WEBVTT - Stocks, Markets, and the Bond Market

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's keep an eye on the market here,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>as John was just reporting kind of a red day

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>on the screen here to s and p off one

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>percent and to me, the question is where do you

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>go here? This fed is going to keep it higher

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>for longer. Let's check in with our next guest. He's

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>probably got an informed opinion. David Diets, managing principle and

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio strategist at pepac Private Wealth Management. David, thanks

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>for joining us again here. I'm a little concerned here

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that at the very least this stock market is range

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>bound until we get a better sense of what this

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is going to do here.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, it could be worse than range bound, as we

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>saw in September, where is the worst month of the

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>year for many sectors of the market. The s and p.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Five hundred. If this ten year treasury yield keeps rising,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that just puts pressure on all assets, whether that be

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 3>real estate, whether that be stocks, whether that be tech

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 3>stocks or utility stocks and so forth, because it reduces

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>that present value. The question is what is ultimately going

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>to break the rise and this interest rates, And we're

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>just not sure. But we're obviously we're looking at inflation,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at the federal Reserve, We're looking at the

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>amount of debt being issued by our federal government. We're

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>wondering what central banks overseas are doing with their catch

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>of US treasury securities that's all in the mix.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>And looking at some of these long term yields here,

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the thirty are just on absolute tear today.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Anything really that's like, you know, standing out to you

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 4>in that part of the curve right now.

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly uncertainty.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>We just got a piece of information today, the so

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 3>called Jolt survey, which showed there were more job openings

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>than we're expected, and that's really an athem about to

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>bond prices and going to create higher yields because one

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of the concerns of the bond market is if this

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>economy stays strong and the one of the most important

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 3>parts of it is labor, then there's going to be

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>more demand for borrowing, there's going to be more inflation,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be increasingly hawkish FED. So that has

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 3>helped push yields up again today, and of course we're

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>seeing the fallout of the market.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, I was taking a look into the jolt

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>support a little bit further here, and I'm not sure

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>how much of it you've seen, but you know, most

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 4>of this rise in job openings came pretty much exclusively

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 4>from professional business services and finance and insurance jobs like

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>that was like the more or less the bulk of

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 4>the jump and openings here. How much do you think

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the FED reads into something like that? And of course,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, there is the bigger picture. The labor market

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 4>is still very strong. There still are a lot of

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 4>job openings. But just looking at this one report here,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 4>seeing as it was so concentrated.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so absolutely, well, you know, I do think that

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>these are the types of jobs that pay a little

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 3>bit better as opposed to the service sectors. So there's

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 3>a couple of things you could read into it. One

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>is that this initial surge and service sector jobs post

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 3>pandemic is starting to ease. Maybe that's reflective of middle

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 3>and lower income Americas having to pull in their belts

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit as interest rates go up and

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>inflation bites. And of course the other thing, if these

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 3>higher paying jobs are the ones that are still most

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in demand, those ultimately pay a little bit more and

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 3>that could exacerbate inflation. So you could make the case

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>that this is not the best mixed from the point

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>of view the Federal Reserve valuation.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>David, You know, I guess there's a couple of ways

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to look at valuation here. A the market's pretty pricey

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>given where rates are, but if you back out the

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>magnificent seven, maybe it's not as bad. How do you

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think about valuation as we guroup for another round of earnings?

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, it is a tail to markets and so

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>many different metrics. And Paul, your right to focus and

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>valuation because now after the September and indeed the last

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>two months of Q three plus of course Monday is mixed. Outing.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>If you strip out that magnificance magnificent seven, you've got

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 3>a pe on the market that's only fifteen. You know,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>that's actually below what the average has been over the

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>last decade. But you're also right to point too. You know,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>you need to always compare these things versus the yields

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>available on benchmark treasuries, of course, and you know, so

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>people are gonna say, well, gee, if I can get

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 3>four point seven percent risk free from a treasury, admittedly

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>with no growth of that income, that looks pretty good,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 3>even relative to a fifteen pe on the market, particularly

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>given the risk of recession and increasingly hawkers fed, so

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 3>valuations look better. That's reasons for optimism. But we're still

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 3>looking over our shoulder at the bond market.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, David, I'm an economy person and I was

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>personally banking on this week being fairly quiet, expecting there

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 4>to be no Joltz report, no jobs report, but no

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 4>such thing. You know, we got a deal and the

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 4>government is the lights are on for now. So looking

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 4>ahead a little bit to Friday, what are you thinking

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the jobs report?

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, so it seems like the consensus on Wall Street

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>is maybe some job creation, maybe one hundred thousand, and

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 3>so we're going to be determining whether, you know, the

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>actual jobs created are less or more. Unfortunately, we're in

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 3>this situation here Molly, where good news has taken us

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>bad news because you know, a better economy means potentially

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>higher yields, which is going to cause people to rotate

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>out of stocks into these bombs. And so I think

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>from Wall Street's perspective, you may want something under one hundred.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Certainly if you are a bond investor, you want something

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>well less than a hundred. And that could help us

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>get you know, our feet back on the ground, and

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of course gives some pause to the Fed who keeps

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 3>talking about higher for longer. If those job if that

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 3>job creation comes in softer, that's to watch. Of course,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>two other things to watch. One is you know the

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 3>the weekly pay is that showing inflationary trends or backing

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>off a little bit? And of course do they change

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the numbers for past months? If they revise them down,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>that could be a positive. The so called bad news

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>is good news for stocks or could go the other way.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Corporate earnings start up and you know a week to

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ten days here, Yet again, what are you looking for

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in this earnings? Have we seen the worst of this

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>earning cycle? Or we still have some more pain to

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>go here?

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>In Q three, well, you know we are going to

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 3>see some pain because the latest factset pronouncements show that

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 3>on average we should just be a little bit below

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>the flat line, which is going to reflect the third

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 3>or fourth quarter in a row of negative year over

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>year earnings. Well, you know, you buy stocks for earnings.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 3>If they're not making more money than they were the

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 3>prior year, Well, what's the point. Well, the point's going

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>to be that forecasters are looking for a close to

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>twelve percent jump in earnings in twenty twenty four, and

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you buy a stock not for the past quarters earnings,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>but for the upcoming earnings. So you know, all lives

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>are really going to be focused, not necessarily in what

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>they report, but what they say about conditions going forward.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>If they're upbeat and constructive, that's the reason to jump

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>back in. If not, people may want to hold their power,

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>and that could be a more slogging that we're going

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>to have to do in the market.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Here, tell us where you're at, David, for you know,

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 4>looking into the November FOMC at this point and expectations

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of the year as well.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's a coin toss right now as

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to whether they're going to be another hike in November.

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Counseling for it is they don't want to have to

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>say they're done, have assets take off and create another

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>inflationary problem. Want they don't want to say that they're

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>done and then have to come back in again. But

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, you know, these interest rate hikes

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 3>act with a long and variable lag. You know, I'm

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 3>still looking at this residence or real estate market where

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>mortgage rates have more than doubled. You know, all things

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 3>being equal, that means carrying costs have doubled. How can

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>residents or real estate prices stay where they are? And

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that's consumer's biggest asset. So I think that there's a

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of reasons for caution on the part of the

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve. And so my best guess is they sit tight,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 3>but they say they're going to stay vigilant. But we

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>all see all right.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>David, thanks so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>getting your thoughts. David Deets, managing Principal and senior portfolio

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Peepeck Private Wealth Management.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastering.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 5>On Bloomberg dot Com.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 6>The iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app or listen

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next guest, because I'm looking at

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this market and we had the job market, the job

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>opening is the Jolts thing MEJIGGI that came in really strong,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>higher than any forecast out there. So of course the

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>market says, well, the Fed's not going to be cutting

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>rates anytime soon, maybe even raise rates. So let's check

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in with Meghan Horneman. She's a chief investment officer at Verdants. Megan,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the Jolts data we saw

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this morning and the market's reaction to it.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 7>So it is one month, we have to remember that

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 7>it has been consistently coming down. It was surprising to us.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean it was very concentrated in some of the

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 7>white collar jobs in finance, business education. It's going to

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 7>be more important on how that translates into Friday's number,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 7>if it does at all. The one thing we took

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 7>out of that report is the quits rate, So that's

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 7>the amount of people that are voluntarily leaving their job,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 7>and that still is very low. So that shows that

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 7>there isn't a ton of confidence in the future of

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 7>the labor market. People are holding on to their current jobs.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 7>Let's just see what happens on Friday. We've already been

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 7>in the camp that there's more of a chance the

