WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - December 28th, 2019

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Hi. I'm

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly and I'm Carol mass Of the next couple

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of hours, we're gonna bring you news of the week,

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>insights from the magazine and more. Well, and we're celebrating

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a birthday ninety years of Bloomberg Business Week, Carol, we are, indeed,

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna take you through the decades the history

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. The topics that have been covered and

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>which I'll find fascinating is some of our editors who

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>have been there for a long time. We're also going

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Boeing halting production of its grounded seven

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>three seven Max. We look into what really went wrong

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with a guy who has been following that company so

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>closely knows it inside and out for many years. Plus

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating feature story from Monte Real. He's our projects

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>and investigations reporter and man. He took us on a

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>trip literally to Madagascar to figure out the wild economics

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of Vanilla, plain old Vanilla. It's a great story and

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>adventure story that you probably wouldn't anticipate. But let's start

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with that big birthday. It's the nine the IF for

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>business Week doesn't look a day over twenty Economics editor

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Peter Coy discusses the magazine's illustrious history. I was with

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the magazine for one third of its life. I'm pretty

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>proud of that, but I was not around in nineteen

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So the fascinating thing is the magazine was launched in

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>September of nineteen nine, which history bus will recall was

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>just seven weeks before the terrible stock market crash which

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>helped helped usher in the Great Depression. So not an

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>auspicious time to be launching a magazine. But we survived

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>those tough times and ended up thriving eventually huge success,

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and at one point they had more advertising pages than

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>any magazine in the country, um and and more circulation

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than any business magazine in the world. And so what

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>was the idea. From the beginning, it was McGraw hill

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was the publisher, and they bought a company called A. W.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Shaw which had a magazine called System, the Magazine of Business,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and that was a monthly. So they spent about a

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>year tinkering with it and relaunched it as a weekly,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which was originally called The Business Week, and it was

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>intended to be in a way very much like what

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we intend to do today, which is be uh a

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>quick read for people who care about business, whether you're

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a business person yourself or not, but you're interested. It

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was as opposed to some of the trade magazines which

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>were very niche, kind of vertical. It was intended to

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>be for everyone, covering all of business. That's what I

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>always think is great about this magazine because I feel

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like for most individuals, right they have kind of a

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>core thing that they're very interested in, but they're interested

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world at large, and as we have learned

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>over the decades, increasingly it's all interconnected. It is. And

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you are working for a tech company,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll be interested in the tech coverage, but you might

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>have would be most almost more interested in the coverage

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of adjacent areas because you're not following that at a

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis, and yet it will impinge on

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>your life or politics. Right I think about how the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>tech community is really embroiled in political scrutiny right now.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So tell us your story. How did you get to

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week? I worked for Associated Press and the guy

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>from a p was from Business Week, who covered telecom

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was leaving and he recommended me for the job and

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I managed to get it. So my first job was

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>covering telecommunications. This was certainly after the breakup of the

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Bell system that was still a big story at the time.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And then it trans offer into technology, and then there

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was an opening and covering economics and with a really

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>smart guy named Michael Mandel, and he trained me up.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I know, not not an economists, but I've

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of learned and enjoyed learning about economics over the years.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And so what was attractive to you at that first

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>blush when you were coming from the a P. Was

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it sort of a it was a destination in your

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>mind or what were you thinking? The beauty is when

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you're at a P you're on top of the news,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're firing out stories all the time. When when

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you're at a magazine you craft something. You have time

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to step back, make sure you get the headline is

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way you want it, phrase everything because you

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of time. And we also have

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously we have shorter term coverage too. We have a

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>website with quick hits, but with with a magazine story,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of eyes on it, um, a lot of

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>attention to getting it, you know, tuning it up. You

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can think of it that way for just the way

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you may you want to deliver that message. I think

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's also interesting and you you really, you guys go

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>into it in terms of the early history in particular

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about how this magazine, whether it was through some of

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the economists that were featured in the magazine or some

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of the stories could really kind of put pressure on

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the government in terms of policy, really became kind of

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>a must read. I think you're I think you're referring

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to our early coverage of what do you call today

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>called Kanesy and economics. John Maynard Keines, the British economist,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was not well known in the United States. Business Week

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was the first, uh and most important publication that sort

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of champions of his ideas. Remember um, when the the

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>depression hit, people had no idea what to do about it.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Economy took extremely steep. Guy. There were a lot of

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people were saying, Okay, let's let's get rid of the rot.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, Uh, if we could just liquidate all these

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>people who took on foolish loans, you know, that'll clean

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the system. And and what Kane said, and Business Week

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>said that No, that's the wrong solution. That'll just spiral

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>downward and downward and downward. The government needs to come

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in and support the economy with things like tax cuts

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and spending until it can get back on its feet.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't put a somebody who's just been in a

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>car act stident, you know, um, through vigorous physical exercise.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got to help and recover, give him ivy fluids

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And that's sort of that was the message.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>That's Peter coy And he's been with Business Week for

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 1>about thirty years and so fun to talk with him

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about the history of the magazine, some of the stories

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's covered, and what's really changed in the world of business. Well,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're reminded how prolific he is because so how

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>much the magazine from an economics perspective, just anticipated so

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>much and really influenced the conversation. This is what Business

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Week does so well. Jason takes something that many of

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>us probably take for granted. And uh, I'm talking about Vanilla. Yeah,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I certainly take it for granted. It's sitting there in

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the Spice cabinet. Although we have noticed over the last

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I think anybody who's paying attention to

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Eve price has spiked at times in a really meaningful way. Well,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a story behind that Monty reel. He has some

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>of those interesting assignments, goes to some of the most

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting places, and this story took him to Madagascar. Are

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Luckily for us, he's back home in Chicago. That's where

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he joins us. So Monty take us to Madagascar and

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to this market. Yeah, so this is a regional market.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the place where vanilla actually enters the international marketplace.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's really remote, it's really kind of hard to

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>get to. It's basically a hut, a wooden hut in

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a really small village in northeastern Madagascar, which is the

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>vandilla growing region. And just to give you an idea

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of how tough it is to get there. So you

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fly to Madagascar's capital, you take a small plane to

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a small airport in the northeast. Then you have to

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>drive over really really bad roads um to try to

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>get to this particular market area. And for example, when

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we did that, our driver couldn't go any further because

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the road we were on was actually swallowed by a river,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so we had to wade across the river. Luckily it

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very deep, and then walk for a couple of

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hours beyond that to finally reach this little hut really

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in a in a village where dozens of farmers would

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bring their annual harvest of vanilla, and that's where it

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would be bartered but over by international flavor companies and exporters.

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And then go out into the wider world. Get to say,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a great line of your story. How you talk

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about where you went. Is this great observation lab that

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to take your words exposes both the genius

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and the insanity of globalized commerce. I mean, that's exactly

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>what you saw at work. Yes, Um, it's almost hard

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to imagine some of the things that happen in the

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>vanilla trade in terms of, for example, just how the

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>crop is paid for. It's all cash. It's a cash economy,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>so the buyers who go to these markets have to

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>get cash, you know, along the same route that we

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>took to get there. And the biggest denomination bill in

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Madagascar is worth about five dollars. And these buyers are buying,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, tons of vanilla beans. And these vanilla beans

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>can when they're cured can cost as much as six

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars per kilo, so they need lots of cash. So

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's actually they bring bales and bales of cash to

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>these markets on the back of motorcycles, uh and and

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just being carried. And that's just one example of kind

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the the strange market that vanilla is because of

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>its isolation there in Madagascar, um and also because of

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the price wings and so Mantya, I have to say

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>reading this story and Carolin, I've talked a lot about

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>it this week, just between the two of us at

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>our desk, This notion of how is this market so

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>limited to this one really obscure place because this is

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not one of these things that candidly you read about

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in the back of pursuits, where you know, only people

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>who are billionaires can get this. I mean, this is

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>something we both have in our homes. How has it

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>been so limited to this one? Geography? Well, it comes

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>from an orchid. Vanilla grows from the flower of an

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>orchid um and it's actually native to Mexico, but many

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago it was basically transferred to Africa and it

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was found that it grew very well in Madagascar. Um

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and just um, you know, Vanilla is not one of

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>those products that can be grown like soybeans or something

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like that easily managed commodity. It really is a stubborn crop.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>As people grow it, describe it um. It likes to

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>grow among other plants um and it's incredibly labor intensive,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so every step of the growing and cultivation process is

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>done by hand. Even the pollination of the flowers to

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>get the beans to grow is done by hand. So

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>um it. Basically, it comes down to one of the

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>main reasons why Madagascar dominates the trade so much is

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>labor costs. Um. The minimum wage in Madagascar for agricultural

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>workers is about eighteen cents an hour. So you know,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in talking with people who work for vanilla companies, they

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about trying to grow um start plantations in other

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>tropical areas like um places like Indonesia. There are countries

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in Africa that have started to develop a vanilla industry.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But they say that, you know, that works well when

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>vanilla prices are at highs, but whenever the prices tank

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the it becomes financially unstable to invest in those kind

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of operations. So, Monty, why do the prices swings so much?

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a case. I mean, I would think

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>demand was fairly consistent, but I'm just curious why do

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we see those kind of wild price swings. There are

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a few reasons, and one of the main reasons is

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because Madagascar dominates the trade so much. Um the infrastructure

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in Madagascar is really undeveloped, and it's also an island

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there in the Indian Ocean that's that's vulnerable to storm. So,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, a few years ago, there was a big

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>cyclone that basically leveled the vanilla fields in the northeast.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And vanilla is a crop that it takes three years

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from the time it's planted for the beans too for

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the plant to be mature enough to produce beans. So

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have a concentrated area and something happens to

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that area, it really can set the production and supply back.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's what happened a few years ago. And ever

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>since that cyclone that came through in the early two thousand's,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the market has been really volatile. It's been, you know,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>spiking up to six hundred dollars or so at a

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>high per kilo, and then it can go down to

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>as low as twenty or thirty. So it's just an

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous range, And so would you take a step back

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and think about this story and highly recommend anybody read this, like,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sit down, you know, take some time over

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the holiday and read it, because you'll learn something about

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>economics and politics and trade, aid and all of that.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But what do you take away as you sort of

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>come back to the United States about either the state

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of global trade, the state of demand economics? What is it?

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is actually a really good kind of

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>window to look at how global trade works. And the

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>surprising thing for me, I think was just how how

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>wild some of that is at the most elemental level.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's monte Real. We love catching up with him.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>He does some wonderful deep dive stories. He's our Projects

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and Investigations reporter, so he literally took a trip to

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Madagascar and just wanted to find out Vanilla. We take

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it for granted, Jason, right, It's in all of our pantries.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We use it for baking and for cooking. But what's

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>interesting is what it takes to get those vanilla beans

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>basically to all of us. Yeah, who would have thought

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that a story involving vanilla would involve waiting through a

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>river sort of chalkboarding and negotiating and bartering. It's a

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>really cool story. Loved it. Three poll market. Well, it

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>makes some people's eyes glaze over, makes others turn away

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>from you at a cocktail party. It's a market that

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>always always needs to be explained, Jason, which is why

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we have Joe Wives. He joins us just about every

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>day on our daily radio show Pizza, keeps us honest

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about the markets. All right, Joe, you're here with us

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Keep us honest on the repo market.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do we care about this? Again? The repo market

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is essentially how various entities, whether it's a bank, whether

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a fun hedge fund, money market fund, how they

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>financed themselves on an overnight basis. Because nobody wants to

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just hold cash because cash, you know, it doesn't really

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>earn anything, and so people always want to be maximizing

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>their profits. So what they do when they need liquidity

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is they borrow it overnight, and they might pledge some

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>collateral like treasury bonds or mortgage bonds or something like

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that to make the cash bills that they need to

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pay um so that they can make the bills they

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>need to pay right. It feels like one of those

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>things that no one really cares about until it stops working,

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which is essentially what happened and Tember right exactly right.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So in September we saw the rates on overnight repo

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>borrowing absolutely sore, and it's important to recognize that prior

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to that, for most of the time, it moves roughly

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in line with where the FEDS sets the rate, and

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one way, the one mechanism view which the FED

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of sets short term interest rates and you expect

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the repo market to behave. The issue is that with

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the the cash that banks have is really reserves held

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at the FED, and the FED, as part of its

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening trying to quote normalize its operations post crisis,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>has been reducing the available supply of cash at the FED.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, you have regulators telling banks you

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have to hold a certain amount of cash as part

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of post crisis regulations to ensure that you have adequate liquidity.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So what we saw in September was this confluence of

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple things. There's the FED tightening reducing the amount of

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reserves available. There's the regulatory restraints saying no, you have

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to hold these reserves even though the FED is eliminating

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>their existence. And then you had this timing issue. We're

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>due to tax payments and treasury auctions and things like that.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly that created a lot of demanding system. That's exactly right.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So this end of quarter payments things like that. There's

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>another issue, which is that at quarter end and year

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>end is when regulators come and they take a look.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And the analogy that I like to use is you

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>might have a really messy bedroom, but if you know,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like five minutes before your mom or dad gets home,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you clean up. So occasionally throughout the year,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the regulators come like peeking in and they want to see, well,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>how liquid is your balance sheet? What kind of assets

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do you hold? So everybody scrambles to hold the highest

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>quality and most liquid assets right at the same time.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>The problem is if there's a finite amount of them,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>then you really have to pay to get them. So

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>should we expect another squeeze coming in in December? Here

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're wrapping up not only a quarter but a year.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a really a really big question. And so

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the man that everybody listens to en REPO is this

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>strategistic credit squeeze. His Alton posts are whenever he puts

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.239
<v Speaker 1>out a note, everybody wants to get it, like what

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>did Sultan say? So he is concerned about this, that

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be this major liquidity squeeze, is various

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>entities demand this liquidity ahead of the regulators checking in

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year. The flip side is

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that the FED seems to be way more cognizant of

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the risks this time around. They've certainly stopped shrinking the

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>supply of reserve balances so that eases some of the strain.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>They've also engaged in some of these operations where our

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>people can borrow essentially liquidity at the FED. So it's

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of unclear right now. But perhaps what we saw

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in September and Zoltan's warning themselves may have been what

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>kicked regulators in the fit into gear to present a

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>blow up, but we don't know for sure. Well, and

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, I mean, the number of questions and the

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of time that j Pal had to spend during

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>his last press conference essentially reassuring answering questions from reporters

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>about this. It felt like he did a good job,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was one of those moments where he thought, man,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he really is talking about this a lot. It's extremely

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>complicated stuff, and a lot of people in the market

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>still don't get it. Actually, Tracy Halloway, one of the

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>authors of the Business Week piece about Postsar and I,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we had interviewed him for a podcast, and the most

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>important thing he said to me. The takeaway is reserve

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>balances at the fit. He called them tokens, and so

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you can. And what I love about that analogy is

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you could imagine going to an arcade and everybody has

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>enough money to play the games, so no one is

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>actually broke. But if the token machine isn't working, or

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe some people pocketed tokens, it took him home. You

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people can't play the game. The game is financed. Everyone

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>might have money, everyone might have solid balance sheets, and

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you could still have a crisis if the tokens are missing.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's Joe wisintal. We love catching up with him

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>on our daily show. He's always got a little bit

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of a quirky perspective, but I have to say he's

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>set the table beautifully for this. I feel like now

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>every conversation I go into about the repo market and

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>arcade is going to pop into my mind. He really

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>did explain it well, and it's an important story. It

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>really kind of confused the markets, confused investors. But it's

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>been a hot topic when it comes to the Federal

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Reserve and j Powell specifically, and one that's going to

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>carry us into So definitely check that out. So no

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. Jason me too has impact of the

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>financial community Wall Street, and yet many might argue that

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>it's day of reckoning has yet to come. Well, and

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>that's what's so interesting about these remarks is that it

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>points out the fact that, yes, there's been a reckoning

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ish so far. Uh And it really when you look

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>at it versus entertainment especially, it has not really resonated

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or reverberated, i should say, the way that some expected.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Max Abelson, he and Cacha Porta Kinski have the remarks

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in this week's magazine. Congrats on this. It's very thought provoking.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Max joins this here in New York City. So what

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do you set out to do here? Well, first of all,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I was working with Cachansky and it's basically a fluke

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that I'm here inside of her because it really should

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be her she's really thoughtful about this stuff. But you know,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in the news room we sit and look at

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>each other and we're like, you know, where is me too?

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>In the financial services industry, I mean, we know from

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>years of chronicling headphunds and banks and private equity and

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>asset management that Wall Street, you know, just like lots

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of other industries, including journalism, has profound imbalances, and women

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>quietly say that they are harassed and discriminated against and assaulted,

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and that they fear retribution. But we haven't seen that

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>broad moment of change. And what this piece is about

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of the system, this machine of silence

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've discovered piece by piece. That that explains why.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, because I do think after me too

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in the entertainment world. Think we all thought, okay, Wall

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Streets next, and it didn't quite happen. I have a

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>word for you, arbitration. Arbitration, I'm embarrassed to say, is

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that I mean, if we we've

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>known each other for years, if if you brought that

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>word up to me two and a half years ago,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure I would more or less draw a blank. Right.

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I was on the phone with a Wall

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Street veteran who said to me, if you really want

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to understand why we're not seeing me too on Wall

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Street And this was, you know, more than a year ago.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>She was like, you have to look at the invisibility cloak.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, invisibility cloak. She was like, the

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>system of arbitration. That's the system that's parallel to the courts,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's behind closed doors. It's basically a private justice

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>system that used to be relatively obscure sort of for

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, fights within an industry, and Wall Street itself

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>really helped it expand so that it now covers essentially

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>two out of three workers at big US companies. And

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, unlike other industries, runs its own arbitration hearings,

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's Wall Street. It's definitely a master of arbitration,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and it really helps explain a lot. I love this

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>intens in the story. But the finance industry's mastery of

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>this system, meaning forced arbitration, has prevented the revolution of

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the past two years from touching it, meaning the meat

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>too revolution. Yes, And look, I mean if a Wall

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Street executive, we're here with us, um I talked to

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>them about this all the time. They women, Well, the

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>senior executives are all men, but the human resources executives

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are some sometimes women. And I've dealt with wall Shoot

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>lawyer's were women foreshore, and so has Katya and so

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is Gavin Lynch who was and Serena Wilmer, who both

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>contributed reporting to this piece. They say, look, arbitration. They'll

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>say it's quicker, it's cheaper, it's quieter, um, but it's

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>just as fair. That's that's what they'll say. That's their

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive arbitration. You know, women will say it stops us

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>from banning together and from learning about each other, and

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>from sort of instituting major change. The kind of class

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>action lawsuits that we've written about in the past few years,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't have those with arbitration. Well, and let's talk

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about both systemic and cultural aspects as well, because you

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>dig into this two in this heats of the cultures

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of these firms are set up in

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a way both structurally and just ethos wise that it

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like a safe place to bring these sorts

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of complaints. Even the advocates that there would be advocates

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>within the firms. HR for instance, aren't really on the

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>side of the employees. They're sort of on the side

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of kind of keeping things quiet and keeping it all

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>under wraps. Our story focused on three sort of crystallizing moments.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>One was Candi fisch Gerald, which has to do with arbitration.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Another was Ken Fisher, who of course had those famous

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>comments now at a conference in California. And the third

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was Lloyd's of London. I mentioned Gavin Finch, who just

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>did really amazing, amazing work out of London. I mean

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like jealousy inducing, you know, but what is really upsetting

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about it? And CONTI and I talked about this with

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Becca Rebecca Greenfield, our editor, you know what's up sending

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Lloyd's story, and a couple of others like

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it is not just that it paints a picture of

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>guys behaving like extremely badly. What's profoundly upsetting about the

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd's story. And another one the firm called MG also

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in London, that also written by Gavin is it gives

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you a sense that these women went to HR and

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and talked about being assaulted for example, or being accosted,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and that HR was basically like, it'll be bad for

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>your career, if you say anything, you know, don't smile

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>around him. I think that was a literal response from

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>human resources at a big institution that Gavin Finch found,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>don't smile around him, but maybe a dressed differently, you know,

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like change your behavior in order to avoid these situations

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Right. Well, And what's interesting too is

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I love how you guys kind of breakdown. What's different

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe about the financial industry also is that predominantly it's

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been built by men. Still the senior positions are men.

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of money at stake here as well,

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>there sure is, and that money equals power there sure is.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Jean Christensen, who is a lawyer and employee side lawyer

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>we door, said to that in almost as well as

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you just did. Well, I kind of was taken home

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fair enough credit where it's but um, listen, you know,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to speak honestly with you about sort of the experience

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of being a Wall Street reporter and trying to cover

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff like vividly but also fairly right, you know,

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what this story is about is basically this machine, the

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>system that Catty and I and Sabrina and Gavin and

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>others in the newsroom sort of found ourselves up against.

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one thing that's nice about working with

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>our editor, Rebecca is it she deals with um the

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>gender uh pay gap, and with discrimination across capitalism. And

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a reasonable point to be made

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that we don't get into the story necessarily, that maybe

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a Wall Street problem. You know, maybe it's

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a capitalism problem, or a power problem, or a gender problem.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>What about the rest of corporate America? Like for comparison,

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys have done incredible reporting over the

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years really when it comes to this issue.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder, like I was thinking about when

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I read it, I'm like, Okay, here's a Wall Street,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but what about the rest of corporate America? Has it

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>come along? It's fair to say that, you know, I

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think just about sitting at a Bloomberg and reading the

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>news that comes down the wire. You know, McDonald's CEO

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>leaves you know that you you do see changes that

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily hit Wallstreet. But maybe what we've seen over

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the past year, in addition to learning about this system

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of silence, is maybe we're seeing cracks, you know, learning

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about Ken Fisher, who by all accounts, would say stuff

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>like this so sexual references getting into girls pants. He

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about slavery. People would basically shrug this off, Sabrina

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>told us, or you know, like laugh uncomfortably, but like

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that's it. This year something changed. I think about reading

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>stories by Annie Massa about Black Rock, literally the biggest

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>asset manager in the world, where apparently Larry Fink sat

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>down his biggest deputies and we're like, was like, guys,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like you gotta watch your behavior. Two of the people

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in that top group are now out because I think

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of breaking rules around company relationships. Maybe maybe that means

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see cha just but maybe not. But

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the arbitration system still exists. The arbitration system still exist.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's a good question because big tech companies, several

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies have moved away from having women who

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are claiming harassment go to arbitration. They're letting them out

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of arbitration agreements. Wall Street is different. Wall Street likes

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this system and it helped pioneer it, and Wall Street

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so far is not moving away from it. You closed

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the piece, I think with a really important point and

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a name that looked like it might trigger a whole

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>series of revelations and didn't. And that's Jeffrey Epstein. What

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>do we know? And what might we have known had

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 1>he not died in jail. It just felt like so

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>much was going to come out. There were those moments

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this summer where it was like, what huge names are

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>will falling now, because you know, Epstein was close with

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>billionaires and with hedge fund managers and with chief executives.

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Instead though he passed away, and it feels like maybe

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that will be um when when I think about whether

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>or not we're going to see change, that feels somehow

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>like a sign that the status quo kind of somehow.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's arbitration, maybe it's a culture of fear, maybe

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's money, maybe's human resources. Somehow the status quo wins

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out and maybe it will keep doing that, or maybe

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we're beginning to see change and it it wins out

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at least for now. But when you look back at

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Weinstein and you think about the times that when

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you read the books now that have been written about

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that case and the reporting that went into it, so

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>many times they almost were there, almost were there, and

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>then they were And you wonder if that moment is

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>coming for what that's right. Well, shout out not only

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to the journalists who covered Harvey Weinstein and to the

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>reporters in this newsroom, but also reporters at places at

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are in Bloomberg, and especially shout out to Kasansin, my

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>co writer who couldn't join us. Day All right, great story,

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>thought provoking, a really interesting to head into twenty big questions,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>more to come for sure, Max Shabelson really appreciate it.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks ninety years of Business Week, the magazine so many

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>changes over the years, including tweks to the name. Someone

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with deep, deep, deep ties to Business Week is none

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>other than Jim Ellis, all the way back to nineteen eighty.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He has seen some things. He's here for us in

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Talk about Business Week. When you joined

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eight what was it like. Oh, it was

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a different magazine. Obviously we were a different place, different owner,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but there were a lot of things that were surprisingly

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the same. And it's always been a big fault that

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we do more than simply report the news. What we

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do is add insight and um, you know,

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>add analysis so that the reader can you know, not

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>just sort of chronicle of what happened this week, but

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>also why it's important, why it matters, and what might

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>become of it in the future. And that's the value

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>add that I think has sort of gone all the

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>way through all ninety years. What's really fun is that

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there are three people. The section that covers ninety years

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of Business Week kicks off identifying three people who span

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire lifetime the ninety years of Business Week. You

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are one of them. Not that you go back ninety years.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But what's fascinating is this whole idea of you know,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>editors and individuals passing down kind of the history of

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the magazine. That's one of the nice things about our

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>magazine is that, you know, there's a lot of continuity.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I might work with people who I have literally known

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years and um, but one of the nice

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>things about that is that we've seen a lot of

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>things happen in business, and there's a lot of context

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we already know. We're not inventing, you know,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of we're not rushing around. Oh my god, I

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was there at the opening of Disney World. I'm sort

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of embarrassed to say I covered that, and um, you know,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but I covered facult business in the past. I've been

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the editorial page editor. I've been a lot of things here,

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of us can easily shift between stories,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and we all hopefully can add a lot when we

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>work with younger reporters as well, because we've seen a

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of these stories. For the surprising thing about business

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is that as much as it changes a lot of

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the themes, you know that we thought of when I

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was young in this business, you know, sort of changing technology,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>changing roles of you know, who the consumer is, changing

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>roles of women in business, all of those that were

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, issues thirty forty years ago or issues today. Well,

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jim, one of the roles I believe you played

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and keep me honest here is you're the chief of correspondence,

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and so you were dealing with all the outlying bureaus

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>which for so long and obviously now in a different

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>context at Bloomberg, that really feeds the magazine in a

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways. That gives it a feel, I should

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>say that is far beyond just a bunch of people

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in New York putting together in magazine. Tell us about that.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the strengths that we've always had is

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to have a bureau system or a system

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of reporters around the world who are you know, sort

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of close to their companies, but also picking up information

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's often difficult to get if you're seven time

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>zones away. But um, you know, having people in Asia

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>back before uh, you know, before the handover Hong Kong,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>before China was completely open, allowed us to be early

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on stories like that and to understand a lot of

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>why things either happen very fast or they don't happen

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>nearly as fast as a lot of people in New

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.479
<v Speaker 1>York seemed to think. We've been We've benefited from you know,

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>having those bureaus back in the day, but we're especially

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from that now because Bloomberg has a huge editorial

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>staff that we're able to draw on, you know, for stories,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for reporting, for insight, for you know. This is a

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>wonderful place to work simply because you've got you know,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>over two thousand journalists and analysts who can sort of

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, throw into a story. If I've got a

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>question or a problem about something, I can call somebody

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow in a cross I can call somebody tomorrow in

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of Singapore and we can talk it through. Yeah,

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you really get a feeling of what's going on on

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and it's so important in terms of reporting.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about a little bit more

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>about you know, bringing women into the magazine, uh, and

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the consumer or to like how it's kind of evolved

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it changed because originally Business Week was heavily um sort

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of based on economic coverage. I mean, and you can

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>undersange by man written by Man saying that you know,

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it started the year of the Great Depression started and

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so therefore a lot of the early years there was

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge emphasis on the economy, which was you had

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>completely fallen apart, and you know, there were the debates

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>about whether kanziean isn't and you know, and we were

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a big player in that. But as the economy strengthened,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you know, the magazine gets an

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to shift along with society and looking at other things.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>First was the notion that you know, the consumer was changing.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, all of a sudden, we had people who said, oh,

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>one size doesn't fit all. It's not Henry Ford again saying,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can have the model T in any

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>color as long as it's black. You know, all of

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, market segmentation became this big deal, and also

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>new businesses were popping up because technology was suddenly inventing

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>new industries, new things that were more consumer focused. And

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened is that, you know, we had to figure

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>out ways to cover that, but also management had to

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>figure out ways to manage that. So the idea of

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a professional manager came up, because before you know, you

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of were in a business, you state, in the

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>general entire life. But then in the fifties and sixties,

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>especially the notion that there could be these nbas, these

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>these professional managers who could learn how to run a

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>business and not have spent thirty years in it. We

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>were early on that we were back in the nineteen fifties. Um,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in the early fifties we wrote about, um, you know,

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>this notion of can a manager be actually trained? And

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it was pegged to um Alfred P. Sloan who was

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of General Motors and famous management guru who

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>who decided to give five million dollars to M I

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>T to open up a business school. And people were like,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what in the world is this for, that a general

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>manager can be taught, and we spent a lot of

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>time talking about, you know, what are the positives, what

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are the negatives, and and sort of we were early

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on that and it it's served us well. And obviously

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the by the time we got around to the

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, we were doing business school rankings and you know,

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and and the NBA was considered to be wow. But

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>at the time we started covering this, the whole idea

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of formal management education was was considered to be this

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of fringe thought. That's Jim Ellis, our business editor.

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He has been at the magazine for forty years. And

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what's really fascinating we highlight that through three individuals they

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>basically their tenure at the magazine covers the span of

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the magazine in its entirety. Jim is one of them.

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>He is and his perspective, having overseen the correspondence for

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the magazine now looking after the business section, he knows

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>these stories from a lot of different perspective. Tech bubble,

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>housing bubble, a bubble and assets. We've seen a few bubbles, Jason,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in our investment lifetime. The question is, and I love

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>this in the remarks this week, have they become a

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>necessary evil in order for developed nations to grow. Well,

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a big question, and he's always asking big questions.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Peter coy is in the magazine and bubble are fascinating

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in part because it's such a loaded word at this point.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I did an interview recently with an asset

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>manager and somebody pulled me aside beforehand and said, be

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>really careful if you're going to ask him about a bubble,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>because it just sets off a whole series of rhetorical

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and intellectual thoughts and made people's minds that you take

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bubbles here, Well, what when you look back,

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happened over the past thirty or so years of business.

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>We had the Great economy of the nineteen nineties, the

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com boom and massive investment in telecommunications and so on,

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and then it turned out to be probably over investment,

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>as was revealed with a big bus that happened right

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>around the year two thousand. Shortly after that, the economy

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>started to recover again, and this time it was housing. Uh,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>probably over investment in housing, and that was fueled by

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the subprime bubble, the bad mortgages, stupid and fraudulent mortgages,

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and so to two times in a and here we

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are again. The economy is recovering from the worst financial

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis is the Great Depression. We've had a very long

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>run of growth. But what maybe we're heading into another bubble,

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as evidenced by the lowest interest rates in the history

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the world. You know, we're in negative territory in

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Japan as far as I can tell, somebody

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can try to disprove me. This has never happened before.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens when rates go so low? Investors

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are desperate for yield, so they look for wherever they

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>can get it, which means they take on more risk.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the definition of a bubble when

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you when you ignore risks and you you just make

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>a bet that this asset price is going to go

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up. Well as you remind us

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that investors get you know, kind of stressed out when

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>prices are down in terms of assets. And yet that's

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the point when there's usually opportunity versus when you've got

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>valuations at higher levels. Right now, it's a holiday season.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not gonna sing, but but there's this

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>attitude like, hey, times are really good stock market is

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>hitting new highs. Just there's a lot of jubilation in

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the air. Well, that's when you should be worrying, because

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's when you know, bad loans get made in good times.

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And the American economist Time and Minsky said, stability breeds

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>instability is exactly when we overreach. Well, and one thing

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I love in your story is you talk about here

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>we are ironically low inflation environment, and yet you are

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing riots around the world, especially in developing areas about

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the high cost of living. Actually even in our own

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>country where there are cities and so on and so forth.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.439
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't quite make sense, does it. Right. A great

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>example actually is Hong Kong. Everybody focuses on how the

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:56.240
<v Speaker 1>students are protesting against the mainland China, and that's certainly

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>part of it, but it's also just there people are

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>fed up with the most expensive housing costs in the world. Well,

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what is that. That's a bubble, that's a real residential

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate bubble in Hong Kong. And yet here we

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are in this bullmarket that shows no signs of slowing down.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>And there is a case to be made, and we've

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about it on this program before. That maybe this

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 1>has been managed the right way all along, despite all

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of those headwinds and warning signs that are out there.

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you square that and especially the jubil achan

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and the enthusiasm that you reference that the consumer stuff.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to steer this article away from exactly deciding

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>whether how or how much we're over valued or undervalued

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>today getting back to the bigger concepts of whether economy.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The U S economy almost depends on bubbles growth. And

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, bubbles are not entirely bad because sometimes that

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>exuberance can lead people to invest in things that need

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to be invested in. So we can go back to

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the connect hours and railroads in the nineteenth century, radio

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century, fiber optics in the nineties, or

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 1>even today some of the dot some of the social

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>media platforms and so on. If taken in a lot

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of money and good things end up happening for consumers,

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>although sometimes the investors lose out. Uh. But the bad

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>side of a bubble is the wasted resources. And uh

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to all these phantom zombie housing developments that

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>were built and then um never occupied. UM. Well, and

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we should point out and maybe this is obvious that

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bus tend to hurt people, like in the sense of

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>think about, you know, the recession that came right after

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bust. Do you think about the Great Recession?

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, people lost their jobs, people lost their homes.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 1>When it busts, it can, it can hurt. The unemployment

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>rate is extremely low right now, but um, if we

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>hit a bust, then it would shoot it up. And

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of course the last hired first fired, and the people

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>who chose to invest, like I feel so sorry for

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>those people who bought houses in two thousands six, two

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven with bad loans and then we're wiped

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 1>out very quickly. But go back to the question I posed,

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was really your question, your story about have

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>bubbles become a necessary evil in order for wealthy nations

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to grow? I mean, is it? Is it? I'm curious

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for from the folks that you talked to. There's a

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.479
<v Speaker 1>guy who appears on Bloomberg Television once in a while,

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>super smart David Levy. He's from the Jerome Levy Forecasting Center,

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's an inheritor of a tradition going back to

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>people like him and Minsky mentioned earlier, who would argue

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that he has a paper out called Bubble or Nothing

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>where he kind of posites the idea that we all

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's true. What what Carol said that maybe, Um,

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's almost as though we're geared to it because balance

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>sheets have gotten so big, so top heavy. Um, people

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>owe so much money that the only way you can

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>relieve some of that debt burden is by kind of

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates. So whenever there's a financial crisis, the

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>interest rate comes down, and we see the Federal Reserve

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of the European Central Bank banker advants on doing that

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>push she rates down and down and down. Each of

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.919
<v Speaker 1>cycle we go through, they get lower. Well, guess what,

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they pretty much hit bottom. You cannot go much lower

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>than somewhat below zero. The US is above that floor,

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but Europe Japan pretty much as the floor. Right, And

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so what happens next? Right? And the US is flirting

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>with rates, and certainly the president has advocated to some

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>extent for that. He has h Once you've once you've

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>exhausted that weapon against recessions, then you've got a big

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>problem in your hands. That's Economics editor Peter Coy and

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I love this story because we've seen so many different

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>bubbles in our lifetime, whether it's the tech bubble, whether

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the property bubble. And I love that Peter asked

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the question, and I think many are asking the question.

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we need bubbles in order to bring about growth,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>especially in a developed economy? Maybe bubbles are kind of

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 1>good for you who knew climate change? We know jay

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and impacts businesses, impacts industries, homes, how people live. But

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the story in the Economic section notes this week that

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it may have helped fuel the popular uprising that is

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>seen millions marching on the streets of Chile. This is

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating and disturbing story. It takes us, as you

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>say to Chili. Christina Lynn Blad, our economics editor, fearlessly

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is here talking about this story. There's a lot to

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of be disturbed by here, I have to say.

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>In the connections that you draw are pretty start Yeah.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that most of the coverage of

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>these protests has focused on dissatisfaction over you know, the

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>economic model and how it relates to you know, meager

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pensions and people feel like, you know, the education system

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>is you know, is producing inequality and the usual suspects exactly.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>But against But we looked at the backdrop of this,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a ten year mega drought. We have now

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>tech mega in front of these events, and that's been

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>affecting central Chile where which is where most of the

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>population is, the north already very arid, and and so

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we looked at these water fights have been played I

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>mean literally that have been playing out, and how these

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>protests kind of you can't say they literally jumped from

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rural areas to the city, but there's definitely been this

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>echoes of like unequal access to water, equals unequal access

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to education, unequal access to opportunity. You know, we'll tell

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>us about the impact that it's had on on the lifestyle,

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>think about farmers in Chile and so much more. How

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is it played out? So, I mean we talked to

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to you know, people who have lost more than half

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of their livestock, you know, in the last couple of years.

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>And and there's also an area in particular in this

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>valley where avocado farming has um you know spread of

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>course to feed this global demand for avocados, in particular

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of exports to the UK that valley. And

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>in that instance, it's because basically the avocado farmers are

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>being accused of exploiting their water rights that they acquired

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago and also tapping verse illegally. And so all

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the small farmers in the area, um are you know,

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 1>have have the rainfall has been lacking, so they don't

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have anything to water. The avocado farmers are fine, Yeah,

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I mean if you look at the photos, it

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>is stark. I mean you'll see these hills that are

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>all brown and on these avocado farms. Avocado is a

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>really water intensive crop, should not really be grown in

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these places. So yeah, that's one of those things,

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. And one of the issues that this brings

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to mind, I think is income inequality obviously, but also

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this notion of political and economic choices that favor business

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>over consumers or people, to get down to it, and

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of businesses even over what I think most would

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>argue is a basic human right. Well, that's right, And

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I think people were initially surprised about the sort of

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the violence of these demonstrations in Chili, of all places,

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>because it has so often been cited as a model

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of Latin America in terms of how

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it enshrined uh, this neoliberal model you know, its constitution,

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and that constitution dates from the time of the dictatorship,

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and so does a water so and so does a

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>water law that basically gives people water rights in perpetuity,

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 1>so companies you know, have them forever, they can trade them.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was once upon a time the thought

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was like free markets will help people, you know, be

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>careful and the management and use of finite resource. But

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that really has not been the case as we've seen it.

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>In some places, mining and and sort of and and

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of export oriented agriculture have really kind of priority priory.

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>The government has prioritized those kinds of uses for water.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we have now communities in Chile

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that depends on what are getting tructed. I mean, when

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>they opened the faucet, nothing comes out. Yeah, it's amazing,

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. And I do wonder, you know, what is

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the political backdrop here, because a lot of this unrest,

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as you said at the beginning of the conversation, has

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>been tied to the political system. Is there any sense

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that that may change soon? What what's the latest there? Well,

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's the outcome. It may be quite radical,

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and that um, legislators have sat and agreed on two

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.919
<v Speaker 1>possible means of rewriting the constitution. So now this consensus

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the country is a fair large consensus that the

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>constitution needs to be written because it enshrines this model

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that is no longer like you know that is that

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has caused distortion, essentially not valid the country. Right, So

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we may see as part of that, I mean, they

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't started talking about how water is going to play

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>into that because that's a separate law, but we could

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 1>see changes in that as well. It's a complete rethinking

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>basically of sort of like what do you want to

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>be as a country? Well, and I think, yeah, exactly.

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. I feel like Chili perhaps the

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>extreme case in terms of climate change, right in the

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>drought and the impact it's had on the people there.

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.839
<v Speaker 1>But Chile is not the only place where we're seeing

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>climate change, a warming climate lead to political strife and

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>social unrest. We've seen it around the world. Right in Syria.

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It played a role in the civil war because it

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>was like um crop loss and then that pushed up

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the price of bread and the or protests. You know,

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of more Again, It's like sometimes it's like

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 1>something lights a match, and then all these other demands

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get you know, kind of folded in, you know, but

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's you know, if you think

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of his water, you know, to be like inalienable, right right, Well,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so it like it exercises people that they don't have accent.

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Christina land Blade, thank you, thank you. In twenty nineteen,

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about soft Bank, the Vision Fund,

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Japanese billionaire behind it all, Massa Yoshi San. Now,

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the Vision Funds mega investments in some of the world's

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>best known and sometimes most controversial startups have captured the

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>attention of everyone. This story in the magazine this week

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>really peels back the layers of the Fund. Sarah McBride

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>joins us from San Francisco to tell us more about

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this cover story. So, Sarah, I do feel like twenty

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 1>nine we did talk a lot about the Vision Fund

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and its investments. What did you set out to do

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with this story? Well, we wanted to take a step

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>back and see where they were, especially in the wake

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's become a very controversial investment for them in

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we Work, and um, how are things looking now? And uh,

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>will they be able to bounce back. Well, and it's interesting, right, because,

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've kind of been legendary in terms of

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the investments we Work Uber and so on and so forth.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, the we Work investment and the governance

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>issues and so many other issues made us all think, okay, wait,

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on at the Vision Fund? What is going on? Right?

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So we Work is actually a very small part of

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 1>their total investment portfolio. We make the point in the

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>article that Masayashi's son's advisors were much more cautious about

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we Work than he was, And in fact, the Vision

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Fund only committed four point four billion tow we Work.

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean only, but compared to the rest of soft Bank,

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 1>which overall invested ten billion, more than ten billion dollars

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in We Work. Uh, the Vision Funds commitment was relatively small.

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>So they've got we Work and then they've got some

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:28.959
<v Speaker 1>much smaller companies that have gone wrong. But because they

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>unfolded around the same time as We Work, people are

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>paying a lot of attention to them, For example, Wag

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Brandless, to consumer companies that they really only invested

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred million dollars in, but because they're high profile,

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>people are paying a lot of attention to those in

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of funds. When companies fail, they often fail

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty early on in the life of the funds. So

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we're at this interesting inflection point where they also have

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a number of very promising companies that aren't quite at

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the point in their lives where we could point to

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>them and say, wow, these are spectacular companies. But for example,

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>coup Paying, a big retailer in South Korea, has a

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of promise, and another one, Tokopedia, also in Asia,

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is very promising, but the promise hasn't delivered yet the

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>disasters have so it's just a bad time for them.

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It is a bad time. What I love about the

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>stories I said at the top is that I feel

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like you dig into how investment decisions are made, and

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you also pay some insight into Massa as he is

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.919
<v Speaker 1>universally known. Tell us a little bit about it, because

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you say, you get one Massa and sometimes you

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get the other. Right, So Massa can be extremely charming

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and very interested in engaging, or he can kind of

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get in a bad mood and pepper people with questions.

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>And in the lead we tell the story of one

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>time on a call where he berated an investor at

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:17.240
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank for not being optimistic enough about a company

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>called Full Chuck Alliance, which is a company based in

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>China that's making good and steady progress, and Massa apparently

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thought it could grow a lot faster and was telling

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the investor, you have to figure out a way to

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>make it grow even faster than it is now. And

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 1>other people on the call were cringing and felt that

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that one investor got the brunt of Massa's ire. But

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>then other people, particularly company ceo s who go to

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:53.399
<v Speaker 1>pitch Massa, if he likes your company, you can walk

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out just feeling like you're walking on air. Sometimes he

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>tells young startup found ns, oh, you're the next Jack Ma,

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they just leave feeling so good, especially if it's

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a company where they've been rejected many times before. I

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting in your story, too, is how you

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>say what kind of sets the Vision Fund apart maybe

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from some other venture capitalists, is that when the Vision

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Fund and when Massa decides to kind of be all

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in on it um, they invest big time and they

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really do push the founders, the entrepreneurs, you know, to

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of be more aggressive in their business, maybe expand

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>at right right, So they give them the kind of

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>money where they can expand much much quicker than they

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been able to do otherwise. And sometimes, you know,

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a company that might have been looking for fifty or

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty million dollars ends up getting several hundred million from

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 1>soft bank. So soft bank gives a lot of money,

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 1>but then they want you to deliver. So let's say

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you've been planning to roll out in one state. Now

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they want you to do a national roll out and

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think about what's your overseas expansion plan. So they do

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>set it up for our company to grow very fast.

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>But not every CEO can deliver on that, so it's

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a big challenge for the CEO. But a lot of

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>them talk very positively about soft banks big thinking. One

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>CEO told me he got an idea for a whole

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>new business line that he never would have had without

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>soft banked, So to pivot. Yeah, And at the same

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>time as these entrepreneurs pivot right, the business grows, the

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>valuations grow, right, and Massa and the Vision Fund and

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank they tend to profit from those growing valuations.

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We certainly saw that. Yeah, a lot of the names.

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>That was another interesting thing so we have a situation

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:53.439
<v Speaker 1>where the accounting rules seem not quite ready for this

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:57.839
<v Speaker 1>era of multi you know, tens of billion dollars worth

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of valuations of startups. So it's not illegal if your

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>startup that you've invested in is suddenly on paper worth

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>tens of billions of dollars, to mark it up on

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your books to reflect that paper valuation. Now Soft Bank

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 1>marks up some of its companies that told us, you know,

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we work earlier this year was worth forty seven billion dollars.

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It says it never marked up we work that high.

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it marked up some increase in valuation. The

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:36.080
<v Speaker 1>same with oil hotels, the same with many other companies,

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and now they've had to mark some of those back down.

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So this is the situation. One UH investor to us

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:49.839
<v Speaker 1>called it unicorn porn. Where accountants can do this, it's

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not illegal, and maybe that's where accounting rules need to

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>catch up. Listen. So no doubt about it that Massa

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is the central character when it comes to SoftBank. Obviously

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in the vision fund UH, he's the individual that you're

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on, but you also do point out a couple

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of other, um, you know, key players. Um you've got

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Regiev Misera. And you've got some other folks. Tell us

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>about those other individuals, and you know why they're important

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on with the Vision Fund. Right, So

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the Vision Fund is full of larger than life characters.

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Regiev Mistra, very charming guy, likes to vape in meetings.

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He sometimes walks around barefoot. He's just kind of a

0:56:35.040 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>big thinker who does not feel the need to act

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in a conservative way or meet other people's UM standards

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of UH of office UM behavior. Not that he does

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 1>anything untoward, it's more an eccentricity. UM. There's another investor there,

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Housenbold, who's a larger than life character, has a

0:57:05.360 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 1>huge wine collection, drives around in a blue Ferrari, but

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes says things that people find controversial or upsetting. UM.

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with the CFO of the Vision Fund,

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 1>who a lot of people think is quite difficult to

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>work for. Some UM people say he once told a

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>former employee who was Mormon to move back to Utah

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and get more wives, or words to that effect. UM.

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>The employee did leave. So there are a lot of

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>UM incidents where people end up feeling upset. Sorry, just

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up because there's a lot of great details

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in this story, and I highly recommend that everybody check

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 1>out the story and read all of it um But

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just to wrap up just thirty seconds here, Silicon Valley,

0:57:57.520 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>how do they see the Vision Fund and Massa. I

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of jealousy. I think a lot

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of people wish they had a hundred billion dollars to

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>throw around and invest in companies, and they're upset that

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's crowding out other investors, making it harder for everyone

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to invest in startups and making it harder for startups

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to compete against Vision Fund backed companies. That's Sarah McBride

0:58:20.720 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and man, there was a team of reporters that worked

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>on this story and it is truly a deep dive

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>into Soft Bank, the Vision Fund, and Massa Yoshi Son.

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And why you care is because we work with such

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a big story this year and really the failed IPO,

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the governance issue, and the Vision Fund a big investor

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and we work well. And the outsize influence that Soft

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Bank and its Vision Fund has had on the world

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital and therefore the world of technology, it's

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be a big story in well,

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna wrap up Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. I'm Jason Kelly and

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Week Radio Live Monday through Friday, starting at two pm

0:58:57.720 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Well Street time. And you can't catch us live, get

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>our Day League podcast for the ride home. Wherever you

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 1>download your podcast, you can get this week's edition of

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the magazine on newsstands now. We'll be back right here

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>next week at the same time. Happy holidays everyone. This

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg m