WEBVTT - The Worst Hacking Scenes from Hollywood

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Get in text with technology with tex Stuff from stuff

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your host, Jonathan Strickland and joining me today over several

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>nodes so I can't actually track her real whereabouts. Shannon Morse, Hi,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing? I'm great, but you're just you're

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>so crazy with the hacks. You're so so good at

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>typing random strings on your keyboard and and always one

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>step ahead of me. Well, you know, if you've ever

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>visited hacker typer dot net, I believe it is you

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>will know exactly how to hack excellent. I'm glad that.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad now because I've been wondering for years. Guys.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We've had Shannon on the show a few times, and

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>today it's a real treat, really because we're gonna talk

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about some examples of hacking in pop culture and some

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that are incredibly awful, just terrible inaccurate

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ways of showing how hacking works, as well as talk

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>about something to get it more right than not right,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of awesome. And I mean the start off,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>we have to admit the real world of hacking, while

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the results can be quite dramatic and have a huge effect.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The process itself is not always cinematic. Nope, it is not.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>It's actually pretty boring. There's just a bunch of text

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on the screen and that's about it, right, Yeah, I

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's it's coding, right, yeah, exactly. There's a

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of coding involved, a lot of Python and BASS

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>scripts and things of that nature, and a lot of

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>terminal work. So you don't see very much gooey or

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>graphical user interface usage whenever you're running some kind of

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hack implementation. A lot of times it's just terminal, right,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I understand the need to stretch the

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>truth when you're trying to create a really thrilling movie

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or TV show and you want to have something interesting

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to look at, having your characters look at lines of

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>code and going through a process of trying to uh

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to to create some sort of exploit for a vulnerability

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really hold a lot of people like on

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the edge of their seat. So I get it, but

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of a problem. And I should also

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>mention we're using the word hacker today a lot. But

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, as I try to mention every time I

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about hacking, hacking is a very broad term, and

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily mean that you are doing anything illegal,

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and it certainly doesn't even mean that you're necessarily working

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on a computer. You could be doing some hardware hacks

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that aren't related to software. Uh, that's important to remember.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But but as far as Hollywood has can certain there's

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>really only one kind of hacking, and that involves trying

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to break into a place that you're not supposed to

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be in. Of course, because those are the most interesting people,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they're the scary ones, and people are afraid of what

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand, right, And I imagine that a lot

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of screenwriters are particularly scared of hackers because it's one

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that they have no understanding whatsoever about it.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And two, I mean we've seen, especially recently, we've seen

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>some very big stories about uh, the entertainment industry running

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>running away from hackers attacking. And whether it's a hacker

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>who's actually gaining access to a system, or it was

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who was on the inside who just managed to

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>exploit their access in the first place, which I would

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>argue really isn't a hack, it's just kind of industrial

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sabotage at that point. But the Sony story would be

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the big example, right. Yeah, the Sony story, I think

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of fear in the entertainment industry. And

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the entertainment industry as a whole, with

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>very few exceptions, are one of the genres that is

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the farthest behind when it comes to their own security

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and privacy. Uh, They're they're the farthest behind when it

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to a lot of things, including how they treat

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>their women. But I think that it's something that they

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>really need to start focusing on and start understanding, not

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>only for their own security, like with for their employees,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for the actors and actresses that work there for these

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>different companies, but also because they need to understand how

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually portray it so that more people understand it

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as a whole and aren't so afraid. Right, And so

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to dive into a discussion of some of

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the more entertaining and often wildly inaccurate versions of hacking

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in film and TV. I should also give a shout out.

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people on my Twitter feed suggested that

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I check out a subreddit. The subreddit is it's a

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Unix system, which is a reference to Jurassic Park. Uh,

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if you remember the young lady runs up to a computer,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>she takes one look at it. She says, it's a

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>unique system. I know this, And then she's immediately looking

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>at a graphic user interface and identifying one block out

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>of like fifty blocks that are on the screen and

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>immediately makes the conclusion that all the files for the

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>entire island are accessible from that one terminal. I don't

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>know how she knows that. Um, that's amazing. It's amazing

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can you you automatically know that everything available

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on the island is on that one drive. Somehow, I

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like the only way you would know that it

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is if you were the information security professional that is

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>working for that company. Was not, you know, she she didn't,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>just something like she was a little too young to

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be in a full time employee at that point. So

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Jurassic Park, while it lends the the the quote it's

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a unique system to the sub credit, I didn't really

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>included on this list. There is one other incredibly famous

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>example that I've talked about on a previous episode Tech Stuff,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that we will hit. But first I'm gonna talk about

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>a movie. I haven't actually seen this movie, but I

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>have seen the sequences that involve hacking. That movie is

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Core And in the first sequence I wanted to

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about, there's a character whose handle is RAT, which

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>could be you know, like remote access trojan or remote

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>access terminal, depending upon what acronym you want to look at.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Often one that is associated with hacking, and RAT is

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>caught by the FBI. The sequence in which he's caught,

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he's trying desperately to erase all traces of his activities.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He's got tons and tons of computers, and he's using

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>massive magnets to try and wipe drives, and he's throwing

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>CD ROM disks into a microwave and turn to get

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on high you know, the typical stuff we do when

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Feds come knocking. Uh. But but my favorite bit

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about this little sequence is he then has taken to

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>an interrogation and as he's being interrogated, he just casually

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reaches over and grabs a guy's cell phone out of

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his little holster or his pocket or whatever. But the

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>guy's it's just a cell phone. What can he do

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with that? Well, Shannon, you know what people can do

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with so I mean, if you have physical access to

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a cell phone, it's game over. But but but what

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what this guy does. He doesn't do something to get

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>hold of the guy's contacts. He doesn't. And this is

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>also pre smartphone. It's really a cell phone. He doesn't

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>do anything like that. What he does is he takes

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a little um, a little chewing gum rapper, He dials

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of numbers on the phone, and then he

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>uses the chewing gum rapper to make a weird little whistling,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>humming noise, and then casually this is the phone, tosses

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it back to the guy and says that phone's got

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>free long distance on it forever. I love to real life,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly how it works. Yeah, totally. So I'm pretty

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is kind of a comparison to what

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>people would actually do, which was called phone freaking. And

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this was like before hacking became a really big popular

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>norm that you would see in like online media that

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you see in this day. So back in the day,

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy named Captain Crunch he got his online screen

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>name from opening up a Captain Crunch cereal box and

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>getting out a little I believe it was a kazoo

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or something similar to that, and he was able to

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>recreate or reproduce the kind of tone that you could

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>put into a pay phone to allow you to make

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>free long distance calls. So they're using that real life

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario to their advantage in this this movie the Core

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and making it seem like you can do the same

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>thing with a gum wrapper. Now, personally, I don't believe

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can do the same thing with a gum wrapper.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That seems a little bit odd. I know that you

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>can make noises with things like that. You can also

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing with a piece of grass if

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you want to. Yeah, you can. You can entertain yourself

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in like a third grade kind of way for hours

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at a time. But yeah, phone freaking really worked on landlines.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>They worked when the phone system wasn't fully digital yet.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a much different system. I mean there and

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>there's some very famous people who got their start as

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>phone freaks. I mean, Steve Wozniak was in that world.

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>The great was was one of the freakers of back

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies and uh, but it was it was

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the same thing that you would talk about

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>hackers today. They weren't necessarily trying to gain the system.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to figure out, how does this work, right,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They were just messing with things. They were trying to

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer them and figure out how they work and

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>put them back together and let them let these different

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>pieces of technology do things that they weren't necessarily supposed

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to do. And that's what I love so much about hacking.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But then you bring it to Hollywood and they're like, oh,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>these are scary people. They're all going to end up

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in the FBI's hands. And that's not necessarily true, right,

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>And and to to take something that worked on landlines

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on a pay phone basis using a whistle that had

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he even modified it slightly so it would

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>make exactly the tone he needed to replicate the tones

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the phone company was using in order to allow

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for this kind of thing to happen. Yeah, it would

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>never work on the cell phone range at all. So

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and and also just just what a weird line like

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this phone's got free long distance on it forever, and

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you think there's gotta be multiple ways a phone company

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>would say, Hey, something weird is going on with this

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one line. But but the Core, the Core also has

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>another great scene in it with that same hacker, same

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>guy rat Uh And when I see him I always think, uh,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he's he's the he's a character who also or he's

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>an actor who also shows up as a character on

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the show UM Supernatural as a weird, reedy looking uh

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>demon killer guy that you would just expect to get

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>completely obliterated the first time he shows up, but he

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be more capable than you would consider

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>based upon his appearance. Anyway, he walks into a cyber cafe.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>He's got a CD rom Uh, I think it even

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>says Kung Fu on it, if I'm not mistaken, and

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he puts it, puts it into a cyber cafe computer,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and after like leaning back and putting his hand up

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to his face for about five seconds, it ends up

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>completely taking over not just his computer, but the entire

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>local network, and all of the screens in the cyber

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>cafe pop up with this image of his rat network

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>where he has taken over all the computers. I don't

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>even know exactly why he's trying to take over all

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the computers, apart from just seeing lots and lots of uh,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be news footage which spoiler alert, there's

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a thing we can use to get that news footage.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's called a TV. You can use that without having

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to hack any systems. But uh, it's it's just a

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>weird little moment where he's taken over all the computers

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in the cyber cafe. Now, let's let's go ahead and

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>make some things clear, Shannon. I know that you've addressed

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this on on multiple episodes and and other ways of

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to your audience. There are certain things you

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about when you go and log into

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>any kind of local area network, UM, any kind of

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>open WiFi. If you're going to a coffee shop and

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're using that kind of WiFi, you need to be

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>more um aware of potential security problems. Yes, absolutely, it's

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy if you're on your local coffee shops

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>network or your locals hotels network for anybody to snoop

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on what you're doing. Uh, you may be using HTTPS,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's not going to keep somebody for understanding what

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sites you are visiting. But even though that data may

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be encrypted, however, they're still collecting that encrypted information. And

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it really just depends on how a website that you're

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>visiting is encrypting that information, whether or not they would

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to decrypt it. After a specific amount of time.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>So I always tell people if they're going to use

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a you know, hotel WiFi or a coffee shop WiFi,

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to use a VPN, use some way to tunnel your

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>traffic from point A to point B so that nobody

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>else on that network will be able to see what

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. They may see that your dogged on, they

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>may see your IP address, but they won't know exactly

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with your traffic while you're connected. So,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm pretty sure that everybody who generally uses these

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>WiFi networks that are available for free aren't necessarily using VPNs,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's a huge security risk for pretty much

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>every consumer out there that's using these WiFi networks, right

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and whereas in the core, you know we were talking,

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hardwired computers that are part of the

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>cyber cafe. You just sit down at a terminal and

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>log in so that you have access to everything on

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that machine. That's scary too. I mean it's it's kind

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of like using a computer at the library. You want

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful about the kinds of activities you

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do on that machine, um, because it's not really yours

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and you don't really you know, and you don't want

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to go so far to cover your tracks that you're

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actually causing problems for the real purpose of that machine. Uh.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's still not quite sure what he was trying to do.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>It was like he was setting up his own a

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>botan net. Also, if you are sitting of a buttonet,

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>probably a bad idea to have a graphic pop up

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on everyone's screen saying, hey, your computer's mind now. Yeah.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's in today's age, it is very popular for

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>people to use ransomware, which will basically announce it's it's

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>availability on your computer. Yeah, it'll announce its presence on

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>your machine to let the user know, Hey, I've just

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>encrypted all the information, all the photos, all the documents

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that is on your computer. Now you have to pay

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>me like one bitcoin to get your data back. And

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>then you pay that bitcoin and you may or may

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not get your data back. So, you know, ransomware it's

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a big thing. But in the case of this one,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the case of rat yes, you can install like

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>malware or something like that on a c D. That's

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible. You can put pretty much anything on a CD. Uh,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And then it looks like he's he's running this CD

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>through the entire network, which you can install malware through

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>pivot and a networks open ports or open eyedps so

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that you can put the same hour on several different computers.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's never a good idea to let everybody

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>know what the heck you're doing, if you're doing something

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't necessarily be doing in the first place. Yeah,

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, it's it's there for dramatic effect. But

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're the one person in the cyber cafe who

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't visibly freaking out when all the computers switch over,

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>here's a here's a little hint, they're going to figure

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>out it was you, right, I mean that, that's kind

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of like, if you're the one guy not surprised that

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>everything's on fire, you probably set the fire. I'm just saying.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Our next example comes from one of my favorite movies

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of all time. Oh my gosh, me too. I love

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this movie. Yes, Oh, it's so great. It's so cheesy

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and wonderful. The Net Also is a is a movie

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in which a character actually has her identity stolen, and

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very prescient for its time. It's not like it got

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>everything wrong. Some of the stuff and actually predicted quite well.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, best prediction of any movie ever it predicted

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>being able to order pizza online. This was before the

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble even began. This The movie came out

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineties, so this was actually pretty advanced.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>They they the people behind the film, said, we wanted

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to let our character make an activity

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>online that would stress how she was uh distancing herself

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>from other people. She was trying her best to limit

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the amount of interaction she had with other human beings.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>It stresses her loneliness, also her paranoia, uh to some extent,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and and it was a neat way of doing it,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and it also ended up being accurate. However, that being said,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit in the very beginning. It's right when

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>she's going to order pizza. When she's on the phone

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with a client she does essentially text support and really

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>helps people who have been attacked by a virus recover

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>their systems. Uh. And it takes her like no time

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at all to identify what the virus is on this

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>customer's computer, which which she does not have access to.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>She's she's she's accessing it remotely. She identifies the virus,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>She sequesters the virus, she removes the virus, plus apparently

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>does repairs to the system, so it goes so it

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>starts working again, and that takes her less time than

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it would take for her to order the pizza. That's incredible.

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she should Every security firm should hire her.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>She's a genius apparently. So so I like making the

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>comparison between Sandra Bullock's character in the Net to an

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>actual penetration tester that we have in the two thousands

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>or in the tens, in the twenty tens. Penetration testers

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>go through contracts. They go through a company. They're usually

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>hired on by a large firm to go through their

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>security and make sure everything's okay. They have to write reports,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>everything has to go through a financial financialist before they're

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>actually paid for any of their work. They don't actually

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>discuss how much they're getting paid with the client. They

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>discuss how much they're getting paid with the company that

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they are salaried through. So in the case of Sandra

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Bullocks character here she's talking about you know, oh yeah,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he's like, yeah, I'm gonna you know, pay X amount

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of money, and he's like, I don't care how much

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it costs. It's worth it. And that's not necessarily something

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that you would talk to the penetration tester about, because

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>when you do, they're going to make their they're going

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to make their time with you as a client much

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>longer to make it seem like a much more important case. Yeah,

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so if you if you do, uh, you know, it's

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what Scotty would say is that he'd

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say he'd figure out how long it was going to

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>take him to do a task, and then he would

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>then he would give the captain a time that was

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>longer than what it would take him to do. In

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that case, it wasn't so that he could get over time.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It was so that he could impress the captain by

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>finishing early. Right. It was like, I told you it

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>was gonna take me three days, but I really put

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>my nose to the grindstone and got it done in

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a day and a half and the captain's impressed, like, Wow,

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you're amazing. In this case, it would be yeah, that's

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna take me. You know, I don't know a

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>week's worth of work and you're done in you know,

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>five hours, then you're just billing the time, right, So,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so during this conversation that these too have, it sounds

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like she's a like she's a red teamer, Like she's

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a penetration tester that works for a big security firm,

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and she's she's talking to her client though. Uh, but

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but her actions make me think that she's a freelancer.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure what's going on here. I think

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that the that it was produced a little bit confusingly. Um,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but now that I understand how penetration testing works, even

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>though I am not one myself, I was quite confused

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>by this scene. Yeah, I I I think it was.

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Out of all the errors that we're talking about today,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the less egregious because, again, unless you

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>were to show like that time had obviously passed a

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>significant amount so that she had had time to really

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>identify what was happening and then respond to it. Uh,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not that big a deal compared to some of

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the other versions that we've got in this episode. So

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna give this one a pass.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not as bad as it could have been. It's

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>certainly not as bad as the next one. Oh my gosh,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>can you just talk about n C I S. Yeah,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about n C I S for a bit, because, uh,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know n C I S. First of all, it

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has one of the most infamous awful hacking scenes in Hollywood,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and so much so that that there are multiple versions

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the clip we're gonna talk about on YouTube, my

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>favorite titled to Idiots One Keyboard. But yeah, let's talk

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>about n C I S for a second here. So

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>we've got we've got a character in n C I

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>S who is sort of she's the the young hip

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>hacker character who uh is the one responding in this

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>particular scene to an attack that's coming in that attack

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is being represented by lots and lots of pop ups

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>of just strings of characters meaninglessly appearing all over her

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>her computer monitor, and her response is that each one

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of these is absolutely meaningful, and she knows exactly what's happening,

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that the hacker is attacking their systems and trying to

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get at very uh very secure data and is quickly

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>winnowing through all the different security and so she's just

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>furiously typing on her keyboard in response, and her co

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>worker who's standing next to her and asking her questions

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and giving her suggestions that don't necessarily mean very much,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ends up deciding to help her out by simultaneously typing

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>on the same keyboard. Chese typing on So you have

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>four hands typing on the same keyboard at the same time.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Dear Hollywood, that is not how keyboards work. A computer

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>can't tell which person is typing which thing. It would

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just come out as a super garbled mess. Not to

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mention the frustration, like have you ever had somebody come

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>up and just like start pressing keys on your keyboard,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's very irritating. It is. There's no way that

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>these two characters would be able to type on the

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>same keyboard at the same time. That's ridiculous. It feels

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like a violation when someone does that to me, Like

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like if they if they're like move, even if it

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if it, if it's preceded by move, I'll show you.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, no, you'll tell me and then I'll

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. This is my computer and I don't let

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you touch it. Yeah. This was one of those sequences

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>where really the whole purpose of the scene was to

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>show how a non tech savvy, pragmatic guy has a

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>solution to a problem that the two tech wizards completely overlook.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, it's it's about taking down the

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>tech wizard folks a peg or two because they're not

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking practically, they're too filled with panic. So you've got

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>these two characters who are responding in real time to

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a security threat as if they're doing battle with the hacker.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is a common thread in a lot of

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>television and movies. It's not terribly accurate in the real

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>world scenarios, but they are. They're acting like the keystrokes

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>they're doing are going to end up either booting the

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hacker out or securing some of the data away from

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the hacker, and they're just furiously typing when the pragmatic

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>guy walks behind the computer system and unplugs it, thus

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>saving them from the hack because now there's no connection

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the hacker to exploit. Except what he did

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was actually make it worse because now they don't have

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a computer that they can work through to hopefully, uh

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>find the hack, find the open port that this guy

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is coming through, this attacker and close it off. So

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he's unplugging a computer as opposed to going to the

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>server and cutting that off and turning off the server.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>He's just unplugging one of the open PCs, right, and

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that just drives me nuts. This and Okay, I wanted

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to throw things at my TV when I was watching

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this scene because I was like, this is so bad.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so bad. Yeah, this one, this one's probably out

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of all the ones that we have, this was probably

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the worst, but it's way up there, and

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's clearly played for laughs, at least a

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit for laughs. Maybe not like outright belly laughs,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, anyone who knows what a computer is

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is probably chuckling, but it's obviously played for this little

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>moment where the pragmatic character can kind of be a

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>smug jerk face like huh see I thought of it first,

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and the other two characters like why didn't we think

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>of that? And as as Shannon points out, because it

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't solve the problem, No, it does not. Yeah. I

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend if anyone is unfamiliar with this, go

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>look for in C. I s who it hits one

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>keyboard and watched this scene and really appreciate it. I

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>also liked when I was reading comments about this one

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of the comments I read in that subreddit was. The

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>part of the scene that completely pulls me out of

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it is the fact that when the guy takes a

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>bite of a sandwich, it's such a tiny little bite.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It lost it lost all credibility with me. There No

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one needs a sandwich like that. Oh that's so funny.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Creditors are great. Um. Now. Next on our list is Swordfish,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>which actually has quite a few awful, awful hacking scenes,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>some of which involved material not appropriate for this podcast,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I did not include those scenes when I wrote.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>There's one in particular where a guy is being tested

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to see if his hacking skills are leite enough to join.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It is awful. It is terrible in so many ways.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But that one was so bad that I was like, no,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't, that's not going on the list. So instead

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked at a different one. And Hugh Jackman's playing

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the hacker and he's trying to get access to a system,

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and the way that they decided to depict this was

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they show a little cube on the screen and he's

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>building onto this cube with other cubes to make what

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>looks like essentially a Rubik's Cube sized digital construct. It's

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>all virtual. There's no actual physical cubes, and this is

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what represents getting access to a system somehow building a

0:27:55.400 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional virtual object out of smaller three dimensional virtual objects. Now, Shannon,

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is that in fact, how that that looks like when

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to access a system you are confronted with

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a Rubik's cube that you have to construct virtually. Yeah,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna say, uh no, So for me, this

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>looks like they are trying to show their viewers a

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>graphical compilation of what coding would look like once you

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>finally finally compile your code and you get the a

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>okay that everything is okay and there are no errors.

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's what it looks like to me. Um, if

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you see actual code, if you see somebody building a

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>virus or building a worm, or like in this case,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Jackman's character is building worm, you'll see lines and

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>line hundreds of lines of code, and then at the

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>end they'll probably choose like go into the gooey and

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>choose to compile code, and then the interface that they're

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>using will give them the okay and tell them that

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>there are no errors. But in this case, he's building

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a Rubik's cube on is computer and it looks nothing

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like what actual compilation looks like. Yeah, yeah, compiling code

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is uh. So to give to give you guys a

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an insight into how computers quote unquote think.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>We use computer languages in order to construct programs, and

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the computer languages are written in such a way that

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a computer understands what operation it needs to perform in

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>order to progress through the program. Ultimately, that stuff gets

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>compiled and you have like high level computer languages and

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>low level computer languages, uh and then you eventually get

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>down to the point where you get to machine code,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you're getting into the binary codes zeros

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and ones, where most humans, the vast majority of humans,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly all humans, are not capable of reading that, at

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>least at least not with a whole lot of time

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on their hands. So that's why we have these programming

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>languages to kind of bridge the gap between the language

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that computers eek and the languages that we speak. So,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're completely unfamiliar with coding languages or programming languages

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and you take a look at it, it looks like nonsense, right,

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and it for someone who is completely unschooled, it looks

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like you would have to be a genius in order

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to use it. But in fact, it follows very specific rules.

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So once you learn those rules, you know, it does

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>take there is a learning curve, but you do get

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you start feeling a little confident

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with that stuff exactly. And there's plenty of programmers that

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I know who never learn every single rule in a

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>specific language that they know, but they they have books

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and books, they have you know, definitions and posters and

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>things of this nature so that they always have a reminder,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're able to write different kinds of programs. But

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as you know a few general rules for

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>any language that you're working with, you can write a program.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very hard, it is very complicated, but it's possible. Yeah. Yeah.

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like you're building a cube, unless, of course,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your program, once executed, is a cube building program, in

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>which case, if it looks like you're building a cube,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>congratulations you coded it correctly, um. But other otherwise that's

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. Our next one is one of my

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite examples of bad hacking because it takes me back

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to my childhood. I had a discussion with some of

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>my my co workers here about this particular movie, and

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some of them couldn't remember ever seeing it. Some of

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>them remembered seeing it as a kid on video. I

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing this in the theater because I'm old. Superman three.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So in Superman three, you've got uh character played by

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Richard Pryor who is a computer programmer, and he goes

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to work for a company and he's a he's a

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>data entry guy. For some reason, the data entry folks

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at this company all have to wear like slippers and stuff.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like it's a clean room, like kind of

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a clean room, but not really a clean room. And

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he finds out that everyone in the company is paid

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their Their payment involves fractions of assent that end up

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>getting rounded down. So if this sounds like office space,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very much the same sort of blood. He figures out, Hey,

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>what if I took all the fractions of assent that

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise go unaccounted. They're just floating around out there, and

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I pay myself all those fractions of assent so that

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I make a real huge amount of money, because once

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you accumulate all of them, it actually amounts to something's significant.

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But because each individual little appearance of it. It's tiny,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>no one takes notice of it. Right Like if I

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>if I took a halfpenny, no one is going to care.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>If I take a billion halfpennies, suddenly it matters. But

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he does this by staying late one day and turning

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on his computer and he does type some stuff with

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one hand on a little bitty keyboard that uh, then

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll makes texts start to disappear and appear like one

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>letter at a time, to a point where it's a

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>very common thing in Hollywood, right that the display has

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of weird effect to it that indicates that, yes,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>something is happening, like a hacker is attacking or the

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>system is being compromised. Um. Once he does that, he

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>types in a command that essentially just says, hey, pay

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>all the fractions of a cent to me, and it's

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>written out in more or less natural language, and then

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>he hits enter and it works. A lot of problems

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with this, the big one being natural language. Like we

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just said just a second ago, computers do not understand

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the languages that we communicate with to each other, not

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not on their own. They have to be taught how

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that. They're not. They don't automatically speak English. Yeah,

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>if you ever open up a command line on any

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of computer, doesn't matter what operating system pick one,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Linux or DOS or whatever. You get to

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that command line and you try and type in full

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>English sentences to see if you can make your computer

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff, You're gonna be sorely disappointed. It doesn't

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>work that way. It's not like a search bar with Google.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Web has really spoiled us, and that

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has not had experience with computers before the

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Web was a thing doesn't really understand that when you

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get to the command line, it's not like a search

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>field like you're not You're not Gooey has spoiled us. Yes, yeah,

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I um side note again, I'm old enough where Doss

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was the way to interface with a computer when I

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, or Apple Basic, but I was mostly

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>using Doss at that point. And then uh, you had

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mac come out in four they took the gooey.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't gate the gooey, the graphic user interface. They

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of took that from Xerox Park. Xerox Park

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>really kind of pioneered that. Then Microsoft came out with

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Windows and I resisted switching to Windows for a very

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>long time, and eventually broke down to get Windows when

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that all the software coming out only

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>would be supported through Windows and not through DOSS. And

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to this day, I'm bitter about that because I taught

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>myself all the Tree commands. Darn it. I grew up

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with Windows since I was a kid, so it was

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>always I started in the gooey graphical user in a phase.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't start with commands. But this is where Shannon

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel old. Yeah, I was born in the eighties,

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's the difference. That's that's that's fair.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. Go ahead. I I love you too, Shannon.

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. Every every every co host I have makes

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>me feel old because I'm older than everyone but one

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>podcaster at this company. So continue. So I actually liked

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this Superman three scene because back in the day before

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I was born, Uh, it was very popular among um

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>people all over the place, no matter what company you

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>were working with, to deal with fractions of a penny,

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>because even a penny as a change in pricing would

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of money. So people would be like, Okay,

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>well it's a penny and a half, and I believe

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>at one point there was even a half cent coin

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that was distributed in the United States. So this was

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing. You can still see it in this day

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and age at gas stations. Whenever you go to a

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>gas station, you see on the sign it says like

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>gases to and nine tenths of a of a penny.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a that's from back in the day. One

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>day would use these exact precise measurements for gasoline distribution

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at gas stations. So so that really is a thing. Um.

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But the whole hacking scenario of this scene is very false.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>You you can't do a specific distribution of money in

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that nature, and anybody who has access to that kind

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of information who is working for a company should not

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>have that access in the first pace, especially if they're

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they're getting paid and they're not like a a chief

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>operating manager of that company. Right. Yeah, it's the the

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that you would have these dumb terminals, like I

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>am assuming they were dumb terminals. I'm assuming they were

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>all connected to a main system as opposed to each

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>being individual computers. But either in either case you would

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have limitations on what any of those terminals could access,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but because of his leap programming skills, he's able to

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>bypass that and get access to the main frame. I'm

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they use it as a main frame. Mainframe,

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is also a great general term that

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood has misused throughout all the computer films. But uh,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that's never explained how he

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>does it. It's just a it's just a thing that

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>happens in the movie. Uh, doesn't you know. They're not

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>drawing attention to it. It's not an important thing other

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>than the fact to illustrate that one. He is smart too.

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't see anything ethically wrong with bending the rules

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because in his mind, these fractions of assent, they're not

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>doing anything right. They're not they're not in an account,

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not being used by the company. They're just they're

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>just kind of loose somehow. They're they're they're in the

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>company's ownership, but no one's doing anything with it. So therefore,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>if no one's doing anything with it, no one's gonna

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>miss them when they're gone. So that's kind of how

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he justifies it, and eventually he becomes one of the

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>he's more of a reluctant villain in the movie. But

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the villains in Superman three. That's a

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have not seen Superman three, good job. Continue

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on that track. Don't feel tempted to change that. It

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is not a good movie. It's better than Superman four,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>although my coworker Joe would probably trounce me for saying so, uh,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>super Superman four is awful. Um the next movie. The

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>next example we have is Numbers, which I love just

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the way it mischaracterizes I r C. Which is,

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene in which people are trying to figure

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>out what these what these hackers, these two different hackers

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>are trying to do, and they don't know, and they

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't sure how they're going to track down the hackers

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and learn what they're trying to do. But then one

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the characters says, oh, we gotta go on I

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>r C because that's where all the hackers go to chat.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And they use handles. You know, they don't use the

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>real name they use. They use handles on I r C.

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 1>And that way they can secretly chat to each other.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And then they use this weird meaningless analogy talking about

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>two ships that are sailing across the ocean, and they

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>meet in the middle of the ocean and they exchange

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 1>illegal goods and then they sail away, and because the

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>wake of a ship fades so quickly, they leave no

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>trace behind. That's the same thing as I r C.

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>They actually do this whole sequence where that that ship

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>analogy I just talked about is visualized on screen, because folks,

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I r C is boring, Like showing I r C

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on screen is incredibly dull, So it's way more exciting

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a visualization of a meaningless ship analogy. Yeah,

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 1>IRC is super boring to look at, but it's very fun.

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You can make lots of friends in I r C,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's it is called Internet relay chat, so that

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is a sure thing. People do use LEAs fat Lee

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>speak in I r C, even though leap speak is

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.479
<v Speaker 1>not that hard to read and her Phinian going into

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the ships made absolutely no sense to me as an

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>IRC user, because when I pop into I r C

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and then when I leave, my chats are still there,

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and they are still there for anybody to see who

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was also logged in at the same time. So saying

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that they disappear after x amount of time is not

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily true, because anybody with a very very simple script

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>can capture everything that was said in an I R

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>C for X amount of time, for whatever time that

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to save a file four, and then they

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can upload that file anywhere that they want to. So

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that this information disappears is completely false. I love that

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a I'm pretty sure it's the same one. I'm

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>not watching the clips as I'm going through them, so

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not entirely certain, but I think there's a moment

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>in this where they have a desperate like take a screenshot,

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>take a screen shot, and she does it like at

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the last second before the connection is broken. And I

0:41:55.880 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was laughing so hard that the idea of oh, yeah,

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take a screen shutter it's gone forever. Um, Yeah,

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty ridiculous. And and there is a funny

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>little exchange where where the lady says like they'll be

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 1>speaking in lete, but don't worry, I also speak let

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like like, oh, screenwriter, you're so adorable son. Yeah. Le

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.399
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to speak, so anybody can do it. Yeah,

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's really it's really just replacing certain

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>characters with other characters. That look similar to the ones

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you were replacing, and then sometimes purposefully misspelling words because

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>someone some at some point misspelled things people thought was

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>funny and they went with it, like pone pone is

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a great example. P w N. It's supposed to be owned,

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but someone just in a typo and then that typo

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>became the word yep. That's the lovely thing about it, guys.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Shannon and I had so much to say about how

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood portrays hackers that we went on for quite some time.

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna divide up the episodes and we're gonna

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>end part one here. The whole thing has already been recorded,

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but next week you'll get part two where we talk

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more about some of the bad examples of hacking in

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood as well as some of the good ones. So

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure you tune in and check that out. Also,

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to follow Shannon on Twitter, her handle

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is at snubs that's s n U b s. And

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to find her other work, it's amazing stuff,

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you can just go to hack five dot org. That's

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>h a K the number five dot org. And I'll

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to you guys again really soon for more on

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is how stuff works.

0:43:48.719 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Dot com