WEBVTT - Surveillance: Pipeline Hack With Amrita Sen

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jaily. We bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal. Right now, in

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Oil with a global view on what we've witnessed with

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>cyber attacks in the United States, Amrita send joins US

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Energy Aspects Director of Research in chief Oil Analysts Emery Day.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>If as you look at the distribution of hydro carbons worldwide,

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>how vulnerable are they to a cyber attack? Well, in

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>great question, I would say pretty much everywhere. More and more,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody is. I mean, the Colonial pipeline is

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a great example, but look at the Middleast, a lot

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of even up kick to that matter, there were elements

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>um of kind of cyber attacks involved in that, but

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>even more recently within the Middle East you do get

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of infrastructure um, not necessarily disruptions, but targets

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>um And I think this is just the new normal.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>There are more and more companies spending on this and

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it just needs to get higher from here, because you

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>know it's not the warfedge generally is changing. The landscapes

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>completely changed. I mean in Malaysia they're they're doing a

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four mile thirty mile key pipeline having to do

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with the distribution. I believe it's up the west coast

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of Malaysia. How many spots do you perceive to be

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>out there like the colonial pipeline worldwide? Is it ten

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>other hot spots or is it hundreds? It's gonna be hundreds,

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you think about the distribution, I mean, if

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're really going down that route, you're talking about

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge distribution or pipeline net works within China, within India,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>even Europe. Europe has a huge network both for crew

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>down for products. Looking more broadly then and racon when

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>way to talk to any one of the commodity market.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're not concerned about this colonial pipeline shut down.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>There's just a belief that will adjust, it will come

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>back online and will get back to normal. Any aspects

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of the infrastructure, the distribution in America, the transportation of

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>energy that you would be concerned about, No, I mean

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not right now, and not the scale at which this

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>attack has happened. I do agree with what you just said.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the pipeline and just generally everything should be

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>back up and running in about three to five days.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But you don't never say never. This is it's definitely

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented in the scale at at which is happening, So

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it will require coordination from various government bodies and that

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can take some time. Um. I don't think there's going

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to be more and I think after this attack, I

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>do think a lot of US networks natural gas as well.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget that they will probably tight and up

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>what they can do to protect their networks going forward.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to coming forward from here build on the

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>other issues surrounding the old market. Right now, we've talked

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton about supply, let's talk about it a little

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more out if Iran can we open things up

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. What the negotiations look like. If

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you said twelve eighteen months ago that we'd have a

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>president Joe Biden, a democratic sweep, we'd be talking potentially

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about loosening things up with Iran, and we still having

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that discussion. Yeah, we are, and you know we've always

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>said that we're expecting some kind of a breakthrough over

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of April and May and then sanctions relieved by July.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I will say, however, talks are progressing, but progressing probably

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit slower than we've been expecting. No, no major changes.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But the thing I will warn is that everybody is

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>expecting a deal in the coming weeks and then sanctions

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>relief over Q three UM. But if there isn't a

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>deal before they are in an elections, which are next month,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing to watch out for because then it

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>could get dragged on and then the deal becomes a

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two story. I don't think that's in the price

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. What is the link em right up that

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you see between oil is a huge weighting of c

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>RB or the Bloomberg Commodity Index with all the other commodities.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>They don't trade and lack step do they No, not

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. And I mean if you you guys were

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>saying as well, just s and B it recordized. But

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at metals, metals markets are soaring, and

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you know oil oil has been a very strong performance

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, but still hasn't been um as a strong

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as some of the other commodities and part of that

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is because you know, transportation was the worst hit during COVID.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It is coming back, but it's not fully back yet.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's also so much kind of talks around working

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>from home, how much are we going to lose permanently

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for oil demand? But I mean, I will say, there's

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>all the data we're getting right now. Personal incomes are

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>back at pre COVID levels, and many many parts of

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think the summer is going to be huge.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>People are going to spend, and the bounce back in

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>oil demand it's probably going to be significantly more than

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>people have been expecting. That is the line that Jeff

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>carry A government is pushing too. I'm Reachel, it sounds

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like you're on the same page. It's gonna hear from you.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to send their energy aspects. We're talking about

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this huge environmental transition on top of a demand boom.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Two pins some of that as well. So the traditional

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sychnical rate that you might get from copper it's a

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit distorted this time around, given the political environment

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're in at the moment. The clear message of

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one being different from two thousand two

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>from Mr curry at Golden Saxon. That has always been

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a consistent theme with Ian Bremer of Eurasia Group, whose

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>books are too many to mention. I can pick one

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of them, one of their titles and say it is

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>also about this moment. We welcome Dr Bremer this morning

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as we speak of every nation for itself. Dr Bremmer,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>once again, food dynamics. Rice in Cambodia really matters rice

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in America less. So what does the food dynamic that

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you observe a this commodity lift. It just tells me

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that the gap between rich and four countries on the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>back of the pandemic and the rebound from the pandemic

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is being felt so so greatly differently. Um, you know

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is UH that you already have UH before the pandemic.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yet about a quarter, for example, of everyone in Yemen

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>being food stressed, not being able to have enough to eat,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and Sudan numbers are similar. Those numbers are doubling on

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the back of the pandemic right now. One of the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most disheartening statistics that was indirect from

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic was the fact that we had an increase

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of fifty million of extreme four people around the world.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>The first time that number has gone up UM in

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>well over uh in generations. It's like forty years since

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that numbers increased year on year. That's that's that's you know,

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that means food insecurity, that's first and foremost the most

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>important things to be that kid. And you're gonna see

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that play out in so many of these contries with

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>these prices have gone up and the people, the governments

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have any capacity to provide support. And I'm sure

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you saw Arama Chander Gua's magnificent essay and the ft

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say ten days ago about the collapse of

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>his India. Do you eurise your group? Look at this

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and the horrific news from India is being politically

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and your Aisia group destabilizing for the region. Um, It's

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not destabilizing inside India. You know on India's Prime

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Minister Modi, despite having incredibly badly mishandled the last wave

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of this crisis, um is still um. You know, the

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>popularity base that he had was higher coming in that

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of any other major leader. So he has a long

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>way to go Before you talk about domestic instability domestic

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>opposition would have a long way to strengthen before they

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>could be cohesive and and really pose a chat olenge

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to him. But but there's no question that when you

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>see the India variant spreading as much as it is

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>across Southeast Asia. Now, when you see the fact that

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Indians, who have been the largest producers of vaccines

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and now they have massive shortages inside

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>their own country, they've had to suspend all export. Most

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of that export was going to other countries in the region.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is now where the broader epicenter of coronavirus

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>crisis is. It's India, but it's also South and Southeast Asia.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's also the region that's going to have some of

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the least capacity to actually fight it. And and by

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, um, the the India based and Chinese based

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccines aren't as effective as the m R and A vaccines.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And I saw some extremely disturbing UH news. I don't

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know if you noticed this from the Seychells say Shells

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>has had more vaccine rollout than any other country in

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the world for their small population. They now also have

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>more human to humans spread per capita in cases new

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>cases than India. That's astonishing, and that's because most of

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines are are coming from coming from China and

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the efficacy in stopping spread. That's again

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a serious problem for the developing world right now, largely

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't about Madearna Advisor, which is much more efficacy. So yeah,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually quite worried about what this is gonna look

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like over the coming month. How the West can have

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the big question right now, and I've got to

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>say the answer to that question is so in some

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>real division between Europe and the United States at the moment,

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the US, as you know, in trying to suspend IP

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>protection at least trying to push that issue through the

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>w c O, and then you've got Europe turning around

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>and saying, well, we don't think that's going to help.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Germany is looking at the United States for holding vaccines

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and not exporting them. What did you make of the

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>U S decision last week? And without bringing the allies

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on board, because this is playing out quite publicly, and

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it did so through the weekend. Yeah, this is playing

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>out publicly. But you know the funny thing, first of all,

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean the German response, um that this is not

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the way to actually provide help in the near term.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I mean it would take a very long time.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about not just weeks or months with his

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>urgent need right now, but but a year or more

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the kind of manufacturing capacity that would be

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>aligned with just opening up the patent. So it's it's

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>important symbolically um for a lot of progressives in the

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party, and Biden will will benefit from that. But

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this isn't what's going to move the needle for the

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>problem that we just talked about. The big issue is

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that here's a Biden administration trying to do the right

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>thing and not coordinating with allies in advance. That's the mistake.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It feels just like the announcement to leave Afghanistan. I mean,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when your allies are absolutely critical, you shouldn't be in

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a position where the German government, where the EU is

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>caught blindsided by you saying you're gonna suspend IP protection.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>The Americans in talking about helping the rest of the

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>world in terms of this endemic, we need to be

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>talking in advance of our announcements with all of the

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>key allies. It's such an easy thing to do. The

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden team should be good at this. This is where

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they're following. Um. I think because they're used to do.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>These are experienced men and women that have been around

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy establishment for decades and for them, UM, you know,

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>multilateralism means the United States does the right thing and

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>other allies just go along with us. It doesn't mean

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that we actually might be wrong or might have to compromise.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we've been a position of such strength and because

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the alliance itself has been so much more cohesive. That's

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not as true today. Part of that has been four

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>years in the Trump administration, but part of that is

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>just Europe itself is moving in a different direction. There.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Their feeling of their social contract, their feeling of the

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness of their representative democracy, UM, just is different than

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that of the United States right now, and I think

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 1>we're living that experience a firm or your top risks

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty one, you have been out front

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and saying we have to pay attention to cyber. You

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about a cyber tipping point in January, and here

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about it for real with this pipeline

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>across the nation. Give us an update on the tipping point,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you see. Yeah, I mean the funny thing is, I

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think the tipping point is between the US and Russia,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>between the US and China, because there is a level

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of deterrence on cyber attacks between those countries. We do

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>espionage against them, they do espionage against us. We use

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the data in ways that are useful for US, but

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't break things. We don't go in and and

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>destroy critical infrastructure. We don't take the kind of actions

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that could precipitate a kinetic response a hot war where

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>when you the problem is unlike news where you had

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that nuclear balance, but those were only the the only

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>countries that had that capacity in the Cold War. Um

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the case of cyber you know, we stop the

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>audience from developing News were trying to get back into

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a deal to do that. We haven't stopped them from

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>developing some of the world's most effective offensive cyber capabilities.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Criminal networks in Russia and Eastern Europe, in the United States,

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>around the world have incredibly sophisticated cyber capacity to destroy things.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And we see that with the smash and grab both

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on the data of this critical pipeline over the weekend,

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>but also in the in the the ransomware attack to

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>shut them down. UM, and you know, we just don't

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have cyber defenses to deal with this. I was I've

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>particularly worried that they were going to shut down hospitals

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>UM in the middle of vaccine rollout. You know, in

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the early days, that was something they were clearly capable

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of doing, these these criminal networks, and thankfully for us,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. But the vulnerabilities massive and it's gonna catch

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he writes, A great president and found a let's brink in.

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared woods Champ, we thank for America Securities, Head of

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Research Investment Committee. Can we just start with the supply

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>side at the moment, Jared, whether it's the Colonial pipeline

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and the issues there, we can solve them with higher prices.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to import some gasoline from Europe, if

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the labor market shortage, you can hire, put up wages.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you see in that dynamic on the supply side.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Can it all be addressed with higher prices? Well, some

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of it can be addressed, not all of it. I

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>mean semi conductors is the big one. I think that's

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an affected even the labor market possibly, uh in

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that latest report, and something is going to take a

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>little while to sort out as far as we can tell. UM.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's also not, you know, a sort of catastrophe.

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But most of the big headlines, whether it's in commodities

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or or in labor, we think can be addressed with

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>higher prices, higher wages UM. And you know, it's it's

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of a two period market. I think everyone's

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>ready and I think proper should be strapped in for

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what could be very wild summer. But if we look

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead six months, we looked at the end of the year, UM,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we expect fairly normal conditions, even inflation back down to

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>levels that were more consistent with what we saw before

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Sign on bonuses transitory, JAREDS. You've made this

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>point that the conversation Tom and I were having early

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this morning ten minutes ago on the labor market, Steve

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Fault offering an appreciation bonus UBS for certain bankers getting

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a bonus if they get a promotion. That is all

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>discretion were spending, Jared, in terms of just the extra bonus.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not base salary. And Jared, I just wonder from

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your perspective whether that plays into the fed's hands a

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the labor market that on either end

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the waste spectrum, we're talking about bonuses and we're

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>not talking about higher base. Yeah, that's this is exactly

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what the third wants. I think if if you're if

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about long term wage price spiral, I think

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you you can relax a little bit here

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because assigning bonus is not a raise. You know, whether

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty dollars to show up for McDonald's you know,

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>job and review or yeah then I mean or at

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the high end, these higher bonuses at the high end,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>these are not permanent salary increases. If they were, that's

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a different conversation. But so far there's no evidence of

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>anything persistent because employers and workers both understand that. Again,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>six and nine months from now, things are probably gonna

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more uh normal than we expect. Yeah, John,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it was great. All from New Jersey sent me a

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollar check and said, sure there's change liftover. How

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>did you count on McDonald's. I don't know. It was great.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>There were two value meal and you know what coffee?

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I went large. I got the extra large fries just

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to get me through today, Jared, you have a single

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sentence in your note that's just so so important and

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>really wise. You gotta have the courage to buy inflation

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>surge when there's no inflation. But then, what do you

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do when inflation expectations finally go? What do you do

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when the expectations of inflation are finally there to sell? Well, look,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>let's let's look a little bit of history. Okay, our

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>economists expect I think three point six percent cp I

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. Um, you know, I think that's exactly right.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at what's happened in the past,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen inflation surgeries above three and a half percent

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just the past thirty years. There's been quite a few

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of those occasions. We looked at the market, you know,

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>impact market data around those prints, and if you bought

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all the inflation trades and commodities, you know you're versus us,

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>etcetera on those occasions past thirty years, on average, one

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>year later your inflation trades loss money. Now, So that

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so to me, that says that if you believe the

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>inflation trade, now you know it is something you have

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to buy when it's already priced into the market at

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>those trades, some of those trades have already done really well,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>then you've got to be convinced that this is the

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>big one, and we just don't see any evidence of that. Instead,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>we we think investors still have to keep a kind

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of a balanced approach within the inflation trades. Within the

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation trades, we still like financials very much, but I

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the you know, the commodities and materials and energy,

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>there's just not enough evidence on that on the on

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that side, and if you do see more more dips

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>um corrections, even in attack and the growth kind of trades,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for a long term investor, those have to be viable opportunities. Jared,

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of the fans David Costons at

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the dust Star, Gold and Sex making a big splash

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this weekend on valuation of the things. Do you agree

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>that the fangs actually offer value given their growth characteristics

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>versus the ten uere yield. I think the trading vehicles,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, perhaps at this point some of these big

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>megacap growth trades um and so you can use they're

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're they're almost kind of like a macro expression of

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>what's happen with growth inflation. But but they're not. I

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think people are looking at them as devalue. But

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>by any means, if you if you like the sort

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of the tech and and and and growth type stocks,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think small and midcaps are more attractive here. Jed

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>caught up with a Greater to a black Rock a

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago on Friday, and he was talking

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about running a higher cash position across some of the portfolio.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Was something in the double digits mad teens. Maybe does

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that make sense going into some attempt that dry powder.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it does make sense to have to have

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>some cash ready to deploy if it's if it's a

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>question of something tactical to to be ready. If there's

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>some big dislocations you know and I or either end,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we could see overheated reflation trades um that you know

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to sell to go rotate back into growth.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You could see the reverse where we get another bad

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>job sprint and people start to really get gloomy. Either case,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to have cash ready. I don't think it's

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a it's a good moment to be sort of allocating

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>higher permanent portfolio positions into into cash or anything else

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's um that's gonna change your fundamental mix because right now,

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so many cross currents. You can roll

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the dice and and and any you know, it's can

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you any number of ten different things. When there's

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that much confusion in the market, that much confusion the

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>labor data, I don't think it's a good time to

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>make permanent decisions just quickly without challenge. What would fund

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that position? Would you trind broadly or some hi specific Well,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it would trade some of the mega cap stocks, whether

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's tech or or otherwise. Um, my colleagues to be

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the superman, and is I think been fairly you know, uh,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, neutral on on some of the mega cap

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks for a while and and uh and at the

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>bank where we're much more favorable on small and mint caps.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the trades that have already done

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>very well, the really liquid names, are the obvious places

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to look for cash um and and that can even

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>include an investment great credit for multist portfolios. We're kind

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>of bearish on on that part of the credit market

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and see better opportunities elsewhere. Gonna see you gotta cash

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>up on a range of asuas John would have been

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>head of Research Investment Committee, this is the right person

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at the right time to talk about the retail cadence

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of America. Friday, we get retail from the lowest price

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>point to the highest price point. And Steve Sadov is

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>expert at this. Mr Sadoff is with master Card senior advisor.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But that barely describes his contribution and retail herbal lessons

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and all that boom a million years ago in shampoo.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>It's Sadov's fault and he's the guy at SAX who

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>exclusive is literally inventing that out of pixie. Does Steve say,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>let me talk about MasterCard and the knowledge that MasterCard

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>has tick by tick and you say it even goes

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>over to the department stores are enjoying this resurgence. Good

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to see you, Tom, And yeah, I think that the

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>month of April, the master Card spending pulse numbers show

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that the consumer is really coming back with a vengeance.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You saw overall sales and this is now not just

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the MasterCard sales, but it cuts across all forms of tender.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Sales were up twenty three point three percent versus year

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>versus year ago, but importantly they were up ten point

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>eight percent versus nineteen and this is ex auto and gas.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're seeing a consumer that's coming back, and it's

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>across all sectors. You mentioned department stores, but it's in restaurants,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>it's in the categories like uh, jewelry and apparel, and

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see the consumer saying, hey, I want

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to get back out of it. Let me ask yourself

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>side question, then, are we pulling forward next autumn sales?

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Are we redoing the closet now where nothing ebbs as

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we go into the holiday season? What is that dynamic? Well,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that that we're redoing our closets. We've

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>been wearing sweatpants for the last year, and you're seeing

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a new fashion cycle starting. Uh. The guys in the

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gene business are all talking about bagg year higher ways.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a new newness, excitement getting out again, and you're

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing it hit just the apparel fashion, but you're seeing

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it in the UH handbags, the shoes, the jewelry. So

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's necessarily pulling forward the volume

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>from the fall because there's so much pent up demanded

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>savings that's out there. And the interesting thing is it's

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>not just online anymore. Online is now of all commerce

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and growing still at but people are back in the

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>stores and brick and mortars started to see that ent

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>up demand. Steve, I'm going to avoid the baggy, higher

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>waste things somehow. I don't think the higher waste genes

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>can work on me as well. Steve, you are a

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>student of all this. And if I can move up

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the scale to luxury and such, will there be a

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>consolidation we have? We have luxury which is three big

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>French companies. You know it better than me. But how

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>does how does how do we come out of this

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on an equity basis further consolidation or is it going

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to be entrepreneurial with I p O s and the rest.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a combination of both. That

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you have, the strong ones are going to be picking

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>off some of the big brands. You'll see the consolidation

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for the lvm ages and the reached months of the world.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>But you're seeing companies like the Tapestries performing uh much better.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You're I think you're gonna continue to see these niche

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>segmented brands that come out and do their I p

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>O s. Uh. The consumer wants values, they want a story,

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to and I think that in the luxury

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>space you're going to continue to see a lot of innovation.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Steve said, how did you bring it back to master

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Card in your work for them now as a senior advisor?

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>How is our relationship with our cards changing? There's a

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of dynamics in fintech and digital dynamics. How does

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>master Card model that forward? Well, I think what you

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have as a consumer that is going much more cash less,

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so that they want touchless, they want ease of transaction.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>They still love their cards, and I think that it's

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it boats very well for the master Cards of the

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>world in terms of the changing behaviors. And it's not

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>just the transaction, it's what you do with some of

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the data and the analytics and the ability to understand

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>consumers better. Right. I think that this is the value

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>added proposition that all of these UH retailers need, and

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a lot more of that coming out of

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the use of data and meeting the consumer needs. On

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a level of one, What is the permanent change of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the consumer out of this natural disaster we've all lived.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the consumer go back to the value and values.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They're want to be safe, they want to be able

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to get what they want when they wanted. This omni

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>channel shopping is here to stay. Uh. These are some

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental changes that had started earlier before the pandemic that

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it probably accelerated six years over the last year in

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>terms of the shift to come the channel and segmented

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and differentiated brands. You just described Amazon. They're doing an

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a trunch offering today of a gazillion dollars in bonds.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>How does Amazon adapt to the Steve Sadoff world. Oh,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's a winner. I think the Amazon's the Walmart. The

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>targets continue to do well. Doesn't mean they are the

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>only ones that are going to do well. But marketplaces

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are important in this environment. They're not gonna be Amazon

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is not the only marketplace. You're gonna have the far

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fetches of the world that will do well. But the

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer loves convenience ease. Amazon sets the standards the way

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that they do, the pres dentation of the product, They

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>understand the personalization. That's going to be the expectation. Amazon's

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a winner over time, but I think that there's gonna

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of others as well. And you also

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have the new evolving, whether it's the resale, the rental.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>All of this is this new age in terms of

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>how retails evolving. S does Amazon take luxury from luxury?

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as Gucci gonna actually sell off Amazon. My

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>guess is the answer is probably not. I think that

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the Gucci's and the lvmhs are going to play in

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of market places. Maybe they'll play in the

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>far fetches, the Netta portes, the Sacks dot com which

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is separated from the full line stores. I don't know

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that those brands play in the Amazon world. But Amazon

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>will play very They'll be the major player in uh

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in apparel. I'm just not so sure it's gonna be

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at the very high end luxury. It's been too long.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, greatly appreciated inventing retail and exclusives

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at Sacks and of course a master card as a

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>senior advisor. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast, on

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg