WEBVTT - NFL Week 16 Predictions: Packers-Bears, Jaguars-Broncos, Chiefs-Titans, Patriots-Ravens & more!

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in episode four oh six of What's Right with

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Right, presented to you by our friends at boost Mobile.

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>A reminder to everybody it helps us out a ton

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>if you like, rate, subscribe, review, and also a reminder

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>next week next two weeks because Christmas is on our

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>regular Christmas and New Year's are on Thursdays, so we're

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna do regular shows on Tuesday, and then our weekly

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gambling show will probably come out earlier in the week,

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably maybe Wednesday, maybe Thursday morning, I'm not

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sure each of the next two weeks, So two shows

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a week for the next two weeks. But right now

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into week sixteen, and first, demand'say, we

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have to look back on Week fifteen, which wasn't great

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>but was not disastrous and honestly only one pick that

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I hate the process on, even though two of my

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>picks got annihilated on. So we went two and three,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>which puts us on the year thirty seven, thirty six

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and two above five hundred, but not profitable. But again,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys have been following some

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other major podcasts out there that are doing

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've been publishing their The whole network is

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>doing a picks contest. Everybody every shows like five games,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>six games, eight games under five hundred. We're just muddling

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>along at five hundred, not feeling great about it. We'd

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be crushing over there. Here were the picks. Buffalo minus

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>won at New England winner, Seattle minus thirteen and a

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>half against Indy. I don't care. I like the process.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Seattle kicks six field goals, punch it in a few times,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Guys Vegas plus eleven and a half at Philly. Again,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Philly had blown out one team all year long, and

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think they could do it. The Raiders is

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just awful. So is a bad pick on me. San

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Francisco minus twelve and a half against Tennessee win by thirteen.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of those you can say, good, bad picks whatever.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The only one where the process was bad was Sensing

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 1>because I did a whole rant about Joe Burrow having

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>an existential crisis about his future in the NFL and

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Bengals, and then I took him plus two

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half against Baltimore like that. That was just

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>dumb and so bad job by me on the Bengals

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>pick I was trying to remember whether or not, because

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I if you guys, remember I said there were some

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>other picks I liked that I didn't you know put in.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>One of them was Cowboys minus six. They lost out right,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so that one wouldn't have worked. Another one was the

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Rams minus six. That one would have worked. But whatever,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>two and three and still a really good chance to

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>finish the year profitable. We just need to have, you know,

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a four and one week here and there, some three

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and two weeks and we'll be fine. A game over

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred as we enter the stretch. And as always,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>all our spreads are brought to you by our friends

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at hard Rock Bet, which is why it's a great

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>time to tell you where I bet on sports during

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the holiday season. Hard Rock Bet not just because they're

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the presenting sponsor of our show, because they make it

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to bet on my favorite teams, players, and leagues

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in a few simple taps, especially with the brand new

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for you page that recommends picks based on my favorites

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and who I like to bet on. I open the app,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>go to my for you page and bet and find

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a bet I like, and then bam, BET's placed just

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in time. When you get back to wrapping presence and

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>enjoying my favorite Christmas movie. Sign up today. Bet five

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars on any game, and if it wins, you also

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>score one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets. A winning

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>bet plus an extra one hundred fifty dollars to bet with.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that is spreading holiday cheer. Plus. Hard Rock Bet

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>fills your stockings with new promos daily, so whenever you're listening,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just open the app and check out what they've got

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>any day of the week. Download the hard Rock Bet

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposit today. Payable and bonus

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bets not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of Florida. In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>In all other states. Must be twenty one plus and

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight eighty eight admit it.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>In Indiana. If you are someone you know as a

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred and nine

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with it. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee or Virginia. All right, so Demanse,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it the stay aways, etc. Before

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we get to our five picks.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Our first stay away is Philly at Washington, Washington six

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and a half point dogs.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So here's why I'm staying away from this one, demnse

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Becuz a divisional home dog getting almost a touchdown against

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a shaky offense feels like a spot that I should

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>jump on. Washington plus six and a half. However, as

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>skeptical as I am about Philly, I have to be

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>open to the possibility that last week was not just

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about them playing the Raiders. Then it also was they

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>figured some stuff out and they are about to start

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>rolling as they get ready to defend their championship. That,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>combined with the potential emotional letdown for Washington of shutting

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Jaden down for the year season from hell official, I'd

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just rather stay away. My lean in this game is

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington getting the points, but I'll stay away from it.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Next one, uh, Green Bay at Chicago, Chicago's one point

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 2>with dogs.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I I don't love. I want to see green Bay

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>without Micah and see how big of an impact it

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has on the defense, because it felt like it impacted

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense within that game last week like that, that

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>game flipped in part when he went out. I also

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>could see Caleb because he is in the part of

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>his career and he is He's not like a steady

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>player yet. The highs are high, but the lowser lows.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He just had a great game. I could see him

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>regressing a bit. And the first week, first game against

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay two weeks ago, it was just a tale

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of two halves. He was so bad in the first half,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but then so good in the second half. So in

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>other words, I don't have a good feel for this game.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think my pick is Chicago, but it feels like

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a coin flip. The line is a coin flip. Will

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>stay away from it.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Next Jets at New Orleans. New Orleans four and a

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>half point favorites. Just not watching the game, I imagine.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just didn't want to listen. This is if

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I were a professional sports better, if it's how I

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>made my money, then you know I would have an

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>obligation to handicap every game. But at this point, this

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>late in the season. If it's a game this bad

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>between teams this bad, I don't want to spend a

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of emotional energy on it. I know, Listen, Tyler

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Shuck's played well as of late. I still don't think

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we're at a point where laying more than a field

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>goal with Tyler Shuck feels smart, and we haven't been

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at a point all year. We're betting the Jets getting

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>less than fourteen feels good, So all just stay away

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from it.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Next one, Cincinnati at Miami, Miami's four point dogs.

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati does not deserve to be road favorites of more

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>than a field goal against anybody. How, getting its first start,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. That's that. So that's the I can't

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>bet on Quinn Yours, the seventh round pick, getting his

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>first start, yeah, without seeing him play. And I also

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>can't lay four points with Cincinnati, So we're staying away

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this one. This next one to mind's I thought long

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and hard about.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Buffalo at Cleveland, Cleveland's ten point dogs. You wanted

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 2>to take Cleveland? No, I wanted to take Oh, you

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>want to say Buffalo?

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, wanted to take Buffalo, But Buffalo next week has

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles they're coming off that huge comeback against the Patriots.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Feels like little trap game spot. Buffalo has not been

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a good first half team, need him to cover ten.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's just to me, I like Buffalo, but it

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just feels like a workman like win is at least

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>possible rather than a blowout. So and we know, listen,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>shador in Cleveland will go They down seventeen, gonna go

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for a backdoor cover all. Just stay away from it,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Stay away from Buffalo. But the lean was Buffalo minus

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>ten all right.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Next is Minnesota at the Giants. Giants three point dogs.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're just Jackson Dark just lives in the concussion tent.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The Giants just want the season to be over. JJ

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy playing the best ball he's played as of late.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Still don't feel like he's earned the right to be

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>road full field goal favorites. Will stay away.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Next, What about nine though, JJ McCarthy, there'sh yeah, that

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 2>guy keep going. Okay. Next we got Atlanta at at

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals. Cardinals are three point dogs.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Again, a lot of bad teams road favorites like we have.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati is a road favorite, Minnesota is a road favorite,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and now Atlanta as a road favorite. Arizona has just

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>been such a dead team as of late. Kirk is

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>coming off the best game, you know, one of the

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>best games he's played as a Falcon. I just still

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's so square to take a bad team

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road and lay points. But I don't. I'm

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>not taking Arizona getting a field just a field goal,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>so I'm staying away.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Next next is Pittsburgh at Detroit. Detroit seven point favorites.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I thought long and hard about the Lions here.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>This feels like a Lion season on the line at

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>home against a Steeler team that's kind of, you know,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe flying a little too high. I also thought the

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>single funniest moment of the week was the Rogers cast

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>offs press conference.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Dude, I haven't seen it, but I've heard it how

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>it went, and like he got mad that they were

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>classifying him as an Outcast's funny. It's like, dude, you

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>got dropped by the Jets, bro, you're an outcast. It's

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.119
<v Speaker 2>so he.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Does forty five seconds.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And names teammates.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Who he loves and about how they're cast offs.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, in that fashion.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>About his teammates, about how they're all cast offs. People

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't want them, and now they're doing it. And then

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the reporter says, not like meanly, it's like, oh, well,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you by that? Do you consider yourself

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a cast off? And Rogers like can't help himself.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>He's like, no, I'm not cast off.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It was so funny, man. But so I like Detroit.

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But laying a full touchdown against a Mike Tomlin team

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in December has not been historically a great bet, so

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll just stay away from it, But man, I will

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I like Detroit.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Next next is Vegas at Houston. Houston's fourteen point favorites

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 2>honestly might be able to take that Houston minus.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Fourteen minus fourteen. I almost did, but I.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, best defense in the NFL right now.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Raiders line Raiders is such a mess. You certainly can't

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>take the Raiders at this point. But I don't like

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the zig zag for like I've been backing the Raiders

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>getting burnt. I think the response to that is stay

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>away from him, not all of a sudden back the

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>other side. And then it's SoJ Stroud.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>He's been good for the last few weeks, but I

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 2>mean he hasn't been.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But right, and they hadn't been, Houston hadn't been throughout

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the year blowing anyone out. That's changed a bit of

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>late fourteen's a lot. The Raiders are so bad though,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're they're so bad, all right.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Last one Monday Night football, San Francisco at Indy Indy

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 2>six point dogs.

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I really stared at San Francisco here. The issue is this,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I because Philip Rivers showed us this past week he's

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just gonna get the ball out immediately, immediately. And the

0:13:55.240 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Niners have sixteen sacks as a team this year. They've

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>just been so bad. So like, are the Niners going

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to exploit what you should be able

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to against, you know, a forty four year old quarterback?

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I'm certainly not backing Philip Rivers

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>against Robert solid defense, So I'll stay away, all right.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Three picks, including a first time ever on this show.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think reminder all the lines are from hard rock.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Bet Demonse, what's the first one?

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I did just notice Kansas City, Tennessee wasn't in

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the staleways. Uh, you have it in here, and it's

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee plus three and a half versus Kansas City you're

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>taking Tennessee.

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Titans are gonna win this game, out right, guys.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that the combination of the drop off from

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes to Minshew and everything Patrick was papering over, plus

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs still dealing with these devastating offensive line injuries,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:10.359
<v Speaker 1>plus the emotional let down for everyone on this team

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>having played in nothing but huge playoff games to playing

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in meaningless regular season games, Plus the fact that I

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Chris Jones is playing, Plus the fact

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think if Travis has one moment left in him,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>if he is gonna step away. And I don't know

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that he is, but his podcast this week sure made

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it seem like he was. That's gonna be his final

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>home game next week at Arrowhead against Denver. I just

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think the Titans are gonna win, and no, I honestly

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it. I don't think it'll be I don't

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think it'd be a bad thing for the Chiefs to

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>get a few games of seeing what they would look

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like with bad quarterback play as a reminder of especially

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>because they don't know if Patrick's going to be back

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for the start of next season. You know what they

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>need to do so I just think the Titans win,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'll take the Titans and cam Ward getting three

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half at home against the Chiefs.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow, all right, it's a new regime we got.

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, let me tell you something else real quick, because

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>as you guys know, I'm in you know the Obviously

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I bet through hard rock bet, but I also have

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that group chat where we bet with each other, and

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>very often in that chat, I post a chief's money line, like, Hey,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to bet the Chiefs at minus one eighty

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Does anybody want to take the other side

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of it? And there's one guy in that chat every

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>time who whatever I So if I say I'm willing

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay minus one eighty on the Chiefs, he'll swoop

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in and say before anybody can fill my bet, he's

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay minus one ninety on the Chiefs. So

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I then come over the top and say, all right,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll pay minus one ninety five, and then he takes

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that bet like he wants to take my chief's bet,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but he wants it at a better price, so he

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>overbids me. So I have a plan this weekend, which

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is I'm going to post that I want the Chief's

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>money line at a too good of a price and

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>anticipate he is then going to come in and bid

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>on the Chief's money line at a reasonable price, expecting

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>me to then overbid him. And then I'm just going

0:17:55.000 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to take his bet and say, okay, okay, no problem.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So you have the Chiefs set that price, buddy, and

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Tennessee. I've been I've been waiting for this.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I almost did it on Thanksgiving, except I bet the

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs to win. I didn't want to bet the Cowboys,

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but he on Thanksgiving did it to me. Uh in

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that game, and I ended up paying a real bad

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>price on time. Right now the good point, all right,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take Tennessee plus the three and a half.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Next the next we got Tampa Bay minus three at Carolina.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is just a line in the sand game, flatly. Uh,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay wins this game and they essentially lock up

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the division. Uh, they lose this game and they're gonna

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>have to fight for their lives for the remainder of

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think I know Tampa's playing it's worse

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for ball of the season. I think that they can

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>rebound from it. I think they've been They're better than

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they've shown over the last six weeks, and I wouldn't

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I love this game at two and a half. I'm

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>okay with it at three. I probably wouldn't bet it

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half. But Tampa minus three at

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina as Tampa Carolina has been a nice story. I

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>still think Tampa has high end upside, even though they've

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just been playing terribly the last few weeks. But they

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>also have to feel like we blew a fourteen point

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>lead in the waning moments a game we had no

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>business blowing whatsoever. And was that hold on the game?

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the first time you see him, considering

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you gonna see him again? Go ahead?

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, well no, that's what I thought. They also have

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the little added benefit of the extra rest because that

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>game against Atlanta was Thursday night, So all that, I'll

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lay the three points with Tampa.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Next next, you got Dallas minus two versus the Chargers.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>So the Chargers offense has really struggled and Herbert has

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>struggled this last month. They have been winning because of

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>their defense. Right. The Chargers also just won back to

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>back wildly important, down to the final moments game of

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the year type of things for them in thrilling fashion

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in both ways, back to back game sealing interceptions Monday

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>eight football against the Eagles and then Sunday against the Chiefs.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>They also because of what's happened to the Chiefs and

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because of what's happening to the Colts, they now they

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>lose out and they're eighty percent to make the playoffs,

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>like they don't need it. They you know, they the

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>because for them to miss the playoffs, they would have

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to lose out and the Colts would have to go

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on something of a run. I shouldn't say the Colts

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have to go on a run, but the Colts would

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have to win two of their final three I mean

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to that's basically going on a run. And so I

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas this is an elimination game for the Cowboys.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Dallas, you know, has been you know, a

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>week two week team in that some weeks they look

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like as good as any team in the league, and

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>then weeks like last week, they just look awful against

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. I also do like that this game is

0:21:54.960 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at I that obvious. I like the fact that this

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>game is in Dallas. I don't love I will admit

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Philly plays the night before, so because

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>if Philly wins, Dallas is eliminated from the playoffs. So

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't love that piece of it. But I also

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>feel like Dallas is probably feels like we're you know,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we're close to eliminated either way, and I just think,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Pickens needs a bounce back performance at some point,

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>dak is going to perform. I think that Cowboys quinnin

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Williams and that improved D line against the Chargers O line.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think Dallas is a good spot here. I'll

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>lay just two points at home against the Chargers in

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a game the Chargers don't really have to have.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Next get Jack's plus three at Denver.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is a bit of a I don't want

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to call it letdown spot Denver because this is a

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>big game for them. But Denver had been playing up

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>until recently nothing but close games. Even last week. They're

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>down nine in the second, you know, in the second

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>half of that game and then play their best football

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of the year. But the Broncos and the you know,

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they played Washington to overtime. The Chiefs game was a

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>three point game. The Raiders game was a three point game.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>The Texans game was a three point game, so getting

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the three points matters. The fact that Denver, I think,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>recognizes that all of a sudden, that Chiefs game becomes

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>so in such a soft spot for them that they

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to have this game. And the Jags are

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>red hot, and the Jags are turning people over, and

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>teams on insane winning streaks historically have been terrible covering teams.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>There have been fifty teams to have eleven plus game

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>winning streaks or fifty instances of eleven plus game winning

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>streaks since nineteen ninety. Those teams are fourteen and thirty

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>six against the spread. So I'll take the Jags getting

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>three points and then last one to Monsey.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>New England plus three at Baltimore.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I say New England's better, and I'm getting the points.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe in the Ravens. And I didn't know

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that Lamar's never lost a game in weeks fifteen through

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>eighteen until right now. Now he has two seasons. He

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>was out all of weeks fifteen through eighteen, but that

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is noteworthy. But I just think the Patriots, coming off

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a terrible loss in a game, they had to have

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Lamar missing practice again a little under the weather. I'm

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the better team, and what I think right now

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is the better coach and the quarterback who's playing better.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm getting a full three points, So I'll take

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. So my three picks this week are the

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs getting I'm sorry, the Titans getting three and a

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>half against the Chiefs, the Bucks laying three at Carolina,

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Dallas laying two at the Chargers, Jacksonville getting three at Denver,

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and New England getting three at Baltimore. Before we get

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to Demonse's teaser, quick note from our friends at boost Mobile.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You ever notice how everything keeps going up? Rents going up,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>streaming services are going up. Your favorite burrito spot suddenly thinks,

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>sauls it should cost extra. With boost Mobile, you and

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your phone bill don't have to play the will this

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>go up soon? Game? Why? Because boost Mobile has unlimited talk,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>text and data plan at a price that will never

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>go up. In fact, it's the same price you'll pay

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for life. So switch now for unlimited wireless at a

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>price that'll never go up. Only at boost Mobile. After

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty gigs, customers may experience lower speeds. Customers will pay

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars per month as long as they remain active

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Boost Unlimited plan. All right, the rare teaser

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lost Demons, tell me you know what happened and where

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we're at this week. Uh?

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was last week's three team eight pointer. It

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>did not hit because I bet against Baltimore. I said

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 2>that if it didn't cover, I had good hopes for

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 2>them in the postseason. It'll mean that, you know, we

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>want a divisional game. Stuff's looking rough before that, so

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I should have just taken Baltimore. I should have just

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 2>teased through Baltimore, to be.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Honest all that, But I mean, I guess.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so so solid. So that's what we said.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say one thing real quick. You were

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>getting ten and a half. It's seventeen to nothing late

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Bengals are driving in the red zone to

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>make at seventeen to seven, and you cover and van

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Ney gets the pick lateral ends up being a pick six.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Like, Yep, it was great for team twenty.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Four, doesn't right? Good for ten team chemistry. It was

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>closer to a ten and a half point cover than

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it seems. Yeah, and then the other two ones were

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stone locks the whole game.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Yep, Chargers thirteen and a half and then Chicago plus

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>half point both win.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So what are you doing this week?

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Another three team eight point teaser at plus one hundred

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and I am going to be teasing Tennessee up to

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 2>eleven and a half. I'm teasing in Buffalo to minus two,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and then we got Pittsburgh to plus fifteen in that game. Yeah,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 2>I feel very strongly about this one, Like this is

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 2>probably second or third teaser that I just felt like,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>this is a lot.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>If it were me, just if it were me, Okay,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have taken out Pittsburgh and I would have

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>put in Houston because I do see a scenario where

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lions just roll. And I think there is no

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>scenario where Houston doesn't win by at least a touchdown.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>But you're you're getting all the key numbers, you're passing

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all the teaser fundamentals here. Buffalo is a great leg,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Titans are an excellent leg. I'm gonna give you

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>an A an A.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And since we lost on the B minus process, so

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 2>it's fair.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>To yeah, exactly, we are not doing a touchdown Genie

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. The juju's bad on it right now, we're

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>letting it sit for a week. What offer do you

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have for me?

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So last week we asked for the Chief's money line

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 2>plus s G a win in the NBA Cup Final.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 2>They didn't make it to the NBA Cup.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that stones and are on both sides.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes. So this week, this is really funny because I

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>was thinking about this. Trevor, Trevor two plus past touchdowns

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and over two hundred and twenty three and a half

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>yards at plus twenty eighty six, did you take that?

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>No? No, I am not gonna take that. Bronco's pass

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>defense too scary. I'm not. I'm not tying stuff into listen.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the Jags plus the points. That Broncos past

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>defense too scary.

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Just win the game.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not. I'm not doing it. But I do

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>love the picks. This week feels like it feels like

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a four and one week. I don't know which one is.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The feels like five and it would be great. Feels

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like four to one week. I love two thirds of

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>your teaser, but I'll root for all three legs of it. Uh.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We will talk to you guys again on Tuesday, Christmas Week. Reminder,

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody like rate subscribe review It helps us out a ton,

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>huge thank to Blue Duck, huge thanks to Volume, huge

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to hard Rock Beat Boost and of course our

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>friends saying see you guys soon. What's right,