WEBVTT - Tesla Cuts 200 Autopilot Workers, Closes Site

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Charlie talking about the overall

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>market trade, signing out some names Tesla also on our radar.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's down about one point eight percent in today's session,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely off. It's loads of the day, and we want

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to get to a story um that is courtesy of

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>our own Bloomberg's Ed Ludlow and Dana Hall Bloomberg exclusive

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the company's plans to cut about two hundred

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>autopilot workers as it shuts down it's California's site. Let's

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>get more. Bloomberg News West Coast correspondent Ed Ludlow. He

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>is in our nine sixties studio in San Francisco. Check

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>them out on YouTube. As we speak, you can see

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>him Hi ed Hey, So tell us about this story.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>You guys broke it? Um, What do we need to know?

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And was it a surprise? Yes and no. There's a

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>facility in Samoteo here in the Bay area and it

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was home to the Auto Pilot dates babling team, and

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sources tell us that they were all called into yesterday

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and told that their jobs were gone, that this was

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>part of a longer term plans moved this team from

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>one facility in Samotheo for one down the road in

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>lots of those workers are expecting to be moved, but

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what happened was they were laid off. And I

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>think you're actually at a port and that's a ship

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>coming in. Is that what's going on? So? I mean

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>when I saw this headline cross yesterday, usually you would

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>see the headline like this and be like, oh man,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the company is in trouble or in some sort of

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stress that we didn't know about. Is that true in

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's case? So elon must hold Our editor achieve John

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mcauthwaite last week that Tesla would be laying off ten

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of salaried workers. Tesla's workforce is split between two

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thirds hourly workers and one third salaried. This is important

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>because according to sources, the vast majority of those laid

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>off yesterday were hourly, not salaried. So it's kind of

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at odds what happened. Because Elon must told us it

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>would cuts would focus on salaried employees, hourly workers would

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be protected. Now. Elon Musk also clarified that a lot

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.839
<v Speaker 1>of the hourly jobs he was talking about growing would

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>be on production lines. The people we're talking about data labelers,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they're working on the auto pilot functionality, but there's still

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hourly workers. So it was a surprise because we were

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>led to believe that those types of employment contracts were protected.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So is this a shift of a mega growth company.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like um as it's wrapped up and you

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have been spitting out its vehicles. I mean, is that

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a shift from this company maybe not being such a

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>big growth player, but still producing a lot. You know,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>autopilot data labing is kind of a manual job and

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a thankless job. You basically take video footage that's generated

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>from the cameras on Tesla customer cars, Tesla owner cars,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and you annotate to help train the neural networks that

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>improved the technology. People are doing that here in the

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area, but they're also doing it in Buffalo, New York.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And what sources tell us is that actually that team

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is growing in Buffalo, New York. But sources also tell

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>us that they are paid less in New York State

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>than they are here in the Bay Area. So that's

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one factor to consider. But it's definitely one of these

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>areas that Elon Musk has referred to where they grew

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>too quickly to two greater size. You know, they're big

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>teams in the Bay areas. I said this was part

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sort of change of plan to move people

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to different Obviously is they've been winding down the team anyway,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's still interesting. Well that's kind of what I

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, because it caught my eye in your story

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that you say that the company now based in Austin, Texas.

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's currently about a hundred thousand employees globally. I had

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>no idea that Tesla employed that many people. And I

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think about what we've heard from Amazon, and I think

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Walmart too, coming out and saying that they overstaffed. I mean,

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>could that potentially be true in Tesla's case. You know,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think what we learned with inflation is inflation took

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>us by surprise. It's surprise to the upside a lot.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>The macro picture in the supply chain breakdown continues to

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>surprise us, and inventories of retailers is a good example

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. What I would say is that people have

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>short memories when it comes to Tesla, and you have

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to remember that there have been rounds of job cuts before.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the stock performed astronomically in the in the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>early days of the pandemic, but they did go through

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a round of layoffs when things were tought. So we've

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>seen Elon must be prepared to do this in the past,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and he'd warned us, Hey, you know one thing I

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you, um kady. Now we're just kicking

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>around some stories in the solar world, in the alternative

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>energy world. There's a story by Tara Patel about Stilantis.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It's one of Europe's biggest automakers and they are warning

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of a car market collapse if evis don't get cheaper.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that's that makes sense to me

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>that unless we bring down the price, and I don't

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>know how we do it, whether it's just you know,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to mass produce more. I mean, how do

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you see it? And how does kind of tests the

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>play into this. Who has been also trying to, I

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>feel like, be more aggressive about getting a car for

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the mass market. Yeah, you guys, remember Elon Musk had

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this original goal of a twenty five dollar EV where

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to make one for the masses. Well that's

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>gone out the window, frankly, he's abandoned that idea, and

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not every If we take the United States an example,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the median household cannot afford a forty fifty sixty seventy

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar vehicle, especially a small one like a Tesla

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Model three or Model Why. They look for value. And

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you look across the market and the trend that we're

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing all of these EV players, the Rivian's, the Lucids

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on top of tests that and the legacy auto like

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>GM and Ford. It's very expensive high end models they're offering.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't yet have a true mass market model that

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is affordable for that media to lower income family household.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's the inflection point. You look at

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>China where you the adoptions further ahead. They have a

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>greater variety of model types and at more affordable prices

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>than we have here in the United States and Europe. Again,

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>more option, lower price point. All right, to look into

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>your crystal ball. What's gonna be the next story on

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a Elon Musk is gonna be tesla twitter wet just

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly yet you know Elon Musk has not tweeted since

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>June twenty one. I want to know why. I feel

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>something's coming. Guys, I feel something's coming. Ellen, are you

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>out there? You can just tweet it ad directly Bloomberg

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Air while you're at it. Yeah, exactly, Come join us

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at love Look. Thank you so much as always, great

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Scoop West Coast correspondent Bloomberg News in our nine sixties

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>studio in San Francisco. You can hear them Bloomberg Radio

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and see them on YouTube. Katie and I come back

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in just a moment. Right here at Bloomberg Radio. You're

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the Bloomberg

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>business Week annual Heist issue. It is out. The cover

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>story takes us from the Cambodian Jungles to the Metropolitan

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Museum of Art. It is about an art crime for

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the ages, and earlier I caught up with Matt Campbell,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Asia editor for Bloomberg business Week from Singapore. Matt wrote

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that story along with Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel reb Webber.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I began by asking Joel about how this story perfect

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Heist issue came to his attention. Matt actually

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote this story and as he'll I think reveal here,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the main character UM is a character named Douglas Latchford,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and Matt had high hopes to actually talk to him

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point, but then obviously COVID happened and he

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>passed away. So what is incredible. But the story though,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is that it really speaks to Cambodia and artifacts at Cambodia,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but also the sea change within the art world where

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>artifacts that UM were looted decades ago are now in

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the crosshairs of investigators who are trying to actually return

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>them to their rightful owners. UM. So, so Matt talked

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to us about Douglas Slatchford, who is he exactly? So?

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Dougla Flashford, the late Dougla flash For who died was

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a British businessman who lived virtually his whole adult life

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in Bangkok uh and among other activities, he was for

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a period of about forty years arguably the top dealer

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world of statues from Cambodia, the spectacular Khmer

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Empire sculptures and some of them a thousand years old

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>or more. And he really built an art dealing empire,

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are works in a very fancy private collections

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and huge important museums like the met in the British

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Museum with links to Latchford all over the world. But

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>but as has now become a parent, he was a

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>part of a looting network and was facilitating essentially the

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>looting and laundering of statues that were being ripped from

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>temple having their origins of Steward and then trafficked onto

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the international art market. So what did that network really

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>look like because he actually really never went into the jungle.

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It was wasn't like he was an Indiana Jones character

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>here going into the jungle to get these artifacts, right,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So what did his network look like that's right, Joel.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There is there has been a perception of Lashford sometimes

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past as as kind of a tomb raider himself,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and that in fact is not true. He directed this

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>operation and he did everything that he did essentially from

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>his apartment in Bangkok. But what he did was by

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever was coming over the border from this network of

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looters and brokers within Cambodia who do that. Lash was

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a buyer. He helped create a huge market for stolen antiquities, uh,

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and certainly had contact with the brokers who were deciding

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to some extent what got looted and what got out

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of Cambodia. So while he was not himself smashing and

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>grabbing statues, he was really the essential node in this operation.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Without him, and particularly without his very energetic salesmanship which

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>made these Cambodian statutes into really big money objects, you know,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>selling for for high six and even seven figure prices, Uh,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this looting would never have occurred on the scale that

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it did. And what are the artworks themselves? So we

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>need to do a little bit of a little bit

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of background history here. Cambodia a thousand or so years

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ago was the center of something called the Khmer Empire,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>which was this Hindu and Buddhist monarchy stretching encompassing all

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of contemporary Cambodia as well as much of Thailand in Vietnam,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>was this very powerful civilization. Ongore was the capital on

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Gore Watt being the site of people are familiar with.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And these Cambodian kings commissioned massive statues. You know, these

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>are four feet tall fig feet tall, you know, six

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds stone objects depicting gods and warriors or themselves,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, or or their wives and children. Really beautiful figures.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And actually when you spend a little time with these

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>objects as I have, it's very easy to see how

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you can become obsessed with them, as Douglas Flatchford was well,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, take us there, Matt, you went to

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cambodian Jungles. Tell us about what you saw, uh,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and kind of the massive I mean some of these

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there's some pictures in the magazine. They really are are stunny,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>but they're they're massive. And take us to also where

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, who knew that feet would be so key

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in figuring out this heist, if you will? Well, so

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that strikes you about visiting temples

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in Cambodia is, first of all, they are spectacular and

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're amazing places and and sort of overwhelming to see

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you in person. But but as you look a little

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>more closely, you realize what's not there is that these

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>buildings are empty. Because as there were statues, they used

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to be full of statues. But the statues are all gone,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're all taken years and years ago. Some were

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>taken under the French, others later, you know, during the

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Cambodian Civil War and the Camara Rouge period and then

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>this really big period of looting which I described in

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the story in the nineties, and that was really the

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>golden age of Temple Robin in Cambodia. And however, this

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>looting was sort of crude and left behind remnants and fragments,

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and actually, as you alluded to, feet uh and and

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the key anecdotes and the story relates to

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>matching a pair of statues that had made it into

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Western collections to their feet which were still in sits

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you on the ground, broken off. And of course it's possible,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with computer technology to three D match

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>these objects together and to determine this statue came from

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this place, and then if you can interview witnesses find

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people who remember that being taken, you can actually nail

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>down the when as well, when and how did this

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>high begin to unravel. So this has been a long

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and kind of interesting, very interesting process where you've had

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of private citizens, heridag activists, archaeologists, other people

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>involved in antiquities in one way or another who have

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>had suspicions about this trafficking network for over a decade now.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But things really began to unravel in the mid when

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>US prosecutors, specifically in the Southern District of New York,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>began to take an interest in antiquities trafficking and antiquities

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>trafficking from Cambodia. So there have been a series of

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>indictments now of both federally and at the state level

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>in New York of people involved in one way or

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>another with the lash Ford operation. And in last for

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>himself was indicted on fraud and h conspiracy charges by

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>SDN Y and that really signaled that there was this

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>extremely serious law enforcement effort underway. However, a latch for

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I had about a year after that indictment. He was

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>very sick at the time, eighty eight years old and

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>never went to trial. I feel like there are three

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>key players in your story, and we've covered um Douglas Latchford.

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>There's the individual who helped him and digging up and

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, finding they aren't getting it out of Cambodia.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>There was also an internationally connected attorney that the U.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>S Department of Justice turned to, Brad Gordon. How important

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was he in kind of helping figure this all out?

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Brad Gordon is a really crucial character in this narrative

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and and is really a remarkable character. He is an

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>American lawyer. He's lived in Asia much of his career,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>had lived in Cambodia for over a decade now, and

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he was hired by the d J about ten years

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ago to begin investigating some of these thefts on behalf

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the US government on the Cambodian side, and Brad

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>really became obsessed by it, totally hooked on the challenge

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of figuring out where these objects were taken and uh

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and how they might be returned to Cambodia ultimately. And

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in that effort he found a really crucial witness, a

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Cambodian man named talk Tick, who actually Brad referred to

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with a code name Lion uh and Lion it turned out,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was a master looter, an extremely prolific looter, and someone

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>who helps Brad and measurably put it all together. Alright,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that last voice Matt Campbell, Asia editor for Bloomberg Business Week.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>He joined us from Singapore Morning, Our time, Night, his time.

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's his story, he wrote it. It's for the annual

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Heist issue, which comes out every summer. And Katie, it

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a great summer read. Just these all these

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of theft stories, intrigue, and Matt tells a tale

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like no other. End. I'm just waiting for this story

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to be on Netflix or Hulu or you know, one

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the streaming channels, because it's pretty incredible. All Right,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, July four, Holiday, just around the bend. So

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking hot dogs, hamburgers, we're talking fried chicken, trip

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>macaroni salad. That's what my mom used to make when

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we were growing up. In fourth we had Fourth of July. Um,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna eat probably some different things, Katie, but safe

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to say that we're all going to probably pay a

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch more for it. So let's get to it and

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>see what our next guest has to say about that.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Carol Flynn is ag tech analyst at Wells Fargo. She

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone in California, and Carol is

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with Katie and myself. So

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about the pain points that

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to face this Fourth of July when it

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to what we eat. Well, thank you so much

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Look, um, it's it's absolutely a pain point.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Food price inflation is hitting everybody's wallets. Um, and we

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote this uh research just to figure out where that

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>pinch of inflation could be potentially solved by finding relative

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>value and more palatable price points. And so what welk

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>us through some of those relative value plays. Feels like

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about stocks here, but when it comes to

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>food in particular, I mean, one are the substitutions that

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one could make if they are trying to host a

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>party and not you know, pay a fortune for it. Well,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. What you know, it's year over

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>year in food price acceloration that we're looking at here,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and the substitutions are truly going to be um, things

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like what else can we put on our grill? It

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like brisket is going to be more affordable than

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>try tip this time. Maybe if you're gonna stick with

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the hamburger patties, take a look in the frozen food section,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>anything that's sort of had shelf stay, book stability, or

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>frozen foods versus perishable. You're gonna see some specials out

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>there and some loss leaders. Um, it's gonna take a

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>little more effort to make sure this is um the price,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the budget is taken care of, all right, Carol Kate

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is already weighed in because I'm not gonna eat shrimp

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and port tacos. I heard that there are so many

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>argans in the produce department and you don't have to

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have that. That's I mean, that's the beauty of the

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>American food and agricultural system. I mean, we have an incredible,

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>incredible glossy of foods available, but are shrimp taco is

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>actually cheaper this time around? The reason we brought up

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>shrimp is actually shrimp prices have not increased over the

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>last five years, but you look at the other proteins

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on the grill and they're looking at twelve or fifteen

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>percent year over year increases. So again all about relative value.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see the shoppers looking for relative value. If

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>shrimp is already on your grill, you may have more

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of it this time. If there's something else that you like, um,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to be maybe looking for substitutions in

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the frozen case or some new innovative menu items. Sp Uh, No,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm gonna say shrimp prices probably haven't gone

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>up because it's a weird food. It is that a

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>weird food. It's a great food, weird texture. Not a fan,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but in any case, I also want to talk about alcohol,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>because personally I don't really like beer, more of a

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>white wine gal, but a lot of people drink beer

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and other beverages at the fourth of July. What's the

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>outlook there. It does look like some of the higher

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>priced beverages in the beer case are up, and we're

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>already seeing demand flow to the domestic um super premium brand,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so people are already making a change, and the white

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>wine and especially killed white wine is still out there

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's some great, amazing brands that are at lower

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>price points. If you're still looking to still you know that,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to prepare with a really nice wine, you're

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be okay, okay, all right, So talk to me

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>too about veggies or things like avocados between have been expensive.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about shortages. I feel like over the last

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>year or so, where are we on that? Well, Avocado

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>shortages is another story altogether. You know, most sleep supply chain,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there's always a perishability issue and weather driven issues. Um,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but California avocados are just about to come into season,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into the peak of the season. To look for your

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in your protest department again, seasonality is going to drive

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot when their tired supply. You're going to see

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>prices get moderated and things move quickly. It's very dynamic

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>space in the in the protest section. So, um, talk

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about sort of weird textures. People talk about that with avocados,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but once you are a fan, it's usually a lifetime issue.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So are you saying they're expensive but they're around No?

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that prices are going to come down

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna better supplies because we're coming into the California.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>See this avocados. Actually, I am not in avocado every

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>single morning, half of all, not an entire avocado left

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the record. Should it's so healthy for you, so healthy.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to hear it, Carol. We only have about

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds left, but we've covered the main course, We've

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>covered beverages. What about dessert. What's the outlook there? Well,

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he might want to look at some of

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the non dairy alternatives. I'm a big fan of the

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>real milk people, so don't forget the real live cream.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But it does look like those are those price futures

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be up substantially. I like a hot fudge Sunday

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on my July four I'm just gonna say it, and

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of watermelon as well. All Right, we're

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna run um. Have a great holiday. Esay holiday, Carol

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Flinch's ag tech analyist over at Wells Fargo joining us

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in California. I'm robbing journal. Yeah, but

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, who's right? Please?

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll ravels. I want to drive. It's a good question

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that drives in the drive to the globe. Well up,

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>jog down on Bluebird Radio. All right, just about eleven

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session. We have been bouncing around.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Slight gain on the Dow, as you just heard from Charlie,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower on both the NAZAC and the SNP.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So off our highs and lows of the session. Talk

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about searching forward directions, So let's get to it. Uh.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Delighted to have with us Stephanie Pierre. She see of

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Dry Fus Melon and E t S for B and

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Y Melon Investment Management. She is in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio with Katie, and she and I were in

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas at B and Y Melon Purging Insight two. We

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about a lot of things, including the future of money,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to in just a moment. But Stephanie,

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>so great to have you. How are you great to

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>see you. It feels like it was just a week

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>or two ago that we're on stage together. Yeah, it

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was just so I felt like it was so forward

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about you know, kind of our discussions. But let's

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>be present right now and as we look at this market,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about volatility in that panel. Uh, we continue

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to see it here in the market environment. What are

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you seeing in terms of fun flows? That tells you

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about what investors are thinking about right now, you know, Carol,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really powerful to see the fun flows ETFs this year.

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>You know what I think it tells you is markets

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>go opper down. But ETFs are still the vehicle of

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>choice for investors. As of the kind of May kind

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of month end, we were almost two hundred sixty billion

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in e t F net inflows here to date, and

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that just tells you that that's only going in one direction.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And I mean beyond that, beyond the inflows you're to

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>date inflows that you are seeing, I mean, what are

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the trends within that those flows, because it feels like

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty broken apart. Well, it's interesting, surprisingly, with all

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the volatility and equities that Carol mentioned, we're still seeing

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>very significant flows into equity e t f s. That

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>was about billion of the two D sixty billion, And

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>within that there's definitely some more defensive um trends. Right

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're seeing healthcare ETFs take a lot of the

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>flows they're relative to some of the more cyclical areas

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>like financials and technology that have been in outflow. Um.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>The other piece that I would mention though, is the

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>continued growth in fixed income in cash like e t

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>F product, which was another fifty billion inflows, and of

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that about twenty five or half of it billion of

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it was an ultra short ETF. So I guess the

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>short version of that is that you know, cash and

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>fixed incomes sort of plain vanilla yield oriented product are

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>really going to start to give more esoteric yield vehicles

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a run for their money as you continue to see

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>rates creep up. Well, that's actually what I started to

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>jump in. But that's something that I've been thinking about

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot because I was looking at some of the

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ultra short duration cash like e t s and they're

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>actually starting to pay dividends, pennies, but something they are.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at where we are today, right,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so we're coming up on another FIT meeting in you know,

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the end of July, markets are pricing in a seventy

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 1>percent probability of seventy five basis points, and then if

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you fast forward to the end of the year based

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on what you know is being priced in in terms

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of fat action. We could be at three three and

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a half percent just in a cash like product, and

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>then you go out the curve a little bit you

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>get more than that. Right, that's pretty interesting. I would

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go as far as to say it's pretty sexy relative

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the liquid alts and the other esoteric

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>products that people have been using to get yield. You

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>may not need to do that actually get an in

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>vanilla fixed income. So sexy because you know, at this

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>point we talk a lot about capital preservation, Stephanie, and

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that's really kind of what investors need to be thinking about.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. I think investors not only cyclically, Carrol,

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but also demographically. Right, the search for yield is not

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just because we haven't seen three percent on money markets

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or cash product in ten years. It's also because we

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>have an aging demographic in this country that need that

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>more structurally for their lifestyles. So giving an idea in

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of Stephanie and market cycles, like you know, we've

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about that it's typically about eight months between when

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the Fed stops raising rates to when it starts to

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cut rates, which is a short period of time. Markets

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are forward looking, right, I mean, how what are you

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for when you get an idea that this maybe

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>down market cycle is on the equity side of things

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is coming to an end. Yeah, look, I mean you know,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we joke about the perspective any of us how

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on markets is probably worth the price of a cup

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of coffee. That being said, um, I think you know

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>our view is that you know, the real question is

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>around inflation, Carol, and that's really what the markets are

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>focused on. That's what people are looking at in terms

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of earnings and multiples and what's really going to impack

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets as well as psychology as well as

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>whether people are employed and continue to spend right. So,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Fed strikes the right balance where we know

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the FED is behind the curve on inflation, if the

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Fed can strike the right balance, then I think you'll

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>see market stabilized. J Powell thinks he can, Wright, Katie,

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we heard this from him today, but he's not he

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thinks he can. So Stephanie, how how comfortable do you

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>feel in an environment that we're coming off of that

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we've never lived through before, that you think the FED

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can get it right because they are going to be aggressive.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>We know that they're definitely going to be aggressive. You know,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. You may be familiar with our chief economists,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Ryan Hart was a former FED official, FED watcher

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>par excellence, and certainly I think Vincent is talking about

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a fine balance here in terms of not turning this

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>into a recession. But it's a very tricky balance given

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>how behind the feed has been on a relation. So look,

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to get it right for us to continue

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the upward trend that we've seen over many, many years

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in equity markets. Um. But um, you know it's gonna

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be It's gonna be a really interesting market to watch

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>her for the next few months. And I'd love to

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>broaden this conversation a little bit and talk about crypto.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that you were on really riveting peril with

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>panel with Carol in Dallas. I wasn't there, you guys,

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but you should have been because it was really smart. Um.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And so let's talk about you know, Stephanie. I loved

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it because we talked specifically about you know, what's what's

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the future of money UH? And we had Matt Walsh UH,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>founder of UH, finding partner at Castle Island Ventures. We

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>had Matt Hogan as CEIO at bit Wise. I mean

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you guys really came in it from different perspectives. They

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>are in on the crypto world, but said, we were

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>very early in. How do you guys at your company

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think about where you need to be in this space? Sure, well,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>from a broad perspective, bing Y Melon seeks to be

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a leader in the digital assets space. As you know,

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we're a leading custody bank. We're really in all parts

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the cash ecosystem, and as our clients look to

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>us for digital assets solutions as a place to keep

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>their money, or trade their money, or manage their money,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to be a leader there. So that's kind

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of the short answer. Now, what does that really look like?

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It's going to go? In different stages? Right, the regulators

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>have a key role to play, and I think what

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw Carroll after you know, some of the crypto

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>events and the dislocation that happened a few weeks ago,

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the regulators are going to come in and

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>provide some standards, particularly as relates to you know, the

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>reserve management underneath um some of these cryptocurrencies and stable coins,

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>which I feel like you guys all welcome that idea

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that we would get some regulatory over. So it has

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen. There was too much white space here and

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that plus, as the guys on the panel

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, there was a lot of leverage as well

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as just not a lot of regulation, and that created

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the outcomes that we have. I mean, the

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reality is the recent people have confidence in traditional currencies

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is because there is a fully transparent, fully liquid hard

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>currency backing in reserve management in every single central bank

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And that wasn't the case in table coin,

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and it needs to be well, talking about crypto, talking

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about regulation, talking about e t F. So let's wrap

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it all together, because there's a very important SEC decision

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>coming on a gray scale application to convert their bitcoin

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>trust into an e t F. I gotta ask, I mean,

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is a spot physically backed bitcoin e t F going

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to become a reality sometime soon? Well, if you hadn't

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>said soon, I probably would have said likely. I think

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is when right, clearly investors love the rapper

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're comfortable with the liquidity, the transparency, the way

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it works in the pipes of every advisor and recail

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>investor in this country. That's why this is so attractive.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, as we just talked about. It remains

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to be seen how the regulators will UM really standardize

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the components I mentioned right, whether that's transparency, liquidity,

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>reserve management. And until that's in place, I think you'll

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>see this UM probably take a little bit of time,

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it won't happen. I think the direction of

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>travel is clear that, even be on the underlying of

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that specific instance, the idea of blockchain and digital ledger

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is here to stay. It's just a question of what

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>not if. All right, Stephanie, I'm so jealous and not

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in studio with you. You have to promise to come

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>back when I am COVID clear. I mean, I'm negative everybody,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're just still quarantining me. UM. Because I loved

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>our conversation and I want to continue with you, Stephanie Pierce.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>She's chief executive officer of Dreyfus Melon H and E.

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>T f s over at B and Y Melon Investment Management,

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us in our interactive broker studio. I highly recommend

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the Insight twenty two conversations and

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>check out our panel, which was all about reimagining the

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>future of money. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News