Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty and Key Armstrong and Jetty.
Speaker 3: Investigators Telfox. The plan was to use drones with explosives
Speaker 3: to hit buildings near the UFC Freedom two fifty event,
Speaker 3: which would force a mass evacuation and steer crowds toward
Speaker 3: a pre staged sniper team. A quote Second Wave was
Speaker 3: allegedly planning to storm the White House gate. Those accused
Speaker 3: of being involved in the alleged plot arrested in Ohio, Nebraska, Missouri,
Speaker 3: and California.
Speaker 4: It was unique due to the numbers involved, the level
Speaker 4: of planning involved.
Speaker 2: We talked about this a lot yesterday when the news
Speaker 2: first broke. I've seen it dismissed by a lot of
Speaker 2: people of Washington. D has technology in place where drones
Speaker 2: cannot do all these different reasons that it couldn't have happened. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there are supposedly all kinds of things in place that
Speaker 2: would make it impossible for a kid to just walk
Speaker 2: onto a fairgrounds with a rifle, climb up a ladder
Speaker 2: in front of everybody, and very very come, very close
Speaker 2: to blowing the president's head off, but he did it anyway,
Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm not sure. I'm feel like that this
Speaker 2: plot had no chance just because of the various safeguards
Speaker 2: you're mentioning anyway, David Spunt goes on.
Speaker 3: In Ohio, investigators say nineteen year old Tyson Propper's mother
Speaker 3: called police after she was concerned about her son's recent conduct,
Speaker 3: including firearms purchases and his communications with people online. Investigators
Speaker 3: are looking at twenty three people in chats online. Proper's
Speaker 3: father told police his son quit his job recently quote
Speaker 3: in preparation to meet the individuals he had been interacting
Speaker 3: with online to conduct mission and recons.
Speaker 2: Good on mom for calling the cops on her own kid.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, his behavior was extremely troubling.
Speaker 2: Good for her.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that had to be a difficult thing to do.
Speaker 2: Do you have a sense of how close they got
Speaker 2: to being able to pull this off? I mean, did
Speaker 2: they actually purchase the drones? Did they have any explosives? Uh?
Speaker 1: I don't know that. I know they they had AMPLI
Speaker 1: firearms and body armor that sort of thing. You know,
Speaker 1: That's that's a great question. Another question might be how
Speaker 1: close did they come to unleashing some sort of death
Speaker 1: and mayhem, even if their big plot didn't come true,
Speaker 1: because they absolutely had the intent and did the preparation
Speaker 1: to kill lots of people.
Speaker 2: So the Secret the Secret Service was not happy that
Speaker 2: the FBI came out and announced this yesterday, highly unhappy.
Speaker 4: I'll tell you a phrase I learned early in my
Speaker 4: career in the New York Field Office, and don't choke
Speaker 4: on your own smoke. Anyone that believes that case was
Speaker 4: worked in a bubble is naive.
Speaker 2: That's Matt Quinn, Deputy Director of the Secret Service.
Speaker 4: He goes on, I'll tell you the Secret Service led
Speaker 4: that investigation from the beginning.
Speaker 2: I'll tell you that it's ongoing.
Speaker 4: In order to maintain the integrity of the investigation and
Speaker 4: the security plan, we chose not to leak it. They
Speaker 4: were planning to attack the Freedom two fifty. Some of
Speaker 4: what you read this morning's accurate. I'm not going to
Speaker 4: get into too many details because, like I said, this
Speaker 4: is still an active, ongoing investigation. Just because we're done
Speaker 4: with Freedom two fifty or that particular event doesn't mean
Speaker 4: we're going to stop. There are still suspects at large,
Speaker 4: and we're going to work it until everyone's been identified.
Speaker 2: So he's saying, the Secret Service was the lead on
Speaker 2: this whole investigation, and they were going to beginning from
Speaker 2: the beginning, and they were going to keep their mouths shutting.
Speaker 2: Then why did Cash Betel go out and make all
Speaker 2: this noise yesterday? In a friend of the Armstrong and
Speaker 2: Getty show who's very close to these sorts of organizations, said,
Speaker 2: with the release of that sealed indictment, the chance of
Speaker 2: identifying co conspirators decreases. None of those indicted, arrested guys
Speaker 2: will work for the government now. Totally sophomoric move by
Speaker 2: the FBI. You know, I don't know anything about this,
Speaker 2: but it's hard to imagine what the upside was of
Speaker 2: coming out early on this, letting us know what happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting because I just before that came out,
Speaker 1: I was just reading that the White House is a
Speaker 1: bit of a fever pitch over the question of leaks,
Speaker 1: specifically leaks of what happened during carefully classified meetings, you know,
Speaker 1: in the situation room and that sort of thing. And
Speaker 1: there's a fair amount of that in the new book
Speaker 1: that's come out by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan in
Speaker 1: which you know, people are quoted directly what the seating
Speaker 1: arrangements were, who was on the speaker phone. I mean,
Speaker 1: clearly they have sources from inside that room. And here's
Speaker 1: a perhaps completely inappropriate, self aggrandizing leak from cash Betel.
Speaker 1: I gotta believe he's getting the getting the fish eye
Speaker 1: what do they call it, the stinky from Trump? Yeah,
Speaker 1: if he mysteriously decides to resign in future days, that's
Speaker 1: what's going on.
Speaker 2: So mom had heard her son who lived in the basement,
Speaker 2: talking to his friends and told law enforcement that the
Speaker 2: group was angry about the handling of the Epstein files
Speaker 2: and the false belief that data centers were using up
Speaker 2: all the water in the communities. Yeah, the group also
Speaker 2: planned to target politicians who took money from APAK, the
Speaker 2: Israeli lobby. And then the guy in California that got
Speaker 2: arrested said that we have politicians eating babies, raping an babies,
Speaker 2: and I can't stand for that. So he believes that
Speaker 2: Epstein QAnon thing right. I brought that up to my
Speaker 2: kids yesterday, and my older son said that he knows
Speaker 2: lots of people in his high school that believe that stuff,
Speaker 2: or at least pretend to believe that stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I've been shocked at some people I've run into
Speaker 1: lately who get hooked by the whole conspiracy theory thing.
Speaker 1: They're like, yeah, yeah, this is not what meets the eye,
Speaker 1: but they have none of the facts. They've just been
Speaker 1: led down the garden path by people who are really
Speaker 1: good at that sort of thing.
Speaker 2: How big is that.
Speaker 1: Under a class under class, a class of people who
Speaker 1: suck up all of the QAnon Tucker Canvas stuff at
Speaker 1: this point.
Speaker 2: So I went through the whole story with my kids
Speaker 2: because they hadn't heard it on the whole QAnon. So
Speaker 2: it was a guy who has now since outed himself
Speaker 2: who is jerking people around on the line claiming he
Speaker 2: had all this secret information. He has come out and
Speaker 2: said it himself. There's a documentary on Netflix or wherever
Speaker 2: from several years ago. He came out and said, I
Speaker 2: did it just to jerk people around. I thought it
Speaker 2: was hilarious. He has said that, Yet the crap he
Speaker 2: made up people continue to believe. The guy who started
Speaker 2: it says, yeah, I was just jerking you around. I
Speaker 2: can't believe anybody fell for it.
Speaker 1: No, total false flag that was not the real Q
Speaker 1: and that was claiming to be.
Speaker 2: To discredit it.
Speaker 1: But we've seen behind, we've seen beyond that. We were
Speaker 1: not duped by that because we're the group that's in
Speaker 1: the know and really understands what's going on.
Speaker 2: But there are conspiracies in There are conspiracies. I mean
Speaker 2: some of them, like a lot of mim I don't believe,
Speaker 2: but I you know, I can see how I am.
Speaker 2: Maybe there's some truth. How is your immediate reaction not no,
Speaker 2: blank and way when you hear we read the Epstein
Speaker 2: files carry such weight like it means something. No, it's
Speaker 2: a piece of paper. A crazy person called some cop
Speaker 2: or FBI or whoever.
Speaker 5: Claimed they were on a yacht where they saw George
Speaker 5: Bush rape a baby, then cut the baby into pieces,
Speaker 5: cut the baby open, and then eat the pooh out
Speaker 5: of the babies intestines.
Speaker 2: Now, how is your reaction to that not? Please?
Speaker 1: You're saying that did not or did happen? The fact
Speaker 1: that your reaction could be anything but just immediate dismissal
Speaker 1: of Wow, that person's really crazy. You could go, I
Speaker 1: suppose a whole bunch of people saw that and have
Speaker 1: kept it secret because you know, people keep secrets.
Speaker 2: Like that all the time. Yeah, it's just it. I
Speaker 2: don't even know. I can't wrap my head around it
Speaker 2: that there would be ten people in the country that
Speaker 2: would believe that could be true. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I came across a really great editorial in the New
Speaker 1: York Post about anti Semitism and how it's about much
Speaker 1: much more than just.
Speaker 2: Public hating Jews.
Speaker 1: It's this strained strand of moral and intellectual rot that
Speaker 1: completely consumes its host culture. And it's it's actually really
Speaker 1: interesting and insightful, and it sent me on a bit
Speaker 1: of a research rabbit hole about the nature of cultural
Speaker 1: scapegoating and and there have been, you know, many examples
Speaker 1: throughout history. The Jews are the most popular target, but
Speaker 1: the psychological common ground it shares with like the witch hunts,
Speaker 1: where you live in a confusing, threatening world, and if
Speaker 1: somebody can reduce the the the randomness and threat of
Speaker 1: it to something explainable that you can fight against, it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter how ridiculous and implausible. Truly, the you know,
Speaker 1: singling out of the scapegoat is people of a certain
Speaker 1: mindset go to it, and they need it, and they're
Speaker 1: they're incredibly enthusiastic about it. And the interesting part about
Speaker 1: it is that the further it goes, persecution intensifies, rather
Speaker 1: than the persecution intensifies the feeling. It's not responding to
Speaker 1: evidence that intensifies the feelings. It's the witch trials themselves
Speaker 1: whipped up enthusiasm for witch trials, and people felt like, yeah,
Speaker 1: they're doing it over there, it must be legitimate, and
Speaker 1: so we're gonna do it too, and by god, that's
Speaker 1: the solution, even though they've never seen the evidence of
Speaker 1: its truth. And you know, I don't know what to
Speaker 1: do about that. I have a feeling that people who
Speaker 1: desperately need to hear that will not hear it, you know,
Speaker 1: from us, And I'm not sure they'll hear it from anybody,
Speaker 1: because they self you know, they self select to what
Speaker 1: inputs they take online, almost entirely online.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, what stood out to me in the conversation
Speaker 2: with my kids is my son saying, yeah, lots of
Speaker 2: high schoolers in his school believe that stuff, so they.
Speaker 1: Heard that from their parents or I don't know, I
Speaker 1: really don't know, yeah, or online young men in particular
Speaker 1: really get sucked into these online communities that promise them
Speaker 1: that you will really know what's going on and really
Speaker 1: understand what's happening, because we're not going to let those
Speaker 1: bastards lie to you.
Speaker 2: That's an appealing pitch. And so the whole Epstein thing
Speaker 2: is the Israel controlled Epstein. He was an asset of Israel,
Speaker 2: worked for the Masade, and he was running the child
Speaker 2: peedo ring in the United States. And it goes back
Speaker 2: to Jews drink the blood of babies something or other.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, Actually the learned editorial I was talking about
Speaker 1: this guy's conclusion is and I found this super intriguing.
Speaker 1: The answer is simple, stop quote unquote combating anti Semitism,
Speaker 1: an effort to which everyone from the federal government to
Speaker 1: the organized American Jewish community is currently pouring tremendous resources.
Speaker 1: These days, it's an enormous waste of time and money
Speaker 1: because anti Semitism, the world's oldest hatred, isn't something we're
Speaker 1: going to solve anytime soon. I thought, wow, wait, what
Speaker 1: Instead we should treat anti Semitism as what it is,
Speaker 1: a symptom for a much larger problem that isn't political
Speaker 1: but spiritual, the problem of no longer knowing what it
Speaker 1: is we believe in defining and defending our core common
Speaker 1: American virtues is hard. Hissing that all of our problems
Speaker 1: are due to the nefarious interference of a shadow of
Speaker 1: minority is much easier. We must resist this temptation at
Speaker 1: all costs and by any means necessary. We can set
Speaker 1: up a federal task force to make sure our shared
Speaker 1: values liberty and dignity, to name but a few, are
Speaker 1: taught vigorously at every level of education. Then he talks about,
Speaker 1: I don't know, reinstate the draft, mandatory public service, Give
Speaker 1: them young Americans a deep and real community, invest mightily
Speaker 1: in cultural startups dedicated not to tearing down america past,
Speaker 1: like all of our educational institutions, but in propping up
Speaker 1: its future and teaching the kids about how great this
Speaker 1: country is.
Speaker 2: You don't it's one of those things.
Speaker 1: You fill the vacuum with something positive, don't fake focus
Speaker 1: on the negative emotion, focus on what's missing.
Speaker 2: I thought that was really interesting and insights. Yeah, it
Speaker 2: is so nature abhors and emotional vacuum. Also something has
Speaker 2: spiritual vacuum. Yeah interesting, Yeah, more on the way. You
Speaker 2: have a comment on that text line four one, five,
Speaker 2: two nine, five kftcar.
Speaker 1: President consigned an executive order to roll back environmental restrictions
Speaker 1: on commercial fishing, which explains the new restaurant chain Gray Lobster.
Speaker 2: What was Mike Pompeo and the Trump administration? He was
Speaker 2: the see the National Security Advisor. That's close anyway, he's
Speaker 2: this statement from him, So this is a piggybacking on
Speaker 2: Vance and Trump both talking about, Look the people we're
Speaker 2: dealing with now, they don't even want a nuclear weapon anymore.
Speaker 2: They're good guys. You can trust them. Mike Pompeo, former
Speaker 2: Trump administration official director to the CIA. That's right, he
Speaker 2: was a CIA director. Yeah, he said, a deal with
Speaker 2: Iran must recognize that this regime has no desire to
Speaker 2: be a responsible member of the community of Nations. They
Speaker 2: do not regret the last forty seven years, nor think
Speaker 2: it was a mistake to kill Americans. They are radical Islamists.
Speaker 2: Any funds available to the regime, whether paid to them directly,
Speaker 2: provided by sanctions, relief, or via releasing s road funds,
Speaker 2: will go straight toward rebuilding the IRGC military capabilities and
Speaker 2: its terrorist proxies. When your enemy is at your weakest,
Speaker 2: you need to win. He was also Trump's secretary of State.
Speaker 2: I forgotten he was s during Yeah, so he's dealt
Speaker 2: with these people before, and he is stating that. The
Speaker 2: vice presidents claim that, Look, they've decided we should play
Speaker 2: that clip from you. It's from yesterday's sheet. But because
Speaker 2: he does it kind of laughing.
Speaker 1: Look, they're looking at it now and thinking, what were
Speaker 1: we thinking trying to get a nuclear weapon all that years?
Speaker 2: That that hasn't done us any good. So now we're
Speaker 2: all on the same page here. So that's fantastic, just ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Yesterday's fifty six, Michael, can you grab that? Perhaps you're
Speaker 2: standing perfectly still, did you hear it? Okay?
Speaker 6: For forty seven years, this country has been a thorn
Speaker 6: in our side. It's been kind of a basket case
Speaker 6: for Democrat and Republican administrations. The coolest thing about the
Speaker 6: progress we've made over the last few weeks is that
Speaker 6: you see people within the Iranian system, senior leadership, even
Speaker 6: IRGC officials, say, you know what, we may have some animosity,
Speaker 6: we may have some mistrust, but we recognize the way
Speaker 6: that we've done business with the United States for forty seven.
Speaker 2: Years is a mistake. Let's try something else.
Speaker 6: We're going to verify that, of course, but we're certainly
Speaker 6: willing to try something else if they comply.
Speaker 2: The coolest thing we've seen is they've decided that forty
Speaker 2: nears a hating us in death to America and everything
Speaker 2: is is. It doesn't work for us.
Speaker 1: So boy, you know, old Pavlavi, the crown Prince, the
Speaker 1: son of the Shah, he's out with just a withering
Speaker 1: statement too. I'm looking and I'm looking for Hey, this
Speaker 1: will probably work out.
Speaker 2: This looks good because I can't find it anywhere.
Speaker 1: Does JD believe that Mark Lavin is murdering Trump on this?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Does Jdvans believe that these tigers have changed their stripes?
Speaker 1: I just think he's the sitting vice president. He works
Speaker 1: for the president.
Speaker 2: And he's spinning best he can.
Speaker 1: Yeah, although you know, under our system he's elected independently.
Speaker 2: But Trumps up there speaking right now. And I don't know,
Speaker 2: maybe I'm misreading it, but Marco Ruby over his shoulder
Speaker 2: looks miserable to me.
Speaker 1: Maybe he got some bad food over there, and where
Speaker 1: are they? Marco has to be miserable, doesn't he? No way,
Speaker 1: he believes these guys have changed and aren't going to
Speaker 1: try to get a nuclear weapon. Yeah, he's near despair,
Speaker 1: practically guaranteed, Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 7: This is the Schalban Intelligent Toilet robot, designed primarily as
Speaker 7: a mobile autonomous toilet for elderly people or those with
Speaker 7: mobility challenges, as instead of the person going to the toilet,
Speaker 7: the toilet comes to the person as soon as you
Speaker 7: are finished. The robot initiates a built in bidet system
Speaker 7: for automated washing, followed by a warm air drying cycle.
Speaker 7: From there, a heavy duty odor control mechanism instantly engages
Speaker 7: ceiling the internal chamber air tight to trap and neutralize
Speaker 7: any smells. The robot drives itself back to the docking station.
Speaker 7: It then extends a disposal arm, completely flushing both the
Speaker 7: solid and liquid waste away. Immediately after, it runs an
Speaker 7: intensive self cleaning and sanitizing cycle on the bowl, leaving
Speaker 7: at pristine for the next trip.
Speaker 1: What does this cost? Never mind, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: I must have one because they're getting Because getting up
Speaker 2: and going to the toilet is such a job. You
Speaker 2: need the toilet to come to you.
Speaker 1: Whatever room I'm in, that's correct, living room, kitchen, doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: Kitchen. So you're sitting there eating dinner and your family
Speaker 2: has to watch you do this. They don't have to.
Speaker 1: They divert their eyes. Nobody's making them watch.
Speaker 2: Start your phone for a second, kids, You know, if
Speaker 2: someone is elderly sort of thing, I could appreciate that.
Speaker 1: It sounds like very amasy. This is this is a
Speaker 1: great time to be alive.
Speaker 2: Maybe you're lazy and sometimes you gotta go and you think,
Speaker 2: do I want to walk clear across the house or
Speaker 2: I just let go on my pall the way over there?
Speaker 2: I mean, I just soil myself. Nobody's coming over tonight.
Speaker 2: Now you don't have.
Speaker 1: To face that unfortunate choice. Now the toilet comes to you, right,
Speaker 1: you still got to scoot off your chair onto it,
Speaker 1: right though?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Presumably yeah, unless you got you know, the next model
Speaker 1: be it? I guess the robot would its docking station
Speaker 1: would be under your favorite chair. What does it look
Speaker 1: so most of the time it would just be right there.
Speaker 1: If you happen to be in a different chair across
Speaker 1: the house, well then you could call it to you.
Speaker 2: What does it look like, Miles, It look like a
Speaker 2: little trash can on wheels. No, it's like a chair
Speaker 2: on wheels, but you know, just like you imagine.
Speaker 1: Chair on wheels, chair on wheels. I mean, yeah again,
Speaker 1: only in America. What a wonderful thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know if there's no audience for that.
Speaker 1: Uh So, totally different topic than mobile robot toilets. I
Speaker 1: thought this was interesting. There was a big debate last
Speaker 1: night or two nights ago in the California Assembly. There's
Speaker 1: some big DEI bill that's about to pass as California
Speaker 1: goes further down the road of neo Marxism and DEI,
Speaker 1: which is nothing it claims to be. And I compile
Speaker 1: a list of that sort of program that's going on
Speaker 1: right now. They all happen to be on the West coast.
Speaker 1: But Chris Ruffo wrote a great piece for City Journal.
Speaker 1: California is currently pressuring public utilities to award six hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty three million dollars in special contracts to LGBT
Speaker 1: owned firms. But to qualify, you've got to go through
Speaker 1: the state's official gay certification program, and you face up
Speaker 1: to a year in jail if you're not gay enough.
Speaker 2: So I got a mm hmm in from with someone.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, but yeah, obviously with someone in front
Speaker 2: of someone so they can document Yep, he's either gay
Speaker 2: or he was good at pretending all right.
Speaker 1: Scheme operates through the California Public Utilities Commission the CPUC,
Speaker 1: which regulates privately owned utility companies. California Utilities spent more
Speaker 1: than forty three billion dollars on contractors, fuel suppliers, surveys, engineers,
Speaker 1: and others.
Speaker 2: You know, you can imagine.
Speaker 1: But they created a supplier diversity problem way back when,
Speaker 1: but now they're trying to expand expand it to the
Speaker 1: LGBTQ plus minus over the power three community.
Speaker 2: What's the theory that I the taxpayer should be giving
Speaker 2: a break to gay owned businesses over Well, the adience
Speaker 2: is that they were discriminated against in the past or something.
Speaker 2: That's usually that sort of thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just nicked used to spread out money to
Speaker 1: specific cronies. But uh, the idea that you would be
Speaker 1: awarded state contracts based on who you are romantically.
Speaker 2: Attracted to and or sexually attracted to is bizarre.
Speaker 1: Applicants can secure gay certification by providing a letter from
Speaker 1: an LGBT organization and testing to their sexual press.
Speaker 2: Is that a one time deal? Do I get certified
Speaker 2: the first time I do it? Or do I every
Speaker 2: six months? Do I have to go back and get
Speaker 2: re certified? Bring some due to.
Speaker 1: Long and I would think it's like a medical license.
Speaker 1: You have to be recertified every so often. Man, you
Speaker 1: haven't forgotten what you've learned? Yeah, wow, I got to
Speaker 1: go to it again. So you can either get a
Speaker 1: letter from an LGBT organization declaring you gay, proof that
Speaker 1: a newspaper identified you as LGBT, or three letters from
Speaker 1: personal contacts written on company letterhead a testing to your
Speaker 1: homosexual orientation. Corporate officials falsely represent their business as gay
Speaker 1: face up to a year in county jail.
Speaker 2: Wow. Man, if I was going to start a business,
Speaker 2: I'd be pretty tempted to claim I was gay and
Speaker 2: make them prove them not. Yeah. Yeah, the gay I
Speaker 2: should have mentioned. I've been wanting to mention it for
Speaker 2: a week now.
Speaker 1: The Justice Department issued an opinion explaining the disparate impact
Speaker 1: under federal law is unconstitutional. Should be It's an earthquake
Speaker 1: in federal civil rights law. Rights one civil rights attorney,
Speaker 1: if right, this is the foundation to overturn that pernicious
Speaker 1: regime and the wall Street Journal the constitution versus disparate impact.
Speaker 1: That's the presumption that if there's a different result, say
Speaker 1: white kids tend to do better than black kids on
Speaker 1: this test, that's proof there is racism there.
Speaker 2: Or if you got more men passing the firefighter test
Speaker 2: than women, that the test iswed against women, clearly, unfairly
Speaker 2: so and needs to be corrected by the government. No
Speaker 2: chance that just men are better at that then, or
Speaker 2: more applying, or any other number of things. Nope, clearly
Speaker 2: sexism or racism or whatever. If you don't end up
Speaker 2: with an equal.
Speaker 1: Result only against black and brown people though, right Asian
Speaker 1: people and people from India, because they're better than everybody,
Speaker 1: you can discriminate against them or Jewish people. Yeah, no
Speaker 1: problem there, no problem there. Justice Department took a great
Speaker 1: step by telling the Equal Opportunity Commission that it's policy
Speaker 1: on disparate impact was unconstitutional and companies might be a
Speaker 1: bit that's kind of confusing. It's the old double reverse.
Speaker 1: But here's the key quote. Rather than treating disparate impact
Speaker 1: as an EVIDENTIARYMO mechanism to smoke out intentional discrimination, contemplates
Speaker 1: liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: You've got to prove intent in specific activity to discriminate,
Speaker 1: which is so obviously true. But so how far has
Speaker 1: this sort of thing gone. It's more examples for it. Canada,
Speaker 1: which is admittedly not an American state, explicitly advertises for
Speaker 1: university and other jobs that are restricted by race and
Speaker 1: gender you need not apply unless you are this race
Speaker 1: or this gender for government jobs in Canada, which is obscene.
Speaker 2: This is hilarious.
Speaker 1: Charles Cook, quoted for the second time on the show today,
Speaker 1: he says, here's the story so crazy that upon first class,
Speaker 1: I assumed it must be a hoax. And it's a
Speaker 1: tweet from a guy who says I just got a
Speaker 1: silver alert, which is a good reminder that California decided
Speaker 1: to racially segregate it's missing person alert system for some reason.
Speaker 1: And Charlie's headline is apparently California has a racially segregated
Speaker 1: missing person alert system. There is an Amber alert, which
Speaker 1: is actually named after an kidnapped child by the name
Speaker 1: of Amber, that is a missing child. There is a
Speaker 1: Blue alert, which is which one maybe I'll just read
Speaker 1: it miss has gone missing. Hilarious, Okay, So you've got
Speaker 1: the Ebony alert, which is for the suspicious or unexp
Speaker 1: explainable disappearance of a black woman or black person, and
Speaker 1: the Feather alert, which is for when a missing person
Speaker 1: is an Indigenous woman or indigenous person. The blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, and there's also a Yellow alert. But mercifully,
Speaker 1: given the state's history, that isn't in the same vein
Speaker 1: as the others, he says, and then he points out
Speaker 1: it's so weird when you dig into it. The CHP notes,
Speaker 1: as I just read the Ebony alert, a company's investigations
Speaker 1: into the suspicious or unexplained disappearment disappearance of a black
Speaker 1: woman or black person. Why are those two things operated?
Speaker 1: Black women are black persons. There's no ore about it.
Speaker 1: The same goes for the Feather alert. Again, one group
Speaker 1: contains the other. I suppose if you're already slicing up
Speaker 1: adults into racial groups for alerts for some reason, then
Speaker 1: creating more weird subdivisions comes naturally. But it doesn't look
Speaker 1: half strange and well racist, especially you know, constitutions says
Speaker 1: you're not supposed to discriminate by race. Both the state
Speaker 1: and federal constitutions.
Speaker 2: So I was having this conversation with my son the
Speaker 2: other day about how it's okay to discriminate against it's
Speaker 2: okay to point out advantages different.
Speaker 1: I don't know what term to use, racist ethnicities, skin colors,
Speaker 1: whatever groups, whatever groups advantages but not disadvantages. And how
Speaker 1: weird that is.
Speaker 2: You can say that this group is better at this
Speaker 2: than others, but you can't say a group is worse
Speaker 2: than it. So you're making this assumption that everything's only
Speaker 2: a positive and never negative. And we got started on this.
Speaker 2: My son sat down. There's a thing they do in
Speaker 2: the town I live in is they have pianos various
Speaker 2: places sitting outside, and so you can just sit down
Speaker 2: and play the piano, Like there's one at the library,
Speaker 2: and then there's one downtown by a coffee shop, and
Speaker 2: there's a couple of different plays. Wow, and they I don't
Speaker 2: know how they survived the rain, but anyway, they're not
Speaker 2: in the greatest tune, but they're a piano. And so
Speaker 2: Henry sat down the other day I was getting some coffee,
Speaker 2: said I'm gonna go play the piano. So he's over
Speaker 2: there by a different coffee shop playing the piano and
Speaker 2: I heard him, and I went over there.
Speaker 1: This little Asian girl came along when he got up
Speaker 1: and just started cranking out some mozart or whatever the
Speaker 1: hell she was, and he said, it seems like everything
Speaker 1: I do, some Asian kid comes along and shows me up.
Speaker 1: And I thought, uh, yeah, yeah, that's the it is
Speaker 1: for us white people Asian The Asians are showing us
Speaker 1: up absolutely everything, pretty much. And you can say that,
Speaker 1: but you couldn't do the opposite. If you're better than
Speaker 1: a group at something, you can point that out because
Speaker 1: that's racist. Uh yeah, you're better than another grew pointing
Speaker 1: out being worse than a group is okay, Well that's
Speaker 1: the weird thing. You can praise a culture, but you
Speaker 1: can't say they're bad at this unless it's in the
Speaker 1: context of its proof that there's been terrible discrimination. You
Speaker 1: can say there are no sociological norms that are negative
Speaker 1: or cultural norms that are negative, except those that can
Speaker 1: be explained away by racism, which is so crazy to
Speaker 1: me because since I've been a kid, I've been studying
Speaker 1: different cultures in political systems, and they all have pluses
Speaker 1: and minuses because well, of course they do, just like
Speaker 1: every human being has pluses and minus right, So you
Speaker 1: can say Asians are better at science and math.
Speaker 2: You can't say Asians are bad drivers. These are things.
Speaker 2: And I just picked a obviously not true stereotype that
Speaker 2: only racists would say.
Speaker 1: As an example, I can't even believe the words came
Speaker 1: out of your mouth.
Speaker 2: Everything I do, some Asian kid comes along and shows me.
Speaker 1: Up a couple more headlines for you will squeeze them
Speaker 1: in real quick, because I went to the trouble of
Speaker 1: compelling them. A Portland based county, Portland area county, it's
Speaker 1: Moltnomah County spent millions of dollars on race based housing programs,
Speaker 1: and outcomes for homeless.
Speaker 2: Minorities got worse.
Speaker 1: They dismissed the data that showed that, arguing that lived
Speaker 1: experience mattered as much as measurable outcomes.
Speaker 2: I mean, how stone dreamy, Portlandia.
Speaker 1: Is that lift experience counts more than your hard, cold data.
Speaker 2: Race dependent.
Speaker 1: And we talked about this actually when when it first
Speaker 1: came to light that there was a point scoring system
Speaker 1: where if you were a black trans person, a twenty
Speaker 1: five year old male masquerading as a female, whatever, you
Speaker 1: got emergency houses before a pregnant white lady or a
Speaker 1: white mom because you are lowered down on the intersectionality
Speaker 1: totem poll. These people are insane, they're racists, and they're
Speaker 1: going further down the road.
Speaker 2: It ain't over yet. We'll finish strong next. So we're
Speaker 2: just doing the story about how you can if you're
Speaker 2: if you if you're running a gay business, you can
Speaker 2: get some sort of tax break if you're if you're
Speaker 2: gay and running a business. It doesn't have to be
Speaker 2: a gay business. Now, that's right now. I was just
Speaker 2: wondering how you prove that. Do you go before a
Speaker 2: government board?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, longtime friend of the Armstrong and Getty show rights.
Speaker 1: If you fake being gay and get busted and go
Speaker 1: to jail and get sexed up by an inmate, do
Speaker 1: you get out and get the contract?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: And I think if this cell maid is willing to
Speaker 1: sign a notarized statement saying you seem to jo it.
Speaker 2: Yes, you can get the gig you enjoyed, is the question?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: And then he notes that in California, no one stays
Speaker 1: in jail locked up long enough to actually consummate the deal.
Speaker 1: Chris Ruffo, in his description of this Idiotic Woke California
Speaker 1: program details the experience of mary Anne Horton, who used
Speaker 1: to be well, he's still a dude essentially, but he
Speaker 1: was a white male who quote unquote transitioned. But he
Speaker 1: was an early internet, the Internet pioneer credited with helping
Speaker 1: develop the email attachment.
Speaker 2: Hmm, that's a claim, the little paper clip that goes
Speaker 2: there by the email.
Speaker 1: But now mary Anne has a is regarded in California
Speaker 1: as a woman, and mary Anne's business is an LGBT
Speaker 1: owned business. The application process, Horton told City Journal, requires
Speaker 1: a mess of documentation to prove that the company was
Speaker 1: lesbian owned. They sent supplier clearing house, domestic partner Affi
Speaker 1: David blah blah blah, birth certificate which is Washington State
Speaker 1: post certified his post transition. Then there's a therapist carry letter,
Speaker 1: a document for medical professional career transgender identity, and give.
Speaker 2: Her to drinks and watch that's what you do here.
Speaker 2: I see what happened. Yeah, I think it was.
Speaker 1: Well, that's funny because this person applied as a lesbian
Speaker 1: nut transgender.
Speaker 2: What the hell? So I mentioned this earlier in the show.
Speaker 2: More details will be coming out, I'm sure, but scumbag
Speaker 2: murderer Luigi Mangione allegedly but also actually who was accused
Speaker 2: of killing the poor healthcare executive of United Healthcare, murdering
Speaker 2: him in cold blood because Luigi Maanngonie's a scumback, his
Speaker 2: lawyers planned to argue that Luigi was experiencing extreme emotional
Speaker 2: disturbance when he killed the United Healthcare executive. He had
Speaker 2: his strong emotions resulted in a profound lass of self
Speaker 2: control leading to the homicide.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's not a good argument. People who lose their
Speaker 1: self control and murder somebody in cold blood on the pavement,
Speaker 1: we generally put them in a cage for the rest
Speaker 1: of their days or execute them.
Speaker 2: Good luck, Luigi read here's your host for final thoughts,
Speaker 2: Joe Getty.
Speaker 1: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
Speaker 1: to wrap up the day. There is pressing the buttons
Speaker 1: in the control room, Mike Langelo, what's your final thought
Speaker 1: the robot toilets.
Speaker 2: We could use them as sporting events. You don't have
Speaker 2: to leave your seat anymore to go to the restroom.
Speaker 2: It just comes to you. You just do your business
Speaker 2: and it goes away. I want to be sitting next
Speaker 2: to somebody to sporting event while they're uh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, beautiful Jack. A final thought for us.
Speaker 2: Ye Katie kd the news lady Katie Green, our news
Speaker 2: person who had a baby a while back. She is
Speaker 2: constantly sending us pictures and she's got one cute baby.
Speaker 2: I will tell you that. Oh yeah, tiny little fella.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be checking in with Katie in the next
Speaker 1: day or two, I think getting update. My final thought
Speaker 1: is what if I swore up and down that I'm
Speaker 1: a closeted gay man, come from a fundamentalist family, and
Speaker 1: I you know, I haven't admitted it to anybody, but yeah,
Speaker 1: I think about sex with men all the time. I
Speaker 1: grit my teeth when I'm with my wife. But I'm
Speaker 1: gay as hell.
Speaker 2: Arm someone, I just haven't find the right person yet.
Speaker 1: Right, And so I've kept thinking, squat, there's no documentation.
Speaker 1: What are they going to discriminate against me? This is
Speaker 1: this is bigotry.
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty wrapping up out of the grueling four
Speaker 2: hour workday. So stupid, so many people that think so
Speaker 2: little time good.
Speaker 1: Armstrong and Getty dot com drop us nop mail bag
Speaker 1: at Armstrong yetdy dot com pick up some swag while
Speaker 1: you're there.
Speaker 2: We'll see tomorrow. God bless America.
Speaker 4: As soon as we made the deal, they came out
Speaker 4: and they dropped a load.
Speaker 2: Of I'm strong and get you the biggest load that
Speaker 2: we've seen. Are you Yep? Absolutely, I don't, frankly fully
Speaker 2: understand it. I'm guarna, call my lawyer guarn it. So
Speaker 2: let's go with a fine look at you.
Speaker 8: You got rights coming out the wazoo, all because a
Speaker 8: whole bunch of good people, two hundred and fifty years worth,
Speaker 8: sacrificed everything they had for this awesome wallpaper behind me.
Speaker 2: No, you're right, thank you all very more Armstrong and
Speaker 2: Getty