WEBVTT - Big Business Says: I've Got the Power

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, This is Dana Perkins, and this is Mark Taylor,

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to Switched on the BENF podcast. Today

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about power purchase agreements, which fit

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>quite well into the narrative at the moment, because earlier

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is this last September, there was Climate Week in New York.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>There were climate strikes around the world had by Greta Thornberg.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe they approximated about seven million people attended those.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The United Nations held their twenty nineteen Climate Change Summit,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Philanthropies held an event called the Global Business Forum,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>where countries and companies continue to talk about various things

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>facing the world, including emissions. An ever increasing number of

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>countries and companies are coming up with what are called

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>science based targets that are aligned with the Paris Agreement

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and the goals that were outlined there. Companies are just

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of things to clean up. One thing

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes to mind when I hear power purchase agreements

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and companies cleaning up is the Mickey Mouse shaped solar

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>farm in Florida. It sits out Disney World, and it's

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just one thing that that Disney is trying to do

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>to clean up its act. It's the happiest solar farm

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on I'm sure it is. Um then there are several

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>efforts like this around the world. Mike Bloomberg at the

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>at the Global Business Forum had a cool quote that

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, we've only scratched the surface of what we

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can achieve when government and business leaders work together on

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>climate change. So I guess that's what last week was

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>all about. What businesses can do really and how they

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>can cooperate with government. So it's not all just governments

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the U N or in a room or whatever,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth. But there are things that businesses

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>can do on their own end together. But back to

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement, I thought the US was out of it,

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>so not technically, the United States is still technically in

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement, even if they're not necessarily moving towards

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>their targets. Now. This is because and actually I was

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>informed by Al Gore who was in London for part

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of Climate Week and gave a talk and he where

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>he reminded everyone that the US is technically still in

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement until the day after the next inauguration.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So the US is in limbo they're in Paris. Not

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in Paris, the US is still signing the majority of

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>back to power purchase agreements. Of the power purchase agreements

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>signed throughout the world are signed in the United States,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So pretty big amount for a country that isn't quite

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sure what they think about Paris. Okay, So so we're

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to get too far into politics today, but

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we are going to talk, as you said, about what

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>companies are doing, and signing p p a s is

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those things because they have these sustainability targets

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to achieve and p p a s are

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty well trodden path to achieving them. So sustainability aside.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Given how cheap renewables have gotten, it seems p pas

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense for companies that just want

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to secure cheap energy for the companies. And today we'll

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Kyle Harrison, who is BNFS Corporate Sustainability Analyst,

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be speaking with us regarding a

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>research note that is titled to h Corporate Energy Market Outlook.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Benef Users can get this report on benf dot com,

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the BENF Mobile, Apple, the bloomber terminal at BENF Go

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and please note that benif does not provide an investment

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>or strategy advice, and you can hear a full disclaimer

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the show without much further ado,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>let's hear what Kyle has to say. Kyle, thank you

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today. Thanks for having me. We are

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>here today to talk about p p A s and

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the first thing that we should do is

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>actually explain what a power purchase agreement actually is, so

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>let us know. Yeah, that's definitely a good place to start.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a long term, typically fixed agreement UM for

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>clean energy between an off taker typically a corporation or

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a utility, and then a developer of a clean energy project.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So for every unit of generation that a solar or

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wind project generates, the off takers agreeing to pay that

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>fixed amount. And what it actually does is it gives

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a developer the revenue certainty they need to go ahead

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and secure financing. So as a corporate buyer, I can

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>actually say I signed a p p A for this

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>solar project in Texas because of my demand for clean

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>energy that solar project was built. Why would anybody want

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Why would a company want to sign a p p A.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Companies are are increasingly setting emissions reductions goals UM, and

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a big portion of those emissions from companies comes from

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the purchasing of electricity, which is called the scope to emission.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of companies are actually setting renewable energy

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>targets alongside these emissions reductions goals, and that's actually guiding

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them and kind of the key component of their strategy

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>when they're setting out and reducing emissions UM. So for

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>some companies, you can actually go ahead and reduce your

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>energy consumption by locking into one of these clean energy

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>contracts UM. But for a lot of other companies, and

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about this a little bit later, but as

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you get more of these industries and sectors beyond the

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>technology space that are getting into this clean energy buying sector,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies are avoiding what we would

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>call transition risk, so they're increasingly getting pressure from investors

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>UM and internal employees to actually be more sustainable UM.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So these companies that are actually getting ahead in the

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>game and buying clean energy to be more sustainable UM,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they're less susceptible to that investor pressure. Is the objective

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to these p p a s is it mostly around

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>clean energy and sustainability and emissions reductions or is there

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>cost advantage to it as well. There's definitely a cost advantage, So,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, Mark, part of it definitely comes down

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to sustainability UM because again it's an effective way to

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>reduce emissions. But for a lot of companies when they

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and sign a clean energy deal UM. So

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you install solar on your rooftop UM,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially be cheaper than your retail electricity bill um.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So companies can save in that regard. But at the

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>same time, a lot of these power purchase agreements that

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we're discussing, they're structured as financial hedges where a company

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually hedging against a wholesale market price. So if

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you sign a p p A and you lock into

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that fixed rate for clean energy and it's actually cheaper

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>than the wholesale market price, companies actually save money in

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the long term. So there definitely is an economic incentive

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for this as well. Well. And that's what some of

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>our other research reports at BIENNA for saying that the

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>price of renewable energy actually is in some regions actually

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>beating other sources of energy. So it may just be

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>good financial sense for companies. My question is what types

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of companies actually want to buy p p A s.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Are they the big data heavy companies that have really

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>energy intensive storage needs, or are they manufacturers or something else.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>When we saw the first corporate clean energy purchases, UH,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this space was really dominated by big technology companies um so,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think these companies that have big data centers that

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>utilize a lot of power demand um and for these

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>companies that was an effective way to hedge against the

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>prices that they'd be paying for power. Um So, those

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>big buyers like Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, they were really

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the first to get ahead in this game. But increasingly

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>data as you mentioned, as the cost of clean energy

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>has come down and there's actually an economic incentive for

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>company to start buying clean energy, we're seeing all these

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>new industries enter this market. Um SO. To give you

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a sense of scale, there's now roughly two hundred companies

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that have established a one Renewable Electricity target UM and

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>joined a campaign that we call the r E one

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred um so, these companies are actually going to go

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead over the next couple of years and offset one

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of the electricity they consume with clean energy purchases. So

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really exciting. UM. You're seeing manufacturing companies, big retailers

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like Walmart UM. But what I would say is actually

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting is we're starting to see the oil

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and gas industry get into the space. So at the

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>end of x on Mobile actually went ahead and signed

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>two of the largest power purchase agreements that we've seen

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the United States to date UM and for them,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of going back to your question, Mark, this is

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a way for them to go ahead and mitigate this

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>transition risk UM and this investor pressure that they're going

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to inevitably get to go ahead and reduce their emissions

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and conduct business more sustainably. So can you describe that

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>those p p as in a bit more details? So

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>who wins when Excen signs a big p p A.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Both contracts were signed with orstad UM, and I actually

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think that brings up a good point is that you're

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of big European companies get involved in

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this space, both in Europe and in the United States. UM.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And it was for a solar and wind project in Texas,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>which has really been the hottest market globally for these

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>corporate pp as. This brings me to another question that

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I was really wondering about. So you were talking about

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in in the note you mentioned how of corporate pp

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>A volumes this year, So nineteen are in the US.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>This project is being built by European company. And one

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>thing I do know being in London is that we

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have a higher density of E s G investors in

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe than the you do in the US. Yet we've

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>got so many more p p as being signed in

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the US. What's kind of driving that big difference and

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>why are they so popular in the US. It really

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the ease of signing one of the contracts.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So in the United States, you have this blueprint for

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>signing one of these power purchase agreements. You have all

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of these advisory companies like Schneider Electric and Edison Energy

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that now exists in this space, and they'll actually go

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>ahead and hold your hand through this entire negotiating process.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So as you get all of these new entrants into

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the corporate procurement market, whether they are from Europe or

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Asia or the United States or anywhere else, typically they're

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>actually going to go to the United States first to

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>sign these deals. Because there was so much experience in

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the market and it's a lot more comforting for them.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's really been the big driver, because I agree

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 1>with you that overall you're seeing so many companies from

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world and outside of the United States make

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>these really ambitious clean energy commitments. To give you a

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of scale, there's actually over twenty companies in Japan

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>alone that have now set this r E one hundred

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>goal that I mentioned earlier. But all of these companies

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>are setting these targets out to, and what that tells

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>me is that there's a public acknowledgement from all of

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>these companies that there's no immediate term option for them

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to buy clean energy domestically in Japan. So what these

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>companies are actually doing is moving to the United States

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to sign the contracts. So if we look at Japan,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>for example, you now have over twenty companies that are

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>based in Japan that have set one of those already

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred goals that I mentioned earlier. But all of

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies are setting their targets out to and to me,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a public acknowledgement that there's no short term solution

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to buy clean energy domestically. They're instead looking

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at the United States to sign these deals, um, and

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a trend that we expect to see moving

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>forward in the US. Then you're saying it's fairly straightforward

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to sign a p p A in Japan. My understanding

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>is that they do this through auctions, and that there

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was one fairly recently that maybe didn't quite get the

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uptake that was planned. Can you explain more what is

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so complex about Japan exactly? And I should have mentioned

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, but there actually is no p p A

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanism in Japan currently. So if I'm a Japanese company

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want to buy clean energy at a large scale,

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>well again, making an effort to incentivize new clean energy

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>build on the grid, which a pp A does, I

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have no option to do that in Japan right now.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>What I instead have to do is tap into this

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>non fossil market that was rolled out in the last

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. So I can actually have go ahead

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and have a energy retailer in Japan go ahead and

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>buy these non fossil certificates for me, which correlate with

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a unit of clean energy generation, and then they can

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>actually go ahead and retire those non fossil certificates on

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>my behalf. Um, so for companies, that's kind of the

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>most accessible way for them to tap into this clean

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>energy market UM. But as you mentioned, it's kind of

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the market is very small right now and it's really

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not living up to its potential UM and to me,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that signals again that Japanese companies acknowledge UM that they

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>need to take away and see approach for this. They're

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>either going to buy clean energy in the United States

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or they're going to continue to push for more accessibility

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for clean energy at a large scale UM domestically because

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>right now they don't have that access. What would facilitate

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a faster rollout in Japan or pretty much anywhere else.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it largely a regulatory environment or is it down

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to how the utilities do things. It's a combination of both.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what you need is boots on the ground

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>from large multinational companies that have a footprint in some

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of these Asian markets. To give you an example, UM,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Google has spent years and years lobbying with regulators in Taiwan,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which has a very similar power market structure UM and

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>historically did not allow for p P a s UM,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so they spent a lot of time working with the

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>regulators to allow them an option to do so, and

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>actually in the beginning of twenty nineteen they signed a

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ten megawatt solar p PA. So it's small volume, but

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it's still a step in the right direction. You need

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to see that type of lobbying in markets like China

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and Japan and India, UM and even some markets in

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe as well. So I think that's one big driver.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And the other way that companies can actually make a

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>big impact here is by targeting their supply chain. So

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>some of these multinational companies, they might not have operations

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of these Asian markets, but they do have

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a heavy supply chain presence there. So actually going ahead

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and setting sustainability goals for your suppliers is actually going

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and pressure them to further pressure regulators

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and actually open the door. UM and the same goes

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>for utilities. They're facing the exact same type of pressure

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that Asian regulators are already at this point. Para purchase

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>agreements are going to lead to additional capacity needing to

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be built to hit the shortfalls. So you mentioned that

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety four gig watts are roughly ninety seven billion U

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>S dollars in New investment will be needed in order

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to reach this is this big number, small number and

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of what dent does this make in emissions? Yeah,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big number, um, you know, compared to

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>global clean energy investment, it's still a small portion. But

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>what you have to remember is that this is still

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a very small grouping of companies. So again, it's roughly

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>two hundred multinational companies that have set these R E

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred goals um, and that group of companies continues

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to grow over time. So as you have more R

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>E one hundred companies making these types of clean and commitments,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this demand this ninety four giga watts of clean energy,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>build this nine billion dollars of clean energy investment. It's

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>only going to grow. And what we've seen in the

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years that we've been doing this forecast

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is that demand for the R A one hundred continues

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep pace or even outstrip the actual existing activity

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from R one hundred members UM. So again just kind

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of the short answer would be the number is not

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>huge right now, but it's going to get a lot bigger.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So power purchase agreements are going to grow in size,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but then also energy demand is growing, population is growing.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this even going to make a dent? And I

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>guess the real question here is our power purchase agreements

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>growing at a rate that is at least faster than

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>energy demand is growing. It depends on what industry you

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>look at. So in the financial space, a lot of

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>banks actually have decreasing electricity demand UM, so they're implementing

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency UM. But at the same time, a lot

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of banks are actually letting go employees and shrinking their

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>workforce UM. So the financial industry demand is going down UM.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And overall, I think if you were to look at

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the financial financial industry alone, these p pas and this

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>activity will eventually outstripped demand. However, if you look at

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an industry like technology, it's the complete opposite. So we

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>actually just put out a report on a big Google

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>clean energy announcement UM and going ahead and doing that research,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what we discovered was that between two thousand and ten,

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Google's electricity demand has actually grown four hundred and fifty percent,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So they now consume over ten terra watt hours of

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>electricity on an annual basis, and that's equivalent to a

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>small country. So even if we used a conservative growth forecast,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for Google's electricity demand moving forward, their demand is still

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to exceed twenty terra wat hours or thirty terra

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>watt hours of electricity in the next couple of years UM.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So for them, they're going to going to need to

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to sign clean energy deals at a very rapid pace, um,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>more rapid than they've even currently been signing deals at UM.

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think it really comes down to the

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>industry UM. But as a whole electricity demand continues to

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>grow at a faster rate, the project to meet that

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is definitely one of the bigger questions we have in

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the space. So currently, uh, this market wall big is

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>still small enough. Um. We're developers, like or said in

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other European and US developers are actually

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>turning their attention to selling clean energy to corporations. So

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's demand from a corporate buyer, there will be

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a seller to provide them the project. That's where the

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>space is at currently. But again, as more companies set

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>these goals, as electricity demand goes up, there's definitely the

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>risk that there won't be enough supply to meet all

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of this demand. We haven't seen that yet, but I

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that all of the stakeholders in this

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>space need to start thinking about more and more companies

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>are signing up to the R one hundred or Renewable

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Energy one hundred. But you also mentioned two other frameworks

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that companies are using to I've down emissions, So the

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>e P one hundred and the e V one hundred.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what those are? Sure? So the e

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>P one hundred UM or I'll take a step back

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and say that both of these campaigns work in a

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>very similar way to the R one hundred UM. The

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>e P one hundred happens to focus on energy productivity

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>or energy efficiency. So the e P one hundred actually

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>encourages companies to double their energy productivity over a set

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>amount of time, so forever unit of a product that

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they produce, they'll actually use half the electricity that's needed

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>compared to where they currently set that target. The e

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>V one hundred applies to electric vehicles, as the name implies,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>companies will go ahead and make some type of commitment

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to electrify their commercial vehicle fleet or install vehicle charging infrastructure.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Is Amazon part of that. So they signed the deal

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the other day with Ryvan Right for a hundred thousand

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>electric bands. I believe is that what you're talking about. Yeah, no,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it definitely is. Amazon is very gung ho about not

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>setting sustainability like joining sustainability campaigns. So they did set

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that commitment and that would technically apply to the e

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>V one hundred, but I don't think they're actually a member. UM.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for specific reason why they're all they

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>also have a one renewable energy goal, but they're not

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>an r A one hundred member. Is there a reason

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that the company would be or wouldn't be part of

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>these campaigns? I think for a lot of companies, the

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>reason that they would join one of these things is

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to for the pr purposes, Right, So you're actually making

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a large commitment that you're going to go ahead and

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>buy one dred percent clean energy or electrifier fleet. The

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>downside of setting one of these commitments is that you're

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>now holding yourself accountable to hitting that target in a

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>certain time frame. Exactly who has the most aggressive target

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the r like in terms of a year, Yeah,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the big tech companies um or I

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>should say Google and Apple UM they had one clean

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>energy goals UH last year and the year before and

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they've actually hit them. Um, so they have really been

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the last forward thinking here. Going back for a second,

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm used to seeing pp as that you know, historically

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>have been signed between a developer and utility. Right, So

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to build a wind farm that I'm going

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell to Envy Energy or or whoever it might

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be for X amount of years, for X amount of

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars um. Are these these p p a s are

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are heavily regulated. Are corporate pp as regulated the same

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>way as one between a developer and utility? Yeah, and

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways um. On the surface level,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the structure of a corporate pp A versus utility p

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>p A are very similar. So, as you mentioned, markets,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a fixed agreement between a buyer and a seller, and

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>for every unit of generation, that buyer pays that fixed

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>price to the seller. When you actually dig in a

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit deeper to these contracts, there's a lot of

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>nuances that make a corporate pp A very different than

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the utility p PA. For example, a lot of utility

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>p pas are what we would say settled at the node.

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>So what that means is that they're hedged against a

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>nodal power price so a very specific power price and

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a specific part of a wholesale market. Corporate pp as,

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, are actually settled at the hub

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>level UM, which is a much larger um swath of

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a power market, and prices tend to vary differently from

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a nodal price UM, and that's actually coming from the

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>demand of corporate buyers. I would say. The other big

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>difference is actually term length. So a lot of utility

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>p pas are in that twenty to thirty year range

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because utilities are comfortable signing these volatile energy agreements. For corporations,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>energy is not the core component of their business. They're

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>not energy companies UM, so for them, they're much more

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>comfortable making shorter term UM commitments to buying clean energy.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing a lot of projects that are pas

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that have gone into effect? Have you seen them already expire?

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Since you've been studying this now, we haven't seen any

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>corporate pp as reached that expiration level yet UM. But

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>what I would envision happening is corporate buyers will go

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead and sign deals with new solar wind projects UM

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>because as Dana mentioned earlier, the price for solar and

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>wind continues to plummet UM and you're likely looking at

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>much cheaper prices five, ten, fIF teen years down the

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>line than what you're seeing now. Does this mean that

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if I signed a p p A with a with

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a corporation from my solar plant UH with my solar

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>farm five years ago, and I've got another five in

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the contract at that end of five years, will nobody

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>want my power and have to rebuild the cellar farm.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of other types of off tape structures

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that developers can take advantage of. So Yes, they can

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>traditionally take that project merchant so actually sell that power

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>directly into the wholesale market and get the volatile energy

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>price at whatever it may be at that time. UM.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a growing number of insurance products that

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>exist in the market today. UM So you actually have

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies stepping in as off takers as alternatives to

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>corporate buyers UM and they'll sign very complicated agreements like

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>what we would call a proxy revenue swap UM that

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually settled as a function of revenue rather than

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>uh a price per unit of generation like a pp

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>A that we described earlier. UM So, for a lot

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of developers they'll actually go ahead and work with insurance

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>companies as an alternative. We are b an e F.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We like to talk about the future, so I want

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to know we're talking about in nineteen you're saying of

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the activity with p p as is happening in the US,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the future going to look like? Is it still

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be really heavily in the US. In the

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>short term, It's going to be in the U s

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>UM And the reason is that you have the illuming

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>step down of the production tax credit and the investment

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>tax credit for so learned wind in the US UM.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So there is this short term urgency both from developers

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but also off takers to go ahead and sign deals

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and get these projects commissioned in time to qualify for

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>these tax credits. So the US will be the biggest

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>market moving forward, at least in the short term UM.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But we really do need to see the Asian markets

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and the European markets evolve UM for this truly to

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>be a global phenomenon UM. So you need companies to

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to make commitments in Europe and Asia. You need

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>multinational companies to continue to put boots on the ground

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and actually work with regulators and utilities to open up

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>access to buying clean energy, and you need to actually

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and galvanize the supply chain to make similar

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>types of commitments. UM. As these trends continue, we do

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that Asia and Europe will pick up some of

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the slack um, but for the short term, it's still

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a U S story. Kyle, Thank you

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today. Yeah, no problem, Thanks

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for having guys. Bloomberg an e F is a service

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor it should it be construed as

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg an e F should not

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to the accuracy

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>or completeness of the information contained in this recording, and

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>any liability as a result of this recording. Did expressly

0:23:59.920 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to squat