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 7>FED will have to raise rates at least one more

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 7>time this year. Whether it's November or December really will

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 7>depend on the data that's coming in. Right now. We

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 7>do see, you know, the labor market in its entirety

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 7>is still relatively strong, so the Fed can't necessarily pull

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 7>back what they're doing. The other thing that has concerned

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 7>us has been the fact that oil prices are back

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.359
<v Speaker 7>on the rise, So that's going to cost some volatility

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 7>in the inflation data and make the job for the

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 7>FED even more difficult.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 4>You also mentioned in the Joltz report there's a layoffs

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 4>also stayed low in addition to quits. And looking ahead

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.239
<v Speaker 4>then to Friday with the jobs report, I mean, where

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>do you see the weakness coming from. It looks like,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, people have been calling for the hiring to

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>be slowing, and it is slowing. But I don't know.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Some of these estimates in here, for like one hundred

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 4>thousand down from one hundred and eighty seven that would

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 4>be a huge drop off.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, as far as weakness in the labor market,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 7>let's remember that the labor market is a lagging indicator.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 7>So a lot of people put so much kind of

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 7>credence into every month's jobs report and the fact that

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 7>it's strong and the Fed's going to have to do

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 7>so much more. Let's just remember it's a lagging indicator.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 7>It is what's kept the economy afloat for this entire year.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 7>But going forward, there are some cracks that are starting

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.479
<v Speaker 7>to emerge. When you look at some of the underlying

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 7>indicators and some of the indexes in manufacturing or even

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 7>the service side, this is showing weakness. We know that

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 7>from the construction side there's weakness there with the housing

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 7>market being in such disarray. So I don't necessarily think that,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, from the weakness in the labor market will

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 7>continue to materialize. It's just not going to materialize immediately. Also,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 7>we do, in reality have a structural issue with labor

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 7>market right now. We have some demographics that are concerning.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 7>But I do think if you look over a long

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 7>period of time, so I'm not talking about this month

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 7>or next month, there are other things that we have

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 7>to member like AI. This will come in and also

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 7>help with some of the structural issues in the labor market.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 7>I just think it's going to make the Fed's job

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 7>very difficult and they're going to have to tread very

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 7>lightly with this. Unfortunately, it looks like they're going to

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 7>push the economy into a recession, a needed recession. There

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 7>are some excesses that need to be cleared out, but unfortunately,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 7>with the amount of tightening that they're doing and that

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 7>they need to do, it's likely pushing the economy into recession.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, all right, So I had taken recession off

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the table, Megan, three months ago, So we'll have to

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see how that plays out.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 5>But I trust your opinion a lot more than mine.

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Looking at the S and P.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Five hundred, Megan, you know, we're still up ten percent

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>for the year, but you know, down eight percent or

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>so from that. I guess that high back in the

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>July or so. Has a market adequally priced in higher

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for longer?

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Or do we have more to go? Or are we

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 5>going to tread water?

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you kind of view the next three to

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>six months.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 7>I still don't think it's completely over. I think a

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 7>lot of it has been done the damage, and we've

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 7>seen this has been a pretty rapid move. I just

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 7>don't think from a valuation perspective, there's two things. I

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 7>think PE multiples still are a little too high given

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 7>the higher for longer, and I also don't think I

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 7>know you mentioned you took recession off the table three

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 7>months ago. We've kind of always been in the camp

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 7>that there'd be a recession, but now there's more people

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 7>coming back into the camp that unfortunately this will end

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 7>in in a recession, whether it's a short and shallow recession,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 7>but some sort of a recession. The earnings expectations for

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 7>next year aren't really reflecting that yet, so I'm afraid

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 7>that we're going to see earnings expectations come down lower

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 7>for next year, So that could put some more downward

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 7>pressure on the market.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 4>There's still so much division within the FED right now

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 4>of where do we go from here, And you know,

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask Megan, maybe you've got a better

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 4>idea then than they do right now of what the

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 4>data is telling you in terms of the direction of rates.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Right now, you think another hike maybe possible this year?

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And I won't say I'm smarter than anybody at

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 7>the FED. But I will say that I think it

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 7>is good to have some of the division there in

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 7>the committee because we are walking such a line. Inflation

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 7>is extraordinarily easy to reignite, especially if you start to

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 7>give the signs that hey, we are done, rate cuts

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 7>are done, or rate hikes, sorry, rate hikes are done,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 7>because then eventually people are going to be looking for

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 7>that rate cut. What my concern is that that rate

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 7>cut isn't going to happen anytime soon because they're walking

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 7>such a fine line with inflation. With the PCE core,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 7>we did just get below four percent on a year

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 7>of a year basis. That's good, Inflation is going in

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 7>the right direction. But there are some other factors that

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 7>we're concerned what just cause a lot of volatility and

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 7>inflation and make us getting from that four or five

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 7>percent inflation down to two percent much more difficult.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>WTI crude oil back around ninety dollars a barrel. Is

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>there still an energy trade here for investors or has

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of played out?

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 7>I think if you're just looking at from a return perspective,

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 7>it is. Look, a lot of it has been priced

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 7>into the market. We think it's definitely an issue from

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 7>the inflation standpoint, but it's also something that can really

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 7>hurt the consumer. Sometimes the cure for high prices is

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 7>high prices, and energy is one of those things. If

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 7>this causes demand to pull back substantially, for the economy

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 7>to fall into recession, commodities including oil, they're not They

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 7>can't escape that weakness when we do fall into an

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 7>economic contraction.

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Megan, thank you so much for joining us again.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I always appreciate getting your thoughts. Megan Horneman, a chief

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Verdants.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Can's our live program Bloomberg

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Joseph, CEO of Big Plan Holdings, he joins us

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>live here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Josh, thanks

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. What is Big Plan

0:15:58.240 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Holdings and how'd you get here?

0:15:59.600 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 8>Thank you for having me. Big Plan Holdings is a

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 8>diversified family office that my wife and daughters run out

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 8>of Nashville, Tennessee at this point, focused in cannabis, real estate, hospitality, fashion,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 8>professional sports, music, and entertainment.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>You funded this family office with the sale.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>Of your cannabis company, yeah, out of Chicago.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 8>We founded a company in Chicago in the Chicago Land

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 8>area back in twenty fourteen fifteen, and grew that to

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 8>the largest privately held cannabis company in the US upon

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 8>an exit in July twenty two. Would you to cure

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 8>Leaf acquired US. That's a public traded yeah company, Yeah,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 8>public Canadian company. Yeah, you can only be public right

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 8>now in Canada in the cannabis space.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 5>That's a good American story. Yeah.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>So what's the steely this story with the legality of

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 4>cannabis and Tennessee right now?

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Not much of one. Yeah, not much Yeah, not much

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 5>of one. Yeah.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 8>Tennessee is going to be one of the last remaining

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 8>states to fall, is my guess at this point. So

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 8>has that you know, Tennessee is a very strong state.

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 8>So you know, more often than not, the states will

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 8>jump in because of you know, needing some additional money

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 8>to come in and you know, right size budgets, et cetera.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 8>Tennessee's fiscally strong. I think politics also, of course plays

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 8>a role in that as well. And I think that

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 8>they'll be one of the last states to fall.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 4>So when you say fiscally strong, AKA, they don't have

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 4>much of a financial incentive here, correct.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So where we on the national legislation for cannabis,

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because it feels like that domino has to fall before

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>banking can have you know, it just seems like that

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has to happen.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 5>At some point.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, A lot of people think that federal legalization is

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 8>the key. I actually don't. I think a lot of

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 8>us who've been in the business, you know, I've been

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 8>in it since twenty fourteen, which is, you know, about

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 8>fifty years in any other industry, I think federal legalization

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 8>really is We're fine keeping it at the state level

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 8>in this industry. But how about like banking, Yeah, what

0:17:58.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 8>we need to happen, what we need to have happened,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 8>or two or three things there, three or four things really. Recently,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 8>the Department of Health and Human Services just about two

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 8>weeks ago made a recommendation to reschedule cannabis to a

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 8>Schedule three drug from a Schedule one that would allow

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 8>a couple of things, a couple dominoes to fall into place,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 8>that would allow hopefully what will be safe banking to

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 8>be passed on Capitol Hill, which has already passed through

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 8>the House seven times and has failed in the Senate

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 8>each time. So we're hoping that with this most recent

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 8>subcommittee bipartisan subcommittee legislation from a week or two ago

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 8>that came.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 5>Through that hopefully we'll get that passed.

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 8>There's something in the IRS tax co to ADE that

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 8>we are not allowed to use in cannabis.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 5>We are very very hopeful.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 8>That we will be allowed to use to ADE and

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 8>exercise that to allow for the appropriate deductions to be taken,

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 8>which will almost automatically allow for all the big MSOs

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 8>and larger operators to be profitable right away, almost overnight,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 8>and then being uplisted and being allowed to be listed

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 8>on the Nasdaq would be absolutely tremendous. So right now

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>you can only be listed in Canada. So that's why

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 8>federal legalization really it doesn't matter if that makes sense

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 8>all that much.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>It looks like this bill that that just went through

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 4>the Senate Banking Committee seems pretty serious. This is kind

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 4>of crazy to me. I had no idea that cannabis

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 4>related companies right now are forced to operate using only cash.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Is that true?

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Yeah, it's aund so archaic.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 5>It's really really antiquated. Yeah, really antiquated.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 8>It's a real challenge in the industry for you know,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 8>as you scale your business, it's a tremendous, tremendous challenge.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Is a consumer or a patient or a consumer, it's

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 8>a challenge. And so this would allow really, you know,

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 8>for the big banks, the FDIC insured banks, to be

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 8>able to take our money and also provide loans to us,

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 8>because as of now, to scale your business in the

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 8>cannabis industry, it's really all cash. You can't provide any

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 8>no one can provide you any leverage in the public markets.

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 8>So you're getting leveraged from private investors like ourselves. You know,

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 8>we'll we'll, we'll lend to certain cannabis operators, et cetera.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 8>But they don't come they don't come cheap.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we have legal cannabis here in New York.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you I'm sure you've walked down the streets

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of New York City there's these cheesy weed shops two

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>or three to every block.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 5>What did the city do so get.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So incredibly wrong here?

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 8>The state, So it's yeah, it's it's at the state level.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 8>And in my opinion, it's it's at the state level.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 8>States state will you know, enact legislation, filled adopt rules

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 8>and rigs as we call them, and you know, and

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 8>then New York like so many other states, unfortunately, will

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 8>roll out a program and they're just not ready for it.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 8>And time and time again we've seen this over the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 8>last decade when states roll them out, especially in limited

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 8>license states. There's rightfully, there's been a real big push

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 8>for DEI diversity, equity and inclusion, social equity participation in

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 8>the cannabis industry, and there are just not the appropriate

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 8>tool for a lot of these states when they roll

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 8>out programs to allow for the influx of interest that

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 8>they're getting that these cannabis commissions are getting. And so

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 8>New York is one of many many states. Really, Yeah,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 8>can you put the genie back in the bottle here?

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 8>It's tough. It's hard. Yeah, it's hard. You know, they're

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 8>going to try, they're trying right now. But it's a challenge.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Because you're supposed to have approved, state approved dispensaries, which

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple or three here in the city.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller would know the details better than me. But

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>then we have the unlicensed ones, right, and I guess

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the law enforcements just has chosen not to enforce.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's that's what they've chosen to do. You know,

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 8>at this point, you know they're a bigger fish to

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 8>fry from a law enforcement standpoint, and so it is

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 8>tough to put the genie back in the bottle.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 5>To your question, is.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 4>That a problem in other states too? Or is it

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 4>just US city folks complaining here?

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 5>No, I think it is.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 8>I think New York, though, has really has a real issue.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 8>Actually job yeah, yeah, I think I think you have

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 8>a real issue. Coming from Illinois, coming from the Chicagoland area,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 8>I will say as is screwed up as our state,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 8>my home, my former home state of Illinois is in

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 8>many respects Illinois cannabis program. We were the eleventh state

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 8>back in twenty fourteen. They actually did a really nice

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 8>job crafting a program that did not provide for what

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 8>is happening here in New York.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>What are the economics for a state for the cannabis.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 5>Business, does it?

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>What are the what are the revenue arguments that are

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>being made have been made, and are they coming to fruition?

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? They are? Yeah.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean you know, Illinois recently, you know, had more

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 8>in sales tax revenue, as an example, in cannabis sales.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 5>Than alcohol sales.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 8>Really yeah, and you're going to continue to see that

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 8>trend around the country, is my guess. So you know,

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 8>when these states are putting together annual budgets, you know,

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 8>this cannabis tax that's coming in is rather significant. You know,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 8>I can talk to you, you know about Illinois just

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 8>for a second, just because that was where I started.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 8>And you know, if you're a medical patient, you're going

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 8>to pay about three or four percent. I want to say,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 8>if you're an adult use customer, you're going to pay

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 8>somewhere between thirty and forty percent of tax based upon

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 8>you So figure you're you're at a thirty five percent

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 8>average tax.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it adds up, you know, pretty significantly.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>When we're looking at you know, next states that could

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>legalize weed, cannabis.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 5>Cannabis, cannabis, yes, cannabis.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Is proper word. Here can we not say weed.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 6>Is that weird?

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Of course?

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, oh right, yes, excuse me, right, that one of

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 4>our new favorite tickers. But when we're looking at legalization

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 4>for future states, I mean, is it really a political argument?

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Is it a fiscal one?

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 4>What are the big talking points here?

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 8>What happens is every every state will always roll out

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 8>a medical program first, every single one. They will typically

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 8>let that go for a year, two years. They'll see

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 8>how it goes. They will notice that there is not

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 8>an uptick in criminal activity, they will notice that there

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 8>is not an uptick in DUIs and all of that

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 8>kind of stuff that folks get scared of, that officials

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 8>get scared of. Then they start talking about adult use.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 8>You're a recreational use, and so it takes a couple

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 8>of minutes for a state to come around, and you know,

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 8>and then once they do it, then takes a little

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 8>bit more time for them to enact adult use legislation.

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing it move a little bit quicker now, just

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 8>because we have so many states that have opted into

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 8>medical programs. I think we're up to thirty seven I

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 8>want to say states plus four territories that I could

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 8>be off by one or two, but around that number

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 8>that have at least medical programs, and then when you

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 8>break that down, you're having the low twenties on adult use.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Josh, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 5>you coming in here.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Joseph, CEO of Big Plan Holdings talking about the

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>cannabis business. Make a lot of movement here on the

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>state level.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Team Can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 6>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 6>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Satalie Traetrevetic Joints.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So she's had an investment grade credit strategy at paid

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in and regal. What should I do with a credit

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>side because for the first time in like forever, I

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can get yield here.

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 9>Yield at six point one five percent are pretty attractive.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 9>But these days it always seems like the best day

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 9>to buy bonds is tomorrow. So it seems to be

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.239
<v Speaker 9>going higher and higher. We think we are near the

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 9>top and you kind of can lock in rates today

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 9>at these higher levels. You mentioned the two year at

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 9>five in a little bit is nice, but we were

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 9>seeing investors want to go further out the curve, even

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 9>if it means taking the lower yield, you can still

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 9>get close to those six percent on ten year corporates,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 9>and we find that pretty compelling.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Natalie True Trevethic Joints is she's had investment grade credit

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>strategy at paid In and Regal.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Natalie for joining us. And yeah, you know, Paul

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 4>was right. I am a bit of a credit person,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 4>at least in a former life here, and you know,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at investment grade bond yields right now, and

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 4>spreads are still pretty tight all things considered. There there

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>is a little bit of widening here. But I guess

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 4>like the question for you right now is probably what

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 4>like there probably is no need to take any credit

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 4>risk right like, you know, duration is just like doing

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 4>all the work for you.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 9>Duration is doing the bulk of the work. But getting

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 9>that extra one hundred and twenty five basis points by

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 9>going into id credit still seems to make sense. There

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 9>has been this tug of war between credit looking rich

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 9>on a spread basis but attractive on a yield basis,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 9>and all factors are signaling that people are yield buyers

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 9>and are really looking at these high yields that you

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 9>can get in high yield a year or two ago

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 9>and seeing it as a relatively safe have in place

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 9>to park their money.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Natalie, how do you guys think about it over there

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>at paid and Regal in terms of what this filter

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>reserve is going to do here? Is there another one

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>move higher or do you think they can stay here?

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 9>We think there's one move higher. The issue which we

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 9>think is going to propel that is just still strong employment.

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 9>Consumers still have a lot of money. Maybe the savings

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 9>rate is coming down, but their expenditures are still below

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 9>what they're earning, so we still feel that the consumer

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 9>has some strength behind them.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's got to be a factor. Then concerning for

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 4>the Fed here and we obviously saw the jolts support

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 4>this morning, job openings not coming down. You must be

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 4>looking ahead then to Friday and I'm the next catalyst

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 4>then on the jobs report then for rates, any expectations

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.959
<v Speaker 4>as we're looking into later this week.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we think as long as you get one hundred

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 9>thousand of job growth per month, that could keep us

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 9>at an unemployment rate of three point eight percent. So

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 9>for the catalyst for the unemployment rate to move higher,

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 9>which would really maybe give the FED more reason to pause.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 9>We just don't really see that in the cards in

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 9>the near term.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Not only in a credit space. Are there certain industries

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that you guys feel more comfortable here or some industries

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe represent better value right here given where we

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>are in the economic cycle.

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 9>Sure, from the credit perspective, we're actually liking the utility

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 9>sector right now. We've seen valuations cheap and up there,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 9>and they tend to be higher quality bonds which are

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 9>also secured, so we're seeing better value in that sector today.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 9>We're also seeing value in some of the consumer sectors.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 9>Autos have also cheapened up a little because of the strike,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 9>and we don't think this is going to be a

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 9>long term burden on their ability to continue to earn

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 9>strong cash flows. So that's a sector we also like

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 9>buying on this little bit of weakness.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 4>How about in terms of credit quality, you think this

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 4>is a time to maybe be greedy, reached down a

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit, or no need.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, we like investment, great credit, but we are fine

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 9>going down into the triple B space. A lot of

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 9>the single lay names have had so much demand that

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 9>you aren't offering you a big premium over treasuries. We

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 9>also think there's some value in the high yield market.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 9>We don't think there's going to be a big wave

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 9>of defaults here, so playing some of that crossover space

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 9>is pretty attractive because then you get yields closer to

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 9>seven percent.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 5>How about do you.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Guys have much exposure to the mortgage backed securities market,

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>because it just seems crazy with mortgage rates and what's

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>going on in the housing market.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure if that's where you guys play as well.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Paydon as a firm has a lot of investments across mbs.

0:28:58.080 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 9>It's not my area of expertise, though.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Do you look at anything else in like the asset backspace?

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess I would also maybe be a

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 4>little concerned with like auto loans right now and just

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 4>anything as you're saying, you know, if consumer spending might

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 4>be slowing here just looking at it from that macro perspective.

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, from the macro perspective, we do see a little

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 9>bit of weakness, but the strength of some of these securities,

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 9>particularly in the triple A buckets, it's still very strong,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 9>and we have seen valuations cheapen up here, so it

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 9>actually can be a bit of an opportunity to buy

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 9>in this weakness.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Now on what is seeing the new issue market, I'd

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be you know, I can I wonder what the issuers

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about here with these rates continuing to move higher.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 5>What do you have like when your discussions with new issuers.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, there's been a lot of issuance in September, but

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 9>at underwhelmed relative to expectations. And what we're seeing is

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 9>a little bit of a dichotomy between what buyers want

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 9>to buy, which is ten and thirty year bonds, and

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 9>what issuers want to issue, which is really the front

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 9>end of the curve. We're seeing a lot more to

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 9>your issuance this year than we have before, and deals

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 9>are with a lot of two three, five sevens because

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 9>they rather have these higher rates for a shorter period

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 9>of time. And they also bought so much thirty year

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 9>paper post pandemic at virtually free rates, so they already

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.719
<v Speaker 9>have that part of their maturity wall very full. So

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 9>we see them kind of topping up more the belly

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 9>of the curve here.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 4>So what are your contacts on the sell side saying

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>about this? Are the issues going to start giving you

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 4>what you want.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 9>No, deals have been coming up very tight levels, very

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 9>aggressive typically, you know, pricing twenty five basis points tighter

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 9>than their initial price talk and dealers and investors aren't

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 9>dropping from these deals. So the demand just is outweighing

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 9>the supply right now. So we think it's a little

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 9>bit more of a seller's market. And also you have

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 9>to think that these companies aren't refinancing their entire debt

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 9>stack at these higher yields of six percent. They've been

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 9>able to borrow very cheaply for many years, so they

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 9>aren't going to stop boring just because interest rates have

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 9>gone up. They want to maintain their access to the

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 9>capital markets.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Natalie, thanks so much for joining us. Really

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time as always. Natalie Trevithick, head

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of investment grade credit strategy at Payden and Regal.

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio