankee Stadium

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 1>now at Georgia Tech, close out the year against Wake Forest.

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not counting anything as a surefire win for Syracuse. However,

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 1>outside of those three games in the middle of the season,

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a pretty workable schedule. So what I

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>would say here is whatever you want to do with

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Dino Babers, it will probably be very clear after this season,

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is a schedule, and this is a roster

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that's got enough back and that's got I think enough

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.320
<v Speaker 1>runway here with this slate that if they want to

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>win eight games, seems like it's there.

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all good points, ty, do you have many eight

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 2>win seasons Syracuse has as an ACC team, so since

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:19.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen, one if eight and three is a reasonable expectation,

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 2>sometimes one, one, yeah, one win in the Big East

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:29.760
<v Speaker 2>since two thousand, okay, so going back to two thousand,

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 2>so that's the Paul Pasqualone era. How many eight win

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 2>seasons do they have in the Big East in the

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 2>regular season? Eight and four plus type seasons since two

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand because they actually did, you know, under Donovan mcnapo team,

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 2>so two thousand more modern era, So two thousand and one,

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 2>they go ten and three after the Bowl nine and

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>three top fifteen team. After that, the number of eight

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 2>win seasons in the Big East in the regular season

0:50:54.840 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is zero. So it's nice to say, and maybe the

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 2>schedule workout has it definitely did a couple of years

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 2>ago when they won ten games. If you remember, they

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 2>played a bunch of all kind of overrated ACC teams

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 2>and pulled those out with the senior quarterback. They got

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 2>very lucky on in Eric Dungee, who I think is

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 2>from Portland, Oregon. Eric, you're your guy, Eric Dungee. The

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 2>evidence is not there that Syracuse should be an eight

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 2>ish win team more often than not, and that's generally

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 2>not because on paper they look like they could be,

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 2>but in practice, this is not a team that can

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 2>recruit a too deep that can compete with the upper

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 2>half of the ACC consistently in an average year, and

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 2>so six I think Bowl should be the expectation at Syracuse,

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 2>all things considered, with the amount of dedication or lack

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of dedication, however you want to view it. For Syracuse.

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Dino's fine. I think he's absolutely fine. The

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 2>weird thing. The thing I would be concerned about is

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 2>cash money, because they don't seem to keep coordinators around ever.

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe that's a good reflection on Dino Baper's

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 2>ability to evaluate new assistant coaches and hires and everything

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 2>like that, But it doesn't seem like they're matching buyouts

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 2>or doesn't or matching you know, Okay, we're off. You

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 2>were raised to stay instead of going to coach you

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 2>know Nebraska's defense Tony White, and so lack of turnover

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 2>is concerning ability to recruit and build up that too

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 2>deep to win eight games more often than not, pretty

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 2>concerning interesting home field advantage in whatever they're calling the

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 2>carrier dome now, JMA wireless.

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:36.240
<v Speaker 1>They get that, right, May wireless.

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look at me, I just I don't know. I

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 2>it's it's again, it's an on paper thing. And the

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 2>ACC is in a weird place right now. But even still,

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:49.919
<v Speaker 2>you start six and oh, then everybody realizes you don't

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 2>have a defensive front and run straight at them and

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing you can do and your quarterback gets hurt.

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:58.000
<v Speaker 2>There just there's very little wiggle room, there's very little

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 2>margin for error at Syracuse. And so who do they

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 2>got just demolished in that year they went ten? I

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 2>think it was Notre Dame, right, Yankee Stadium, I believe, so, Yeah,

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 2>they lost like thirty five to three. And so that's

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 2>that's the issue where you just don't have a twelve

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 2>game roster. And I think you win six or seven

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 2>in Syracuse. It's pretty good. And Dino Babers is buy

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 2>and large done that.

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Dino's been there since twenty sixteen, went to a bowl

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this past year, went to a bowl back in twenty eighteen,

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone to a bowl at any point beyond that.

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of five and sevens and four and eight's

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in here for Dino Babers. The one season where they

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>did go ten and three, they finished up ten and three.

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>That was the year where they had a top fifteen offense. Right,

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is ever going to be the

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of program that is driven by defense. Dino's an

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>offensive guy. If he can get offense out there, then

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking, then we're talking.

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I think expectations foot it kind of was driven by

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 2>defense these past couple of years. To go five and seven, yeah, right, six,

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to go five.

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And have to go six and six, even still has

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not fielded a top fifty defense. So relatively speaking, defense

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 1>has been okay, but the offense has not been there

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to match and to hold up its end of the bargain.

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that'll be different this coming season. I don't know,

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but I tend to agree with you. I don't know

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>if the historical data is there to suggest that Syracuse

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can get there to be a consistent eight and four team.

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But what I am saying as we look forward down

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty three, the schedule's there for it, and the

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.839
<v Speaker 1>roster is there, I think to go eight and four

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if they want to, not a whole lot of teams

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:44.919
<v Speaker 1>on that schedule that really put the fear of God

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into even on the road at North Carolina with some

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of their turnover, with how they've underperformed on defense, it's

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not a stretch to envision to shootout in which Syracuse

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>comes away winning. But I think this is the year.

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>This is like the mistest for Dino. If you're a

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Dino fan, if you believe in Dino, if he can

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>get everything going in the same direction, you can envision

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>an eight and four season. If not, if he goes

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>five and seven again against a schedule like this, then

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>then maybe there's a reason for some healthy skepticism.

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's also because I remember the end of the

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Perdue game. Was there another game that Syracuse eked out

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 2>like they're just always going to be eight points, Like

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:31.799
<v Speaker 2>the swing between seven and five and four and eight

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 2>is going to be so tiny, right that margin I'm

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 2>pulling up what they did this year. It's just when

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 2>you have that kind of coach turnover, especially, it's just

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 2>when you don't have that any sort of successful continuity,

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 2>it seems. So they lost five straight, they lost by six, seventeen, ten,

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty five and ten once again, and so in their wins.

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.919
<v Speaker 2>They beat Perdue last second, they eke by Virginia by two.

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 2>So they go seven and five this year and they're

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 2>like ninety seconds from going five to seven. Yeah, so

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that just it doesn't give me a lot of confidence

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 2>that they're able to build up that roster to like, oh,

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 2>our you know, left guard went down, our week side

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 2>linebacker went down, and we're not going to miss that

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 2>much of a beat, which is what better teams are

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 2>able to do. And so they obviously didn't have it

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback when they got hurt there. Yeah, I just

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 2>think they're right around five hundred.

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We shall see Sliverblegmail dot com as always, is the

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>email address that does it. For today. We've got a

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch more questions that I'm going to save nice and

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to use for our Thursday show. We

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>had folks chiming in. We can give folks more time

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to send in their questions as well. Don't forget to

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 1>hit us up on social media. The aforementioned email address

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is always open as well. If you're into the old

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>school means of communication. We will be checking that in

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>time for the Thursday episode. But keep the questions coming,

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to hit subscribe or follow whatever it is

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 1>your podcasting app of choice allows you to do two

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes every week if you want the bonus stuff. Verballers

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com is where you can go to sign up

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Patreon get access not just to the bonus content,

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but also to the discord server, which continues to be

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a lively place to talk about college football and really

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>anything else. We'd encourage you to check that out if

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you were ever so inclined to be a little bit

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 1>more of an official member of the verballerhood of course.

0:57:28.160 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I just came up as you were saying that,

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I came up with the stupidest idea I've ever come

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 2>up with for an episode. Yeah, yeah, yeah, and I'm

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 2>only going to talk about it on an episode on

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Forballer Stuff on our bruin a or something that's some

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of special reveal there. Yeah, that's it.

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Dan, Happy President's Day. Okay, Hey you as well.

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Hope you get a new mattress or something to take

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 2>advantage of the sales for that guy.

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Dan for myself tied, Thanks again for tuning on in.

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We will talk to y'all soon. Stay solid, peace,