WEBVTT - Beijing Olympics Open Under Covid Cloud

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Hey, we're watching what's going

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on with a macron. Cases are spreading in China during

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the countdown to the Winter Olympics in Beijing, with a

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>leading ski jumper pulling out after she tested positive. Our

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>next guest, by the way, is an Olympian silver medalist

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>winning at the Athens Games for swimming back in two

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand four ten. We're talking about Tara kirk Cell, Senior

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Scholar at the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Public Health that is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg philanthropist. Are It's great to

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>speak with you again. I'm wondering about the Olympics happening

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing versus the Olympics that we saw in Tokyo.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And these are both happening in the midst of a pandemic.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so much more difficult for athletes in Beijing? Yeah, well,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on the show. You know, I

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>think that the Tokyo Olympics proof that you can hold

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of Olympics during a pandemic, But the difficulty level is

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>so much greater this time around for China. First, because

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with the o maicon variant instead of the

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>delta variants. Macon variant is much more transmissible and seems

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to um effect have more breakthrough cases

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for people who are vaccinated. And then the second reason

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is because China has this zero COVID approach to COVID nineteen,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and so the margin for error there just really isn't

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a marginal for error because they can't let it get out,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they can't make any mistakes. So do you think it

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was smart that they went ahead? With the Games. Yeah,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that that it's there. They've had

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some competing priorities, right, they want to be able to

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>hold the games. They put a lot of investment into it.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, it can be done. Um.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you know, it's very hard

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for them to do that, um and still push this

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>COVID zero COVID approach. I mean, I think at some

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>point they're going to have to say, um, you know,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>then what what are we gonna do? How are we

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 1>going to move away from zero COVID? And I think

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, the games maybe the start of

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to think about that. So how should

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>how should we watch it as as spectators? How should

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we look at it as spectators and try to understand

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>what these Olympians are going through? I mean the big

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the Olympics, of course, is understanding the athletes,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>learning about their backstories. The experience that you had at

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics in Athenes in two thousand four, that's got

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to be completely different than what these athletes are doing

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. It doesn't sound that fun to actually be

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an Olympian right now. Well, I mean the first thing

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you that's the most important to continue in their export.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is still you know, even with sort of

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the fun drained out of you know, the partying and

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, gathering, the camaraderie right about meeting so

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>many people rotary, even with that dreamed out, I still

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do feel like you've trained all your life, or at

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>least for the last four years, to you know, compete

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on the world stage. And I think that that is

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that still remains and that's still valuable UM. And so

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why athletes they're still trying to participate

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>UM and still going through all the trouble of these

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>tests and everything that they need to to get to

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>get UM, you know, to Beijing and to compete. I

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's still worth it. But you're right, there

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is something lost here. So how do you feel like

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>once we get through this? I wonder. I do think

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be with us for a long time,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at least based on the conversations we have with you

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and your team at Johns Hopkins and others in the

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>healthcare professions. UM, I don't know. Well, it sounds like

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we've learned a lot. We're ready for the next one.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. How do you see it? Well, I

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to COVID nineteen, you're right, and

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be with us for a long time.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that for the most part, people who have

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>been backnated UM have a really good, good protection against

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>severe disease. So I think it's something that won't be

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of this front burner UM, you know, emergency anymore.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Will probably see some searches in cases where you have

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to put a mask back on if the cases got

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really high, And you might worry about hospitals because you

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>know there's some people who just won't get vaccinated UM

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or you know who will end up in the hospital.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think overall we're just going to be dealing

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>with it. Now. Does that make us ready for the

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>next one? I think that there's a question there because

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>public health has lost a lot of trust. But people

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>have lost a lot of trust in public health, and

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the you know, the work of

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a generation of public health leaders to try to rebuild that,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think trust is the most important thing when

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to pandemic response. Well, how do they do

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that in this last this last phase of vaccine rollout

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for kids under the age of five. How does how

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>does the federal government say that these shots are safe

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for the youngest? Sure, well, I think that it's proving

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the data that people can look at it and feels

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>confident in it. But I also think it's not the

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>federal government that should be telling people, you know, like

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>here's what you should do. I think it's really about

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>helping people have these conversations with people they trust. I mean,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you either trust the government or you don't, and we're

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to change that in the

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>next few months. So I think that really it's about

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, JOHNS. Hopkins has um you know, published a

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>new um how to talk to you know, Ambassador Vaccine

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador training to how to talk to parents about vaccinating

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their kids. Right, these types of conversations that happen, you know,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines of sports events, on the bleachers of

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>us at a school meet, you know, or you know,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>amongst other parents, people they trust at church, those types

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>of things. That's where we sort of will make these games.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's you know, having someone from the

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>CDC coming out saying anything, all right, we gotta run

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>these conversations. Ter good, Thank you. Tara kirk Sol She's

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 1>senior scholar at the Center for Health Security JOHNS Hopkins

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health, joining us on the phone

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>from Washington. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week, and this

0:05:54.800 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bomberg Business Week with

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to this week's cover story. Back

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in June of last year, Hong Kong authority shutting down

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple Daily. It was a popular newspaper aligned with the

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>city's democracy movement. It's become clear that China's attack on

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the publisher was really a template for a broader crackdown

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Hong Kong and democracy in Hong Kong.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>This story is the cover of the new issue of

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's available on news stands, on

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com Slash business Week.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>The story written by Ian Marlowe, Asia Government senior reporter

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. He's with us now on the phone

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>from Canada. Ian. This is congratulations on the cover. By

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's just a really really important story and

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a really important topic. I wanted to start off with

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>with more about what Apple Daily is or was. Yeah,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you no. Apple Daily was an enormously popular newspaper

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. Just to give you a sent there

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>were roughly three point eight million registered users on the website,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which is roughly half the city's population, and just before

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they were shut down, they had more than more than

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousands paying digital subscribers. So very popular with

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge source of news. But it was also at

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the heart to some extent of the pro democracy movement

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. It was owned by Jimmy Lai, a

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy tycoon in Hong Kong who, unlike the other

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, establishment figures in that city, was willing

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.119
<v Speaker 1>to use his resources, his financial firepower to push back

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>against China, to push back against what they were doing

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong with regards to pushing the National Security

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Law through uh you know, jailing all these pro democracy

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>advocates and those sorts of things. So he was a

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>prime target not just for the local Hong Kong government,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for Beijing more broadly, and they had singled him out

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>numerous times. Uh you know, for being a sort of

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>rabble rouser in Hong Kong. And when the government went

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>after his paper, they really went after it. They froze

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the bank account, they arrested the top staff. There were

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred police officers sent to raid the headquarters in

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. This was unprecedented in a city that is

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not just the global financial center, but was also a

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of regional base for international media companies, from from

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to CNN to two others. So it was the

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>shut bound was shocked, but it was also to a

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>large degree template for what Beijing wanted to do with

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong in the future. And since it was shut,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>things have only accelerated further. You know, Ian, I think

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about I worked at the Wall Street Journal on a

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>broadcast called the Wall Street Journal Report, and I mean,

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong was this safe zone, right and you know,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>um when it came to business markets, uh, you name it, uh,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and everybody kind of look to Hong Kong is maybe

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a sign of what was hopefully to come were broadly

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in China, and now we're finding out that that's not

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the case. By targeting Apple Daily, right, it could have

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>targeted you know, a lot of things initially, but by

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>really going aggressively after Apple Daily, that tells you what, yeah,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it basically tells you that, like in mainland China,

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>there is just zero tolerance for anything that could represent

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>an alternate power center in Hong Kong, and systematically, bit

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>by bit, the government had gone after the opposition politicians

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, Tho's democracy advocates who were actually working

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>within the system. They went after Apple Daily, you know,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat, closed that that was a huge

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>source of opposition support. Then they started going after smaller targets.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>They started going after charity NGOs, some of the organizations

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that had promoted some of the peaceful prot has over

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>over the past you know, twenty years um, and that basically,

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one by one sort of dismantled anything that could represent

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>any threat at all to China getting its way in

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. And and Apple Daily was absolutely, without you know,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>any doubt, it was the biggest one there. And I

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>think that the big thing about Apple Daily, uh closure

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was you know what happened. Everyone was saying, well, who

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's next? And I don't think anyone's really even asking

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that question anymore because everything that's happening people guests from

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the outset of the National Security Law of being put

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:44.359
<v Speaker 1>down in June that basically gone after anything that represents

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>memorials to the tmmms, where anyone that was agitating in

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a labor union, all those sorts of things by the

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and now even just this week we saw the University

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of Hong Kong, which is one of the most prestigious

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>universities in the city, just had a visa rejected or

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a researcher who is meant to come into the city

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just to do uh research on LGBT key rates. And

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of a endless procession here where you know,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>anything can be considered somewhat uh anti establishment if the

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>authorities really feel like it's it's a threat to them.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know. And the other thing here is

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that Apple Daily was a business. It was it was

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>owned by a publicly listed company. Jimmy Lai had sententy

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the shares in that company. He was

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>overruled and he was, uh, there's a government order for

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>him not to exercise his voting rights. And then the

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>government throws the accounts without any resource to the courts,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>and then company was shut down. So that's something that

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people in Hong Kong are

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned about because essentially the sky's the limit now in

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of what the government can use this law for,

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're putting it into every piece of legislation they can,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>from film sent for ship laws to tax guidance or charities. Uh,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's all over the place with language about national security

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and acting contrary to the interest of national security. It's

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>all it's all very vague, and I think people just

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>actually now kind of know which way the slide is

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going here. Well, it's a must read. It's the cover

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>story of Bloomberg Business Week magazine, and we really appreciate

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>catching up with Bloomberg News Asia Government Senior Reporter Ian Marlowe.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All Right, so,

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>how's your day going? Uh, not so great if you

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>are Metal platforms also known as Facebook company shares, experience

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a one day crash that may rank as the worst

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in stock market history. Ten yea Mark Zuckerberg losing some

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars in net worth as well with stock

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>plunge like this, it's like unbelievable. And we've seen a

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>great story on the Bloomberg Naomi Nicks putting it out

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about Mark Zuckerberg actually talking to his employees. Let's get more.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Tech team leader Sarafy, she too has an

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting column that's out. She's on the phone from San Francisco.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>She knows this company so so well. She's the author

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of No Filter, The Inside Story of Instagram. Sarah Fryer,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It is great to have you back with us. I

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>remember from reading your book close you know, at this point,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>close to a couple of years ago, the book about

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Instagram um No Filter The Inside Story of Instagram, that

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg is so paranoid about competition. How do you

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's feeling right now seeing that Facebook user growth

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>has stalled and that TikTok is a real competitor where

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people are spending, especially young people, a lot of time.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is his deep fear that

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he's had at the One of the reasons that Facebook

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has continued to grow for so long is because of

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>zuckerberg paranoia. The growth team that he has um basically

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>monitoring every possible reason that people could have to leave

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and trying to fix that as soon as possible.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons for that is is the

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>network effects. The thing that made Facebook so powerful, um

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if somebody uses uses one network, um,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>other people are more likely to use it. It has

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>also a test scating negative effect. If people leave the network,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's suddenly becomes less valuable for the remaining users. And

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so Zuckerberg never wanted Facebook to reach the point where

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it gets into a death spiral, and and this could

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be that point. So I think it's very concerning to

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>people at meta and UM, I think that's why they're

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>putting all their eggs in the metaverse. Does does the

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook saw this coming because of what it sees in

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the internal data and perhaps because of the pivot that

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it announced a few months ago of going into the metaverse?

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You've covered Facebook for years? Is this the most pivotal

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>point that you've seen for the company from a business perspective?

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think so, I mean, I think I think Listen,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a lot of options in the past.

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they could have acquired a great upstart social network

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to breathe new life into this into Facebook. You know,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they can't make the kind of acquisition right now because

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of antitrust pressure. Um. They could you pull some levers

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to get people to share more, um, but they've already

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>done that. So I think it's it's really hard for them,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>especially when you consider that their their ad targeting is

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>going to become less useful and it's gonna be less

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's less easy for them to tell advertisers how well

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>their ads performed because of Apple changes to tracking asking

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>users to agree with tracking, and a lot of users

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>are saying no, don't track me, so that those are like,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a time where you're seeing multiple existential threats

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to facebooks business model and their way out of it. Um.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They the short term way out is their TikTok copycat product,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>which is real which you know it could it could work.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean YouTube Shore because it is also a TikTok product,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>copycat product that's done pretty well and maybe real good too.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen a lot there, but it looks to

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>me like a lot of the stuff is reposted from chickof.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's that, and then there's the betaverse of that.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>The latter is something that requires all of us to

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>want it to live and work in a virtual world,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be Yeah, it's kind of a

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>pie in the scared dream. I'm not ready to leave

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the real world. I'm just gonna put it out there. Hey.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, um, we just we're talking about the

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>markets and we're talking about meta Facebook with our TV

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and Romain Bostick bringing up that, you know, maybe

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's time that Mark Zuckerberg steps aside running the company.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there needs to be some new people coming in.

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this at a lot of these whether it

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was Google. I think about when Eric Schmidt came in.

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You see this sometimes changing where the founder steps away

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. Is that something that we need to

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about or should be? It depends how bad

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this gets. We've seen Zuckerberg pull up from a downturn before. Uh.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm sure some employees are looking at this

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and thinking it's a great buying opportunity. Um. But but yeah,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it does seem it does seem pretty existential. That said,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who else is going to be the one to drive

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this this um pass into the metaverse. There is so

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>much money invested on three point for more than three

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>billion in operating loss this past quarter, that there's no

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>turning back. They've they've put all the resources into play

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>there and and if he's got the vision like this

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>is he's really the guy that's going to have to

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>pull it through. UM, I would expect. And so that

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>makes things a little complicated. But money makers are really

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram. Sara, are you sitting down with Mark

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg right now, You've got about forty seconds left here?

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you ask him? I just want to know

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>if if he really thinks that that they that they

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can afford to put products like Facebook and Instagram into

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a sort of maintenance mode, like sort of change the

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>focus of the metaverse. It seems like there's still so

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>much to fix on those products. UM. And I just

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder if if that's going to hurt them long term,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're not um focused on solving the problems with

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>their existing networks instead focus on the future future effort. Alright,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna run. Sarah, Thank you, Thank you, Sarah Fire, Big

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Tech team leader, Bloomberg News. Check out her book if

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't read it already, No Filter, The Inside Story

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram, Facebook Shares right now, Tim down worst day

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in the company's history by far, and talk about a

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>haircut on that market cap. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Alright, just one week from now, Tim

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I are going to be out in Sunny l A,

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>just ahead of the Super Bowl and at the Bloomberg

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Power Players Smit, the gathering of who's who in sports,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>including NFL team owners, players of all sports, agents, broadcasters

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. No doubt we will be talking

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>about the explosive lawsuit filed by former Miami Dolphins head

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>coach Brian Flora. So let's get some reporting on this

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and what the owner of the Dolphins is now saying

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with us right now is Bloomberg News legal reporter Christal Match.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>She's on the phone from Manhattan, the Manhattan Federal Courthouse.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey Chris, nice to have you here with Tim and myself.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So what is the owner talking about? We're talking about

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ross. Yeah, So Mr Ross is um you know,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the humerently denying the allegations in the lawsuit and most

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>substantially the allegation that he offered Brian Flora's a hundred

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per game to lose, basically the tank so

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that the team would have a worse record and have

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a better shot at one of the top draft picks. UM.

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, you know, he never made these Uh. He's

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>welcomed the NFL's investigation. UM, and he's promising to fight

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>these allegations. In the lawsuit, Florist does allege that his

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>refusal to tank games led to a clash with Stephen Ross,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who was mad that the team won five games that season,

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>costing them a chance of the top overall draft pick.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Chris, first of all, these are big allegations.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. I've seen an interview with Brian Flores on CBS.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean to come out, you know, when he was

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>potentially up for maybe other jobs at other teams. I mean,

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>these are big allegations to make. They're huge, and I mean,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, as he said himself, he's you know, this

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a huge professional risk. He doesn't really expect to

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>work in the NFL any more after this. UM. So

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, for whether or not the lawsuit goes anywhere,

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of variables at the class action suit,

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he has to certify a class in order to perceive

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that way, they'll be you know, years of arguments, at

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>least months of arguments, dismissal motions, things like that. But

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this goes anywhere, this lawsuit did a

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>huge shot across the ball in the NFL, whether its

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>steeds or not. Um, it's a this is an issue

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been plague in the league for for decades um.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And they've been accused of not hiring black coaches. That's

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole reason the Rooney rulers. And that's a big

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>part of his lawsuit, right, correct that that the Rooney

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>rule is the sham that it's really not. It doesn't

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do anything because they don't actually hire black coaches. They

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>just interviewed them, he says, he you know, got a

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sham interview with the Denver Broncos two years ago. Yeah,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and Chris as you note that Giants, Dolphins, and Denver

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Broncos are all co defendants in the lawsuits. So you mentioned, Chris,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that's it doesn't matter whether this lawsuit goes anywhere, and

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it could drag on for years. What could the implications

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be for the NFL? Well, certainly, you know, there could

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of settlement, you know, where the NFL

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of agrees to make some sort of changes in

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, in its functions and the way as

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the ruling rule or it forces it, you know, try

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to make some improvements. Um. But that's just assuming there's

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a settlement and doesn't go to court. I mean, that

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>could take a long time. We'll see what happens. But

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the implications for the NFL legally are a lot less

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>probably important than really just you know, in terms of

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>its fan base, its perceptions, um, it's image and two weeks,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like you guys said, the Super Bowls coming up. You

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>guys will both be there. It's gonna be a huge

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>topic of conversation. The NFL would prefer that this thick

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>about the Rams, you know, and the I've forgotten the

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other team, but the Bengals, don't forget. My wife is

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be very very angry, Chris Will. She should

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be mad at me. All Cincinnati people should be there.

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say. All the playoff games, it's easy to

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be like, wait, wait, who finally wanted because it was

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>such a toss up in those playoffs. Hey listen, Chris, Chris,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>just twenty seconds left here. Does he have to get

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>those other members for this to ultimately become that class

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>action and have some some bite real quickly. He does,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but he, you know, his lawyer, Doug wig Door said

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that he has other people ready to sign or on

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>others who said they have coaches that can kind of similarly, um,

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, prove the same allegations. So there's a good

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>chance he could get of people in here. Whether gonna clap, Yeah,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fascinating to watch crystal match. Legal reporter

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News on the phone from the Manhattan Federal

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Courthouse road. Yeah, but you let me drive? Oh no,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, I want to drive. It's a good question.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Good drive. This is the Drive to the Clothes on

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Bluebird Radio. All Right, we've got just about ten minutes

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>left in today's trading session. It's been another wild week.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We are at Loews of this session. You just heard

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that from Charlie Pellett, and of course we've been talking

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>about the tech sell off, largely those disappointing results from

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook owner Meta platforms. Also some concerns about persistently high

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 1>inflation from the ECB that continues to weigh on the market.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some thoughts from Tom Plump, President and chief

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Plump Funds. Tom joins us once again

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on the phon from Madison, Wisconsin. Tom, we are really

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>pleased to have you on a day like today when

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at the way that meta platforms

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is just reverberating throughout the market, especially the NAZAC one

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred other social media companies like Snap, Pinterest, Twitter, and more. Um,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you try to understand what the role of

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one company can be on all these other companies. Result,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be here even on a day like this,

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know what the market UM, well, we always

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>used to talk about is the second derivative the rate

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of growth of the rate of growth. And when you

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>see companies, even great companies like Facebook and PayPal and

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>those companies show a moderation in their growth rate or decline,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's when the stock market starts punish them. And we've

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seen that on some of the companies, but of course

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>other ones like UM, Microsofttion show the opposite. So UM,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think right now it's really key to be focusing

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>on those companies that continued to sell acceleration in this

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>market environment and some of them will see you tonight

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>if Amazon, for example, reports UH that the cloud a

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>WS is growing strong enough to continue to show in acceleration,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>or or if we're going to see some moderation because

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of the retail issues that we saw in some of

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>these other companies. Hey Tom, we love talking with you.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Your plumb balanced fund in the ninetcent for the past

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>five years based on our data, meaning you be just

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about all of the other funds in the category, returning

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on average annually nearly twelve percent. You don't on Facebook,

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I I looked through the holdings and I

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>did not see it. Why Well, we didn't own Facebook

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because we were thinking that there'd be a significant competition

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at some point, and and for much of this run,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>of course, we missed it. UH. So I can't make

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit for the fact that we missed

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>today because you missed the run up of the previous years.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But we have been concerned about the sustainability, the fact

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that they are in the political uh target of governments, UH,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and that there was gonna be a lot of uncertainty

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>about what their next thing would be. Hey Tom, I

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>want to go to Amazon because they're reporting after the

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bell today and you did mention them, but they are

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>among the bigger holdings, uh, that you have in plumb Funds,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 1>accounting for more than two point seven percent of the holdings,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about three point five million dollars worth of shares um.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon shares down about a quarter since July eight. What

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do we need to see from Amazon to to get

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>back to where it was? Well, Uh, Amazon is you

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>know obviously, when you've been as successful as they have,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they have to continually come up with something new. And

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the cloud aws. If if they match

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's numbers they're showing you know, thirty five plus growth

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in that area, that would be something that would be

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>very um, you know, I think very big good news

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and continue to say that they're finding the next big thing. Um,

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really a question of how much is going to

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be on online sales versus you know, the what PayPal

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and those were saying is that there's a lot more

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>people going into the stores. But I can tell you

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Amazon is ingrained. It will continue to grow.

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just the question of the growth rate. Where would

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you be allocating new money because we have seen when

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the equity market sells off, Tom we have seen dip

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>buyers and maybe took a while, but they did come back,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen some rallies off of those losses. What

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>would you where would you be buying? Where would you

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be putting new money to work? Carol? Is a great

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>question because you know opportunities. Don't hume because the market

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is hitting new Hyes, they come on. You know the

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>old cliche when they throw the baby out with the

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bath water. And there's some very good companies that are

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>continued to show some acceleration that we think are good

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>places to invest when this market gives you this opportunity.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>One of them, of course, is a master Card, which

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is our largest holding in the plum plants, where we

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>look at a company that has a forty percent net

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>profit margin, they've got crypto patents, they are recovering business

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in both business travel and expense, consumer travel, cross border transactions,

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and addressing the huge business to business market which is

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe five times as large as the consumer to business market.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Right and who recently reported earnings along with Visa, and

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>both of them really some eye popping numbers when it

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to spending on their platforms. Hey, Tom, where else

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are you guys playing? Cash right now. Well, um, there's

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of smaller you know, one of the things

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that happened since the summer is a lot of the

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>small emerging technology companies, especially in that software area, had

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>been uh, really punished. And one of them is a

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>little company called Latch, which is what we call the

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>type of company that has hardware enabled software. And here

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we think that they are. They're basically the company that

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>allows access and control over entry into apartment buildings. Uh,

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they're probably about thirty of the new apartment buildings. Small

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>emerging company, but it's got probably a backlog that's almost

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>eight times larger than their current sales. And so we're

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for a company again that's accelerating, maybe more than

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>tripling their sales next year and even doubling it the

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>following year. All right, And one other name, we have

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>just about thirty forty seconds left. Oh, we like this

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>company called Olo. And every one of us has been

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in that fast foodline. We've talked about this one that

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you can order ahead and uh, this is a company

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that's providing the software for a lot of the medium

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>size chains like Denny's and Portillo said and shake check,

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>um making it work so that the labor can be

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>used so much more effectively. Bit beating up. It's down

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about this year, as we've seen a lot of these

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>names under pressure. Tom Plumb be well. Good to check

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in with you, Tom Plum, He's president, chief investment officer

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>over at Plump Funds on the phone from Madison, Wisconsin.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Global News