WEBVTT - Nick Wright’s NFL Playoff PREDICTIONS, NFC win totals + Rashee Rice suspension

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in episode three sixty of What Dright with Nick Brighton.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 1>As always, these episodes are brought to you by our

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>friends at Boost Mobile Demons. Part two of the Gambling Show.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>There might be a part three. This has to be

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a tight sixty. We did the AFC over Unders on Tuesday. Today,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we do the NFC over Unders to make miss the

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>playoffs division winners, and then we will see if we

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>will do our Super Bowl exacta, which while we've never

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>won it, two years ago we were no. Three years

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>ago we were potentially oddly a brock party injury away

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>from getting it. Oh yeah, we had Chiefs over Niners

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, and the Niners were in the NFC

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Championship game. Years ago we had Chief Sover Cowboys, which

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was closer than we remember it to be. The Cowboys

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>won twelve games that year. They had a home playoff game,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Jordan Love came into Dallas State Texas Stadium

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and walked the dog on them. Last year we were,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, halfway there. We had Chiefsilver Bears, and so

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we will see what it is this year. What we

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>forgot about at the end of last season is Demand's

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>five preseason bets crushed. We will recap those and give

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you his five preseason bets today as well. So all

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>of that's coming up. The reason this has to be

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a tight sixty little cross pod promotion. I'm going on

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg Rosenthal's NFL Daily right after this show doing it's

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect for predictions week on the TV show our gambling shows. Here,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're Greg and I are doing demanday

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and over unders draft where like he picks. So if

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I have the number one pick, I take Chiefs over

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half wins. He then can't take that

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>team and we do it like that. So that'll be fun.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So all that coming up. Not gonna have time for that.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how.

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, to be totally honest, I rarely do

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a pod after the pod, but Greg does such a

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>good job and I like doing stuff with the NFL

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>folks on doing it. Also, by the way, speaking of

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>pods like rate, subscribe, review, cross promote, do all that.

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't get as many ratings on iTunes and Spotify

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>as maybe it would be helpful to get. The reviews

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are nice, but I understand that actually you have to

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>type things out. Who likes to do that? Just click

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the little five stars. We would appreciate that. Follow us on YouTube.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We will now get two things we're not going to

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get to except we're briefly gonna get to them. Demandsay

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>straight to voicemail. Brought to you by our friends at

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile. Rashi Rice suspended for six games. More on

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the moment, Travis and Taylor engaged. More on

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that moment and Dennis Corner US Open update. More on

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that next week. I was there last night, saw real,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>saw holgar Rooon go down from the second row he was.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I went to Alcarez Alcarez at Ash Alcarez won in

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>straight sets. I then went over to we were I

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>could tell it was gonna be a five set masterpiece

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>between this big german fella and holgar Roun, and so

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we went there, sniped some really good seats at Old

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Court seventeen was there till eleven? Great, there's the US

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Open update. Rashi Rice suspended six games. Fair resolution. I

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>had said I liked when it was going to be delayed.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Other people made the point it'd be better get it

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the way early. That's kind of a tomato

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tomato thing, depending on how you see it. The reason

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention it is because, like all great

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories, the moment it is disproven, people act like

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't ever a conspiracy theory. The league's rigging it

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to help the Chiefs. They're the raiding the ratings. No

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one's gonna watch Chiefs Eagles in Week two if for

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>she Rice isn't playing. That's why he's not suspended. Oh wait,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the real news is the league wanted to suspend him

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve games, and now he is missing the

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>first six games. All right, we'll just move on to

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the next thing. Much like Travis and Taylor is a work,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a publicity stunt. I don't give him three months.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>They're now about to become America's you know, basically America's royalty,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and people will be like, I never had that take

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We need to take accountability in this world, demons. That's

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>all I'm asking for. I have to own all my

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>How you how long do you think I'm gonna be

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>reminded I picked the Bears to go to the Super

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and put Caleb on Mahlmes Mountain for the rest

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>of my life. They just be listen, one nothing, no

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>problem with a spike take. Just be accountable for it

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, like great subscribe review, do all that quick

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>recap demands of our AFC over unders, and there's always

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>all lines and odds courtesy of DraftKings. Here is how

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we ended up. You want to roll through it for

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the audience the three we real quick before you do,

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen Tuesday show. I gave you all

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen picks, but we only made six bets. The overs

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>were what demonse.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>For the overs, We've got Jags at seven and a

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>half at minus one twenty five, Kansas City over eleven

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and a half at plus one hundred, Vegas six and

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>a half at minus one hundred and forty five. For

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the unders, we've got Cincinnati nine and a half at

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>minus one fifteen, Indianapolis seven and a half minus one thirty,

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>then Denver nine and a half at plus one two.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Nice little plus money on that one, I think, aside

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Chiefs, my favorite one is actually the Colts.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think the Colts are gonna be bad bad.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong. Is Shane Steichen has you know, been

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>He's found ways to win with that team. I think

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be bad, all right, let's get right

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to it. NFC East, starting with formerly America's team, the

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Demons.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you got the Cowboys over under and you're taking

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the eight and a half on the under.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at minus one forty five. And this is a

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>bet that I am actually making. I am not as

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>confident as everyone else that Mike is going to be

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there week one or week two. I think Micah going

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to get this second opinion on his back is upping

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the ante a bit on how far he is willing

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to take this. All he needs is to find the

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>right doctor that will be like, oh, yeah, I do see. Yeah,

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a little concerning. And then Micah can sit

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for indefinitely and keep getting paid and hold out without

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>paying the penalty of holding out. And the problem is,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>even with Micah, I am not a believer in the

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys this year. I'm not certain they're going to have

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>as quality of an offensive line as Dak is used

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. Listen, I like Tyler Booker, their rookie first

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>round pick, still a rookie player, you know, starter from

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>day one. I don't think that the George Pickens trade

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to pay the dividends. Some people think it's

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to pay. I don't like their running game, and

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>their defense with Micah is mediocre. Without Micah is going

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to be disastrous. The Cowboys under eight and a half

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>wins and I didn't love the Schottenheimer higher it coach.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys under eight and a half wins to me is

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not only where I'm going with that, but one of

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFC bets we will make. You then have the

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Giant demonse with your guy Russell Wilson at a meager

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 1>five and a half wins. Now Rude minus one thirty

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the over is is what it is now. The

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Giants opening schedule, if I may pull it up real quick,

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is not exactly the way most teams would want to

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>start a season.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I must admit.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>They go Commanders, Cowboys, Chiefs, and then Chargers, sorry, Commander's Cowboys,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Chargers. You then get a nice little respite with

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles or I'm sorry, with the Saints, and then

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you face the Eagles, uh, and then then at the Broncos,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>then the Eagles again. So those opening eight games, I

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think that you know they can beat the Cowboys. They

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously should beat the Saints, but they're both on the road.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the start of the schedule. However, they

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>should have better quarterback play this year. Demonse, whether it's

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Russ or whether it's Jackson Dark. I think they might

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have the best front four in football. I think Abdul

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Carter will be an instant impact player, and Brian Dable

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is desperate so late in the year there won't be

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>any like, oh, you know, let's you know, let's tank

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for draft position. If they're sitting at five and ten,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he is going to want every single win imaginable. That,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>paired with the fact that I'm bearish on the Cowboys

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and a little bearish on compared to the public on

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two of their games that other people are chalking up

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as losses Broncos and the Niners. I will this is

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not a bet, but I will go over with the

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants. You just have to get to six wins.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The reason I can't make it a bet is because

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I I'm not a Russell Wilson guy, and if they

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>bench him, then they're going going to a rookie second

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a rook not second round pick, rookie

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>late first round pick who even if he ends up

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>being good, it's still a rookie quarterback starting, you know,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in year one, and so I will go over for

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants. I feel like that's one you like,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>am I correct?

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a little win total. I like that. I

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>mean I believe in Russ a little bit more than

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 2>you do. You can get six wins. They pull together

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>six And.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>The worry the way it hits the under is that

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>because of that tough early schedule, they pull the ripcord

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>on RUSS early. They go to the rookie, and the

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie is not yet ready. But that d line should

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be worth four wins by itself. Can the def Can

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the offense find you at least two wins? With Malik Neighbors?

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think so? All right? Eagles over unders at eleven

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Juice has changed on this. You're now

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>getting plus money on the over minus one fifty on

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the under. This also is not a bet demands because

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think eleven winds is where it lands. But my

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>if I think eleven winds is where it lands, that

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>means I'm going under, and so I will take the

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Eagles under again. I am not I am not trying

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to argue with Philly fans. And Philly fans, honest to god,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>public service announcement. And I'm a pretty and demons. I'd

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like you to back me up on this, if you

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>would let me get this correct. I'm pretty affable in public,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Like people come, have you ever? And I'm not acting

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like I'm some big star or anything, but people ask

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for pictures or for a moment or whatever. Have you

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ever once seen me say no? Ever? Once?

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 2>No, honestly, I never never once.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I I might start under very specific circumstances. The next

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>fucking person that comes up to me and says, hey, Nick,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, can I have a picture? And I say, yeah,

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of course, how are you doing? And then as they

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>are getting ready to take the picture, they say something

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Eagle Super Bowl. I'm gonna I it's it

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>happened twice at the US Open. One guy last night,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one guy including being like the Eagles are gonna repeat

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Sixers are gonna win it. And now I'm like,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know which of you things to respond to,

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Like I like the Sixers, my buddy runs the team,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's a terrible take, and like the the I.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Mean, it's just so you're saying they're playing it cool

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 2>at first, or like.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and occasionally occasionally demons they asked for a picture,

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they slide the thumb over to video and then.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 2>Start talking, Yeah, that's annoying, that's any.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Just trying to have a honeyduce. Watch some a German

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>play a Dane in tennis. Leave me alone now again,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>exception exists when I go to Philly to gamble. If

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I go to Philly, I'm setting myself up to get right.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, but we're on a neutral site where.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 3>It happened to tennis, and it happened a group of women.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I told you this in Monaco that one of them,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I didn't.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Tell you this.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Women confronted me about my jail and hurts opinion at

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the casino in Monaco. Really one woman with her two friends.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's and the friends apologize, and then that same

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>woman talk to a little trash to your mom.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Her about boots on the ground everywhere.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I got put my head on the swivel with that set,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the under very very tough schedule. I think

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that the defensive losses. Danny mentioned this on the TV

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>show They lost like forty four hundred snaps from last

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>year's team to this year's team, the majority of which

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on defense, in you know, free agency and retirement, all

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I think they'll be really good. I don't

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be twelve or thirteen wins good.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the under, which leaves us with the Commanders

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>over under at nine and a half even money. This

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>might surprise you, I'm going over.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason I thought it might surprise you is because

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I have been cast as a Jaden skeptic. I am

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not a Jaden skeptic. I am a skinny quarterback skeptic.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>There is a difference. Now he is a skinny quarterback,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, sat question style. If this therefore that,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess that does make me a Jaden skeptic. But yeah,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>logic exactly. But it is not about his ability. And

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that they invested in the offensive line,

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>which was a problem. I like the dk me I'm sorry,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the Deebo Samuel trade. And I also like the fact

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're like, you know what, we can't fix the defense,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in one draft, so what if we patch

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>work it with some veteran free agents for the time

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>being and try to build it up. So I like

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders over nine and a half. I do think

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they go back to the playoffs. I think that they

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in Philly. This is this is where picking division winners

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>like I did on the TV shows a little weird.

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I in my math on this, I had the Commanders

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Eagles both finishing eleven and six and splitting

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the season series and both going four and two in

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the division. So I then determined, like, am I really

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>going to figure out on my fake two hundred and

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy two game grid of results who would win this tiebreaker?

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And I decided, you know what, I just think the

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Commanders are gonna win the division like I've been, both

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>finishing eleven and six, Like I am I gonna do

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden strength of scheduled tiebreakers on a

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>fake grid that of games that hasn't happened. Probably not

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>buying the Commander should be good, but it's not a bet.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>The only bet I have in the NFC East is

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys under. So if the NFC East unders Cowboys

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and Eagles overs Giants and Commanders, and that now gets

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>us to the NFC North and demands start us off

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with the first team listed.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So the Bears over unders listened at eight and a half,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>and you're taking the over at plus one fifteen. I

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>thought about that, Matt betting them to get ten wins.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that was like plus two to twenty or

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>something like that. Oh yeah, one of them, something like that.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, one of the alternate It would have

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>been probably around If they're eight and a half, is

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifteen over nine and a half would probably

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be plus you know, a round two. The I resisted

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the urge to pick them to win the division. I'm

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>resisting the urge to you know, make bold, bold proclamations

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>about how they are going to do, you know, over

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the postseason. However, I think they had an

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>excellent offseason. I think they had a massive upgraded head coach.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>They lost some absolute heartbreakers last year, not just the

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Jaden Daniels Hall of Fame or a Hall of Fame

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Hail Mary game, the Thanksgiving game we watched together, which

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>was a train wreck. Like, I just think they're good.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're gonna be great. And I think I,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I obviously overrated how quickly Caleb would be

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ready last year, and I maybe, in my opinion, overrated

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>their defensive bit as well, and so I am learning

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>from that, but I still think they're gonna be above

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, and so with a couple breaks last year

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they would have won seven or eight games with bad

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>coaching and Caleb really being over his skis for a

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of it. So I will take and I will

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>bet the Bears over eight and a half that you

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>can get them over nine and a half de Monsa

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>at plus one ninety over ten and a half at

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>plus three hundred. The bet you might have seen was

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly ten wins. And I don't like those bets. I

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like the exact record because you can be right

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>in spirit and lose the bet, you know what I mean. Like,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, oh the Bears, the Bears are gonna

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be good, I'm gonna bet them to win tens.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Through the app Yeah. I didn't even realize that if

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>that was the thing. I thought it was just for

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 2>them to get ten plus.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe it was. So maybe it was, and the

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>juice has changed, so I'm not sure. I don't know

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>what you saw. I'm just saying as a gambling note

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>from me, I'm always hesitant on the exact record bets

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing worse than than being right on a

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bet and losing it. So like, if your argument is

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the you know, I like the Bears to

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>go ten and seven because I think it's gonna be

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>better than people think. And then somehow they go eleven

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and six and you lose the bet. That's just a killer.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's just not my You usually get sick odds

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on it, but it's not my favorite. All right, Lions

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>over under is at ten and a half with plus

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one twenty on the over minus one forty five on

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the under. This is a huge stayaway from me, But

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because we give out all picks on this show, I

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>am obligated to pick a side here. If it's this close,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>then I have to go with the plus money side,

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 1>So I will say over, but I don't love it.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I think ten and seven eleven and six is very

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>very in play for Detroit this year. Very tough schedule,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>tough division, The loss of the coordinators matters that shuffle

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on the interior of the offensive line matters on the

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>flip side to that they do get their gut their

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive players back. I imagine Demon's you like this as

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>an over stronger than I do.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Not strong, probably just about the same, but it is

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 2>close to twenty so I would lean over on that.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, they did get a lot of guys back

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that they had injured last year, so I feel like

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>it kind of balances out.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>If there is going to be a season from hell

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for Detroit, which I don't anticipate, but if there is

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be, it'll be because the playoff game screwed

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with golf, right, and I don't think we can dismiss

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that as a possibility. I'm not predicting it, but I

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think we can dismiss it full on as a possibility.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>That being that close to the Super Bowl two years ago,

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>them not having it, and then having his worst game

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year in their first playoff game, and then

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>also not having Ben Johnson in his ear, that all

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of that comes together and he has a tough season.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>That's the recipe for them having the Oh my god,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the Lions went seven and ten. I don't think it's

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, but that would be the Yeah, that'd be

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the recipe for it. But I will go over by

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the thinnest of margins. All right, Packers total nine and

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a half with even money on the under, which I

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like because I am going under for the Green Bay Packers. Yes,

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>so I I am. It's not a bet. Thus far,

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the only NFC bets we've made is a Cowboys under

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and a Bear's over. I just think they're gonna win

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>nine games, and I am I'm not as high on

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the Packers defense as everyone else seems to be. And

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>while I do like their draft pick Matthew Golden, the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie receiver, and I do think of all of their

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that huge room of good but not great receivers,

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he is the one guy who has a

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>chance to be a great receiver. Hard to rely on

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>him in year one to be a great receiver. Listen, uh,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thomas Junior did it, Malik Neighbors did it. But

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>still it's it's hard at that position to be great

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>year one. But here's the other factor of it that

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that I am putting into this

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't seem like other people are. I know

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry is ageless, and I know that Christian McCaffrey

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>prior to last year. You know what I mean had

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this amazing year, Saguan had the amazing year. Is Josh

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs going to look like a twenty eight year old

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>running back normally does or the way some of those

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>other guys have, Because I think Josh Jacobs has been

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an underrated was an underrated addition for them, and I

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>think a large part of their success last year was

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he had a I can't even call it sneaky, just

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>an awesome season, thirteen hundred yards, fifteen touchdowns, four and

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a half yards per carry. What if you know after

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's now over sixteen hundred career carries six straight years,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>none of which missing real big time? Like, what is

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what is Josh Jacobs gonna look like? And this is

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what I said about Jordan Love yesterday on the TV

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>show demonte And tell me if you think it's fair.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not yet ready to say he guarantees you a

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>floor for your team, like he hasn't graduated to the

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay if that and I listen, when he's been these

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>two years as a starter he has, I just don't

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>know if that's who he. I feel like he and

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>CJ both might end upstars. I think they have established

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they are quality starting franchise quarterbacks, but I don't yet

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know if they are in the man. If he's healthy,

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>unless it's just a disaster on your team, you should

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>win at least ten games.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so like last year, he was dealing with

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the injury from the start, I think this year you

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of have a better idea of of who.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and the talent is really impressive. Sometimes the decision

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>making seems less, so so I'm curious how that plays

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>out this year. Yeah, and so it's not a I

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>have the Packers finishing third in the division and it

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds like an indictment. But if I think they're gonna

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>win nine games finish third like that doesn't make you

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>a bad team. It's tough division, which leaves me with

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just one team for last. And this is a bet,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is the Vikings win total of nine and

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a half. I understand they won fourteen games last year.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Under one twenty five is where we are going with that.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Demanse and Brian Flores is awesome. Are they going to though,

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have that number of turnovers last year when they just

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>they had a great scheme. He's a great decordinator, but

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>turnovers fluctuate so much year to year. It's hard to

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>rely on that. I know they got great production from

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, they got great production from Sam Darnold, and

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year, if they got the

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>pick right with JJ McCarthy, they should have great production

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>from JJ McCarthy. With all that said, he didn't play

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>a ton of college ball. He missed all of last year.

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there were varying reports on how he

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looked in training camp from the people on the ground there.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like this is a bit of a

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>reset year for Minnesota, which, by the way, I think

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>they're fine with. I think they expected last year to

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be the reset year, but you know, but they expected

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to do it with a rookie quarterback. Instead, Donald played

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and Darnald played the best ball of his life. If

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>they are a double digit win team again and JJ

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy looks really good, then even though he hasn't won

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game yet, we have to probably elevate Kevin O'Connell.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I already think Kevin O'Connell's good. But if you can

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>get double digit wins with Kirk Cousins, Sam Darnold and

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then JJ McCarthy is a first year player coming off

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>an injury. That'd be wildly impressive. But I think, excuse me,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. I think they could go seven and ten

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and be okay, okay with it's the wrong word, feel

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>okay going into the twenty sixth season. If they're like,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, we have the upside of this quarterback. He's young,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he's cheap, obviously, justin Jefferson's great. So I will bet

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings under nine and a half. So through two divisions,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>demons our bets are Cowboys under eight and a half,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings under nine and a half, and Bears over eight

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We will get to the South and

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the West in just a moment. But first, the rivalries,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the marching bands, the upsets. Saturday's just got way more fun.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>College football is back. You think you know the game,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Put your college football knowledge to the test with Draftings

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook and turn your picks into big payouts. From live

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>betting during the game to rivalry week odds, boosts, and

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>so much more. Draftings Sports Book has everything you need

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the action from kickoff to the final whistle,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you're betting on your go to team or making

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>moves mid game as the momentum shifts. Saturdays are yours

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to own with DraftKings Sports Book. Number one Texas is

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a one and a half point dog at Ohio State

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this Saturday. It is the first time in more than

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, or at least fifty years, that the number

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one team is an underdog in week one. That speaks

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the number one team in the nation

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>almost never plays a huge road game in week one,

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but that is what we are getting this week. Of course,

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>lines and odds are subject to change, something that is

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable for first timers. New customers bet five bucks

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and get three one hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use code right that's

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>code right Wright to get for new customers to get

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly when you bet

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>just five bucks. In partnership with DraftKings Sportsbook, The Crown

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is yours.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 4>called eight seven seven eight open wire text ope and

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 4>wy AT four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 4>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 4>eight seven eight nine seven to seven seven seven, or

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 4>boothillk A Cinamin Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 4>eligibility varies by jurisdiction Voyd and Ontario. Bet must win

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 4>to receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 4>bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Ins four. Additional terms and responsible gaming resource see DKNG

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 4>dot co slash audio.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, demanse, let's get to the NFC South and

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one that. You know what, guys, I'm going to add

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this team to our official overs. Sorry if the if

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to adjust some graphics, I apologize. I thought

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I had this in my official overs already and I didn't.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>My bad. The Falcons seven and a half, just seven

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half wins at minus one. So the argument

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Falcons is last year, despite Kirk Cousins kind

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of not kind of legitimately falling apart and the and

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it being a new head coach who I like and

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a new system and all that, they still won eight games.

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>They last year, Bijon looked like the player that I

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>knew he would be. They started six and three, with

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the one of those losses being a bit of a

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>heartbreaker to the Chiefs, and then after that it really

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>unwound on him, as Cousins was pretty clearly cooked. And

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then they go to Pinnix late in the year and

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>even then Week eight, week seventeen overtime lost to Washington,

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Week eighteen overtime loss to Carolina. Now that's not good Carolina,

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but they won eight games. So now you have, well that.

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 2>The Saints and the Panthers. That's four wins right there.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they did leaved him last year, but I

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>think that's good for it.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But no, those are two of the worst teams in

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the league. I totally agree with you on that and

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that part of it, like can they go four and

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>two in the division? I think so you go four

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and two in the division to get to eight wins.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Your other games are as follows. Minnesota, Washington, not Buffalo,

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco not easy Miami, New England, Indianapolis, the Jets,

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, Arizona, the Rams. Like your non divisional games

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 1>early are pretty tough. You have some nice soft ones

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, but if you have you need to

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>get to eight wins. You have four against Carolina and

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. You have another against Miami, you have another

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. You have two more against Seattle and Arizona.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And again it's not like I think Seattle and Arizona

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be terrible, But there's eight games. If you

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>go six two and those eight, can you go two

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and seven in your difficult games? I think so. I

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>actually think this team is a sneaky playoff contender because

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule, not pardon me, not because they're a

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.479
<v Speaker 1>great team, but because of the division they're in, and

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the conference they're in. And so I one

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of my bets will be Falcons over seven and a

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>half at minus one forty. And now we get to

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the tricky ones demanse, which is the Panthers total is

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>six and a half and the Saints total is four

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And the problem is in handicapping this.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>These teams do play each other, and I do think

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they're both Like I am going to go under on

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers and over on the Saints, and I'm here

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell you I do not love going over on

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. But four and a half is such an

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>outrageous number, and it wouldn't be crazy if the Saints

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>go to to zero against Carolina and now, all of

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you only need three more victories on your schedule.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe the Panthers are gonna get to seven,

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's an easy under But I'm not gonna

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>bet it. I just that I'm going to have a

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>significant investment in the NFC South, but it is not

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>either of these teams. I know you have a follow up.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You want to ask me about the Saints.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, Do you have any interest in them to

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 2>have the fewest wins in the NFL at plus four hundred?

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>No, but it's interesting, like, I don't think that's a

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>dumb bet. But my answer to that is no, I

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>think that I think there's three or four teams this

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>year that have a chance to be truly awful. They're

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them. So maybe at plus four hundred that

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's three or four, But I I'm gonna

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do a worst team in the league

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>bet because the other piece of that that makes it

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>tricky is there are a few teams that are and

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>injury at quarterback away from all of a sudden, just

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be awful. And by the way, the Browns

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>exist and they you know what I mean. Yeah, and

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm fading the Colts and I but that's

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>worst team again. Worst team in the league is tough.

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And also worst team in the league is a bet

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that you never can lock up, Like the Patriots were

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the league all year last year.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Week eighteen the Bills. Yeah, the Bills basically give them

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the game and all of a sudden they're drafting fourth

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's just a I don't love that bet. I

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do love this bet. The Bucks over nine and a

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>half minus one twenty. I think Tampa Demonse is gonna

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>win a bunch of games, a bunch of games. I'm

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not saying they are necessarily the best team in the NFC.

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I am saying I think they have a real path

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to being the one seed.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean they're top three easily. I mean in

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that division, so.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh because of the division their top three in that

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>division conference.

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that in that conference they're one of

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the top three teams.

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they're going to start three and

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>zero at Atlanta at the Texans home for the Jets

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Texans are a good team. I think Tampa's better, right,

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they have a tough stretch of Eagles, Seahawks, Niners, Lions,

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And then after that demonse, here is how the Bucks.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>When I say close the season, I mean their final

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>ten games. Okay, at the Saints, home for the Pats,

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>at the Bills, really hard, at the Rams, tough home

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Cardinals, home for the Saints, home for the Falcons,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Panthers, at the Dolphins when they will have

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>quit home for the Panthers. Yeah, Like, could the Bucks

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>start five and two or you know what? Could they

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>start four and three and finish twelve and five? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>And so I think I think the schedule, plus I

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>really like Abuca, the rookie receiver. God Win will be

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>back at some point, and they'll have three legitimate receivers.

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I like their running back Bucky Irving, Tristan Wurfs. I

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure I'm right about this. Did he

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>clear the pup list?

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>He passes his physical, as did Godwin. So they're at

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>least on the active roster. Does that mean they're gonna

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>play Week one? Not necessarily, but it does mean they're

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit ahead of schedule. I love the Bucks. I

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>love the schedule. I love Bake Show. Also Baker Demanse MVP.

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not a terrible pick. I think they're not because

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I because I don't think their defense is gonna be great. No,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I know their defense is gonna be great.

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna have to score a bunch. But also,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a de facto contract year for him. He's

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>got a year left after this one. But if he

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>has another excellent season, he's He's one of those fifty

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars a year men. And so I'm all

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>over the Bucks this season over nine and a half.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>And I.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You might hear more about my feelings on the Bucks

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>later in the pot. Let me put it like that. Okay,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so that could be coming up in a bit. All right,

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Now to the NFC West, where we have the Cardinals

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>total at eight and a half with the little juice

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on the under. I will go with the under. I

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>am listen. Jonathan Gannon is trying to build out the defense.

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>He might finally have some of the personnel to do that.

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>And I still believe Marvin Harrison Junior can be an

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable pro even though he had a disappointing rookie year.

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm not a Kyler guy. I got

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>questions on their O line. I just don't think they're

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna to be above five hundred. So I will go

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>under on the Cardinals eight and a half. Do you

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>go ahead?

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>What happens with with the Cardinals if they're like, what's

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:11.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen with Kyler Murray?

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Like the Irish quarterback in a year?

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I agree with that as well. I don't

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the Cardinals.

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, don't you think the Steelers trading for

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyler's sounds about Steelers.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 2>E It sounds like something that Steelers would do.

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it feels like Kyler Murray starting quarterback for the

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers Week one of next year. Feel feels about

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like the plan and the Cardinals, you know, kind of

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>start over. That's what I would think. Maybe I'm just

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>making that up, but it feels like that is a

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>real possibility. I guess the Colts too. The Colts. The

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Colts just went veteran, veteran veteran, then they drafted Anthony

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Richardson snap gave up on him. Maybe they go back

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to a veteran, but a team like that, all right, Rams,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this will surprise people. This is not one

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of my bets. I am going over with the Rams

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for nine and a half. However, I am not gonna

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>put money on it because of the Stafford question. I

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>think with a healthy Stafford, they are incredibly dangerous. I

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think that they could if they get if Matt Stafford

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>is healthy by the playoffs, then all feel about them

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:30.919
<v Speaker 1>this year the way I did last year. They could

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>win the conference. But that amortal Chamber and missing that time,

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>even if part of it was a wink and a nod,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you can have, you know, a lot of training camp

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>off like you've speculated a bit demands. It does seem

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like there was at least something there. So I don't

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>want to bet the Rams, but I listen. I do

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna win the division. I do think they're

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the best team in that division. But I don't want

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to have a bet on the Rams. And then by

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>week six it's like in starting his third straight game,

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo. That's a nightmare, and so I don't want

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And then the Niners, one of my

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite bets of the Year under ten and a half.

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>They this is the least talent they've had on defense

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>since Shanahan's first year there. They have just totally had

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to remake Fred Warner's amazing Nicky Bosa is really really good.

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Aside from that, it's a bunch of young guys that

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a hope and a prayer. The wide receiver

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>corps is just ravaged. I mean they just keep They

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>have signed Sky's they traded for Sky Moore. I think

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>they signed MBS. It's a bunch of guys who while

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes can throw touchdowns to them in the Super Bowl,

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I do not know that Brock Purdy is going to

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>get the most out of them. And listen, I think

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey win healthy as a top three back in

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the league. I think that's undeniable, is you know? But

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that hell is a concern. Yeah, say it again.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean when you got I think you had to

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 2>go to Germany to do that. Oh yeah, I feel

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 2>like if you got to do all that, like it's serious,

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>it's correct.

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And Kittle has shown no signs of slowing down, but

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>he's at an age where you have to incorporate there's

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance he does. And they lost their backup left

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle to the Chiefs in free agency. Trent Williams future

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>first ballot Hall of Famer, but he did miss some

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 1>time last year. The oldest starting tackle in the league.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Feels like you're on a knife's edge. And we have

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>seen what Purdy's numbers are, what that team happens to

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that team when Trent Williams is out, all those reasons

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they could win the division, make

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and the under still come in because it's

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half and half. And I listen, I

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>know the one thing I'm not saying that everyone else

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna say, the schedule, the schedule, the schedule. Despite

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 1>all that, I will go under ten and a half,

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and then that leaves us Seattle. This is.

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>A true coin flip. So we have to spend much

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>time on it. It's set at eight and a half

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:32.399
<v Speaker 1>even money on the over. I will go. I will

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.879
<v Speaker 1>go under, but I don't have much. They are an eight, nine, nine,

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen to me, and so we don't have to

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because I don't have a super strong feeling on it.

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't have spend a ton of time on it.

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Give us demands the full well, I will give us

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFC, then you give us the whole thing. The

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>bets we are making in the NFC are the Cowboys

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.280
<v Speaker 1>under eight and a half at minus one forty five,

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bears over eight and a half at plus one

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>point fifteen, The Vikings might over I'm sorry, under nine

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half at minus one twenty five, the Falcons

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>over seven and a half at minus one forty, the

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Bucks over nine and a half at minus one twenty

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then Niners under ten and a half at minus one thirty,

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>which gives us. You don't have to tell us the

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>odds on these demonte but give us all the overs

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and the win total the teams in the wind total.

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So overs, we got Jags over seven and a half,

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs over eleven and a half, Raiders over six and

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 2>a half. We got Bears at over eight and a

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 2>half and Tampa Bay over nine and a half. In

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta over seven and a half.

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the only big number over I have is

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, not surprising, I'm sure, and the only team

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on there with a low low number that I think

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>could smash it is the Raiders at six and a half.

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to unders.

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Unders. You got the Bengals under nine and a half,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 2>got the Colts under seven and a half, Broncos under

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half, Cowboys under eight and a half,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings und nine and a half, and then the

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Niners under ten and a half.

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the only team on there that I think

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>might might smash it is the Colts. I don't you know.

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of those other teams are gonna

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden win three or four games. I get,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you know what the Niners could The Niners are a

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey and or Trent Williams missing six weeks away

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from potentially winning six games again with that defense, so

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they could smash it. But that's twelve. Last year we

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>did ten. No, we did eight last year because we

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.919
<v Speaker 1>went six and two. We gave you all thirty two

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but our bets. And here's why we only did eight

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>last year because I got too cute, because I did

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.279
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of there's a better way to bet this,

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and I did a division or a playoff or whatever,

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and I got annihilated on those. So this year we're

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be smarter. We will get to our other

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>more manicured wagers that we're making and less parlays in

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. But first ever sign up for phone plan,

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking Wow, amazing price. Then a few months later, surprise,

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Bill's hired Boost Mobile. You pay twenty five dollars a

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>month forever. That's unlimited talk, text and data starting at

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just twenty five dollars a month, No price hikes, no

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>contract forever.

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Plus.

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile is now a legit five G network. They've

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.919
<v Speaker 1>invested billions building five G towers across the country. Visit

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>boostmobile dot com or head to your local boost store

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>today and get unlimited talk, text, and data for twenty

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>five dollars a month forever. Five G speeds not available

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in all areas. After thirty gigs, customers may experience lower speeds.

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Customers will pay twenty five dollars a month as long

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as they remain active on the Boost plan.

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Demans make miss playoff bets which involve a bunch of

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>redundancy to my other to my over unders, which I'm

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fine with. Last year I made the mistake by bifurcating

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>them to try to minimize losses. This year, I'm going

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with the ones I truly believe in and betting them

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in multiple spots instead of doing like multiple units on

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a win total. We'll do it like this. First one.

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and tell the audience you can make fun

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>of me.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 2>We've got the Jags at plus one eighty to make

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. I've got them too.

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm rhying with you on that one, okay, yeah, and

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm listen. I'm being I think conservative because I'm not

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>having them win the division. I'm having them make the

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>playoffs at plus one eighty. I it's the biggest year

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of Trevor's career. I think he comes through. I then

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>demands the next one is probably the most juice I've

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ever laid on this show. But I don't care.

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Yeah, the Chiefs to make the playoffs at

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 2>minus three eighty.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:15.760
<v Speaker 1>What was that money laying on the ground?

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 2>One?

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And I pick it up the you can you can

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 1>say you're gonna lay. Yeah I am. I'm gonna lay

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>minus three eighty. And you can be like Nick, what

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if what if Patrick gets hurt? I got bigger problems

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.280
<v Speaker 1>than the damn Chiefs make the playoffs. Bet if Patrick

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt, I'll tell you that much right now, and

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so the that's that, yeah, the Chiefs, And so that

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>means I'm gonna have to risk the way these I

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>should have made this clear for our new listeners. All

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of our plus bets, unless otherwise specified, all the plus bets,

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we put one unit on. All the minus bets, we

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we put enough. If it's it's minus one forty, we

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>put one point four units on it. We put enough

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to win one unit. So the Chiefs, I'm putting three

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>point eight units to win one. But that's fine. This

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>one here, however, like I said, unless otherwise specified, this

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>next one is a half unit bet, and the one

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.720
<v Speaker 1>following it is a quarter unit bet. Go ahead.

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 2>You got the Raiders to make the playoffs at plus

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 2>three forty.

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I've talked a ton about the Raiders

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of spots. I just like the value

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at plus three forty. This one's going to shock people,

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine, but I'll explain it in a second

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on people.

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Giants at plus five hundred to make the playoffs.

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So the producers wondering, if I believe the

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Giants can make the playoffs, why not also bet them

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to win at least six games, because here's the deal,

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they're I don't actually think the Giants are gonna be

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>really good. However, there has to be the shock playoff team.

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I have cast my lot with it being the Raiders.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there an argument that Russell Wilson channel something that

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>d Line Malik neighbors continues on the ascent a soft

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>NFC East because maybe Jaden misses time or something. Yes,

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so I will. I think the Giants check a few

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of those boxes, and at five to one, I'm good

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with it. So that's where that's where I land. And

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 1>then last but not least, And you can see this

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>team all over my gam card.

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 2>This year. You got the Bucks at minus one seventy

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to make the playoffs.

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean they're gonna win the division, but maybe

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe Pennix is unbelievable and the Falcons with

0:51:56.920 --> 0:52:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that schedule end up somehow winning the division a leate,

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but the Bucks will the only the Bucks are going

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to win ten games. Ten games will get them in

0:52:05.760 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, at least ten games, I should say. So,

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>I just want to have action on the Bucks all

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>over the place. So my make the playoffs bets are Jags, Chiefs, Raiders,

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Giants Bucks with again, half unit on the Raiders, quarter

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>unit on the Giants. Now the always popular missed the playoffs.

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Bet uh, you love putting this team here. You got

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers to miss the playoffs at minus one forty.

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>This the Steelers in the the Steelers two years ago,

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jags ruined me. Last year, the Steelers ruined me.

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have If you remember, the Steelers are

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not one of my win total bets because maybe Tomlin's,

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, gonna somehow create enough magic to get to

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>nine wins. I don't think they're gonna make the playoffs.

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll take them under one forty. This next team is

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the team I've been fading throughout the show.

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, you've got the Colts minus two sixty to miss.

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just don't see any scenario where the Colts

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>find their way into the playoffs with Daniel Jones in

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the AFC. So I don't mind laying minus two sixty.

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you're going to see them somewhere else

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>as well, in one of my very few this year parlays.

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Next, you've got the Broncos to miss at plus one thirty.

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just like that. It's plus money. You guys

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:34.719
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm not a believer in the Broncos the

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>way other people are. And what is really unbelievable about

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:50.399
<v Speaker 1>where the Broncos stand is they could It's unlikely, don't

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong, but they could hit their over for

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 1>win total and miss the playoffs. They could go ten

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and seven and you'll miss the playoffs. I again, it's unlikely.

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Ten wins in the seventeen air, I'm sorry, in the

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seven game playoff field should get you in, but it's possible.

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I still I don't have to spend more time on it.

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going on the radio with my friend Mark

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Schlaret than Denver tomorrow because everyone wants to yell at me,

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. I'll take the Broncos under nine and

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. Al, I'm sorry, I'll take the Broncos to

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>miss the playoffs.

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. Uh, you got the Cowboys to miss at

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 2>minus two ten. Yeah.

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I almost did this instead of their total, but I

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>decided to double down on Cowboys skepticism this year. I

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just think a coach I don't necessarily believe in a

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 1>drama with the best player on their roster. Yeah, terrible offseason.

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll take them to miss.

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 2>You've got the Vikings to miss at plus one hundred.

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm actually this is the first one I'm

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>doing like this, and this is going to sound odd.

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw two units on this one. I just

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think that it would in that division. It would be

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>shocking to me if the Vikings somehow find a way

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs. I know they did last year. I

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>know they won fourteen games, and I do like Kevin O'Connell,

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but I am going to fade the Vikings to the

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 1>tune of betting there under and a two unit bet

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and then last but not least again.

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. You've got the Cardinals to miss at minus

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:29.240
<v Speaker 2>one forty.

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Yet the only reason my only trepidation there is what

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if Stafford does miss a bunch of time and that

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>division feels wide open for everybody. So that is that's

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the extent of my real concern there. I also am

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>going to do one, not multiple like last year to

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Monsey one missed the playoffs, parlay and folks, we're going

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. We're gonna put two units on this. It is.

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:07.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell the audience it's minus one thirty five. Tell

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the audience who it.

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it's it's minus one thirty five. You got New Orleans,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the Jets, in Cleveland all to miss the playoffs minus I.

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Mean, hold on, you're leaving one team out.

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Indianapolis, I'm sorry. The Colts is.

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, if you without the Cults, it's like minus

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>four point fifty or something I needed to have. I

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mean New Orleans, the Jets and the Browns to miss

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs feels like it feels to me. Now listen,

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bets have gone to die this way.

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 1>This is not sound gambling advice. And again, gamble for

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>recreational purposes, don't bet more than you can afford to lose.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But adding New Orleans to miss the playoffs or Cleveland

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to miss the playoffs to any preseason bet you make

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just to give yourself a little extra juice is not

0:56:57.520 --> 0:57:01.839
<v Speaker 1>a Again, it's not sound owned gambling advice. Accept it

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 1>feels like impossible to lose. The team that I am

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>most worried about here blowing this up is actually the Jets.

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That the Jets that if just you know, they run

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the hell out of the ball, Aaron Glenn gets more

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the defense than Solid did. If those things

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>happen that they would be my concern, but I don't

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really have any concern. I think these are four last

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>place teams, four teams that I would be very surprised

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't finish in last place in their division. Okay,

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So that leaves us Tomanse with our division winner bets,

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>our division winner parlay if it exists, and Demonse's five

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 1>best bets, which again last year he made five bets

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and won Jade and Daniels to win Offensive Rookie of

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Year at six to one, the Chiefs to win

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the AFC at three and a half to one, and

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore to win the AFC North at plus one forty

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>five three plus more winners. All of that, Demanse coming

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday's show, So we will do a full our

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>final NFL season preview, plus the juiciest parts of our

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>gambling shows, and so all of that is coming up.

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We're finally here, I mean we finally we have gotten

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to where the next time we're on the air, we

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>will be talking about Ohio State Texas, which will have

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>just been played, and we'll be two days away from

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the open the NFL season, and for the first time

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in years, I get to watch the first game of

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season without being stressed about my team being involved.

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the one upside to your team not winning the

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Again, I don't recommend it, but we're a

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>bright side show. We try to find it. Like rate, subscribe, review,

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>appreciate everyone involved in the show today, Volume Boost, DraftKings,

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Blue Duck Demons, everybody. Apologies for the tight sixty. I

0:58:58.360 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>told you I was going to do it, though. I

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>will see you guys on TV in a few hours.

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:03.240
<v Speaker 2>What's right,