WEBVTT - Ex-CIA Head Discusses Terrorism, Russia, & Intelligence Sharing

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Runt you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality,

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Be of a, mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch,

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>bring you insight from the best of economics, finance, investment,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. A

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to have with us here in our Bloomberg eleven

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three Ust to Stephen Roach. Stephen Roach, of course, said

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the former chairman of Morgan Stanley AGIA, former chief economist

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at Morgan Stanley, now senior lecturer at the Jackson Institute

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of Global Affairs at the Else School of Management. Uh,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we get this budget today, they'll be talk again of

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>growth expectations here in the US. You've been given some

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>thought to the expectations for growth more globally. Can we

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>start domestically and just to talk about what we've heard

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from mcmulvanny, the Office of Management Budget Director. He spoke

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday saying the days of being content with one point

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>nine percent growth have to be put behind us. All

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>well and good that he says that, is there any

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of that happening here in the near term in

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the US, Well, David, there's there's always a likelihood of

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>anything happening. But I think to push the button and

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go from two to three UH in a period where

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>productivity growth is still under pressure, where um you're not

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get any uplift from growth in the labor force,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very, very difficult to achieve. So

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think any realistic assessment of the budget or the

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>debt trajectory over the next ten years, which one has

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to go through to try to make some sense out

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of this or any other president's budget proposal, is quite problematic.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll have a foreign policy expert on and ask him

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or her what we know about the Trump doctrine, the

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 1>nascent Trump doctrine. I suppose in the realm of economics

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>we have trump anomics, and I wonder if we're any

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>closer to getting a clear definition of of what that is. Again,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>mcmilvanny spoke yesterday and he said his definition is principally

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's an effort to get sustained three percent economic

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>growth in this country. Again a very aspirational, golden aspirational definition.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you speaking debate all this um, but but you know,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we we have to be analytical and assessing,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>UH where this budget deficit, how it fits into the

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>mosaic of of the U S economy. And I think

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a real Achilles heel here, and that is that, UH,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the US right now has an extraordinarily low national savings rate.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the sum total of personal business and UH saving

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>plus the government budget deficits. And when you run a

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>low savings rate and you want to grow, you import

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>surplus savings from abroad, you run massive current account and

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>trade deficits to attract the capital. The Trump proposals, in

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>my view of realistic assessment, is they're not gonna be balanced.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get budget deficits, so that will push the

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>national savings rate lower and make the current account deficit

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wider and our trade deficits become more problematic in the

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>years ahead. So here's the catch, David, is that with

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with budget deficits UH and trade deficits likely to expand,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom will be running these charts on the twin deficits.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Once again. Uh, You've got a president then, who wants

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn protectionist against many of our trading partners. How

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>does that add up, Tom? How does it add up

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to U to go protectionists at a time when your

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>trade defficences are getting bigger? This is vintage Stephen Roach.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious, David, this is this goes to the heart

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of what I call balance sheet analysis. Let's stop the

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>show and explain to us that some savings rate which

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>includes the government deficit, what's it mean for the person

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg surveillance? It means that the United States

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is growing beyond its means. Tom. We we we teach

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>um students when they take their very first economics course,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you remember this, tom Um, that the

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>savings must always equal investment. It's an accounting identity. So

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when we don't save at home, uh, we then borrow

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>savings from abroad and we run these big current account

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>balance of payments deficits and trade deficits to attract the capital.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea that we can uh now single

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>out our trading partners, whether they're in Germany, Japan. Of course,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>China or Korea and others as being villains in what

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>they're doing to punish American middle class workers. This is

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the most important point, is that we need these trade

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>deficits to square uh the saving investment identity United States

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and David, what's so important about this and Dr Roach's

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>analysis is dead on is when I mentioned this in

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>speeches or discussions, often citing Stephen Roach, people are just

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in disbelief. They're like, no, that's not true, disbelief because

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>my name or because you know, but but but Stephen,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>this is important. Essentially every month by accounting identities, somebody's

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>got a right to check there's a flow. There's a

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>flow here every month. You know, I, I know, I'm

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a broken record on on this tim We've gotten away

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with it because where the world's reserve currency and um

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of countries, including most recently China,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have tied their currencies to the dollar, and so they

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have to buy a lot of dollar based assets to

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>maintain that relationship. But you know, the day is coming

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>um uh, and we we never know when when the

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>world starts finding other places uh to um uh put

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>its um uh savings rather than a low return uh

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>US economy and then it becomes tougher for us to

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fund are the circus savings we borrow on terms that

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have been extremely attracted to us for a long long time.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It would be good to speak to someone with experience

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on going with extended trips of leaders. That would be

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee, wh or a few years ago used to

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be on the White House uh A circuit here as well.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I I look, Michael McKee at the exhaustion of the trip.

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it real? Is that come with absolutely? I mean,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the hours are very long, you fly all night, you

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get to where you're going, the Middle East in this case,

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to start functioning immediately. The president has

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a bed, but nobody else. Nobody else has a bed.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Your your jet lagged, You're tired, and the days are long.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>David Girl, I believe we have a headline out crossing

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg are Islamic state claiming responsibility for the attack

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in Manchester last night that came at the end of

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a concert by Ariana Grande. We've been following this throughout

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the morning. We'll bring you updates throughout the morning here

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg surveillance. This is according to site, and that's

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a website of professionals who monitor social media chatter web

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>chatter about terrorist groups. We welcome all of you worldwide.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio coast to coast.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So we say good morning to Bloomberg Boston FM in

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington early morning and San Francisco in the Bay Area

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>over a special good morning to all of you, uh

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and in the United Kingdom as well. On

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>London Radio, Michael McKee is here, uh, you know, to

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about the president's trip and offer go to Rome.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But much more, Michael McKee about the budget. You've got

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>detailed notes. What was the thing that stuck out for

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you in your note taking on this political document of

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the president? Well, from the perspective I bring to it

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of an economist, the Rosie scenario that the administration assumes

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>three growth from with no credible way of getting there.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Not only that they assume three percent growth and unemployment

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>goes up, uh, so much for the Phillips curve. So

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point, uh, it's kind of hard to take seriously.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers out with an interesting moments ago, uh, noting

0:08:54.280 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that they double count the tax savings that the tax

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>cuts they propose will create a lot of growth and

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time will fill in the budget hole

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>caused by the tax cuts. And he called that ludicrous.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>With within this in Stan Calendar writing in Forbes has

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been a good friend of the show. Was made very

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>clear this is just simply undoable in your experience when

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you try to quote unquote make budget cuts and operational government,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not entitlements. How much is a painful cut? How much?

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Somebody asked me this last night. What's to the bone

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fiscal world? Is it? Two? Is that the

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts we're talking about, you have to take it program

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>by program. Uh. The way Washington works normally, what you

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about when you talk about a cut is a

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>reduction in the rate of increase. Uh. The government continues

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend more money because the United States continues to

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get bigger, more and more people involved, and of course

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the bureaucratic comparative to continually raise their own budgets. Uh.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're talking about actual reductions that would probably

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be painful, then you have to get into the question

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of whether a program is worthwhile or working. And that's

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>much of the argument from this Office of Management and

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>budget that a lot of these programs don't work and

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't worth funding. We've talked about assumptions. Just a moment

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>ago strikes me that the director of the OMBA mcmilvany,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is making a huge one here when he expects the

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>House version of the Republican healthcare bill to get through.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>He's really counting on that for this to work. Absolutely.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>The budget assumes eight hundred and sixty billion dollars in

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Medicaid cuts. The budget assumes that there will be the

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>rollback of the Obama Care taxes that were imposed on

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy. So yes, he's he This all assumes both

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that they will pass the rollback of Obamacare, pass trump Care,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>if you want to call it that, and cut taxes

0:10:55.600 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>h to the levels that the administration is has proposed

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring Congressman Jan Chikowski, she represents the ninth district

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois, Democratic congressman on the House budget me, you're

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not being accurate. The congresswoman represents my mother's heist there

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Trier High School, when that Illinois. That's the correct specificity

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is key here, odd surveillance. Jeensickowski joining us on our

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>phone line is great to have you with us. You're

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>out with this statement here in advance of the budget

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>release this morning, I say you will resist this outrageous

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>proposal every step of the way. I I assume you're

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>regarding this budget is dead on arrival. Well, I hope

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's dead on arrival. I certainly do. I mean, this

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is a budget of broken promises and then new promises

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that he can't keep. Like these massive tax cuts that

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go for the wealthiest are actually going to create economic growth.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been there, done that hasn't hasn't worked. And meantime,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be on the backs of people who

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>need their Social Security and their Medicare and their Medicaid.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really remarkable. It's going to uh, you know,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the very people that he promised to UH to help

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>um and to to make life better for and make

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>America great for a great again are the ones that

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to be hurt the most. Something that

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Director mulvanny said yesterday and his briefing with reporters is

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a real problem here is the efficacy of a lot

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of these programs. Why should a taxpayer be paying money

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>toward a program that's only I think he's had six

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>percent effective. How does Congress, how do you and others

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>look and improve the efficacy of of programs? I gather

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't have a lot of sympathy with the

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>argument that he that he's making there, But how about

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the broader point here that there are programs that could

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be working better? Well? First of all, when he talked

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>about about a month ago about meals on wheels that

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no proof that those programs work, you ask the

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are waiting in their homes every day I've

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>delivered those meals on wheels two people. Um, those programs

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>keep people out of nursing homes, which are more expensive.

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He said that nutrition programs for children at at school

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's no evidence that they really helped to increase learning.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? So? First of all, as a

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Democrat who believes that government programs work, yes, I want

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they are effective, and I'm willing

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at that. But really, I mean that those

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of cons and believe me, in newchur Township or

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>New Tour High School is there are people who are

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>waiting for those meals right now? I would suggest congresswoman

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out of Sullivan High School and with the Illinois blood

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that you have, that the redrawn ninth district has people

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that support a Republican ethos, a conservative ethos, even though

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it is a very liberal district. What permeates the Trump theology,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is we've got to figure out how

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to get these people back on jobs, particularly with his

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>food stamps. What is the reality you've seen about the

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>snap program, the food stamp program, and the idea that

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to get people back on jobs. How do

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you dove tail that when you're on the opposite side

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>of the debate. Well, first of all, the about half

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the people that that get nutrition assistance through the food

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>stamp program, the stamp program are children, and so certainly

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if parents are going to be able to um, have

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a raise of family and have a little bit of

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>help to put food on the table while they're looking

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for their job or trying to get job training, which

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is also caught in this budget, I

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty hard to explain to them that, you know,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a key element of this budget plan will be huge

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>tax breaks, mostly that go to the wealthiest Americans. Um.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, as they said this, this kind of idea

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of trickled down is something that has been tried over

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again. And when you cut the

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>state tax, which goes to just a few people, really

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think feeding helping to to make sure

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's food on the table. And by the way,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>those programs most people stay on them for a year

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or left. It's kind of a bridge over troubled waters.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this. We are out of time today with

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the horrific news flow we see here, particularly with a

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>tragedy in Manchester, United Kingdom. Cox Cocaswoman Chikowski, we look

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>forward to speaking to you again on the shores of

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Lake Michigan, the Ninth District north of Chicago, and then

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>off to the west as well. Just seeing the footage

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>here at Eva Gerner Studios of the two Air Force ones,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that's how many people are on the trip in I

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>believe in tel Aviv. I may be wrong on that.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell where it is Jerusalem or Tel Aviv,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're both out waiting there to fly the President, David,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>why don't you bring in the ambassador who is a

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>unique distinction of being ambassador to Israel in Egypt decade now,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a lecturer and professor at the Woodrow Wilson School of

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Public International Fairs at Princeton Universe. That's Ambassador Daniel Kurtzer,

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who joins us on our phone line. Since ambassad Kurz

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to this was a quick trip, much has been made

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, the brevity of some of these visits the President.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The President made in Israel today, What do we learn

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about his attitude towards the Middle East peace process from

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this visit to Israel, his meeting with the President of

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Boss Palton Authority as well well. He reaffirmed during his

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>speech he just gave very strong commitment to try to

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>reach peace, indicated that in his conversations with President of

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Boston Prime Minister Nataniello, both of them were ready to

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>reach forward. But he provided a very few details of

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>those discussions. That may be a good thing. The longer

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he can continue to the dialogue in in quiet, rather

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>than try to publicly broadcast different issues, he may be

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>able to make incremental progress. But we really don't know

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>very much about either the President's view of how to

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>make peace. Well, what's the two sides hold him? What's

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>your sense of how the speech he made in Saudi

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Arabia over the weekend rang out through Israel. That speech

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in which he called for suiting nations largely to rally

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>together to fight against Iran and to purge themselves of

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>terrorist entities within within their populations. How do you think

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that played in Israel? Well, I think it was music

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Israeli ears because he associated himself and the

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>United States with all of the same enemies that Israel

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>has identified Iran terrorists, countries that support terrorists, and uh,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there's really no distance between the United States and Israel

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on those issues. What made the speech interesting is that

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he did it in front of forty or fifty Arab

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and Muslim leaders and in a sense conveyed the idea

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that we now have a larger group of countries, not

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just the US and Israel, that are ready to act

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>affirmatively against terrorism. And I think that was the key

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from that speech. Where do we go from from here?

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that the speeches that he delivered were largely

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>short on specific I know the Secretary of State Rex

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Tillerson was asked if there might be a trilateral meeting

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>here with the President of palacting authority at the Israeli

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister and the President of the United States, and

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future. He demurred. He didn't answer that question.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you go from the rosie rhetoric we heard

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>from the president to action here after what several years now,

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if they're being very little process on peace. Well, Frankly,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually buoyed by the fact that the administration did

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>not seek some kind of the media takeaway. I mean,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>there's always just tendency to look for a deliverable, you know,

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what can what we announce as some big outcome of visit.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think there was a lot of speculation before

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the visit that the president would want to announce a

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>trilateral meeting or some it of some sort involving the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Arab States, and that didn't happen. Now, it's possible it

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen because she tried and failed, But it's also

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>possible because he realized that this is a very complicated

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>set of issues and you can't go for short term gains.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You really have to be in it for the long haul.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see over the next period of what the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>next steps are. He'll probably send out his envoy, Jason Greenblatt.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We now have an ambassador in place in Israel who

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can move this issue on a day to day basis

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and if those next steps indicate a continuation of

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue, then I think because we have some reason

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to believe that this will go on for a while.

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador to thank you so much. Daniel Kurtzer with us

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Woodrow Wilson School as well the former Ambassador

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of the United States to Israel, David what a more.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>The news flow is just an extraordinary, incredible beginning with

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that a terrorist attack. We've been covering their threat, the

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>point that took place that last evening, and of course

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the presence visit to Israel apping up. Now he's back

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at the King David Hotel. He will leave for Rome.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe in about an hour's a time. He'll head there,

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have an audience with with the Pope, and then he

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>presses onward to two major summit, the first being the

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>NATO Summit in Brussels and then the seven Summit in Italy.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Is still a long way for this present to go

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>before he makes his way back to Washington or Kevin

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Cirelli in Jerusalem. Touching on the domestic challenges of Washington

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Brunt You by Bank of America Mary Lynch

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>with virtual reality virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a transforming world. VI of a mL dot Com slash vr,

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch, Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. There's something new

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg. It's called Lens. Starting right now, you can

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>use the Bloomberg iOS app off your iPhone or iPad,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>or our new Google Chrome extension to read any news

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>story on any website, scan it, and then instantly see

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the news stories relevant market data from Bloomberg. In addition,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see all the bios of the key people mentioned in

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the story. It's called lens, and it is just that,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a lens into the people and the data of any

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>story you may be reading. Again. Lens brings you the

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>power of Bloomberg's news and data. Download or io s

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>app or search for the Bloomberg extension at the Chrome

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>store to try lens out. Learn more at Bloomberg dot

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Com slash Lens. I've been waiting for this interview David

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Gura sent the moment I heard that Mr Fields was out.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>My opinion doesn't matter on this, but we do have

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the considered opinion of the cars are. If you're going

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to Google and type up cars are you get the

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia for one, s rat and Steve Rattner, of course,

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>appears often with us. He has a wonderful journalist integrity

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>along with his financial knowledge, and was selected at one

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>point to save Detroit. You didn't have to save Ford

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>when you were in the trenches of being a czar,

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>which is a phrase you and I hate. How distinctive

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was dear Born? How different was Bill Ford, the family

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the company. It's something that fascinated me because you

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>had these companies that were essentially identical in every respect

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their customers, their footprint, all these things.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But yet Ford did not need our help, and the

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>others did, and it was simply a question of management.

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Ford had better management. They anticipated the crisis, they put

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>money in the bank, and of course, famously for Bill,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Ford reached out to Alan Mollallely, who, other than owning

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a car, probably knew nothing more about cars than that,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and he turned out to be one of the great

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>CEOs of our generation. We'll talk a bit more about that,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the shadow into which Mark Fields stabbed aln Milelly of

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>of Boeing Vintage. Coming to to Dearborn, what did he

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>do well? For Ford? He changed the culture? What what

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ford always felt was that Detroit was way too insular,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was industry people talking, industry people playing golf

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the industry people, and he wanted to shake Ford up,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted an outsider who would bring a fresh

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective and a whole different management approach. And I think

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you see that courage being demonstrated yet again here where

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he's reached out to another non traditional auto executive and said,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>this industry is in the bigger in the midst of

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>actually a much bigger transformation than even what we dealt

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>with in two thousand and nine, and he just wanted

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to have fresh leadership to do that. You mentioned that

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the perceptiveness anticipating the financial crisis to come. Are we

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing that here as well? Is is forward making a

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>calculated smart step in your estimation looking to driverless cars

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to self driving vehicles, it's not. Yes, I think they are,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but remember it's not just driverless cars. There are three

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>things happening that are going to transform this industry. Driverless

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>cars are one, Electrification is a second, but probably the

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest one is ride sharing. The average cars only used

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>four percent of the time. It's most family's second biggest

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>capital asset. The rest of the time it sits in

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the garage. You're gonna see. I think a dramatic reduction

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>in the number of cars Americans need to buy, and

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Detroit is going to have to reposition itself for that reality.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you quantify that from eighteen million seventeen million the

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>run rate is sixty million? Where Steve Rattner's new sixteen million.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know, Tom it's fair, but it's a

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very fair question. I think it could be twelve. I

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think it could be eleven. It could be something like that.

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back, and we can do this

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with Ratner, folks, because he was Honors Economics at Brown,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's somebody that actually moved the pencil. One of

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the great unspoken is in corporate America is slick guys

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>versus the grind. And time after time after time, I

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>see companies with an engineering and economics ethos within the

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>C class officers go to marketing guys, go to the

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>smooth guys, and then they have to reverse. I saw

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the Google. There was a tangential move at Google. Eastman

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Kodak I lived in. Is that what we saw here?

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean within the happy talk of the center from

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan football team, blah blah blah, is

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just really about an engineering ethos like Mallally that took

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a sidestep with Mark Fields and wants to go back

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>to somebody that understands how to code or understands how

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to read a slide rule. I suspect there's some truth

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to remember. One of the oddities of the situation is

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that these guys worked together for twenty five years. It's

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not like Bill Ford met Mark Fields three weeks exactly

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and so. And it's a little bit like the Disney

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.239
<v Speaker 1>situation where you had a guy, Tom Staggs, who had

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>worked with Bob Iger for twenty years and then discovered

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't see material. It's very unusual when that happens.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it is a move away from

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you called marketing or whatever towards a transformational leader. I think,

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>more even than engineering economics, I think Bill Ford wanted

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>another transformational leader. What did Mary Burro get right, Well,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet. When Mary barn has gotten right.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Mary bar has done a good job of calming the waters.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>She's I think made some smart moves and getting out

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of these margins. Getting out, getting out

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of the marginal mark. Getting out is what this is about. Yeah,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know again, when I was doing cars, there

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was a view that to be a global car maker,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you need to be a global carmaker. And now the

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 1>view has changed. We'll find out if she's right or not.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's certainly her view. Um. But but again this

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is this is this race is going to be defined, uh,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>not by whether you make cars an India or not.

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be defined by the three factors that

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier. How hard is it to affect cultural

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>change at these companies? They've been around for a long time,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>they're huge, they have such legacies to them. Obviously, you

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>can make changes when you're under financial pressure to do so,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but to to embark on a radical change in culture,

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>how hard. It's It's less hard than you would think.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>And throughout my career I have been struck by the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ability of great leaders to make cultural change and institutions

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that I thought were impervious best. One of the best

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>examples is Luke Gersoner going to IBM when it was

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in trouble and he and he affected huge cultural change.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs going back to Apple, I mean, you can

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>go on. The list is fairly long. It's not it's

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not impossible when you look at the relations I

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you just about the relationship these companies

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have had recently with with the White House. What's that

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>meant in your in your estimation, You've had Mary Barr,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You've had Mark Fields going to the White House with

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>great frequency for a time early on in this administration

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to meet with with the president. What's the strength of

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that connection, that that conduit between the greater Detroit area

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and Washington. Right now? Trump is a manufacturing guy, and

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he and and and when you go to Silicon Valley,

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>where I was a couple of weeks ago, they feel

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a little unloved by this administration. Uh. In contrast, if

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you make something, you feel very loved. For the point

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of view the company is, if the president invites you,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of course you go because it can't be bad for

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>your business and may be good for your business. And

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously presidents very focused on auto jobs and auto plants

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and where they're built and where they're not built and

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff. So if I were the

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO of an auto company, I would try to stay

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>close to the White House as well. Boston yesterday at

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 1>this TMT conference that JP Morgan arranged there. Steve may

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not know that cost there's a city to the northeast

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were the baseball team one game above five. You may

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>not know. I went to Good morning to all of

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you on route this morning. Continuous. A point that somebody

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>made there is you're looking at who's buying tech companies

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>investing in tech companies. That's a lot of traditional manufactories,

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>traditional companies. You talk about the the uneasy relationship perhaps

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>between Washington of today in Silicon Valley. How difficult is

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it for a traditional company like Ford to marry with

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>or do work with tech companies. How how difficult is

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the the marrying of those two things. It's hard, and

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>some are more successful than others. I think the good

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>news is they're all trying. All the auto companies now

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have a footprint of some sort. Obviously GM did that

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>large acquisition, Forward did this kind of joint ventury thing

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with BlackBerry of ball things, which has an operating system.

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>They all know that they have to do this, but

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it is hard. It's not in their DNA, and we'll

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have to see how it i'n false. Steve Retner, thank

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Thank you for having guys today, probably

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mostly on the Ford Motor Company of Dearborn at Michigan,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>David Guru, I am on the vintage where I am

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>still in lawe of these seven forty seven there are

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>seven forty seven's and then there's one and it is

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>air Force one taxiing Dave had been a great airport.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>It is just there's just it's generational. I'm sure there's

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>something else to be in awe of, but it is

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>something to see that plane get out there in text.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a wait. I don't think I

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's got a time on the well. But

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know I've mentioned this on

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>air folks, but I had a modest waited Reagan a

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>month ago with our producer Kieran Buchanan Rita Gupta. I

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that was a four hour wait. Surveillance correction coming here,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael Midtown East writing in noting that I was mistaken

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>when I said that that flight that President Trump took

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>from Saudi Arabia to Druthan flying child, you rather flying

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that route was a pioneering flight Glenn Kessler of the

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, noting that in two thousand and eight, President

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush made a similar direct flight, but in

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the reverse order, going between Israel Landing and Saudio. Anyway,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Michael in Midtown East. We value our

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listeners who are always wiser than we are. We've learned that.

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>No excuse me, let me not speak for you, David,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I've learned that more often than now. What I've learned

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is it Spenno O'Donnell has a unique respective on the

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom. She is our reporter in Parliament. In there's

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just something I think Spenya. Being a reporter in Parliament

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is more romantic than being a reporter on Capitol Hill.

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>What's it like? Actually being a reporter in Parliament is

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is luxurious, as I would think. I don't know about

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the cruise. I don't think the culpets have been changed. Um,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly. I mean, you're in a beautiful historic building

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and and it's a it's a very strange and quirky institution.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Um in a way sort of fulfills every every cliche

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you've had about probably English public schools, because it very

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>much feels like being in one um at the same

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>time you're in the you know you're in the corridors

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of power um and you know you're It gives you

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a very very unique perspective, but also in a way

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be careful not to have a narrow

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one from that because it is a it is a

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>very closed world, the unfortunate reality. And we make jokes

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about Parliament in spanness Christian job. But there is terror

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on the River Thames and there's terror in Manchester. How

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>will the United Kingdom link those two acts of violence? Well,

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the Manchester attack is emerging is something quite different.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>There have been arrest made, the police have made several

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>raids since last night. It's looking less and less like

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a learned world attack. We've had several commentators saying that

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think for the UK broadly, it's something that people

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>have been expecting for some time. And compared to France,

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>which is which has suffered a few attacks in the

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, there's so far been the security services seemed

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to have managed to keep quite a few out in

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK, but the UK has certainly been a target

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Where are we in terms of the

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>investigation The Prime Minister Against speaking this morning outside ten

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Downing Street, said that Tim she's confident that the Security

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Service knows the identity of the perpetrator of this attack.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The investigation is ongoing. What's your sense of where things

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are and where they're heading. Well, I think they're going

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to be very very careful into releasing any further details

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's looking increasingly like they may have suspected that

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there were more than one person involved in several people

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at play, whether that was just people who didn't denounce

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a potential attack or some more sinister planning going on.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So for security reasons, I think that's probably all were

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>likely to hear for some time. What's emerging so heartbreaking

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Lee in the last hour is details on some of

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the victims. The youngest victim is an eight year old

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>girl who was at the concert with her family, and

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's that kind of detail, unfortunately, that we're likely to

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 1>get more clarity on as as the day unfolds. How

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about the the identification of victims? Are we are we

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 1>getting any identifications thus far? Is that something that's being

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>closely held as well? Well? We've only had two victims identified,

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>one an eighteen year old girl in one of the

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>eight year old girl I just mentioned, uh time mentioned

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the attack on Parliament just a couple of weeks weeks ago.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there response to these events uniform? In other words,

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are we are we seeing what's happening here mirror what

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>happened after that that event as well. But I think

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there's more of a sense today of police really stepping

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the mark, and that sort of tells you

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're treating this a little bit differently. The Westminster

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>attack was horrible, but you know, it was a man

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in a car. It very much looked it had all

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the hallmarks of a of a lone wolf attack. This

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is a suicide bomber that requires a level of planning.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>They've evacuated a shopping center earlier today, they've made several

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>raids and houses in South Manchester that arrested someone in connection.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>So this seems to have all the hallmarks of a

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>planned attack. I drove by the terms the other day

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it was the new Scotland Yard building.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about intelligence in the United Kingdom. Identify the

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>m I or this or that in Scotland Yard and

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>how they fit in to the protection of the United Kingdom. Well,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what's been interesting is it's had a bit of a

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>checkered history in recent years because there have been cutbacks

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to security services, to police forces. But in the last

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of years they've really beefed up sections such as

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the sort of online data internet surveillance where a lot

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of these terrorist activities are tracked. Of course, you know,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>these cells are often formed on kind of special sites

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's one thing that they've really sort of stepped up.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I think. However, but this incident is really going to

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>highlight is that security is going to be very much

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the dialogue again, and inevitably the fact that

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there have been cutbacks in the last ten years is

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>going to become a matter of discussion. Sonya Donald, thank

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for prospective this morning. She is a

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bloomberg news in our parliament reporter. Let me ask you,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Director wils if I could just how you reacted to

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the reports in the post in the Times of the

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>President in that meeting with the kisley At, the Russian

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ambassador to the US and the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey

0:35:56.040 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Lavrov evidently reportedly sharing closely held information with them, declaring

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>afterward that that is that within his mandate, he's able

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to do it. How did you, as somebody who's spent

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a career in the intelligence side of things, react to

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened there? Well, the president is the ultimate authority

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of classificified material, and if he says something is classified,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>unless you want to impeach him, Uh, it's classified. So

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no real dispute about it. Uh. In terms of

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>his responsibility, it's clear. And the president is the ultimate

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>authority on this. And so people who think he has

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been misusing that authority are in a great difficulty because

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>they can't factually cite individual words, documents, sentences, numbers, or whatever. Uh.

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.919
<v Speaker 1>You can recite something that somebody said, somebody said, somebody said,

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>But uh, if you can't prove your case, Uh, there's

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>really only one answer, which is that it is the

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>president's authority. Now, if you ask, hypothetically, would it be

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to share with Russian establishment at the top? Um?

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is a KGB state we're talking about for

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>all practical purposes um Uh, any information that might lead

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to they're figuring out how we were getting important intelligence.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be a very bad choice. But people make

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>choices in those jobs. For different reasons. I was faced

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>one time with the question, uh, whether or not to

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>go to a major media owner and explained to him

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms that he could understand, but which also disclosed

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>some extremely sensitive intelligence, UH, whether or not I would

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do that or just sit there and let them publish

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>without knowing something that could well give away an agent.

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And I decided to go to the executive and explain

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to him exactly what was going on. And he said, okay,

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we won't we won't use the number in the story,

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you. And I said, that's that's the way it's

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work. But but you can't really do that

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>with uh, you know, a Russian uh intelligence officer masquerading

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>as a diplomat. If I be interrupt, this is important.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>The president has a unique relationship with Mr Putin and

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with Russia. You you supported the president, you were part

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of his campaign, and you abruptly walked away. Does President

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump understand James Woolsey's Russia? I don't know. UM, I'm

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really walk away. I just told them I

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to recognize that I was not advising the transition.

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Might advise the campaign, but they weren't asking me for

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>advice on the transition. I was still out uh doing

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>press interviews and so forth, but I just didn't want

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to fly under false colors. UM. I I think that Russia,

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>even though it's ideology, Soviet ideology, is dead. Um really

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>has historically except for the reign of the wonderful Alexander

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the Second. I wish they had more of him. Uh.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Russia is a bit like the old farmer that Abraham

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln used to say lived on the farm next to

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>his parents when he was growing up. The old boy

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>used to say, I don't need much land, just what

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it joins mine. That's kind of Russia. Uh. You know,

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if if you've got uh one country, region or area,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>then it's pretty good chance that maybe be a good

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>idea to take the next one. And that they've always

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.240
<v Speaker 1>been like that. It's it's not any thing particularly related

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to to their recent communist passed, but they're My experience

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with them in for negotiations, three of them were really

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.720
<v Speaker 1>really tough, and we made modest progress. One I headed

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>up the conventional force in Europe negotiations and uh Vienna,

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and uh. Right after the Berlin Wall went down,

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you have never seen such friendly Russians. Let me tell

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you we were popular guys. Oh yes, this is critical.

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Dexter Filkins wrote yesterday on Jim Maddis General Madis in

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the New Yorker magazine. David Gerr and I interviewed the interview.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's saying, what a Secretary Tiller is going to do?

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>What is Secretary Maddis going to do to instruct this president?

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with that that they're the adults in

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the room and that they've got to somehow mold inform

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this unique president. Well, Uh, they've got a lot to

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do because President has a lot of experience negotiating and

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>some experience uh with Russians, although not a great deal, um,

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but that isn't all you need in order to be

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>able to deal with the Russians. And I think that

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he started out with a somewhat friendlier uh stance than

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has now evolved over the course of the last several weeks.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Even good a question. Let me ask you just go

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>going back to intelligence sharing. I think that you know,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the Brexit process play out obviously that

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 1>that could have grave consequences for how much intelligence has

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>shared with and by the United Kingdom. We saw what

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>happened reportedly in the Oval Office as well. Certainly this

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be something I think that will come

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>up at the NATO summit that next week. What's the

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>state of the way that we share intelligence right now?

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing it effectively? Is at being done in

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>in the most effective white there's not a single UH approach.

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you're working on something jointly with a country that

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you're very friendly with, that you've worked with many times

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Let's say Britain UH, and UM, you

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>actually develop an asset or a technique with the two

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of you making a contribution. In those circumstances, even if

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States does most of the collecting of the intelligence, UM,

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be able to operate jointly and effectively for

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>very long. If you said to the British okay, bye,

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bye bye, thank you for the help. We'll just sit

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>on this now ourselves. We don't do that. We we

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:51.919
<v Speaker 1>work closely with with friends and allies, and sometimes that

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go well, but lots of the time it doesn't.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Multiplies are are effectiveness. We'd like you to come back

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and just as the beginning idea to talk about the

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>state of our Navy. A lot to talk about there

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there is. I'm I'm worried about carriers survivability, especially if

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it's true that the Russians have this two plus moel

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>per hour torpedo that they've provided to the Iranians. That's

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a deadly idea, and particularly within the close confines of

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the Persian golfer just outside of James Wilsey, thank you

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so much. He has the sixteenth Director of the Central

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Agency and we're thrilled to have him in today.

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. David

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you can

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Brunt You by

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, virtually everything

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world, be of

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, Pierced Fenner

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and Smith Incorporated,