WEBVTT - Markets, Chips, Nikola, And Battiers (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg markets podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOS, market pros and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news on the Bloomberg markets podcast,

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Dot com, slash podcast s and p five hundred.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, getting close to retesting those June lowe's. Certainly

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>feels very heavy out there in terms of the tape.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Looking across the asset classes, let's check in with the professional,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a j Odin's Senior Investment Strategist for bn Y Melon

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Investors Solutions. A J thanks so much for joining us here.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling your clients at B N Y? Hey?

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Um, right now we're telling clients

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to remain under underweight and equities

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean we we see the fat that

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to capitulate or pivot anytime soon, and so

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you know we're staying. You know, obviously we need to

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>stay in the markets, but remaining underweight equities, looking for,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, more defensive names, large cap stocks, with, you know,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>income generating equities. Um, we're neutral from a fixing commerspective,

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but we prefer short duration. However, as we start to

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>see the tenure continue to move up, we're gonna act

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>continue you start to add a little bit more duration

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the portfolio. Um, we're replacing that underweight in equities

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with an overweight in real assets, just because we need

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to be allocate to the sources of inflation. However, pulling

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>back on that commodity pieces. We're seeing energy come down today,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's that's kind of how we're we're positioning our

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>our clients a little bit more defensive in nature. Um,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at utilities, healthcare, Um, things names like that. What

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>does that mean in terms of the thought that we

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have to have capitulation to really have a sustainable but market?

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>In the last hour pulseween I we're speaking to David

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Sowerby and he said, you know, we can't really tell

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what capitulation looks like. We don't know what the signals are.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Your take on that? What do you look for? You know,

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna have to follow the feed here. We,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, the more kit for the last fourteen,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years has been under this this sort of understanding

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the market's gonna or the Fens gonna come,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>come through, you know, ride through on a white horse

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and sort of Save the markets when there's a massive

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>dip like this Um. But you know, we have to

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>understand that we've benefited from the amount of quantitative easing

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's come in and that nine trillion dollar balance sheet,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as part of their mandate, is trying to run that

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>off as well. And so you know, when when inflation

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is persistently highlight this, you know they're they're waiting for

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to see a downward trend of that. You know, the

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>last month we're seeing inflation rise in parts of of

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of the PC and C P I um, aside from energy,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, wage wage pressures continue to add

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>onto the inflation narrative until we start to see cooling

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and the labor markets. Can Imagine, the FT's going to

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to move forward, and that's I felt like they

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gave a good projection of where what the potential terminal

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rate could be. And so a market at some point

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>will stabilize as as we start to see yields sort

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of normalized here. But obviously when you're seeing, you know,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the five basis points swing up in the two year

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at four seventeen right now. You know we're going to

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to see repricing and so we start to see

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>yields normalize a bit. So you're you're you're not alone

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in saying that following the Fed is is the way

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>to go. But I have to talk about the precedent

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's set. The last time the federal reserved high rates

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like this about seen through. At the same time, they

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>had this massive quantity of tightening operation, which was massive

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time, not of the same skills it is

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, and the equity market actually rallied over that

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>time frame. You had tech leading that charge despite rising rates.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is this time different? You know, that's a great question. Um,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what we would say here is that the reason why

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this time is different, I think, has a lot to

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do with inflation and it's it's really it's really been

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>this sort of differentiator in the market. Um and and

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>many of the different UH exogenists supply driven impacts that

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with here. You know, Russia Ukraine conflict is

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>still having spillower effects. There's still the risk for for

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>energy prices to go up Um and China, zero covid

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>policy having an impact on supply chains and any other

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical tensions that it's sit out there between China and Taiwan,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but also the concept of reshowing and on showing and

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>how you know, even though the Fed has a two

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>percent target for inflation, that it's potential that we could

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>see persistently higher inflation for longer as jobs move back

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to the US, and so I feel like inflation is

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>is that is that differentiator in the in the in

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the environment that we're seeing today and the feds, and

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not just the Fed but on a global perspective major

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>central banks, trying to maintain price stability. So H is

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession part of the bing y melon kind of outlook,

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess, for markets? Is that kind of what you're

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>factory into your models? We're definitely looking at it. Um

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I I wouldn't say you know it's it's

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a high probability. I know we do have a

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>more recent UH snapshot. Our projection come out in a

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, so I don't want to uh jump ahead

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and give any sort of UH indications before that comes out,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but it is something that we're wearing on. I'd say Europe.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe in the UK, some of the news coming out

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about potentially being in a recession is definitely something that

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at as well. And and but you know,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the U s seems to be a relative out performer

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Um when you're looking at many of the developed market countries.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But to that question that you had, yes, it is

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>something that we're looking at, but I think we believe

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed can still pull this off and navigate

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this this landing Um of the economy. Are you guys

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>holding more cash than you typically do? Uh, we're definitely

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>moving into Um. A little bit more cash, for sure. Um,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and even within some of our our tacticle asset allocation,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>looking at Treasury floating rate securities. Um. But, like I

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>said before, as we start to see higher duration, I'm sorry,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>higher yields from the ten year, we're gonna start to

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>add a little bit more duration to the portfolio. All right,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a J great stuff. Really appreciate you taking the time

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>checking in with us. Hey, J Odin, he's a senior

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>investment strategist at B and y melon's investors solutions. B

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>N Y, the Bank of the York Nicole dugal joins us.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior vice president general manager for automotive at Qualcom,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and your qualcom has probably got this monster booth there

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>which shows off all all its cool stuff. Nicole, talk

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to us about where we are with just kind of

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the computerization of the automobile. I mean, Matt Miller had

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to wait for US Chevy silverado truck for months because

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't get enough chips to fund to drive all

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff that's in the car. Where are we now? Yeah,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>good morning, thank you for having me. Look, I think

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the car industry is going through this massive transformation where

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>every automaker realizes that the platform that they're building has

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>so much more potential, so much more capable, capability to

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>really create a brand identity for the automaker, to connect

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>with their customers, make it a services platform, find new

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to monitor times, and really the center of it

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>all is chips and software. These platforms are all becoming

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>much more advanced technologically, you know, keeping up with the

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>most complex technology that we are defining today. So, uh,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this progression has started. It's upon us and we really

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing every card company become a technology company and our

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>snapdrag and digital chassis is the basis on top of

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which we are building these partnerships with automakers. Talk to

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>us a little about pricing here. I mean it's clear

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that chips are in demand and have been in demand

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and probably will be in demand, I want to say,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for the next minimum year or so, as we starts

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>see supply chain issues really a bait. What does that

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>mean for pricing? How much of a premium can you

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>charge based on that really Um unabated demand? Yeah, you know,

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think automotive is and remains a very competitive space. Uh.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>What is changing, however, as you know, as we are

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>able to integrate more and more functionality into the chips

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that we build, it allows us to be able to a,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>bring technology, bring products over to more affordable segments of

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the value chain also, uh, bring much more capability to

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the higher end. So there is certainly a price premium

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can extract by the integration capabilities that we

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have Alba, bringing more technology to really every year of vehicle.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, so, Nicole, in the past couple of months

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I experienced to first for me. Number One, I drove

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>my first pickup truck. Number two, I drew my first

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle. That happened to be the electric pickup truck,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and I was just blown away by the technology of

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that E v in the in terms of the performance.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So okay, I get the EV thing that's coming. I

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>get it. Autonomous Driving, that's another thing altogether. How do

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you envision the evolution towards autonomous drivings? I know calcom

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to be right at the four front of them. Yeah,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>it's an excellent question and you know, our snap dragon

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>right platform really addresses this transition towards autonomous driving. So

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there are a few things going on, you know. I

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think your experiences in terms of driving a new vehicle

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and really being impressed with all of the electronics inside.

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that is certainly indication of one shift. I

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think the other, clearly, is that cars are becoming safer

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because there is technology, there are sens there is a

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of capability now available to make cars much more safe.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The transition from safety to comfort, to where you can

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>actually allow the car to take you from point a

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to point B, is a complex part. It is something

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that is going to take time because it really is

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about making sure that this can be implemented in a

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>safe way. We are already seeing, for example, for highway applications,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the ability for cars to be operating in autonomous mode

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for long durations, for long length of time. But as

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you start to bring in more way ability, more animous

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there is clearly a lot of work that needs to

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be done. And mostly, in my mind, this is actually

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a question of the safety responsibility that automakers owe to

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>their consumers. So, while the tech might be there, you

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>have to do this in a very responsible fashion because

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially taking control away from the driver giving you

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle, and that's kind of where the responsibility potion

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be really high. Cool. Yeah, I know you

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on the auto industry, but just I'd love to

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts just over on the overall UH semiconductor

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>supply issue kind of where are we as an industry

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting supply matched with demand on a

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>global basis, because that was a big, big problem continues

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a big, big problem for, you know, getting

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>these economies kind of reopen and back up, up and

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>running where already think? You know, I think from an

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>auto perspective we've been fortunate in that we've actually been

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>able to prioritize availability of semising to supply for our

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>automaker customers ahead of all other verticals and through Covid

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we were actually able to manage that quite well. Uh.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we look at the next year or so,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they are clearly still, uh, pockets of the market, you know,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>certain types of semiconductors that are still in short supply.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Supplies catching up, but I think, you know, through the

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>second half of next year I do feel that the Automan,

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that the auto industry, is going to start to see

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>much better balance between supplying the man so we have

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>had a minute left. talked to us a little bit

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>about the regional challenges that call comes specifically might be facing.

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the auto industry is really in North America.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's in Germany as well, but a lot of the

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>chips are coming from abroad. Talk to us about the

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>challenges there. So, you know, we are a fabulous company.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>We have partnerships globally across many different H semiconductor fabric

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>fabrication partner and very the way that we have established

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the businesses to have the ability to build products across

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple locations, have dual sourcing strategies. H The automotive supply

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>chain is highly complex and so scale is a very

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>important factor and you have to be able to work

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>across a wide variety of complexity, whether it's partnerships at

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the front end or the back end. Because of the

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>scale which we operate, this is something that we've actually

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>been able to do, perhaps a bit better than some

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of the other more entrance players that do not have

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>similar scale from a from an overall semic supply perspective.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Nicole, thank you so much for joining us there.

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Nicole de Gal, senior VP and general manager. He covers

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the automotive business for Qualcom and again, the transition to

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles well on the way Um and again the

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>performance that I experienced, which is awesome. Now the question is,

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting more and more autonomous. Looking at the

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>shares of the Nicola U N K L A is

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your ticker, you can put in there. Trading at three

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars and eight cents to share. It's off five percent today,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>off year to date, fifty two week low. It is ugly.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But we want to talk about, and that's so much

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock. But what's going on with it's founder? Ed Ludlow,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Ed Ludlow's west coast correspondent, but he's in

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>New York, but he's from England, so I don't know

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>where he calls home here, but he joins us here

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about the trial of Nicola founder Trevor Milton and

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>give us the background here on the issue here, at

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the trial here. What's going on, a kind of where

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are we? So Nikola was the post to child right

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of this wave of EV companies that went public. Vis

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Back Special Purpose Act was in company one and Milton

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was like bill to be the next mosque. He was

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>this visionary who would make hydrogen powered fuel cell semi trucks.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a reality, and retail investors poured money into this stock.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, things change really quick. You know, at

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one point they had a market cap bread and forward,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but just after they went public, Bloomberg reported that their

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>first truck, their debut truck that they'd unveiled in twenty six,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>was grossly exaggerated, never worked, missing parts. The next thing

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that happens a short seller takes notice, cites that Bloomberg report,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>looks into Trevor Milton and basically accuses him of deceiving investors.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The SEC gets involved, looks into him and ultimately by

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.239
<v Speaker 1>September of that year. He resigns. A year later he's indicted,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>charged with securities and wire fraud and that is the

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>trial that's ongoing in Manhattan right now. So walk us

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>through now what comes next in the trial and walks

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>through the timeline. What have we seen? Where are we

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>see next? So we're in day ten of the trial

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to working weeks in and it's just been astonishing. Um,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had key witnesses, including Nicholas current outgoing CEO,

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark Russell, who basically testified and told the jury that

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he did have a lot of concerns about things that

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Milton was saying, that in fact most of what much

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of what he said was not true and that he

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and other executives had warned Milton that, as the executive

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>chairman at the company, he everything he said equated to

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a press release, equated to a securities filing. We heard

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>from Nicolas Social Media Manager, and a big part of

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the story around Milton is he was a big user

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of twitter, sounds familiar, right, and Instagram, and she testified

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that they had a policy that non public information must

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>not be shared on social media. She testified that only

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>herself and Milton had access to the company's accounts and

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>she testified that Milton was breaching his own company social

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>media policies. Next we hear from the CFO. We heard

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>from a retail investor that says they lost a hundred

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and sixty thousand dollars because of investing in the company

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>based on what Milton says. That's the crux of the case,

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way. So I look at I see Steve

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Gursky is the chairman of the board, who's a long

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>time auto executive, longtime analyst. He and I used to

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>work together way back in the day when he covered

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the auto stocks. He's a savvy investor, savvy auto person.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Trevor Milton perhaps duped a lot of

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>smart people, not just kind of retail investors as well, potentially. Yes,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to say, like the defense are

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>going to argue and they're trying to prove and convince

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a jury that a Milton genuinely believed what he was

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>saying was true, but also that he was the CEO

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of the company right, it was his duty to market

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the company. He was following the marketing plan and the

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>burden of proof this is the American justice system is

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the prosecution to not just prove that he lied,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but those lies in fact did prompt investors to invest.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And Steve Gursky is really interesting and that that's the

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>extra bit of this trial that we're learning what really

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>took ace at the time. For example, yesterday a GM

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>current GM employee and engineer testified that the pickup truck,

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Badger, that GM had agreed initially to build on

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Nikola's behalf was not going to contain any parts from Nikola. Well,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Milton gave an interview saying seventy of the parts

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>would come from Nikola. So we're kind of filling the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>blanks of what we knew at the time. What is

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the fine here? What is the what is the defense

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>APP or the prosecution, excuse me, after when it comes

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to if they win this case, do the investors benefit?

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>What is Trevor Milton cast a great question. This is

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a criminal trial and he faces two counts of securities fraud,

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>two counts of wire fraud. The most severe penalty for

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the counts is twenty five years in prison,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and so I think most legal experts and based on president,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he is unlikely, I found guilty, to face that much

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>prison time. But the other way looking at it is

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the holistic picture that they were the poster child of

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the EB back wave. There are many commentators that would

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>say this is kind of the shot across the bow

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from the government and regulators about the perils of investing

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in companies that when public virus back, and also the

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>behavior some of those companies. We know there are many

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that have encountered financial trouble. Um You know. It's kind

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting tale of a market that's changed, the

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>specific market. What's the timing here? I mean I know

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you're here in part to cover this trial. What's the

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>expectation when we might get a kind of windingness up

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and when we get a ruling? Yes, so it's it's

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>built to be a five week trial winding up around

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>October fourteenth. That's at least what the judge brief the jury.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the government will need a few weeks to

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>present their case and they have a long list of

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>witnesses that they've been calling, Um you know, and that

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>would leave about a week for the defense before closing arguments.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know this is being really closely followed. That

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people want to know what happened to this guy, but

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>many stuck with nickle. But you pointed out the stock.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the stock breached four dollars for the first

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>US time. Um, you know, the background being that most

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>SPECTA quad companies, Star trading attend. There's a share. So

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you're out of the money right if if you held

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>onto your your shares. You know it's become in the background.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Has Become a boring truck company and at a really

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>hard time. I'm looking at some of the stockholders, shore

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard Group, nor just bank, Black Rock, h some state streets.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the some big big funds own

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this thing. So I'm sure there's a lot of folks

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>paying attention, in addition to obviously all the retail uh

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>investors as well. Ed Ludlow, thanks so much for joining us.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>There are we got in our studio here, Leo Kelly,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO Verdon's capital visors. I have no interest in any

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. I just found out, first of all, he's

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a graduate of the College of New Jersey in Ewing,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, which I have. I grew up in that

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>area so I'm very familiar with that. That school has

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten so good so quickly, but then you just worked

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of summers at Bloomberg and Princeton. Well, you

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just found his new best friends. Yeah, exactly. I mean

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe he still doesn't have his badge or

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>his badge doesn't work. Who says it doesn't? Late night

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>snack there? You've got to get a free lunch sometimes. Exactly.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Leo, you've been doing this wealth management stuff

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for a long time in Merrila Kelly wealth management and

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I got your own firm here. What do you talk

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to well, what do you say to your clients these

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>days when they see their performance in yes one, great years,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this year just brutal equities and fixed income. Where do

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you go? So what do you what do you tell

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>your clients? Well, the first thing we tell them is

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have to remain calm as always and Um.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But in the bigger picture we've been talking about this

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation and rising interest rates now for a couple of years.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>It's never made sense to me, Um, that we could

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>put this much money, grow M to a percent a

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>year and not have inflation. We didn't buy into the

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>transitory we didn't buy into rates would remain low. So

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been prepared. I don't think you can be prepared

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for this, though. I don't think you'd be prepared for

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine. We're running up to four on the

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ten year Um and the result of this, in my opinion,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the money being flooded into the system, is

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're moving into a secular change in interest rates and

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change a lot of things in the market.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So what people have relied on to be constants in

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the market in the past, it's all going to change

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're talking to our clients about. Well,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we've been talking about throughout

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this show has been the C word capitulation, not clients Um,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious if you're in the camp that says

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to see a sustainable rebound in the stock market you

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have to see capitulation. And if you answers yes, tell

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>me how we discover like, how you detect it. For

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Answers No, tell me why not. Well, this is starting

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to feel like we're getting there. I don't think we're

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>there yet and I think if you think seasonally, we

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>we did get to a bear market. Bear markets do

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not typically go down touch a bottom and then run

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>off to the races. It takes a few of these

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>tests and often a new low before we see the

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the market. So we have been talking to

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>our clients about get ready. September seasonally bad. Um, November,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>December seasonally better. Right, we recover from that. Normally there's

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>actually one more tempt at the bottom before you run

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>off to the races. But sorry, really quickly. They're seasonally

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bad because it's a reaction, from what I've seen historically,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to usually a summer rally like a or a Santa Rally,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>followed then by some sort of correction when you have

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>higher volume. Now, well, we did have a rally. We

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>had a rally off the down from the summer and

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Um again, I think more than seasonality, and I don't

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>want to I don't want to make this a technical conversation. Right,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>more than a seasonal rally. We have to take a

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>step back. We have higher energy prices still, even though

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they've come down. We've got really large inflation, we've got

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>rapidly rising interest rates, we have an extraordinarily aggressive fed

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and replicate that everywhere in the world. That is not

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I would call stimulus. So us that says

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for volatility. What we're telling clients is be

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>prepared for volatility. We have to be active in the markets.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Going to sleep on a sixty pass of portfolio? Those

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>days are done, they're behind us. That's exactly right. I

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that you think about it, this year, I guess

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know the S and p off more than most

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of the bonding disease that we look at here on

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the bloomber criminal off. You know ten there's really been

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to hide here Tis and you've got some clients

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who want to, you know, maybe take a little bit

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more risk, maybe put some cash into the market. Where

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are you suggesting? They look well, and I will be specific,

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but the first place is um not what has been

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>successful prior okay, as we go and we have higher

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and more volatility, right, that's going to impact pe.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So the the higher pe steady growth companies, I don't

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>think perform as well. Now, it's not to say that

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go down necessarily, but I just don't

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think they perform as well. We like earnings power. Strong

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar means small cap looks interesting to us right, small

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>cap growth and small cap value growth, because it's down

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so much value because there's value there. Um, we like

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the international markets, but there's gonna be tremendous volatility. International,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>developed international is two to three standard deviations lower evaluation,

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>relative valuation, than what we see in the norm, than

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the medium. So to me that says let's put some

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>money there and yes, we're gonna have to go through

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the gyrations of the market. But, as we tell our clients,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>when you invest in equity you sign a contract and

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that contract says I know there's going to be volatility,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I accept that for a higher rate of return and

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to put up with it. Well, now is

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the time to now's the time to earn your money

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to make good on that. All Right, Leo Kelly, thank

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Leo Kelly is the

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>CEO of verdant's capital Advisors, joining us uh live in

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg interactive broker studio here today. So we've got

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>central bankers around the world raising interest rates to trying

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to tame inflation at the risk of recession, and then

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I wake up this morning, and that includes the Bank

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of England, and then, you know, we wake up this

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>morning we see the UK announces his biggest tax cut

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seventy two. What is up with that? Talk

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>about it seems like a lack of coordination. So we

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>figured we've got to get ED price in here. He's

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow and former British trade official, uh at,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>from M N Y U. and what do you make

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of your English government and this tax cut vs V

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the Bank of England is trying to

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>do with other central banks? Sure, thank thanks. At odds,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is a fair enough description. Straight off the BAT.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>At odds Um, I would say that the the the

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>point of the Conservative Party is, in part as we

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, cutting taxes. So that doesn't that's not surprising, Um,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of it's kind of ignoring context. And

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so the other point of the Conservative Party is fiscal responsibility. Um,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fiscal responsibility. This ain't so if you're asking me, what

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know what the Bank of England is doing.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably not enough. We're at two in a quarter. They'll

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to go higher. And the the the let's see,

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>mixture of the policy posture in the UK seems to

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>me to be inflationary. Um, in an inflationary context. Now, well,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess my question here is if you are, and

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be as empathetic as possible, so help

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>me be in their shoes. But literally, if you are

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Um Andrew Bailey, you are in the Bank of England,

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it totally makes sense to be restrictive right now. If

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you are on the political side and you're seeing people

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>getting laid off, not being able to afford housing bills, etcetera,

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>then it makes sense to stimulate the economy from from

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. But why is this not being done in

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a coordinated manner? I mean less trust was very open

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to do this when she was campaigning. Right,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is economic policy ever coordinated? You tell me. I don't

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think it is. I don't know if that's a cop

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>out answer, but I don't think it is. And I

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think that, yes, let's trust, the prime minister was open

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about being someone who would cut taxes. And yes, of

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>course our back is against the wall. visit the energy

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so of course, again there has to be some sort

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal intervention because people are going to be cold.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It's that simple, rights Um. But again, the Bank of

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>England is probably thinking our independence is the most important thing.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent do we have to hike to

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate that our independence is the most important thing? Let's

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that we're facing an inflationary supply side shock on

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the energy side, right. So that that if you look

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>at rates, that's kind of also a bit on the

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one hand. On the other you might say, well, let's

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>cut rates to fight the deflationary pressure the unemployment that

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>results from that. On the other hand, and I think

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>at nine this is what you should do. You should

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>hike to fight, to fight that inflation, right, but that sorry,

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>they're they're at odds with each other at the end

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of the day. So it's kind of like neither side

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>almost has gets the full effect of what they're trying

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to achieve because they counteract. talked to us a little

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>about the politics of it as well. When you walked

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in here. I asked you about the Conservative Party specifically.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>They haven't cut taxes for I think three years, but

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that's part of their party line, that's part of the

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>DNA right. If you vote conservative, you're voting for a

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>tax cart Um and they and they've delivered right. They've

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>cut what is it? They've cutty the top right down

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to four. The timing is impecable because they haven't done

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it for three years and now they're doing it right, right, well,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's always a good time to cut taxes if you're

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a tor here, right, don't yeah, I don't think it's

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a Um, a bad time. So that's that's two billion

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and then five billion out of the basic rate. So

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think again, I'll go back to context pretty and

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>say that makes sense without context. In context, it seems

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to me like it's sort of shooting your load a bit. Earli.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're doing as a country is saying

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bet on us in the medium term. Bet On us

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>after this spending comes through, the system, comes through the economy.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>There's probably a two year lag on economic policy anyway.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Then take another look at us, right, because at that

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>point we will be in different shape relative to other

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions and other economies. So, looking at the pound, sterling here,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Brook Blow One ten were now one spot, zero nine

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>three to a couple of people of today have said

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK economy looks kind of like an emerging market. Here.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm currency, I'm outrage. I'm leaving immediately. Exactly. I mean,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it's what do you make of the sterling here in

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the training. Well, I came on your show previously and

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>said that parity was something we should be talking about.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's I'm not going to deny that.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That is realistic. Um Emerging markets. I mean, that's a

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of a that's a bit of a cheeky. That's me,

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? That's something for twitter. Well, to be fair.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, I saw this on yen's Nord big who,

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who's the CEO and founder ex anti data and the

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>former FEX, head of Goldman, I believe, and he said

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that the way you define an emerging market currency, forgive me,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready for it. I'm ready for it. Says the

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>way you you need define emerging market currency is when

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you have a basically in the United States, for example,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>when you have yields go higher, it supports the dollar

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rate differentials. They said emerging mark currency is the

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that which the pound, the cable rate, is

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>actually supporting. So technically, in theory, by that definition, I'll

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>split the difference. I'll split the difference with you and

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>say a very high quality emerging market. Okay, and again, British,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have you. I'm very British, but I think that the

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>future is unwritten. And again, this is all that. This

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is all coming out of Brexit, right. So sterling is

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>rewriting its core narrative. The old sterling narrative was we've

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>got Anglo Saxon innovation and European market size. That was

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that was very juicy. Now that that has to change

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>because we've left the EU, I don't think that that

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rules out future roles for sterling as a hedge in

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the world against other narratives. That will also change. So

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm optimistic in the sense that the UK is like

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>front loading its twenty century supply side shock or one

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, and reacting to these these things that we're seeing,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like covid and Ukraine, in a way that ultimately is

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>add aisle. And ultimately, you know, with agility there's always

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a premium in the medium term. What's the feeling how

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>tough of this winter be for Europe, for the UK? Um,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the thinking these days in terms of energy and

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all that time? Yeah, well, tough, tough, I think. I

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>think that if we sort of move over the channel

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Germans, M Schultz is not happy. We saw

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that the other day. Um, I said earlier, people are

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get cold and I think I'll stand by that.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think some people are going to be cold and

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be worse than that. If you think about

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>elderly people, if you think about children, if you think

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>about businesses and firms shutting down, it's not just temperature,

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's also going to be activity. So I think it's

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>very tough. But looking even further right, further east, I'm

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not sure that Puson is having the best time that

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he you know, the best time that he thought he would.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, a lot of Geo political issues out there today.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Just happened to be in the United Kingdom again. A

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>big big tax cuts in the face of rising interest

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>rates and a slowing economy, ed price joints as his

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow to N Y U formers, British trade

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>official joining us here in our Bloomberg interactive broker studio.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg markets podcast. You can

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with apple podcasts or whatever

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on twitter

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller. Three on ball Sweeney, I'm on twitter

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>at PT Sweeney. Before the podcast you can always catch

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>US worldwide at Bloomberg radio.