WEBVTT - Quantum Computers Could Change Everything

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:21.196 --> 0:00:24.676
<v Speaker 2>In a world where you can put billions of transistors

0:00:24.716 --> 0:00:28.756
<v Speaker 2>on a single chip, and where anybody can access trillions

0:00:28.796 --> 0:00:32.036
<v Speaker 2>of transistors in the cloud, it feels like we can

0:00:32.156 --> 0:00:36.236
<v Speaker 2>use computers for for, you know, anything that can be computed.

0:00:37.076 --> 0:00:41.036
<v Speaker 2>Kind of amazingly, this is not true. There are lots

0:00:41.116 --> 0:00:44.756
<v Speaker 2>of things that could theoretically be computed, but that in

0:00:44.836 --> 0:00:48.396
<v Speaker 2>fact are just too complex, too hard to compute for

0:00:48.636 --> 0:00:52.236
<v Speaker 2>even a cloud full of computers. Things like predicting how

0:00:52.356 --> 0:00:56.316
<v Speaker 2>prospective drugs will work in the body, or modeling really

0:00:56.356 --> 0:01:00.636
<v Speaker 2>complex financial scenarios, even figuring out the factors of very

0:01:00.716 --> 0:01:04.396
<v Speaker 2>large numbers. There are all kinds of computations that people

0:01:04.836 --> 0:01:08.956
<v Speaker 2>just don't do because computers are not nearly powerful enough

0:01:08.996 --> 0:01:15.236
<v Speaker 2>to do them. But but there is an entirely new

0:01:15.356 --> 0:01:18.836
<v Speaker 2>kind of computer people are trying to build. It's called

0:01:18.876 --> 0:01:22.636
<v Speaker 2>a quantum computer. You've probably heard of this. Quantum computers.

0:01:22.716 --> 0:01:25.356
<v Speaker 2>If they work like people hope, they will, will be

0:01:25.476 --> 0:01:29.396
<v Speaker 2>profoundly more powerful than any cloud full of computers that

0:01:29.436 --> 0:01:32.756
<v Speaker 2>has ever existed. They could allow for new breakthroughs in

0:01:32.956 --> 0:01:37.076
<v Speaker 2>everything from drug design to energy storage. Also, a big

0:01:37.196 --> 0:01:41.356
<v Speaker 2>quantum computer could factor very large numbers, which would allow

0:01:41.396 --> 0:01:44.196
<v Speaker 2>it to crack the encryption codes that secure most of

0:01:44.236 --> 0:01:52.996
<v Speaker 2>the data that flows across the Internet. I'm Jacob Goldstein

0:01:53.036 --> 0:01:55.316
<v Speaker 2>and this is What's Your Problem, the show where I

0:01:55.436 --> 0:01:58.556
<v Speaker 2>talk to people who are trying to make technological progress.

0:01:58.996 --> 0:02:02.516
<v Speaker 2>My guest today is Chris Munro. He's the co founder

0:02:02.556 --> 0:02:06.596
<v Speaker 2>and chief scientist at IONQ, one of several companies that

0:02:06.716 --> 0:02:09.116
<v Speaker 2>is trying to figure out how to build a big, power,

0:02:09.116 --> 0:02:13.636
<v Speaker 2>powerful quantum computer. Chris is also a physics professor at Duke,

0:02:14.116 --> 0:02:16.756
<v Speaker 2>which was good news for me because a big part

0:02:16.796 --> 0:02:18.796
<v Speaker 2>of what I wanted to talk to him about was

0:02:18.956 --> 0:02:22.476
<v Speaker 2>quantum physics, which is of course amazing and weird and

0:02:22.876 --> 0:02:29.156
<v Speaker 2>essential for understanding how quantum computers work. We started off

0:02:29.196 --> 0:02:33.956
<v Speaker 2>by discussing the fundamental difference between quantum computers and regular computers.

0:02:34.316 --> 0:02:37.556
<v Speaker 2>It comes down to the bit, the basic building block

0:02:37.636 --> 0:02:40.436
<v Speaker 2>of computing. The essential thing to know about a bit

0:02:40.836 --> 0:02:42.716
<v Speaker 2>is that it can be in one of two states,

0:02:43.116 --> 0:02:46.796
<v Speaker 2>on or off zero or one. At least that's the

0:02:46.836 --> 0:02:51.436
<v Speaker 2>case for traditional computers. Quantum computers use bits called quantum

0:02:51.476 --> 0:02:54.916
<v Speaker 2>bits or cubits, and they're different than traditional bits in

0:02:54.956 --> 0:02:57.436
<v Speaker 2>a really strange, really profound way.

0:02:58.436 --> 0:03:03.156
<v Speaker 3>A quantum bit can be in both zero and one

0:03:04.036 --> 0:03:07.276
<v Speaker 3>at the same time. So this is totally new. We

0:03:07.356 --> 0:03:11.876
<v Speaker 3>never experience, you know, a coffee cup being in two places.

0:03:11.916 --> 0:03:12.476
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at a.

0:03:12.476 --> 0:03:14.996
<v Speaker 2>Coffee cup here, yes, or more simply a light switch

0:03:15.076 --> 0:03:17.276
<v Speaker 2>that is both on and off. Right, plainly, the light

0:03:17.636 --> 0:03:18.516
<v Speaker 2>is either on or.

0:03:18.516 --> 0:03:21.076
<v Speaker 3>You don't experience those things in everyday life. So here's

0:03:21.796 --> 0:03:25.596
<v Speaker 3>my physics, my two minute description of quantum. Okay, there

0:03:25.596 --> 0:03:28.836
<v Speaker 3>are exactly two rules, no more, no less. There are

0:03:28.836 --> 0:03:31.156
<v Speaker 3>two rules, and they have almost nothing to do with

0:03:31.156 --> 0:03:33.196
<v Speaker 3>each other. Here are the two rules. Okay. The first

0:03:33.236 --> 0:03:36.596
<v Speaker 3>rule is that a quantum system can exist in multiple

0:03:36.636 --> 0:03:39.476
<v Speaker 3>states two. It could be more, but let's just say

0:03:39.476 --> 0:03:42.996
<v Speaker 3>two a cubit it's in both states at the same time.

0:03:43.636 --> 0:03:46.436
<v Speaker 3>And this is not this rule by itself. If you

0:03:46.516 --> 0:03:49.676
<v Speaker 3>think about what's going on, it's not such a big deal.

0:03:49.716 --> 0:03:53.636
<v Speaker 3>And the reason is a quantum system follows a wave

0:03:53.716 --> 0:03:56.916
<v Speaker 3>equation sort of like water waves. That if I throw

0:03:56.916 --> 0:04:00.196
<v Speaker 3>a pebble in the pond, it's going to emanate these

0:04:00.276 --> 0:04:03.076
<v Speaker 3>circular waves that occupy the entire pond.

0:04:03.356 --> 0:04:05.316
<v Speaker 2>So you throw a rock or a ball into the

0:04:05.316 --> 0:04:07.556
<v Speaker 2>pond a minute later wears the waves like the whole

0:04:07.556 --> 0:04:08.076
<v Speaker 2>pond is way.

0:04:08.156 --> 0:04:09.996
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right, that's right, it's not you know, the

0:04:10.036 --> 0:04:12.516
<v Speaker 3>wave is not localized is kind of technically how we

0:04:12.596 --> 0:04:17.036
<v Speaker 3>say something, So it's in many places. Now, that's rule

0:04:17.116 --> 0:04:19.156
<v Speaker 3>number one. So here's rule number two, which is the

0:04:19.156 --> 0:04:22.276
<v Speaker 3>weird one. Rule number two basically says that that wave,

0:04:22.516 --> 0:04:27.836
<v Speaker 3>like that wavelike superposition that all quantum systems can can

0:04:27.956 --> 0:04:31.236
<v Speaker 3>exist in, only works when you're not looking.

0:04:32.796 --> 0:04:36.116
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's the part that seems like dumb is

0:04:36.156 --> 0:04:39.436
<v Speaker 2>not quite the right word, but lengthy, implausible, little goofy,

0:04:40.076 --> 0:04:43.436
<v Speaker 2>like surely the world can't give a shit whether I'm

0:04:43.476 --> 0:04:44.396
<v Speaker 2>looking at it or not.

0:04:44.876 --> 0:04:46.796
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because what I mean, and what happens when you

0:04:46.836 --> 0:04:49.396
<v Speaker 3>do look, and quantum says that when you do look

0:04:50.156 --> 0:04:55.516
<v Speaker 3>the superposition, it pops, It latches onto a definite state,

0:04:56.036 --> 0:04:58.836
<v Speaker 3>so it localizes, and it does it at random. You

0:04:58.876 --> 0:05:01.516
<v Speaker 3>can't predict where it's going to localize. All you can

0:05:01.956 --> 0:05:03.916
<v Speaker 3>say is, well, is supposed to be in these two positions,

0:05:03.916 --> 0:05:05.476
<v Speaker 3>and I looked at it it was in one position.

0:05:06.276 --> 0:05:08.436
<v Speaker 2>More to the point, I mean, are like more to

0:05:08.476 --> 0:05:10.796
<v Speaker 2>the point, as people are first thinking about this, are

0:05:10.796 --> 0:05:13.756
<v Speaker 2>they they're thinking of an electron. So the electron is

0:05:13.916 --> 0:05:16.796
<v Speaker 2>like a wave it kind of exists in all these

0:05:16.796 --> 0:05:22.516
<v Speaker 2>different places around the nucleus. But then they figure out

0:05:22.596 --> 0:05:25.316
<v Speaker 2>if you look at an electron what happens.

0:05:25.316 --> 0:05:30.356
<v Speaker 3>It pops into one state that almost has no space.

0:05:30.436 --> 0:05:32.476
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it pops into a point like particle, like

0:05:32.476 --> 0:05:33.556
<v Speaker 3>a little tiny baseball.

0:05:34.556 --> 0:05:37.236
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not looking at it, is it literally not? There?

0:05:37.476 --> 0:05:37.636
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:05:38.596 --> 0:05:40.476
<v Speaker 3>Now you're getting philosophical on me.

0:05:40.556 --> 0:05:44.596
<v Speaker 2>Here, you did it. You're the one telling me these things.

0:05:45.516 --> 0:05:47.556
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Well, it's these two rules. We have to

0:05:47.596 --> 0:05:49.316
<v Speaker 3>add that rule because.

0:05:49.476 --> 0:05:51.996
<v Speaker 2>So so yeah, so state the rules again, just to

0:05:52.116 --> 0:05:53.036
<v Speaker 2>keep us on the rails here.

0:05:53.196 --> 0:05:55.956
<v Speaker 3>Rule number one, any quantum system like a cubit or

0:05:55.956 --> 0:05:59.476
<v Speaker 3>an electron, can be in a superposition of states. It

0:05:59.516 --> 0:06:01.156
<v Speaker 3>can be in this fuzzy existence.

0:06:01.876 --> 0:06:03.876
<v Speaker 2>It can be in two places at once. It can

0:06:03.956 --> 0:06:04.876
<v Speaker 2>be on and off.

0:06:05.036 --> 0:06:09.516
<v Speaker 3>Rule number two is that that first rule only works

0:06:09.516 --> 0:06:11.676
<v Speaker 3>when you don't look, and when you do look, it

0:06:11.716 --> 0:06:15.916
<v Speaker 3>will randomly localize pop out into a singular place.

0:06:16.636 --> 0:06:19.436
<v Speaker 2>It will cease being on and off. It will become

0:06:19.556 --> 0:06:23.396
<v Speaker 2>either on or off. Famously, the cat will stop being

0:06:23.396 --> 0:06:27.036
<v Speaker 2>both dead and alive, and will either be dead or alive.

0:06:27.916 --> 0:06:30.796
<v Speaker 2>And just to be clear, observed, doesn't just mean us

0:06:30.836 --> 0:06:33.356
<v Speaker 2>looking at it, right, that's the kind of caricaturish version.

0:06:33.436 --> 0:06:36.236
<v Speaker 2>But in fact it means like no particle can touch

0:06:36.276 --> 0:06:40.116
<v Speaker 2>it or something like that. Right, So observed doesn't just

0:06:40.236 --> 0:06:43.516
<v Speaker 2>mean seen by a person. It means interacted with by

0:06:43.556 --> 0:06:45.756
<v Speaker 2>any part of it, by anything, even a single molecule

0:06:45.756 --> 0:06:49.796
<v Speaker 2>of air or a photon. One. All of that ruins

0:06:49.836 --> 0:06:53.636
<v Speaker 2>our beautiful superposition and forces the thing to resolve. So

0:06:54.036 --> 0:06:56.716
<v Speaker 2>there's two pieces of jargon that I always come across

0:06:56.756 --> 0:07:00.836
<v Speaker 2>when I'm reading about quantum computers. One, I think you've

0:07:00.876 --> 0:07:05.436
<v Speaker 2>just described one, this idea that quantum things can be

0:07:05.596 --> 0:07:09.516
<v Speaker 2>both one and zero if we're not looking at them,

0:07:09.676 --> 0:07:11.476
<v Speaker 2>is it right, that's called superpositions.

0:07:11.516 --> 0:07:14.716
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's called That's a I would call it a

0:07:14.716 --> 0:07:16.756
<v Speaker 3>plain old superposition. And you'll see what I.

0:07:16.756 --> 0:07:22.876
<v Speaker 2>Meanilla superposition, no sprints, right, Okay, good, So we've talked

0:07:22.876 --> 0:07:26.196
<v Speaker 2>about superposition. There is this other piece of jargon that

0:07:26.196 --> 0:07:29.396
<v Speaker 2>people always use when they are talking about quantum computing,

0:07:29.556 --> 0:07:34.036
<v Speaker 2>and that is entanglement. So just like we'll get to

0:07:34.276 --> 0:07:36.956
<v Speaker 2>what it means for the computer, but just like, in

0:07:36.996 --> 0:07:38.836
<v Speaker 2>a basic way, what is entanglement.

0:07:39.516 --> 0:07:41.996
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is that we're bringing Einstein in here. All

0:07:42.036 --> 0:07:45.036
<v Speaker 3>the time. He had a famous paper in nineteen thirty

0:07:45.076 --> 0:07:49.756
<v Speaker 3>five that he thought finally put the end to quantum mechanics.

0:07:50.396 --> 0:07:54.476
<v Speaker 3>He said, and this is ridiculous because these two cubits,

0:07:54.596 --> 0:07:57.196
<v Speaker 3>and I'm gonna, I'm going to use cubits are so simple.

0:07:57.236 --> 0:08:00.236
<v Speaker 3>Here you have two cubits prepared in zero zero and

0:08:00.276 --> 0:08:03.196
<v Speaker 3>one one. Then you separate them. They could be really

0:08:03.236 --> 0:08:09.396
<v Speaker 3>far apart. Nevertheless, when one person measures their cubit, they

0:08:09.436 --> 0:08:13.436
<v Speaker 3>know immediately even before the even before light could traverse

0:08:13.436 --> 0:08:16.156
<v Speaker 3>the distance between them, they know immediately the state of

0:08:16.236 --> 0:08:21.836
<v Speaker 3>the other one. And that violates relativity. Another of Einstein said, right.

0:08:21.916 --> 0:08:25.276
<v Speaker 2>So Einstein has this paper if I as I understand it,

0:08:25.316 --> 0:08:28.316
<v Speaker 2>where he basically says, look, if quantum mechanics is true,

0:08:28.916 --> 0:08:33.836
<v Speaker 2>there will be these particles, whatever very small particles that

0:08:33.876 --> 0:08:37.836
<v Speaker 2>behave in quantum ways, that become connected to each other

0:08:37.916 --> 0:08:40.636
<v Speaker 2>in some strange way. They're not physically connected. You can

0:08:40.636 --> 0:08:41.956
<v Speaker 2>put them as far apart as you want, you can

0:08:41.996 --> 0:08:45.076
<v Speaker 2>put them a million miles away. And if you look

0:08:45.116 --> 0:08:48.636
<v Speaker 2>at one of the particles and it resolves itself into

0:08:48.676 --> 0:08:53.156
<v Speaker 2>some position whatever, call it zero or one instantly, instantly,

0:08:53.276 --> 0:08:57.116
<v Speaker 2>at that same instant, the other particle will resolve itself

0:08:57.156 --> 0:09:00.956
<v Speaker 2>the same way, and surely that can't be true because

0:09:00.996 --> 0:09:03.236
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't make any sense. The universe doesn't work that way,

0:09:03.276 --> 0:09:07.036
<v Speaker 2>and therefore quantum physics is wrong. Question spooky action at

0:09:07.076 --> 0:09:08.756
<v Speaker 2>a distance, he said, mocking list.

0:09:08.796 --> 0:09:11.076
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, the title of the paper was a question

0:09:11.196 --> 0:09:13.716
<v Speaker 3>can quantum mechanics be considered complete? In other words, is

0:09:13.716 --> 0:09:15.036
<v Speaker 3>it right? There's something else there?

0:09:15.076 --> 0:09:17.276
<v Speaker 2>And he's saying, surely, if this could be true, the

0:09:17.276 --> 0:09:19.716
<v Speaker 2>theory must not make any sense because this obviously can't

0:09:19.756 --> 0:09:20.116
<v Speaker 2>be true.

0:09:20.196 --> 0:09:22.356
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he was wrong. He was famously wrong. It

0:09:22.436 --> 0:09:25.316
<v Speaker 3>spent tested time and time again that this is exact.

0:09:25.596 --> 0:09:28.756
<v Speaker 3>This is actually how nature works. We have to think

0:09:28.796 --> 0:09:29.356
<v Speaker 3>of it this way.

0:09:29.636 --> 0:09:32.876
<v Speaker 2>And people in China did one recently right where they

0:09:33.236 --> 0:09:36.076
<v Speaker 2>had one particle on the ground and an entangled particle

0:09:36.156 --> 0:09:39.116
<v Speaker 2>on a satellite, and they looked at the particle on

0:09:39.156 --> 0:09:41.196
<v Speaker 2>the ground and it resolved itself in whatever way, and

0:09:41.276 --> 0:09:43.036
<v Speaker 2>at the same moment the particle on this I mean,

0:09:43.076 --> 0:09:45.236
<v Speaker 2>I know that's the party trick version of it, but

0:09:45.356 --> 0:09:46.356
<v Speaker 2>it's a good party trick.

0:09:46.476 --> 0:09:49.356
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So entanglement is I like to think of it.

0:09:49.756 --> 0:09:51.476
<v Speaker 3>You know, if we move on to quantum computing. I

0:09:51.716 --> 0:09:53.396
<v Speaker 3>like to think of entanglement as sort of like a

0:09:53.476 --> 0:09:58.836
<v Speaker 3>wire without any wires. Yeah, and when you're talking about computing,

0:09:58.916 --> 0:10:01.876
<v Speaker 3>that's in fact what gives quantum computers its power, the

0:10:01.916 --> 0:10:04.276
<v Speaker 3>ability to wire things together without having wires.

0:10:05.196 --> 0:10:09.636
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So okay, so we've got these two idea, right.

0:10:09.716 --> 0:10:11.756
<v Speaker 2>Superposition a thing can be in two states at once

0:10:11.836 --> 0:10:15.316
<v Speaker 2>until you look at it, and entanglement meaning particles, and

0:10:15.356 --> 0:10:17.836
<v Speaker 2>it's not just two, right, it can be multiple particles

0:10:17.876 --> 0:10:20.676
<v Speaker 2>can be entangled such that when you look at one

0:10:20.756 --> 0:10:23.676
<v Speaker 2>and it resolves into some state, you will immediately know

0:10:23.716 --> 0:10:25.916
<v Speaker 2>what state all the others are resulting into. Right, These

0:10:25.956 --> 0:10:31.036
<v Speaker 2>are the two intellectual tools we've got. Can we build

0:10:31.076 --> 0:10:33.716
<v Speaker 2>a computer in our minds from these two tools?

0:10:33.756 --> 0:10:35.916
<v Speaker 3>Well, the good news is that there's a cool scaling

0:10:35.996 --> 0:10:38.916
<v Speaker 3>law because when we go to three cubits, now there's

0:10:39.076 --> 0:10:43.916
<v Speaker 3>eight states, it's zero one, yes, all three cube, all

0:10:43.956 --> 0:10:47.116
<v Speaker 3>three bit numbers, there's eight of them. With four, there's sixteen,

0:10:47.236 --> 0:10:49.636
<v Speaker 3>thirty two, and so on and so forth. So every

0:10:49.636 --> 0:10:53.636
<v Speaker 3>time you add one cubit, you've just doubled the possibilities.

0:10:53.756 --> 0:10:57.116
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exponentially is an overused word, but this is an

0:10:57.156 --> 0:10:58.516
<v Speaker 2>actual exponential thing.

0:10:58.516 --> 0:11:01.516
<v Speaker 3>And this is the structure of quantum computing that gives

0:11:01.516 --> 0:11:04.116
<v Speaker 3>it its power to calculate things that we could never

0:11:04.156 --> 0:11:07.516
<v Speaker 3>do using classical computer. It's this fundamental exponential gain.

0:11:08.036 --> 0:11:10.396
<v Speaker 2>I get more or less the theory of a quantum computer.

0:11:10.516 --> 0:11:13.316
<v Speaker 2>It's also clear that quantum computers don't exist in a

0:11:13.396 --> 0:11:18.516
<v Speaker 2>useful way yet, right So what do you and everybody

0:11:18.596 --> 0:11:20.476
<v Speaker 2>in the field have to figure out to get from

0:11:20.516 --> 0:11:23.916
<v Speaker 2>where we are now to having amazing quantum.

0:11:23.676 --> 0:11:27.356
<v Speaker 3>Well, in our case using these atoms, it's a simple

0:11:27.356 --> 0:11:31.116
<v Speaker 3>matter of scaling. We routinely work with twenty to thirty

0:11:31.196 --> 0:11:33.076
<v Speaker 3>right now. As soon as we get up to about

0:11:33.116 --> 0:11:37.036
<v Speaker 3>one hundred, we're going to start to challenge will be

0:11:37.076 --> 0:11:41.836
<v Speaker 3>well beyond what challenges supercomputers, and that's where the opportunities

0:11:41.876 --> 0:11:44.396
<v Speaker 3>will happen. And the trick is, with one hundred cubits,

0:11:44.436 --> 0:11:46.196
<v Speaker 3>you need to do a lot of stuff with them.

0:11:46.396 --> 0:11:48.396
<v Speaker 3>You need to do many more operations. They have to

0:11:48.436 --> 0:11:51.956
<v Speaker 3>live longer, they have to be even more isolated as

0:11:51.996 --> 0:11:56.636
<v Speaker 3>you add more. So it's a tricky scaling problem. Our

0:11:56.676 --> 0:11:59.156
<v Speaker 3>technology we sort of we sort of know how to

0:11:59.196 --> 0:12:02.516
<v Speaker 3>do this. Other technologies are still in the lab. I

0:12:02.516 --> 0:12:05.476
<v Speaker 3>think they don't know the underlying physics of materials to

0:12:05.516 --> 0:12:08.036
<v Speaker 3>make them clean enough to do. That doesn't mean we're

0:12:08.036 --> 0:12:11.036
<v Speaker 3>out of the woods. The challenge here is what you said,

0:12:11.196 --> 0:12:14.316
<v Speaker 3>is trying to isolate it the control. But these challenges

0:12:14.356 --> 0:12:16.956
<v Speaker 3>have nothing to do with quantum. It has to do

0:12:16.996 --> 0:12:18.636
<v Speaker 3>with how good of a vacuum, how goods your chip,

0:12:18.636 --> 0:12:20.316
<v Speaker 3>how good are your laser beams. These are all things

0:12:20.316 --> 0:12:21.156
<v Speaker 3>that can be engineered.

0:12:21.796 --> 0:12:24.756
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's very you're like a construction guy, like

0:12:24.876 --> 0:12:28.676
<v Speaker 2>your core problem is just building whatever a box to

0:12:28.756 --> 0:12:31.116
<v Speaker 2>put an atom in so that the atom will be

0:12:31.196 --> 0:12:36.516
<v Speaker 2>left alone to exist in its unobserved quantum stamp.

0:12:36.996 --> 0:12:41.876
<v Speaker 3>Yep, exactly. Quantum systems only exist that way rule number one,

0:12:42.316 --> 0:12:47.196
<v Speaker 3>you know, without looking that meaning that they're nearly perfectly isolated. Yeah,

0:12:47.236 --> 0:12:50.556
<v Speaker 3>so that's the hard part of building a big quantum computer.

0:12:52.996 --> 0:12:56.716
<v Speaker 2>So that's the theory. After the break the practice how

0:12:56.756 --> 0:12:58.036
<v Speaker 2>to build a small.

0:12:57.796 --> 0:13:08.876
<v Speaker 1>Quantum computer form real. Now back to the show.

0:13:09.516 --> 0:13:12.836
<v Speaker 2>A bunch of companies are building quantum computers, big companies

0:13:12.916 --> 0:13:15.876
<v Speaker 2>like IBM and Google and Microsoft, as well as a

0:13:15.876 --> 0:13:19.276
<v Speaker 2>few smaller companies like ion Q. The different companies are

0:13:19.276 --> 0:13:23.316
<v Speaker 2>trying different approaches. Some require super cold temperatures, in your

0:13:23.356 --> 0:13:29.916
<v Speaker 2>absolute zero. Some use photons. Ion Q uses ions charged particles.

0:13:30.596 --> 0:13:33.276
<v Speaker 2>I asked Chris to walk me through how ion Q

0:13:33.516 --> 0:13:37.356
<v Speaker 2>builds a quantum computer and so what so lest I

0:13:37.356 --> 0:13:39.796
<v Speaker 2>mean your company is called ion Q, right, and so

0:13:39.916 --> 0:13:43.076
<v Speaker 2>let's like tell me about tell me about your qubits?

0:13:43.476 --> 0:13:45.596
<v Speaker 2>What what kind of atom? What kind of ion? Like

0:13:45.636 --> 0:13:46.556
<v Speaker 2>what is it that you're using.

0:13:47.356 --> 0:13:50.756
<v Speaker 3>The first few generations were uturbium one seventy one. It's

0:13:50.756 --> 0:13:53.596
<v Speaker 3>a very heavy yes, a heavy atom, the lower right

0:13:53.636 --> 0:13:55.836
<v Speaker 3>part of the periodic table. And it turns out that

0:13:55.956 --> 0:13:58.636
<v Speaker 3>it interacts with the lasers in a very simple way,

0:13:58.716 --> 0:14:00.636
<v Speaker 3>I believe it or not. Okay, so that's what we use.

0:14:00.676 --> 0:14:03.036
<v Speaker 3>It's a metal. So we have a little wire of uturbuum.

0:14:03.036 --> 0:14:05.676
<v Speaker 2>So you have a little piece of metal that's U turbium.

0:14:05.876 --> 0:14:07.556
<v Speaker 2>I would if I were you, I would sell visors

0:14:07.556 --> 0:14:08.436
<v Speaker 2>that said uturbuum.

0:14:09.356 --> 0:14:11.916
<v Speaker 3>That's not sure. Oh yeah, okay, all kinds of swag.

0:14:13.236 --> 0:14:16.996
<v Speaker 2>So okay, so you take this element, this metal U turbium.

0:14:17.676 --> 0:14:18.236
<v Speaker 2>Go it is.

0:14:18.556 --> 0:14:21.836
<v Speaker 3>We have a little vacuum chamber. It's small. They're getting

0:14:21.916 --> 0:14:24.476
<v Speaker 3>those are getting smaller. It's all at room temperature. By

0:14:24.476 --> 0:14:27.316
<v Speaker 3>the way, we don't have to cool things as aggressive o.

0:14:27.836 --> 0:14:30.756
<v Speaker 3>This little wire is inside that vacuum chamber, and there's

0:14:30.796 --> 0:14:34.516
<v Speaker 3>a few black magic things that happen. It's nothing, nothing

0:14:34.596 --> 0:14:37.876
<v Speaker 3>super fancy here. We blast a piece of that metal

0:14:37.876 --> 0:14:39.916
<v Speaker 3>with a laser beam and what happens is we get

0:14:39.956 --> 0:14:44.516
<v Speaker 3>a puff of metal in gas in vapor form. Its sublimates.

0:14:44.996 --> 0:14:48.356
<v Speaker 2>It goes straight from solid to gas without being a liquid.

0:14:48.316 --> 0:14:50.596
<v Speaker 3>In a vacuum chamber. So there's nothing else there, and

0:14:50.636 --> 0:14:53.316
<v Speaker 3>so we get this puff of neutral atoms. Now we

0:14:53.356 --> 0:14:57.876
<v Speaker 3>have these electric fields from chips that again, nothing really

0:14:57.876 --> 0:15:01.436
<v Speaker 3>fancy there. The atoms don't see the electric field because

0:15:01.476 --> 0:15:05.436
<v Speaker 3>the atoms are not charged electrically yet they're neutral. Now,

0:15:05.516 --> 0:15:07.956
<v Speaker 3>when they float above the region where we want to

0:15:07.996 --> 0:15:10.796
<v Speaker 3>hold them as ion, we send another laser beam that

0:15:10.876 --> 0:15:14.156
<v Speaker 3>removes an electron from each atom. We know exactly how

0:15:14.156 --> 0:15:16.356
<v Speaker 3>to do that, very efficient and bam, it's now an

0:15:16.356 --> 0:15:18.876
<v Speaker 3>ion and it says, hey, wait a minute, I'm now stuck.

0:15:19.836 --> 0:15:22.436
<v Speaker 3>So they just sit there and we do something called

0:15:22.516 --> 0:15:24.636
<v Speaker 3>laser cooling to bring them to rest.

0:15:25.076 --> 0:15:29.796
<v Speaker 2>Sogerat to be clear now that so it's an ion

0:15:29.956 --> 0:15:35.036
<v Speaker 2>of uterbium and it's held because by electrical charge. That's

0:15:35.076 --> 0:15:36.676
<v Speaker 2>your Cubit you got a cubit.

0:15:36.756 --> 0:15:37.196
<v Speaker 3>Now that's it.

0:15:38.076 --> 0:15:41.516
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that part you've solved, right, Yeah.

0:15:41.356 --> 0:15:44.076
<v Speaker 3>And when you put many turbium mindes next to each other,

0:15:44.076 --> 0:15:47.316
<v Speaker 3>they form a little crystal, an atomically perfect crystal. And

0:15:47.356 --> 0:15:49.396
<v Speaker 3>you can see that when you shine a different laser on,

0:15:49.636 --> 0:15:51.636
<v Speaker 3>they glow and you can see like stars in the sky,

0:15:51.756 --> 0:15:53.876
<v Speaker 3>there's they're not randomly oriented there.

0:15:53.956 --> 0:15:56.356
<v Speaker 2>So now you've created a bunch of cubits. You've got them,

0:15:56.396 --> 0:15:59.556
<v Speaker 2>as you say, like stars in the sky. They're sitting there.

0:15:59.596 --> 0:16:02.436
<v Speaker 2>They're held in place by electrical charge. What has to

0:16:02.436 --> 0:16:02.916
<v Speaker 2>happen next.

0:16:03.076 --> 0:16:05.716
<v Speaker 3>What people might not know is that an atomic clock

0:16:05.876 --> 0:16:09.076
<v Speaker 3>is actually based on two levels inside of the caesium atom.

0:16:09.196 --> 0:16:10.356
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter what the atom is.

0:16:10.436 --> 0:16:12.756
<v Speaker 2>Oh shit, I was already on uturbium.

0:16:12.356 --> 0:16:16.116
<v Speaker 3>And we have very similar levels in utbium that behave

0:16:16.156 --> 0:16:19.236
<v Speaker 3>as our cubit. It's a pretty good atomic clock, very

0:16:19.276 --> 0:16:24.556
<v Speaker 3>well defined states. And each each atom has its own cubit. Okay,

0:16:25.116 --> 0:16:27.676
<v Speaker 3>so we can prepare them all in the state zero.

0:16:27.956 --> 0:16:30.276
<v Speaker 2>So what is it? I mean? I know an atomic

0:16:30.316 --> 0:16:32.436
<v Speaker 2>clock is just a clock that's super accurate, But why

0:16:32.436 --> 0:16:34.236
<v Speaker 2>does that matter here? I don't even know what it means.

0:16:34.236 --> 0:16:36.596
<v Speaker 3>On. Ah, Well, it has to do with the fact

0:16:36.596 --> 0:16:40.316
<v Speaker 3>that two states in an atom, they have they generally

0:16:40.316 --> 0:16:43.356
<v Speaker 3>have different energies, sort of like different orbits planets around

0:16:43.356 --> 0:16:43.676
<v Speaker 3>the sun.

0:16:44.236 --> 0:16:48.156
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's like what level, what energy level is

0:16:48.156 --> 0:16:50.116
<v Speaker 2>the electron at it's going between one.

0:16:49.996 --> 0:16:52.236
<v Speaker 3>And you can think of that, and those energy levels

0:16:52.236 --> 0:16:55.516
<v Speaker 3>are incredibly well defined and they're exactly the same for

0:16:55.676 --> 0:16:57.036
<v Speaker 3>two different atoms.

0:16:57.596 --> 0:17:00.236
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and so is this our zero in one? Tell

0:17:00.276 --> 0:17:01.396
<v Speaker 2>me this is our zero and one.

0:17:01.436 --> 0:17:01.756
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:17:02.196 --> 0:17:06.956
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Uh So now we have our and if we're

0:17:06.956 --> 0:17:10.676
<v Speaker 2>not looking, they're in superposition. It's always some probability were

0:17:10.756 --> 0:17:11.316
<v Speaker 2>zero and one.

0:17:11.356 --> 0:17:13.916
<v Speaker 3>We start by preparing them all in a very boring state,

0:17:13.956 --> 0:17:17.916
<v Speaker 3>all in the state zero. That's like initializing the systems,

0:17:17.956 --> 0:17:20.396
<v Speaker 3>like clearing out your computer. It's putting all the registries

0:17:20.396 --> 0:17:24.836
<v Speaker 3>into zero. Reboot rebooter, that's rebooting. Okay. After we prepare

0:17:24.836 --> 0:17:27.196
<v Speaker 3>in zero, now we're going to make superpositions. We're going

0:17:27.276 --> 0:17:32.196
<v Speaker 3>to different laser beams, going to drive the system halfway

0:17:32.796 --> 0:17:35.036
<v Speaker 3>to the other level. That's sort of making a fifty

0:17:35.036 --> 0:17:37.796
<v Speaker 3>to fifty superposition. You can make as you can also

0:17:37.956 --> 0:17:40.956
<v Speaker 3>entangle them, and the entanglement is based on the fact

0:17:40.956 --> 0:17:44.076
<v Speaker 3>that these are ions, and they're like masses connected by springs.

0:17:44.076 --> 0:17:47.596
<v Speaker 3>They vibrate together. So when you push on one, literally

0:17:47.636 --> 0:17:51.196
<v Speaker 3>we push them in space. We push them around, and

0:17:51.236 --> 0:17:54.116
<v Speaker 3>they interact with their neighbors, and they're very well defined

0:17:54.116 --> 0:17:55.596
<v Speaker 3>ways to do this. Those are called gates.

0:17:55.796 --> 0:17:58.876
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm with you. When you've got your ions, I

0:17:58.956 --> 0:18:01.276
<v Speaker 2>understand you're resetting them and they have their zero in

0:18:01.316 --> 0:18:03.996
<v Speaker 2>one and then you do something with them, you mess

0:18:04.036 --> 0:18:06.636
<v Speaker 2>with them in such a way that they become entangled exactly.

0:18:07.076 --> 0:18:10.116
<v Speaker 3>Yes, okay, shine lasers that shun these atoms just a

0:18:10.156 --> 0:18:10.516
<v Speaker 3>little bit.

0:18:10.596 --> 0:18:12.916
<v Speaker 2>Love it. I love it that it's another laser. And

0:18:12.996 --> 0:18:15.396
<v Speaker 2>so now do you have a quantum computer? Have you now?

0:18:15.716 --> 0:18:15.956
<v Speaker 2>In this?

0:18:16.156 --> 0:18:19.116
<v Speaker 3>No? One? Last step? Okay, it's an easy one. It's

0:18:19.156 --> 0:18:22.636
<v Speaker 3>very similar to remember the initialization step. We prepare everything

0:18:22.676 --> 0:18:26.716
<v Speaker 3>in the state zero. The final step is to make

0:18:26.756 --> 0:18:29.356
<v Speaker 3>a measurement. Well, that's the beauty of atoms in a

0:18:29.436 --> 0:18:33.036
<v Speaker 3>vacuum is that we can send yet another laser beam,

0:18:33.356 --> 0:18:35.876
<v Speaker 3>very similar to the other ones. And this laser beam,

0:18:36.036 --> 0:18:38.276
<v Speaker 3>if the atom is in the state one, it will

0:18:38.276 --> 0:18:40.756
<v Speaker 3>glow and we can collect that. It's like a star.

0:18:40.916 --> 0:18:43.356
<v Speaker 3>It's really bright. You can see a single atom with

0:18:43.396 --> 0:18:46.996
<v Speaker 3>your naked eye in my laboratory. If it's in the

0:18:46.996 --> 0:18:49.596
<v Speaker 3>state zero, it's dark. So we basically look for bright

0:18:49.676 --> 0:18:52.596
<v Speaker 3>dark bright dark, and that's what we read. That's it.

0:18:52.756 --> 0:18:53.676
<v Speaker 3>That's a quantum computer.

0:18:54.836 --> 0:18:57.636
<v Speaker 2>And so you have built one of those, built.

0:18:57.436 --> 0:18:59.996
<v Speaker 3>Several of them, Duke, We have six of them at

0:19:00.036 --> 0:19:02.156
<v Speaker 3>I and Q. We've built nine different generations.

0:19:02.596 --> 0:19:05.436
<v Speaker 2>And the issue is they're just not big enough. They're

0:19:05.436 --> 0:19:07.116
<v Speaker 2>not enough cubits to be that.

0:19:07.356 --> 0:19:09.556
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're at twenty to thirty right now. We need

0:19:09.596 --> 0:19:11.156
<v Speaker 3>to get to sixty two hundred.

0:19:11.356 --> 0:19:17.596
<v Speaker 2>So as you've described it sounds easy. I get it, Like,

0:19:17.756 --> 0:19:19.676
<v Speaker 2>if you can do twenty, why can't you do sixty?

0:19:20.236 --> 0:19:24.556
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'll make it very short. Remember the vibration I

0:19:24.636 --> 0:19:27.796
<v Speaker 3>talked about, like when you move one atom, the other

0:19:27.836 --> 0:19:30.876
<v Speaker 3>one moves. If you put five hundred of these atoms

0:19:30.876 --> 0:19:36.716
<v Speaker 3>in a chain, that motion becomes very sloppy and noisy.

0:19:36.876 --> 0:19:38.356
<v Speaker 3>So you want to limit the number you have in

0:19:38.396 --> 0:19:40.996
<v Speaker 3>a chain. We know we can put twenty or thirty,

0:19:41.076 --> 0:19:43.916
<v Speaker 3>maybe forty in a chain, but we need to we

0:19:43.996 --> 0:19:46.836
<v Speaker 3>need to have a modular way to connect to another

0:19:46.876 --> 0:19:49.756
<v Speaker 3>group of twenty or forty using optical fibers. We know

0:19:49.796 --> 0:19:50.516
<v Speaker 3>how to do that too.

0:19:51.436 --> 0:19:53.316
<v Speaker 2>We have done it, but you haven't quite worked out

0:19:53.356 --> 0:19:55.436
<v Speaker 2>all the bugs yet. Okay, so it's not there. Doesn't

0:19:55.476 --> 0:19:58.196
<v Speaker 2>need to be some big breakthrough or some step functions in.

0:19:58.316 --> 0:20:00.636
<v Speaker 3>The engineer just have to want it's engine a lot

0:20:00.676 --> 0:20:04.916
<v Speaker 3>of engineering, and we don't need breakthroughs. We don't need breakthroughs.

0:20:07.956 --> 0:20:09.996
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back in a minute with the lighting ground.

0:20:19.236 --> 0:20:21.836
<v Speaker 2>Back to the show. I know you got to go soon.

0:20:22.156 --> 0:20:23.956
<v Speaker 2>I want to finish with a lightning round and we

0:20:23.996 --> 0:20:25.636
<v Speaker 2>can truly make it a lightning round a lot of

0:20:25.716 --> 0:20:27.556
<v Speaker 2>questions and you can answer them fast so you could

0:20:27.556 --> 0:20:31.396
<v Speaker 2>go to your next meeting. I understand you're a percussionist

0:20:31.596 --> 0:20:34.516
<v Speaker 2>in an orchestra and that you play like the weird instruments.

0:20:34.556 --> 0:20:34.716
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:20:35.796 --> 0:20:38.476
<v Speaker 2>I watched a YouTube video. I'm curious, what is your

0:20:38.596 --> 0:20:40.796
<v Speaker 2>favorite weird percussion instrument.

0:20:41.076 --> 0:20:43.116
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna have to say, alephone.

0:20:44.756 --> 0:20:45.996
<v Speaker 2>What's the aleophone?

0:20:46.356 --> 0:20:48.276
<v Speaker 3>It's a wind machine?

0:20:49.276 --> 0:20:50.796
<v Speaker 2>How does it sound? What sound does it make?

0:20:51.796 --> 0:20:55.316
<v Speaker 3>Actually, some orchestras serve pieces called for it. It's basically

0:20:55.316 --> 0:20:57.676
<v Speaker 3>a big piece of burlap on a spindle that has

0:20:57.716 --> 0:21:03.876
<v Speaker 3>slats and it's like I made one of those for

0:21:03.956 --> 0:21:05.236
<v Speaker 3>our orchestra those fun.

0:21:06.436 --> 0:21:09.116
<v Speaker 2>So how long have you been working on quantum computer?

0:21:10.516 --> 0:21:13.276
<v Speaker 3>Thirty years a long time?

0:21:16.036 --> 0:21:19.516
<v Speaker 2>Did you think there would be a useful quantum computer

0:21:19.956 --> 0:21:22.436
<v Speaker 2>sooner than there has been? Like? How is it relative

0:21:22.476 --> 0:21:23.676
<v Speaker 2>to your initial expectations.

0:21:23.796 --> 0:21:27.196
<v Speaker 3>What I've learned is the love that you know. Physics

0:21:27.196 --> 0:21:31.436
<v Speaker 3>in the laboratory is one thing. Engineering is yet another thing,

0:21:31.876 --> 0:21:35.596
<v Speaker 3>and then product is a third thing, and they're all different.

0:21:35.636 --> 0:21:37.916
<v Speaker 3>And when I started in the field, I had no

0:21:37.996 --> 0:21:40.876
<v Speaker 3>knowledge of product and a little bit of knowledge of engineering.

0:21:41.436 --> 0:21:45.036
<v Speaker 3>I think given engineering and product nature of this of

0:21:45.076 --> 0:21:50.396
<v Speaker 3>this evolution, it's actually been faster than I thought it

0:21:50.396 --> 0:21:50.756
<v Speaker 3>would be.

0:21:52.276 --> 0:21:55.436
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious just in terms of your work in quantum physics, right,

0:21:55.476 --> 0:22:00.276
<v Speaker 2>this is you as physics professor. Now, when you're deep

0:22:00.356 --> 0:22:03.476
<v Speaker 2>in quantum physics work, does it ever freak you out

0:22:03.596 --> 0:22:07.076
<v Speaker 2>that quantum physics suggests that the world is so different

0:22:07.476 --> 0:22:09.236
<v Speaker 2>than the world we experience in our daily.

0:22:10.476 --> 0:22:12.716
<v Speaker 3>I should be losing more sleep over it, But I

0:22:12.716 --> 0:22:16.356
<v Speaker 3>think I've been able to be kind of successful by

0:22:16.436 --> 0:22:19.196
<v Speaker 3>not thinking, at least during the day of those things.

0:22:19.236 --> 0:22:21.436
<v Speaker 2>You're too busy trying to build a computer to think

0:22:21.436 --> 0:22:22.036
<v Speaker 2>about that stuff.

0:22:22.316 --> 0:22:24.036
<v Speaker 3>We know the law I'm more of a mechanic. I've

0:22:24.036 --> 0:22:26.556
<v Speaker 3>always been very good at applying math, and to me,

0:22:27.076 --> 0:22:29.676
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of what quantum is. Just it works. We

0:22:29.716 --> 0:22:31.356
<v Speaker 3>know the laws, don't think too much.

0:22:32.436 --> 0:22:34.676
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned when you go home you think about it,

0:22:34.676 --> 0:22:36.156
<v Speaker 2>Like when you wake up at four in the morning,

0:22:36.316 --> 0:22:40.396
<v Speaker 2>is there a particular aspect of the quantum universe that

0:22:40.436 --> 0:22:41.036
<v Speaker 2>you returned to.

0:22:42.516 --> 0:22:47.716
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's certainly entanglement that it's sort of space seems

0:22:47.716 --> 0:22:50.476
<v Speaker 3>to wind upon itself. I guess that's one way to

0:22:50.476 --> 0:22:51.036
<v Speaker 3>think about it.

0:22:51.236 --> 0:22:54.676
<v Speaker 2>Entanglement shouldn't that shouldn't happen, right, Like that's basically what

0:22:54.716 --> 0:22:58.916
<v Speaker 2>Einstein said, and like he seems right, or there's some

0:22:59.076 --> 0:23:01.556
<v Speaker 2>huge thing about the universe that we obviously don't understand.

0:23:01.796 --> 0:23:02.476
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's the other thing.

0:23:02.556 --> 0:23:05.356
<v Speaker 3>It's so fundamental too, you know that. I mean, what

0:23:05.436 --> 0:23:08.996
<v Speaker 3>is gravity. There's no microscopic model for gravity. It's just

0:23:09.636 --> 0:23:13.436
<v Speaker 3>space is distorted so that things sort of fall toward

0:23:13.476 --> 0:23:17.956
<v Speaker 3>each other. So and entanglement. It's really tantalizing to link

0:23:17.996 --> 0:23:21.516
<v Speaker 3>those two. Entanglement to gravity. It hasn't happened yet, but

0:23:21.556 --> 0:23:23.636
<v Speaker 3>that you know, that's an outstanding question. A lot of

0:23:24.276 --> 0:23:27.156
<v Speaker 3>really smart people are thinking about this. Yeah, that keep

0:23:27.436 --> 0:23:29.116
<v Speaker 3>I think about that sometimes it's fun.

0:23:34.956 --> 0:23:38.076
<v Speaker 2>Chris Munroe is the co founder and chief scientist at

0:23:38.156 --> 0:23:42.316
<v Speaker 2>ion Q. Today's show was produced by Edith Russello and

0:23:42.356 --> 0:23:45.436
<v Speaker 2>Gabriel Hunter Chang. It was edited by Sarah Nix, and

0:23:45.476 --> 0:23:48.596
<v Speaker 2>it was engineered by Amanda ka Wong. You can email

0:23:48.676 --> 0:23:51.876
<v Speaker 2>us at problem at pushkin dot fm, or you can

0:23:51.916 --> 0:23:54.956
<v Speaker 2>find me on Twitter at Jacob Boldstein. I'm Jacob Boldstein,

0:23:54.996 --> 0:23:57.196
<v Speaker 2>and we'll be back next week with another episode of

0:23:57.236 --> 0:24:03.356
<v Speaker 2>What's Your Problem.