WEBVTT - Day Three Part Two from the Milken Institute Global Conference

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus gloom O Business Finance

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to our special Bloomberg coverage live from the

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Milicon Global Institute Conference in Beverly Hills, California. Armor Romain

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Bostik alongside Carol Masser and Carol the next guest, really

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>does have a great view on what's going on in

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the world of credit and private markets.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Steven says yeah, even says that within the.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Liquid credit marker right now, there are a lot of

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>opportunities out there partickling in high yield bonds, I'll leverage

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>loans primarily because he sees those as areas of market imbalance.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Armon Panosi and joining us right now the co chief

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Executive Officer and how to performing credit over at oakh Trey.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you again, arm Man.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 4>To see it too, Thank you.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Le's start, we got a lot to talk about. Let's

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>start with the liquid credit here, because I am curious

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>about that supplied demand and balance, what's driving that and

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>what closes the gap.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's a it's an unusually uncertain time because

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 5>we have a lot of liquidity in the markets, especially

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 5>after all the COVID related stimulus. A lot of savers

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 5>have capital to spend and to invest. But meanwhile we

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 5>have some overhangs. We have the highest cost of borrowing

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 5>we've seen in many years, we have a slow in

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 5>growth rate in the economy, and it just no one knows.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, should we be really heavily.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Going into the markets and getting that yield that's available

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 5>in the markets these days, or are spreads too tight

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 5>and so that vacillation between the opportunities that causes some

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 5>volatility month to month.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what I'm curious about, particularly in the high

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>yield space, like how much risk is there and when

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you get when you're looking at spreads, is there enough

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>compensation for that risk.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.639
<v Speaker 5>So when we when we think about spreads or total

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 5>return from pre COVID days, we would always focus on spread.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>The reason was was because high old bonds were priced

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 5>at par and the absolute yields on treasuries were very

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 5>very low, so spread was what you were really focusing on.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>These days, there's other ways to win in high yield.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 5>The prices are discounted, there's convexity, there's higher base rates

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 5>ten year treasury at four and a half, and the

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 5>spreads are not so low that are concerning. They're sort

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 5>of within the range of historical norms. As a result,

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 5>total return is more attractive today than it's been in

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 5>quite some time. Meanwhile, spreads are a little bit tighter,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 5>but spreads reflect credit risk, and credit risk in the

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 5>high yield bond market is actually lower today.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Than it's been in quite some time.

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 6>So, having said that, when you look at high yield,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 6>does it matter the quality?

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 7>Do you want higher quality? Is that how you're looking

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 7>in terms of the investment.

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Play, oak Tree generally in our liquid credit strategies looks

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 5>for higher quality, and usually it's focused on single B

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 5>or upper single BE credit quality. There's a lot of

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 5>opportunity there in the high old bond market. There's about

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 5>eight hundred issuers. It's about a one point four trillion

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 5>dollar market, So you could put together a diversified portfolio

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 5>that will avoid defaults and losses pretty well. That's what

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 5>we're aiming to.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 8>Achieve it open.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 6>What are the risks that you think about most in

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 6>terms of having to factor.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 5>In for hygold in particular. Yeah, let's go hi yield.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think high yield is a pretty bifurcated market.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, half of hygyield today is trading out of

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 5>two hundred spread.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 4>So when you think.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 5>About that, you say, well, how do I actually get

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 5>the return that I want? Can't really get it with

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>two hundred spread. That's kind of more consistent with investment

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 5>great bonds. So you have to look at single bees

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 5>and you have to really select credit carefully. It's really

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 5>easy to make make bad decisions. It's easy to make

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 5>some mistakes, and so avoiding triple c's that have generally

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 5>speaking shorter maturities. I think those are going to be

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 5>the locus of a lot of defaults over the next

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 5>two years. But within that single bee category, can you

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 5>really put together a well diversified by industry, by region

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 5>portfolio that could outperform the markets through a cycle.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 7>You can just push that in.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 6>I know it's a little crazy, no, don'tie. We want

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 6>to make sure you can hear us.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's move on and talk a little bit

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>about M and A or A the LBO environment right now.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I think a year ago there wasn't a whole lot

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>to talk about there. We've seen activities start to pick

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, the forward pipeline for M and A deal flow

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>is certainly better than the last six months, and I

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 5>think it's a combination of factors.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 4>First of all, spreads have.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Come in both in broadly syndicated loans and in private credit.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 5>Over the last twelve to eighteen months, there's probably been

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 5>about one hundred to one hundred and fifty basis points

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 5>of spread compression. Meanwhile, the private equity firms that have

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 5>dry powder, you know, they have a ticket in a

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 5>time clock and they really need to deploy that capital,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 5>and they took a pause for about twelve to eighteen months.

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 4>So now they're back and a little bit.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 5>More realistic to have to pay up a little bit

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>to buy good businesses. And meanwhile the sellers of those businesses,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 5>they're also getting realistic because they have investors telling them

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 5>that they want their capital back too. So the bid

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 5>ask is narrowed, and the frequency of deals that we're

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 5>seeing in the market looking for financing solutions.

0:04:59.440 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 8>Has picked up.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting you say that about the gap, that gap

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 2>in between I guess realism and just you know, fantasy,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>because that was a big topic of conversation last year

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>that buyers and sellers were just so far apart. Here

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>who has actually given in on that? Has it been

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the seller has finally woken up to the fact that

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe this just isn't as valuable as I thought it was.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I think they both moved a little bit. You know,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 5>when you when you were near a seller and you

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 5>own a let's say you're a private equity firm, you

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>own a business, you have it marked at a certain valuation.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 5>It takes a little bit of time to move that

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>value down as you kind of reassess the market conditions.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think generally speaking, those valuations have been stable

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 5>to maybe declining, and it allows those private equity firms

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 5>to transact more they if they could, if they could

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 5>get a price that's as good or better than their mark,

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 5>they're more likely to sell. And by the way they

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>had marked up their positions generally speaking, you know, if

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 5>they if they paid one hundred million dollars of inequity

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 5>to buy a business, generally speaking, after a two year

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 5>period that it marked it one and a half times

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 5>two times already. Yeah, and so it is a factor

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 5>of kind of bringing that down and managing that the

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 5>appearance of sort of your marks and the legitimacy of

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 5>those marks.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 7>Hey, let's talk about some of.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 6>The upcoming low maturities that are coming on next year

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 6>and for the years to come. What kind of opportunities

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 6>does that present for you guys.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's a huge market opportunity for oak Tree.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 5>We're one of the world's largest providers of capital solutions,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 5>and we just see a very large tale of credit

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 5>risk or just issues because there were a lot of

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 5>borrowers that took on credit when base rates were near zero,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 5>never contemplated five percent or five and a half percent sofa,

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 5>never contemplate four and a half percent treasury rates. And

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 5>so the owners of those businesses have found themselves where

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 5>there are good businesses. They've actually grown over the last

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 5>five years, but they have not grown into a capital

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 5>structure that is now four hundred bases points more expensive

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>than it was to difference, huge difference. So capital solutions,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 5>rescue lending, that's a huge part of what we do.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Ed OT treat and I expect that over the next

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 5>two or three years we're going to be very, very active.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 6>There any signs already you're starting to see it or

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 6>not yet.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've seen some maturity driven rescue lending, even in

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 4>We were quite active last.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Year, and so what we're not seeing yet is cash

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 5>flow shrinkage rescue lending. So in other words, if a

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 5>company is not performing well and just can't cover its

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 5>interest expense, yeah, that's a little bit riskier than what

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 5>most rescue lenders want to step into. At least at

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 5>this time, it's been more focused on maturities, and the

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 5>maturity schedule really kicks in in twenty twenty six and

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven, so twenty twenty five sort of a year

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 5>in advance that maturity is when it's going to be

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 5>the most active.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think is going to be the

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 2>outcome of that. Are we going to start to see

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>basically just sales.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>From one fund to another.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to see a real exit into public markets?

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Are we just going to have to sort of address

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the fact that some of these companies are.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Just going to go away.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that's just going to be kicking the can.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't think there will be exits writ large. I

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 5>think the best businesses owned by private equity firms will

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 5>certainly get sold, but it's we're really talking about the

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of the middle of the pack or the worst

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>positions in the private equity fund. They will want some

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 5>sort of solution to kick the can down the road,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 5>and they're not going to want to draw capital from

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 5>a fund that was raised in twenty seventeen or eighteen

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>to support.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Those But I think it's sort of where the economy

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>is and where rates are. And I know Oachre's always

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>load to kind of make macro predictions. But if we

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>do get maybe a little bit of easing in rates

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and financial conditions and at the same time growth economic

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>growth holds up at least some sort of sustainable level,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>does that not offer any relief?

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 5>It can, but I think that those two statements are

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 5>at odds with one another. Seeing a meaningful reduction in

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 5>rates usually means that some sort of shock has occurred,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and then you have to ask yourself, well, how good

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>do I feel about my portfolio, especially my equity portfolio

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 5>in that type of environment. I mean, what happened to

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 5>cause one hundred basis point decline. A twenty five to

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 5>fifty basis point decline I think is immaterial in.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Light of where we've gone in rates.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 5>I think you really need to see one hundred or

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 5>two hundred basis point decline to really see a broad

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 5>based relief for some of the most levered in the market.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm curious about what you want to do for investors,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 6>and Bloomberg was reporting that you guys are looking to

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>do a raise of about two billion for an asset.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 7>Back lending product. What can you tell us about.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 5>That, Well, we don't comment on specific fund raises, but

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 5>we are seeing some dislocation in markets, sometimes caused by

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 5>rates being high, in maturities kicking in, and sometimes caused

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 5>by regulatory changes.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Regulation.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of work being done by regulators and

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 5>banks to figure that out, and it results in higher

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 5>risk weighted assets required in terms of capital at banks,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 5>which means that they will exit these legacy areas of lending,

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 5>creating an opportunity for investment managers to step in.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, just on that point too, and I know you

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>can't comment on the funding, but at least based on

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 2>what Bloomberg is reporting the focus have that fun So

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>deals back by like equipment leases, royalty payments, things like that.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>These all seem like more steady streams of revenue, and

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>they seem a little bit different than maybe what was

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 2>in the complexion of the portfolio prior.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that not right?

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, the way to think about asset back finance is

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't mean hard asset back finance. It just means

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 5>any contractual cash flow stream that could then be securitized

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 5>or a series of securities could be structured around them.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 5>So that applies to a lot of different industries. It

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 5>could be medical royalties, it could be music royalties, it

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 5>could be equipment finance, shipping finance, aircraft finance, and various

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 5>types of consumer lending. So it's asset back finance is

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 5>just different than corporate blending, which is what we really

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 5>do a lot of it a treat, whether it's on

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 5>the distress side or on the performing side. But really

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 5>enterprise value lenders, which is what a corporate direct a

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 5>corporate lending, whether it's public or private, that's what is

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 5>the focus there. Asset back finance is attaching to a

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 5>revenue stream.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, speaking of assets, you know you guys do get

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 6>into the real estate area, and I'm just curious, what's

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 6>the smart what are you seeing when it comes to

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 6>real estate?

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 7>Some of the concerns that are outher, especially when it

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 7>comes to office and.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Other Well, I think that we're gonna have several years

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 5>of maturities in real estate that will result in sort

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 5>of a rolling set of defaults and losses in real

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 5>estate creates an opportunity for buyers who are willing to

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of pick and choose the right markets and the

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 5>right assets. So, you know what, anytime we see risk,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 5>we also see opportunity and we're excited about the opportunity

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 5>part of that.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 7>But do you hear crisis around what's going on.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>In real estate?

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Like, I don't think it's a crisis.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 7>We see opportunity, But I'm just I don't.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Think it's a crisis other than in certain markets in office,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 5>I think it's really hard to find a way through

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 5>some of those assets without a massive repositioning in them.

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 5>But even that creates an opportunity for the right.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Investment, and you feel like there are people out there

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>willing to take on that risk, take on that opportunity.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Slowly, slowly, it's not there.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Even though there's a lot of capital parkland the sidelines generally,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 5>especially for credit, we're not seeing a lot of that

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 5>capital flood into real estate all at once right now.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 5>I think it's just the issues, especially around maturities is

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 5>so significant over the next few years. There's a lot

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 5>of concern to just kind of put all your exit

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 5>one basket at the moment.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 3>All right, Arman, we have to leave it.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>They are always great to get your insights with you

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 2>and the guys over and the folks over at oak Tree.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>You're doing off always really insightful.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>So, then give our best to Howard arm and Punulsi,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and they are co chief executive over.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 3>At oak Tree.

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it's fascinating about the real estate side

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 6>of things. I've had some conversations with folks here that's saying,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, maybe the government's got to step in and

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 6>take take some of these assets and just deal with

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 6>them because nobody wants them. But it's interesting to hear

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Armed site. Yeah, there's gonna be buyers.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 3>How long people do want them? You know you still

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 3>work in office.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 6>I do.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 7>I work at a gorgeous office.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's the man out there.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just a different type of demand, right, Yeah, maybe

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a little less maybe the complexion of a change.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Some of those properties in midtowm Manhattan, those old properties,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 6>I do wonder whether or not you can kind of

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 6>rework them.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've seen whether they can repurpose them and find purposes.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll some juristicans doing some interesting things.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast Can't Just

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then brought auto with a

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business at or Wan't Just Live on YouTube.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 3>We've got to have up some pretty good discussions today.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously there's been a big focus on what's going on

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>here domestically, but I had a chance to catch up

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 2>with a few people who are really investing internationally.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Now Runo along.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>She's a co founder and the co founding partner of

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a company called Development Partners International, and they just focus

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>on companies in the Pan African region.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 6>I love this because we've been so I feel like

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of US centric, if you will.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 7>So it's interesting to see what she.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Has to say.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 2>And this gets back to the old idea. Everybody's looking

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>for that next big opportunity. She was on a panel

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>this morning. They really talked about digital transformation, how that

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 2>could actually.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Close the global growth growth.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Gap, and she talked a lot about how these African

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>companies they're not looking to export their skill set. They

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>want to kind of keep this internal here. It's an

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting dynamic. Let's take a listen as to what she

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>had to say.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 9>The opportunity in this space is the pure demographics and

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 9>all the secular trends. Huge population growth, one out of

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 9>every four humans in the world by twenty fifty will

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 9>be in Africa. Huge urbanization eighteen out of the thirty

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 9>biggest cities in the world hoping now Africa, huge digitization,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 9>and really great opportunities for a private equity investor like

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 9>myself to invest there. Am I finding it en nothing absolutely.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of talk about digitization. There's talk about

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 9>the Global South, so it is being worked in all

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 9>of the discussions here.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So to break up, I mean, gen you mentioned the

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Global South because when a lot of people talk about it,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you hear a lot more in the context of some

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Latin.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>American nations as well.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 2>As some of the Southeast Asian nations break it down

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>as to how some of the African countries fit into that,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>what's the hierarchy.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 9>I do think the great investment opportunity in Africa is

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 9>the lack of discussion about Africa. So how does it work? Yes,

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 9>Africa is probably developmentally a little bit behind East Asia,

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 9>but it is interesting to note that in the next

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 9>five years Africa will grow as fast as Asia by

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 9>five percent a year. And because of the low level

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 9>of legacy assets and the low level of growth, the

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 9>investment opportunities are huge. One said, before you see a

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 9>town where the kids have no shoes, you can either

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 9>be kids have no shoes there, this is batter you

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 9>can say, I can sell them shoes. In Africa. The

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 9>amount of demand for consumer products, be they pharmaceuticals, be

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 9>they a bank account, be they agribusiness FMGG, all of

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 9>those things huge unmet gap compared to the rest of

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 9>the world. Other em bigger demand. If you look at China,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 9>Africa actually will have a bigger working population by twenty

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 9>thirty five than either China or India.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 7>A young population.

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 9>China is leveling off of that, so all of that

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 9>will lead to growth and opportunities.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that exportable growth or opportunities or does that even matter?

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 10>Well?

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 9>I think that Africa, as McKenzie called it, we call

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 9>it the African Lions. They are more about intra Africa growth,

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 9>intra Africa trade, rather than ext morning to the US

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 9>and Europe. So it doesn't matter in the sas that

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 9>it's still least to growth. It does matter to investors

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 9>in the US if you want to hedge. The correlation

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 9>Africa to the US is much less than East Asia,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 9>It's much less than Latown. So if you want something

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 9>that hedges a bit the US, Africa is the investment destination.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>You're coming off a panel this morning that was about

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>digitization and that closing the global growth gap. When you

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 2>hear about African industries and particularly the companies that have

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>been successful, a lot of them seem to fall into

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that space, whether it's telecom, internet, etc. Here is that

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the primary investment opportunity there now?

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 9>I think because digitization goes across all industries, it's an

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 9>opportunity in different segments. With the theme of digitization, what

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 9>do I mean by that? In our fund, we're doing

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 9>three things. First, investing directly in fintech companies. We have

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 9>a company called Optasia, company called Ukes that covers all

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 9>of Africa and Southern Africa. We are doing turnarounds of

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 9>legacy assets, which is really one of the most interesting

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 9>things happening in Africa. Look at a company like Mmantemhlan

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 9>in Egypt. A few years ago they were leasing toktoks,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 9>handwriting microlos. What they're doing today is purely fintech. Millions

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 9>of customers. Only Unicorn in Africa for several years and

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 9>it's a Pe company. And then finally embedded finance where

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 9>we're taking our company that's in a different area like

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 9>specialty chemicals level in West Africa, home Choice in Southern Africa,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 9>and by putting a digital part to that, we're actually

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 9>growing the valuation, We're growing number of customers, we're making

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 9>them more efficient. So in Home Choice selling home goods

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 9>to women, primarily they had a side of the company

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 9>that was giving credit to these women's That side of

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 9>the company became really a lender is much much bigger

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 9>and fintech through digitization from the original company.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 2>For investors who want exposure to that, are there relatively

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>easy avenues. Obviously they can go through somebody like your

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>company at Development Partners. But are there enough of those

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>companies out there for investors who want that type of access.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 9>There are opportunities, and that I would say that the

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 9>opportunities are through direct investment or through funds like ours,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 9>because a lot of these companies are not yet public,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 9>so they're not reflected in the twenty three stock exchanges

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 9>in Africa quite yet. There are some you will see

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 9>in the future that they will be.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 7>Some of our.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>Companies, frankly, are not only just listening in Africa and

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 9>in London, but actually they're going to the Middle Eastern

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 9>stock exchanges because of proximity. So eventually there will be

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 9>opportunities on the listed side. Right now, it's direct investments

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:45.479
<v Speaker 9>and private equity.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Runa Alam there the CEO and co founding partner over

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 2>at Development Partners International. She has her primary focus really

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>on African companies.

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, I feel like some of the you know, earlier

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 6>conversations we talked about how much investment into Africa specifically

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 6>has come out of China, but they have really pulled

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 6>back over their own concerns and slowdowns, if you will.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 6>But also, you know, you think about Africa more broadly

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 6>the higher global interest rate environment that's been problematic for

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 6>them to really tap into.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 3>The capitol art problematic for them. So has the stronger

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 3>dollar as well.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>But at least in her optimism, she looks at some

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of the demographic trends, the young population, the rise, of course.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 8>And they have.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>And then some of those countries have great educational systems too,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>so they're building a great skill set as well.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 8>Listen on Apple car Play and androut Auto with a.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app or wants us live on YouTube.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 3>Let's get right to it now, we're able joining us

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 3>right now. Really, there's no introduction.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>The CEO overhead Kane Anderson one of the top alternative

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>investment management firms, a big focus of real estate, credit, infrastructure,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 2>and energy.

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 8>Out.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Great to see you, great to have out, great to

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 2>be here, object and great to have you. And I

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 2>do want to te to talk about investment strategy at

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a time where I mean things are stable, certainly a

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>lot more stable than what they were a year ago,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 2>but there's still a lot of dislocations out there, and

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I just want to know what kind of what your

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 2>thought process is in navigating that.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 11>Our thought process is this is this is a time

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 11>of dislocation and one that I think is going to

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 11>take a while to work through. So we're incredibly excited

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 11>because we've actually built our platform for times just like this.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 11>So we want to be relevant in all in all cycles.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 11>But really where we want to be buying is times

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 11>of dislocation. And that's the reason with intentionality that we've

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 11>built the real estate platform to invest in in elastic

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 11>demand sectors so medical, office, seniors housing, student housing, class

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 11>being multifamily often referred to as workforce. So you know

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 11>when you know when the macro economy falters or enters

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 11>a more difficult period of time. And I'd say we're

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 11>in one right now, and I think this will be

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 11>the case for kind of the next twenty four months.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 11>It'll be choppy at best. I've been in the hard

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 11>landing camp for a while. I still sit there throwing

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 11>a hard landing. We've had This is the ninth time

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 11>that we've had inverted an inverted yield curve since nineteen

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 11>sixty two. In seven of the eight previous times, only

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 11>exception being nineteen sixty seven, we've had a recession, so

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 11>there is a great deal of historical precedence for the

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 11>fact that a recession follows an inverted yield curve. I

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 11>also think that bank balance sheets are in a very

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 11>precarious position at the moment. I do think that that

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 11>means that I think effectively Powell eased rates last month

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 11>by by essentially saying that the FED was comfortable with

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 11>a bigger balance sheet. That was an effective ease. I

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 11>do think that we will see two to three rate

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 11>So you.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Didn't interpret that what he said as hawkish.

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 4>I did not.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 11>I interpreted it as dubbsh and I think that it

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 11>took the market a little bit of time to digest.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 11>But now we've seen sort of seven of eight up days.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 11>You've seen the ten year treasury drop from four to

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 11>seventy to four forty four to forty five. So I

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 11>think the market digested what he said, and I do

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 11>think that he's looking for.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 4>A reason to ease.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 11>I think he understands that the bigger risk between price

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 11>inflation and asset deflation is asset deflation because bank balance

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 11>sheets right now have the greatest amount of unrealized securities

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 11>losses that they have ever had in history, and they

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 11>have one point six trillion, well, not all banks, but

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 11>there's one point six trillion of real estate that comes

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 11>due by year in twenty twenty six.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Most of that sitting on bank balance sheets.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 11>What I think he does not want to do is

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 11>risk a contagion and have another financial crisis on his hands.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 11>And so I think you're walking that fine line.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Is that why we get the heart landing?

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Help me understand, Because you see the growth, you see

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 6>the metrics, consumer still spending, How do we get that

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 6>heart landing?

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 11>I think that the economy is doing fine, but you

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 11>already see deflation happening. If you take the jobs numbers

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 11>absent government spending, you have a massive decrease on the

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 11>job front side. I think things slow, demand for goods

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 11>and services slow. And I'm not predicting a catastrophic inflation.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 11>I certainly I think stagflation is pretty much off the table.

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 11>I think the economy is too strong for that, but

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 11>I do think we experience a recession now. Regardless of that,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 11>I would say our focus is on the asset classes

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 11>in which we invest, and really I'm focused on the

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 11>massive opportunity that exists.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, go ahead, and I.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 6>Want to get into that, but I want to You know,

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 6>you do look at justlocation as an as opportunistic. I

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 6>know you don't play in the office area, but you're

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 6>smart and you follow real estate and you follow cycles

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 6>and talk about dislocation. You had Barry Stern Looks saying

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 6>here at Milkan.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 7>There's a huge distress cycle ahead of us.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 6>And then you had Kathleen McCarthy a Blackstone saying the

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 6>shipwreck has already happened. Dislocation in terms of views, what

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 6>do you think is the view when it comes to

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 6>office real estate?

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So office real estate, everybody wants to know.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we haven't played office and have never invested

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 11>in office for a very specific reason. It is the

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 11>opposite of an inelastic demands. It is highly correlated to

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 11>the macro economy and obviously the pandemic. Not many people

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 11>underwrote that, but office is an asset class in which

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 11>you put all of your capital in upfront. You hope

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 11>the economy is good enough to lease it up and

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 11>get out before you have.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 4>A down cycling.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 11>We've been running in ten year recession cycles for the

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 11>last five decades, So that is a timing game and

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 11>one that is highly correlated to the macro economy.

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 4>So where do I think we are with office.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 11>I think it's going to be a rough slug and

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 11>I think it's they're very disparate outcomes. Office in West

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 11>Palm Beach is fine, Office in San.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Francisco not so much. So it's not all bad, but

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 11>I think the tastes of the nation have changed and

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 11>they're not going back to pre pandemic dynamics anytime soon.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 11>And we've been slower on the return to office than

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 11>really any other large economy.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 7>So I don't see it in New York.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 6>I mean on a Monday or Friday, right, it's kind.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 11>Of I agree with Kathleen, though, by the way, on

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 11>the we're in the bottoming phase, I do.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 4>I you know, I would never believe.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 11>That I'm smart enough to call the bottom or say

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 11>it's this month, it's this day. But we're in the

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 11>bottoming phase. What I'm saying is we understood and we

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 11>were very disciplined with our capital in twenty one and

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 11>twenty two when we thought we were much nearer a

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 11>peak than a trough. Because you had massive acid inflation

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 11>due to what the Fed did. They injected a tremendous

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 11>amount of money into the economy, took treasuries down tenure

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 11>treasury down to eighty six phases points.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 4>So you had.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 11>Massive asset inflation that is now winding its way out

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 11>of the system. I'm not saying we're at the bottom,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 11>but we are definitely in the bottoming phase, meaning we

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 11>are much closer to a trough than a peak. So

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 11>now for investors who have been disciplined, who have access

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 11>to equity and debt capital, who are.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Not dealing with problems, this is to me.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 11>I believe this is one of the three to four

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 11>best buying opportunities I've seen in the last thirty five years.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about those opportunities and particularly when it comes

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to new projects. Is it better were well, is there

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 2>a better risk return by building that or buying it?

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's a great question. I'm saying we're doing both.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 11>It is a very difficult building environment. The benefit in

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 11>our asset classes, as I said, you sort of have

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 11>the trifecta in medicalovist, senior student, affordable housing, and that

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 11>is that you've got demand tail winds because you have

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 11>massively escalating demand, you have an aging US population, you

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 11>have supply tailwinds in the sense that you have massively

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 11>constrained new supply illiquidity in the market's high interest rates.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 11>Supply is way down, and you have a buying opportunity

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 11>because the rapidity with which rates rose was unforeseen by

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 11>many and put and made structural leverage unworkable for many.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 11>So you've got demand tailwinds, supply tail wins, and a

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 11>buying a buying opportunity. So I would say from a

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 11>risk perspective, our preference would always be to buy fully

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 11>stabilized askets at deep diss counts to where they have

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 11>historically traded. Now, there are some opportunities on the development side,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 11>but obviously you're deferring cash flow. You've got construction costs,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 11>you've got labor dynamics, etc.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 6>But it's interesting when you talk about those dynamics that

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 6>the valuations have gone up, right because the supply is down.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 6>But you can't start to create new opportunities right that

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 6>are investable if you can't, if it's difficult to build out.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 4>You can't.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean, listen, there are development deals at work, and

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 11>we are active on the development side of the business.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 11>I'm just saying that the opportunities set that exists for

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 11>us today, and it existed very briefly in twenty twenty

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 11>and the last time it really existed before that was

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 11>just POSTGFC, and that is buying super high quality, fully

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 11>stabilized assets at what I'll say are discounts to intrinsic

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 11>value because you have forced selling. By definition, any seller

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 11>today is a motivated seller. There is no seller who

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 11>is sitting around saying, hey, May twenty twenty four, June

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty four, this is when I absolutely want to sell.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 4>We all know that, So.

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 7>All right, have your energy.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 3>One of the smartest guys out there.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll rabel over at Kane Andersen, seal over at Kane Anderson.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Any's right, I mean, look, I mean this is kind

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>of is what it is.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>each weekday. He's starting at two pm.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 8>Eastern on Apple car Play and ANDROYD Auto with the

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg Business Ad.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 6>All right, everybody, we are back at Milkin and Harvard

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 6>University professor of public economics, Laws Shetty was one of

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 6>the conversations we have.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 7>What are you laughing at you?

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm going to get move cal We're almost done.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I have to say we had a great conversation.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 6>We had so much we wanted to talk to him.

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 6>The tense discourse on college campuses regarding war geopolitics partly

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 6>fueled by economic disparity.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 7>And that is something he said that really stuck with us.

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 7>We spoke to him earlier.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 6>He says improving the US education system depends on better

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 6>pay more successful teachers.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think at cornerstone aspect of the American

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 10>dream is the idea that through hard work, anyone has

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 10>a chance to rise up in the income distribution relative

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 10>to their parents. Historically, America was very much a land

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 10>of opportunity in that way. Our studies showed that for

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 10>kids born in the middle of the last century, virtually

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 10>all of them, ninety two percent of them went on

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 10>to earn more than their parents. But if you look

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 10>at the data today for kids born in the nineteen

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 10>eighties who are turning thirty around now when we're measuring

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 10>their incomes as adults, it's become a fifty to fifty shot,

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 10>a coin flip as to whether you're going to do

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 10>better than your parents and achieve the American dream?

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 7>Why is it happening?

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 10>So why is the American dream faded? You know, we

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 10>think there are lots of different trends that are driving that,

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 10>from increasing segregation, stalling, and levels of education. So in

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 10>the past, as technology progressed, as we had more global competition,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 10>American workers were becoming more skilled, getting more education, getting

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 10>more advanced, knowledge able to compete with machines and with

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 10>other people around the world. Around nineteen eighty that progress

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 10>basically stalled. We started to lose the race between education

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 10>and technology.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I come from a generation where the idea was you

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>went to college for your university, maybe.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 3>To grad school. That was all part of that upward

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 3>mobility promise.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a lot of frustration, particularly with the

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 2>generations behind me, the millennials, etc. Have now said, look,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that value proposition isn't the same, but you're still pushing

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 2>us into those areas.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Is there's still an argument.

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>To be made the higher education can afford you that

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>upward mobility.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so I continue to think, and I think the

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 10>data show clearly that higher education can be a great

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 10>pops upward mobility. But it matters what higher education we're

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 10>talking about. There are some colleges in America where we

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 10>see very clearly if you manage to get into a

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 10>highly selective college, it totally changes your trajectory in terms

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 10>of what you're able to earn, the types of jobs

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 10>that open up, the doors that open up you. But

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 10>there are other colleges in America where if you look

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 10>at the outcomes follow people over time who went to

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 10>those colleges, they're not doing any better than kids who

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 10>didn't go to college. So the value proposition is not there.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.479
<v Speaker 10>And so I think what makes this challenging is that

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 10>just saying college for everyone, we need everybody to get

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 10>a higher edufiction, It's not clear that's the solution. But

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 10>that doesn't mean that education is not a pathway outward mobility.

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 10>We need to figure out how to get more kids

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 10>to colleges that really are engines of upward and mobility.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>How do we do that, Because for a while, it

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem like there was an alternative. Right either you

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>went to college and maybe prosper or you didn't go

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to college and you ended up in just kind of

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a wage job and maybe if you got lucky, you

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 2>had some upward mobility. But is there an avenue, whether

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>it's vocational schools or whether it's a return or the

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 2>resurgence of community colleges and do your programs.

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so I think vocational schools can be part of

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 10>the picture. We're finding evidence that certain types of job

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 10>training programs that give you exactly the skills you need

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 10>to do it or maybe in the future to do

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 10>certain effective AI tasks can provide a pathway to really

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 10>having significant growth and earnings without having a college degree.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 10>So I think targeted training for skills that matter can

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 10>be an important part of the picture as well.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, Ros We've done a lot of recording at

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg about the shortage and plumbers shortage and electricians. You know,

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 6>here we are at NOKIN talking about the infrastructure build out.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 7>We need a lot of people who can do these things,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 7>and they're just not out there.

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 6>So I'm just curious how you kind of roll that

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 6>into and how do we get to a point where

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 6>as an economy, as a society we actually respect those

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 6>types of jobs.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 10>So I think part of what you're bringing up here,

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 10>Carell is that the issues here are deeper. It's not

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 10>just about our higher education system. What we're seeing in

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 10>the data as lots of kids, you know, let alone

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 10>going to a four year college, they're not finishing high

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 10>school or not really motivated to get those jobs as

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 10>plumbers or electricians, may not have the skills needed to

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 10>navigate the labor market, the social skills, the kind of

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 10>ability to adapt to the concerts, and so my view

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 10>is a lot of the way we fix these issues

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 10>is going back to the roots of where the problems originate,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 10>in elementary school or even before, in the communities where

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 10>kids are growing up.

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, do you feel like elementary, middle schools, high schools.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 7>Are failing us today? Because it's really interesting.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I grew up going an incredible public school

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 6>system in New Jersey. My daughter I had to do

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 6>private schools because we were in an area where public

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 6>schools were horrendous. And increasingly we see people, you know,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 6>paying to get their kids through school. So is our

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 6>public educational system in some way failing us before the

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 6>kids even.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 7>Can think about college?

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean I think there's serious issues in our public

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 10>education sym Why aren't there serious some of you which

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 10>have to do with funding, but some of which have

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 10>to do with constraints in our system. So if you

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 10>look at the data, there's certain types of charter schools,

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 10>for example, that show really good records of success where

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 10>they have high quality teachers, they're bringing kids into smaller

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 10>classrooms in a bit of curriculums where you're seeing really

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 10>good outcomes for those kids. But then there are other

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 10>charter schools where you're seeing much less progress, And so

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 10>the details really matter. We've got to get an education

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 10>system that is prioritizing high quality output. Just like in

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 10>the private sector in America, businesses that succeed, you know,

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 10>end up doing really well in gaining market share.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 7>With no offense.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 6>They succeeded when I went through and I mean public education,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 6>went to an Ivy League school, So like they did

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 6>work before, how come they're not working anymore.

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 10>I think part of the issue is that other options

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 10>that people have. So if you think about thirty forty

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 10>years ago, many highly qualified women became teachers. Now many

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 10>highly qualified women go into other careers that are much

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 10>more lucrative in a relative sense than education. It becomes

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 10>very challenging to retain talent in our public school system.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 10>If we pay people enough to reward them for being

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 10>in education, and that influences the next generation.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Well how do you fix that? I mean, this has

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>been a problem we've talked about for a while. I

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>always joke I have a family full of former teachers,

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and with emphasis on the former, because it was not

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 2>a career path for a lot of them, primarily because

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>it was not financially sustainable and there was just a

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of stress involved in it that for a lot

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 2>of them just.

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't worth it.

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think finances are part of it.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 10>I think part of it is somehow making teaching more

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 10>of a prestigious profession where people feel like this is

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 10>something that I really aspire to do. But I also

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 10>think part of it is just about flexibility and the

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 10>way we pay people. So in most public schools in America,

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of rigidity where your pay is basically

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 10>set as a function of how many years you've talked.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 10>If you've got a star teacher who's really inspiring your students,

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 10>there's no way to reward that feature and say you know,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 10>we're going to pay you extra, give you that bonus,

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 10>really work hard to try to keep you. And most

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 10>of the jobs were all in outside education. If you've

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 10>got a star employee, we're going to try to keep

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 10>that employee. And I think giving schools that latitude can

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 10>make a difference.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Rush, I do want to go back to colleges and

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 2>universities and the process for prospective students to get into

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 2>those universities. There's been a lot of back and forth

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>over admission requirements or the standards.

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Whether you don't, I know, Harvard has gone back and

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 3>forth on this.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Here what is the best barometer to measure whether a

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 2>student is acceptable enough to be part of your university.

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 10>So our team has been studying these issues recently. Last

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 10>year put out a paper trying to understand who gets

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 10>into highly selective colleges Does it matter how you should

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 10>evaluate students. Part of what came out of that paper

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 10>is very clear evidence that standardized tests are actually some

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 10>of the best predictors we have of how well kids

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 10>do in college and after college. They're not perfect, and

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 10>we worry that you know, you can prepare for tests,

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 10>and you can take the test multiple times and there

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 10>may be certain biases inherent in those tests, but the

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 10>issue is that the other things that you might use

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 10>if you don't have standardized tests, are even more prone

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 10>to those biases. So if you put weight on things

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 10>like high school grades or extracurriculars or your wreck letters,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 10>kids with more resources have more of an opportunity to

0:36:54.440 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 10>credential themselves on those fronts.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 6>Of course, was Harvard University professor of public economics Raj Shetty,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 6>and I feel like that conversation you and I walked

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 6>away and just felt like there were so many things

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 6>that he hit upon that were so important and maybe

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 6>thinking about it a little bit differently, especially when it

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 6>came to the protests and the thoughts about the economic

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 6>underpinnings of maybe why there are so many protests.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that sort of gets lost in it.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 2>We focus on the here and now what's happening, but

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we forget what sort of led us here, And I

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 2>think being able to address that, particularly as college administrator,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be really important.

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 6>Really really important, really tapped into a lot of things.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Education right seemed to be the door that opens up

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 6>opportunities for people.

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 7>But then you get a little worried. If it's not there,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 7>that's for sure.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Play and Androyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 6>All right, everybody, Well, speaking of the environment, we've talked

0:37:57.400 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot about M and A. We are live here

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 6>at the Milkin Institute. Let's talk about M and A.

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Volume in the first quarter totally about three hundred and

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 6>fifty two billion dollars. That was up seventy percent from

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 6>a year earlier and the highest for the period since

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 7>This is according to our data here at Bloomberg Now.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 6>The rebound of deal activity after a prolonged drought has

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 6>been boosted by the comeback of mega deal like Capital

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 6>One buying Discover our next guest, saying earlier on a

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 6>panel at Milk and moderated by my co host Romain Bostik,

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 6>that emanation top two and a half trillion dollars this year,

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 6>but not the record amount of five trillion that company

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 6>spent on M and A back in twenty twenty one.

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 6>With more on the deal environment, we're joined by Andrew Bednark.

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 6>He's partner in CEO of the global investment banking firm

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 6>Corella Weinberg. So nice to have you here with us.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Let's start big and broad. How is the M and

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 6>A environment today?

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so just the level set on M and A markets.

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 12>There are some very observable and enduring characteristics of M

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 12>and A markets. One they're large, Two they're growing, and

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 12>three they're cyclical. And so we do have movements from

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 12>year a year, quarter to quarter. We see peaks and

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 12>troughs really throughout the history of when we've been recording

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 12>M and A volume, but we are seeing higher troughs

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 12>and higher peaks, and so therefore you get the dynamic

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 12>of long term secular growth which has been persistent in

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 12>the M and A markets. Now we're today on a

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 12>pace for about two and a half trillion, which is

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 12>what I mentioned in the panel yesterday with Romaine. I

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 12>don't see five trillion in the near term. Usually when

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 12>you have these peaks and troughs from a peak usually

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 12>fall down the elevator shaft. You go down very fast

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 12>and then you walk your way back up, and we're

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 12>walking our way back up. So we've got a lot

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 12>of encouraging signs. You've got larger deals, you've got some

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 12>significant stock for stock deals. The boardrooms are very active,

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 12>and I do think that's a harbinger for future activity.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 12>But it's a slow walk back up, but it's an

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 12>encouraging one.

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 6>Andrew Wire companies doing deals because they have to or

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 6>because they want to.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 12>So strategics are eating us out of this trough in

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 12>M and A, so it's clearly a strategic lead market.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 12>I think sponsors will follow. Strategics are faced with the

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 12>same pressures they've typically had, which is growth, so they're

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 12>looking at how much can they continue to grow the

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 12>top line in a late stage economic expansion. Most economists

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 12>will say GDP is probably a single digit for the USA,

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 12>and emerging markets may be a multiple of that, but

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 12>most of the developed markets are single digits. A lot

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 12>of action has happened in the middle of the P

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 12>and L cost cutting and other supply chain improvements that

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 12>have been made post COVID. You have capital going back

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 12>to shareholders for dividends and buybacks. But that's not enough

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 12>to satisfy equity investors who want twelve thirteen, fourteen percent

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 12>equity return. So how you're going to get that you

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 12>have to look externally, and that's where M and A

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 12>becomes this permanent part of the discussion in a boardroom

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 12>about how do we grow, how do we adjust the transition,

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 12>how do we adjust to transformation? All the things happening

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 12>in the economy around AI energy transition. What was globalization

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 12>now seems to be a bit of a shrinking globe

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 12>where certain markets are uninvestable. So that presents new challenges

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 12>as well, because some of the historic markets for growth,

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 12>like China, for example, many companies find that to be uninvestable.

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Now interesting, I have cried about the strategic buyers. I mean,

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 2>what type of premium do they have to pay in

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 2>this environment in order to gain that type of growth?

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it much higher than what it was in the past.

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 12>So valuations are elevated. We have a very large and

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 12>liquid market in the United States. Globally, there's about one

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 12>hundred and ten trillion dollars of equity value and I

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 12>mentioned this yesterday on the panel. There's forty seven trillion

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 12>in the US. Part of that is because we're a

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 12>very large and liquid market and that's driving more capital

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 12>to this market, which is increasing valuations, so we do

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 12>have a higher multiple environment. Premium is largely an output

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 12>in what we do as M and A advisors and

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 12>thinking through complex transactions with our clients. We're not thinking

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 12>about what premium do we have to pay, but we

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 12>look at underlying cash flows, We look at synergies, We

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:21.280
<v Speaker 12>look at strategic value and enhancements that a new buyer

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 12>can bring to an asset, and determine what we can

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 12>pay that either is a premium or not, and then

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 12>that premium either clears the market, satisfies investors, or it doesn't.

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 12>It hasn't been the premium that's been an inhibitor to

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 12>these transactions.

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I want to look at the other side of the equation.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 2>We had a guest on earlier on the show who

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>talked about the idea that you're going to see a

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of forced selling in this market, and that's actually

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be a driver of a certain pocket of

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 2>M and A. Talk about those folks out there, those

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>companies that are struggling that are really going to have

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 2>no choice about to find somebody. I mean, what are

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 2>they going to be able to get in the market.

0:42:55.920 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there's always Even in a very strong marketvironment, you're

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 12>always going to have some companies that just run into trouble.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 12>They're going to be over levered, They're going to have

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 12>some kind of disruption to their business, maybe they have

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 12>a life threatening lawsuit, something that just fundamentally changes their operations,

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 12>and those companies can seek to raise new capital to

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 12>hopefully recover out of a difficult situation, or in many cases,

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 12>they look for a merger solution. And so whether it's

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 12>a forced marriage or whether it's forced financing, you do

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 12>see many of those transactions playing out, not full on bankruptcies,

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 12>So not calling nine to one one I've got to

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 12>go bankrupt, but we're in trouble. We need a new partner,

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:46.240
<v Speaker 12>and that partner could be a merger partner. I don't

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 12>see a watershed event coming where you have a lot

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 12>of forced sales. Rather, I see, and this was mentioned

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 12>again in the panel yesterday, thousands of companies held in

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 12>private hands that are not really what they're natural perpetual owner.

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 12>Those owners are there as custodians for a time period.

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 12>Private equity and otherwise to help enhance value, deliver returns

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 12>for their sharehold for their LPs in that case, and

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 12>then reintroduce them to public markets or sell them to

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.919
<v Speaker 12>another party who's a better owner. We're going to see

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.280
<v Speaker 12>more of that, and those assets held in private hands

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 12>I think will transact going forward, but there's still a

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 12>valuation problem there. A lot of those assets were bought

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 12>during a high multiple period and a lot of owners

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 12>are waiting for those multiples to come back.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 6>Do you think most of those properties that are held

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 6>in private equity hands it's a case that that will

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 6>be acquired or is it a case of going ipoing

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 6>or something and coming to the public market on their own.

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 12>So for the last two years or so, we've had

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 12>almost no IPO market, and so that's been an alternative

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 12>that you typically look at for monetization that just hasn't

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 12>been available. Now we've got some early signs of opening

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 12>of that plumbing, which is encouraging the reasons by making

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 12>IPO is very well received and I think is a

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 12>good sign of maybe an additional IPOs that will come

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 12>to market. So I think the IPO is definitely back

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 12>on as an opportunity for modernization but also for outright sales.

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 12>But again, you do have this one immutable trait that

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 12>you have in the private equity business, which is and

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 12>it's true for strategics as well. What is that that

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 12>they can't change the multiple they paid on entry. So

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 12>the purchase price is the purchase price. There's a lot

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 12>of things they can do once they own the asset,

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 12>but they cannot change the purchase price. And some of

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 12>these assets were bought at a higher multiple where there's

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 12>more leverage and also much cheaper leverage. So one of

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 12>the issues with today's higher cost of capital is that

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 12>the evaluation equation, the mathematics just don't work. So I

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 12>think it's going to take some more time for private

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 12>equity come to the table, but they're going to come back.

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 12>It's geology, time and pressure. It's just a matter. It's

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 12>going to bring those two together, and they're going to

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 12>come to market with assets and they're going to redeploy

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 12>four trillion dollars at some point because that's what's sitting

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 12>in private market.

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 6>Hands got it at some point. I don't know if

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 6>he asked you this on the panel, you know, I

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 6>know he does a good job, but I am curious

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 6>that if you had to pick one sector, You've done

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 6>a lot in retail, you've got transportation. Is there one

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 6>sector within the M and A environment where you're like, wow,

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be a lot people.

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 7>Are asking, I want to do stuff right now? Where

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 7>is there?

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.399
<v Speaker 12>Well, first of all, Romaine did an A plus job

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 12>on the panel yesterday.

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm stripped to.

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Rip a colleague every once in a while.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 12>Is there one sector? It's an interesting market. Unlike ninety

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 12>eight ninety nine it was all about telecom and tech

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 12>and media. You had twenty sixteen larger because the stress

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 12>was a big energy market for consolidation. I'm seeing this

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.760
<v Speaker 12>activity really in every sector.

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 12>Because as I said yesterday, also, M and A is

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 12>not a market trends, it's a and it's not a

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 12>short trend. It's a long term corporate strategy. So these

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 12>are the best allocators in the world within private equity

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 12>and within private credit and infrastructure in real estate, those

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:12.919
<v Speaker 12>are going to be very, very active. Again, there's four

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 12>trillion sitting there without leverage, so the purchasing power is

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 12>much higher. You have four point eight trillion dollars on

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 12>non bank corporate balance sheets. There's only so much dividend

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 12>and buy back you're going to do. There's only so

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 12>much build versus buy. And I would say in many industries,

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 12>build versus buy is really dead because it's not practical.

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 12>So in certain industries you'll always have it, like tech,

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 12>But in other industries, by the time you build, it's

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.879
<v Speaker 12>another market and so buying becomes necessity. And so again,

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 12>I just think this is a matter of time. We

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 12>have to be patient and continuing the walk up.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious Andrew about the regulatory environment. There's been a

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of pushback at least on the big mega deals,

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 2>particularly in tech here in the US and in Europe.

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>How much of that regulatory trend affects what you do

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and the type of companies that you're involved with.

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 12>Very meaningful change to our business and very meaningful change

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 12>to how we map out a timeline for our clients.

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 12>So what used to be, you know, a fairly routine.

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 12>You know, if you're not in a particularly sensitive area

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 12>from a competitive perspective, you would estimate a few months

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 12>to close. You'd probably request early termination, but maybe go

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 12>through a short process if you didn't get that. Today

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 12>there is no concept of early termination of the HSR

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 12>waiting period, so that's off the table. Many, many industries,

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 12>including that are not particularly consumer sensitive on pricing, are

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 12>being reviewed by competitive authorities.

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Not just in the United States. It's happening in.

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 12>Brussels with the with the with the competitive authorities in Brussels,

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 12>as well as the CMA in the UK. So it's

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 12>not a US alone phenomenon, but it's very real. It

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 12>extends the timelines, it makes it more costly, which then

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 12>I think ironically feeds into the need to do larger

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 12>deals because the entry price right, well, right, if you're

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 12>gonna do it, I might as well do it where

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 12>it has consequence. So it's the entry price to M

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 12>and A is higher because of longer duration. By the

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 12>time I signed something, If it takes me longer to close,

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 12>I don't know what I'm getting it closed. Yeah, right,

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 12>I've got to make it meaningful. So it's really interesting dynamics.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:19.879
<v Speaker 7>One of those things.

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 6>If you're gonna do it, go big, right, it's gonna

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 6>it's the same kind of steps, So just really go

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 6>for it, and thank you so much, really appreciating you.

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Great perspective.

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean, listen, we always talk about different metrics and

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:31.839
<v Speaker 6>what it says about the health of an economy. What's

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 6>going on in the deal making environment is an important one.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it really is kind of the greath

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of this economy here. But we've heard from I mean,

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 2>not just what the Andrew said, but yeah, a lot

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of the other folks I had on that panel yesterday.

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 2>They're seeing a lot more opportunity, much more than maybe

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 2>just a year, year and a half ago.

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 6>I think it's fascinating, especially across so many industries.

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 7>Again, or thanks to Andrew Bednar.

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, a little bit

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you can get your podcast.

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.