Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio show podcast. Alright, Happy New Year?
Speaker 1: How's everybody? And uh hope all of you at CNN
Speaker 1: fake news recovered from your bong mask wearing, uh, joints
Speaker 1: holding and bong lighting celebrations. Did you see that? We'll
Speaker 1: get to that later in the front. Did you see this?
Speaker 1: That was their New Year's Eve and they send a
Speaker 1: reporter out to Colorado to follow up on Oh, we're
Speaker 1: in the bong bus. I'll just try it with a
Speaker 1: gas mask. You don't want to lose one bit of
Speaker 1: marijuana smoke as you as you're getting paranoid and stoned.
Speaker 1: It's hilarious. You can't make it up. This is CNN,
Speaker 1: the most trusted name in Uh. Let's see pot smoking. Wow,
Speaker 1: you will show you how to light the bong. Right,
Speaker 1: we'll light it for you on a life show. Alright, Arn,
Speaker 1: hats retire me retiring? Not just cleared the way Everyone
Speaker 1: speculating Mitt Romney's gonna run, Uh could happen. If he does,
Speaker 1: he'll win. I'll tell you right now, it's not gonna
Speaker 1: be stopped. That's my prediction. Uh. Anden is gonna be
Speaker 1: a very interesting year for so many different reasons and
Speaker 1: so many things that happened. One of the things that's
Speaker 1: gonna happen is, you know we we now can watch
Speaker 1: the media begin there shift away from Trump Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: You can see it. It's not gonna happen. So all
Speaker 1: the breathless, hysterical reporting that you got last year with
Speaker 1: their nonsourced material or anonymous sourced material, it's all gonna
Speaker 1: go away. I noticed the media was more focused on
Speaker 1: the fact that there was a truck parked outside of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's Mora Lago golf club where there was an
Speaker 1: opening in the trees, and they couldn't get a shot
Speaker 1: of President Trump playing golf. And they were so upset
Speaker 1: about the truck and they thought that the Trump people
Speaker 1: put it there on purpose. I mean, this is that's
Speaker 1: what media is today. You can't make it up anyway.
Speaker 1: This is a year. Oh we got two things to
Speaker 1: look forward to here. Number one, we're gonna go over
Speaker 1: Trump's accomplishments. Why because the media is never gonna do it.
Speaker 1: He had an amazing, amazing culminating with the tax cut bill.
Speaker 1: I even saw that CBS had four separate people that
Speaker 1: they picked randomly to go over their taxes with, and
Speaker 1: four of them, all four middle class families, are getting
Speaker 1: significant tax cuts that must have killed them to go
Speaker 1: ahead and have to report the truth about the tax plan. Also,
Speaker 1: you don't. I don't think anybody that I saw reporting
Speaker 1: ever reported that the Obamacare mandates dead in that tax bill.
Speaker 1: That was a huge, huge, pretty almost undisclosed. Nobody was
Speaker 1: talking about it. And then an war. And I've always
Speaker 1: said for years on this program, energy energy, energy independence,
Speaker 1: energy independence, energy independence. Why energy independence, Well, number one,
Speaker 1: then we don't have to suck up to countries that
Speaker 1: we know hate our guts. We were less likely to
Speaker 1: get embroiled and in any type of foreign conflicts. And
Speaker 1: involving the free flow of oil at market prices. So
Speaker 1: that's a good thing for America. And then it's but
Speaker 1: more importantly, it's going to create millions and millions of
Speaker 1: high paying career jobs for people, and that that to me,
Speaker 1: is the single most important thing. By the way, We're
Speaker 1: gonna get to this Iranian issue that's happening. There's there
Speaker 1: is a chance the Malah's and Ayatollah high Maynee is
Speaker 1: scared out of his mind right now over the protests
Speaker 1: that are going on in Iran, and we'll talk about that.
Speaker 1: We also have more evidence of people paying women to
Speaker 1: make allegations against Donald Trump and others. That's very, very
Speaker 1: dangerous if we're not gonna pay people to make sexual
Speaker 1: harassment allegations prior to elections, because let's just like, for example,
Speaker 1: would you think it's credible if I'm paying people to
Speaker 1: say things on radio or TV? You would think it's
Speaker 1: less credible. That's what tabloid paid journalism does. Sometimes it's accurate,
Speaker 1: but sometimes it's not. And it's supposed to accept that
Speaker 1: journalism is dead. It's supposed to have less credibility than
Speaker 1: what the quote establishment mainstream media is supposed to do.
Speaker 1: You don't pay people, and it's just a huge difference,
Speaker 1: massive difference. And apparently the amount of money we're talking
Speaker 1: about those being thrown around to pay women to come
Speaker 1: up with stories about Donald Trump harassing them, well, it has,
Speaker 1: it has. It's gonna get to the point it's gonna
Speaker 1: be like, well, how do you we trust anybody that
Speaker 1: makes an allegation to you getting paid to make it.
Speaker 1: That's number one and number two women that are victims,
Speaker 1: real victims, and there are many. They're gonna make allegations
Speaker 1: and people are gonna think, well, maybe it's not true.
Speaker 1: Were you paid that's gonna be the first way you paid,
Speaker 1: or is your mortgage paid off? Where you've given money
Speaker 1: of any kind, We offered money of any kind. So
Speaker 1: it's uh, it's this is fascinating. The degree to which
Speaker 1: the left will do anything to stop conservatives is pretty amazing. Um.
Speaker 1: You know, it's even funny. Even the New York Times
Speaker 1: reported today, you know, that the Trump economy is improving rapidly,
Speaker 1: and that had to send a collective shutter down the
Speaker 1: spines of every Democrat in d C. Because the New
Speaker 1: York Times is now officially acknowledging the economy is booming
Speaker 1: and they're crediting Donald Trump for doing it. And you know,
Speaker 1: this is where these eight one you know, there's eighty
Speaker 1: one major Trump achievements in the last year, and he
Speaker 1: was out there pointing out, you know, a lot got
Speaker 1: done last year that nobody knows about and nobody talks about.
Speaker 1: But for the New York Times to officially acknowledge this,
Speaker 1: this is interesting to watch. I don't think it's real,
Speaker 1: you know, probably the Democrats. What is poor maxim water
Speaker 1: is gonna do in Peach forty five now? And reclaiming
Speaker 1: my time now? But anyway you're on my time, I
Speaker 1: can reclaim it. Reclaiming my time, reclaiming, proclaiming my time,
Speaker 1: claim in my time. Ream. Let me read from the
Speaker 1: New York Times. A wave of optimism has swept over
Speaker 1: American business leaders, and it's beginning to translate in the
Speaker 1: sort of investment in new plants, equipment, factory upgrades that
Speaker 1: bolsters economic growth, spurs job creation, and may finally raise
Speaker 1: wages significantly. How did we get here? Even before it
Speaker 1: became clear the Republicans who have passed their major tax cut,
Speaker 1: capital spending had risen significantly, climbing to an annualized rate
Speaker 1: of six two percent during the first three quarters of
Speaker 1: last year, and surveys of plans spending also show major increases.
Speaker 1: Business executives say the Trump administration deserves credit. Mr McDonald
Speaker 1: said home builders have benefited from the killing of regulations
Speaker 1: written by the Obama administration, including a rule that broughtened
Speaker 1: the definition of wetlands, which could have restricted home building
Speaker 1: in certain areas. National Labor Relations Board also reserved a
Speaker 1: decision I'm sorry reverse the decision that made builders more
Speaker 1: responsible for the working conditions of their contractors employees. The
Speaker 1: Business Roundtable of corporate lobbying group in d C reported
Speaker 1: last month that regulatory costs were no longer the top
Speaker 1: concern of American executives for the first time in six years.
Speaker 1: He said regulation was still the top concern and Moody
Speaker 1: survey of business confidence, but that it's rapidly losing ground
Speaker 1: to concerns about the availability of labor that's now their
Speaker 1: biggest concern. National Association and Manufacturer's fourth quarter member survey
Speaker 1: found the fewer than half of manufacturer cited an unfavorable
Speaker 1: business climate, including regulations and taxes, as a challenge to
Speaker 1: their business businesses, down from nearly three quarters a year ago.
Speaker 1: Some industries have particularly uh seeing clear changes in their fortune,
Speaker 1: and the Trump administration has reversed a number of environmental
Speaker 1: protections that would have imposed significant costs on energy companies,
Speaker 1: and the president's appointees to the Federal Communications Commission voted
Speaker 1: last month of repealed so called net neutrality rules, which
Speaker 1: treated internet services as a regulated industry like power lines
Speaker 1: and prohibited broadband providers from charging for faster internet service
Speaker 1: or from blocking or slowing some websites. That decision helped
Speaker 1: prompt Comcast to announce that it would invest more than
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars in infrastructure in the next five years.
Speaker 1: All these companies can announce their bonuses, how much money
Speaker 1: they're giving people. I mean, it's unbelievable. Eighty one major accomplishments,
Speaker 1: killing the mandate and war. The President got rid of
Speaker 1: twenty one regulations for every new one that they adopted.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we do, we do. I mean
Speaker 1: all of this. We now have consumer confidence at a
Speaker 1: seventeen year high. We now have black employment at a
Speaker 1: seventeen year high in America. We now have you know, uh,
Speaker 1: a move by the by the president with this new
Speaker 1: tax bill. Everybody's gonna get more money back in their pockets.
Speaker 1: And the whole point of a corporate tax cut is
Speaker 1: so that they will now invest in me even more factories.
Speaker 1: The reason you get rid of regulations is to incentivize
Speaker 1: them to build factories and manufacturing centers. You know. And
Speaker 1: probably the biggest and best thing the President did has
Speaker 1: to do with energy, because if we've become energy independent,
Speaker 1: well that means if it's the fracking industry, the drilling industry,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter, that means or the coal industry. Well,
Speaker 1: that then means that Americans are gonna have high paying
Speaker 1: career jobs that they have been lacking. And if we're
Speaker 1: gonna keep Carrier and Forward and Chrysler and GM building
Speaker 1: their cars in a Erica, well we can revitalize places
Speaker 1: like Detroit and and cities in Wisconsin and the rust
Speaker 1: Belt and these cities that have been suffering needlessly for years.
Speaker 1: You know that that I'm not even talking about Neil
Speaker 1: Gorsich or President Trump apported appointing more Appeals Court judges
Speaker 1: in a year, and I think Obama didn't like eight.
Speaker 1: This is the biggest transformation of our court systems, and
Speaker 1: we know the impact is going to be felt for
Speaker 1: generations now in a good way. You know, we have
Speaker 1: twenty one regulation signed renegued for every new one past
Speaker 1: I mean yet signed by the president, Fifteen congressional regulatory
Speaker 1: cuts withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement global warming. I'm
Speaker 1: really feeling at the minute I got back from Florida
Speaker 1: thirteen degrees when I landed, and executive order cutting the
Speaker 1: time for infrastructure permit approvals, getting rid of Obama rules
Speaker 1: that targeted the coal industry, opening up an noir, and
Speaker 1: the promise to get rid of t p P. The
Speaker 1: North American Free Trade Agreement. Talks continue now to work
Speaker 1: more in our favor. Companies like Toyota, Mazda, broad Calm, Limited,
Speaker 1: Fox Con announcing they're all building new US plants, working
Speaker 1: to promote sales of products abroad, including China. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of this is good. Getting rid of the deal
Speaker 1: with Cuba that was a good deal. Energy, though, is
Speaker 1: gonna create millions of high paying jobs right now. If
Speaker 1: you're looking for a career and you don't have a
Speaker 1: good you're not a good place in your life, and
Speaker 1: you're able bodied and hard working, get in the energy
Speaker 1: industry now, find a way to work in an more,
Speaker 1: find a way to work in Texas or Oklahoma. I
Speaker 1: don't care if it's just driving a truck. You'll make
Speaker 1: maybe up to a hundred grand a year with overtime.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of money for people anyway we have.
Speaker 1: Of course, now the battle over DACA is gonna ensue,
Speaker 1: but the principal simple secure the border, and secure the
Speaker 1: border first, and if Republicans want to be successful in
Speaker 1: I think that the American people gotta need to see
Speaker 1: two or three hundred miles of border wall built. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of this is good. I'll go through some of
Speaker 1: these things and uh, we'll talk about it. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: actually list them all tonight on TV. That's the benefit
Speaker 1: of TV. I can talk and actually list something at
Speaker 1: the same time, which you don't get to do on radio. Oh.
Speaker 1: I love radio radio so much fun. Oh you know
Speaker 1: what I'm jealous of. I was listening to the best
Speaker 1: of Howard Stern over on Serious One over the holidays.
Speaker 1: I add like all these great interview except the the
Speaker 1: interview he did with Alec Baldwin, which was atrocious, because
Speaker 1: he's an atrocious human being. You know what he has
Speaker 1: that nobody else, nobody ever goes after Howard Stern. He
Speaker 1: can do and say anything, and he does and it's
Speaker 1: like everybody else have. We have a whole different set
Speaker 1: of rules we live by. And by the way, I
Speaker 1: don't want anybody to ever go after him because it's
Speaker 1: raw and it's truthful, and it's honest and it's real.
Speaker 1: Listening to a Scarlett Johanson interview yesterday it was no,
Speaker 1: it was interesting, and he's talking about I won't even
Speaker 1: go I can't even mention it because I haven't mentioned it,
Speaker 1: and I'll be thrown off the air. We need freedom
Speaker 1: of speech in this country. These these all these all
Speaker 1: these people being funded millions to monitor this show and
Speaker 1: shows like it because they hate our politics. You guys
Speaker 1: gonna look at yourselves and realize how pro censorship you are,
Speaker 1: how anti free speech you are. Are you gonna just
Speaker 1: take a look this year and say to yourself, is
Speaker 1: that the America you want to live in? Where you
Speaker 1: shut people down because you would disagree with them? And
Speaker 1: I We'll have a lot to talk about this year.
Speaker 1: Eight nine for one, Shawn, you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Hey, as we roll along Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity's show, Iranian protesters now are attacking police stations. That's
Speaker 1: going on as we speak. You know, Trump predicted the
Speaker 1: I ran would were vault in his U n speech
Speaker 1: four months ago, and it's soak uncanny how often he
Speaker 1: gets things like this right warned about bin Laden long
Speaker 1: before one. We have a guest tomorrow who's gonna be
Speaker 1: on this program that is actually leading the effort and
Speaker 1: is willing to come forward and explain how his organization
Speaker 1: is the one leading these protests in Iran. Uh, you
Speaker 1: had armed protesters now showing up and storming in the
Speaker 1: Iranian military base. All of this is very significant. And
Speaker 1: on top of that, the protests now spread, anti regime
Speaker 1: protests are spreading in Iran. And this time we actually
Speaker 1: have a president encouraging the good guys, unlike what Obama
Speaker 1: did back in two thousand and nine. Um, and it
Speaker 1: even goes as far this was reported in Egypt today
Speaker 1: that they're chanting death to the Ayatollah. They're talking about
Speaker 1: how many and how afraid how many is about what's
Speaker 1: actually unfolding in Iran. I mean, do you realize how
Speaker 1: significant this would be if this, this Iranian revolution would
Speaker 1: ever take hold. Meanwhile, Obama tried to buy his way,
Speaker 1: you know, just like Bill Clinton before him, trying to
Speaker 1: buy peace and bribing the all at that time, Kim
Speaker 1: Jong Ill, Kim Jong UN's father. We know how well
Speaker 1: the billions of dollars taxpayer dollars and energy credits that
Speaker 1: worked out. Trump is now actively protesting, saying it's time
Speaker 1: for change in Iran. You know, I think There's been
Speaker 1: twelve people now that have been killed. But at least
Speaker 1: we're on the right side of history. The U S
Speaker 1: siding with the anti Iranian regime protesters amid the crackdown.
Speaker 1: And you think you want to live in Iran, You
Speaker 1: think you want the government telling women how to dress.
Speaker 1: You think you want gays and lesbians killed. You think
Speaker 1: you want that you must practice one religion and one
Speaker 1: religion only. Remember Obama assisted Commanees regime took their crushing
Speaker 1: of the Green rebellion in two thousand and nine. Be
Speaker 1: amazing for this world if that happened. By the way,
Speaker 1: China as we speak, is now putting troops on the
Speaker 1: border with North Korea. All the more on that when
Speaker 1: we continue, be sure to check in as soon as
Speaker 1: you get to your car after work for breaking information
Speaker 1: you need to know about. This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: It is far pastime for the nations of the world
Speaker 1: to confront another reckless regime, one that speaks openly of
Speaker 1: mass murder, vowing death to America, destruction to Israel, and
Speaker 1: ruined for many leaders and nations in this room. The
Speaker 1: Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guys
Speaker 1: of a democracy. It has turned a wealthy country with
Speaker 1: a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue
Speaker 1: state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos. The
Speaker 1: longest suffering victims of Iran's leaders are in fact, its
Speaker 1: own people. Rather than use its resources to improve Iranian lives,
Speaker 1: its oil profits go to fund he Belah and other
Speaker 1: terrorists that kill innocent Muslims and attack their peaceful Arab
Speaker 1: and Israeli neighbors. This wealth, which rightly belongs to Iran's people,
Speaker 1: also goes to shore up but shar Al Assad's dictatorship
Speaker 1: fuel yemen civil war and undermine peace throughout the entire
Speaker 1: Middle East. We cannot let a murderous regime continue these
Speaker 1: destabilizing activities while building dangerous missiles, and we cannot abide
Speaker 1: by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual
Speaker 1: construction of a nuclear program. Arandia was one of the
Speaker 1: worst and most one sided transactions the United States has
Speaker 1: ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to
Speaker 1: the United States, and I don't think you've heard the
Speaker 1: last of it. Believe me, that was the president just
Speaker 1: four short months ago. Now what are we seeing. We're
Speaker 1: seeing now the Iranian people rise up again. And there's
Speaker 1: an important difference by the way, about what's happening in
Speaker 1: Iran today in the Green Revolution protests and on nine
Speaker 1: because back then I don't recall seeing any direct assaults
Speaker 1: on institutions of authority and control. So here we are
Speaker 1: now nine years later, after people live in tyranny and oppression,
Speaker 1: and we're seeing reports of armed protesters storing, storming military
Speaker 1: bases and police stations. This nobody seems to understand. This
Speaker 1: is now the biggest existential threat to the entire world,
Speaker 1: and that is you know, there's a reason why Israel
Speaker 1: is now getting along with Egypt and getting along with
Speaker 1: the Saudis, and getting along with the Jordanians and getting
Speaker 1: along with the UAE. Their greatest fear is a nuclear
Speaker 1: armed Iran and Iranian hegemony in the Middle East. It
Speaker 1: would be a disaster because we all know that radical
Speaker 1: Islamis can't be armed with nuclear weapons because if they are,
Speaker 1: they'll use them. And if they can put bombs on
Speaker 1: their own kids in the name of all lotical killing
Speaker 1: as the men, women and children, you know, Islamic radicals
Speaker 1: can if they can do that, then they're gonna have
Speaker 1: no problem thinking, well, we're better off wiping Israel and
Speaker 1: the United States off the face of the earth, which
Speaker 1: is something that they have been saying they want to
Speaker 1: do now forever. Anyway, they know they're risking death, these protesters,
Speaker 1: and the only difference this time is a president is
Speaker 1: now backing them. And I saw, I saw Susan Rice
Speaker 1: said you need to just shut up and be quiet.
