WEBVTT - From the Vault: Dreamfall into the Dark, Part 1

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb. We're doing some vaults this week as

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we are on a little bit of a summer break,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so we want to give you the dream Fall into

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the Dark series. This is going to be part one

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and it originally published six fifteen, twenty twenty three. Enjoy.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>If dreaming really were a kind of truce, as people claim,

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a sheer repose of mind, why then, if you should

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 2>waken up abruptly, do you feel that something has been

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>stolen from you? Why should it be so sad the

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>early morning? It robs us of an inconceivable gift, so

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>intimate it is only knowable in a trance which the

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>night Watch guilds with dreams, dreams that might very well

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 2>be reflections, fragments from the treasure house of darkness, from

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the timeless sphere, that it does not have a name,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>and that the day distorts in its mirrors. Who will

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.639
<v Speaker 2>you be tonight in your dream Fall into the Dark?

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>On the other side of the wall.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is Robert.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>That was, of course a dream by Jorge Luis Borges,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>an author that we cite and refer to with some

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>degree of regularity on the show, because he was fascinated

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>with many of the things we're fascinated with on Stuff

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>to Blow Your Mind, Mirrors, dreams, strange creatures, stabbings sometimes

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing. And in this episode we're going

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to be discussing the dream world a bit more. This

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>is a topic that we also come back to with

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>some regularity on Stuff to Blow Your Mind, and for

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>good reason, right because there is a universality to dreaming,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and it constitutes an altered and highly subjective mental state

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that runs the gamut from the mundane and the frankly

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>boring to the other worldly, from the specific to the ineffable,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and from the comforting to the just absolutely terrifying. It's

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>at once entirely shut off from the waking world and

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>yet can greatly impact it. And we've spent a considerable

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>portion of our conscious history as a species trying to

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>make sense of it and to figure out to what

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>extent these two worlds are connected or to what extent

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>they're disconnected, and the enigma in many respects still remains now.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Rob.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>When you first told me you wanted to talk about this,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>it was in the context of looking at a specific

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>mythical monster, I believe one from Japan, right, Yeah.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>That was kind of I guess the White Rabbit that

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I followed into all of this because it's an interesting

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>monster and it ties in with so of practices and

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>superstitions concerning the manipulation of dream on our side in

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the Waking world, and I think we are going to

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>get back to that monster, perhaps in a forthcoming episode.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>But as I was reading about this creature from Japanese tradition,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I started reading more about how some of these ideas

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 2>extended back through Chinese tradition as well, and so I thought, well,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I should maybe go a little broader and looking at

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 2>the larger slice of Sino Japanese thought concerning dreams, and

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I ended up picking up this really fascinating book titled

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>The Dreaming Mind and the End of the Ming World

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>by Lynn A. Struve, published in twenty nineteen by the

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>University of Hawaii Press. It's an incredible book, and I

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>was particularly taken by Struve's discussion early on about the

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>mystique of dreams in various global cultures across time, with

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>particular times and places in which the focus of intellectual

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and or theologic sections of the populace are just particularly

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>focused on the dream world and what is going on

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>in dreams, and what we should draw from dreams, and

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>how much of our waking effort and time and thought

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>should be dedicated to dreams.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned in the title of the book, it

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 4>makes reference to the end of the Ming world. She

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 4>seems to draw attention to the especially the late Ming

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 4>period in China, as a time when there was a

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 4>lot of writing produced about dreams and focus on the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 4>meaning of dreams, compared to maybe the same region of

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 4>the world in earlier or later times.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Yeah, And this is something I had never really

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>thought about before, because obviously, to some degree, it's like

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 2>everyone is fascinated with dreams. If nothing else, you're going

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>to be interested in your own dreams, and then any

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>given culture is going to have some degree of ideas

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>about what they mean or what they don't mean, and

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 2>then you know, there's going to be sort of a

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 2>global trend towards you know, modernization and rational interpretation of dreams.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'd never really thought about this idea that there

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>are going to be times and places where if you

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>are looking at I don't know, some sort of a

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>mechanism that was giving you the readings. All right, this

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>is what dream fascination is looking like. Oh we have

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a spike. Why is it spiking it certain? Or does

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 2>it seem to spike at certain points? And so Struve

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 2>is making a point largely for this period of time

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the Ming dynasty and it's decline,

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>as it's about to fall an end and another dynasty

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>is about to come to power. But this argument that

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>there are some other places as well where all the

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 2>elements are just in proper place to sort of push

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>people inward, and particularly to push intellectuals of the day inward,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 2>those who have more time to devote to these matters,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and then also you know, the ability to write about

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 2>them and have their words passed on to subsequent generations.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>So in the book she naturally discusses the subjective nature

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>of dreams, their wide variety, and how the quote deficit

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 2>of logic and rationality unquote in dreams has inspired both

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>suspicion and celebration, which is this duality will come back

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to several times in this episode. Also key to all

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>of this, of course, is that dreams arise unbidden. Certainly

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 2>we have no power over what other people may dream,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but generally we lack control over what our own dreams

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 2>are going to consist of. And this can prove again

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a source of great inspiration, even divine inspiration. You know,

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>look what the dream world has given to me, Look

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>what the powers beyond the dreams have given me. But

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in some cases and some worldviews, it may also be

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 2>seen as threatening or truly terrifying, especially within worldviews where

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 2>rigorous control of thought, desire, and emotion are key. You know,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>it's like, perhaps you're a person and in your religious

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>devotion you spend a lot of time denying yourself say

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>lustful thoughts, and then you enter into the dream world,

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 2>and there are no guarantees that those lustful thoughts will

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>not arise there and take on forms that may seem

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>at odds with what you're trying to do with your

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>waking self.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and of course that can be threatening and unsettling

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>to people. But coming back to the first half of

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 4>what you said about dreams being an inspiration and having

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 4>a kind of power or authority. I think that is

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 4>linked to the fact about them seeming to be unbidden,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they seem to come from somewhere other

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 4>than your own thoughts. I mean, you could say that,

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 4>we'll wait, where do your waking thoughts really come from? Those,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 4>if you examined them more closely, might come to seem

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>as unbidden as dreams. But at least we have a

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>sense more like our thoughts in our waking state are

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 4>more under our control, and our thoughts in the dream

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 4>world are not, And because they feel like they're not,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 4>they're less under our control than thoughts in the way state.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 4>They can take on a kind of third party authority.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's like you can report the contents of your dreams,

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 4>or even just contemplate the contents of your dreams, without

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the sort of self doubt and anxiety that you might

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>have about if you were just, say, like, offering your

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 4>personal opinion about something. When it's a dream, it's like

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 4>you're reporting something you read in another source. It has

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>a kind of third party authority. And often because dreams

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 4>are ascribed to gods or literal powerful figures or ancestors

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 4>or other you know, beings that have senses and information

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 4>and powers beyond what we have in waking life. The

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 4>contents of dreams can be interpreted to have power and

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 4>authority over other people like you, I can tell you

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>my dreams, and that might have a message that you

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 4>think you should pay heed to, because I'm not just

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 4>saying my opinion. I'm reporting what was revealed to me

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 4>in a dream.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's interesting to sort of self analy over this,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Like if either of us were to tell our spouses

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to report in the morning, Hey, I had a dream

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>in which I was wearing this green suit. It's weird.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't own a green suit, and then you kept

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>reporting this same dream over and over again, Like how

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>would they interpret it? How would you interpret it? Like

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>at some point would you just be taking it apart,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to think of what does green mean to me?

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>And like where is this coming from? Or they might think, well,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe my spouse really needs a green suit. Maybe that's

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 2>what the root of this is, like deep down they

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>desire it. Like there's so many ways to sort of

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>tease it apart and try and make sense of it

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>when ultimately, like the signal itself is irrational.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Of course, it gets even more complicated when the dream

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 4>is interpreted to include an exhortation or some kind of

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 4>guide to action, because consider the contrast between a couple

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>of other things. What if, on one hand, I just

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>say to my family, I think I'm going to shoplift

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a green suit out of the clothing store, and I

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 4>just present that as my idea. It seemed like a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 4>good idea to me. Versus I say, I have a

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 4>dream in which I take a green suit out of

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the clothing store without paying for it, and I keep

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 4>having this dream. Well there, it kind of seems like, look,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 4>it's not It wasn't my idea. You know, it came

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 4>to me from the dream. So it's like somebody else

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 4>is telling me I need to do it.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. This idea that there's something about the dream that

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>does not seem to fully originate in ourselves. This is

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a This is a theme that we'll return to again

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and again here, and something that various interpreters of dreams

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and sort of dream theorists over time have latched onto. Now,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>coming back to Lynn A. Struve's book, she says that

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>while in some rare cases, dreams have allegedly and allegedly

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 2>is important because the nature of other people's dreams is

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>always alleged, and even our own accounts of dreams that's

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>subject to interpretation, remembrance and reporting and so forth. In

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>some cases you have dreams of allegedly directly informed history,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>but otherwise, like what does it matter that people are

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>having dreams and reporting them and focusing in on them.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>There's sort of like two major areas that she looks

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out at here. One, as we'll explore, is like what

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>happens when you're fascination with dreams kind of like bubbles

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 2>over into making decisions about the waking world. But the

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>other one that she touches on has to do with

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>ultimately with like how a given society viewed consciousness, how

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a society views its dreams, Especially in highly intellectual and

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>authoritative cultures. You know, you can look to the surviving

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>writings on dreams dream journals, and they can ultimately reveal

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>much about that culture and the individuals doing the dreaming

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and the writing, as well as the inner workings of

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 2>the mind. She writes, I submit that dream writing can

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 2>indirectly contribute to a history of consciousness, not in the

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 2>sense of what people were conscious awe of over time,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>such as class identity, but in the sense of what

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>people thought consciousness was and how they experienced it. Delving

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>into this can illuminate how they felt and understood themselves existentially,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>which underlay other actions and endeavors. Consciousness at its most

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>primal is a sense of being an observant entity, and

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 2>it builds and modifies selfhood by the agency of narrating

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 2>what is observed. Attempts to narrate that most ineffable kind

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>of observation of what occurs to us in dreams expose

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 2>this process at the most elemental level that is accessible

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to others and therefore on which self interacts with society.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So dream talk can give us valuable information on how

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>people probed awareness itself, under what circumstances they were moved

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to do so, and how their evolving selves negotiated narratologically

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 2>with their sociocultural milieu.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this is interesting. So Struve is making the argument

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>that even if you don't have people, say, writing philosophical

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 4>treatises on what they believe the nature of consciousness to be,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 4>you can infer a lot of things about what certain people,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 4>at certain times thought believe the nature of consciousness to be.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 4>By reading their reports about dreams and how they talked

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 4>about dreams, because in a sense, dreams are a dreams

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 4>are relating an experience of consciousness separated from action and

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 4>waking life.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Yeah, it provides this this sort of distance

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>on inner thought process. That's and again I never really

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 2>really thought about this either. It's easy to sort of

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 2>think of of accounts of other people's dreams as either

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, interesting or boring, or interesting only to them,

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>or perhaps interesting in terms of like exactly how it

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is interpreted based on everything else and all that's valid,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>but this added level of like, yeah, to some degree,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>these are accounts of people thinking about their own consciousnes. Now.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 2>In this book, Struve ultimately dives into the particularities of

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Late Ming Dynasty China during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>but she also highlights other times in places that seem

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>particularly focused on the power of dream So, you know,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it's all interesting, I think, coming from our current place

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>in the consideration of dreams, sort of the tail end

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of what she classifies as an accelerating Western decline in

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the belief of prophetic and oracular dreams. And she argues

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>that this decline has been accelerating, at least among the

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>educated since the seventeenth century. I mean, we're still obsessed

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 2>with our dreams. We still talk about our dreams, right.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>They still have the power to fascinate us, terrifies and

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>all that, but we're generally more inclined it seems to

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>me anyway, to dismiss them as nonsense or the scrambled

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>remnants of waking experience, thoughts and feelings. I remember David

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Eagleman when I initially interviewed him the interview before last,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>he said that he mentioned the he always thought of

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>it as sticking his head in the night blender, which

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought was rather apt. You know, this idea that yeah,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>this is what you this is what you get. You know,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>these are just the mental leavings from the previous day,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and you can pick through them. You can, you know,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe you'll find something useful that is, you know, you know,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>provide some inner reflection. But ultimately the thing itself has

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 2>no meaning. It is like a waste product that is

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>extruded from the mind.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Eagleman's particular theory about the adaptive function of dreaming

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>was that it is a defensive action of the visual

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 4>center of the brain to prevent takeover of that tissue

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 4>in the brain by other senses during the dark period

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 4>and the night, so that when you know it's nighttime

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 4>and you have your eyes closed so you're not using

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 4>the visual centers of your brain, those brain cells don't

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 4>start to get recruited too much by other functions of

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the brain because our brains are very plastic. And part

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 4>of the evidence he produced for that was that there

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 4>seems to be across the human life span and across

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>different animals, there appears to be a negative correlation between

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 4>the plasticity of brain tissue and how much dreaming you do.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it was an interesting hypothesis that he came

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>to after initially seeing it as the night blender. But

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't hear someone like David Eagleman talking about dreams

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>being the vehicle or the instrument through which God is

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 2>speaking to him or to us, or to random people.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you will find it in the modern world,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but for the most part, we don't really lean into

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that on the whole.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess technically, I want to say those

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 4>are two separate scientific questions. One would be what is

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 4>the adaptive function of dreaming in the first place, Like

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 4>why do we dream? And I think that's the main

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 4>question that Eagleman was answering when we talked to him

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 4>about that. The purpose of dreaming is to prevent the

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 4>nighttime takeover a visual tissue by other functions. But there's

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 4>a totally separate question, which is what determines the actual

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 4>contents of dreams. And you could have a you know,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 4>in a way that's kind of unrelated to the other theory.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 4>You could just say, well that you know, the fact

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that we need to prevent the takeover of that brain

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 4>tissue means you've got to have something going on in there.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 4>What's going on in there? What kinds of stuff you

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 4>see and imagine in a dream? I mean, it could

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 4>be anything. So why do we see the things we see?

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 4>And that's an interesting psychological question that seems somewhat separate.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see what you're saying. Yeah, I mean, certainly

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 2>you could have a situation where if the Eagleman's hypothesis

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 2>was correct, that you could still have God speaking through

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the content of the dreams, because it's like the brain

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>just needs something to keep the to keep things visually

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>powered up, but it doesn't particularly care what is in there,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and then yeah, you could have God or God's slipping

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a message in to the stuff. In the same way

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 2>you might be able to cut up open the entrails

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of an animal and supposedly determine the future based on

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 2>what they contain.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Ah.

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so it's technically there's no conflict between you being

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 4>able to read the future in the in the guts

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of a chicken and the fact that the guts of

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 4>a chicken are used for digestion by the chicken.

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, all right. Coming back to these different periods in

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 2>times where there's been an uptick in interest in the

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>contents of dreams and this idea that there's something meaningful

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 2>there to really latch onto. One of the periods that

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Struve touches on is the Romantic period in Europe, particularly

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 2>late eighteenth through early nineteenth centuries. Truve writes that the

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 2>quote felt limitations of an Enlightenment rationalism and mechanism, especially

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 2>as a concerned the human body and the inner workings

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of the mind, led to a kind of increased interest

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in the non rational and the mysteries of the self

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>consciousness and the unconscious mind. She writes, quote with growing

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>interest in dreaming as a medium through which to link

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 2>these compulsions. Dreams came to feature prominently in natural philosophy,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>medical thought, the budding field of anthropology, art in art theory,

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>personal notes, and especially creative writing and literary criticism. This

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>occurred as intellectuals responded with elan and or anxiety, hope

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 2>or dismay to the epical French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>rising nationalisms, and socio environmental changes attendant on the Early

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Industrial Revolution.

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 4>If I understand Struve's argument correctly, this seems to fit

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 4>with the pattern of the late Ming period in that

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I think she understands an increased focus on dreaming among

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 4>the people producing writing as a common feature of periods

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 4>where there is a lot of where there is a

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of strife and rapid change.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think so. And I think that's one

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>of the main reasons that the Romantic period here is

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>such a nice parallel exam Now, in bringing up Romanticism,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the mind instantly goes to particular authors of that period,

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>say Samuel Taylor Cooleridge, who lived seventeen seventy two through

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>eighteen thirty four, whose work often explored dreams, as well

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>as those visions brought about through the use of opium.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to look at like another text that

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>dealt with this topic, and I ran across a very

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting book from nineteen ninety eight titled Coolridge on Dreaming

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 2>by Jennifer Ford, and it explores this naturally in the

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>specifics of the poet's work, but also in the larger

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 2>context of eighteenth and nineteenth century dream fascination in the West.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 2>You see examples of this in the work of other

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 2>notable Romantic authors as well, like Lord Byron and Thomas

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>de Quincy, who of Cose, of course, also famously imputed opium.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 2>Ford writes that there was no consensus concerning the nature

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of dreaming at the time during the Romantic Romantic period,

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>with opinions are really centering on the big three interpretations.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>So one potentially vine visions you know, could be could

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 2>be God sneaking in a voice or a message there

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 2>or some you know, supernatural entity with our interests at heart.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess you could also look at that is too,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a font of creativity and inspiration, a natural place for

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the poets in the writer's mind to go, in the

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>artist's mind or three dreams as residue or byproduct, which is,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 2>you know what, We've been discussing this idea that maybe

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>dreams are nothing but just sort of the reassembled contents

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 2>of things we thought about or observed, et cetera during

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the course of our day. Now, Coolridge was much inspired

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 2>by the writings of Antiquity on the matter, considering the

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>idea of prophetic dreaming especially, but he also consumed contemporary

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>writings that included both serious attempts to understand dreaming from

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the vantage point of of current medicine and physiology, as

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>well as magical and mystical strains of thought. Now this

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>is kind of an aside here, but one of the

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 2>things that Ford points out is that one of the

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>off is that he would have, of course read from Antiquity,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>would be Homer, and who in the Odyssey describes the

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>two gates from which dreams may arise quote four. Two

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>are the gates of shadowy dreams, and one is fashioned

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of horn, and one of ivory. Those dreams that pass

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 2>through the gate of saun ivory deceive men, bringing words

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 2>that find no fulfillment. But those that come forth through

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>the gait of polished horn bring true issues to pass

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>when any mortal sees them.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Well in a way that belief is not very helpful.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 4>So it's like some dreams could contain prophetic content and

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 4>other dreams are there to deceive and misguide you, but

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 4>you can't you can't know which or which.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it reminds me a little bit of the ideas

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>presented by the gomork and the Never Ending Story, you know,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea of this link bit and creative creativity and

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>deception between dream and creations of imagination and lies. And

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I guess this get touches on like one of the

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 2>real problems of value you wing the content of dreams

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>is that like, sometimes dreams are just stupid. I mean,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>there are gonna be maybe some there's some versions of

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>it where you're like, okay, there's always something there might

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 2>be cryptic, but there's something there that might be your

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>viewpoint regarding dreams. But at times you're gonna have an

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>uphill battle because you're gonna have that dumb dream where

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 2>you're what like in the the the words of Mitch Hedberg,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, had a joke about a dream in which

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 2>he had to build a go kart with his old

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>boss or something like that. You know you're gonna have

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>dreams that you're really gonna have to have to try

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>hard to find some sort of prophetic interpretation or meaningful

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>interpretation of what's there. So easier to say, well, you know,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they come through this gate and they mean something.

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they come through the other gate and it's just

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>complete crap. Now Ford has a section here where she

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 2>briefly goes through mentioning. You know what other writers of

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>antiquity had to say about it, like Hippocrates and much

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 2>later Gallan, both agreed that dreams mattered and they were

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 2>connected to health. They also wrote that Galen and the

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Roade that they could contain divine messages of healing contained

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>in dream symbols and so forth. But for both of

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>these individuals, however, food and digestion were deeply linked with dreaming.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Hmmm, yeah, you might be an undigested bit of.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Beef for cheese exactly. Yeah, it's exactly the example I

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 2>thought of as well from a Christmas carol. Now, Plato, Aristotle,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and Cicero, for the most part, and with some notable exceptions,

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 2>argue that dreams were not prophetic. Apparently, Cicero kind of

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 2>was wishy washy on this. Aristotle, however, was pretty firm

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 2>on the matter, Ford writes, quote, he explained sleep as

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the rising to the head of vapors from digestive processes.

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Dreams could be explained by their relation to the material

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 2>world and to waking thoughts, and not as a result

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>of prophetic messages from gods totally in the Potato camp.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Here, there's more of gravy than grave about you.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>That's Aristotle, yeah, now, But still idea of prophetic dreaming

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>cast a long shadow across Western history. And of course,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, outside of what's going on in the like

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 2>intellectual realms of it in given culture, obviously you have

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of deeply rooted folk traditions and so forth as well,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>which you know, none of the Don't Think's authors particularly

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 2>get into that as much. But with the Christian tradition,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Ford points out, there was always a lot of back

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 2>and forth on the matter, because the Bible itself seemed

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to be of two minds on prophetic dreaming, sometimes championing

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the prophetic power of dreams and other times denouncing it,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact casting out the dream observers with the soothsayers

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and the wizards. In the Book of Deuteronomy.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I feel like this, this is a repeating pattern,

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 4>and I think this will come up again in some

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 4>stuff we'll we'll talk about later, either in this episode

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 4>or in the next one in the series. But there's

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 4>always sort of a tension in the practice, in the

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>reception of the practice of receiving revelations, whether that's through

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 4>divination or whether that's visions and dreams and so forth,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>because many religions will have that type of content in

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 4>a sanctioned way, like maybe some of its orthodoxy or

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 4>its history, its stories, its current priesthood will practice things

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 4>that involve some methods of knowledge of that form, and

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 4>that will be the sanctioned version. But then there is

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of an unsanctioned version that is not promoting orthodoxy

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 4>or is subverting the power of the priesthood or whatever,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 4>and well, you don't want to allow that stuff. So

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of like, you know, well, there were some

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 4>there were some visions and dreams that were legitimate, and

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 4>that's part of what we believe now. But if somebody

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 4>is telling you new information from visions and dreams, then

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 4>you've got to be careful about that.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not canon. But anyway, during the time of

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the Romantics. A lot of this increased interest and confusion

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>about dreaming had to do Ford stresses with quote the

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 2>perceived unsatisfactory factory, mechanical and associationistic explanations of dreams offered

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 2>by John Locke, David Hartley, George Berkeley, and others. Interest

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>in the forces and features of psychic life began to increase,

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and a concept of the unconscious mind began to emerge.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So it seems like a lot of these unsatisfactory ideas

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>involved digestion. So I guess, you know, ultimately it's not

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 2>very romantic to for someone to say, look that dream

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you had. I know it was really inspiring, but it

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 2>was essentially like you passing gas in the night. You

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't give it a lot of attention unless it is,

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, interfering with your ability to sleep. But it

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>also comes back to what you said earlier about like

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a time of change, a time of like changing ideas

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and emerging ideas, and sometimes this kind of feeling of like, well, no,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that that can't be right. That's not how I feel

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 2>about it. That's not what these voices from the asked

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 2>have necessarily agreed with. Now Coolidge himself wrote that he

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>thought much of these discussions were too dismissive of the personal, psychological,

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>mysterious nature of dreams, as well as their overall value

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to the dreamer. But he also read the writings of

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Scottish metaphysical rationalist Andrew Baxter and was particularly taken by

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 2>his arguments that dreams did not originate in one's own soul,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but were brought on by external beings. So dream spirits

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 2>were to blame, because otherwise, how could we dream something

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that we had never witnessed or thought or felt in

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the waking world. How could we meet someone in dreams

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that we had never met in reality.

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 4>This seems like an odd thing for Coleridge to be

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 4>enticed by, because, like, he was a writer, so you'd

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 4>think he'd be more familiar with the concept of creative imagination.

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 4>And how like, yes, a character can start talking back

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 4>to you in your mind and you haven't met them.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 4>You made them up. This is part of the creative process.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, it's a good point. I kind of interpreted

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>those being like again to her point, like recoiling a

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit from this. You know what the rational world

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is saying about dreams? You know that it's it is potato.

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And then on the other hand, you know, wanting this

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>idea that's more in keeping with the muses, that dreams

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>are overpowering, that they that they are are coming to

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>us and giving us something, giving us a creative gift

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 2>that we might run with. And apparently this was this

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of thing that Baxter was talking about.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, the idea that the dreamer is visited during

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>sleep and that quote dreaming may degenerate into possession.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh okay, So you could imagine it being attractive for

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Coleridge and other romantic writers to think like this in

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 4>the same way it might have been attractive for writers

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 4>who literally believed in the muses as entities, because it

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 4>gives that same kind of third party authority to what

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 4>you're writing that I was talking about with dreams earlier,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, if oh I didn't just make this up,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 4>this was given to me by a divine being.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it reminds me a bit of some

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of our past discussions about the bicameral mind hypothesis. You know,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like, Okay, there's the idea that a

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>god might speak to you, but here's this other idea

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that kind of gets you to a similar place, but

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>through a different, different strain of more rational thinking. Though

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess at the end of the day you're still

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about some sort of entity outside of your own

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>being in the case of Baxter's writing. So I don't know,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>but I guess I tend to sort of interpret it

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>here as being like you know, it's the irrational in

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the rational insight any given person's mind, and certainly you're

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>able to hold on to and be attracted to conflicting ideas,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>but still from that idea, it's a short walk to

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>pre existing concepts of dreams brought on by demons and

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the like. Believe Baxter wrote about the incubus and the

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>succubists a bit at least the general concepts. The link

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>is made between nightmare and madness, and Ford makes special

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>mention of this quote. The notion of dreams as possessing

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the dreamer provides a rich source of anxiety and thoughtful

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>deliberation for Coleridge and many others who ventured into the

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>often hostile territory of the dream. Dreams were involuntary events

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and could not be controlled. Often, the dream itself was

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>perceived as the controlling force.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>In my case, oftentimes I will sort of think, you know,

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>vaguely about like there being something that is programming my dreams,

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Like there's a little person in my head that makes

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of programming choices, like it's a TV channel

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and often makes just illogical programming choices, like like I'll

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 2>look at it and'll be like, well, think of all

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the things that I did yesterday, that I read about,

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>or experienced or watched on television, and this is the

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>dream you gave me. This was the programming that was

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>selected for my night's entertainment.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 4>We're rerunning transfers five, five times in a row.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I would love transfer five dreams, but no, it's generally

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot more boring. It's like, I don't think you

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>know the target audience here, But anyway, one sees this

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>idea of dreams possessing the dreamer and the works of

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Coleridge to Quincy, Wordsworth and others. But Coleridge again also

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>kept abreast of modern medical writings as we as the

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>writings of people like the physician Erasmus Darwin who's stress

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 2>quote the terror of involuntary thoughts, sleep and dream as

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a sub human state in which we cannot fully exert

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>our will. So, you know, I guess this seems to

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>be just a common theme that everyone who's thinking about

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 2>dreams has to come up against. Is that there we

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>can't fully control it. And what does that lack of

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>control mean?

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, when I really think about it, the question

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 4>it raises is what does it mean when we do

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 4>feel like we're in control of our thoughts? What causes

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 4>that sensation? Because again, like I feel like the closer

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.959
<v Speaker 4>you look at the moment to moment functioning of your

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 4>waking mind, the more mysterious the origin of your thoughts becomes,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 4>and it can start to feel like a dream. We're like,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 4>wait a minute, why did I just think about that?

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Did I? Did I really have control of thinking about that?

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 4>What made me say transfers five? Where did that come from?

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Though I know what you mean, though, I guess at times,

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>so there are waking thoughts, and you know, if we

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>have a really active, you know, default mode network, we

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.719
<v Speaker 2>can kind of self analyze and we'd be like, oh, well,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>this is why my mind went here, and then you know,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>we can sort of try and trace it. But dreams

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 2>often are more difficult to interpret along those lines like

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 2>they they're less easy to interrogate.

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I guess sort of what I'm getting at is

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 4>that it seems like maybe the difference is that in

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 4>dreams we have less of the illusion of control over

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 4>the direction of our own thoughts that we feel we

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 4>have during waking states.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely so. You can see a number of these

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>ideas reflected in a poem by the romantic author Lord Byron.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>This is a This is a piece at Ford also

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 2>references in the book, but I thought it might be

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 2>nice to read just a portion of it here. Again,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 2>this is from Lord Byron's The Dream. Joe, do you

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>do the honors? Since I read the Borets at the beginning?

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Oh sure, let's see. So this is an excerpt from

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 4>the Dream. They pass like spirits of the past, They

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 4>speak like sybols of the future. They have power, the

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 4>tyranny of pleasure and of pain. They make us what

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 4>we were, not what they will, and shake us with

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 4>the vision that's gone by, the dread of vanished shadows?

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Are they so? Is not the past all shadow? What

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 4>are they? Creations of the mind?

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, on that note, we're going to go

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>ahead and close out this episode, but we'll be back

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>in part two and we'll continue to discuss this idea

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>of the mystique of dreaming these different places where in

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 2>time where there seems to have been a surge and

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>interest in the power of dreams and the like the

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 2>practicality even of dreams. So we'll look at a few

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>other different cultures, including the Ming dynasty example that Struve

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 2>is directly mentioning, and eventually we'll get to that monster.

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that may be even further along. But

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 2>at the end, there's a monster at the end of

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 2>this book, is what I'm saying.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Will it steal my dreams?

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It might?

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 2>It meant very well, might, or it might just help

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>you build ikea furniture for all night long?

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Will it steal a green suit for me?

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, one would hope, One would hope that monster has

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>connections all right.

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, if you want to write in about

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 2>your dreams, hey, We're always happy to hear them. Our

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>listener mail episodes published on Mondays, Core episodes on Tuesdays

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we do a short form monster

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>fact or artifact episode, and on Fridays we set aside

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 2>most serious concerns to just talk about a weird film

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 2>on Weird House Cinema.

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer, JJ Posway. If

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 4>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 4>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 4>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 4>can email us at contact Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 4>dot com.

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.