WEBVTT - How to Build Empathy and Avoid Burnout

0:00:14.916 --> 0:00:33.836
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. It's often counterintuitive for people that empathy could be

0:00:33.876 --> 0:00:36.996
<v Speaker 1>more than one thing, like walking in someone else's shoes,

0:00:37.156 --> 0:00:40.316
<v Speaker 1>feeling their pain, caring about them and being kind. And

0:00:40.356 --> 0:00:43.156
<v Speaker 1>people say, how could one word like empathy refer to

0:00:43.236 --> 0:00:46.636
<v Speaker 1>many things? But empathy is the way that other people's

0:00:46.756 --> 0:00:50.316
<v Speaker 1>experiences get into our experiences, and so there should be

0:00:50.356 --> 0:00:54.356
<v Speaker 1>many ways that that happens. That's Jamie Zaki, a professor

0:00:54.396 --> 0:00:58.476
<v Speaker 1>of psychology and an expert on empathy. Jamil is the

0:00:58.516 --> 0:01:01.836
<v Speaker 1>author of the book The War for Kindness, Building Empathy

0:01:01.916 --> 0:01:05.156
<v Speaker 1>in a Fractured World, and he sees empathy as a

0:01:05.236 --> 0:01:10.076
<v Speaker 1>kind of psychological superglue that connects people. Neil says empathy

0:01:10.196 --> 0:01:12.476
<v Speaker 1>is a skill we can cultivate and that we should

0:01:12.516 --> 0:01:16.396
<v Speaker 1>be more intentional about where we focus it. Empathy is

0:01:16.436 --> 0:01:19.236
<v Speaker 1>like a spotlight. The thing that I think is really

0:01:19.276 --> 0:01:21.836
<v Speaker 1>important to remember is that we are the ones pointing

0:01:21.876 --> 0:01:26.116
<v Speaker 1>that spotlight, and that we have agency. We have autonomy

0:01:26.476 --> 0:01:30.316
<v Speaker 1>to align our emotional experiences with the people we want

0:01:30.356 --> 0:01:35.356
<v Speaker 1>to be. On today's episode, a deep dive into the

0:01:35.436 --> 0:01:38.836
<v Speaker 1>science of empathy, the different types, how we can build it,

0:01:39.036 --> 0:01:41.676
<v Speaker 1>and what you can do if you feel things too much.

0:01:44.476 --> 0:01:47.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maya Shunker and this is a slight change of plan,

0:01:47.796 --> 0:01:49.916
<v Speaker 1>a show about who we are and who we become

0:01:50.156 --> 0:02:01.396
<v Speaker 1>in the face of a big change. I would love

0:02:01.436 --> 0:02:03.996
<v Speaker 1>to start by hearing about how it is that you

0:02:04.076 --> 0:02:07.756
<v Speaker 1>got interested in the topic of empathy. Yeah. Well, I've

0:02:07.756 --> 0:02:10.556
<v Speaker 1>been interested in this topic since well before I knew

0:02:10.596 --> 0:02:14.196
<v Speaker 1>what the word empathy meant. My parents come from very

0:02:14.196 --> 0:02:17.436
<v Speaker 1>different places. My dad is from Pakistan and my mom

0:02:17.556 --> 0:02:21.476
<v Speaker 1>is from Peru, and they both immigrated to the United

0:02:21.516 --> 0:02:23.996
<v Speaker 1>States when they were about twenty five years old and

0:02:24.116 --> 0:02:26.956
<v Speaker 1>ended up, of all places, in Pullman, Washington, at Washington

0:02:26.996 --> 0:02:30.636
<v Speaker 1>State University, where they met and fell in love. I

0:02:30.716 --> 0:02:33.236
<v Speaker 1>think that they fell in love mostly because they both

0:02:33.276 --> 0:02:37.596
<v Speaker 1>felt out of place in the US as immigrants, as foreigners,

0:02:37.756 --> 0:02:40.716
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I think that they found solace and

0:02:40.796 --> 0:02:44.156
<v Speaker 1>commiseration in each other. But I think as they grew

0:02:44.196 --> 0:02:48.236
<v Speaker 1>acclimated to this country, they realized how little they have

0:02:48.316 --> 0:02:51.996
<v Speaker 1>in common, which is very little, like very little, And

0:02:52.036 --> 0:02:54.196
<v Speaker 1>by the time I was six years old, it was

0:02:54.196 --> 0:02:56.276
<v Speaker 1>clear that it wasn't going to work for them. They

0:02:56.316 --> 0:02:58.956
<v Speaker 1>started divorcing when I was eight, but didn't finish until

0:02:58.956 --> 0:03:01.076
<v Speaker 1>I was twelve, and it was not what you would

0:03:01.116 --> 0:03:04.236
<v Speaker 1>call an amicable split. I'm their only child, and for

0:03:04.316 --> 0:03:08.796
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of my childhood, my primary experience was being

0:03:08.836 --> 0:03:12.516
<v Speaker 1>in this state of conflict with these two people whose

0:03:12.676 --> 0:03:16.076
<v Speaker 1>minds and hearts were as different as the countries that

0:03:16.156 --> 0:03:19.116
<v Speaker 1>they came from, and it was a lot of turmoil.

0:03:19.156 --> 0:03:21.196
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of pain, and so I felt

0:03:21.236 --> 0:03:23.756
<v Speaker 1>like my job as a kid, almost as a survival

0:03:23.796 --> 0:03:27.436
<v Speaker 1>strategy for our family, was to learn to tune myself

0:03:27.636 --> 0:03:31.156
<v Speaker 1>to their different frequencies. I think these days of my

0:03:31.236 --> 0:03:34.716
<v Speaker 1>parents divorces like an empathy gym that forced me to

0:03:34.916 --> 0:03:39.956
<v Speaker 1>work at care and understanding. Yeah. Interesting. I love the

0:03:40.036 --> 0:03:42.796
<v Speaker 1>definition of empathy that you give in your book. It's

0:03:42.836 --> 0:03:46.156
<v Speaker 1>really beautiful to me and very stirring. You talk about

0:03:46.196 --> 0:03:51.196
<v Speaker 1>empathy as being our emotional and psychological entanglements with one another.

0:03:51.716 --> 0:03:55.116
<v Speaker 1>You also define three different types of empathy, and I'm

0:03:55.116 --> 0:03:57.036
<v Speaker 1>wondering if we can actually just walk through each one

0:03:57.036 --> 0:03:58.916
<v Speaker 1>in detail to give people a sense of what each

0:03:58.956 --> 0:04:02.036
<v Speaker 1>of these different types of empathy means. So I love

0:04:02.036 --> 0:04:04.236
<v Speaker 1>it if we could first talk about what you call

0:04:04.356 --> 0:04:11.236
<v Speaker 1>emotional empathy. Emotional empathy is the evolutionary and developmentally oldest

0:04:11.396 --> 0:04:13.996
<v Speaker 1>type of empathy, so it's the type of empathy we

0:04:14.036 --> 0:04:17.516
<v Speaker 1>share with many other species in fact, and it's this

0:04:17.596 --> 0:04:21.316
<v Speaker 1>idea of resonance or feeling what other people feel. So

0:04:21.676 --> 0:04:24.276
<v Speaker 1>it's that experience of I don't know if you've ever

0:04:24.316 --> 0:04:28.276
<v Speaker 1>watched a tightrope walker and you kind of feel yourself, Yeah,

0:04:28.356 --> 0:04:30.796
<v Speaker 1>like your palms start to sweat and you feel like

0:04:30.796 --> 0:04:34.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm hyperactive ver neurals hard for me to watch movies

0:04:34.516 --> 0:04:39.996
<v Speaker 1>even exactly. So that experience of resonance, whether it's motor resonance,

0:04:40.036 --> 0:04:42.316
<v Speaker 1>sort of as you see someone move in a certain way,

0:04:42.316 --> 0:04:44.396
<v Speaker 1>you kind of feel something in that part of your body.

0:04:44.436 --> 0:04:47.396
<v Speaker 1>It can be resonance for pain, it can be resonance

0:04:47.436 --> 0:04:51.596
<v Speaker 1>for different emotions like sadness, anger, and joy as well.

0:04:51.996 --> 0:04:56.116
<v Speaker 1>But that sense of overlap between self and other emotionally

0:04:56.276 --> 0:04:58.956
<v Speaker 1>is what we think of as emotional empathy. And how

0:04:59.036 --> 0:05:03.916
<v Speaker 1>is that different from cognitive empathy. Yeah, so cognitive empathy

0:05:03.956 --> 0:05:06.156
<v Speaker 1>I would think of as the detective work that we

0:05:06.276 --> 0:05:10.236
<v Speaker 1>do to try to understand what's in someone's mind. Now,

0:05:10.396 --> 0:05:14.676
<v Speaker 1>there's a big difference between emotional and cognitive empathy. Emotional

0:05:14.716 --> 0:05:18.716
<v Speaker 1>empathy often trades on the things that we have in common.

0:05:18.996 --> 0:05:21.396
<v Speaker 1>If I see you in pain. I can sort of

0:05:21.396 --> 0:05:24.516
<v Speaker 1>imagine what that feels like, and it's the similarities between

0:05:24.596 --> 0:05:28.036
<v Speaker 1>us that allow me to access that type of emotional empathy.

0:05:28.756 --> 0:05:31.676
<v Speaker 1>Cognitive empathy is useful when we don't come from the

0:05:31.716 --> 0:05:34.516
<v Speaker 1>same place, when I'm trying to take the perspective of

0:05:34.556 --> 0:05:39.076
<v Speaker 1>someone whose worldview or perspective is different from my own.

0:05:39.836 --> 0:05:42.996
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, the third type of empathy is something

0:05:42.996 --> 0:05:47.156
<v Speaker 1>that you call empathic concern or compassion. Do you mind

0:05:47.196 --> 0:05:50.756
<v Speaker 1>just describing what empathic concern is. It's a desire to

0:05:51.476 --> 0:05:56.036
<v Speaker 1>improve somebody else's well being, to decrease their suffering, or

0:05:56.076 --> 0:05:59.356
<v Speaker 1>to increase their joy. It's a mission that we put

0:05:59.356 --> 0:06:03.116
<v Speaker 1>ourselves on, right, It's a motivation, And that part of

0:06:03.116 --> 0:06:06.796
<v Speaker 1>empathy is actually probably the least well understood by scientists

0:06:06.836 --> 0:06:10.156
<v Speaker 1>and the most well understood by spiritual practice. Tis. It's

0:06:10.156 --> 0:06:14.876
<v Speaker 1>been studied and developed for thousands of years in numerous

0:06:14.916 --> 0:06:20.476
<v Speaker 1>spiritual traditions. But neuroscientists, for instance, have studied compassion far

0:06:20.556 --> 0:06:23.916
<v Speaker 1>less than they've studied cognitive empathy, and much less than

0:06:23.956 --> 0:06:27.436
<v Speaker 1>what we think of as emotional empathy. So to summarize,

0:06:27.556 --> 0:06:32.396
<v Speaker 1>empathy has three core components. Emotional empathy, which is that

0:06:32.476 --> 0:06:35.676
<v Speaker 1>kind of resonance, that feeling of what other people feel.

0:06:36.196 --> 0:06:39.756
<v Speaker 1>Cognitive empathy the efforts we make to try to understand

0:06:40.076 --> 0:06:42.956
<v Speaker 1>what is in someone's mind and in their heart. And

0:06:43.316 --> 0:06:47.676
<v Speaker 1>empathic concern or compassion, the desire or motivation we have

0:06:47.996 --> 0:06:52.116
<v Speaker 1>to improve their well being. One of the most fascinating

0:06:52.396 --> 0:06:54.556
<v Speaker 1>things you talk about in your book that really stuck

0:06:54.556 --> 0:06:57.956
<v Speaker 1>with me is that these three types of empathy are

0:06:58.036 --> 0:07:01.556
<v Speaker 1>only moderately correlated with each other. So, for example, you

0:07:01.596 --> 0:07:05.196
<v Speaker 1>can be the kind of person who intensely feels another

0:07:05.236 --> 0:07:08.276
<v Speaker 1>person's sadness, but you might not be very good at

0:07:08.396 --> 0:07:11.756
<v Speaker 1>understanding why they feel that way or how to actually

0:07:11.836 --> 0:07:14.516
<v Speaker 1>help them. Yeah. I think a lot of times when

0:07:14.516 --> 0:07:16.796
<v Speaker 1>I describe the three pieces of empathy, people are like,

0:07:16.836 --> 0:07:19.156
<v Speaker 1>all right, Zachi, you just describe the same thing in

0:07:19.196 --> 0:07:22.116
<v Speaker 1>three different ways. You know, if I share what someone feels,

0:07:22.116 --> 0:07:24.756
<v Speaker 1>won't I understand it? And if I understand it once,

0:07:24.796 --> 0:07:26.876
<v Speaker 1>I also care about it, And I say, well, you

0:07:26.916 --> 0:07:28.996
<v Speaker 1>know that's fair. But it turns out that these pieces

0:07:28.996 --> 0:07:32.636
<v Speaker 1>of empathy, although they do connect in many ways, are

0:07:32.876 --> 0:07:36.076
<v Speaker 1>weirdly independent at a number of levels. So, for one,

0:07:36.316 --> 0:07:39.676
<v Speaker 1>they're not that correlated in the population. If you are

0:07:39.756 --> 0:07:43.156
<v Speaker 1>somebody who really takes on other people's feelings. That doesn't

0:07:43.156 --> 0:07:44.956
<v Speaker 1>tell me very much about how good you'll be at

0:07:45.036 --> 0:07:48.596
<v Speaker 1>understanding them. In fact, one of the biggest mistakes we

0:07:48.716 --> 0:07:52.756
<v Speaker 1>make in cognitive empathy is assuming that people are just

0:07:52.836 --> 0:07:55.756
<v Speaker 1>like us, assuming that we can use ourselves as a

0:07:55.756 --> 0:07:59.516
<v Speaker 1>beacon for understanding someone else. So, for instance, if I

0:07:59.596 --> 0:08:02.756
<v Speaker 1>meet somebody else whose parents are divorced and they tell

0:08:02.756 --> 0:08:05.196
<v Speaker 1>me their story, I might think to myself, Oh, their

0:08:05.196 --> 0:08:07.996
<v Speaker 1>parents divorce must have been really difficult for them, because

0:08:08.036 --> 0:08:10.076
<v Speaker 1>my parents' divorce is really difficult for me. But maybe

0:08:10.076 --> 0:08:12.716
<v Speaker 1>they had a breeze of it, right. And our overuse

0:08:12.996 --> 0:08:16.196
<v Speaker 1>of assume similarity is one of the things that gets

0:08:16.196 --> 0:08:19.756
<v Speaker 1>this in the most trouble with respect to cognitive empathy. Yeah,

0:08:19.876 --> 0:08:21.996
<v Speaker 1>it's so interesting in this moment, I'm reflecting Jamil on

0:08:22.036 --> 0:08:24.996
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we tend to put a premium on

0:08:25.036 --> 0:08:29.836
<v Speaker 1>this first type of empathy, emotional empathy one, because it

0:08:29.916 --> 0:08:32.716
<v Speaker 1>does breathe this instant feeling of solidarity. So I sit

0:08:32.756 --> 0:08:34.916
<v Speaker 1>down for dinner with you, I tell you about my problem,

0:08:35.396 --> 0:08:38.676
<v Speaker 1>and it just feels so unifying to see that you

0:08:38.716 --> 0:08:41.396
<v Speaker 1>are carrying a bit of my distress, right, that you

0:08:41.436 --> 0:08:44.516
<v Speaker 1>are feeling my pain, and similarly, if you're the one

0:08:44.556 --> 0:08:47.116
<v Speaker 1>feeling it, it feels really good to feel someone else's

0:08:47.116 --> 0:08:49.796
<v Speaker 1>pain because you know you're connecting with them emotionally. But

0:08:49.876 --> 0:08:53.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm reflecting in this moment that maybe we should be

0:08:53.116 --> 0:08:56.036
<v Speaker 1>more open minded about the different ways in which people

0:08:56.076 --> 0:08:59.916
<v Speaker 1>can provide empathy to us. Right, someone might not actually

0:08:59.956 --> 0:09:02.756
<v Speaker 1>be great at emotional empathy, but their intentions might very

0:09:02.756 --> 0:09:05.676
<v Speaker 1>well be in the right place. They absolutely have that

0:09:05.796 --> 0:09:08.436
<v Speaker 1>will to help you. So in that moment, I might

0:09:08.476 --> 0:09:12.236
<v Speaker 1>write them off and say, oh, they didn't even seem

0:09:12.316 --> 0:09:14.996
<v Speaker 1>to care that I'm having the worst day ever and

0:09:15.116 --> 0:09:17.476
<v Speaker 1>all these terrible things happen to me, and so they're

0:09:17.516 --> 0:09:21.196
<v Speaker 1>an unempathetic person. But upon reflection, if I think through

0:09:21.276 --> 0:09:23.636
<v Speaker 1>this lens, this framework that you're providing for us, and

0:09:23.716 --> 0:09:26.876
<v Speaker 1>might think, look, maybe emotional empathy in this person is

0:09:26.916 --> 0:09:31.156
<v Speaker 1>not super high, but they really excel in the cognitive

0:09:31.156 --> 0:09:33.836
<v Speaker 1>empathy space. They are like my super friend when it

0:09:33.876 --> 0:09:36.796
<v Speaker 1>comes to understanding what I'm feeling, why I'm feeling it,

0:09:36.836 --> 0:09:39.596
<v Speaker 1>ways that they can actually help me. And so I

0:09:39.636 --> 0:09:40.956
<v Speaker 1>just wonder if you could lead all of us to

0:09:41.036 --> 0:09:44.516
<v Speaker 1>kind of revisit our expectations of others and from ourselves,

0:09:44.836 --> 0:09:47.996
<v Speaker 1>and to recognize that even if someone doesn't excel in

0:09:48.036 --> 0:09:50.876
<v Speaker 1>one of these three domains, they might actually be excellent

0:09:50.916 --> 0:09:53.556
<v Speaker 1>in the other ones. I love that perspective. I think

0:09:53.596 --> 0:09:58.236
<v Speaker 1>you're right that emotional empathy is so easy to access,

0:09:58.436 --> 0:10:01.636
<v Speaker 1>it's so palpable. But I feel like there's all this

0:10:01.756 --> 0:10:04.436
<v Speaker 1>talk these days about what are known as love language,

0:10:04.516 --> 0:10:07.436
<v Speaker 1>is the different ways that people communicate their affection and

0:10:07.476 --> 0:10:09.796
<v Speaker 1>care for one another. Maybe we should be more open

0:10:10.156 --> 0:10:15.076
<v Speaker 1>to empathic languages, to understanding both ourselves and each other

0:10:15.516 --> 0:10:18.316
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a profile, right, Yeah, And if you're

0:10:18.356 --> 0:10:22.076
<v Speaker 1>not a person who's very warm and fuzzy, you don't

0:10:22.116 --> 0:10:25.596
<v Speaker 1>always feel what other people feel, that doesn't mean you're unempathic,

0:10:25.636 --> 0:10:27.316
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to think of yourself that way.

0:10:27.836 --> 0:10:30.396
<v Speaker 1>And this is a great idea from you, Maya. It

0:10:30.516 --> 0:10:33.316
<v Speaker 1>might be useful for us to each introspect a little

0:10:33.316 --> 0:10:36.356
<v Speaker 1>bit about who we are and then maybe even communicate that. Say,

0:10:36.436 --> 0:10:39.116
<v Speaker 1>you know, my favorite way of empathizing with people is

0:10:39.116 --> 0:10:41.876
<v Speaker 1>to try to listen and understand, and I hope that's okay.

0:10:41.916 --> 0:10:45.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, just bringing that into conversation could enrich our

0:10:45.956 --> 0:10:50.116
<v Speaker 1>ability to connect with each other. So much. Yeah. Okay,

0:10:50.116 --> 0:10:53.036
<v Speaker 1>so now we have a better understanding of what empathy is,

0:10:53.116 --> 0:10:57.756
<v Speaker 1>Jimial and I'm wondering why should we care about empathy?

0:10:57.796 --> 0:11:01.316
<v Speaker 1>And I ask this in part because sometimes our minds

0:11:01.316 --> 0:11:05.716
<v Speaker 1>can be so overwhelmed by the empathic needs of just

0:11:06.156 --> 0:11:08.436
<v Speaker 1>living on this planet, because there is so much suffering

0:11:08.476 --> 0:11:10.796
<v Speaker 1>and distress, it's easy to just want to put a

0:11:10.836 --> 0:11:12.636
<v Speaker 1>lid on it sometimes and be like, you know what,

0:11:13.436 --> 0:11:16.916
<v Speaker 1>I'm over this, Like I cannot solve all the world's ills,

0:11:17.116 --> 0:11:19.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course. Yeah, I think that the reason

0:11:20.116 --> 0:11:23.716
<v Speaker 1>that we should care about empathy is because it is

0:11:23.876 --> 0:11:27.396
<v Speaker 1>at the root of who we are and how we flourish.

0:11:27.716 --> 0:11:30.996
<v Speaker 1>And that's true at basically every level you can think of.

0:11:31.036 --> 0:11:33.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's probably one of the secrets

0:11:33.236 --> 0:11:37.036
<v Speaker 1>of our species success. You know, human beings not really

0:11:37.076 --> 0:11:39.156
<v Speaker 1>that impressive. An animal, what do you think about it? Right,

0:11:39.196 --> 0:11:42.876
<v Speaker 1>We're just medium sized mammals, you know, not really that fast.

0:11:43.196 --> 0:11:45.516
<v Speaker 1>We can't fly or swim very well, right, I mean,

0:11:45.516 --> 0:11:49.476
<v Speaker 1>as solo creatures, we have no chance. What we are

0:11:49.596 --> 0:11:54.316
<v Speaker 1>is a coalitional and hypersocial species, and so that means

0:11:54.356 --> 0:11:57.116
<v Speaker 1>that it's important to understand, well, what is it that's

0:11:57.156 --> 0:12:00.316
<v Speaker 1>in us. What did nature imbue us with that allows

0:12:00.396 --> 0:12:02.596
<v Speaker 1>us to work together so well? And I would say

0:12:02.596 --> 0:12:06.436
<v Speaker 1>that one of the pillars of our ability to cooperate

0:12:06.796 --> 0:12:10.436
<v Speaker 1>and to coordinate is our tendency to connect with one

0:12:10.436 --> 0:12:15.076
<v Speaker 1>another and to care for one another. Empathy basically benefits

0:12:15.116 --> 0:12:17.876
<v Speaker 1>almost everybody involved, including the people who feel it. You know,

0:12:17.876 --> 0:12:19.476
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to think of empathy is something you do

0:12:19.556 --> 0:12:23.396
<v Speaker 1>for other people, But people who report being empathic versus

0:12:23.476 --> 0:12:27.636
<v Speaker 1>less empathic tend to have deeper and more meaningful connections

0:12:27.676 --> 0:12:31.436
<v Speaker 1>to family and friends. And then, finally, I think empathy

0:12:31.516 --> 0:12:35.916
<v Speaker 1>is really critical to building community, to seeing people who

0:12:35.956 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>are different from us free from the lens of stereotyping, prejudice,

0:12:39.556 --> 0:12:44.036
<v Speaker 1>and bias. To our ability for collective action, from making

0:12:44.076 --> 0:12:47.276
<v Speaker 1>small sacrifices for the greater good. Really all the things

0:12:47.276 --> 0:12:50.956
<v Speaker 1>that allow us to work together. Yeah, you know, on

0:12:51.076 --> 0:12:54.596
<v Speaker 1>this question of bias, researchers like Paul Bloom and others

0:12:54.596 --> 0:12:58.076
<v Speaker 1>have pointed out that our empathy has design flaws, right,

0:12:58.316 --> 0:13:00.596
<v Speaker 1>and so if we rely too much on our empathy

0:13:00.636 --> 0:13:03.476
<v Speaker 1>to guide our decisions, it can carry some risks. So,

0:13:03.556 --> 0:13:06.956
<v Speaker 1>for example, we feel less empathy for people who are

0:13:07.036 --> 0:13:09.676
<v Speaker 1>from different cultures than we are, or who don't share

0:13:09.676 --> 0:13:12.596
<v Speaker 1>our skin color, or we feel more empathy for people

0:13:12.636 --> 0:13:15.876
<v Speaker 1>who are attractive or are right in front of us, right,

0:13:15.916 --> 0:13:18.556
<v Speaker 1>are approximate. Yeah, I think that's right. And you know,

0:13:18.756 --> 0:13:22.156
<v Speaker 1>Paul Bloom's book Against Empathy is well worth a read.

0:13:22.196 --> 0:13:25.756
<v Speaker 1>It's really provocative and interesting, and as you say, he

0:13:25.876 --> 0:13:29.196
<v Speaker 1>points out, hey, wait a minute, empathy doesn't always move

0:13:29.276 --> 0:13:33.636
<v Speaker 1>us towards justice. It doesn't always move us towards kindness equity, right, Yeah,

0:13:33.676 --> 0:13:37.676
<v Speaker 1>it moves us to care for people who were evolutionarily

0:13:37.756 --> 0:13:41.396
<v Speaker 1>programmed to care for. I think that empathy, like every

0:13:41.396 --> 0:13:44.196
<v Speaker 1>other part of our mind and our psychology, is built

0:13:44.236 --> 0:13:47.556
<v Speaker 1>for an ancient world, one in which probably we are

0:13:47.596 --> 0:13:51.276
<v Speaker 1>just around our family members and community members, and it's

0:13:51.316 --> 0:13:54.876
<v Speaker 1>hard to scale up experiences like empathy for the needs

0:13:54.876 --> 0:13:57.716
<v Speaker 1>of the modern world, to help people who we will

0:13:57.756 --> 0:14:00.596
<v Speaker 1>never meet, who are thousands of miles away. Yeah, And

0:14:00.596 --> 0:14:03.836
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so important for us to recognize where

0:14:03.876 --> 0:14:06.036
<v Speaker 1>these biases lie. Like you said, an empathy, but all

0:14:06.116 --> 0:14:08.836
<v Speaker 1>spaces of behavioral science. I feel like in my entire career,

0:14:09.116 --> 0:14:11.356
<v Speaker 1>whether I been a practitioner of this phase or an academic,

0:14:11.756 --> 0:14:15.636
<v Speaker 1>I'm always looking at ways in which these more ancient

0:14:15.956 --> 0:14:19.156
<v Speaker 1>intuitions can lead us astray. We want to be very

0:14:19.196 --> 0:14:24.436
<v Speaker 1>intentional about where we are directing our empathy spotlight. Right,

0:14:24.476 --> 0:14:26.796
<v Speaker 1>You call empathy as spotlight, and we as humans have

0:14:26.796 --> 0:14:30.076
<v Speaker 1>the ability to maybe direct that spotlight. Empathy is like

0:14:30.116 --> 0:14:33.956
<v Speaker 1>a spotlight, and we are the ones pointing that spotlight,

0:14:34.476 --> 0:14:38.516
<v Speaker 1>and that we have agency. We have autonomy to align

0:14:38.956 --> 0:14:41.956
<v Speaker 1>our emotional experiences with the people we want to be,

0:14:42.396 --> 0:14:46.236
<v Speaker 1>and when we're able to do that, empathy can supercharge

0:14:46.356 --> 0:14:51.836
<v Speaker 1>our values and morals by adding emotional weight to them. So,

0:14:52.076 --> 0:14:55.476
<v Speaker 1>for instance, if you feel like you are more inclined

0:14:55.516 --> 0:14:58.156
<v Speaker 1>to empathize with people who look like you than people

0:14:58.156 --> 0:15:00.836
<v Speaker 1>who don't look like you, it's a great opportunity to

0:15:00.876 --> 0:15:03.316
<v Speaker 1>interact with people who don't look like you and learn

0:15:03.316 --> 0:15:07.236
<v Speaker 1>more about them, or read their stories, or just become

0:15:07.236 --> 0:15:11.276
<v Speaker 1>familiar because it turns that that those experiences can reshape

0:15:11.316 --> 0:15:14.996
<v Speaker 1>our empathy, broaden it, widen it in ways that are

0:15:15.156 --> 0:15:18.356
<v Speaker 1>more appropriate for the morality that many of us have

0:15:18.436 --> 0:15:21.636
<v Speaker 1>these days. Yeah, it is very helpful for us to

0:15:21.676 --> 0:15:24.116
<v Speaker 1>understand the ways in which it can be biased, because

0:15:24.556 --> 0:15:27.276
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these empathetic responses are operating at a

0:15:27.316 --> 0:15:32.716
<v Speaker 1>purely subconscious level. Right, we're not consciously deliberating over who

0:15:32.756 --> 0:15:35.836
<v Speaker 1>gets our empathy, and so does require some higher level

0:15:35.836 --> 0:15:38.876
<v Speaker 1>cognition kicking in. Yeah, you can think of ourselves as

0:15:38.876 --> 0:15:42.676
<v Speaker 1>being on autopilot some vast majority of the time, and

0:15:42.956 --> 0:15:45.836
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we have to switch into manual and drive the

0:15:45.876 --> 0:15:48.516
<v Speaker 1>car ourselves. And I think that's definitely true of empathy

0:15:48.556 --> 0:15:52.356
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well said, so empathy can confer a lot

0:15:52.396 --> 0:15:55.756
<v Speaker 1>of benefits on an individual level, on a societal level,

0:15:56.156 --> 0:15:59.636
<v Speaker 1>as you've just described, but you note that sadly, empathy

0:15:59.716 --> 0:16:04.636
<v Speaker 1>has been steadily decreasing over time, and you've identified that

0:16:04.716 --> 0:16:08.036
<v Speaker 1>there are some building blocks of empathy that are crucial

0:16:08.076 --> 0:16:12.196
<v Speaker 1>for empathies revival, if you will, that are less available

0:16:12.276 --> 0:16:14.116
<v Speaker 1>to us in present day than they used to be,

0:16:14.156 --> 0:16:16.596
<v Speaker 1>and this might be responsible for some of the decline.

0:16:17.156 --> 0:16:20.236
<v Speaker 1>Do you mind sharing what those building blocks are? Yeah.

0:16:20.276 --> 0:16:23.436
<v Speaker 1>I talk a lot about the world that empathy evolved in, right,

0:16:23.476 --> 0:16:25.956
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about the social world that we

0:16:25.996 --> 0:16:28.476
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred thousand years ago, it's just a lot

0:16:28.516 --> 0:16:31.236
<v Speaker 1>different than where we are now. You know, people existed

0:16:31.236 --> 0:16:34.716
<v Speaker 1>in small bands of hunter gatherers, maybe a few families

0:16:34.716 --> 0:16:36.516
<v Speaker 1>a piece, and what that meant is that if you

0:16:36.556 --> 0:16:39.196
<v Speaker 1>interacted with somebody else, probably a bunch of things were true.

0:16:39.556 --> 0:16:42.716
<v Speaker 1>You were really familiar to one another, maybe you were related.

0:16:43.356 --> 0:16:46.716
<v Speaker 1>People were visible to one another. We could hear pain

0:16:46.796 --> 0:16:49.396
<v Speaker 1>and pleasure in each other's voices, see it in each

0:16:49.436 --> 0:16:54.036
<v Speaker 1>other's faces, and we were accountable to one another. It

0:16:54.076 --> 0:16:57.156
<v Speaker 1>was clear who had acted kindly and cruelly, and we

0:16:57.156 --> 0:16:59.876
<v Speaker 1>could take that history into account when we decide how

0:16:59.876 --> 0:17:02.036
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to treat them. And I think of those

0:17:02.436 --> 0:17:08.196
<v Speaker 1>pieces of social life, visibility, familiarity, and accountability as kind

0:17:08.236 --> 0:17:12.476
<v Speaker 1>of empathies, immortal soup packed with ingredients that make it

0:17:12.516 --> 0:17:15.436
<v Speaker 1>easy and natural to connect with one another. But those

0:17:15.596 --> 0:17:18.476
<v Speaker 1>ingredients have fallen out of the lives that we live

0:17:18.556 --> 0:17:21.676
<v Speaker 1>now more than ever. You know, even before the pandemic,

0:17:21.716 --> 0:17:25.196
<v Speaker 1>people were living in giant cities more than ever in

0:17:25.276 --> 0:17:27.636
<v Speaker 1>human history, and a loan, so we were sort of

0:17:27.996 --> 0:17:31.596
<v Speaker 1>seeing more people than ever, but familiar with fewer of them.

0:17:31.636 --> 0:17:35.596
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like people turned into obstacles instead of people.

0:17:35.756 --> 0:17:39.916
<v Speaker 1>We interact now more in anonymous ways, in transactional ways,

0:17:40.196 --> 0:17:43.956
<v Speaker 1>and those types of human connections are really not great

0:17:43.996 --> 0:17:47.876
<v Speaker 1>soil for empathy to grow in. Yeah, well, we're going

0:17:47.916 --> 0:17:51.796
<v Speaker 1>to give listeners. Some hope now, Jamil, because the very

0:17:51.916 --> 0:17:55.076
<v Speaker 1>hopeful message coming out of your book is that we

0:17:55.156 --> 0:18:00.356
<v Speaker 1>are not doomed given modern barriers. Empathy is something that

0:18:00.396 --> 0:18:03.956
<v Speaker 1>we can in fact increase with some effort. Yeah, you know,

0:18:04.036 --> 0:18:08.476
<v Speaker 1>I think that for a long time, scientists, philosophers and

0:18:08.516 --> 0:18:12.036
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us have thought of empathy as a trait.

0:18:12.476 --> 0:18:14.596
<v Speaker 1>You either have it or you don't. It's just fixed.

0:18:14.756 --> 0:18:16.796
<v Speaker 1>And I ask people a lot, you know, to think

0:18:16.836 --> 0:18:20.116
<v Speaker 1>of the most empathic and least empathic person they've ever known.

0:18:19.956 --> 0:18:23.156
<v Speaker 1>And if I ask people, how did that individual get

0:18:23.196 --> 0:18:24.476
<v Speaker 1>that way? They said, well, what do you mean? They

0:18:24.476 --> 0:18:26.756
<v Speaker 1>didn't get that way. They were born that way, and

0:18:26.796 --> 0:18:28.916
<v Speaker 1>they were that way of their whole life. And I

0:18:28.956 --> 0:18:32.236
<v Speaker 1>think it's normal to see ourselves as fixed because we

0:18:32.276 --> 0:18:35.436
<v Speaker 1>don't see ourselves changing, because we change slowly, and when

0:18:35.436 --> 0:18:38.196
<v Speaker 1>something happens slowly, it's hard to see. It's also it's

0:18:38.236 --> 0:18:40.276
<v Speaker 1>been true by the way of other parts of our mind.

0:18:40.596 --> 0:18:43.436
<v Speaker 1>We used to think of intelligence as something that was fixed.

0:18:43.476 --> 0:18:46.516
<v Speaker 1>We used to think of our personalities as totally fixed.

0:18:46.916 --> 0:18:49.596
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that people do change and we

0:18:49.676 --> 0:18:52.316
<v Speaker 1>do move. In fact, the only thing that you can't

0:18:52.356 --> 0:18:56.956
<v Speaker 1>do is stop changing evidence suggests that although some people

0:18:56.956 --> 0:19:00.756
<v Speaker 1>are born more empathic than others, our experiences matter enormously,

0:19:00.796 --> 0:19:04.356
<v Speaker 1>and some experiences can cause our empathy to grow and

0:19:04.436 --> 0:19:09.836
<v Speaker 1>some can cause it to shrink and weaken. Ahead, Jamil

0:19:09.956 --> 0:19:14.036
<v Speaker 1>gives us strategies to try and become more empathetic. We'll

0:19:14.036 --> 0:19:16.396
<v Speaker 1>be back in a moment with a slight change of plans.

0:19:23.556 --> 0:19:26.756
<v Speaker 1>So I'd love to talk about how it is that

0:19:26.796 --> 0:19:28.756
<v Speaker 1>we can be more empathetic. Right, so you've built a

0:19:28.796 --> 0:19:33.636
<v Speaker 1>strong case that, Okay, good news, folks. Empathy is more

0:19:33.676 --> 0:19:35.396
<v Speaker 1>of a muscle than you think it is. It can

0:19:35.436 --> 0:19:38.636
<v Speaker 1>grow with hard work and perseverance and effort and understanding.

0:19:39.156 --> 0:19:41.556
<v Speaker 1>Now let's get into some of the tactics. So you know,

0:19:41.556 --> 0:19:44.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to this podcast, I'm feeling motivated to be

0:19:44.236 --> 0:19:46.996
<v Speaker 1>my best empathetic self. I didn't want to say most empathetic,

0:19:47.036 --> 0:19:48.516
<v Speaker 1>by the way, because we'll get to why that might

0:19:48.556 --> 0:19:51.276
<v Speaker 1>be problematic language in a little bit. But I want

0:19:51.276 --> 0:19:53.516
<v Speaker 1>to be my best empathetic self. So the version of

0:19:53.556 --> 0:19:57.196
<v Speaker 1>Maya that helps people in the most impactful ways possible.

0:19:57.796 --> 0:20:01.276
<v Speaker 1>And one antagonist you say that gets in the way

0:20:01.396 --> 0:20:05.636
<v Speaker 1>of feeling empathy is our tendency to engage in what's

0:20:05.636 --> 0:20:09.596
<v Speaker 1>called tribal thinking. So there are those people who are

0:20:09.596 --> 0:20:12.316
<v Speaker 1>members of our group, and then there are those people

0:20:12.316 --> 0:20:15.076
<v Speaker 1>who are not members of our group. And you say

0:20:15.116 --> 0:20:20.036
<v Speaker 1>that having in us and them mentality can sap us

0:20:20.076 --> 0:20:23.236
<v Speaker 1>of our innate curiosity and our empathy for those who

0:20:23.236 --> 0:20:26.676
<v Speaker 1>are not in our group. And so, given this, what

0:20:26.796 --> 0:20:31.836
<v Speaker 1>are some strategies we can use to resist tribal thinking? Yeah,

0:20:31.876 --> 0:20:35.636
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great question. Tribal thinking gets in

0:20:35.676 --> 0:20:38.196
<v Speaker 1>the way of empathy. It even does more than that.

0:20:38.276 --> 0:20:41.116
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, if we think of ourselves as having

0:20:41.196 --> 0:20:44.556
<v Speaker 1>an in group sort of us, and an outgroup them,

0:20:45.156 --> 0:20:47.476
<v Speaker 1>we might empathize less with people who we think are

0:20:47.556 --> 0:20:50.676
<v Speaker 1>different from us. But the real problem comes when those

0:20:50.716 --> 0:20:54.276
<v Speaker 1>groups come into conflict or competition with each other, because

0:20:54.316 --> 0:20:57.516
<v Speaker 1>then the outgroup, the people who are you know them,

0:20:58.116 --> 0:21:00.796
<v Speaker 1>aren't just different from us, they're a direct threat to

0:21:00.876 --> 0:21:04.556
<v Speaker 1>our community. And when you get into that situation, whatever

0:21:04.596 --> 0:21:07.796
<v Speaker 1>happens that's good for them is bad for us, and

0:21:07.836 --> 0:21:10.916
<v Speaker 1>whatever is bad for them is good for us. So

0:21:10.956 --> 0:21:13.436
<v Speaker 1>you get not only a lack of empathy, you get

0:21:13.476 --> 0:21:16.516
<v Speaker 1>what my friend Mina Chakara calls shod in Freuda and

0:21:16.556 --> 0:21:19.116
<v Speaker 1>She's studied this a lot. This is kind of savoring

0:21:19.196 --> 0:21:22.756
<v Speaker 1>other people's pain. I feel these days that a lot

0:21:22.796 --> 0:21:24.956
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter has become sort of a shod In Freud

0:21:24.996 --> 0:21:27.676
<v Speaker 1>a buffet at this point, you know, But you get

0:21:27.676 --> 0:21:30.956
<v Speaker 1>this reversal of empathy, and I think that there are

0:21:30.996 --> 0:21:34.316
<v Speaker 1>ways that we can overcome this. The first is to

0:21:34.556 --> 0:21:39.276
<v Speaker 1>understand who's really out there. We often have gross misconceptions

0:21:39.316 --> 0:21:41.396
<v Speaker 1>of what the other side is like. We think that

0:21:41.436 --> 0:21:44.916
<v Speaker 1>they are way more extreme, way more threatening, way more

0:21:45.076 --> 0:21:50.076
<v Speaker 1>violent than they really are. So learning and trying to

0:21:50.356 --> 0:21:53.436
<v Speaker 1>revive some curiosity about who's actually on the other side

0:21:53.876 --> 0:21:58.116
<v Speaker 1>is quite helpful in reducing that sense of threat. Relationships,

0:21:58.156 --> 0:22:01.436
<v Speaker 1>in a way, are a key that can unlock our

0:22:01.956 --> 0:22:05.636
<v Speaker 1>openness not just to the people we connect with, but

0:22:05.676 --> 0:22:07.756
<v Speaker 1>to people like them. And that's part of why it's

0:22:07.796 --> 0:22:10.236
<v Speaker 1>so important for any buddy who wants to build their

0:22:10.276 --> 0:22:13.836
<v Speaker 1>empathy to try to foster these individual connections, because they

0:22:13.876 --> 0:22:17.476
<v Speaker 1>go far beyond just the two people who might be

0:22:17.516 --> 0:22:21.636
<v Speaker 1>talking with one another. Yeah, and there's really interesting research

0:22:21.676 --> 0:22:24.476
<v Speaker 1>corroborating what you've just said. Do you mind sharing some

0:22:24.556 --> 0:22:27.996
<v Speaker 1>of the research in this area. Yeah. Absolutely. There's a

0:22:28.036 --> 0:22:31.956
<v Speaker 1>study from almost twenty five years ago. That shows how

0:22:32.436 --> 0:22:36.916
<v Speaker 1>empathizing with an individual can unlock our care and understanding

0:22:36.956 --> 0:22:39.876
<v Speaker 1>for an entire group. So in this study, people were

0:22:39.916 --> 0:22:42.916
<v Speaker 1>asked to read the story of somebody named Julie who

0:22:43.676 --> 0:22:45.756
<v Speaker 1>was suffering from AIDS, and I should say the study

0:22:45.876 --> 0:22:48.276
<v Speaker 1>conduct in the nineteen nineties, when there is still more

0:22:48.356 --> 0:22:52.596
<v Speaker 1>stigma than there is now around AIDS. Some of these people,

0:22:52.636 --> 0:22:55.236
<v Speaker 1>in reading about Julie were asked to empathize with her,

0:22:55.596 --> 0:22:58.796
<v Speaker 1>to really try to understand what she's going through and

0:22:58.916 --> 0:23:01.916
<v Speaker 1>what this might be like for her. Other people, while

0:23:01.956 --> 0:23:05.196
<v Speaker 1>reading her story were told just be objective and detached.

0:23:05.916 --> 0:23:09.716
<v Speaker 1>Now the people were asked to empathize, empathized with Julie.

0:23:09.796 --> 0:23:13.196
<v Speaker 1>No shock, they're really But what's more interesting is what

0:23:13.236 --> 0:23:15.876
<v Speaker 1>happened when the researchers then ask these people, well, what

0:23:15.956 --> 0:23:19.036
<v Speaker 1>about folks who have AIDS in general? How should we

0:23:19.116 --> 0:23:22.916
<v Speaker 1>think about them? How should society treat them? What support

0:23:22.956 --> 0:23:25.716
<v Speaker 1>should we have in place for them? And it turned

0:23:25.716 --> 0:23:29.716
<v Speaker 1>out that people who empathize with Julie didn't just care

0:23:29.836 --> 0:23:33.796
<v Speaker 1>for Julie, they cared more about people with AIDS in general.

0:23:34.356 --> 0:23:38.516
<v Speaker 1>So again, in this way, relationships aren't just connections between

0:23:38.556 --> 0:23:42.556
<v Speaker 1>one person and another they're keys that unlock our ability

0:23:42.596 --> 0:23:45.676
<v Speaker 1>to connect with all sorts of people and entire groups

0:23:45.716 --> 0:23:48.116
<v Speaker 1>of people. Yeah. I find that to be such an

0:23:48.156 --> 0:23:53.116
<v Speaker 1>inspiring takeaway because it feels like something that exists within

0:23:53.156 --> 0:23:56.356
<v Speaker 1>our control to build empathy with an individual person that

0:23:56.396 --> 0:23:59.076
<v Speaker 1>we know or we're reading about, and then to think

0:23:59.076 --> 0:24:01.396
<v Speaker 1>that that can have all sorts of positive spillover effects

0:24:01.396 --> 0:24:05.116
<v Speaker 1>for how we think about communities all over the world. Yeah.

0:24:05.156 --> 0:24:07.636
<v Speaker 1>It just makes my heart happy that there's hope in

0:24:07.676 --> 0:24:09.796
<v Speaker 1>this space. And I think think many of us have

0:24:09.876 --> 0:24:13.316
<v Speaker 1>had this experience where we've connected with someone who's different

0:24:13.356 --> 0:24:18.196
<v Speaker 1>from us and just learned so much so quickly, and

0:24:18.316 --> 0:24:20.996
<v Speaker 1>we think of what we learn as I have this

0:24:21.036 --> 0:24:23.956
<v Speaker 1>new perspective, I have this new knowledge, but I want

0:24:24.036 --> 0:24:27.476
<v Speaker 1>people to realize that they're also learning emotionally. They're also

0:24:27.596 --> 0:24:30.236
<v Speaker 1>learning what other people's worlds are like and what they

0:24:30.276 --> 0:24:32.076
<v Speaker 1>care about, and that makes it easier for us to

0:24:32.116 --> 0:24:35.476
<v Speaker 1>care about that too. Yeah. No, I love that. Another

0:24:35.516 --> 0:24:37.676
<v Speaker 1>way that you say we can create more empathy in

0:24:37.676 --> 0:24:41.036
<v Speaker 1>the world is to better establish empathy as a norm.

0:24:41.196 --> 0:24:43.876
<v Speaker 1>And we know from lots of social psychology research that,

0:24:44.116 --> 0:24:47.516
<v Speaker 1>of course we as people are highly influenced by how

0:24:47.516 --> 0:24:51.956
<v Speaker 1>other people behave. We tend to follow social norms. And

0:24:52.436 --> 0:24:55.516
<v Speaker 1>there's this very fun, charming study that was run on

0:24:55.836 --> 0:25:00.276
<v Speaker 1>seventh graders in which empathy was established as the norm.

0:25:00.356 --> 0:25:04.796
<v Speaker 1>So this is a particularly impressionable population. And so yeah,

0:25:04.836 --> 0:25:07.436
<v Speaker 1>would you mind just talking a bit more about this study? Yeah,

0:25:07.516 --> 0:25:10.516
<v Speaker 1>of course. I mean, seventh graders turned out to be

0:25:10.956 --> 0:25:13.956
<v Speaker 1>the most conformist people on the planet by age, right,

0:25:13.996 --> 0:25:16.996
<v Speaker 1>So if you map conformity against age at peaks in

0:25:17.076 --> 0:25:20.156
<v Speaker 1>early adolescence, and I get it. I mean, shoot, when

0:25:20.156 --> 0:25:22.476
<v Speaker 1>I was in seventh grade, I would have done anything

0:25:22.596 --> 0:25:26.316
<v Speaker 1>to fit in with anyone at any time. Not that

0:25:26.356 --> 0:25:29.396
<v Speaker 1>it worked, but that's a conversation from my therapist. But

0:25:29.596 --> 0:25:32.356
<v Speaker 1>so I think, especially in adolescence, it's easy to think

0:25:32.356 --> 0:25:34.916
<v Speaker 1>of conformity as pretty dangerous, as something that's going to

0:25:34.996 --> 0:25:39.516
<v Speaker 1>lead people, lead kids to do things that maybe they shouldn't,

0:25:39.556 --> 0:25:43.396
<v Speaker 1>to be mean, or to engage in risky behaviors. But

0:25:43.796 --> 0:25:47.036
<v Speaker 1>just like with adults, adolescent conformity can be a force

0:25:47.156 --> 0:25:49.676
<v Speaker 1>for ill or a force for good. And so we decided,

0:25:49.876 --> 0:25:52.716
<v Speaker 1>in work with my graduate in Erica Wise to see

0:25:52.716 --> 0:25:56.356
<v Speaker 1>if we could use conformity to build empathy among seventh

0:25:56.396 --> 0:25:59.436
<v Speaker 1>grade classrooms. So we worked in four schools and a

0:25:59.516 --> 0:26:01.276
<v Speaker 1>third of the students we worked with we put in

0:26:01.316 --> 0:26:04.996
<v Speaker 1>what we called an empathic social norms condition, which basically

0:26:05.036 --> 0:26:07.516
<v Speaker 1>means we tried to convince them empathy is cool. We

0:26:07.596 --> 0:26:10.716
<v Speaker 1>really We showed them videos, and I should say all

0:26:10.716 --> 0:26:13.436
<v Speaker 1>the videos were based on real data, so we were

0:26:13.436 --> 0:26:16.076
<v Speaker 1>not deceiving these kids in any way. But the videos

0:26:16.116 --> 0:26:19.636
<v Speaker 1>basically talked about how empathy is this real, powerful social

0:26:19.676 --> 0:26:22.636
<v Speaker 1>skill that helps you make friends, and that seventh graders

0:26:22.996 --> 0:26:27.356
<v Speaker 1>really value empathy, that they tend to gravitate towards other

0:26:27.436 --> 0:26:30.596
<v Speaker 1>kids who are empathic. Again, this is all true. We

0:26:30.716 --> 0:26:33.076
<v Speaker 1>then asked them to, based on what they had seen,

0:26:33.276 --> 0:26:36.676
<v Speaker 1>write about why they valued empathy, and then we collated

0:26:36.716 --> 0:26:39.796
<v Speaker 1>all their responses why so that when they came back

0:26:39.796 --> 0:26:42.196
<v Speaker 1>to the classroom, we could give these kids a brochure

0:26:42.676 --> 0:26:45.076
<v Speaker 1>of all of their friends and classmates saying why they

0:26:45.196 --> 0:26:48.996
<v Speaker 1>value empathy. In essence, we're alerting them to a social

0:26:49.036 --> 0:26:50.876
<v Speaker 1>norm that was all around them, but that they might

0:26:50.876 --> 0:26:54.196
<v Speaker 1>not have realized. Was there the popularity of empathy among

0:26:54.236 --> 0:26:57.076
<v Speaker 1>their peers. So we came back to these classrooms a

0:26:57.116 --> 0:26:59.956
<v Speaker 1>month later and we asked students to nominate people in

0:26:59.996 --> 0:27:03.756
<v Speaker 1>their class who were nice, who seemed compassionate, and did

0:27:03.796 --> 0:27:06.396
<v Speaker 1>favors for other kids. And we found that kids in

0:27:06.636 --> 0:27:10.236
<v Speaker 1>our empathic social norms condition who were more motivated to

0:27:10.276 --> 0:27:14.236
<v Speaker 1>empathize a month later, we're more likely to be nominated

0:27:14.476 --> 0:27:17.636
<v Speaker 1>by their peers as somebody who was acting kindly, which

0:27:17.676 --> 0:27:20.796
<v Speaker 1>is to us not just an indication that this effect

0:27:20.876 --> 0:27:23.316
<v Speaker 1>lasted a long time, but also that it showed up

0:27:23.596 --> 0:27:26.156
<v Speaker 1>not just in kids' hearts and minds, but in the

0:27:26.156 --> 0:27:29.636
<v Speaker 1>way that they acted towards one another. Yeah, in their

0:27:29.676 --> 0:27:32.956
<v Speaker 1>behaviors and their expressions. Yeah, I love that outcome metric.

0:27:33.916 --> 0:27:37.316
<v Speaker 1>Your final recommendation in your book, Jamil, around building empathy

0:27:37.396 --> 0:27:42.476
<v Speaker 1>has to do with changing our own mindsets about empathy

0:27:42.956 --> 0:27:46.196
<v Speaker 1>being something that is in fact malluable, that is something

0:27:46.196 --> 0:27:49.356
<v Speaker 1>that we can change, And you say that it is

0:27:49.396 --> 0:27:52.156
<v Speaker 1>a self fulfilling prophecy, right, Like, the more we believe

0:27:52.196 --> 0:27:54.876
<v Speaker 1>that we can change our empathy, the more successful will

0:27:54.916 --> 0:27:58.076
<v Speaker 1>be at empathizing with others. Do you mind sharing some

0:27:58.116 --> 0:28:00.196
<v Speaker 1>of the work that you've done in this space. Yes,

0:28:00.556 --> 0:28:03.756
<v Speaker 1>this is work with one of my scientific idols, Carol Dweck.

0:28:04.316 --> 0:28:07.516
<v Speaker 1>Carol is uber famous for her work on mindsets. This

0:28:07.596 --> 0:28:11.316
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're expressing. When people think that they can't change,

0:28:11.436 --> 0:28:14.236
<v Speaker 1>they don't really try to, because why was the energy.

0:28:14.556 --> 0:28:17.236
<v Speaker 1>When people know that they can change, they tend to

0:28:17.276 --> 0:28:19.996
<v Speaker 1>work harder, which in turn makes it more likely that

0:28:20.036 --> 0:28:22.156
<v Speaker 1>they really do change, and that turns out to be

0:28:22.156 --> 0:28:25.996
<v Speaker 1>true for empathy as well. In a series of experiments,

0:28:26.076 --> 0:28:30.116
<v Speaker 1>Carol and I, along with our colleague Karina Schumann, presented

0:28:30.196 --> 0:28:33.276
<v Speaker 1>people with one of two essays. Some people read an

0:28:33.356 --> 0:28:36.396
<v Speaker 1>essay that said empathy is a fixed rate. You can't

0:28:36.396 --> 0:28:38.716
<v Speaker 1>really change it. Whoever you are now, you're going to

0:28:38.756 --> 0:28:41.196
<v Speaker 1>be for the rest of your life. Other people read

0:28:41.236 --> 0:28:43.596
<v Speaker 1>an essay that told them empathy is a skill that

0:28:43.676 --> 0:28:46.916
<v Speaker 1>you can grow. It's up to you how empathic you become,

0:28:47.156 --> 0:28:51.076
<v Speaker 1>at least to some level. And after people read one

0:28:51.116 --> 0:28:54.316
<v Speaker 1>of these essays, we put them through an empathic obstacle

0:28:54.356 --> 0:28:57.276
<v Speaker 1>course full of situations in which it doesn't always come

0:28:57.356 --> 0:29:00.956
<v Speaker 1>naturally to connect with people, the very situations that sometimes

0:29:00.956 --> 0:29:04.356
<v Speaker 1>put walls up against our empathy, like difference. For instance,

0:29:04.396 --> 0:29:08.156
<v Speaker 1>we might ask people to listen to emotional stories that

0:29:08.196 --> 0:29:11.076
<v Speaker 1>are told by someone who is a different race, or

0:29:11.156 --> 0:29:13.556
<v Speaker 1>we would ask them to imagine a conversation with somebody

0:29:13.596 --> 0:29:16.796
<v Speaker 1>they disagreed with politically and ask how much energy would

0:29:16.796 --> 0:29:19.916
<v Speaker 1>you put into trying to understand this person in their perspective.

0:29:20.396 --> 0:29:24.116
<v Speaker 1>These are the very cases where empathy doesn't always happen

0:29:24.156 --> 0:29:27.396
<v Speaker 1>the way that we wish it would, where our biases

0:29:27.396 --> 0:29:29.476
<v Speaker 1>get in the way, And that's why we were so

0:29:29.516 --> 0:29:32.796
<v Speaker 1>curious about those very cases. He said, well, what if

0:29:32.796 --> 0:29:34.516
<v Speaker 1>people know that they can grow their empathy? And it

0:29:34.516 --> 0:29:37.556
<v Speaker 1>turns out that people who we had just taught that

0:29:37.636 --> 0:29:40.916
<v Speaker 1>empathy was a skill worked harder at it, including in

0:29:40.956 --> 0:29:44.796
<v Speaker 1>trying to overcome those biases. They spent more time listening

0:29:44.796 --> 0:29:46.876
<v Speaker 1>to stories told by someone who is a different race,

0:29:47.276 --> 0:29:50.396
<v Speaker 1>They put more energy into trying to understand someone who

0:29:50.476 --> 0:29:54.356
<v Speaker 1>was different from them ideologically. They basically put in the

0:29:54.436 --> 0:29:58.436
<v Speaker 1>work in cases where empathy takes work. And I think

0:29:58.476 --> 0:30:01.276
<v Speaker 1>that's what mattered most to us about that study, is

0:30:01.276 --> 0:30:03.796
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just that people work harder at empathy

0:30:03.836 --> 0:30:06.556
<v Speaker 1>when it's really fun and easy, they work harder at

0:30:06.556 --> 0:30:10.116
<v Speaker 1>it when it's hard. Think it's important to note in

0:30:10.116 --> 0:30:13.396
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, and I imagine there are many listeners of

0:30:13.396 --> 0:30:15.956
<v Speaker 1>a slight change of plans in particular that fall into

0:30:15.956 --> 0:30:20.396
<v Speaker 1>this camp, which is having too much empathy. You note

0:30:20.476 --> 0:30:23.876
<v Speaker 1>that it can debilitate us psychologically, it can prevent us

0:30:23.876 --> 0:30:28.316
<v Speaker 1>from doing our jobs. And conventional guidance for people in

0:30:29.036 --> 0:30:32.836
<v Speaker 1>high empathy professions in particular, so people like first responders,

0:30:32.836 --> 0:30:36.756
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers, etc. Is for them to engage in more

0:30:36.836 --> 0:30:40.236
<v Speaker 1>self care. But you offer up another way of thinking

0:30:40.276 --> 0:30:44.156
<v Speaker 1>about this problem altogether. And look, I think there are

0:30:44.236 --> 0:30:47.676
<v Speaker 1>multiple solutions to obviously a single problem. I mean, for one,

0:30:47.756 --> 0:30:51.276
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have our first responders working sixteen hour shifts.

0:30:51.276 --> 0:30:53.716
<v Speaker 1>That's in humane, and so we have to have protections

0:30:53.716 --> 0:30:56.836
<v Speaker 1>for people. But there is a shift in mindset we

0:30:56.876 --> 0:31:01.236
<v Speaker 1>can have around the kind of empathy we feel. And

0:31:01.596 --> 0:31:03.196
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the fact that we don't want to

0:31:03.276 --> 0:31:06.316
<v Speaker 1>rid ourselves that the empathy altogether, because certain types of

0:31:06.316 --> 0:31:10.036
<v Speaker 1>empathy can actually be protective against burnouts. So walk me

0:31:10.076 --> 0:31:11.436
<v Speaker 1>through some of this work because it might be a

0:31:11.476 --> 0:31:14.556
<v Speaker 1>little counterintuitive for people. Yeah, I want to start by

0:31:14.676 --> 0:31:17.516
<v Speaker 1>just thanking you for acknowledging the structural piece here. You know,

0:31:17.556 --> 0:31:20.116
<v Speaker 1>it's so important that as a psychologist I focus on

0:31:20.116 --> 0:31:23.716
<v Speaker 1>people's minds and their emotions, but the structure is and

0:31:23.836 --> 0:31:26.956
<v Speaker 1>culture around us matters so much and so you're exactly right.

0:31:26.996 --> 0:31:29.836
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the first step towards decreasing burnout is building

0:31:29.836 --> 0:31:32.876
<v Speaker 1>a just system for the people who work within it. Yeah,

0:31:32.876 --> 0:31:34.956
<v Speaker 1>it's like, if you're getting three hours of sleep at night,

0:31:35.116 --> 0:31:37.276
<v Speaker 1>only so much a mindset shift can do. Let's be

0:31:37.356 --> 0:31:39.956
<v Speaker 1>reasonable here, please, right, please, there are limits on the

0:31:39.956 --> 0:31:43.596
<v Speaker 1>power of the mind when it's severely sleep deprived and underfed.

0:31:43.956 --> 0:31:45.956
<v Speaker 1>You know, in my book, I talk about my older

0:31:46.036 --> 0:31:48.916
<v Speaker 1>daughter who had a very difficult birth and then was

0:31:48.956 --> 0:31:51.836
<v Speaker 1>in in NIKKIU for a long time, and the people

0:31:52.316 --> 0:31:54.876
<v Speaker 1>who cared for her and really cared for my wife

0:31:54.876 --> 0:31:58.476
<v Speaker 1>and I as well. We're empathic superheroes. I mean, we

0:31:58.556 --> 0:32:00.956
<v Speaker 1>needed them so much, and they were there for us

0:32:00.996 --> 0:32:03.436
<v Speaker 1>at such a deep level. And as I got out

0:32:03.476 --> 0:32:05.836
<v Speaker 1>of the fog of worrying about my daughter, I started

0:32:05.876 --> 0:32:08.396
<v Speaker 1>to kind of worry about them because I thought, how

0:32:08.436 --> 0:32:11.476
<v Speaker 1>do you do this every day? Go home to your

0:32:11.516 --> 0:32:13.396
<v Speaker 1>own families, and then come back and do it again.

0:32:13.476 --> 0:32:17.316
<v Speaker 1>So I ended up shadowing the nurses and physicians and

0:32:17.396 --> 0:32:20.676
<v Speaker 1>texts on that unit, and I've found that many of

0:32:20.716 --> 0:32:24.876
<v Speaker 1>them were empathizing so much that they were really losing themselves.

0:32:25.436 --> 0:32:27.276
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think many of us these days, even

0:32:27.276 --> 0:32:29.476
<v Speaker 1>if we're not healthcare workers have this sense that we're

0:32:29.756 --> 0:32:32.876
<v Speaker 1>drinking from a fire hose of human misery. They were

0:32:32.916 --> 0:32:34.836
<v Speaker 1>doing it at their jobs. We might be doing it

0:32:34.836 --> 0:32:37.796
<v Speaker 1>when we doom scroll at one in the morning. But

0:32:37.836 --> 0:32:40.316
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much pain out there, and it's very

0:32:40.356 --> 0:32:44.076
<v Speaker 1>easy to feel overwhelmed and shut down. One choice that

0:32:44.116 --> 0:32:46.356
<v Speaker 1>we often feel we have to make is then to say, Okay,

0:32:46.396 --> 0:32:48.916
<v Speaker 1>do I keep on empathizing and wear myself into a

0:32:49.036 --> 0:32:51.956
<v Speaker 1>nub or do I stop? Do I shut off my

0:32:52.076 --> 0:32:56.276
<v Speaker 1>empathy as a kind of self preservation mechanism. It turns out, though,

0:32:56.516 --> 0:32:59.356
<v Speaker 1>that we don't need to see it in such black

0:32:59.356 --> 0:33:01.716
<v Speaker 1>and white terms, that you don't have to choose between

0:33:02.276 --> 0:33:05.956
<v Speaker 1>burning out and empathizing or protecting yourself by becoming callous.

0:33:06.276 --> 0:33:08.756
<v Speaker 1>And this gets back to the same three pieces of

0:33:09.356 --> 0:33:11.876
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about earlier. Yes, and you were

0:33:11.876 --> 0:33:16.116
<v Speaker 1>talking about how emotional empathy is so palpable. It feels

0:33:16.116 --> 0:33:19.316
<v Speaker 1>like that's what empathy is to many people. I think

0:33:19.316 --> 0:33:21.476
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people who care deeply for others

0:33:21.676 --> 0:33:23.476
<v Speaker 1>think that the only way that they can express that

0:33:23.556 --> 0:33:26.956
<v Speaker 1>care is by feeling what other people feel. But it

0:33:26.996 --> 0:33:30.236
<v Speaker 1>turns out that that type of empathy is the easiest

0:33:30.276 --> 0:33:35.196
<v Speaker 1>one to burn out. It's the path through which we

0:33:35.236 --> 0:33:37.556
<v Speaker 1>get overwhelmed, and it's the path through which we end

0:33:37.596 --> 0:33:39.476
<v Speaker 1>up feeling like we don't have anything left to give,

0:33:40.356 --> 0:33:45.596
<v Speaker 1>whereas cognitive empathy and especially empathic concern turn out in

0:33:45.876 --> 0:33:50.276
<v Speaker 1>medical professionals and healthcare workers to be protective against burnout.

0:33:50.636 --> 0:33:53.396
<v Speaker 1>So it's amazing, right, I mean, empathy is not just

0:33:53.436 --> 0:33:57.196
<v Speaker 1>one thing. It's complicated, and different pieces of empathy could

0:33:57.676 --> 0:34:00.636
<v Speaker 1>either put you at risk or protect you from that

0:34:00.796 --> 0:34:05.396
<v Speaker 1>very same risk. And you know, to dig into some

0:34:05.436 --> 0:34:09.356
<v Speaker 1>of the risks of emotional empathy because it does me

0:34:09.436 --> 0:34:12.276
<v Speaker 1>that when you are in cognitive empathy mode, when you're

0:34:12.316 --> 0:34:16.556
<v Speaker 1>in empathic concern mode, it's a very other minded orientation

0:34:16.836 --> 0:34:21.036
<v Speaker 1>where you're almost exclusively focused on relieving the other person's

0:34:21.036 --> 0:34:25.836
<v Speaker 1>pain through problem solving. If you're in the emotional empathic space,

0:34:26.396 --> 0:34:30.116
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you're now carrying a mental burden

0:34:30.156 --> 0:34:32.916
<v Speaker 1>that you can be very eager to relieve yourself of,

0:34:33.276 --> 0:34:35.916
<v Speaker 1>or you might look for a quick fix just because

0:34:35.956 --> 0:34:38.276
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling distressed. Like I can just imagine it having

0:34:38.356 --> 0:34:43.516
<v Speaker 1>distortionary impact. That's extremely insightful and well put because when

0:34:43.596 --> 0:34:48.236
<v Speaker 1>you feel personal distressed, your goal changes. It's not any

0:34:48.316 --> 0:34:50.356
<v Speaker 1>longer that I just need to be there for this person,

0:34:50.396 --> 0:34:53.836
<v Speaker 1>It's I want to stop feeling bad right now. Yeah.

0:34:53.876 --> 0:34:57.956
<v Speaker 1>But if you feel compassion, your goal is to help

0:34:57.996 --> 0:35:00.956
<v Speaker 1>the other person, and that goal cannot be satisfied by

0:35:01.076 --> 0:35:04.716
<v Speaker 1>merely doing whatever it takes to feel better yourself. Yeah.

0:35:04.996 --> 0:35:09.836
<v Speaker 1>So interesting. If we do suffer from turn out, if

0:35:09.836 --> 0:35:13.996
<v Speaker 1>we do feel the burden of sharing in other people's emotions,

0:35:14.596 --> 0:35:17.956
<v Speaker 1>what can we do to re orient ourselves towards more

0:35:18.036 --> 0:35:22.516
<v Speaker 1>of a cognitive empathy empathic concern way of thinking. Like

0:35:22.596 --> 0:35:24.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking, I mean, it makes so much sense,

0:35:24.836 --> 0:35:26.996
<v Speaker 1>but I'm trying to give people a means towards that

0:35:27.196 --> 0:35:30.476
<v Speaker 1>end in case they're really eager to dive in. There

0:35:30.516 --> 0:35:33.596
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of great contemplative practices that help with

0:35:33.756 --> 0:35:39.196
<v Speaker 1>tuning our empathy away from personal distress and towards compassion.

0:35:39.236 --> 0:35:42.116
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these drawn from sort of the Buddhist tradition,

0:35:42.236 --> 0:35:46.036
<v Speaker 1>but there are these practices in mindful self compassion as well.

0:35:46.476 --> 0:35:49.516
<v Speaker 1>You can find videos and scripts for this on YouTube

0:35:49.556 --> 0:35:53.716
<v Speaker 1>all over the place that again help orient us not

0:35:53.916 --> 0:35:58.316
<v Speaker 1>towards how we are reacting to somebody, but towards their

0:35:58.396 --> 0:36:01.756
<v Speaker 1>reality and what we can do for them. And it's

0:36:01.796 --> 0:36:05.436
<v Speaker 1>a slight change of mindset, but it's enormously important to

0:36:05.596 --> 0:36:09.076
<v Speaker 1>basically the extent that we can realize that we are

0:36:09.116 --> 0:36:12.036
<v Speaker 1>are not the ones going through this situation. You know,

0:36:12.076 --> 0:36:15.316
<v Speaker 1>one of the nurses at the Nikku that I shadowed

0:36:15.316 --> 0:36:17.836
<v Speaker 1>from my book had this practice of when she was

0:36:17.836 --> 0:36:19.956
<v Speaker 1>with the family who was going through a tragedy or

0:36:19.996 --> 0:36:22.596
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult time, she would be there for them,

0:36:22.676 --> 0:36:24.596
<v Speaker 1>and then she would go to the kind of break

0:36:24.716 --> 0:36:27.916
<v Speaker 1>room and just sit and repeat to herself, this is

0:36:27.956 --> 0:36:31.716
<v Speaker 1>not my tragedy, And that's not at all to be callous.

0:36:31.756 --> 0:36:34.876
<v Speaker 1>She cared enormously about those people, but in fact, she

0:36:34.996 --> 0:36:38.356
<v Speaker 1>was more capable of caring for them effectively when she

0:36:38.476 --> 0:36:41.476
<v Speaker 1>got herself out of the equation, when she focused on

0:36:41.756 --> 0:36:43.636
<v Speaker 1>the good she could do for them instead of the

0:36:43.636 --> 0:37:19.236
<v Speaker 1>bad that she was feeling. Hey, thanks so much for listening.

0:37:19.796 --> 0:37:22.916
<v Speaker 1>On next week's episode, we'll hear from writer Kelly Corrigan.

0:37:23.676 --> 0:37:26.916
<v Speaker 1>Kelly shares how parenting her two kids went to exactly

0:37:26.956 --> 0:37:31.036
<v Speaker 1>according to plan and still left her reeling it is different.

0:37:31.436 --> 0:37:34.316
<v Speaker 1>It is over, like that part is over and it's fine,

0:37:34.396 --> 0:37:37.316
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm going to have a great forty years, but

0:37:37.876 --> 0:37:42.476
<v Speaker 1>there's no denying that, Like the big page has been

0:37:42.556 --> 0:37:46.596
<v Speaker 1>turned and I'm something else now. To them, I'm something different.

0:37:56.636 --> 0:37:59.676
<v Speaker 1>A Slight Change of Plans is created, written, and executive

0:37:59.676 --> 0:38:03.356
<v Speaker 1>produced by me Maya Schunker. The Slight Change Family includes

0:38:03.396 --> 0:38:07.476
<v Speaker 1>our showrunner Tyler Green, our senior editor Kate Parkinson Morgan,

0:38:07.876 --> 0:38:12.436
<v Speaker 1>our sound engineer Drew Bastola, and our associate producer Sarah McCrae.

0:38:13.156 --> 0:38:16.436
<v Speaker 1>Louise Scara wrote our delightful theme song, and Ginger Smith

0:38:16.476 --> 0:38:19.836
<v Speaker 1>helped arrange the vocals. A Slight Change of Plans is

0:38:19.876 --> 0:38:23.316
<v Speaker 1>a production of Pushkin Industry, So big thanks to everyone there,

0:38:23.916 --> 0:38:27.036
<v Speaker 1>and of course, of very special thanks to Jimmy Lee.

0:38:28.756 --> 0:38:31.236
<v Speaker 1>You can follow A Slight Change of Plans on Instagram

0:38:31.276 --> 0:38:56.196
<v Speaker 1>at doctor Maya Schunker. I love that reflection, Maya. I

0:38:56.236 --> 0:38:59.316
<v Speaker 1>think it's so critical when we reflect on our own

0:38:59.316 --> 0:39:02.836
<v Speaker 1>empathic biases to not just say I tend to be

0:39:02.876 --> 0:39:08.116
<v Speaker 1>more attractive. I'm sorry. That's one more time at Jamiel

0:39:08.236 --> 0:39:10.356
<v Speaker 1>at the Truth. Okay,