1 00:00:02,200 --> 00:00:03,680 Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal. 2 00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:08,160 Speaker 2: I'll that for me. I'm a man, I'm forty. 3 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:10,119 Speaker 3: I've heard so many players say, well, I want to 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,080 Speaker 3: be happy. You want to be happy for a day? 5 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 3: Edo Steak is that woo woof? 6 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:16,920 Speaker 2: And them and Ty. 7 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: Welcome back to the solid verbal. Boys or girls, My 8 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:23,800 Speaker 1: name Ty hilde Brandt, that fine gentleman over there as 9 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:27,840 Speaker 1: always the one, the only, still, the incomparable Dan Rubinstein, 10 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 1: who has a bit of a harrowing tale key word 11 00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: tail to share with us this morning, Dan, how are 12 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:36,640 Speaker 1: you doing? Are you okay? 13 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 3: I'm all right. I had my normal Friday pizza. I 14 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 3: had a good Father's Day. I was feeling good. Uh 15 00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:45,680 Speaker 3: saw a family. Got to hang out with the boys, 16 00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 3: of course, which is just all you want if you're 17 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:50,120 Speaker 3: you know, you're a dad on Father's Day, you want 18 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:52,200 Speaker 3: to hang out with the people who made you d dad. 19 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 3: So I had a good one, and you know, I 20 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:57,440 Speaker 3: wanted to go for an early run this morning, maybe 21 00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 3: run off some of those cows, some of the grief 22 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,960 Speaker 3: from the week. Woke up early, you know, really went 23 00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:05,120 Speaker 3: for it. Beautiful morning out here in the suburbs of Chicago, 24 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 3: and I guess it's sort of the season for I 25 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 3: think it's red tailed hawks, red tailed talks. Yes, I've 26 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:18,119 Speaker 3: been running, you know, California, Eugene, Oregon, New York. I've 27 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 3: been running for many, many years, and I haven't thought 28 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:27,080 Speaker 3: about birds once. And apparently I think red tailed hawks 29 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 3: set up camp over the summer or whatever in this 30 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 3: area and are agitated and territorial. And I just want 31 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 3: to say, right from the onset, I did nothing to 32 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 3: provoke this bird. Right just on my way running, listening 33 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 3: to a movie podcast, and all of a sudden, I 34 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 3: feel talents on my head, and you think about a 35 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,760 Speaker 3: lot of things when you're running. Yeah, my first thought 36 00:01:57,880 --> 00:01:59,640 Speaker 3: was it was just a friend from the area who's 37 00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 3: also running and sort of messing with me. 38 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:03,320 Speaker 1: Like a friend with very long nails. 39 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, it was a very like it was like a 40 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 3: violent scout massage. So it didn't really make sense like 41 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 3: I would have expected like a pat on the back 42 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:12,000 Speaker 3: or something like that, like hey, bud Way to get 43 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:13,560 Speaker 3: after it early morning, something like that. 44 00:02:13,720 --> 00:02:15,160 Speaker 1: No, that was not the case. 45 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 3: And I look up and I don't see anything specific, 46 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:24,920 Speaker 3: but I hear and the flaps and I just catch 47 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 3: it like going into a tree after a shot. Across 48 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 3: the bow at the non threatening Dan and I altered 49 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 3: my route on the way home. I have now donated 50 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,400 Speaker 3: a good amount of money to some anti bird causes, 51 00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:47,280 Speaker 3: like I'm suddenly pro logging, I'm all sorts, I'm in favor. No, 52 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:53,000 Speaker 3: but I do want to say this. It got my attention. Yeah, 53 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 3: it got my attention, and it woke me up to 54 00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 3: the fact that sometimes you have to keep your head 55 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 3: on a swivel and realize your surroundings and what time 56 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 3: of year it is. And right now, Ty, I. 57 00:03:10,040 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 1: Was wondering, how are you gonna do this continue? 58 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:16,040 Speaker 3: Right now? The off season sort of turning into the preseason, 59 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 3: and it's grabbing me on the scalp and it's telling 60 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 3: me wake up. The first time I had that was 61 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 3: realizing the preview magazines were coming out, however accurate they 62 00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 3: are with you know, transfers and coaches and everything like that. 63 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:30,040 Speaker 3: I was like, oh, wow, it is that time. Okay, 64 00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 3: all right. And then the second instance was Dug the 65 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 3: Red Tailed Hawk. I don't know why I'm calling him Doug. 66 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,000 Speaker 1: Doug, Doug, Yeah, don't. 67 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 3: I don't love a lot of Dugs that have come across. Okay, Yeah, 68 00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 3: I've fluty hasn't been great for me on TV. 69 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: I don't know he was on TV. It's not just you, 70 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:49,160 Speaker 1: but man. 71 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 3: It really woke me up. 72 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 1: And here we are. I have I have lived to 73 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 1: tell the tale. We are swooping down into all things 74 00:03:58,160 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: preview to the preview season in On today's episode, our 75 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:05,280 Speaker 1: good friend Bill Connolly from ESPN dot com is going 76 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 1: to stop by. Bill's been previewing things college football related 77 00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:13,600 Speaker 1: pretty much all off season, but more seriously, gosh, since 78 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: February now, he's really been down in the weeds doing 79 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:20,560 Speaker 1: the dirty work. And as we are set to embark 80 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:23,479 Speaker 1: on our own preview mission here starting next month, we 81 00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 1: need to get some preview to the preview content from Bill. Storylines, trends, favorites, 82 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 1: all sorts of things that he's identified through the course 83 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:35,280 Speaker 1: of his own research. So he's going to stop by 84 00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:37,560 Speaker 1: give us about thirty five to forty minutes of his 85 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 1: time or so if we can cover a little US 86 00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: men's national team. If we can cover that, we will, 87 00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 1: right but if not, we'll find another way to do 88 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:47,760 Speaker 1: so we appreciate his time. 89 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 3: We do some off topic shows on Patreon right for 90 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 3: our most art and supporters and most supportive listeners, which 91 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:58,640 Speaker 3: I encourage everybody spoke around. I think maybe we'll have 92 00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:01,600 Speaker 3: to bump it over to the Patreon Verballers dot com 93 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:02,920 Speaker 3: by the ways, where you can go if you are 94 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 3: ever so inclined. We've got a number of new folks 95 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:09,320 Speaker 3: signing up joining the discord being part of the verballer 96 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 3: hood as we know it, as we like to promote 97 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 3: it is a great community of college football fans. Don't 98 00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 3: forget this episode. All of our episodes are driven by 99 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 3: our good friends over at Geico. We would encourage you 100 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:24,479 Speaker 3: all to not only subscribe to the podcast if you 101 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 3: like what we've been doing this offseason, There's going to 102 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 3: be much more of it to follow, I promise you. 103 00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 3: But if you've already subscribed to the show, don't forget 104 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:34,600 Speaker 3: to tell your friends who want to grow the verballerhood 105 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,480 Speaker 3: as best we can here, especially as we start reving 106 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:40,599 Speaker 3: up in preparation for college football season and last but 107 00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 3: not least, solid giveaway dot com. 108 00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:47,800 Speaker 1: You've got about eleven days, oh ten days left to 109 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:51,520 Speaker 1: sign up for your opportunity to win that Brian Brazie 110 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:55,360 Speaker 1: signed Clemson mini helmet. But yeah, it ends at the 111 00:05:55,440 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 1: end of June, which is crazy to say a week 112 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:02,280 Speaker 1: and a half away, June is done, July has begun done. 113 00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,760 Speaker 1: So yeah, but get in before it is too late. 114 00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:09,360 Speaker 3: Agree. I think I have a lot of questions for Bill. 115 00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 3: I'd like to talk to Bill, no offense. I love 116 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:13,559 Speaker 3: talking to you, but I talked to you a lot, 117 00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:17,279 Speaker 3: both on with microphones and outside of microphones and in 118 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:20,720 Speaker 3: text form like I'm ready for I'm ready for a newer, 119 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 3: shinier model. 