WEBVTT - Disney Earnings and Google's New AR Glasses

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily changing San Francisco, and this is

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Whoever said

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>streaming is slowing down didn't tell Disney, the company reporting

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a major increase in subscribers for Disney. Plus this after

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>concerns following Netflix's shocking drop. We're gonna break down the

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers and where the streaming business goes from here. Plus

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how low can crypto go? The massive sell off that

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 1>started with tech is spilling over to cryptocurrencies at Bitcoin

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and Ether have both fallen more than fifty since record

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>highs last year. And Google gives us a sneak peak

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a our glasses. What can they do and when can

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your hands on them? And how do they

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not repeat the failures of Google Glass A top Google

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>exact call join us. We'll get to all of that

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, but first let's get a look at

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the market. Stocks sliding on signs inflation isn't going away

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. And then as dat closing down. Three bloombergs

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Emily Grafhao here with the latest Emily walk us through

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the day. Hi, Emily, what was another volatile day for

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the US equity market. The SMP five hundred ended down

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>over one point six percent, but the pain was really

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in those tech stocks. We saw the Nasdaq one

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fall over three percent. Big tech giants like Tesla and

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple were really falling along with the index. And this

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of course came after we had some CPI data that

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>showed investors inflation is higher than expected and probably going

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to prompt the Federal Reserve to continue on that aggressive

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>monetary tightening path that doesn't really bode well for high

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks. Field on, the u S tenure was lower

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for the third day, but didn't seem to provide any

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>support for u S stocks. Also, the dollar finishing the

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>day in New York largely flat but still approaching its

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>largest a highest level since May. We talked about a

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of pain in tech stocks, but the pain

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is even worse when you look at the crypto markets.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin falling below that key thirty thou dollar level, and

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this of course was near an eleven month low, and

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we're also seeing ethereum down about forty percent year to date.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>The risk goff mood and market has kind of been

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>weighing on cryptos pretty much all year, but the pain

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>right now is really being felt because of the plunge

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in Terra. It's an algorithmic stable coin, but it lost

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>its dollar peg earlier this week. It plunged about eight

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>percent today, paired back some of those losses just a

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but really worrying those crypto investors. We also

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>saw Luna, which is a crypto token that's linked UM

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and helps maintain the Terra peg, also fall. There was

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an exchange traded product from twenty one shares that tracks Terra.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It fell over nine today. I heard from Bloomberg Intelligences

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of Eric Baltuna is that is one of the worst

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>single day exchange traded product declines in ETP history ever,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of losses there. Let's get to Disney though.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>They reported earnings, missed on revenue, also missed on EPs,

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>but they did beat on Disney Plus subscribers and reporting

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more Disney Plus subscribers than expected. Quite a change from UM,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>its streaming competitor, Netflix, which of course the stock plunged

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>after they reported earnings. Disney actually down a little bit

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in the postmarket zoom out here to date, Disney is

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>down over thirty so we'll see how analysts are taking

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this earning support that was largely positive. Alright, Bloomer's Emily

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Grafe O, thank you. I want to stick with Disney. Now.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Talk more about those results with Ross Gerber, president CEO

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of Gerbert Kawasaki, a long time Disney shareholders. So look,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Ross hul in ESPN plus subscribers a little light, but

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at that massive subscriber increase and

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>feel some sense of relief, even surprise. I don't know,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is this what you were expecting. Well, we didn't really

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>have much expectation as far as subscriber because it's so

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to predict what, you know, consumers do based off

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what contents being released on each streamer. But what we

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>now see it, you know, at the end of this

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings period, is that Netflix did lose a certain amount

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of subscribers to the competitors, one being Disney Plus and

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other being you know, Peacock or and Paramount Plus.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So um. You know, certainly we don't know if that's

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a permanent change in behavior, because we think streamers go

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between what you know shows are you know,

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>popular at the time. So Disney had very good results

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for their um, their streaming businesses, and and much better

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>than we expected because obviously we thought they had a

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tough comparison to the COVID era. And you know, quite frankly,

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>all of their businesses are starting to improve now and

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see revenue dramatically increase in parks and resorts,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and and actually a wonderful weekend at the theaters this weekend.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, with the valuations so cheap now in

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, stocks like Disney are quite compelling for

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>long term investors. I thought what CEO Bob J. Peck

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>had to say about Disney Plus subscribers who are grown

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ups but don't have children was really interesting. Take a

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>quick listen to what he had to say. It's certainly

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>popular with families, but as a reminder, almost half of

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus subscribers are adults without kids, and he said

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to try to cater more to that audience.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that strategy, Well, I think

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>his point is really trying to broaden the market because

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously Disney Plus is just a no brainer if you

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have kids, So you know, what would be your impetus

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to getting what is perceived as a kid's channel. But see,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about adults, you're talking about gen xers

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like us who have grown up with Star Wars, and

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so what he's really saying is that there's an enormous

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>audience base of people who don't have kids, who are

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>really into the I P like, you know, Star Wars

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and Marvel movies and you know, you think, oh, these

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>are kids movies, but they're actually not. You know, they're

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>adult movies and it's adult content. And I think that's

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why they've been successful, is that there is stuff for

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>different age groups on Disney Plus. How do you think

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus holds up if Netflix releases a lower priced

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>ad supported tier. I don't really see it as an issue. Like,

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so look at it this way. So you have basically

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>three main streamers now with with Hulu, Disney Plus, Netflix,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and what will be HBO Discover or whatever that is.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Those will be the three main players. And then you

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>have Amazon and Apple are the players that don't charge

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for streaming services and they try to sell other products.

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look at the you know, environment

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that's out there today, I think Disney's extremely well positioned

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the multiple content offerings. So with ESPN plus their

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>agreement with UFC and and really their numbers would have

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been completely blowout numbers if it weren't for the billion

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars they had to pay producers and other people to

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to put stuff on the streamers instead of in the

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>theaters over the last year or two. So Disney took

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a big hit, you know, investing in the streamers, but

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna pay off big time for them long term. Meantime,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about rolling out into fifty three new markets. Obviously,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about Netflix's global appeal, a lot

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of you know, new content coming in from for example,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>South Korea and the success of Squid Game. Do you

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>think Disney can repeat that? No, and I don't think

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it would benefit them to. You know, Disney has a

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>different approach to content. So if I make a Pixar

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>movie that will play in all countries in the world,

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you just change the language. But the content works globally,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>where Netflix doesn't make kids content really and so it

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work globally. So I've recently watched a lot of

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Asian based shows that they've been making Korean dramas,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Japanese crime movies. You know, I watched some of these

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff on Netflix and Netflix has a far deeper approach

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to the local cultures and artistic sensibilities than I think

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the approach Disney has. So I think that Netflix ultimately

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be much more successful internationally. And I

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>think what Disney is really focused on is you have

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>hot start in India where they they're a main player

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in India, and it's a massive market, and I think

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they're very focused on that market. And it makes a

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense for them to focus on bigger markets

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>where they can put money into content and not have

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to spread it between so many regions. Um, So, parks,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>let's go want to talk about parks because you know

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>trade Peck saying domestic parks are firing on all cylinders,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>but they might have to take a big hit to

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>operating income three a fifty million dollars potentially because of

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the closures of its parks in Hong Kong and Shanghai

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do the pandemic and as we know, Shanghai is on

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a very restrictive lockdown to this day. How concerned are

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you about that? I mean, for me, this is probably

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concern I have as an investor right now.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm I'm not that worried about the FED

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actually because I you know, it's easy for them to

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>stop causing pain. But like China has, we have a

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of business that we do in China, whether it's Apple,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla or Disney and many others, And and this approach

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai has been hugely detrimental to the economy in China,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to the people in China, and it may or may

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not work. I'm less believing that it's gonna work. So

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so this is a big issue for for Disney on

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the short term and and and maybe even on the

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>medium and long term in in a country like China.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't expect it to be easy for Disney

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to do business us in China for the foreseeable future

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because of their goal of having no COVID and and

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that theme parks are sort of the exact

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what you know, the Chinese government wants people

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. But I do think that that's more

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a short term issue than a long term one, but

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one that one weigh on Disney well. I wonder if

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you think doing business in Florida being more difficult is

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a short or long term issue you have. You've been

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear that you're not a huge fan of Bob Speck.

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't think he handled this situation in Florida very well.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Disney is now losing these special privileges that they've enjoyed

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in Florida for decades as a result of this, you know,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very controversial don't say gay bill. And you know it's

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that lawmakers in Florida are you know, taking this

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>out on Disney. What's your take on shape back now

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>now that you see these numbers, are you having a

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>change of heart at all? Or are you still not

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a fan? Well? I mean he just fired the PR guy,

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>right uh uh for for what's going on in Florida. Um,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of things I don't think

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>he's handling the way I wish. The Florida situation is

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>really tough one. But I think that Disney wins in

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the end because in the end, whether you're on the

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>right wing or the left wing, your kids want to

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Disneyland and and there's a lot of people type stuff

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>onto Twitter or Facebook, but then they go to Disneyland,

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I don't think that that's such an issue.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And and really the politicians in Florida are sounding and

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the people of Florida with higher costs, higher debts and

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>taxes because Disney's actually relationship benefits Florida. So what I

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>think is this will smooth out over time. And I

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think these political wars over the right and the left

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are more played out in the media than in people's

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>actual behavior. All Right, we're continuing to get headlines from

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Call Disney saying they still expect Disney Plus to

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>grow even more in the second half of the year,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>though maybe not as much as we've seen it grow

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of the year. So that of

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>course the number to watch, that big subscriber number. Ross Gerber,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Gerbert Kawasaki, always love having you on

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. Ross, Thank you for stopping by. There are

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that are going on, um, a

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of different disturbances around the world, but you know,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for us, it's really about focusing on our long term strategy.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So as mortgage rates have gone up and and they're

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna they still have further to go. Clearly, homebuyers are

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to trade down to slightly lower price points.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But most of the data that I've seen around housing

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>still predicts strong housing appreciation. I think people are overreacting to, uh,

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the inflation worries some of the other travel players.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>We've been studying inflation pretty carefully now for the past

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>four or six quarters, because I think it happened, actually,

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or the growth of inflation I should say, you know,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.599
<v Speaker 1>occurred maybe a bit more sharply than some had anticipated,

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and it certainly it continues to be a real concern

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>some top tech execs. There. We've had right here on

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology reacting to concerns about rising inflation. Wednesday's report

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>painting a troubling bigger picture for tech, especially as the

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>FED tries to combat rising prices, all of this adding

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the decline we've seen in tech docs in particular.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, I'm joined by Steve Sarah's no

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>founder and partner at Active in Capital. Steve, thank you

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. So what do you think

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the impact more broadly of inflation has been so far

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on tech. Well, when we went and looked back at

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the seventies during the stack placing period, the best performance

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sector was actually consumer products and the worst performing with

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>information technology, you know, And I think that's a testament

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to how mission critical a lot of the you know,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>software computers were back then for businesses. It's much more

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 1>mission critical today, and so we expect actually tech to

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>perform a lot better where it's gonna where it's gonna

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>show up in the form of pain or equity prices declining,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>or those um software programs that businesses use on an

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ancillary basis for things that are just not court of

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the business. So we do affect and we do expect

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation to affect technology pretty dramatically. And in gross stocks

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen it as they're down six pretty much

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>across the board, and we're seeing in the private markets

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>as well. So by dramatically, what do you expect the

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>impacts of that will be, you know, massive down rounds,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>inability to fundraise, more layoffs. Yeah, okay, so you hit

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on all the key factors. We saw this before the

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com bust. There's a very strong anchoring bias in

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the private markets for the last twelve years, and even

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>through the Great Financial Crisis, gross stocks really um never

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>went down, and so it's gonna take time for prices

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to adjust. We're seeing the early cracks, um, some of

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>which come in the form of last competition. We're also

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing converts, and what converts do is maintain an equity

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>price but allow a company to extend its runway. What

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>follows converts is always down rounds UM the other thing

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that's coming, and we saw this today with carbon or

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>lay offs. You know, we think in technology the layoffs

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are actually gonna be shocking. They're going to be shocking, Emily,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen Meta and Facebook freeze hiring, the same

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with Uber and it's this will be in the millions

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of people in the next twelve of the twenty four months.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>This is just the beginning. So you're comparing it to

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bust, I mean, just how close the

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>comparison is there? I mean, do you think this could

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>take twelve years to play out? So unclear how long

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it will take. Our current view is that over the

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months it's going to be very rocky. Back

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>half the next year, things should firm up in the

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. The dot com bus, you know, like that

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was unique to that time period. Our time period UM

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity company business models are a little bit stronger.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a better understanding of, you know, how to get

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to couch on profitability UM at the management team level,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at the board level, and those discussions are happening right now.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So I suspect that the downturn will be a little

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more violent, but the recovery recovery will be faster

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and the next kind of twelve to twenty four months,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see some really interesting opportunities. But we've got

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to flush through these down rounds, and companies with six

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or twelve months of capital left are really going to

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>struggle or raise raise money in this environment. So who

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it out of the gauntlet who doesn't? So those

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with fortified balance sheets, those companies that got ahead of

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>fortifying the balance sheet by trimming staff when necessary. It's

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>always unfortunate to do lay offs, but it's it's part

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of what needs to happen during a downturn UM, and

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see the most pain is on the

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>larger businesses unicorns. The smaller companies that can adapt UM

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and extend runway three or more years should be okay.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Those that have less than two years are are going

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to struggle. UM. You know, more broadly, what's gonna work commerce,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>commerce infrastructure, anything to do with e commerce, fintech. Although

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing competition increase, it's been a blood back both

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in the private and the public markets, and then transportation,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>lotistics and security. Wow, they're giving it to us straight.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Steve Sarasino, Activate Capital Founder, We'll be watching well. It

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was built as the biggest change to Airbnb in a decade.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>We have the biggest updates to our product in ten years.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We've been thinking about this for a very long period

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of time. I can't say a lot, but I'll just

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>give a couple of clues. Number one, there will be

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a whole new way to search on Airbnb, and this

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>new way to search is going to be a new

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>way to find really interesting homes. And then the second

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>thing is we're gonna have a big step change to

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>our service level and the kind of customer service we offer.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Airbb has now revealed its big update, which includes a

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>new way to search for homes, split your trips between

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of homes, and perhaps the biggest upgrade, more

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>protections while traveling. They are calling it air Cover, which

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>includes a number of guarantees on your booking check in

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and what they're calling a get what You book to promise.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We will talk about all that and more with Airbnb

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>c O and co founder Brian Chesky tomorrow on the show,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and coming up, we need a Name. We We Live,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>We Dream, We Work? What didn't work at We Work?

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And what lessons can tech companies learn from it As

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we navigate market turmoil and employers try to get workers

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>back to the office. We're going to talk about all

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that and more with a former We Work exec Next,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg from Wall Street to Silicon Valley. Companies

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are competing fiercely for talent and to avoid losing more

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>employees are tweaking in person requirements, even going fully remote.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about all this and more with

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Melissa Diameler, chief learning officer at the online teaching platform

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>You to Me and former We Work executive, as she

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is out with a new book called Reculturing. Design your

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>company culture to connect with strategy and purpose for lasting success. Melissa,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic has totally reshaped the workplace, for better or

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for worse. How should companies re culture in this environment? Yeah? So,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I The biggest question I always get right now is

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>how do we bring our culture back? And that is

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the wrong question because it assumes that culture is the office.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And while I think a lot of us enjoyed the

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ping pong tables and enjoyed the donuts and the free food,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that is not what culture is. Culture is how work

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>happens between people. And so I think the focus needs

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more on the values and the behaviors and

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and how we're showing up with each other through different

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>ways of communicating, versus how we can get back people

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>into an office. So let's talk about what companies are

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>doing wrong. I mean you've companies, you know, changing their

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>work from home policies, trying to you know, create these

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>new perks for when people are in the office. Yeah,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that you know, it comes down to, uh,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>going a little deeper than just defining your values. I

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>think companies stop when they have a list of values

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>on the wall or they threw them up on a website.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the companies that are thinking through this and

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>we're doing this at you to me, are really trying

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to codify what culture is. What would it what would

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a value for instance of teamwork, how would that show up?

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You know? Is that collaborating with each other effectively. Is

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that constructive debate? And how do we do that in

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a way that is in this hybrid environment? What are

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>what are opportunities for us to come back together in

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an office If it's more of a brainstorm and opportunity

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>versus you know, when can we do it remotely? So

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's less about how we can get people

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>back into the office or you know, how do we

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>how do we make sure that that we're continuing to

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>UM figure out ways to provide food. It's more about

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>how to connect so quickly. What are some parallels you

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>can draw from your experience that we work and what

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing right now in tech market term oil companies

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>getting punished, you know, whether you're growing or not. Mm hmm.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I think of organizations again as as

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a total system, and I think it we work and

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies get this wrong. I think we

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>think of culture as this is separate hr initiative versus

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>continuing to look at how to reconnect it to your purpose,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to your strategy and closing those gaps. So if you're

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>if your mission is to um, you know, to to

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make a life not a living and then you invest

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in wave pools. There's a gap there, No, Yeah, all right,

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Well you can check out your new book out now.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Melissa Diamelar, chief Learning Officer at You to Me, thanks

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Welcome back to Bloomer Technology

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Imamily check in San Francisco. We've got some breaking news

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>now headlines involving Twitter, Dal Jones reporting that federal regulators

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are investigating Elon Musk's disclosure of his sizeable steak in Twitter.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>The report saying that the SEC is probing his late

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>submission of a public form that investors must file when

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they buy more than five percent of a company shares.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>As we know, he started amassing Twitter shares back in January,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>but didn't reveal his steak until April. We're gonna have

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>more on that story as we get more details. Meantime,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Google just unveils a series of upgrades to its search

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and map services, revealing more about the company's augmented reality ambitions,

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and a slew of new products, like the six A

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>phone and a Google Pixel watch to rival Apple Watch,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and even a pair of new A R glasses. Rick

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>aster Loo, alphabet Senior Vice president of Devices and Services,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Now for more on all this Rick loss

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to get through here, let's talk about the phone first,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the six and six A talk to us about the

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>strategy here and the need for high and lower end devices.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>You bet well, thanks so much for having the Emily uh.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>First off, I just mentioned you know, our vision for

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>computing is a vision that we call ambient computing, where

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>computer should be able to help you with whatever you

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>need seamlessly and kind of be all around you. The

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>center of that universe is really phones today, and that's

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>why we are investing so much in this area. Google

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Tensor is our technology substrate for these phones. Um it's

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a system on a chip the powers all of them.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And today we introduced Pixel six A, which is a

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four dollar version of the Pixel phone that includes our

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>premium tensor s ocuh and could do all sorts of

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>great things for users around speech recognition and photography. So

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's pretty key. You know, later in the year

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll on the Phone Arena will be also launching our

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pre our next version of our premium lineup of phones,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>called Pixel seven. So we talked a little bit about

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about that too. So let's talk about the Google Pitch

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Pixel Watch. How do you think it stacks up to

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch? And how many of these do you think

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can sell? Well? I mean, first of all, we

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a terrific offering. I've got

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it right here. It's a beautiful device, round uh circular

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>design with stainless steel and beautiful features. Um some of

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the key things you know. For anyone that uses a

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Pixel phone or Pixel family of devices, this is going

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the watch for them. It deeply integrates with

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Google's ecosystem products. You can get turned by turn directions

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>without having your phone. You could use Google Wallet to

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for anything. Google Home app will beyond there you

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can do your smart home controls. And of course the

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>best part is it deeply integrates with Fitbit. I've been

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a Fitbit user for ten years, so everything I do

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on here seamlessly sinks of my Fitbit account. I can

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>get heart rate tracking, sleep tracking, all the latest features

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for health and wellness. So it's it's really exciting. I

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think people are gonna love this product. Any chance you've

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>got a pair of those new A R glasses in

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>your pocket too, I don't have them with me. There.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a prototype where of course been involved in the

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a R space for a very long time, um, and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're really excited about the advances we've made. We see

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>this area of being just a key part of the

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>AMMY and computing vision. You can see how wonderful it

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>would be to have something on your face that enables

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you to do real time communication, to do translation, to

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to live caption the world around you, all

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of this powered by powerful technology with our A our

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>systems and with Tensor and so, you know, we were

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>excited to show a little bit about the future here.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's a bit of a ways off. This is

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a prototype, but we are very much continuing to invest

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in the air space and we see it as a

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>key part of where we're headed with ambient computing in

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the future. So tell us more about how the glasses work.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this like Google Translate on a pair of glasses

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or is it something more? Well, you know it's gonna

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>end up being a lot more, but it's very early days.

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we showed was a prototype and we

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have like a ton of product details to share today.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>We were just showing a little bit about you know,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>how one facet of how it might work with powerful

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>speech recognition and translation. We do have a lot of

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>air capabilities on smartphones today. You can see that throughout

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>everything we do with lens and Google Maps and things

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. So you'll see a lot of continued investment

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the a R space. We believe strongly in offering

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>users help in the real world and that's what we're

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>very focused on with our A our efforts. So we're

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are you on the glasses in the research stage right now?

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a limited number of users testing it?

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how far along are you with this prototype? Oh?

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we have we have a number

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>of engineers and developers continuing to build product in this

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>space for internal use and uh, you know, we're still

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the research phase, so it will be quite a

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>ways off, but we're very excited about where it is headed.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>And is it based on AI image processing. I mean

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>there must be a lot going on on the back

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>end there to make all this work. Um, well, yeah,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean a R is one of the more sophisticated

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>computing capabilities that's that's required to offer useful information of people. Um.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>We have in of course, a gray prowess in our

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>computing capabilities in the data center what's been new is

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're adding a lot of intelligence to end points,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can see an indication of that with Google Tensor.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Um we're able to leverage both of these capabilities together

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to really offer this sort of powerful

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>experience in the future. So the big question is when

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>when will these be available for consumers or how many

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>years out? Are we talking more to come, But it's not,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not imminent. We're definitely in the prototyping stage. So

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll make sure to tell you Emily when they're

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about to be out. And okay, last question on the glasses,

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but look, Google Glass wasn't necessarily the consumer success you

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>hoped it would be, you know, became the butt of

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a few jokes. How do you avoid that same fate

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with another set of glasses? I mean, we learned so

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>much from the introduction of Google Glass. Um. We we

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly learned how hard it is to develop this kind

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of technology and learned a lot about what users care

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about and what's important um So, so I think that

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that informs us, uh and gives us just a great

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>background to understand what we need to do in this space.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're very glad that we had that initial effort. Um,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really helped us think through where we need to

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be for the future. So we're very we're excited about it.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We're using all the learning from our prior entry into

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this space and uh and I think you'll see a

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the benefit of that in the future. So

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you said you also planned to release a tablet next

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>year as a companion to Pixel and you know, I

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>believe back in twe you said no more tablets. So

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so why the change of heart? Well, you know, I think, um,

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we the Andrew team has really invested a lot in

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>larger screen devices, larger form factors, and I think in

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years in the pandemic, it became

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>really clear how important having these large screen devices is

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for the home for various use cases. And so between

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all of those, um collective things, at once, we decided

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that it was really important for us to develop one.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And it really does provide a new, facet new experience

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for Pixel users. So we thought it was important to

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have it as part of the Pixel portfolio. So just

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>how many facets will there be? Is this a foldable

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>tablet we're talking about? Oh? Um, you know, we just talked.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>We just showed a little bit of a prototype of

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're building right now today, which is a standard tablet,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and there'll be a lot more details shared next year

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to market. Okay, so bigger picture, how

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>do you measure the success of Google's hardware division? I mean, comparatively,

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>when you look at other companies and you compare the numbers,

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Google is not quite there, but obviously it's still growing

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's still a place that you're investing. What's the

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>bar for you? Well, I mean, you know, clearly we

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>want this to be a very large business for the company,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and it has been growing quite significantly. For for instance,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>um we talked about it our earnings that Pixel six

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>has sold more in its first six months than Pixel

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>four and Pixel five combined. UM. So, so without a doubt,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're investing a lot in this area, and

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we also are growing a lot, and our intention is

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to continue to grow the business. We're no doubt a

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>challenger in this space, where a new entrant relative to

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>other people who've been in it. So we're starting from

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a very small base, but we do expect to continue

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to grow and we're investing in the future for that,

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you see, you know, us make investments

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like the pixel uh sponsorship for the NBA Playoffs which

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have been just terrific to see, and trivia games to wash.

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this is gonna be a space we definitely

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>invest in and grow in the future. So in the future,

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>how big a piece of the pie do you think

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or do you see hardware being in the overall Google hole, Well,

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, you know, hopefully it will become a meaningful part. Obviously,

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we're quite a quite a large and successful business as

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it stands, and we hope to be a contributing part

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of that. All right, Rick Ostelo Alphabet, Senior vice president

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of Devices and Services, Thanks for giving us a little

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>peek into the future. Appreciate you stepping by. Thanks. Coin

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>based shares coming up falling to new loads in this

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>ongoing bear market. We're gonna talk about all that and

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>more with Fourager Digital, another crypto exchange next. This is

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg time now for our crypto report, and I want

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to get another look at coin base shares falling to

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>new lows. Even the word bankruptcy the big B word

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>being floated. Our crypto contributor Snelli BOSSI here with more Shanelle.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Emily. When we talk about what

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>happened with coin based today, you do have shares and

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds of coin Based plunging to new lows after results

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>disappointed Wall Street, really Goldman Sacks coming in and saying

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>here that coin bas is unlikely to return to recent

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>levels of profitability in the near term. In a quarterly report,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they added a disclosure that if the company filed for bankruptcy,

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the court might treat the customer assets as a line

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for repayment, meaning the customer assets are what are going

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to be at play here. But you also, I want

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to be very clear about this, having Brian Armstrong really

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, saying that this is about a disclosure about

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>how they hold the crypto assets and not really a

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>statement about the chance of bankruptcy at coin base. While

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not a risk in the near term, here he

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is saying that your funds here are safe at coin Base. Still,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you do have a huge drop off in the shares

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of questions about the exchange business moving forward.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>To answer some of those questions, Emily, I want to

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bring in Steve Erlick. Now he's the CEO of Chris

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Strip crypto asset trading platform Voyage or digital see if

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a long time member of the trading community, both

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from stocks and now to cryptocurrencies. When you look at

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the exchange model moving forward, a lot of concerns here

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about profitability. How do you make this work in a

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>down market? Well, look, I think that you know, the

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>exchange model is something that has been become very profitable

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>across traditional exchanges. So we're in the early stages of

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>adoption of crypto, especially in the US. We are working

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>through you know, thoughtful regulation. So my belief is the

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 1>exchange model will become you know, extremely profitable over time.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna have bumps in the road until we

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>get there, and today it's one of those bumps in

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the road. But you know, I'm really you know, bullish

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the exchange model and the industry in general. You know,

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk more about coin base for a

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>second here, because the idea that there's a claim on

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>assets here at the end of the day if there

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>were to be bankruptcy. A lot of firms have not

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>gone public yet, so they don't have similar discos disclosures.

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a risk does that really entail and

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>what does that make the customer really aware of at

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day if they go to zero.

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting because the SEC came down and said,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in the prior quarters they didn't disclose the

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>level of customer assets that they were holding. But the

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>SEC changed disclosures and said, hey, if you're holding customer assets,

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you now have to put it on your asset and

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>liabilit anty side of your balance sheet. So now that

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>disclosure is there and we see how much assets they

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>really do have. But to your point, a public company

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>like coin based, like Voyager, we've been disclosing that since

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>day one, and we've been public three years now. I

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's actually a good thing for consumers because now

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they see that our assets do cover all the liabilities

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>where nowhere near any any bankruptcy situation in either case,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and you now have more clarity than if you were,

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, investing in a private company and holding your

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>assets with a private company with no required disclosures. So

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what about the model itself in terms of making money.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of questions around there around whether fees

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really start to go to zero, kind of like you

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>saw in the stock market as spreads started to come in. Look,

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, there's there's a place in

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this business for commissions. Consumers are getting a great price,

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>great you know, action on all their trades. But I

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>do think that you know, there's no national best bid

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and offer. This is where the market actually changes and

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is different for crypto versus the traditional markets. The traditional

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>markets have reaganam Mass a national best better offer, so

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you have price protection on every trade. In the crypto market,

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't, And that's why I think we're looking for

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful regulation. But as long as there's exchanges around the

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>globe holding and trading all these cryptos, there's opportunities for

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>commissions and for spreads for every everybody in the industry. Now,

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk more about price protection. As you say,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it as it pertains to us T

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>now trading out about seventy cents on the dollar. You

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>made a decision not to list u s T, but

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you did list LUNA. Why is that. Yeah, So when

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we looked at the underlying of us T, we saw

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it truly wasn't a stable coin in the same instance

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as USDC. Now USDC, the US dollars stable coined by

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Circle and coin base is backed by US dollars and

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries, so and it has an attestation from a

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>prominent accounting firm in Grant Thornton. We felt very the

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mo and we still do that there always will be

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a dollar for dollar there. When we looked at UST,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see the same assets behind it, and so

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we're uncomfortable in bringing that to our customers. But we

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>did list Luna only from an aspect of price action

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that consumers can actually participate in and trade Luna, but

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not take it off the platform. Because one of the

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>main reasons to take it off the platform was to

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stake it for US T and earn those rewards. We

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel comfortable always thinking about the customer first and

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>how they were going to look at the trade and

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the asset. We chose not to list UST and to

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>list Luna. How do you think more exchanges are going

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to be more discerning moving forward about the types of

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>assets that they do list, especially when it comes to defy.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think that, you know, exchanges, everybody's going to

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>take a different look about how they list their coins.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>We go through a really detailed process, and I think

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's starting and going to expand their processes for that,

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>processes for that as well. I do think we sort

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of we sort of flight out of defy. Today. We

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of consumers bringing their assets back to

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a centralized place like US so they can actually be

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in holding the assets because in the defied world,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you're putting your assets into some contract and going to

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>get some reward on it. But now we see that

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>those rewards may not be as good as they look,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and to trust another party to do a lot of

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the work in diligence for you. We serve massive inflows

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>today and massive trading volume today. So what then is

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate ramification for defy into this year? Given that

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not just us T that is falling, you see

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin falling as well, below that thirty thousand mark that

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone was watching. Look, I think that this is an

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for a reset opportunity. I think, you know, UST

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>did have an impact on the entire market today because

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>us T was backed by bitcoin and there was a

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of selling of bitcoin related to the u s T.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're seeing a reset time. I think

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we're close to the bottom here if we're not there already,

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see that rebound. But it's truly an opportunity

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for people to learn more. And that's the key thing here, individuals, consumers,

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>brokers like us. We need to educate people more, educate

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>consumers why these cryptocurrencies matter, and therefore then they could

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>make an educated decision on which wants to own. Steve,

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. That is Stephen Rlex, CEO of

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Voyager Digital, Emily back to you, Shanali, thank you well.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Nike is escalating its legal battle with the sneaker marketplace

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>stock x, saying it purchased four pairs of counterfeit shoes

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on the platform despite them advertising authentic footwear. This after

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Nike sued stock x back in February, accusing it of

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>free riding on Nike's trademarks with a service called vault

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>n f t S. Stock X argues it's n f

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>t s aren't digital sneakers, but simply listings for physical

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>sneakers that are stored in its fault and can be

0:39:48.320 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>traded by users. We believe that we and you know,

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of move up and cascade up our net price

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>over time. Given the tremendous value that we started with

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and the increased price value relationship all of all the

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>new content. But we're pretty bullish above that. Disney to

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>go about check there on the company's earnings call, speaking

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>about pricing power and future pricing power for Disney Plus,

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Disney saw big growth in subscribers, beating estimates the service

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>finishing the quarter with a hundred thirty seven point seven

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:31.479
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers globally, up thirty three from a year ago.

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Disney not the only one reporting results today. Ev makeer

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Rivian also out with its earnings and our Ed Ludlow

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>has been listening in on the call, so shares up modestly.

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>At what are the headline takeaways. It's still really hot

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 1>out there for Rivian, but it was as good as

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it could be. There's still planning to build twenty five

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>evs this year. Split across the consumer product in the

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>van for Amazon, semi conductors are still hard. Cell supply

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is still hard. But I think you good use for

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>investors is they got a lot of trucks built, sitting

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in a parking lot somewhere waiting to be delivered, and

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they're finding out the hard way. It's not easy being

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a real company. What about the supply chain crisis and

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>especially what's going on with China. Are they feeling the

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>brunt of that. I think they're disappointed. They've built five

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand vehicles since production started around the quarter, but at

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>times they had to pause the line. Literally, you've seen

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the video, right, I've been inside the factory. All these

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>great robotic arms just stopped because they don't have enough parts.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Semi conductors is a big issue still, but they say

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're speaking to their suppliers. We've seen the worst

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. We've hit the bottom, and we're going to

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>get better from here. He also disputed some reports from

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal about battery cell supplies and actually,

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look over a five year horizon, battery seal

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>supplier is fine. It's longer term when we all start

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>building e vs. The whole world's clamoring for an electric car.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where it becomes a content. Did they have anything

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to say about Amazon, Yeah, a lot to say about Amazon.

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Progress on Amazon. You know, the two figure for this

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>year includes ten thousand bands for and what's interesting is

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>they're building in two sizes for one of a better

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>description big and small. The big is really underway, the

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>smallest in development, and they're on track and they're starting

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to roll out more and more pilots of amazon Is

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>cities around the country. Adam Jonas from Morgan Stanley really

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>willed them. What did he get anywhere? He kind of

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>got somewhere. His point was that you look at the

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>equity story. Rivian has fallen from a hundred and seventy

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>two dollars a share following its I PO to around

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a share. Investors have lost patients for a

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>company that burnt companies that just burned through cash. You

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know, how are you going to do better?

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to limit your costs? How are

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 1>you going to spread out spending smartly? They give very

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>detailed but very safe answers, and you can see the

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>stock reactions kind of modest and after us, but it's

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up and given the tough time, that's positive. Exactly well,

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly it matters with inflation and rates going up and

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>labor and supply chain stiles and just about everything. Okay,

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I thank you for that update, appreciate it. And that

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>does it for the sedition Bloomberg Technology. We're back tomorrow.

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got a pack show. Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky will

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be back. We'll talk about the companies at new redesign,

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>changes to shirt search. We've also got Arms CEO Renee

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Has and the CEO of son Nos, Patrick Spence. Big

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>show tomorrow. Don't forget to check out our podcast Daily.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find it anywhere you get your podcasts. I'm

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily checking in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg