WEBVTT - 5/1, Part 2: Buying or Selling Mallex Smith, Walker Buehler stash, lists and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did we just

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>become best friends? Young? Fantasy best friends forever? Our number two?

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best friends forever? Fantasy Sports or Radio Network. Frankstaffle

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sussman joined, as we are each and every day

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for our number two. At the Closer, Chris Ftro was up, Chris,

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what top guys? How you doing? It's your boy The

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Closer back Wednesday? Ready to get kicking? Let's do it?

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Ready to rock here a too? Man? Do we just

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all have a case of the midweeks here Wednesday? Like,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? I think it's the well for me?

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Like my mom has been the hospital. Okay, she's good, right, yeah,

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>she's actively here. She got through the surgery yesterday and

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>now she's she's out today, so I was gonna go

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>pick her up, but she they let her go at

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like twelve o'clock. So good, she's doing it right, Yeah,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>she's doing good. Good at the gold bladder right, and

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we're good. Who needs a gold bladder anyway? You don't,

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's true waste. It's just just the waste

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>yourmal your mouth will be good and we're all good. Um,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to hit on before we have

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>some fun? That's okay? Yeah, well there's there's two games

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit on, Like you don't have as

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>many games as you want. I don't want to. You

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned during the pager stroke who didn't get the save

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>last night instead of Steve sche came in almost blew it,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but he winds up getting to save your boy. Cohamles

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>goes five and a third six hits, four runs, only two,

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>earned three walks seven strikeouts. On the other side for

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners, King Felix with six and names strike out eight.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty nice by King Felix. Mr Groundball rb I

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>himself Anthony Rizzo had he stolen base and a home

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>running this one his sixth of the year, while Kyl

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Schover hit his fourth of the year. Rizzo off to

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>his typically slow start, batting to twenty eight thus far

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this season, while Kyle Schover off to his normal just

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bad player one on the season. Oh, Greg, regarding Anthony Rizzo,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what he was saying in his mind while

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets a home run and stolen base? Greg, what

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was he saying? Saying? It's gonna be once once the

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>calendar turns to May and Rizzle is good to go. Yeah,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be May, Greg. You know, so

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he's looking forward to the future. He's getting pumped up,

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he's getting ready. By who sucks in his career in

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>March and April, Aleander turns to me, he's ready. What

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do you What do you think about? It's gonna be

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>may venture? Do you not like that joke? Are you just?

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just I get it? And he played like twice

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know we got it. But listen, Rizzo by

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know what I mean. He's still he's still producing,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.839
<v Speaker 1>batting to like he's still been producing. He's got six homes,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he's got six doubles, he's got eighteen eyes and twenty

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one squad It's not like he's not producing. He's just

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna just get better. So if there's anybody selling,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd be one of the first to jump on it.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And by easily. You know, Rizzle, you know what he's

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do, and you're right when as the season goes along,

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets better and better. I'm assuming that Pedro stroke

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't pitch last night, because he threw twenty six pitches

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. Still very frustrating. I'm sorry, Frank, Yeah, had

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>him in the lineup. I saw Coss Warbets go ahead homer. Yeah,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Cubs in line for save. We'll just keep Steve c

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>check in there for the save instead of beauty using.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And when Edwin Cornascion hit his eighth homer of the season,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>does this guy ever stop? Is he's just timeless? Shame guys,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, same guy. Bad batting average, all right, that's fine.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Just give me eight home runs, give me twenty rabbies.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>To start the year. First month of the season, the

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Mariners were the hottest hitting team in baseball for most

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of the month of April. They've cooled off a little bit,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but it went in. Cornascion, I mean, one year older,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but the production doesn't stop. It's another home run. Eight

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>home runs there? How about this? Greig? I tweeted this

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>out last night. Drink Dee Gordon has seventeen RBIs. Would

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you like to hear the list that he has? List

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of players that he has more RBIs than sure? That

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>would include J. D. Martinez, Xander Bogart's, Nelson Cruz, Ya clueg,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman, and Chris Bryant. Good times, good times, seventeen RBIs,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>first month of the season, and he's betting lest you

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that? And why didn't he lead off for

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this team yesterday? Greg? When they when they sent down

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Malex Smith? Did we talking about that? Talking about that?

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about that Alex Smith? We were on and

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>off and then I'd say, remained off. I don't have

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>any no shares Alex Smith. Disastrous April so much so

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he's in the sent down. I mean, he was doing

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so well earlier on. I mean, everyone all the matter

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is doing well earlier on until they stopped doing well.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>He had eight stolen basis. I mean, he was really

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was doing what you wanted him to do. He was

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on for his forty plus stolen bassis like you wanted

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>also strikeout right from a I also think this is

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a response to get Dan Vogelbach in the

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup every single day with Mitch Hattiger playing center in

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Bruce and Santana in the corners with vog back at first.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>That's real bad defense, you know, I thought the Yankees

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>had a bad defense. That's a bad defense. But in

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the lineup wise, you don't miss batting average b PA

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with Malex Smith in there, and instead you could back

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the Gordon first, and that's just a much better version

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know what I mean. Maybe not as

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>many stolen bases at this point with Dee Gordon, but

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>much better batting average, you know, just a much better hitter.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 1>There was going to be regression at some point because

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got a two thirty four Babbitt. Regarding Malex Smith

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>still hitting the ball on the ground a ton would

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he supposed to do? Right, when you're a speedster percent

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>ground ball, right, that's fine, But a two thirty four babbit,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not like Malex Smith. I mean, he's

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a three thirty nine career Babbitt. Guys, So some batting

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>average we're gonna come. I think the main reason they

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sent him down was because of a thirty percent strikeout, right,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you can't be a leadoff hitter and be a speedster

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and strike out thirty percent, and you can't be a

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lead of hitter. That's o b pot. But he has

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent. If doesn't, he doesn't Gordon is performing well? Yeah,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what is Gordon batting average? Three? Why do you put

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>him leading off? That's what I want to see as

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>a D Gordon owner. He should be him in a

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>few leaks. What do you meet off? That's fine. I

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do think that Alex Smith is going to be back

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point. Gregg when five years old. I don't

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're just throwing in a towel on Malex Smith.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Let him correct himself. So if somebody drops Malex Smith

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in a roto or head to head categories league, I

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>would pounce on that. Greg I think he's gonna be back.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Pounce on that would deep because twelve teams, two teams

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to get out of here. He stolen basis. He was

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on page for forty. You can't just find forty stolen

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>bases off the waiver wire. He's in the miners. How

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>many your point, Nick Paveno, who you're making us hold

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on too. Who's gonna be transition to a reliever? You

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>know what is he now? Oh yeah, I told you that.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The week after that, I said I would drop him.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about? At the time, he said,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hold on to him Alex Smith. Greg, you can't just

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>find someone on the Waiverbard. It's gonna give be forty

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. You don't work that. Maxmith has to be

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the majors to give you a forty stolen basis. And

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be back sooner rather than later.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But twelve team leagues, I think a twelve team rot

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>league where you start five outfielders and it's hard to

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>come buy stolen bases. I am picking up Malex Smith

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if somebody drops him, and if I own Alex Smith

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in a twelve team rotal league, I am dropping Malex

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Smith because he cannot help me and he is in

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the minors, and that is a huge mistake. I do

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not play. I do not play where league where minor

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>league players help my major league stats. Let's remember this

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation a couple of months from now, and we'll see

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Sure, you know, because you know it could

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>go either way. But from now is different. I think

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that right, because he'll be out there. I can find

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>someone else on my team to drop, and I'm not

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna find someone on my team that that can give

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>me forty stolen bases. But that's the thinking. Maybe maybe

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't find someone else to drop. Maybe you're just

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck and you have you have all you always said,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>well all the injuries, like we're kind of screwed. You

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>almost have to drop him if you're in twelve league

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes because like he might be a guy that's in

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>your lineup, and then you're like, wait, I can't get

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a zero my life. I just gotta drop and pick

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody else up. I just have to do it, and

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to head points league. I have no problem dropping him

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>at all. I'm just saying when it comes to speed,

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone is always trying to find stolen bases and run.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>As bad as he was, they continued to eat him

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>off every single day in the lineup that was scoring

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of runs, So he's gonna give you runs. Typically,

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a better batting average than what he showed. The

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent strikeout rate is not like Malex Smith. The

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>babbo is extremely low. There's a guy that stole forty

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>bases last year, and he had eight stolen bases just

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from being garbage the first month of the season, so

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>he was on pace for over forty stolen bases. He's

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be back and he's gonna steal basis. I would

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>not drop. Who would you rather own? Malex Smith of

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Delono the Shields, Alex Smith what he had? Male Smith

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>at eight stolen bases, Delano the Shields has seven. Delight

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Shields plays in the major leagues. Still, the

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>line of the Shields is not as good of a

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>hitter as Malex Smith. Once in the miners, once in

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the majors, one can help you, one cannot. The line

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was also hidden both. I mean when when I was

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about on the Shields before the season, I mean,

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this was a guy with like a three fifty plus

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a DP. It's not like I'm not tied into the line.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>I know you're not. But Malex Smith is a better

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>player than him. The Linol Shields is not a guy

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>they can provide batting average. He's not a good batting

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>He's in the miners here hoping he's going to be

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>back soon. Are you telling you why? What makes you

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's young enough. They clearly liked him. They went

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>out and traded for him, Greg. They like him. They're

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>giving to get right. They're giving him a few weeks

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to get right in the minor leagues. He's better than

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what he's shown. He's never been a guy that strikes

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>up thirty percent of the time. He's gonna go down,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get right. He's got fixed build this college six.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you don't know how so young Malex

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Smith just twenty six, and he does another thing. Malex

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Smith is a better player than the line up the Shields.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>There's just maybe I mean, listen, do three thirties seven

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>ot For most people, they don't have to line up

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Shields in their lineup. That's what it comes down to.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I play in a fifteen team league where I need speed.

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I have him in my lineup as my fifth outfiller,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't love it. By the way, you I

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>need the speed and he's given me seven stars. I

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't understand the most teams away how you could

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like Malex Smith over Delonot Shields. He's a better player.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>What don't you understand he's a better player, But he

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been this year at all. He hasn't been this year.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Are do we judge every player of all time one month?

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm judging if I'm going to hold the role

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>correct And the Mariners made a decision in April or

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>May whatever to send the player to the miners. I

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>could find a compared player to the minors, doesn't mean

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be there forever. I can find a comparable

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>player that's in the majors right now, Comparable because they

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have a similar average, similar steals, similar everything, right now.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Give me that guy that I can put in my

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>line up right now, and then dropped the guy who's

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not playing right now. I'm not saying I can't pick

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Malex Smith back up later. Yeah, it teems to be

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder and it's gonna cost you fed to

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pick him up. It's twelve team lea, No it is not.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody's disagree wholeheartedly. I mean, look at

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of like the Linos Shields. You say

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>comparable player de Lionodo Shields hit to sixteen last year

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with twenty stolen bases. Alex Smith who six with full

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>He's stolen basis, how do you he attempted fifty two deals?

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you know Max, he's a better player. But

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you know that one season isn't an anomaly?

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you know before he hit to seventy he's

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a two sixty six the line of the shield is

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a two forty two career hitter at the major league level.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That's twenty plus points difference in batting average. I know.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But no, no no matter how much a team likes a guy,

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if he's hitting one sixty five, I mean, you can't

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have deserves to be in the miners right now. I

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>agree with that he doesn't deserve to be in the majors.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna go down, He's gonna get right. He's striking

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>out thirty percent at a time in his career he's

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he's twenty percent strike out right, So that's up a

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>massive amount. It's not gonna get it done. I agree

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with that he shouldn't be in the line up right now.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>He deserves to be sent to the miners. But he's

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a better player than Dene at all. He's in the

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>lineup and and and he has higher upside. He has

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>higher upside too. That's why I'm dropping Malex Sismith for

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>de Line on the Shields. I think he's gonna be

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>back within the next week or two. He will not, Okay,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a week or we're going on that. Well it's May one, right,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>if he's not backed by May fifteenth? Do you what

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? Lunch lunch bet demonics. Yeah,

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that's who's gonna be better? Who the shields? Her mouth?

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to bet that, so that that's that's

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>an easy way. You didn't take my Vladimir Guerrero bet either,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's an easy win for me because he has

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to spend ten days in the minor because eleven, so

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't come back immediately. I win. He will be

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not scared of Up or whoever they called up.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason not getting a shot. Okay, he's twenty

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>five years old to right, and he's not known for

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>being an offensive player. Who knows all right? Well he

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't last night he went over. You believe in Malex

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot? I mean, I don't know, I don't know

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>if that's the truth. Would an eight stolen bases in

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one month seven amazing? And we having a two five

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>O b P and he five batting average, So he's

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>he's still basis he still he's doing super fast. We

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>know how fast he is. He's in like the top

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one or two percent of the league. The problem is,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is he right? Is he just? He might just be

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe gaft I always loves Joe gath I mentions I

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hit like he's better than that, though I'm just

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>saying I don't know. I don't think you hit two

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>nineties six over four four played appearances in a hundred

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>forty games last year if you're a fluke. I just

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's a fluke over the course of

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>an entire season. So that's not even my argument. My

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>argument is that right now, and it's a five team league,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to hold on to him. It's no

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one's gonna pick him five outfielders, and and everyone is

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>always trying to find speed. Greg he should not be dropped.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But I just found you speed and Delano just shields.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I just found it for you. He's not and they're

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not the same saying yesterday he didn't play yesterday, but

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>now Smith didn't play for like three days on the

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>other day. Like you keep talking about speed. We always

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for speed. I found you're being too short sighted

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with this. But if the twelve team league there are

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>players out there, I'm done. I'm just I'm telling you

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you dropped Malex Smith in a Rhodo

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>league with five outfielders, you are going to regret it.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you can. I think you get to pick

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>him back up. This was great. I'll let you know that.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll you know, the big Billy agrees that you should

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>stash him like he's enjoying the commentary. Um, you know,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>last night Houston shut out Minnesota leven zip Garrett Cole

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seven strong innings, love and strike, hats, walk three, allowed

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just one hit. Michael Panada not nearly as good. Five innings,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>nine hits, five runs. You him, You can definitely drop

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>him for Grivin Canning, who totally agree with that. I

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>already picked up can a lot of home run who'd

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you drop for him? I dropped Anthony Swarzak. I'm done

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with him and I had to head points. I'm alright

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. Cool, I'm cool with that. The home runs

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hit by Houston yesterday Jake MRIs Nick's second home run,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>George Springer's ninth home run of the season. Georgie's got

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>nine on runs? Would Geo comeback to seventy four? The

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>o BP at three sixty three, Alex Bregman his fifth

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>home run. This he's like believe Springers nine home runs,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot. Yeah, he's got power. It feels like

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been such a slow star for Alex Bregman. I

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>don't own him anywhere. He's only got five home runs

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>compared to George Springers nine of a slow star. You know,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I say that he's hitting two seventy one with ps,

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so he hasn't been bad. But I think for where

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted a bit of a slow start here

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for you, I mean, George Springer, it's been great. You

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, Greig, I just slammed you. I'll give you

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>some credit, you too, George Springer over ya C L

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Peak had r c L Peak ranked higher than Springer.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That so far right about this, although they I also

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>remember I talk him over Tommy Fan as well, which

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Tommy fans have a great year. Tommy frights well. And

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think over Roll and Road he's probably been better

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because he has more steals, definitely definite and famine and

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>points Lea's also is doing great. Sob fan has been awesome.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Just walk rate is tremendous to just that. Tampa Bay

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Bray's lineup has been awesome too. All right, George Spring

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>has been right. We will take a break and one

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more game we want to chat about, and that's the

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers from last night. And uh we'll get into some

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>lists like lists lists, stick around, Fantasy best Friends forever,

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>having great Old Wednesday, It's nippy. Lose weight now. Go

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to fat dot com. Lose that unwanted belly fat today

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and get free information at fat one dot com. Fit

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the dress or pets or bathing suits you've always

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to Go to fat one dot com. Lose ten,

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty or more pounds immediately. Go to fat one hundred

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>dot com for free information on how you can lose weight.

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Go to fat one dot com fat one dot com.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That's fat dot com. What's your I R S problem?

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you owe back taxes? Is there a lean placed

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>on your property? Have your bank accounts been frozen or seized?

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Have your wages been garnished? Are you being audited by

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the I R S? Are they sending you letters that

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>demand actions and have urgent due dates well. Solving your

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>tax problems is as easy as calling taxes three to one.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The I R S is the largest collection agency in

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. You need the best representation to give you

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>peace of mind. You need experienced professionals that can cut

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>through the red tape and stop the collection process. If

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a serious problem with the I R S,

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>called the taxes three to one network today, We'll get

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>them off your back. Eight hundred nine six one thirty

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>six thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty

0:18:54.400 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine six one three six three one.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Game time Decisions. Okay, I'm I'm usually sort of I'm

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>caught it on top of pop culture and stuff, but

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Game of Throws is stuff that I missed out on,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not taking a pot shot at about like cool.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>People watch Game of Throws, people like it, they like

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.239
<v Speaker 1>what they like. I was so luke. I was on

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and I saw trending go ot and I actually

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>thought I was a guy. Damn go trades out of

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>service again. Go Op. Go to Game of Throw week

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>days four pm Eastern one pm Pacific only on the

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network. I was actually listening to this

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>song earlier today. It's Bryan Adam somewhere six to nine. Yeah,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere six and nine. Good song, are you thinking of it? Frank,

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>very very vanilla break Suspen type song. It doesn't surprise me.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It is very of its time, like classic. I was

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to a lot of eighties classic rock tonight. Yeah,

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason is in that kind of mood, you're just standard,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Like do you think of classic eighties rock? Some of

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's good. You can never take exception of being called

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like a forty year old guy. You just can't. Just

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>when you love songs like that, you just can't. I'll

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you the medal I got to accept it. It It

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was just in the mood for it. The metal in

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the eighties was hair metal, which was some of it

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>was metallico was. It was was not the norm. That

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was different was just your like your pop ones, right,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like White Snake that White Snakes consider some of the

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Here I Go, yeah, Here I go, Yeah, that one counts.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That's all right. A little you know, a little bit

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>harder than you know, Summer Roofs, Tom Petty, Steve Miller Band,

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, I like Petty, pet like, Petty's not bad.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>A kid in college got me into that one. He's great.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>They always always never Petty because he was. He and

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the Heartbreakers were the musical guests. Musical act right, the

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>free falling Right? Yeah, like that song. They were musical.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The first Giant Patriots Super Bowl, did they absolutely? Yeah,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That's Walker Wheeler last night against the Giants,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>five and the third, six hits, three runs, one walk strike.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>As Frank, what did you think of Walker Wheler's bast

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>back performance. I'll use bounce back very loosely because against

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco Giants overall, I was just expecting a

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>better performance. I mean, the gives up six hits and

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.239
<v Speaker 1>five and the third three year and runs against this

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is isn't a good line of blue he's facing yesterday,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Joe Panic, it's Alrte Buster Posey, Brandon belt Mongoria. This

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be a bounce back performance. Someone tweeted

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>at me today asking what the pitch usage was like

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>for Walker Bueller yesterday. I looked into it, throwing a

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of fastballs this year. It's overall, I mean there

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was fastball sixty three times yesterday out of ninety pitches.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So I looked overall to his pitch usage this season.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Last year he used his four seam fastball round forty

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the time. This year it's up to fifties.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>He was using his fastball per cent more this year,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>using his cutter less, using his curveball less. The slidder

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>usages up a little bit, but overall he's just using

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the fastball lot. I wonder is he not using his

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches as much, because like there's still something going

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>on with his arm. I'll just keep going back to

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what we heard before the season started. He was he

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with a dead arm. He got it. He

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>had a late start, later start than anyone else in

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers rotation outside of Kershaw, who was hurt at

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. But I just I'll go back to that, Like,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, is he pitching through something right now?

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't look right, and the fact that he's using

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his fastball more than any other pitches a really weird

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>start of the year for Walker. Bueler venture. Yeah, I

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think I think something's up, But I think it's also

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's still a young player, you know, lest she

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>was his first year in the majors and he you know,

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's still harnessing his his repertoire, you know, and

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what works best for him. I

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good sign that he at least, you know,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the six k's the one walk, obviously, that's good. The

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thing you don't like his five and a third innings.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not enough innings against a bad Giants lineup, so

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you want more. But I think this is a great

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>by candidate for the second half. I think he's gonna

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have a big second half once he figures it out

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to do, how he wants to go

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>about pitching. Uh, every every game that he starts, what

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his repertoire is gonna repertoire is gonna be. So I think, listen,

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a good bye Candon right because honestly a

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will worry, and you should be. But

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything wrong. I don't think there's

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>an injury here. I think it's more about him trying

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to figure out figure himself out. The underlying numbers for

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>build just not good. Ent swinging strike rate last year

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven first pitch strike percentage. So you know, starting off

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his counts, at least compared to last year,

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his accounts down one oh, because he's

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>got a fifty two and a half percent first pitch

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>strike percentage last year that was sixty three point six,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so down over eleven percent this year. And they're not

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>chasing pitches outside the strike zone either. His O swing

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is down. I don't know. I think something's wrong with

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bout Walker Buller right now. It would not surprise me

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>if we get some kind of and we won't know

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a real I Elston or a phantom I

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Elston because the Dodgers do this with all their starting pictures. Great,

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to buy Walker Buller right now, it wouldn't

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>surprise you can be laying from the IL. Yeah, we said,

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we actually said this after his last start, that he

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>could wind up on the IL. And I said, it's

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>like phantom injury, and you said, maybe it's not such

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a phantom injury. Maybe there's something really is. He's a

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>better picture than he's showing us right now. He absolutely

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>looks better like his second half, and I think what

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go in his favor though, is that they can

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>stash him on the ile and they have other guys

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>can step in in stripling in Urias were on the ile.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I think long term, Chris, I agree with you. I

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think long term, I want to buy Walker Bueller because

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he is talented, he is a really good picture, and

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that maybe if he does go on the I l

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know that that's good, that's a good thing.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll figure out whatever he's got going on and stash

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>him and then and then unleash you in the second half.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I still think a bottomer yes, because you could get

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>him for a nice prices right now, I think hopefully.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? So what would it take, Chris? Would

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you if you had Walker Wheeler, would you take Tyler

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Glass enough for him? See now I want Glass now now.

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I would not give it away Glass now like I

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>want to buy high on tyler Glass now. And I said, really,

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not how fantasy works, right. You shouldn't buy a

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>picture at his highest value unless you think he could

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially get better than this. Yeah, than sure. If you're

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching Tyler Glass now, let's see the performances,

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and you think he's gonna keep it up, or you

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think he could potentially be better than what he's doing

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>right now, and by all it means go on and

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>get go out and get Tyler Glass. Now, can he

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really be better than what he's done so far? Maybe

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he does have a lot offside. He is young, um,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's in the right place to get better.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>So I want to look up some Yahoo trades, and

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm holding if I if I'm a glass, Now, what

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>does it take to get Walker Bueller right? You could

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get him for let's see here, Walker Bueller for John

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Gray and Renato Nunyez. I would give up those two guys.

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>See at Walker Buller. I would do that. I don't think.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a terrible trade either. I don't know.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't really, I wouldn't probably have. But Walker Bueller

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jose Alvarado for David Price and Holland. So let's

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>say Alorado versus Holland is a wash. Would you give

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up David Price to get Walker Bueller right now? David

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Price has been pretty good? I would you would still

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do that? What about you? Greg? Would you give up

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>David Price to get Walker Bubueller? Dad Price has been

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>really good? But I would still but David Price is

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>guy I was looking to buy. Would you rather have

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueller Aaron Nola Nola Dealer. I think I would

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>take Nolah too, because I don't have concerns about an

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>injury with no one at least I still have that

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what I heard in the spring lingering in the back

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of my mind when it comes to Walker Bueller. No,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to correct himself. He'll get better as the

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>season goes on. Yeah, I hear what you guys are

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.120
<v Speaker 1>saying and trying to buy Walker Bueller. It's just it's

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to stash the starting picture that's pitching poorly right now.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just like the pitching landscape. You're trying to find

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>pictures who can help you. A lot of the aces

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean haven't performed well. I told you this during

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a Breakna Ti on today pitching in Texas. I think

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the Rangers lineup. I'm terrified. I'm terrified for today.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance he gets blown up. I'm sorry.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>In Texas against the Rangers. I think he'll be all right.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>That's just a tough place to pitch, man, it is,

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>especially for a right handed picture. It's just tough I'm

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not great, so it could have some power. But take

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the chance. The top three in baseball and runs scored

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>so far. I'll take the chance, and Stashing Bueler will Yeah, No,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I want you, Um, somebody brought up in the chat um,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>can we talk about Griffin Canning spoke about him. They

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can rewind, they can rewind and we'll they'll hear it.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Unless there's anything you want to say about hid venture.

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I did pick him up, so what do

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you and I did a lot of you know, I

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>looked into him. Uh, listen, I think this obviously could

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be a great pitch. Of the problem is you gotta

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about innings, cap and all that. He is a

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, fresh rookie coming right out of the miners.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But everything he's done uh in the miners has been great.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's got a great k rate, walk rate's

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. You know, I only gave up nine yard

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>hits in a hundred and thirteen ings last year in

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the miners. Obviously, this guy has a ton of talent.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you need a quick, you know, a right

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>now stream type of guy. And Griffin Kenning, I know

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he only went uh was it four innings in his

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>start yesterday he did have six ks in a third

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for one of thirty had six k's. And I'm sure

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>they'll start ramping him up a little bit more. But

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he could give you high k rate, low walk rate.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He'd give you that logo whip in roto leagues and

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>points leagues. He could, he could get it done, but

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he needs to get the innings up. I think it's

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not a bad guy to pick up and says, you know,

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe he could get it done. Uh, if there are

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple more starts of him getting used to the majors,

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get you five six inning starts? You want to own

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning right now as well? Yeah, let's talk about

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the other pictures you may want to own.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 1>See to be in front of me, gentlemen, you can

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>close your computers. Oh, we're gonna talk to the chat room. Craig,

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you pay attention to the show. I'm here in front

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of me. I have a list of the top ten

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>players with the lowest x FIP the month of April.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>How many do you do you can name, Chris? I

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe a couple be a number. Uh four

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out of ten? You said, yes, do you think you

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can beat that? Um, yeah, you look at that many.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>How many do you think you can name? Do you

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think you can beat that? Probably? Not? All right, Frank,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you're a first. You gotta name five players that they're

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten in x fift through the month

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of April. Max's number one in the league's extract was

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two point three seven. I don't this guy qualifying fake

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>kershaw seem list. He's not on the list three pretty

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>down one like family foods in a way. Alright, So

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Glass, Tyler Glass now is ninth on the list.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Is x fit is three point one? Four? Pretty good?

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good? Pretty pretty good, pretty good? So all right,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I got two so far? The name three knew in

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenge an a'll have the Remember it's a little

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>different family feud. We only has the name three, name

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>three more the five he said, name five, it's five

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>beats two? Last night? Was that? What nine? No? What

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was his three point one four? Mm hmm mm hmm

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was Barrios barriers is not on a list. There's your

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>second strike. Gosh, I would have knew that. I have

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>him everywhere. Alrighty x fit is a little bit interesting.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>If you told me right, he's number one. Little spoiler alert,

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I asked both of these guys before he came upstairs,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>do you prefer FIT or X FIT? They did? You

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>want to cheat? Want to absolutely not. I'm just making

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it very transparent, frank said, XPIT. I said, I don't.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter to me. So I am giving x

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>FIT because I'm probably thinking about probably think it's too

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hard about players who have given up home runs when

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I should probably just be thinking about like the best

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>pictures in baseball. And with that, I will go with no,

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>not him. Um let's go with Garrett cole Gerrit cole

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is correct, third in the on the league an x

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>FIT with a two point six six x FIT excellent.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You got three two more to get good, two more

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to go, And now that I think about it, I

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>probably could have got like six or seven of these.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out in a second. Um, well, I mean

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if he wins ot Oba, he doesn't, he doesn't, ALRIGHTY

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do do scrolling through my mind knowledge here? Greg and

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>thralling Frankling, will you know what? I go with? Old

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>reliable guy who's always better in X fifth leagues and

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the leagues. Actually, no, I'm not gonna go then go.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with I'm gonna go with her Man Marquez,

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, didn't matter if he said John Gray or Harms,

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 1>they're both wrong. I was gonna, I was thinking. So

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he got three, so we got three. Chris, she said

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he game six or seven, so here are seven more.

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Give you seven more. Luis. Luis Castio is not on

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the list. Okay, right, he's probably close though I thought

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about him, but he's he's probably like a mid threes

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>x FIP guy. Hey, look that up. Hang on a second,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Louise Castio's x FIP. Here's three point three one her

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mom Marquez, by the way, three seven, so not bad.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>We were far off. Matthew Boyd Maddy Boyd, also not

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on the list, was twelve three points, so we're not

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>far off. Not top fifteen guys, so the other guys

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on the list, you don't have to keep going. Blakes

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>now at two point four or five, he's good. I

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't think he qualified because he's hurt. He only missed

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one staring Stephen Strassburg, guy you don't like. At two

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>point eight five. I want to talk about Strasberg, which

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is why I brand up and open my computer. Yes,

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he's a computer. So Stotsberg on the year two and

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one is EO raised three point eight two. The x

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>fit is an entire run less at two point eight five.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>His caper nine eleven and a half walks for nights

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ato point three. Not great left percentage around se homer

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ball ratio is actually hi Stephen Stosberg, gentlemen, you're buying

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it right now. Oh. Absolutely, he's been ridiculous. I'm not surprised.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Strike swinging strike rate right now is by far the

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>best in his career. I mean even in his best

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>seasons that he's had specific lee Let's look at when

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he had a two point five to e r A

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a hundred and seventy five innings.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>He was just superb that year. Even that season at

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a twelve point nine being strike rade this year getting

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>more chases outside the strike zone than ever before. He's

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff right man. I mean a hard hit rate

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is down tremendously, And that's why you see the x

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fit much lower than the e r A because his

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>home run the fly ball ratio right now, it's so

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that's astronomical. His home runs per nine or are one

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>point four three for his career. He's a zero point

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>eight nine home runs per nine, So he gave him

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>three to San Francisco Regressions. It's coming here for Steven Strossberg.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw this your way. Would you trade Peter Alonso

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to get him Greg? This is interesting because this is

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a truth story, true story. I have this trade on

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the table. Has this trade on the table? Imagine I

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>would trade Peters for Steven Stosberg. Yes, you had a

0:34:55.160 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fair trade. No, I don't say that significantly, rather have Stephen. Yes,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>pitching is hard to come by and it's significantly, Rather

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have Steve. I could find made it trade the other day.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, in this league, you know Ali? Yeah,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would you do another one? I traded away everyone can

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for Corey Seeger, Like, why don't you trade for Malex

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Smith right now? You like trading for people who end

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>up in the minor leagues. That'sa will be back? What

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think about my tea? Yeah, I'm buying absolutely,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and I would not whoever has Strouss I know who

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>it is. But I would never give away Strausburg for

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Pete Alonzo. I'm just not doing that. Let's change the conversation.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who's next, who's sleepth in the league?

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were gonna see this tweet last night

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>by Mike Floria Sunny Gray x FIP at two point

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>eight five. If you look at what Sonny Gray has

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>done on the season for Cincinnati, the record obviously not

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>very good. It's owing four, but caper nine close to

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven x fip once again a full run lower than

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>he's e r A. He's walking two point four home

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is only five percent hich kind of scares me because

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that's going up. Left on base percentage UM is only six,

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>so that's another also that could go up a little bit.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So are you buying Sonny Gray and either of you?

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trading for Sonny Greg. I like Sonny Gray,

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Sonny Gray. He's kind of a mixed

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>bag right now. Um, the three point I think the

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>three point six four e r A is more of

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an indication of where he'll remain rather than the underlying numbers,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's got a near eleven k per nine right now.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>But his swinging strike ray is actually lower than where

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been in years past, So the strikeout seemed like

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a fluke his first pitch strike percentage

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is is actually down this year as well. Looking at

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>his pitch uses, Greg, you know, he complained that the

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yankees made him throw too many sliders, complained about it.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He actually cried about this. You know, his his his

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>slider usage us your fifteen point nine slider use this

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>year eighteen using a lot. Yeah, it's the Yankees must

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>still be having an influence on you. There, and his

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>whip is under one that is not remaining. This is

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>some warning suns. I like, I like Sonny Gray, but

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think his ear a is more indicative of where

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to remain. I don't think that he's going

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to get closer to these underlying numbers. There still been

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>really good. The rest of the top ten ext when

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we come back as well. Was another category on Listen This.

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Maid Sailors is the leading cleaning service in New York

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>City and Boston. He service homes, offices, corporate departments, and

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb turnarounds. Give us a call or a text at

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two and two zero to book now. That's two one

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>two five one zero. Use the promo code f n

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>T s Y for fift off your first cleaning. For

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>more information, go to made sailors dot com. That's made

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>sailors dot com. Make it rain five starters, all five

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>starters over fifteen points first time in Steve car Era

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Golden State Warrior like, you're not beating. I

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>don't care what you do. You're not beating that. It's

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>not just that they all score, It's not that I

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 1>sell basketball air playing a game that not many other

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>teams can play. Sometimes we get so caught up at

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>looking and looking for the vulnerabilities of the Golden State

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Warriors that we forget that this is no ordinary team here, guys.

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So weekdays six and ninety m Eastern on the Fantasy

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Sports networking on your popular podcast providers. Morie Salad two

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen, European Long Drive

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Tour Champion two thousand seventeen, World number one Me personally,

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I keep my game face on me all the time,

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>especially coming out with the bucker leaving the range or

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you're leaving the pots. What's your story? Go to Game

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Based Grooming dot Com from all your athletic facial wipes

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and body cleansing needs. The morning after a team from Boston,

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like Anthony Weiner. Okay, Anthony Weener can't go a

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>day without like harassing a teenager online or showing his

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>way in the ears PP to someone. A Boston athlete

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot go pore than twenty four or forty eight hours

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>without doing something abusive or cheating. Proved me wrong. Besides

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics, tread Socks, Bruins, Patriots, Celtics are fine, sweet days.

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Not Ammi staring on F and T s Y radio

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and on your popular podcast providers, it's so good question

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>mark chat readfully so well? The hell's X fIF they ask,

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's X field fielding independent pitching. And the difference

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>between X five and five is and when what does

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 1>this do? What is different? Ear? So it's an underlying metric.

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of used as an ear a estimator or

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a view of things to be coming decator.

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't always work out this way, but we use

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>expected batting average when it comes to guys who are

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>performing lower than expected in their current batting average. Uh.

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of similar to that. X fit is

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>basically what your what your ear A would be if

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>your home run a flyball ratio was normalized to lead average,

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>so around ten per cent, but it also takes it

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>basically builds off FIP and fielding. Independent pitching is what

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your ear A would be if you had basically competent

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>defense behind you. So there are anything different factors that

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>go into play, like there are. There are guys that

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know in in years past. Kyle Hendricks comes to mind,

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>who pitched to a super low ear A and he

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>had a great, great defense behind him with that Chicago

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Clubs defense and his underlying numbers, his FIP his x

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>FIT were much higher, but he had a much better

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>defense behind him than the rest of the lead, so

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why his ear A was actually much better than

0:40:56.040 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his underlying numbers. So PHIP is basically all the contact

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that's made that's not a strikeout or a home run

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that's FIP. Exfit accounts for the home runs with home

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>run of fill live all rations, so it basically just

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>builds off of FIP. That's why guys like Modica like

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>exfit more because it's like it's brings home runs into

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the equation as well. Well. A couple of other names

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on this top ten lists, I want to go on

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a different list in a second. James Paxton at two

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>point nine, good exit, which I think we could figure

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out how he's pitched recently? Right he Lib Smith at

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>three point zero two, and you've been hid on Caleb

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith recently. Frank Jose Quintana at three point four one

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the guys you really like coming into the year.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And then David Price we just talked about at three

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>point one, that interesting list of names. M what do

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to go to next? Gentlemen, close your laptops? Place?

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>What are what are our options? You want to go

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>hit her a picture? First? We did pictures, so let's

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 1>go hit hits. You want to do hitters? Okay, let's

0:41:55.719 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>do hitters. Can you name the ten players with the

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 1>lowest hard hit percentage? No? Simply so, maybe I'm trying.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at somewhere you want to buy

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>right like if y'all I want you to be able

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it this way? Can you name the players

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the lowest babbitt then the guy the ones that have

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 1>gotten the least lucky because you I'm not gonna I'm

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to name all of them. Yeah,

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll give you two or three? Three venture can

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you beat the Christian three the lowest babit in the majors.

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Players are gotten unlucky. All right, yeah, four, I guess

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you do four? All right, Frank, all right, we'll do

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll do do four. Christian, name four players that are

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the lowest babbitt in baseball. All these numbers are under

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>two hundred. The bat is under two hundred. Bat is

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>batting average of balls in play. Okay, Um, Matt Carpenter.

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carpenter is not this list. Okay, Uh, Let's go

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with Byron Buxton. Byron Buckston is not on this list.

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>This is hard. I don't know. It's tough, man, Yeah,

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like I know who like guys who have high babbs.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know the guys. We could do that,

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We could do that next. I have that as well.

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I passed, but I wanted to look people to buy

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than sell that. You've got a guy, Frank, anybody

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I have a few names in mind. The metanable makes

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sense that it was um what about Ian Desmond in

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Desmond's novelist Massara, Probably you got it. It's a lot

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of lazy flyballs. That sounds accurate. How about Praza Peraza

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is not on the list. But he wasn't the lowest

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>hard hit percentage list. When you said hit percentage, he

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was one of the names that came to UM anyway.

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So the lowest matter in the majors belongs to Jay Bruce,

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>who's is one sixty. Well, what's his batting average? Terrible?

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>All he does it well. He doesn't strike out or

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>hit fly balls. Basically, you let me know as I

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>run through, and I'll go through a quickly. As we

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get some more lists, you let me know anybody you're

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in buying out of these guys. Ready, Yonder Alonzo,

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes you are. That is one seventy two, Riyando Alonso.

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>How are you buying him? His expected batting average, he's

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>he's on the He's in the top ten of the

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference between expected batting average and current batting average.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Expected batting averages to seventy. He hits the ball in

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the air. Um, he hits a decently hard He's walking

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>a ton this year as well, so much better in points,

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>leaves and O B p UM And I think once

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the weather starts to heat up a little bit in Chicago,

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see some of those flyballs for Yonder Alonso

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>starts to fly out of the park, So I would

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>be buying yonder Alonzo, maybe only in deeper lease, but

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I do like him, only you just splait the list

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>only in uh I teen team is maybe I'm not

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>really buying him in twelve or a twelve team or

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>with a corner infield. Maybe I can see that too.

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>One seventy four is the third player list's jersey, jerks

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and profile. I'm buying why. I mean this, This even

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>proves it even more. He's obviously and he's not like,

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 1>what's this what's his career strikeout percentage? Can pull for you?

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's that bad that he should be

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>batting that His babbit's one seventy four seventeen percent and

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>this year's four. So obviously he's getting a little unlucky.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the point, yeah, right, so and and and he

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't trick out ton, So this is a guy that

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>should hit a lot better. She is well below his

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>career mark and bad. And even last year when he

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>had a career year, you have twenty home runs, two

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>batting average, he had a two sixty nine babbit. This

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>year he's got a one seventy four Babbitt, so I

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>would send to a and you know, as bad as

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he is, still has two homers, still has three stolen bases,

0:45:55.920 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ten runs, and thirteen ribbies. Those got the yips. You

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>can't throw the first base. Oh he's got something, But

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>this is the first time that he's playing second base

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>full time too. He's normally a guy that would bounce

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>around the diamond, play a little bit of shore, play

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of first base. Overall, I do agree

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with venture. This is the one where I feel more

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so I would be buying him in deeper leagues, like

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in a twelve team league. I don't know that I

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>would be buying right now more yeah, but in a

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team or especially with his versatility could play. I

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think he has outfield eligibility as middle enfield eligibility. I

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>get behind that. I like buying him in a deeper league,

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and I would think, like, right now, you could pick

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.439
<v Speaker 1>up a Javis for third, you know whatever. You could

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up guys that are doing better right now, Michael Javis,

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who I did pick up recently um to replace Tim Beckham.

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But like I think later on, I'm not saying that

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely buy him if I don't need him.

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't need him, But like I'm saying, I can

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>guarante almost guarantee that he's going to have a much

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 1>better production as we go on through the season because

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of that bad but once something was way too low

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. He doesn't strike out enough four Mitch Morley

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one seventy seven, Josh Harrison one. Eddie Rosario despite the

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ten old runs one four. Well, that's because all of

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the balls that he's hitting are not going to play.

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>They're just over the wall. So that's why his bad

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is low. But it is still really low. So I

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would buy I'm buying any Rosario. He's very good at baseball.

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this isn't this is what we were just

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Tyler Glasnock. You're buying him high, Greg, Well,

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a two thirty eight age. He's still producing.

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>He's producing. That's why he's bad is as low as

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it is because it's basically he's hitting the ball out

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>or probably not gonna be able to get him get ball. Yeah,

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be able to get him. Ryan O

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hearns at Nope, you gotta ask Florida about him. On Friday,

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Jock Peterson's at one another Florio guy and Kevin Pillar

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is at you. Guys. Both said an interesting group of players. Guys, well,

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them make senense to be this lower

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>bad bits like Jock Peterson. I would expect, Kevin uh,

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin pull out forget about him, Ryan o. Hern, I

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>guess I would expect, but only three homers you define

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to buy that. Guys both said, you

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>can name the hitters of the highest Babbitt Frank, how

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>many can your name? Five? I'll see yeah, probably five?

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, so with Frank, go ahead. Christian Walker. Christian

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Walker is a ten on the list. He also has

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the hardest hit percentage in the majors right now at Yeah.

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I knew he had one that was up there. I

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this guy qualified after last night he missed time.

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We just spoke about how high is Babbitt was. I'll

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>say him anyway, David dal I don't know if he qualified.

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know that he go off as

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>either he's not on the list. He's not on the list,

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but he does have a massively high Babbitt. Um, let's

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 1>go with do do do? I guess when I when

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I said I knew them. It was basically just Christian Walker. Okay,

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>um no, oh, Cody Bergers were nine on the list.

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a massive but he's mashing right now. How about

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian yelch Christian is nonal list that's your second strike? Um,

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I will say, marm yeah, come on, Frank, all right, Chris, yes,

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 1>he said you can get your five the right ahead.

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Timmy Anderson number one in the majors with this babit.

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's bad currently is four thirty five? Would your Selti

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Manderson right now? No? Okay, so okay, regression is coming

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's not going to continue to hit over four hundred.

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But okay, Chris, who else? Um hunted Dozer Doser's nonalist? Okay?

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would say, my boy, what's his name?

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know her? Boy is you have a lot

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 1>of boys? No, I just had a guy in my head. Oh,

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>um pulled the young is not on the list, not

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about I guess he's the rest of the rest of

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the list. Two of my guys. Elvis Andrews at four babbitt,

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm selling, would selldres right now. A problem with that

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Boom boom Man at four thirteen. I think about these guys, Greg,

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is what are you gonna get for them? What do

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you can get something? What do you get to get

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for Elvis Andrews if you trade Treeman SENI? Like, what

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is what is another Fantasy owner gonna give you for

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Treeman Seni? Right now? He's awesome? Though, No, I agree

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>with you. That's why I think the point of this

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 1>exercise is say like, well, is it for real? Can

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>this guy keep it up? I don't you know? These

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>guys are not gonna keep up this massive amount of

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>babbitt for the entire season, but they are doing things differently,

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like Boom Boom has actually raised his launch angle this

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>year and he's performing quite well. I still just don't

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think that anyone is going to give you anything for

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>him Mancini though maybe. I mean, you know, he's producing

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and listen, I'm not a guy. I'm not a Mancini guy.

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not big on him, so I would sell him

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think you'd get little him. Elvis Andrews has

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a forty seven percent hard hit rate right now, you know,

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you want to talk about a resurgence. This

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>guy is thirty years old. UM dealt with a lot

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of injuries last year. I know two years ago he

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. He had that career year twenty home runs,

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty five stone bases. But what he's doing right now

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look dissimilar from what he was doing that year. Yes,

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>five homer's nineteen runs, twenty RBIs, and six stolen bases,

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and he's hitting third in the one of the top

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>five best offenses in baseball. Right now, he's got a

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent hard hit rate. So who are you

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about Elvis Andrews. I don't know that I'd be

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>so quick to sell him. I just I think most

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I think most people would say sell him, and that's

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>why you're not going to get fair value for him.

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna get for for Elvis Andrews. There's

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two guys on this list that I would say I

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't sell because I feel like this is where they're

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Babbs would be maybe obviously a little lower, but close

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to this is Jeff McNeil, because the guy just hits

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't hit a lot of home runs. Jem Right,

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and he puts the ball in play and he don't

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>hit a lot of homers. So I expect his bad

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to be high because he gets a lot of hits.

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>He gets a lot of multi hit games. And then

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the other one is David Perulta because he's another one

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hits a lot of line drives, doesn't hit a lot

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of like unless she at thirty homes. But he's not

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that type of guy selling those Those those guys, I'm

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not big on them, Like I'm not gonna own them,

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but if you do own them, I wouldn't sell them

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like this is around like the hot babies.

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>They always have hot, hot bad. That's what they're gonna do.

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>The other guys like well too, always well usually Chi

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>shoot four oh three, Brian Goubin four oh four, and

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Dexter Fowler at four US. I would sell Fouler with

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a doubt, and you know one owns him coming back

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>down to earth a little. Is he gonna keep this up?

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I trust trade Man Seni a little bit more than

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I trust Sin Chu. You look at trade Man Seni

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the age bat a ball profile right now and what

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. He's got a twenty six line drive right

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:00.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're you're bad a ball contact when you're putting

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the ball in play. A quarter of the time you're

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>hitting a line drive, that's gonna help your babbitt. Yeah,

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>let me continue with babbitt. But from the pictures side,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the pictures that have gotten a little bit lucky here

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to babbitt in the top ten pictures,

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>close your laptop the top ten pictures with the lowest

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>babbitt in the majors. Chris, how do you think you

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can name lowest bab in the major? Um? I say three? Okay,

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I've I've learned my lesson lowest bab in the majors.

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say Luis Castile not on the list? I

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>guess so, um, let's go which, No, not him? Not

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>my sneeze. Now, I was gonna say Strausburg, but I

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think you know he wouldn't be on the list.

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I would say Spencer Turnbull. The Bull is not on

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the list. Bull one more? Please more? Guests tell you

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you really think the Bull is overperforming? Huh dates my

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>face a little bit, a lot of it. Uh, talk

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bad about the ball. Let's go. You mentioned somebody before

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think is interesting. How about Trevor Richards. Trevor

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Richards is not on the list. Trevor Richards, though it

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't one of my list. Trevor Richards has the highest

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>x FIT in all of baseball at five point seven

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>five little unlucky for Trevor Richards, highest expert in the league. Okay,

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>can you need any players that a little bit? But

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanna just tell you Zach Davies. Zach Davis is

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not on the list. Number. That's what I was gonna say.

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 1>D number one in Babbitt, lowest Babbitt and all baseball.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock one six. Saw that to less. I saw

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 1>someone tweeting about one sixty a little bit nervous? Are

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit nervous about the regression alert bat?

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's this regression comment. How dramatic is it

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be? I don't think that dramatic. I don't. I

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna be massively dramatic. And I do

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that I'm one sixty bad. He's not there,

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be able to maintain that. Um he's

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got one ear a. He's got a two six nine

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fIF and at three eight x fit, and that's because

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 1>he's only given up two home runs despite being more

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of an more of a flyball Pitcher. He allows fort

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>fly balls, so there is gonna be some regression, but

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I would expect him to settle in around a mid

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>three z A. Yeah, he's at one one right now.

0:55:30.920 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 1>There's obvious regression, you know, coming with that. But the

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm more worried about what Paddock is is an

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>inning's limit. At some point it's fatten him, and I

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair. You only chernos at one eight two

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:54.279
<v Speaker 1>oh sorry two, Domingo her mom one mhm, Justin Verlander

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at two oh two, Mike Minor at two o four.

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, chess. How about these two back

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to back, Trevor Bauer at talking about him before, Shane

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bieber at two twenty two? Interesting last two or Caleb

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith once again and then your boy and Nick Vicious. Well,

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a fine line here, and this is what I'll

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 1>say about these pictures who have low babbits. If you're

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a really good picture, you're going to have a low babbit,

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have a low batting average against. If you're

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the elite, then you deserve to be here.

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer, Justin Verlander. Those guys deserve to be here,

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are they going to maintain a babbit this low the

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>entire season. No, And there's gonna be some regression obviously,

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, they're not gonna A lot of these

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>guys have very low e arras right now, and they'll

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:43.720
<v Speaker 1>settle in as a even the best pictures high twos

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.320
<v Speaker 1>e r a low three's ear a. But what I

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 1>will say is a lot of the best pictures and

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>maintain low babbage because they're the best. And then the

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>picture self contact I think Bower Verlander and the most

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.320
<v Speaker 1>interest trying to find the pictures in there that aren't

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the best picture, the most interesting names the man, he's

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a really good pitch. Is he this good? Probably not,

0:57:04.440 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's good. He's really he's good for Chris VNTRA,

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanford, I'm Greg so doesn't think so much for

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 1>check it out in the BFS. We'll do it all

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>go tomorrow with Brad Zieler. We hope couldn't catch the

0:57:16.760 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>live show. Make sure the download our podcast at the

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>v n T S Y Sports Network Audio Boom channel.

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh So