WEBVTT - From the Vault: Minds of Musical Emptiness

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Time to go into that old vault. And this is

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be an episode from July that you actually

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>did with our old friend Christian Seger. Yeah, this episode

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gets into the topic of a museum and some related

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>conditions in which an individual does not get music. And

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean in the sense that, like you know,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they just don't get funk or they don't get this

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>particular genre. Don't understand why everybody likes Eric clapton solo career, right,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the idea that music could just not be

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>connecting with certain brains, uh, the way that it does

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of us, that sounds very interesting. I'm intrigued.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll give it a listen. All right, well, let's

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and dive into minds of musical emptiness. Welcome

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff Works

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and my name is Christian Seger. Hey, Robert,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.279
<v Speaker 1>have you ever met a person who doesn't like music?

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I do not think I've ever met anyone who just

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>across the board doesn't like music. I've certainly met plenty

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of people who seem to dislike music in certain scenarios

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm the kind of type of types of music,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you mean, well, types of music, but also music in

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>certain situations, like I've certainly known people who don't like

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>music while driving. I'm of the mindset I want music

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on all the time, just about music of my own choose,

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but music. I know a lot of our colleagues have

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>difficulty writing while there's music on. I don't have that problem,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>although I do like sort of cultivate playlists of stuff

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that helps me to write, you know, mostly instrumental stuff

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes there's certain music that I can listen to

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that has vocals that I can listen to all writing.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so you know, I know, like you like,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I've known like various sort of iterations of people who

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>can't listen to music during certain times. I've only met

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like one or two people in my life who just don't.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They literally say I don't like music, and that's so alien,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so difficult for us to comprehend, because it's like hearing

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>someone say, oh, I don't I don't like food, Like

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't like drinking liquids. It almost seems in human

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>in a way. And I think like when you hear that,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>at least in my experience, people will kind of think like, oh,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the trade of a psychopath, right, But it's not.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's actually not. We've talked about psychopaths on the show

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and that hasn't come up as one of the symptoms.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But also, as we're going to talk about today, this

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is a real brain condition. Yeah, at least a couple

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of different conditions we're going to discuss, and I think

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they both serve to remind us just how tenuous our

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sensory experience of the world really is. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean, like,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think about you and me, right, Like, the audience probably

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>knows if they don't already, that you are really into

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>electronic music, and you cover it for stuff to blow

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>your mind, i'd say weekly, right, Yeah. And um, and I,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as many people have heard on other episodes, grew up

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the punkin metal scene and still listen to a

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of that stuff, which a lot of people find

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>unlistenable and dissonant, including you know, my wife, and um,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that, but it's interesting because dissonance plays

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>into these diseases as well. Well, here's a quick question

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>for you, and I think this helps to sort of

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this helps a lot of us, uh try and comprehend

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what some of these conditions are. Like, Like what what's

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the type of music that you just really don't get

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that you just you can't really listen to, you don't understand,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and and you're just willing to say, yeah, I that

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is not from me usually like NPR style jazz. I

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to just say jazz in general, because there's

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>plenty of stuff that's being done in that area that's

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting and I like, but like that kind of like

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>background elevator music jazz, you know what I mean? Like

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that that drives me crazy. It's like fingers on a chalkboard.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>For me. It's I have to say jazz as well.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And part of this could be I mean, the view

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess is that jazz takes some getting used to.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You have to be you have to immerse yourself in it.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And I like some jazz, and I like jazzy elements

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of the music I listened to from time

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to time, But it's that jazzy jazz that spacey jazz

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that that completely unhinged jazz that just kind of gives

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>me the shape something. We think of this joke on

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Parks and Rack. I don't know if you remember this,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but the their local MPR station, they had a show

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and they would say jazz plus jazz equals jazz. Whenever

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I hear something like that, I'm like nope. During the channel.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I often think about it that it's maybe like a

0:04:54.320 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like a strong alcoholic property. You know, something strong liqueur

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that you would never drink on your on its own,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but you would use in a recipe or you would

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly used in using a mixed drink. So I often think, well,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that is that is the strong, undeluded stuff that is

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not for me. Yeah, but you can put a like

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a shot of it, or like I will. I don't

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>drink clearly so shots a lot, but you know a

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It's like adding grenadine to your to your

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>soda or something like to drink and given a little flavor. Well,

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like punk is is one of those things. I think

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>about this sometimes it's like pure punk. I've just it's

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>not my scene, it's not what I dig. But I

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have certainly loved groups that have elements of punk in

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their sound. They neither come out of punk or find

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>some of their musical genre to combine it with, Like

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>um oh the Poges come to mind. Yeah, like a

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Irish music, a little bit of punk music.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>It's really I would be hard pressed to want to

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to Irish or punk music on their own, but

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>when these two come together, then I you know, I've

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>always enjoyed it. Yeah, No, I can definitely see that,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>even like having spent many a year in basements watching

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just like crusty punk bands just hammering out four chord songs. Uh,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I can understand where you're coming from, and that that

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of has led to like what a lot of

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>our I guess, like popular alternative music is nowadays. Right,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like a fusion of punk and jazz

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or punkin metal, or where Joe and I were just

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>talking the other night about SKA like nineties and how

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of something like that. Yeah. Well, okay,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>enough about our musical interests, but so clearly we're human

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>beings who love music. We've got opinions about music. We

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about it, we like to listen to it,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we go to shows um. But there's people out there

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who don't. And it's not just because you know they don't,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>they don't go to things like that, or they're just

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>not it's because there's literally something going on in their

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>brain that makes it so that they're incapable of enjoying music. Right,

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>something's wired differently, Some systems are online in a slightly

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>different array, and we will get into into these in

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but before we do, without would be helpful

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to just go ahead and give a nice overview of

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the cognitive experience of music, just basically what's going on

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>when we process it. So music is of course a

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>deep part of our cognitive architecture. It changes our mood,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it heightens our emotions, it summons and banishes memories, It

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>affects the manner in which we preceive perceived time. Even

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we can actually use it to treat illnesses of the

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>mind and body. So it's powerful stuff. It's potent stuff

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not even just with human beings. There's been research

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>done on plants that music affects plants, so we're talking

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>about some serious magic here. There are parts of the

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>brain that respond to music that that don't respond to language.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>There are separate parts of the brain that respond to melody,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to the melody of language, different than these different for

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the brain the respond to the melody

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of music, they're parts of the brain that deal with movement, attention, planning,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and memory, and these all respond to music even though

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't have anything to do with the actual auditory process.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot going on behind the scenes. Yeah,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and and we don't fully understand it yet. I mean,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say this research well, you know, we'll talk

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about it later, but really, only in the last century

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>have we even been aware of this as a medical condition.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But only in maybe the last twenty or thirty years

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>has there been like real deep research into what this means. Yeah,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and certainly there's a lot of wonderful research out there

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>about our relationship with music, and we can't cover it

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>all here, but just a couple of i think illuminating

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>studies to to touch on here. Um In in recent years,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we found that you can look to the brain via

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>f m R I, and specifically you can look at

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>brain activity in the nucleus incumbents. This is involved in

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the formation of expectations, and we can actually tell if

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a person is enjoying the music they're listening to. By

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at at brain activity in this region, if it's

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>meeting their musical expectations and matching up with the stored

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>templates of what you've heard before, then you see stuff

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>light up. Um yeah, I could absolutely believe that given

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my experience with music. Yeah, Like if you're just like A,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like here's an example, Like I walk

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>around sometimes and I'll just have like my entire music

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>library on shuffle on my phone or something like that,

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Like one like really great song for my high school

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>days will pop up, and it's like I can feel

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like whatever those lights are that are going on in

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>my brain just activate, you know. Yeah. Yeah. The expectation

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>plays such an interesting role in our experiencing music because

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, there's there's something that happens when a

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>when a melody or a tune or the lyrics take

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you to that place you're expecting it to go. But

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>then also when it goes to a slightly different place

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>where it kind of you think it's going to turn

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>left and it turns right, like that animates you as well.

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's almost like narrative without words, really ah, yeah,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a really interesting way to put it. I um,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll just do a little bit of subjective experience here

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to throw in here. I'm not like, personally a big

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>fan of The Cure, but a friend of mine is,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>uh and if he's listening her, this is your story.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So The Cure just played in Atlanta recently, like I

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think like two weeks ago. Did you know about this?

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I have. I have some friends who are

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>really they went to this show. So the way that

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he told me was that, like, apparently this tour was

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they're going to be playing all their

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>greatest hits or whatever, but that was sort of like

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a different arrangement of the musical instruments. So he was

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>really excited because he's like, well, I'm gonna hear the

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>songs that I love, and it's gonna be played by

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the guys who wrote them, but they're going to be

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>playing them in very different ways than I'm used to

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's a wholly new experience. Oh yeah, I've had

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that experience with I guess tool has been. It seems

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of band that would do something like that.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>They'll play with the intro on something and so the

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>live version, at first you're not sure what it's going

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to be, but then then you realize, oh, it's it's

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this track, it's that track, whatever the particular track may be.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's this, you know, a physical experience of excitement

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to when I was, you know, still involved in the

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>music scening just go into a lot of shows. The

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that was always the most impressive to me, and

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that just showed like a real class act, professional touring band,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was when they could play an entire set without stopping,

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Like they would just start and their songs. They had

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>figured out ways to weave their songs in and out

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of one another, so they would just play like a

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>really tight thirty forty minutes set and then boom they

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>were done, got off on stage. And that is the

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that just floors you. It's just like

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you don't have time to stop and breathe and kind

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>of judge them, uh for other factors like whatever they're wearing,

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>or what they say in between songs or something. You're

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>just like bombarded. Well, that's one of the reasons that

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been so into DJ mixes over the years that, uh,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite the same as a as a band

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>performing the entire set without stop. But this the idea

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can take various musical elements and and a

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talented DJ can create a seamless tapestry of sound. I

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>love that, and certainly you get those six surprises. Those

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>expectations net Or skewed throughout that sonic narrative as well.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So all right, we're clearly establishing that we're music nerds.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We love music, and whatever parts of the brain that

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>don't work for for some of these people, they're they're

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lighting up like fireworks for us. Now. Another key point, though,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is certainly you've been to a concert or performance and

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you've been experiencing the music, and maybe you've seen somebody

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like clearly their significant other drug them here and they're

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>not enjoying it, or they got When you said drugged them,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought like ruderally gave them drugs so that they

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>would just sit put. But yeah, that's that's that's possible,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>depending on the because I've seen you both. Yeah, so

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you've seen people that are not into it, or they're

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't they're clearly the first time, or maybe they

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel like they could possibly be enjoying the

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>music on the same level as you are. Yeah, possibly

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and certainly like and I have to applaud my wife again,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like she's indulged me by you know, sometimes I can't

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>get a friend to go with me to a particular

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. She's like, all right, you know, let's

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with you. You know, we'll go see Converge

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and High on Fire. And she's just sitting there like

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>shaking her head while I'm like really into it, you know, Um,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I get that. Well. It's interesting because despite

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all of our very musical taste, in our varying levels

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of engagement with particular types of music, particular performances, the

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>brain experiences that we have are actually pretty consistent among

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>most people. There was a two thousand thirteen study publishing

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the European Journal of Euroscience, and they found that if

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>two people listened to the same track, one inexperienced fan

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the music and another not the other one just

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like a newcomer, you know, there's been dragged in there

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>by their spouse, you're still going to see the same

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>synchronization in several key brain areas and similar brain activity.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So as much as you you know, might like to

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're experiencing your favorite band and an entirely different

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>cognitive level than the you know, the dumb guy next

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to you with the glories on his fingers. Um, that

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be quite the case. We're still engaging

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like the same networks. I wonder if this is similar

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to like research that's been done on depression and anxiety

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in that like, Um, the more you listen to the

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>songs over and over again, right, Like, it's maybe it's

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like a like writing over the same pathway of the

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>brain over and over and over again, so it makes

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it easier for that experience to happen. It's happening in

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the same way for everybody, but it's just kind of

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>going through the brain. I don't know how to describe

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this other than with like road metaphors, right, Like, it's

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like going down the same road, but it's just like

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>going down faster for for us or something an expectation,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, where the road is going to turn, where

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna split, etcetera. Yeah, interesting, huh. I wonder if

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>anybody's done research on that, Like the the the experience

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of having music encoded to the brain as being similar

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to the sort of expectations that encode anxiety into people. Yeah,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to follow up on that, because I know

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there have been a number of studies that have looked into,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the potential therapeutic aspects of music as well

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as the role of music and in various emotional states. Yeah. Right,

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and you think about it, like some of the emotional

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>states that are created by listening to music have very

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>similar symptoms to anxiety. Huh. All right, maybe that's a

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>future episode. We'll have to dig deep for that one.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But let's take a quick break and then when we

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>come back, we're going to talk about the condition of

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a musia or tone deafness. All right, we're back. So

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this first one, tone deaf deafness amusia. I feel like

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the one where we're going

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to see far more listeners who can share experiences with this. Certainly,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we've probably all encountered people with varying levels of tone

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>deafness over the years, and it seems like tone deafness

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>has variations on it, like extremes or you know, some

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>people have it to to less an extent than others.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The term congenital amusia is what we use to denote

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>tone deafness that you're born with. It's been described in

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>medical literature for more than a century, and it manifests

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>basically as a severe deficiency in processing pitch variations. Now

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this extends to impairments in musical memory and recognition, as

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>well as what we traditionally think of his tone deafness

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as like bad singing or the inability to tap in

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>time with music. Right. Um, everybody's right now is probably

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking of like the person who I don't know was

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>inquired or something like they just couldn't hit the notes. Yeah. Um.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Some literature also refers to a musia as dis melodia

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or dismusia, but the term amusia is generally agreed to

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>be preferable because it acknowledged just the possibility that there

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>exists as many forms of congenital amusias as there are

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>forms of acquired amusias. And what I mean by that

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is accidental brain damage, So you can hurt yourself a

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>variety of ways that will also produce this effect. Now,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, congenital means present from birth, but it is

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>possible to acquire a musia through brain damage in life.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>The very first study that looked at. This was done

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen seventy eight by a guy named Grant Allen,

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and he was investigating a thirty year old man with

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a neurological lesion that gave him this, as he referred

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to it then severe musical handicap um. And maybe some

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of you out there wondering right now, like I can

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>relate to this, is this me? Well it could be

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a recent study found that out of a hundred people

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>who self declared themselves as having a handicap for music,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>only twenty two So actually, exhibit did the traits of

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a musea after they were tested with a formal questionnaire

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and the way that this questionnaire worked. It tested your

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>aptitude for scale, interval, and contour information as well as

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>melodic organization dimension, rhythm and meter, and temporal organization dimension.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They also tested memory recognition ability connected to music. Now,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>those who are tone deaf are generally unable to hear

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the differences in pitch and tone that the rest of

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>us here we joke about this, right you know that

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's always like uh, and I imagine with like movies

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>like Pitch Perfect or TV shows like Glee, like there

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>must be tons of joke about jokes about tone Definitely.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every long running show ever has had

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at least an episode where, oh, it's the person who

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>can't sing, but they don't realize they can't sing it. Yeah.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a common enough of a thing that it

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>shows up in some pop culture narrative and we all

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize it. Uh. We use the phrase really to describe

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people who don't understand simple commun unication strategies to write,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like like even outside of it, we've turned into this

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>metaphor for like, ah, well, he's tone deaf, so that's

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>why he doesn't understand what we're talking about here. It's

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not even we're using it on a on a level

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>beyond like its actual medical application. Right at its most extreme, though,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are tone deaf are unable to even perceive

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>music the same way that the rest of us do.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And it comes down to an actual difference in their

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>brain structure. Uh. And it's different from those like you know,

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert and myself for whom music comes naturally. Okay, it's

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>actually defined as a learning disability. There's a team from

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the University of Montreal who have first published an empirical

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>study on it, and that's their delineation. So, for instance,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>most children, and I didn't realize this, but this is

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>probably a common experience for you. Most children learned to

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>sing at the same time that they're learning to speak, right,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so they're like kind of like singing words. Like I

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>was a babysitting a friend of ours four year old

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the other night, and he was singing constantly. But then

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>he would just kind of talk to himself too. Oh yeah,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's my experience with my son Bastion is um. There's

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of talking at this point

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he's four, but there's also a lot of singing. He

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will just burst into song about the silliest things, to

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the point we're just like, all right, you just you

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can't sing about butter anymore. I just just eat, don't

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>play with the butter, and don't sing about the butter,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>just consumed. But well, that sounds like he is not

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>tone deaf, because tone deaf children don't do this singing

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>when they're younger. Uh. And this is where this this

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>woman seems to be like the expert on this, Like

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>every study I was looking at she was somehow involved in.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Isabelle Perette's. And that's when she gave

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it the official disorder congenital amusia. It's innate in these

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>people's brain, the lack of musical perception, and it's also hereditary. Uh.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>They found that congenital amusia is genetically transmitted. Thirty of

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the people who have first degree relatives with this cognitive

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>disorder also have it. However, if you look at control groups,

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>only three percent habit and control and control group families. However,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>congenital amusia doesn't seem to result from any particular family environment.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, I don't know, uh, you can somehow

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>connect it to like alcoholics or something like that. Right, Like,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there doesn't seem to be an environmental source that's causing this.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be genetic. Remember, though genes don't specify

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>cognitive function, they actually influence brain development. So the next

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>step that these researchers are looking at is, let's identify

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the genes that relate to these neuroanatomical anomalies that are

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>found in the brains of people who have amusia. Now, interestingly,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that three percent control group almost lines up exactly with

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>what they've found to be the percentage of people in

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the population who have it. Four percent seems to be

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the number of people in general population who are a music.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>They grow up with normal exposure to music and are

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise capable of doing everything else everybody else does. They're intelligent,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they're educated. This only affects their ability to recognize pitch

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>in music, and it doesn't apply to language. This is

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the really fascinating part, right. The musics can process speech

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>as well as environmental sounds like I don't know, like

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 1>an animal's cry or something right, or voices. They can

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>understand all of that. They can even understand the pitch

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>changes in different languages like you know a little Chinese.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I spent some time in China. You know how important

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pitch is to the difference in words. They're fine with that,

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's only with the music that they have this

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pitch problem. Well, it reminds me of some of the

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>bits we we discussed earlier about how our brains process music,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that your brain is processing its separately

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>from the music itself, based on all of these other factors.

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So I guess it stands a reason someone with even

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, fairly significant um a musica here could still

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>listen to say, a track with some really engaging lyrics,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, and they're gonna get some sort of lyrical

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>experience out of it. Yeah, and maybe maybe even something

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that is I'm thinking of some of the more some

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of the least musical music that I like, some of

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the more noise oriented stuff, Like maybe they could listen

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to that and appreciate that on some level that is

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not as tied to the music, but still somehow tied

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to a sonic experience of the thing. We are going

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to get back to that. Yeah, there's a there's uh

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a way that dissonance in particular plays into both regular

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>music listening experience and a music listening experience. But there's

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>actually some music acts that are recorded that are fluent

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in several languages, so this is it doesn't at all

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>affect their other communicative abilities. Uh. And the way that

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>they figured this out was they use these tests that

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>were originally designed to assess the presence and specificity of

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>musical disorders and patients with brand damage. The big one

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the difficulty in detecting bit related changes, right,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>especially when that extains into dissonance, which a musical subjects

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have little sensitivity too. So that's interesting, right. So Uh,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>people who love music. When you create music that has

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>dissonance in it, when tones are playing over one another

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>that don't match up the right way, and it just

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds like kind of white noise, some people hate that, right.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I dated a girl once too. I remember putting

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on a record in a car and she just said,

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>turn this off. It just sounds like insects. Uh. And

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't wrong, but she probably wasn't in music because

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they have very little sensitivity to dissonance. Okay, So I

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so one with this condition could very well be an

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>exclusive fan of say like Nurse with Wound or early

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>into New Boton, very like throw a xylophone down a

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hallway sort of music. That's what I'm kind of wondering

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is if like these experimental noise fans that are just

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>super into it and that's all they listened to. I

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could have a musia and not even

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>know it because that's sort of your genre of choice. Um.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't appear, unfortunately, to be something that can be

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote fixed either. Peretz's team has tried teaching kids

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>with the musica to like music. Actually, they basically they

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>gave them MP three players, and they said listen to

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>this for thirty minutes a day. Not only did the

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>kids fail to improve on their tests, but they how

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>poorly they scored on the test correlated to how much

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they reported listening to the music. Um. So the next

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>steps to to see if there's any kind of way

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to reverse this. Seemed to be some kind of remediation

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>training programs that might improve pitch perception and memory. The

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>very least, this will help us understand the neurological basis

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for this so that we can use it to diagnose

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>other learning disorders. To you, so, what what's going on

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the brain here? Right? Like, let's zoom in, take

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a look at the brain and figure out what exactly

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the deal is. Well, there's a study by a team

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in France and they used m EG scanners to figure

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>this out. A music people's brains stem from delayed or

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>impaired functioning in their frontal and auditory cortex. They also

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>had physical abnormalities in those areas of the brain, with

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>more gray matter and less white matter than usual. Now,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's come up on the show a

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of times when we're talking about everything from brain

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>disorders to drug usage. Right, Like that white gray matter

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>balance seems to be pretty important again. People with music,

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't enjoy music, but they're capable of enjoying all

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the other pleasures the rest of us are. Right, It's

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>not like they're dead inside, right, it's just this one area,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and arguably an area that that certainly has nothing to

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do with their survival or ability to to move and

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>enjoy life and and and partake of our culture. They're

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just not into the musical aspect of it. Yeah, I

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>mean they like food, they like money, they like sex.

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>This has all been tracked in UH. There was a

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>March six article in the Journal of Current Biology. They

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>looked at this UM. So, Okay, we know it's innate

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or it's acquired. We know it prevents people from processing

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>music the way they do. There's also another way to

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>look at this, another terminology called specific musical and hedonia. UH.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is what another studies authors called the inability

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to expla experience pleasure from music in general. So if

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a musia is the like disease, the extreme version where

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't appreciate music at all, is this specific musical

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and hedonia. And in their study they divided thirty people

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>into three even groups, and they were asked to do

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what they called a music task, where they listened to

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>classical pieces of music and then they rated them. Then

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they were asked to do a monetary incentive delay task.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Basically the is gambling um and usually both would induce

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>an emotional reaction in the brain. The researchers analyze the

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>heart rate of their subjects and how much they perspired. Now,

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>some were quote emotionally oblivious to music that they could

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>tell what they were supposed to be feeling. So they

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>heard the stuff they knew they were supposed to be

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>having some kind of feeling, but their brain wasn't registering it.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Their brain registered okay, there's some reward system in place.

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>When I'm when they were playing around with the money

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and gambling, that was lighting up, but not when they're

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to music. So I'm wondering, this is just me

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>here and maybe I'm way off, but do you think

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a museum can also affect a person's timing and tapping

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like fine motor control? Because I'm thinking, like,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if you can't tap out a beat along to a song,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>would that affect your fine motor control in terms of

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like trying to find don't know, I'm thinking about like

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>platform video games where you're trying to like jump from

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing to another at just the exact right time,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like it was like the old school platformers

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>where they were just insanely difficult and you essentially had

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to know like the exact beats to hit the exact key.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There's to that, right, And I'm wondering if that affects

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>them as well, or like Simon game comes to mind.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that would be a perfect example. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like they would just be unable to do Simon. I'm

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>curious about that. Again, it comes down to like a

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>small loss like Simon wouldn't be a big deal. But

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine if the fine motor control extended into

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>other aspects of your life that might be difficult. I mean,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly there was a time when like the predominant game

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>video game was those insane platformers, and if you were

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>not able to partake of those, I mean, you felt

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like you were missing out a little bit, Like I

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was just always kind of horrible at them, and I

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>remember feeling a little left out like I had never

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>beat Like I don't think I bade any of those

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>old Nintendo games, and and I did feel like this

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or something something wrong with me that I haven't beat

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Mario Brothers too. I can sort of remember that, yeah,

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>because especially like our generation, the way we played like

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we all would just huddle around the TV and the

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>console right for hours at a time. I remember playing

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like Mega Man for like ten hours straight into the

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of the night with my buddies, and we would

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like switch off, right. But yeah, you would sort of

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>get laughed at if you weren't as like, oh you

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>can't make that one little jump? Come on, you know,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thank god they got EASi here. Okay, So Robert tell

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit more about agnosia and how it's

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>related to a musea. Well, agnosia in Greek means not

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>knowing and um and if. From a broad standpoint, agnoja

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>refers to a number of different neural disorders that basically

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in which the subject experience is an inability to inability

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to process different sensory information. Now what sort of information

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this varies a lot. Some experience and inability to recognize

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and identify objects or persons or aspects of objects or persons. Uh,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the sense itself is not defective, however, it's just how

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you're processing it. So it's not that you can't hear,

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not that you can't see. It's there's no memory loss.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And it might be limited to a single sense, it

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>might be more than one. So what I immediately thought

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of here was all of our sacks famous study of

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the man who mistook his wife for a hat, which

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was about a guy who had a brain disorder and

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>literally like couldn't perceive the difference between his wife when

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he saw her in his hat. Uh, And all of

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your Sacks was famous for doing all kinds of studies

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like this. But this that seems like maybe a more

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>extreme version of agnosia. Well, there are a number of

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>different versions of it that have been either officially or

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>unofficially identified, So just a few here it There's there's

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>finger agnosia. This is an inability to recognize the fingers

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the hand. There's a more famous one, and certainly

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Oliver Sacks don't um study this one a good bed.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 1>And this is a prosopagnosia. This is face blindness. So

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at a face, it's not that you can't see,

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not even that you can't see a face. It's

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not like on that that wonderful episode of Hannibal, where

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like a swirly like blank thing. Right, It's it's

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not that as wonderful as that was visually in that show.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>It's not really what of facial face blindness is like.

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But still you you can't you look in at the face,

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing the face, but you can't really identify what's

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>going on. You can't like put the markers together to

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>identify it as being different from one face or another. Right,

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>There's also a phone agnosia, which is voice blindness. There's

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>time agnosia, which is an inability to interpret the passaging

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of time. And there's also semantic agnosia, and this is

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>object blindness. And without being fresh on the details of

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the hat situation, that seems like that that would be

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the related classes. Probably, Yeah, And I have to say, um,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and I have to bring this up in a bigeeki

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about it since I'm currently reading the latest book in

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>our Scott Baker's Prince of Nothing. Yeah, you have told

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>me about this numerous times, and so has a friend

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the show, ec Steiner. Yeah, Yeah, I look forward

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to chatting about this latest book with Steiner because it's uh,

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the title is a Great Ordeal. But throughout the entire

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>series there's this tragic, undying elder race known as the

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>non Men. Okay, so they're like humans, but they're very

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>alien in many respects. They've been around forever, they're they've

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>had all these traumatic experiences, and there are a few

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>different differences that like very notable differences between them and humans, like,

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they're you know, they're ghastly and pale, kind

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of google ish. They there Keith are all fused together.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But the one that I've always found really fascinating was

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the revelation that they can't see paintings. Interesting, they deal

0:33:55.200 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>almost exclusively with scroll dimensional three dimensional representations. That would

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would definitely work for Steiner since he's working. For those

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of you who don't know who we're talking about, this

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is a friend of ours who has actually done work

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for the show before, especially for our video series. Um

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he's worked with me on comic books before in two

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>dimensional formats, but he actually sculpt it, like these huge

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>set pieces that we used for the Monster Science series here.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He did this wonderful Cathulu piece that we have here

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 1>in the office, and uh, there's the giant cyclops skull

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can see in the background and a couple

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of those. So he's worked with us on the show before. Yeah,

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe he's he himself is one of the

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>non men um He might be. But I've seen people

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>interpret this like painting blindness, if you will, and maybe

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it maybe it's something to do with oh well, they

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>can't see colors, the color blindness. But I can't help

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but wonder if this is, uh, if this would be

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like painting agnosia. Certainly, our Stan Baker

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>works so many neuroscientific and philosophical ideas to his work.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised at all of that was

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a partial inspiration for it. Okay, Yeah, I like that.

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I that yeah. Yeah. But all of these conditions, the

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>real ones that we've discussed here, there are examples where

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>again you're the stimuli is entering through your senses, but

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>then something is messed up, the wiring is crossed, there's

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>there's something in many cases physically damaged in the brain

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that is permitting the proper processing of that stimula. Yeah,

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and where this enters the musical realm is auditory agnosia,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're essentially two different versions. Here. There's classical auditory agnosia,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>which entails environmental sounds, so this would be like you

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>hear a bird or a car, but you're unable to

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>process exactly what that sound is. And then there is

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>interpretive or acceptive agnosia, and this entails music and gets

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more into this, this idea of musical agnosia. I guess

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>like here's a good point for me to probably clarify too,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because I have this. I don't know about you, but um,

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I have a good bit of tenitis um from all

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.479
<v Speaker 1>my years going to shows, and even though I want

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>ear plugs, yeah, I still hear that whistling at night

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and if everything's quiet, I just hear a high pitched

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>wine all the time. Um. And this isn't that though, right,

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's an actual like we actually have an

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>episode of brain stuff about that, um, But that's part

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of your ear drum being affected and then connecting to

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your brain. This is totally different. This is just brain

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. In some of the case and we'll look

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of case studies here, uh in a minute.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>In some of those you do see like actual deftness

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>occurring as well. But but yeah, for the most part,

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the about not a physical hearing loss.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So examples of this go back at least as far

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as nineteen o five. I was looking at some articles

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about this, and the reference a physician only referred to

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bond Vincini and another one by the name of

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Lammy L. A. M Y. And both of those, uh

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>encountered individuals who who had difficulty with music so they

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>could In the first one, the nineteen five case, the

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>patient could still process musical information, but could no longer

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>recognize well known tunes. Um he could pick out a

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong note in a famous tune, but he couldn't name

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that tune. And in the nineteen o seven case from

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Lammy L. A. M Y described a patient who could

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>transcribe his national anthem but didn't know what it was.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, huh. And I'm assuming that given their names,

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they probably weren't transcribing the American national anthem, right. I

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>think these were both, Uh at least said the first

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one was Italian. I'm not certain about Lamby. Again, I

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>look to try and find some more information about these

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:50.720
<v Speaker 1>individuals as possible. That from motor head did something. Certainly

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those may be lost of time, alright. So the thing

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind is there's a lot of variety.

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's an example two thousand and eleven a case that

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was reported by Zang Kaga and I. She of a

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven year old woman with long term severe hydrocephalis.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>This is abnormal accumulation of cerebro spinal fluid in the brain,

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and this was due to congenital spina bifida. She gradually

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>lost her hearing, but she experienced quote severe difficulty in

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>distinguishing verbal, environmental, and musical instrument sounds as her hearing

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>left her. She continued to enjoy music, however, and could

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>she could because she could sense the rhythms by simply

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>turning up the music allowed enough to feel the vibrations,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and this allowed her to actually summon the memories of

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>emotional associations that she had made with the music prior

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to her hearing loss. Okay, that's nice. Yeah, I think

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of beautiful. I mean it gets into this

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that we discussed earlier, that the brain is processing

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>music in a few different ways, and if one of

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>those bridges happens to break down. It doesn't mean, you know,

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the information can't get across, and the vibrations alone are

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to sort of trigger those emotional associations. Is interesting. Yeah,

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can also of course get into I don't

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think they got into it as much in the paper,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you have you have instances where you

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>can you can use hearing a devices that that that

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>depend upon like vibrations in the skull as opposed to

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, straight up you know your drumstizations. Yeah. Now

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>compare all of this to an earlier case. This was

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>present in n in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, that

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of A and this was I think the case itself

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was first studied in the seventies, but it was a

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>forty year old nurse referred to as c N who,

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>following a series of surgeries at age thirty five to

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>repair cerebral aneurysms in each of her temporal lobes, complained

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that she was no longer able to pick out the

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>simplest overlearned tune, you know things, the tunes you should

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have known just by heart. So she no longer recognized

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>tunes from her own record collection unless they had audible lyrics,

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>which is, which is interesting. She can only identify them

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the lyrics kicked in. So this is making me

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>think of people. I listened to a lot of music

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that has unrecognizable lyrics, and I'm okay with that, but

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people who are like, how

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>could you listen to that you don't know what they're saying.

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's connected. I don't know, because maybe

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just an aesthetic preference. But I often think of

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in cases like that where you can't quite understand what

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the the the vocalist is saying. It's like Tom York

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. Certainly some of the music a tool

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>even or or um Sugares another act that comes to mind,

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>where if I'm not even understanding exactly what's saying, or

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm only picking up on certain words, like the voice

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>itself as a musical instrument. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. I was

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>just mentioning this the other day to a friend of

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>mine about Radio Ahead. But that's how I think of

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Tom York is less as a lyricist and more as

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like a vocal musical contributor, sort of like how Mike

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Patton does stuff with his voice and some his side

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.359
<v Speaker 1>projects like um, like Phantom Moss where he's not even

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really saying things, but he's just like using his voice

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>as an instrument. Yeah, or like certainly we can all

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>listen to music in different languages. We can listen to say,

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Mongolian throat singing and still enjoy it. Yeah. So the

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the the individual in question here, she had no problem

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>understanding or communicating verbally, but music simply didn't register like

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it used to. Musical patterns found no purchase in her mind,

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and this made her a near perfect case of music agnosia.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>While and it sounds like there's an overlap there with

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a musa. So I wonder if, like um, the neurobiologists,

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they're really looking into this deeply, if there's just a

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>terminology overlap here, or if there's some symptoms of agnosia

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and some symptoms of as a musea that separate them

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>out as being totally different. I think that there is

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>definite overlap here, because I have seen in some of

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the papers we're looking at they even you said even

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you used them interchangeably or said, this is also known

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>as a musea. Though, and though there are plenty of cases,

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in the stuff we covered earlier where a musa

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is not describing agnosia and vice versa. So it sounds

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like that we need to do a lot more research

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on this and sort of better identify these categories. Yeah,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe. I believe the experts in these areas are

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get firm ideas of what's going on,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because certainly agnosia is a is a rarity compared to

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the more simpler versions of the music. Right, Yeah, you

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>can have a musa and okay, so maybe this is

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the difference. Amusia is the four percent of the population

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>who are just toned deaf, whereas agnosia or the term

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that I was using earlier, me scroll back into the

0:42:52.920 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>notes to find it specific musical and hedonia those sound

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like the the extreme version of it where you just

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>don't process music at all, Right, And I think that's

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where we see the overlap. Yeah, and

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>those conditions where we're talking, especially when we're talking about

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>brain injuries UM, physical trauma to the brain, physical changes

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to the brain, the result in these symptoms. Now in

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the treatment of agnosia UM. The analogy I made earlier

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about the two bridges, that's ultimately where we see the

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>main treatment or coping mechanisms, and that is that if

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>one bridge is out, there are other bridges. There are

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>other ways that we consume music, that we that we

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>take music in and so we we see in various

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>cases where it basically information is just presented in other

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>modalities with that connect to the patients. So it's just

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a different way of connecting with the music. It's interesting

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that you use the term bridges because from what I

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>can tell, the causes that lead to and these are

0:43:55.400 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the physical causes that lead to agnosia UM usually are

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>around the occipito temporal border in the brain of the

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ventral stream right connecting parts of the brain together, the

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>bridges between that that gets damaged, and this could be

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>lesions on the parietal or temporal lobes. It can be

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>produced from head injury or a stroke, or infection or

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>carbon monoxide poisoning, all kinds of things, right, Um, But

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>these lead to all the kinds of ignosia, not just

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the auditory ones we're talking about also visual and tactile

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're focusing on auditory today, But that bridge,

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if that's severed, that's where that sense kind of goes. Hey,

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>why are ye all right? So this is what I'm wondering,

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is what I'd like to see more research of,

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, leading us out for the future. What effects

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do a musia or agnosia have on other behaviors like

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>we've we've seen okay, yes, these people understanding uh language,

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>still right, and they're they're capable of being functional in

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 1>society and working and being intelligent and educated. But what

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of personalities develop from a person who just doesn't

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>have music in their life. It's a good question I'd

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from from any listeners on this. Certainly,

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the the data we were looking at in the papers

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>we were reading, they seem, if anything, it seems like

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the time the researchers are surprised at how

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how well the individual does you know, so it's it

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot maybe in the more severe

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cases where it's affecting you know, greater sound agnosia in general,

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>or or other types of of a stimulus coming into

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the brain, But for the most part, it doesn't seem

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to handicap them significantly. I mean, they're still able in

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 1>many cases to enjoy music. The thing, the one area

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that is that is specifically affected. Yeah, I'm also wondering too,

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and please listeners chime in on this one as well.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 1>With the rise and popularity of podcasts, I wonder if

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>that is an outlet for a muse as like there, Well,

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like music, but these podcasts are great, so

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll just load up a bunch of these and listen

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to these all the time. I've certainly met people like that,

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the people who don't want to drive with music on,

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and then inevitably that they want to listen to something right,

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and they'll they'll go for a podcast, We'll go for

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a radio show, or like a book. Yeah, yeah, interesting, Okay, huh. Well,

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I like to balance back and forth between the two.

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I'm in the mood for music, sometimes in the

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mood for a podcast or a book. But that's an interesting,

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting difference in experiences. Well, it seems like there's a

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of information that we can learn from you, the

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>listeners out here about this. I mean, we're scratching the

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>surface of this pretty much brand new discipline of research.

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So let us know what you think about it. I

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>want to hear your your experiences. Maybe you've met people

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>who don't like music at all, maybe you're one of

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 1>those people, and maybe that's why you listen to the show. Um,

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so let us know. You can contact us in all

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the usual ways. We are on social media all over

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the place, Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. And then there's

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>also our landing page, stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>That's where you're gonna find all the podcasts, all the

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>videos we've made, and all of the articles, none of

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>which are musical based. If you have a musea, you

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can consume them and be just fine. That's right. And hey,

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us directly,

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>as always, email us at blow the Mind at how

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com. Well more on this and thousands

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff Works dot com.

0:47:49.840 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Blow by blas Larger Towns is found by a bottle

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>prote