WEBVTT - A Former Surgeon General on the Coronavirus Pandemic

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.116
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background the show

0:00:22.156 --> 0:00:25.356
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:25.716 --> 0:00:30.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm no affeldment. The possibility of a COVID vaccine grows

0:00:30.916 --> 0:00:35.396
<v Speaker 1>greater with each passing day, and yet simultaneously, the danger

0:00:35.476 --> 0:00:39.316
<v Speaker 1>continues to grow that some significant percentage of the population

0:00:39.676 --> 0:00:43.116
<v Speaker 1>will not trust the vaccine. The breakdown of that trust

0:00:43.236 --> 0:00:45.356
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the erosion of our trust in

0:00:45.396 --> 0:00:48.836
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of authority, in government authority generally, and in

0:00:48.916 --> 0:00:53.036
<v Speaker 1>scientific and medical authorities in particular. It also has very

0:00:53.116 --> 0:00:56.156
<v Speaker 1>much to do with a deep partisanship that we're encountering

0:00:56.396 --> 0:01:00.756
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this pandemic. To discuss trust, how

0:01:00.756 --> 0:01:03.876
<v Speaker 1>it can be rebuilt, and what indeed needs to be

0:01:03.956 --> 0:01:07.596
<v Speaker 1>done to get an efficacious vaccine to the American public.

0:01:07.996 --> 0:01:11.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by doctor Vaveck Murty. Doctor Murty was the

0:01:11.996 --> 0:01:15.156
<v Speaker 1>Surgeon General of the United States from twenty fourteen to

0:01:15.236 --> 0:01:20.436
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen during Barack Obama's presidency. Is now advising Democratic

0:01:20.476 --> 0:01:32.076
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate Joe Biden on his coronavirus response. Vic, thank

0:01:32.116 --> 0:01:33.956
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining me. I want to start

0:01:34.036 --> 0:01:36.516
<v Speaker 1>with a question that you've spent a huge amount of

0:01:36.556 --> 0:01:39.516
<v Speaker 1>time focused on, and that's a question of trust, public

0:01:39.556 --> 0:01:43.556
<v Speaker 1>trust in science, public trust in medicine. And what's particularly

0:01:43.676 --> 0:01:46.436
<v Speaker 1>driving me to ask you this question is that as

0:01:46.476 --> 0:01:51.796
<v Speaker 1>we move through phase three trials for potential vaccines with

0:01:51.836 --> 0:01:55.916
<v Speaker 1>respect to COVID nineteen, there's a lot of uncertainty about

0:01:55.916 --> 0:01:59.276
<v Speaker 1>how the public will react if and when there's an

0:01:59.316 --> 0:02:03.716
<v Speaker 1>emergency use authorization for these vaccines, or if there's publicity

0:02:03.716 --> 0:02:07.756
<v Speaker 1>around these vaccines. It seems to be politically motivated, and that,

0:02:07.836 --> 0:02:11.676
<v Speaker 1>of course is a question that science. It implicates medicine,

0:02:11.996 --> 0:02:15.716
<v Speaker 1>it implicates approvals, and it implicates politics. So there's a

0:02:15.756 --> 0:02:18.156
<v Speaker 1>lot to be said about this, but intervening it whatever

0:02:18.196 --> 0:02:21.236
<v Speaker 1>you would like to start. So this is a timely question,

0:02:21.596 --> 0:02:25.316
<v Speaker 1>and I think the issue of trust is one that

0:02:25.396 --> 0:02:29.276
<v Speaker 1>has been growing frankly during this pandemic response. Let me

0:02:29.396 --> 0:02:31.636
<v Speaker 1>just say a word about why this is so important.

0:02:31.756 --> 0:02:35.716
<v Speaker 1>It's not just about a vaccine during pandemic responses, and

0:02:35.796 --> 0:02:38.196
<v Speaker 1>I saw this when I served a surgeon general during

0:02:38.196 --> 0:02:41.436
<v Speaker 1>the Zeka outbreak and during Ebola as well. Public trust

0:02:41.596 --> 0:02:44.396
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most important resources you have and

0:02:44.476 --> 0:02:47.756
<v Speaker 1>you have to cultivate it at all costs. That means

0:02:47.796 --> 0:02:51.076
<v Speaker 1>being honest with people even when you've done something wrong.

0:02:51.436 --> 0:02:54.236
<v Speaker 1>It means being open to hard questions, even when you

0:02:54.276 --> 0:02:58.476
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answers to them. It means communicating openly, transparently,

0:02:58.516 --> 0:03:01.676
<v Speaker 1>and regularly with people. And in this moment, it also

0:03:01.716 --> 0:03:05.596
<v Speaker 1>means allowing them to hear directly from the source of information,

0:03:05.676 --> 0:03:08.836
<v Speaker 1>which are scientists. You know, science hastic guide pandemic responses,

0:03:08.876 --> 0:03:12.956
<v Speaker 1>and scientists aren't allowed to speak directly in an unfettered

0:03:12.996 --> 0:03:16.596
<v Speaker 1>way with the public. It's so stubt. What's happening here

0:03:16.636 --> 0:03:19.876
<v Speaker 1>with regarding a vaccine is that we have an unfortunately

0:03:19.956 --> 0:03:23.796
<v Speaker 1>confluence of factors. We have Number one trust, which has

0:03:23.836 --> 0:03:27.796
<v Speaker 1>been I think badly injured over the last several months.

0:03:28.356 --> 0:03:31.316
<v Speaker 1>You have a political cycle which is coming to a

0:03:31.356 --> 0:03:35.396
<v Speaker 1>culmination with this presidential election, and you have a pandemic

0:03:35.516 --> 0:03:39.636
<v Speaker 1>that has not gotten better. In fact, we have the

0:03:39.676 --> 0:03:42.196
<v Speaker 1>most number of cases in the world. We have had

0:03:42.316 --> 0:03:44.516
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred thousand people at this point when you

0:03:44.516 --> 0:03:47.156
<v Speaker 1>and I are talking today who have died from COVID

0:03:47.236 --> 0:03:50.036
<v Speaker 1>nineteen to the United States, and we do not see

0:03:50.036 --> 0:03:52.796
<v Speaker 1>a sign of this ending because our response has been poor.

0:03:53.476 --> 0:03:55.636
<v Speaker 1>And so all of these are coming together to make

0:03:55.636 --> 0:04:00.156
<v Speaker 1>people nervous about a decision around a vaccine, and I

0:04:00.196 --> 0:04:04.396
<v Speaker 1>think there's great danger to rushing a vaccine approval or

0:04:04.436 --> 0:04:07.876
<v Speaker 1>an emergency authorization in this environment. The damage is not

0:04:08.036 --> 0:04:11.796
<v Speaker 1>just that people may not take the vaccine. In fact,

0:04:11.916 --> 0:04:16.076
<v Speaker 1>right now from September Kaiser Family Foundation poll, we know

0:04:16.156 --> 0:04:18.756
<v Speaker 1>that fifty four percent of people are saying that they

0:04:18.796 --> 0:04:21.116
<v Speaker 1>would not take the vaccine if it was offered today.

0:04:21.996 --> 0:04:24.876
<v Speaker 1>That's a staggering number, just given the toll that COVID

0:04:24.876 --> 0:04:27.596
<v Speaker 1>has taken, how much it's turned our lives upside down,

0:04:27.596 --> 0:04:30.356
<v Speaker 1>how much people so desperately want this pandemic to be over.

0:04:30.636 --> 0:04:32.636
<v Speaker 1>Yet fifty four percent of people are saying they wouldn't

0:04:32.636 --> 0:04:35.316
<v Speaker 1>take a vaccine if it was approved before the election.

0:04:36.156 --> 0:04:37.636
<v Speaker 1>So what does that tell us? That tells us that

0:04:37.636 --> 0:04:40.396
<v Speaker 1>people are worried about the process, and they have good

0:04:40.436 --> 0:04:43.116
<v Speaker 1>reason to be, because we've seen a couple of processes

0:04:43.156 --> 0:04:46.156
<v Speaker 1>in the FDA which have been driven by politics, the

0:04:46.276 --> 0:04:49.716
<v Speaker 1>issue of an emergency use authorization for hydroxy chloroquine being one.

0:04:50.156 --> 0:04:54.236
<v Speaker 1>The way in which the convalescent plasma emergency authorization was

0:04:54.276 --> 0:04:57.796
<v Speaker 1>issued with false numbers and hype that was political and

0:04:57.876 --> 0:05:01.356
<v Speaker 1>not scientific. So if the administration really wants to ensure

0:05:01.756 --> 0:05:05.356
<v Speaker 1>that people have faith in an emergency authorization. Here's what

0:05:05.396 --> 0:05:07.636
<v Speaker 1>they need to do. They need to, number one, make

0:05:07.676 --> 0:05:11.956
<v Speaker 1>sure that they estab and communicate clearly an explicit standard

0:05:12.356 --> 0:05:15.676
<v Speaker 1>for safety and efficacy that will be met before an

0:05:15.676 --> 0:05:18.836
<v Speaker 1>emergency use authorization is approved. The second thing they have

0:05:18.876 --> 0:05:20.396
<v Speaker 1>to do is they have to make sure that the

0:05:20.516 --> 0:05:24.796
<v Speaker 1>FDA scientists and very importantly it's external Advisory Board which

0:05:24.836 --> 0:05:27.756
<v Speaker 1>is known by the some a clunky acronym VERTPAC which

0:05:27.756 --> 0:05:31.836
<v Speaker 1>stands for a Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.

0:05:31.916 --> 0:05:35.276
<v Speaker 1>Both of these groups of scientists must be able allowed

0:05:35.436 --> 0:05:39.596
<v Speaker 1>to communicate directly with the public and share their assessment

0:05:39.876 --> 0:05:43.396
<v Speaker 1>without a political filter. And finally, the data itself from

0:05:43.436 --> 0:05:45.756
<v Speaker 1>the trial needs to be made available to the public

0:05:45.796 --> 0:05:49.276
<v Speaker 1>so that the external scientific community can assess it, can

0:05:49.276 --> 0:05:52.076
<v Speaker 1>come to their conclusions, and can share their opinions with

0:05:52.156 --> 0:05:55.516
<v Speaker 1>the public. Only when these are done you should have

0:05:55.596 --> 0:05:58.596
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine be considered for emergency authorization, because again the

0:05:58.636 --> 0:06:01.676
<v Speaker 1>consequences is not just people won't take the COVID vaccine,

0:06:01.956 --> 0:06:05.356
<v Speaker 1>but if we allow hesitancy and doubt to be sown

0:06:05.396 --> 0:06:09.196
<v Speaker 1>about the process itself, then people will doubt vaccines, and

0:06:09.276 --> 0:06:12.276
<v Speaker 1>after COVID is over, they'll worry that politics and arts

0:06:12.276 --> 0:06:14.676
<v Speaker 1>science is driving the process, and that will ultimately hurt

0:06:14.716 --> 0:06:17.436
<v Speaker 1>all of us. I have to say, when I heard

0:06:17.436 --> 0:06:19.796
<v Speaker 1>those poll numbers about the number of people who wouldn't

0:06:19.796 --> 0:06:22.356
<v Speaker 1>take a vaccine, at first I felt shocked, but then

0:06:22.396 --> 0:06:24.876
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I myself had a conversation in fact

0:06:24.916 --> 0:06:27.996
<v Speaker 1>with my own parents, who are you. My father's eighty

0:06:28.036 --> 0:06:31.556
<v Speaker 1>and my mothers in her late seventies, and they had

0:06:31.636 --> 0:06:35.236
<v Speaker 1>similar skepticism. And I was actually horrified in the conversation,

0:06:35.236 --> 0:06:37.316
<v Speaker 1>and I took it upon myself to try to convince

0:06:37.316 --> 0:06:42.396
<v Speaker 1>them that, given their age and the bad outcomes that

0:06:42.756 --> 0:06:45.156
<v Speaker 1>happen to people in that age group, if they do

0:06:45.596 --> 0:06:48.556
<v Speaker 1>actually develop a case of COVID, that they were getting

0:06:48.556 --> 0:06:51.436
<v Speaker 1>it rationally wrong. They ought precisely to be prepared to

0:06:51.436 --> 0:06:54.836
<v Speaker 1>take a vaccine again and provided some emergency used to authorization.

0:06:54.876 --> 0:06:58.116
<v Speaker 1>And I think of my parents is superrational and cautious

0:06:58.156 --> 0:07:01.876
<v Speaker 1>and sensible around medical issues. And that leads me to ask,

0:07:02.396 --> 0:07:05.596
<v Speaker 1>even if the administration, the current administration, the Trump administration,

0:07:06.036 --> 0:07:08.396
<v Speaker 1>did all three of the things that you just said,

0:07:09.276 --> 0:07:13.956
<v Speaker 1>if they actually specify clear protocols for what counted his safety.

0:07:14.316 --> 0:07:17.236
<v Speaker 1>And then they left the scientists at the FDA and

0:07:17.436 --> 0:07:20.796
<v Speaker 1>on the advisory committee, the Vaccine Advisory Committee speak directly

0:07:20.836 --> 0:07:25.436
<v Speaker 1>to the public, and they publicized what data existed from

0:07:25.596 --> 0:07:28.996
<v Speaker 1>Phase three trials. And let's just imagine in the scenario

0:07:29.076 --> 0:07:32.476
<v Speaker 1>that sometime between now and the time of the inauguration

0:07:32.476 --> 0:07:35.756
<v Speaker 1>of the next president, that all of those things pointed

0:07:35.836 --> 0:07:38.996
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of an emergency use authorization. Is there

0:07:39.076 --> 0:07:41.996
<v Speaker 1>any credible way that we could get a lot of

0:07:41.996 --> 0:07:45.276
<v Speaker 1>the public, even under those circumstances, to trust the vaccine

0:07:45.636 --> 0:07:48.476
<v Speaker 1>or is the damage that's been done already so deep

0:07:49.036 --> 0:07:52.916
<v Speaker 1>that we couldn't credibly imagine that certainly in any Trump

0:07:52.956 --> 0:07:57.316
<v Speaker 1>authorized emergency use. Well, Noah, the damage that has been

0:07:57.356 --> 0:07:59.676
<v Speaker 1>done is deep and it will take years to repair.

0:08:00.116 --> 0:08:03.756
<v Speaker 1>Because people had a very high degree of confidence across

0:08:03.796 --> 0:08:07.516
<v Speaker 1>the population in the CDC before COVID nineteen, and we've

0:08:07.556 --> 0:08:11.476
<v Speaker 1>seen their credibility damaged. The FDA's credibility has taken a hit.

0:08:12.956 --> 0:08:16.116
<v Speaker 1>Even people like doctor Tony Faucci, you know, who are

0:08:16.236 --> 0:08:19.276
<v Speaker 1>very highly regarded by the scientific community and by the

0:08:19.276 --> 0:08:22.516
<v Speaker 1>majority of the public. You know, even doctor Faucci's credibility

0:08:22.596 --> 0:08:25.076
<v Speaker 1>has taken a hit because of smear jobs and other

0:08:26.076 --> 0:08:29.356
<v Speaker 1>criticism that he's received that has been politically directed, and

0:08:29.396 --> 0:08:32.076
<v Speaker 1>so there's been a lot of hits to trusted sources

0:08:32.116 --> 0:08:34.796
<v Speaker 1>and it will take years for that to recover. Let's

0:08:34.796 --> 0:08:36.996
<v Speaker 1>just say in your scenario that there is in fact

0:08:37.276 --> 0:08:41.196
<v Speaker 1>a good worthy data that tells us that vaccine candidate

0:08:41.236 --> 0:08:43.756
<v Speaker 1>meets the standards for safety and efficacy, and an emergency

0:08:43.836 --> 0:08:46.876
<v Speaker 1>use authorization is issued. What would happen to happen if

0:08:46.876 --> 0:08:49.356
<v Speaker 1>you wanted people to actually be open to taking that

0:08:49.476 --> 0:08:53.116
<v Speaker 1>vaccine as you would need number one, members of the

0:08:53.156 --> 0:08:56.156
<v Speaker 1>scientific community across the country, and not just you know,

0:08:56.276 --> 0:09:00.156
<v Speaker 1>nationally known scientists, but deans of medical schools, doctors and

0:09:00.196 --> 0:09:02.836
<v Speaker 1>local communities who are trusted and respected, nurses who are

0:09:02.876 --> 0:09:05.476
<v Speaker 1>known and respected. He would need them speaking out in

0:09:05.516 --> 0:09:08.956
<v Speaker 1>local communities to help people recognize that people I know,

0:09:09.236 --> 0:09:12.476
<v Speaker 1>people I recognize, institutions that are local to me trust

0:09:12.556 --> 0:09:14.796
<v Speaker 1>is vaccine. The second thing that you would need to

0:09:14.836 --> 0:09:17.836
<v Speaker 1>see is you would need to see community organizations get

0:09:17.876 --> 0:09:21.716
<v Speaker 1>behind it. People would need to hear from non medical

0:09:21.796 --> 0:09:24.196
<v Speaker 1>voices that they trust as well, whether that's the faith

0:09:24.276 --> 0:09:27.756
<v Speaker 1>leader you know, their community, they're church leader, their synagogue leader.

0:09:28.316 --> 0:09:30.596
<v Speaker 1>They would have to hear from friends and family who

0:09:30.596 --> 0:09:33.596
<v Speaker 1>are getting the vaccine. They would have to hear people

0:09:33.596 --> 0:09:36.836
<v Speaker 1>are getting this and they're not having significant side effects.

0:09:36.956 --> 0:09:39.916
<v Speaker 1>All of this mobilization, if you will, all of this

0:09:40.076 --> 0:09:44.076
<v Speaker 1>messaging will take time, and it will take regardless of

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:48.916
<v Speaker 1>who wins the presidency. One of the most complicated and

0:09:49.156 --> 0:09:52.516
<v Speaker 1>challenging vaccine rollout efforts that this country has ever seen.

0:09:52.996 --> 0:09:57.156
<v Speaker 1>So that is why I often say that while developing

0:09:57.156 --> 0:10:01.076
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine for COVID nineteen is extremely challenging, actually rolling

0:10:01.076 --> 0:10:03.716
<v Speaker 1>it out and administering it to people, getting that shot

0:10:03.756 --> 0:10:05.956
<v Speaker 1>in the arm of a sufficient number of people that

0:10:05.956 --> 0:10:08.236
<v Speaker 1>we can achieve herd immunity, that will be just as

0:10:08.516 --> 0:10:12.556
<v Speaker 1>if not more challenging. You've been advising Joe Biden on

0:10:12.836 --> 0:10:15.996
<v Speaker 1>COVID related issues, and that means that if Joe Biden

0:10:15.996 --> 0:10:19.156
<v Speaker 1>would be elected president and to take office in January,

0:10:19.556 --> 0:10:22.156
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the very small number of people who

0:10:22.196 --> 0:10:25.116
<v Speaker 1>will be in line for the single hardest, most thankless

0:10:25.236 --> 0:10:28.156
<v Speaker 1>job imaginable in the Biden administration, and that would be

0:10:28.596 --> 0:10:32.516
<v Speaker 1>spearheading the actual operation of doing exactly what you're just

0:10:32.556 --> 0:10:36.156
<v Speaker 1>set of, actually getting the vaccine to people So let

0:10:36.196 --> 0:10:39.436
<v Speaker 1>me start by asking you about what plans you have

0:10:39.516 --> 0:10:42.196
<v Speaker 1>been developing. You and the Biden campaign have been developing

0:10:42.796 --> 0:10:46.796
<v Speaker 1>for how to begin that process. Should keep be elected

0:10:46.876 --> 0:10:50.436
<v Speaker 1>and should a vaccine become a safe and available Well, no,

0:10:50.596 --> 0:10:54.836
<v Speaker 1>the Vice President has been really focused on developing and

0:10:54.876 --> 0:10:58.236
<v Speaker 1>thinking about plans. He never takes for granted that he

0:10:58.356 --> 0:11:00.356
<v Speaker 1>is going to win the election, but he wants to

0:11:00.396 --> 0:11:03.116
<v Speaker 1>be prepared to act on day one if he does.

0:11:03.916 --> 0:11:06.836
<v Speaker 1>And what that has meant is not just going about

0:11:06.836 --> 0:11:10.316
<v Speaker 1>the usual process that you have on transition teams, where

0:11:10.356 --> 0:11:12.436
<v Speaker 1>you think about the structure of a department and you

0:11:12.476 --> 0:11:16.076
<v Speaker 1>think about personnel, but it's involved thinking about some very

0:11:16.116 --> 0:11:18.436
<v Speaker 1>specific areas that are going to require a whole lot

0:11:18.476 --> 0:11:21.956
<v Speaker 1>more planning. So, for example, how do you actually expand

0:11:22.156 --> 0:11:25.476
<v Speaker 1>testing sufficiently so that we have enough testing so that

0:11:25.476 --> 0:11:27.596
<v Speaker 1>everyone who needs a test and get one. How do

0:11:27.636 --> 0:11:31.836
<v Speaker 1>we ensure that we actually have enough contact tracing capacity

0:11:31.836 --> 0:11:34.076
<v Speaker 1>in our country. We don't right now, but we really

0:11:34.116 --> 0:11:37.356
<v Speaker 1>need that we have any hopes of getting this under control.

0:11:37.676 --> 0:11:40.116
<v Speaker 1>And of course it involves how to think about the

0:11:40.276 --> 0:11:43.516
<v Speaker 1>deployment of a vaccine. So these have been the topic

0:11:43.596 --> 0:11:46.636
<v Speaker 1>of countless discussions that I and others have had with

0:11:46.836 --> 0:11:50.636
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Biden where he asked very specific questions. He's

0:11:50.836 --> 0:11:53.636
<v Speaker 1>thinking about very specific plans. But a key parts of

0:11:53.676 --> 0:11:58.076
<v Speaker 1>these plans, certainly for the Vaccine Distribution Fund, include thinking

0:11:58.116 --> 0:12:01.356
<v Speaker 1>about who the trusted partners are that we will need

0:12:01.476 --> 0:12:04.636
<v Speaker 1>in communities, like for example, if you think about the partners,

0:12:04.636 --> 0:12:07.476
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a medical establishment, but it's also schools

0:12:07.476 --> 0:12:10.996
<v Speaker 1>and employers. We know that schools and workplaces or sites

0:12:11.036 --> 0:12:14.956
<v Speaker 1>where a vaccine could be administered, and having partners in

0:12:14.996 --> 0:12:18.236
<v Speaker 1>those spheres is going to be absolutely essential. We know

0:12:18.276 --> 0:12:21.316
<v Speaker 1>that local government and states are going to be extremely

0:12:21.356 --> 0:12:23.996
<v Speaker 1>important partners. But here's the way I think the Vice

0:12:24.036 --> 0:12:27.916
<v Speaker 1>President would approach that partnership differently. In the early part

0:12:27.956 --> 0:12:31.476
<v Speaker 1>of this COVID response, what we saw is a transfer

0:12:31.516 --> 0:12:35.316
<v Speaker 1>of responsibility from the federal government to the states, saying,

0:12:35.316 --> 0:12:39.036
<v Speaker 1>you take care of this, and we will lead behind

0:12:39.156 --> 0:12:41.396
<v Speaker 1>lead from a different place. We will step back. I

0:12:41.396 --> 0:12:43.596
<v Speaker 1>think the Vice President realizes that you need to give

0:12:43.676 --> 0:12:46.036
<v Speaker 1>states the ability to craft their own response, but you

0:12:46.076 --> 0:12:48.676
<v Speaker 1>also have to lead as a federal government, and one

0:12:48.676 --> 0:12:50.676
<v Speaker 1>of the places in which you have to lead is

0:12:50.676 --> 0:12:53.076
<v Speaker 1>in the allocation of resources. So just think about the

0:12:53.116 --> 0:12:55.676
<v Speaker 1>following question, how do you decide how much vaccine goes

0:12:55.716 --> 0:13:00.916
<v Speaker 1>to Georgia or Florida, or Massachusetts or California. You can't

0:13:00.956 --> 0:13:03.556
<v Speaker 1>have that driven by politics. That has to be driven

0:13:03.596 --> 0:13:06.316
<v Speaker 1>by science and by need. So which raises a second

0:13:06.356 --> 0:13:08.476
<v Speaker 1>issue that he's been working on, not just partnerships, but

0:13:08.556 --> 0:13:12.676
<v Speaker 1>thinking about data systems right for understanding where the need

0:13:12.756 --> 0:13:14.436
<v Speaker 1>is and making sure that we can meet that need

0:13:14.516 --> 0:13:18.556
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm worried that we don't have strong, robust

0:13:18.636 --> 0:13:21.196
<v Speaker 1>data systems that are integrated in our country such that

0:13:21.276 --> 0:13:23.996
<v Speaker 1>if we administered and rolled out of vaccine today, we

0:13:24.036 --> 0:13:26.756
<v Speaker 1>would automatically know where it was being delivered, who was

0:13:26.796 --> 0:13:29.316
<v Speaker 1>getting them, so that we could target our follow up

0:13:29.356 --> 0:13:32.676
<v Speaker 1>activities appropriately. We have to fix those data systems. So

0:13:32.716 --> 0:13:35.076
<v Speaker 1>he's been thinking about a number of areas like this

0:13:35.476 --> 0:13:39.196
<v Speaker 1>and bringing experts together, well beyond myself, you know, experts

0:13:39.196 --> 0:13:41.236
<v Speaker 1>from really around the country who have done this before.

0:13:41.796 --> 0:13:44.436
<v Speaker 1>He wants to assemble the best team possible because he

0:13:44.436 --> 0:13:46.276
<v Speaker 1>knows this is going to be a once in a

0:13:46.316 --> 0:13:49.796
<v Speaker 1>generation challenge. Let me press you on this. I think

0:13:49.836 --> 0:13:52.436
<v Speaker 1>you're right from what I know that the data systems

0:13:52.476 --> 0:13:56.316
<v Speaker 1>that we presently have aren't sufficiently robust to even have

0:13:56.396 --> 0:14:00.476
<v Speaker 1>a clear sense of what prevalence looks like. And that's

0:14:00.516 --> 0:14:02.676
<v Speaker 1>before you get to the substantive question, which is, if

0:14:02.676 --> 0:14:05.676
<v Speaker 1>you're new prevalence, where should you focus resources. Because it's

0:14:05.716 --> 0:14:07.876
<v Speaker 1>not immediately obvious that you want to focus a vaccine

0:14:08.036 --> 0:14:10.876
<v Speaker 1>immediately on the heartest areas. There are actually arguments for

0:14:10.996 --> 0:14:13.156
<v Speaker 1>beginning in more moderately hit areas, and so forth and

0:14:13.156 --> 0:14:15.036
<v Speaker 1>so on. So, I mean, this is a complex topic

0:14:15.076 --> 0:14:18.156
<v Speaker 1>in its own right, But given that the data systems

0:14:18.436 --> 0:14:21.836
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly are not in place, how is it realistic

0:14:21.916 --> 0:14:25.436
<v Speaker 1>to think that a Biden administration could take the time

0:14:25.516 --> 0:14:29.116
<v Speaker 1>to build up these data systems in order to then

0:14:29.356 --> 0:14:31.796
<v Speaker 1>make an informed decision. I mean, if you are doing this,

0:14:31.956 --> 0:14:33.956
<v Speaker 1>you and a team and people are doing this, you

0:14:33.996 --> 0:14:35.836
<v Speaker 1>are going to be doing it in media's race. You

0:14:35.876 --> 0:14:39.316
<v Speaker 1>are going to be inheriting the mess that you have inherited,

0:14:39.556 --> 0:14:43.676
<v Speaker 1>and you will be under enormous pressure to act quickly. Again,

0:14:43.796 --> 0:14:47.396
<v Speaker 1>assuming that there is a safe and available vaccine. So

0:14:47.876 --> 0:14:49.436
<v Speaker 1>I guess I want to say that sounds nice in

0:14:49.476 --> 0:14:52.116
<v Speaker 1>the abstract, like let's solve the data systems, but there's

0:14:52.156 --> 0:14:54.156
<v Speaker 1>no way that there's going to be the time that

0:14:54.196 --> 0:14:55.756
<v Speaker 1>it would take to do that. So how do you

0:14:55.796 --> 0:15:00.276
<v Speaker 1>make decisions under radical uncertainty without the data systems? So

0:15:00.436 --> 0:15:03.076
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, and you're right, we can't wait

0:15:03.156 --> 0:15:05.476
<v Speaker 1>until the perfect systems are built. You can't wait until

0:15:05.516 --> 0:15:08.596
<v Speaker 1>all the partners are assembled around the table either, because

0:15:08.596 --> 0:15:11.356
<v Speaker 1>if thereccine truly is safe and effective, that means that

0:15:11.596 --> 0:15:15.036
<v Speaker 1>every day you lose our lives that are potentially lost.

0:15:15.276 --> 0:15:18.156
<v Speaker 1>So what we would have to do is we'd have

0:15:18.156 --> 0:15:19.596
<v Speaker 1>to do the best we can in the beginning to

0:15:19.676 --> 0:15:22.076
<v Speaker 1>use the data we have and go to areas that

0:15:22.116 --> 0:15:24.796
<v Speaker 1>we have great need and start to point the vaccine

0:15:24.796 --> 0:15:28.476
<v Speaker 1>through existing partners. We also have, thankfully, through the National

0:15:28.476 --> 0:15:32.796
<v Speaker 1>Academies of Medicine, recommendations on what the priority population should

0:15:32.836 --> 0:15:35.756
<v Speaker 1>be that we should target. So we know that healthcare

0:15:35.796 --> 0:15:38.596
<v Speaker 1>workers and other workers in the front line are critical.

0:15:38.636 --> 0:15:40.596
<v Speaker 1>We know the people at higher risk because of their

0:15:40.676 --> 0:15:43.756
<v Speaker 1>age or other medical conditions they have, are at higher risk.

0:15:43.836 --> 0:15:45.996
<v Speaker 1>So we can go to nursing homes, we can go

0:15:46.036 --> 0:15:49.356
<v Speaker 1>to other locations where high risk populations are and preferentially

0:15:49.756 --> 0:15:52.636
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate there. There is a lot of low hanging fruit,

0:15:52.676 --> 0:15:54.516
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in terms of actions that can be

0:15:54.556 --> 0:15:57.636
<v Speaker 1>taken in the very beginning, even while you're trying to

0:15:57.836 --> 0:16:00.716
<v Speaker 1>build up systems and build up partners. But all of

0:16:00.756 --> 0:16:04.396
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be infinitely harder if people are skeptical,

0:16:04.436 --> 0:16:07.196
<v Speaker 1>if they're doubtful, if they don't trust what you're doing.

0:16:07.236 --> 0:16:09.796
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the other plank of this so essential

0:16:10.156 --> 0:16:13.076
<v Speaker 1>that we've been talking about is the importance of communicating

0:16:13.436 --> 0:16:16.356
<v Speaker 1>openly honesty about what our plans are and what progress

0:16:16.356 --> 0:16:19.076
<v Speaker 1>we're making from day one. This is a kind of

0:16:19.116 --> 0:16:22.956
<v Speaker 1>crisis communication that has been deployed by Republican and democratic

0:16:22.996 --> 0:16:27.156
<v Speaker 1>administrations alike in prior pandemics. It's not the purview of

0:16:27.156 --> 0:16:30.196
<v Speaker 1>one party, but it hasn't been done well in this response,

0:16:30.196 --> 0:16:31.636
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we have a lot of ground to

0:16:31.676 --> 0:16:44.436
<v Speaker 1>make up. We'll be back in a moment. I'm deeply

0:16:44.436 --> 0:16:47.636
<v Speaker 1>worried that, regardless of the outcome of the election, if

0:16:47.676 --> 0:16:51.756
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine becomes available and safe under a Republican administration,

0:16:51.836 --> 0:16:54.516
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Democrats won't trust it, and that if

0:16:54.556 --> 0:16:57.516
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine becomes available and safe under a democratic administration,

0:16:57.916 --> 0:17:00.196
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans won't trust it. In other words,

0:17:00.436 --> 0:17:04.196
<v Speaker 1>my worry is that the profound political partisan differences that

0:17:04.236 --> 0:17:10.316
<v Speaker 1>we have are fully bleeding into people's trust in scientific

0:17:10.316 --> 0:17:15.516
<v Speaker 1>institutions and medical institutions. What's our long run societal solution

0:17:16.076 --> 0:17:18.236
<v Speaker 1>to that problem. I mean, I'm not asking you to

0:17:18.236 --> 0:17:20.796
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem of partisan division. Nobody can do that,

0:17:20.876 --> 0:17:24.716
<v Speaker 1>and it's been with us in certain respects, although waning

0:17:24.716 --> 0:17:27.196
<v Speaker 1>and waxing throughout our history. I'm talking about the very

0:17:27.276 --> 0:17:31.036
<v Speaker 1>concrete problem, much closer to your area of expertise, which

0:17:31.076 --> 0:17:35.156
<v Speaker 1>is that people's trust in science and medicine is coming

0:17:35.156 --> 0:17:38.676
<v Speaker 1>to be deeply inflected by their partisan views. How do

0:17:38.796 --> 0:17:43.316
<v Speaker 1>we break that linkage no matter who's president. Yeah. And

0:17:43.756 --> 0:17:46.116
<v Speaker 1>the reason to be concerned because we've seen that on

0:17:46.196 --> 0:17:49.996
<v Speaker 1>a number of measures, whether it's people's views of the

0:17:50.116 --> 0:17:53.316
<v Speaker 1>masks and whether they're appropriate or not and useful, or

0:17:53.556 --> 0:17:55.876
<v Speaker 1>people's view of other precautions related to COVID. There has

0:17:55.956 --> 0:17:58.836
<v Speaker 1>been a partisan divide here. But what's interesting, as a

0:17:58.916 --> 0:18:00.796
<v Speaker 1>side note, is if you look at this data on

0:18:00.956 --> 0:18:04.796
<v Speaker 1>vaccines and specially the COVID nineteen vaccine. I mentioned that

0:18:04.836 --> 0:18:06.876
<v Speaker 1>fifty four percent of people are saying they would not

0:18:07.356 --> 0:18:10.156
<v Speaker 1>take the vaccine if it was available for election day.

0:18:10.236 --> 0:18:14.156
<v Speaker 1>That actually includes forty eight percent of Democrats, but sixty

0:18:14.196 --> 0:18:17.516
<v Speaker 1>percent of Republicans. So in a very interesting way, we're

0:18:17.556 --> 0:18:21.156
<v Speaker 1>finding that both Democrats and Republicans have deep worries about

0:18:21.156 --> 0:18:25.116
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. But the larger point around polarization and affecting

0:18:25.116 --> 0:18:27.356
<v Speaker 1>how we take in information and what we trust is

0:18:27.396 --> 0:18:29.876
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true and it will be deadly as it has

0:18:29.916 --> 0:18:33.916
<v Speaker 1>been to date regards to coronavirus. I think one critical strategy,

0:18:33.956 --> 0:18:35.476
<v Speaker 1>and there are many here, but the one I'll mention

0:18:36.036 --> 0:18:38.036
<v Speaker 1>is that we have to go local in terms of

0:18:38.076 --> 0:18:41.636
<v Speaker 1>mobilizing information sources. Typically, people think, well, if you get

0:18:41.676 --> 0:18:44.156
<v Speaker 1>somebody on a major network in terms of news, or

0:18:44.156 --> 0:18:46.516
<v Speaker 1>a national radio station, that's how you get the message out.

0:18:46.756 --> 0:18:49.396
<v Speaker 1>But I think increasingly in this polarized world where people

0:18:49.396 --> 0:18:52.276
<v Speaker 1>are listening to their own sources, you actually have to

0:18:52.316 --> 0:18:54.236
<v Speaker 1>go much more local. You have to think, how do

0:18:54.276 --> 0:18:59.516
<v Speaker 1>I ensure that an individual's doctor actually knows that the

0:18:59.636 --> 0:19:02.236
<v Speaker 1>truth about this vaccine so they can recommend them. How

0:19:02.236 --> 0:19:05.236
<v Speaker 1>do I ensure that other people who are trusted members

0:19:05.236 --> 0:19:07.236
<v Speaker 1>of a community, like faith leaders, know the truth about

0:19:07.316 --> 0:19:10.516
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine so they can advise people. Because when you

0:19:10.676 --> 0:19:13.196
<v Speaker 1>have doubts about whether people are telling you to truth,

0:19:13.516 --> 0:19:15.556
<v Speaker 1>all of us as human beings go to the people

0:19:15.596 --> 0:19:18.356
<v Speaker 1>we know and that we have trusted for a long time,

0:19:18.556 --> 0:19:22.396
<v Speaker 1>that our friends, our family, our nurses and doctors, are

0:19:22.756 --> 0:19:25.796
<v Speaker 1>faith leaders and other trusted populations like this. So I

0:19:25.796 --> 0:19:28.716
<v Speaker 1>think if ultimately we want to convince people that the

0:19:28.796 --> 0:19:31.916
<v Speaker 1>vaccines is safe and effective, if indeed the evidence backs

0:19:31.956 --> 0:19:34.076
<v Speaker 1>that up, we've got to think about how to mobilize

0:19:34.116 --> 0:19:36.156
<v Speaker 1>those voices, and I think those will end up being

0:19:36.276 --> 0:19:40.036
<v Speaker 1>much much more important than getting people on cable news

0:19:40.196 --> 0:19:43.676
<v Speaker 1>and on national radio. That raises the really hard question

0:19:43.756 --> 0:19:45.756
<v Speaker 1>of how do you reach the local leaders that you're

0:19:45.756 --> 0:19:49.716
<v Speaker 1>talking about. We live in an era where local newspapers,

0:19:49.756 --> 0:19:51.596
<v Speaker 1>which at one time would have been a standard way

0:19:51.596 --> 0:19:53.436
<v Speaker 1>to reach people locally, because you can have a local

0:19:53.436 --> 0:19:57.796
<v Speaker 1>newspaper article about the local physician or faith leader who says,

0:19:57.916 --> 0:20:00.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, the vaccine is great, but they're in retreat,

0:20:01.196 --> 0:20:03.476
<v Speaker 1>or in many parts of the country they're already gone.

0:20:04.116 --> 0:20:06.716
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ways that people now increasingly communicate

0:20:06.796 --> 0:20:09.636
<v Speaker 1>with their trusted sources, whether it's family or friends or

0:20:09.716 --> 0:20:13.836
<v Speaker 1>local leaders, is actually through social media. And in that environment,

0:20:14.276 --> 0:20:17.116
<v Speaker 1>authority isn't quite as powerful as it once was in

0:20:17.196 --> 0:20:20.756
<v Speaker 1>historical terms, and things can go the other way relatively

0:20:20.996 --> 0:20:25.716
<v Speaker 1>quickly there can be a decentralized distribution of distrustful information.

0:20:26.316 --> 0:20:28.156
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that we want to get people

0:20:28.156 --> 0:20:30.036
<v Speaker 1>to hear an important and true message from people who

0:20:30.076 --> 0:20:32.796
<v Speaker 1>may trust. But how do you at a national level

0:20:32.916 --> 0:20:36.956
<v Speaker 1>think about reaching those people if it's not through going

0:20:36.996 --> 0:20:39.956
<v Speaker 1>on CNN and MSNBC, which you do so frequently and

0:20:39.996 --> 0:20:44.956
<v Speaker 1>so skillfully. Well, no, I think this is not easy work.

0:20:45.116 --> 0:20:47.476
<v Speaker 1>It's a hard grind, if you will, because it requires

0:20:47.476 --> 0:20:50.596
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversations. This is I think why people

0:20:50.636 --> 0:20:54.116
<v Speaker 1>have gravitated so much toward national news and national media.

0:20:54.156 --> 0:20:56.996
<v Speaker 1>It has the illusion that seeming to be more efficient, right,

0:20:57.036 --> 0:20:59.556
<v Speaker 1>you reach more people, Hey, why wouldn't that be better?

0:21:00.196 --> 0:21:03.116
<v Speaker 1>The problem is it comes with a heavy filter that

0:21:03.236 --> 0:21:06.276
<v Speaker 1>people don't necessarily trust. And so the way that I

0:21:06.596 --> 0:21:08.676
<v Speaker 1>would think about this is that we would need to

0:21:08.716 --> 0:21:12.356
<v Speaker 1>reach out, for example, to local organizations that bring together

0:21:12.436 --> 0:21:14.676
<v Speaker 1>faith leaders. We need to reach out to the YMCAs,

0:21:14.676 --> 0:21:16.756
<v Speaker 1>to the rotary clubs. We'll need to reach out to

0:21:16.756 --> 0:21:20.316
<v Speaker 1>associations of librarians. We'll need to reach out to groups

0:21:20.316 --> 0:21:22.396
<v Speaker 1>where we can get in front of people, talk to

0:21:22.436 --> 0:21:25.796
<v Speaker 1>them and then start engaging their local chapters. And if

0:21:25.796 --> 0:21:30.356
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like really tough, tedious, tenuous work. It is.

0:21:30.676 --> 0:21:33.956
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy to do because what we're really talking about, Noah,

0:21:34.436 --> 0:21:36.196
<v Speaker 1>even though we haven't used this word before, is we're

0:21:36.196 --> 0:21:40.436
<v Speaker 1>talking about relationship building, right, and relationship building can take time.

0:21:40.676 --> 0:21:42.756
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it doesn't mean that we'll never

0:21:42.796 --> 0:21:44.756
<v Speaker 1>be able to get a vaccine out for months and months.

0:21:44.756 --> 0:21:46.996
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are enough people who believe that

0:21:46.996 --> 0:21:49.756
<v Speaker 1>this is an urgent crisis and will understand the science

0:21:49.796 --> 0:21:51.916
<v Speaker 1>behind it, that we will have some uptake of the vaccine.

0:21:52.276 --> 0:21:54.476
<v Speaker 1>The question is how to sustain that and get to

0:21:54.476 --> 0:21:57.196
<v Speaker 1>a sufficient level where we have her in immunity. There's

0:21:57.236 --> 0:21:59.196
<v Speaker 1>one other point I want to raise here, though, if

0:21:59.196 --> 0:22:02.116
<v Speaker 1>this is indeed about relationships, and if what we need

0:22:02.156 --> 0:22:04.636
<v Speaker 1>our organizations that have a lot of relationships in the

0:22:04.636 --> 0:22:07.956
<v Speaker 1>local level. It's been particularly worrisome to me over the

0:22:08.036 --> 0:22:11.836
<v Speaker 1>last many years that we've had a breakdown in those

0:22:11.916 --> 0:22:15.116
<v Speaker 1>kind of community organizations over the last many decades, like

0:22:15.196 --> 0:22:18.276
<v Speaker 1>in this country. You know, something that's been well documented

0:22:18.316 --> 0:22:21.396
<v Speaker 1>by about Putnam, you know, I've been Harvard and by others,

0:22:21.836 --> 0:22:25.556
<v Speaker 1>But this decline in participation in community organizations and affiliation

0:22:25.596 --> 0:22:28.916
<v Speaker 1>with community groups leaves people with fewer sources that they

0:22:28.916 --> 0:22:31.916
<v Speaker 1>actually trust that are easy to access in a crisis

0:22:31.956 --> 0:22:35.116
<v Speaker 1>like this, and I see that as deeply worrisome. It's

0:22:35.116 --> 0:22:38.316
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why when I left my time

0:22:38.316 --> 0:22:40.436
<v Speaker 1>in government, when I was thinking about what do I

0:22:40.516 --> 0:22:42.396
<v Speaker 1>work on, what do I want to contribute to in

0:22:42.436 --> 0:22:44.836
<v Speaker 1>the world. That's why I kept coming back to this

0:22:44.916 --> 0:22:48.276
<v Speaker 1>idea of social connection as being such an important topic,

0:22:48.716 --> 0:22:51.836
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't have strong connections in your life,

0:22:51.836 --> 0:22:53.876
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have people you trust. If you don't

0:22:53.876 --> 0:22:57.396
<v Speaker 1>have people you trust, then you're reliant on social media,

0:22:57.476 --> 0:23:01.636
<v Speaker 1>on cable news, on other sources for your information, and

0:23:01.716 --> 0:23:04.476
<v Speaker 1>you don't have people to talk through doubts and worries with.

0:23:04.636 --> 0:23:06.836
<v Speaker 1>And I think we are bearing the consequences of a

0:23:06.916 --> 0:23:11.996
<v Speaker 1>deterioration in social connect in social organizations. But that said,

0:23:12.476 --> 0:23:15.036
<v Speaker 1>we still have many organizations in our communities that we

0:23:15.036 --> 0:23:16.716
<v Speaker 1>can lean on, and that's going to have to be

0:23:16.756 --> 0:23:19.916
<v Speaker 1>our priority in a new administration. Let me ask you

0:23:19.956 --> 0:23:24.436
<v Speaker 1>about how deeply penetrated a vaccine would actually have to

0:23:24.476 --> 0:23:26.996
<v Speaker 1>be to achieve her immunity. I mean, I realized there's

0:23:27.036 --> 0:23:29.796
<v Speaker 1>not an exact number that one can define with respect

0:23:29.836 --> 0:23:32.436
<v Speaker 1>to a particular pandemic, although there is some general guidance

0:23:32.436 --> 0:23:35.196
<v Speaker 1>that we have from epidemiologists. And the reason I want

0:23:35.196 --> 0:23:38.196
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about that is what sort of emerging

0:23:38.236 --> 0:23:40.316
<v Speaker 1>in my mind as I listen to you is that

0:23:41.036 --> 0:23:42.596
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us have been thinking, well, how do

0:23:42.636 --> 0:23:44.996
<v Speaker 1>we get out of this? Well, maybe the right way

0:23:45.036 --> 0:23:47.156
<v Speaker 1>to get out of it is with a vaccine, But

0:23:47.356 --> 0:23:49.556
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from you is that actually getting a

0:23:49.596 --> 0:23:52.436
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is not necessarily the way out. The way out

0:23:52.516 --> 0:23:55.316
<v Speaker 1>is to have a vaccine and then have that vaccine

0:23:55.396 --> 0:23:58.196
<v Speaker 1>be sufficiently trusted by a broad enough swath of population

0:23:58.596 --> 0:24:02.156
<v Speaker 1>that when it is distributed and taken, it gets sufficient

0:24:02.156 --> 0:24:05.116
<v Speaker 1>penetration to actually reach her immunity. And that may be

0:24:05.156 --> 0:24:08.636
<v Speaker 1>a very very different thing. I'm letting that sort of

0:24:08.676 --> 0:24:11.036
<v Speaker 1>see through my thinking right now. So let's just walk

0:24:11.076 --> 0:24:14.436
<v Speaker 1>through it. Start with what percentage do you think roughly

0:24:14.516 --> 0:24:18.716
<v Speaker 1>we would need to reach for the vaccine to be efficacious? So, Noah,

0:24:18.756 --> 0:24:22.236
<v Speaker 1>that number depends on how effective the vaccine is. So

0:24:22.276 --> 0:24:25.156
<v Speaker 1>if we had a vaccine that was one hundred percent effective,

0:24:25.676 --> 0:24:29.556
<v Speaker 1>which would be exceedingly unusual, then we would have to

0:24:29.636 --> 0:24:32.916
<v Speaker 1>vaccinate somewhere in their neighborhood of a seventy percent of

0:24:32.956 --> 0:24:35.676
<v Speaker 1>the population, maybe a little bit less because you know,

0:24:35.756 --> 0:24:38.596
<v Speaker 1>number of people have had the virus already, they may

0:24:38.636 --> 0:24:40.956
<v Speaker 1>have some short term immunity, but it would have to

0:24:40.956 --> 0:24:43.436
<v Speaker 1>be around seventy percent. But if you start dropping that,

0:24:43.796 --> 0:24:46.956
<v Speaker 1>if you get to a vaccine that's around fifty percent effective,

0:24:46.956 --> 0:24:49.876
<v Speaker 1>which is a threshold in fact that the FDA set

0:24:49.996 --> 0:24:53.756
<v Speaker 1>and it's June thirtieth guidance, then even if you vaccinated

0:24:53.796 --> 0:24:56.156
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the country, you're not necessarily going to get

0:24:56.156 --> 0:24:58.476
<v Speaker 1>to her immunity levels. Now, that doesn't mean that it's

0:24:58.476 --> 0:25:01.436
<v Speaker 1>still not worthwhile. See, herd immunity is not a switch

0:25:01.476 --> 0:25:03.756
<v Speaker 1>that we flip on or off. There are benefits to

0:25:03.796 --> 0:25:05.676
<v Speaker 1>be gained, you know, if we get halfway there, there

0:25:05.756 --> 0:25:07.316
<v Speaker 1>benefits to be gained if we get three quarters of

0:25:07.316 --> 0:25:10.636
<v Speaker 1>the way there. But what this means, given the fact

0:25:10.716 --> 0:25:13.316
<v Speaker 1>that getting to hurt immunity levels will take time and

0:25:13.356 --> 0:25:16.156
<v Speaker 1>will be difficult, is it means that many of the

0:25:16.196 --> 0:25:19.196
<v Speaker 1>precautions that we're taking right now in terms of distancing

0:25:19.516 --> 0:25:22.876
<v Speaker 1>and wearing masks and really upping our game in terms

0:25:22.876 --> 0:25:26.276
<v Speaker 1>of personal hygiene and washing our hands, that those behavior

0:25:26.396 --> 0:25:29.276
<v Speaker 1>changes will be with us for a while. Certainly through

0:25:29.396 --> 0:25:33.316
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one and very likely beyond that. It doesn't

0:25:33.316 --> 0:25:34.796
<v Speaker 1>mean that we're going to have to stay in our

0:25:34.796 --> 0:25:37.836
<v Speaker 1>homes for years and years. We will learn, as we

0:25:37.916 --> 0:25:40.996
<v Speaker 1>have already in the last six months, safer ways to

0:25:41.036 --> 0:25:44.156
<v Speaker 1>come together in smaller groups, you know, outside, or to

0:25:44.196 --> 0:25:49.036
<v Speaker 1>even improve our current ventilation systems and other measures indoors

0:25:49.076 --> 0:25:52.796
<v Speaker 1>to make the risk of getting coronavirus lower. So we

0:25:52.836 --> 0:25:56.196
<v Speaker 1>will find safer ways to re engage in our life,

0:25:56.196 --> 0:25:58.236
<v Speaker 1>But our life is not going to go back to

0:25:58.396 --> 0:26:02.436
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic sort of ways until probably at least several

0:26:02.516 --> 0:26:04.636
<v Speaker 1>years from now. I just want to make sure that

0:26:04.836 --> 0:26:07.956
<v Speaker 1>everybody who's listening gets the full weight of what you're saying.

0:26:09.476 --> 0:26:13.996
<v Speaker 1>Even a perfectly effective vaccine, perfectly efficacious vaccine, which basically

0:26:14.076 --> 0:26:16.356
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist in the real world for almost anything that

0:26:16.436 --> 0:26:19.196
<v Speaker 1>we think of being vaccinated for, would have to reach

0:26:19.236 --> 0:26:21.556
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the population before we can say we're

0:26:21.556 --> 0:26:25.436
<v Speaker 1>at her immunity and we can remove various forms of

0:26:25.476 --> 0:26:29.676
<v Speaker 1>social distancing and masks and separation. As you go down

0:26:30.156 --> 0:26:34.876
<v Speaker 1>the efficacy numbers, you get greater and greater probability that

0:26:34.996 --> 0:26:37.796
<v Speaker 1>a good number of people will still be getting the virus,

0:26:38.596 --> 0:26:41.596
<v Speaker 1>and as you go down, you need more and more

0:26:41.596 --> 0:26:43.516
<v Speaker 1>people to be vaccinated, And of course that's going to

0:26:43.596 --> 0:26:47.796
<v Speaker 1>be actually inversely correlated in the real world. Right if

0:26:47.836 --> 0:26:49.996
<v Speaker 1>we heard that the vaccine was one hundred percent efficacious,

0:26:50.036 --> 0:26:52.956
<v Speaker 1>more people would be inclined to take it, and ironically,

0:26:53.036 --> 0:26:54.436
<v Speaker 1>what we need is the other way around. The less

0:26:54.436 --> 0:26:56.436
<v Speaker 1>efficationous vaccine needs more people to take it. But if

0:26:56.436 --> 0:26:58.716
<v Speaker 1>people say it's only fifty percent effective, a lot of

0:26:58.716 --> 0:27:01.876
<v Speaker 1>people will mistakenly say, and therefore I shouldn't take it.

0:27:01.876 --> 0:27:04.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean mistakenly in the rational sense that rationally you

0:27:04.876 --> 0:27:07.596
<v Speaker 1>really should take it if it has any capacity to

0:27:07.636 --> 0:27:09.516
<v Speaker 1>help you provide it that you don't think, the danger

0:27:09.596 --> 0:27:11.796
<v Speaker 1>is still great. So we could very easily get an

0:27:11.836 --> 0:27:16.276
<v Speaker 1>extremely messy situation with like a ninety percent efficacious vaccine

0:27:16.516 --> 0:27:18.876
<v Speaker 1>but lots of people not taking it. And then the

0:27:19.036 --> 0:27:23.436
<v Speaker 1>upshot of that I'm hearing you saying is that masks

0:27:23.516 --> 0:27:26.276
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue even after the vaccine is out there.

0:27:26.556 --> 0:27:31.316
<v Speaker 1>Social distancing measures, including not getting together with medium groups

0:27:31.316 --> 0:27:34.716
<v Speaker 1>of people or large groups of people indoors, those restrictions

0:27:34.756 --> 0:27:37.556
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue for at least twenty twenty one

0:27:37.596 --> 0:27:40.156
<v Speaker 1>and maybe for several years longer, and that is, in

0:27:40.196 --> 0:27:44.636
<v Speaker 1>a certain sense, a much more depressing picture than a

0:27:44.676 --> 0:27:47.716
<v Speaker 1>lot of us have been imagining as progress towards the

0:27:47.756 --> 0:27:51.116
<v Speaker 1>vaccine seems to be advancing. I mean, am I getting

0:27:51.116 --> 0:27:53.676
<v Speaker 1>it right? I mean, you're saying it very cautiously and

0:27:53.916 --> 0:27:57.676
<v Speaker 1>very rationally, but what I'm hearing is actually a pretty

0:27:57.676 --> 0:28:01.636
<v Speaker 1>striking rational conclusion that we're very, very very far from

0:28:01.676 --> 0:28:05.996
<v Speaker 1>anything approaching normal life. So yes, no, I mean, you know,

0:28:06.196 --> 0:28:08.756
<v Speaker 1>I try never to be alarmist about these things, because

0:28:08.796 --> 0:28:10.476
<v Speaker 1>there's got to admit, there's a lot we don't know,

0:28:10.716 --> 0:28:14.236
<v Speaker 1>and I'm always optimistic, hoping for major breakthroughs. But I

0:28:14.236 --> 0:28:17.436
<v Speaker 1>think the realistic picture is that we are looking at

0:28:17.436 --> 0:28:20.316
<v Speaker 1>our life continuing to be changed for several years now. Now.

0:28:20.316 --> 0:28:22.556
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear by one thing, That does

0:28:22.556 --> 0:28:24.036
<v Speaker 1>not mean that we're going to be in the exact

0:28:24.076 --> 0:28:26.516
<v Speaker 1>state that we're in right now in a year. In fact,

0:28:26.636 --> 0:28:29.276
<v Speaker 1>I think that we will be more able to get

0:28:29.276 --> 0:28:32.516
<v Speaker 1>our children back to school, that we will find safer

0:28:32.556 --> 0:28:34.276
<v Speaker 1>ways to do that. In fact, we know safer ways,

0:28:34.276 --> 0:28:36.716
<v Speaker 1>we're just not really implementing them right now. I do

0:28:36.796 --> 0:28:39.996
<v Speaker 1>think they will see more workplaces actually up and running again,

0:28:40.316 --> 0:28:43.596
<v Speaker 1>because again we will, hopefully if we have advances in testing,

0:28:43.996 --> 0:28:46.396
<v Speaker 1>and if we have people more observant precautions and we

0:28:46.436 --> 0:28:49.236
<v Speaker 1>get local prevalence of the virus down, we can have

0:28:49.476 --> 0:28:52.876
<v Speaker 1>workplaces operating at least in a partial way or even

0:28:52.876 --> 0:28:55.436
<v Speaker 1>close to normal, in ways that we haven't near these

0:28:55.516 --> 0:28:58.196
<v Speaker 1>last several months. So I think we will make progress.

0:28:58.316 --> 0:29:01.236
<v Speaker 1>And even with getting together socially, I think we will

0:29:01.276 --> 0:29:05.116
<v Speaker 1>find ways to get together in small groups indoors and

0:29:05.316 --> 0:29:07.796
<v Speaker 1>socialize and see each other, but we'll do it in

0:29:07.836 --> 0:29:10.316
<v Speaker 1>ways that are safer, just like you see some schools

0:29:10.636 --> 0:29:14.516
<v Speaker 1>actually able to bring children together with masks, with distancing

0:29:14.796 --> 0:29:18.396
<v Speaker 1>in indoor environments to learn. So we are an incredibly

0:29:18.556 --> 0:29:21.556
<v Speaker 1>adaptable species. We've adapted a lot in the last six months.

0:29:21.556 --> 0:29:24.396
<v Speaker 1>We will adapt a lot more. But what I do

0:29:24.436 --> 0:29:27.036
<v Speaker 1>think we should be realistic about is that when a

0:29:27.116 --> 0:29:29.676
<v Speaker 1>vaccine arrives, it's not like tomorrow or even in a

0:29:29.716 --> 0:29:32.156
<v Speaker 1>month or in six months that suddenly we'll go back

0:29:32.196 --> 0:29:36.116
<v Speaker 1>to having full arenas at basketball games and having crowded

0:29:36.156 --> 0:29:39.996
<v Speaker 1>concerts and having large groups get together for birthday parties

0:29:39.996 --> 0:29:43.676
<v Speaker 1>and other festive occasions. That will come back eventually, but

0:29:43.756 --> 0:29:46.836
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take some time. The public pressure though

0:29:47.156 --> 0:29:50.956
<v Speaker 1>the moment a vaccine is broadly available, a safe vaccine

0:29:51.036 --> 0:29:54.236
<v Speaker 1>is broadly available to go back to normal at the

0:29:54.236 --> 0:29:58.036
<v Speaker 1>basketball arena. It's going to be overwhelming. I mean, I

0:29:58.076 --> 0:30:02.036
<v Speaker 1>wonder how any president, even a president informed by science

0:30:02.076 --> 0:30:05.436
<v Speaker 1>and advised by the best advisors, we'll be able to

0:30:05.476 --> 0:30:08.916
<v Speaker 1>resist the kind of pressure that's going to be associated

0:30:08.916 --> 0:30:10.676
<v Speaker 1>with that. You know, I think it is going to

0:30:10.716 --> 0:30:14.156
<v Speaker 1>be increasingly difficult. But here's what I'll use this analogy.

0:30:14.276 --> 0:30:18.116
<v Speaker 1>Like when you sprain your ankle, if you choose to

0:30:18.236 --> 0:30:20.996
<v Speaker 1>arrest for a requisite period of time and then actually

0:30:21.076 --> 0:30:23.796
<v Speaker 1>get your physical therapy, you will recover a lot faster

0:30:24.356 --> 0:30:26.036
<v Speaker 1>than if you just continue to walk on it and

0:30:26.076 --> 0:30:29.316
<v Speaker 1>never do any pt. If you think about our COVID response,

0:30:29.636 --> 0:30:32.156
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing more the latter than the former. And

0:30:32.516 --> 0:30:34.636
<v Speaker 1>I attribute a lot of this to leadership. Like what

0:30:34.676 --> 0:30:37.796
<v Speaker 1>we told people our political leadership was that we got

0:30:37.796 --> 0:30:39.396
<v Speaker 1>to shut down for some period of time and then

0:30:39.436 --> 0:30:42.996
<v Speaker 1>we opened up quickly, right before levels of the virus

0:30:42.996 --> 0:30:45.996
<v Speaker 1>were truly low in communities, and we were reluctant to

0:30:46.036 --> 0:30:49.676
<v Speaker 1>put in place mask mandates in many communities around the country.

0:30:49.996 --> 0:30:53.516
<v Speaker 1>We were reluctant to push for bars and other higher

0:30:53.596 --> 0:30:56.716
<v Speaker 1>risk indoor spaces to actually close down. And so what

0:30:56.756 --> 0:31:00.356
<v Speaker 1>you saw was this stuttering response and a level of

0:31:00.356 --> 0:31:03.836
<v Speaker 1>infection that never truly got low. Like almost every other country,

0:31:04.156 --> 0:31:06.876
<v Speaker 1>every other developed country was able to go up and

0:31:06.916 --> 0:31:08.716
<v Speaker 1>come down to a low level, and now they're trying

0:31:08.716 --> 0:31:11.516
<v Speaker 1>to keep that level low. We actually never got to

0:31:11.556 --> 0:31:14.436
<v Speaker 1>a low level. We're still smoldering at a very very

0:31:14.516 --> 0:31:17.156
<v Speaker 1>high rate of daily cases. And the thing is that

0:31:17.196 --> 0:31:19.756
<v Speaker 1>public only has limited patients, and that's a risk of

0:31:19.796 --> 0:31:21.596
<v Speaker 1>taking as long as we have to get it right.

0:31:21.956 --> 0:31:24.796
<v Speaker 1>So the new president will have, yes a herculean task.

0:31:24.876 --> 0:31:27.316
<v Speaker 1>You know. I thought that President Obama and Vice President

0:31:27.356 --> 0:31:29.116
<v Speaker 1>Biden had a massive task in front of them in

0:31:29.156 --> 0:31:31.716
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine when they began the presidency at

0:31:31.716 --> 0:31:34.196
<v Speaker 1>the time of the Great Recession. But I think the

0:31:34.276 --> 0:31:38.836
<v Speaker 1>difficulty of this health, economic, and really a crisis of

0:31:38.916 --> 0:31:42.276
<v Speaker 1>public confidence, I think will dwarf anything we've seen in

0:31:42.316 --> 0:31:45.956
<v Speaker 1>a few generations. I want to thank you back for

0:31:46.076 --> 0:31:48.636
<v Speaker 1>joining me and I for one to hope that your

0:31:48.716 --> 0:31:52.716
<v Speaker 1>participant in the process of rebuilding trust in institutions and

0:31:53.396 --> 0:31:56.996
<v Speaker 1>in directing us to a rational and calm and efficacious

0:31:57.036 --> 0:32:00.356
<v Speaker 1>way of addressing these problems. I appreciate those kind words.

0:32:00.516 --> 0:32:02.676
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say that, as much as what

0:32:02.796 --> 0:32:06.676
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about today is perhaps sobering and not know

0:32:06.716 --> 0:32:08.236
<v Speaker 1>the message I think all of us would want in

0:32:08.356 --> 0:32:10.636
<v Speaker 1>terms of like this thing is going to go away tomorrow,

0:32:10.916 --> 0:32:13.996
<v Speaker 1>I actually do feel optimistic overall about the future. And

0:32:14.356 --> 0:32:16.996
<v Speaker 1>the reason I feel optimistic is, you know, I have

0:32:17.036 --> 0:32:18.836
<v Speaker 1>been blessed in the work that I've been doing over

0:32:18.836 --> 0:32:22.076
<v Speaker 1>the last six months to see the deep well of

0:32:22.196 --> 0:32:24.876
<v Speaker 1>scientific and medical talent that we have in our country

0:32:24.916 --> 0:32:27.636
<v Speaker 1>and frankly with collaborators around the world. So many of

0:32:27.676 --> 0:32:31.356
<v Speaker 1>these extraordinary individuals are standing at the ready. They want

0:32:31.396 --> 0:32:34.356
<v Speaker 1>to help, they want to do their part to address

0:32:34.436 --> 0:32:37.436
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen, and we just need to bring them off

0:32:37.476 --> 0:32:47.076
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines. Listening to doctor Morte talk about the recreation

0:32:47.116 --> 0:32:51.796
<v Speaker 1>of trust was a very sobering experience for me. As

0:32:51.796 --> 0:32:55.196
<v Speaker 1>he spoke, I gradually came to see much more clearly

0:32:55.236 --> 0:32:58.676
<v Speaker 1>than I had done before that just having a vaccine

0:32:58.956 --> 0:33:01.836
<v Speaker 1>will not really be the end of the problems that

0:33:01.876 --> 0:33:05.916
<v Speaker 1>we face. Even if a vaccine were completely efficacious, which

0:33:05.996 --> 0:33:09.516
<v Speaker 1>doctor Morti emphasized is pretty unusual, we would still need

0:33:09.556 --> 0:33:12.636
<v Speaker 1>to see some seventy percent of the population taking the vaccine.

0:33:13.396 --> 0:33:16.036
<v Speaker 1>That will not be a simple thing to accomplish, not

0:33:16.076 --> 0:33:19.196
<v Speaker 1>merely because it's difficult to distribute a vaccine, but because

0:33:19.316 --> 0:33:22.916
<v Speaker 1>some significant number of people may not trust the vaccine

0:33:23.236 --> 0:33:26.596
<v Speaker 1>no matter who is president, and of course is also

0:33:26.636 --> 0:33:30.796
<v Speaker 1>possible the vaccine will be substantially less efficacious than one

0:33:30.876 --> 0:33:34.396
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent, perhaps as low as fifty percent, which is

0:33:34.436 --> 0:33:37.276
<v Speaker 1>the threshold that the FDA has set for approving a

0:33:37.356 --> 0:33:41.876
<v Speaker 1>vaccine at all. The confluence of these factors, that is

0:33:41.916 --> 0:33:45.076
<v Speaker 1>to say, our uncertainty about how effective the vaccine will

0:33:45.116 --> 0:33:47.636
<v Speaker 1>be and our uncertainty about how many people will agree

0:33:47.636 --> 0:33:51.516
<v Speaker 1>to take the vaccine, leads doctor Morty to conclude that

0:33:51.596 --> 0:33:54.636
<v Speaker 1>we may well be in a situation where we have

0:33:54.716 --> 0:33:59.356
<v Speaker 1>to continue with social distancing and masking measures for a

0:33:59.396 --> 0:34:03.516
<v Speaker 1>good long time, even after the vaccine comes to be

0:34:03.716 --> 0:34:07.596
<v Speaker 1>in play. So, notwithstanding my fantasy that perhaps by the

0:34:07.636 --> 0:34:09.956
<v Speaker 1>fall of twenty twenty one, things could be quote back

0:34:09.996 --> 0:34:12.996
<v Speaker 1>to normal, the sense I got from talking to doctor

0:34:13.076 --> 0:34:16.676
<v Speaker 1>Morty is that that is quite unlikely, and that normal,

0:34:17.036 --> 0:34:19.716
<v Speaker 1>in fact is something that will be a new normal,

0:34:20.076 --> 0:34:25.116
<v Speaker 1>and maybe substantially further off into twenty twenty two, or

0:34:25.156 --> 0:34:29.036
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even beyond. I wish that weren't the case, and

0:34:29.076 --> 0:34:31.316
<v Speaker 1>I wish that my fantasy that we could all have

0:34:31.356 --> 0:34:34.236
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine which we could all take and get everything

0:34:34.276 --> 0:34:36.476
<v Speaker 1>back to normal by the fall of twenty twenty one,

0:34:36.716 --> 0:34:40.836
<v Speaker 1>We're not just that a fantasy. But hey, that's why

0:34:40.876 --> 0:34:43.516
<v Speaker 1>we speak to the experts on Deep Background, to make

0:34:43.516 --> 0:34:46.796
<v Speaker 1>sure that the views we hold, including our fantasies, are

0:34:46.876 --> 0:34:50.116
<v Speaker 1>to some important degree informed by what the experts have

0:34:50.196 --> 0:34:53.356
<v Speaker 1>to say and what they know. I promise they will

0:34:53.356 --> 0:34:56.716
<v Speaker 1>continue to cover the question of vaccines and how and

0:34:56.876 --> 0:35:00.516
<v Speaker 1>if and when we return to normal very very closely

0:35:00.676 --> 0:35:04.756
<v Speaker 1>here on Deep Background. It remains at the absolute center

0:35:05.236 --> 0:35:08.956
<v Speaker 1>of how we return our lives to some state of normalcy,

0:35:09.156 --> 0:35:12.036
<v Speaker 1>even as we continue to talk about the election, the

0:35:12.076 --> 0:35:16.716
<v Speaker 1>political environment, and the composition of the Supreme Court. Until

0:35:16.756 --> 0:35:19.956
<v Speaker 1>the next time I speak to you, be careful, be safe,

0:35:20.196 --> 0:35:25.476
<v Speaker 1>and be well. Deep Background is brought to you by

0:35:25.516 --> 0:35:29.596
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Jean Kott, our engineer

0:35:29.676 --> 0:35:33.236
<v Speaker 1>is Martin Gonzalez, and our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Theme

0:35:33.316 --> 0:35:36.596
<v Speaker 1>music by Luis GERA special thanks to the Pushkin Brass

0:35:36.716 --> 0:35:41.356
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Clodwell, Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm Noah Feldman.

0:35:41.636 --> 0:35:44.276
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Noah R Feldman.

0:35:44.676 --> 0:35:47.116
<v Speaker 1>I also have a new book out called The Arab Winter,

0:35:47.356 --> 0:35:49.956
<v Speaker 1>A Tragedy. I'd be delighted if you checked it out.

0:35:50.316 --> 0:35:52.676
<v Speaker 1>I write a column for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can

0:35:52.716 --> 0:35:57.116
<v Speaker 1>find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's

0:35:57.116 --> 0:36:00.556
<v Speaker 1>original state of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot com slash

0:36:00.596 --> 0:36:03.796
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and if you like what you heard today, please

0:36:03.796 --> 0:36:06.836
<v Speaker 1>write a review or tell a friend. This is deep

0:36:06.876 --> 0:36:07.356
<v Speaker 1>background