Speaker 1: Shut up and be quiet. The last time they were
Speaker 1: quoting Jefferson and Washington and our framers and our founders
Speaker 1: for crying out loud, and we were quiet, and we
Speaker 1: end up giving to the evil regime a hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty eight billion dollars in American currency and other world
Speaker 1: currency and gold. Well, that's great because now we just
Speaker 1: accelerated their ability to get nuclear weapons. And it's the
Speaker 1: same exact failed policy, that of appeasement that Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: had towards North Korea under Kim Jong ill And that
Speaker 1: was the president, by the way, predicting four months ago.
Speaker 1: The people of Iran want change. And I mean, if
Speaker 1: you haven't looked at the videos of them throwing gays
Speaker 1: and lesbians off rules and killing them, you need to
Speaker 1: take a look at it, because it's real and it's
Speaker 1: happening in this day and age. And I watch the
Speaker 1: movie the The Stoning of soriah M and the movie
Speaker 1: is phenomenal, but that's how women are treated. And they
Speaker 1: literally bury this poor woman up to our neck and
Speaker 1: and leave her head exposed and the stone her and
Speaker 1: they make our own kids do it. Yeah, well, that's
Speaker 1: actually that's what life is like under Sharia law for
Speaker 1: a lot of people in these countries. I see that
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia is making steps towards eliminating their corruption, and
Speaker 1: you know, but it's all too slow. And I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that we have the ability to change these countries.
Speaker 1: I'm not. I'm not a big believer that Western values
Speaker 1: and now all of a sudden gonna dominate the Islamic world.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's gonna happen. But if you can
Speaker 1: purge the radical Islamics out of them, And it was
Speaker 1: a pretty interesting statistic that I saw, and this is
Speaker 1: all part of Trump's accomplishments. If you can lend to
Speaker 1: bring in the eighty one, I forgot to bring it in.
Speaker 1: You know. There was an analysis from September through December
Speaker 1: of December. So just recently, the square miles that were
Speaker 1: liberated from ISIS under Trump were more than Obama in
Speaker 1: just one year, and what Obama had done the final
Speaker 1: three years of his presidency. The square miles held by
Speaker 1: ISIS wander Obama was seventeen thousand, five hundred. Under Trump,
Speaker 1: it's only one thousand, nine thirty. The estimated number of
Speaker 1: ISIS fighters will under Obama was thirty five thousand, now
Speaker 1: it's one thousand. The number of people freed under Obama
Speaker 1: two point four million under Trump in one year five
Speaker 1: three million. The number of coalition bombs dropped, and one
Speaker 1: year versus a three year period, forty by Trump and
Speaker 1: sixty thousand by Obama in three years. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. That's according to the Department of Defense. If
Speaker 1: you wondering where I got the numbers from, that is
Speaker 1: a huge difference. You know, we don't stand up to
Speaker 1: evil in our time, and we see now how difficult
Speaker 1: North Korea has gotten. You know, we see how tough
Speaker 1: that is. But if you have armed protesters now storming
Speaker 1: an Iranian military base, attacking police stations, and if they
Speaker 1: now as I have been reporting, chanting death to the
Speaker 1: Malah's and that these protests are now spreading. This is
Speaker 1: the opportunity of a lifetime and that could change the
Speaker 1: every single dynamic in that part of the world now
Speaker 1: for forever, in a good way. I think that would
Speaker 1: be a great thing. It was one. The Free Beacon
Speaker 1: reported that Iran may have received as just thirty three
Speaker 1: point six billion dollars in cash gold payments from the US.
Speaker 1: New questions emerging on several billions paid out to Iran
Speaker 1: by the Obama administration. Why would you ever give Iranian
Speaker 1: mulus that chant death to America, death to Israel? Why
Speaker 1: would you ever give them a penny? Never mind the
Speaker 1: hundred and forty fifty billion dollars that we gave them.
Speaker 1: I did, I don't. It makes no sense anyway. So
Speaker 1: now the US is siding with the anti Iranian regime protesters.
Speaker 1: Trump says it's time for change. Barack Obama assisted the
Speaker 1: Commeni regime to crush the two thousand and nine Green rebellion,
Speaker 1: and you have the roots of rebellion now beginning to
Speaker 1: take hold. You have a leaked memo this was on
Speaker 1: Fox news dot com about a meeting and notes of
Speaker 1: a meeting about how panic the Iranian regime considered stopping
Speaker 1: the deadly protests anyway. The leak report to the Fox
Speaker 1: News channel shows that the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kameni,
Speaker 1: met with political leaders and heads of the country's security
Speaker 1: forces discussing how to tamp down on the deadly nationwide protests.
Speaker 1: The reports covered several meetings up to December thirty first
Speaker 1: provided by the National Council of Resistance of Iran, and
Speaker 1: what it said were was that there were high level
Speaker 1: sources within the regime and the meeting notes translated into
Speaker 1: English said the unrest has hurt every sector of the
Speaker 1: country's economy and threatens the regime security. The first step, therefore,
Speaker 1: is to find a way out of the situation, the
Speaker 1: report added. Religious leaders in the leadership must come to
Speaker 1: the scene as soon as possible and prevent the situation
Speaker 1: from deteriorating further. It continued, God help us. This is
Speaker 1: a very complex situation and different from previous occasions. So
Speaker 1: as those protests now get it's just getting interesting. Let's
Speaker 1: put it that way. Well, if some more on that
Speaker 1: tonight on hand, we'll ask New king Rich about it.
Speaker 1: At the top of the hour. This is an interesting
Speaker 1: development that the Chinese military apparently, according to some reports,
Speaker 1: we're looking at here, a province along the border with
Speaker 1: North Korea is now seeing an influx and there are
Speaker 1: pictures to back it up of tanks and soldiers and
Speaker 1: military trucks. That's pretty interesting, well, because it is their
Speaker 1: region of the world. Kim says that the U should
Speaker 1: know North Korea is a nuclear force, and that is
Speaker 1: a reality now and we have to accept it, you know,
Speaker 1: at some point. And now the only thing that's different
Speaker 1: is North Korea is Kim Jong un is now open
Speaker 1: to dialogue with South Korea. We'll only use nukes have threatened.
Speaker 1: That's pretty interesting from my perspective too. You know. So
Speaker 1: the last so that I mentioned earlier in the program,
Speaker 1: I said, you know, eighty one major accomplishments by Trump
Speaker 1: and eleven Obama legacy items have been repealed, and when
Speaker 1: you look at every single indicator on the economy, it's
Speaker 1: now getting work and everything that he's talked about. I
Speaker 1: won't give you all of it I mentioned, and more
Speaker 1: I mentioned the healthcare Obamacare mandate. UH. Building up our
Speaker 1: military piece through strength once again is now how our
Speaker 1: Defense Department is acting. We see now the new Afghanistan strategy,
Speaker 1: We see the strategy against the Syrian air base after
Speaker 1: the chemical weapons attack, and we see the president now
Speaker 1: we see a dramatic improvement in terms of dealing with
Speaker 1: ices because he's given power and control to the military
Speaker 1: leaders on the ground. We see the confidence and respect
Speaker 1: in America is now being restored. I know that everybody
Speaker 1: was wigged out over the President talking about the billions
Speaker 1: of dollars we've given Pakistan. Well, I think we've got
Speaker 1: to flip over every nickel and ask ourselves why are
Speaker 1: we doing this? As I think the United States, you know,
Speaker 1: cannot be the world's policeman, nor can we be the
Speaker 1: funder of all things for every country. You know how
Speaker 1: many people in this country are suffering from opioid addiction.
Speaker 1: What about our veterans that don't get the care that
Speaker 1: they need. I met this woman over my vacation, a
Speaker 1: vet that has been severely injured. She's still struggling to
Speaker 1: get the care that she needs, although it's getting better,
Speaker 1: and I gave her a couple of ideas on how
Speaker 1: to how to make sure her case is heard. You know,
Speaker 1: we're now protecting and laid the principles out for protecting
Speaker 1: the homeland, ending chain migration, you know Kate Steinley's law.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be the new battle going forward. We have
Speaker 1: now new immigration judges, We've hired more Board of Patrol people.
Speaker 1: We're now protecting our communities as well, and we're putting
Speaker 1: more police officers on the street. We got Trump nominated
Speaker 1: seven seventy three federal judges. He also got, of course,
Speaker 1: uh Neil Gorst's on the Supreme Court. You know this
Speaker 1: tax bill, the economy now is turning around. They passed
Speaker 1: the five point five billion dollars in tax cuts, appealing
Speaker 1: the Obamacare a mandate. We now for the first time
Speaker 1: President Obama never had a single year of GDP growth
Speaker 1: above three percent. That's now happening. We have one point
Speaker 1: seven million new jobs that have been created, dal Jones
Speaker 1: reaching record highs, rebounding economic confidence, a new executive order
Speaker 1: boosting apprenticeships and stuff like that. Getting rid of these
Speaker 1: Obama error regulations. Twenty one regulations gone for every new
Speaker 1: one taken on. Now we're moving forward also on important
Speaker 1: energy issues, involving the energy and dependence issue in the country.
Speaker 1: By the way, people say, well, you just want to
Speaker 1: destroy the air. I don't want to destroy the earth.
Speaker 1: I don't want dirty air and dirty water. But I
Speaker 1: don't want to be dependent on countries that hate us
Speaker 1: for the lifeblood of our economy. And I don't want
Speaker 1: businesses investing in Mexico or other countries when they can
Speaker 1: be building their factories in the manufacturing centers here and
Speaker 1: Americans can be thriving. And the best way that we
Speaker 1: can help other countries in the end is that if
Speaker 1: we're successful, we can show them how to be successful
Speaker 1: themselves and they can follow our lead in our model
Speaker 1: instead of sending money abroad constantly. You know, forcing business
Speaker 1: is basically incentivizing businesses to leave because the regulations are
Speaker 1: so out of control and government taxation is so out
Speaker 1: of control. You know, every year when I go on vacation,
Speaker 1: I mean with my financial guy, I just hate doing
Speaker 1: that crap. I just hated. I just start talking about
Speaker 1: things and he says everything every year, the same thing.
Speaker 1: Don't die in New York tells me. I'm like, okay,
Speaker 1: I'll try and figure that out for you. How do
Speaker 1: you want me to figure out how not to die
Speaker 1: in New York? Because if you die in New York.
Speaker 1: Here's the amount you're gonna pay an estate taxes. It's
Speaker 1: ten more. New York takes ten percent of money they've
Speaker 1: already taxed the federal government take. And believe it or not,
Speaker 1: I know everyone says, oh, there's all sorts of ways
Speaker 1: to mitigate that. There's not not like you think, well,
Speaker 1: it's you shouldn't be able to give that money. What
Speaker 1: it's not your money. I already paced sixty two cents
Speaker 1: of every dollar I make for crying out loud. And
Speaker 1: I love how I get audited too. Three audits in
Speaker 1: one year last year. Three unbelievable. All right, so it
Speaker 1: looks like arn Hatch, Well, it doesn't look like he's out.
Speaker 1: He'll be retiring. And the headline on the Drudge Report
Speaker 1: is about Mitt Romney. Is Mitt Romney now gonna run
Speaker 1: for Utah's Senate seat. I'd argue if he does, he's
Speaker 1: a shoeing um. But we'll see, well, we'll watch monitor. Well, Hannity,
Speaker 1: how do you know they Because I know politics, and
Speaker 1: you can spend all the money you want and say, well,
Speaker 1: we don't want Mitt Romney. He doesn't like Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you it's it's will it be what
Speaker 1: it's gonna be? All right, we'll talk about Trump's accomplishments,
Speaker 1: the latest in the boomerang scandals that exist out there,
Speaker 1: much more straight ahead. I clad you with us our
Speaker 1: to eight or nine p one sewn if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. New King riches
Speaker 1: with us. He says, don't underestimate Trump, and if you
Speaker 1: do so, do it at your own peril. Also as
Speaker 1: newde has some observations about eighteen that are not conventional
Speaker 1: thinking on the part of the media, because they think
Speaker 1: is gonna be a wipe out of the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: Mr Speaker, how are you. I'm doing really well. And uh,
Speaker 1: I just try to remind everybody that the folks who
Speaker 1: are convinced it will be a wipeout are the same
Speaker 1: folks who were convinced Trump wouldn't be president, and the
Speaker 1: same folks who were convinced that his first year would
Speaker 1: be a disaster. And you go down the list. I mean,
Speaker 1: these folks have been so consistently wrong you can almost
Speaker 1: take what they're saying, reverse it and be reasonably sure
Speaker 1: you're right, it's really true. And I remember before in November,
Speaker 1: and you and I both were out there and we
Speaker 1: were saying, of course he can win, and there's a
Speaker 1: good chance he's going to win, and the media collectively
Speaker 1: had the shock of their life. And ever since then,
Speaker 1: I've been doing everything in their power to stop this president. Um,
Speaker 1: there are eighty one specific accomplishments in twelve major categories
Speaker 1: by this president, and over a hundred other minor achievements.
