WEBVTT - Air Travel, Alcohol, and How to Bet On a Coin Toss

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:28.644
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.684 --> 0:00:31.324
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:30.924 --> 0:00:31.684
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:32.124 --> 0:00:35.084
<v Speaker 1>So today on the show, note, we're going to start

0:00:35.164 --> 0:00:38.924
<v Speaker 1>off by talking about some of the current events that

0:00:39.204 --> 0:00:43.044
<v Speaker 1>we have been experiencing in the last week or so,

0:00:43.324 --> 0:00:46.684
<v Speaker 1>some personal ones like poker, some less personal ones, but

0:00:46.804 --> 0:00:48.484
<v Speaker 1>very important ones like plane crashes.

0:00:48.804 --> 0:00:51.924
<v Speaker 2>Continue on this theme of everyday types of risk, we're

0:00:51.924 --> 0:00:54.724
<v Speaker 2>talking about booze just in time for it not to

0:00:54.764 --> 0:00:58.284
<v Speaker 2>be dry January. But there is a new Surgeon General

0:00:58.884 --> 0:01:02.324
<v Speaker 2>discourse out warnings and Maria has and I have some

0:01:02.404 --> 0:01:03.404
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on these.

0:01:03.564 --> 0:01:06.204
<v Speaker 1>And finally we're going to be talking about my area

0:01:06.244 --> 0:01:08.284
<v Speaker 1>of expertise, the Super Bowl.

0:01:15.284 --> 0:01:20.604
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot going on. I'm like, I'm apartment hunting officially, Maria,

0:01:20.804 --> 0:01:23.444
<v Speaker 2>I played some poker this weekend. I got fourth place

0:01:24.324 --> 0:01:24.964
<v Speaker 2>in a tournament.

0:01:25.044 --> 0:01:25.244
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:01:27.044 --> 0:01:29.084
<v Speaker 2>Four hundred dollars tournament. But you know, look, it's a

0:01:29.124 --> 0:01:32.204
<v Speaker 2>it's a final table. It was big. Oh, it's a

0:01:32.244 --> 0:01:34.324
<v Speaker 2>five card high low game. When I started playing, I

0:01:34.324 --> 0:01:36.884
<v Speaker 2>did not know it was a split pot game. I

0:01:36.884 --> 0:01:40.124
<v Speaker 2>thought it was a high only game. But nevertheless, luck

0:01:40.164 --> 0:01:43.964
<v Speaker 2>box my way to a small but fun final table.

0:01:44.684 --> 0:01:47.004
<v Speaker 1>That's fun, well before we get into serious stuff, and

0:01:47.004 --> 0:01:49.124
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of serious stuff that we need to

0:01:49.124 --> 0:01:52.124
<v Speaker 1>cover this week. I love that you were able to

0:01:52.364 --> 0:01:55.164
<v Speaker 1>kind of pick up the game midway through. So should

0:01:55.164 --> 0:01:57.284
<v Speaker 1>I be registering ina tournament?

0:01:58.044 --> 0:02:02.204
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like, so in different ways, I'm both

0:02:02.244 --> 0:02:05.724
<v Speaker 2>the best and the worst player at the table, right

0:02:05.804 --> 0:02:10.004
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like overall tournament experience and like po knowledge.

0:02:10.044 --> 0:02:11.764
<v Speaker 2>I mean this, I'm sure there are some pros there right,

0:02:11.844 --> 0:02:15.364
<v Speaker 2>been a pretty recreational heavy field, so in terms of

0:02:15.404 --> 0:02:17.244
<v Speaker 2>like kind of raw poker ability, But then like I

0:02:17.364 --> 0:02:20.684
<v Speaker 2>won't know the equities in the hand, right, so you're

0:02:20.764 --> 0:02:23.044
<v Speaker 2>very vulnerable to like, am I supposed to call a

0:02:23.124 --> 0:02:24.844
<v Speaker 2>check braise with this hand? Am I supposed to value

0:02:24.844 --> 0:02:26.804
<v Speaker 2>at this? Am I supposed to bluff this? You're kind

0:02:26.804 --> 0:02:31.924
<v Speaker 2>of guessing? And so that battle resulted in a pretty

0:02:31.924 --> 0:02:34.564
<v Speaker 2>good result. But also you know, also feeling, I mean,

0:02:34.764 --> 0:02:36.964
<v Speaker 2>when you have relative mastery over Texas Hold, which is

0:02:36.964 --> 0:02:38.964
<v Speaker 2>a game that both you and I play far more

0:02:39.004 --> 0:02:42.764
<v Speaker 2>than anything else, right, It's it's kind of frustrating, like

0:02:42.804 --> 0:02:44.284
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know the answer to this, right, Like

0:02:44.284 --> 0:02:46.964
<v Speaker 2>I haven't studied this game, and like I'm just guessing

0:02:47.044 --> 0:02:50.084
<v Speaker 2>and like trying to improvise, and and so it's chat.

0:02:50.124 --> 0:02:51.684
<v Speaker 2>One reason I like the mixed games is because, like

0:02:52.004 --> 0:02:54.084
<v Speaker 2>it's a challenge for your poker brain, right, You're trying

0:02:54.084 --> 0:02:58.444
<v Speaker 2>to take these concepts and apply them to a different canvas.

0:03:00.244 --> 0:03:03.324
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that that's a really interesting overarching point

0:03:03.364 --> 0:03:05.884
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to be actually talking about in

0:03:05.924 --> 0:03:09.004
<v Speaker 1>some of the more newsy segments on today's show, which

0:03:09.084 --> 0:03:14.204
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the way that our perceptions of risk

0:03:14.284 --> 0:03:17.124
<v Speaker 1>can translate to different environments. For someone who is a

0:03:17.124 --> 0:03:20.244
<v Speaker 1>poker player We've talked about this a lot, who actually

0:03:20.284 --> 0:03:23.764
<v Speaker 1>does have that innate sense of probabilities, I'm guessing that

0:03:23.924 --> 0:03:26.444
<v Speaker 1>you were better able to kind of get those risk

0:03:26.444 --> 0:03:30.564
<v Speaker 1>assessments right than somebody who who wasn't right, who is

0:03:30.724 --> 0:03:35.444
<v Speaker 1>just trying to go off of random experience or something

0:03:35.484 --> 0:03:37.444
<v Speaker 1>like that. So I think that that's a really interesting

0:03:37.484 --> 0:03:40.324
<v Speaker 1>point because when we talk about things that you know,

0:03:40.444 --> 0:03:43.404
<v Speaker 1>like plane crashes, you know, risks in our daily life, alcohol,

0:03:43.444 --> 0:03:46.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, it is interesting to try to see, you know,

0:03:46.404 --> 0:03:49.804
<v Speaker 1>how can we calibrate risk perception based on past experience.

0:03:49.804 --> 0:03:52.724
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this little this little poker Foray

0:03:52.804 --> 0:03:56.324
<v Speaker 1>into a game that you had never played before. Is

0:03:56.324 --> 0:04:00.324
<v Speaker 1>a really fun lens into that. Congratulations on your first

0:04:00.324 --> 0:04:02.564
<v Speaker 1>final table of twenty twenty five, right.

0:04:02.604 --> 0:04:04.724
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Yeah, no, pretty good start.

0:04:04.844 --> 0:04:10.324
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's the first of money Nate. So shall

0:04:10.364 --> 0:04:13.844
<v Speaker 1>we shall we move on to slightly less fun topics.

0:04:13.884 --> 0:04:17.284
<v Speaker 1>There has been a lot going on in the news

0:04:17.484 --> 0:04:20.724
<v Speaker 1>this week since we you know, since we last spoke,

0:04:21.604 --> 0:04:24.484
<v Speaker 1>both politically and also in the sports news, and we'll

0:04:24.484 --> 0:04:27.924
<v Speaker 1>be covering, uh, we'll be covering those as well. But yeah,

0:04:28.004 --> 0:04:31.124
<v Speaker 1>you you had a very funny emergency post on sports.

0:04:31.524 --> 0:04:34.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when I was playing this tournament, there's just like

0:04:34.284 --> 0:04:36.124
<v Speaker 2>esp and my phone's dead. It's like one in the

0:04:36.164 --> 0:04:38.004
<v Speaker 2>morning at this point, right, and like there's an ESPN

0:04:38.044 --> 0:04:41.564
<v Speaker 2>alert that Luka Doncic, the Great Dollars former Dallas maverick,

0:04:41.804 --> 0:04:45.764
<v Speaker 2>uh point guard unicorn, you could describe them as different

0:04:45.764 --> 0:04:49.004
<v Speaker 2>positions was traded in this deal. It's like totally inexplicable

0:04:49.004 --> 0:04:50.764
<v Speaker 2>because usually you get a really high return, but was

0:04:50.764 --> 0:04:53.684
<v Speaker 2>traded to the La Lakers for Anthony Davis and a

0:04:53.684 --> 0:04:56.364
<v Speaker 2>bunch of crap and a first round draft pick basically,

0:04:57.724 --> 0:05:01.964
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, it's probably the most shocking NBA trade in history.

0:05:02.004 --> 0:05:03.964
<v Speaker 2>If you want to read more about my view on that,

0:05:04.084 --> 0:05:09.684
<v Speaker 2>go to Silver bulletin my newsletter on substack. Tariff's another

0:05:09.684 --> 0:05:15.204
<v Speaker 2>story running about this week. This is a very influx policy.

0:05:15.724 --> 0:05:18.924
<v Speaker 2>Full disclosure. We're taping this on Monday afternoon, East Coast time.

0:05:20.364 --> 0:05:24.244
<v Speaker 2>Terrafts went into effect on China and Mexico over the weekend. However,

0:05:24.964 --> 0:05:27.644
<v Speaker 2>an hour or something ago, Trump suspended for a month

0:05:27.684 --> 0:05:31.884
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on Mexico after Mexico made some concessions, saying they

0:05:31.884 --> 0:05:33.484
<v Speaker 2>would deplay a bunch of troops in the US.

0:05:33.404 --> 0:05:35.524
<v Speaker 1>Border ten thousand troops night.

0:05:36.444 --> 0:05:38.164
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of leverage. There's a lot of

0:05:38.284 --> 0:05:42.284
<v Speaker 2>game theory involved, both in terms of the domestic political

0:05:42.284 --> 0:05:45.084
<v Speaker 2>reaction to the terriffs and in terms of these other countries.

0:05:45.124 --> 0:05:47.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have I was just looking at this, right,

0:05:47.524 --> 0:05:50.244
<v Speaker 2>do you know that US exports are twenty six point

0:05:50.324 --> 0:05:52.764
<v Speaker 2>four percent of Mexico's GDP.

0:05:53.124 --> 0:05:55.084
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea that is a high percentage.

0:05:55.204 --> 0:05:57.644
<v Speaker 2>Our exports to Mexico are one point two percent, right,

0:05:57.684 --> 0:06:00.124
<v Speaker 2>so they can retaliate. We're like, fuck you, Mexico. But

0:06:00.364 --> 0:06:04.844
<v Speaker 2>you know the fact that we're levering these allies is

0:06:04.964 --> 0:06:08.804
<v Speaker 2>just kind of gross in some ways. But anyway, there's

0:06:08.804 --> 0:06:10.284
<v Speaker 2>a lot to talk and I'm sure that'll be a

0:06:10.324 --> 0:06:12.324
<v Speaker 2>theme that will hit on going forward the next couple

0:06:12.404 --> 0:06:12.844
<v Speaker 2>of weeks.

0:06:13.124 --> 0:06:14.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I think it's going to be a really

0:06:14.764 --> 0:06:18.524
<v Speaker 1>important topic. There are also there are a number of

0:06:18.604 --> 0:06:22.244
<v Speaker 1>other interesting and concerning policies that have come out in

0:06:22.284 --> 0:06:24.564
<v Speaker 1>the last week. I don't know if we want to

0:06:24.564 --> 0:06:28.244
<v Speaker 1>get into all of them. Giving Elon Musk's access to

0:06:28.324 --> 0:06:32.524
<v Speaker 1>treasury payment systems is something that I think is you know,

0:06:32.924 --> 0:06:36.204
<v Speaker 1>it is notable, but has kind of gone under the radar.

0:06:36.284 --> 0:06:39.124
<v Speaker 1>What's going to happen to us for an aid? All

0:06:39.204 --> 0:06:41.764
<v Speaker 1>of these things are I think topics that we might

0:06:41.804 --> 0:06:44.164
<v Speaker 1>talk about in the future, but as of now, I

0:06:44.204 --> 0:06:46.924
<v Speaker 1>think it actually doesn't make sense to talk about them

0:06:47.004 --> 0:06:49.524
<v Speaker 1>because it's too much speculation. We don't know what's actually

0:06:49.524 --> 0:06:51.164
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, we don't know how it's going to

0:06:51.204 --> 0:06:55.404
<v Speaker 1>be enacted, and we don't know how much is Bark versus.

0:06:55.404 --> 0:06:58.284
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that's kind of the bottom line

0:06:58.284 --> 0:06:58.804
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of this.

0:06:59.124 --> 0:07:02.644
<v Speaker 2>And look, there's also so one thing that like I

0:07:02.684 --> 0:07:05.804
<v Speaker 2>think poker teaches you, but also life stress. We both

0:07:05.844 --> 0:07:07.844
<v Speaker 2>have lots of interesting life experience at this point, right,

0:07:07.964 --> 0:07:10.804
<v Speaker 2>is like can you do with multiple things going on

0:07:10.884 --> 0:07:15.884
<v Speaker 2>at once and prioritize? And it seems like Democrats are

0:07:16.004 --> 0:07:20.444
<v Speaker 2>not good at that. I think both kind of constitutionally

0:07:21.444 --> 0:07:24.084
<v Speaker 2>that's a whole theory about like different personality traits, but

0:07:24.124 --> 0:07:27.164
<v Speaker 2>also just like people aren't used to having like all

0:07:27.164 --> 0:07:31.724
<v Speaker 2>these different stories at once, and prioritizing is essential and like,

0:07:32.444 --> 0:07:33.844
<v Speaker 2>but people don't do it right. They tend to like

0:07:33.884 --> 0:07:35.484
<v Speaker 2>focus on Like, so there's all this focus on the

0:07:35.524 --> 0:07:38.644
<v Speaker 2>first week. Maybe the biggest story until the tariff stuff

0:07:38.644 --> 0:07:41.884
<v Speaker 2>and I'm playing crash was Elon Musk's salute. We talked

0:07:41.924 --> 0:07:45.484
<v Speaker 2>about that in me a little bit last week, and

0:07:45.564 --> 0:07:49.324
<v Speaker 2>like this is not the most important. We're trying to

0:07:49.444 --> 0:07:52.044
<v Speaker 2>leverage our friends north and south of the border and

0:07:52.124 --> 0:07:57.564
<v Speaker 2>Elon controls of Treasury Department payout system and like AI stuff.

0:07:57.564 --> 0:08:00.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all this stuff is like quite a lot

0:08:00.164 --> 0:08:00.924
<v Speaker 2>more important.

0:08:01.444 --> 0:08:06.484
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about multitasking briefly on my substack this past

0:08:06.524 --> 0:08:09.284
<v Speaker 1>week because I think that it's so important to remember

0:08:09.444 --> 0:08:12.284
<v Speaker 1>how our brain works, right, and how attention works, because

0:08:12.484 --> 0:08:14.204
<v Speaker 1>it's really playing in And we talked about this a

0:08:14.204 --> 0:08:18.324
<v Speaker 1>little bit. To Trump's strategy right overwhelm overwhelm. Overwhelm because

0:08:18.404 --> 0:08:20.844
<v Speaker 1>our brain is like ooh yay, like I get to

0:08:21.244 --> 0:08:23.444
<v Speaker 1>do all of these different things. It's really hard to focus,

0:08:23.764 --> 0:08:26.284
<v Speaker 1>and it's really hard to kind of figure out what's

0:08:26.324 --> 0:08:28.084
<v Speaker 1>best on. Our brain is not good at that, right,

0:08:28.084 --> 0:08:30.324
<v Speaker 1>Like our brain wants to be all over the place,

0:08:31.044 --> 0:08:34.684
<v Speaker 1>and so this just plays into kind of the worst

0:08:34.724 --> 0:08:37.804
<v Speaker 1>vulnerabilities in our thinking. That's why what I said last week,

0:08:37.804 --> 0:08:41.364
<v Speaker 1>I think is still the message, which is focus, right, like, figure,

0:08:41.684 --> 0:08:45.444
<v Speaker 1>reclaim your attention, focus on what's important, prioritize you need,

0:08:45.764 --> 0:08:47.964
<v Speaker 1>you need to kind of see, okay, what are our priorities,

0:08:48.004 --> 0:08:50.484
<v Speaker 1>what's the coherent message here? And knowing that that, by

0:08:50.484 --> 0:08:52.484
<v Speaker 1>the way, is not like a Democrat or Republican, that's

0:08:52.524 --> 0:08:55.284
<v Speaker 1>just like a human failing. Right. Our brains are really

0:08:55.284 --> 0:08:57.564
<v Speaker 1>really bad at that, right, and Trump is really really

0:08:57.604 --> 0:09:00.084
<v Speaker 1>good at taking advantage of it. It's like, you know,

0:09:00.364 --> 0:09:02.724
<v Speaker 1>like social media, right. Social media is designed to take

0:09:02.764 --> 0:09:06.484
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that brain's inability to focus and the desire

0:09:06.524 --> 0:09:08.604
<v Speaker 1>to have all of these different things happening at once.

0:09:08.884 --> 0:09:12.764
<v Speaker 1>And Trump, like the human walking social media, he's so

0:09:12.804 --> 0:09:14.844
<v Speaker 1>good as just throwing all this shit out there, seeing

0:09:14.844 --> 0:09:15.404
<v Speaker 1>what sticks.

0:09:15.564 --> 0:09:18.924
<v Speaker 2>Trump and social media and the regular media too, right,

0:09:19.124 --> 0:09:22.524
<v Speaker 2>But algorithmically and editorially people are very aware of like

0:09:22.644 --> 0:09:25.124
<v Speaker 2>what things make headlines, and kind of plane crashes are

0:09:25.124 --> 0:09:30.044
<v Speaker 2>in a classic category where I mean it used to

0:09:30.124 --> 0:09:32.804
<v Speaker 2>be I used to think when a plane crash in

0:09:32.804 --> 0:09:36.724
<v Speaker 2>the US, this was like almost a hurricane type story

0:09:36.764 --> 0:09:38.924
<v Speaker 2>for days. And you know, one reason why that's not

0:09:38.964 --> 0:09:42.644
<v Speaker 2>as much anymore because there are far fewer plane crashes.

0:09:42.764 --> 0:09:46.604
<v Speaker 2>Flying on airplanes on commercial airlines in the US is

0:09:46.644 --> 0:09:50.964
<v Speaker 2>incredibly safe. But you know, but when there are crashes,

0:09:51.044 --> 0:09:54.324
<v Speaker 2>then then they freak people out, and that changes the

0:09:54.324 --> 0:09:56.764
<v Speaker 2>incentives toward more and more safety.

0:09:57.164 --> 0:10:00.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's talk about that. Obviously, last week was

0:10:00.964 --> 0:10:04.564
<v Speaker 1>the first major aviation disaster since two thousand and nine,

0:10:04.964 --> 0:10:06.884
<v Speaker 1>so it's been a one, it's been a minute, right,

0:10:07.644 --> 0:10:11.204
<v Speaker 1>which goes to your point that general plane travel is

0:10:11.284 --> 0:10:16.364
<v Speaker 1>incredibly safe, even though our risk perception gets overblown because

0:10:16.524 --> 0:10:19.244
<v Speaker 1>we do have an outsize focus on events like this,

0:10:19.604 --> 0:10:21.524
<v Speaker 1>as we should by the way, you know, I think,

0:10:21.564 --> 0:10:25.124
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's actually important to hold kind of

0:10:25.164 --> 0:10:29.084
<v Speaker 1>these these sorts of institutions to account in the sense

0:10:29.164 --> 0:10:32.204
<v Speaker 1>that one of the one of the things that has

0:10:32.204 --> 0:10:34.884
<v Speaker 1>come out of this is that oh, Hey, there were

0:10:34.924 --> 0:10:37.764
<v Speaker 1>a lot of safety concerns that have been ignored, a

0:10:37.764 --> 0:10:40.564
<v Speaker 1>lot of safety recommendations that have been ignored for years,

0:10:40.724 --> 0:10:44.084
<v Speaker 1>specifically with the DC air space. There were recommendations that

0:10:44.124 --> 0:10:46.804
<v Speaker 1>the DC air space was already overstressed, and yet more

0:10:46.844 --> 0:10:49.284
<v Speaker 1>and more flights kept getting added, you know, et cetera,

0:10:49.324 --> 0:10:53.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, and people ignored them because nothing

0:10:53.484 --> 0:10:56.844
<v Speaker 1>had happened since two thousand and nine. So there's some

0:10:56.964 --> 0:11:02.164
<v Speaker 1>really interesting statistics that near misses have gone up, actually

0:11:02.244 --> 0:11:05.724
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount, and near misses is accidents that almost

0:11:05.764 --> 0:11:11.604
<v Speaker 1>happen but not quite so since from a decade ago,

0:11:11.684 --> 0:11:14.724
<v Speaker 1>we have a twenty five percent increase in runway incursions.

0:11:14.724 --> 0:11:18.524
<v Speaker 1>So that's near misses just on the runway, which is

0:11:18.524 --> 0:11:21.404
<v Speaker 1>a lot, right, not not that high in terms of

0:11:21.404 --> 0:11:27.564
<v Speaker 1>absolute numbers, but in relative terms, something that's a little

0:11:27.564 --> 0:11:31.244
<v Speaker 1>bit worrisome. And we have near misses mid air, not

0:11:31.444 --> 0:11:34.484
<v Speaker 1>just on the runway, you know, takeoffs, landing, all all

0:11:34.484 --> 0:11:38.564
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things like that. But because everything tends to

0:11:38.644 --> 0:11:42.324
<v Speaker 1>work out okay, people are just like, eh, it's totally fine.

0:11:42.444 --> 0:11:45.604
<v Speaker 1>So this is a big logical fallacy that people commit

0:11:45.684 --> 0:11:48.964
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and it's called the near miss fallacy.

0:11:49.044 --> 0:11:52.044
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost leads to something that we talk about

0:11:52.044 --> 0:11:54.484
<v Speaker 1>often on the show over Confidence, right that like, oh,

0:11:54.524 --> 0:11:56.844
<v Speaker 1>it'll all work out. This means the system's working like

0:11:56.924 --> 0:11:59.884
<v Speaker 1>it's all good. No, it means that the system is

0:11:59.924 --> 0:12:03.084
<v Speaker 1>barely holding on and you've gotten you know, how many

0:12:03.084 --> 0:12:05.884
<v Speaker 1>times did it work versus you got lucky? And that's

0:12:05.924 --> 0:12:09.644
<v Speaker 1>such a difficult thing to track, and both you and

0:12:09.684 --> 0:12:12.284
<v Speaker 1>I know that you know, being outcome oriented is not

0:12:12.364 --> 0:12:13.764
<v Speaker 1>the way to do it. You need to make sure

0:12:13.804 --> 0:12:15.284
<v Speaker 1>that your process is intact.

0:12:15.684 --> 0:12:17.404
<v Speaker 2>No, And in fact, if you're doing some type of

0:12:17.444 --> 0:12:21.964
<v Speaker 2>like statistical modeling, then near misses give you data and

0:12:22.004 --> 0:12:24.364
<v Speaker 2>tend to actually increase the incidence of the thing that

0:12:24.404 --> 0:12:29.084
<v Speaker 2>you fear going forward. Right, if if we intercept a

0:12:29.644 --> 0:12:32.364
<v Speaker 2>you know, attempt, a terrorist attack on the Brooklyn Bridge

0:12:32.884 --> 0:12:35.524
<v Speaker 2>or something, right, that's not good news. Assuming the attack

0:12:35.564 --> 0:12:38.804
<v Speaker 2>got like reasonably far along in the planning stage, that

0:12:38.844 --> 0:12:42.004
<v Speaker 2>means that like the incidence of terrorism is maybe higher

0:12:42.044 --> 0:12:46.964
<v Speaker 2>than we would have thought, right, because usually you know,

0:12:47.444 --> 0:12:49.244
<v Speaker 2>when you look back at something like nine to eleven,

0:12:49.284 --> 0:12:51.324
<v Speaker 2>you're like, how many different things had to go wrong

0:12:51.444 --> 0:12:53.764
<v Speaker 2>or right? And how many signals do we have to

0:12:53.844 --> 0:12:55.644
<v Speaker 2>miss right, And it is true that to pull off

0:12:55.684 --> 0:12:57.884
<v Speaker 2>like a complicated attack or any type of disaster where

0:12:57.884 --> 0:13:02.404
<v Speaker 2>there are multiple redundant systems in place, like you know, two, three, four,

0:13:02.484 --> 0:13:05.164
<v Speaker 2>things have to go wrong. But still if you say,

0:13:05.284 --> 0:13:07.404
<v Speaker 2>if you say, oh, three things went wrong, but we

0:13:07.444 --> 0:13:09.764
<v Speaker 2>got lucky in the fourth thing and it saved us. Right.

0:13:10.164 --> 0:13:14.884
<v Speaker 2>To take a more recent example, the fact that President Trump,

0:13:15.044 --> 0:13:22.924
<v Speaker 2>than its cannony Trump was nearly assassinated, really bad news, right, yeah,

0:13:23.404 --> 0:13:25.004
<v Speaker 2>really bad news in terms of like the rise of

0:13:25.044 --> 0:13:26.324
<v Speaker 2>political violence in the US.

0:13:26.484 --> 0:13:29.284
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, the takeaway from that isn't great, but he

0:13:29.444 --> 0:13:33.284
<v Speaker 1>wasn't assassinated. Sources to worked correctly, the takeaway is, oh shit,

0:13:33.524 --> 0:13:37.044
<v Speaker 1>you know what happened to make that even possible? And

0:13:37.124 --> 0:13:40.244
<v Speaker 1>so but the you know, but oftentimes we do the

0:13:40.284 --> 0:13:42.644
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite, right, and people are like, oh, we don't

0:13:42.684 --> 0:13:46.044
<v Speaker 1>need to implement these recommendations. We don't need to you know,

0:13:46.084 --> 0:13:48.084
<v Speaker 1>spend more money on this, We don't need to really

0:13:48.524 --> 0:13:50.884
<v Speaker 1>relieve this airspace or whatever it is, because it's all

0:13:50.924 --> 0:13:53.564
<v Speaker 1>been working out, no crashes since two thousand and nine.

0:13:53.964 --> 0:13:57.764
<v Speaker 1>So this is you know, what happened was absolutely horrible,

0:13:57.924 --> 0:14:04.124
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like absolutely preventable, and that overconfidence and

0:14:04.644 --> 0:14:08.124
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lack of accountability on some in some

0:14:08.204 --> 0:14:11.804
<v Speaker 1>respects is one of the reasons that we're having this

0:14:11.884 --> 0:14:15.724
<v Speaker 1>conversation now. So if there is a silver lining, I

0:14:15.724 --> 0:14:18.524
<v Speaker 1>hope that it is that, you know, people actually start

0:14:18.524 --> 0:14:20.804
<v Speaker 1>looking at the process and realizing that the number of

0:14:20.884 --> 0:14:24.524
<v Speaker 1>near misses that we have both mid air, on the ground, takeoffs,

0:14:24.604 --> 0:14:28.044
<v Speaker 1>landings are actually important. And as you say, like if

0:14:28.124 --> 0:14:31.404
<v Speaker 1>you were building a statistical model, all of these things

0:14:31.884 --> 0:14:34.964
<v Speaker 1>change your probability, and not for the better, right, your

0:14:35.044 --> 0:14:38.924
<v Speaker 1>priority probabilities have to be adjusted, not in a good direction.

0:14:40.084 --> 0:14:42.284
<v Speaker 1>And so I hope that this is a wake up call.

0:14:42.644 --> 0:14:43.924
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it will be? I don't know.

0:14:44.124 --> 0:14:47.044
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now I'm gonna see the controversial thing, right, I

0:14:47.084 --> 0:14:54.084
<v Speaker 2>am not sure that it's rational to put more resources

0:14:54.084 --> 0:14:59.964
<v Speaker 2>into aviation safety. Right, defined as follows right. So, the

0:15:00.004 --> 0:15:03.724
<v Speaker 2>statistical value of a life is a concept we've talked

0:15:03.724 --> 0:15:06.324
<v Speaker 2>about before on this show. Yeah, and that is how

0:15:06.404 --> 0:15:08.484
<v Speaker 2>much are people willing to pay. It's not based on

0:15:08.484 --> 0:15:10.404
<v Speaker 2>some bureaucrats in a back office. It's how much people

0:15:10.404 --> 0:15:14.564
<v Speaker 2>willing to pay to ensure their risk of surviving or

0:15:14.604 --> 0:15:19.044
<v Speaker 2>extend their life. Right, and comes out to about ten

0:15:19.084 --> 0:15:23.084
<v Speaker 2>million dollars. That if people could gamble and say I'll

0:15:23.084 --> 0:15:24.524
<v Speaker 2>give you ten million dollars and you have a one

0:15:24.604 --> 0:15:27.164
<v Speaker 2>n x chance of dying, right, I mean, you know,

0:15:27.204 --> 0:15:29.404
<v Speaker 2>there's some nonlinearities, but it comes from like things like

0:15:31.324 --> 0:15:34.164
<v Speaker 2>people being willing to do dangerous tasks, are being willing

0:15:34.204 --> 0:15:41.084
<v Speaker 2>to have medical inventions or buy safety features, right, and

0:15:41.164 --> 0:15:43.724
<v Speaker 2>across all different ways this is measured, it's pretty consistently

0:15:43.764 --> 0:15:47.684
<v Speaker 2>about ten million. For aviation safety. It's much higher than that.

0:15:47.724 --> 0:15:54.004
<v Speaker 2>People fear. People fear hijackings, and they fear plane crashes.

0:15:54.044 --> 0:15:56.644
<v Speaker 2>It would be an obviously terrible way to die, but

0:15:56.844 --> 0:15:58.484
<v Speaker 2>like you know, not every time that, I mean, the

0:15:59.244 --> 0:16:01.444
<v Speaker 2>failure rate should not be zero.

0:16:01.684 --> 0:16:01.804
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:16:01.804 --> 0:16:03.564
<v Speaker 2>To take a much less serious example, you hear the

0:16:03.604 --> 0:16:05.764
<v Speaker 2>phrase like if you've never missed a flight, you're not

0:16:05.764 --> 0:16:07.924
<v Speaker 2>doing it right, meaning that like, if you're flying from

0:16:08.604 --> 0:16:11.564
<v Speaker 2>New York to Chicago, go there are you know, fifteen

0:16:11.564 --> 0:16:16.004
<v Speaker 2>flights an hour an hour? But a lot, right, not

0:16:16.004 --> 0:16:19.084
<v Speaker 2>that much consequence to missing your flight. Obviously, any crash

0:16:19.204 --> 0:16:21.884
<v Speaker 2>involving what are we up to, like seventy deaths roughly

0:16:23.884 --> 0:16:27.404
<v Speaker 2>is more serious. But at the same time, like you know,

0:16:27.684 --> 0:16:31.084
<v Speaker 2>bad shit's supposed to happen some of the time because

0:16:31.084 --> 0:16:34.844
<v Speaker 2>the alternative is that you are paying gigantic amounts for

0:16:36.564 --> 0:16:38.964
<v Speaker 2>safety features. And I mean you see this, right, You see,

0:16:39.044 --> 0:16:42.924
<v Speaker 2>like in construction of the New York Subway, for example,

0:16:43.004 --> 0:16:46.724
<v Speaker 2>there are so many commitments to different groups and to

0:16:46.764 --> 0:16:49.204
<v Speaker 2>safety equipments and a special interest that it just is

0:16:49.244 --> 0:16:55.484
<v Speaker 2>incredibly expensive to do anything. So you know, this is

0:16:55.564 --> 0:16:58.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of more high level bravarian thinking to you, but

0:16:58.924 --> 0:17:01.684
<v Speaker 2>like being willing to think about in terms of trade, uster,

0:17:01.804 --> 0:17:07.964
<v Speaker 2>what is the price of reducing air traffic fatalities, right,

0:17:08.404 --> 0:17:11.004
<v Speaker 2>compared to what we might spend on other things like

0:17:11.724 --> 0:17:16.844
<v Speaker 2>road safety or medical safety or other things. Right. And

0:17:16.844 --> 0:17:19.844
<v Speaker 2>the fact is that humans are pretty inconsistent, yeah, about

0:17:19.964 --> 0:17:22.244
<v Speaker 2>kind of what they're willing to what risks they're willing

0:17:22.244 --> 0:17:23.164
<v Speaker 2>to take action to prevent.

0:17:23.404 --> 0:17:25.284
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is a very valid point that

0:17:25.764 --> 0:17:29.484
<v Speaker 1>we are inconsistent. However, I will kind of push back

0:17:29.524 --> 0:17:34.044
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, not in terms of like overall spending, right,

0:17:34.084 --> 0:17:37.124
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm talking about is how we respond to

0:17:37.964 --> 0:17:41.684
<v Speaker 1>two different risks and what the takeaway is from near missus. Right.

0:17:42.124 --> 0:17:45.404
<v Speaker 1>You could reallocate spending, you could not make stupid decisions

0:17:45.444 --> 0:17:48.924
<v Speaker 1>like adding over sixty flights to an airspace that you've

0:17:49.004 --> 0:17:52.364
<v Speaker 1>already been warned is overcrowded. This doesn't have to do

0:17:52.444 --> 0:17:56.284
<v Speaker 1>with pouring more money into it. This is just risk management,

0:17:56.324 --> 0:17:59.964
<v Speaker 1>making different decisions, making different process decisions, holding yourself to

0:18:00.244 --> 0:18:03.964
<v Speaker 1>different accountability, maybe reallocating some of the funds you already

0:18:04.004 --> 0:18:08.764
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of two different things, looking at training,

0:18:08.884 --> 0:18:11.404
<v Speaker 1>like looking and looking at models from the bottom up,

0:18:12.164 --> 0:18:15.444
<v Speaker 1>and reassessing a lot of kind of the decision making

0:18:15.484 --> 0:18:19.244
<v Speaker 1>along the way, as opposed to complacently saying, oh, everything's

0:18:19.284 --> 0:18:22.204
<v Speaker 1>fine or I think it's actually the lazy thing is

0:18:22.244 --> 0:18:24.924
<v Speaker 1>just to throw money at it, right, because why throw

0:18:25.004 --> 0:18:27.404
<v Speaker 1>money if you don't even know you know, first you

0:18:27.444 --> 0:18:30.684
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out what are we fixing, what's going wrong?

0:18:31.044 --> 0:18:33.404
<v Speaker 1>What's going wrong in the human decision making and the

0:18:33.444 --> 0:18:36.284
<v Speaker 1>non human decision making? Right, like a where are the

0:18:36.324 --> 0:18:39.284
<v Speaker 1>systems most vulnerable? And if we don't do that, I

0:18:39.284 --> 0:18:42.244
<v Speaker 1>don't care if we allocate billions of dollars to the problem,

0:18:42.404 --> 0:18:44.844
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to help, right. That's what happens with

0:18:46.004 --> 0:18:49.964
<v Speaker 1>bad financial decision making, where you just think, oh, you know,

0:18:50.404 --> 0:18:52.444
<v Speaker 1>pouring money out the problem is going to help. So

0:18:52.804 --> 0:18:54.404
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's kind of the way of thinking

0:18:54.484 --> 0:18:57.524
<v Speaker 1>about it, not just like, oh, you know, like let's

0:18:57.884 --> 0:19:00.284
<v Speaker 1>either allocate more money or not. I think that a

0:19:00.284 --> 0:19:03.404
<v Speaker 1>lot of people made bad decisions along the way. And

0:19:03.684 --> 0:19:08.164
<v Speaker 1>this was also differences in priorities, right because people say, oh, well,

0:19:08.164 --> 0:19:11.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, Senator X, Senator why, and Senator Z all

0:19:11.284 --> 0:19:13.804
<v Speaker 1>need direct flights home, and so we're going to add

0:19:13.844 --> 0:19:17.644
<v Speaker 1>those roots to you know, for that specific reason. That's

0:19:17.684 --> 0:19:19.964
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Right now, what are you saying about the

0:19:20.004 --> 0:19:23.004
<v Speaker 1>value of human life? Right You're saying that this person's

0:19:24.044 --> 0:19:28.444
<v Speaker 1>preference on when he gets home is much more important

0:19:28.484 --> 0:19:32.764
<v Speaker 1>than the safety of all of the people who are

0:19:32.804 --> 0:19:36.244
<v Speaker 1>flying through this airspace. Right, So there have been some

0:19:36.444 --> 0:19:41.364
<v Speaker 1>questionable decision making results along the way, and I think

0:19:41.364 --> 0:19:43.284
<v Speaker 1>those are the types of things we should be looking at.

0:19:43.364 --> 0:19:45.724
<v Speaker 1>But I think your other point is very well taken

0:19:46.124 --> 0:19:48.324
<v Speaker 1>and something that you know, we do talk about on

0:19:48.364 --> 0:19:51.364
<v Speaker 1>the show. But I think it's just something that's really

0:19:51.924 --> 0:19:55.164
<v Speaker 1>worth stressing over and over because even though I know it,

0:19:55.244 --> 0:19:58.844
<v Speaker 1>I still fall for it. Right when we do inconsistently

0:19:58.964 --> 0:20:01.604
<v Speaker 1>take these risk assessments where we do, you know, we

0:20:01.724 --> 0:20:04.404
<v Speaker 1>are too scared of a plane crash too, scared of

0:20:04.404 --> 0:20:07.644
<v Speaker 1>a hijacking, not scared enough of, you know, crossing the

0:20:07.684 --> 0:20:11.844
<v Speaker 1>street where our chance of dying is actually much higher,

0:20:12.404 --> 0:20:14.964
<v Speaker 1>right and being hit by a car, having something horrible happen.

0:20:16.004 --> 0:20:20.444
<v Speaker 1>You know, we do have very inconsistent risk preferences, and

0:20:20.484 --> 0:20:23.124
<v Speaker 1>that's something that you know, we should just constantly remind

0:20:23.164 --> 0:20:26.444
<v Speaker 1>ourselves of, constantly remind our listeners of, and constantly remind

0:20:26.444 --> 0:20:29.564
<v Speaker 1>our brains of, so that we try to behave more rationally,

0:20:29.564 --> 0:20:31.484
<v Speaker 1>even though at the end of the day, emotion always

0:20:31.484 --> 0:20:34.324
<v Speaker 1>gets into it. It's really difficult not to have emotion

0:20:34.444 --> 0:20:37.364
<v Speaker 1>in your decisions when it comes to you and immediate

0:20:37.364 --> 0:20:41.364
<v Speaker 1>decision making as opposed to having kind of the time

0:20:41.444 --> 0:20:46.804
<v Speaker 1>and space and leisure to think through it in a

0:20:46.844 --> 0:20:47.644
<v Speaker 1>more rational way.

0:20:47.844 --> 0:20:49.964
<v Speaker 2>I remember I was in Costa Rica a couple of

0:20:50.004 --> 0:20:52.284
<v Speaker 2>years ago with some friends and we were like staying

0:20:52.364 --> 0:20:56.324
<v Speaker 2>at this airbnb on a hill and the coaster is

0:20:56.524 --> 0:21:02.684
<v Speaker 2>very very wet, right, with like torrential thunderstorms like a lot, right,

0:21:02.764 --> 0:21:06.044
<v Speaker 2>maybe every day, but yeah, we're like driving down this

0:21:06.204 --> 0:21:11.044
<v Speaker 2>like dirt road in a thunderstorm in a country we've

0:21:11.044 --> 0:21:15.244
<v Speaker 2>never been in before. Like, probably not the best idea,

0:21:15.284 --> 0:21:17.484
<v Speaker 2>even though like they have incredible drainage systems, right, they're

0:21:17.524 --> 0:21:21.044
<v Speaker 2>used to this problem. But sometimes you gotta be like

0:21:21.044 --> 0:21:22.524
<v Speaker 2>fuck it, you know what I mean. I mean, if

0:21:22.564 --> 0:21:25.204
<v Speaker 2>you never take there's like a portfolio of like you

0:21:25.204 --> 0:21:28.284
<v Speaker 2>should get like one fuck it card a year. I

0:21:28.324 --> 0:21:31.684
<v Speaker 2>feel like, maybe, yeah, we could, we could talk about

0:21:31.684 --> 0:21:34.964
<v Speaker 2>this stuff every week. Let's go on and talk about booze.

0:21:35.084 --> 0:21:38.724
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, let's let's uh, let's talk about some alcohol warnings.

0:21:38.764 --> 0:21:56.044
<v Speaker 1>After this break, we have had some news coming out

0:21:56.044 --> 0:21:58.324
<v Speaker 1>on the alcohol front. I don't know if it was

0:21:58.404 --> 0:22:01.764
<v Speaker 1>time to coincide with dry January when lots of people

0:22:02.204 --> 0:22:05.404
<v Speaker 1>decide to, you know, abstain from drinking, but that's that's

0:22:05.444 --> 0:22:10.124
<v Speaker 1>when it came out. So the Surgeon General earlier had

0:22:10.164 --> 0:22:14.524
<v Speaker 1>issue to report on the potential cancer risks associated with

0:22:15.004 --> 0:22:20.684
<v Speaker 1>drinking any alcohol whatsoever. And so are you know, there

0:22:20.764 --> 0:22:23.084
<v Speaker 1>are now talks of putting morning labels like you have

0:22:23.164 --> 0:22:26.964
<v Speaker 1>on cigarettes right on all alcohol saying, you know, sculling

0:22:27.004 --> 0:22:30.844
<v Speaker 1>cross bones, you're going to die basically if you drink this,

0:22:30.884 --> 0:22:33.804
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people, a lot of wellness gurus,

0:22:33.844 --> 0:22:37.044
<v Speaker 1>health influencers have been saying, yes, this is exactly right,

0:22:37.244 --> 0:22:41.164
<v Speaker 1>zero drinking, you know, no amount of alcohol is healthy.

0:22:41.924 --> 0:22:44.844
<v Speaker 1>This is the way to go. And man, oh man,

0:22:44.924 --> 0:22:47.004
<v Speaker 1>like I have, I have so many thoughts on this,

0:22:47.364 --> 0:22:49.524
<v Speaker 1>Like this is like the most little for.

0:22:49.484 --> 0:22:52.364
<v Speaker 2>You, because I kind of I saw this news. Uh huh,

0:22:52.524 --> 0:22:54.524
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, that sucks. You know, it's nice to

0:22:54.564 --> 0:22:56.644
<v Speaker 2>have some beer and wine now and then, right. I mean,

0:22:57.124 --> 0:22:59.324
<v Speaker 2>but I didn't really want to process it because I

0:22:59.364 --> 0:23:01.444
<v Speaker 2>didn't either like want to give myself like an excuse

0:23:01.444 --> 0:23:04.324
<v Speaker 2>if I thought it was bullshit, or like didn't want to Facebook.

0:23:04.324 --> 0:23:06.484
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to let you drive this segment because I

0:23:06.484 --> 0:23:07.884
<v Speaker 2>know you've been researching us a lot.

0:23:08.204 --> 0:23:11.444
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, so first of all, let's just start off

0:23:11.484 --> 0:23:15.724
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that all studies of alcohol and health

0:23:16.204 --> 0:23:20.964
<v Speaker 1>are correlational, right, And the fact that they're all correlational

0:23:21.484 --> 0:23:25.604
<v Speaker 1>not causational, that they're observational studies in the environment makes

0:23:25.764 --> 0:23:29.804
<v Speaker 1>all nutritional studies, like not just alcohol, incredibly difficult to

0:23:29.844 --> 0:23:34.004
<v Speaker 1>do and conclusions very suspect depending on how you parse data.

0:23:34.004 --> 0:23:36.644
<v Speaker 1>There are so many other variables because it's not like

0:23:37.084 --> 0:23:39.844
<v Speaker 1>you take people from birth right and you say, okay,

0:23:39.844 --> 0:23:42.844
<v Speaker 1>when this person turns twenty one, we are going to

0:23:42.884 --> 0:23:44.964
<v Speaker 1>give them. We're going to control everything they eat their

0:23:45.124 --> 0:23:47.244
<v Speaker 1>entire life. We're going to have all these people live

0:23:47.324 --> 0:23:50.404
<v Speaker 1>in our little lab environment, and when this person turns

0:23:50.404 --> 0:23:52.644
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, they're going to start getting a glass of

0:23:52.644 --> 0:23:55.324
<v Speaker 1>wine right a day. And this one's not going to

0:23:55.404 --> 0:23:59.284
<v Speaker 1>drink at all. No, that is you know, maybe there's

0:23:59.284 --> 0:24:01.764
<v Speaker 1>a science fiction novel about that, but that's not the

0:24:01.764 --> 0:24:04.324
<v Speaker 1>way that this all works in the real world. Right,

0:24:04.364 --> 0:24:07.124
<v Speaker 1>So in the real world, what we do in all

0:24:07.164 --> 0:24:11.004
<v Speaker 1>of these cases is ask people, right, and have observational data.

0:24:11.404 --> 0:24:14.244
<v Speaker 1>And there are some studies that have followed people for

0:24:14.524 --> 0:24:18.164
<v Speaker 1>decades and decades, and you look at what their habits are.

0:24:18.244 --> 0:24:21.004
<v Speaker 1>You try to control for stuff as well as you

0:24:21.084 --> 0:24:23.604
<v Speaker 1>possibly can, and then you see what happens to them. Right,

0:24:23.804 --> 0:24:26.164
<v Speaker 1>who's getting sick, how are they getting sick, how long

0:24:26.204 --> 0:24:30.924
<v Speaker 1>are they living, et cetera, et cetera, and lo and behold.

0:24:31.164 --> 0:24:35.484
<v Speaker 1>In past studies when they did that, it turned out

0:24:35.564 --> 0:24:40.684
<v Speaker 1>that moderate drinkers actually did better than people who abstained

0:24:41.764 --> 0:24:45.284
<v Speaker 1>from alcohol all together. There was one big study that

0:24:45.324 --> 0:24:48.124
<v Speaker 1>showed that light drinkers, so people who consumed one to

0:24:48.164 --> 0:24:51.604
<v Speaker 1>three drinks per week, had lower rates of cancer and

0:24:51.804 --> 0:24:55.044
<v Speaker 1>death than people who abstained all together. There was a

0:24:55.084 --> 0:24:57.604
<v Speaker 1>study of nearly a million people that were followed for

0:24:58.164 --> 0:25:01.164
<v Speaker 1>over a decade that showed that abstainers had higher rates

0:25:01.164 --> 0:25:05.324
<v Speaker 1>of death chronic disease, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, chronic lung

0:25:05.364 --> 0:25:09.924
<v Speaker 1>disease than light were moderate drinkers. There are have been

0:25:09.924 --> 0:25:12.004
<v Speaker 1>a study of you know, millions of people that show

0:25:12.044 --> 0:25:15.324
<v Speaker 1>that non drinkers had, you know, had higher rates of

0:25:15.364 --> 0:25:18.004
<v Speaker 1>death than moderate drinkers. But this is all to say

0:25:18.044 --> 0:25:20.844
<v Speaker 1>that that was the prevailing wisdom. Now, all of a sudden,

0:25:20.884 --> 0:25:23.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see other data that say, oh no,

0:25:23.444 --> 0:25:27.204
<v Speaker 1>actually cancer rates go up. What the fuck? Right, Like

0:25:27.324 --> 0:25:31.284
<v Speaker 1>this is true of so much nutritional advice, where we

0:25:31.444 --> 0:25:34.564
<v Speaker 1>just get really really bad advice for a long time,

0:25:35.324 --> 0:25:40.204
<v Speaker 1>and then it's upended, and then it's upended again. Cholesterol good,

0:25:40.284 --> 0:25:44.964
<v Speaker 1>cholesterol bad, cholesterol, eggs, right, all sorts of stuff that's

0:25:45.004 --> 0:25:47.524
<v Speaker 1>good for you, that's bad for you. Butter is horrible.

0:25:47.524 --> 0:25:50.124
<v Speaker 1>You should have margarine. No, margarine's going to kill you

0:25:50.164 --> 0:25:53.084
<v Speaker 1>because of the chemicals in it. You should have butter. Right,

0:25:53.564 --> 0:25:55.764
<v Speaker 1>All all of these things just go round and round

0:25:55.844 --> 0:25:59.604
<v Speaker 1>and round. And I hate when people make it into

0:25:59.644 --> 0:26:02.044
<v Speaker 1>a moral crusade, which is by the way exactly what

0:26:02.364 --> 0:26:05.484
<v Speaker 1>is happening right that like, oh this is good and

0:26:05.524 --> 0:26:07.844
<v Speaker 1>this is the way to a long life, and this

0:26:08.044 --> 0:26:09.764
<v Speaker 1>is bad and this is you know, this makes you

0:26:09.804 --> 0:26:12.204
<v Speaker 1>a bad person and you are going to die because

0:26:12.244 --> 0:26:14.204
<v Speaker 1>the other, the other flip side of it is even

0:26:14.284 --> 0:26:16.244
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if I have a drink, if I

0:26:16.284 --> 0:26:19.724
<v Speaker 1>have a glass of wine with dinner, and my risk

0:26:20.004 --> 0:26:25.204
<v Speaker 1>of breast cancer goes up by one percent, right from

0:26:25.444 --> 0:26:27.964
<v Speaker 1>an a you know or whatever it is that I

0:26:28.004 --> 0:26:31.564
<v Speaker 1>just totally made up that number, by the way, Okay,

0:26:31.724 --> 0:26:35.884
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm willing to have that because it you know,

0:26:36.284 --> 0:26:38.684
<v Speaker 1>do I want to live a life where I just

0:26:38.964 --> 0:26:42.764
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything, don't drink, don't eat this, don't do that,

0:26:42.964 --> 0:26:45.804
<v Speaker 1>don't do this, and just spend all day trying to

0:26:45.844 --> 0:26:49.444
<v Speaker 1>live longer. No, right, Like that's that ain't the kind

0:26:49.444 --> 0:26:50.284
<v Speaker 1>of existence I want.

0:26:50.364 --> 0:26:54.644
<v Speaker 2>Who's that Brian Johnson guy who's like drinking his son's plasma.

0:26:54.684 --> 0:26:58.084
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Yeah, exactly, I'm measuring his son's nightly erections. Yes,

0:26:58.164 --> 0:26:59.204
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be that guy.

0:26:59.364 --> 0:27:01.804
<v Speaker 2>But this is like, oh my god, this is like

0:27:01.844 --> 0:27:04.404
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of like a Silicon Valley thing now

0:27:04.444 --> 0:27:08.644
<v Speaker 2>where like you know, I'm not sure, it's exactly straight

0:27:08.684 --> 0:27:10.764
<v Speaker 2>edge living as people say, oh yeah, I'm silver, but

0:27:10.764 --> 0:27:14.004
<v Speaker 2>then they'll take different types of drugs from psychedelics to

0:27:14.004 --> 0:27:16.484
<v Speaker 2>whatever else can be included in sobriety, right, I mean,

0:27:16.684 --> 0:27:19.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, it gets very difficult. And I do think

0:27:19.644 --> 0:27:22.084
<v Speaker 2>there is this like I don't know, if you'd call

0:27:22.084 --> 0:27:23.564
<v Speaker 2>it puritanism.

0:27:23.084 --> 0:27:24.724
<v Speaker 1>I would call it puritanism exactly.

0:27:24.804 --> 0:27:27.684
<v Speaker 2>There's kind of like a self improvement culture that you know,

0:27:28.684 --> 0:27:30.804
<v Speaker 2>it's a little ascetic acsc I don't know how you're

0:27:30.804 --> 0:27:33.124
<v Speaker 2>supposed to say that word, but like there's something about that, like,

0:27:33.204 --> 0:27:36.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, even like even like the effective altruism movement

0:27:36.644 --> 0:27:39.124
<v Speaker 2>in Silicon Valley is I don't know. It's also it's

0:27:39.124 --> 0:27:42.644
<v Speaker 2>also kind of like a California thing, where like because

0:27:42.644 --> 0:27:45.444
<v Speaker 2>if you're drinking socially in California, then you have this

0:27:45.524 --> 0:27:49.564
<v Speaker 2>constant problem of like how to get places without drunk driving? Right.

0:27:49.644 --> 0:27:51.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, I think that there are two things going on,

0:27:51.604 --> 0:27:55.204
<v Speaker 1>and they do go back to the Silicon Valley in California,

0:27:55.204 --> 0:27:58.924
<v Speaker 1>and in another way, one, I think it is puritanical,

0:27:59.004 --> 0:28:01.044
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there's kind of this like moral

0:28:01.124 --> 0:28:03.684
<v Speaker 1>judgment that comes with it that's like a part of

0:28:03.724 --> 0:28:06.044
<v Speaker 1>American culture and has been for a long time. But

0:28:06.084 --> 0:28:10.204
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is simplifying, oversimplifying, right, this desire for

0:28:10.284 --> 0:28:13.604
<v Speaker 1>like one solution that will make you live longer, where

0:28:13.604 --> 0:28:17.844
<v Speaker 1>you take tons of data that is really complex, really difficult,

0:28:17.884 --> 0:28:23.404
<v Speaker 1>where you can't actually draw conclusions, and you say cold plunge, right, yes,

0:28:23.524 --> 0:28:25.404
<v Speaker 1>cold plunge a day, and all of a sudden, you're

0:28:25.404 --> 0:28:27.644
<v Speaker 1>going to improve your health in your life, and for

0:28:27.724 --> 0:28:31.764
<v Speaker 1>red saunas right, and that you don't actually look to say, oh,

0:28:31.804 --> 0:28:33.804
<v Speaker 1>that study was done on ten people and they were

0:28:33.844 --> 0:28:37.044
<v Speaker 1>all finish and right, and all the confounders and all

0:28:37.044 --> 0:28:39.164
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, we have all of these things. So

0:28:39.444 --> 0:28:42.164
<v Speaker 1>you see these things that are like these solutions that

0:28:42.204 --> 0:28:43.884
<v Speaker 1>if you just do this one thing, if you do

0:28:43.964 --> 0:28:46.124
<v Speaker 1>this and this, then all of a sudden, you're going

0:28:46.124 --> 0:28:49.444
<v Speaker 1>to hack your you know, hack your health and this

0:28:49.564 --> 0:28:54.124
<v Speaker 1>biohacking will make you live longer, be smarter, and all

0:28:54.204 --> 0:28:56.484
<v Speaker 1>of these things. And so I think that alcohol is

0:28:56.564 --> 0:28:58.924
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of these let's simplify and let's just

0:28:59.004 --> 0:29:01.444
<v Speaker 1>say you know, absolutely no, and it's wrong. This is

0:29:01.884 --> 0:29:03.044
<v Speaker 1>and the best way to think about it.

0:29:03.084 --> 0:29:06.204
<v Speaker 2>You also find that you have people who are concerned

0:29:06.204 --> 0:29:08.084
<v Speaker 2>about harm reduction or if you want to put it

0:29:08.084 --> 0:29:11.964
<v Speaker 2>more in NATO Maria terms, kind of ev maximalization. Right,

0:29:11.964 --> 0:29:14.084
<v Speaker 2>you get some benefits out of drinking. Maybe it's enjoyable,

0:29:14.124 --> 0:29:16.444
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's good for your social life. Not advocating it

0:29:16.444 --> 0:29:18.884
<v Speaker 2>either way, but like you know, people are doing it,

0:29:18.924 --> 0:29:21.324
<v Speaker 2>and there's some costs in terms of health outcomes and

0:29:21.324 --> 0:29:23.964
<v Speaker 2>other risks, right, and like you know, how can you

0:29:24.004 --> 0:29:26.284
<v Speaker 2>reduce the more harmful ways to use this product? I

0:29:26.324 --> 0:29:29.244
<v Speaker 2>mean this comes up a lot, right with nicotine. I'm

0:29:29.244 --> 0:29:30.764
<v Speaker 2>not to date with this literature, but like there are

0:29:30.764 --> 0:29:34.844
<v Speaker 2>all these alternatives to cigarettes, zin and vapes and everything

0:29:34.884 --> 0:29:39.484
<v Speaker 2>else come and you know, sometimes they're advocators, oh there

0:29:39.524 --> 0:29:41.724
<v Speaker 2>are safe products, right, because they don't evolve the tar

0:29:42.004 --> 0:29:43.884
<v Speaker 2>of cigarettes. Sometimes they're wrapped up and say there's just

0:29:43.884 --> 0:29:45.844
<v Speaker 2>another gateway drug. I don't know what the liture on

0:29:45.884 --> 0:29:47.804
<v Speaker 2>that is. But like, but you actually have people who

0:29:47.804 --> 0:29:49.564
<v Speaker 2>want to do harm reduction and people who are who

0:29:49.564 --> 0:29:51.364
<v Speaker 2>are prudes. Right, And then you have that when it

0:29:51.404 --> 0:29:53.924
<v Speaker 2>comes to like COVID stuff, you would hear things will

0:29:54.004 --> 0:29:57.444
<v Speaker 2>mass just provide a false sense of security, and the

0:29:57.524 --> 0:30:00.124
<v Speaker 2>alternative often imply was just stay at home and don't

0:30:00.124 --> 0:30:02.684
<v Speaker 2>do anything for a year and a half until vaccines

0:30:02.724 --> 0:30:07.164
<v Speaker 2>are widely available. So that's always that's always tricky, is

0:30:07.244 --> 0:30:09.444
<v Speaker 2>kind of what are people's actual.

0:30:09.164 --> 0:30:13.044
<v Speaker 1>Mone for sure? For sure? And then I will also

0:30:13.284 --> 0:30:16.164
<v Speaker 1>just close this out by saying that you know, the

0:30:16.604 --> 0:30:20.004
<v Speaker 1>proposed let's put these warning labels and like basically say

0:30:20.004 --> 0:30:24.164
<v Speaker 1>that you know, alcohol's terrible and is going to cause cancer.

0:30:24.724 --> 0:30:26.964
<v Speaker 1>First of all, life causes cancer, right if you look

0:30:27.004 --> 0:30:30.804
<v Speaker 1>at the cancer risks, almost anything causes cancer. So like,

0:30:30.884 --> 0:30:33.484
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's just put a warning label on life.

0:30:33.524 --> 0:30:35.524
<v Speaker 1>Life also causes death. You know, it's a it's a

0:30:35.564 --> 0:30:38.124
<v Speaker 1>really it's a really bad thing. But the fact that

0:30:38.164 --> 0:30:42.204
<v Speaker 1>we're embracing marijuana the way that we are and vilifying

0:30:42.244 --> 0:30:46.964
<v Speaker 1>alcohol is just absolutely like mind boggling to me because

0:30:47.164 --> 0:30:51.244
<v Speaker 1>the data yet, yeah, the data on like the harm

0:30:51.324 --> 0:30:57.364
<v Speaker 1>that can come from marijuana consumption, especially now where it's

0:30:57.684 --> 0:31:00.004
<v Speaker 1>much stronger than it used to be, is a ton

0:31:00.044 --> 0:31:02.804
<v Speaker 1>of long term damage that can happen to your memory,

0:31:03.564 --> 0:31:06.164
<v Speaker 1>to kind of reaction time, to all sorts of things.

0:31:06.324 --> 0:31:08.564
<v Speaker 1>We don't talk about that, and we're like, yeah, pot good,

0:31:08.644 --> 0:31:11.364
<v Speaker 1>because you know, for some reason pot is now good

0:31:11.644 --> 0:31:12.644
<v Speaker 1>and alcohol bad.

0:31:13.244 --> 0:31:15.804
<v Speaker 2>People have to be like honest with themselves about what

0:31:15.924 --> 0:31:21.164
<v Speaker 2>things they enjoy more or less. Right, Like, you probably

0:31:21.164 --> 0:31:23.484
<v Speaker 2>have some matrix of like what is the risk of

0:31:23.524 --> 0:31:27.284
<v Speaker 2>something relative to the personal amount of exactly enjoyment that

0:31:27.404 --> 0:31:30.724
<v Speaker 2>it brings you? Right, And you know, sometimes I watch

0:31:30.724 --> 0:31:33.644
<v Speaker 2>it knew more about the risks to a little you know,

0:31:33.964 --> 0:31:36.724
<v Speaker 2>I have some heuristics that so this is really bad

0:31:37.244 --> 0:31:40.684
<v Speaker 2>deep fried foods seem really bad. And then but sometimes

0:31:40.724 --> 0:31:42.284
<v Speaker 2>they don't care. Sometimes you know, it's kind of your

0:31:42.724 --> 0:31:44.964
<v Speaker 2>every now and then you're indulging. But like but like,

0:31:45.364 --> 0:31:48.484
<v Speaker 2>but having you know, really out that matrix would be

0:31:48.484 --> 0:31:51.164
<v Speaker 2>helpful because you get confused, you hear, like sure, mixed

0:31:51.204 --> 0:31:53.444
<v Speaker 2>vesteras a lot. They are different objectives, right, If you're

0:31:53.484 --> 0:31:56.484
<v Speaker 2>trying to lose weight versus trying to reduce cholesterol, those

0:31:56.484 --> 0:31:59.244
<v Speaker 2>are very different diets that you might consume.

0:31:59.404 --> 0:31:59.564
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:59.804 --> 0:32:01.244
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we are going to do like a

0:32:01.244 --> 0:32:04.764
<v Speaker 2>ton of like personal health stuff on the show, but

0:32:04.764 --> 0:32:06.364
<v Speaker 2>we'll promise that when we do, it will not be

0:32:06.524 --> 0:32:10.444
<v Speaker 2>like judge because a wee be like hypocrites and we

0:32:10.484 --> 0:32:13.044
<v Speaker 2>trust people to make their own decisions. But like, you know, yeah,

0:32:13.244 --> 0:32:15.324
<v Speaker 2>I would often like more straightforward information about is this

0:32:15.364 --> 0:32:17.084
<v Speaker 2>thing that is build as being really bad? Is it

0:32:17.124 --> 0:32:18.084
<v Speaker 2>actually bad or.

0:32:18.084 --> 0:32:19.004
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely you know?

0:32:19.204 --> 0:32:19.844
<v Speaker 2>Or not? Right?

0:32:20.084 --> 0:32:23.124
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely? I think I think that that's something that that

0:32:23.164 --> 0:32:26.804
<v Speaker 1>we can all aspire to. And the unfortunate truth though

0:32:26.844 --> 0:32:29.244
<v Speaker 1>is when it comes to nutrition, it is tough, but

0:32:29.364 --> 0:32:31.244
<v Speaker 1>we can we can do a little bit more about

0:32:31.244 --> 0:32:33.284
<v Speaker 1>that in the future. But do you want to take

0:32:33.284 --> 0:32:36.964
<v Speaker 1>a break and then end on some super Bowl predictions

0:32:37.084 --> 0:32:39.044
<v Speaker 1>or prop bets or just thoughts.

0:32:39.324 --> 0:32:41.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's do a few Superbowl bets.

0:32:59.084 --> 0:33:04.924
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Nate. So I'm so proud of myself because I,

0:33:05.084 --> 0:33:08.004
<v Speaker 1>in order to prepare for this segment, I figured out

0:33:08.044 --> 0:33:10.484
<v Speaker 1>who was going to be playing in the super Bowl.

0:33:10.964 --> 0:33:13.844
<v Speaker 1>This is my level of interest. I was like, I

0:33:13.884 --> 0:33:17.004
<v Speaker 1>was like, I got to I have to know who's playing.

0:33:17.284 --> 0:33:20.124
<v Speaker 1>So I was I was very proud of myself. That

0:33:20.324 --> 0:33:24.044
<v Speaker 1>is the extent of my super Bowl knowledge. So let's

0:33:24.124 --> 0:33:28.924
<v Speaker 1>have you take it away. We've already talked about, you know,

0:33:29.044 --> 0:33:33.164
<v Speaker 1>the odds of who you should be betting on the

0:33:33.244 --> 0:33:36.124
<v Speaker 1>Eagles or the Chiefs given where the odds are. But

0:33:36.684 --> 0:33:38.924
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some Super Bowl prop bets because this

0:33:39.044 --> 0:33:42.324
<v Speaker 1>is something that you know, I think a lot of

0:33:42.364 --> 0:33:44.724
<v Speaker 1>people are interested in and more and more sports books

0:33:44.764 --> 0:33:48.764
<v Speaker 1>are offering just a whole array of them. How do

0:33:48.884 --> 0:33:51.604
<v Speaker 1>you think about it? By the way, do you think

0:33:51.644 --> 0:33:54.924
<v Speaker 1>that they're like, would you ever put money on prop

0:33:54.964 --> 0:33:58.244
<v Speaker 1>bets or you know, real money? I mean, maybe you'd

0:33:58.244 --> 0:34:00.124
<v Speaker 1>put on ten bucks because you think it's funny or

0:34:00.164 --> 0:34:03.324
<v Speaker 1>fun but would you ever actually like bet real money

0:34:03.324 --> 0:34:05.044
<v Speaker 1>on prop bets or do you think that that's not

0:34:05.364 --> 0:34:07.964
<v Speaker 1>kind of a smart way of looking at these things?

0:34:08.404 --> 0:34:11.644
<v Speaker 2>Oh? No, I so, actually in my book On the Edge,

0:34:13.164 --> 0:34:15.764
<v Speaker 2>there is discussion about Super Bowl prop bets. But wanted

0:34:15.804 --> 0:34:17.884
<v Speaker 2>to meet a guy named rufus pea buddy may be

0:34:18.004 --> 0:34:20.004
<v Speaker 2>familiar to fans of the show. He has his own

0:34:21.244 --> 0:34:23.964
<v Speaker 2>gambling related podcast with Jeff ma also featured in the book.

0:34:25.244 --> 0:34:27.844
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, so he is somebody who like builds computer

0:34:27.964 --> 0:34:32.004
<v Speaker 2>models and specializes in Super Bowl prop bets and is

0:34:32.124 --> 0:34:35.284
<v Speaker 2>very high ev in them to the point where of

0:34:35.284 --> 0:34:37.524
<v Speaker 2>course he gets limited, and you know he'll like, literally,

0:34:37.564 --> 0:34:41.004
<v Speaker 2>go is the West Gate the super book? Get the

0:34:41.004 --> 0:34:44.124
<v Speaker 2>West Gate? I think casino where they're famous for their

0:34:44.124 --> 0:34:46.644
<v Speaker 2>prop bets, will like set up camp and bring thousands

0:34:46.644 --> 0:34:47.964
<v Speaker 2>of dollars where you are all have to make like

0:34:47.964 --> 0:34:49.244
<v Speaker 2>two bets at a time, and you just like go

0:34:49.364 --> 0:34:51.084
<v Speaker 2>to the back of the line, right, But like you

0:34:51.324 --> 0:34:55.364
<v Speaker 2>these are these are beatable if you do research, and

0:34:55.484 --> 0:34:57.764
<v Speaker 2>I haven't done the research, but they're chaunting on people

0:34:57.804 --> 0:35:02.404
<v Speaker 2>being lazy, right that they're recreational bets. They're a lot

0:35:02.404 --> 0:35:05.524
<v Speaker 2>of fun, right, and so if you're sharp, And it's

0:35:05.564 --> 0:35:08.244
<v Speaker 2>probably true by the way, for the Super Bowl in general,

0:35:09.564 --> 0:35:12.204
<v Speaker 2>is that there's so much public money out there, everybody

0:35:12.284 --> 0:35:16.164
<v Speaker 2>is making a bet that there isn't enough sharp money.

0:35:16.204 --> 0:35:18.844
<v Speaker 2>There's not enough roofous pea buddies in the world to

0:35:19.124 --> 0:35:22.164
<v Speaker 2>gobble up all that all that expected value, right, And

0:35:22.204 --> 0:35:29.404
<v Speaker 2>so like you know, as of today Monday to third,

0:35:29.644 --> 0:35:32.524
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven percent of the money on the point spread

0:35:32.604 --> 0:35:37.444
<v Speaker 2>is on the Philadelphia Eagles. That's probably a good sign

0:35:37.484 --> 0:35:39.404
<v Speaker 2>that you should bet on the Kansas City Chiefs. See

0:35:39.444 --> 0:35:42.124
<v Speaker 2>of course are sixteen and one, right, who have won

0:35:42.204 --> 0:35:46.044
<v Speaker 2>two balls in a row have often had very hairy

0:35:46.244 --> 0:35:50.924
<v Speaker 2>escapes from games this year, right are are are you know?

0:35:50.964 --> 0:35:52.964
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, do you want to do some crop betting?

0:35:53.444 --> 0:35:55.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, Well there's there's one that I know that

0:35:55.764 --> 0:35:57.884
<v Speaker 1>people do bet on, but it's just to me, it's

0:35:57.924 --> 0:35:59.764
<v Speaker 1>like so mind boggling, which is the result of the

0:35:59.804 --> 0:36:03.044
<v Speaker 1>coin toss, right, Like, why would you bet on that?

0:36:03.124 --> 0:36:07.364
<v Speaker 1>Of all the things that could be you know, predictable, modelable,

0:36:07.404 --> 0:36:09.764
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, it's a coin toss. This is what we

0:36:09.844 --> 0:36:12.924
<v Speaker 1>base a lot of our statistics on, right, the fact

0:36:13.044 --> 0:36:15.964
<v Speaker 1>that a coin toss is fifty to fifty and yet

0:36:16.284 --> 0:36:18.084
<v Speaker 1>and yet night it's like the.

0:36:18.044 --> 0:36:23.684
<v Speaker 2>Face tattoo of of gambling. Right, It's just you're so.

0:36:23.764 --> 0:36:26.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean, first of all, heads does win like fifty

0:36:26.604 --> 0:36:28.124
<v Speaker 2>point five percent of time or something?

0:36:28.204 --> 0:36:32.244
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, in our limited data set of Super Bowls.

0:36:32.324 --> 0:36:34.444
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, but the reference class is like, isn't there

0:36:34.484 --> 0:36:35.924
<v Speaker 2>wasn't that a study? Have we talked about this for

0:36:36.124 --> 0:36:38.844
<v Speaker 2>like where like a coin flip is not actually random

0:36:38.844 --> 0:36:40.724
<v Speaker 2>whatever aerodynamic shit it lines on.

0:36:40.684 --> 0:36:42.804
<v Speaker 1>The Yeah, well it depends on the coin.

0:36:42.964 --> 0:36:45.484
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and I guess it's a special Super Bowl commemorative

0:36:45.604 --> 0:36:47.124
<v Speaker 2>coin with I don't know what the fuck on this.

0:36:47.484 --> 0:36:49.164
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that one. But no, the study

0:36:49.204 --> 0:36:52.724
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about there was. There was a study where

0:36:52.724 --> 0:36:54.924
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that the two faces were not actually

0:36:55.004 --> 0:36:56.364
<v Speaker 1>weighted equally.

0:36:56.724 --> 0:36:59.044
<v Speaker 2>If I were the Kansas City chiefs for the field

0:36:59.044 --> 0:37:01.884
<v Speaker 2>of fit Egals, I would have a fucking intern spend

0:37:02.044 --> 0:37:05.444
<v Speaker 2>the week researching what coin will be flipped and which

0:37:05.484 --> 0:37:08.404
<v Speaker 2>side is like heavier, Right, I would optimize that strategy

0:37:08.684 --> 0:37:09.284
<v Speaker 2>if possible.

0:37:09.524 --> 0:37:12.364
<v Speaker 1>What if you find out that neither side is heavier?

0:37:12.964 --> 0:37:16.604
<v Speaker 2>Uh, come on, I'm not gonna I think the side

0:37:16.964 --> 0:37:19.244
<v Speaker 2>it's like once I with like a little l i

0:37:19.524 --> 0:37:24.204
<v Speaker 2>X it's Super Bowl licks l I X. That looks heavy, right,

0:37:24.244 --> 0:37:26.284
<v Speaker 2>there's like a lot of embossing and shit like that.

0:37:27.804 --> 0:37:29.844
<v Speaker 2>So I bet on the on the LICKS side. I think,

0:37:29.924 --> 0:37:33.044
<v Speaker 2>which is a heavier side, fall tend to come up

0:37:33.604 --> 0:37:34.044
<v Speaker 2>on top.

0:37:34.244 --> 0:37:37.324
<v Speaker 1>No, the heavier side is going to be on the bottom, Okay.

0:37:37.044 --> 0:37:41.884
<v Speaker 2>So bet against licks. I think bet against the side

0:37:41.924 --> 0:37:44.404
<v Speaker 2>with a big Super Bowl logo on it. And I

0:37:44.444 --> 0:37:47.524
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that's heads or tails, so and probably

0:37:47.524 --> 0:37:48.884
<v Speaker 2>not enough to whatever. Where are they are?

0:37:48.884 --> 0:37:49.044
<v Speaker 1>There?

0:37:49.084 --> 0:37:51.804
<v Speaker 2>Are they giving like minus one ten on this bets?

0:37:51.844 --> 0:37:54.484
<v Speaker 2>You're risking eleven dollars to win ten? Right? But like

0:37:55.084 --> 0:37:56.724
<v Speaker 2>if I don't know, I think there's some edge there,

0:37:56.844 --> 0:37:58.684
<v Speaker 2>maybe with minus one oh one or something.

0:38:00.204 --> 0:38:02.604
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll see, we'll see. And also do we know

0:38:02.924 --> 0:38:06.324
<v Speaker 1>so maybe this is we're getting into the nitty gritty

0:38:06.364 --> 0:38:11.004
<v Speaker 1>of coin tosses. Guys, do we know whether they always

0:38:11.044 --> 0:38:13.884
<v Speaker 1>position the coin with the same side up before the

0:38:13.924 --> 0:38:16.404
<v Speaker 1>flip or is that also random? Do they flip a

0:38:16.404 --> 0:38:18.244
<v Speaker 1>coin to know where their heads or tails is going

0:38:18.324 --> 0:38:19.964
<v Speaker 1>to be up when the flip starts.

0:38:20.284 --> 0:38:22.244
<v Speaker 2>I'm just telling you, this fucking Super Bowl logos had

0:38:22.284 --> 0:38:24.764
<v Speaker 2>looks pretty fucking heavy. You know, I can't tell if

0:38:24.764 --> 0:38:27.484
<v Speaker 2>it's in bosted or not, but yeah, Google superb commemorative coin.

0:38:27.764 --> 0:38:29.604
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well there's your.

0:38:29.484 --> 0:38:32.324
<v Speaker 2>Coupon code risky business for no I'm just kidding.

0:38:32.964 --> 0:38:37.044
<v Speaker 1>That would be hilarious. But yes, okay, okay, fine, we

0:38:37.044 --> 0:38:39.964
<v Speaker 1>could do some research, but it's still likes. That's about

0:38:40.004 --> 0:38:42.564
<v Speaker 1>as DEGENNI of a bit as as you can get.

0:38:42.644 --> 0:38:46.284
<v Speaker 1>I think the coin toss. But there are also a

0:38:46.324 --> 0:38:51.844
<v Speaker 1>lot of other lines that are available, such as will

0:38:51.884 --> 0:38:54.724
<v Speaker 1>a player or a coach cried during the national anthem?

0:38:54.924 --> 0:38:57.204
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a gimme, right, someone's gonna cry?

0:38:57.524 --> 0:38:59.524
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, minus three hundred, I think.

0:39:00.844 --> 0:39:01.604
<v Speaker 1>Minus a million.

0:39:02.204 --> 0:39:06.124
<v Speaker 2>Okay, look, I'll take I'll take no crying at plus

0:39:06.124 --> 0:39:06.684
<v Speaker 2>five hundred.

0:39:09.444 --> 0:39:11.924
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, let's say we could talk about that.

0:39:12.124 --> 0:39:16.084
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm betting twenty bucks at plus five hundred on

0:39:16.204 --> 0:39:18.724
<v Speaker 2>no crying. If no one cries you owe one hundred bucks. Okay,

0:39:19.404 --> 0:39:20.084
<v Speaker 2>let me.

0:39:20.004 --> 0:39:22.324
<v Speaker 1>Think about it. How do we define crying? It's tearing up?

0:39:22.484 --> 0:39:27.684
<v Speaker 1>Is tearing up? Is tearing up a because I think

0:39:28.444 --> 0:39:30.404
<v Speaker 1>I mean like you. I don't mean someone's going to

0:39:30.524 --> 0:39:34.124
<v Speaker 1>like full out bawling, but like tearing up. I think

0:39:34.484 --> 0:39:36.924
<v Speaker 1>for me counts. That's that's when I said, like minus

0:39:36.924 --> 0:39:37.804
<v Speaker 1>a million, you have to.

0:39:37.804 --> 0:39:40.644
<v Speaker 2>See a tier. Okay, not merely watery. You have to

0:39:40.644 --> 0:39:41.204
<v Speaker 2>see a tier.

0:39:41.364 --> 0:39:44.164
<v Speaker 1>But what happens? But we can't see everyone either, So

0:39:44.204 --> 0:39:45.804
<v Speaker 1>who actually decides this?

0:39:45.884 --> 0:39:48.684
<v Speaker 2>But on the official whichevery Networks till us in the game,

0:39:48.684 --> 0:39:52.884
<v Speaker 2>which should probably no official broadcast. It's on Fox on

0:39:52.964 --> 0:39:56.524
<v Speaker 2>the Fox News US, not Fox deport this or whatever?

0:39:56.604 --> 0:39:59.844
<v Speaker 2>Right the Fox News US feed during the national anthem?

0:40:00.164 --> 0:40:03.084
<v Speaker 2>Is there a player or coach who has a tier

0:40:03.124 --> 0:40:05.284
<v Speaker 2>in the ride during the national anthem? Picture on Fox?

0:40:05.284 --> 0:40:07.524
<v Speaker 1>All right, we can do it. How about ten dollars?

0:40:07.684 --> 0:40:08.164
<v Speaker 1>Not twenty?

0:40:08.244 --> 0:40:10.564
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, fine, okay, we're we're.

0:40:10.324 --> 0:40:12.084
<v Speaker 1>Do you risking? And then and then you're on let's

0:40:12.084 --> 0:40:12.364
<v Speaker 1>do it?

0:40:12.724 --> 0:40:14.484
<v Speaker 2>Any of their bets.

0:40:16.244 --> 0:40:18.324
<v Speaker 1>First song performed by Kendrick Lamar.

0:40:19.764 --> 0:40:20.964
<v Speaker 2>I look these odds up.

0:40:22.804 --> 0:40:25.164
<v Speaker 1>Does Polymarket, by the way, have odds for all of

0:40:25.164 --> 0:40:26.364
<v Speaker 1>these Super Bowl bets as well.

0:40:26.484 --> 0:40:29.124
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm and I'm an investor to POLYMCA. I'm sure,

0:40:29.164 --> 0:40:34.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you can. You know, Dja hard your heart's content, okay,

0:40:34.484 --> 0:40:38.884
<v Speaker 2>not like us. Plus one humble plus two ten for you,

0:40:38.924 --> 0:40:41.604
<v Speaker 2>plus three hundred by the weather is also a plus

0:40:41.644 --> 0:40:45.764
<v Speaker 2>seven to fifty chance of a Taylor Swift cam girl

0:40:45.844 --> 0:40:48.844
<v Speaker 2>friend of the Cansallity Chiefs taught in I have you know?

0:40:51.124 --> 0:40:54.604
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift guests appearance is plus seven fifty. I guess

0:40:54.644 --> 0:40:57.644
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like that. I mean she's in the stadium, right, Yeah,

0:40:58.764 --> 0:41:03.284
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I mean it would be Actually I don't.

0:41:03.324 --> 0:41:06.564
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean overexposure is a problem.

0:41:06.724 --> 0:41:10.044
<v Speaker 1>Right, what's this true? This is?

0:41:12.244 --> 0:41:14.884
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you can, like, look, you can bet on everything, basically,

0:41:14.924 --> 0:41:18.084
<v Speaker 2>any any other bits you want to make with me, though, Maria, No.

0:41:22.964 --> 0:41:25.644
<v Speaker 1>We got one. We got one. We'll report back on

0:41:25.724 --> 0:41:32.084
<v Speaker 1>the risky business prop bet, I say, sadly, Nate, I'm too,

0:41:32.244 --> 0:41:35.364
<v Speaker 1>I'm too Uh, You're you're too good. I can't. I

0:41:35.404 --> 0:41:38.484
<v Speaker 1>can't bet against you, and I know nothing. The funny

0:41:38.484 --> 0:41:40.164
<v Speaker 1>thing is, though these types of prop bets, you need

0:41:40.204 --> 0:41:44.564
<v Speaker 1>to know absolutely nothing about football or about the actual

0:41:44.844 --> 0:41:45.964
<v Speaker 1>kind of results of the game.

0:41:47.044 --> 0:41:48.644
<v Speaker 2>But there is like, what's a chance that like a

0:41:48.764 --> 0:41:51.484
<v Speaker 2>foam ball return in the second quarter results? And you know,

0:41:51.724 --> 0:41:52.844
<v Speaker 2>I like that kind of stuff.

0:41:53.284 --> 0:41:56.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are prop bets that are actually very much

0:41:56.684 --> 0:41:59.564
<v Speaker 1>related to football knowledge and to the actual gameplay, but

0:41:59.604 --> 0:42:02.564
<v Speaker 1>the ones we've been talking about are completely random. So

0:42:02.844 --> 0:42:05.844
<v Speaker 1>I guess, Nate, you don't have any special insider knowledge.

0:42:05.924 --> 0:42:08.604
<v Speaker 1>And I'm hoping that my knowledge of human psychology will

0:42:08.644 --> 0:42:13.204
<v Speaker 1>render me on top on our crying that someone will

0:42:13.244 --> 0:42:15.244
<v Speaker 1>tear up I believe where.

0:42:15.164 --> 0:42:16.804
<v Speaker 2>You actually find that. On Thursday, there's going to be

0:42:16.804 --> 0:42:19.524
<v Speaker 2>a silver bulletin post about historic crying during the Super

0:42:19.524 --> 0:42:21.724
<v Speaker 2>Bowl and empirical rates of crying every time. And now

0:42:21.764 --> 0:42:22.364
<v Speaker 2>that's changed.

0:42:25.284 --> 0:42:27.084
<v Speaker 1>What was that voice? I like that?

0:42:27.444 --> 0:42:29.244
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's a blogger voice. I don't know.

0:42:29.284 --> 0:42:33.204
<v Speaker 1>Would blogger your blogger voice? Got it? And on that note,

0:42:33.444 --> 0:42:36.404
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business listeners, we will see you next week where

0:42:36.444 --> 0:42:39.244
<v Speaker 1>we will know whether crying did in fact take place.

0:42:49.084 --> 0:42:51.244
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:42:51.324 --> 0:42:54.604
<v Speaker 1>out to us at Risky Business at Pushkin dot fm.

0:42:55.004 --> 0:42:57.444
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if you're a Pushkin Plus subscriber,

0:42:57.644 --> 0:43:00.484
<v Speaker 1>we have some bonus content for you. We'll be answering

0:43:00.484 --> 0:43:03.484
<v Speaker 1>a listener question each week that's coming up right after

0:43:03.524 --> 0:43:04.244
<v Speaker 1>the credits.

0:43:04.404 --> 0:43:07.684
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not subscribing yet, consider signing up for

0:43:07.844 --> 0:43:10.644
<v Speaker 2>just six ninety nine a month. Nice price. You get

0:43:10.684 --> 0:43:13.604
<v Speaker 2>access to all that premium content and ad for listening

0:43:13.644 --> 0:43:15.684
<v Speaker 2>across the Pushkins and Hire network. Of show.

0:43:16.564 --> 0:43:20.244
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanikova.

0:43:19.404 --> 0:43:21.804
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co

0:43:21.844 --> 0:43:25.644
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:43:25.644 --> 0:43:29.164
<v Speaker 2>by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer is Gabriel Hunter Chang.

0:43:29.724 --> 0:43:32.724
<v Speaker 2>Sally Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is

0:43:32.764 --> 0:43:35.124
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Breuger.

0:43:35.564 --> 0:43:37.924
<v Speaker 1>If you like this show, please rate and review us

0:43:37.964 --> 0:43:41.764
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too. Thanks so much

0:43:41.764 --> 0:43:42.324
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in.