120 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 1: No offense. All right, Dan joining us now. We like 121 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: to bring them on every so often. Just see what's 122 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:30,640 Speaker 1: going on in in his world. Bill Connolly from ESPN, Sir, 123 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:32,840 Speaker 1: how you doing pretty good? 124 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:34,680 Speaker 2: This is a this is a college football podcast. I 125 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 2: don't know why you were invited a soccer writer on. 126 00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 1: That's true. 127 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 3: Well we have tys in his notes has a number 128 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:44,560 Speaker 3: of questions about Byron's academy and who among the ten 129 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:49,239 Speaker 3: eleven year olds you're buying early on, So just be prepared. 130 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 2: Okay, I'm ready. 131 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:53,479 Speaker 1: Yeah, you actually went to Germany? Yeah, I did went 132 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:56,640 Speaker 1: to Germany. You did some yeah, yeah, I was gonna 133 00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:59,840 Speaker 1: say you did some reporting on the Bundesliga and all 134 00:06:59,839 --> 00:07:02,800 Speaker 1: things soccer. Did you learn anything about college football while 135 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 1: covering soccer abroad. 136 00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 2: Well, I mean one thing, I told my editor that 137 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:10,239 Speaker 2: I need to go to a couple of pretty cool 138 00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 2: college football events venues this fall because I'm in danger 139 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 2: of becoming an even bigger soccer snob at this point 140 00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 2: and that's really just not a good place to be. 141 00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 2: So I need to kind of even things out a 142 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:23,520 Speaker 2: little bit. Because it was it was incredible. I saw 143 00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 2: four of the best venues, the best clubs you could see, 144 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:31,280 Speaker 2: and it was an absolute blast. So the bar is 145 00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:31,800 Speaker 2: pretty high. 146 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 1: Now does that make it harder for you to come 147 00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: back into this world and do college football previews in 148 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:40,920 Speaker 1: mid ap it? 149 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:44,200 Speaker 2: I mean, it was a nice test of whether that was, 150 00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:46,640 Speaker 2: you know, true or not, and it's absolutely not true. 151 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 2: I dive back into like it's just such a familiar 152 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 2: world and I know all the neighborhoods, all the knooks 153 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:53,680 Speaker 2: and crannies. As soon as I get back in, it's 154 00:07:53,720 --> 00:07:57,240 Speaker 2: all extremely familiar. So no, no danger of that. I 155 00:07:57,560 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 2: just have to figure out how to create, how to 156 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,320 Speaker 2: live in two different worlds that I really love instead 157 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:02,680 Speaker 2: of one. 158 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 1: Well we'll get to that other world a little bit later, 159 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:08,280 Speaker 1: I promise, but let's talk about the one that we 160 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,520 Speaker 1: all live in college football. You started doing previews what 161 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:12,200 Speaker 1: mid April? 162 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 2: Oh, I mean, like the whichever one was first, Conference 163 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 2: USA or MAC or whatever. That was mid February. We 164 00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:23,720 Speaker 2: had to take some time off because suddenly there were 165 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 2: no schedules. You know, Southern miss had twenty games scheduled 166 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 2: because they were in Conference USA and the Sun Belt 167 00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:32,840 Speaker 2: and all that. So there was a period, a decent 168 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:35,320 Speaker 2: sized off period there. But we've been rolling in full 169 00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:37,200 Speaker 2: steam since mid April, I believe. 170 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 1: Just asking for two friends here, Bill, it feels like 171 00:08:41,679 --> 00:08:45,480 Speaker 1: there were a lot more moving pieces this offseason, and 172 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 1: it's hard for me to tell if it's just that 173 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 1: the ones that moved were higher profile, or if in reality, 174 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 1: there is more variability that we need to account for. 175 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:55,920 Speaker 1: We're about to start doing our previews next month. 176 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:57,840 Speaker 3: I mean, we also have teams moving tie and we 177 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 3: have teams moving conferences and how that afects how Bill 178 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:01,520 Speaker 3: evaluates things. 179 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:05,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, So was it harder this year with your preview content? 180 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 2: Well, I guess the writing part wasn't just a ton harder. 181 00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:11,400 Speaker 2: It was still kind of the same vibes. They're bringing 182 00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:13,840 Speaker 2: in these transfers and here's the backstory of the coach 183 00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:16,440 Speaker 2: and blah blah blah. Like that part wasn't bad, but 184 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:20,200 Speaker 2: from a numbers perspective, From a projections perspective, I mean 185 00:09:20,880 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 2: USC and LSU are unprojectable. Yeah, Like there's no an 186 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 2: ask my I'm going to once I'm done finally updating 187 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 2: all the rosters over the next week or so, I'm 188 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:33,439 Speaker 2: going to try to look back at twenty twenty one 189 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 2: and see what we can learn just in terms of 190 00:09:37,559 --> 00:09:40,360 Speaker 2: what does taking on a lot of transfers mean different 191 00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:43,720 Speaker 2: kinds of transfers, and hopefully try to start piecing together 192 00:09:43,720 --> 00:09:46,920 Speaker 2: how I'm going to create projections for this new eight 193 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:50,760 Speaker 2: You know, one team takes eighteen transfers in a year 194 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 2: kind of environment, and so you know, moving forward, maybe 195 00:09:54,520 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 2: it'll be all right. But I mean this time around, like, 196 00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 2: how do you how do you project USC's off when 197 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 2: they lose two starting quarterbacks and at a third huh? 198 00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:06,360 Speaker 2: And it was it was a guy who everybody knows 199 00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:07,719 Speaker 2: is going to be good, but he only played like 200 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:09,920 Speaker 2: two thirds of a season to begin with, so he 201 00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:12,360 Speaker 2: didn't even have like a full year's stats. And then 202 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:15,240 Speaker 2: they like lose a top ten draft pick or wherever 203 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:19,280 Speaker 2: Drake London ended up first round and they gained the 204 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:23,400 Speaker 2: bolitnik Off winner. Like it's it's a it's a completely 205 00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:26,600 Speaker 2: different universe, just the not only the number of transfers, 206 00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:30,640 Speaker 2: but the importance of the transfers has has changed considerably, 207 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:33,880 Speaker 2: And I don't know how to project that. I'm still 208 00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:36,559 Speaker 2: pretty sure USC's defense is going to stink and therefore 209 00:10:37,080 --> 00:10:38,960 Speaker 2: then being a top five team is going to be 210 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:42,160 Speaker 2: Probably that's probably foolish thinking. But I have him like 211 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 2: fifty first right now, that's pretty foolish too. So I 212 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:46,840 Speaker 2: don't know. We're gonna We're gonna find out. 213 00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:50,120 Speaker 3: So this question basically has no merit and it is 214 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:57,280 Speaker 3: rounded in nonsense, but hostfully it triggers something in your head. 215 00:10:57,720 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 3: Is there anything on player level data, because it is 216 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 3: now much more of a player centric movement across the 217 00:11:07,800 --> 00:11:11,760 Speaker 3: sport than I mean, and coach obviously level movement as well. 218 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,559 Speaker 3: But like when you think about a quarterback who leaves, 219 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:16,640 Speaker 3: when you think about an offensive lineman who leaves, or 220 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,160 Speaker 3: a receiver, a high profile receivers or receivers like Jordan 221 00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:22,440 Speaker 3: Addison and Mario Williams, is there on any level a 222 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 3: need for you or for anybody to say what's their 223 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,760 Speaker 3: plus minus essentially, like are they on the field for 224 00:11:29,840 --> 00:11:33,199 Speaker 3: successful plays more often than not? And is that something 225 00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:36,800 Speaker 3: that's transferable to how you evaluate and project a grouping 226 00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:40,120 Speaker 3: of starting players on a team. Again, I know that's 227 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:43,200 Speaker 3: not grounded in merit or sense, but is that sort 228 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:45,760 Speaker 3: of the next level about how you start thinking about 229 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,719 Speaker 3: player movement and coaching movement across the sport. 