WEBVTT - Bloomberg Intelligence: Lyft Margin Error, Uber Buyback Plan (Podcast)

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Car playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Even with today's thirty seven percent increase and lift, the

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>stock still has a market cap, you know, six seven

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars worth.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 3>Uber's got you know.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Multiples of that's skyrocket and such a huge divergence. So

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 2>let's break down both of those numbers. We can do

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 2>that with men Deep Singh. He follows some of the

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>technical sectors of this market, follows pretty much everything in

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 2>ten Yeah, so he's a technist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So let's start with Lyft.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 4>I took getting fired.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I took a Lyft home last night because why because

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>it was cheaper than.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Uber by how much?

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>By like twenty Yeah, and that's typical one one or

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the other not. I just arbitraged the too. Matt Miller

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 2>does not do that. I arbitraged the too. I thought

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>everybody did that. So anyway, what happened to Lyft with

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>their earnings last night?

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, last night was bizarre because you know, you don't

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 5>often see that in press releases.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 6>You there, but you know, at the end of the.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Day, it was I think just a mistake that happened.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't intentional in any way. And the stock move

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 5>was pronounced because of you know, the short interest and uh,

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 5>the fact that obviously people were not very optimistic going

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 5>into the print. And look, I think in the case

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 5>of Lyft, not much has changed in terms of execution.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 5>There's still kind of a distant number two. And you

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 5>talked about taking a lift, but there are certain zip

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>codes where they are able to meet the ETAs that

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Uber has, but in other zip codes they have no supply.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 5>So even if you want to take a lift, there

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 5>is no availability.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>But my dude last night, like most markets I go to,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>he's got a n Uber sticker and he's got a

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Lift sticker, and he's got both apps open and they'll

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>drive each other.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there is a huge amount.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Of owner that and so literally it's apparently.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 3>It's just here's my reading and you're the effort. It's

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>just Uber algorithm, Lift algorithm. They're different. They're going to

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 3>give you different prices and things like that. But but from.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 5>A driver perspective, what Lift is doing is they are

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 5>paying out more to lower drivers. So if it was

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 5>a ten dollars ride, the driver is getting seven dollars

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 5>or eight dollars from Lift, whereas from Uber they're getting

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 5>six dollars.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 6>It's just an example.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Yes, So that's where you know, the take rate matters

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 5>what these companies keep versus.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 6>What the driver is getting. And that's the I think tactic.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Lift is using to really pay more to the driver

0:02:58.760 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 5>to bring on more supplies.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 7>So then how does that then play out? So at

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 7>some point they get enough supply and then they can

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 7>sort of make more money per ride and increase the shares.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>When does that moment happen?

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean scale is the only mote you can have

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 5>in this business, scale and operating efficiency. And so what

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 5>Uber has done is obviously they have the scale. They

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 5>are six times bigger than Lift in just the mobility segment,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 5>and like think of the gross margin. The reason why

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 5>this is a sixty percent gross margin business is because

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 5>insurance costs is.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Pretty high for right sharing, So how do you bring down.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Insurance costs through scale? And that's what Uber has because

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 5>it does, you know, six times more rides, then lift,

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 5>and in the case of Lift, if they don't maintain

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 5>the supply, then they're just going to keep losing share,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 5>which is what was happening.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 6>So they have to compete on price.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>The only way they can maintain their share is they

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 5>if they offer a lower price, as they did with

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Paul last night.

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 6>So that's that's the tactic. And I don't think.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be term modeled.

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so think of what happened with food delivery. There

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 5>were so many players. Now you're down to two or three,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, remaining it's Uber Door.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I still will not pay for for my youngest in college.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 4>I have a hard time paying, but I'm.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 5>Not going to.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>We've established that firmly.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>I support this.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so there will be consolidation.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 5>But if uber is announcing a seven billion dollar buy back,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 5>you know they're not buying Instacart now, So that's and

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 5>are they are buying left? Okay?

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 4>Talk about that that buy back?

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 7>What does that tell us like when you buy backstock,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 7>isn't that because you're no longer a growth company?

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Like? Is that the thing?

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.239
<v Speaker 6>Yes? I think there is that element.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 5>And also they're going to be prudent in terms of returning.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Cash to the shareholders.

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 5>So remember they acquired the freight business, that is a

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 5>big drag on profitability. Uber didn't build freight business organically.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 5>They bought a company that didn't work out well. They

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 5>bought Postmates for food delivery that didn't work out well.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 5>So their track record with Aquas isn't great. And so

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 5>now they're saying is we are going to generate about

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 5>seven to eight billion dollars in free cash flow. Well,

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 5>guess what we are using seven billion out of that

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 5>for buying back er stock. I mean, obviously it's going

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 5>to be over a period of time, not in the

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 5>next twelve months. But I think that's good sound capital allocation, stuality,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 5>And look, this company is generating.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 6>The mobility side is very healthy.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 5>They've got you know, mid twenty percent ebit dumb margins

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 5>compared that to lift, which what got people excited is

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 5>they could get to twenty percent ebit dumb margins.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, not so fast. I guess that was the typo.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 2>So I say, all right, how about the Uber each business. Again,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't support this. I mean, I know it's a

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 2>great people love it, but not on my credit card.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>So talks about the each business.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 5>This is just to drive frequency, ok, just so that

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Paul has more transactions.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Which is advertising.

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Then basically exactly and the only profit they're going to

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 5>generate right now is through advertising. So the good thing

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 5>working out for Uber is they have a membership's business,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 5>So that's your recurring subscription. You're going to buy an

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Uber membership that works for both mobility and delivery, and

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 5>also they're going to show ads. So ads is a

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar rundread business now primarily driven by delivery and

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 5>it's almost ninety percent gross market, so that's what's going

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>to drive the delivery profitability. But on a transaction basis,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 5>this is zero.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 7>So this is sort of like Amazon Prime VIDDEO. Like

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 7>it's just basically sell more subscriptions Amazon Prime up the

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 7>price a little bit and then you get more viewers

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 7>who were just into it and they buy more stuff

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 7>on Amazon's Coming.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 6>Is the way.

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 5>So they like Uber talked about this concept of being

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 5>a super app almost three four years ago and they

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 5>have been working towards it. Now they have integrated taxi.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Remember when Uber came to the scene, they were supposed

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 5>to or they actually disrupted taxis. Now they have onboarded

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Taxis on the platform to boost supply, and Taxis is

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 5>about five percent of their business, So clearly, you know.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 6>You come a full circle there.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 5>You have integrated Taxis and their thing is will bring

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 5>everything related to transportation on one app and you can

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 5>find any and everything.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Neahi, I mean, he's done an amazing job turning that

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 2>company around.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Minus the acquisitions.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 5>If it was buying stuff, and that's.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 6>What he did at Expedia. Expedia was built around acquisitions.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 8>There.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 5>I think acquisitions worked out probably better than they did

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 5>in Uber, but clearly acquisitions wasn't and.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So one of the potential acquisitions I was out there

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>was Instacart to ramp up the Uber eats. But you're

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>now saying the stock buybacked signals that un likely to do.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 6>That's completely out of question.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the question is can door Dash buy something

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 5>given Like the reason why Lift's stock moved this much

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 5>is because the valuation is like one time CB to sales.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 6>Compare that to.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Five times ZV do sales or Airbnb ten times ZV

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 5>do sales.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 6>So clearly a.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Lot of the growth prospects are reflected in the lifts valuation.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Airbnb will do that next time. I'm just I'm

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>just not comfortable that concept. But I know a ton

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 2>of people are around the world and they love it.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>So we'll get to that next time.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 7>Staying or renting out your renting out your house or

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 7>staying at someone else's.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>House, both both, you know, I don't know, but I

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>might not that weird. Yeah, coming into somebody else's It's more.

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Like an investment property lot at the time.

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, man, Deep Seeing Senior Tech anais Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you stopping buy.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 7>I want to take a little deeper into the small

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 7>cap world because the rust of two thousands up one

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 7>point six percent of the narrative, if you just rewind

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 7>the money, was that we were broadening out this rally

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 7>in the S and P, that it wasn't just big tech.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 7>We were finally seeing small caps get a little bit

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 7>of a bit. Well, let's talk to Brian Smoluck. He's

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 7>principal and portfolio manager of the Hood River Small Cap

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 7>Growth Fund. He joins us from Palm Beach, Florida, much

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 7>to Paul Kane as he looks at the palm trees

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 7>in the background.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Brian, kill me. Do you buy small caps here?

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 7>Are they actually going to finally make a good comeback?

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 6>I think so.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 9>The CPI print yesterday clearly didn't help things near term,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 9>given the FED was a little bit too aggressive in

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 9>December when they talked about aggressive cuts this year. But

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 9>I think once the CPI does settle down to a

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 9>level of people are comfortable with where the Fed's going

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 9>to cut, it's a matter of when, not if, then

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 9>small caps will outperform. You see that when people want

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 9>to put on risk, small cap, particularly small cap growth,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 9>tends to put on a really big move, and then

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 9>in Q four last year when that happened, the space

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 9>really ripped. And it's been a fairly protracted period of

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 9>big underperformance for the last several years. So the setup

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 9>is good given valuations, earnings revisions are trending. Positive spreads,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 9>which are a great leading indicator for small cap stocks,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 9>have tightened significantly to just a little over one hundred

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 9>basis points, So the odds are highly in the space's

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 9>favor for it to app perform over the next twelve months.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey Brian, Am I going to get an evaluation break

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>if I go down into smaller mid MidCap territory relative

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to the S and P five hundred?

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. So if you look at small cap growth versus

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 9>the SMP, it usually trades at a premium. Right now,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 9>it's trading around eighteen times twenty twenty five earnings versus

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 9>the SMP at twenty times, so you do get a

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 9>discount there, And that's part of what I was saying

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 9>why the setup is good because you get a relative

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 9>valuation break. Usually the growth is faster and small cap names.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 9>I wouldn't expect this upcoming cycle to be any different.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 9>So that's why you'll get probably some multiple expansion and

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 9>positive ring servision which would lead to our performance over

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 9>the next twelve months.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 7>Hey Brian, would you have made a different argument six

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 7>months ago because small caps did have a moment last

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 7>year in that moment was short lived? Is the argument

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 7>different now?

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 9>I would say it's honestly pretty similar. You know, we're

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 9>bombs up stock pickers trying to find companies with a

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 9>dislocation of fundamentals valuation. It's been a constructive setup, and

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 9>six months ago it actually was good when you look

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 9>into Q four and small capt putting up playing a

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 9>move on to being up around nineteen percent for the

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 9>year last year, so it was solid. But it has

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 9>been a waiting game for small cap and you need

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 9>race to cooperate with spreads for the sector to work.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Fortress Aviation FTAI is the ticker.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>What's the call there, Brian.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 9>We like the stock, it's one of our bigger positions.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 9>It's been really huge over the last eighteen months. We

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 9>think there's some significant legs left in the story for

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 9>it to really work. It trades it around twenty times earnings.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 9>They have a new module repair business for engines that's

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 9>growing around one hundred percent, and we think there's upside

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 9>in that area, particularly when you look at all the

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 9>news in the supply chain and airlines across the world

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 9>really need to optimize how well their current engines were

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 9>given that they can't get new engines or new planes

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 9>when Boeing's having all these problems. Meanwhile, the asset value

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 9>on their current their current engines has been moving up

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 9>because of the supply to demand and balance created by

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 9>the fact that new planes really can't make it out

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 9>the door, and you have rising demand around the world

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 9>continuing for passenger travel.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 7>You also have Celsius, which is it's like a Red

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Bull energy drink, right, I know it's different, but it's

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 7>the same kind of idea.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 4>You like this company, how come?

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've owned it for a while.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 9>It's a secular market share gainer. We think in the

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 9>category it's gone from around two percent share to ten

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 9>percent share. We think they can reasonably get to twenty

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 9>percent share. They have a partnership with Pepsi that's ramped

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 9>up over the last twelve months. Pepsi's the largest distributor

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 9>in the world. And fortuitously they left Budweiser, which obviously

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 9>wasn't great with all the bud light issues that they

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 9>were having. And we think the streets at about forty percent,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 9>they could easily grow fifty this year and the stocks

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 9>has can around thirteen percent share, and as I said earlier,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 9>we think they can get to twenty And have.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 4>You ever had them on those energy drinks? No, I'm

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 4>scared of them.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a little bit bitlius.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Celsius is a little bit healthier. It's all natural ingredients.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 9>You still get the boost from caffeine. It's two hundred

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 9>milligrams of caffeine. So I definitely wouldn't take it for

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 9>you to go to bed, but it tastes better, it's

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 9>healthier than some of the other drinks out there.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Brian, what's a what's a how do you divine

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the market cap? Like what's a small cap,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>what's a MidCap?

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Few?

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And what happens when they maybe grow out of those levels.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:12.479
<v Speaker 9>So the last the last six months has been abnormal

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 9>for the sector, and that there's been a huge bifurcation.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 9>So within the Russell two thousand growth, for example, super

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 9>Micro is actually in the benchmark and it's over a

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 9>thirty billion market cap. So normally I would say the

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 9>range is between call it one hundred million up to

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 9>six or seven billion, but it has expanded over time.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 9>The sweet spot really is in that two to five

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 9>billion dollar range, and those stocks tend to be a

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 9>little bit more inefficient, and we don't typically sell stock

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 9>when it gets too big. It's really when we think

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 9>it's efficiently priced based on the fundamentals, or we think

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 9>something bad is going to happen, we'll step aside.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 7>It is a leading question because we're talking about you

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 7>manage a small cap growth fund, but growth versus value

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 7>in the rustle? Is it the same kind of thing

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 7>as what we see in the general market growth, tech,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 7>everything else.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, in small cap growth you do have a larger

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 9>percentage of software companies, semiconductor companies, biotech, and a little

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 9>bit less financials and then some of the higher growth consumers.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 9>But small cap growth and small cap value are relatively

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 9>highly correlated. But in different area there can be biggest versions,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 9>Like in twenty twenty you saw growth massively outperformed value

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 9>and then it completely inverted the prior year. We frankly

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 9>try to be agnostic and try to find companies that

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 9>are growing reasonably quickly called fifteen percent, but are inefficiently priced,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 9>So we kind of thread the needle there.

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a good article in the Bloomberg Terminal today Florida

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>boom cools an area where home insurance costs tripled Hurricane

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Ian worsened already rising homeowners rates, and they call that

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 2>like Naples Sarasota Cape Coral.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I noticed you guys own some exposure here.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>HCI Group is a homeowner's insurance company based in Florida.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Uhh yes, what's that?

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So it's been a great stock because of the

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 9>dislocation in this particular geography. And what's happened is the

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 9>lawyers had the upper hand, not a big surprise for

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 9>an extended period here. A lot of insurers pulled out

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 9>because of that because they were having massive losses. The

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 9>state legislature came in made it so that it was

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 9>more reasonable and favorable to insurers. Each CI was set

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 9>up well to write new premiums profitably, as well as

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 9>takeover existing premiums from the state entity, which is called citizens,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 9>which allowed them to dramatically apperform expectations and earnings. Growth

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 9>is significant. So it's trading eleven times zarniings. We have

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 9>to think there's upside of that number. And they're just

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 9>set up well because the supply demand in the area,

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 9>and as you know, the area is really growing, so

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 9>you have a lot of people moving here, so demand

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 9>is strong.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>As Paul talks about all the time, you do want

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 4>to move here?

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 3>No, no, he doesn't that's a hard note.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it's a hard no, but it does get jealous

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 4>of the pond trees.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 7>What I find interesting though, when you talk about insures

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 7>is that you know Florida is going to get hit

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 7>with storm after storm, and it is a bit worse now,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 7>and I just wonder how the risk premium got to

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 7>bake into these docks.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 9>So whether it's a big issue obviously during hurricane season,

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 9>HCI has been here forever and they did a good

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 9>job pricing for that risk. So you just got to

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 9>assume over extended period of time that when you take

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 9>your lumps, you're going to more than make up for

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 9>it based on pricing, And as you've noted from that article,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 9>pricing is up huge and there are a lot of

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 9>different reasons for that. In condos, for example, there was

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 9>that condo that went down in Miami and that jacked

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 9>up premiums all over the area, and an insurance companies

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 9>were able to capitalize because now condos realized they just

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 9>had to become conforming with state codes. So to me,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 9>hurricanes are a manageable risk here. There's actually been less

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 9>direct hurricane impacts on Southeast Florida than in the up

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 9>to the northeast where you guys are so but you

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 9>do have a fair amount happening happening in the golf,

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 9>but there's less population in Florida and the golf and

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 9>on the southeast side.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Rian, thank you so much for joining us. As always,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Brian Smallock. He's a principal and portfolio manager of the

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Hood River Small Cap Growth Fund. Not in Bend, Oregon,

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>but in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>then broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I want to know what's up with Craft?

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 7>So that' stock is moving a wopping six percent, it's

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 7>down six percent. Organic sales decline wasn't so great. It

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 7>was a lackluster end of the year and that's really

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 7>dragging on sales.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 4>So what's up with that?

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 7>Let's go to Jim Bartash's she has Boomberg Intelligence Senior analyst,

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 7>retail Staples and packaged foods. Jen what was just so

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 7>bad about Craft?

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, the big surprise for Craft that volume was down,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 8>which was not a surprise, but it was down more

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 8>than prices rose, and that really put pressure on the

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 8>ability to generate sales growth, and so organic sales were

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 8>negative for the first time since twenty twenty. And although

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 8>there's some momentum in the business, it's got people concerned.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So, Jen, as I understand the package food business from

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>reading your research and talking to you, you know, I

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 2>guess post pandemic volumes are down, but then they've been

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 2>able to make up for it by raising prices. More so,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 2>is that game kind of played out now?

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.239
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. Basically a lot of these companies have run out

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 8>of their pricing power. And what that means is, you know,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 8>they were able to raise prices because their input costs

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 8>were hire, whether it was ingredients or transportation or packaging.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 8>But as inflation is coming down, they're losing the ability

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 8>to pass through additional price increases, which means that if

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 8>you want to have top line growth or organic sales growth,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 8>you have to have positive volume growth because you're not

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 8>getting it from just higher price anymore. And the problem

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 8>for Craft Hends has right now is that volume is

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 8>still down, price is lower than it's been and they're

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 8>not seeing that bounce back in volume that typically lower

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 8>pricing would encourage.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so a couple things to focus on. Let's go

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 7>to the product side then, because you mentioned that a

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 7>few times so volumes are down, it doesn't seem like

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 7>that's just a pricing power thing. Do they not have

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 7>the right products right now?

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think their portfolio is actually pretty good. It's

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 8>just that the consumer is not buying as much as

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 8>they were before. So if you think back to pre pandemic,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 8>people had huge pantries and everything was stocked. They had

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 8>lots of boxed goods in there. And now people are

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 8>still a little bit more conservative and buying more on

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 8>a need basis rather than a stockpiling basis. And so

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 8>until people start to bulk up those pantries again, it's

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 8>hard to entice them to buy more than what they

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 8>just need for this week.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>So as I look at the analyst forecast, jen, I

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of see the one and a half to two

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to two and a half percent revenue growth in the

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 2>next several years. That really is the story for most

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of these consumer package goods companies, isn't it.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 8>It really is, especially for companies where the bulk of

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 8>their portfolio are what you would call center of the

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 8>store items, so that's the candy items, the boxed items.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 8>You know, that type of outlook for top line growth

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 8>is pretty much in line with where you would expect

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 8>normal inflation rates to be, and so that in and

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 8>of itself is probably a reasonable expectation for where these

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 8>where these companies can go over the next few years.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 7>Do you think that prices then will come down or

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 7>do you think that they stay sticky?

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 8>Prices will slowly come down. Retailers are looking to pass

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 8>through cost savings to their customers, so there will be

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 8>higher pressure on package food companies to lower prices as well.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 8>And as their input costs or their packaging packaging costs

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 8>come down, it's harder for them to just tofy holding

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.239
<v Speaker 8>prices at a higher level and not passing through some

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 8>of those savings. So while prices may never come back

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 8>down to where they were pre pandemic, they should come

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 8>down a little bit from where they were in terms

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 8>of peak pricing in the last eighteen month.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 4>A little bit, I don't know if we like a

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 4>little bit.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>No, we don't. And that's and that's what that's the problem.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem for a lot of people, and it's

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>a problem for the politicians who are saying inflation is still.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 3>A bad story here.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 2>So all right, So Jen, with these names like Craft

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Hinds and General Mills and Kellogg's, I got a you know,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>low single digit revenue growth.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking.

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I got dividend yields for Craft Highs about four point

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 2>seven percent. I mean, what am I owning this thing for?

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Am I owning it for single digit kind of maybe

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>stock prece return plus some dividend yield.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's and that's my game.

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 8>That's that's that's probably the value play at the moment, right,

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 8>meaning you've got steady kind of slow and steady growth,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 8>you've got a reasonable dividend. They do do share buybacks,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, so there's some some shareholder benefit there, and

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, as consumers start to pick up their spending,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 8>then we may see a better outlook for these companies

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Who does Craft This is a really dumb question. Who

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 4>does Craft compete with?

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 7>Like the Coke and PEPSI I know that PEPs was

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 7>all like snack snack snacks, but they have the soft

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 7>drink business. Who's like a straight up Craft competitor.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 8>Someone like Caniagra would be, you know, or Campbell Soup.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, those would be kind of those center type

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 8>store companies that would compete most directly with the Craft Times.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jen, I look at the at the holder's list

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 2>here and I forgot about this. Berkshire Hathway Warren Buffett

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>by far the biggest shareholder of this company with about

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty six twenty seven percent ownership.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>What what?

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 2>What is Berkshire Hathway publicly said about this investment? How

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 2>long have they owned it? What do they say about

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>their stake here?

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 8>They've been involved for a very very long time. Haven't

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 8>made a lot of public comments lately. But when Kraft

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 8>Times began its transformation plan, which was now a little

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 8>or three years ago, Berkshire Halfway was very pro They

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 8>were very positive on that transformation story. And to be fair,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 8>Craft Times has executed on that transformation plan and generally

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 8>ahead of schedule when it comes to cost savings initiatives,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 8>streamlining things, rebalancing their portfolio. So they really have been

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 8>sticking to that plan and delivering ahead of schedule. It's

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 8>just that it's a multi year process.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 7>Right, And like it's a tough time, and I get it,

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 7>and there's inflation and then there's the demand. Do you

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 7>think that the stock move I mean, I'm just looking

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 7>at the chart here is it overdone?

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 8>Well? Part of it, you know, part of it is

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 8>the concern about the volume. And when they gave their

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 8>guidance for twenty twenty four, the company actually said that

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 8>they think volume is going to shift to positive growth

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 8>in the second half of the year. That seems like

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 8>it might be overly optimistic and is probably part of

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 8>what's contributing to that stock decline today.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 2>So Jen, in your coverage area, you know, you got

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>to Staples, the package food companies. What's the kind of

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the best idea? What do you talk to clients about

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>most often?

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 8>Well, right now we're talking to people about, you know,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 8>who is it that has taken the least amount of

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 8>price increases over the last say, eighteen months, and where

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 8>are volumes holding up? Because to be successful over twenty

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 8>twenty four and into twenty twenty five, it really is

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 8>that question of how are you going to actually drive

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 8>overall growth and profitability. And so the companies that have

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 8>been more conservative and been more prudent in that approach

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 8>are the ones who are positioned right now to maybe

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 8>benefit from.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>That, So you haven't benefit from those. Actually, what's a

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 3>representative name there?

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 8>So a good example there would be Mandolies where they

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 8>took a lot less price than and actually the spinoff

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 8>from Kraft Times career. Yeah, but they've been very They've

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 8>been a little bit more prudent in terms of their

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 8>price increases. And what we've also seen is that their

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 8>volume has held up better Hershey, is another one where

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 8>their volumes have held up, and part of that is

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 8>that people love their chocolate.

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 4>That's true. I don't care about the Flowers examples. I'll

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 4>definitely take.

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>We're learning a lot about Jen, we're learning a lot

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>about Alex and her Valentine's Day preferences.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 3>So flowers know, but chocolate, well.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't want anything.

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Don't stupid but stupid.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 10>If one tray herself as like this, simple girl, no demands,

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 10>I don't buy it for a.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Minute, simple girl?

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 7>What No do I like Valentine's No, it's done. But

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 7>will I eat chocolate? Absolutely as long as it's high

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 7>end dark chocolate. Hey, Jen, what what's something you really

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 7>don't like right now?

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 8>Like?

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 7>What sort of a negative trend because I'm also trying

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 7>to understand for some of these names, the normalization that

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 7>we've seen sort of backtrack the last four years and

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 7>erase that, and that's where you have to kind of

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 7>pick up and go from there.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think one of the I think one of

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 8>the things that is an issue for the industry is

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 8>that everyone still believes that they can optimize their portfolio

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 8>and that they're going to find a buyer for the

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 8>products and the product lines that they don't want at

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 8>a good multiple. And you know, at the end of

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 8>the day, there aren't a lot of buyers out there

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 8>for you know, categories that are slow growth or declining,

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 8>and so there's maybe a little bit of a mismatch

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the belief that they can streamline their portfolio,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 8>get up you know, all the value that they think

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.959
<v Speaker 8>they deserve out of it, and yet I don't see

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 8>a whole, you know, a whole suite of buyers lining

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 8>up to look at those products.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Hershey, this company went public in nineteen twenty seven. Oh boy,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 2>they did one follow on offering, and then for about

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a period about twelve months in nineteen ninety three or four,

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 2>we pitched them hard on doing another following. We actually

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>had a good analyst on the name in the company

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 2>like this, We went to Hershey probably six or seven

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 2>times in a space you're pitching a falling pitching. Nothing

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't get paid, but the got the Hershey and got

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Hershey chocolate.

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 3>There's that.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So, so, Jen, what does a company like Hershey do?

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things. I know they've gotten bigger

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>through some acquisitions, but there's still relatively a small player

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 2>relative to some of the.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Other big names.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 2>But is there a brand so good that they can

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of remain independent?

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I believe that the Hershey brand is really iconic.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 8>And if you think about some of their uh some

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 8>of their biggest chocolate lines, there really aren't a lot

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 8>of uh, mass targeted competitors out there, so, you know,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 8>people may prefer the higher end alex, you know, but

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 8>but when it comes to kind of that mass market,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 8>it's hard for an external brand to come in and

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 8>get the kind of penetration that Hershey has. And in addition,

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 8>Hershey has really done a good job of diversifying into

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 8>the broader snacking, so they own you know, they own

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 8>popcorn brand they own, you know, Pretzel brand, so you

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 8>know they've they've done a good job of diversifying and

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 8>that'll help, you know, that'll help them with their long

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 8>term growth as well.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Really interesting.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm surprised that John Tucker didn't have some weird factoid

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 7>about Hershey, Pennsylvania.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>We have the Hershey School and all that kind of stuff, and.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but I mean like weird off the beaten track,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 7>like here's where the cemetery.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 10>I don't have any fun facts about Hershey, but I

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 10>suspect it's out in that region of the world because

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 10>there are lots of farms and milk cows that give

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 10>milk and stuff.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 7>I could have told you that. All right, we really

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 7>appreciate it. It's so great to catch up with you.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 7>Such wonderful analysis. Jen Bartasha's Consumer Staples Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 7>industry analysts, and she covers everything everything, everything food related,

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 7>which is just such.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 2>An years ago which still shocks me to this day.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 2>The number one supermarket chain in the United States is Amazon.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 3>What no, I mean Walmart. I'm sorry Walmart.

0:29:58.600 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, okay, okay, that makes more sense.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, right, and I forgot about that. But when you

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 3>do go in there. They're just massive square footage.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 4>It's huge. H I mean, isn't where they make the

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 4>majority of their money or.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I think it drives traffic and they make

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it on it because it I think, you know, supermarkets,

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the margins are really really, really really low,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 2>so you make it up on buy them and you

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>bring them into the store and they buy other stuff.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Okay, let's get to the markets here at the SP's

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 7>up four tenth of one percent. You know, I kind

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 7>of felt like this was going to happen yesterday when

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 7>we had that big sell off, particularly as we closed

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 7>off the lows.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 4>But the question is how sustainable is this? Sort of

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>by the dip narrative?

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 7>So let's ask Nancy Davis, founder and CEO of Quadratic

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 7>Capital Management. She joins us now from Greenwich, Connecticut. Nancy,

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 7>how do I own understand the price action right now

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 7>on the main index.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, Alex, I think you said it. Well, it's a

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 6>little confusing.

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's basically good data. Yesterday we had a

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 11>stronger inflation, less FED height or FED cuts, and that's

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 11>what's kind of fueling the market. The market's on hope

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 11>right now that the FED is going to ease rates

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 11>and save everything from being overly tight.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I'm looking at the bond market here

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>because boy, in twenty twenty two, the bond market just

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 2>got crushy. There's no place left to hide. The sixty

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>forty portfolio did nothing for you, a little bit of

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a positive performance, and last year, thanks goodness to November December.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 2>But here we are starting off the year again in

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the red for fixed income.

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 3>What is what do we do in the fixed income space? Nancy?

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's tricky because the US yield curve is so

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 11>incredibly inverted. So what that means is that longer dated

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 11>interest rates are anticipating the FED will aggressively cut rates,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 11>and everybody in the bond market is kind of holding

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 11>out their hands saying okay, cut now. And the market

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 11>being inverted, you're getting paid less yield to take more

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 11>duration risk. And so the market has been rushing into credit,

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 11>private credit, public credit. So credit spreads are incredibly tight,

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 11>right along with their corporate cousin equities, So those financial

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 11>assets that are at all time highs. And then if

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 11>you look at the treasury market, you can buy a

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 11>one month T bill and get paid five point four percent,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 11>or you can lend money to the US Treasury for

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 11>ten years and get over a percent less. So it's

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 11>a really crazy environment because the yield curve is not

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 11>normally this inverted for this long and it's really I

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 11>think a message to bond investors that you're not being

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 11>paid to take duration risks.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 7>So it's funny you mentioned that because a week ago,

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 7>the conversation was, Okay, my three month T bill was up?

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 7>What do I do with the money? Do I do

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 7>I go into equities? Now do I do something else?

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 7>And now it's like whoof Nope, gotta stay, gotta stay,

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 7>because that the money market funds are just really too attractive.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 7>How do you then navigate an environment where we're going

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 7>to get three cuts maybe for normalization rather than something

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 7>more dramatic.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think most people do have equities in

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 11>their portfolio, and the equity market is really hanging on

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 11>to this premise that the FED is going to cut rates.

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 11>So I think it's reasonable to have some short term treasuries.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 11>And I don't think you're really getting paid for the

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 11>risk to take credit risk, because it's similar. You know,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 11>if you think about owning a corporate bond and owning

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 11>a corporate stock, it's a similar corporate beta, and corporates

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 11>are really expensive right now, so I think it makes

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 11>more sense to just have treasury exposure and not add

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 11>that credit risk into your bond portfolio because you already

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 11>have it on the equity side.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was surprised last year when we did

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 2>get some decent performance out of fixed income, that high

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 2>yield was the real outperformer. And I would have thought

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 2>with all the discussion of everybody talking about a recession

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>right around the corner, that you wouldn't want to take

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 2>that level of risk.

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 3>What happened in the HYLD space.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 2>And I assume, just by your previous comment that you're

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 2>not being enticed by the hyold space this year.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think high yield investment grade pretty much anything

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 11>with a credit spread. What you want is credit spreads tighter.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 11>If you own bonds with credit risk, and credit spreads

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 11>are near you know, their tenth percentile of all time tightness.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 11>So you know, especially I think I caution people it's

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 11>not just high yield, it's also short dated. A lot

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 11>of people have been going into short duration funds, and

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 11>if you look at your short duration funds that take

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 11>credit risk, you know, ig credit spreads are around thirty

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 11>basis points for the three year point. It's even tighter

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 11>when you go closer in and there you need a

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 11>company to amend or extend, right, they either have to

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 11>pay back the loan or they have to turn it out.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.959
<v Speaker 11>So it's really you know, it can only go to zero, right,

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 11>so there's very little. You know, you're taking a lot

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 11>of risk and not getting a ton of return. And

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 11>so going back to those tea bills, like, yeah, maybe

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 11>maybe the FED is going to cut rates, but then

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 11>you should be okay on your equity side of the portfolio.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 11>And if they don't cut rates, you don't have that

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 11>reinvestment risk. So I don't I don't think T bills.

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 11>They're they're boring and they're not super exciting, but I

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 11>don't think they're bad.

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 7>You also mentioned here in your notes of the fiscal

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 7>situation and watching the deficit. I feel like, yes, except

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 7>no one seems to care, So like, what do you

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 7>do with that?

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 11>No, Alex, You're exactly right, nobody cares. But I think

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 11>that's also the time when nobody's talking about something, it's

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 11>important to be mindful of it because usually that risk

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 11>is not priced. You know, the Treasury Department does have

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 11>to refinance a tremendous amount of debt, we have a

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 11>ton of fiscal spending, we have an election year. There's

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 11>really even no election premium priced into the volatility markets.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 11>I mean, talk about pulling my hair out. I want

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 11>to grab people and be like, what's wrong with you?

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 11>Do you realize what's around the corner and what we're

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 11>going to be facing. So I think that's the time

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 11>that investors. You know, in all markets, you want to

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 11>buy things that are low and sell things that are high.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 11>And there's certain things in the fixed income markets that

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 11>are really inexpensively priced, and then there's ninety percent of

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 11>the market that's really expensive, so you want to kind

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.720
<v Speaker 11>of avoid the expensive stuff and buy the cheaply priced things.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, so what is the FED going to

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>do this year. I guess obviously the March cut is

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 2>off the table. I think people are now really debating

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 2>May and maybe even suggesting June might be the first,

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>might be the launching point.

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 11>I think it's really hard to predict what policy makers

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 11>are going to do, and then it's even harder to

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 11>predict what markets are going to do in response to

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 11>that policy, because it's all related to expectations. Right. You know,

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 11>if we if we rewind before the FED started hiking

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 11>rates and the dot plots started to come out higher,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 11>I don't think any economist out there would have said, Okay,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 11>the Fed's going to hike to five twenty five and

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 11>about a twelve month window. I think nobody was talking

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 11>about that, and now everybody is talking about rate cuts.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 11>It's just a question of how many, how quickly, and

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 11>when is it going to happen. I think we also

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 11>have to be mindful of the Silicon Valley swap lines.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 11>So the BTSP program is expiring in March. That's put

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 11>a ton of liquidity out there in the system that's

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 11>going to be coming out. So I think there are

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 11>a lot of things out there that are catalysts to

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 11>make markets more normal and fixed income, I think having

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 11>an upward sloping yield curve. You know that's not some

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 11>kind of tail event, right, that would just be normal.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 11>Like in normal environments, when you lend somebody money longer,

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 11>whether it's a sovereign or a municipality or a corporate,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 11>you typically get paid more interest to lend longer, right,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 11>because it's more risks. Right now, we're not seeing that.

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 11>So I think there are a lot of ways to

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 11>kind of play for a more normal market, and it

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 11>doesn't necessarily have to be dependent on the FED just

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 11>cutting rates, because I think the longer the FED pushes

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 11>off the rate cuts, the more the economy, especially all

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 11>the corporates out there that have debt will have to refinance.

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 11>So it could potentially be higher for longer means more

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 11>cuts faster later because the economy is really slowing. So

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 11>I think it's tricky.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 4>That, all right, Nancy, We appreciate it.

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 7>Nancy Davis, founder and CEO of Quadratic Capital Management talking

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 7>about fixed income, and then also you layer in the

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 7>election timetable and the idea that the closer you get

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 7>to the election and the more you cut the more it.

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Looks political, and that kind of changes the framework to

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 4>a little bit.

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think if you start, maybe that takes

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 2>some of the political risk at you start.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Olentially see how play that.

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.