WEBVTT - It's A Borrower's Bond Market, As Amazon Scores Record Low Rates.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com. We talked about the lack of coherence

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in markets. We're seeing that across the board at a

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>time when America's cities are dealing with the unrest, the

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>likes of which we have not seen since the late

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>nineties sixties. We also see split fates among corporate America,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with the haves and the have nots, the haves being

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>able to borrow virtually for free, and the have nots

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going bankrupt. Joining us right now is Molly Smith, the

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>corporate finance reporter for Bloomberg News, the latest Amazon dot

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Com borrowing money basically for free for three years. I

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>mean really, I'm paying what twenty basis points above treasuries

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to borrow this amount of money? Molly, what do we

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know so far about this amount? So this is Amazon

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>actually set a few records yesterday, not just on the

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>three year, also for seven, ten, and forty year debt

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that these premiums are just mean, I feel weird calling

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it a premium. There's hardly one of any there. This

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is more or less a treasury bond, or perhaps even

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>less in some cases. So it's uh, it's pretty impressive

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to see how Amazon was able to do this yesterday.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, like you said, so just really speak to

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the divide in the market right now that Amazon Convertual

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>can borrow for basically nothing, while you know, there are

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.919
<v Speaker 1>so many companies that don't have any bond market access

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at all right now. So Molly, you have a great

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>chart in your article kind of looking at the high

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>grade barring costs, and it's almost back to where it

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was pre pandemic. Is this just simply the market saying,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Federal Reserve has our back here very much.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So yes, so we can think that said for not

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>only the rally here in spreads, which is the reflection

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the demand and the secondary market, but also for

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>all the issuance we've seen in the primary market that

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>last week we hit the one trillion dollar annual issue,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and for the fastest rate ever last year. We didn't

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>get through that until November. So, uh, the said has

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>been there for both supply and demand, and it's really

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>just opened up a ton of issuance on this Matthew rally.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So the trillion dollars that investment grade corporate corporations have

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>borrowed in the first couple of months of the year,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what people think. Is this to continue or

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is this just basically the largest best capitalized companies creating

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>war stashes of cash just in case things deteriorate. So

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of that, a lot of companies, like

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, capitalizing on these low interest rates. It's also

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of companies that genuinely do need the

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>money and are still investment grade rated, like Carnival and

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Marriott UM hardly a borrower of an Amazon kind of status,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless are still rated investment grade and that they've

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>come to the market as well. But uh, most strategies

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are seeing that this is going to slow down a

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lot in the second half of the year. That so

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>much of what we've seen largely been pulled forward from

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>what would have been uh in the second half of

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. So we're probably going to see issuance slow

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>down some say, I think of America maybe even just

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred billion dollars of issuance in the last six

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>months smally in terms of use of proceeds, are most

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>companies here refinancing existing debt or are they just as

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at least with steching, you know, taking down debt bolstering

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>up putting cash on their balance sheet. Here, it's a

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of both. So we've seen a ton of

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>companies to liability management exercises in UH in tandem with

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>these bond offerings, so they'll issue new debts hopefully and

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>use those proceeds to take out debt that's coming up

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in UH in new in upcoming years. So we've seen

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those concurrent bond offerings and tender offers together.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But then there are a lot of companies, like you said,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all that are just they need the money and they're

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 1>just trying to have the war chest now and who

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>knows what's in front of us, So it's a combination

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of both. Molly, the last time Amazon dot Com borrowed

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>money was ahead of their acquisition of Whole Foods. Now

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they're raising ten billion dollars at a time when they

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't exactly need a ton of cash. It's not as

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>if their business model is struggling right now. Do we

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have any idea of whether they're planning another acquisition? Uh,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they could be, and I believe that's what our analysts

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence uh speculate could be something that they're

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about. Amazon also did borrow in in um, a

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>smaller offering than this one, but like you said, yes,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>they've been a pretty infrequent borrower and the one that's

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>really of note was for the Whole Foods acquisition. So

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell beyond what they said is just

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>general corporate purposes as far as what this ten billion

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars maybe used for. Smally, how far how broad is this?

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know kind of uh rallying the bond market,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>new insurance market going down in terms of credit quality,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of investment grade issues issuance where

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>does it kind of get dicey here for an issuer?

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So the high old market has definitely been open to

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>some of those custody or borrowers, like you said, even

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just today we're seeing some the like MGM uh, which

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>is actually just the reek connected to the casinos is

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>borrowing in the high old market. We also have Sick Goes,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the US refinery unit of Pita Vesa so and outside

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, just more largely, we've seen a lot of

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>issuance from hotels, casinos, a lot in the travel leisure

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>sector more broadly. That really speaks to those sectors that, um,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that need the cash right now. They're not looking to

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>refinance that, they just need the money wherever they can

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>get it from. Although let's be clear, some of the

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>lower rated borrowers aren't exactly getting the best deals in

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's not like they're borrowing for free, right.

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen them pledge islands. We've seen them,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, pledge cruise ships. We've seen them pledge you know,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the clothes in their closet. I mean, at a certain point,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>their ability to borrow isn't necessarily testament to a great

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>desire for their debt correct, correct, you know. And that's

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a great point at Lisa, And yeah, and that's even

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's more remarkable, like you said, is that

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>these are secured offerings, so there is some physical collateral protection, um,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, like an island in the case of Norwegian. Uh.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's like you said, most of these deals, they're

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>coming at double digit interest rates. We've seen some think,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head, up to fourteen percent

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>yields on some of these, which was I believe that

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was Landry's, which is the operator of a casino and

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>restaurant empire. So we've seen well into the double digit

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, and like you said, these are hardly coming

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for free for some of the more challenge companies. Molly Smith,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks much for joining us. Molly Smith is a corporate

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg News. Brings us up to day

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on what has just been in a short and your

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>new issue market, particularly in the investment grade market. Lisa

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>a year today hitting that trillion dollar mark, uh, the

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>earliest on record just recently. So again, if you need

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>cash in your investment grade rated uh, boy, now is

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah. I can just already hear people saying

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>bur like the cash printing machine that the Federal Reserve

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is making. I mean, that's essentially what a lot of

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people are attributing this to. Given how much the Feds

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>actions stepping in saying that they're going to buy corporate

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>debt for the first time in its history, pushing down

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>yields considerably near their all time lows now for investment

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>grade companies. Still, however, the question in my mind is

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at what point do investors start to price in the

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that the FEDS actions will not prevent certain companies

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from going bankrupt? Yeah? Absolutely, Looking at just the ten

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>year yield on the treasures right now, the it's down

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>three thirty seconds, pushing to yield up just slightly to

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>uh point six. Let's call it point six on the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>tenure treasure just extraordin. We have been wondering about the

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>disparities that we have been seeing in the job market,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with some of the job losses in the wake of

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus hammering the Black and Latino communities disproportionately. This

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just has come to the fore as the unrest in

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>America cities gets harder and harder to combat. Joining us

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>right now is John Stroyer, chief executive officer of Calvert

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Research and Management. I want to know from your perspective,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you say that ending racism is the responsibility of corporations.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Why do you say that? Thanks for having me on

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly we've given corporations a significant amount of

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>power in the United States. They inform innumerable social and

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>environmental outcomes. So as a result of having that power,

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which has been something they've acquired over time, they have

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a responsibility to help solve these types of issues. Additionally,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>their ability to take action and to drive positive social

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>change is a significant driver for their brand value and

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>their attractiveness and reputation as a provider of products and

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>services as also as an employer. So they have that responsibility,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they've taken it, and they've got to take action to

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>help solve this. John, how about the counter argument that

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the responsibility of a company is to maximize shareholder profits. Well,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a tie in here, because you know,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>society that is destabilized as results of civil and rest,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>which is an outcome of excessive inequality GDP, is suboptimal.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that companies working to solve this

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>problem will be able to see a benefit to long

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>term value creation. I don't really think there's a conflict here,

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>although markets may disagree, and I'm thinking of Facebook and

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter in particular, and not necessarily on the racism question,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but certainly on interfering and sort of making a judgment

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>call when it comes to how people are using their platforms.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook aired on the side of not really interfering, and

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has loved a number of labels with warnings on

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it for a number of different leaders recently including President Trump.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>How can this not necessarily be what we're looking at

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>longer term in terms of the benefit and attractions and interfering,

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>because right now it seems like Facebook is one and

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is lost. Well, certainly in the short term, anything

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>can happen with with security prices. UM. What we think

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>about is long term value creation and what happens over

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a slightly longer time period. And I think it also

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>extends well beyond social media. UM. Two companies that are

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>doing business in in in every community. And I'm not

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that you know Twitter has won or lost or

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Water loss. It's way too soon to tell. So, John,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this discussion, your argument per se, seems to fit into

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the E s G kind of discussion environmental, social and

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>governance that a lot more investors are paying attention to

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in their securities analysis. How do you think this fits

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>into kind of E s G and overall analysis? Well,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>companies today UM are all striving to prove their capabilities

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on diversity and inclusion, whether that's t E s G

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>investors or whether that's to the workplace of today in

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the future. So this is uh. This is a square

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on E s G issue, and investors and asset owners

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really expect companies to provide the necessary information so we

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know how they're really doing. And let me relate this

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to financial returns. Today, the demographics of the country that

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really shifted and changed. We have a much larger Black population,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of much larger Hispanic population, and educational attainment across the

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>board in minority groups is going up. So we want

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>companies to be able to draw from a broad labor pool.

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>We want companies to be able to achieve the benefits

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of diversity and inclusion. From an E s G investor's perspective, though,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we need data from companies to really assess how they're

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>doing and for companies to be able to be attractive

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>workplaces for Blacks, Force band X, for Asians, for all

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>people of color, and for everybody. They have to do

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a good job helping to actually use their voice and

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>solve these larger social issues. So it's a square on

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>E s G issue. By the way, I think the

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>E s G investing community needs to do a lot

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>more to push companies to help solve these problems and

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>provide us the data that we need to know what

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>outcomes are really achieving through these diversity and inclusion programs. John,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>your position a top Calvert Research Management which was acquired

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>by eat Advance and overseas nearly twenty billion dollars with

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this focus on E s G is admirable, and I

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>would love to see some of the things that you're

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about come to fruition. What are you looking for

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with respect to corporations steps that are meaningful towards ending racism?

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>What can they actually do well? Racism is tied up

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>with inequality, and inequality in this country is deeply embedded

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and starts with inequality of opportunity at every level. So

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of things that companies are responsible

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>for doing. And they said a first thing is disclosure,

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>providing us the real information about the demographics of their workplace,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>who has what jobs, so that we know how well

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the company is doing there. Next, creating attractive training and

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>development programs for people of color and for um people

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who have not had those opportunities in the educational system

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is critical. Being able to develop talent across the board

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is essential UM. I think also working with the educational

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>system in the communities where these companies draw from and

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>helping to create equal opportunity in the educational system is

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>also critical. And if you think about it, companies in

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>America need to have a well educated workforce across every demographic.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are a number of things that companies need

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to do in order to secure their place in the

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>labor market and to help improve the workforce. So it

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't just what they should do, it's what they need

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. Hey, John, thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate that John Strayer uh CEO of Calvert Research

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and Management with that nineteen billion dollar dollars in assets

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on the management based in Bethesda, talking about racism and

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the role that corporations have Lisa, and it kind of

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>goes back to that E s G discussion, is we

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think about UM companies holistically and their impact on their environment.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It also goes to some of the comments that we've

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>heard out of the chief executives from everyone from City

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Group to JP Morgan to black Rock in response to

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the protests really coming out in solidarity with the cause,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly not the violence, but the cause. Then everything that's

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been going on, Paul, we have not discussed one area

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the market that was super hot a couple of

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and that is the crypto assets sector, and

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it has actually been on fire, with Bitcoin rallying above

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars once again and it has gained forty

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>percent more than that so far this year. Let's talk

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about digital gold with maltolm Demers, chief strategy officer with

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>coin Shares Group, which has about seven fifty million dollars

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the digital space, joining us from London, Maltham, thank

0:15:58.000 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Can you talk

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin and it's use or just a crypto assets

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sector in general. It's use is digital gold right now, absolutely,

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for having me on. So it's really interesting

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to be living in this time right now. Bitcoin with

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a product of the last financial crisis. As some of

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>us who been the been in the space for a

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>while they know, the Bitcoin white paper was written in

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine and the network launched in two thousand ten.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We're now eleven years into sort of the Bitcoin story

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing bitcoin really come of age. And mature

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in this financial crisis we're going through right now, particularly

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen over the last three months, a lot

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of risk, a lot of uncertainty, and investors really starting

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at the investing landscape and reevaluating how they

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be allocated going into the next year and beyond.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So the investment community obviously still has a lot of

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>mixed views on bitcoin. Some and assement firms and investment

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>managers have made big strides into the sector and are

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>offering products and services to their clients. Where one example,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we come from the commodity space as a team that

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>have been in the digital assets space for the last

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>seven years now. Other firms, most notably Goldman's wealth management team,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have been less than hot on crypto assets. But one

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 1>thing is sure, every investor is talking about bitcoin, getting

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>smart on crypto assets and starting to develop a perceptive

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and really trying to figure out where bitcoin might fit

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>into their portfolio going forward. So it's an exciting time.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's been a really wild time, and we're really excited

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about the intelligent conversation we see developing around bitcoin, digital assets,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and this technology more broadly. So, maltime you mentioned the

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Golden Report, I remember when I came out and caused

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some waves here sometize what Goldman was saying there and

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>whether kind of what if you agree or disagree with them? Absolutely,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's import to know. UM. The report was issued

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by one of Goldman's chief investment officers, who has been

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>an analyst of a lot of different trends in the

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>investing space UM, and I think it was an interesting

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>summary because it really used what's happening in macro markets

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was happening in gold as a way to flame why

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>they felt bitcoin was not a great investment, UM, not

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a great long term value investments for investors. The way

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they described bitcoin, which I think was an interesting characterization.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They talked a lot about issues pertaining to money laundering,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and as we know, Goldman has itself been dealing with

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a number of issues related to money launderings following the

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>fallout of the one MDB scandal and the other aspects.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That was interesting is in this report they not only

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that they felt bitcoin was really just purely speculative

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and not really fundamental value investment, they also made a

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>similar assessment of gold, where they stated they did not

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>feel that gold was a significant investment opportunity for investors,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and as we look at what's happened to those, both

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the price Schoold and the price of bitcoin, I think

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>here is an interesting instance where the market certainly is

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>indicating it's not in agreement with that particular assessment. But then,

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, though, I think they're not alone in

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>saying that right there especially, I mean, I leave gold decide,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to crypto assets, Colman sacs Uh

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly has plenty of company and saying it's a speculative asset.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Considering the fact that people are not using it the

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>way that they would another currency, what's the counter argument

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to why this has staying power in a way that

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond what some people are saying. Sure, I think

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of great rebuttals written by the

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>industry that use a great set of data. I think

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of evidence to the contrary, and we

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have coined share and a lot of time surfacing that

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>data and sharing it with our investors, our clients in

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. But I think there are a few key

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>trends here on bitcoin is being used and the way

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's being used by people. It's being used as a

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>hedge against inflation and as a long term store values.

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>There are more people than ever that whold bitcoin in

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>their investment accounts, whether that's through a structured product like

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>our xbt provider products or the gray Scale GBTC products.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Here in the US, there are a lot of bitcoin

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>wallets that have been created and that number continues to increase.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>The bitcoin that's held in those wallets of staying dormant,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning people aren't speculating on it, they're really holding it.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And then most importantly, we've seen just a tremendous number

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of inflows into bitcoin over the last two months alone.

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>One interesting fact over the last two months, the demand

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin has outpaced its supply. Uh So, as you know,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin has a daily production of new bitcoins through an

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>activity is called mining. And in the last two months alone,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the amount of investor demands for bitcoin through things like

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>squares cash app, Gray Scales, GBTC product US, and our

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>XPT Provider products, which is an exchange traded product, there

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a hundred and fifty per cent demand for

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that exceeds the supply being produced, which to me,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>again is a very bullish indicator. We're also seeing investors

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on the trading side, taking a lot of interest. H

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>The Ciene Bitcoin futures contrast broke all time high in

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the last month in terms of outstanding up an interest

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>on the platform, and at the end of May we

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>saw one day where we had over a billion dollars

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of traded volume, which is an all time high for

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that particular product. Meltem thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Meltem demere she's a chief strategy officer for coin Shares

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>group of seven million dollars in digits in the digital space,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>based in London, giving us the latest on Bitcoin which

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is rolling as Lisa mentioned earlier, and all things in

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space. Trying to get greater credibility in financial markets.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>It looks like they're having some success. Looking at the

0:21:55.440 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin, busy, busy, moreing here. We're taking a

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>look here at an interesting story that we are seeing

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Business Week about private equity firms. They've been

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>really big investors in the hospital business, and they've also

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>been beneficiaries of some of the bailout money. David Kaczynski,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week reporter, joins us. David, thanks so much

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I think he's getting up right now.

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But it really is an interesting focal point because private

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>equity was sort of carved out of a lot of

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the programs passed by the federal government, with them saying

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that they do not want these firms to be beneficiaries,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet they have been such huge investors in the

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>healthcare industry and hospitals in particular, that there's been an

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>extra emphasis Paul on on on how to parse out

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare considerations with the efforts on the part of

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers and others to keep money away from private equity. Yeah,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>so let's welcome David and David Kozski. Bloomberg business Week reported, David,

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Lisa and I

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about your story here. Private equity really

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>investing in the hospital business and they've received some bailout money.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of kind of the scope and

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>scale of this, Well, well, the scope is still being

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we're still kind of digging through the numbers. Um. You know,

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>there was concern when the administration and amongst some lawmakers

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>about private equity not getting bailout money and trying to

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>target that money towards the needier healthcare companies. However, we

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>found there's this tranch of loans. It was a hundred

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in uh interest free loans that hhs UM

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>decided to give out in late March and early April,

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and well none of it wouldet went directly to private

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>equity companies. UM. The portfolio medical care companies they owned

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>got more than one point five billion dollars. So can

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you walk us through how they managed to get this

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>where the money went, especially given some of the sentiment

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about trying to keep money away from

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>private equity back firms. Well, all the big boys got it,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Apollo Global, KKR, UM, Cerebrius, UH, you know

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>those those UM private equity firms have been buying huge

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>stakes in medical care companies and in physicians staffing companies

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years. UM, and it was easy

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for them to get it. UM. You know. Hhs I

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>interviewed them of Verma, who is the administrator of CMS,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the eight the Health and Human Services department

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that the administer the loans, and she said they didn't

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>ask who the who the ultimate owners are anyone who

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted money and said, hey, we're gonna be losing UM

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be losing uh some income because of the

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>elective surgery being banned during the COVID crisis. You just

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>put an application and they FEDS would send them, um,

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some cases hundreds of millions of dollars

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to the subsidiaries of the private equity firms. David, I'm

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>curious there has been an emphasis by private equity firms

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to take stakes in hospitals that provide lucrative, lucrative operations

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>such as the elective procedures that have been put on

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>halt by the pandemic. Has this been one of the

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>main sources of hurt at a time when hospitals are

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there at the very epicenter of treating and caring for

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the people out there who are struggling

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with the effects of COVID. Yeah, you know, elective surgery

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>as a profit center for every uh, you know, for

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>most medical providers. UM, you know. But what's interesting about

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>this is that, you know, it also hurts some of

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the safety net hospitals, you know, the ones who deal

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with you know, who don't have the billions of dollars

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in cash reserve that Apollo does or that KKR does. Um.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So some of these safety net hospitals actually were unable

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to apply because the money was gone so many that

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so many of the big UM for profit UM hospital

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>companies UM, the corporate owns and the and the private

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>equities got in there, got all the money and they

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>struggling providers weren't able to get money in time. So,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>UM it is a problem. And unfortunately HHS didn't do

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>much to target the money towards those who needed it

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the most. So how have they done just overall in

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the hospital business of private equity firms? You know, UM,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're in the past ten years, they've

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of money. I think in the last

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>year or so, there's been some problem with KKR and

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>black Stone because they're under fire for the surprise billing

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>scandal UM or surprise building issue where the staff um

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>network in network emergency rooms and surgical centers with out

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of staff out of network doctors. So if you go

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and get a surgery, may think you're covered for the room,

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but you'll later get a surprise bill for you know,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes tens of thousands of dollars from the surgeon who

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>was out of network. There's been such a public outcry

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>about that that Congress has been pushing to ban it,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and KKR and Blackstone, who are the two biggest um

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>UH companies. They own Team Health and Envision, which are

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the companies which are at the center of this. They

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>spent millions of dollars trying to fight that off UM

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have been struggling because there is a sense

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that the public outcry is going is going to UM

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>lead to a restriction on that. But overall they've made

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>UM it's been a hugely profitable sector for private equity.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with David Kochanski, reporter for Bloomberg business Week,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and David just sort of tie this all together. Why

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is there so much opposition to private equity among hospital ownerships.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to figure out whether they have acted

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>worse than any other hospital operator or investor given the

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that these issues have been considered endemic throughout the

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>entire industry. Well, I think it's hard to paint things

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with a broad brush UM, but I do think if

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you look at the actions of the individual companies, some

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of them have been at the forefront of the biggest

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and what are considered the most predatory UM actions

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like the like this surprise billing UH situation. UM. We

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned Cerebraus, which owned which got tens of millions

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in UM low interest loans. You know they

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have bought UH. There's a hospital in eastern Pennsylvania that

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been trying to sell and in the middle

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID crisis they threatened to close it down

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>unless they were given millions of dollars from the government

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania. UM. So there isn't there is a sense that, well,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that the healthcare UH system in the US

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>has been UM, you know, been costs of reason above

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the costs of inflation for years, that private equity has

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in some instances used more um hard hardball tactics in

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of billing and in terms of suing low income

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people who can't pay the bills. Yeah, Davidki, thank you

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with US reporter for Bloomberg Business

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Week talking about a story about private equities involved meant

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with the hospital system and the receiving of some of

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the bailout money that the US has provided, even though

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a whole effort to have private equity firms

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not benefit from that. But Paul really highlighting one of

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the key flashpoints heading into the election and beyond, which

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is the rise of private equity, the rise of the alternative,

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative investment community, where in some ways the lending the

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>risk the shadow banking system has expanded as the traditional

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>investment banks continue to pull back in terms of size

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and risk taking. So a lot of questions going forward

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>about how that will be translated into policy as well

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as some of the political backdrop. Thanks for listening to

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa A.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.