230 00:11:48,960 --> 00:11:51,199 Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I think there is, certainly there's a 231 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:54,320 Speaker 2: little bit of value there just in terms of, you know, 232 00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:56,440 Speaker 2: there are really nice overall measures now that we have 233 00:11:56,480 --> 00:11:59,560 Speaker 2: snap counts for everybody, you know, Sports Info Solutions PFF, 234 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 2: that we actually have snapcouts and we know how frequently 235 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:05,680 Speaker 2: these guys are involved and so on and so forth. 236 00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:07,880 Speaker 2: Now that we kind of have that, you can get. 237 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 2: I mean, there's a measure you see used a lot 238 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:13,120 Speaker 2: of PFF and I've used it at times, yards per 239 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 2: yards per route run for a receiver, and so it 240 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:22,360 Speaker 2: combines both like efficiency and explosiveness and frequency of use 241 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:25,520 Speaker 2: in a really interesting way. If you averaged over two 242 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 2: yards per route run last year, you did really well, 243 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 2: you know, Jackson Smith and Jick my average like four 244 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:34,800 Speaker 2: point one or something absurd. But I think when you 245 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:36,840 Speaker 2: have that kind of measure, or you know, you're looking 246 00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:38,920 Speaker 2: at a running back and you know not only you 247 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:41,240 Speaker 2: know his yards per carry or his yards per touch, 248 00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 2: you know if you want to include passes, but you 249 00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:47,160 Speaker 2: know again how frequently he was involved in the offense, right, 250 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,360 Speaker 2: and you can sort of project how frequently he's going 251 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,360 Speaker 2: to be involved in his future offense. You can kind 252 00:12:52,400 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 2: of get down the road of decent player projections like that. 253 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 2: I'm not that far down that road, right, but you 254 00:12:58,800 --> 00:13:01,960 Speaker 2: can kind of see that. Now. It's still college football 255 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:05,920 Speaker 2: and opponent adjustments still matter more than anything else in 256 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:09,440 Speaker 2: the world, and those are really really hard, but you 257 00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 2: can at least sort of get down that road, and 258 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 2: it would be interesting to see, like I got to 259 00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:19,200 Speaker 2: figure that would do if I were to make headway 260 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 2: in that regard, that would be very beneficial for the 261 00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:22,440 Speaker 2: projections overall. 262 00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:25,559 Speaker 3: You who are the teams, be it you know, Conference 263 00:13:25,679 --> 00:13:28,880 Speaker 3: USA America and Big Ten, whoever? Who are the teams 264 00:13:28,920 --> 00:13:32,559 Speaker 3: that you are the most sure of, Not your projection 265 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:35,880 Speaker 3: and what it says, but because of the amount of 266 00:13:36,040 --> 00:13:40,080 Speaker 3: data you have on those teams, because of returning guys, 267 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:43,640 Speaker 3: returning coaches. You know, data on those coaches have been 268 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:47,119 Speaker 3: around for a long time within that program. Like, who 269 00:13:47,320 --> 00:13:52,720 Speaker 3: are your your data overlords at this point, Georgia. 270 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:55,520 Speaker 1: Okay, that's a good answer. 271 00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean no transfers. They didn't take a single 272 00:13:58,559 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 2: transfer this year. Offense, I mean, the defensive coordinator left, 273 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 2: so there is that, But you know, the offense, we 274 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:09,040 Speaker 2: kind of know what that offense is going to be 275 00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 2: and we trust it even with the defensive coordinator gone. 276 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 2: Last time they lost a defensive coordinator, they got better defensively, 277 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 2: So I'm not real worried about that site either, Like 278 00:14:17,920 --> 00:14:23,120 Speaker 2: they have really really good pieces to replace, and so 279 00:14:23,160 --> 00:14:25,120 Speaker 2: they're you know, they're projected third and sp plus a 280 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:28,200 Speaker 2: hair behind Ohio State and Alabama. But I feel we've 281 00:14:28,240 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 2: got a very very very good read on them. Alabama too, 282 00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:34,920 Speaker 2: if we're being honest. I mean, they actually didn't lose 283 00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:37,280 Speaker 2: a coordinator for the first time in like thirty eight years, 284 00:14:37,320 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 2: and they return their starting quarterback who's pretty decent. I 285 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 2: feel like we have a good read on them. After that, 286 00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 2: I'm not really sure. I mean, you just look at 287 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 2: the top teams and sp plus and you realize the 288 00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:52,480 Speaker 2: number of unknowns not that, not that it's rare to 289 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 2: have unknowns at the top at this point in college football, 290 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,040 Speaker 2: but I mean, Ohio State, we have no idea what 291 00:14:57,080 --> 00:14:59,840 Speaker 2: their defense is capable of. If it's the top fifteen defense, 292 00:15:00,720 --> 00:15:03,360 Speaker 2: they're probably the best team in the country, but we 293 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:05,840 Speaker 2: don't know for sure that that's going to happen. Michigan 294 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:11,520 Speaker 2: massive assistant coach turnover or important turnover. I should say 295 00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 2: Oklahoma is fifth, kind of completely new, you know, that's 296 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:20,560 Speaker 2: just pure Oklahoma are right there, lots of coaching changes there. 297 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 2: Clemson is sixth. We have no idea what their offense. 298 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:27,080 Speaker 2: If it's going to be merely averaged, then they're probably 299 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:29,160 Speaker 2: a top five team, but we don't It wasn't average 300 00:15:29,240 --> 00:15:32,040 Speaker 2: last year, and you know, Dabo responded to that by 301 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:34,920 Speaker 2: promoting from within for his coordinator, which I really didn't 302 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:37,880 Speaker 2: like all that much. So we don't know that. Notre 303 00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 2: Dame is seventh. They have a new coach, like it's 304 00:15:41,240 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 2: it's tough after that, and then you add in the 305 00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 2: USCS and the LSUS and the old miss the teams 306 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 2: that took on just a hilarious number of transfers. It 307 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:53,160 Speaker 2: is a pretty unique environment. But I feel Alabama and 308 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:54,920 Speaker 2: Georgia are pretty trustworthy overall. 309 00:15:55,160 --> 00:15:58,120 Speaker 3: Did you bake in anything new or tweak anything? You 310 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:00,160 Speaker 3: seem to do that every year in terms of how 311 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:04,400 Speaker 3: you evaluate teams and returning production and recruiting ranking, and 312 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:06,800 Speaker 3: you know, there's a number of factors that go into this. 313 00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:11,000 Speaker 3: What were this year's SP plus weighted tweaks? 314 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:14,440 Speaker 2: If any I didn't want and I didn't like doing 315 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 2: this because I don't like doing anything where I don't 316 00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:18,280 Speaker 2: have like three or four years at least of data 317 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,120 Speaker 2: to know how it'll go. But I did add the 318 00:16:22,720 --> 00:16:27,080 Speaker 2: recruiting rankings. I added a recruiting component for the transfers 319 00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 2: you're taking in, so it's not so your recruiting ranking 320 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:33,600 Speaker 2: isn't solely based on your freshman and your juco's the 321 00:16:33,640 --> 00:16:36,480 Speaker 2: typical signing class quote unquote. I tried to account for that. 322 00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:42,600 Speaker 2: You know, I'm including you know, those recruits their production. 323 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:44,800 Speaker 2: I'm including that in the returning production piece, which I've 324 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:48,760 Speaker 2: always done. But just knowing that that wasn't quite enough 325 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:51,000 Speaker 2: if you're gonna you know, that worked really well when 326 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:53,920 Speaker 2: you're bringing in three, four or five transfers. If like 327 00:16:54,120 --> 00:16:56,240 Speaker 2: legitimately a lot of first year coaches are bringing in 328 00:16:56,280 --> 00:17:00,560 Speaker 2: fifteen plus and understanding the important so that I at 329 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:02,680 Speaker 2: least tried to account for it in that way. It's 330 00:17:02,720 --> 00:17:05,359 Speaker 2: not a huge weight. It's probably enough weight. But we 331 00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:07,680 Speaker 2: don't really know how these transfers are going to work out. 332 00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:10,640 Speaker 2: But that was that was the one thing. The one 333 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:13,520 Speaker 2: change I made. One change I might make in the 334 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:15,520 Speaker 2: future that I'm going to look into once I have 335 00:17:15,600 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 2: data for it. Is you know, I always talking about 336 00:17:18,040 --> 00:17:20,840 Speaker 2: how clumsy it is the way I handle transfers, where 337 00:17:20,840 --> 00:17:23,400 Speaker 2: I just kind of mash that production into the into 338 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:27,000 Speaker 2: the numerator and the denominator of the returning production formula. 339 00:17:27,080 --> 00:17:29,360 Speaker 2: So like, you know, if you lose your starting quarterback, 340 00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:31,440 Speaker 2: but you pull in somebody else's, then you return fifty 341 00:17:31,480 --> 00:17:34,959 Speaker 2: percent of production, which kind of makes sense. Might tweak 342 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:38,200 Speaker 2: the way that works a little bit. If it turns 343 00:17:38,240 --> 00:17:40,399 Speaker 2: out that, you know, USC really does suddenly have a 344 00:17:40,400 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 2: top ten team, then I might you know, we'll see 345 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:45,240 Speaker 2: what the data says. But I haven't done anything in 346 00:17:45,280 --> 00:17:46,360 Speaker 2: that regard just yet. 347 00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 3: I want you to plant your flag on the G 348 00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:51,880 Speaker 3: five level now that especially that's where you've started your 349 00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:54,879 Speaker 3: previews and you are probably the most familiar even though 350 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:58,800 Speaker 3: in some cases I'm sure it's more difficult to evaluate 351 00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 3: because of transfers come in and there's more known between 352 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:05,439 Speaker 3: Power five transfers based on production and opponent quality. Maybe 353 00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:07,959 Speaker 3: I don't know, that's just me guessing, but play your 354 00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:13,760 Speaker 3: flag now purely in terms of unforeseen fun among teams 355 00:18:14,119 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 3: from group of group of five conferences that you're like, 356 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 3: you know what, they return a lot, that they did 357 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 3: interesting things in the back end of the season. Who 358 00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,960 Speaker 3: are the teams in the American or the Mountain West 359 00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:26,240 Speaker 3: or whoever that you're like, you know what, you should 360 00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:29,800 Speaker 3: just keep tabs on this team. They're going to be entertaining. 361 00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:33,040 Speaker 2: Well, there's this up and coming named Luke Fickele who 362 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 2: I think might have a pretty good team at Cincinnati. Sure, 363 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:38,719 Speaker 2: that's something you might want to keep an eye on. 364 00:18:40,160 --> 00:18:44,080 Speaker 2: I knows. As crazy as that sounds, you know, I 365 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:47,399 Speaker 2: do think I joke, but it is probably worth pointing 366 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:50,720 Speaker 2: out that Cincinnati could be really good again, like they 367 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:54,600 Speaker 2: really do. Obviously they're going to regress at the cornerback position, 368 00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:57,119 Speaker 2: Like there's no way you're going to have you know, 369 00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,400 Speaker 2: two of the whatever that was five or six best 370 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:02,560 Speaker 2: cornerbacks in the country again, that was rare, and there's 371 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 2: probably gonna be a little bit of regression at the 372 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:09,000 Speaker 2: quarterback position, but they have two really high potential quarterbacks. 373 00:19:09,640 --> 00:19:11,119 Speaker 2: One of them is going to take over probably do 374 00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:14,040 Speaker 2: pretty well. So I think they are still probably a 375 00:19:14,080 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 2: top twenty or twenty five caliber team overall. Beyond that, though, 376 00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:19,439 Speaker 2: I mean there is Mount West has a ton of 377 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:24,440 Speaker 2: potential for oddity, Like Boise State maybe figures things out 378 00:19:24,480 --> 00:19:26,400 Speaker 2: there were early weren't that bad last year, but maybe 379 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:30,280 Speaker 2: they take a nice step forward again. Forresno State, you know, 380 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:31,960 Speaker 2: look like, you know, they lose their head coach and 381 00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 2: their starting quarterback, but then you know, bring Jeff Tedford 382 00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:37,880 Speaker 2: back again in the quarterbacks days and suddenly it looks 383 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:41,560 Speaker 2: like they might have a good amount of potential. Air 384 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:44,960 Speaker 2: Force probably is ready to overachieve its projections again like 385 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:47,640 Speaker 2: it normally does, so that could be just a weird race. 386 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:49,119 Speaker 2: I don't know if any of those teams really went 387 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:53,679 Speaker 2: enough to you know, you know, snare the New Year's 388 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,679 Speaker 2: the New Year's six bid or anything, but just in 389 00:19:56,800 --> 00:19:59,080 Speaker 2: terms of weirdness, that should be a pretty fun conference 390 00:19:59,119 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 2: to watch. And honestly, I mean, I could not be 391 00:20:02,160 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 2: more excited about the sun Belt East just as a whole, 392 00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:09,080 Speaker 2: as if forty that's going to be the first sun 393 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:12,040 Speaker 2: Belt East that is you know, that includes Marshall, that 394 00:20:12,080 --> 00:20:17,600 Speaker 2: includes James Madison Old Dominion. That is maybe the best 395 00:20:18,119 --> 00:20:20,440 Speaker 2: since the AAC doesn't have divisions at least, that is 396 00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:24,359 Speaker 2: probably the best division at the G five level. And 397 00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 2: I'm really not sure which way it's going to go. 398 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:27,960 Speaker 2: Marshall has a lot of potential. App State has a 399 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 2: lot of potential. Of course, Coastal still has Grays and McCall. 400 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:31,720 Speaker 2: They lose quite a bit. 401 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 3: But it has the feel of when when app State 402 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:37,200 Speaker 3: made the leap, We're like, this is a serious football 403 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:40,600 Speaker 3: program that is making a leap and will absolutely compete 404 00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:42,840 Speaker 3: sooner rather than later with what the East looks like now, 405 00:20:42,840 --> 00:20:43,360 Speaker 3: which I love. 406 00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:46,399 Speaker 2: Yeah, No, it's it's just a really cool conference. I 407 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 2: love that it came together. I love that ten years 408 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:51,120 Speaker 2: ago when Conference USA rated the sun Belt and took 409 00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:54,040 Speaker 2: all of its you know, market potential, we got We're 410 00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:56,960 Speaker 2: taking North Texas because of Dallas, We're taking Middle Tennessee 411 00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:01,160 Speaker 2: because it's Nashville. You know, I'm suddenly the Conference USA 412 00:21:01,160 --> 00:21:04,440 Speaker 2: got worse while the sun Belt added football programs that 413 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:08,240 Speaker 2: got better. I love that they basically continued that that 414 00:21:08,320 --> 00:21:11,320 Speaker 2: they beat Conference USA out for James Madison basically, and 415 00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:14,919 Speaker 2: they took Marshall and someone Miss is like thrilled to 416 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 2: be going from Conference USA to sun Belt. It's just 417 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:20,440 Speaker 2: a cool place right now. And I wish Louisiana Tech 418 00:21:20,480 --> 00:21:22,560 Speaker 2: had gone too. It kind of feels like they should 419 00:21:22,560 --> 00:21:24,960 Speaker 2: be there, even though they would never dag to join 420 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:29,000 Speaker 2: a conference with Louisiana and Louisiana Monroe, that feels like 421 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:31,200 Speaker 2: a Sunbell program that should be a sun Belt program. 422 00:21:31,240 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 2: But alas the fourteen that are in there are really good. 423 00:21:33,840 --> 00:21:37,320 Speaker 1: Bill on the topic of the Sun Belt. I feel 424 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:39,960 Speaker 1: like over the course of our discussions, we've talked through 425 00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:42,800 Speaker 1: a number of different variables that you have to account 426 00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:45,000 Speaker 1: for with your rankings. How do you account for a 427 00:21:45,040 --> 00:21:49,080 Speaker 1: program jumping from FCS up to the FBS level like 428 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:49,880 Speaker 1: James Madison. 429 00:21:50,600 --> 00:21:52,639 Speaker 2: I feel like I have a better grasp on it 430 00:21:52,640 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 2: now than I used to, just because I've got pretty 431 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 2: good FCS numbers. You know what, I came up with 432 00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:01,120 Speaker 2: a like, Honestly, the FCS s peoples ready the last 433 00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:04,479 Speaker 2: year were better than the FBS numbers which is weird. 434 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:07,760 Speaker 2: But so I feel like we have a you know, 435 00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:12,400 Speaker 2: a decent grasp of kind of the gap between FBS 436 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:14,920 Speaker 2: and FCSS, like twenty eight points or so on average. 437 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:17,280 Speaker 1: What does that mean? Twenty eight points? 438 00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:20,080 Speaker 2: It means basically like the average FBS team would be 439 00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 2: projected to beat the average FCS team by twenty eight points. Wow, 440 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:25,600 Speaker 2: like that perfect. If both of them had like their 441 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:29,240 Speaker 2: perfect zero point zero rating and their respective subdivisions, it 442 00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:31,040 Speaker 2: would be about a four touchdown advantage. 443 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: And so it seems high. 444 00:22:33,240 --> 00:22:35,320 Speaker 2: I mean it is, But at the same time, you know, 445 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 2: James Madison and North Dakota State have been basically playing 446 00:22:37,800 --> 00:22:40,640 Speaker 2: like top forty to sixty programs over the last few years, 447 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:42,560 Speaker 2: and that's kind of where they grade out. It probably 448 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:47,080 Speaker 2: honestly discounts North Dakota State of hair, but it's that's 449 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:49,840 Speaker 2: where the numbers, that's where the projections fare the best. 450 00:22:49,920 --> 00:22:52,199 Speaker 2: When that number is at about twenty eight. Last year 451 00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:54,600 Speaker 2: was a hair smaller because everything was weird last year, 452 00:22:54,640 --> 00:22:57,359 Speaker 2: but on average it's about twenty eight. So we take that, 453 00:22:57,480 --> 00:22:59,920 Speaker 2: We take what their ratings have been in recent years. 454 00:23:00,040 --> 00:23:01,680 Speaker 2: We take the fact that you know, I can do 455 00:23:01,720 --> 00:23:06,040 Speaker 2: a pretty good approximation of returning production based on you know, passing, 456 00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,200 Speaker 2: and like, we don't have snap counts, but we got 457 00:23:08,200 --> 00:23:10,560 Speaker 2: everything else. I feel like I kind of approximate it 458 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,840 Speaker 2: pretty well. And so you know, the recruiting hasn't been amazing. 459 00:23:13,880 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 2: That is a tricky part of the equation, just because 460 00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:18,400 Speaker 2: not even you know, the two four seven composite really 461 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:22,360 Speaker 2: gets ratings for all that many FCS signings. So that's 462 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 2: kind of chicky. But I have them right now one 463 00:23:25,359 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 2: hundred and seventh. Overall, that kind of I adjusted the 464 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:30,399 Speaker 2: way I was looking at their recruiting rankings a little bit, 465 00:23:30,440 --> 00:23:32,879 Speaker 2: so they fell from like ninetieth to one hundred and seventh. 466 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:37,000 Speaker 2: But I do feel like I have better tools for 467 00:23:37,720 --> 00:23:40,760 Speaker 2: evaluating a program making that jump now that I used to. 468 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:43,520 Speaker 1: That'll be an interesting story to follow. I do want 469 00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:47,439 Speaker 1: to jump back to USC you mentioned them earlier. I 470 00:23:47,440 --> 00:23:51,800 Speaker 1: think you said what fifty first in your rankings, which admittedly. 471 00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:56,080 Speaker 3: Unprojectable, projectably rejectable is the name of a Ringer podcast. 472 00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:59,320 Speaker 3: By the way, righty may need to be tweaked. 473 00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:02,600 Speaker 1: Mark Schlebaugh had him forth last month. Yeah, Yeah, the 474 00:24:02,640 --> 00:24:04,520 Speaker 1: answer is clearly somewhere in the middle. 475 00:24:06,240 --> 00:24:10,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, I would be like, again, I can guarantee that 476 00:24:10,080 --> 00:24:13,120 Speaker 2: it's that sp plus is undervalue. With their offense. They're 477 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:17,000 Speaker 2: projected twenty fourth on offense. I will be shocked if 478 00:24:17,040 --> 00:24:20,679 Speaker 2: it's not top ten, just because of Lincoln Riley, because 479 00:24:20,680 --> 00:24:22,560 Speaker 2: of the pieces he added and the pieces that he 480 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:25,680 Speaker 2: already inherited. You know, that's it's hard not to see 481 00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:28,920 Speaker 2: that as an elite offense. But why do I, Why 482 00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:33,800 Speaker 2: should I? Why should anyone expect the defense to be 483 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:36,760 Speaker 2: that of a top five team overall? Alex Grinch, you know, 484 00:24:36,840 --> 00:24:39,320 Speaker 2: it was what three years at Oklahoma had a good 485 00:24:39,400 --> 00:24:41,560 Speaker 2: I had a really really good defense for about half 486 00:24:41,560 --> 00:24:43,960 Speaker 2: of a season, you know, the second half of twenty 487 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:45,960 Speaker 2: twenty when his suspended guys came back and he had 488 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:49,199 Speaker 2: like three elite pass rushers and suddenly everything kind of 489 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:52,480 Speaker 2: worked really nicely in twenty twenty. Otherwise they've been barely 490 00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:57,120 Speaker 2: like borderline top fifty defense. USC's defense was horrific last year, 491 00:24:57,160 --> 00:25:00,280 Speaker 2: and admittedly, you know, their coach got fired and everything 492 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:02,680 Speaker 2: was kind of weird, but it was they haven't had 493 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:05,239 Speaker 2: a really good defense in a very long time. They 494 00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:08,879 Speaker 2: added transfers on defense, but not like Mario Williams Jordan 495 00:25:08,920 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 2: Addison level transfers, and so they're projected eighty fourth in 496 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,760 Speaker 2: defensive sp plus. That's probably too low. But why should 497 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 2: I why should they have? Like, what evidence do we 498 00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:23,000 Speaker 2: have that that's a top fifty defense. I don't think 499 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:26,439 Speaker 2: we have much. So I have the feeling, you know, 500 00:25:26,560 --> 00:25:29,600 Speaker 2: this is Alex grinch Stow, He's going to want to attack, attack, attack, 501 00:25:29,640 --> 00:25:31,639 Speaker 2: and they're going to get burned a lot, and they 502 00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 2: might have the offense to overcome it and still win 503 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:35,360 Speaker 2: a lot of games, but I don't see that as 504 00:25:35,359 --> 00:25:36,720 Speaker 2: the top five team for that reason. 505 00:25:37,920 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 1: One of the other conferences Bill that Dan and I 506 00:25:40,800 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: have been very interested in just through the course of 507 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:45,680 Speaker 1: our discussion here in the pre to the pre pre 508 00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:51,600 Speaker 1: preview acc namely because there are a ton of interesting storylines, 509 00:25:51,640 --> 00:25:54,120 Speaker 1: not the least of which is quarterback play. We went 510 00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:56,400 Speaker 1: through a bit of a thought experiment on our show 511 00:25:56,400 --> 00:25:59,040 Speaker 1: we did last week where we talked through our favorite 512 00:25:59,119 --> 00:26:01,879 Speaker 1: quarterbacks in the ACE and who should be first and second. 513 00:26:01,880 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 2: Look. 514 00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:03,560 Speaker 1: I don't want to put you too much on the spot, 515 00:26:03,600 --> 00:26:06,399 Speaker 1: but we both agreed that our top two was Tyler 516 00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:09,640 Speaker 1: van Dyck and Devin Leary, followed by a whole bunch 517 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:14,399 Speaker 1: of other guys. Sam Hartman filed your Kovic, Malie Cunningham 518 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:17,760 Speaker 1: who probably should not be overlooked, Brendan Armstrong. There is 519 00:26:17,800 --> 00:26:20,680 Speaker 1: a pretty long list of really good quarterback. Jordan Travis 520 00:26:21,080 --> 00:26:23,600 Speaker 1: has better numbers than perhaps I would like to admit. 521 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:28,520 Speaker 1: As you think through the acc and that particular quarterback storyline, 522 00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 1: how do you kind of suss out the field? 523 00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:34,760 Speaker 2: Well, first of all, I think I put cunning him 524 00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:37,880 Speaker 2: Man Hartman ahead of Leary. I know that I didn't 525 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:40,120 Speaker 2: realize that would be controversial, but it feels like it's, 526 00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:42,199 Speaker 2: you know, the way the hype chain has kind of 527 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 2: gathered steam there, that's suddenly kind of a controversial, uh take. 528 00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 2: But Devin Larry, I mean, his numbers, like his high 529 00:26:51,359 --> 00:26:53,480 Speaker 2: level numbers aren't crazy. And I really I realized that 530 00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:56,920 Speaker 2: it was what like thirty five to five touchdown to interception, 531 00:26:57,000 --> 00:26:59,800 Speaker 2: sixty six percent completion rate. Most of those completions didn't 532 00:26:59,800 --> 00:27:03,160 Speaker 2: go inhere. That's a very very conservative offense that kind 533 00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:07,879 Speaker 2: of had a at times a big play issue. They 534 00:27:08,280 --> 00:27:10,760 Speaker 2: they still produced some like Devin Carter Amasi and the 535 00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:14,359 Speaker 2: I guess am Easy's gone, but they still had some 536 00:27:14,400 --> 00:27:16,520 Speaker 2: big play moments. But the run game went nowhere. They 537 00:27:16,600 --> 00:27:18,120 Speaker 2: leaned as much on the run game as they could, 538 00:27:18,200 --> 00:27:20,960 Speaker 2: especially when they had the lead, and Leary was asked 539 00:27:20,960 --> 00:27:22,240 Speaker 2: to throw a whole heck of a lot of like 540 00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:27,439 Speaker 2: seven yard passes. So with the defense they have, maybe 541 00:27:27,680 --> 00:27:30,560 Speaker 2: that's fine. It's it's you know, that's a pretty good 542 00:27:30,560 --> 00:27:34,240 Speaker 2: combination because their defense should be absolutely ridiculous. They were fifteenth. 543 00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:37,160 Speaker 2: They jumped to fourteenth actually in defensive s PEO plus 544 00:27:37,240 --> 00:27:41,879 Speaker 2: without Peyton Wilson last year and Cecil pal the cornerback 545 00:27:42,240 --> 00:27:46,480 Speaker 2: who was a borderline starter as well, and CJ. Clark Actually, 546 00:27:46,560 --> 00:27:49,040 Speaker 2: now that i'm looking the nose tackle, they had some 547 00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:54,040 Speaker 2: serious injury issues on defense and still were awesome. They're 548 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:56,440 Speaker 2: gonna be awesome. That's great. You can get by with 549 00:27:56,480 --> 00:28:00,480 Speaker 2: a conservative offense, but as far as offense goes wakes awesome, 550 00:28:01,320 --> 00:28:05,119 Speaker 2: just just tremendous. And Hartman is the absolute perfect quarterback 551 00:28:05,200 --> 00:28:08,760 Speaker 2: for what they want to do. And yeah, Malie Cunningham's 552 00:28:08,800 --> 00:28:10,879 Speaker 2: numbers really kind of sneak up on you. But he 553 00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:13,639 Speaker 2: almost threw He almost rushed for twelve hundred yards. He 554 00:28:13,640 --> 00:28:17,000 Speaker 2: almost threw for three thousand yards last year. That's a 555 00:28:17,080 --> 00:28:19,640 Speaker 2: really really fun offense. If they have any defense whatsoever, 556 00:28:19,640 --> 00:28:21,680 Speaker 2: Louisville could be a team that surprises a little bit. 557 00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:25,040 Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean, as far as that hierarchy goes, 558 00:28:25,119 --> 00:28:28,199 Speaker 2: I get Vandyke. He's also kind of the you know, 559 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:30,399 Speaker 2: he threw a lot of safe passes too, but just 560 00:28:30,440 --> 00:28:33,800 Speaker 2: the way he the way he grew the second half 561 00:28:33,840 --> 00:28:35,719 Speaker 2: of his red shirt freshman year when he started off 562 00:28:35,720 --> 00:28:38,600 Speaker 2: as the third stringer, that was awfully impressive. So I 563 00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:40,320 Speaker 2: definitely have him in the top tier, but I might 564 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:43,320 Speaker 2: I might have cunning him and Hartman both ahead ahead 565 00:28:43,320 --> 00:28:43,720 Speaker 2: of Leary. 566 00:28:44,120 --> 00:28:47,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, you get the sense with TVD as we lovingly 567 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 1: refer to him here on the show, that the ceiling 568 00:28:50,200 --> 00:28:52,640 Speaker 1: is pretty high, maybe more so than anyone else in 569 00:28:52,640 --> 00:28:55,560 Speaker 1: that class. He's he's got a pretty high pro ceiling, 570 00:28:56,000 --> 00:28:58,640 Speaker 1: which we'll probably hear all about throughout the course of 571 00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:02,040 Speaker 1: the season. What other storylines jumped out to you, Bill 572 00:29:02,440 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 1: as you went through and did your previews? Are there 573 00:29:04,080 --> 00:29:08,160 Speaker 1: are there any other things that perhaps for like pet 574 00:29:08,240 --> 00:29:12,720 Speaker 1: storylines of yours that just felt really meaningful or really 575 00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:13,960 Speaker 1: exciting as you looked ahead? 576 00:29:15,360 --> 00:29:17,280 Speaker 2: Well, I think, I mean nobody's read my Big twelve 577 00:29:17,320 --> 00:29:20,240 Speaker 2: preview yet because it hasn't gone up yet, but everything 578 00:29:20,640 --> 00:29:24,120 Speaker 2: like the thing I have come back to the most 579 00:29:24,320 --> 00:29:26,520 Speaker 2: this season, and I made a visit to a Big 580 00:29:26,520 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 2: twelve school this spring. I have a piece coming out 581 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,080 Speaker 2: later this week about it. I don't really know why 582 00:29:31,120 --> 00:29:33,160 Speaker 2: I'm being secretive about who that is, but it's fun, 583 00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:36,760 Speaker 2: so I'm going to keep doing it. Pig twelve's gonna 584 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:39,480 Speaker 2: be so much freaking fun, like just so much fun, 585 00:29:39,600 --> 00:29:42,600 Speaker 2: and in a way that when OU and Texas leave, 586 00:29:42,880 --> 00:29:46,000 Speaker 2: it'll become more fun because every single game in that 587 00:29:46,080 --> 00:29:48,160 Speaker 2: damn conference is going to be decided by like three points, 588 00:29:49,480 --> 00:29:51,320 Speaker 2: just constant. And we saw that last year Baylor in 589 00:29:51,360 --> 00:29:53,680 Speaker 2: Oklahoma State. The reason they had the seasons they did 590 00:29:53,840 --> 00:29:57,880 Speaker 2: or they won the close games. I Aoway stayed just 591 00:29:57,920 --> 00:30:00,960 Speaker 2: got so like, you know, losing to Texas Tech VA 592 00:30:01,120 --> 00:30:03,400 Speaker 2: sixty two yard field goal. They were the snake bitten 593 00:30:03,440 --> 00:30:06,720 Speaker 2: team that lost all the close games. But there's just 594 00:30:06,760 --> 00:30:09,160 Speaker 2: so much drama just week to week, so many games 595 00:30:09,200 --> 00:30:11,480 Speaker 2: to watch in that conference, and I love, you know, 596 00:30:11,600 --> 00:30:14,160 Speaker 2: all four teams that they're adding starting next year have 597 00:30:14,320 --> 00:30:16,800 Speaker 2: been like top thirty level at least once in the 598 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:20,240 Speaker 2: last five years. Obviously, Cincinnati and BYU have been much 599 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:23,200 Speaker 2: better than that. USUCF was very close to that what 600 00:30:23,840 --> 00:30:26,920 Speaker 2: four and five years ago. That's going to be, like, 601 00:30:26,960 --> 00:30:30,080 Speaker 2: I might that conference might never produce another national title 602 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:32,840 Speaker 2: winner after Hokie leaves, and I get that, but oh 603 00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:35,280 Speaker 2: my god, they have so many Top twenty caliber teams, 604 00:30:35,280 --> 00:30:37,520 Speaker 2: and that's going to be just a blast to follow, 605 00:30:37,640 --> 00:30:41,000 Speaker 2: especially if we if everybody stops being you know, huffy 606 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:43,120 Speaker 2: and stubborn, and we actually get the twelve team playoff 607 00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:44,000 Speaker 2: we were supposed to get. 608 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:46,400 Speaker 3: I want to piggyback that a little, just because I 609 00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:49,400 Speaker 3: don't care about the best conference necessarily in the way 610 00:30:49,400 --> 00:30:52,760 Speaker 3: that I think there is always that conversation during the season. Yeah, 611 00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:56,160 Speaker 3: I care about the conference with the highest depth of 612 00:30:56,400 --> 00:31:01,640 Speaker 3: competence to you, and it's not the BacT Well, to you, 613 00:31:03,320 --> 00:31:05,360 Speaker 3: I mean, is it the SEC? I mean, you know, 614 00:31:05,600 --> 00:31:08,080 Speaker 3: you hear from coaches that like, look, the top is incredible, 615 00:31:08,080 --> 00:31:10,480 Speaker 3: but like the middle and bottom are not all that 616 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:13,360 Speaker 3: different from the middle and bottom of other conferences. Who 617 00:31:13,520 --> 00:31:15,800 Speaker 3: is that? Who is that conference right now? Just in 618 00:31:15,920 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 3: terms of depth of competence, and usually that means combination 619 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:22,160 Speaker 3: quarterback and defense, But who is that conference at you know, 620 00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:23,560 Speaker 3: in mid to late June. 621 00:31:23,760 --> 00:31:27,640 Speaker 2: I mean it's at the Boord answer. Probably it's probably yeah, yeah, 622 00:31:27,840 --> 00:31:30,120 Speaker 2: it's okay, Like I mean, I don't I don't want 623 00:31:30,160 --> 00:31:31,840 Speaker 2: to give that answer. But I mean, even outside of 624 00:31:31,840 --> 00:31:36,240 Speaker 2: Alabama and Georgia, obviously A and M is a potential 625 00:31:36,240 --> 00:31:38,920 Speaker 2: top ten team or like probable top ten team at 626 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:41,200 Speaker 2: this point, even though you know they don't believe in 627 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:44,240 Speaker 2: you know, bells and whistles in explosive plays one of 628 00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:48,920 Speaker 2: your past, right, Like, besides that, they just like fighting 629 00:31:48,920 --> 00:31:50,840 Speaker 2: with rocks and they're pretty good at it at this point. 630 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 2: But I mean you go through the number of teams 631 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:56,880 Speaker 2: that have top fifteen ish potential. Tennessee does, Old Miss 632 00:31:56,880 --> 00:32:01,000 Speaker 2: does Mississippi State might, Kentucky might Auburn and Florida still do. 633 00:32:01,280 --> 00:32:04,960 Speaker 2: I mean, they've got plenty of issues, but they obviously 634 00:32:04,960 --> 00:32:08,280 Speaker 2: still have top fifteen potential. LSU probably does. I have 635 00:32:08,360 --> 00:32:12,360 Speaker 2: no idea what to really expect from LSU. Arkansas probably does. 636 00:32:12,960 --> 00:32:16,320 Speaker 2: So that's still a lot. I mean, that's the conference 637 00:32:16,400 --> 00:32:18,600 Speaker 2: with the most money. When they make a series of 638 00:32:18,640 --> 00:32:21,680 Speaker 2: pretty good hires, that's usually a pretty good combination. And 639 00:32:21,720 --> 00:32:24,640 Speaker 2: it's it looks really good right now for the SEC. 640 00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:26,760 Speaker 2: But beyond that, I mean, the PAC twelve is not 641 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:31,400 Speaker 2: in that conversation, but the Big ten is obviously also 642 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:34,200 Speaker 2: has money and a lot of good hires. But this is, 643 00:32:34,480 --> 00:32:36,760 Speaker 2: you know, you can certainly you look at the Big ten, 644 00:32:36,880 --> 00:32:39,640 Speaker 2: the Big twelve as it is currently as it is 645 00:32:39,680 --> 00:32:44,720 Speaker 2: currently constituted. Oh, you's got top five potential. Texas, I 646 00:32:44,720 --> 00:32:47,160 Speaker 2: don't freaking know, like I saw. I know FBI hasn't 647 00:32:47,200 --> 00:32:49,280 Speaker 2: in the top ten. We all know they have that potential, 648 00:32:49,320 --> 00:32:52,040 Speaker 2: but it's you know, show it. You know, you got 649 00:32:52,040 --> 00:32:54,200 Speaker 2: to maybe show it a little more frequently. But the 650 00:32:54,200 --> 00:32:57,440 Speaker 2: potentials there. Oklahoma State and Baylor were top ten last year. 651 00:32:57,560 --> 00:33:00,360 Speaker 2: Kansas State has top fifteen potential. I love their defense 652 00:33:00,400 --> 00:33:05,360 Speaker 2: and I love that backfield. That's a good number of 653 00:33:05,400 --> 00:33:09,080 Speaker 2: teams right there. That's half the conference basically that has 654 00:33:09,160 --> 00:33:10,960 Speaker 2: that potential too. So I do think that's the third 655 00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:13,560 Speaker 2: best conference overall this year. And that's why it is 656 00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:16,000 Speaker 2: a nice deep conference. Even if we can't really trust 657 00:33:16,040 --> 00:33:19,040 Speaker 2: O you with all that change to get through twelve 658 00:33:19,080 --> 00:33:21,840 Speaker 2: and oh or thirteen and oh necessarily, that's still a 659 00:33:21,880 --> 00:33:22,560 Speaker 2: lot of potential. 660 00:33:22,600 --> 00:33:26,320 Speaker 3: I think there is value in somebody who keeps keeps 661 00:33:26,360 --> 00:33:31,120 Speaker 3: tabs of as many things as you do. There's monetary value. Okay, 662 00:33:31,360 --> 00:33:34,400 Speaker 3: there's monetary value. And something that we discussed last year 663 00:33:35,240 --> 00:33:39,800 Speaker 3: is the teams who outperform the spread consistently that you know, 664 00:33:39,840 --> 00:33:42,080 Speaker 3: finished ten or eleven and one or whatever against the 665 00:33:42,120 --> 00:33:44,680 Speaker 3: spread that Vegas couldn't quite figure out or couldn't quite 666 00:33:44,680 --> 00:33:47,680 Speaker 3: get a handle on, tended to be teams who are 667 00:33:47,760 --> 00:33:52,160 Speaker 3: catastrophic on some level, relatively catastrophic the year before, and 668 00:33:52,280 --> 00:33:54,360 Speaker 3: Vegas couldn't make heads or tails of them for the 669 00:33:54,440 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 3: first six or eight weeks before starting to correct things. 670 00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:02,080 Speaker 3: And usually not always, but usually that sort of improvement 671 00:34:02,160 --> 00:34:05,800 Speaker 3: from catastrophic to competent came on the defensive side of 672 00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:10,000 Speaker 3: the ball, especially in the ability to limit bigger plays. 673 00:34:10,080 --> 00:34:13,320 Speaker 3: Not always, but like we saw Michigan make a defensive 674 00:34:13,320 --> 00:34:17,000 Speaker 3: coordinator change and got way better on defense, especially as 675 00:34:17,000 --> 00:34:19,279 Speaker 3: it relates to preventing big plays. And obviously Iowa was 676 00:34:19,320 --> 00:34:22,040 Speaker 3: always that team, and just the teams that tended to 677 00:34:22,120 --> 00:34:26,000 Speaker 3: bounce back against the spread especially had that in common. 678 00:34:27,120 --> 00:34:29,360 Speaker 3: It's silly for me to ask you this question because 679 00:34:29,400 --> 00:34:32,280 Speaker 3: you don't know, nobody knows, but we had a number 680 00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:36,680 Speaker 3: of catastrophic teams last year. So of those catastrophic teams 681 00:34:37,480 --> 00:34:41,120 Speaker 3: if you were a wagering human and looking at Okay, 682 00:34:41,160 --> 00:34:43,799 Speaker 3: here's who Vegas is going to undersell until mid to 683 00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:47,880 Speaker 3: late October or something like that. Who are those teams 684 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:50,279 Speaker 3: that you're like, I don't know. I'm still a Tom 685 00:34:50,320 --> 00:34:52,759 Speaker 3: Allen believer. They're not an elite loser anymore like they 686 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:55,239 Speaker 3: were last year. I'm a Michael Oxley believer. Like, who 687 00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:57,000 Speaker 3: is there anybody who were like, they're not going to 688 00:34:57,480 --> 00:35:01,279 Speaker 3: It's impossible for them to be as catastrophic, which is 689 00:35:01,280 --> 00:35:03,319 Speaker 3: my word of the day as they were last year. 690 00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:07,040 Speaker 2: So while you were talking, I got my projections here. 691 00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:09,239 Speaker 3: I always do that, by the way, I always that's 692 00:35:09,280 --> 00:35:11,520 Speaker 3: like our Stockton Malone, Like I always try to give 693 00:35:11,520 --> 00:35:13,640 Speaker 3: you a little time to load up a spreadshel That's. 694 00:35:13,520 --> 00:35:16,880 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that's right. And nobody brings spreadsheets to a 695 00:35:16,880 --> 00:35:22,040 Speaker 2: podcast like I've got the you know, I got my 696 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:27,239 Speaker 2: twenty twenty two projections here. I got you know, I 697 00:35:27,280 --> 00:35:29,280 Speaker 2: sorted them out by defense. I'm looking at the worst 698 00:35:29,280 --> 00:35:32,840 Speaker 2: defenses in the Power conferences projected defense in the Power Conferences. 699 00:35:33,120 --> 00:35:36,400 Speaker 2: A lot of them are extremely justifiable. Duke and Kansas 700 00:35:36,400 --> 00:35:39,719 Speaker 2: at the bottom two makes sense, Yeah, Georgia Tech's down there. 701 00:35:39,760 --> 00:35:44,279 Speaker 2: Branderbilts down there makes sense of the ones that are 702 00:35:44,320 --> 00:35:47,400 Speaker 2: down there that I could see, you know, teams that 703 00:35:47,440 --> 00:35:51,000 Speaker 2: have either had good defenses recently and like you said, 704 00:35:51,000 --> 00:35:54,640 Speaker 2: got ripped apart by big plays. Specifically, TCU has projected 705 00:35:54,680 --> 00:35:59,600 Speaker 2: eighty fifth because they were suddenly terrible defensively last year. Yes, Andy, 706 00:36:00,120 --> 00:36:02,880 Speaker 2: not been, you know, they were. That was kind of 707 00:36:02,920 --> 00:36:08,200 Speaker 2: Gary Patterson's thing was having not tragic defenses, and suddenly 708 00:36:08,200 --> 00:36:10,359 Speaker 2: they had one. And so they're projected pretty I mean, 709 00:36:10,360 --> 00:36:15,080 Speaker 2: they're borderline top fifty basically because of that. But if 710 00:36:15,400 --> 00:36:17,399 Speaker 2: you know, I mean, Sunny Dicks made a lovely higher. 711 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:21,320 Speaker 2: He brought in the Tulsa guy as defensive coordinator. Tulsa's 712 00:36:21,320 --> 00:36:24,120 Speaker 2: had a couple of three straight really really solid defenses. 713 00:36:24,400 --> 00:36:27,040 Speaker 2: If that kind of sticks, if something clicks there and 714 00:36:27,520 --> 00:36:30,200 Speaker 2: his truckload of transfers that he brought in, if everything 715 00:36:30,280 --> 00:36:33,160 Speaker 2: kind of normalizes and they just leaned big plays a 716 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:37,080 Speaker 2: little bit better, their often should be fantastic. Like suddenly 717 00:36:37,320 --> 00:36:41,279 Speaker 2: tcgoes from borderline top fifty to top twenty. So that's 718 00:36:41,280 --> 00:36:43,719 Speaker 2: a team and I'm not sure like Vegas might, they're 719 00:36:43,719 --> 00:36:47,080 Speaker 2: still TCU. They've won games relatively recently enough that maybe 720 00:36:47,520 --> 00:36:50,600 Speaker 2: maybe Vegas is already expecting decent things of them. But 721 00:36:50,680 --> 00:36:52,759 Speaker 2: that is a team that you know, they're projected to 722 00:36:52,760 --> 00:36:56,000 Speaker 2: win like six point eight games on average with my ratings, 723 00:36:56,560 --> 00:36:59,560 Speaker 2: it's not hard to see them suddenly being a lot 724 00:36:59,600 --> 00:37:02,880 Speaker 2: more calm on that side and suddenly winning nine or 725 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:06,840 Speaker 2: ten games USC. I do think it's still going to 726 00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:12,600 Speaker 2: get ripped apart defensively at times, but no, never mind, 727 00:37:12,760 --> 00:37:16,080 Speaker 2: Vegas is gonna Yeah, Vegas is not going to treat 728 00:37:16,080 --> 00:37:18,279 Speaker 2: them as a as a top fifty team, So that's 729 00:37:18,360 --> 00:37:22,240 Speaker 2: not there's no catching up to do there, North Carolina. 730 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:23,120 Speaker 2: How about that? 731 00:37:23,160 --> 00:37:27,600 Speaker 1: Oh the Hysick rise to mediocrity. 732 00:37:26,960 --> 00:37:30,320 Speaker 2: Effect, which I'm not really sure is a thing. 733 00:37:30,280 --> 00:37:32,719 Speaker 3: Which he's already done by the way in Chapel Hill. 734 00:37:33,000 --> 00:37:35,120 Speaker 3: The rise to mediocrity, I think he took like the 735 00:37:35,120 --> 00:37:37,439 Speaker 3: one hundred and eighteenth best defense and turned them into 736 00:37:37,480 --> 00:37:38,440 Speaker 3: like the sixty fourth. 737 00:37:39,120 --> 00:37:40,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, he hasn't. I did look it up for my 738 00:37:40,960 --> 00:37:43,320 Speaker 2: ACC preview. He hasn't had a top sixty defense in 739 00:37:43,400 --> 00:37:45,520 Speaker 2: my numbers since two thousand and six when he was 740 00:37:45,520 --> 00:37:48,080 Speaker 2: with Mac Brown. But he did make them more competent, 741 00:37:48,239 --> 00:37:51,800 Speaker 2: so maybe even after five years in the broadcast booth, 742 00:37:51,840 --> 00:37:55,360 Speaker 2: maybe he's still capable of that. And I mean they 743 00:37:55,440 --> 00:37:57,799 Speaker 2: lose a lot offensively, but they're still it's you know, 744 00:37:57,840 --> 00:38:00,759 Speaker 2: that offense, you know, never going to score much on 745 00:38:00,800 --> 00:38:03,480 Speaker 2: the lead defenses they don't face just a ton of those, 746 00:38:03,560 --> 00:38:06,319 Speaker 2: so you know, they they will score points. And if 747 00:38:06,360 --> 00:38:08,919 Speaker 2: suddenly they're not getting blown up for constant fifty yard 748 00:38:08,960 --> 00:38:12,160 Speaker 2: gains on defense, then that is a team. Like where 749 00:38:12,160 --> 00:38:14,680 Speaker 2: are they They're they're projected in my numbers to win 750 00:38:14,719 --> 00:38:16,000 Speaker 2: seven and a half. I'm not ware of this year. 751 00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:19,319 Speaker 2: Where they're over under is it's not impossible to see 752 00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:22,200 Speaker 2: them jump in a decent amount. My heart's not really 753 00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:24,600 Speaker 2: in these picks to a certain degree, I don't know, 754 00:38:26,600 --> 00:38:29,680 Speaker 2: but that is that Iowa states one that they lose 755 00:38:29,719 --> 00:38:32,279 Speaker 2: a ton defensively. They didn't. I mean, they were good 756 00:38:32,320 --> 00:38:35,160 Speaker 2: defensively last year, so it's kind of a different story. 757 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:37,919 Speaker 2: But they we could be overestimated how much they fall 758 00:38:38,000 --> 00:38:40,239 Speaker 2: because especially if you look at their seven and six 759 00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:42,359 Speaker 2: record and decide they weren't very good last year, they 760 00:38:42,360 --> 00:38:45,279 Speaker 2: were still, you know, very solid. Is just they lost 761 00:38:45,320 --> 00:38:47,840 Speaker 2: on their close games. So that's a team that you 762 00:38:47,920 --> 00:38:50,799 Speaker 2: combine that with a defensive turnover. If Haycock is just 763 00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:54,640 Speaker 2: incapable of producing bad defenses, then that's a team that 764 00:38:54,640 --> 00:38:55,440 Speaker 2: could overachieve. 765 00:38:57,239 --> 00:38:58,960 Speaker 3: By the way, I'm picturing as you're saying this, both 766 00:38:59,000 --> 00:39:01,600 Speaker 3: Gary Patterson and John Haycock with business cards with their 767 00:39:01,680 --> 00:39:05,279 Speaker 3: names and have her of not bad defenses. It's like, 768 00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:08,480 Speaker 3: that's kind of my thing. I may have a bad defense. 769 00:39:08,600 --> 00:39:10,759 Speaker 2: Yeah, Patterson had his card taken away last year. 770 00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:13,680 Speaker 1: I'm gonna say not at TCU last year. Back to Kinko's, 771 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:18,200 Speaker 1: back to moo dot com. Yeah, sorry, oh man. 772 00:39:18,120 --> 00:39:20,960 Speaker 2: He's an assistant to the Texas head coach. That is 773 00:39:21,120 --> 00:39:22,000 Speaker 2: just crazy. 774 00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:25,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's wild. Bill Connolly, ESPN. I think we're out 775 00:39:25,719 --> 00:39:27,840 Speaker 1: of time. I do want to talk soccer with you, 776 00:39:27,920 --> 00:39:29,360 Speaker 1: but I'm going to invite you back to do that 777 00:39:29,440 --> 00:39:31,000 Speaker 1: at some other point because I know you got to go. 778 00:39:31,600 --> 00:39:34,480 Speaker 2: We have time, and we've got time before the World Cup. 779 00:39:34,400 --> 00:39:36,440 Speaker 1: So that's right, So we'll invite you back on at 780 00:39:36,440 --> 00:39:38,680 Speaker 1: some point in near future. You and I can can 781 00:39:38,719 --> 00:39:40,680 Speaker 1: have a go at the US national team in advance 782 00:39:40,719 --> 00:39:43,000 Speaker 1: of the World Cup, but in the interim, very quickly 783 00:39:43,040 --> 00:39:44,759 Speaker 1: before you go, what you got coming up over the 784 00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:48,000 Speaker 1: next few weeks and months and promote anything you need to. 785 00:39:49,239 --> 00:39:51,280 Speaker 2: Well, it's it was a it's been a weird offseason 786 00:39:51,280 --> 00:39:53,759 Speaker 2: for me, just because I was suddenly traveling again, and 787 00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:55,600 Speaker 2: therefore a lot of the pieces I would have written 788 00:39:55,600 --> 00:39:57,480 Speaker 2: in like March and April, kind of the one off 789 00:39:57,560 --> 00:40:00,280 Speaker 2: kind of things, we've been banking to a certain degree, 790 00:40:00,520 --> 00:40:02,160 Speaker 2: and so I did. I had a piece with Virginia 791 00:40:02,239 --> 00:40:05,080 Speaker 2: Tech about Virginia Tech and Brent Pryor last week. Got 792 00:40:05,120 --> 00:40:06,680 Speaker 2: a whole bunch more of those to come. It's going 793 00:40:06,719 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 2: to be a very heavy June, July, August run here 794 00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:13,839 Speaker 2: with stuff that I've banked. So not that anybody has 795 00:40:13,880 --> 00:40:18,439 Speaker 2: ever really doubted my quantity even this year, but there's 796 00:40:18,480 --> 00:40:20,520 Speaker 2: a lot of quantity coming in. A lot of it 797 00:40:20,560 --> 00:40:22,920 Speaker 2: is that variety the travel things that I that I 798 00:40:22,920 --> 00:40:25,120 Speaker 2: did in the spring that haven't really seen the light 799 00:40:25,160 --> 00:40:26,520 Speaker 2: of day yet. We're gonna have a lot of those 800 00:40:26,560 --> 00:40:26,839 Speaker 2: to come. 801 00:40:27,120 --> 00:40:30,920 Speaker 1: All right, Pill Connley, ESPN dot com. Always a pleasure. 802 00:40:31,440 --> 00:40:35,080 Speaker 1: We will talk soon. Thanks again for your time. Absolutely 803 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:39,520 Speaker 1: all right, Dan, there you go. Bill Connolly, ESPN dot com. 804 00:40:39,640 --> 00:40:42,640 Speaker 1: We're gonna have to invite him back, maybe maybe for 805 00:40:42,719 --> 00:40:45,239 Speaker 1: an off topic show on Patreon for Bowlers dot Com. 806 00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:48,800 Speaker 1: Wink wink, nudge nudge. Uh huh. Of course, maybe maybe 807 00:40:48,840 --> 00:40:52,000 Speaker 1: we can do US soccer in the run up to 808 00:40:52,040 --> 00:40:52,640 Speaker 1: the World Cup. 809 00:40:54,360 --> 00:40:58,279 Speaker 3: Which country would you like to go? I assume you're 810 00:40:58,280 --> 00:41:01,480 Speaker 3: gonna say England if you could go a international soccer, 811 00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:03,839 Speaker 3: but you could say Argentina, you could say Germany. There's 812 00:41:03,840 --> 00:41:06,279 Speaker 3: also you can say Italy, you could say Spain. Like 813 00:41:06,640 --> 00:41:10,680 Speaker 3: which non England? There's your your qualifier because Bill just 814 00:41:10,680 --> 00:41:13,600 Speaker 3: went over to Germany and you know, fattened himself up 815 00:41:13,600 --> 00:41:16,480 Speaker 3: with currywurst and donor kebab's in the best possible way. 816 00:41:17,480 --> 00:41:22,520 Speaker 3: Which non UK England country would you go to see 817 00:41:22,560 --> 00:41:27,600 Speaker 3: international soccer? Well, I mean there's club soccer with the 818 00:41:27,680 --> 00:41:30,480 Speaker 3: various leagues in each That's what I'm talking about, and 819 00:41:30,480 --> 00:41:33,040 Speaker 3: then there's international which is kind of a different ballwax. 820 00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:34,000 Speaker 2: No club soccer. 821 00:41:34,160 --> 00:41:38,239 Speaker 1: For me, it's probably either Germany or Spain. Okay, I 822 00:41:38,480 --> 00:41:43,200 Speaker 1: would say Germany or Spain probably neck and neck for me. 823 00:41:43,400 --> 00:41:45,920 Speaker 1: I know a little bit more about German. Plus my 824 00:41:46,040 --> 00:41:47,600 Speaker 1: last name is German and I speak a little bit 825 00:41:47,600 --> 00:41:50,799 Speaker 1: of German, So okay, that would probably be around easily. Yeah, 826 00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:53,200 Speaker 1: that would probably be the answer for me, but definitely 827 00:41:53,239 --> 00:41:56,520 Speaker 1: a different world than I've been reading all of Bill's breakdowns, 828 00:41:56,560 --> 00:42:00,760 Speaker 1: as he's himself gone through and traveled Germany in Europe. 829 00:42:01,880 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 3: Do you watch like non English club soccer? Will you 830 00:42:05,000 --> 00:42:07,040 Speaker 3: watch it down and watch Bundesliga? I know, like what 831 00:42:07,280 --> 00:42:10,239 Speaker 3: Geo Rena and Pulisic have been on or are on 832 00:42:10,760 --> 00:42:13,239 Speaker 3: German clubs. Is that your main impetus or do you 833 00:42:13,280 --> 00:42:14,680 Speaker 3: watch it just because it's good soccer? 834 00:42:16,280 --> 00:42:20,600 Speaker 1: That was one of the motivating factors. But okay, I 835 00:42:20,920 --> 00:42:24,000 Speaker 1: don't watch as much as Premier League to be real, 836 00:42:24,239 --> 00:42:29,080 Speaker 1: But if I'm watching, if there's a game of interest, yeah, 837 00:42:29,280 --> 00:42:32,440 Speaker 1: I'll flip it on. It's not so much any kind 838 00:42:32,480 --> 00:42:35,160 Speaker 1: of loyalty to the league as it is, Oh there's 839 00:42:35,200 --> 00:42:37,560 Speaker 1: a cool game that's happening, right right. I treat it 840 00:42:37,600 --> 00:42:41,800 Speaker 1: the same way I would treat Sunbelt football or sometimes 841 00:42:41,840 --> 00:42:44,960 Speaker 1: in the game or sometimes acc football. Yeah, it's just 842 00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:48,840 Speaker 1: game by game based whatever suits my fancy in that moment. 843 00:42:49,400 --> 00:42:52,440 Speaker 3: Okay, that's fair enough. I don't think I have anything 844 00:42:52,440 --> 00:42:54,640 Speaker 3: else for you. I'm looking are you getting Philly tickets 845 00:42:54,719 --> 00:42:55,560 Speaker 3: twenty twenty six? 846 00:42:55,719 --> 00:42:57,160 Speaker 1: I'm gonna work on it. Yeah. 847 00:42:57,200 --> 00:42:58,120 Speaker 3: Do you have connections? 848 00:42:58,239 --> 00:43:01,480 Speaker 1: No? No, not, but I will develop them in the 849 00:43:01,520 --> 00:43:03,920 Speaker 1: next four years. I guarantee it. All Right, you. 850 00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:05,799 Speaker 3: Gotta get to fit. What's the backup city if you 851 00:43:05,800 --> 00:43:06,839 Speaker 3: can't get Philly. 852 00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:09,279 Speaker 1: Well, there's games in New York. 853 00:43:09,600 --> 00:43:11,319 Speaker 3: Dude, we got to take the games and take the 854 00:43:11,360 --> 00:43:14,600 Speaker 3: show on the road, Lahara, twenty twenty six. 855 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:15,680 Speaker 2: Let's go. 856 00:43:16,600 --> 00:43:19,200 Speaker 1: I will figure out some way to witness the World 857 00:43:19,239 --> 00:43:23,520 Speaker 1: Cup in person in four years. Okay, here, I will 858 00:43:23,520 --> 00:43:26,400 Speaker 1: find a way. What was the dude's name, was it 859 00:43:26,520 --> 00:43:29,440 Speaker 1: Dion Rich? The guy who would sneak into all the 860 00:43:29,440 --> 00:43:32,400 Speaker 1: sporting events until they wise don't remember. Yeah, there's a 861 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:34,160 Speaker 1: big thing on it. What I want to say, Dean Rich. 862 00:43:34,160 --> 00:43:36,280 Speaker 1: I don't remember if that's the right name, But okay, 863 00:43:36,400 --> 00:43:38,640 Speaker 1: I will. I will pull a Deon Rich. Let's assume 864 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:41,280 Speaker 1: it's correct. Do you look some way into the Games 865 00:43:41,320 --> 00:43:41,920 Speaker 1: in four years? 866 00:43:42,200 --> 00:43:46,040 Speaker 3: Do you look enough like could you train yourself and 867 00:43:46,160 --> 00:43:50,279 Speaker 3: shape yourself physically like MTV's made to look enough like 868 00:43:50,320 --> 00:43:54,000 Speaker 3: an international soccer star like fake Klay Thompson got into 869 00:43:54,040 --> 00:43:56,560 Speaker 3: the Chase Center this past week by looking enough like 870 00:43:56,640 --> 00:43:58,520 Speaker 3: Klay Thompson. Is that a viable way? 871 00:43:59,560 --> 00:43:59,680 Speaker 2: Like? 872 00:43:59,719 --> 00:44:01,399 Speaker 3: I don't know what country it would work? 873 00:44:01,400 --> 00:44:01,719 Speaker 2: For you. 874 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:04,040 Speaker 1: I think I think I've got a little bit of 875 00:44:04,080 --> 00:44:05,440 Speaker 1: geoorina in my jawline. 876 00:44:05,840 --> 00:44:08,400 Speaker 3: All right, but you need to you probably need the 877 00:44:08,440 --> 00:44:10,880 Speaker 3: physique to be more in line. No, I need to 878 00:44:10,960 --> 00:44:13,400 Speaker 3: hear your trim guy, But none taken. 879 00:44:13,600 --> 00:44:16,359 Speaker 1: I will be deeper into my fifth decade of life 880 00:44:16,400 --> 00:44:19,240 Speaker 1: at that point. It's true. I still I still maintain 881 00:44:19,320 --> 00:44:22,359 Speaker 1: the babyface and was carded twice this weekend. Look at you. 882 00:44:24,080 --> 00:44:29,800 Speaker 3: It's still a stretch. But probably temples, the grand temples. 883 00:44:29,800 --> 00:44:31,879 Speaker 3: We might need some just from a natural No one 884 00:44:31,920 --> 00:44:32,279 Speaker 3: can tell. 885 00:44:32,360 --> 00:44:34,960 Speaker 1: Not a sponsor. Could be, Yeah, it could be. We'll 886 00:44:35,000 --> 00:44:38,959 Speaker 1: see four years to figure out my master plan. Wait, 887 00:44:38,960 --> 00:44:39,400 Speaker 1: how old will we? 888 00:44:39,600 --> 00:44:39,759 Speaker 2: Oh? 889 00:44:39,800 --> 00:44:42,200 Speaker 3: My god, stop going to be much older in four years? 890 00:44:42,280 --> 00:44:45,520 Speaker 1: All right, Dan, that does it for today, Thanks again 891 00:44:45,640 --> 00:44:48,960 Speaker 1: to our guest of honor, Bill Connelly from ESPN dot 892 00:44:49,040 --> 00:44:51,719 Speaker 1: com is always go and check out Bill Connolly and 893 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:53,920 Speaker 1: the fine work that he puts out. We will be 894 00:44:53,960 --> 00:44:56,560 Speaker 1: back on Thursday. I believe we're doing a mega June 895 00:44:56,640 --> 00:44:59,520 Speaker 1: Q and a to wrap. You are month right, mm 896 00:44:59,600 --> 00:45:02,560 Speaker 1: hmm correct. Stay tuned. If you've got any questions that 897 00:45:02,600 --> 00:45:05,360 Speaker 1: you'd like answered, we will be putting a call out 898 00:45:05,400 --> 00:45:08,480 Speaker 1: all across social media as ever, our email address is 899 00:45:08,520 --> 00:45:12,960 Speaker 1: soliverbal at gmail dot com. And last, but certainly not least, 900 00:45:13,080 --> 00:45:16,120 Speaker 1: subscribe to the show. If you haven't already, we'd encourage 901 00:45:16,120 --> 00:45:19,000 Speaker 1: you to tell your friends to follow us on social 902 00:45:19,040 --> 00:45:21,920 Speaker 1: media that includes all the social media platforms, not the 903 00:45:22,000 --> 00:45:24,799 Speaker 1: least of which is YouTube, or we'll post clips from 904 00:45:24,840 --> 00:45:28,359 Speaker 1: this episode, all of our episodes in much much more. Yeah, 905 00:45:28,560 --> 00:45:30,400 Speaker 1: that's how I have for that guy over there, my 906 00:45:30,400 --> 00:45:33,640 Speaker 1: good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie Hildebrand. We will 907 00:45:33,680 --> 00:45:36,640 Speaker 1: talk to you all on Thursday. In the meantime, as always, 908 00:45:36,719 --> 00:45:38,520 Speaker 1: stay solid, please