WEBVTT - How Attorney-Client Privilege Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know from How Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Clark and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and this is

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know Flying Solo Edition. I was gonna

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not say anything and just see if anyone out there

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>would think I just wasn't here at all. It's just me, everybody.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>If you be like god, no, no, and cares. I

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know about that. Man. Do you remember how berserk

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone went with that one jokey three D printer April

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Fool's episodes? Yeah, poor Ben. No. People were very respectful

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to Ben. They were like, Ben, I really like you,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is a travesty, all right, So this is

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty relevant topic. Oh wait, hold on, will you

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>indulge me real quick? Sure? Speaking of Ben, so so

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>just I want to give a shout out real quick.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben and I worked on a How Stuff Works first

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ever fiction podcast called The Control Group, and it's out.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The first five episodes are out and maybe by the

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>time this comes out, will be releasing the last five

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.559
<v Speaker 1>once a week. Um. And it's pretty good. It's set

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties, It's it takes place in a mental asylum. Uh,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a doctor who is running the show who

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is under the encouragement of a very shady organization, a secretive,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>shady organization, starting to really go off the rails and

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>lose his ethics and immorality. It's pretty engrossing. It's a

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>really engrossing yeah, for sure. It's an engrossing radio drama basically. Yeah.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, if you like our mk Ultra podcast episodes, uh,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>then this is kind of right up your alley for sure.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's really really well done. The acting is top notch,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>music is really great to sound effects are great. Really

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sucks you in. So go check it out on iTunes

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Control Group and um, if you like it, leave

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a nice review maybe if you want whatever, even if

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you just go and enjoy it, that's all I'm asking

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you to do. Agreed. Okay, thanks for indulging me. Charge.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're moving on to attorney client privilege, which is

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>something that I knew just about everything about. It turns out, yeah,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's not that much to it. I mean, there's

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some nuance here there, but basically everybody knows what it is. Yeah.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. There is nuance because our legal

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>system here in the United States and in Canada um

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are very much based on precedent and legal precedent, and

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>attorney client privilege. Privilege is not It's not something that

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was laid out in the Constitution. So it's something we've

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>had to formulate over the years, uh, through precedent on

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>prior cases to kind of figure out all the nuances

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that you were talking about. That's right, it's just since

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes from English common law, that means it's a

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very old custom. But since, like you're saying, it's not

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>enshrined in the Constitution, you can't point to and be like,

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>here are the rules of attorney client privilege. You have

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to work it out through court cases over the years. Yeah,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>should we talk about that very first one or the

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>very first one that mattered? Yeah, for sure. And do

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you remember this story from the Revenge episode we did?

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Was that where this was okay, Yeah, it did smack

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of something that I had heard before. Pretty fascinating, So

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so tell it to them, all right, So this is

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seventeen forty three, and prior to this there had been

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>references to an attorney client privilege, but it's all here

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that only fourteen reported decisions on this predate, Uh, this

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen forty three K. So it wasn't something trotted out

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there a lot, but uh Annestlely the and Glessia I

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, anglesey anglese really yeah, I guess you could

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it, and Glessia Huh it's Anestley Jennifer Aniston versus

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Julio Iglesias. Well, regardless of it's let's just say a

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>v A is a very pivotal trial because it pitted.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>This is a story of inheritance. When there was a

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>man named Arthur who died and his brother Richard said,

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm due to inherit this estate because

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>my brother didn't have any kids more. But it was

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>very inconvenient. When someone named James showed up and said, no, no, no,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I am his long lost son and rightful heir, he

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>said waw. And that's where the story kicks off. Right.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So James, it turns out, was very much telling the truth. Um,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, not only is this guy a jerk, he

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>knows full well that I'm the rightful heir because he

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>got rid of me when I was a mere twelve

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>year old pup growing up in England. All of a sudden,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I found myself kidnapped. Suddenly. This is like um uh

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Robert Louis Stevenson book, right. So he's kidnapped and sent

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>off to Delaware to live as an addentured servant for

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years. Yeah, which might as well have been Siberia

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at the time, exactly, I mean still kind of. And

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>he's working it off as a like. He just basically said,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this is my fate. So he worked for thirteen years

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as an addentured servant and worked it off and made

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>his way down to Jamaica at age twenty five, and

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>then made his way back to England to claim as inheritance.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So he shows up and his uncle Richard, who was

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the Earl of Well and Glessia or angle Sea, one

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the two, and um, he said, he said, this

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>guy is a fraud. I'm the rightful heir. So first

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, Richard thinks he got rid of this kid forever. Now,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the kids shows up and he

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>does another even dastardly thing and frames him for murder.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah he was. There was this accident that

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>happened and Earl got his attorney, one John Gifford, to

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of go for a murder prosecution even though he

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>knew that the death was an accident. So, like you said,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he sort of framed it up in such a way

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that he could really get rid of this kid now

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a young adult, and even said in pre trial hearings

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of his nephew he would give a ten thousand pounds

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to have him hanged. And how this all relates back

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to attorney client privileges is that, like we said, Gifford

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was his attorney and was sort of in on this thing,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>and when it all came out, the attorney was the

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one the only person really that could give testimony that

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this happened. And uh, the original Uncle Dick said no, no, no,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this is attorney client privilege. This is protected, and it

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>would violate that. It into all the way to to

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>uh to court and they said, no, no, no, that's

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. I'm sorry to tell you. Yeah,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 1>because uh, Annesley Um argued that or his lawyer argued

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that Um these other things, the kidnapping that the lawyer

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>helped arrange them, the statement about how we would have

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him hanged for ten thousand pounds, that had nothing to

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do with the inheritance, and what we were talking about

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>here was the inheritance, and thus that shouldn't be protected

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>communication between the client and his attorney. And the court said,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't even care what you just said.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>This story is so bonkers and that guy is so

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>patently evil. I'm going to rule in favor of you.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And the first ruling, the first major clear concise ruling

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on attorney client privilege, was registered in seventeen forty three. Right,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So the whole idea behind any attorney client privilege is

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you the assurance as a client that you

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>can speak to your attorney in private, and that's very key,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>as we will find out later, in private without fear

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that they will then use that information against you somehow,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or that that information can be extracted from them under

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>threat of say jail time or something. Yeah, exactly. And

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's um It's defined pretty well in this other article

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you sent. It's where legal advice of any kind it's

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sought from a professional legal advisor uh in his or

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>her capacity. As such, the communications relating to that purpose

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>made in confidence by the client are at his or

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>her instance, permanently protected from disclosure by the client or

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>by the legal advisor, except the protection be waived. Yeah,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's I mean, that's a pretty big mouthful. But

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>what it's basically saying is that if you commit a

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>crime or committed tort, which is basically a civil a

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>civil act against somebody that they can sue you for

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you commit either one of those, and

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you say, oh god, I need a lawyer, and you

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>go to a lawyer and say a I want you

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to be my lawyer, and the lawyer says, okay, go ahead,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and you start talking, say you tell them everything. You

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>admit to guilt, You admit to everything. It doesn't matter

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what you've admitted to. That that speech, that communication, that

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation is to stay between you and your lawyer forever,

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>even after your death. They've ruled, as we'll see, and

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that you, the client, are the only person who can

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>waive that right, that privilege of that communication, so that

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer has to take it to their grave even

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>after you're dead, as long as you say I as

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you never wave that right. Yeah, and that's

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what you just said, would satisfy one of the four

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>basic elements necessary here, which is one. It was a communication,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>uh too, it was made between the privileged persons, that

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is you and the attorney. It was made in confidence.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And this one's really important. It's for the purpose of

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>seeking or obtaining a legal assistance. So it's you can't

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't count if you go to your pal who's

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer and ask them for legal advice. If you're

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not retaining them for their services, that's a big one.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a really big one. Even if you do go

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to a pal and retain them as a lawyer officially,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or even if your lawyer is not your pal and

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you retain them as a lawyer. If you say I

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>committed this crime, I need your help to cover it up,

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not protected either. Correct. You also can't go to

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer and say, um, hey, i've been thinking that

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we could come up with a pretty great real estate

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>scam with your lawyering skills and my my scamming skills.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's come up with something that would not be protected

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>either because it's a crime. It's you're planning a crime.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Either planning a crime or covering up a crime. You

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just lost your your privilege, your attorney client privilege. All right,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.599
<v Speaker 1>should we take a break? I think so that's a

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>good little overview, and we'll come back and talk about

0:10:54.559 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all the ins and outs right after this. Alright, Chuck,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're back. We're talking about some ins and outs, yeah,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and exceptions. And you you mentioned one that

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you would probably that would probably fall under the crime

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fraud exception. Uh. And again that's the in our own article.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The thing they reference here is like, hey, let's set

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>up a phony company UM as a front. Can you

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>help me do that as an attorney? Right, then there

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is obviously no protection there attorney client privilege, right, or

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I want you to go make this bribe to an

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>elected official or whatever. It doesn't matter what it is.

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>If it's if it's on the law books as a crime,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you're you just lost your privilege. Yeah. And another way

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it can get gray too is if UM lawyers do

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things for people, it's not always providing

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>legal counsel. So this is where it can get a

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>little little hinky on both sides. You can have a

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>communicative act, but uh, as they say in our article,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>business is business and the laws the law. Right. You know,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's only pertaining to legal matters, not if your attorney

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing some sort of business deal for you, right,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And that really comes in play more for corporate law,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>which is they're really big into attorney client privilege because

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they're frequently letting their clients or their attorney in on

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>um tax evasion, UM, maybe selling knowingly selling tainted products,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or even like on the more innocent end of the

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>spectrum like trade secrets UM, intellectual property secrets there, and

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a business attorney will have a lot of knowledge about

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>their come any or their clients business that you just

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want them going and spilling the beans, even in

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>open court. Right, So that but that's where you want it.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You want that very much if you're a company with

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>your corporate lawyer. But in the same time, as far

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>as the courts have said over the years, that's very

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very murky because what constitutes legal advice what constitutes business advice.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's clear, you know, like what's our what is

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>our legal implication for this tax evasion that we just

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:35.119
<v Speaker 1>found out our accounting department did that would be protected

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not um uh, I don't know. Help us, help us

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out some ways to evade our taxes or even

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>even beyond that, even legal ways. Help us figure out

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>some legal ways to evade our taxes that might not

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>cut muster because that's more business than law. You could

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>make an argument, yeah, and and likely like I said earlier,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it can get super gray as too far as far

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as whether or not you have obtained the services of

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>an attorney, because this can come about in a lot

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of ways. Uh, Like if you have to you're trying

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to prove this in court, you can bring an engagement letter, um,

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of contract that you've signed the outlines fees,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or just the relationship. It can be an oral agreement, UM,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's you know, both sides are acknowledging

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that it could be that they have appeared for you

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in court. Um, like you you know you don't go

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to court that first day, Like your attorney goes on

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>your behalf and like file some something for you in court,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of document. Then that is an official expressed acknowledgement.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So there are all kinds of ways that you can

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>have an attorney officially represent you. But it has to

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>go beyond just sitting in a room and saying like

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I could use a little advice, like you have to

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>agree that you're engaging one another, right, um, So are

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>non legal legal advice to you. That is not legal

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>advice in any way, shape or form. Is if you

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ever hire a lawyer, doesn't matter what kind of lawyer

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it is. Before you tell them anything, say I would

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like to take you on as my lawyer. Will you

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>take me on as your client? And if they say yes,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>everything after that is now privileged as long as you're

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not planning a crime, right yes, And you'll know that

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>happens because they start a little time or on their desk,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>little dollar bill clinks. But even even without um an

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>express say like an engagement letter, or even them expressly

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>saying yes, I'm your lawyer. UM, I think courts have

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of found over the years that there are certain

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>things that a person could reasonably expect that the the

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lawyer has agreed to represent them. Right Like, if you

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>go to a lawyer that you've used before, UM, and

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but you aren't currently engaged with, and they start doling

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>out legal advice because you told them your problem, the

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a court would probably find that you had an attorney

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>client relationship and therefore there is attorney client privilege. UM.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>If they quote you fees and then follow up with

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>some advice, I same thing. It's more just like the

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>client can't unilaterally say we had an attorney client relationship.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is protected that there has to be some

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of sign or signal from the lawyer as well

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that that there's a relationship there. Yeah, And speaking of

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>signs or signals, uh, apparently it doesn't even have to

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be like a verbal communication that like you could look

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>at your attorney and say like, well, you can ask

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>him a question and they could just sort of give

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you a wink and tap their nose and that could

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be used in court. You know. They don't have to

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>expressly say something out loud even no, that can't be

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>used in court. That's protected. Yeah, that's what That's what

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean. I mean that would come up, but it

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to. Yeah, I think I just confused everybody.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, you don't even have to be talking.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if if they say did you kill that person?

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And you nod, that's protected community exactly, you know, um or.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they've even found that like a um a

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sigh islens like a complete silence has protected communication too,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're not you're not denying things left unsaid pretty much. Yeah,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>because if somebody's like, did you kill that person? And

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't. You're gonna say, hell, no, I didn't kill

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that person. Get me out of this. If you're just

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>completely silent, I think a reasonable person might take that

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as an ambition of guilt. But it's still a protected

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>communication between you and your lawyer. Should we talk about

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>people versus Meredith. I think so people v. Meredith. So

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this was in California nineteen seventy six and a man

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>named Michael Meredith convinced his friend Frank Scott to uh

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>commit a crime, which was let's jump this guy, Mr

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>David Wade. Uh. They ended up shooting and killing him.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that was the original intent, but

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened. They ran for it, they got arrested,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>found and arrested, and then they were in jail. So

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Scott's appointed counsel was one Mr James Shank, and he

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>went by to talk and they were kind of it

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>chatting around, and uh, Scott said something about a wallet.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He was like, yeah, we got the wallet from the victim.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We split the money up and put it in a

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>trash can. The lawyer then sends an investigator and actually

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>found that wallet and took it and gave it to

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the cops. So obviously this was a key piece of

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>evidence that ended up um well, I mean it ended

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>up backfiring because his client rightfully went to prison, right

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>but Schenk was subpoenaed and said, you're going to be

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>found in contempt of court unless you admit like how

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>this thing went down and how you got this wallet.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And the whole key here is if he had never

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>went and got the wallet, then it still would have

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>been attorney client privilege. Yeah, because all he did was

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>received information in confidence from his client. It was when

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he basically broke through into the real world and manipulated evidence,

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when all that just changed everything and apparently broke

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the broke the veil or the privilege of that communication. Well, yeah,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which is rightfully so because the courts I believe this one. Yeah.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I went all the way to the California Supreme Court. Uh,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they ruled rightfully that you can't do this because all

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna do we allowed it. It would incentivize

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>defense attorneys to go out and like try and find

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence right and collect it, and you don't want attorneys

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>doing that, yeah, because once they collected it, it would

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>enter the veil of privacy. And would be protected, and

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't. You could never discover it. Um. Similarly, though,

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think I agree with you. I think that

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just logical and sensible, Like you can't you can't

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>allow attorneys to go do that kind of thing. Um. Similarly,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just because you communicated a fact doesn't mean that the

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>fact itself is protected from discovery, just that your communication

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of that fact to your lawyer was protected. So if

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>there's other ways to find out that you did something,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and this seems just boneheadedly, I've yes, but apparently it

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>was worth spelling out and at least one of these articles.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>If you said, yes, I killed that person, your lawyer

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>can't tell anybody you said that to them, But if

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you said that to your wife, well, and your co worker,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>your coworker can go can go testify against you. So

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the fact that you have admitted that

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you killed that person is protected. It's that the communication

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>between you and your lawyer about that fact is what's protected. Right,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So if it's otherwise discoverable, then it's fair game. Yeah,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you can enshrine a fact with your

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and then it belongs to them and them only

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world can never learn of

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it legally speaking. That's good point. It doesn't make any sense,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but I guess it was worth working out. Uh, you

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>want to take a break, I think we shall. All right,

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll go back and talk about this extending beyond the grave,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Chuck. So, um, you have a relationship with

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>your attorney. Your attorney is like ten years old at

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the time you hire him, and you're seventy, so you

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>pass on before your lawyer. Well, it turns out that

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>something comes up later on and somebody wants info from

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer, private info that you gave them. Your lawyer says,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>no way, Jose, this is covered by attorney client privilege.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>That is true. Yeah, because that happened very famously with

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Foster, who us most people know was a big

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>h He worked for the Clintons in Arkansas. He was

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>an attorney. He was one of their close attorneys, personal attorneys.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah. So, uh, he ended up killing himself.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you if you have on your tinfoil hat

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or if you go to these conspiracy websites, then h

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>then you firmly believe that Bill and Hillary Clinton murdered

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this man with their with their parents. If you're a

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>reasonable human, you know that he fell into clinical depression.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And every single investigator an investigative unit, and there were

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>quite a few, including one Kinneth Star went out and said, yes,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he definitely committed suicide. Um, all the evidence was there.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that's a spectrum you could you

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>could be somewhere on that spectrum between those two beliefs.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh what between thinking he killed himself and was murdered. Yeah,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so he was obviously involved in the infamous Whitewater real

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>estate deal. And when Kenneth Starr was investigating this stuff,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>he tried to get his hands on notes created by

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Foster's lawyer, and the lawyer said, no attorney client privilege,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>even though this man is dead, And it went all

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the way to the Supreme Court and they ruled six

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to three that it must be honored even after the grave. Yeah.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I was really surprised that that was as recent as

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. I thought that that would have been a

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really old case that came up long ago. But yeah,

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that was from the nineties, so that one was established

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in um, well the nineties. I don't see when the

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>actual case or when the Supreme Court ruled on it um.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But that was that was one thing that was tested

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in court. There was another one UM that had to

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do with like employees giving testimony for their company. For

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a long time, it was if you hired, if you

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>were a director level or a m an executive level

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>person in a company and you were talking to corporate council,

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever communication was being made was protected. But then cases

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>started to come up, like what if somebody from accounting

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>was talking to corporate council about that case? Like is

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that for tected and um. For a long time there

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was this test called the control group test appropriately which

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was basically, just are you one of the people who

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is in a position to take the advice of legal

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>counsel and either run with it or decide not to

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do with that? Are you like pretty high up in

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the company. And if you weren't, then that speech wasn't protected.

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>But then over time they decided that no. One of

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we have this privilege is that we

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>want lawyers to be fully briefed on the facts of

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the case so that they can figure out the best

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>defense or the best legal route to resolving this thing um.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>And if they're not fully informed. Then we're kind of

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>hamstringing our attorneys. So we want them to know everything,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and they won't know everything unless people feel comfortable telling

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>them everything. Hence the attorney client privilege. Well, they said

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that extends to employees as well, because employees sometimes have

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>information that members of that control group won't have. And

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as long as they're talking about something that directly reflects

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>their job and the case at hand to that council,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be considered protected by the by the attorney

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>client privilege. That was the up John ruling I believe. Yeah.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And just this year, um, it's been making a lot

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of headlines because of the Mueller investigation. When Trump's personal attorney,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or one of his personal attorneys, one Michael Cohen, had

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>his office rated in April this year into two thousand eighteen,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI sees all sorts of documents looking for

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence of bank fraud, came back that it was part

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Mueller investigation, and Trump starts tweeting about how

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>attorney client privilege is dead. Uh, And the attorney that

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was quoted in this article said, no, it's not dead

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>at all. This is very typical. What's going on is uh?

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a judge that his UH in the Cohen cases,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>appointed what they call a taint team, one of the

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>more unfortunate unfortunately named teams UH. And what they do

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a third party what they call an arms

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>length group of qualified people, so they're not involved with

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with anyone in this investigation. And they go through all

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the evidence gathered and say what's pertinent to the case,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what's not pertinent, and here's the pertinent stuff. It's not

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like we're just trying to release everything ever said between

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>these two men right there, and they they are. They

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>take all the stuff they saw that didn't relate to

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the case to their grave. So it is a form

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and extension of attorney client privilege. Yeah, and especially in

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the in the Cohen case, this UH. This attorney goes

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on to say, because Cohen was performing little to know

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>actual legal work for Trump, UM, not much of what

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>was seized in the raid would be protected anyway. So

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what this attorney says, that's his expert opinion. So

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>can't you see like one member of the taint team

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>at the bar being like the snow it it means

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>deterrek I quit saying that it's really important and vital

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's good stuff. So we should talk about another

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>famous recent case of attorney client privilege or attorney client

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>privilege being violated. Actually with the Jodi Arias case. Yeah,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know a whole lot about this one except

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that um, she murdered someone right, yes, in cold blood. UM.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>From what I read most recently, one of the alternate

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>jurors believes that she killed her ex boyfriend because he

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>was breaking up with her and she wanted to be

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the last person he had sex with or the only

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>person he had sex with her the last one of

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the two. UM went off the rails, stabbed him like

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine times, cut his throat, shot him in the head,

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and just left him for dead and ran off to

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>California and was caught within like a week or so

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of his body being discovered. So she UM. She mounted

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a defense that he was a pedophile, he abused her, UM,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and that he was in the act of physically abusing

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>her when she fought back and snapped and killed him.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that that was all just completely made up. That

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a pedophile, he wasn't an abuser, and he

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>was just trying to break up with her. That's the

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>way it stands now. And she was convicted of I

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think premeditated murder, initially sentenced to death, a mistrial was

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>declared and she ended up with life without the possibility

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of parole. So that's where it stands now. She um

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>publicly criticized her public defender, a guy named Kirk Nermi

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and Um over the years. Kirk kind of put up

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with it and then was diagnosed with cancer and said,

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to hell with it, I'm writing to tell all book.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what he says. He says that he was he

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>had a bit of an epiphany, a reversal of his

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>his life in that cancer diagnosis, and said, I might

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be dead. I can't let her be the only person

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>telling the side. The side of the story is he's

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>saying like a canary in this book. Oh yeah, man.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>He he revealed stuff that didn't come out at trial.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>He he gave his own personal assessment of her guilt

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that she was definitely guilty, talked about how her mother

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lying on the stand for her was laughable. Um, just

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff just ripped apart their attorney client privilege.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result, she's suing him big time.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's still in the middle of I mean, this

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been decided, right, not as far as I know.

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the article I read was from two thousand

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen, so I don't think it's been decided yet.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he and he's defending himself saying no, when

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>she gave public interviews and talked about our private attorney

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>client conversation, she revoked privilege. She weighed her privilege in

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>doing so, and so I'm free to tell anybody anything

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. So the California Bar, the Arizona Bar, I

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think disbarred him. He agreed to disbardment without admitting misconduct.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And he's like a life coach or a professional coach

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for lawyers. Interesting, Yeah, it is very interesting. Um, the

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is super interesting. Her cases just gut wrenching

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and the the this this new piece of it. He

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>basically hates her, hates her. He says that he was

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>forced into the smear campaign as a defense, that he

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to have anything to do. He just hates

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>her guts and even her defense team said that that

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>he's developed some bizarre hatred of her. And he he

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>said in this quote in this Reuter's article that um

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>he was he was standing up to years of abuse

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>from her, So it's like a deep seated hatred. Um

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one way or another, they ruined each other's lives. I

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 1>think she blames him for botching her defense. He blames

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>her apparently for a whole whole slate of stuff. So

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 1>so this will probably be another precedent center. Huh, I

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would guess so. But it's a it's a civil so yeah,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I could still set president. But yeah, the fact that

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he was disbarred that doesn't bode well for him. But

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I have the feeling he's like, I'm dying of cancer,

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so what ofs Yeah, screw it. So that's attorney client privilege.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we missed anything, did we? I don't

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think so. There are probably little nitpicky things here and there.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It is, Uh, there are some definitely some gray areas,

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's been shaped and reformed over the years. Imagine

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be someone. Hey, one more thing I

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say is um, I read and this is

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of apropope, but not really. I read an article

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>probably about six months ago, maybe a little longer. It

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was by a lawyer, you know how, like lawyers will

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>write like blog posts or articles or stuff like their

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>clients is on general stuff. This one lawyer wrote one

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about how if you ever talked to the FBI without

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, you are an idiot. And he put it

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, but no, he makes this really great case

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for why most people, especially innocent people, would would think

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a lawyer. And he said everyone needs

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer when they're talking to the FBI. And he

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>laid out this really exquisite case, multiple point case why

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to where by the end of it you're like, oh, yeah,

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer if you're talking to the FBI.

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty pretty amazing stuff. He's like, you're not qualified

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk to the FBI. A lawyer can make you qualified.

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't go in there and expect to be qualified.

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It was really fascinating. I don't remember who wrote it,

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think if you search something like if you

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lawyer and speak to the FBI, you're

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>an idiot, something along those lines. It was fascinating. Just

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>call FED Protect Josh will pat you through for the people. Ah,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else? Nope? Okay, Well, if you want

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to know more about attorney client privilege, you can type

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that word in the search part how stuff works. And

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>since I said privilege, it's time for a listener mail.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I do have one more thing to say without getting

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>too much on a soapbox. I hope people take the time,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like to understand something like attorney client privilege, because when

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the president is tweeting out things and all exclamation points

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like attorney client privilege is dead, I think a lot

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of people believe that to be true when they don't

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>even really understand the true legal sense of what this means.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, I totally agree with you, man. It's

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>just like it's misinformation that people think like a tweet

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is means well, that's a fact, you know, and it's not.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a tweet, Yeah, something typed out on a phone

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like do better? People with fat fingers sometimes too. Alright,

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So moving on, I'm gonna call this Mercury Bobcat. Yeah. Hey, guys,

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>been listening for about a year and I just listened

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Ford Pinto death Trap episode. To put this

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>timeline into context. I was born in This is what

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>makes this story perfect. If you ask me, Uh, when

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, my family had a powder blue

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Mercury Bobcat sister card to the Pinto. Like he said,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>my dad sold the car and bought it back eight

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.959
<v Speaker 1>years later, just before my sixteenth birthday. And I drove

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this car for two years in high school, eventually selling

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it to buy a vehicle compatible with highway travel because

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a Bobcat could not top ninety kilometers per hour, which

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>is what I don't even know something like that. Well,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew the Pinto was generally regarded as unsafe. I

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>somehow did not know the extent of the carnage until

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to the episode that you guys did, And after listening,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe my parents ever allowed me to get

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>behind the wheel of this car, although mine was a

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, so maybe that time they had faith in

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the upgraded flaming death bolts. It's been about seven years

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and this dude, he was born in ninety three. He

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was driving this old car around well after its prime. Yeah,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have been driving it in the two thousand's

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's great. Yeah, it was like me. I had

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a sixty eight Beatle when I was in the eighties

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and everyone just thought I was weird with the ankle burner. Yep. Yeah,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been about seven years since I'll let the car go,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and now twenty four my friends and I missed the

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>car so much. I frequently search the Canadian version of Craigslist,

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>uh called KEG, hoping to buy it back. So that's

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>made up. I love this guy. That guy just he

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>just said some code word that we just said on air.

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The Bobcat never went up in flames, but it did burn.

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We did burn it up in it a few times.

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I hear you man, and this can't know what you mean.

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Owen from Nova Scotia, and uh, I think

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty great. And I hope you get to buy

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that car back. Dude, Yeah, good luck in your quests Owen.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Anybody out there in s y s k Land, if

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>you know where Owen's Bobcat is, help him out. Let

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>us know. We'll connect to same with my sixty eight beetle.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh that'd be something. I'd like to buy that thing back. Well,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if you guys know the vin number, just shout at

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>out you and knowing. Okay, agreed. If you want to

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with me and Chuck, you can hang

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>out with us at our home on the web. Stuff

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>you should know dot com and there you will find

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>links to all of our many myriad social media sites.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, while you're doing that, if you

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>want to dash off an email, you can send that

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to Stuff podcast at how stuff works dot com.

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that how stuff works dot com.