WEBVTT - Surveillance: Flight to Quality With Rabobank's Foley

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jailey.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Try

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Ask joining us now Skybridge Capital Coucy I Troy, big

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>news out of Europe, a second wife, potentially a second

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>dip looking at the restrictions coming out of the continent

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>as well. How are you processing the news this morning, Troy? Yeah, well,

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's bad. I mean from a standpoint of the

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic you know, resurging over Europe, which as you guys

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>remember back in March led the u S resurgence at

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the time, and and remember the big left tail risk

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for markets for quite some time now has been a

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>significant resurgence above expectations, coupled with the potential for a

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more stimulus right. And so you know, up until today,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>most of the selling we've seen from the two kind

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of tops we had in late August in mid September

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have been tied to the fact that fiscal stimulus was

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>being priced out of the markets, and one day was

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the day where it was effectively priced out completely prior

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to the election, and now with a combination and resurgence

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and any of I mentioned this, equities are only off

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>six from the recent high. We were about twenty three

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. You know, there could be more downside as

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we closed the month into early next month UM, prior

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to the election UM, and then hopefully post election will

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>get more clarity on the stimulus side and the pandemic

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.279
<v Speaker 1>will be at somewhat under control at that point, Troy,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>your charm is to know what people are doing with

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>their money. What are alternative investors doing right now with

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>their money? Are they loading up on growthiness, are they

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>making rotations? And is anybody making alpha? Well? I think

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think in general right prior to the past two months,

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>risk on was very much the mantra of the day

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for hedge funds. There was quite a bit of risk

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>being taken in tech in particular, but not only they

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>are broader beta and as we've moved closer to the election,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>managers of de risk modestly they've taken down their growth

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in their net exposures. But directly to your point, Um,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concern arguably for the industry right now is

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>how crowded techniques have been because that's been such a

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>significant profit driver. But the problem there is that no

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one really knows when that reversal will come. Will be

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by higher interest rates which look unlikely, will be

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by a more significant reopening of the economy hard

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to say so. In the meanwhile, growth still favored over value,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>although that's starting to change a little bit. And then

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>within regard to alpha, you know, it depends on the strategy.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Right In general, the hedgeman industry has had the best

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>alpha year really since two thousand thirteen, if not before

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, because you've had so much dispersion in the

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>equity market in particular, which is still a very heavy focus,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and you have had big sector winners and big sector losers.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, many of the credit

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>managers that got hit back in March have really made

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a significant portion of their losses back and the outlook

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there looks good. So it has been a fairly strong

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>healtha year for the hedge fund industry. Troy David Ironhorne

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of green Light Capital yesterday at the conference has been

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>going on the Robin Hood Conference, said that tech was

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in a bubble, that it probably already peaked in September,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and that he is shorting a certain overpriced I p

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>o s as he sees them as well as other

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>more peripheral tech companies. Are you getting on that train? Well, look,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a lot of growth or tech exposure

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, we do have it through some long

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>short multi strategy exposures. The problem is is really not

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in a bubble per se. It's nothing like the late

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>nineties where you had these weak, dramatically overvalued companies, many

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of the case, in many cases had no business case.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We're at a period where the strong techniques are very

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>good businesses and continue to grow margins for the most part.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But but you do have very elevated valuations, right and

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so when the SUPs at twenty three times four earnings

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NASTACS five seven multiple points higher, that just

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>set yourself up for for near term weakness. But in

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of having some significant bear market over the short term,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we think is unlikely. So with all due respect to

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Mr Iron Moore, and we could be in for you know,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a prolonged correction, but we're in for nothing like we

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>had you know, two thousand o two, which was you know,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty down Beau the trot for the SNP with the

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC down to eighty. We just think that's very unlikely.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be very careful if you're over

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>your skis in terms of tech exposure. You know, the

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>next two three months can be pretty painful. But I

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>think the point that on Hones, Mike and Osa you

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>bring up the nineties, that the ninet nineties shouldn't be

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the bench amount for whether we're in a bubble or

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>not because it was sub Cristy thirty years ago. Troy.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>The question is asking is whether we are moving just

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of sentiment from great towards complacency. You look

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>at across fixed income and the universe right now, can

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>you identify I that shift from great to complacen? Say,

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what would that look like? Well, look, in terms of

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, I think you're starting to see prices adjust

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for worst growth, lower probability of stimulus, and that's why

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the curve flat and combined with the pandemic complacency.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say the term would be more

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>exuberance like we had in August. I mean August was

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>a month where you had very frothy behavior in markets.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You had many parable behavior, not only in broader indices,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but also in some of the larger cap tech names

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, many of them type of the pandemic. So

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>that was arguably the peak froth, and then you started

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to build it back up a little bit last week,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and now you're seeing some of the froth come out.

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>We just don't see complacency in terms of you know,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>managers being very comfortable with their risk and not factoring

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in all the various risks that are coming about. You know, again,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>people have been de risking modestly going into the election.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's necessarily complacency. Um, it's just

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that the froth that was built up in August has

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>not quite come out, and we might need to have

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>three to five percent more downside and SMP to kind

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of clear out some of that excess. Getting about half

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of that right now, Troy right to catch up, so

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get to see its capital. Thank you, Troy. I appreciate it,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>said like, do you want to mention gold hammered down

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one eight oil cannot find a bit. Daniel Morris has

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>seen this before with BMP, Perry Bond. We notice service

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to t I A craft over the years. The chief

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>market strategies for BMP, Perry bout Daniel. I like what

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you're say in your note about the Transatlantic partition. The

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>p m I numbers are different. Is Europe in recession? Well,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly the risk of that happening in the fourth quarter

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>has gone up, is going up. You know, we had

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about the different shapes of the recovery several months ago,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and it does look more and more likely that you

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>may well see a W in Europe, if not necessarily

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US. If we do get that W, that

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>W double dip down, what does that mean for your

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 1>allocation to Europe in the next few quarters. Well, currently

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we're we're overweight US and emerging markets as opposed to

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe in our multass or portfolios. I think that you know,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>simply reflects that risk that you see in Europe. Uh

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And in addition to that, the relative lack of tools

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>options in Europe to compensate for that being monetary stimuluspit

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>fysical similar cities don't have as many lovers as you

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>see in China or in the US for that matter.

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>The fear that I think a lot of people have

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Dan, And I'm not saying what the probability

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of it happening is you can talk to me about that,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is that Europe's present right now is in America's near

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>term future. Does it have to be that way? Dan,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two things we really need to keep

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in mind. When there's just the evolution of the pandemic itself,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>number of infections, number of deaths and so on. Uh.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And from that point of view, I think it is

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly a possibility that Europe is just ahead of the

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>curve in this and so this is what we're going

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to see in the US. But what's really going to

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>matter more for the markets is a reaction to and

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's really been the story all along. It's the restrictions

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that are driving the reaction in the market today. We've

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>had the increase in infections, frankly in France since August,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but the markets are relatively blase about that because the

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>assumption had been no more lockdown has been there done

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that they just can't go back to nationwide lockdowns is

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>too costly, except what we're seeing now in the face

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of these just very high numbers in terms of daily

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>infections that governments are kind of stepwise moving in that direction. Now,

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of course they still want to avoid that, but the

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>pressure is building and the markets are pricing, and now

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's the ultimate endpoint that we reach, maybe not

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>full nationwide lockdowns, with something a lot closer to that

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>than they would have thought a month ago. Janue, is

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this a buying opportunity then if there's more of a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>pullback in the in the face of restrictions and lockdowns,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that people are still expecting some sort

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal support bill next year, well we're not allocated

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that way currently. We have a modest overweight to aquities

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in general. You know, I think you're always waiting for

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a goodbye the day opportunity. Our medium term outlook is

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>constructed partly based on the anticipation of some sort of

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, certainly in the US UH anticipating that you

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>know in Europe even you know, there will be a

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>point where stocks just look so attractive and you want

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to move in. But we'd probably say it's premature to

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be making that type of change right now. What do

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you make of the fact that earnings have been coming

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>in broadly better than expected, and yet people have just

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>been punishing anyone who's underperformed, and even those like Microsoft

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that have outperformed but not crossed the high enough bar. Well,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, the refrain, what have you've

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>done for me lately? Partly, and I think the fact

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that you've had such a swing and sentiment over the

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>last month, you know, over the last week or so, frankly, uh.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, inevitably, earning seasons are backward backward looking. Uh,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to say, well, gosh, that was really

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>great for the third quarter, but it isn't telling me

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as I would like about the fourth quarter.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So even though the surprises are are quite good, that's

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessar ssarily helping, you know, as you point out

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that said, if we do look at the guidance of

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>forward guidance, it has been you know, very very positive.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Two thirds of the companies that have given guidance so far,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been upwards. Now, of course, there's always that qualifier

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that we know fewer companies are offering guidance and in

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the past, and it's still relatively early in the earning season.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But if there is something that people are investors want

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to focus on to justify more positive meetings her outlook.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it is that guidance that companies are giving

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Morris across all of b MP Perry Boss Securities research.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you see what I'm gonna call an elasticity of

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>CEO s? I mean Boeing right now, horrific numbers. They're

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>being elastic. John Farrell mentions they go to a hundred

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and thirty thousand jobs. Do they have a lot of

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>room to cut costs to John loves this phrase to

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>right size? Do they have a lot of room to

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>globally right size? Given this pandemic, I think it's going

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to be extremely challenging for those industry these like airlines,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, where you appreciate that you know, it's not

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just the short term effect from the lockdowns, it's a

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>longer term ramifications of what's changed thanks to the pandemic.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a change of mentality. People realizing they don't need

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to fly around the world for a couple of hour

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>meeting anymore, or do they even need to commute into

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the office every day the way we've done in the past.

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So those are arguably permanent changes that's going to hit

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some industries quite significantly, and there's gonna be much bigger

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>restructuring is necessary than anyone would have anticipated. So I

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>think there's without questions, certain parts of the economy UH

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that are going to go through a pretty wrenching change

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and inevitable is probably never going to be fast enough.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, then we also need to

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about, Okay, where is that demand going to go?

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would still believe that agg demand is

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to rise, It's just going to be

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>spent in different ways, and we need to really focus

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on where those opportunities are as well. Down I just

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>want to finish on the market at the headline level

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and just think about the following concept. I wonder how

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>much support is beneath this market on a daylight today,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and the concept of the vaccine put down, how important

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is that vaccine put just this idea that people want

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay allocated to risk because they believe at some

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>point in the next few weeks, the next few months,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we could get that key announcement. Well, certainly the timing

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is crucial beneven if it is and in the next

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, and it is more the months that you

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned, you know, if we think a year

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>out and you know, if you are an equity investor,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you are buying hopefully a stream of ouriens that goes

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit further out than the next quarter of the

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>next six months. Absolutely that's going to be important. I

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think the other thing we we can't put aside is

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it is the week before the U S election. There's

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>still then inevitable uncertainty about the outcome and the implications

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of that. So you've got kind of these two negative

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>factors weighing on the market. Increase in infections and certainty

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>head of the election. You know, one of those will

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully be resolved by this time next week, though maybe not,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the second as we all hope sooner resident later.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't great to catch up. As always, Dan Morris

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of BNP PO Asset Management, thank you sir. It is

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, and again, as Lisa mentioned earlier, the spread narrowing,

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the difference in yield between that big negative tenure and

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in every larger negative two year yield really coming down

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and squeezing down to a flat or flatter negative based

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>yield curve. In Germany, Jane Foley knows as well with

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Robbo Bank senior foreign exchange strategist, but she understands that

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>foreign exchange not linked to the equity markets, who cares,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but linked to the bond market, No question about that,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Jane Foley. It's real simple. There's something going on in

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Germany is signaled by those greater negative yields. What is it, Well,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's sort of flight to equality. It's fear

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tom And we do have the CPI dated for hero

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>don't Happeople the end of the week, and that is

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to highlight that more disflation. Now, we did have

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>import process for Germany this morning a little bit better,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but it leaves that TPR number later in the week.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's again going to worry investors. It's going to be

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting because we have that EP data for Q

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>three that's gonna look really quite good at and nearly temperacent.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Bounced back Q and Q and in Q three. But

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of course the market is already going to disregard that

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because even though it's not been released yet, it's already

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>all news we all know now about the new lockdowns

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>up throughout the region, and that of course means it's

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be bad news economically for the full quarter.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't look good from the European perspective right now,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>export import dynamics, importantly in the United States advanced goods

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>trade balance, it's a secondary statistic, I'm going to call it.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty grim negative number, not to where it

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be on survey. But nevertheless, another key

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>data point there is well Jane Foley. Then when I

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>look at this and John has mentioned the resiliency of

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the euro, of the euro, how does euro get a

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bid here? Well, I mean it doesn't if you're looking

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at against the end certainly. I mean that definitely is pushing,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is pushing lower and even against the the US dollar

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one sevent you, I mean, it wasn't too long ago

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and we were above one eighteen. So the euro is

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at like it's on the back foot. There is

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some anxiety going into the ECB meeting tomorrow and it

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>could they potentially pull the trigger on policy measures tomorrow. Well,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean our central view is December, and I think

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's probably closer to consensus. But there is some rumblings

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that given the worsening in the backdrop this week, given

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the fear about further lockdowns nationally in France, and maybe

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>more restrictions in Germany and elsewhere that maybe the the

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>guard the UCB president could pull the trigger. So I

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit of anxiety and that's pushing the

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Euro on the back foot today. I've been really

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>surprised by how resilient it's been up until the last

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours, given the direction of travel the continent

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was on. It's been pretty obvious for the last four weeks.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But here's the break this morning with a broader dollar bid. Jane.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We've been looking at the Italian bond market and I

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think we can all agree the jury is still out

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as to whether this is really transformed from behaving like

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a credit to a self in the lower Today Italian

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>bonds are softer, yields are hired by five six basis points.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not dramatic, but the move is there, and I

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are focused on it, whether

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we can break that positive correlation between the single currency

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and the periphery. Jane. If I'd ask that question a

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, I think people would have had

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>confidence and said yes. I think the move that's starting

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to emerge this morning, just slowly as this session grows

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>older might be making some people nervous. Jane, what's your take.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there were doubts really emerging. I mean, for instance,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we did have headlines suggesting that there were protests in

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Rome about the restrictions. But I think more than that,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>if we if we look back over the spring and

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the summer about what really drove the euro higher. There

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of confidence about the shop policy, certainly,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but also about the recovery fund. And as we go

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into this the second dip of this, of the second

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wave and the and the double dip of this, this recession,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know we would have asked about the recovery fund

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a is it big enough? Well, it's it's not that

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>big as a percentage of GDP for the whole week.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's also concerns, there's biggering going on about the timing.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>When are they going to get the funds out? Can

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>itally given its its history of not being able to

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>invest productively that can it actually use the loans that

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it will get and turn them into in a productive

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>capacity rather than just more debts. So I think there

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are doubts beginning to emerge, and certainly, if those restrictions

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really do take a toll on the economy throughout Europe

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in Italy. I think those doubts can only

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>get bigger in Q four. Well, Jen, that's the question.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Where is that recovery fund? That recovery fund hasn't been

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ratified yet, and you've talked about the political difficulties. We've

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>been really keen to draw a distinction between a European

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>economy that's struggling and redenomination risk. Jane, do you think

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>before year end? And I'm not saying that we start

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to think about the breakup of Europe, just that people

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>start to conflate the two issues. Where the periphery starts

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to trade significantly weaker, it feeds back into the banks again.

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you see that scenario developing before your rise? Now?

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I can see Niggoline certainly arising. I mean we're starting

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>off from a very strong position. If you look at

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the euro if you look at the amount of long

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>positions built in the euro over the spring in the summer,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really extensive. Now to put it, to put it in perspective,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if we got back to sev seventeen, was I think

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a will go deluxe that year for the Eurozone. We

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>had really strong growth from the outset or stronger than

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>expected growth from the outset, and we had better political outcomes.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the year. Remember that the market was fearful

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the far right and the French presidential election in

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dutch election that didn't happen, So we had better outcomes.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We had a really good year for the Euro. Long

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>positions building and this year, this spring and summer, the

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>markets become even more optimistic about the Europe. So I

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>think that there is the perceptive that the risk that

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>we could get some sort of more reality emerging and

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people lowering those long positions in the Euro. At what point, Jane,

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>will central bank policy not have that bigger effect to

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>uncurrency differentials? And it really all comes down to the economy,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like perhaps that's what we're seeing today

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>involved given the ongoing restrictions that we're hearing about in Europe. Well,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly confidence is a lot of it um, you know,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and and and certainly today we've seen confidence really taken

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>not by those headlines, but in terms of such about policy.

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what the ECB did back in May and

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and really pushing hard against talk of fragmentation by you know,

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:25.959
<v Speaker 1>stepping up the types of bonds that it was going

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy. By by really making that message very clear,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>it really did help with the whole confidence in the

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>notion of the Euro moving forward. And of course, at

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the same time was that recovery fund that the whole

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>notion that perhaps they had taken a step forward to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a fiscal comprehensiveness within the region. Now again,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that during you for just the background of

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy, the worst union conditions is going to poke

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>some holes in that confidence. And I think that's why

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the Euro is looking a little bit more vulnerable

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. And of course that is independent of course

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the possibility that the dollar will see a bit

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>more of a safe haven bid going into Quey for

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with the similar sorts of concerns about COVID nineteen and

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the double dip recession Gina. Based on positioning the sense

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that you're you're giving now that there could be dollar strengthening,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>How violent could that be given how many short positions

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have been put on on the dollar. Well, I don't

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>think it could be as violent as anything like that

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw in March, and the reason for that is

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just the huge amounts of liquidity provisions at the FED

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is put in place. But I think we could see

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>some sharp movements certainly now. I think the movement that

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in neuro dollar today is reasonably sharp and

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly if we're looking for in exchange um

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we've seen some quite sharp movements in

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in well certainly Turkey, but also some of the other

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging market classes as well. So I think we could

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly have sharp movements. I don't think we're going to

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>see anything like what we saw back in March and

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all Jenna, I look at all this and I guess

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at some point here, with futures negative fift AID deteriorating

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>on a session i'm watching, yen was some resiliency even

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>with dollar stronger. At some point, I want to be

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunistic within this calamity, this natural disaster. What's your trade

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>right now? I don't say that lightly, what's your trade

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>right now to create gain in this pain? Well, to

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>be honest right now, you know, I would probably be

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a sort of several of the emerging markets. I would like,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the dollar against many of those UM, EU, A, Yen.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very interesting one. Although we've come

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>back very sharply. Today We're still very elevated compared with

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>where we were in EU an earlier on in the year,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>even in the summer months. So I think we've got

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a movement there. And also I think if fear of

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>certain I think we could see the Aussie pushing down

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as well of there perhaps a little bit of a

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>lift there, because there is this perception that Asia and

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>China are perhaps faring better in terms of recovery from

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>into Barris and we are in Europe and in the

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>US as well. Jane, always fantastic to catch up with

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you and take you in the morning light this morning

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Thank you, Jane Thardi that of Ramba Bank,

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Scorsky, Captain Gorsky of Johnson and Johnson out of

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>West Point, someone with a really really interesting executive career

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course in the cross heres of this pandemic

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. Of course, a good conversation peer to peer

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>conversations with David Rubinstein. I'm Bloomberg Television and the gentleman

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>from Carlisle Group joins us this morning. What if I'm

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>fascinating here, David by besides the predictable discussion of the

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is this is a guy who was at J

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and J in left and then he came back to

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Johnson. That's an interesting move, isn't it. You

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see that often, do you. Well, you certainly don't

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>see it where they rise up to be the CEO

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>very often, and so that's unusual. I remember he's also

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>started out a relatively low level marketing job in a

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, did that for a while,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then left, then came back and rose up to the

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>CEO position, which he's had now for about eight years.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it is, and it's done an incredible job.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Their market capitalization now is about the tenth playas in

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States of any company the United States, about

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a hud billion dollars. There was a lethargy. You've seen

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>this across all market capitalizations of Carlisle Group. There was

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a J and J lethargy. And then something changed under Gorsky.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>What was that, Well, he diversified a fair bit um.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people would say, well Johnson Johnson that

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>they make band aids or don't they make Q tips,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But they're gigantic and so many different areas of healthcare.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>In fact, many people didn't realize that they were in

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine business, and now they're producing what maybe one

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of the best vaccines that's coming out for the COVID virus. David,

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>one thing that this pandemic has thrown into cold relief

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is there's a conundrum for pharmaceutical companies whether to focus

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on simply developing the high costs, high return cancer drugs,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>other types of drugs that perhaps might not have the

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>same sort of global benefit as a vaccine. Did he

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>address a shift in that mentality and how to compensate

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical companies going forward to focus in a different way. Yes,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are not the most profitable part of the pharmaceutical

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>business because typically you take them once a year and

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to repeat business where you take it

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>once a month or once a week or something like that. However,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>um there are a limited number of companies that do

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>specialize in it, but it's not the main thing that

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they do. Johnson and Johnson does do vaccines, but it's

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not their main business for sure. However, in this case,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the US government is subsidizing so many companies that they're

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to lose money on it that will do

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>okay on it, But it's really I think the public

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>relations benefit of coming up with a vaccine that will

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>be so helpful to all these companies. And then there's

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>also question of actually getting the vaccine manufactured and distributed

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of timely manner. What did he say

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>about supply chain issues? How to manufacture us in the

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>most expeditious way possible? While the US government has done

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>something that no one had ever done before. Typically of

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>vaccine takes, I would say somewhere around seven years to develop.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The fasts have historically been four years, let's say for Ebola.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>This is being done in one year. Now. It's being

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>done because so many companies are getting so much money

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>from the federal government, but also they are manufacturing the

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>vaccine before they know whether the FDA will approve it.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That has never been done before. And so once the

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>FDA approves one of the vaccines or more than than

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the vaccines, they're ready to be distributed. The

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>issue is who's going to get them, and then whether

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>people will take them. A lot of people are nervous

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about taking them because they think they're not either safe

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or they've been politically Uh fine tune to make them available,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe before they should be. So there's gonna be a

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>while before people really take these, and most experts would

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>say not until the third or fourth quarter up next year.

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to see people really fully vaccinated? David,

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you told us the last time we've visited that you

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly weren't taking sides in this presidential campaign, and you're

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>trying young to stay removed. What do you expect to

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>see in the next six days. Will this be a

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>traditional dash to Tuesday or will it be something different? Well,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>traditionally people vote on election day, and now we will

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>see that maybe sev the people have already voted before

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>election day. That's a big difference. Secondly, elections tend to

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>tighten towards the end. People tend to come home, and

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the country is relatively split evenly between

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans. Obviously not completely evenly, but I do

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think that you're gonna you're gonna see some people come

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>home to their base, and therefore I suspect it will

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>tighten up, which is what you normally see right before

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the election. David Rubinstein, thank you so much for joining

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>us today at a conversation with a gentleman from Johnson

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and Johnson UH their chairman and CEO, Alex Gorski. Look

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for that tonight nine pm. Peer to peer conversations with

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Mr Rubinstein. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio