WEBVTT - Blanchflower: Turmoil Amongst Conservatives on Brexit (Audio)

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the Radio plus mobile last and on your radio.

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash l Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pellottadal the SMP nestack all advancing in. This

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>update is brought to you by c I T. From

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C I T offers commercial lending, leasing,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and treasury management services for small and little market businesses.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at c I T dot com put Knowledge

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to work. Stocks rising the most in two months as

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>increasing speculation the Federal reserveal raise rates. This summer spark

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gains in financial shares, while housing data signal the economy

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is strengthening enough to support higher borrowing costs. The SMP

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred index up to what he's seven points now

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand, seventy four, a gain of one point

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Nes stack up ninety two, a gain of

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one point eight nine percent down, indust rolls up two

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>oh seven, a gain of one point two percent. Ten

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>yure down six thirty seconds, yield one point eight five percent,

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Gold falling to a drop of one point nine percent.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Crude oil forty eight sixty four for a barrel of

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>West Texas intermediate crude of fifty six cents. Again, of

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one point two percent. I'm Charlie Pellett and that's a

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business flash. The Brexit vote on Bloomberg Radio. The

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Brexit debaate and even more heated it in the British Parliament,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>as a Conservative lawmaker asked the head of the Bank

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of England Mark Arney of his former employer, Goldman Sachs,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>encouraged him to warn about the risk of the UK

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>leaving the European Union. Can I'll just give you the

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to refute any suggestion that Goldman Sacks may have

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on your second Wow. Um, it's not an

0:01:55.080 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>allegations refuge. Well, yes, I refute it categorically and and stunned. Stunned,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>says smart Kearney. Let's ask David Danny blanche Flower, professor

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of economics at Dartmouth College, if he was stunned by

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this question. Danny, a brit himself and a former member

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee. Welcome back, Danny,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be great to chat you. I was completely stunned too.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in all the time I've listened to

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>governors of the Bank of England answering questions in front

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Treasury Select Committee. I've ever heard a governor

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>say wow. I mean he didn't have to say much. Yes,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that was quite something. That and another another person asked

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>him about whether he'd been leaned on by the government

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to say that the things that he'd said, and that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that actually he'd been pushing government propaganda, and the governor

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was not very happy, shall we say, and I think

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it was out of line? Why was it out of line?

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with at least asking the head of the

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England these questions? Well, I think, I mean

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's I guess it's you know, the way the way

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it was said probably was a little bit too much,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, I mean the job of the governors

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to explain what he's doing. I mean he actually said,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>this is actually part of my remit this is what

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to do. It was asserted that this vote

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for Brexit is like an election, but the governor I

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>think made it very clear that that's not true, partly

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>because we know what would happen to the Brexit. You

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>would leave and then there'll be a lot of uncertainty.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>An election is not so clear, so that was the

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>big issue. But I think the evidence is that from

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of sources that Brexit looks like an econog economically

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>negative event for the UK and probably for the world.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Why for our listeners, who maybe are not following it

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as closely, why will Brexit be so negative? Well, I

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing is we've already seen some slowing

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the UK economy, We've seen a rise in uncertainty

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about what the future might bring. But I think you

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked on this before. I mean, it's

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>quite clear that this would be in a sense the

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>first domino that might generate other other countries to fall

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>next it, if you like, um, the Netherlands leaves or

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the Grease leaves or whatever. So the breakup of this

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>huge economic area would be a very big deal. But

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the evidence certainly looks that it would generate,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the short term, some considerable slowing of the

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>UK economy which could feed through to the rest of

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean, the FED is going to be

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mindful it makes a vote on very little time prior

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to that Brexit vote, so that that in itself is

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have an implication. I mean, obviously, if it

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's not going to pass, that's one thing.

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>But if it looked like it did, if you were

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting at the FED, you'd be mindful of this to

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be a worldwide event. Then I just want to push

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit of this on the on the

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>domino theory. I mean, domino theories have been used in

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the past, and they've been shown in the past and

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not be accurate. So rather than speculate on it, is

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there any way to sort of just quantify what No' Well,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a way to quantify what the

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank having has done, which I don't think is crazy,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is they have seen slowing already. Um, they've attributed half

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of that slowing to the fears of Brexit. We've actually

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seen contracts, apparently commercial property contracts that have had clauses

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>put in them which says that in the event of Brexit,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the deal won't go ahead. And that's that's obviously the

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>first thing. But I do think that that that it

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has political implications, probably more than economics to other parts

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, and there are movements in other countries. In

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>France and as I said in the Netherlands, that suggests

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that um, if a country can leave and nobody thought

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>they could, then others could too. Remind us Danny of

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what the pro brexit argument is Internet sell Well, the argument,

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>more than anything is that the UK needs its own sovereignty,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't need rules set out to for it by

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the European community. And even though they haven't set out

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what brex it would look like, I mean, some of

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>them will argued it would look like the Albanian model,

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that that would absolutely be wonderful and they could re

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>negotiate all kinds of deals separately and they would have

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>control over immigration. But but sadly they haven't really persuaded

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>people as far as I can see in international groups

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>around the world, including the o E, c D and

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the I m F. And President Obama has said, this

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really does not look credible, and you're not going to

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>be very able quickly to negotiate trade deals and all

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the countries you're going to need to do that with.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's so the theory is obviously that's a negative event.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there any a fear that there will be a

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>backlash from the electorate, from all the people explaining why

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a vote to leave is terrible. Well, I certainly think

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a likelihood of that, not least in fact in

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the government. I mean, David Cameron looks to be in

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>trouble whichever way it goes. If there's a vote for Brexit,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>then obviously I think it's very likely have to have

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to quit. And if there's a vote not to leave,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty narrow now he's got a split party. Um, politically,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a highly charged event. So yes, I think

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have implications later, but probably not least

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>amongst the governing Conservative Party, where you actually have got

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>some government ministers on each side. So I think that's

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>where the biggest term was going to be. Thank you

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>very much. Danny blanche Flower, Professor of Economics, Dartmouth College,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at d underscore a blanche Flower about the

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Brexit vote on June. This is Bloomberg Radio. Location, Location,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Location coming up. The head of the International Council Shopping

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Center says that's what's going to make the difference for

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar retail Live from Las Vegas coming up

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.