WEBVTT - Meta Seizes Its Moment to Spend Aggressively in the AI Race 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Norma, Linda, Paul Sweeney.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 3>We're live here in on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>We're streaming live on YouTube as well as to check

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>us out there as John's just reporting met a big,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>big earnings numbers last night after the close, stock up

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>eleven and a half percent here today, all time high,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 3>fifty two week high, whatever you want to look at it.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 3>We're on a two trillion dollar market cap watch here

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 3>one point ninety five trillion as we speak. Let's check

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 3>in with Kurt Wagner, tech reporter for Bloomberg News. He's

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 3>in Denver callout and he's worked out this scam. I

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>have no idea how he did it, but it's a

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>good gig for Kurt. Kurt talked to us about Meta here.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Some people feel like, you know, it might be a

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>little late to the AI party.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that, and I.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Don't know Zuckerberg was talking pretty guestly about the spending there.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>What'd you take away.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're late at all. I don't think

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 4>that they have offered some of the same products that

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 4>some of their rivals like open Ai and a topic

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 4>have at Google. So they have been building AI models

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 4>for you know, basically a decade.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.279
<v Speaker 2>They mostly kept them in house.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 4>They use them, you know, in this case, they've been

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 4>talking a lot about how they're using them to improve

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 4>their own ad targeting and their own content recommendations. And

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 4>so while they're not out selling access to their models

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>and the way that rivals are, they're still building them.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, clearly the street's very happy with what's

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>happening here, which is that their ads business, which is

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 4>powered by Instagram and Facebook, is just a cash printing

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 4>machine and they are taking all the profits from that

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and they're you know, funneling them into AI. And yesterday

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>we saw that the ads business is doing better than

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 4>expected and they're spending even more on AI, and that

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 4>is a combination that people seem very happy with right now.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, Kurt, even if there are people saying that Meta

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 5>is late to the AI party, if you look at

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 5>shares year to date, and you compare it against the

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 5>others in the mag seven we are seeing it as

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 5>the best performing stock, the second best performing stock, right

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 5>behind Nvidio. What do you think is really propelled it

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 5>forward to that magnitude here?

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think there's a couple of things. One, there's

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>the Mark Zuckerberg factor of this. You can love him,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 4>you can hate him, but Mark Zuckerberg has a pretty

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>strong history of you know, quite frankly, reaching the largest

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>audience with his products. That is something he's done repeatedly

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>throughout Meta's history, and he has sole control of this company.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 4>So if you are a believer in him, you are

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 4>a believer in Meta right now. And I think that's

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>one factor. And then I think the other is you

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 4>know that reach matters a lot when you're talking about

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>AI because when you build in this case, Meta AI

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 4>is the name of their chatbot. They have put it

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 4>into Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp. It already has a billion monthly

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 4>users simply because they have that existing audience. So where

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of companies are building these AI products and

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>then trying to find the audience for them, Meta already

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>has the audience. So when they figure this out when

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 4>they know if they're ray Ban Glasses, for example, take

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>off in the way that they hope they will. They

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 4>have the built in online audience already for these tools,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 4>and I think that that's something that a lot of

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 4>people are optimistic about.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Kert. You mentioned WhatsApp wall.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I was covered in stock when they bought

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>WhatsApp seven eight years ago. Are they finally starting to

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 3>monetize whatsappen?

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>So how are they doing it?

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 4>They are starting to monetize what's up? They announced in

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>June that they're going to start running ads and WhatsApp

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>for the first time. If you're a history buff in

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>terms of following Facebook history, you'll know that that's been

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 4>a long time coming and there's been a lot of

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 4>bumps and bruises along the way and get in there.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 4>But I will say the CFO, Susan Lee, she did

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 4>warn yesterday in the earnings call that even though they

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>are putting ads into WhatsApp, this is a long road.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>It is not going to be a material impact for

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>the business in terms of revenue or ad impressions for

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 4>the next few years. They're going to start slow. I

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>think that makes sense for a couple of reasons, the

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 4>first being that WhatsApp is popular in a lot of

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 4>regions that aren't necessarily lucrative in terms of advertising. You know, India, Brazil,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 4>places like that. And then a second you're kind of

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>trying to convince advertisers to shift budget perhaps from more

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 4>lucrative things like Instagram or Facebook, and so I think

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be slow for people to maybe move

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 4>over their money towards WhatsApp. But again, fast forward a

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 4>few years from now, I think there is obviously potential here.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 4>That app has multiple billions of users globally.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 5>Kurt, It's hard to be a bear here on this stock.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at Wall Street ratings right now, seventy four

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>people have a buy. We have five holds on the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 5>stock and then one cell and that's coming from BNP Paaraba.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 5>But if you really had to dig in and see

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 5>what the overhas could potentially be here for this company,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 5>what would you stay or some areas that investors are

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 5>looking to see a bit more of a push forward.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, I do think the spending is a lot and

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 4>so while the ads business continues to chug along, people

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>are going to say, Okay, that's fine. If there is

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 4>a stumble in this ads business, you know, heading into

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 4>the holiday quarter or something like that. Suddenly people might

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>start wondering why are they spending so much if the

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 4>ads business isn't delivering.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's one.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>The other is their reality labs division, that's the Quest

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 4>VR headsets, things like that. That is a loss leader.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 4>I believe four point five billion dollars in losses just

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>last quarter alone. They also mentioned on the call that

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Quest sales were down year over years, so that's a

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 4>concern I would imagine for some people.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Kurt, thank you for reporting. Appreciated.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Wagner, Tech reporter, Bloomberg News in Denver, Colorado. I'm

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>never driving I seventy again, up to the downs again.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 3>I made that value or so good.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's stuck a little bit healthcare here, Eli Lilly.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's always about, like the OBCD drugs, who's

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the winner, who's the loser, How big is the market.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 2>App but there's a lot more to talk about. I

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know Damian Guardet. He joins us here. He's a

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 2>healthcare reporter.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Eli Lily, the blockbuster diabetes drug Monjaro fell short of

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>expectations that it would do a better job by preventing

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>heart attacks and strokes than its older medicine, Trullicity.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Is that a promiming Dabian It depends on how you

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 6>look at it, but it does underline I think what

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned that the bar is so high for these medicines,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 6>both commercially and clinically.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So what we learned today.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Lily ran a study comparing Manjaro, the newer GLP one

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 6>combination medicine, against its older GLP one called Trullicity, to

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 6>determine whether it worked as well in preventing heart attacks

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 6>and strokes. And the good news is the study met

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 6>its goal. It proved non inferiority as a scientific term,

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 6>which is to say it did just about as well

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 6>as the older drug. The bad news, through the lens

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.119
<v Speaker 6>I think of a lot of investors, is it didn't

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 6>prove to be superior, which was kind of the if

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 6>not expectation, then kind of hoped for outcoming.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 5>So what's the biggest business here for Eli Lilly, I mean,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 5>is Manjarro one of their front running drugs that we're

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 5>talking about here.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 6>It is so Monjarro is it's a little triggy because

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 6>it's the same basic medicine, but when it's used for

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 6>diabetes they call the drug Manjarro, and when it's used

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 6>for obesity they call it zep bound. But it's the

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 6>same scientific molecule underneath at all. And that combined is

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 6>by far Lily's biggest growth driver, and.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a medicine that is in demand.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 6>It was until relatively recently in shortage officially, and it

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 6>is definitely paving the path to Lily becoming the most

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 6>valuable drug company in the world. And it's also outpacing

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.559
<v Speaker 6>Novo Nordisk, the Danish company that really invented this market

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 6>that's also had a lot of unfortunate news in recent years.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 6>Lily is lapping the competition there and is on pace,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 6>it's assumed to kind of dominate this market at least

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 6>in the near termal So, some imoking.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 3>At the PGeo function in the bloomber terminal, it kind

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of breaks out kind of where the revenue comes from

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>either by you know, business line or by geography. Cardio

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 3>metabolic health, that's their biggest revenue line.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that the obesity stuff. Yeah, that's inclusive of obesity

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and DiPT.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean look at this, let's go twenty twenty one,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>that at thirteen billion of revenue.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good business.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty four it had about thirty billion business expected

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to be forty three billion this year, fifty two billion

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>next year.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Holy cow, that is out of control growth. No wonder

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>they're so valuable.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 6>Well exactly, and it's I mean, that's what we've demonstrated,

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 6>what Lily has demonstrated in sales just with the products

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 6>that it has on the market. But I think when

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 6>you look at the company's valuation, what's being priced in

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 6>is assumed to come oral golp one, So they would

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 6>have asks what we're talking about that could win approval

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 6>next year at the earliest, and that is likely to

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 6>both be a massive commercial product for obvious reasons, but

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 6>really like democratize this therapeutic category because these are all

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 6>injectable medicines that we're talking I am as.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>The injector of this medicine on another person, which I enjoy.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I get a cocktail out, we make a little party

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 3>of it. But the oral thing that's going to open

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>up the market like crazy, I would think there's probably

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people that don't want to don't.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy doing the shots. I mean, a lot of people

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>don't like needles.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and it's also going to probably diversify it. So

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the focus on these medicines is what percentage.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Of weight loss do they drive?

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 6>It could get it up to twenty five percent, for example,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 6>but for a lot of people they don't need to

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 6>lose twenty five percent of their body weight. The pill

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 6>seems to have a lower percentage body weight change. But

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 6>the assumption is that there's a huge demand for that,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 6>and that when there's a multitude of these medicines, the

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 6>heavy duty ones versus the lighter ones, then you could

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 6>really meet a lot of the demand that people need.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 3>How about all the other stuff in the world, Like,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, cancer, dementia, Where's where are they in that?

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're Lily in that type of thing.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 6>Well it Lily particularly does have an approved medicine and

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 6>for Alzheimer's disease and a lot of drugs for cancer

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 6>mostly in the pipeline that's been a major investment of THEIRS.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 6>But one thing that's notable about the golp ones, not

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 6>to pull it back there, is that we've seen that

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 6>in the long term, as this study demonstrates, it reduces

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 6>the risk of heart attack and stroke. But likewise, there

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 6>are observational studies tying it to reduce risk of Alzheimer's

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 6>and of cancer, which follows reason in that these drugs

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 6>basically make you eat less and in many cases drink less,

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 6>smoke fewer cigarettes. These are things that we know our

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 6>behavioral changes that prevent cancer, heart.

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Attack, and stroke.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's funny that these things came out at

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 3>the same time as gummies came out, just saying.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean I think that there's there's well maybe

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 5>there's a correlation there right, just need to find it.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 5>But I mean, when we think about this company, how

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 5>are they in comparison to competitors right now? I mean,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 5>this is a massive company here.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Lily, I think HAS this is a long term,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 6>dating back about a century investment in diabetes research that

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 6>Lily Has and the GLP one medicin grew out of.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 6>They began as diabetes streatments before they were discovered to

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 6>have such profound effects on obesity. So I think Lily

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 6>would say this is them carrying on the tradition, and

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 6>their market cap and all of these kind of superlatives

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 6>we can fix to them are just the markers of

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 6>a success that they set in motion in years past.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 6>I would say other major American drug makers look at

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 6>them with some envy and perhaps occasionally resentment, because they

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 6>and Novo Nordisk are the leaders in GLP WAN Pfizer,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 6>Johnson and Johnson, Bristol, Myers.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Squib Merk.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 6>All of the heavyweights of this sector missed out on

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 6>that first wave of BCD drugs that have really driven

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 6>the success of the industry in.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Recent Here and I'll tell you this is how you

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 3>see it, nor you ask that question kind of where

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>do you see the difference here? How about valuation on

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five estimates. This is on the BQ function, folks,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And this comp sheet is curated by Bloomberg Intelligence, so

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 3>you know it's right. It's the right comps and the

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 3>right numbers. That's what the bi folks do. Four on

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five numbers. ELI Lilly Stock is trading at

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty four times earnings, the rest of the peer group

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 3>fifteen times, so more than twice the valuation Wall Street

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 3>is giving to Eli Lilly versus the other big cap

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>names like you know, Johnson and Johnson at ev Murk.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>So just extraordinary there, Damian, thanks so much for joining us.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate the reporting there.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Damien Gardeve, healthcare reporter our Bloomberg News, joining us live

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube paulcom.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 3>The company reported earnings a little bit disappointing. The stock

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>is down five point eight percent today, down two and

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 3>a half percent for the year. Let's break down what

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 3>happened in that quarter with an expert. Con John Savanni

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 3>joins the CEIs of Senior analysts cover semiconductors for Bloomberg

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Intelligency joins us via zoom from San Francisco, Coujohn, you

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to do this stuff for a living. You see all

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 3>these companies break down the Qualcom earnings.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 2>What did you see?

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there was nothing hugely wrong with these results. In fact,

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 7>there were a few positives, namely the beat on the

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 7>IoT due to better smart glass chip sales to Metti

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 7>and others. Auto is still continuing to be on track

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 7>despite the automotive end market seeing weakness. The handset guide

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 7>for next quarter which is for to come in in

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 7>line which to typical seasonality, which is actually surprisingly positive

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 7>despite given that they're going to have significant Apple share

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 7>law starting next quarter. That means that the gains they're

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 7>gaining in Android and Android continues to get better for

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 7>them for their chip sales. But all of this goodness

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 7>is still sort of near term or one time. The

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 7>big questions in investors' mind don't disappear from these this goodness. Unfortunately,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, there is going to be that big Apple

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 7>loss this year, this calendary and the next calendar year

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 7>that is going to weigh on their top line revenue,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 7>and there is no offset to completely offset loss, so

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 7>that's going to stay. The diversification efforts in IoT and

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 7>Auto and the PC and the XR, etc. Is moving

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 7>on track, but it's not sexy enough or new enough

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 7>for in the near term to get investors excited about

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 7>this name.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 5>And that's what I'm seeing the rest of the street

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 5>saying as well. I mean, the CEO just said in

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 5>the interview with Ed Ludlow that they see content in

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 5>the automotive space accelerating here. But then we see the

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 5>print that we just are analyzing right now in the

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 5>street is saying that weakness in the handset and automotive

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 5>chip sales sector, that all coming in weaker has really

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of put a damper here for investors. How much

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 5>runway do you think that the company has here?

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, they've been pitching this diversification story

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 7>for a while now. They have to give them credit.

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 7>They have made meaningful progress in a lot of these avenues.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 7>The automotive and IoT still looks to be on track

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 7>to get to that twenty two billion dollars target that

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 7>they've promised. You know, once you get there, it will

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 7>be enough to offset all the Apple losses. It's just

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 7>it's just moving very slowly, which is good. It is

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 7>still moving consistently, but slowly. And in the times that

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 7>we are in right now, and an investor in Semi

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 7>has the optionality to look at all the fast growing

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 7>AI names where most of the spending is coming. It's

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 7>just very hard to get people excited very quickly about

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 7>still investing in a company which is still primarily to

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 7>dat driven by handset revenues.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Ku John, what is what is Qualcomm? And maybe some

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 3>of your other chip names, What are they saying about

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>tariffs about thirty seconds?

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, most of the companies in our coverage are not

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 7>calling out tariff impact directly. You know there some companies

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 7>have you know, decided to take a step forward and

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 7>call some kind of pollons. We heard from Christiana where

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 7>and Qualcom is saying this, haven't seen no pollons. It's

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 7>very hard to DeLine it because you know, initially from

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 7>our channel checks, we believe they're where some pols pullions

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 7>because of tariff fears. But as the discussions and the

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 7>news have sort of died down, the risk for that

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 7>has reduced, so the consumers which we are initiating politics

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 7>might have normalized. So we're not seeing a lot of

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 7>impact on the semi space for the most part from tariffs,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 7>except for this movement between two Q and three Q demand.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Good John, thanks so much for joining Uskunjohn, So, honey,

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 3>he's a senior and I's covering of semiconductors for Bloomberg

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence based out there in San Francisco.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever you

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Comcast reported results here.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I guess they lost fewer subscribers, and that's kind of

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>a net wind that stocks up one point six percent

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>for the day, down twelve percent for the year. It

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 3>just feels like there's a lot of headwinds for this industry,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the cable TV slash broadband industry. Keitha Ranganath, and she

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>covers all the media stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Keitha.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 3>What you see from Comcast numbers today?

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, thanks so much, Paul. So, what happened really was

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 8>last week we had Charter, which is the second largest

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 8>cable or the second largest broadband operator reporting. They reported

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 8>broadband subscriber numbers that were extremely weak. Losses were much

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 8>higher than what you know the investment community was expecting.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 8>That triggered a thirty percent lunge in Charter stock price

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 8>and generally spooked Comcast investors as well. So there was

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 8>a lot of kind of panic and nervousness coming into

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 8>today's report. And Comcasts did lose subscribers. They in fact

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 8>lost the most number of subscribers that they ever have

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 8>lost in their broadband business. But it was still better

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 8>than what the street was fearing, and that's why we're

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 8>seeing a little bit of what you know, you can

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 8>call a relief rally here for Comcast.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what is the broader market looking like right now?

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you've compared it against Charter, But how are

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 5>we thinking about broadband right now?

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So broadband really has been, you know, at least

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 8>over the past few years, NARA has been completely dominated

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 8>by the cable industry. So just you know, even up

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 8>to two or three years ago, cable had almost a

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 8>sixty seven percent share of the you know, home broadband

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 8>what we call the fixed broadband market. But with the telecoms,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 8>so with AT and T, Verizon and T Mobile coming

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 8>in and becoming extremely aggressive in terms of two of

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 8>their product offerings, so one which they call fixed wireless,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 8>which is basically you know, also called five G home

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 8>Internet and the other being fiber, and with both of

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 8>those on the fixed wireless really from a pricing perspective,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 8>because they're only charging about fifty dollars or so a month,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 8>so they're really competing with cable on the low end.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 8>And then if you want a superior product a cable

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 8>in terms of both upload and download speeds, you go

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 8>for fiber. So they're really attacking cable from both ends.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 8>And that's where we're seeing kind of this intense competition

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 8>for the cable operators like a Charter Don Comcast that

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 8>have been losing subscribers and losing subscribers really at a

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 8>pretty you know, alarming pace. The problem is that they're

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 8>going to continue to lose subscribers, and that's you know,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 8>that's kind of how we're framing it for the cable

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 8>investors right now.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, KEITHA. Comcast is a big company. It's a

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 2>diversified company.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 3>It also owns NBC Universal, but that's also a challenging

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>part of the business. Where are we in terms of

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>that company maybe selling or splitting off some of their

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 3>cable network businesses.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 2>What's the status?

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so they are spinning off their cable network's business

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 8>that is their most challenged portion of the whole NBC portfolio.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 8>They are spinning it off into a company called Versuent

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 8>that should happen a little bit later this year. So

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 8>once that happens, then you're left, you know, as far

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 8>as the NBC asset mixes concerned, you have the broadcast network,

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 8>which is you know, the NBC Broadcast network. You have Peacock,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 8>which is their streaming platform, and then you have the

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 8>slightly higher growth assets. So remember they are investing very

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 8>big in their theme park business. They just opened Epic

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 8>Universe reported some really stellar results today in terms of

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 8>revenue growth thanks to Epic. And then of course there's

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 8>studio business. You know, I don't know if you saw

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 8>the news, but they already have one of their movies, Odyssey,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 8>which is a Chris Nolan movie for which they're pre

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 8>selling tickets a year in advance. So their studio business

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 8>and really shape as well.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 5>So executives have acknowledged that competition in broadband still remains

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 5>quote unquote intents, especially when we think about other wireless

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 5>companies like AT and T for instance, and we're seeing

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 5>shares down for Comcast down about eleven percent year to date. Here,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 5>how are we thinking about competition as it relates to Comcasts.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, competition is going to be a huge factor for

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 8>Comcast down the road. So you know, Paul talked about

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Comcast being a diversified company. Yes, they have exposure to

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, the cable systems, but they also can diversify

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 8>a little bit with NBC. But still cable brings in

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 8>eighty to eighty five percent of the company's EBITDA, so

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 8>it's really important for them to have some kind of

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 8>visibility into their broadband business. So again, competition is intense.

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, both Comcasts and Charter refer to this. It's

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 8>going to continue to be intense just because we're seeing very,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 8>very aggressive fiber rollouts from all of the telecom operators.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 8>So we don't necessarily expect the cable broadband business for

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Comcast to return to growth. However, they are trying desperately

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 8>to kind of really cub SHN and so we're seeing

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 8>them kind of really you know, go very aggressively after promotions,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of tweak their pricing and packaging strategy. So that's

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 8>kind of going to help them defend their turf a

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 8>little bit. But I'm not necessarily sure, it's going to

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 8>be a game changer, so competition is a huge issue

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 8>for them.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Have you been to Epic Universal yet?

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 8>Not yet?

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 3>We got to get her over there to Yeah, so

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>we'll see, all right, Keitha, thanks so much for joining us.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Kethan Rogennathan us media anasts form Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You can so watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal