WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 13, 2024

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and am Marie Hordern. Join us each

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Max Ketner of

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>HSBC writing, we don't think it's time to pull the

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>plug on risk. We therefore add to US equities as

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Q three warnings, or rather earnings expectations. Also don't look

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>challenging to be. Max joins us now for more Max

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Good Mornings.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>You, sir, good morning.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>That's the equity call. I want to get to the

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>credit call. There was a shift on high yeal FEME

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in the last week. You move that overweight from max

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>overweight to where are we now?

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Slight overweight? Slight overweight from exciting to boring.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So what's that shift about? Let's start there.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 4>I think look, when we look at high yield, it's

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 4>not like it's bearish, So certainly in your high yeld

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 4>things look still pretty okay. Valiation wise, it looks a

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 4>bit more attractive. I think in you as high yeld

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 4>there's partly a story around valiations. You know you have

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 4>high yield spreads around three twenty. There's not an awful

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 4>lot to go anymore. There's not an awful lot of

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 4>spread tightening that you can still see. So at some

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 4>point it gets around pure carry it and then you

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of okay, is that still the best place where

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I get the carry? Or is other places better such

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>as EUM local debt for example, where perhaps you know

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 4>you get higher carry.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit sure, it's sort of equal.

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Similarly short duration, and it looks a little bit more

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 4>attractive now given how much has been priced in since April,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 4>they're similar to the fair and I guess you know,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 4>when we look at it from a total return perspective

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 4>as well. In high yields, if you get now these

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 4>sort of ten eleven cuts priced and by the end

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>of this year, if you get just a few priced

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 4>out right, let's say compare high yield to equities, then

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 4>if if you're a long equities, now, if you're long

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the S and P, do you care whether they cu't

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>ten eleven times by the end of the year or

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 4>they can't seven eight times by the end of next year.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Not really right, That's not really the big tail risk anymore.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 4>The big tail risk, particularly in April or in September

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>October last year, was they're not going to cut at all,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 4>or they may even have to hike. The tail risk

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 4>now is well, maybe I'll do only four or five,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 4>but they will be cutting. So for equities it doesn't matter.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 4>For high yel that matters because obviously the front end

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 4>of the curve goes up.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, doesn't it matter for em as well? Can we

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>get into EM a little bit more? What are the

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 2>assumptions you're making on rates on the US STARLA to

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>make that cool?

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I do think however that in EM again, valiations are

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more enticing if you look at EMD

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 4>spreads in particular, you know, year today, so there's sort

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>of flattage. Of course, there's been some index composition changes

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>as well, yes, of course, but from a valiation perspective,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 4>certainly there's a bit more juice left compared to you

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 4>as high yields. So we're really at the stage now

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>where it's not really bearers about high yield and much

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 4>more bullish on the other stuff. It's a bit like, okay,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 4>you're really harvesting that carry. Where's the carry best across

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 4>all the epic classes?

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>How much is this just a revival of the fomo trade?

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Essentially look for the biggest return and go, And that's

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 5>essentially because the FED is cutting rates and so.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, pretty much.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 4>I think it's it's sort of the you know, we

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>were saying in twenty I think it was twenty twenty

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 4>one that it's all pretty much a yolo world, right,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 4>and it was sort of the return to Yola. You

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 4>could argue that's sort of what we're seeing, for example

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 4>this week. But let's be honest, we could also sit

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 4>maybe by the end the next week, we could sit

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 4>here and you guys talk about one and a half trillion.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Being wiped out again.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Like if we had had this chat last Friday, we

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be that upbeat. No, we would all be like,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>oh my god, is this recession? And you know, are

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>we closer to the end now and the start of

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 4>a bear market, and what is commodities trying.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>To tell us and all this sort of stuff, And

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>now we sit there and we're like, yolo, yeah, everything's great.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So you know, this is how much it shifts within

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>a week, if we're honest.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 5>We were having a conversation to start the show about

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty five versus fifty basis points, and I wonder how

0:03:58.440 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 5>much you were rolling your eyes and how much you

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 5>are actually saying this is going to matter to the market.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>You want me to roll my own.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 6>Happy you're viewing who actually can go seeing on his weekend,

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 6>But I am curious about whether you are seeing a

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 6>market that is likely to sell off in response to

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 6>a fifty basis point rate cut or respond with that

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 6>cheer and you're low.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it depends.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>I think they would have had the chance in the

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>last few weeks to say, look, we're so comfortable with

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>this disinflation picture. If they had had look we're so

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 4>comfortable with this disinflation picture. Look what has happened since

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>April this year. We've had super core down, We've had

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 4>all these you know, all these components down. So because

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>of this inflation, we could cunt higher, right, we could

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 4>cut more, we could start more aggressive. The problem now

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>is that, of course, particularly with Jackson Hole you said, oh,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 4>we're attentive to growth risks more than inflation. So the

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 4>problem is if you start with fifty now, particularly with

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 4>what John was saying in terms of the data, the

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>totality of the data, you.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Know, sorry, not making fun of course, of course, now,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of course it's not more language anyway, while we play,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>we me for that.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 3>That's chairman Belle.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 4>So if we look at that, then the last couple

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 4>of weeks actually has been really good. Look at look

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 4>at weekly same store retail sales data. It's been picking

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 4>up from four and a half to six and.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 3>A half percent.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Now when we look at jobless claims, you look at

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 4>weekly consumer confidence data, you look at you know, some of.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>The electricity output. Look at the Dallas Fed's.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Weekly Economic index, look at the GDP now from Atlanta Fed.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We're talking two and a half percent. So it just

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 3>doesn't warrant it currently. So the risk is if you

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>go fifty.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 4>First, the market wall say what do you know that

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't?

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>What am I missing?

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 4>And that's I think that's what the market will take

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 4>a bit of, like, oh, God, this, I don't like this.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>I really don't like that.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 7>Can't the chairman just clean that up in his press conference?

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>I think he could, But I think particularly with Jackson Hall,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>they've sort of missed the boat. And it was particularly

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 4>also with Jackson Hole that they could have said, Look,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 4>it's it's really because of inflation. It's really because of

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the disinflation that.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>We're so comfortable with.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>That is why we could be cutting much more aggressively

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 4>from the start, right, That's why we could sort of

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 4>rush out of the gates and be like, we can

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 4>cut fifty. Yeah, growth has been a bit of wobbly,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 4>but we're really comfortable with this still. It's just because

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 4>of disinflation, and they sort of missed the boat on that.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 7>Since you're visiting US from abroad, I have to ask

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 7>about the US election. How concerned you about the risks

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 7>that are tied to November?

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, not an awful lot.

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 4>But because when we look, for example, at twenty twenty five,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 4>I think people talk a lot about the US election,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure how much people have positions on. Certainly

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 4>when you look at our tactic glance allocation convictions, they

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 4>are really not particularly tied to the US election, because

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 4>I think what we're missing looking a bit into twenty

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five as well, there is the debt ceiling issue looming,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 4>for example. So but the Treasury has made it clear

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 4>that we want to have these seven hundred billions stocked

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 4>up in the Treasury General account in order to be

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 4>able to pay that down, which could be at least

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 4>perceived by the market, again but as temporary stimulus, you know,

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>similar to what we had in Q two last year,

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 4>which is actually pretty good.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's independent of the election.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 4>We know that in twenty twenty five, of course, there's

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 4>a couple of those tax cuts from twenty seventeen expiring.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Again that's independent of the election. We're going to have

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>to deal with that. There is some sort of fiscal

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 4>cliff awaiting us perhaps second half of next year, when

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the negotiations start. There is going to be something looming

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 4>that's independent of the elections.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Any evidence from your conversations that the Europeans are willing

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to de risk from US as sets ahead of all

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>of that. Are they concerned about it?

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all, not at all, not at all.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 4>I think if anything we've seen in the last particularly

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>let's call it five months.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>We've seen the opposite.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 4>I think we've had this sort of long Europe trade

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 4>into April, call it April May long europeerhaps long Japan,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 4>a bit of diversifying. Oh is the XUS performance is

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>that really now kicking off? And in fair is when

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 4>we look at all the activity data, when we look

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 4>at the high frequency data, it's really strong. Still in

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 4>the US, we're talking about the fiscal picture of the

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 4>fiscal support, it's really strong in the s Look at

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 4>what drag he was saying this week around come on,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 4>we've got to be with supporting more, right, We've got

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to be supporting more. And where it's happening is here.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 4>It's in the US. So if anything, you know, then

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 4>you've got this, uh, you have the.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 3>French elections of cars.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>So there was these sort of concerns around that as well,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 4>whether the unwarranted or warranted, don't care.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>But all of that really led a little bit more

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of the inflo picture back into the US.

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Max, It's good to see you here in New York,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, sir. Going to catch up Mass Canada of HSBC.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>That's where Bank for America's Business Owner report showing cautious

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>optimism from small and mid sized businesses as the FED

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>prepares to cut interest rates. Sharon Miller of Bank for

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>America writing rate cuts will reduce the cost of debt

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>servicing on floating rate credit facilities. This easing of the

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>expense environment may create cash flow capacity for expansion or

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>investment opportunities. We're lucky this morning that Sharon gets to

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>join us on this program. Sharon, Welcome to this program.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I just want to start with this one. The amount

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of insight that you and the team have across one

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>in every three small businesses in America. We're worried about

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>stress starting to build, weakness starting to materialize. What are

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>you seeing in the businesses that you cover at the moment.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're right. We cover three point four million small

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and mid sized businesses in the US and we are

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the number one lender to small business across the US,

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we do have a lot of insight into

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. In our most recent survey that we did

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with business owners in the spring, we found cautious optimism

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from our clients and so they do expect their revenues

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to increase over the next twelve months. And we know

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that that debt servicing, as you said in the opening here,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>will be reduced because we do expect that rates will

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>be cut as wese our economists do you here at

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America twenty five bass point in the next

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>five said meetings.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So Shanny, you saying they've got the confidence the expansion

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>linds of reading that just waiting for small reductions for

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve over the next few cooltzas.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>They are, and we still see demand in the marketplace now,

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying that they're rating entirely. There is

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>good growth in the across the small and mid sized

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>company sectors, but they are watching that and certainly as

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we see rates come down, that will improve their cash

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>grow and certainly consumer demand.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Sharon I got to say, I was reading this report

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 5>and I was shocked to the recent.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 8>Report that you put out.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 5>I was kind of shocked that actually we saw such

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 5>sanguine sentiment that people were expecting to continue to hire,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 5>that they were continuing to expand they had positive outlook

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 5>for their businesses. How do you reconcile that with some

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 5>of the rhetoric that we hear every single day. This

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 5>is an economy that's on the raisor edge of turning negative.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, I think with small and.

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 8>Mid sized companies.

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>So we've bank clients in the business banking space from

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>startup to fifty million in revenues.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 8>And so when you have a.

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Smaller company, you're certainly more nimble, You're able to really

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think about your business, your growth, and you can pivot easily.

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bigger corporations may have more of a hard time doing that,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and so that is a competitive advantage of small to

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>mid size companies and we see that come through in

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the data and just in our conversations that we're having

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>every day across the death from these clients.

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 5>What I thought also was striking was in the market,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 5>it seems like inflation is no longer a significant concern.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 5>We heard just a couple of days ago from Mike

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Wilson over at Morgan Stanley that's dead. Essentially, Inflation is

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 5>no longer an issue when it comes to what you're

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 5>seeing in bonds. Nonetheless, sixty eight percent of small business

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 5>owners so they've raised their prices over the past twelve months,

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 5>and on average they've raised prices by twelve percent. They're

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 5>talking about inflation as a more pressing concern than many

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 5>other things that we talk about every day.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 8>How do you.

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 5>Understand whether this is really a small business issue or

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 5>whether maybe we're not giving enough credence to just much

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 5>ongoing inflationary pressure there actually is.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, there is ongoing and inflationary pressure. It is a

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>sticky issue, and so we continue to hear that that

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is the number one concern of small and mid sized companies.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>And so you have seen price increases brought along because

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of all the pressure they are. So I do see

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it as a concern. We hear it from our business owners,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and we do feel that as we go forward and

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the cycle begins to ease a bit, that it's going

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to take some pressure off.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 7>Sharon, given that pricing pressure, how difficult is it for

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 7>these small companies to keep up with the bigger players?

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that you know, there is some difficulty

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in keeping up with the bigger players, but I would

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>say that you know, they also have a competitive advantage.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, as supply chains have improved, and

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as businesses have expanded, and certainly they've gone more online,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>gone more digital, they have more UACh and scale than

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they might have had before the pandemic, and so what

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing are expansion plans from small and missized

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>companies and they are competing and certainly, you know, they

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the downstream impact as well from larger corporations.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about inflation, We're talking about the fact that

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 7>they're preparing for these rate cuts. When you talk to clients,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 7>what is their number one concern right now in this economy?

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Their number one concern is inflation, and then right next

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to that is hiring and making sure that they have

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the right skilled labor, the right employees to go into

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>their business to work. And so those are the concerns

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that we hear every day. We were also in an

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>election year, so you do hear that as well, but

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we hear that with every election cycle. We've been doing

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this report for the last ten years, and so in

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>each election cycle, we'd see, you know, concerns once the

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>election is over, no matter who wins, no matter what party,

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's certainty and so people can move forward. So

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're hearing discycle as well. And you know,

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I anticipate after November there'll be certainty and people will

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>continue with their plans.

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Sharon talk to us a little bit about how things

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 2>have changed since March of last year, given all the

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 2>banking stress in this country and some of the banking

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>failures as well. How some of your clients have changed

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the way they do business with you. Where they've managed

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to attract a lot more small businesses over the last

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve months, worried about where they place that cash, and

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>they want to put it with a bigger institution like

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Banks of America.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Sharon, how much has changed, Well, I mean, I think, listen,

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we are the number one small business bank in the US,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're very proud of that. We have been for

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the last four years plus, and so you know, we

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to stand on our clients and good times and

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bad and certainly you know we every day we work

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to attract new clients and to retain the clients we

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have because this is our mission. This is where communities

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>meet business, and that is what we do at Bank

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of America. So we want to be sure that we

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are there for our clients. We have capabilities they need,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's to transact internationally, to be able to have

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>expansion in their business, to get a loan, to provide

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>payments for merchants.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 8>So all of.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Those different areas we are able to help our clients,

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we want to make sure that we're there

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for them, whether it be our online tools and capabilities

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to manage their PASK flows. So we're investing in the

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>business based on what we hear from clients and what

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they need.

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, we were thankful that you managed to make some

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 2>time for us this morning, and we appreciate it. Sharon,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>thanks for joining the program. Thank you, Sharon Miller. That

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>thanks America. Over the next week, a busy slate ahead

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 2>with retail salves and a FED decision next week. Tiffany

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Wilding of PIMCO saying, we're heading back to pre pandemic conditions.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Develop market economies now look more like they did in

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen than are any time since the pandemic. In

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that context, we think the more question is this, why

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>are interest rates still well above where they were in

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen? Tiffany joins us now for more So, Tiffany,

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you've got to give us the answer. What did that

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>conversation sound like a pincoke this past week?

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think the bottom line for US is certainly

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 10>interest rates are coming down. The Federal Reserve, I think

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 10>has also been very clear about that. Pale when he

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 10>spoke at Jackson Hole, I think acknowledged the fact that

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 10>monetary policy now probably doesn't reflect the underlying conditions in

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 10>the US economy. And if you look at the labor markets,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 10>we don't think that the US economy is in recession,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 10>but nevertheless, the recent loosening in labor markets just suggests

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 10>that there is some possibility for overshooting on that side.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 8>And in that kind of vein.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 10>You know, the Federal Reserve should be focused on moving

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 10>policy rates back to neutral, and I think the question

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 10>at this point is is just how quickly they get there.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 10>We think they probably will revise down their own estimates

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 10>for the rate path in September.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 8>We're looking for a.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 10>Twenty five basis point rate cut, but for them to

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 10>really signal they're going to do sequence.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Of cuts here, Tiffany tell us why you think neutral

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>is if they revise the path down, what is the

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>path two?

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I think that's a great question.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 10>So the Phtal Reserve still believes it's between two and

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 10>a half and three on a nominal basis, you know,

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 10>And I think ultimately that's why they will get there, you.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 8>Know, with not overnight.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 10>They're not going to move the policy rate there overnight

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 10>because they're not exactly sure where it is. And when

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 10>you're not sure, you want to just go slowly. Now

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 10>how slowly, I guess is the question. It's about balancing risks.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 10>You obviously don't want to take the economy into recession

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 10>because your.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 8>Policy is too tight.

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 10>We think a reasonable kind of baseline for them is

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 10>to kind of write down a median rate path of

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 10>kind of three and a half percent by the end

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 10>of twenty twenty five, could even be a little bit

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 10>lower than that, you know, And so that's the kind

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 10>of pace every meeting, type of pace over the next

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 10>several meetings to see how the economy responds, and then

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 10>they can they can reassess and make a further decision

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 10>from there.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 5>Tiffany, we've been talking a lot about twenty five basis

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 5>points or fifty basis points on Wednesday, and before we

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 5>get into the guessing game of how you interpret the

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 5>tea leaves that have come out of a number of

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 5>publications overnight, I am curious about how you will be

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 5>gauging the trickle through effect the real economy of whether

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 5>they cut twenty five or fifty.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 8>How will you understand how.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 5>That's being sort of deployed in the real economy.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, I mean I think if you know, a

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 10>fifty basis point cut is if they if they end

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 10>up doing it, you know, it suggests to us that

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 10>or would suggest I think that they're they're more worried

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 10>about downside risk to the economy and they want to

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of more quickly get to neutral. You know,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 10>we've said they've achieved a stoff landing. Now really it's

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 10>going to be about sticking that soft landing and keeping

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 10>it going, you know. And I think again the question

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 10>is about how quickly they know they need to get

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 10>to neutral.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 8>How quickly do they get there?

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 8>So that's how we would be read.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we still think a twenty five basis point

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 10>rate cut is probably reasonable here. We don't think the

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 10>economy is in session right now. You know, certainly the

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 10>labor market indicators you know, are worrisome, but we have

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 10>had this big surgeon immigration that is kind of blurring

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 10>the picture with some of those indicators. So you know,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a lot of things they have to

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 10>take into consideration here, you know. And so again twenty

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 10>five with a sequence of costs that they signal seems

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 10>reasonable to us.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Just what I'm trying to get at is what's going

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 5>to be the actual implementation of lower rates in the economy.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>Will you'll be looking for some sort of significant uptick

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 5>in small businesses borrowing. Are you going to see increases

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 5>in consumer borrowing or reductions in say some of the

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 5>delinquencies as people as borrowing costs go down. What are

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 5>the sort of signs that this actually is working at

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 5>a time where the efficacy of monetary policy has been

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 5>profoundly questioned as rates went up, and now the question

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 5>is how quickly I'll be implemented on the way down.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think if you look at the

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 10>household sector. We've been talking a lot about this as well.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 10>You know, households just haven't really felt higher interest rates.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 10>Many of them have low rate mortgages that they locked

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 10>in two of.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 8>Thirty year periods during the pandemic.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 10>So the household sector probably won't feel a lot of it,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, unless you have new home buyers or first

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 10>home buyers. But where I do think it could be

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 10>potentially helpful, you know, is in terms of housing supply.

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 10>So we've all known that we've been in a period

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 10>of underbuilding relative to population growth over the last decade

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 10>post pandemic or more. And that's resulted just in you know,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 10>supply demand and balances in the housing market, which which

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 10>suggests us that as you have rates coming down, you

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 10>can have real residential investment that picks up. That's obviously

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 10>going to be helpful for the economy. We think housing

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 10>investment probably subtracted a point and a half from GDP

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 10>in the third quarter. That's a pretty big subtraction, you know,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 10>so just getting that back into some modest growth we

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 10>think is probably helpful, you know, and you could certainly

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 10>get that as you have rates coming down.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 7>I'm glad you mentioned housing. There's been this debate on

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 7>what actually will happen when rates come down, Well, people

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 7>start moving and more supply will come in the market

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 7>and costs will come down, or potentially will we actually

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 7>see housing prices go higher?

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean I so in terms of you know,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 10>the moving and the existing home sales and things like that.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, when people move, they usually move from one

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 10>house to another, so you know, in terms of the

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 10>aggregate supply picture from that, yes, you get more churn

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 10>in the market. But it's not on net really that

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 10>it doesn't It shouldn't increase by that much the overall

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 10>supply of homes. What increases the overall supply of homes

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 10>is new building, and so that I think is is.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 8>Really the key.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 10>You know, building you know, has been slow and sluggish

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 10>this year because interest rates are elevated. You know, many

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 10>builders you talk to say the economics are you know,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 10>make less sense with higher interest rates, and so we

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 10>when rates come down, we do think that you know,

0:21:55.600 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 10>building will you know, will accelerate somewhat, and I think

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 10>that's ultimately good for the economy, you know, it's good

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 10>for the supply demand and balances. Eventually hopefully that helps

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 10>to moderate housing prices, you know, although you know, we

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 10>don't think that they drop. Housing prices will probably be

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, kind of five kind of five percent type

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 10>is ranges, you know, But again I think I think

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 10>that's not necessarily.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 8>A bad thing for the economy.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.239
<v Speaker 7>Tiffany, and just circling back to what Lisa alluded to,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 7>some of the tea leads that are coming out of

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 7>things like the Wall Street Journal or the Financial Times.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 7>If the market is now presented with potentially next week,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 7>the FED going fifty basis points. Does that mean now

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 7>there's outside weight on retail sales next week?

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, certainly.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 10>I think if retail sales next week is bad, is

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 10>much worse than expected, I think that would maybe potentially

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 10>increase some probability.

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 10>I think if you just kind of take the whole

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 10>the broader range of data that we've gotten over the

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 10>last you know, month or two, labor market data in

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 10>our minds is important. And the labor market data that

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 10>we saw, you know, it wasn't great, but it wasn't

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 10>terrible either, you know.

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 8>So it does.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 10>Suggest that labor markets are slowing, and I think the

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 10>Federal Reserve wants to try to understand what's going on

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 10>there a bit more. The slowing that we've gotten over

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 10>the last couple of months, I think has been more

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 10>pronounced than many people expected, both in payroll growth and

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 10>of course the unemployment rates taking up. You know, So

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 10>I think, you know, they they probably look at that

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 10>and they say, you know, we.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 8>Are a little bit concerned about that.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 10>And if you're concerned about payroll growth slowing the labor

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 10>market slowing, of course, you'd expect consumption to be slowing

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 10>as well, so they probably will be looking at retail

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 10>sales and those consumption indicators, you know, to kind of

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 10>confirm or deny, if you will, whether the labor market

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 10>slowing is having a broader impact on the economy.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Tiffany, I appreciate the updiate. Thank you, Tiffany Welding the

0:23:52.840 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 2>pincome looking ahet some explain. Joining us now to discuss

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>is Troy Gasking of FS investments. Troy got to say,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 2>as always, welcome back to the program. Before we get

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>into the markets, let's talk about the Federal Reserve. What's

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the base case for you and the team?

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so three twenty five basis points cuts. You know,

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 11>we came into this year thinking two to three. There

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 11>was some overreaction obviously early on at there'd be six,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 11>and then when the inflation data came hot in Q two,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 11>some folks were arguing for none. But you know, it's

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 11>almost a certainty at this point that we're going to

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 11>get three cuts.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 9>Clearly, believer market softened and there's no doubt about it.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 9>Inflation's gotten much more under control. That's the right policy response.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 9>And I'll tell you.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 11>Know, when you think of credit investors like ourselves or

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 11>originators of private debt. You know, we're more than happy

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 11>to trade off some degree of incremental income to further

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 11>reduce the risk of a recession going forward.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 9>And so that's where we're at.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 11>The economy, and it's going to be an appropriate response

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 11>to your point before it's now about next year in

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 11>the year there after, where there's much much more certain.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, much more to play for, Troy. I want to

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 2>get to the quote from Tiffany Wilder just moments ago

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 2>from PIMCO when she said this, and I'd love your

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 2>reaction to it. Develop market economies now look more like

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>they did in twenty nineteen than any time since the pandemic.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 2>In that context, we think the more relevant question is this,

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>why are interest rights still well above where they were

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen? Troy, what's the best argument for that?

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? So when you think longer term, right, arguably the biggest.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 11>Reason why we should have more sustainable inflation going forward

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 11>than we did pre pandemic, and particularly in the post

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 11>GFC realm, as we all know that that was struggling

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 11>just to.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 9>Get inflation too. It is a much globally tighter labor market.

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 11>Right, you think of places like Japan or even China

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 11>now climbing working age population.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 9>The US labor market has gotten much more structurally and efficient.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 9>So that's arguably reason number one.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 11>And then reason number two, of course, is this really

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 11>desire to onshore production.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 9>Obviously we're going through a period of protectionism.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 11>So you know, I think that debate is new term,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 11>right two and a half or three, We can debate

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 11>that quite vociparously. However, it's certainly not zero unless we

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 11>have some type of major exogy shock that is unforeseen.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 5>There is this question right now of how much we

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 5>can really count on just sort of inflation continuing to diminish.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 5>And I just want to build on what you're mentioning.

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 5>How are you arranging how are you sort of countering

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 5>the assumption in markets that inflation is dead in terms

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 5>of more contrariant investments that push against that.

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, I don't think we're arguing our most

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 9>rational market participants are arguing that inflation is dead.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 11>It's just that we've made significant progress and the balance

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 11>of risks is now much more symmetric between the.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 9>Labor markets and inflation.

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 11>But in terms of countercyclical to that thinking there's really

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 11>nothing specific there. However, you know, opportunistically, we have to

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 11>look across markets and try to find areas where there's

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 11>more inefficient pricing. So, for instance, if you look at

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 11>most spread product whether it's HYO bonds or levered loans,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 11>and even in on the run.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 9>Private credit spreads your relatively tight.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 11>They're a little bit tired than they were coming into

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty two.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 9>You still have very attractive yield. However, if you look

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 9>over at public markets, what you're seeing is markets you're

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 9>pricing about a twenty two percent probability of deal breaks

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 9>in each individual deal. With mergers.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 11>Historically, over ten twenty years it's been five Even in

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 11>this environment.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 9>It's peaked at eight percent.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 11>So we're trying to identify and efficiencies like that that

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 11>we can take advantage of in our liquid strategies.

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 5>I know you focus on liquid strategies and some of

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 5>the private investments. You're talking about merger arbitrage, and let's

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 5>go there, because this is actually one area that a

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of people don't want to get caught dead in

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 5>just simply because a lot of these deals have been

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 5>broken and we have seen a very different FTC under

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Lena Kan.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 8>How can you have confidence.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 5>To go in and bet the deals are going to

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 5>get done now given how politicized so many of these

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 5>deals are actually getting.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think again that gets back into pricing.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 11>Let's say, for instance, markets are pricing in twelve or

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 11>fifteen percent probability deal breaks and the historical averages somewhere.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 9>Between five and eight. Depending on how aggressive the FTC

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 9>was or not, it would be a different story.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 11>But you're as an investor, you're always trying to look

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 11>at market miss pricings versus empirical data, and this is

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 11>one of the more glaring and we're going to say

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 11>it's an overreaction to your point of very active STC.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 11>It's just presenting itself with a very attractive them over

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 11>the next twelve eighteen months.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 9>And I think at this point, regardless of the political

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 9>outcome in November, that looks.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 11>Like a very attractive risk reward to us relative to

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 11>other strategies out there.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Troy, It's going to hear from everybody as always.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Trokski then of FS Investments, Thank you, Troy, appreciate it.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Seventans podcast bringing you the best

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angio politics. You can watch the show

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and, as always, on the

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business out

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 8>M