WEBVTT - NFL Week 9 Fallout, Ohio State Breakdown with Bobby Carpenter

0:00:01.230 --> 0:00:05.170
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz.

0:00:05.390 --> 0:00:08.690
<v Speaker 2>Where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.730 --> 0:00:10.050
<v Speaker 2>sports stories of the day.

0:00:10.070 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Patz.

0:00:13.490 --> 0:00:14.620
<v Speaker 4>Not So Fast, my friends.

0:00:16.180 --> 0:00:19.020
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Patz.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 3>There is so much going on. I don't even know

0:00:21.060 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>how we're going to fit in everything today, Paul.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.500
<v Speaker 5>Pearl, we're going to go to the fallout from USC

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.790
<v Speaker 5>versus Ohio State. Monday Night Football preview. I'm all hopped

0:00:27.890 --> 0:00:30.650
<v Speaker 5>up on three Musketeers bars. Let's go. Let's hit some NFL.

0:00:30.670 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's start with a simple question. Who should

0:00:33.729 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 3>feel the worst today?

0:00:35.260 --> 0:00:36.339
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we're skewing negative.

0:00:36.659 --> 0:00:37.900
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course we're going to start negative.

0:00:38.740 --> 0:00:41.020
<v Speaker 5>I think the first ballot who feels worse today has

0:00:41.060 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 5>to be the Baltimore Ravens and their fans. You get

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.300
<v Speaker 5>Lamar Jackson back early game against the Bills. First play,

0:00:47.330 --> 0:00:49.110
<v Speaker 5>it's like what happened to, you know, it's not as

0:00:49.150 --> 0:00:50.890
<v Speaker 5>bad as what happened to Aaron Rodgers with the Jets,

0:00:50.930 --> 0:00:53.750
<v Speaker 5>but he hits his hand on a helmet. Not even

0:00:53.770 --> 0:00:55.470
<v Speaker 5>like a big hit or big injury and he's out.

0:00:55.930 --> 0:00:58.790
<v Speaker 5>Tyler Hundley, who's considered a pretty high-end backup for you.

0:00:58.810 --> 0:00:59.950
<v Speaker 3>He can win some games.

0:00:59.970 --> 0:01:01.490
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, here it is. First play of the game, Bango.

0:01:02.020 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 5>I thought it was a hit. It was a thumb.

0:01:04.140 --> 0:01:06.220
<v Speaker 5>And now Tyler Hundley, where you think, oh, we're fine there.

0:01:06.540 --> 0:01:08.780
<v Speaker 5>He gets a turf toe. These two guys could be

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.190
<v Speaker 5>out a long time. At least one of them, Lamar Jackson,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:11.950
<v Speaker 5>could be out for the season.

0:01:12.030 --> 0:01:13.810
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Coach Jesse Minner said he could be out for

0:01:13.830 --> 0:01:14.350
<v Speaker 3>the season.

0:01:14.730 --> 0:01:17.170
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's almost one of those seasons, like my

0:01:17.209 --> 0:01:20.250
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia Eagles, It's so bad, I don't even know if

0:01:20.290 --> 0:01:21.209
<v Speaker 2>you feel bad right now.

0:01:22.069 --> 0:01:24.770
<v Speaker 3>When Lamar got hurt, it was just like pulling off

0:01:24.810 --> 0:01:26.010
<v Speaker 3>a mandate. Season's over.

0:01:26.490 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 5>Right, but okay, if you're compared to the Eagles, it

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 5>feels like the Eagles, especially after last night, it's over, over.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.259
<v Speaker 3>Like we say, done, done.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And?

0:01:34.260 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, yes, like you said.

0:01:35.580 --> 0:01:36.740
<v Speaker 3>The Ravens are done, done too, dude.

0:01:36.780 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 5>No, but if the Ravens, do you look at yourself

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.410
<v Speaker 5>as done, done? The Bengals almost lost to the Titans.

0:01:42.670 --> 0:01:45.150
<v Speaker 5>The Steelers are good, not great. And if you look

0:01:45.170 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 5>at what's going on around you, Would you go to

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 5>the trade market this week? You have a game coming up.

0:01:50.060 --> 0:01:50.700
<v Speaker 5>I'm being serious.

0:01:50.900 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>No, of course you would go to the trade market.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.460
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you have to bring in somebody. You have

0:01:53.500 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>no quarterbacks.

0:01:54.180 --> 0:01:57.490
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so their office coordinator, Declan Doyle, was with the

0:01:57.510 --> 0:01:58.250
<v Speaker 5>Bears last year.

0:01:58.270 --> 0:01:58.490
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:01:58.570 --> 0:02:02.430
<v Speaker 5>Tyson Bajent is considered a high-end backup, but he may

0:02:02.450 --> 0:02:04.370
<v Speaker 5>have fallen out of favor with the Bears. Is that

0:02:04.390 --> 0:02:04.970
<v Speaker 5>your first call?

0:02:05.150 --> 0:02:06.830
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Tyson Bajent has fallen out of favor

0:02:06.870 --> 0:02:11.030
<v Speaker 2>with the Bears. I think Ben Johnson loves Tyson Bajan. And, no,

0:02:11.070 --> 0:02:14.150
<v Speaker 2>the Bears have a quarterback with a wonky hamstring. And

0:02:14.190 --> 0:02:15.950
<v Speaker 2>I know they have my guy Casey Keenum in third string.

0:02:15.990 --> 0:02:19.150
<v Speaker 2>They're not giving up Tyson Bajan, really, unless it's a

0:02:19.389 --> 0:02:19.850
<v Speaker 2>really high pick.

0:02:19.910 --> 0:02:21.550
<v Speaker 5>Well, but don't you fleece them? Don't you try to

0:02:21.590 --> 0:02:24.450
<v Speaker 5>fleece a desperate team? Like, remember Sam Bradford years ago?

0:02:24.470 --> 0:02:26.030
<v Speaker 5>He got traded from your Eagles to Minnesota.

0:02:26.570 --> 0:02:29.110
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. The Bears have one goal this year.

0:02:29.130 --> 0:02:31.350
<v Speaker 2>It's to win the Super Bowl. You cannot let Tyson

0:02:31.380 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Bajan walk out the door.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 5>Now, I know it's not about what fans think, but

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.299
<v Speaker 5>right now, if you said to the fans, would you

0:02:36.340 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 5>rather keep Case Keenum or Tyson Bajan, I think they'd

0:02:38.660 --> 0:02:40.060
<v Speaker 5>want Keenum right now today.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:41.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man.

0:02:41.100 --> 0:02:43.820
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that would be short-sighted to let either

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.070
<v Speaker 3>of them go. I mean, Caleb Williams was pretty hurt.

0:02:46.169 --> 0:02:48.750
<v Speaker 2>I know it was a little overstated, but Caleb Williams

0:02:48.850 --> 0:02:50.130
<v Speaker 2>also likes to run.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:51.419
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to keep them.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And the Ravens, to me, if you're adding Tyson Bajan,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.220
<v Speaker 2>you're not back in the Super Bowl mix. So are

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you going to give up a high enough pick to

0:02:57.580 --> 0:03:00.650
<v Speaker 2>tempt the Bears? First of all, the Ravens have injuries

0:03:00.710 --> 0:03:02.669
<v Speaker 2>at other positions, too, and they haven't looked great with

0:03:02.710 --> 0:03:03.250
<v Speaker 2>Lamar's there.

0:03:03.330 --> 0:03:04.690
<v Speaker 5>Joe Flacco is on the Bengals.

0:03:04.850 --> 0:03:08.170
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to give him up. There's no unless.

0:03:08.270 --> 0:03:11.070
<v Speaker 3>The Bengals are not going to give the Ravens Joe Flacco.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 5>But unless you can fleece them and trust that Joe

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.820
<v Speaker 5>Flacco can't beat you, it's a calculated risk.

0:03:16.630 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would not do that. Listen, I'll be honest.

0:03:19.470 --> 0:03:22.380
<v Speaker 2>I prepared later a list of quarterbacks the Vikings should

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 2>go over. Daniel Jones has been thrown out a lot

0:03:25.139 --> 0:03:27.100
<v Speaker 2>for the Vikings. How about the Ravens for Daniel Jones?

0:03:28.020 --> 0:03:31.019
<v Speaker 5>Oh, man, I don't feel any better. I guess beggars

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 5>can't be choosers. All right, staying with who feels the

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.700
<v Speaker 5>worst today, let's go to those Vikings. The Vikings were 6-0.

0:03:36.380 --> 0:03:38.620
<v Speaker 5>You said a couple days ago they're probably going to

0:03:38.660 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 5>end up being 6-4 in a couple weeks. Kyler Murray

0:03:41.260 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the game, they had a chance

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.500
<v Speaker 5>to take down the Lions, and that would have been

0:03:44.540 --> 0:03:46.790
<v Speaker 5>one of those perception wins. And Kyler Murray, he had

0:03:46.870 --> 0:03:49.130
<v Speaker 5>a third and four. It didn't work out. The defense

0:03:49.170 --> 0:03:51.310
<v Speaker 5>was missing tackles all day. They got run over by

0:03:51.350 --> 0:03:53.530
<v Speaker 5>Jameer Gibbs. They got to feel pretty bad today because

0:03:53.790 --> 0:03:55.970
<v Speaker 5>not only did you kind of blow it, it feels

0:03:55.990 --> 0:03:57.950
<v Speaker 5>like that whole first month and a half was for naught.

0:03:58.530 --> 0:04:01.130
<v Speaker 2>No, well, the Vikings fans knew their offense was terrible

0:04:01.190 --> 0:04:03.670
<v Speaker 2>coming into this game, and it was terrible once again.

0:04:03.690 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't understand. Explain to me, Paul.

0:04:07.420 --> 0:04:11.710
<v Speaker 2>Kevin O'Connell, quarterback whisperer, great head coach, great guy. How

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.970
<v Speaker 2>did he not see any of this in the preseason? Like,

0:04:14.030 --> 0:04:17.089
<v Speaker 2>how did Kyler Murray so decidedly beat out Carson Wentz

0:04:17.150 --> 0:04:17.570
<v Speaker 2>and J.J.

0:04:17.610 --> 0:04:18.070
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy?

0:04:18.510 --> 0:04:18.750
<v Speaker 1>How?

0:04:19.029 --> 0:04:21.210
<v Speaker 5>It feels like the Vikings are in this mess of

0:04:21.270 --> 0:04:22.230
<v Speaker 5>their quarterback situation.

0:04:22.250 --> 0:04:23.210
<v Speaker 3>That they put themselves in.

0:04:23.210 --> 0:04:25.370
<v Speaker 5>That they put themselves in. They let Cousins go. They

0:04:25.430 --> 0:04:28.110
<v Speaker 5>draft McCarthy. They could have had other people start for them.

0:04:28.310 --> 0:04:30.990
<v Speaker 5>They let Jones go. They let Sam Darnold go. And

0:04:31.029 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 5>it feels like they can't lock in on anybody. Justin

0:04:34.220 --> 0:04:36.339
<v Speaker 5>Jefferson has got to be very salty right now because

0:04:36.380 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 5>he had nine targets. He should have 15. Literally should

0:04:38.940 --> 0:04:39.339
<v Speaker 5>have 15 targets.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.610
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he did not look happy yesterday. But wait,

0:04:42.630 --> 0:04:44.850
<v Speaker 2>if we're doing who feels worse, what are we talking about?

0:04:44.890 --> 0:04:47.980
<v Speaker 2>The Vikings lost a close game. The Ravens lost their quarterback.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.260
<v Speaker 3>They're done. But clearly, Monday morning.

0:04:51.339 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the Cowboys by far. To me, and it's not

0:04:54.250 --> 0:04:57.130
<v Speaker 2>just because of this loss, but it's what it means.

0:04:57.450 --> 0:04:59.070
<v Speaker 2>Two of their next three games are against the Colts

0:04:59.150 --> 0:05:03.369
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans. They could walk to the NFC East title,

0:05:03.710 --> 0:05:06.580
<v Speaker 2>and yet they couldn't hold a 14-point lead Paul, this

0:05:06.620 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 2>was a devastating loss, a loss that normally would get

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a coach fired, but I don't think the Cowboys are

0:05:11.980 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 2>going to fire Brian Schottenheimer, but they absolutely should.

0:05:14.500 --> 0:05:17.060
<v Speaker 5>So Gardner comes in, Gardner Mischu comes in, rips him up.

0:05:17.490 --> 0:05:19.650
<v Speaker 5>They go for this extra point, and it doesn't go,

0:05:19.710 --> 0:05:22.730
<v Speaker 5>and they get the overtime bailout, and the Cowboys don't

0:05:22.790 --> 0:05:25.250
<v Speaker 5>close there. Like you said, this division is so winnable,

0:05:25.570 --> 0:05:27.210
<v Speaker 5>you really just have to play average football, and they're

0:05:27.230 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 5>not even doing that.

0:05:28.490 --> 0:05:31.350
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, they are kind of average at, what,

0:05:31.430 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>three and five. So they do still have a chance.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think they actually still win the division. They

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.860
<v Speaker 2>have so much talent. And I know that you overrate talent.

0:05:37.900 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>And I say this myself as a star. But they

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>have two of the best receivers in the league, no doubt.

0:05:42.500 --> 0:05:44.940
<v Speaker 2>CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens. They just traded for Joey

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:45.460
<v Speaker 2>Porter Jr.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:46.659
<v Speaker 5>These teams should not be that close.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 2>They have Quinn and Williams. You know, listen, the Cardinals

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>have their number. They've beaten nine out of ten times.

0:05:52.060 --> 0:05:54.810
<v Speaker 2>So there's something weird going on there. But the Cowboys

0:05:54.850 --> 0:05:57.550
<v Speaker 2>cannot blow a lead like that. I blame the coach.

0:05:58.180 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 3>You have Dak Prescott, and you have that receiving core.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Throw the ball more.

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.339
<v Speaker 2>Brian Schottenheimer has been conservative since the day he came

0:06:04.380 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to the NFL. He's got to open it up.

0:06:07.140 --> 0:06:07.900
<v Speaker 3>It's 100% on him.

0:06:08.010 --> 0:06:11.469
<v Speaker 5>Okay, this week, does Jerry Jones fire nobody? Schottenheimer or

0:06:11.510 --> 0:06:12.210
<v Speaker 5>the offensive coordinator?

0:06:12.230 --> 0:06:13.610
<v Speaker 3>Defensive coordinator. Christian Parker?

0:06:13.690 --> 0:06:13.810
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:06:14.589 --> 0:06:17.300
<v Speaker 2>I would lean toward nobody. It doesn't feel like Jerry

0:06:17.330 --> 0:06:19.980
<v Speaker 2>Jones wants to fire people. He doesn't want to spend money.

0:06:20.860 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a weird personality quirk with Jerry Jones

0:06:23.380 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that he has loyalty to these coaches.

0:06:25.020 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>But it's weird because Jerry Jones, I think, doesn't fire

0:06:27.740 --> 0:06:31.409
<v Speaker 5>people when they should be let go, no offense, because

0:06:31.450 --> 0:06:33.690
<v Speaker 5>it's like I'm pointing the finger at myself because I'm

0:06:33.710 --> 0:06:34.390
<v Speaker 5>the guy who hired them.

0:06:34.570 --> 0:06:35.430
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, right, right.

0:06:35.610 --> 0:06:38.050
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is, he will not hire a big

0:06:38.089 --> 0:06:40.150
<v Speaker 2>name to compete with him. He hired Bill Parcells back

0:06:40.170 --> 0:06:42.230
<v Speaker 2>in the day and said never again. For example, let

0:06:42.270 --> 0:06:43.110
<v Speaker 2>me just take it one second.

0:06:43.190 --> 0:06:43.790
<v Speaker 5>I know where you're going.

0:06:43.830 --> 0:06:44.010
<v Speaker 6>Go ahead.

0:06:44.029 --> 0:06:48.050
<v Speaker 2>Mike Tomlin shredded the Cowboys on Football Night in America.

0:06:48.190 --> 0:06:48.809
<v Speaker 3>It was awesome.

0:06:49.130 --> 0:06:52.789
<v Speaker 2>He said that they basically, he needs guys who can

0:06:52.850 --> 0:06:55.789
<v Speaker 2>close the deal. Something about eyelids. It was really powerful.

0:06:56.190 --> 0:06:58.430
<v Speaker 2>So people were like, oh, is he auditioning for the Cowboys?

0:06:59.270 --> 0:07:00.870
<v Speaker 2>I think you and I think Jerry Jones would not

0:07:00.910 --> 0:07:01.630
<v Speaker 2>bring in Mike Tomlin.

0:07:01.950 --> 0:07:04.250
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Mike Tomlin only takes the Cowboys' job if they

0:07:04.300 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 5>give him control of player personnel.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>That's not happening.

0:07:06.580 --> 0:07:09.089
<v Speaker 5>And it won't happen, which is defeating your own purpose.

0:07:09.110 --> 0:07:11.450
<v Speaker 5>You give Mike Tomlin whatever he wants because what's the downside?

0:07:11.980 --> 0:07:15.490
<v Speaker 2>Because you're Jerry Jones, and you want a low-wattage head

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.990
<v Speaker 2>coach in there. You know how a president wants a

0:07:18.030 --> 0:07:19.710
<v Speaker 2>vice president who doesn't take away the shine?

0:07:20.070 --> 0:07:21.770
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Jones doesn't want a coach who's going to take

0:07:21.790 --> 0:07:22.210
<v Speaker 3>away the shine.

0:07:22.450 --> 0:07:24.090
<v Speaker 2>He probably could have hired Sean Payton at one point.

0:07:24.110 --> 0:07:26.470
<v Speaker 5>It's like a hot girl wanting a non-threatening boyfriend, like

0:07:26.530 --> 0:07:27.170
<v Speaker 5>a CBS sitcom.

0:07:27.390 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think nobody gets fired. Okay.

0:07:29.420 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Let's go to biggest statement of the weekend. Which team

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.820
<v Speaker 5>kind of made some hay, did some things? I'm going

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 5>to go weirdly with the Broncos, because the Broncos, that

0:07:37.220 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 5>win could have easily been a loss, kind of a

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.290
<v Speaker 5>wonky false start call against the right tackle of the

0:07:41.570 --> 0:07:44.050
<v Speaker 5>Chiefs or the Chiefs win it. But the Broncos proved

0:07:44.070 --> 0:07:45.970
<v Speaker 5>that they're in every game and they could win any

0:07:45.990 --> 0:07:48.530
<v Speaker 5>game in the fourth quarter. Now, style points, the first

0:07:48.550 --> 0:07:51.390
<v Speaker 5>three quarters are not good. And Bo Nix gets criticized

0:07:51.430 --> 0:07:54.510
<v Speaker 5>probably more than any good quarterback in the league. But

0:07:55.190 --> 0:07:55.820
<v Speaker 5>they can beat anybody.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.780
<v Speaker 2>They can beat anybody. They can keep any other team

0:07:58.820 --> 0:08:02.220
<v Speaker 2>in the game. Their defense is awesome. And I love

0:08:02.260 --> 0:08:04.020
<v Speaker 2>Nick Bonito. I love Patrick Chartan.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Is it enough? I mean, it's funny.

0:08:06.580 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like they're going to be in some

0:08:08.020 --> 0:08:10.870
<v Speaker 2>crazy close game in the playoffs. Just fast forward to

0:08:10.910 --> 0:08:13.550
<v Speaker 2>January where they're against the Bills or the Chiefs again.

0:08:13.910 --> 0:08:15.870
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be close. I picked them for the

0:08:15.890 --> 0:08:17.190
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, so I'm in on them.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 3>But, yeah, it's hard to argue with. That was a

0:08:19.780 --> 0:08:20.580
<v Speaker 3>very meaningful win.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:21.140
<v Speaker 5>Give me one more.

0:08:22.140 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, to me, the.

0:08:22.660 --> 0:08:28.460
<v Speaker 2>Lions because the Lions, Jameer Gibbs is maybe– Yeah, he

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>might be the best player in the NFL right now.

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.730
<v Speaker 2>He broke tackles against the best defense in the league.

0:08:32.750 --> 0:08:35.410
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota is the best defense. Seattle and Minnesota may be

0:08:35.490 --> 0:08:37.830
<v Speaker 2>one and two. And Jameer Gibbs kicked their butt.

0:08:37.890 --> 0:08:38.530
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he really did.

0:08:38.550 --> 0:08:40.729
<v Speaker 5>He was amazing. The color announcer in the game said

0:08:40.770 --> 0:08:44.550
<v Speaker 5>that the... Vikings missed 17 tackles in that game. That's

0:08:44.610 --> 0:08:46.429
<v Speaker 5>twice as much as they missed in any game this season.

0:08:46.730 --> 0:08:48.390
<v Speaker 5>Jameer Gibbs was toying with them. When he came out,

0:08:48.410 --> 0:08:50.850
<v Speaker 5>the backup running back, Bakke, was toying with them.

0:08:50.890 --> 0:08:54.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's the new David Montgomery. Also, Jared Goff moved

0:08:54.570 --> 0:08:56.990
<v Speaker 2>around and made some plays with his feet. I think

0:08:57.010 --> 0:09:01.620
<v Speaker 2>the Lions obviously have a possibly really sad situation with

0:09:01.650 --> 0:09:04.100
<v Speaker 2>Jack Gamble, the linebacker, who's in the hospital.

0:09:04.179 --> 0:09:06.900
<v Speaker 3>We have no news of him right now. We'll see

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:07.500
<v Speaker 3>where that goes.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.700
<v Speaker 2>But the Lions, I think, came away from that feeling,

0:09:10.740 --> 0:09:12.420
<v Speaker 2>you know what, we're as tough as any team in

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.540
<v Speaker 2>the league. Brian Flores has been torturing every other offense

0:09:15.580 --> 0:09:17.110
<v Speaker 2>in the league, and we stood up against them, and

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.689
<v Speaker 2>we played really hard-nosed Dan Campbell kind of football. You know,

0:09:20.770 --> 0:09:23.070
<v Speaker 2>that being said, I don't know if I put them

0:09:23.110 --> 0:09:25.690
<v Speaker 2>as a contender. Do you have them in the NFC mix?

0:09:25.770 --> 0:09:27.850
<v Speaker 5>I do because no one in the NFC scares me,

0:09:28.010 --> 0:09:30.809
<v Speaker 5>even the Bears, even the Lions. I'm sorry, even the Rams.

0:09:31.130 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 5>No one really scares me. Let's give out some helmet stickers.

0:09:33.340 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 5>I'll go first. Helmet stickers this week. Tyler Algier, the

0:09:36.380 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 5>running back, the backup running back for the Arizona Cardinals,

0:09:39.300 --> 0:09:41.420
<v Speaker 5>he's always the backup running back. He was the backup

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>for Bijan. This guy just produces. 11 carries, 147, and

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 5>a TD. He gets no pub. Tyler Algier is a

0:09:48.140 --> 0:09:49.489
<v Speaker 5>really nice running back for the Cardinals.

0:09:49.500 --> 0:09:51.030
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's an interesting dynamic with him.

0:09:51.190 --> 0:09:54.850
<v Speaker 2>So they draft Jeremiah Love, number three overall, and then

0:09:54.870 --> 0:09:56.380
<v Speaker 2>they have this guy who's better than him.

0:09:56.410 --> 0:09:56.949
<v Speaker 5>Just like Bijan.

0:09:57.390 --> 0:10:00.090
<v Speaker 2>And it's exactly like uh what happened with the raiders

0:10:00.110 --> 0:10:02.510
<v Speaker 2>the raiders have ashton jenny's number six overall pick and

0:10:02.530 --> 0:10:04.820
<v Speaker 2>they get mike washington jr in the fourth round who

0:10:04.890 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>is probably a better player which goes to show you

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.900
<v Speaker 2>you know you draft a court running back high someone

0:10:09.940 --> 0:10:11.460
<v Speaker 2>else will take up the mantle i'm gonna go with

0:10:11.500 --> 0:10:13.540
<v Speaker 2>t higgins You know what?

0:10:13.780 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>You could do a Bengals receiver almost every week this year.

0:10:16.380 --> 0:10:16.890
<v Speaker 5>Great year. T.

0:10:17.140 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Higgins was dominant yesterday.

0:10:19.179 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The Titans, who played a great game, give them credit,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>give Cam Ward credit. T. Higgins was unstoppable.

0:10:26.500 --> 0:10:28.780
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's had a very good year. Their defense, not

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.620
<v Speaker 5>so good. If they would have lost that one to

0:10:30.660 --> 0:10:32.430
<v Speaker 5>the Titans, that would have been... I mean, it almost

0:10:32.450 --> 0:10:34.290
<v Speaker 5>feels like a bad win. Great job by Higgins, but

0:10:34.309 --> 0:10:35.740
<v Speaker 5>it almost feels like a bad win for the Bengals.

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely. Okay. All right. We have a lot more

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.260
<v Speaker 3>to dive in on this Football Monday.

0:10:40.340 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get more into USC's big win over

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.700
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State and try and solve the quarterback situation in Minnesota.

0:10:46.780 --> 0:10:47.860
<v Speaker 3>That's next. Not so fast.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:49.870
<v Speaker 7>You are.

0:10:50.540 --> 0:10:51.450
<v Speaker 3>Ravens, by the way, I.

0:10:52.010 --> 0:10:54.330
<v Speaker 2>Just feel like do not invest a lot.

0:10:54.370 --> 0:10:56.330
<v Speaker 5>So just wipe off the season.

0:10:56.470 --> 0:10:56.770
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:10:57.030 --> 0:10:58.010
<v Speaker 3>You're saving for next.

0:10:58.050 --> 0:10:58.750
<v Speaker 5>Man, that's a bummer.

0:10:58.950 --> 0:11:01.020
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, but it's the way it is.

0:11:05.980 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Back on Not So Fast, Paxton Perloff, the midday pick-me-up.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:12.540
<v Speaker 5>This was a great ending. There's a Minnesota kicker, seemingly

0:11:12.660 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 5>for the win from 60.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:14.300
<v Speaker 2>Good!

0:11:15.260 --> 0:11:17.340
<v Speaker 5>On fourth and eight, they think they're going to win it.

0:11:17.390 --> 0:11:19.730
<v Speaker 5>What a nice upset for Minnesota. The Gophers having a

0:11:19.750 --> 0:11:23.350
<v Speaker 5>nice season. PJ Flex says calm down because Patty McIntyre

0:11:23.910 --> 0:11:28.430
<v Speaker 5>from Ireland, 60 yards, the backup kicker for Indiana, sends

0:11:28.490 --> 0:11:30.430
<v Speaker 5>it to OT, and Indiana stays alive.

0:11:30.809 --> 0:11:32.850
<v Speaker 3>That was a crushing loss for Minnesota.

0:11:32.890 --> 0:11:36.090
<v Speaker 2>They thought they had beaten... Defending champion. It would have

0:11:36.110 --> 0:11:37.570
<v Speaker 2>been a new step for that program.

0:11:37.690 --> 0:11:38.770
<v Speaker 5>It felt so good.

0:11:38.809 --> 0:11:39.290
<v Speaker 3>They had it.

0:11:39.290 --> 0:11:41.910
<v Speaker 5>But, like, two kickers in a college game going for 60?

0:11:41.910 --> 0:11:43.010
<v Speaker 5>It's never happened before.

0:11:43.050 --> 0:11:43.569
<v Speaker 3>Back to back.

0:11:43.809 --> 0:11:45.210
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's a sign of the times, though,

0:11:45.230 --> 0:11:47.900
<v Speaker 2>because kickers are getting crazy good. Even college kickers can

0:11:47.940 --> 0:11:48.500
<v Speaker 2>kick long ones.

0:11:48.540 --> 0:11:51.260
<v Speaker 5>Like, Indiana season, they could have three losses or no losses.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:52.699
<v Speaker 5>Not sure what to make of them. All right, let's

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 5>go to college football for the first warm take here

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:55.940
<v Speaker 5>on Not So Fast.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:56.339
<v Speaker 7>Ready, Pearl?

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Here we go.

0:11:58.340 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Saturday night, fourth quarter, just under six minutes to go.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.590
<v Speaker 5>Ohio State is down 27-12 versus USC. Buckeyes score a touchdown.

0:12:05.710 --> 0:12:08.949
<v Speaker 5>They go for two. They miss it. Now they're down nine.

0:12:09.230 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 5>Now they're down two possessions instead of one. If you

0:12:12.390 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 5>kick the extra point there, you're down 27-19 with five

0:12:15.620 --> 0:12:17.580
<v Speaker 5>and a half minutes to go. You're back in the game,

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.420
<v Speaker 5>and they passed on that option. I'm sure some analytics

0:12:20.500 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 5>kid or some guy said, here's the chart when you

0:12:22.740 --> 0:12:24.420
<v Speaker 5>go for it, when you don't. I don't know if

0:12:24.500 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 5>analytics takes into factor momentum and jumping on the other team,

0:12:29.970 --> 0:12:31.970
<v Speaker 5>stepping on their neck a little bit. So I'm debunking

0:12:32.050 --> 0:12:35.570
<v Speaker 5>analytics here. You have to make room for momentum and pressure.

0:12:35.910 --> 0:12:37.530
<v Speaker 2>But wait, they have to go for two at some

0:12:37.570 --> 0:12:39.569
<v Speaker 2>point because they're down by two scores.

0:12:39.850 --> 0:12:41.209
<v Speaker 3>So they're going to have to go for two on

0:12:41.230 --> 0:12:41.709
<v Speaker 3>the next score.

0:12:41.750 --> 0:12:44.140
<v Speaker 5>The next one, when it's more of a tense situation

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 5>because the other team is now giving it up and

0:12:45.780 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 5>they have their backs against the wall. You get the

0:12:47.660 --> 0:12:50.780
<v Speaker 5>extra point. You're down eight. And now the next five minutes,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 5>USC feels the pressure to get a first down. Instead,

0:12:54.020 --> 0:12:58.429
<v Speaker 5>USC goes, it's a two-score game. It's a two-possession game. Now,

0:12:58.630 --> 0:13:00.970
<v Speaker 5>USC would feel the heat, and USA has the boost.

0:13:01.330 --> 0:13:04.300
<v Speaker 5>By going for two there... You took out the momentum

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.589
<v Speaker 5>you just had. When they missed it, everyone's like, well,

0:13:06.710 --> 0:13:10.290
<v Speaker 5>it's not going to happen. You have to insert momentum, juice,

0:13:10.330 --> 0:13:11.990
<v Speaker 5>whatever you want to call it. You've got to keep

0:13:12.010 --> 0:13:13.690
<v Speaker 5>your team in the game while putting pressure on the

0:13:13.710 --> 0:13:16.170
<v Speaker 5>other team. So I'm debunking analytics here and think that

0:13:16.210 --> 0:13:18.469
<v Speaker 5>Ohio State, and it's not just Ohio State. Lots of

0:13:18.490 --> 0:13:21.570
<v Speaker 5>teams do this. They go for the two early. instead

0:13:21.590 --> 0:13:22.329
<v Speaker 5>of waiting for it late.

0:13:22.390 --> 0:13:23.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I've got to be honest.

0:13:23.370 --> 0:13:24.830
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they were going to make the second

0:13:24.850 --> 0:13:26.580
<v Speaker 2>two-point conversion, even if they had made it.

0:13:26.590 --> 0:13:29.170
<v Speaker 5>Probably not, but I just think that you take yourself

0:13:29.220 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 5>out of the game. You put loss as an equation.

0:13:31.420 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Bigger picture, though. Lincoln Riley and USC. We talked about

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 5>it here. It was shut people the hell up weekend.

0:13:37.990 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 5>What are you saying? You didn't shut people the hell up?

0:13:39.850 --> 0:13:41.050
<v Speaker 3>They beat Luke Fahey.

0:13:41.980 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no, they beat the Ohio State Buckeyes.

0:13:44.020 --> 0:13:47.230
<v Speaker 3>No, they did not. That is not the Ohio State Buckeyes.

0:13:47.330 --> 0:13:49.410
<v Speaker 5>This kid isn't from the replacements.

0:13:49.670 --> 0:13:50.270
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he is.

0:13:50.610 --> 0:13:53.290
<v Speaker 2>He does not belong on a major college football field.

0:13:53.390 --> 0:13:56.110
<v Speaker 2>I watched the game ball. That is not the same team.

0:13:56.170 --> 0:13:58.350
<v Speaker 5>But no one's going to judge this for style points.

0:13:58.550 --> 0:14:01.219
<v Speaker 5>We said it there. Lincoln Riley and USC need to

0:14:01.260 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 5>shut people up with a one-point win or a 30-point win,

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 5>and he did so. And now it puts them in

0:14:06.100 --> 0:14:08.420
<v Speaker 5>a position right now where... Is anyone calling for his

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 5>job this morning? Is anyone talking about buyouts?

0:14:10.700 --> 0:14:13.059
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, but, I mean, what difference does it make?

0:14:13.100 --> 0:14:17.100
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to beat Indiana. They're probably their 10.5-point underdog.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:17.630
<v Speaker 8>Oh, man.

0:14:17.940 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Indiana had to bench their quarterback. USC now spells blood

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:21.620
<v Speaker 5>in the water.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.260
<v Speaker 3>I think Hoover's hurt, by the way, the Indiana quarterback.

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 7>Sure.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:26.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, Indiana's a double-digit favorite.

0:14:27.250 --> 0:14:32.670
<v Speaker 5>But USC right now, they got a week off. Indiana, Maryland. UCLA.

0:14:32.850 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 5>That UCLA game could be to take UCLA out of

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.340
<v Speaker 5>the playoff picture and put themselves in it.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.260
<v Speaker 2>You're telling me you saw something in the USC-Ohio State

0:14:40.300 --> 0:14:42.730
<v Speaker 2>game that leads you to believe USC could go to

0:14:42.750 --> 0:14:44.290
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the country and win on the road?

0:14:44.430 --> 0:14:44.950
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:14:45.050 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>They got whooped at Wisconsin. And Wisconsin's Awful.

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.060
<v Speaker 5>You said this week to week. See that at in

0:14:52.100 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 5>front of the Indiana?

0:14:53.260 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>That is the problem there.

0:14:54.620 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 5>Now, you're saying that that Indiana home crowd is just insurmountable?

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying USC cannot go on the road in the

0:15:00.100 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Big Ten and beat a good team.

0:15:01.780 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Probably not, but they have the opportunity. No one thought

0:15:04.140 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 5>they were winning last night.

0:15:05.140 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>They had the opportunity. No, I think if it wasn't USC,

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you would have even reacted to this game.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I think you reacted to the helmet, not the actual team.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:14.420
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough. I think they're good.

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>No, honestly, I walked away from that. I'm like, oh,

0:15:16.490 --> 0:15:18.510
<v Speaker 2>my God, what is this? What's going on with Ohio State?

0:15:18.530 --> 0:15:19.630
<v Speaker 2>They can't get the ball to Smith.

0:15:19.670 --> 0:15:21.450
<v Speaker 5>I do think all the freshman talent at USC is

0:15:21.470 --> 0:15:22.250
<v Speaker 5>starting to hit its stride.

0:15:22.650 --> 0:15:25.290
<v Speaker 2>I think you're overrating them tremendously. I think they're going

0:15:25.310 --> 0:15:28.770
<v Speaker 2>to come and go. I think Indiana beats them. I

0:15:28.790 --> 0:15:30.830
<v Speaker 2>think Indiana beats them, and then we move on.

0:15:30.890 --> 0:15:31.270
<v Speaker 7>There you go.

0:15:31.510 --> 0:15:34.690
<v Speaker 2>And also, too, I think those outstanding freshmen at USC,

0:15:34.970 --> 0:15:36.590
<v Speaker 2>they're going to look great in either a Baylor or

0:15:36.610 --> 0:15:37.390
<v Speaker 2>a TCU uniform.

0:15:37.430 --> 0:15:38.340
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.140
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go to the NFL for my first

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.420
<v Speaker 2>warm take. So the Minnesota Vikings have their first loss.

0:15:45.510 --> 0:15:47.250
<v Speaker 2>They are not getting it done in quarterback. I do

0:15:47.310 --> 0:15:49.479
<v Speaker 2>not know why they're not going to Carson Wentz. Kyler

0:15:49.500 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Murray has been completely ineffective. But the one man that

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.950
<v Speaker 2>melds best with Kevin O'Connell is clearly Kirk Cousins. So

0:15:58.090 --> 0:16:00.810
<v Speaker 2>people are talking about we've got to get Cousins. They're

0:16:00.830 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>4-4 with the Raiders. But I would actually go even further.

0:16:04.150 --> 0:16:06.620
<v Speaker 2>I would give up a third-round pick or a second round,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.780
<v Speaker 2>even a second-round pick possibly, because it's going to be

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.460
<v Speaker 2>a low second round. I would go all in on Kirk. Now,

0:16:12.500 --> 0:16:15.300
<v Speaker 2>that seems crazy because he's a 38-year-old quarterback on a

0:16:15.380 --> 0:16:18.790
<v Speaker 2>one-year deal, a total rental. I do not care. This

0:16:18.870 --> 0:16:22.070
<v Speaker 2>is a chance for Minnesota. You mentioned it earlier. The

0:16:22.270 --> 0:16:24.410
<v Speaker 2>NFC is potentially wide open. The best team in San

0:16:24.430 --> 0:16:27.370
<v Speaker 2>Francisco is injury-prone. I think this is an opportunity where

0:16:27.410 --> 0:16:29.470
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota could possibly make the Super Bowl.

0:16:29.790 --> 0:16:31.170
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to do it with Kyler Murray. They're

0:16:31.190 --> 0:16:32.530
<v Speaker 3>probably not going to do it with Carson Wentz.

0:16:33.310 --> 0:16:35.890
<v Speaker 2>Why not really sell out for Kirk Cousins in a

0:16:35.950 --> 0:16:38.290
<v Speaker 2>way that nobody expected? There was a rumor that they'll

0:16:38.310 --> 0:16:39.730
<v Speaker 2>give up a fifth rounder for Kirk Cousins.

0:16:39.970 --> 0:16:42.170
<v Speaker 3>Forget fifth rounder. I'd give up a third and a fifth.

0:16:42.450 --> 0:16:43.810
<v Speaker 5>So I'm going to look at this from the Raiders'

0:16:43.830 --> 0:16:46.330
<v Speaker 5>side of this. The Raiders would have to be very,

0:16:46.390 --> 0:16:49.090
<v Speaker 5>very disciplined and have a ton of forethought to make

0:16:49.130 --> 0:16:51.130
<v Speaker 5>this move. They have to say, I know we're kind

0:16:51.170 --> 0:16:54.380
<v Speaker 5>of a semi-competitive team right now. We just beat the Jets,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:55.940
<v Speaker 5>but that Jets game was way too close.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.820
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're 9.5-point dogs this week at San Francisco, and

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.620
<v Speaker 2>the trade deadline is next Tuesday. So if they get

0:17:00.700 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>killed by the Niners and they're 4-5, do you think

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>that this is more attractive to the Raiders for a

0:17:06.180 --> 0:17:07.139
<v Speaker 2>very good draft pick?

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.770
<v Speaker 5>If the Raiders are smart, they do this because you're

0:17:09.810 --> 0:17:11.830
<v Speaker 5>waving the white flag early. You may get criticized by

0:17:11.869 --> 0:17:14.530
<v Speaker 5>people saying, Kirk Cousins did so much for you. You're 4-4.

0:17:14.550 --> 0:17:17.650
<v Speaker 5>You're still in this. We are looking to the Mendoza era,

0:17:17.670 --> 0:17:19.570
<v Speaker 5>and we can do it now and move on. And

0:17:19.650 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 5>whatever happens the next few games, but if I pick off,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.219
<v Speaker 5>fourth or a third-round draft pick that I can just

0:17:24.260 --> 0:17:27.070
<v Speaker 5>pick off a nice extra tool for Mendoza in the future.

0:17:27.470 --> 0:17:29.290
<v Speaker 5>That will be looked back on well in a week

0:17:29.330 --> 0:17:29.530
<v Speaker 5>or two.

0:17:29.850 --> 0:17:32.750
<v Speaker 2>So Dan had a great point. One thing is you

0:17:32.770 --> 0:17:34.620
<v Speaker 2>probably don't want to play Mendoza the next two games.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.300
<v Speaker 2>You don't want him against the Niners, and you probably

0:17:36.340 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>don't want him against the Saints.

0:17:37.260 --> 0:17:37.940
<v Speaker 5>Aiden O'Connell time?

0:17:38.619 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you might want to keep Cousins.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>And Cousins is probably a great coach in the quarterback room.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>So there is a lot of reasons to help Mendoza

0:17:45.619 --> 0:17:48.050
<v Speaker 2>to keep Cousins around. But that's why I think they

0:17:48.090 --> 0:17:49.810
<v Speaker 2>might have to go even higher in the third round.

0:17:50.170 --> 0:17:50.649
<v Speaker 7>I'm serious.

0:17:50.730 --> 0:17:52.430
<v Speaker 3>They might have to go second round for Kirk.

0:17:52.490 --> 0:17:54.270
<v Speaker 5>You can only keep Mendoza on your roster for eight

0:17:54.290 --> 0:17:54.650
<v Speaker 5>more days.

0:17:55.140 --> 0:17:57.060
<v Speaker 3>This is it. You mean Cousins on your roster? Cousins, yeah.

0:17:57.180 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 5>Cousins on your roster.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is your one chance to trade him. You

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>know what?

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.020
<v Speaker 2>I think Minnesota should be all in. Mike Florio, our buddy,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.100
<v Speaker 2>said they should go for Daniel Jones. Obviously, Jacoby Brissett

0:18:07.140 --> 0:18:10.270
<v Speaker 2>could be out there. Geno Smith is probably gettable. I

0:18:10.290 --> 0:18:13.070
<v Speaker 2>think Minnesota has to try something because the offense is

0:18:13.250 --> 0:18:13.850
<v Speaker 2>not working.

0:18:13.869 --> 0:18:15.929
<v Speaker 5>Nobody talks about Gardner Minshew as always. All right, my

0:18:15.970 --> 0:18:20.030
<v Speaker 5>next warm take. Here we go. Congratulations to the WNBA Finals.

0:18:20.170 --> 0:18:22.590
<v Speaker 5>Very good game. Congratulations to the Valkyries in only their

0:18:22.630 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 5>second year. Gabby Williams was unconscious in the second half.

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.620
<v Speaker 5>Really nice WNBA Finals. I watch the WNBA quite a bit.

0:18:29.859 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 5>My kids kind of hook me in there. They watch

0:18:32.500 --> 0:18:34.419
<v Speaker 5>quite a bit. They play ball. I got to tell

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.770
<v Speaker 5>you this. Being a fan of the WNBA is exhausting.

0:18:38.450 --> 0:18:39.130
<v Speaker 3>Exhausting.

0:18:39.410 --> 0:18:41.209
<v Speaker 5>Let me tell you why. It's not the play. It's

0:18:41.230 --> 0:18:44.070
<v Speaker 5>not the games. It's the coverage. It's the coverage and

0:18:44.109 --> 0:18:46.570
<v Speaker 5>the social media agendas that are around us. Unless you're

0:18:46.609 --> 0:18:48.590
<v Speaker 5>on the moon, you see this on your phone. You

0:18:48.609 --> 0:18:50.020
<v Speaker 5>see it all over the place. You can't avoid it.

0:18:50.609 --> 0:18:53.150
<v Speaker 5>There is almost no such thing as measured opinions around

0:18:53.190 --> 0:18:58.260
<v Speaker 5>this league. It's about these certain players like Angel Reese, Clark, Cunningham, Wilson.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 5>You name the player. It's extreme takes that either show

0:19:01.220 --> 0:19:03.750
<v Speaker 5>one of two things. You don't know much about basketball,

0:19:04.250 --> 0:19:07.010
<v Speaker 5>or you're just putting out bait for your own self-serving

0:19:07.070 --> 0:19:10.050
<v Speaker 5>interest and your own self-serving agenda. And it's one of

0:19:10.070 --> 0:19:11.850
<v Speaker 5>the two, and everyone knows who's doing it. Everyone knows

0:19:11.890 --> 0:19:13.490
<v Speaker 5>who you are. It's a lot of people who don't

0:19:13.510 --> 0:19:16.380
<v Speaker 5>watch a sport who, you know, content farming. They're trying

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.340
<v Speaker 5>to get clicks. They're trying to do things. And I'm

0:19:19.380 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 5>not saying this next take for clicks, which is going

0:19:21.380 --> 0:19:23.909
<v Speaker 5>to be kind of almost hypocritical to me, But the

0:19:23.990 --> 0:19:26.750
<v Speaker 5>coverage of Angel Reese the past two weeks has been

0:19:26.770 --> 0:19:30.850
<v Speaker 5>surreal in its lack of context in both directions. Not

0:19:31.050 --> 0:19:35.609
<v Speaker 5>one or the other, both. They talk about Angel Reese,

0:19:35.869 --> 0:19:37.890
<v Speaker 5>some people talk about her as she's the best player

0:19:37.930 --> 0:19:39.790
<v Speaker 5>in the league and she's a future Hall of Famer.

0:19:40.570 --> 0:19:43.270
<v Speaker 5>And it's just not true. She's a very good rebounder.

0:19:43.609 --> 0:19:46.750
<v Speaker 5>She's a limited offensive player. She started out in WNBA

0:19:46.790 --> 0:19:49.950
<v Speaker 5>Finals playing really, really well. And in the last three games,

0:19:50.210 --> 0:19:53.850
<v Speaker 5>she was a liability to her team. Turnovers, missed shots,

0:19:54.510 --> 0:19:56.770
<v Speaker 5>tons and tons of missed shots. Both can be true

0:19:56.790 --> 0:19:58.410
<v Speaker 5>at the same time. She could both be a great

0:19:58.450 --> 0:20:01.429
<v Speaker 5>rebounder and tough defender and a liability on offense. It's

0:20:01.470 --> 0:20:04.150
<v Speaker 5>not one or the other. But if you're watching networks

0:20:04.250 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 5>and sports media outlets, they pick a side and they

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.170
<v Speaker 5>force an agenda on you. And what they do it

0:20:10.230 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 5>for is a simple reason. It's all bait to get

0:20:13.340 --> 0:20:15.620
<v Speaker 5>you to click, to get you to comment, to get

0:20:15.660 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 5>you to jump in and stir the pot around this player.

0:20:19.100 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 5>And multiple things can be true about different players. Kaitlyn

0:20:22.020 --> 0:20:23.980
<v Speaker 5>Clark is not the best player in the league, but

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.570
<v Speaker 5>she's also awesome. But she can also have things that

0:20:26.590 --> 0:20:29.170
<v Speaker 5>she has to work on, right? Measured coverage in this

0:20:29.230 --> 0:20:31.530
<v Speaker 5>league does not exist. And it's almost a relief that

0:20:31.550 --> 0:20:34.649
<v Speaker 5>the season is over because then the Social media fan

0:20:34.710 --> 0:20:36.630
<v Speaker 5>bait stuff will go away for just a few months.

0:20:36.650 --> 0:20:39.590
<v Speaker 5>But it's sloppy, it's ugly, and I don't see it

0:20:39.630 --> 0:20:41.930
<v Speaker 5>going away anytime soon. It's kind of a bummer around

0:20:41.950 --> 0:20:42.310
<v Speaker 5>this league.

0:20:43.109 --> 0:20:45.910
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, can we make sure our social media team cuts

0:20:45.950 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 2>where he said Kaitlin Clark was not the best player

0:20:48.140 --> 0:20:48.660
<v Speaker 2>in this league?

0:20:49.580 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Just saying. We might as well take the clicks, too.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:51.739
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:20:52.260 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 5>It's a frustrating coverage of this league. If you don't

0:20:55.660 --> 0:20:57.180
<v Speaker 5>want to watch it, you don't watch it. I always say, like,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.180
<v Speaker 5>you know, I don't like broccoli. I don't like Brussels sprouts.

0:21:00.290 --> 0:21:02.590
<v Speaker 5>I don't raise my fist and yell, I hate Brussels sprouts,

0:21:02.630 --> 0:21:04.060
<v Speaker 5>and call them out. I just don't eat them. If

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 5>you don't like them, don't watch.

0:21:05.460 --> 0:21:07.270
<v Speaker 3>Don't comment. Don't worry. Lots of people are not watching.

0:21:07.410 --> 0:21:10.250
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to turn to college football for my

0:21:10.310 --> 0:21:11.050
<v Speaker 2>second warm take.

0:21:11.570 --> 0:21:13.389
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's going to be unprecedented, Paul.

0:21:14.070 --> 0:21:16.210
<v Speaker 2>It is going to be the most amazing Heisman ceremony

0:21:16.290 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>ever because there's only going to be one quarterback.

0:21:18.100 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Mark my words, Paul Paps. One quarterback and three receivers.

0:21:22.260 --> 0:21:22.420
<v Speaker 7>Wow.

0:21:23.100 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>It'll be the first ever three-receiver duo. Now, if you

0:21:25.900 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>look at the odds right now, Darian Mensah is number one.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.540
<v Speaker 2>So I'll give him the invite, the actual quarterback. Then

0:21:32.700 --> 0:21:35.889
<v Speaker 2>Jeremiah Smith's number two, wide receiver Ohio State. Malachi Toney's

0:21:35.910 --> 0:21:39.530
<v Speaker 2>number three, wide receiver Miami. I definitely think Jeremiah Smith

0:21:39.570 --> 0:21:42.210
<v Speaker 2>and Toney get invites to New York. Now, Smith might

0:21:42.250 --> 0:21:44.550
<v Speaker 2>be in trouble because the quarterback play isn't good, but

0:21:44.570 --> 0:21:48.470
<v Speaker 2>I think those two are guaranteed a spot. Now, this

0:21:48.530 --> 0:21:51.429
<v Speaker 2>is where it gets interesting. Jesse Legree, you see, is

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.379
<v Speaker 2>10th in odds. plus 8,000. I think he has a

0:21:55.420 --> 0:21:56.260
<v Speaker 2>chance to get an invite.

0:21:56.340 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>He's got big numbers.

0:21:57.780 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>But the guy that I really think is going to

0:21:59.780 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>get an invite is not him at all. I think

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.260
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Becker in Indiana is one of the most unstoppable

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>players in college football, and he's going to be incredibly impactful.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Because they have big games coming up.

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.780
<v Speaker 2>The aforementioned game against USC, they'll probably have the Big

0:22:12.820 --> 0:22:15.530
<v Speaker 2>Ten title game, which is the day before, sorry, two

0:22:15.570 --> 0:22:18.230
<v Speaker 2>days before the Heisman vote is due. So I think

0:22:18.369 --> 0:22:21.290
<v Speaker 2>Becker comes out of nowhere and gets into the.

0:22:21.290 --> 0:22:21.890
<v Speaker 3>Mix and could.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Potentially earn a spot to New York. The quarterback play

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.990
<v Speaker 2>is not perfect this year. You've got Mets, who's great.

0:22:28.369 --> 0:22:29.209
<v Speaker 3>Trinidad-Chamberlain.

0:22:29.750 --> 0:22:31.310
<v Speaker 2>You never know if Ole Miss is going to win

0:22:31.330 --> 0:22:34.580
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of games. And then Drew Messermaker. Other than that,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a great opportunity for the wide receivers

0:22:36.859 --> 0:22:38.700
<v Speaker 2>to come in. And Becker, by the way, has moved

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 2>up to 3, 4, and 5.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 3>In mock drafts. He's an outstanding player. This is the

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:44.500
<v Speaker 3>year of the wide receiver, Paul.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.060
<v Speaker 5>It's fascinating. You called Malachi Toney before the season started.

0:22:47.340 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 5>Charlie Becker is not getting enough credit because he bailed

0:22:49.820 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 5>them out in the game against Minnesota the other day

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:52.540
<v Speaker 5>with his late catch.

0:22:52.580 --> 0:22:53.820
<v Speaker 3>Well, he started to get a lot of credit.

0:22:53.980 --> 0:22:55.930
<v Speaker 5>Finally, finally. But he was a big part of it

0:22:55.970 --> 0:22:58.370
<v Speaker 5>last year. Omar Cooper got all the credit last year.

0:22:58.750 --> 0:23:01.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think, well, Becker kind of took over

0:23:01.230 --> 0:23:04.450
<v Speaker 2>the end of last season, but, I mean, he is hot.

0:23:04.830 --> 0:23:06.090
<v Speaker 3>He is very hard to cover.

0:23:06.150 --> 0:23:08.970
<v Speaker 5>It's wild because how the Heisman works, it's all about

0:23:08.990 --> 0:23:11.730
<v Speaker 5>the voting, and they can have either three, four, or

0:23:11.830 --> 0:23:14.149
<v Speaker 5>five people invited to the ceremony. It's all about the

0:23:14.230 --> 0:23:17.070
<v Speaker 5>threshold of votes. And right now, no quarterback is jumping

0:23:17.109 --> 0:23:18.210
<v Speaker 5>up to put themselves in the mix.

0:23:18.310 --> 0:23:20.859
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Mensah's number one in odds. And I

0:23:21.020 --> 0:23:23.859
<v Speaker 2>think he's playing well, but is Miami that good? I

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.460
<v Speaker 2>know they're the number one team, but they do.

0:23:25.380 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Not look great.

0:23:26.020 --> 0:23:27.300
<v Speaker 5>And do you split votes at Miami?

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:27.500
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:28.300
<v Speaker 5>Do you split votes?

0:23:28.540 --> 0:23:30.900
<v Speaker 2>And honestly, I think Tony, to me, is a more

0:23:30.940 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 2>attractive guy than Mensah because he's unique.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, Devontae Smith won wide receiver, so it could

0:23:35.940 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 3>be the year of the wide receiver.

0:23:36.900 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 5>All right, a lot more football coming up. Coming up next,

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 5>former Ohio State linebacker Bobby Carpenter. How is it playing

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 5>today in Columbus? Stick around. Not so fast. Are you

0:23:47.540 --> 0:23:49.500
<v Speaker 5>wide receivers? Actually, I would put.

0:23:49.460 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Four if I could. If it was socially acceptable?

0:23:54.550 --> 0:23:56.810
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State, I don't know how many voters actually watch them.

0:23:57.130 --> 0:24:02.990
<v Speaker 2>And also, they've lost this weekend to Fresno State. All right,

0:24:03.030 --> 0:24:04.970
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to Not So Fast. We're part of the

0:24:05.070 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 2>NBC Sports Now lineup from 7 a.m.

0:24:07.580 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 3>To 7 p.m.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:08.699
<v Speaker 7>Eastern.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.500
<v Speaker 2>Catch the full daily lineup of Sports Talk on NBC

0:24:11.540 --> 0:24:14.899
<v Speaker 2>Sports Now. Channel is available live on Peacock and for

0:24:14.940 --> 0:24:18.380
<v Speaker 2>free on Roku, Samsung, TV +, or wherever you stream.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:24:19.830 --> 0:24:22.429
<v Speaker 5>Oh, don't forget, tonight, Fanta in 60. I think he's

0:24:22.460 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 5>got Gino Ariema on the show.

0:24:24.380 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 7>Oh, fun.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.940
<v Speaker 5>I think he's got Dan Hurley on the show together.

0:24:27.580 --> 0:24:28.300
<v Speaker 3>Oh, man. Bonus.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And there's a UConn quarterback starting in the NFL, possibly.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>It's all happening for UConn. But the big game of

0:24:33.540 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>this weekend, of course, was USC beating Ohio State. And

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 2>we would like to bring this guest in off an

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.850
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State. win but it's not happening of course talking

0:24:43.869 --> 0:24:48.250
<v Speaker 2>about bobby carpenter seven-year nfl veteran graduate of the ohio

0:24:48.290 --> 0:24:52.290
<v Speaker 2>state host of morning juice in columbus bobby how much

0:24:52.330 --> 0:24:53.630
<v Speaker 2>trouble is ohio state in.

0:24:55.010 --> 0:24:56.929
<v Speaker 8>Um you know trouble they've got some things they've got

0:24:56.950 --> 0:24:59.610
<v Speaker 8>to obviously get figured out it's not a great situation

0:24:59.830 --> 0:25:01.570
<v Speaker 8>for them to be in now i mean you burned

0:25:01.630 --> 0:25:04.169
<v Speaker 8>up all of your mulligans you have no more losses

0:25:04.190 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 8>really to have with four games remaining you got to

0:25:06.260 --> 0:25:09.379
<v Speaker 8>figure out how to help your through freshman quarterback a

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.700
<v Speaker 8>little bit more who I feel like he played probably

0:25:11.740 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 8>well enough for you to win the game. Guys just

0:25:14.180 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 8>didn't step up around him. So there's some questions. There's

0:25:17.300 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 8>some stuff on the defensive side, some of the big

0:25:19.180 --> 0:25:22.530
<v Speaker 8>plays that they gave up with tackling and fits. I

0:25:22.990 --> 0:25:25.230
<v Speaker 8>don't think it's incredibly dire. I mean, I always look

0:25:25.270 --> 0:25:29.409
<v Speaker 8>at the betting markets as kind of a signal, if

0:25:29.450 --> 0:25:31.470
<v Speaker 8>you will. For me, the Canary and the coal mine,

0:25:31.490 --> 0:25:34.630
<v Speaker 8>I think Ohio State is making seventh now of odds

0:25:34.690 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 8>of winning the national championship, which, all right, well, if

0:25:37.420 --> 0:25:39.889
<v Speaker 8>you're seventh, I mean, that's– better than being 12th.

0:25:39.970 --> 0:25:40.949
<v Speaker 7>Maybe it's not first.

0:25:41.450 --> 0:25:43.250
<v Speaker 8>So as long as they get some things straightened out,

0:25:43.450 --> 0:25:45.270
<v Speaker 8>but they've got Oregon coming to town and they're off

0:25:45.290 --> 0:25:46.810
<v Speaker 8>a big win against Northwestern.

0:25:46.869 --> 0:25:48.350
<v Speaker 7>So it should be a challenge.

0:25:48.470 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bobby, you play for the program. You're locked in.

0:25:50.540 --> 0:25:52.540
<v Speaker 5>You talk about it and cover it every day. You

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 5>were there back in the day. When Julian Sainz first

0:25:55.500 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 5>goes down, people didn't really overreact too much because I

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.180
<v Speaker 5>think they'd seen Ohio State's history of backup quarterbacks, Cardale

0:26:01.220 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Jones and others. The two backup quarterbacks right now, what

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 5>should we know about them going forward?

0:26:06.780 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, I The thing is, there's a little bit of

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 8>controversy surrounding even that, where David St. Clair is a

0:26:12.700 --> 0:26:17.340
<v Speaker 8>high school kid, an Ohio kid, five-star guy coming in.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 8>He's in his second year. I don't know if he's

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 8>developed probably as quickly as maybe they would have hoped.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.820
<v Speaker 8>They brought Luke Fay in, who's not as big. He's

0:26:25.859 --> 0:26:30.740
<v Speaker 8>probably 5'11, from Mission Viejo, California, maybe a little bit

0:26:30.820 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 8>further along in his development at the quarterback position. So

0:26:33.700 --> 0:26:36.659
<v Speaker 8>he was out there. I think that's who Ryan is

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.030
<v Speaker 8>going to roll with I mean, he played well enough

0:26:39.050 --> 0:26:40.790
<v Speaker 8>for them to win the game. I mean, there was

0:26:40.810 --> 0:26:42.990
<v Speaker 8>a couple of overthrows that he had, had a few misses,

0:26:43.030 --> 0:26:44.129
<v Speaker 8>but guys had some drops.

0:26:44.510 --> 0:26:45.990
<v Speaker 7>He did some things really, really well.

0:26:46.010 --> 0:26:48.580
<v Speaker 8>You know, he's going to be a little bit, maybe

0:26:48.619 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 8>more of a runner than Julian Sane is going to be.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.660
<v Speaker 8>He's got a little more athleticism. So you've got those

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 8>things going for you, but it'll be a little different,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.100
<v Speaker 8>but I don't, I don't, he was not the reason

0:26:59.140 --> 0:26:59.980
<v Speaker 8>why Ohio state lost.

0:27:00.020 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:00.740 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 7>I would just say that.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>What was the reason?

0:27:04.300 --> 0:27:07.790
<v Speaker 8>Well, when you, Get down in the red zone. I

0:27:07.850 --> 0:27:10.390
<v Speaker 8>think they were 0-3 in the red zone for touchdowns. Well,

0:27:10.410 --> 0:27:13.350
<v Speaker 8>until the very end. But you're kicking field goals in

0:27:13.369 --> 0:27:16.450
<v Speaker 8>the red zone. You're giving up big plays on defense.

0:27:16.550 --> 0:27:19.689
<v Speaker 8>They had two plays that totaled about 40% of their yards.

0:27:20.740 --> 0:27:23.580
<v Speaker 8>And so that's something that they were uncharacteristic of them.

0:27:23.619 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 8>They hadn't done that all year with Matt Patricia. 11

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.220
<v Speaker 8>penalties for 71 yards, including some stuff on special teams.

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:33.179
<v Speaker 7>That wasn't great.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.220
<v Speaker 8>And then when you get false starts and you're on

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.260
<v Speaker 8>the one-foot line, that changes the math dramatically of what

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.180
<v Speaker 8>you're trying to do. So kind of those three things

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 8>in concert. Realistically, they didn't protect all that well. I

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.340
<v Speaker 8>think Luke Fahey was pressured on close to 45% of

0:27:49.380 --> 0:27:52.179
<v Speaker 8>his snaps, and that's not winning football. They had some

0:27:52.220 --> 0:27:55.219
<v Speaker 8>offensive line injuries coming in. I thought some of that

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.340
<v Speaker 8>had been corrected, and it'll be up to the offensive

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.860
<v Speaker 8>staff to see if they can get this fixed heading

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 8>into Oregon.

0:28:01.990 --> 0:28:03.970
<v Speaker 2>Bobby, I was looking at the NFL draft history of

0:28:04.050 --> 0:28:06.070
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State, of course, which you were part of that history.

0:28:06.310 --> 0:28:08.790
<v Speaker 2>They had eight first-rounders in the last two years and

0:28:08.890 --> 0:28:12.930
<v Speaker 2>six second-rounders. Is it possible that they've just lost so

0:28:12.990 --> 0:28:15.130
<v Speaker 2>much talent to the NFL over the last two years

0:28:15.450 --> 0:28:18.050
<v Speaker 2>that maybe there was a little bit of a decline inevitable,

0:28:18.570 --> 0:28:21.250
<v Speaker 2>or are they able to reload that quickly in today's

0:28:21.290 --> 0:28:22.050
<v Speaker 2>college football era?

0:28:22.730 --> 0:28:23.730
<v Speaker 7>Well, there are a couple of things.

0:28:23.750 --> 0:28:27.130
<v Speaker 8>In this new era, it is easier to reload, but

0:28:27.170 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 8>you're not reloading with your guys. Gone are the days

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.100
<v Speaker 8>where you had probably four or I think there was

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 8>one time where Ohio State had four number one draft–

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.980
<v Speaker 8>first-round draft picks in their wide receiver room at the same–

0:28:38.340 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 8>over the course of like three or four years. Like

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.590
<v Speaker 8>those guys don't stay. They don't sit anymore and wait.

0:28:43.110 --> 0:28:45.650
<v Speaker 8>And so you really go from starters down to like

0:28:45.830 --> 0:28:48.910
<v Speaker 8>first-year players. So when you have injuries, there's some issues.

0:28:48.950 --> 0:28:52.270
<v Speaker 8>This team is pretty talented. I think they have the best–

0:28:52.330 --> 0:28:53.750
<v Speaker 8>I heard you guys talk a little bit about Heisman

0:28:53.770 --> 0:28:56.030
<v Speaker 8>stuff before this. I mean, Jeremiah Smith is the best player.

0:28:56.270 --> 0:28:59.030
<v Speaker 8>When I played with Calvin Johnson, I played with Terrell Owens,

0:29:00.070 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 8>played against a number– a number of other Andre Johnson,

0:29:04.540 --> 0:29:07.380
<v Speaker 8>super talented guys, Hall of Famers, William Jones. He's as

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.050
<v Speaker 8>good probably at this stage of his career if not

0:29:10.070 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 8>better than most of those guys.

0:29:11.460 --> 0:29:14.670
<v Speaker 7>You have him. It's just a function of, okay, an offensive.

0:29:14.330 --> 0:29:16.270
<v Speaker 8>Line maybe hasn't performed as well as they would have

0:29:16.290 --> 0:29:19.290
<v Speaker 8>liked due to some injuries and cohesion. But the rest

0:29:19.310 --> 0:29:21.330
<v Speaker 8>of the skill position players, they're looking for guys to

0:29:21.350 --> 0:29:23.550
<v Speaker 8>step up. And the running back room, they rush it

0:29:23.590 --> 0:29:26.590
<v Speaker 8>for 200 yards, need to probably be a little better

0:29:26.650 --> 0:29:30.050
<v Speaker 8>than the other wide receivers. They've got some really good

0:29:30.110 --> 0:29:33.590
<v Speaker 8>young players. But like Chris Henry Jr., he's got a

0:29:33.690 --> 0:29:37.510
<v Speaker 8>famous name. He's very talented. Made a huge play. Had

0:29:37.530 --> 0:29:40.010
<v Speaker 8>a drop that probably is a first down. So some

0:29:40.050 --> 0:29:41.950
<v Speaker 8>of those things that you've got to grow through with

0:29:41.990 --> 0:29:44.190
<v Speaker 8>those guys, they've got to grow up quick and in

0:29:44.230 --> 0:29:46.300
<v Speaker 8>a hurry now because you don't have a Heisman finalist

0:29:46.650 --> 0:29:47.860
<v Speaker 8>as your quarterback anymore.

0:29:47.890 --> 0:29:49.940
<v Speaker 7>So, you know, that's some of the things that you

0:29:49.980 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 7>see on the offensive side.

0:29:51.300 --> 0:29:54.220
<v Speaker 8>And, you know, really defensively, Matt Patricia does a great

0:29:54.260 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 8>job of calling what he has, and they've got to

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 8>get a little bit healthy. They're Nickelback, J. Timothy's hurt.

0:30:00.430 --> 0:30:03.450
<v Speaker 8>Him coming back will help immensely. But, I mean, it

0:30:03.490 --> 0:30:05.650
<v Speaker 8>was just really tackling on some of those big plays,

0:30:05.670 --> 0:30:06.350
<v Speaker 8>to tell you the truth.

0:30:06.770 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bobby, let's get to the rest of the

0:30:08.100 --> 0:30:10.660
<v Speaker 5>Big Ten. Ohio State, let's take them out of this conversation.

0:30:11.060 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Is there a team you could picture right now in

0:30:13.100 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the national title game, Indiana, USC, other? Because it feels like,

0:30:17.260 --> 0:30:18.740
<v Speaker 5>as great as the Big Ten has been the past

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.990
<v Speaker 5>three years, this might be the year that they're maybe

0:30:22.050 --> 0:30:23.650
<v Speaker 5>not quite as threatening overall.

0:30:23.670 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's amazing that you... you just overlooked the highest

0:30:27.820 --> 0:30:29.820
<v Speaker 8>ranked team in the big 10 this year, who also

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 8>resides out in California and UCLA, because I don't know

0:30:32.500 --> 0:30:36.220
<v Speaker 8>if anybody truly believes in what they're able to do,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.050
<v Speaker 8>that they would be maybe a national title contender. And

0:30:39.150 --> 0:30:41.290
<v Speaker 8>I don't know that they are, they might be a

0:30:41.330 --> 0:30:43.990
<v Speaker 8>little bit premature in this and they have benefited from

0:30:44.070 --> 0:30:46.630
<v Speaker 8>somewhat of a softer schedule. I don't know that Indiana

0:30:46.690 --> 0:30:50.090
<v Speaker 8>is quite as good as what they were. Um, You

0:30:50.370 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 8>start talking about USC. I mean, that was a nice

0:30:52.860 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 8>win for them. They're talented. I know this, USC and Oregon,

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 8>they didn't spend as much money as anybody on their roster.

0:30:58.860 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 8>And USC has gotten some results out of it. Oregon, obviously,

0:31:02.300 --> 0:31:04.370
<v Speaker 8>with the Dante Moore injury and him now being gone

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.430
<v Speaker 8>for the year, that changes a lot of the chemistry

0:31:07.450 --> 0:31:08.930
<v Speaker 8>of what they were designed to be.

0:31:09.370 --> 0:31:13.060
<v Speaker 7>So they've got some issues. I mean, Indiana... Could they

0:31:13.100 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 7>make it?

0:31:13.620 --> 0:31:13.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:14.140 --> 0:31:17.340
<v Speaker 8>Here's the reality, gentlemen. I look at college football this year.

0:31:17.380 --> 0:31:20.219
<v Speaker 8>You see teams win and lose every given week. It's

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 8>a little bit NFL-esque. People ask, Ohio State, they can't

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:25.540
<v Speaker 8>win a national championship.

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.340
<v Speaker 7>I'm like, I don't know, maybe.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.180
<v Speaker 8>Who do you pick out there that you think would

0:31:30.220 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 8>win it, that if you had to say was an

0:31:31.590 --> 0:31:35.250
<v Speaker 8>overwhelming favorite, like Georgia looks good, but they've got some flaws.

0:31:35.830 --> 0:31:38.270
<v Speaker 8>BYU was up there. They get beat. I think Notre

0:31:38.290 --> 0:31:43.020
<v Speaker 8>Dame is really good. They have some struggles. Miami, they're undefeated.

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 8>They haven't really played a hard schedule. And North Carolina,

0:31:45.660 --> 0:31:47.580
<v Speaker 8>Florida State are taking them to the brink. So I

0:31:47.620 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 8>think this year, it's really going to be who's hot

0:31:51.060 --> 0:31:53.860
<v Speaker 8>at the right time. And so the good news for

0:31:54.180 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 8>these teams, there's about a month left. And like the NFL,

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:58.770
<v Speaker 8>can you get hot going into the tournament? And I

0:31:58.810 --> 0:32:01.470
<v Speaker 8>think there's a couple of Big Ten teams, maybe USC,

0:32:01.510 --> 0:32:03.790
<v Speaker 8>maybe Ohio State, maybe Indiana can get some stuff fixed.

0:32:04.220 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 8>But it doesn't seem like there's that juggernaut. But I

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 8>don't know that that juggernaut exists this year.

0:32:08.500 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bobby, before we get you out of here,

0:32:09.940 --> 0:32:11.340
<v Speaker 5>I was looking at a picture of you playing at

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.290
<v Speaker 5>Ohio State. We've got about a minute left. You had

0:32:13.370 --> 0:32:16.310
<v Speaker 5>tons of those helmet stickers on. I didn't play college football.

0:32:16.330 --> 0:32:18.810
<v Speaker 5>I was an archer. How do you get a helmet

0:32:18.830 --> 0:32:20.870
<v Speaker 5>sticker at Ohio State? Like if your room is clean,

0:32:21.190 --> 0:32:22.650
<v Speaker 5>if you show up on time to practice? Because you

0:32:22.670 --> 0:32:24.910
<v Speaker 5>had tons of them. I know you didn't have 30

0:32:24.910 --> 0:32:26.910
<v Speaker 5>sacks a game. How does one get a helmet sticker?

0:32:27.990 --> 0:32:28.650
<v Speaker 7>So it's interesting.

0:32:28.670 --> 0:32:30.430
<v Speaker 8>It changes a little bit throughout the years. I think

0:32:30.450 --> 0:32:32.910
<v Speaker 8>my sophomore year, I did lead the team in that.

0:32:32.990 --> 0:32:35.330
<v Speaker 8>But we would have there'd be number one, you have

0:32:35.350 --> 0:32:37.290
<v Speaker 8>to win. It's like, you've got to win games. No

0:32:37.350 --> 0:32:39.290
<v Speaker 8>one gets them. If you lose, then you would get

0:32:39.310 --> 0:32:41.690
<v Speaker 8>them for a conference win as well. And then you

0:32:41.730 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 8>would have different metrics on each side of the ball defensively. Like,

0:32:45.140 --> 0:32:47.060
<v Speaker 8>can you get five, three and outs? Did you hold

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 8>them under a hundred yards rushing, you know, passing metrics?

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.580
<v Speaker 8>Could you be team one was like plus in the

0:32:52.620 --> 0:32:56.140
<v Speaker 8>turnover margin. Everybody got it for some special team units.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.710
<v Speaker 8>And then you would have big plays incorporated there as well.

0:32:58.750 --> 0:33:00.910
<v Speaker 8>And so, If you could be a guy that's like

0:33:01.030 --> 0:33:02.830
<v Speaker 8>playing a lot on one side of the ball, but

0:33:02.850 --> 0:33:05.470
<v Speaker 8>then on a couple of good special teams, like back

0:33:05.490 --> 0:33:07.510
<v Speaker 8>when they used to return kicks, I mean, I think

0:33:07.550 --> 0:33:09.300
<v Speaker 8>my sophomore year I had like five or six tackles

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:10.090
<v Speaker 8>inside the 20.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 7>Those were good for helmet stickers.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 8>So like you got to win, got to play well individually,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.500
<v Speaker 8>and then your units kind of have to play well

0:33:16.940 --> 0:33:17.740
<v Speaker 8>ultimately as well.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.140
<v Speaker 7>So it's kind of a three-pronged attack.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:19.860
<v Speaker 5>That clears that up.

0:33:20.180 --> 0:33:22.540
<v Speaker 3>How many does Jeremiah Smith has them all? I mean,

0:33:22.580 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 3>he deserves them all, right?

0:33:23.420 --> 0:33:26.990
<v Speaker 5>He needs a second helmet. He's good, man.

0:33:27.170 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 7>He's really good.

0:33:27.780 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 3>All right. Bobby, thanks for the time.

0:33:30.300 --> 0:33:33.540
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully Ohio State is still alive deep into the winter.

0:33:33.580 --> 0:33:35.140
<v Speaker 3>We're still talking about them. Thank you, buddy.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:36.060
<v Speaker 7>Thanks, guys.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.140
<v Speaker 5>I've always wanted to know how those helmet stickers, like

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 5>if your room is clean, if you get a B

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 5>in algebra, how do you get a helmet sticker?

0:33:42.340 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, did you assume that a good play?

0:33:44.780 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 5>I know, but like if you get a couple three

0:33:46.780 --> 0:33:48.270
<v Speaker 5>and outs to get you a helmet sticker, that seems

0:33:48.290 --> 0:33:50.770
<v Speaker 5>like pretty easy. All right. Staying in college football, it's

0:33:50.830 --> 0:33:53.460
<v Speaker 5>time for the rando. How about this? The end of

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.940
<v Speaker 5>the Miami-UNC game the other day. This was as wild

0:33:55.980 --> 0:33:58.340
<v Speaker 5>as it gets. UNC trying to get back in it.

0:33:58.370 --> 0:34:01.430
<v Speaker 5>They trade two onside kicks in a row. They convert

0:34:01.810 --> 0:34:05.170
<v Speaker 5>both onside kicks. The first one they said offsides.

0:34:05.510 --> 0:34:06.270
<v Speaker 3>Which it was.

0:34:06.290 --> 0:34:06.490
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:34:07.090 --> 0:34:10.350
<v Speaker 5>At that guy, number 84. No offense. They recover the

0:34:10.390 --> 0:34:12.830
<v Speaker 5>first one. Then the second one, they did it again.

0:34:12.850 --> 0:34:16.549
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, except that one they really cheated. Do you

0:34:16.570 --> 0:34:17.089
<v Speaker 3>see it right there?

0:34:17.110 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 5>He hit the guy like six inches in front of

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.339
<v Speaker 5>the line. I think you let him play a little

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:22.310
<v Speaker 5>bit with on-site kicks.

0:34:22.370 --> 0:34:24.730
<v Speaker 3>No, no, you can't block the guy who's about to

0:34:24.770 --> 0:34:25.410
<v Speaker 3>catch the ball.

0:34:25.590 --> 0:34:27.150
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly what you're supposed to do. You're supposed to

0:34:27.190 --> 0:34:27.780
<v Speaker 5>knock the hell out of him.

0:34:27.810 --> 0:34:29.629
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what the rule says you can't do.

0:34:29.910 --> 0:34:31.489
<v Speaker 5>I think both on-site... The rule is.

0:34:31.469 --> 0:34:33.770
<v Speaker 2>Written very clearly. The second one was cheaper than the

0:34:33.810 --> 0:34:36.130
<v Speaker 2>first one. The first one was just bad luck. The

0:34:36.150 --> 0:34:38.330
<v Speaker 2>second one was specifically designed.

0:34:38.430 --> 0:34:40.250
<v Speaker 5>On the first one, the guy who was off-size was

0:34:40.250 --> 0:34:42.190
<v Speaker 5>40 yards away, and the ref said, I'm going to

0:34:42.210 --> 0:34:44.109
<v Speaker 5>throw a flag here for a guy who's 40 yards

0:34:44.130 --> 0:34:44.529
<v Speaker 5>from the play.

0:34:44.969 --> 0:34:46.410
<v Speaker 3>That one, I don't know.

0:34:46.450 --> 0:34:48.819
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the second one, obviously everyone would do

0:34:48.860 --> 0:34:50.739
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. You just try and plow through the

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:51.820
<v Speaker 2>guy the ball is targeted to.

0:34:51.900 --> 0:34:54.140
<v Speaker 5>You will never see this again in sports. Two straight

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 5>onside kicks recovered and called back.

0:34:56.660 --> 0:34:59.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're right. But the first one, yes.

0:34:59.290 --> 0:35:02.209
<v Speaker 2>The second one, the only reason they recovered was because

0:35:02.230 --> 0:35:06.550
<v Speaker 2>of the penalty. That being said... This was an indictment.

0:35:06.590 --> 0:35:08.290
<v Speaker 2>Miami is not playing good football.

0:35:08.350 --> 0:35:10.270
<v Speaker 3>They could have lost this game. Of course they should

0:35:10.290 --> 0:35:10.989
<v Speaker 3>have lost this game.

0:35:11.170 --> 0:35:13.169
<v Speaker 2>They should have lost to Florida State, who just fired

0:35:13.190 --> 0:35:14.930
<v Speaker 2>their coach, and North Carolina.

0:35:15.890 --> 0:35:16.390
<v Speaker 3>That was great.

0:35:16.510 --> 0:35:17.790
<v Speaker 5>That was great. That was fantastic.

0:35:18.489 --> 0:35:21.050
<v Speaker 2>All right, coming up next, we're going to the clip joint.

0:35:21.150 --> 0:35:23.890
<v Speaker 2>Nick Wright gets us all angry, as usual. We'll talk

0:35:23.910 --> 0:35:25.819
<v Speaker 2>about the NFL MVP frontrunner.

0:35:25.860 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 3>That's next. Not so fast.

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.020
<v Speaker 5>I was watching. I was like, they got the inside kick.

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.090
<v Speaker 5>I was like, ugh. Then they got the onside kick,

0:35:31.250 --> 0:35:32.210
<v Speaker 5>and they tried the third one.

0:35:32.710 --> 0:35:35.630
<v Speaker 2>But actually, the second one, they knew something was off immediately.

0:35:35.690 --> 0:35:37.110
<v Speaker 2>The first one, that was controversial.

0:35:37.170 --> 0:35:37.610
<v Speaker 8>The second one.

0:35:38.570 --> 0:35:40.610
<v Speaker 5>Back on Not So Fast with Pabst and Perloff. I'd

0:35:40.630 --> 0:35:42.230
<v Speaker 5>like to be smothered, you know, like a pool top

0:35:42.290 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 5>right now. That'd be fantastic. All right, Perloff, let's get

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.219
<v Speaker 5>to it. Staying NFL Week 8, it's time for the

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.700
<v Speaker 5>Clip Joint. Our buddy Ross Tucker was on the show today,

0:35:50.780 --> 0:35:53.339
<v Speaker 5>Ross from CBS Sports, and he talked about what he

0:35:53.420 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 5>thinks right now, currently, about the MVP race in the NFL.

0:35:57.780 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 6>Purdy has had a terrific start. So I think Purdy

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.489
<v Speaker 6>should probably be in the running. We should probably start

0:36:04.530 --> 0:36:07.250
<v Speaker 6>to talk about Trevor Lawrence more. If you look at

0:36:07.290 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 6>what Trevor Lawrence has done... Over the last 17 games,

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 6>Lawrence should be in the conversation. But I think it's

0:36:14.620 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 6>Josh Allen. I mean, he's, I think, easily the most

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.860
<v Speaker 6>entertaining player to watch, both.

0:36:20.739 --> 0:36:21.620
<v Speaker 3>Good and bad.

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 6>You know, and he'll even admit that.

0:36:23.380 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's my big question. Do they really want

0:36:26.020 --> 0:36:28.219
<v Speaker 2>to go back-to-back Josh Allen?

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:29.899
<v Speaker 3>I'm not arguing about it. First of all, the MVP

0:36:29.940 --> 0:36:31.620
<v Speaker 3>award has nothing to do with who the most valuable

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 3>player is. That's not even part of it.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:33.380
<v Speaker 5>It's story-related.

0:36:33.420 --> 0:36:34.380
<v Speaker 3>It's what's the best story.

0:36:35.020 --> 0:36:37.049
<v Speaker 2>They were sick of giving it to Lamar Jackson, so

0:36:37.070 --> 0:36:39.669
<v Speaker 2>they gave it to Josh Allen last year. If there's

0:36:39.710 --> 0:36:41.910
<v Speaker 2>someone close, don't they want to mix it up just

0:36:41.930 --> 0:36:43.090
<v Speaker 2>for the sake of mixing it up?

0:36:43.170 --> 0:36:46.210
<v Speaker 5>You're 100% right. This would be Joe Burrow's year if

0:36:46.250 --> 0:36:48.609
<v Speaker 5>he didn't throw those interceptions and keep people in games.

0:36:48.670 --> 0:36:52.050
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no. Joe Burrow, defense is their problem.

0:36:52.110 --> 0:36:54.290
<v Speaker 2>He's going to have amazing numbers. He's going to have

0:36:54.330 --> 0:36:56.009
<v Speaker 2>the best numbers, but that'll be enough.

0:36:56.030 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:36:56.300 --> 0:36:58.739
<v Speaker 5>Okay, people want to give it to Joe Burrow. Josh Allen,

0:36:58.980 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 5>once you get two, you can never win another one again.

0:37:00.820 --> 0:37:02.339
<v Speaker 3>What happened to Brock Purdy? We were talking about Brock

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:03.060
<v Speaker 3>Purdy two weeks ago.

0:37:03.910 --> 0:37:07.230
<v Speaker 5>Brock Purdy does it in an unspectacular fashion, just like

0:37:07.250 --> 0:37:08.969
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Lawrence does it in an unspectacular fashion.

0:37:08.989 --> 0:37:11.190
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think if they go 15-2, then Purdy,

0:37:11.450 --> 0:37:12.939
<v Speaker 2>because of the record, will have a good shot, though.

0:37:13.060 --> 0:37:14.739
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but you have to have the story. You need

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.020
<v Speaker 5>a little help. You need one of those breakout— he needs

0:37:17.060 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 5>a national TV four-touchdown game, and the next day everyone

0:37:20.340 --> 0:37:21.780
<v Speaker 5>will go to bat for him to win the MVP.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.450
<v Speaker 2>What about this year you bring in a nontraditional position

0:37:24.469 --> 0:37:25.589
<v Speaker 2>because they don't want to give back-to-back?

0:37:25.630 --> 0:37:27.029
<v Speaker 3>Bring in JSN or Jameer Gibbs.

0:37:27.510 --> 0:37:28.950
<v Speaker 5>It would be great, and I think this is the

0:37:28.969 --> 0:37:31.609
<v Speaker 5>year that there's an opening, but how it works is

0:37:31.670 --> 0:37:33.969
<v Speaker 5>it's almost like the Joker in the NBA. You can

0:37:34.010 --> 0:37:35.830
<v Speaker 5>get two. You can't get three in a row.

0:37:36.010 --> 0:37:38.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if you do get two, you have to

0:37:38.469 --> 0:37:40.260
<v Speaker 2>at least get a Super Bowl appearance.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:40.580
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:37:40.620 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So Lamar Jackson, they're sick of Lamar Jackson. They're not

0:37:42.940 --> 0:37:44.419
<v Speaker 2>going to give it to him again until he gets further.

0:37:44.500 --> 0:37:47.020
<v Speaker 5>Exactly right. Josh Allen, by default, could get the MVP,

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 5>but he better win a Super Bowl.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.049
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's turn to Nick Wright, who was on the show.

0:37:52.310 --> 0:37:54.970
<v Speaker 2>I think he called in specifically to give Todd Fritz,

0:37:55.190 --> 0:37:58.029
<v Speaker 2>super Broncos fan, a hard time. But he talked about

0:37:58.150 --> 0:38:00.290
<v Speaker 2>Bo Nix and the future of the Broncos at quarterback.

0:38:01.469 --> 0:38:04.450
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hope the Broncos love him. Feels like

0:38:04.489 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a $ 70 million a year quarterback to me, Fritzy.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 5>I'd sign him up immediately.

0:38:10.340 --> 0:38:10.660
<v Speaker 8>I would.

0:38:10.739 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hope Bo Nix is the quarterback of

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.300
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos today. For the rest of Patrick Mahomes' career.

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>That's how I view Bo Nix. And he might just be.

0:38:24.660 --> 0:38:30.490
<v Speaker 1>Because he might just be good enough that you're afraid

0:38:30.550 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of him.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.810
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we love the snark. A little snark there by

0:38:34.969 --> 0:38:37.009
<v Speaker 5>Nick Wright. That was great. I wish they would sign

0:38:37.030 --> 0:38:39.219
<v Speaker 5>Bo Nix. But it proves the point of that. that

0:38:39.260 --> 0:38:40.819
<v Speaker 5>Bo Nix is going to have a performance like this,

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 5>and still a lot of people don't believe in him

0:38:42.900 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 5>overall as a quarterback.

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know who talked me into Bo Nix a

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.580
<v Speaker 2>little bit was J.J. Watt during the telecast. He pointed

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>out that he, that was the Watt game, I think.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>He's coming back from a broken ankle, and J.J. pointed

0:38:54.100 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>out he's gotten a little better every game. He's probably

0:38:56.500 --> 0:38:57.660
<v Speaker 2>at 60% right now.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:58.060
<v Speaker 5>Really?

0:38:58.219 --> 0:39:00.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was what Watt said, and his numbers, he

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 2>was 24-32, 222 yards, two TDs, no picks. He's getting

0:39:04.460 --> 0:39:07.629
<v Speaker 2>a little better every week. I don't quite understand Sean

0:39:07.670 --> 0:39:10.210
<v Speaker 2>Payton's play calling. That's part of my issue. They seem

0:39:10.250 --> 0:39:11.029
<v Speaker 2>really conservative.

0:39:11.650 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious. What I want to talk about is their

0:39:13.460 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 3>running back.

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Jonah Coleman makes some big plays, but he is slow

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 2>for an NFL running back.

0:39:17.540 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 3>I didn't notice that.

0:39:18.940 --> 0:39:21.100
<v Speaker 2>Could they go after Jonathan Taylor and just try and

0:39:21.140 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 2>put the full court press on that division?

0:39:22.780 --> 0:39:24.270
<v Speaker 5>But we love plotting running backs.

0:39:24.370 --> 0:39:27.149
<v Speaker 3>Oh, by the way, Ken Walker, MVP, that went away.

0:39:27.170 --> 0:39:27.830
<v Speaker 5>That went away real quick.

0:39:27.850 --> 0:39:29.290
<v Speaker 3>The Broncos stuffed him pretty good.

0:39:29.620 --> 0:39:31.860
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's get to another week eight thing, a

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 5>little game we like to play here called Mind Readers.

0:39:33.860 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 5>We're going to play a cut, and we'll tell you

0:39:35.420 --> 0:39:38.299
<v Speaker 5>what they're actually thinking. Okay, here we go, Pearl. This

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.689
<v Speaker 5>is the Ravens' Jesse Minter, head coach. His quarterback gets hurt.

0:39:42.870 --> 0:39:44.529
<v Speaker 5>What is Jesse Minter thinking here?

0:39:45.650 --> 0:39:48.670
<v Speaker 4>You know, I don't really believe in that. Again, things happen.

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.110
<v Speaker 4>It's how you respond. You know, there's no testimony without

0:39:53.150 --> 0:39:57.150
<v Speaker 4>a test. And so we'll do everything in our power

0:39:57.170 --> 0:39:59.110
<v Speaker 4>to keep rolling, to keep this thing going.

0:39:59.460 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 2>That's what he's saying. My meter is this ball. Jesse

0:40:02.739 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Minter is saying, dear Lord, why did you let Lamar

0:40:05.260 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Jackson get hurt?

0:40:05.820 --> 0:40:06.859
<v Speaker 3>It's my first year here.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm supposed to be this hot shot NFL coach, and

0:40:09.300 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>this is happening to me?

0:40:10.590 --> 0:40:11.180
<v Speaker 3>This sucks.

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.890
<v Speaker 5>Yes, if I'm Jesse Minter, I'm thinking to myself, take

0:40:13.950 --> 0:40:16.290
<v Speaker 5>my thumb. Take my ankle. I'm not doing anything with them.

0:40:16.530 --> 0:40:19.830
<v Speaker 5>Keep Lamar healthy. And you can't let Hundley get hurt.

0:40:19.850 --> 0:40:20.470
<v Speaker 5>That's my backup.

0:40:20.750 --> 0:40:22.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he comes from the Harbaugh school, so he's

0:40:22.930 --> 0:40:24.910
<v Speaker 2>trying to keep a positive face on it. But I

0:40:24.930 --> 0:40:26.850
<v Speaker 2>think Jesse Minter is just doing coach talk. I think

0:40:26.890 --> 0:40:28.169
<v Speaker 2>he is so bummed right now.

0:40:28.370 --> 0:40:29.090
<v Speaker 5>Terrible, terrible.

0:40:29.390 --> 0:40:30.969
<v Speaker 3>All right, next mind reader.

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Kevin O'Connell, the Minnesota Vikings head coach.

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 3>What did Kevin have to say?

0:40:36.700 --> 0:40:41.980
<v Speaker 9>You know, we had some opportunities for him, and, you know,

0:40:42.020 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 9>there were some chances there. I thought we missed a

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 9>couple of them high, if I remember right. And then just,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, just the way the flow of the game went,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.790
<v Speaker 9>we only had 50 plays.

0:40:52.890 --> 0:40:56.110
<v Speaker 5>He is thinking there, Kevin O'Connell, I would love to

0:40:56.150 --> 0:40:59.489
<v Speaker 5>have Sam Darnold back Because I just need B-level quarterback

0:40:59.510 --> 0:41:01.700
<v Speaker 5>play with this defense, and I would probably be undefeated

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:01.940
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:03.870
<v Speaker 3>So, you're not getting Sam Arnold. No.

0:41:04.030 --> 0:41:05.950
<v Speaker 2>But he could get Kirk Cousins back. He could get

0:41:05.969 --> 0:41:08.550
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones back. He could get Carson Wentz back. Carson

0:41:08.570 --> 0:41:09.210
<v Speaker 2>Wentz is on the bench.

0:41:09.250 --> 0:41:10.950
<v Speaker 5>Does he go to management and say, I want this?

0:41:12.450 --> 0:41:14.870
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but he chose Kyler Murray, and it's

0:41:14.890 --> 0:41:17.090
<v Speaker 2>a new GM because, remember, they fired their GM.

0:41:17.150 --> 0:41:19.290
<v Speaker 3>So, there really is no management. It's up to him.

0:41:20.070 --> 0:41:21.770
<v Speaker 3>I don't get what he sees in Kyler Murray because

0:41:21.810 --> 0:41:23.509
<v Speaker 3>it's not working right now. And.

0:41:24.070 --> 0:41:25.930
<v Speaker 2>He clearly needs to get the ball to that man

0:41:25.969 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 2>right there. What a great catch by Justin Jefferson. This

0:41:28.700 --> 0:41:32.739
<v Speaker 2>is a real interesting season. I think Kevin O'Connell is thinking, God,

0:41:32.969 --> 0:41:35.090
<v Speaker 2>I might have made a mistake. I think Kevin O'Connell

0:41:35.110 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 2>is going to put this on himself. Because Kyler Murray,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it, it's a cliche, he plays

0:41:39.780 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 2>like he's short. Like, he has to get 20 feet

0:41:41.739 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 2>behind the line of scrimmage to see the field. Then

0:41:43.620 --> 0:41:45.739
<v Speaker 2>he's throwing high because he's just launching it up there.

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:48.420
<v Speaker 5>And my little quarterback is facing the biggest, strongest quarterback

0:41:48.460 --> 0:41:49.739
<v Speaker 5>in the sport next week at the Bills.

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.580
<v Speaker 2>And why is he not running more consistently? Why is

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray not a running weapon? I know teams are

0:41:54.980 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 2>rushing him and trying to contain him.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 5>I think that's by design, but you take away one

0:41:58.260 --> 0:42:00.410
<v Speaker 5>of his threats, and now you're like, he's just a passer?

0:42:00.650 --> 0:42:03.150
<v Speaker 5>It's not that great. All right, coming up next, constructive

0:42:03.250 --> 0:42:04.009
<v Speaker 5>criticism time.

0:42:04.230 --> 0:42:04.330
<v Speaker 6>And.

0:42:04.860 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Monday Night Football preview. Your picks, our picks.

0:42:07.180 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Stick around.

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:08.299
<v Speaker 5>Not so fast.

0:42:09.620 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge game.

0:42:11.460 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Huge.

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 5>With a W. Yeah, this is a big deal. Perception game.

0:42:15.700 --> 0:42:16.980
<v Speaker 5>Monday Night Football. Big perception.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.280
<v Speaker 3>What kind of standings, dude?

0:42:22.969 --> 0:42:26.230
<v Speaker 5>Sunday Night Baker Mayfield and his running game against Kayla Williamson.

0:42:26.710 --> 0:42:29.190
<v Speaker 5>Their flair for heroics to prime time as the Bucs

0:42:29.510 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 5>battle the Bears in Chicago. Sunday Night is No Surrender

0:42:32.460 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Night on NBC and Peacock. Run the ball at the Bears, huh?

0:42:36.420 --> 0:42:38.140
<v Speaker 3>Love it. All right, welcome back to Not So Fast.

0:42:38.180 --> 0:42:40.180
<v Speaker 2>That game got a lot more interesting, actually, as the

0:42:40.219 --> 0:42:43.810
<v Speaker 2>Bucs are probably going to win Tennessee South again. But meanwhile,

0:42:43.830 --> 0:42:46.370
<v Speaker 2>we got a little something more important for the Bears.

0:42:46.410 --> 0:42:49.690
<v Speaker 2>They play the Seahawks tonight. Seattle is favored by three,

0:42:50.130 --> 0:42:52.490
<v Speaker 2>so we get to see two new acquisitions. Jeffrey Simmons

0:42:52.510 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 2>for the Bears, Quentin Nelson for Seattle. Who wins the

0:42:55.540 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 2>battle up front, Paul?

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.190
<v Speaker 5>The Bears have been desperate for a defensive tackle. Like

0:43:00.290 --> 0:43:02.470
<v Speaker 5>back in the day, they had Tommy Harris or Akeem Hicks,

0:43:02.590 --> 0:43:04.489
<v Speaker 5>a guy who wrecks people, and they haven't had one

0:43:04.530 --> 0:43:07.130
<v Speaker 5>in a long, long time. So it is Jeffrey Simmons

0:43:07.190 --> 0:43:09.710
<v Speaker 5>coming out tonight. Bears fans, they cannot wait to see

0:43:09.730 --> 0:43:10.350
<v Speaker 5>this guy play.

0:43:10.469 --> 0:43:12.390
<v Speaker 3>You know, I will give you a little warning. Jeffrey

0:43:12.410 --> 0:43:14.590
<v Speaker 3>Simmons didn't do much in the last Titans game.

0:43:14.650 --> 0:43:15.550
<v Speaker 5>That was all by design.

0:43:15.930 --> 0:43:18.010
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes trades like this don't work out the way we

0:43:18.070 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 3>want them.

0:43:18.390 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would be nice on prime time if

0:43:19.739 --> 0:43:22.620
<v Speaker 2>we blew up the game, but I'm not convinced that

0:43:22.660 --> 0:43:25.339
<v Speaker 2>Simmons is a real game changer for Chicago yet.

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:26.819
<v Speaker 3>Talk to me at 9 o'clock tonight.

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:28.700
<v Speaker 5>Okay, how about the other side of this? Seattle looking

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 5>for a running game. They keep their running backs. They

0:43:30.820 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 5>don't trade for a running back. Like you said last week,

0:43:32.980 --> 0:43:35.620
<v Speaker 5>they went counter and said, Let's get one of the best,

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:37.900
<v Speaker 5>if not the best, offensive linemen of the past generation.

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.140
<v Speaker 2>Well, they love Zach Charbonnet to the point that they

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.219
<v Speaker 2>let Ken Walker walk out the door. So I think

0:43:43.540 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>he's a big impact. But for me, this game means

0:43:46.260 --> 0:43:49.340
<v Speaker 2>more to Chicago than Seattle. Seattle already has the ring.

0:43:49.820 --> 0:43:51.660
<v Speaker 2>I think even if they win this game at home,

0:43:52.060 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 2>no one's going to say they're better than the Rams

0:43:53.910 --> 0:43:56.549
<v Speaker 2>and the Niners. Where Chicago, because they're not in the

0:43:56.630 --> 0:43:58.950
<v Speaker 2>NFC West, if they win this game, I think they

0:43:58.989 --> 0:44:02.009
<v Speaker 2>are looking at really being a Super Bowl champion.

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.590
<v Speaker 3>Contender and maybe even the favorite in the nfc.

0:44:04.489 --> 0:44:06.670
<v Speaker 5>And the national media already fell in love earlier in

0:44:06.690 --> 0:44:09.049
<v Speaker 5>the season with the chicago bears offense if they do

0:44:09.070 --> 0:44:12.130
<v Speaker 5>it against a serious defense tonight yeah the reaction tomorrow

0:44:12.150 --> 0:44:12.790
<v Speaker 5>will be what.

0:44:13.010 --> 0:44:15.190
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god it's caleb williams time.

0:44:14.989 --> 0:44:18.170
<v Speaker 2>He is the next he is you know possibly the

0:44:18.210 --> 0:44:20.330
<v Speaker 2>new mahomes maybe not that far.

0:44:20.210 --> 0:44:22.310
<v Speaker 5>Okay but in that direction if he lights up seattle

0:44:22.350 --> 0:44:25.779
<v Speaker 5>tonight they get a nice comfortable 10 point win is

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 5>he in the mvp conversation.

0:44:27.890 --> 0:44:30.350
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's see. He missed, what, two games? Three games.

0:44:30.430 --> 0:44:31.910
<v Speaker 5>But that helps the story, I think.

0:44:31.930 --> 0:44:32.790
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's going to be.

0:44:32.770 --> 0:44:35.710
<v Speaker 2>Hard numbers-wise, because you're going to have Josh Allen with

0:44:35.710 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>40 touchdowns. I don't think he can quite make it

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:40.419
<v Speaker 2>back in, because at most he'll get 14 games.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Also, his numbers have not been big. No. They're really

0:44:43.540 --> 0:44:46.180
<v Speaker 3>a run-first team, ironically, because Cal Williams gets all these.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 5>You got a pick for tonight?

0:44:47.910 --> 0:44:51.260
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would lean Seattle because of what Seattle did

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 2>to Kansas City's offense.

0:44:52.900 --> 0:44:53.500
<v Speaker 5>Basically a shutout.

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.100
<v Speaker 2>And, you know, like I said, I love Ben Johnson.

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he's awesome. I think he's going to try

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and run the ball. It's just really hard to run

0:44:59.739 --> 0:45:00.540
<v Speaker 2>the ball in Seattle.

0:45:00.739 --> 0:45:03.750
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to go Bears 24-23. It's going to be

0:45:03.770 --> 0:45:04.489
<v Speaker 5>as tight as it gets.

0:45:04.590 --> 0:45:07.150
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh, in that scenario, Sam Darnold definitely gives it

0:45:07.190 --> 0:45:07.650
<v Speaker 3>up at the end.

0:45:07.810 --> 0:45:10.670
<v Speaker 5>I'm not saying I hope so. All right, time for

0:45:10.710 --> 0:45:13.649
<v Speaker 5>constructive criticism time. Big weekend, lots to talk about.

0:45:13.690 --> 0:45:14.149
<v Speaker 3>Here we go.

0:45:14.190 --> 0:45:16.700
<v Speaker 5>Here are your questions for us. Pearl, here's the first one.

0:45:18.500 --> 0:45:20.819
<v Speaker 5>Have you ever left a team's game early and missed

0:45:20.860 --> 0:45:23.570
<v Speaker 5>an all-time comeback? I left the IU game early. Come on,

0:45:23.580 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 5>what are you doing?

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:27.029
<v Speaker 2>Is that an all-time comeback to beat Minnesota when you're

0:45:27.050 --> 0:45:28.230
<v Speaker 2>the defending national champion?

0:45:28.250 --> 0:45:29.910
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota College?

0:45:30.170 --> 0:45:30.649
<v Speaker 5>An Irish kicker.

0:45:30.670 --> 0:45:31.630
<v Speaker 3>Maybe if you beat the Vikings.

0:45:31.850 --> 0:45:32.029
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:45:32.739 --> 0:45:34.980
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I've never left a game early where I felt burned.

0:45:35.310 --> 0:45:38.410
<v Speaker 5>I was at a Monday Night Football game, Jets-Miami, when

0:45:38.670 --> 0:45:40.770
<v Speaker 5>Jumbo Elliott had a tackle-eligible play.

0:45:40.810 --> 0:45:41.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I remember that game, yeah.

0:45:41.989 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 5>And it was the biggest comeback in Jets history. I

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 5>had some friends who wanted to leave, and I talked

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 5>them out of it. I still dine out on that one.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Gosh, you must still be tired of that game in

0:45:50.380 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the middle of the night.

0:45:51.140 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 5>It was terrible.

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.700
<v Speaker 2>You know, I haven't really been to a game like that.

0:45:54.860 --> 0:45:57.390
<v Speaker 2>I was at the Garden when Larry Johnson hit the four-pointer.

0:45:57.430 --> 0:45:58.170
<v Speaker 2>I was still there.

0:45:58.290 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 5>We're not leave early guys. We're a stay-late guy.

0:46:00.410 --> 0:46:02.270
<v Speaker 2>I'm a leave-early guy. I'm definitely a leave-early guy. If

0:46:02.290 --> 0:46:04.690
<v Speaker 2>I'm on my own ticket, I want to be traffic,

0:46:04.790 --> 0:46:05.910
<v Speaker 2>but you know what?

0:46:05.930 --> 0:46:06.770
<v Speaker 5>You love a good night's sleep.

0:46:06.790 --> 0:46:08.569
<v Speaker 3>I'm a Philly sports fan, and we haven't had that

0:46:08.590 --> 0:46:09.370
<v Speaker 3>many all-time moments.

0:46:09.530 --> 0:46:11.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, all right, here we go. Here's our next question.

0:46:11.890 --> 0:46:14.750
<v Speaker 5>This is for you, Pearl. Dad's thoughts. Is NIL the

0:46:14.810 --> 0:46:17.210
<v Speaker 5>sole reason why there's more parody in college football than ever?

0:46:17.450 --> 0:46:18.350
<v Speaker 3>I can't think of another one.

0:46:18.750 --> 0:46:21.529
<v Speaker 5>It's really self-explanatory. The depth is spread out all over

0:46:21.570 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 5>the place. The teams restart every year. It's starting to

0:46:24.900 --> 0:46:27.700
<v Speaker 5>resemble the NFL more and more. Is this a good thing?

0:46:27.739 --> 0:46:29.060
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a good thing for the sport.

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 3>I do, too.

0:46:29.900 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think that it's one of the reasons to go.

0:46:31.700 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 2>No one's really complaining too much about 24 teams. But

0:46:34.420 --> 0:46:36.420
<v Speaker 2>there's 24 teams who might be the best team in

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:38.450
<v Speaker 2>the country, or at least more than 12.

0:46:38.450 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's good.

0:46:39.450 --> 0:46:42.150
<v Speaker 2>You know, the only other option is that quarterbacks are

0:46:42.170 --> 0:46:45.390
<v Speaker 2>getting better coaching coming into the college ranks. High school

0:46:45.410 --> 0:46:48.330
<v Speaker 2>has gotten better, better, better. But still, I think NIL

0:46:48.350 --> 0:46:48.910
<v Speaker 2>is the only reason.

0:46:48.930 --> 0:46:50.630
<v Speaker 5>All right, last one, Pro. Here we go. This is

0:46:50.710 --> 0:46:54.410
<v Speaker 5>from Baseball Mafia. Did Lincoln Riley buy himself another year

0:46:54.430 --> 0:46:57.540
<v Speaker 5>Saturday night? No, but he cooled things down quite a bit.

0:46:57.660 --> 0:46:59.529
<v Speaker 5>It is just he will not be a topic this week.

0:46:59.550 --> 0:47:01.410
<v Speaker 5>They have the week off. Now, if they lose to

0:47:01.450 --> 0:47:04.690
<v Speaker 5>Indiana and lose to UCLA, it turns right back around.

0:47:04.710 --> 0:47:06.729
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me ask you this question. Forget they lose

0:47:06.930 --> 0:47:09.310
<v Speaker 2>one of Indiana and UCLA. They miss the playoff.

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Is 8-3 and missing the playoffs keep Lincoln Riley and USC?

0:47:12.900 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine so.

0:47:14.140 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 5>I would be concerned if I was the AD at USC.

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 5>If we get rid of Lincoln Riley, we lose that

0:47:18.140 --> 0:47:18.739
<v Speaker 5>freshman class.

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely.

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 5>That would be my concern.

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.550
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe if you lose to Indiana and UCLA,

0:47:23.610 --> 0:47:25.509
<v Speaker 2>but I think Lincoln is safe if he wants to

0:47:25.550 --> 0:47:25.770
<v Speaker 2>be there.

0:47:25.790 --> 0:47:27.930
<v Speaker 3>Unless he does... You talked about a mutual parting. That

0:47:27.969 --> 0:47:28.690
<v Speaker 3>might make sense, too.

0:47:28.810 --> 0:47:30.790
<v Speaker 5>All right, Pearl, that's it for Constructor Criticism. Send in

0:47:30.810 --> 0:47:33.570
<v Speaker 5>your thoughts on Twitter. But now we go to the feel-good.

0:47:34.210 --> 0:47:37.260
<v Speaker 5>Here we go, Pearl. 24 hours of college basketball. There's

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.980
<v Speaker 5>been college basketball going on all day. Check this out.

0:47:40.660 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 5>This is the service guy at the stadium in Sioux Falls.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.020
<v Speaker 5>The Northern Kentucky basketball team was stuck in an elevator.

0:47:48.219 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no.

0:47:48.980 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 5>For 45 minutes.

0:47:50.610 --> 0:47:51.950
<v Speaker 3>One, two, three, four.

0:47:52.010 --> 0:47:52.240
<v Speaker 8>It's up.

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Big guys, too.

0:47:54.140 --> 0:47:56.580
<v Speaker 5>It looks like a clown car. There's 13 dudes. The

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.410
<v Speaker 5>shortest one's 6'2. How would you do in an elevator?

0:47:59.450 --> 0:48:00.390
<v Speaker 5>You're tall. Drink of water.

0:48:00.670 --> 0:48:02.950
<v Speaker 3>Oh, for 45 minutes with a bunch of 6'6 guys?

0:48:03.030 --> 0:48:03.450
<v Speaker 3>Not well.

0:48:03.610 --> 0:48:03.969
<v Speaker 5>Not well.

0:48:04.070 --> 0:48:05.190
<v Speaker 3>Not well at all. I would hate that.

0:48:05.330 --> 0:48:08.130
<v Speaker 5>And you got water, but that makes another situation by

0:48:08.210 --> 0:48:08.830
<v Speaker 5>having water.

0:48:09.020 --> 0:48:11.700
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and also, too, I mean, listen, if there's three

0:48:11.739 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 2>people in the elevator, then you can figure something out.

0:48:13.460 --> 0:48:15.299
<v Speaker 2>But with 12 guys, there's going to be a lot

0:48:15.340 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 2>of splashing going on.

0:48:16.340 --> 0:48:17.140
<v Speaker 3>I'm not into that.

0:48:17.700 --> 0:48:19.819
<v Speaker 5>Good job by the tech guy getting him up there,

0:48:19.860 --> 0:48:21.299
<v Speaker 5>the service guy, the shop guy.

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:22.140
<v Speaker 3>Saved the day.

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:23.990
<v Speaker 5>You should get a game ball for that. All right,

0:48:24.030 --> 0:48:25.650
<v Speaker 5>tune in to the Dan Patch Show tomorrow to find

0:48:25.690 --> 0:48:27.810
<v Speaker 5>out all about what happened on Monday Night Football. And

0:48:27.850 --> 0:48:29.890
<v Speaker 5>come hang with us on Not So Fast every day

0:48:29.950 --> 0:48:32.430
<v Speaker 5>right here with Fashion Pro. Enjoy the football. Take it easy.