WEBVTT - 2017 Big 12 Conference Preview

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Come that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for Dake Edith state is that? Whoo whoom? And Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and Tye welcome back to the solid verbal Boys and girls.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hildenbrand, joining me the far side

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a planet Earth. Dan Rubinstein, sir, how are you? I'm

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ready for previews? Oh freaking yeah.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>So we're into August. It is preview time, Ty, How

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>are we handling said previews? In the past, We've done

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>conference previews. We have done you know s and p

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>top forty countdown previews. We did previews as it relates

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to which team got you. I mean, this was your idea,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I got you most aroused. I remember that was a

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>strange year, but you know, we got through it and

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I think we're the better for it.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It was what are we weird? G chat? Yeah? Yes,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing this yere? While I'm still waiting

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for the checks to clear? And depending on who donated

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the most money, that will be who we spend most

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of our time covering.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I like that and who we like the most. Where

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 2>you're biased towards the most.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the way this thing works here in the media.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So here here's the deal. As you mentioned, we we've

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>done a bunch of different cuts on season previews last

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>two years. I believe we've done the top forty or

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>top whatever according to the S and P Plus. The

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>S and P plus is still going to have a

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty big role in how we preview teams building up

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to the twenty seventeen season. We're going to try and

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have a conference conversation here each and every week now

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the build up to the season. Tonight, we're going

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to do Big twelve. We're going to start there. But

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what we didn't want to do is leave some teams

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like Iowa State out because Iowa State to me as

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a team that I'm really excited about that I want

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that. I know we have fans who

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show want to get a little bit

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>igh with State. Matt Campbell discussion out there for some

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>people who might be interested in really just how they

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fit into the whole Big twelve equations. So a conference

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation is how we are going to approach each of

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the Power five conferences. And then we've also got some

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>important nuggets about the group of five conferences as well. Correct.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think tonight we're gonna do the American Conference or

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the Act.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>The Power six.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe according to the American Conference, the sixth team are

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the sixth conference. Excuse me, Yes, So we're gonna do

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>some nuggets about the American after we talk about the

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Big Twelve. We're going to touch on all of the

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 2>teams in some fashion or form.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But first time, I have breaking news. Oh, breaking news.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, double breaking news.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Who whoa? Whoa? Did you want to

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>play again? No? Just once once? Oh? Okay, okay, that's fine.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I did it again.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>We have two things, two news stories to break as

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it relates to the solid verbal. The first is in

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a few days, nine days, we're doing a live show

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Yes, it's a live live show in

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the Western Blood. Yes, we're doing it at hill Country Barbecue.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Last time we did it Hill Country Chicken. We are

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 2>friends with the people at the Hill Country Restaurant Group.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>They've been very good to us, and they serve very

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 2>good food and they have shiner and all that good

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff at both of their restaurants. So good cheap beer

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 2>that's a winning combination for us. We're doing it a

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>hill country barbecue this time. It's a slightly bigger venue.

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>We want to fill it. Most of the tickets are gone,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>but we are telling you right now, because you are

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the people who are listening to the show, probably relatively

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>quickly after it went up. If you happen to be

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>in the New York area, we demand that you come.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>We want to see you. We will have beer, we

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>will have snacks at either discounted or we're just going

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>to give beer and snacks away because you know what,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>we want people enthusiastic about our Fantasy Live Things Draft,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a Fantasy Things Draft Live, and so we want you

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>to be there.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So the tickets are where tie The tickets you can

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>find if you go on out to solidverbal dot com.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got to post up. If you go out to

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook page, if you go out to our Twitter page,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been making Instagram videos. We've got posts on Instagram

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. If you need help finding that link, you

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can always email us at solidverbal at gmail dot com.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also find it out on Reddit at reddit

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash our slash solid verbal, which is the

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>subreddit that some of our fans have graciously created on

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>our behalf that. Oh, by the way, sign up for

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the newsletter of intent. The people who sign up for

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the newsletter got a two hour notice on when the

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>tickets were going to be available, where they were going

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be available, all that good stuff. They're available now.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>As you said, most have been sold, but available for

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars plus some whatever odd fees get thrown in

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for the ticket processes.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Super minimal. I think it's like a dollar something, you know.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a very it's not a ticketmaster situation.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We are We are not going to get rich off

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>any of these live shows, nor do we have any

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>intention of doing so. We just want to meet the people.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>We're excited about college football season. We love this show.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna play this sound a bunch of times. I'm

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>excited about that, maybe more than anything. It's one of

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the favorite shows that we do all year, and we

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>just want people to show up. So any place you

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can find the solid verbal, you can find links to

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get those tickets.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And take pictures. Will you take pictures with people? Will

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you hug them if they ask for a hug?

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure? Okay, I'll rerecord your voicemail greeting. Oh yeah, takes whatever.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh, yeah, they have good they have really good food.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's barbecue, and as we both know, Ti New

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>York convented barbecue. So we're in a good spot absolutely,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So come on out to the live show. That is

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>that both breaking news stoles though that's only one. That's

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>only one one. I'm gonna play it again, double record.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Our shirt is done being designed and we are accepting

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>pre orders at solid verbal dot com slash store. Mostually

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is that I'm a big fan of how this shirt

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>came out, and I say that as somebody who designed

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 2>the entire thing. But it's the new shirt for twenty seventeen.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>It's we are not going to be ordering a lot

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>of these just because it's very difficult to keep track

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>of everything. So it's a limited order run of shirts.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, we might find a place to put it

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 2>up after the fact, but we don't know when that's

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 2>going to be. So if you're interested in a shirt,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>we have small through I think double X. Yep, that's correct,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>that's small through double X available for pre order and

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 2>then you'll get your shirt and everybody's gonna be happy.

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 2>They will once again be very comfortable. They are a

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 2>new color, it's a brand new design. I really like

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 2>how they came out. I cannot wait to wear one

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>myself because I love the Solid Verbal and I hope

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 2>that you do too, so solidverbal dot com slash store.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>A few enterprising for ballers found the link hidden in

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>our time navigation at solid verbal dot com. You can

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 1>see it. It says store. Yeah, click on that order form,

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fill it out. It'll take you to PayPal twenty five

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>bucks a shirt. Again, not getting rich off this, trying

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover costs and make it worth our while. I

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want you to be wearing comfortable shirts. It's a very

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>comfortable shirt. I am excited as well about the design

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and pre order lasts. How long preorder is gonna last

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>until about like the second to last week of August,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So I really we can get people their shirts at

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some point in middle September and be a great college

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>football season. We'd out to your tailgate promo the Verbal

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're out there at the stadium. And I should

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>also add that our History show which did really really well. Yeah,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people really seem to enjoy the History Show as well

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as the nineties video game show we did with Bill

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Barnwell and Ryan Nanny, the two shows we recorded in

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the same day that caused me to lose my voice

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for a week and a half, just a little bit. Yeah.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>People have asked in response to that, how can they

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>donate to the Solidverbal We are not taking donations for

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the soliverbal We would instead encourage you to go on

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>out and buy a shirt or come to a live show.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Just be part of the community. Help spread the wealth.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're all about.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're not super comfortable asking for your money for

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 2>doing something we already want to and love doing. So

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a shirt or coming out to the live show would

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>be incredible for our relationship as hosts and audience. That'd

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>be wonderful.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't want to spend any money, at

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a minimum going out. If you like the show, write

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>us a review on Facebook or on iTunes at iTunes,

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash Solid Verbal, or just join our pool.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Our pickam pool which I sent out to a gentleman

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>yesterday happening. I will be yeah, a lot going on here.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>As we turn the calendar to August, there will be

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a pick and pool out on Yahoo which will advertise

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>progressively more and more as we get closer to the season. Ty,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>can we talk about football? I love to talk about football, Dan,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to play this. I already gave away the

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>game in saying that we're gonna talk about the Big Twelve.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah here, But what are your thoughts in the Big Twelve?

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling about this conference? Dan? I feel

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I was trying to come up with something

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>clever or flashy, or a way to brand the Big

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Twelve as a whole, and all I could come ahle,

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I came up with two things. One I probably should

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>have like heavy metal under me, but incremental improvement. Incremental

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>improvement or El Pasco. Yeah, Well here's my thing. Yeah,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>every team in the Big Twelve has a big, bold,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy two point aerial question mark, and the only differentiator

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for Oklahoma is that their question mark is only big

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and bold, but thirty six points, yes, not quite as big.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They to me represent the clear top tier in the

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Big Twelve this season. Beyond that, though, I think it's

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Incremental Improvement's a good way to phrase it.

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But as a whole, most of the teams, if not

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the teams in the conference, save for maybe

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, which we'll talk about here momentarily, save for

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe Baylor, who knows where they're going, Save for maybe

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech. Because it's always the same preview each and

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>every year under Cliff Kingsbury. Most teams across the board,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think are going to get better enough production, coming

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>back enough improvements made towards the latter half of last season,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we should see a better conference as a whole in

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve this year.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>The clear worst Power five or Power six, all things considered,

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>conference that there was in twenty sixteen. I believe, the

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>only Power five conference with fewer than fifty percent of

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 2>their teams finishing with a winning record, which is it's

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty unacceptable, it really is. But I understand they play

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>nine conference games and other conferences don't. But there's no reason,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>considering the level of talent generally speaking in this area,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that more than five teams can't finish with the winning record.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>The non conference schedules sort of up and down across

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the board, but I think it's fair to assume that

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>this conference can only go up from where they were

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that. So what I think we'll

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do talk about our general impressions of the teams within

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Big twelve, how we see them all meshing, how

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we see them all knocking each other off, throwing a

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>little soliverble personality, kick it up a notch with some

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>solible your words, your words, and that we'll just we'll

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>try to suss all this out, man, figure out where

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes. Yes, do you want to start with Oklahoma?

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I do want to start out with Oklahoma. Okay? To me,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they are, by the way, pre season eighth in the poll,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the Amway Coaches poll that USA Today released earlier today.

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Good timing. They are eighth in the preseason poll. Take

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that with a green of salt. They are clearly the

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>cream of the crop. They should be able to control

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage on offense. They should be solid

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with their back seven. What concerns me at a very

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>high level, and what I'm legitimately curious to see, is

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if there is at all a transition phase now with

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Riley stepping in for Bob Stoops who retired. Remember

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that it feels like it was an eon ago. Bob

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Stoops retiring was kind of something that came out of

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>left field. It was a big story. I covered it

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>while you were away on your Where were you? Where'd

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you go? I was on my moon. I was honeymoon.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You were off mooning. I talked to Bruce Felm and

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Andy Staples about it, what it all meant.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't as big a surprise to them as I

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think it was for a lot of college football fans.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to undersell the fact that a

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>coaching legend has passed the baton onto a guy who's

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>still relatively young, who's very well respected in coaching circles,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but this is still his first head coaching gig Dan.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that can go wrong with that.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he won't have time to devote as much energy

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 2>as he has these past couple of years to the offense. Luckily,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield is really, really good at college football, one

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>of the great all time walk ons. And on the

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>flip side, no d d Westbrook, no samaj p Ry,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 2>no Joe Mixon. So certainly going to be new names

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>on offense, But as you mentioned, the lineup front should

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>be really good and the schedule all things considered, and

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's fair to look too deeply into

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>what this Oklahoma team will be just because of what

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 2>they do at Ohio Stadium against Ohio State early on

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in the year. Because the Big Twelve schedule is pretty good. Yeah,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they never played Texas as a true road game,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>so it's your neutral site Cotton Bowl game. They're on

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the road against Kansas State, They're on the road against

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma State and Bedlam. But all things considered, it's a

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty even schedule once they get into the conference part

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>of the year. So I really like Oklahoma. I'm curious

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to see what kind of in game management we see

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 2>from Lincoln, right that's the big difference on game day.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I have him down for ten wins. I

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 2>have ten and two. I have them losing Ohio State

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>on the road and to either Oklahoma State on the road,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, Kansas State. Nobody ever wants to play against

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>this style Kansas State team or some sort of weird

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 2>shootouty game, be it against West Virginia or TCU, who

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>they had a shootout against last year. So that's I'm

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>really excited to see this team, and I think you

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>hit every other point the wins projection. According to our

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>friend Bill Connolly, is currently at nine point seven.

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so ten wins feels about right to me. I

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would urge you and we'll talk a little bit more

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about this when we get to Texas. Don't discount what

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Herman does as an underdog. We saw what he

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>did at Houston against some teams that he wasn't supposed

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to beat, namely Oklahoma. Right, we'll see, We'll see what

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he's able to do, how he assembles those parts. I

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>also want to come back to a point that you

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned about Oklahoma losing Joe Mixon samaj p Ryan. They're

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>two headed monster at running back as well as Dede Westbrook,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>who was in New York for the Heisman Trophy presentation.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>That's forty six hundred total yards walking out the door, yep.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>How do they repentance that they've got names, they've got

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>talent because they're Oklahoma. But I don't expect that to

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be just something that works out automatically. Because you've got

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. I think it's going to take some time.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It helps that you've got a really good offensive line,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>probably the best in the Big twelve. That'll work for you,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's going to take some time. To

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>work things out. I don't think they'll have that all

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in order by September ninth when they go to Ohio State.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I would also add this fun nugget, speaking of which,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma is one of a handful of teams to have

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 2>never been shut out in a college football playoff game.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh college football playoff teams mostly have never been shut out,

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and that includes Oklahoma.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Very good, very good. Yeah uh. And we'll see what

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the defense has in story if it can improve. It's

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>been good. It's not been elite since brand Vettibles left,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but still a pretty good unit. As it relates, certainly

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Big twelve. Who do we have next? We

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>both feel in ten wins? Yes, I'm feeling ten. Let's

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>go down to Texas. Okay, I mentioned Texas. They are

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>pre season twenty three dan according again to the Amway

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Coaches USA today pol mm hmm. They get with a

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>green as salt. They indeed are. Last year, they were

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very young, very very young. Charlie Strong was still the

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>coach way back when the defense as a whole got

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>better throughout the course of the year. Inconsistent, but got

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>better throughout the course of the season. The offense, though

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>had trouble. They had trouble assembling their parts outside of

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Deonty Foreman and Shane Bachelle was certainly a revelation early

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>could certainly throw that streak down the side against teams

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that were willing to surrender the street Notre Dame, but

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, it just felt like they had a difficult

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>time building that cohesion. Now we've got Tom Herman, dan is,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>what is he going to do with Shane Buschelle who

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't exactly as young, but he wasn't exactly any model

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for efficiency on offense. Yeah, and it's sort of a

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>misnomer that you know Houston had this big, fancy offense

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because of how they played early on in the season.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We saw them beat Oklahoma of course early on, But

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I imagine Shane Bochelle will have a better idea of the

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>expectations of the offense because of Tom Herman, because of

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>what you know, it's Tim Beck, who I know a

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have very mixed opinions of as a coordinator.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>He comes in to help run that Texas offense. But

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the really good news. I still like Chris Warren

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if he can stay healthy. I really like the Texas

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Defensively, I would say the Lion's share of

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the talent is in the back whatever six or seven,

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Lak Jefferson, Anthony Wheeler. These are healthy people, well hopefully.

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I like a couple of the defensive backs for Texas

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Chris Boyd and PJ. Lock are good, but

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I see like super duper game

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>changers up front. And that's why I can't really get

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>into the threatening nine or ten wins sort of mode

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for Texas. So my expectations are pretty limited because of health,

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because of depth, because I just knew everything, including I

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think Tom Herman shaved his head. I saw that today.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I saw they have forty three inch screens at every locker,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>so everything is getting real sleek, whether it's a scalp

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 2>or a dressing room. So I am optimistic that Texas

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to improve. If they can stop the run

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better, if they can get after the

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 2>quarterback with some guys being shifted around a little bit better,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think big things for Texas long term. I really

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>like Todderland to always have their defensive coordinator. Their schedule

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is not the best because they travel to USC early

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>on but both Oklahoma schools are not true road games,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>but they go on the road to TCU and West

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Virginia at the end of the year. So will it

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 2>appears right now be tests for the front of the defense,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 2>so we'll have a better idea of.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>The incremental improvement. That's right, that's right by event. So

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to also mention Todd Orlando, who came with

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom Herman from Houston to Texas. Defense was again very

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>young a year ago and it did improve, but it

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to get better against the run. Like you said,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>what kind of impact will he have coming with Tom Herman.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We know that those two have worked pretty well together

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to turn their Houston defense into what I thought was

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a unit that was pretty formidable last year.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and on that a similar token. Here's what we

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 2>saw from Texas near the end of the year, a

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>lost to Kansas. Here's what we've seen from Tom Herman

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>these past couple of years. And I think we both

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>really like Tom Herman as a head coach.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Doudwicks, we saw them really look bad Houston

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>against SMU last year. They lose to Yukon a couple

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. They've struggled with Navy. So it's the

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>freshing the idea that you should be teams that are

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're clearly better than, and so eliminating not limiting. Eliminating

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the dud weeks. For Texas, I think is going to

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be the huge, huge thing I'm looking for. There may

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>be dud weeks, but they're gonna play USC tight, and

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna play Oklahoma type. Okay, maybe they'll maybe they'll

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>lose that Baylor, but there are going to be games,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>those games where they are underdogs where I think they

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>they play well because of Tom Herman and because of

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all the returning talent they have coming back. Let me,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about the scale. Yeah, let me read through

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this list really quick. Right, Who's gonna who's gonna blow

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the lid off the defense? That's yeah, that's a big

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>question on offense. But in terms of just guys coming back.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Eight of nine offensive linemen, including Connor Williams, who is

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>an All Doplican top three wide receiving targets, seven of

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the top nine defensive linemen and six are either sophomores

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or juniors. Seven of the top eight line again, six

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are either sophomores or juniors and eight of the top

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>ten defensive backs returning. Seven of those are either sophomores

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or juniors. So Texas is set up really nicely, not

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>just for this year, but certainly next year as well.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>What's the record. I see a loss to either USC

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>or Oklahoma. I think they're going to knock one of

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>those teams off. Wow. I think there will be a

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dud week at some point in there, and I'm going

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to count another unspecified loss in there as well. I

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>say nine wins for Texas. I'm high on Texas.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm at like seven and a half, seven and five,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>eight and four. If things go right health wise, I

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>think they they're just going to be that that transition yere.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, where are we going next?

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Oklahoma State? All right, let's go to Stillwater.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to a team that I think we're both

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty high one and Oklahoma State schedule wise tricky, it's

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 2>sort of a landmine situation. They have Tulane, excuse me,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Tulsa early on, and it's a Tulsa team that's looking

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different, but they were dangerous last year.

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 2>They traveled to pitt SEC really decent, only time. We'll

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>tell Tyler. But they've got a stretch of I think

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>it's at Texas, at West Virginia and Oklahoma in late

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>October early November. If they can go two and one

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 2>out of that, I think they have a very good

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>chance to at least threaten double digit wins. I think

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>they're good enough to be pitt They're good enough to

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 2>beat Tulsa in the non conference. I have them down

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 2>as a team threatening. I don't know if they can

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>get to that double digit winder in the regular season mark,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>but I like all sorts of pieces on this team.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Even though the defense is pretty inexperienced, there's guys that

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have rotated in. There's promising talent there. Offensively, I think

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>we all know the story at this point. Mason Rudolph

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>de Sides to come back. We love Junkyard, Jim Washington.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>He's not even the only receiver in that core that's

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>really good. They're a deep core of speed and talent

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 2>in the receiving area of things.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And Tie, Yeah, guess what I have right now? What's

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it breaking news? It's not breaking news.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Tie, I've got a Doode alert. There's a duode alert

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 2>because Justice Hill is so good. I'm planting my flag

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>on Justice Hill.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He is long arm of the law, just the long

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>arm of the law. Is a home run hitter. He

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>is a cut and go guy. He was, I believe,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a freshman last year and campaign sure was just ridiculous.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And gives them the balance that will have to draw

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>safeties in sometimes and give then obviously Junkyard Jim Washington.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Room to Rome Deep. So he makes this offense complete.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Justice So actually reminds me a lot of Michael James

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and that sort of cut and go and he's sort.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Of elusive water bug. Yeah, kind of kind of running back.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Justice Hill. He's gonna be so damn fun. Yeah.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Oklahoma State, the Cowboys are eleventh in

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the preseason poll. Again, take it with a grain of salt.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Release today the Amblay USA Today Coaches Poll. They are

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a ton of fun to watch. They always

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>are because of the offense. Mason Rudolph throws an awesome

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>deep ball and Mike Gundy is not afraid to use it.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>That will make them exciting to watch. On offense, the

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>questions defense, it leaves a lot to be desired. We're

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>going on a couple of years now, Dan, since everyone

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>was enchanted by what Glenn Spencer could do as a

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator. It just happens. Yeah, it hasn't been the same.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>They're replacing a bad secondary with four of their top

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>six defensive backs going elsewhere, graduating, leaving the program. The

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>defense has been mediocre at best since like twenty thirteen,

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and corner is really weak this year, the worst in

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Big twelve. I am very curious to see how

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>defensively they handle a Big twelve conference that's gonna want

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to throw the football. Yeah, so that all there. We'll see.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got so many, got some good defensive ends. I'm

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking like eight or nine. Yeah, I have nine and three.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight or nine feels right to me. M hm. Defense

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be that issue, gonna be a problem. Where

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are we going next?

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's got a West flip in Virginia? Tyler, Okay, let's

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 2>talk here.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Point of contention, m West Virginia is pre season twenty

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>USA today am White pole two. Yeah. Last year was

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a good year, ten and two regular season ten and three,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>lost the bowl game to Miami. Do you feel that

0:25:53.600 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with the following inventory of losses personnel losses, No, that

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia should be the preseason twenty Skyler Howard is gone.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Two of their top three receivers are gone, five of

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>their seven offensive linemen, five of their top seven offensive

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>lineman excuse me, are gone. Their top three defensive linemen,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>five of their top six linebackers, and five of their

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>top six defensive backs all gone. Do you feel that

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that warrants a top twenty preseason ranking? USA Today am

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Way coaches, Bull.

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the Will Greer or as I now really

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 2>want to call him, the Bill Greer factor.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Are we hold on pause? Are we doing the Bill convert?

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The will to Bill conversion? Here?

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Do we currently have a college football bill with Big

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Bill Fuller in the NFL? I love Bill Greer, as

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the name.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Grier doesn't have enough syllables. Maybe it's one of

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>these things because the same syllables as Bill Fuller, Bill

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>full Er. That's three Bill Greer, only two. No, Bill Greer.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit of a stretch. Dan, that's fact.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe only Maybe Bill Greer prefers Bill in a professional setting,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but to his friends, kind of like you with Dan, Danny,

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe his family and friends call him Billy all right,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we've done Bill before we'll go.

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Billy Greer got up to some stuff after high school, right,

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure it all out in Morgantown, Billy Billy Greer.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that overvalues how people are viewing West Virginia

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and there are things really like about

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia. I love Justin Crawford and what he was

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 2>able to show last year, another home run hitter. I

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>am worried. The linebackers are pretty much all back, but

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 2>you're right the front on defense, the secondary is rebuilt

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 2>once again. And it's not like these West Virginia teams

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>haven't had two overhaul units year over year. They keep

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 2>infusing with JC guys, they keep scouting and developing correctly.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>So Tony Gibson at the very least deserves somewhat of

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of the doubt. I'm a Tony great defensive coordinator, Yes, absolutely,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But I just it's a tough year to overhaul everything

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 2>on defense like they're going to have to do, so

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they take a step back. I don't think

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 2>they're a top twenty team. Like it's the Amway, which

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>is so funny. The Amway coaches pol.

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, am way you look at today coaches pol.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they're not that sort of nine to

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 2>ten win type team like they've threatened to be recently.

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say they're a seven and five team

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this year. They take a step back. The defense will

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>be fine eventually, but I think they're gonna they're gonna

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 2>take some hits.

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's fair to Dana Holgerson that there

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are such expectations, because again, if you look at what

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they are losing, this is a near total rebuild. Yeah,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it really is. I think you need to temper expectations.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough schedule too, it is it is you're

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about an early game against Virginia Tech. Virginia Tech

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>loses its quarterback, but I think should be a pretty

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>solid opponent in Week one. I don't think West Virginia

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to find their sea legs in time for

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that game. I could see Texas Tech being a problem

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>because of their passing attack. I could see Baylor being

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem if they get their defense together. I can

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see Iowa State being a problem based on the way

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they're sandwiched in between Oklahoma State and Kansas State. Yeah,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I could see a lot of things up in the air.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.959
<v Speaker 1>For West Virginia. The only thing I really like at

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this point is justin Crawford. That's the only thing. I'm

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Billy Greer, but he only had two

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>good games. Yeah, let's keep things in check a little bit,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty high talent ceiling, but I think that's reasonable to say.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying five and seven, four and eight for West Virginia.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I am not in at all huge steps back and

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm usually pro West Virginia Mountaineers, but count me out

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>way out. I am selling hard.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>See, I'm not that down because you have a good court,

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>you have a good system in place, you run the

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>ball well enough.

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you win more than you don't. So wow,

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm looking for I respect it system. I'm looking

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for personnel, and I'm looking for fit. Okay, all right.

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Fit is the greatest concern for me when I'm looking

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at teams, and also Dan when I'm talking about dress shirts.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh shoot, finding a dress shirt that fits is hard.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You know that the collars too tight, sleeves are too long,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>something's always off. Luckily, if you order a custom fit shirt,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever thought about it, it's never been easier.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to our good friends over at proper Cloth.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Propercloth dot com. All one word, you can easily create

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a custom shirt in seconds. All you got to do

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is answer ten easy questions. Dan Rubinstein tested, Dan Rubinstein approved,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>correct sir. Absolutely. It is a full proof process. You

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even need the measuring tape. They've got over five

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred fabric styles that you can choose from, including Premi,

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Italian and Japanese fabrics, as well as business and casual styles.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It all starts at just eighty five bucks. Best of all,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they guarantee you a perfect fit, meaning that if somehow

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>your shirt doesn't fit, they will remake it for free.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>They're the highest rated custom shirt maker on Google. GQ

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>has called them their favorite online custom shirt maker. It

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is the future of shirts. Don't take my word for it,

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>take Dan's word for it. That's true. I have a

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>weirdly shaped body and it fits me perfectly. Stop wearing

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>shirts that don't fit your person. Start looking your best

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>with a custom fitted shirt right now. Go to propercloth

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash solid today, enter the gift code solid

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sol id and you will save twenty dollars off your

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>very first proper cloth shirt. You want to make sure

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that you do that today. It's just better it is fresh.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You look fresher in a shirt that fits you properly.

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You're a high quality person, wear a high quality garment.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I should also mention on the topic afresh that bou

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>apron is the number one fresh ingredient and recipe to

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>livery service in the United States.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Dan snap is what you'll hear when you have a

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 2>pod of peas into your recipe.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Good one, Thank you, thank you that up on the fly,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't you. I can write there absently.

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I just I have legal pads of notes that led

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 2>me to that goof.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>For less than ten bucks a meal, they'll deliver you

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a seasonal recipe along with pre portioned ingredients, right to

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your door. We've used it, we think it. I can't

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>say all the ingredients all the time, nor can I

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>say all the titles of the sophisticated dishes that you get.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm telling you I've referred to people in various situations,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>various walks of life. They all love it.

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Will you play a drum roll before you announce the

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 2>dishes that are available coming up?

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I can know there's five of them. Okay, love it.

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Blue Apron completely flexible. You can customize your recipes every week,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you can choose a delivery option that fits your needs.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And Blue Apron and they have got a freshness guarantee.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>They promise that every ingredient arives ready to cook or

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they will make it right. Some of the meals in August,

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there we go basil pesto chicken with summertime vegetable and zanella. Yeah,

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. One for one, sautage shrimp and

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>green beans with globe tomatoes or is it globe tomatoes

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>As far as I know, Globe spinach and orzo pasta

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>failed it whole grain pasta and summer vegetables with airloom tomato,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Caprice salad, miso butter salmon and low maine noodles with

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>cucumber and charmed tomatoes. A really strong representation here by

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the tomato industry. And finally meatball pizza with fresh mazzarella,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>cheese and charm tomatoes.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Hy, you were so close, You were so close, and

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe. Just like you screwed up Nyoki before

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 2>you screwed up an Italian dish, it's not caprice capraisee

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>whatever Dan Capraise check out this week and you get

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>your first three meals for free with free shipping by

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 2>going to Blue Apron dot Com slash Solid Blue Apron

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>dot Com slash Solid.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You'll love how good it feels and pastes to create

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible home cook meals with Blue Apron. Don't wait again.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Blue Apron dot Com slash Solid, Blue Apron is a

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>better way to cook. When we laughed left our heroes

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Twelve, we were talking about five and

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>seven West Virginia. Where we go in next in.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's go with perhaps because I think for proper cloth

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 2>or blue Apron, I forget which one. There was a

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>keyword of solid, Yeah, promo code. So let's go with

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>what looks to be the most solid. And that's the

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 2>most bankable team I think on our list here other

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 2>than Oklahoma in the Big Twelve, that's Kansas State.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel very good about Kansas State, not because of

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>what they necessarily return on offense, but because of what

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 2>they've shown on defense lately, even with the loss of

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 2>some big names, notably Jordan Willis on defense. I like

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>how their defense is playing. I like what they return

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 2>on that side of the ball. And the big thing

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>for me is even though their offense isn't going to

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 2>put up huge numbers, they have such a clear identity

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 2>and Jesse Ertz is just so solid they might put

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 2>together a thirty four hundred play drive. I don't know

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>what they do. I don't know how they do it.

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going to go inch by inch and draw people

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>off sides, whatever the case may be. They are going

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to ruin teams in the way that somebody who is

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>very patient and very adept at NCAA football rip for

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Xbox PS four whatever, in that they can get five

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 1>yards every time they run. They're not going for weird

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>RPO plays, not trying to run an option. They're not.

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>They're just patient. And Kansas State does that on offense,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and that ruins the other their team's offense because then

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they get impatient if they fall behind. Yeah, so Kansas

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>State this year. I like Jesse here. It's a whole bunch.

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I like what they bring back on both sides of

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball. There's a lot of talent, there's a lot

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of experience, and all things considered, the schedule's not bad.

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It is they open against are they early on? Yeah?

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 2>It totally is feasible. They early on in the season.

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 2>I think they go to Nashville to play Vanderbilt, which

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>should just be a demolition derby that should be ten

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to seven one way or the other. And then they

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>have it looks like they go to Texas, but they

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>always beat Texas, I mean usually Texas.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that game at Texas will be will be

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the bell Weather there. There's a tough stretch if you're

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>looking at the schedule critically, very tough stretch from late

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:47.919
<v Speaker 1>September through the first three weeks of October, because you've

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>got a Baylor game, which we don't know what we're

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get out of Baylor right now, but Baylor's defense,

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about Baylor's defense could be intriguing. Yeah, at Texas,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a good bell Weather game for

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>where Kansas State is at. Then in consecutive weeks at

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>home TCU and Oklahoma. You get through that four week stretch,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're mostly sitting pretty in the Big twelve.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That to me is the rough patch to watch in

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the schedule.

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that's fair. I think that's reasonable. I feel

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 2>good about it, though. I think at this point, if

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 2>everything you know, in Bill Snyder's getting over some health

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>concerns he had in the offseason, and we hope he's

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously all right and that full strength sort of anchor

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 2>this team moving forward. But yes, you're absolutely right that

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>stretch is going to speak volumes. But this feels like

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the year that we finished the season saying and Kansas

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 2>State was Kansas State. They did exactly what they should

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 2>have done given the talent that they have. I like

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>them a lot. I'm optimistic. I'm at about nine and

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 2>three right now with Kansas State. Yeah, I like the identity.

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Preseason nineteen, by the way, in the newly released USA

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Today Coaches, and it'll find to me it totally fine

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to me nine and four last season. Important to note

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is a team that improved drastically from start

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to finish, both offensively and defensively, particularly on the defensive

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>side of the football. It's the season war on. The

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>defense got a lot better and that really did make

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a difference, especially against the pass, which is paramounts if

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you're going to play in the Big twelve. My question though,

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not they have more than just Jesse

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Ertz and Alex Barnes making plays offense. Now, we've seen

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Snyder Kansas State do a lot. Even if you've

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>only got two guys. They can find a way to

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>make that work with that slow, plodding vanilla five yards

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of play offense. But can they manufacture some big plays

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like they did towards the end of last season. If

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>they do that, I think that takes them to another level.

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that gets them to that nine win mark.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to wait and see. That hasn't

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been their identity, but I think the pieces are

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in place where they can do it. My other set

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 1>of questions is about their defensive front because they lose

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Willison. That's gonna hurt. Can the front seven hold

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up against the run and force the pass? Because I

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be pretty good against the pass this year.

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that may ask you a question, Sure, would you

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 2>want to be and we're talking optimist at Kansas State?

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you want to root for this Kansas State team?

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Just that's the end of the question.

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, pure, pure style, pure This is what I have

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 2>come to expect every week from Kansas State. They will

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 2>be outmatched by a couple of teams that are clearly

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 2>just way more talented and have a system in place.

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, Kansas State maybe can't keep up with their speed,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 2>can't produce enough big plays. Whatever, be it Oklahoma, be

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>at West Virginia, be at Oklahoma State, whatever, But you

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 2>know that Kansas State is going to be more sound.

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 2>They're going to force more one on one tackles than

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>most of the teams they play against. But there's not

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be a ton of exciting plays, deep passes,

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 2>trick play. You know, whatever the case may be, is

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 2>that a team you would want to root for?

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I would say no, because cheering for Case State's a

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lot like cheering for Navy in that, even though you

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>don't have any kind of pyrotechnic identity on offense, you

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of know what you're signing up for. You I

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>love root Navy. You know what the team is going

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to do offensively, and you also know that if it's

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>not working, it really ain't working right, and that can

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be maddening. Yeah, so I would say no.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 2>We saw a couple of years ago and they just

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 2>stopped being able to run the ball completely, like it

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 2>was feet that they were averaging per carry.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas for me is the Bellweather Game October seventh circle

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it right now at Texas, I've got K State at

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>seven and five. I am not buying K State this year.

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I disagree. I haven't said that in a long time.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Baylor. Mm hmmmm. Baylor is clearly in transition.

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>They started last year six and oh. They finished oh

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and six a tumultuous interim year led by Jim grob

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>which was weird, but they had to do it. In

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the offseason, they hire Matt Rule from Temple, which was

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a surprise. I have warmed to Matt Rule,

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I will add I've never been the biggest Matt Rule

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>coaching hire fan, but I've warmed to Matt Rule based

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on what he's done so far. It's interesting. It follows

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the theory of hire the opposite of the guy you

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>had in previously. And if ever there were an opposite

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Art Briles, just stylistically, schematically, certainly that guy would

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>be Matt Rule. Fair to say, yeah, absolutely fair to say.

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>What intrigues me, What surprises me, perhaps the most of

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the Big twelve is how much I like

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the potential that Baylor has on defense. When I used

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to talk in that way about a Baylor defense. But

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of talent there, Yeah, a ton of experience.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's back and the combination of Matt Ruhle and Phil

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Snow was really effective at Temple. They built legitimately good

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>defenses in Philly. Offensively, I have no idea what's going

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I don't even know what's going to look like.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that will probably take some time. On the

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the ball, Dan, I'm actually quite bullish

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>on what Baylor could do. This is a conference that

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>needs better defenses to give it, I think, a better reputation.

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited to see what they can what they

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>can do here. I am pretty optimistic about Baylor this season,

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm kind of feeling seven or eight wins here.

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I thought the Wheels, I mean, it was very

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 2>clear the Wheels came off on the field last year

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and second half of the season, and certainly it's a

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 2>fresh start for Baylor, for whatever that's worth.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who they open with Baylor? Baylor? Yeah,

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they opened with Liberty. Liberty right, who hired the athletic

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>director who was at Baylor for a while and a

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Liberty Baylor matchup is sort of like what if there

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>was just really inclement weather and they just decided, you

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, let's just not this year.

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 2>That's just not That's how I feel about Liberty Baylor.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Beyond that, schedule's not bad. They go to Duke, they

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 2>go to Kansas State, to Oklahoma State, but it sort

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 2>of clears up near the end of the year. It's

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 2>a front loaded schedule, which is very strange to say.

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>With Baylor. I like them. Matt Rule hire a lot.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I like his staff hires a whole lot.

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I like what Obviously it's hard not to what Phil

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Snow did with the Temple defense these past couple of years.

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Baylor's going to be fine on the field because of

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Matt Rule. I don't think they're going to be as

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>nearly as explosive. Nobody will be as they've been these

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:50.479
<v Speaker 2>past few years during the Arbriles tenure. But schedule's not bad.

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 2>The quarterback position, whether it's it's Zach Smith or a

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 2>new Solomon, the Arizona transfer running things, it'll be okay.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 2>There's talent along the skill pa positions. I have them

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 2>down as six and six just because I do think

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 2>there is going to be transition elements that you know,

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 2>they might lose toss up games, they might have problems

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 2>with offensive identity. We're not talking about a Temple offense

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that was super explosive at all. So what exactly are

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 2>they going to be trying to do with an offense

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 2>that was recruited to play a very different type of

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 2>system that I think there's going to be There are

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna be some growing pains there. Numbers are still a

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit dicey just in terms of pure available high

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 2>level talent. So six and six feels about right, yeah,

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 2>and I show some flashes, they're going to show some deficiencies.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't just pan over the offense and say I

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they're going to do. I don't. I

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>still don't know what they're going to do. But right

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 1>what strikes me in looking at this roster is that

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the main stabilizing forces from a year ago are pretty

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much all gone save for Terrence Williams and three offensive linemen.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Seth Russell gone, Katie Cannon gone, Kyle Fuller, dom de

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Susan on this Tom yeah gone, yeah, this is Mora.

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>So they've got a lot to work out on that side.

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Of the ball that hasn't necessarily been Matt rules Forte. Defensively,

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see what Phil Snow can do because

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>they do have a lot coming back on on the

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the football. So I'm feeling like seven

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and five, eight and four if I want to get

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>really risky with it. But seven and five, let's let's

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>keep it right there. Who do you want to go

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to next? I want to talk about Iowa State Wow,

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>before TCU. All right, let's talk about TCU. I don't

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>want to disrespect to you. We'll go TCU respectful. TCU is

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>my playoff pick a year ago. Remember, Yeah, how'd that

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>work out? They won? Eight and four? They didn't make

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the playoff. Alas, for all intents and purposes, everyone is

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>back from that eight and four team from a year ago.

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>They have, according to our friend Bill Connolly, the most

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>returning production of any Power five team, which is certainly meaningful.

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I am going to harken back though, to what I

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>said a year ago about Tennessee, and that is it's

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about trust, babe. Oh my god, it's about trust, babe. Okay,

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>explain yourself. I am not gonna go where I went

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a year ago with TCU because I just don't trust

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Hill. And I know it's not all his fault.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>This is more of a me thing, not a hymn thing,

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just laying my heart out there for everyone. Some of

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it was his fault. He got a lot of drop passes.

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 1>A year ago. There was a revolving door at wide

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver because guys kept getting hurt. You can't blame it

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>all on Kenny Hill, but you can't blame a chunk

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of it on him. He made a lot of dumb throws,

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad mistakes, and quite frankly, you just

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. You can't do that. For as good

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>as he was to start his college football career at

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M, that's how inconsistent he was this

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>past year at TCU. There were times where I wondered

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>if he was really interested in playing or if he

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>had just mailed it in. Felt like he had killer instinct.

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>To me, maybe that's too harsh of criticism, but that

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>was what I was left with at the end of

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>TCU's season a year ago, and for that reason, I

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know to what end I'm willing to subscribe again

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seventeen just left a bad taste of my mouth.

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.959
<v Speaker 1>That's all rational. That being said, there is a ton

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to like here because Kyle Hicks also comes back. In

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>addition to Kenny Hill, They've got four senior offensive linemen,

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>including Austin Schlottman, who's a big deal at center. The

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>back seven of their defense is loaded. All of their linebackers,

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>including their leading tackler, return, and they've got a workable

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule which is mostly backloaded. In November, when teams like

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Baylor will probably be more experienced, it'll be

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>tougher than if you had them early. It sets up

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty well for TCU. The only real question I have

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is along the line Josh carroway self, Cavante Turpin. He's

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a minidod alert for me, Mini dood alert. We don't

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>play mini doodle now, No, I'm just telling you, he's

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a literal mini dude. Yeah. So, I think if you

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>want to be optimistic about TCU, the canvas is there.

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's there for you to paint your picture of what

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a successful season looks like. I'm just I'm not going

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to engage on that level with TCU again. I'm going

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to say eight and four. That's what I have down

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>here as well. And I think it's the Kenny Hill

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pulled back factor. It's the inconsistency from receivers as talented

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 1>as they are. It's an identity thing they lose. You

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention Doug Meachum. He goes over to Kansas to

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>run their offense. Honey Comby's still there, and they promote

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the running backs coach to a co coordinator job,

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so some transitions along the staff. I just I don't

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>know what to expect from TCU. You know, you look

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at the problems that they had last year. I'm not

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>sure how they've addressed everything. Hopefully it's just a health thing.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully it's an identity thing. Hopefully it's a motivational thing.

0:48:57.440 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>If then, you know, then you can see nine or

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 2>ten wins, if everything is clicking and they stay healthy.

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, Gary Patterson with time and experience to reshuffle things,

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 2>seems like a good thing. I'm going to say eight

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 2>and four. I think some things get better, somethings stay

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 2>as is. I don't see it with this schedule, especially

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 2>the stretch. And you mentioned a workable schedule, but there's

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 2>some chunks in the schedule, they have Texas and Oklahoma

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 2>and consecutive weeks in November, and then early on in

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the season, sort of late September, early October, Oklahoma State

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 2>on the road, West Virginia and then Kansas State on

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 2>the road. So a variety of styles one after the other.

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know those are all the defenses there, you know, maybe,

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 2>say for West Virginia should be a tricky enough that

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think TCU is able to pull away.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So I have eight and four. The other thing I'll

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>add here, I don't want to pan over the defense

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>because they do have a lot coming back in the

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>back seven. This defense has yet to return to the

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>glory days of a couple of years ago, right, I mean,

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point they need to stop giving up big plays.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I erase the entirety of the twenty fifteen season, including

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 2>the bowl season of TCU, So I don't even know

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:05.280
<v Speaker 2>what you're talking.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, right, of course, at some point they got to

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>stop giving up big plays. They got to start being

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>disruptive again. The only good part of their defense, the

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 1>only consistently good part of their defense from a year ago,

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was a pass rush. They need to be all around

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>more consistent in order for this team to take another

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>step forward and maybe try to live up to some

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of that hype. I don't even know if there is hype.

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just making that up as a whole. That's how

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel about TCU. Sort of ambivalent. I'm going to

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>go eight and four. All right, we were Now we're

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:42.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about Iowa State. Please? What I am excited about

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>this team? Why? Good question? Okay, good question. This is

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the program to follow if you have no rooting interest

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Big twelve, if you just want to invest

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 1>in a story Dan that's going to be fun to

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>watch over the next two to three years. I think

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Iowa States where it's at. We got a

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who own this show and they say, Wow,

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening in Australia. Who should I root for? You're

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>telling Australians root for Iowa State? Oh kind am, Yeah,

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the hell is wrong with you. Matt Campbell's first year

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in ames last year they went three to nine. A

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of improvement from start to finish. There are some

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>good pieces coming back from a year ago. He did

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a good job recruiting in the offseason. At a minimum,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a program that no longer feels as stagnant

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as it did at the end of the Paul Roades era.

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's I think he's doing some stuff. Defense

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a problem. They're gonna get overpowered

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of the better attacks in the Big twelve.

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about the offensive line. They got experienced, but

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>most of their starts from a year ago are gone.

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be a work in progress. To

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:54.720
<v Speaker 1>keep Jacob Park safe, open up holes for Mike Warren.

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>The defense, you know, that's just going to be where

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it's at. It's going to be a mess. I am

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>excited though about my doodle Art. A gentleman. You may

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have heard of him by the name of Alan Lazard.

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Sorry six five two twenty three, Alan Lazard. I have

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a storied history with mister Lazard. Please tell we are

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing if not friends, honest brokers here on the solid

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>verbal den I've never publicly admitted this. I've had grave

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>difficulty getting this gentleman's name correct really over the past

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.359
<v Speaker 1>two It's just like a mental block for me. Two

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. You can go back and find a preview.

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I may have edited it out, but at least the

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>first time through, I referred to him as Alan Lizard. Okay,

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I realized the air in my way is

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>A couple weeks later and I started calling him in

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>true Eastern PA form Alan Lazard, which was also wrong.

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm back officially on the Allan Lazard train. But

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the bigger point that I have, in addition to the

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's a thousand yard receiver, he's a big dude.

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be an NFL prospect, probably get drafted

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>next year in the senior year, clearly Jacob Park's top target.

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>The larger point is that we've got options now for

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the coming season. I've sort of been workshopping a few

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>things that I think of real potential. Here. I'm upset already.

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm pre upset. I'm gonna give you two options. I

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you which I should go with, because

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>whether you like it or not, I am going with

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one of them. This better be better than your four

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>syllable guys. Option A huh charred by Alan Lazard.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm I'm really gotten. I really have fingers crossed

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 2>for Option B because it's the.

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Big twelve Texas Tech. Texas Tech gonna get charred by

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lazard. Okay, I'm waiting. It's a slogan. It's like

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Body by Jake. Now, I got it. It's not a nickname.

0:53:57.640 --> 0:53:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's more than that, and it could be if it

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work out, it could be the name of his

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>restaurant or a showing food network Charred by Alan. You

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>don't like it, I'm I'm ready for be. Option B

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would be if I want to return to my roots

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as an Eastern Pennsylvanian with a slightly Philadelphia influenced accent. Okay,

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the Duke of Hazzard Alan Lazzard. But it's not it's name.

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>He's dangerous, he drives a Dodge Charger. He wants to

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>date your sister. He's the Duke of Hazzard, Alan Lazzard.

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we just call call ioways say it el passego,

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>el passe coo. Yeah, because Jacob Park is really good,

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 1>even though he has a weird skin, beret haircut. I

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've seen what he looks like. It's

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>very it's very strange.

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think we just accept Alan Lazard Alan

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Lazard for who he is. Now I was I was

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about these all day. Dan a workshop. You're you're

0:54:57.640 --> 0:54:58.879
<v Speaker 2>just gonna toss them in.

0:54:58.800 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>The waste basket.

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I think we got to keep going, ty, I think

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 2>we got to keep workshopping chard by Lazart. I'll accept

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 2>that one ahead of whatever the hell you said was

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 2>option B.

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about being team? Then you really

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>ruined the whole night for me.

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Iowa State is going to be good, perhaps eventually, if

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 2>they recruit well on defense, if they're able to stay

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:18.840
<v Speaker 2>healthy on offense.

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:21.959
<v Speaker 1>We like Jacob Park. You skimmed over the fact that

0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Lanning, who started out the season at quarterback for

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>them last year, is now they're starting mid linebacker. Hell yeah,

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's awesome. Would you say he's the quarterback

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the defense? Yes, he is the quarterback of the defense.

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>In so many ways, Iowa State was in games last year.

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They blew a lead against I think it was Baylor,

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and they lost a shootout, but they were in even

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>though they went I think they went three to nine

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>last season. They were competitive, they didn't back down. They

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>played motivated football. I was very excited to see that

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>because the Big twelve was kind of stanky last year

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in a number of ways, and the emergence of a

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.760
<v Speaker 1>competitive Iowa State and even to a slight lesser extent,

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of a competitive Kansas team was at least

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you're ready tie. Yeah, incremental improved, incremental improvements. I think

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they have Northern Iowa again this year and the game

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they lost last year, so hopefully they can flip that game.

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>They can hopefully flip maybe either the Kansas State game

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>or who else were they close against the lost the

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma game. They're probably not going to beat Oklahoma this year,

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but if they can flip that or Oklahoma State they

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>were competitive in I could see a four and eight

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 1>campaign for Iowa states. I could. Yeah, to me, this

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is like the new drive for six. I don't know.

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where six is coming from. I'm not

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sure I know where five is coming from. The schedule

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>gets weird in November. You got three or four on

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the road, including your final two at Baylor at k State.

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You'll probably be able to throw against something. Teams definitely

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:56.319
<v Speaker 1>should be Yeah, lackluster defenses. West Virginia comes to mind.

0:56:56.360 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>They should be be able to be had in the

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>secondary and Texas Tech that's kind of their mo We'll

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about them next. But I'm going to say I'm

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna say five and seven at best, four and eight

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more realistically, Okay, but I'm excited. I like Matt Campbell.

0:57:15.760 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of the Duke of Hazzard, Allen

0:57:18.360 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Lazard and Mike Warren and Jakwan Bailey on defense. So

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they take another step forward. I'm excited to

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>see where they go. I think them getting incrementally better,

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not going to make a bowl that's

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningful for the Big Twelve. They need to have I

0:57:37.600 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think more parody between top and bottom, and I think

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this will help get them there. Agree, all right, let's

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>go to Texas Tech. Dan, Let's do it. I am

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>obligated to play this sound every time I talk about

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech. We put a ton of research into these previews,

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.439
<v Speaker 1>as you because we're covering a bunch of teams each week,

0:57:59.520 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, don't don't pan it, don't kill us.

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me if we pan over some stuff here and there,

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't get into the full minutia and the

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>machinations of each team, all right, that's not what we

0:58:09.160 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>always do here. It did dawn on me though, that

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there's really no need to overthink Texas Tech. The preview

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 1>has been exactly the same each of the last three years.

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The names change, the preview is always the same. True

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it does every year every year. It's well, Tech's got

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a good offense, they're gonna throw it for a ton

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of yards. They got to play better defense. They play

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>better defense, they're gonna be much better shape. But offense,

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a ton of FUNNL watch. We just we

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're gonna stop anybody. And I feel

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like we're there again this year. They lose Pat Mahomes.

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Their defensive lines of total reboot for their top five

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 1>tacklers are gone.

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah they were super beat up last year too on defense.

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 2>But yes, the point stands.

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just, you know, I'm very blase on Tech

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Tech again. I need Cliff Kingsbury to prove to me

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's got more in the tank than just a

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>really fun offense. Okay, I think that's all right.

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 2>They have promising quarterbacks, they have speed on offense. They're

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 2>going to put up points, they're gonna put up yards.

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The defense, you know, if it's not a disaster, that

0:59:19.120 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 2>will be a surprise, because that's what we've come to expect.

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that there's more to say about Texas

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Tech at this point. I think it would actually be

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 2>wasting our breaths to say anything that we already have

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:31.280
<v Speaker 2>not said.

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I'm I'm fine with that.

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I would also add, though, that two of the quarterbacks

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 2>on the depth chart their names are Payne Sullens and

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 2>McLain Carter, which are aggressively Texas quarterback.

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, it's very aggressive.

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I have them down as five and seven,

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 2>five and seven. Maybe when a shootout they didn't, I

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 2>go five and seven here.

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Final team, Final team, Dan Rock, Chalk Jayhawk. Mmmmmmm.

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to ask you how high the ceiling

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is because that's a weird way to phrase it for

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>where I think Kansas is going to be this year. Instead,

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>let me turn it around a little bit. Let me

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you how much higher do you think the floor

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is in twenty seventeen as opposed to twenty sixteen?

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>A significant distance, because if the floor is one in eleven,

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>two and ten, I think even not even sort of

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>based on win loss record, but just what they look

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>like on the field. They keep infusing with JC guys

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the defensive line looks really good. I like the ability

1:00:37.520 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>on offense to find playmakers. The talent is in a

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 2>place that's much higher than it was under Charlie Weiss,

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think that can be overlooked, and that

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>includes coaching talents. They hired Doug Meachum. So I expect

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>improvement in scheme, in identity on offense. It's going to

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>take a while to really look like a robust, big

1:00:56.720 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>twelve offense. But schedules fine, it's backloaded. I don't think

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>they're winning five games, but can they go threatening three

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>and nine, four and eight, A couple breaks here and there,

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they play a team with an injured quarterback and

1:01:14.280 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>pick off a few passes.

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so.

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't expect it's another drive to six team, but

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I'm gonna say three and nine, but an

1:01:24.840 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>incrementally improved three and nine.

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in Kansas primarily because of the way that

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>David Beatty built this year's version of the team. He'll

1:01:36.040 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Connelly referred to it as surfing the transfer market as

1:01:38.840 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if they were at English soccer school. But there are transfers,

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there are jucos stepping in plug and play guys to

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>help stabilize the ship, because the problem at Kansas was

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not just limited to schematics. It was talent. They need,

1:01:53.760 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they need bodies, they need better players, and I think

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.959
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to do his part to build depth this year.

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, offensively, last year they were a huge mess.

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>This year they lose a good chunk of their secondary

1:02:07.320 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>from a year ago, which wasn't great to begin with,

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but again, that's gonna be a problem spot. You're right

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that there's a murderer's row starting in October

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and then all throughout the rest of the season. Here

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is what happens to Kansas in terms of their schedule

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>between late September when they're on buy and the end

1:02:31.520 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Texas Tech at Iowa State at TCU,

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>K State, Baylor at Texas, Oklahoma at Oklahoma State, all

1:02:41.000 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in consecutive weeks. I don't know if they win any

1:02:45.040 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of those games. And Bill Connolly was wise to point

1:02:48.440 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>out in looking at that schedule that really the hit

1:02:52.920 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or miss game, the Bell Weather game for Kansas is

1:02:56.280 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be Ohio in Week three. Ohio, which he's

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>got projected as the one hundred and third best S

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and P plus team in the country. He's saying, that's

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the bel Weather game, and I agree. I agree. You

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>got three games in the beginning that are probably winnable.

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you pick off a game at some point later

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the year. But I don't know how you get

1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to four wins. If you're Kansas, you can go three

1:03:21.560 --> 1:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to nine still improve drastically because they've been so bad,

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think feel pretty good about where things might

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>go in twenty eighteen.

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>So they have as I look at this, quarterback wise,

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>if we're worried about their defense, guys who will throw

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it all over them, A good chance of guys who

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>are throwing it all over them. Maybe not a guy

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>until that well, Texas Tech probably will, but other than

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Texas Tech, I'm not fully confident in.

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>What Billy Greer. Billy, We'll see what happens Billy Greer. Yeah,

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of depth of dangerous quarterbacks, it's a good

1:03:57.680 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>year to be rebuilding a secondary, a bad school. We'd

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad program or bad with a bad squad or

1:04:04.040 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an underwhelming squad. So they always seem to put the

1:04:07.840 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>fear of life into TCU every year, and that's on

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the road this year it's in Fort Worth. They're going

1:04:13.720 --> 1:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to beat somebody that we don't have it down as

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. They are going to take somebody down that

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>seems improbable. That's what I will say. All right, Well,

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in closing here, since we've gone through all ten teams, yes,

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's tier off these teams. Let's let's put them

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in like four groups. I think we both agree that

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma is tops. Mm hm. You think they're alone on

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the top. I think they're alone in the top tier.

1:04:41.160 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I would put in Tier two Oklahoma State, Texas, and

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>TCU probably in that order, Okay. I suspect that you

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>would put k State in that tier. I would, Okay,

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>behind TCU. I have k State kind of right on

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the border of tier two and three, and then I

1:05:02.320 --> 1:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>go Baylor sixth. I go bail in a better place

1:05:06.720 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than West Virginia right now, I think so because I

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of have that too. Yeah, West Virginia right on

1:05:12.560 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the cusp there. If there's a gray area between tier

1:05:15.560 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>three and four, I put West Virginia there. Even though

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they're again preseason top twenty, which for the life of me,

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't understand they are totally rebuilding. I really think

1:05:24.760 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you got to temper your expectations. I still would argue

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt factor is pretty high there.

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And then for me, I go eighth, Iowa State, Ninth

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech. Who I'm just I'm probably putting them ninth.

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Not because of actually believing they'll finish worse than Iowa State,

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just fed up with Tech's Tech. Okay, on

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a personal level, I'm very fed up with them, okay.

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And then tenth is Kansas. You know, a bunch of transfers,

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>plug and play guys. I'm curious as to how they

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Lord Doug meetchim away and what that could do for

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a Kansas offense. But uh, three and nine, I think

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a ceiling for them.

1:06:04.600 --> 1:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Wow, down, down down, Yeah, all right, I mostly agree.

1:06:10.120 --> 1:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Should we check in with our parallel universe Serius XM

1:06:14.640 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 2>version of the show, Let's do It, Ladies and gentlemen,

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, SiriusXM The Solid Verbal eight eight.

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Eight, nine nine, nine. Tune tu Tim give us a

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>call in the insta Loom hotline. We are talking Big twelve.

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>What will Oklahoma look like without vod stoops. It's going

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a change, no doubt about it. What can

1:06:32.000 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas do with new coach Tom Herman? Will he bring

1:06:35.400 --> 1:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some much needed energy to the forty acres? Gotta be honest,

1:06:38.320 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>big question right there. Mike Gundy has a big offense

1:06:41.880 --> 1:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. Will it be enough for those cowboys to

1:06:44.840 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>make some noise? Gonna be a fun fall in stillwater,

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. We know Cliff Kingsberry has the looks,

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but will he find the defense? Some new questions and Lodock,

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. Should we be hearing sirens warning about

1:06:57.720 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>dan O Holgerson's air raid? God, wait and see? Is

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can he Hill the answer for TCU? And can Gary

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Patterson get this Hornbrock team back to where they were?

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Only time will tell. What about Kansas State? Are they

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sneaking up on America? And what about Kansas, Iowa State, Baylor?

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Could they make some noise? A huge question, no doubt

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>about it. Eight eight, nine, nine on tune Turn ten,

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>give us a buzz on the install Loum hotline. And

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>now because you've requested it on that hotline, Disbussyo, I

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>love those ties. Ty. You brought it back in, Yes,

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you brought it back down. Oh it felt right, Ty

1:07:37.240 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>felt right? We got to pigive the people what they demand.

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It felt good.

1:07:42.480 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just to know it's out there, ty Just to

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>know it's out there. For not listening to podcasts, it

1:07:46.240 --> 1:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>felt good.

1:07:46.720 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It feels good to be back in the swing of

1:07:48.560 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>things here talking about twenty seventeen college football. I do

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have five nuggets though, Tye, please please, we don't want

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to leave out the aa C nuggets. Yeah.

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Please, I've got a group of five nuggs. It's power

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>six nuggets. Here's what you need to know going into

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the season. According to me, you probably don't agree with

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>all of this.

1:08:07.120 --> 1:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Number five. Randy Edzel's back. Yeah, dream job? Can we play?

1:08:12.440 --> 1:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we play? Sexier than Edsel? Throughout the course of

1:08:15.880 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the season, because people really got into that. Absolutely, I

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>had gotten through. I had my mom texting me about

1:08:21.800 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Randy Edseel's overall sexiness. Okay for me, but it was fun.

1:08:27.760 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>William Shatner, Oh, you're you're playing it now?

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm asking you, ty Is William Shatner objectively sexier than Randy?

1:08:36.439 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>No, you gotta go Edzel. I think I'm going on

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Etzel's younger.

1:08:39.680 --> 1:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it probably has his own hair, sure, but he

1:08:43.479 --> 1:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>hired RTT Lashley, who has been at Auburn, and Auburn

1:08:46.120 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>was looking for a change offensively, so he's running the

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:52.719
<v Speaker 2>offense that you caught next. SMU has a literal large receiver,

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and he is a big receiver in every sense the word.

1:08:55.479 --> 1:08:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Courtland Sutton is probably one of the best three receivers

1:08:58.920 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in college football. Is borderline unguardable, especially when he plays

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>in the American He is awesome. He's really good. You

1:09:07.080 --> 1:09:09.879
<v Speaker 2>should watch SMU. If there's a like a weird random Wednesday,

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Thursday or Friday night game, watch Courtland Sutton.

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He's worth it.

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>What about what about Tom Selleck? Oh, Seleck is way

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>sexier than it. You gotta go with this passroom slowly,

1:09:19.600 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not even close. I would point out that Riley Ferguson

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:25.799
<v Speaker 2>is really, really good. He is the quarterback of Memphis.

1:09:25.800 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>He of course transferred from Tennessee a little bit ago,

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>even without Chip Long, who Notre Dame pulled away unceremoniously.

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:34.479
<v Speaker 1>He's very, very good.

1:09:34.479 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>He finished last season with an eleven to one touchdown

1:09:36.960 --> 1:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>interception ratio in November was super efficient.

1:09:40.160 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I like him a lot.

1:09:41.040 --> 1:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I like Riley Ferguson, I like Mike Norvella everything is

1:09:43.640 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>happening from Memphis. He's a He's an even bigger prospect

1:09:46.439 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>than just good in college. You could be a good

1:09:47.960 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>pro prospect ideal size. What about John lithgow Ah Edseel, Yeah,

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you gotta go. I think you gotta go.

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Go on ed Soel. There's a there's a sportiness to

1:09:57.800 --> 1:09:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Edsel that I don't think Lythgo is ever gonna match.

1:10:00.880 --> 1:10:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Houston has Ed Oliver, and Oliver is going to destroy

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody that tries to block at Oliver. Also, they have

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen, but mostly they have Ed Oliver. Yeah, Major

1:10:10.880 --> 1:10:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Appleoy takes over Kyle Allen is fun, but at Oliver Finally,

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is the one you're gonna appreciate your guy,

1:10:17.280 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Quintin Flowers, Tie, my boy, he's got a very very

1:10:21.920 --> 1:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>soft schedule, my boy.

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Seventeen, Charlie Strong takes over at USF. Quinn Flowers is back,

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>A ton is back on both sides, which isn't always

1:10:29.600 --> 1:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the best because that defense wasn't particularly good, but right

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>spot of that defense. Who is the leading returning tackler

1:10:38.880 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 2>for the American Athletic Conference Tie, It's a great name

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>because I'm gonna say it right now.

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Augiez augez Jay, do we say it like John Miller,

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez Sanchas, Augie au g g I E Sanjay, I'm excited. Yeah.

1:10:56.920 --> 1:10:59.919
<v Speaker 2>So those are your five American you know, Navy's rebuildings,

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of stuff. Well, hopefully Willie Fritz improves that tulane.

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it should be a really fun conference this year.

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:07.559
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well that does it for Big twelve. That

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>does it for some American nuggets. Next week we're doing

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>the Big ten. Next week we are doing the Big ten. Yes,

1:11:18.880 --> 1:11:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that sounds right. We're starting big. We're starting literally big.

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I have one more sexier than Randy Edzel for you, Tie, Yeah,

1:11:30.280 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>let's go with.

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Warren Beatty. Probably go Randy Etzel. I'm going baby Tie,

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not close for me, Gonna go Randy Etzel.

1:11:44.560 --> 1:11:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Now, Warren Batty is definitely sexier. Warren Beatty has a

1:11:47.560 --> 1:11:49.639
<v Speaker 2>long history of being a good looking guy.

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>What about Randy Etzel or Bob Davey. That's almost like

1:11:55.479 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>the brothers say, they're kind of the same person At that.

1:11:59.439 --> 1:12:01.519
<v Speaker 2>Point, I'm one personality. I think I can believe in

1:12:01.560 --> 1:12:03.519
<v Speaker 2>Bob Davey a little bit more. As about three I'm

1:12:03.560 --> 1:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>still going to.

1:12:04.320 --> 1:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob davey okay fa fair all right, So again, thank

1:12:08.240 --> 1:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you for tuning in. Check us out on Facebook, on Twitter,

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. We're all over the place. We're also on Reddit,

1:12:14.920 --> 1:12:17.639
<v Speaker 1>reddit dot com, slash r slash Soliverble. Some fans set

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>up a little community. If you're interested, Yeah, hang out.

1:12:20.200 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I promise people I would read off that url. Join

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the pool by the shirt and if you are available.

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>August twelfth in New York City, Soliverble Live Fantasy Things Draft.

1:12:34.560 --> 1:12:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Most tickets are gone, some still available. If you're interested.

1:12:38.560 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>If you've got questions, email a soliverable at gmail dot com.

1:12:40.960 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise going out through the website, to Twitter, the Facebook,

1:12:43.520 --> 1:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram, all over the place. We've got links if

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you are interested to buy tickets and come meet us.

1:12:50.880 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We're exciting. It's gonna be a fun show. Hi is six'.

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Five that's. Right how many people know? That for that

1:12:57.880 --> 1:13:01.519
<v Speaker 1>guy over, there my good Friend Dan, rubinstein for, Myself Tye,

1:13:01.560 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hill the, brand thanks for hanging with us. Again we

1:13:05.240 --> 1:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>will catch you all in a week talk big town or,

1:13:07.280 --> 1:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>meantimes stay solid he one more. Time don't forget about

1:13:23.160 --> 1:13:27.639
<v Speaker 1>our friends over at propercloth dot. Com Dan rubinstein, Tested

1:13:27.680 --> 1:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Dan rubinstein. Approved stop wearing shirts that don't. Fit go

1:13:31.520 --> 1:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to propercloth dot com slash solid, Today enter the gift

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>code solid that's S o L I d and save

1:13:39.560 --> 1:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty bucks on your first shirt