WEBVTT - Maybe Mitt Isn't The Worst 0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:15.960 You are entering the freedom hunch. Looks like Trump does 0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.360 so far have the votes. Biden won't answer if he'd 0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.400 pack the Supreme Court mitt Romney looks like a yes. 0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.279 The CDC changes some COVID guidance who should get the 0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:31.160 vaccine first? And an NYPD officer spying for China. Buck 0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:36.960 Sexton coding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. 0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.520 Make no mistake, American Great, You're a great American again. 0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:48.519 This is the buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, I 0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.680 can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try 0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:57.560 doing that sometimes. No welcome friends to the bucks Sexton Show, 0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.480 and honor is always to have you here with me. Now, 0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.679 let's get right to it. Looks as of today, Blake 0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.880 Trump has the votes in the Senate to get a 0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:14.480 Supreme Court nominee confirmed and through to the seat recently 0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:20.399 left vacant by Ruth Bader Ginsburg's departure. So now we 0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.480 have to figure out what are the Democrats planning next? 0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.759 Because right now I understand the inclination would be for 0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:33.279 all of us to say, okay, the Republicans have every 0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.040 right to do this, as much as Democrats whine about it. 0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:41.920 Doesn't matter. They have a constitutional not only clear designation 0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.160 for this, they have an obligation. I think that's a 0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.240 better way of putting it. Here is the Vice President 0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.160 saying just that play fourteen. President Trump believes that he 0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.000 has an obligation under the Constitution of the United States 0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.800 to put forward to nominique for the Supreme Court. There've 0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640 been twenty nine times that there have been vacancies since 0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.120 George Washington through Barack Obama. In all twenty nine cases, 0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.760 the president has made a nomination to the Supreme Court 0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.639 during an election year. And President Trump believes that it's 0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.760 his responsibility and his duty to do that. Again, the 0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:21.280 Senate's role is to advise and consent, and we're working 0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.040 already with the Republican leadership in the Senate to make 0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.200 arrangements for the process to move forward. But we believe, 0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:34.880 judging from history, I believe Justice Ginsberg was confirmed within 0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:40.280 forty three days of her nominations. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor 0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.880 in less time than that. So it's been done in 0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.639 less time. It's been done many times under the same circumstances, 0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.320 and there's no rule, there's no law, there's nothing to 0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.520 prevent it. There's not even a president to prevent it. 0:02:55.760 --> 0:03:00.360 So the Libs are flailing right now. They're trying to 0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.960 come up with some argument that will turn the tide 0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.720 in favor for them, and they're not succeeding because we 0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.520 do have the ability to go back and look at 0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.760 what's happened in the past, and we also understand that 0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.880 there's the obligation of politics here too. Why do we 0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.240 vote for the president as Republicans? Why do we vote 0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.960 for these various senators if when they finally have the 0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:27.400 opportunity to do what they have been promising to do, 0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.320 they don't do it. How could we think they have 0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.359 the courage of their convictions if they refuse to take 0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:38.480 the opportunities that come to them to fulfill promises. I mean, 0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.960 it would be a choice to not fulfill this promise 0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.480 to Republican voters. Why would they do that out of 0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.040 some misplaced sense of fair play? I gotta tell you, 0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.920 I had been thinking that mitt Romney would find the 0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.880 first opportunity possible to try and back out of this 0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.720 just because of spite against Trump. But it seems perhaps 0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.680 mit Romney recognizes that there's no real argument here. There's 0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.760 no real argument against what the president's trying to do. 0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:15.520 There's the only pseudo arguments, bad faith arguments. I saw 0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.360 a piece by never Trumper's David French and Jonah Goldberg 0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.120 making the rounds about how what's best for our republic 0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.080 would be to cave to Democrat demands here under the 0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.080 promise that they then won't pack the Supreme Court, as 0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.640 if that's a concession to us. First of all, if 0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.840 anyone believes that Democrats would keep a promise not to 0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.320 pack the Supreme Court based upon this nomination battle, they 0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.120 probably also believed that Jesse Smolette was attacked by two 0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.120 Maga hat wearers on in Chicago at one o'clock in 0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.599 the morning yelling this is Maga country. If you believe one, 0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.160 you probably believe the other, which is not a good 0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:04.039 indication of one's intelligence. Democrats will break their word, all miss. 0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.440 Democrats were all the opposing side of the table in 0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.000 twenty sixteen. They did not or twenty fifteen, No, sorry, 0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.160 twenty sixteen, they did not care. They simply it doesn't 0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.239 matter to them that they're all on the record telling 0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.880 us that we have of course, the president has this 0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.640 power in election. Of course you should be able to. 0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.960 That was when they thought they could strong arm us 0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.479 into going with Merrick Garland. That was when they believed 0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.440 if they had the media and enough enough whiny law 0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.080 professors and former prosecutors and other people that were supposed 0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.479 to revere. And I don't know why, but if we 0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.400 had enough of that, they believed that we would be 0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.760 able to we would cave and they'd get what they want. 0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.359 But it didn't happen. Didn't happen. And Mitch McConnell deserves 0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.320 a lot of credit because they tried the pressure campaign, 0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.919 then they tried all the stuff that they're making in 0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.760 terms of arguments now plus now you got to add 0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.479 to they're camping outside of people's homes. No sleep for 0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:08.520 Lindsey Graham, no sleep for Mitch McConnell. Looking for weak 0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.480 links in this chain. I thought Romney would be a 0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.040 weak links. So far, we'll see. I'm not. I'm not 0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.159 giving Romney an at a boy until we see whether 0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.520 or not he actually does his duty here to the 0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.960 voters of Utah, KNRS a great station out in Salt 0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.880 Lake City having added us to their lineup. I know 0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.240 the folks in Utah, not all of them love Trump. 0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.360 A lot of them do not all of them love Trump, 0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.280 but they do expect somebody who is a Republican Senator 0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.000 from the great state of Utah to support this most 0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.160 important of tasks for conservatism, for constitutionalism, and the Republican 0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:49.520 Party getting us a judge that will truly tip the 0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.839 balance away from what it has been for decades. You see, 0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.880 Democrats have gotten a little too, a little too smug 0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:01.279 and emotionally and intellectually complacent when it comes to the court. 0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.680 They're so used to at this point just being able 0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.440 to count on the court coming up with nonsense with 0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.160 legislation by thought of a bunch of lawyers who have 0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.520 been appointed as judges. And Ginsburg was one of the 0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.200 best examples of that. I mean, Ginsburg was using the 0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.920 Supreme Court as a super legislature, which is not what 0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.440 it is supposed to be. But it was always the 0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:28.840 stopgap against legislation. It was a stopgap against representative form 0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.600 of the representative form of government that we have our republic, 0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.520 that even if the people wanted something, voted for someone, 0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.679 and that leader then tried to execute on the promise, 0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.800 the lib Supreme Court would step in and say nope, 0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.600 we see a different thing. Here we see a right 0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.880 that no one else had been able to figure out 0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.520 in two hundred years. We see an interpretation of this 0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.920 language that's not English. But who cares. We make it 0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.640 up as we go along. That's what they've been doing. 0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.400 In fact, Mitt Romney correct when he points out, Look, 0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.160 Mit had his good moments back in the day. He 0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.240 crushed Obama in that first presidential debate. Of course, Obama 0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.600 went on to win, but it was an embarrassing performance 0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:19.280 for Barack Obama. Everybody knew it. And Mitt Romney does 0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.000 have his capabilities. I wish he hadn't marched with BLM. 0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.320 That was the lame, cowardly move, but he did. But 0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.520 here he is at least understanding what's going on with 0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.480 liberals and the court and their perception that what has 0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:37.679 been will always be not the case Play seventeen. Well, 0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.160 I think it's straightforward in terms of the qui qualifications 0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.080 you look for, which is someone who is an expert 0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.760 of the law, someone who has a record of fairness 0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.520 and judgment that you think is consistent with the law. 0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.440 I prefer choosing those folks who are, if you will, 0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.400 stric constructionists mean that they look at the law itself 0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.160 and the Constitution as opposed to sort of looking into 0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.240 the sky and pulling out ideas if they think be 0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.280 more appropriate than either of the law or the Constitution. 0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.640 So I recognize that we may have a court which 0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.240 has more of a conservative bent than it's had over 0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.520 the last few decades. But my liberal friends have over 0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.000 many decades gotten very used to the idea of having 0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.960 a liberal court, and that's not written in the stars. 0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.600 And I know that a lot of people are saying, gosh, 0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.920 we don't want that change. I understand the energy associated 0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.920 with that perspective, but it's also appropriate for nation, which is, 0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.200 if you will, center right to have a court which 0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.719 reflects center right points of view, which again are not 0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.199 changing the law from what it states, but instead following 0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.320 the law and following the Constitution. What Mit says here 0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.439 is correct. Truth is truth, whether it comes from it 0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.680 Rami or anybody else. The Libs just believe that there 0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.640 is some sanctified, imaginary right to always have a liberal 0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.280 leading Supreme Court that will give them what they want. 0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.400 I know, people say, oh, but Buck, what about what 0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.400 about you know Bush Gore in two thousand, Oh, you 0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.480 mean the court case where the swing vote right, this 0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.920 is where were the swing vote was. Like, guys, you 0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.360 can't just pick districts that are Democrat majority districts and 0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.000 only recount those and pick out the ones where you 0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:17.800 think you might be able to harvest more votes and 0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.240 not to recounts in other places in Florida where there 0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.240 have been equal Probably they were trying to scam the system, 0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.000 and it was obvious. But on all the major social 0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:32.160 issues and most notably abortion, gay marriage as well among others, 0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.439 the courts left lean has been obvious and has been unbroken. 0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.200 But we may enter a new era now and one 0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.200 in which we will see whether liberals are willing to 0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.800 abide by the rules that they were pretending were sacrosank 0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.160 when they were going in their favor. Let's all be 0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.600 very clear about this. Democrats are effectively at this point 0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.360 already telling the American people, if we don't have a 0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.240 Supreme Court that we can count on on the big 0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.640 social issues that are very emotional for us and the 0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.800 drive a lot of the Democrat Party's power, if we 0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.480 don't have a Supreme court that will do that, we 0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:14.240 will break down, subvert and destroy the system. They're they're 0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.800 pretty explicit about this. I mean, here's Don Lemon, who 0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:23.360 is sometimes too dumb to be subtle or to obscure 0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.840 his intent, but he's definitely a big lib. Here's what 0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.880 he's saying over at CNN play ten, everybody, We're gonna 0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:31.840 have to blow up the entire system. And you know 0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.200 what we're gonna have to do. I don't know. You 0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:34.840 know what we're gonna Yes, what you have to do, 0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.800 you just got to honestly, from what your closing argument is, 0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:39.760 you're can have to get rid of the electoral college 0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.160 because the people, I don't see it, because the minority 0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.000 in this country decides who the judges are, and they 0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.520 decide who the president is is. They need a constitutional 0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.520 amendment to do that. And if Democrats, if Joe Biden wins, 0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.800 Democrats can stack the courts and they can do that 0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.720 amendment and they can get it past well, you need 0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.320 to third in the Congress and three quarters of the 0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.240 state legislature. They may be able to do that. Yeah. Yeah, 0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.800 about as big a waste of time as the Convention 0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.160 of the States project to talk about. By the way, 0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.720 but here we are, here we are. That's what Democrats 0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.439 are promising that they're going to be able to get 0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.680 a constitutional amendment that they're going to change the whole system. 0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.960 They're going to change the whole system such that it 0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.560 comports with their desires. But we've listened to the system 0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:33.000 for a very long time. Right, we've been obeying. We 0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.360 who are pro life. We've said, okay, I mean, this 0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.200 is the law, even though it's immoral and wrong. But 0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.120 I we're gonna We're not gonna break the law, subvert 0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.040 the law. I mean, people aren't going to advocate The 0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.439 Republican Party doesn't advocate for you know, shutting down with 0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.360 force the way that BLM does, shutting down with for 0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.000 his businesses that they don't like, shutting down abortion clinics 0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.679 that the right has not been doing that. We've said, okay, 0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.760 this is the law. That's work to change the law. 0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.120 And now we see the little tyrannical side of the 0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:14.439 Democrats where the law is just an impediment to their desires. 0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.880 They don't care when the system went against the right, 0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.880 what did the right do. Let's rebuild, Let's let's win elections, 0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.880 and when the time comes and we have the legal 0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.760 right and authority to make certain decisions, will make different decisions. 0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.160 The Democrat view is when we have the power, that's 0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.280 what we do. When you have the power, we shut 0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.280 down the system and make sure that you can't use it. 0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.120 And people want to talk about good faith and fair 0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.280 play with them, I mean, are Goldberg and David French 0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.600 are they No, they're just never trumpers who have boxed 0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.640 themselves in to intellectually ridiculous positions. Now now, among many 0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.120 other never trumpers who have done the same thing, a 0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.240 lot of them are part of this Lincoln Project garbage. 0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.880 Now it's always you know, they can conservative case for 0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.400 a portion, the conservative case for undermining everything you believe. 0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.240 This is what never trumpers have been turned into it. 0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:11.160 It's quite sad, actually, it's really rather pathetic. That's where 0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.680 it is. That's what we see happening. They are telling 0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.880 you if they don't get their way, they're going to 0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:23.040 break things. They're going to disrespect, undermine and alter the 0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.080 system itself. They're going to change the rules of the game. 0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.160 They're not going to try to win the game with 0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.120 fair play. This is the Democrat approach to everything in 0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.840 politics now, but particularly around a judicial nomination like this. 0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.160 This is the same thing as saying Okay, you know 0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:46.200 you have a four quarters to win a football game. 0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.760 We're going to change it and now it's going to 0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.160 be whoever can get the most field goals in the 0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.400 first two quarters that's the winner. Well that's a totally 0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.520 different game. Oh what are you Oh, that's what they're 0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.000 gonna do. Or they're just going to pay off the 0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.240 refs and just openly cheat. Whatever they have to do, 0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.080 they will do. That's what you're seeing, which is why 0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.120 I want to tell you right now this pause where 0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:14.680 it feels like, wow, Romney is being sane, which is okay. 0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.280 Look when it happens, I'll say it's a good thing, 0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.760 and you know, credit where it's due. Truth is truth, 0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.320 credit where it's due. Two principles on this show. If 0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.840 Romney casts the right vote here, we're gonna say, hey, 0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.640 high Fivedmit Romney for not being a total sellout coward. 0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.160 Good job. But I don't think we can get there yet. 0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.880 Well obviously it hasn't happened. But I don't want us 0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.080 to become complacent at all. Remember the analogy I use right, 0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.520 this is a rabid squirrel that we're injecting meth into. 0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.840 No one really knows how this is gonna turn out. 0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.400 This is gonna be crazy. The Libs aren't going to 0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.160 just quietly allow this process to play out. They're gonna 0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.000 go full of Lynsky on this. Yeah, they have no 0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.360 parliamentary procedure to play they have no means of stopping this. 0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.280 It would be like trying to stop a presidential pardon. 0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.760 I mean, the president's allowed to pardon, we wants to pardon. 0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520 But they're going to go to that level of what 0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.080 if we take the pen out of his hand, What 0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.560 if we don't allow him to you know, write it down? 0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.920 What if what if we prevent the president from you know, 0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.240 That's what we're going to see. I believe that they're 0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:25.560 going to physically block members of Congress from being able 0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.920 to hold a session. I think that they're going to 0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.520 do things that Right now, if you set out loud, 0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.000 people would call you a someone who's being you know, 0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.160 worrying too much, who's being hyperbolic. No, I think that's 0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.240 what we're going through. I don't know what it is yet, 0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.600 but always leave room for crazy, my friends, I've been 0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.560 saying that to you for many years. Always leave room 0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.240 for crazy. And these Democrats are completely nuts and will 0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.040 do anything that they think will be successful to stop 0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:02.640 this Supreme Court nomination. You're in the Freedom Heart. This 0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:09.560 is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, the Democrats are 0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.200 going to hang together, and I think the American people 0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.960 would be very interested to know that is it asking 0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:19.360 too much to have Republicans actually live up to their word? Already? 0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.520 Wec that Lindsay Graham. It's not that we see that, 0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.639 Mitch McConnell, it's not so Republicans can't be touched this 0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.919 to keep their word, and the American people should know 0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.520 that we will explore every tool that we Democrats have 0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:36.760 to keep Hitch McConnell from shoving this nominee down our fook. 0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:38.800 They're going to come up with stuff that you and 0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.360 I can't even think about right now because they're emotionally 0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:49.440 deranged over this. Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat George Stephanopoulos's wife, 0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.560 it was reported in Daily Mail, I forget her name, 0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.800 she's like a third third pier actress. Or was she 0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.560 cried for forty five five minutes? Obviously this was told 0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.359 of the press. Cried for forty five minutes with her 0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.800 whole family in the car when they heard Ruth Bader 0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:13.040 Ginsburg passed away. That's bizarre, that's not normal. You don't 0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.760 know this person, you don't love this person, give the 0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.000 relationship with her. You're gonna cry for forty five minutes 0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.640 with your whole family because a judge who we all 0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.359 know is really a political figure passes away at the 0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:32.479 age of eighty whatever it was. Really they think that's normal, folks, 0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.000 they think that's sane. Thanks for listening to the past. 0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.920 Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, 0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.600 or wherever you get your podcasts. Another rule for life, 0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.760 not just for politics, but for everything you do. Never 0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:56.000 take advice from your enemy about what's best for you. Okay, 0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.400 don't take advice from people who don't want to see 0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.240 your future your go well, who don't want to see 0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.639 you succeed. When they say, hey, you know what you 0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.919 should really do, Listen to that thing and do the 0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.640 other thing right, Listen to that thing that they're telling you, 0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.280 and then go back to whatever you know is a 0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.600 better option and feel even more confident in it. That's 0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.440 how you should feel about people like Nancy Pelosi coming 0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:28.520 out to tell you that this is bad politically for Republicans. 0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.680 It's gonna be like the twenty eighteen midterms. Right here 0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:37.400 here she is, Nancy Pelosi play. So people know that, 0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.199 and that's why the Republicans are rushing. They want to 0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.240 get it done so they can overturn the Affordable Care Act. 0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.760 And you know what, they're going to be paying this 0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.440 price for elections to come, elections to come. Everyone's looking 0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:56.719 at what makes a difference in these senatorial races. We'll see, 0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.359 But what they don't really understand is you're going to 0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:06.960 see two eighteen again and again and again. It could 0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.439 not be more ironclad. It could not be more clear 0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.240 to any of us who are paying attention to this 0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.000 that Nancy Pelosi telling Republicans that if they put through 0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.440 this Supreme Court justice, whoever it may be, we don't 0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:24.920 know yet. I think it's I think it is gonna 0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.440 be Amy Coney Barrett, but it could be wrong. But 0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.440 Pelosi telling you that this would be bad for Republicans 0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:40.240 is a is a one hundred percent certainty that Republicans 0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.959 will pay a terrible price if they don't do this, 0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.040 which we already knew anyway. But notice how shameless she is. 0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.000 Oh yeah, sure, it's gonna be so bad for this 0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.000 is just whining. Republicans. You're gonna lose forever if you 0:20:55.119 --> 0:21:00.240 do this thing. A promise. No, there were probably in 0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:05.800 party would be massacred in the next election if they 0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.119 didn't at least do everything they can. Now, when I 0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.280 say everything they can, I'm worried that. You know, Democrats 0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.720 are going to go to a whole other place that 0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.360 I can't even psychologically really get there. You, I'm like, how, 0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.960 Remember they were willing to lie about a man who 0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.199 was manifestly innocent of any wrongdoing. They were willing to 0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.080 read into the congressional record as Kamala Harris, the current 0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:37.000 vice presidential nominee, did unsubstantiated, completely outrageous and insane and 0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:44.880 obviously false gang rape, high school gang rape allegations about 0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.800 now Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. If you're willing to do that, 0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.240 you have no morality that will stop you from doing something. 0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.760 It's just a question of are you worried about the 0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.359 punishment for doing certain things illegal things, for example, open 0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.000 violence to stop this from happening. You know, one of 0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.679 the reasons why Democrats, I think wouldn't necessarily go the 0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.800 open violence route to keep the seat is because there 0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.000 are enough people who believe in the law law in 0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.040 order that they would be punished for that, because I 0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.640 do worry. I worry they're gonna be threats of violence. 0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.000 I'm sure they're already are against the very Spreme Court nominees, 0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.280 but that they'll become more intense and Republicans we do 0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.600 not do a good enough job of protecting our people 0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:36.200 who fall under this ring of hatred from the left. 0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:37.600 I mean, all of a sudden, it's like the eye 0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.280 of Soron pops up and is focused on one person 0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.040 on the right, and we all say, oh, you know, 0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.439 I hope they've got a nice personal security detail or 0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.919 something we do not do enough. Never happens in the left. 0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.919 When was the last time a prominent Democrat had a 0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.359 mob of morons outside his or her home shouting threats 0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.280 and epithet insanity over a political issue. We don't do that, 0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:08.320 they do. Look, not all political parties are created equal, 0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.480 my friends, or are equal. Not all of them are 0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.320 are similar in their and their aspirations, their morality, their 0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.560 culture of respect for rule of law, for open discourse, 0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.000 for human and individual freedom. They're not all the same, 0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:28.439 all right. You know, the the Bolsheviks winning in the 0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.920 Soviet Union was not just something that had to happen, 0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.760 and well, it would have been the same if anybody, No, 0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:35.800 it would not have been the same. If some other 0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.919 party had won, would have been better. Almost certainly. I 0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.960 don't see it's possible. It couldn't have been, right, you know, 0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.720 And then people and I don't like the Nazi analogies 0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.600 of Democrats to all the time, but you know, the 0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.399 Nazis were democratically elected. They cheated and threatened people and 0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:56.880 used coercion, but Nazis were democratically elected in Germany, so 0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.280 it's not like that's it, that's impossible. But they were 0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:05.160 clearly much more moral political options in Nazi in Germany 0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.439 before it became Nazi Germany. I'm just trying to tell you, folks, 0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.400 you know that when I say the Democrats have gone 0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.200 and saying and their party has really lost its way, 0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.160 I'm not exaggerating. I'm not saying it for attention. It's true. 0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.520 It's clear. Look at what is normal for them and 0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.840 it's not normal for us, and anybody can see it. 0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.000 Conservatives sit around saying, okay, what are the laws what 0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.879 really matters? How do we protect people, How do we 0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.600