Speaker 1: You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt Monday, September twelfth edition of The Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Here we have so much to discuss. First off, Chuck
Speaker 1: Todd asks Kamala is the real big threat right now?
Speaker 1: The inside threat from the January sixth insurrectionist? And is
Speaker 1: it just like the threat that we had from al
Speaker 1: Qaida on nine to eleven? He actually asked basically that question.
Speaker 1: It was pretty shocking. Also, Kamala tells everybody she's the
Speaker 1: vice president. Is she still the borders are that the
Speaker 1: border is secure? But nobody thinks that's actually true, So
Speaker 1: what the heck is going on there? Plus Fetterman m
Speaker 1: he has another moment where you ask yourself, is this
Speaker 1: a person who could run a lemonade stand, never mind
Speaker 1: should be the next senator from great state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Some polling that shows that, well, actually it's really poll
Speaker 1: number crunching that shows that the polls are often wrong
Speaker 1: and they favored Democrats, And even the New York Times
Speaker 1: is admitting it. And finally Brad Stouter. He has found
Speaker 1: himself at other parts where they will no doubt give
Speaker 1: a plenty of jelly donuts at ice cream. He will
Speaker 1: be at Harvard University. Because the Left takes care of
Speaker 1: its own. We will discuss that, my friends in just
Speaker 1: a moment. But you know, the data breaches just keep
Speaker 1: on coming. There was another one announced recently, including Social
Speaker 1: Security Numbers as a technology servicing company used by the
Speaker 1: Oklahoma Student Loan Authority. They announced a breach that affected
Speaker 1: a couple of million student borrowers. And the problem with
Speaker 1: a lot of these things is that when the breach happens,
Speaker 1: you don't even know about it. That's why you need
Speaker 1: somebody who has your back. It's important to understand how
Speaker 1: cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Your personal
Speaker 1: information gets exposed so often it makes it really easy
Speaker 1: for cyber criminals to steal what's yours. LifeLock detects and
Speaker 1: alerts you to potential identity threats you may not spot
Speaker 1: on your own, like loans taken out in your name,
Speaker 1: and if you do become a identity theft victim, they
Speaker 1: will have a dedicated restoration specialists working with you to
Speaker 1: fix the problem. No one can prevent all identity theft
Speaker 1: or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but it's easy
Speaker 1: to help protect yourself with LifeLock. Join now and save
Speaker 1: up at twenty five percent off your first year with
Speaker 1: promo code buck. Call one eight hundred LifeLock or go
Speaker 1: to LifeLock dot com online LifeLock dot com and use
Speaker 1: promo code buck for twenty five percent off. Now. We
Speaker 1: just had the memorial, the annual memorial of the nine
Speaker 1: to eleven attacks over this past weekend nine to eleven
Speaker 1: was yesterday, and for a lot of us, it's changed
Speaker 1: our lives. We lost almost three thousand of our fellow
Speaker 1: human beings, mostly our fellow Americans on that day. Men, women, children,
Speaker 1: people killed in massive number by a terrorist, jihadist threat
Speaker 1: that was a true existential threat to this country. They
Speaker 1: were plotting more attacks, including chemical and biological weapons attacks.
Speaker 1: They would have used nukes if they could have gotten
Speaker 1: their hands on it. These were all the things that
Speaker 1: the global network of al Qaeda was actively plotting against
Speaker 1: the homeland, and we were hit with that horrific attack
Speaker 1: on September eleventh. We should remember always what that meant
Speaker 1: and how it changed our lives. But over at the
Speaker 1: Chuck Todd Meet the Press show, there is a belief
Speaker 1: among the lunatic libs. It seems that what happened on
Speaker 1: nine to eleven was very similar in scale and threat
Speaker 1: in severity to what happened on January sixth. We're at
Speaker 1: the twenty first marking, if you will. But the September
Speaker 1: eleventh attacks, Yeah, this is a foreign terrorist attacking our democracy,
Speaker 1: attacking this country. We're now as a nation battling a
Speaker 1: threat from within. Is the threat equal or greater than
Speaker 1: what we faced after nine eleven? That's an interesting question.
Speaker 1: I have held many elected offices as district's attorney, attorney general, senator,
Speaker 1: and now Vice president, and there's an oath that we
Speaker 1: always take, which is to defend and uphold our constitution
Speaker 1: against all enemies, foreign, endimistic. We don't compare the two
Speaker 1: in the oath, but we know they both can exist
Speaker 1: and we must defend against it. Notice that Kamologist pivots
Speaker 1: right away instead of saying that's a crazy question, Well,
Speaker 1: what do you mean. On September eleventh, we had jumbo
Speaker 1: jet liners, effectively, you know, commercial airliners used as guided
Speaker 1: missiles full of human being hitting buildings full of human beings,
Speaker 1: And it was a day of really a declaration of
Speaker 1: war against the United States and its allies by the
Speaker 1: global jihad of al Qaeda. You're going to compare that
Speaker 1: to QAnon shaman guy in a furry hat taking selfies
Speaker 1: and marching around the Capitol taking direction from some Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill police and other employees of the building when they're saying, well,
Speaker 1: go here, don't go there, Hey, don't do this. Are
Speaker 1: you gonna treat those like a similar threat? Really? Is
Speaker 1: there anything that the Democrats? Is there anything that is
Speaker 1: too vicious for them to say, too stupid, vicious, unfair
Speaker 1: for them to say about Trump's supporters, And also the
Speaker 1: exaggeration they make of January sixth. It was not an insurrection, Okay,
Speaker 1: It was a riot really, not all that different in
Speaker 1: many ways from the riot that occurred months before in
Speaker 1: front of the White House of Donald Trump, where there
Speaker 1: were injured police officers, where they had to disperse the
Speaker 1: crowd using tear gas and non lethal measures while they
Speaker 1: were threatening to what overrun the gates of the White House.
Speaker 1: I mean that there were lunatic mobs of Biden voters
Speaker 1: for months terrorizing the country and there's one day where
Speaker 1: there is a mob on January sixth that gathers and
Speaker 1: Democrats want to act like it goes Pearl Harbor nine
Speaker 1: to eleven, January sixth. That's really how they view this.
Speaker 1: These people are nuts, but you have to understand this
Speaker 1: is what they believe. This is what the regime tells
Speaker 1: its adherents. They don't say to them, you know what,
Speaker 1: We're going to calm this down. We realize this is excessive,
Speaker 1: we realize that that is an unfair comparison to make. No,
Speaker 1: they push even further on it. They seem to really
Speaker 1: think that somehow this is this is in the realm
Speaker 1: of sanity. Nine to eleven in January six should be
Speaker 1: talked about in the same category. But see, this is
Speaker 1: where you get a window into the mind of the Libs.
Speaker 1: They think the only real threats are here at home,
Speaker 1: and that means you external threats can be negotiated, bought off,
Speaker 1: send them a check from the taxpayers whatever, or maybe
Speaker 1: we deserve the external threat depends on which leftist you're
Speaker 1: talking to at any point in time. That's how they
Speaker 1: all see it. They only view or rather they view
Speaker 1: the only real threat to their power, to their agenda
Speaker 1: for this country. The commies in our midst believe that you,
Speaker 1: who stand for freedom, the constitution, and the limitations that
Speaker 1: we set on government to prevent tyranny, that is the
Speaker 1: real problem. You are the real problem, more so than
Speaker 1: any external threat, more so than the Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: of Vladimir Putin's Russia, the Mullahs and their lust for
Speaker 1: nukes in Iran, more so well than any of that.
Speaker 1: You are the problem. You are the threat. This is
Speaker 1: what they say, This is what they believe. You have
Speaker 1: to remember that it's irrational, it's crazy, it's disturbing. But
Speaker 1: some of them say it out of cynicism. Some know
Speaker 1: that that's crazy, but they go along with it. But
Speaker 1: a lot of leftists today, a lot of the real
Speaker 1: adherence to the leftist cause. For them, this is actually
Speaker 1: what they think about the country. January six, nine eleven,
Speaker 1: very similar in terms of the threat that we faced. Insinsanity.
Speaker 1: It really is. People are completely nuts. You know what
Speaker 1: else is crazy? Kamala Harris telling people the border is secure.
Speaker 1: We will get to that at a moment. And you
Speaker 1: ever want to invest in real estate, but you didn't
Speaker 1: know how to do it right. You've never done it before.
Speaker 1: That's how I was until a few years ago when
Speaker 1: I met my friends at Done for You real Estate.
Speaker 1: They're amazing. I have bought multiple houses now Done for
Speaker 1: Your Real Estate, and I'm going to be buying more
Speaker 1: because I'm building out a portfolio as a real estate investor. Now,
Speaker 1: these are great single family homes that give people a
Speaker 1: nice place to live in a good neighborhood. These are
Speaker 1: homes that are lived in by families, and you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's really just a fantastic process all around for
Speaker 1: building wealth for yourself and learning how to become a
Speaker 1: real estate investor. From start to finish. They took me
Speaker 1: through where I should be looking, what house I should buy,
Speaker 1: how I get the loan, how I get the management
Speaker 1: company and then the tenants in place, so then I
Speaker 1: get the free cash flow coming to me every month,
Speaker 1: and I'm paying down the mortgage while the house builds
Speaker 1: up equity and value over time. It's a great system.
Speaker 1: I am not just somebody endorsing this. I'm a client.
Speaker 1: I've been a client have Done for Your Real Estate
Speaker 1: for years, and I'm continuing and I'm gonna be buying
Speaker 1: another house here in the months ahead. Go to done
Speaker 1: for you Buck dot com. See how this works. By
Speaker 1: the way, this is for everyday folks. This is not
Speaker 1: super expensive. If it's not crazy, it's not you know.
Speaker 1: This is not for fat cats. Thurston how the third
Speaker 1: on his yachts. This is something that working people can do.
Speaker 1: You can get it. Get yourself started in real estate
Speaker 1: investing and build a cash producing asset for yourself. Gonna
Speaker 1: done for you, Buck dot com. That's done for you,
Speaker 1: Buck dot com to begin your real estate investment journey.
Speaker 1: All right, now we've got Kamala Harris. I mean this
Speaker 1: was remarkable because the border just by way of quick
Speaker 1: overview here, the border is the worst it has ever been. Okay,
Speaker 1: the board, and that is by the numbers. That's not
Speaker 1: just some subjective Oh I think the border could be
Speaker 1: more secure. No, no, no, the border is the most
Speaker 1: insecure it has been in the history or at least
Speaker 1: the modern history of this country. Five million have entered
Speaker 1: the United States illegally. While Joe Biden is in office,
Speaker 1: and we all know too. They change the policies around,
Speaker 1: They change things so that this would continue. They got
Speaker 1: rid of remain in Mexico entirely. That just happened pretty recently.
Speaker 1: They paused it and then they got rid of it.
Speaker 1: They want an overwhelm border patrol. The people who are
Speaker 1: showing up at the US Mexico border right now have
Speaker 1: said on camera, we've seen it that they are here
Speaker 1: because of Joe Biden. They are here because they believe
Speaker 1: they a Biden amnesty is coming. They know they won't
Speaker 1: be deported, they know they will be let in, and
Speaker 1: it is because of Joe Biden the Democrat Party. But
Speaker 1: Kamala wants to tell you that despite the numbers, the
Speaker 1: border is you'll hear it from her secure. Would you
Speaker 1: call the border secure? I think that there is no
Speaker 1: question that we have to do what the President and
Speaker 1: I asked Congress to do is the first request. We
Speaker 1: may pass a bill to create a pathway to citizenship.
Speaker 1: The border is secure, but we also have a broken
Speaker 1: immigration system, in particular over the last four years before
Speaker 1: we came in, and it needs to be fixed. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have two nine people across this border for the
Speaker 1: first time ever. You're confident this border secure? We have
Speaker 1: a secure border, and that that is a priority for
Speaker 1: any nation. Including hours in our administration. But there are
Speaker 1: still a lot of problems that we are trying to fix.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of problems. But the borders secure,
Speaker 1: but it's not secure, and we inherited the problems from Trump.
Speaker 1: But we're doing a great job. But it is a mess.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just this is just blather. This is nonsense,
Speaker 1: This is garbage. But what's she gonna say. Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: we're running an open border system because we want more
Speaker 1: Democrat voters when the big amnesty comes. Notice she says
Speaker 1: Congress needs to pass an amnesty. Now I know she's
Speaker 1: the borders are remember that she was put in charge
Speaker 1: of this by Biden. Then they just said, oh, she
Speaker 1: doesn't know what the heck she's doing. So we're gonna
Speaker 1: pretend like we didn't say that. But how is let's
Speaker 1: think this through for a second. How is it going
Speaker 1: to make things better to pass a massive amnesty which
Speaker 1: I'm telling you it is at least twenty million. They
Speaker 1: say it's twelve million. Now no, no, no, it's at
Speaker 1: least twenty million illegals in the United States. When you
Speaker 1: look at the real numbers and the real data, it
Speaker 1: might be twenty five or thirty million. I don't know that,
Speaker 1: but it's it's millions more than you have been told
Speaker 1: that we are all told the official number is all
Speaker 1: the time. So it's at least twenty million. And so
Speaker 1: you're going to give twenty million people who came here
Speaker 1: illegally permanent right to stay under law, and then of
Speaker 1: course you're going to get them citizenship. And she thinks
Speaker 1: that's going to stop the illegal immigration into this country.
Speaker 1: Think about that for a second. I mean, it says
Speaker 1: though we can't determine whether they're so dumb they believe
Speaker 1: this or they're so dishonest that they will just lie
Speaker 1: to you in this way. That is, it's apparent that
Speaker 1: this is bullcrap. They are what they're saying to you
Speaker 1: about the border, what Kamala Harris is saying is bullcrap.
Speaker 1: It just is. And anyone who knows anything about the
Speaker 1: US Mexican border understands that. But Democrats also know that
Speaker 1: on the polling, this is an area of real weakness
Speaker 1: for them. This is something that is going to be
Speaker 1: a major problem for them, because the Republican Party is
Speaker 1: far better on immigration. According to huge majority sixty to
Speaker 1: seventy percent of the American people depending on the polling
Speaker 1: and the question. So this is not a right left issue.
Speaker 1: This is a center independence all the way to the
Speaker 1: right issue. And even some Democrats on this issue are
Speaker 1: a break with the Democrat Party. So it's important to
Speaker 1: see that there's also this Fetterman as election in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Want to talk about for a moment here, let's understand
Speaker 1: that Fetterman is a buffoon. It has recently come out
Speaker 1: more in the press. There were this has been reported
Speaker 1: in the past, but that was in the Democrat primary,
Speaker 1: and now they're hoping everybody forgets about this. That Fetterman
Speaker 1: was involved in an incident in twenty thirteen where there
Speaker 1: was what he said was gunfire. Here do we actually
Speaker 1: we have an old old here's an old news clip
Speaker 1: from twenty thirteen describing what happened in this incident where
Speaker 1: Fetterman falsely here's gunfire, it wasn't gunfire, and then drove
Speaker 1: in his truck and pulled a gun out on an
Speaker 1: unarmed black man who had done nothing, had committed no crime,
Speaker 1: had nothing to do with anything. And Fetterman wants, ever
Speaker 1: n act like this was no big deal. Watch and
Speaker 1: I heard approximately a dozen or more what clearly sounding
Speaker 1: like assault rifle gunshots go off. Mayor John Fetterman says
Speaker 1: he rushed his son inside, called nine one one, and
Speaker 1: took off in his truck after a masked man in
Speaker 1: black he saw running, But Chris mairas the man Fetterman confronted,
Speaker 1: turns out to be an innocent jogger who police say
Speaker 1: had no weapon. There wasn't any assault rifle shots. It
Speaker 1: was bottle rockets behind the library. Mayor Fetterman did have
Speaker 1: a weapon, a twenty gage a shotgun in the under
Speaker 1: the back seat of my truck, which I pulled out
Speaker 1: and I showed to just say, look, we're gonna wait
Speaker 1: here and we're gonna get this all sorted out. When
Speaker 1: the police arrived, the eros and the mayor tell very
Speaker 1: different stories. He says, Fetterman followed me into North Braddock
Speaker 1: and pulled a shotgun and aimed it at my chest.
Speaker 1: Did you point the shotgun at him? No? I did not.
Speaker 1: I pointed it, you know, a way, so he would
Speaker 1: see that I was armed, But I did not point
Speaker 1: it at him. In fact, I didn't even have a
Speaker 1: round chambered or the remove the safety at that point.
Speaker 1: So he pointed a gun out a black guy who
Speaker 1: had done nothing at all, nothing, He was just jogging,
Speaker 1: and Fetterman now tells everybody, oh, I didn't know he
Speaker 1: was black. Really, that's that's that's that's supposed to fly,
Speaker 1: and that he didn't have a round of the chamber.
Speaker 1: So it's all, okay, look, this guy is a buffoon. Okay,
Speaker 1: Federman's a buffoon. It's obvious he wears giant schlumpy hoodies
Speaker 1: because yeah, that's that just shows he's he's a union guy,
Speaker 1: a working man. Meanwhile, his family pays his bills, his
Speaker 1: parents pay for his house. But he's a working man
Speaker 1: who knows, you know what it is. Roll up the sleeves,
Speaker 1: get your hands dirty. You know. It's so condescending, it's
Speaker 1: so ridiculous. And that's before we even talked about the
Speaker 1: fact that he clearly obviously has some major cognitive issues
Speaker 1: at work. Here, my friends, I mean, this was he
Speaker 1: did a rally, and I think a big part of
Speaker 1: the rally was supposed to be that he is not
Speaker 1: um still suffering from the effects of his severe stroke
Speaker 1: which almost almost took his life. And it was a
Speaker 1: very serious stroke. And this is what he sounds like
Speaker 1: on stage. Now, let's play this clip of Federman at
Speaker 1: his rally where this is what it actually this is
Speaker 1: the real audio. Watch. It's such the most important race
Speaker 1: for the Senate here for twenty two. We have to
Speaker 1: replace Hi, Tommy. Senator Tommy was not very nice to me.
Speaker 1: He Hi too. Mey is a miracle. I mean, do
Speaker 1: you remember the Teddy Ruxpin dolls from the eighties. There
Speaker 1: were these bears that that had a that had a
Speaker 1: little battery you put in them. This sound. He sounds
Speaker 1: like a Teddy Ruxpan doll that's got the batteries failing.
Speaker 1: You know, it sort of starts, starts and stops and
Speaker 1: then keeps going. And then this guy's gonna be United
Speaker 1: States senator. I mean, you know, the United States Senate
Speaker 1: votes on you know, who's gonna be in the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: who's gonna be in the Federal badge? What federal laws
Speaker 1: can pass? Declarations of war though we don't want to
Speaker 1: do that anymore. Do we just kind of send over
Speaker 1: the troops and no declarations of war? But this big stuff,
Speaker 1: and he's going to be the guy. I saw some
Speaker 1: ridiculous poll that said, oh, he's up thirteen points on
Speaker 1: doctor Roz. Give me a break. It's ridiculous. That's actually
Speaker 1: a perfect transition to this other thing. I want every
Speaker 1: to be very aware of going into the spinterm election,
Speaker 1: and that is the polls are all skewed for Democrats.
Speaker 1: Everything you're seeing, it's all meant to be a propaganda tool.
Speaker 1: And even the New York Times had a story out
Speaker 1: looking at the numbers, which anyone can look at these numbers,
Speaker 1: but they're analyzing them because I think it's so apparent. Now,
Speaker 1: guess what, when you look at what happened in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty versus what happened in twenty sixteen, all of the
Speaker 1: polls showed favoritism for all the Biden always somehow is
Speaker 1: ahead in general in the polls right, meaning that he's
Speaker 1: ahead of where he actually should be based on what
Speaker 1: the real numbers are. They had this this chart out.
Speaker 1: It showed in Wisconsin they had Biden twenty twenty up ten,
Speaker 1: and that compared to twenty sixteen, with the margin of
Speaker 1: actual error they had in the twenty sixteen election, it
Speaker 1: should be up for it was up four, and the
Speaker 1: actual result was Biden one by less than one less
Speaker 1: than one percentage point. Michigan Biden up eight in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: What had Biden actually win by three? Nevada Biden up six?
Speaker 1: What had Biden actually win by two? Pennsylvania Biden up five?
Speaker 1: What had Biden actually win by one? Good on the list. Somehow,
Speaker 1: every time everywhere, Democrats end up based on the polling,
Speaker 1: with a bigger lead than they actually have. Now, I
Speaker 1: think this is meant meant to increase enthusiasm for the
Speaker 1: Democrat candidate. Right, if someone's up by three points, you
Speaker 1: think your guy's gonna win, and you're gonna go vote
Speaker 1: for that guy because you know it's close enough that
Speaker 1: it matters. That's why they don't say, oh, they're up
Speaker 1: by fifteen points, that's crazy, and then people would know
Speaker 1: the polls are bullcrap and they don't work. But this
Speaker 1: is what everyone has to be aware of, that they're
Speaker 1: trying to manipulate perception to the benefit of Democrat candidates
Speaker 1: with these polls. Now, maybe it's just some bias that
Speaker 1: the pollsters have that they're not able to figure out.
Speaker 1: But remember, all all posters are really supposed to do
Speaker 1: is get it right, and they always get it wrong.
Speaker 1: Favoring Democrats. That's an indicator if something isn't it, that's
Speaker 1: about more than just maybe they made a mistake here
Speaker 1: or there. There's something systemic, you could say in all
Speaker 1: of this, there's something much more, something much more problematic
Speaker 1: at work. So don't don't let them. I think they're
Speaker 1: running suppression polls at some level. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: they're trying to make people think, you know, oh, also
Speaker 1: it's all over because of abortion. Oh it's all over
Speaker 1: for Republicans because of abortion, or oh it's all over
Speaker 1: for the first Senate candidates like Masters and Oz And no,
Speaker 1: it's not. These are very winnable racist and you and
Speaker 1: I both know that if Democrats lose the House, and
Speaker 1: let's say they lose two or three Senate seats and
Speaker 1: you've got a nice little Republican majority, the Biden agenda
Speaker 1: is over if they If they have in this midterm election,
Speaker 1: Republicans take the House and the Senate, you effectively just
Speaker 1: see the country move into a general election posture with politics.
Speaker 1: That's where we go. Then it's all about who's going
Speaker 1: to be president, because Biden's not getting a darned thing done.
Speaker 1: If you have Republicans take the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1: The Senate alone will be able to push through you know,
Speaker 1: bad candidates to hire office and a whole bunch of things.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's what's really going on here, friends, So
Speaker 1: they get the polls wrong in favor of Democrats all
Speaker 1: the time. These races for Republicans are closer than they
Speaker 1: seem right now based on the polling, and they are winnable.
Speaker 1: Republicans need to focus focus in on the messaging and
Speaker 1: people out there watching this, listening to this right now
Speaker 1: need to get out there and vote. There's the latest
Speaker 1: news about Brad Stelter who lost his job, lost his
Speaker 1: perch at CNN where he used to do the bidding
Speaker 1: of a fellow nab Jeff Zucker, and now he is
Speaker 1: going to Harvard. He's going to be teaching a class
Speaker 1: focused on threats to democracy. You know what a threat
Speaker 1: to democracy is as far as Stelter is concerned, what
Speaker 1: happens where they run out of Boston crab pies. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be at Harvard if they run out of Boston
Speaker 1: crab pies at the faculty loud, there's a threat to democracy.
Speaker 1: There is a broader point here though, that I have
Speaker 1: to make You can be a total clown with a
Speaker 1: failed show who never should have had a show in
Speaker 1: the first place. But he was Jeff Zucker's little mini
Speaker 1: me and see and you'll get taken care of. The
Speaker 1: Left takes care of their fighters. It doesn't matter how incompetent,
Speaker 1: how dishonest. They always look at someone like Elliot Spitzer. Okay,
Speaker 1: that guy got a show at CNN. He got a
Speaker 1: show at CNN after he was fired in disgrace from
Speaker 1: being the governor of New York, where he was, you know,
Speaker 1: paying prostitutes after he'd been the Attorney General of the
Speaker 1: state of New York arresting people for frequent deed prostitutes,
Speaker 1: the Johns, he was going after the Joms. The guy
Speaker 1: is such a scumbag, and CNN gave him a show
Speaker 1: because he's a lib. They take care of their libs.
Speaker 1: That's what they do. Now. CNN took Selters show away
Speaker 1: the new management at CNN. So what happens Harvard steps in?
Speaker 1: You imagine class, The real threat to democracy is that
Speaker 1: I have to lug or have a show where I
Speaker 1: get to do the bidding of the left. Yeah, more
Speaker 1: for you tomorrow, Team appreciate it. You joining me for
Speaker 1: the expanded show. Please tell people about it. I need
Speaker 1: you to help spread the word about the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast, So tell everybody about it. Share it on
Speaker 1: your social pages. Please help me get the word out.
Speaker 1: We're doing longer shows now longer form. Shield's high