WEBVTT - TSMC Beats Expectations, Raises Revenue Outlook

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>TSMC reports third quarter results, beating expectations and giving a

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>positive outlook, buoyed by strong AI demand.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Glass's trade tensions re escalate between China and the US.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 5>Good president. She's rare US hardbules, but a global pushback.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>And yet another exec departure from Apple with its head

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 3>of the chat GPT. Like AI search efforts going to Meta.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 4>For first ed we dig into the market instead of

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 4>shaking off that trade anxiety and refocusing on the AI trade.

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Of course, you just just TSMC will dig into it.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 4>NASA up three quarters percent with trading higher for two

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 4>straight days. People focus on that and indeed potential talks

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 4>between President Putin and indeed the United States President.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 5>But what are we looking at underneath the hood?

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, TSMC the world's biggest and most important contract manufacturer

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 3>of semiconductors. The news is that it is hypedic sales

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>growth outlook for twenty twenty five for the second time

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 3>this year. Then we look at the shart we open

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>up two percent. We've given off some of those gains

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>if you read on the Bloomberg terminal or some of

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 3>the market stories. The early part of the morning was

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>TSMC driving US up positivity. But the trade story is

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>overtaking a little bit AI demand intact character.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 5>It is, let's just talk about that being an impact.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 4>Bloomos Peter Elstrom, who needs that tech coverage from the US, Europe,

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>in Asia, and Peter, look, TSMC did almost what ASML did.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 5>They said, Look, AI, the.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Mega trends still there even if China pulls away in

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>terms of demand.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a little bit more than that.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 6>CC way, the CEO had this conference call after the

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 6>earnings results and as Ed was talking about, they hike

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 6>their forecast for twenty twenty five for the second time.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 6>Just three months ago, they hike their forecast. And now

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 6>what CC, what you're saying is that this AI mega

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 6>trend is actually getting stronger. They of course are making

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 6>the chips for Nvidia and for many others too, and

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 6>what they're seeing is that the demand for those chips

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 6>is getting stronger. At this point, they're watching the capital

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 6>spending from some of the big customers out there, including

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Open Ai. They realize that in Video is going to

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 6>have to supply those customers, and the trends are going

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 6>up from here. So we're starting to get a fuller

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 6>picture of what's going on in the chips business. We've

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 6>got preliminary results from Samsung earlier this week, and we

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 6>got ASML, the chip equipment maker after that, and now

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 6>we have TSMC, the biggest contract chip manufacturer, which is

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 6>giving us a very strong forecast too.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the demand side, right, Peter. But on

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the supply side, there was lots of interesting information. The

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>two headlines that jump out at me are there massively

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>supply constrained. Capacity is tight, but they're moving really quick

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 3>to expand manufacturing capacity here in the United States.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, it takes a while to build these chip plants.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 6>They've begun construction in the US a few years ago,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 6>and they've now said that they want to build on

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 6>top of that. They want to expand even more than they.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Have in the past.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>But they're trying to add capacity in the US while

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 6>they also build up their capacity in Taiwan right now.

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 6>So it's taken a while for them to bring those

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 6>fabs online and then meet this very strong demand that

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 6>they're getting from customers like Nvidia, also from Apple, they're

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 6>supplying a number. They also make the chips for AMD too,

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 6>as AMD tries to compete with Nvidia, so they're really

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 6>the big beneficiary. They're kind of the picks and shovels

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 6>that are helping with this AI boom.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Look, we are looking at the ADRs a little lower, Peter.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 4>They're at a record high in trading over in Asia.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Is perhaps just a lot already priced in?

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, maybe, as Ed was talking about, there are a

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 6>lot of factors going on in the market right now.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 6>The primary trading forum for TEA SMC shares is in Taiwan,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 6>so we'll see how they do tomorrow as they open

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 6>up there. But the ADRs are getting buffeted a bit.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 6>Probably there are some high expectations going into this. I

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 6>think investors did anticipate that there was going to be

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 6>some pretty strong numbers from TSMC, But on top of that,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 6>there are a lot of trade factors that are playing

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 6>into this. The US China tension certainly kind of overlay

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot of what we are seeing in the market

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 6>right now.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 3>The index Peter Alstrom, Thank you very much. Our next

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>story is trade tensions between China and the US. This

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>is what Treasury Secretary Scott Besson had to say about

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>how negotiations are going, and in particular about one top

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 3>Chinese trade official.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 7>We've had four rounds of talks Geneva, London, Stockholm, and Madrid,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 7>and both sides approached them with great respect, and this

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 7>individual did not. He showed up uninvited and said, quote,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 7>China will cause global chaos if if the poor shipping

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 7>fees go through. So I don't believe that China wants

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 7>to be an agent of chaos. And maybe maybe they

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 7>used to have the wolf warrior diplomats, so maybe he

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 7>thinks he's a wolf warrior.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 8>We don't know.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 2>This is happening.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Is China's decision to unveil export controls and the rare

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>earth supply chain is now sparking a global pushback. Bloomberg

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Senior Tech editor Mike Shepherd joins us to break it

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>all down. Based on what the Treasury Secretary was talking

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 3>about and recent reporting, China sees its hand with rare

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 3>earths as being leverage in a negotiation. There are two

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 3>sides and question Mike is whether China is or is

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:43.559
<v Speaker 3>not overplaying that hand.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, that is a big question right now in the market,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 9>and certainly here in Washington where we're seeing the IMF

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 9>and World Bank meetings being held, in so many global

0:05:54.839 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 9>officials in town to watch these trade negotiations unfold on

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 9>in real time between the US and China with so

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 9>much at stake, and the question is how much of

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 9>an impact there will be on other economies in the

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 9>US is banking on other nations, other trading partners and

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 9>other allies also feeling that pain and joining the US

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 9>and trying to counter whatever China may try to do

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 9>in restricting the shipment and export of rare earth materials

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 9>from China to buyers outside China, and that is something

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 9>that will affect the European Union and other nations and Japan.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 9>We have seen a push led by the US to

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 9>try to get the Group of Seven to somehow counter

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 9>and respond to China's intention here and look what we're

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 9>seeing is even as China is trying to exert some leverage,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 9>the US is also expressing a little bit of skepticism

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 9>about whether this will actually go through. Jamison Greer, the

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 9>US Trade representatives said yesterday he doesn't think China will

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 9>actually take this step, owing to the geopolitical implications and

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 9>the fallout it would have on the global economy. And

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 9>we can see a sign of that step the sism

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 9>in the counteroffer that the US made at the US

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 9>is really only stepping forward with a longer pause and tariffs,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 9>and that's not nearly enough for what Beijing had been

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 9>hoping for. They have been really angling to get a

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 9>relaxation of years of export controls as a result of

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 9>that leverage.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 4>That did seem to be real anger coming from Treasury,

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Sectary Scott VESNT.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Their MinC.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 4>And I'm interested as to reminding us how important the

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 4>hand is that China has when it comes to technology.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 5>The fact that they.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Mine an awful lot of the rare earth, but the

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 4>main point is they also produce and refine most of

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the rare earths.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 9>Well they do, they own, They really hold more than

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 9>half of the world's reserves, and they dominate the refining

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 9>and production of these elements are critical across the economy

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 9>and consumer electronics and automobiles, and in military equipment. Think

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 9>of night vision goggles. You can't run those without some

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 9>rare earths, and so the importance of this is something

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 9>that hits a nerve with trade officials around the world,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 9>but especially with the US, because American officials had thought

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 9>the rare earth's issue have been settled during the last

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 9>round of trade talks, and here China goes, in their view,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 9>reopening it and trying to use it as a last

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 9>minute bit of leverage heading into this all important meeting

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 9>between President Donald Trump and his counterpart Hijiping at the

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 9>end of the month, And rather than seeing a narrowing

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 9>list of trade issues to be resolved heading into that meeting,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 9>we're actually seeing a growing list. And you heard the

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 9>Treasury Secretary talk about the sensitivity around shipping. And there

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 9>is also the question, Carol, of the US move to

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 9>expand coverage of sanctioned firms to include subsidiaries, and that's

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 9>something that hits some of the Chinese champions like Huawei

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 9>and SMIC, and that is something that Beijing also has

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 9>objected to. And we've seen this all play out just

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 9>in the last few weeks, and it raises questions, Carow,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 9>about whether the two leaders can actually sort all of

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 9>this at the end of the month, if and when

0:08:58.640 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 9>they sit down.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 4>If is a big if right now, Mike Shephard, thank

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>you very much. Indeed, from DC, look amid this geopolitical tension,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 4>you are still seeing the markets relatively calm. I'm looking

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 4>at the tech markets up sevent ten percent on the

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 4>nastat one hundred. We've been whipped a little bit about

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the concerns on resurgence, trade frictions more broadly, but the

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 4>AI real feel factor is still there. Angeloukakafas is with

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>us seeing global investment strutres to Edward Jones.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 5>Today is AI winning out.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 10>It is a good tech for a good day for technology.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 10>That the SMC results and guidance provide some confidence in

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 10>the durability of the AI theme. There's no AI related

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 10>slow down, at least not yet, and AI is going

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 10>to remain a kid driver for markets and Joe.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the most read stories today on the Bloomberg

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>terminal and on the website is Ken Griffin, the founder

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>of hedge fund in Citadel saying that jen AI is

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 3>not helping hedge funds beat them market with astonishing returns.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>We're going to pull up what it is that he said.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 3>But as somebody that is in the markets as a strategist,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 3>your reaction to that news story and also what Jeni

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>better than you in strategy.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 10>I don't think we're quite there yet. We are still

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 10>in our view in the early stages of adoption. Of course,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of spending going in now to make

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 10>this technology and incorporated. But thinking about major technology firms

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 10>and really many different businesses, including in finance, they are

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 10>all requiring their operating system to incorporate AI. So it

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 10>will take a little bit while to see productivity gains,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 10>but we do think that these gains are on the way.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 10>Of course, from an investment standpoint, we need to be

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 10>ware of complacency or euphoria. At some point that's going

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 10>to be increased competitions and overbuilding over capacity. We are

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 10>not quite there yet, but something to what's out for

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 10>and I think the reaction in the c SMC results

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 10>in the stock today, the meat reaction reflects the high expectations.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So it's the two very distinct story, right, how market

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>participants use AI and then the impact of the ALI

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 3>story on markets. But you went there with TSMC, So

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 3>what did that sort of outlook from them tell you

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 3>about the staying power of this cycle?

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I do think it provides confidence that this will continue,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 10>especially thinking about the next six to twelve months only

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 10>the direction of travel force spending is higher, and there's

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 10>a lot of push for many different businesses and industries

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 10>to incorporate AI. So I think that the mega trend

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 10>of adoption remains alive and well. And yes, we can

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 10>debate all day about valuations, but the results speak for themselves,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 10>especially as we enter a key earning season.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>We don't have all day, but let's debate where would

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 4>you go? Evaluations are high for some of the big names.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So we favor a Barbel approach.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 10>So having continue to participate in this AI long term

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 10>secular theme as I would call it, but at the

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 10>same time, for especially new capital, start to complement portfolios

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 10>with areas of the market that have been left behind,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 10>and that could include value style investments, small cap stocks

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 10>that may benefit from the Federal Reserve rebooting its rate

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 10>cutting cycle. So having this balanced approach and again avoid

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 10>chasing some of the unprofitable, more speculative parts of the market.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 4>What is the catalyst for those speculative parts of the

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 4>market to actually be popped? Do you think that we

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>can remain irrational for a little bit longer if you

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 4>see it that way, you know.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 10>As they say, you can only tell a bubble kind

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 10>of with the benefit of hindsight. But at the same time,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 10>there's some key differences between now and the late nineties.

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 10>A lot of these companies that are doing all these

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 10>heavy spending, they are financing that from their own cast

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 10>from operations, so not that finance. They are very mature,

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 10>profitable businesses, and they have a diversified stream of revenue.

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 10>So we're not quite there yet. Valuations are not at extremes,

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 10>But at the same time, markets are going to be

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 10>sensitive to any news about return on investment from all

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 10>this spending that is taking place, and also paying attention

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.479
<v Speaker 10>to science of euphoria, which we do not see yet.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 3>In this environment anger. I think we should continue to

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about tariffs. The idea when the President took office

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 3>in January was that consumers would take on the burden

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 3>of tariffs, right because companies would raise prices across all

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 3>sorts of domains. That hasn't really materialized. What has been

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 3>impact impacted is the labor market in different ways. Are

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the people of cutting back, how are you reading that

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 3>play out right now?

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeh, couple of things here about prices. As we navigated

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 10>the very period of high uncertainty, especially in April and May,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 10>companies really try to absorb a lot of that and

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 10>not pass these increased costs to the consumer. Now that

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 10>we have a little more clarity, we may see a

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 10>little more even distribution of these increase in costs. We

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 10>have seen goods prices increase, but at the same time

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 10>they increase. The apptic in inflation remains manageable now as

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 10>it relates to the labor market. We remain in a

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 10>low hiring and low firing mode. The labor market remains balanced.

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 10>Corporate Corporate profits remain at record highs, even as we've

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 10>seen a significant slowdown in hiring, which to me applies

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 10>productivity gains, so we do not expect a major uptick

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 10>in unemployment. Companies have been very profitable, so they have

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 10>really no pressure to continue to cut costs to protect

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 10>margins because margins again aurt all time highs. But something

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 10>to monto, there's going to be some disruption from AI,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 10>But so far it seems like only a small part

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 10>of that slowdown in the laboral market is because of AI,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 10>or you know, Tarish for.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>That matter, and I take you, I ask you, that

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>takes us nicely into earning season that's about to hit

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>us hard next week. Angelocal cofas of Edward Jones, thank

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>you very very much. Indeed, Okay, coming up, Salesforce looks

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 3>to reinsure investors worried the company could lose out in

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the AI boom. We have more on Salesforce next. This

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 5>Salesforce shares.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 4>As you can see, they spite this morning after chief

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 4>financial and operating officer Robin Washington has said the company

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 4>expects to return to double digit revenue growth in the

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 4>coming years.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 5>More in the company's outlook.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Brodie Ford, who covers enterprise software companies.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 4>It's still down a quarter so far this year in

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 4>terms of its market cap, but some reassuring points that

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 4>to reacceleration of growth exactly.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this is a stock that was beat up

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 11>thirty percent year to date yesterday, and so it's up

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 11>seven today and that's pretty cool, but it's still investors

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.239
<v Speaker 11>are a little anxious whether these kind of traditional application

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 11>leaders like Salesforce are going to be the ones to

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 11>successfully sell ai products. We got a decent outlook from

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 11>Salesforce yesterday, but you know, it's not a resounding celebration.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 11>At this point.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 3>You've been reporting on the close relationship between open ai

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and Oracle and how maybe the publicly traded and at

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>this stage slightly bigger of the two is helping that

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 3>company navigate chip export controls.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know? It's interesting.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 11>I mean, Oracle is kind of a famous lobbyist, right

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 11>they know Washington, They're pretty tight with the Trump admin

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 11>right now. And yesterday open ai said when we're having

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 11>trouble getting chips into UAE or Argentina, we call up

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 11>Oracle and they are the ones that have kind of

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 11>been able to help us get our chips around the world.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 11>And we found that pretty interesting because our arcle is

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 11>playing an increasingly large role in open Aiyes in for

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 11>a bill.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Out Bloomberg's Brady Ford across a lot of stories, thank

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Another top top story, Apple can't catch

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 3>an AI break. The executive who is in charge of

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 3>developing a chat GPT like search feature within Apple is

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>stepping down and heading to Meta. That's according to sources.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 3>For more, bloombergs Mark gunman who brokes that story joins us. Now,

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 3>who is this executive and how significant is it Mark

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 3>that he's jumping to Meta.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is keying.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 8>And to give you an idea of how significant this is,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 8>we've talked about maybe a dozen Apple AI departures over

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 8>the last few months. This is probably the most significant

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 8>or second most significant of that group. This person was

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 8>a direct purport to John g and Andrea, the senior

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 8>VP who runs all of AI at Apple. This person

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 8>was actually put into their role only a few weeks

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 8>ago when his predecessor, Robbie Walker left Apple. Walker had

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 8>been in charge of Siri, but he was removed from

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 8>being in charge of Siri in March after the major

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 8>delays and the blowback against Apple Intelligence.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 12>And then he.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 8>Started a new team called AKI Answers Knowledge and Information,

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 8>and that team is focused on AI powered web search tools,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 8>so basically adding chat, GPT, perplexity, Gemini like functionality to

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 8>Siri and other parts of the Apple operating system. And

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 8>Yang he became in charge of that program just a

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 8>few weeks ago. Before that, he was running the search

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 8>related functionality, then he was running the whole thing. And

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 8>so now Apple's AI team is going through another major

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 8>reorganization in light of that significant departure.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 4>And a key line in your story is several of

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 4>the Apple team members think that this is going to

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 4>continue to happen, more departures to come.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 2>This is going to keep happening.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean the core team developing the models underlying Apple Intelligence.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 8>It's a team called AFM or Apple Foundation Models. They've

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 8>been breeding bleeding talent since July. The creator of that

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 8>team and the person who ran that team, Roman Paying.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 8>He left for a two hundred and fifty million dollar

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 8>multi year pay package and is now a senior AI

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 8>executive at Meta. Since his departure, they've lost about a

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 8>dozen people. I'm told there's several other people on that

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 8>team continuing to interview. Other people are going to met

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 8>Us still. Other people are going to start ups Open

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 8>AI and Google. We've been reporting this out as these

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 8>departures have been happening, and these new companies have been

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 8>hiring these folks, and this is going to continue, given

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 8>the pay packages that these competitors are offering, and given

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 8>the embarrassments that Apple's AI AI efforts have become for

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 8>some of these people actually working on them.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Mark you've come on Bloomberg Tech and you've broken all

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 3>these stories about people to Apple. A reasonable question and

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>we just have sixty seconds, is is there actually anyone

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 3>left at Apple of notes working on AI.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 12>Oh.

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 8>Apple has tons of folks. They're working on acquisitions to

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 8>try to refuel the ranks there. John g and Andrea,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 8>despite their being rumors and discussions about him stepping down,

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 8>are being pushed out of the company for several months now,

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 8>he remains in charge.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>He may not be.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 8>There for long, as I'm told that Apple has been

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 8>looking for outside replacements for him, but for now he's there.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 8>Creig Federighi, who runs all software engineering, has now taken

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 8>an ownership role over all the AI.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Strategy at Apple.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 8>Mike Rockwell, who created the Vision pro he's heavily involved

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 8>in the AI strategy there now too. So yeah, they

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 8>have definitely had folks, but it's just about refueling the

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 8>ranks and putting the right people in place. But certainly

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 8>this is another considerable setback to Meta's game potentially.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 5>As always, we thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, coming up potentially catastrophic breach of a US based

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 4>cybersecurity firm it's being blamed on Chinese state backed hackers.

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 5>That detail and the fallout.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Next, this is Bloomberg, Bloomberg Tech, and it's time now

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech and first up. US cybersecurity provider F

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 4>five disclosed that Nation state hackers from.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 5>China breached its networks and gained.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Long term, persistent access to certain systems, including source code now.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 5>The breach prompted warnings from the.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 4>US and UK authorities, describing the attack as a significant

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>cyber threat that could be used.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 5>To exploit vulnerabilities.

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Plus, Uber is giving some drivers in the US the

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 4>option to earn money by completing tasks related to the

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 4>companies new data labeling business. This is an area where

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the rideshare giant sees an opportunity to shine in the

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 4>AI boom. And Microsoft is pushing Windows users to talk

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 4>to their computers. But the company is rolling out a

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 4>new AI voice feature activated by saying hey, Copilot. It's

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 4>part of a broader effort to rebuild Windows around AI,

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>including expanding use of tool including copalant Vision, which lets

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 4>software see what's on a user's screen.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Ed Okay, coming out, We've got a riddle for you.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 3>How do stocks get weaker? And more valuable. More on

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 3>how the AI boom is impacting equity dilution next, Also

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>quick look at markets right.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 2>The story has been.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Split between the early part of the day where TSMC's

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 3>outlook was really boosting US, but TSMC US listed shares

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>at least have fallen away. The market is modestly higher.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 3>There was some sort of nervousness and now calm about

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>what is happening in trade talks between US and China.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Will continue to track those stories throughout the range of

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the show.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 2>This has been big Tech. Welcome back to bloombog Tech.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Our top story is TSMC, the world's biggest, most important

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 3>contract manufacturer of semiconductors. It's US listed shares are now

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>down a percent. They had opened up two percent and

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>quickly fell away.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>The story is.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>That they have for the second time this year, hiked

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>their sales growth outlook to the mid thirty percent range

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty five, and the writing on the Bloomberg

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 3>terminal is really clear. That's given the market at large

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of optimism about the outlook for AI and demand. Remember,

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 3>TSMC is the contract manufacturer of Nvidia chips as an example,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 3>not doing much for their own US listed shares, though

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it's an important one that will stick with.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Caraen we will.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 4>Let's just turn our attention back to that riddle that

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 4>you left us with, ed because unusually, well usually we

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 4>see a company's equity gets diluted. We tend to see

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 4>investor Sara on the stock. But the AI boom has

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 4>turned that on its head. Take a look at Intel shares.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 4>August is when the chip maker began selling newc to

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 4>the US government from SoftBank and Nvidia wanted to Bloomberg calculations.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 4>That waters down the stake of existing investors by around

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 4>fourteen percent.

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 5>So why are shares up so much?

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Markets reporter common Rhyinicky has been answering the red ule

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 4>and it's just all about the AI boom.

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it really is. So it basically boils down to,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 12>you know, Intel was really not doing very well. It stocked,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 12>was very beaten down. There was a lot of worries

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 12>about how the company was going to turn itself around.

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 12>And this new influx, this new cash on the balance

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 12>sheet is really positive and investors are saying, basically, we'd

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 12>rather own eighty five percent of something than you know,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 12>zero percent or one hundred percent of nothing. Right, So

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 12>it's basically this idea that this is going to help

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 12>the company grow more, that it's going to do better

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 12>in the future, and so taking a little bit of

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 12>dilution on the profits is okay for now.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Commen.

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 3>This is about hype and the golden tickets of AI.

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 3>You write in your story about AMD gets its partnership

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>with open AI, Intel gets its partnership and investment from Nvidia.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 2>The stock story is history from that point.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's so true. And AMD shares are up, you know,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 12>just as much forty three percent, you know, since that

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 12>deal was announced, and you know, Intel's been up ninety

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 12>percent just since the end of August. So we're seeing

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 12>so much enthusiasm about AI and all of these deals,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 12>even though they're in such rapid succession, have been really beneficial.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 12>Investors are excited about it. They want to be buying

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 12>into these shares, and they want to see the growth

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 12>going forward.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloem moost Calm, and Ryan Key, thank you very much.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Meta has announced plans to build a new gigawatts scale

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>data center in Texas, committing more than one point five

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars to the project. The investment marks the social

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 3>media giants twenty ninth data center and underscores it's pushed

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 3>to keep pace in the rapidly evolving AI race. The

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 3>news comes mid a wave of major data center announcements yesterday,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 3>including a Microsoft ndscale partnership, a new collaboration between Coreweave

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 3>and Paul Side, and a forty billion dollar consortium acquisition

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of a ligned data centers. Here to discuss their identity

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>center further, Nancy Tegler Laffer Tengler Investment CEO, who says, quote,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>it's about the power stupid Okay, hit me with that thesis.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 13>Oh and do you always find the right nugget to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 13>pull out?

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Well, I mean, look, there's expected to be I

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 14>mean Open AI has said they need twenty gigawatts of power.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 14>At sixteen billion per two gigawatts, that's a fair amount

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 14>of change. And then you have all of these just

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 14>using Texas as an example, you have all of these

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 14>companies opening data centers in Texas.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 13>It's kind of the perfect place.

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 14>Horizon is the only one that comes with its own

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 14>power source, which is natural gas on the Mitchell family

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 14>Longfellow ranch. And so that's great news, but powers a

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 14>lot of power is going to be needed for the

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 14>rest and Texas already has a grid problem.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 13>So we are looking at Laffer Tangler, at names.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 14>To names that can that can solve some of the

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 14>data center problems and some of the grid problems that

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 14>are coming with this major buildout.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 13>And photonics is a hope. It's not yet.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 14>We're not yet there in reducing power consumption, and buildouts

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 14>are are critical. What we heard from Oracle recently, from

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 14>the co CEOs was that you know, it's not about

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 14>demand demand, it's about supply.

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 13>They can't get these data centers built fast enough.

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to the promise of photonics, because you're already

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 4>looking at a particular company cohere. Remind us of what

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the thesis is there, Nancy, and how quickly you think

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 4>it can become a reality.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so that's the question, Caroline, I mean, Coherent is

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 14>you know, really focused on building photonics around the quantum

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 14>computing needs, which is just going to add another layer

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 14>onto this whole power question. And so what we've done

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 14>we've launched a new strategy called Macrocycle Opportunities and we

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 14>have four themes space, robotics, quantum and nuclear and in

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 14>that we are trying to identify the companies that are

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 14>going to drive the next wave of transformation overlaid with

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 14>AI because it's essential to many of those themes, or

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 14>most of those themes.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 13>So coherence. One.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 14>One of the other names that is important to us

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 14>is not a photonics name, but is quantum services. We

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 14>own that in our twelfth best we own it in macrocycle,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 14>and we own it in our growth portfolio. They've got

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 14>a thirty six billion dollar backlog in modernizing existing grids

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 14>or power providers.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Nazi, You're doing what so much of the market is

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 4>having to do right now, which is have a lot

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 4>of hope baked into these forward looking not only promises

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 4>of the actual returns on investment in AI, but promise

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>of photonics, promise of quantum. What is the fundamental research

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 4>you bring to bear to be like? These are good bets.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 13>Well, so what we've done. And I didn't answer your

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 13>question on timing, I don't know, Caroline. I mean it

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 13>could be. The expectation is it could be a decade.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 14>But we've seen things accelerate so quickly, and the excellent

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 14>CEO at AI World yesterday said we're going to see

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 14>more transformation in the next ten years in the last

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 14>one hundred. But what we've done in constructing the portfolio

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 14>is we've established leaders and they are about forty to

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 14>fifty percent of the portfolio. So thinking quantum IBM, which

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 14>is a pretty low risk business model, and then the enablers,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 14>which is a coherent and then the speculative names and

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 14>that would be Ion, q Righetti, all of those names.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 14>So the objective is and that's ten to fifteen to

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 14>twenty percent, and then enablers are twenty to twenty five.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 14>So we're trying to mitigate risk by existing build positions

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 14>in existing technologies that are already reproducing earnings and then

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 14>couple that with names that are speculative.

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Nan we started this conversation about the news of Meta's

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 3>latest or twenty ninth data center a gig or what

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 3>in Texas. You have the small if my Bloomberg terminal

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>data is correct position in Meta, but they are not

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>a hyperscaler, right, so how do you view that build

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 3>out that they're doing and the attractiveness in the broader

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 3>thesis you've just outlined to us.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 14>Well, so we do own a very small bit ed

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 14>but if you recall we've talked about this in the

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 14>past where we sold the majority of our holdings because

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 14>we felt like the business model and we were wrong

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 14>by the way. We felt like the business model of

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 14>advertising was not where we wanted to be, and then

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 14>they pivoted to AI and I think.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 13>That's what's driving these investments.

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 14>And they've been pretty successful at attracting a number of

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 14>high leveled executives from many companies, but in particular Apple.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 14>So I think that for us is you know, we

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 14>pivoted to Spotify. I think we actually did better with Spotify,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 14>But the point is that we've we missed the meta

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 14>run and I think the question now is can they

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 14>convert it to revenues And I.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 13>Think that's going to be the challenge.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 14>However, Mark Mahaney just published a piece that shows EBIT

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 14>per employee in revenue per employee at Meta, Amazon, Microsoft,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 14>and Google is up massively and that goes to the

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 14>bottom line. So I think the jury is still out

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 14>on how they're going to monetize all of this, but

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 14>we'll see. I mean, they're making the investments in people

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 14>and in capex.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Nancy just very very quick is Elon's pay pack is

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>going to get voted through.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 14>I think so, I hope so. I like to be

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 14>aligned with the CEO as a shareholder.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Nancy Tegler, we appreciate it so much. Lafa Tengra investments

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 4>great time on the show Coming up, the CEO of

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Startup Upgrade joins us to discuss the company's leasest running

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 4>ground and what changed in the fintech market since his

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 4>day's running Lending Club isys.

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Bluembg tech.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Fintech Startup Upgrade has just closed a one hundred and

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>sixty five million dollar Series G funding round that gives

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the company a seven point three billion dollar pre money valuation. Upgrade,

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>which offers mobile banking, credit card and other financial services,

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 3>was founded by former Lending Club CEO and co founder

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Reno Laplanche.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:30.719
<v Speaker 2>He joins us now in San Francisco.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Over the last couple of years, actually, Caroline and I've

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 3>tracked very closely the valuation of private I wouldn't even

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 3>say just fintech, you know, it's more specific modern banking services,

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>multi platform offering. But just to start, why raise that money,

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 3>what do you need it for?

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 2>How does it help out with growth?

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 15>Now? So we're in the fortunate situation of being cash

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 15>flow positive, so we didn't need might say that. Yes,

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 15>but as we think about the evolution of the company,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 15>we're sort of getting closer to taking the company public.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 15>This is probably our last sort of pre IPO raise,

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 15>so it's a good opportunity to sort of check on

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 15>where we stood in terms of building up Shaoulder value

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 15>and also create an opportunity for liquidity for existing employees

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 15>prior to an IPO.

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 3>It's quite a definitive statement our last pre IPO raise.

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>So you have a plan in place in a roadmap

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:31.239
<v Speaker 3>to do that.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean no certainty obviously, it always depends on

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 15>the market and on our own sort of growth in

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 15>the next twelve to eighty a month. But we're yeah,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 15>we're feeling good about the direction a go, Nald.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting is the way in which Upgrade gets

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 4>new customers. In many ways, you're casually positive because in

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 4>many ways looking for that profitability metric because you don't

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 4>have to spend loads of marketing because you partner with

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 4>big businesses. Just tell us about how the business model

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 4>has help to weather what has been a real downturn

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 4>for other neobanks during the twenty twenty one earlier era

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 15>That's right, Caroline. That's really what makes a great unique

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 15>is our mutile product, multi channel strategy. So we're fortunate

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 15>to have six different products, mobile banking, credit cards, personal loans,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 15>and then sort of indirect products like BNPL, home improvement

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 15>financing and auto loans where we work with partners to

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 15>deliver financing at the point of seal. And increasingly these

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 15>sort of indirect products already of turning into good source

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 15>of customer acquisitions where we can acquire a customer for

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 15>a not a loan at a local dealer, of home

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 15>improvement financing, at a local roofer person who installed new windows,

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 15>and don't become upgreade customers, and we can self intern

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 15>sort of benefit from all of great products, including credit cards,

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 15>including mobile banking. So we really created that sort of

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 15>ecosystem that benefits from multiple products.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.959
<v Speaker 4>And many know you from Lending Club. Was it those

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 4>relationships that helped you on the other side? Could you

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 4>repackage these loans, perhaps sell them in bulk to well

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 4>a community bank if it's relatively risk free, or onto

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 4>a private equity house if it's relatively risky, And I

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 4>think auto loans come to mind when we're thinking about risk.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:25.479
<v Speaker 5>At this moment.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 15>That's right, right. So we've i think helped sort of

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 15>provide forty five billion in nouns since we started. It's

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 15>not all on our balance sheet. So we are certainly

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 15>sort of setting loans to loan buyers, and that include

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 15>a very broad range of buyers from small banks and

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 15>community banks and credit unions that are going to focus

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.720
<v Speaker 15>on the sort of safest loans to sort of private

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 15>credit funds, securitization structures where you can allocate the risks

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 15>differently and where of investors might might be willing to

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 15>chase a higher yield.

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Reno jurisdictionally, would you just reflect on on the experience

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>of leading this company in this startup, What is it

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 3>like being a neo bank under the Trump administration?

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>For example?

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Are they friendly and cooperative in the things that you

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 3>want to do versus their governance of traditional banks?

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 15>So, yeah, it's certainly a very business friendly environment right now.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 15>But some of that translates into media a little bit

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 15>less stringent of regulations at the federal level, but lending

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 15>is also regulated at the state level, and I think

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 15>whatever relax relax standards where we're getting on the federal

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 15>h stage, where where we're not getting at a state level.

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 15>So so state regulators I think fielled that vacuum left

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 15>by federal regulators to to to a certain point. So

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 15>I don't think there's a sort of meaningful change in

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 15>how sort died the regulatory environment is.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 4>No memories are short, but I just want you to

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 4>reflect from an on lending club and what you learn

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 4>that briefly, because there were issues then.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 5>You did have to step down. I'm interested is to

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 5>what you've learned from it.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 15>Oh yeah, so much. Yeah, So I think the lending

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 15>club was really the first sort phase of fintech, right,

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 15>it was really sort of building up an entirely new industry.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 15>We've so very uncertain. Regulatory and compliance framework upgrade ten

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 15>years later has really been part of that sort of

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 15>second phase of the industry, whereas more efforts of established framework,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 15>established rules of the game, and I think we've we've

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 15>all been benefiting from from that, and the fintech industry

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 15>has been able to grow and and not really be

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 15>a sort of strong challenger.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Truly.

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.720
<v Speaker 15>Some more traditional banking industry.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate the answer, and O Laplanche come back, CEO of Upgrade,

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 4>We thank you now.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 5>Coming up.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic reportedly looks to raise even more money, particularly from

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East.

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 5>We're on that next. As a Bloomberg Tech.

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic is reportedly in talks about a Debbi based investment

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>firm MGX to raise additional capital, just weeks after completing

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 3>a funding round that valued the AI startup at one

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty three billion dollars all. According to sources,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 3>CEO Dario m Oday met with MGF executives during a

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 3>recent tour of the Middle East, joining us as Bloomberg

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Shering Gafari. This is something you and I have been

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 3>reporting out together. The way i'd summarize it, you give

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 3>us the details is need money, need compute, make some

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>friends across the Middle East.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 13>That's right.

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 16>It's never too early, I think for these AI companies

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 16>to start thinking about the next funding round, even if

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 16>they're weeks before they've closed the last one, and you know,

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 16>we're talking about you know, the billions at this point.

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 16>Anthropics last round they raised thirteen billion at one hundred

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 16>and eighty three billion valuation. If you're thinking about what

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 16>kinds of pools of capital are out there at that scale.

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 16>The Middle East is increasingly sort of one of the

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 16>only remaining pools that's going to make those kinds of

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 16>investments at that level in the still unprofitable, still somewhat used, risky,

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 16>right AI companies Suan.

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting, and as you and Ed make clear in

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 4>the story is Katsa had been a pool of capital

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 4>for them previously, but they had to make amends for

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 4>previous choice words when it came to other Middle East

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 4>pools of capital.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 13>That's right.

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 16>Zoanthropics CEO Dario Amedi has you know, in the past

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 16>made comments There is a memo to his own staff

0:39:55.960 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 16>saying that acknowledging that sort of fundraising in or that

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 16>they would be taking money in the Middle East and

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 16>there are trade offs there and that the company would

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 16>sort of have to come to terms with the fact

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 16>that not everything that they do will always be helping democracies,

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 16>that it may help dictators, and so of course with

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 16>the Middle East, you know, having a different sort of.

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 13>Set of governments, that is a new reality.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 16>I think for these CEOs of AI companies that they

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 16>may be making deals with countries that have different and

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 16>maybe more undemocratic systems, right than here in the US.

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 5>And they shrink fari. We thank you very much.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 4>And let's just say with Anthropic, because the AI startup

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 4>founded by former Open AI executives.

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Of course we just mentioned.

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Daria, there's also Daniella Ramade and a handful of others

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 4>is under a new scrutiny from the White House as

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 4>it doubles down on its mission of building safe, steerable AI.

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 4>White House ais are that David Sachs took to ex

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 4>acusing Anthropic of running a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 4>on fear mungery and blaming the company for a few

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 4>a state regulatory frenzy that's hurting startups topic of Dave

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 4>Lee's leader's Bloomberg opinion article and he joins US now.

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 4>And David sax was responding to a recent essay written

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 4>by another co founder of Anthropic could come from Open AI,

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 4>and let's just talk about what Jack had been posted.

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 17>Yes, this is Jack Clark, one of the co founders,

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 17>their current head of policy as well.

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 10>And in this essay, you.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 17>Know, he goes over some of his fears about AI

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 17>and he may sort of metaphors around sort of being

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 17>scared of the of the Dark essentially as a kid

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 17>and sort of comparing the future of AI in some

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 17>ways to the dark and not quite knowing you know,

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 17>what shape it's going to take, what the risks are.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 17>And it seems, you know, this is this isn't the

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 17>first time David Sachs has kind of spoken badly off

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 17>anthropic and what it's doing is scratching this itch to

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 17>David sax And it seems the White House has the

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 17>anthropic is it's kind of separate from the tech world

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 17>in a lot of this, you know, we're not seeing

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 17>anthropic leadership at many of these White House events. They're

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 17>not going to you know, the been released with Trump

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 17>in the same that as Jensen Huang has. They're certainly

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 17>not handing him a small trophy like Tim Cook did

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 17>in the Over Office recently, and that now has kind

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 17>of put a bit of a target on their back.

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 17>I think is this sort of standalone AI company that

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 17>likes to think it has perhaps stronger principles on safety

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 17>than Open Ai and so many others.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Dave, this is a story that's in the zeitgeist. To

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 3>borrow Tom keenism. It's playing out on social media. There

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 3>are other people beyond David Sachs weighing in on it again,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 3>it's a little bit repetitive, but just explain the grievance

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the issue here that these kind of tech figures have

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 3>with Jack and his essay and an Anthropic.

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 17>Well, look, there was for the longest time these sort

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 17>of two camps in AI that one would say, you know,

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 17>slow this down, let's do this deliberately, do bit safely.

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 17>The others say, no, let's be accelerationist. Let's just innovate

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 17>as quickly as we can and treat the problems as

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.760
<v Speaker 17>they come and solve some of so many problems with AI.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 17>And the way that's going to manifested in a more

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 17>practical sense is that you have states like California that

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 17>have recently made into law several bills related to AI.

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 17>One in particular was Senate Bill fifty three, which is

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 17>about transparency, is about protecting whistleblowers. Anthropic stood alone in

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 17>endorsing that bill. Open a Eye sort of begrudgingly said

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 17>they could live with it after the fact, but Anthropic

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 17>was the only company to say, yes, we think this

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 17>is a good idea. Now, their preference would be for

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 17>a federal law that would stop there being individual laws

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 17>in different states around the country, and that's obviously what

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 17>David sax wants as well. But Anthropic are saying, look,

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 17>if you want to do a federal law, let's see it,

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 17>let's have it in Congress, let's see what that is.

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 17>Until then, we're happy to back what little legislation is

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 17>happening in California, even if that means it might make

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 17>things more complicated for the AI companies.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Opinion columnist Davely with the latest Thank you very much.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Carra

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 3>what an addition it was.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 4>It was, and yet more focus on data centers and

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 4>indeed growth of AI.

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Do not forget to check out our podcast.

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Find it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 4>and iHeart from New York.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 5>For San Francisco. This is Bluemberg Tech