WEBVTT - Bill Poole on Brexit: EU's Regulatory Burden Will Remain(Audio)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>The Brexit vote coverage on Bloomberg Radio. So as Charlie

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Apologist so ably reported, it does look like the vote

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to Remain in the EU has edged out Breggs that

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>we will not know for hours, but this is the latest.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And when you have Nigel Farage, who has been such

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>allowed and important voice urging voters to say no to

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the EU, if he says it looks like Remain has won,

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a very powerful indicator to all of

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>us who are listening and watching. So if the EU

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is not going to see the exit of the UK,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for the global economy? What does

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it mean for the US economy? And in fact, what

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for global central banks. We're gonna put

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>all this to Bill Pool. He is a former president

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, senior fellow

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Cato Institute. Joining us now, Bill, welcome back,

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kathleen. So what's your immediate reaction to this

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or my reaction is? Uh, First of all, it looks

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like Remain winds. I follow the betting odds and they

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>have now gone to twelve to one for Remain. Uh.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned it looks like it's going to be a

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty two split. Percentage wise, it's a fairly healthy margin.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good that it's not just eking out

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a bear a bear wind. It appears that the UH.

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the results is going to be that the

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the EU is going to have to respond to the

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>fervor with which the Leave campaign proceeded in the UK.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people in the UK are set up

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with the regulatory burden that comes from the EU. UH.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's important to understand that the EU has UH used

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>this very nice sounding word, they want to harmonize regulations,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of what that is about is that

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the French want to saddle other countries with the same

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>unsatisfactory labor market rules. For example, the Hollan government and France,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>elected as a socialist government, has been backtracking to a

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>degree that backtracking has led to labor disputes in France,

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>been some strikes recently. So I think there's going to

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be should be some soul searching here and the UK

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to come forward with a very positive program of

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>reform for the U. For the EU, it's becoming a scleric.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Growth rates are low, unemployment hangs high, and most of

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the EU reforms are really needed, and that's what the

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>UH leave people. UH, we're saying that we're fed up

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with this bill Pool. I wondered if you could talk

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about demographics, not only when it comes

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to the United Kingdom, but to the European Union at large,

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>because as part of the U govn whole results, they

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are saying that people under the age of twenty four,

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're three to one for remaining in the European Union,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>while those over the age of fifty voted to leave.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to change after the results are in

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow morning, is it. No, that's not going to change. Um. Actually,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>because as the older people are gradually dying off the

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fraction of the population that remembers and was governed by

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the UK before it joined the EU. UH, that population

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is declining, UH as people age and die. So I

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>would guess that the allegiance to the EU among the

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>voting public in the UK will rise, but that's not

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to satisfy a lot of the underlying concerns. And

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I would guess also that as the younger people UH

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>achieve more responsibility various places in their career. UH. For

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>actually senior positions in businesses large and small. They will

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>see the burden that is imposed by the EU and

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they will uh gravitate towards an appreciation of what the

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>leaf position was all about. So we'll see how that

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>plays that. I just have to ask you, Bill uh,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen, Fed chair. Actually other central bankheads have said

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>they're really waiting to see what happens with the breggsit vote.

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Looks like the Braviin vote maybe prevailing at the very least.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Do we say, now, well, Janet Yellen, you said you

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>better watch out because it might buy financial market volatility

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that could tighten financial conditions, hold off on an interest

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>rate increase, and said she was very specific. It had

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a big influence at the last meeting. Is opened the

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>door wider to a rate hike for Janet Yellen and

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. I suppose. But one of the things that's

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>rather surprising about this look, when was this election scheduled

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>over a year ago, wasn't it? So why is it

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>just now the Janet Yelle on feder Reserve is becoming

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>concerned and using that as a reason to um delay

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>consideration of a rate hike. Uh. It seems to me

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's uncertainty has been out there for at least a year.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's getting We've gotten closer to it. Isn't the Fed

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to look ahead? Well? I think maybe they're worried

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about the financial market impact and being more because I

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think people took it seriously that would happen, And

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>when they did, for a while the FED said, WHOA,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe the horse of a different color. The polling

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>results and the betting results have for quite some months

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>indicated that leave was a had had some probability put

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on it. That's not a recent development. That didn't just happen.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Bill pull Just to inform you, the unemployment rate in

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom right now is about five five percent,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and the pound sterling is strengthening against the euro, up

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>more than half a percent of more than eight tenths

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of a percent against the US dollar. UH the en weakening,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Swiss frank weakening. Will any of this change? Mark

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Karney ahead of the Bank of England's position on interest rates.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>There was an interesting chart I think it was in

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal this morning showing per capita GDP

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in the UK relative to UH some I guess it's

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>France in Germany and the UK has been pulling out ahead.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>The UK has been pulling out ahead. The economy has

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>been performing better. That's not to say that it's great,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but it has been performing better. And I think that

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if if this UH, if this leave campaign leads to

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>leaves the UK to promote more structural reform, more pro market,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pro growth reform, that's going to speed up growth and

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it will justify require indeed, interest rate increases and UH

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming incoming quarters. Now. Of course, a lot of people

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about Mark Arney. Mark Arne, excuse me us, the

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>governor of Head the Bank of England, has been pounding

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the table about how damage has already done to the

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>UK economy. UH Is that insufficient to slow down an

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rate increase for the BOE the Bank of England.

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The damage already done? I think that's pretty small. There's

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>been some uncertainty. I don't see any evidence of huge disruption, um,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, significant investment projects on hold, etcetera, etcetera. I

0:08:53.960 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think that he's probably overstating damage already done and that

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>will disappear from the equation pretty quickly. Thank you very

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Bill Pool is former president of

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. He is a

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>senior Fellow at the Cato Institute. Continuing coverage right here

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg on the Brexit boat. The polls are closed

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom to determine whether the country will

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>remain in the European Union or will leave. This is

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio