WEBVTT - The Right To Privacy And Encryption

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make informed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this started. Hello, and welcome to another episode of the

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Market Disruptors podcast. Today, I'm sitting down with Rob Biglione,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO of zen Labs, and we are

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about their Privacy coin, privacy platform, and privacy overall,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the need for privacy. We're talking about what the US

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>government is talking about encryption, putting in backdoors, why privacy

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is important, what that fight of encryption looks like, and

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>then we get into some other topics. Rob is a

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>pH d in economics, so we get into economics, Austrian economics,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. It's a great conversation with Rob,

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and just go ahead and jump right into it. Hey, everyone,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>welcome to another episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast. Today,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by Rob Biglione. He is the CEO,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>co founder of zen Labs, Horizon Cryptocurrency, and he's got

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a very good background before that as well. It's very interesting.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dive into UM but let's get into it.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Rob Hey, thanks for having me appreciate it. Yes,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple of conversations in the past. It's

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure to talk. So thanks. Thanks for coming

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>back on UM. So I've got to know you pretty

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>good over the past. But for people that are listening

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, why don't you give us your background,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which I think is very interesting in kind of your

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>path into cryptocurrencies and what you're working on right now.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Totally So at my background, Actually, I started my career

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as a physicist and mathematician working UH with the military.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So I was an Air Force officer, worked in Air

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Force Space commander, working on satellites and intelligence systems and

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>rockets that launch them up. And from there I went

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>into the more of the operational side of the intelligence

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>world and actually parked myself in Afghanistan for a couple

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of years doing initially a counter i E ed mission.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It was really quant a quant intel work, and then

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>started working with a bunch of different parts of the

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>military and a bunch of different missions over there UH,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then from there I got lucky enough to have

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to go back to academia, so I left

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that world, went back to from my PhD in financial economics,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and I had a very good departments that allowed me

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to study bitcoin. I was studying asset pricing specifically, and

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>then they allowed me to actually look at bitcoin asset pricing,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so that was fun. Um. They hired me back as

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>an adjunct faculty member to teach bitcoin in boxing applications

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and finance, and then I launched zen cash back into

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen with my cocount row first Loose and we

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ran that as an open um, you know, public boxing

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>system for a couple of years, and just recently in

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this January, we launched an off shoot, basically a commercial

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>offshoot called Horizon Labs, which is really taking the base

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>protocol technology that we've created there and we can talk

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, but bringing that to the commercial domain and

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>really just trying to get that next level exposure for

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the tech and then the real economic use cases. So

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>um Horizons in which used to be zen cash, now

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Horizon is a is a privacy coin right forked off

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of z cash and z classic, etcetera. But you have

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your privacy coin, and then you went on to become

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>more of a privacy protocol where you could build privacy

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>applications such as private messenger, private storage, etcetera. So it's

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>not what you're talking about taking that layer and putting

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that out of Rising Labs. That's exactly right. So actually,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to be specific, we're we're a few months away now

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from releasing an alpha of our side chain protocol. So

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that we're looking at this, and really the

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that pivot from a privacy coin to a platform is

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>via side chain. So the way we look at it

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is we want to create a hub and spoke sort

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of model where you have a very stable, secure main

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>chain and then you have all the applications of the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>logic and business logic and anything that you want to

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>do bespoke, um, you can do on a side chain,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can have your own side chains. You can

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 1>have any number of side chains. Really that that part

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is not really bounded um and then it doesn't the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that happens on the sessions doesn't necessarily clog up

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>the main chain. All that goes to the main chain

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is basically the security feature. In the fact that's consensus

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on the side chains the met So this is our

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>our solution for skillability basically and really where I think

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we will be industry leaders once we're release this because

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a truly unfederated side chain system. And when we

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about philosophy and you know, what we're doing later

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the show, we can talk about that, but I

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important to be truly decentralized. And the

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>side chaine systems on the market to date have been centralized,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so those where you have to rely on trusted nodes

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or trusted certifiers. Ours is truly decentralized, one where the

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>main chain doesn't even have to know what happens in

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the side chain. No one approves or you know, authorizes

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the side chain to exist. It's just any aptive

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>offering and take our toolkit, launce there on blockchain is

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the horizon side chain, and do whatever they want on

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that chain and still retain the security properties of you know,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>our public architecture. Interesting, so a lot of times we'll see,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>like with Lightning for example, as a side chain of Bitcoin,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Lightning is more centralized and solutely yeah less, it's less

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's less secure than the decentralized main chain. Um.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So typically I think of side chains is less less secure, right, Uh,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but you're saying there's a way that you guys can

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>keep a side chain but still keep its security or decentralization.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>There absolutely like massively secure. So we're actually using an

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting recursive snark technique for security and leveraging our thirty

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand nodes basically are are super and secure notes system.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>They have close to a third about thirty thousand nodes

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>right now like full nodes operating in the network, and

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they will be basically a competitive marketplace for them to

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>be certifying nodes. So you'll have a massive note network

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>where basically, um, you know, all of these notes will

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to act certifiers or forgers on on

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the side chains and also actively hunting and sent to

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>byst the hunt for fraud uh and uncover fraud. So

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually extremely secure system. That's that's nice hybrid public

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>private architecture. Yeah. I remember you guys had suffered an attack,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>um that you caught pretty quickly and you got really

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in front of which I really thought that the way

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>you handled that was good, um, and you made some

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>updates to the system, so um, I believe if incorrect,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong. But after that you had updated

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>system and even changed the way maybe the consensus work

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>so that even though um, your chain might be, let's

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.559
<v Speaker 1>have less value than the Bitcoin main chain, it doesn't

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>make it easier to attack. That's exactly right. Yeah, So

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what we did was we modified the macomotive consensus. So

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of just being um, you know, I'll say, naively,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just the longest chain role you know, the most the

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>most proof of work, um, you know, dictating which which

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>branch of a chain gets to be the valid one,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>we added a second check which basically provides a delayed

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>block penalty. So that so the attack vector for this

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>fift one percent attack thing is basically you would have

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a neferious actor mining privately and then all of a

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sudden dumping all of these box of devine privately into

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the network and scooping the network into thinking that it

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>has the most accumulated pro for work, and then they

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>can execute double spends. And this happened to us. We

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had a few double spends that were executed or basically, um,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hacker or whatever you wanna call this

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>type of criminal stole a few hundred thous dollars from

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an exchange it lists that. Um. So it was a

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>terrible event, but not catastrophic. What it did was it

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>really kicked us into gear to try to solve this

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>problem for the industry and for us of course, so

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we added this second check. So it's really a two

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>checks type of consensus. Now it makes us much more robust.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>If you know, without it, then we are without it. Um. Now.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Not not to say like bitcoin is massively secure because

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it has a ridiculous amount of per for work on there.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>We have a miniscule amount of work, but our penalty function,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we can actually modulate that to be as escalated quickly

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be on it to be and right now it's you know,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be more than sufficient to protect us.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's good now. UM. I know, with new technologies

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't really envision the future because they give us

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>new platforms to build new things off of. We can't imagine,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but um, as best as we can. What do you

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>see being done on these side changes at least now

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>or in the near future. Yeah, I mean, so there

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton and actually are we we have a

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>go to market strategy we have a great strategy marketing

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>bad team, and they've already been carving out projects with

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>select design partners. So basically, right out of the gate,

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>once our alpha's released, you're gonna hear an announcement for

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some key companies and projects that we're working on. Two

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>showcase the technology. So for instance, one of them is

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a large digital invoicing company in Latin America looking at

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>um integrating cryptocurrency payments, looking to do things like factoring marketplaces.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So if their clients have receivables or payables these notes,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they can actually digitize them, you know, standardize them, make

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>them transparent, and put them into an auction marketplace environment.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's something we're looking at. By by doing that

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>side chain, they have their own token exactly, so they

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>have the token their own system. So basically, if if

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>their system becomes massively popular, it's theirs. They control it.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And then importantly, we provide our software developer toolkit provides

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a basically a reference blockchain model and a whole bunch

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of tools, but they can modify the consensus and at

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>any type of transaction type they want from there to

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really make it very bespoken configurable to their needs. Okay, yeah,

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so so that that's one of them. Um. So also

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>there's another projects looking at a factory marketplace seems to

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty hot topic, and another auction environment looking

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at a tokenization platform, looking at working with one of

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the main maintainers for a version of hyper Ledger that

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>has an e v M UH and seeing if maybe

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we can put in UH an e v M variant

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of hyper Ledger running as a Horizon side chain. So

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it just shows you the generalizability of it as long

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as UM an a v M an Ethereum virtual machine,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so exactly right, So an Etherium virtual machine as a

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>side chain on the Horizon main chain exactly. And in

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that sense, it means that any smart contract that was

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>written on Ethereum would be compatible to basically just kind

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of ported over to work with US. Now wouldn't interact

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with the you know, the Ethereum chain, but you're basically

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>replicating the same type of you know, infrastructure that then

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>they can build on us as an alternative. Okay, yeah, okay. Interesting.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So you know when we talk about like bass

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>layers and then we add chains and layers and side

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chains and all these different things on there, Um I

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that's kind of how things scale. Um, what about like,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>um using like side chain or some sort of like

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>horizon side chain to like add like a a privacy

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>layer on top of a bitcoin, like a side chain

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin. There's some sort of like interoperability like that.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. That's a really interesting question. We honestly have

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not thought about that. So that's that's something to consider. Yeah,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's you know, there's a whole bunch of

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>other stuff. What I like about the side chain model

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is you can experiment with any type of system as

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a side chain, and rather than the launster room blockchain

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and figure out how you do this big big launching

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and convince people to run your software, you can just

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>do it a small experiment on the side chain. Modify

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the privacy features, modify the applications you

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>running their, modify consensus. Uh. It's an excellent experimental environment. Yeah.

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>You could almost like, uh, you know, I don't know,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe wrap wrap the wrap the bitcoin with us in

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>privacy coin and then uh and then add like a

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>privacy layer on top of the bitcoin network or something

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. UM, I don't know, I've I often just

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about like you know, obviously bitcoin is missing a

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>huge piece of that of privacy. It's a it's a

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a big glaring hole that maybe they'll get to

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>at some point. But then there's a good solutions like

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like uh like Horizon and I just wondered about that,

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not I'm not the guy to figure that

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>out by any means. Uh, But I definitely understand that

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the need for privacy. You know, from your background, you

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>were in the military, and I think you were working

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on some sort of like encryption stuff there or some

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of reconnaissance intelligence or something. Yeah, I mean definitely

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>encrypted systems, but really from the intelligence satellite perspective. Okay,

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So but encryption, and so you understand you understand kind

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the need for that. Um, what do you think

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>about the need for privacy and the maybe the war

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>on privacy that we have today. I think maybe specifically

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about um, you know, them calling for an end to encryption, right,

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so trying to stay above the line with

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the thinking is I I I've seen you know, the

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>downsides of um, you know, or I guess said, there's

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a downside to people being able to hide and obfuscate,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, bad behavior, right, we all know that no

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>one's trying to argue against that. I think you would

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>be a big shame though, if regulators, um didn't I

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>take the time to understand what we're doing and all

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of the social and economic good and value that comes

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with actually allowing people, uh, you know, privacy, which is

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a shame or philosophically weird to say, allow

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>people to have privacy, because I think we have a

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>right to it to begin with, right, Um, So I

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>guess my my persecative is there are bad people out there,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and bad people can do bad things. We all know this,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it would suck if they use their technology to

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. They use cell phones, they use dollars, right,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they use all the tools that are currently exist. Uh.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And yet we know that cell phones, you know, and

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>encryption on cell phones is absolutely critical, and the abilities

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for people to communicate with each other has unleashed quite

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars with economic value and social good. So

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I really hope regulators take their time to do their

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>due diligence and don't overreact and take you know, these

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like strong man examples of terrible scenarios and

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>try to destroy the intern industry would just be a disaster.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think when they get into those hyped up examples

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like you said, you know, like uh, I think it

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was Obama you said, you know, if we can save

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>one life, really so we're going to destroy the entire

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>constitution and and and and start a civil war to

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>save one life, and then how many lives get destroyed

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>after weigh the good and the bad and and uh

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>and and it's almost like, um, you know, I could

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>whisper a secret to you, and how are they going

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to regulate that? But because now I want to share

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a secret with you over communication, now said it has

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to be listened to, right exactly? You know, yeah, I

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldna say. The argumentative technique is to come up with that.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You know that that micro example that just you know

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is in your face. Look at this kid that was

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>killed from this you know, predator who used encryption somehow.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a horrible example and it just it listed at

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>list it's emotions. And then on the other hand, you said, hey, Constitution,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill of Rights, you can't do that, and this kind

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of like abstract argument, and people just naturally flow towards

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that emotional argument, and it's easy to forget you know that. Well,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if you violate human rights, and you violate the Constitution

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and Bill of Rights, you can have a whole lot

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>more destruction that happens. I think, I think we can

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>see all the hot button issues, uh that that are

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>discussed politically have gone from um, logical arguments to emotional arguments.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So most of these things, uh, you know, I don't

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>even want to say, but you know, whether it be

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>guns or vaccines or whatever, Um, you can't have a

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>logical conversation, even climate change, you can't have a logical conversation.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's always an emotional one. And then you you can't

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>can't reason with with emotion, right, Yeah, exactly, No, I

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>completely agree, and and that's really a shame and it's insulting. Yeah,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's insulting. Curious though, UM, what you think about this

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>attack on privacy, not from a philosophical level but from

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>being a US based company? H what does that look like?

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? I mean, I'll just have you out

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this with, Hey, we're US based companies, so we have

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to comply with US law. We have no intention of

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not doing that. But sometimes I don't I'm optimistic on it.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that these strawman arguments and kind of

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>doomsday scenarios that get pulled out out for you know,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>pr opportunities. I don't think that they're gonna carry the

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>day and we're going to see destruction of privacy. I

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think we'll ever see a backdoor on you know, iPhones,

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least one is legislated, And of course there's

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>all those agencies that can do that with you know,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>illegally without us knowing, and then hopefully we catch them.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>M But you know, so I'm optimistic. I think that

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty it's pretty well established that code is sort

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of a kind of a freedom of speech element, and

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't repress code, you can't try to violate the

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>mathematics of encryption. Sorry, just doesn't happen, right, So I

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think we're gonna have this dystopian um outcome.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I really hope not. Yeah, I I would agree. I mean,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna basically have to blow up the Constitution, right,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, exactly that that the argument will come

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>back down to the right to freedom of speech, and

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be a very tough one for people

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to swallow. Although it's been interesting to see what's happened

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on the digital Uh like the three D printed gun front. Yeah,

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to claim that freedom of speech as well. Yep,

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>but what about um, I mean that would be affecting

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess US companies. But there's plenty of blockchain, cryptocurrency

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>encryption stuff going overseas then, right right, yeah, yeah, absolutely so.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>In fact, what I view as an imperative for US

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as a project and horizon and for the entire industry

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is we have to decentralize, and we have to decentralize fast,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want single points of failure where it's

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the US government says, hey, Rob, we're shutting you guys down.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Stop doing what you're doing, right, um, freeze money. I

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mean if if you have points of failure and you

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have humans in the loop, of course, um. You know,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>let's not be cavalier about this. And too many people

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in the industry have been cavalier about the government's ability to,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, stop these systems. And we can say, okay,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>technically you can't ever stop bitcoin, right it's it's it

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>could be replicated by anyone with a computer, so you

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can't technically stop it. But they can make our lives

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hell and destroy a lot of lives, So we shouldn't

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be cavalier, um, you know, and I really hope that

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>never comes down to that. Now, we are an international

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>organization and we are decentralizing, say our treasury, we want

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to decentralized decision making with the voting system, right, decentralize

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>our note network from the tracking to the payments of it.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We want to just decentralize everything so we don't have

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>those constail here. And you know, I would love to

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to just be one of many participants in

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this UM ecosystem. We see the we can see the

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>contrast today now because of Facebook, right, Uh, they're being

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>brought before the US government to testify, but there's no

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>one from Bitcoin going to testify exactly. There's a glaring

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>difference that, uh that has become very obvious you know. So, um,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is that something that's in the roadmap for Horizon Labs

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>or absolutely? Yeah. Yeah, So with the whole side chain thing,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're going live within alpha in the end of

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Q three slash early key four. We'll see how that goes, uh,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And the whole point of where one of the big

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>things that that allows us to do is we're building

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a voting system on a side chain, so basically where

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>our treasury pool, we're democratizing and we'll have a way

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for people to vote on how the resources are used

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and how this what kinds of decisions are made as

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>an organization. And then we're also gonna have another side

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>chain that does our our no tracking payments and automating

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>all that. That's just the start. So we have to

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>decentralize fast because we know that you know, whether it's

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and I don't think it will be

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but the leg parts of the world

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>where what we're doing will be considered illegal, which is insane, right.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're we're building technology, we're united people around

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, We're giving people opportunity, and we're basically innovating,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, economically, technologically, socially, and I can see some

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>systems that are more repressive trying to stop that. And

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't want us to have points of

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>failure where they can go after this points of failure. Yeah, yeah,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I mean that's the problem with the financial

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>system as we know today is that it's permissioned. So

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to have permission to join at and a

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of people aren't aren't able to receive permission and

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>two billion adults on banked and so there's this this

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>exclusion and then of course there's a gap of equality

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because people can't even get into the system and uh

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>through cryptocurrencies, whether that be stable coins or bitcoin or

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever method they choose. Um, it's permission lists, but um,

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely they don't want that and exactly, yeah, it's shocking.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>But you know what I do think that what I

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>love about this technology and other things that that I

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>participate in, like C setting, is we have to make

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>governments compete with each other and view us as as

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>customers instead of subjects. And then as soon as they

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>start viewing their role as providing useful services, uh, and

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that we have many options, then I think that you know,

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll start competing with each other to do better a

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>better job. And you see this in a way like jurisdictions. Think,

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think about that that that you just said, because I

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>know you're I know you're deep into the libertarian philosophy,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so you can get this. But think about what you

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just said where they should look at us as customers

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of subjects. Yeah, yeah, there's deep it but but

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but but the government is servants of the people. It

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be. But feel that way, right, right,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But so we're going from wishing that their subjects or servants,

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but to now at least just at least treat us

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as customers. Yeah. No, that's that's just lip service. I mean,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>go into a government agency and try to get something done,

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and then are you really their boss? Of course not No, no,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't it's not yeah exactly, but no. But this

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is the line that's used, which is very misleading, is

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't control government. There is a very small subset

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of people, say a few hundred, you know, at the

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>first level of control, and then you have thousands at

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the next level of control, and there are our bosses. Right,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's not the other way around. No matter what

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can of rhetoric there is. I think it should flip

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>back around, right, Yeah, exactly. I was. I was in

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>l A with Max Kaiser and he was he was

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>he was talking to a small group and they were

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about these increasing regulations and whatnot, and he just

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>basically the same converse station and he just said, look,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment was put into place to protect against

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tyranny and if you don't think your government is representing

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you is a tyrannical and then maybe you should think

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. And he just kind of left it like that,

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, not advocating for anything obviously, but just something

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to think about, you know. But we should have the

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>right to change the government. But now we'd like it

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if they could just look at as customers. UM. But

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that actually goes into something that we talked

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about before we started recording, where you would you would

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you had said you had gone from New York to

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>California to Texas, and I'm in California and and those

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two states are the highest tax states in in the nation.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck in one of them. But you left to

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>go to a lower tech state. We were talking about

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>going to Puerto Rico, which is a behaven because it

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>can bring taxes down very, very low. And just the

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that UM, as a customer, we would go where

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we're treated best, exactly. Yeah, And there's a reason why

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>so with Horizon Labs. In January, we lost Horizon Labs.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's a reason why we chose Austin, Texas as

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>our headquarters because they don't have repressive taxation. You know,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a botching hub. It's emerging as a blotching hub.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You have key talent there, but people are moving there

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and relocating from you know, Silicon Valley traditional areas to

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Austin and to other parts of Texas and in states

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like that that are actually trying to attract people instead

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, repel them. So it's it's that concept,

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>like do we see it within the United States? You

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have states competing with each other. You see it with

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, internationally, countries start competing with each other, right, Um,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so I want to see more of that. I just

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see competition. You know. I'm not a fan

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>of you know, uh, you know, replacing governments or rebellions

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, because you know, the reality is

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you and I may disagree with a government, and you know,

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the population doesn't disagree with them. They

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>actually like that government, and then what what percentage you

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>gets to impose its will on the other percentage? Right?

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't like scenarios like that. They seem to

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be like win lose, which is why, which is why

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer is less government, right, yeah, exactly, and everment Ever,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>men should be out of everyday decision. So, um, then

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>instead of fifty fifty split, it should be like the

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>majority of people don't have a problem with government because

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not really affecting my life that much, right Exactly.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big believer in, you know, the set of

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>things the government does being as small as possible, because

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>then you have the least ability for to violate people's

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>rights and then to basically cause such discontent. So it's

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a different scenario because people that have discontent with

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the small government just wants to get something from government,

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's for themselves or for others. Maybe

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they're being philanthropic by taking your money

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and giving it to someone else, but that's not real,

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, philanthropy. So I can't said the word. Yeah,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how you came to have that viewpoint being

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a PhD in economics financial economics, because it seems like,

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not I'm not a PhD in economics, so

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you can correct me if I'm wrong, But it seems

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like from all the people that I know that are

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>masters or whatnot in economics, Um, really teach in the

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>school system is kind of exact opposite of what we're

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>talking here, right, So they teach that, um, we should

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to control the market, and we should have

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>centrally planned uh policies to control the market versus personal um,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, responsibility. So yeah, I think there's there's a

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of biases or behavioral biases that that play themselves

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>out in academia. One is, uh, academics really like to

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>feel smart, right, you know, like basically we go through

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>out our lives is like the top of our classes

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that are high school and college and all that, and

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we go into academia because we're good at it and

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we're always we've always been told our whole lives, you're

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so smart, right, And they kind of get off on that,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and then it manifests such that we tend to gravitate

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>towards theories that have tractable solutions, like tractable but also complex,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's a nice feeling to be able to

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>solve like a second order differential equation and have attractable results.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And not everyone in the world can do this kind

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, but you can and you have attractable result there.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's a nice thing because then then the next

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>thing is the biases they like to everyone likes to

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>feel important, right, and it basically lass hundred years, probably

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>since Kan's and maybe a little bit before that, UM

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>economists and academics started getting more influencing government because the

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>things that they were telling government, we can control this,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 1>we can you know, overcome these problems that they kind

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>of self identify in the market, UM by giving you

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>more power. Of course, politicians are gonna love that. Yeah,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>give me the theory that justifies that I have more power,

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of course. But true science though, and you know, so

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I know in the libertarian world and anarcho capitalists where

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all that that kind of you know I live in

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you probably live in is um. There's this big academic

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>dashing that goes on, and I think it's gone too far,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like very very much too far by people that don't

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>really understand what goes on in academia and true academics

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>is true science where we do have a scientific method

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and we have Dad and his processes and techniques to

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>evaluate hypotheses. Now, there's too many, too many academics that

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>violate these fundamental premises and they impose their opinions under

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the guys of academic credibility, like Paul Krug for instance,

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not an economist anymore. He was an economist and

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>now he's just basically a social commentator on the left.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's using his creditis that's when you reach the top, right, yeah, right, so,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's a shame, and I think that that does

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a big disservice to the world of science. Right but true,

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>like true, academia should be just based science. Uh. And

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it's just really unfortunate. But there are amazing guys that

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like John Cochrane for instance, my my favorite economist,

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>finance professor out of University of Chicago. Now I think

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>he's at the Hoover Institute. But the guy, the guy's brilliant.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>He wrote all the you know, or some phenomenal books

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and that surpricing. But he's a real scientist and he's

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the kind of example that I look up to. But

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it isn't science is a science is not like fact.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Science is some thing that's an evolving learning stage. Right.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We're constantly testing and learning exactly. It's a process. And

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so you want to talk about economics as a science,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have controlled studies, no, no, no, Yeah,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the studies are are very very very much uncontrolled. I

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>think there are some control studies or not, but they're

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>very limited because the range of what you you should

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate the results to be is very narrow. Um. But yeah,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, especially in social systems, their complex systems, So

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be so arrogant. I think that we really

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>understand human behavior so thoroughly that we can predict everything.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then and have you have you dived into

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Austrian economics, then you've I'm a huge fan. That's

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>where I came from. Actually, so that was you know that,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that was where I came from before I went into academia.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I still very much love love and you know

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the premises. I think Austrian economics to me is more

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of a philosophy than it is necessarily economic science. It

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>provides a great um framework, but it is like a

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred year old you know, economic tool tool set, and

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>there are there are more modern tools as well. Would

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you say though? The big difference is that with Austrian

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's more about human incentives, like personal incentives versus um

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>traditional economics or kinsing economics being more like master planned

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and controlled totally totally. Yeah, So Austrians probably more micro

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kaanging is more macro, and I definitely think macro

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is more voodoo science because it treats it treats economics

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like physics and it's not. Uh, you know, so I'm

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>much more of a believer in at the human level. Now.

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>One thing that Austrian economics doesn't have, although maybe there's

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge overlap, is the behavioral economics stuff that came

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>about basically from uh, you know, from the economen in

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>diversity experiments that they started doing the sixties and seventies. Uh,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and then some of those papers really blew open this

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>whole you know, sub field of economics that I think

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>maps in a way back to Austrian school of thought

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>where we're actually looking at human humans as non standard

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>economic agents, you know, because you know, if you want

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tractable you know, second order differential equation solutions, you need

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>uniform economic agents, and we're not all uniform. We don't

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have all the same utility functions that are easily mappable

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and tractable. Right. So I'm a big fan of where

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>economics is going. Although the problem, there's a downside to

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that is you have some some academics that use this

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as like a toolkit to advocate for more control from government,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the exact wrong outcome from it.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 1>They basically say it's like a market for lemons. As

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>as an example, you see this, you know, okay, nice

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>theory that says that you should never have a secondary

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>marketplace basically for used cars. No one should ever buy

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a used car because the previous owner or the current

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>owner knows more about the car's condition than you. There's

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an information asymmetry, and therefore you guys can't agree on

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a price. This is the academic arguments, a famous art

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a journal article. Obviously false. We have secondary

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>markets for everything, right, so obviously false. But if you

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>were to just take this theory in blind apply it

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>without context, I think you'd be completely wrong. And I

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>think this is where unfortunately, a lot of policy guidance

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>has gone well. It seems like in that analogy, but

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>also the other policies that I hear, it always leaves

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>out the human incentive part. And I think humans have

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this innate ability. I have little kids and I see

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>them on the playground and they're already change trading their

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bologna sandwich for the chips, like we have this, we

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have this like innate ability or desire to trade and

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to uh and do property and and uh. You know,

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to preach equality, but at the end of

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the day, some people just are more motivated than other.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Some people want to work harder than other something and

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh and there's incentive there and so um when

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these these macroeconomic policies don't take that into consideration, and

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they they almost work against a lot of that incentives

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>from from my from my standpoint. And even that car example,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>as you say, um, I may have an incentive to

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>save money, and I may have an incentive to save

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>money because I know more about cars than you do

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have an edge, right, and so you just

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you just you can't that away from people. Yeah, and

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know one other things that they're out there is

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there's uh utility to freedom, all right. I value freedom.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So even if you were to just mathematically proved to

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>me that you know, eating sugars that actually don't eat

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sugar, but say like eating eating fat

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is bad, you you go and prove it. You have

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>some theory us evidence. If you take away my right

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to eat a cheeseburger, I'll be pissed even if I

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>know that it's not necessarily bad, but it's completely disproproportionate

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>because maybe it gives me some value right now. And

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm not gonna eat a hamburger every meal

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of my life, which would be a

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>short life, right, But freedom has value, and to just

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>impose people on people, you know, the will of the

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The Ivory Tower is a terrible idea.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Even if they're right, which I don't think they are,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so well, they can't. They can't be They can't be

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>right for everybody. I might be okay dying at forty

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>years old if I can eat a cheeseburger every day,

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's my right exactly. I love cheeseburgers that much,

0:32:58.360 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't need to live to eighties, So I'm

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna eat an every day and and to forty, And

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>who are you to tell me that I can't. I

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's a philosophical argument that, um, you

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can't make somebody's life better by taking away their choices

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>or forcing them to do things they don't want to do, right, right,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much opposed to that absolutely. I would love

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for them to say, hey, we can help you. Here,

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>here's the plan, here's why it's bad, and try to

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>reason with me education exactly. But you know, I think

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes. I think it just goes from a win

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>win into a win lose deal. But I think there's

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>also a stark difference in you know, Austrians believe in

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>saving and deploying that capital versus Austin traditional economics believes

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and spending for capital. Right, and so that's a big

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>difference totally. And I think the reason why that's important

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand right now is I believe what bitcoin is

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>doing is it's changing that narrative because we've never really

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had a deflationary currency before. And I know this personally

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>because I own bitcoin, and I know because I talked

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to other people a bitcoin. But it changes the way

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about spending. So might dollars. I have no

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>problem spending my dollars yep, Oh, two thousand bucks last

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>week and went to Texas with my daughter. Sure dropped

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>too grand we on a trip together. No big deal.

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are my dollars. They're worth less next month. Anyway.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>My bitcoin, I'm not selling that for anything, right, and so, um,

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we should be, right, we should be

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>in that saving mindset deploying capital. And so that's a

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>big difference, right, I completely agree with you on that.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know where the nonsense of you know,

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>perpetual deficits and perpetual inflation came from. I think it's

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just insanity. Um. Now you can see why it's supplied

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>because it's really useful for politicians. Why would they ever

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>want to live within a budget? Politicians are too creative

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to live within a budget. They want obviously they want

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to spend more than they have right now because they're

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 1>not responsible for paying it. So of course they're gonna

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gravitate to any theory that tries to pseudo justify that

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that nonsense. But it's not sustainable. No, But it's human nature. Yeah,

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>human nature is always gonna want to push it as

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you can push it until you can't push

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. Exactly. So, Um, you're not an economist, but

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you are a PhD in economics. Uh. But so, I mean,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, we have this system where we have uh,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we have this system that whatever you want to call

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it kenzie in or modern whatever, where we're building debt.

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We're spending money we don't have. In the next couple

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of years, we wont be able to cover the debt

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the interest on the debt um And now we have

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>this other system that's creating this deflationary currency. Uh, and

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see the this, you know, the stink

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>differences of that. All the developed world, not just the

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.959
<v Speaker 1>United States but the whole West at least, but most

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of the world is in the same economic situation where

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we're spending spending spending. Is there a way out? I mean,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>once they've gone down this path, there's really no way,

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Like you have to continue down the path, right, there's

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>no way I mean there. I mean, I guess you

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>could wake up tomorrow and just change your mind, but

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that's likely not going to happen. So the reason that

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't collapsed yet is because theoretically, they say, hey, growth

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>will catch up and we'll be able to grow ourselves

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>out of our problems, grow ourselves out of the debt.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Right so far hasn't happened. We've seen a lot of

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>growth around the world, but that actually incentivizes politicians to

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>spend even more. So you know, if they just spent

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>less than we're growing, you know, and we got into

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>less that per year, and then we were growing, would

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually be able to theoretically work ourselves out of it. Um,

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't see right now. The incentives are

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not there for politicians, so I wouldn't expect at anytime soon.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we need more competitive governance, really, and this

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm such a fan of things like c

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>setting and cryptocurrencies, because we can vote with our our

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>our money, now we can vote with our feet. These

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>are really empowering things. There's never been a better time

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to be alive than today. Yeah, I believe we're in

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a very transitional period that you know, maybe a hundred

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>years from now they will have this period written about

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in history books, where, um, what the heck were they thinking? Like, no,

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree it was a fifty year they did.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Like what the heck? Have you ever seen that video

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of like an alien comes to Earth and uh, some

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>some encount terms his first human and the humans said,

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do you want me to take you to our leader?

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And the aliens like, what's a what's a leader? Like?

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Where does they lead? Where do they lead you? You know?

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's just really cool video it's like a cartoon.

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommended because it's a huge parody of I

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 1>think a hundred years from now people will look back

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on today. I think we're savages, Like, how can we

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>live this way? How could we let people exploit each

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>other this way? And by exploit, I mean really exploit,

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>not these like weird fantasy terms of unexploiting you because

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting I'm making money. No, No, I'm talking about

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>people actually taking you know, taking us and putting us

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in cages for smoking pot or you know, violating people's

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>human rights, are stealing from people, like systematically through through

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>unfair taxes and stuff like that. That that's real exploitation.

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think this will be looking back on is

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>barbaric and completely unnecessary. I agree. And to think that

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we have no um, no standard unit of account for

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>wealth or value or whatever you want to call that,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which really I think stems you know, at the at

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the base of all these problems. But um, yeah, good

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff and interesting. We could we could talk about that forever,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but kind of we're kind of running out of time.

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>But um, I love I love what you're doing, Rob,

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I love I love the information that you're putting out, um,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and I love what Horizon Labs is doing to increase privacy,

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think is uh is a big piece we

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get into. But from from a philosophical level,

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the privacy is such a big piece of an entire society.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't just maybe tell me in a couple of sentences,

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>why why you think privacy is so important to a society.

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, privacy is at the heart of everything. I mean,

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's almost so big of a question I don't know

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.240
<v Speaker 1>how to answer. You know, how do you answer something

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, because, uh, you know, if you don't have privacy,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you really don't have the ability to have any kind

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of freedom. Right. Um. You know, we can say you

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>have freedom, but the second some authority doesn't like what

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, it doesn't like what you're saying, uh, doesn't

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.399
<v Speaker 1>like what you're doing with your money, right, then then

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they could do whatever they want to you. So, you know,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's starts if you believe in freedom and you believe

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that human beings have a right to their own lives.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to believe in privacy. And it's

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>not about having something to hide, It's about having the

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>freedom to have your own thoughts and um to people

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>who think they have nothing to hide. The problem is

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>is that there's someone on both sides of the aisle.

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't matter what debate you're on, pro life,

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>for a choice, Democrat, Republican, whatever, there's gonna be somebody

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the opposite side. And uh, and really it comes

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's more than just the decisions. It's uh, it's

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the thought and then it's the creativity that comes from that. Ye.

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So so anyway, I think it's a huge piece and

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I love it and and and that's why I really

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like the project and follow along? So where do people

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>follow along? To learn more about Horizon and Horizon Labs

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and yourself. So our website, Horizon dot global is the

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one stop shop for everything. But then please join our

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>join our discord, join our telegram groups, you know, come

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to our Reddit page, participate, see what's going on, and

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we're always up there. I definitely encourage our team to

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.959
<v Speaker 1>be very active with the community so you can reach

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out to us directly. Please do cool All right, good stuff.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for the conversation, Rob, I look forward

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to it again sometime. Thank you, Mark, appreciate it. Hey,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if you like this, episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast.

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Please help us take this to the top of the

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast charts. Just please do me a favor and rate,

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. Taking fifteen seconds to just leave a

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>quick review goes a long way and helping us reach

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>more people and disrupt more markets. I really appreciate you

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>listening and I'll see you next time on the Market

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Disruptors Podcast.