1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:02,080 Speaker 1: I was gonna ask you whether or not do you 2 00:00:02,080 --> 00:00:04,960 Speaker 1: think we are at peak rates? But is the better 3 00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 1: question is I don't know how low do we get 4 00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:07,480 Speaker 1: in the next cycle. 5 00:00:08,720 --> 00:00:12,880 Speaker 2: Well, you know, the one thing I'm confident about is 6 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:18,160 Speaker 2: that I don't know, but I think that rates may 7 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 2: go a little higher, but not terribly much higher or not. 8 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:28,520 Speaker 2: There's substantial progress being made against inflation, and that's what matters. 9 00:00:29,040 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 2: The economy is producing mixed signals, but at least inflation 10 00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 2: is well. 11 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:35,640 Speaker 3: Down from the peak and. 12 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,720 Speaker 2: Things are performing well, So you would say, I would 13 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 2: say that maybe a little higher or maybe not. 14 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 1: You've been known not to give your macro forecast, although 15 00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: very recently you've made something similar, which is the thesis 16 00:00:53,560 --> 00:00:55,920 Speaker 1: is that the sea change has come, Yes, and that 17 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 1: the next ten years will. 18 00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 3: Be very different, very different from the last. 19 00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:01,240 Speaker 4: Yeah and underscored premister, And yeah, what do I do 20 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:02,000 Speaker 4: with that information? 21 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 2: Well, if you came into this business since nineteen eighty, 22 00:01:07,959 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 2: which covers almost everybody, you've only seen either declining interest 23 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 2: rates or ultra low interest rates. You have to go 24 00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 2: back into the seventies to have seen a different climate, 25 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:27,080 Speaker 2: which I fortunately did do, and I believe that this 26 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:31,959 Speaker 2: monotonic decline of interest rates is over. Number one, there's 27 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 2: not much room for a further decline. And number two, 28 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:38,680 Speaker 2: I think the FED probably understands that it kept rates 29 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:41,319 Speaker 2: too low too long and that there was a negative consequence, 30 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 2: certainly in terms of inflation. 31 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 3: So you know, I think the important thing is that. 32 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 2: And I said in my memoc change, which was published 33 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 2: in December, that I don't believe in forecasts, especially my own, 34 00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 2: but I'm willing to say that for the next decade, 35 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 2: the FED funds are is more likely to be between 36 00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 2: two and four than between. 37 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:05,400 Speaker 3: Zero and two. That's as far as I can go. 38 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 2: But and I only say that directionally to indicate my 39 00:02:11,240 --> 00:02:14,400 Speaker 2: belief that the period of ultra low rates is over. 40 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:18,920 Speaker 1: And let's say, let's assume that's correct. Do I have 41 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,079 Speaker 1: any business than being in the equity market? What does 42 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 1: it mean for not so much investment strategies, But you 43 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 1: know where you want to part the bulk of your money, 44 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,839 Speaker 1: because equities have been rewarded substantially, Yes, over the last 45 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:29,920 Speaker 1: fifteen Yes. 46 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:35,800 Speaker 2: Look, as Warren Buffett alway says, you don't want to 47 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:38,799 Speaker 2: desert the US or the US economy, or I think 48 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:42,360 Speaker 2: the corporate sector, and and you know the S and 49 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 2: P has given a ten return every year on average 50 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:48,359 Speaker 2: for the last century. 51 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,400 Speaker 3: You don't want to give up that. Right now, it 52 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:52,160 Speaker 3: looks like. 53 00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 2: You can get equity type returns from credit a little 54 00:02:56,400 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 2: below ten for what we call liquid credit, tradable every day, 55 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 2: and well above ten perhaps for private credit, which is 56 00:03:05,440 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: not tradable. The point is that you know, twenty one 57 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:16,440 Speaker 2: months ago today HYO bonds yielded in the nines. Twenty 58 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 2: one months ago they were in the fours. 59 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:20,080 Speaker 3: When they're in the. 60 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 2: Nines, you can invest in them with high expectations, competitive 61 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:31,079 Speaker 2: with equities and more than sufficient to meet most organizations needs. 62 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 2: Private credit returning in the low double digits or more. Well, 63 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 2: that's obviously very very competitive, But you know, equities, or 64 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 2: what equities have that credit doesn't have is the ability 65 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:51,040 Speaker 2: to surprise on the upside. And you find some great, great, 66 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 2: great growing companies in your portfolio, you'll be sorry if 67 00:03:56,840 --> 00:03:57,720 Speaker 2: you weeded them out. 68 00:03:57,880 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 1: Although the other side to that is credit is always 69 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 1: so high year up the capital structure. 70 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 4: That's an obligation too. 71 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,440 Speaker 1: So my question there would be, you know, for longer 72 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,000 Speaker 1: term investors, let's say have they have to match your 73 00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 1: liabilities for thirty years. 74 00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:10,839 Speaker 4: Insurance companies come inline as well. 75 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 1: Yes, is the proposition fixed income and not equity markets 76 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:19,600 Speaker 1: because equities tended to give you longer term returns more consistently. 77 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 3: Right with variation. 78 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 2: But in credit you can't tie up anything for thirty years. 79 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:30,359 Speaker 2: You know, a long maturity nowadays is seven years or 80 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:34,599 Speaker 2: something like that. So you can invest today and get 81 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:38,480 Speaker 2: a rate for seven years, but then you have no 82 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:41,599 Speaker 2: way of knowing today what rate you'll reinvest in seven 83 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:43,919 Speaker 2: years from now. So this is why we don't go 84 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:47,360 Speaker 2: one hundred zero or zero one hundred. That's why there 85 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:49,600 Speaker 2: will always be a place for equities. But I think 86 00:04:49,760 --> 00:04:52,360 Speaker 2: now there's a much better place for credit than there 87 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 2: has been at most times in the last fourteen years. 88 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,239 Speaker 4: Would you go above fifty percent? Would you say majority 89 00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 4: is at So the question is the. 90 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:09,039 Speaker 2: Biggest potential catch in becoming a credit investor is that 91 00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 2: you reduce the likelihood of downside, but you give up 92 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:16,479 Speaker 2: the upside of equities. So the question is how do 93 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 2: you and your organization feel about that trade off? If 94 00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:21,600 Speaker 2: I say to you, I think I can get you 95 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 2: nine to ten through a balanced portfolio of credit. 96 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 3: Over the long term quite dependently. 97 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:38,719 Speaker 2: If you say that's great, I love that, maybe you 98 00:05:38,839 --> 00:05:42,040 Speaker 2: do seventy five percent of your portfolio. If you say 99 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 2: I want to still make sure that I have exposure 100 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 2: to the upside of equities. 101 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:50,880 Speaker 3: Then you say maybe fifty or forty. 102 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 1: Here's my question, though this is a relatively new asked 103 00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:55,719 Speaker 1: clay yes or operation credit. 104 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:57,760 Speaker 4: What happens when you get a recession. 105 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: I can't think of a recession since this, this whole begins, 106 00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:02,280 Speaker 1: So what happens now? 107 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:02,680 Speaker 3: That's right? 108 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,360 Speaker 2: I mean private credit as an assa class really has 109 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,360 Speaker 2: existed since twenty eleven, and it hasn't been tested by 110 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,279 Speaker 2: a real recession. We had one bad quarter in twenty 111 00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:14,720 Speaker 2: twenty because of an external reason, the pandemic, not internal 112 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 2: economic reasons. 113 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:19,280 Speaker 3: So you know it all. 114 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:22,600 Speaker 2: It's gonna vary because some people do good credit analysis, 115 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 2: some people. 116 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 3: Do bad credit analysis. 117 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:27,440 Speaker 2: The ones who do good credit analysis perceive the risks 118 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 2: accurately and demand a commensurate margin of safety, should do 119 00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 2: quite well, and they may have a default rate of 120 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:40,040 Speaker 2: a couple percent the year in their portfolio and lose 121 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 2: half their money. In those situations. Well, two, if you 122 00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 2: have two percent of fault and you lose half your money. 123 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 2: You lost one percent, obviously not a significant number, bad 124 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 2: credit analysts. Bad managers will have higher default risks, race rates, 125 00:06:56,480 --> 00:07:00,839 Speaker 2: and lower recovery, so they could lose several per cent, 126 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:03,280 Speaker 2: which would make it an unsuccessful strategy,