Speaker 1: But not the least of which is how even the
Speaker 1: New York Times now recognizes the economy is turned around rapidly. Well,
Speaker 1: it's shocking today that on page one above the fold
Speaker 1: in the New York Times is a very prominent story
Speaker 1: about how Trump and his deregulatory efforts and his pro
Speaker 1: business attitude have just launched a whole new wave of
Speaker 1: economic growth. I mean, for the New York Times to
Speaker 1: write that, what a way to start the new year,
Speaker 1: it was amazing. Well, if you look at the economy
Speaker 1: and you look at consumer confidence, and you look at
Speaker 1: nearly two million jobs created, and you look at you know,
Speaker 1: GDP growth, and you look at you know, every economic measure,
Speaker 1: even the even the tax bill the past. This is
Speaker 1: all before the impact of that those tax cuts, which
Speaker 1: I think will be significant. But then you get rid
Speaker 1: of the employer mandate, and then after the employer Amandada
Speaker 1: I opened up drilling in Anoir, which we should have
Speaker 1: done years and years ago. Then you look at the regulation,
Speaker 1: you get rid of twenty one regulations for each new
Speaker 1: one adopted. And I mean it's now created an environment
Speaker 1: where all these companies are now wanting to invest in
Speaker 1: factories and manufacturing centers here. And I think energy in
Speaker 1: particular is going to create a lot of high paying
Speaker 1: career jobs for people. Well, I think that's right. And
Speaker 1: I think you're also seeing across the board small businesses
Speaker 1: the combination of deregulation so they don't just spend all
Speaker 1: their time filling out paperwork for the government, and the
Speaker 1: tax cuts which is gonna let them keep more money
Speaker 1: in their pocket. You're really going to see a continuous,
Speaker 1: I think, growth of economic opportunity. And I think you're
Speaker 1: going to see the Trump administration continue to move towards
Speaker 1: more and more good ideas, more and more reforms, with
Speaker 1: a very clear vision that they want to have in America,
Speaker 1: which is UH, creating jobs, increasing take home pay, giving
Speaker 1: people more opportunities. Uh that they really are so dramatically
Speaker 1: different from Barack Obama and the left. Well, I think
Speaker 1: that's the difference, I mean, and not to me was
Speaker 1: the biggest closing argument that after eight years of Obama,
Speaker 1: we never had a single year of three percent GDP growth,
Speaker 1: and we had eight million more Americans in poverty in
Speaker 1: thirteen million more Americans on food stamps, and the lowest
Speaker 1: labor participation rate in the worst recovery since the forties
Speaker 1: of the thirties, and uh, you know, the lowest home
Speaker 1: ownership rate in fifty one years. That matters to people.
Speaker 1: Those are real people, real lives, dramatically in that case,
Speaker 1: negatively impacted. Well, that's exactly right. And I think as
Speaker 1: the there's a great CBS piece last week where CBS
Speaker 1: interviewed three different families in three different parts of the
Speaker 1: country and all three we're gonna get real tax cuts.
Speaker 1: And you could just tell that the CBS reporters couldn't
Speaker 1: quite figure out what they were covering because that wasn't
Speaker 1: what they had said every single day up until the
Speaker 1: bill passed. It was going to be a terrible bill,
Speaker 1: It was gonna hurt people, you know, the whole line.
Speaker 1: Now suddenly it turns out oh, actually people are going
Speaker 1: to be better off. And I think that is a
Speaker 1: remarkable example of why I believe we could have a
Speaker 1: very different election this fault than anybody is currently ready for. Now.
Speaker 1: We talk a lot about the economy because first and foremost,
Speaker 1: I think people need to see improvement in their lives.
Speaker 1: I mean, consumer confidence seventeen year high, two million jobs
Speaker 1: created on top of that, black unemployment at its best
Speaker 1: level in years, the lowest food stamp usage in seven years,
Speaker 1: the best GDP growth in in nine years. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are all real numbers. But then you pointed out
Speaker 1: in your column which is headlined underestimate Trump at your peril,
Speaker 1: that Trump posted forty three world leaders at the White House,
Speaker 1: he engaged or met with a hundred and forty nine
Speaker 1: world leaders in and a hundred and eighty three he
Speaker 1: calls the president spoke with leaders from fifty one countries. Um,
Speaker 1: that is all in its own right significant and a
Speaker 1: dramatic turner out. Well, and it's a good reminder that
Speaker 1: when you see President Trump doing things, whether it is
Speaker 1: UH moving our embassy to Jerusalem, or it is standing
Speaker 1: up to the Iranian dictatorship on behalf of the Iranian people.
Speaker 1: He's talking to leaders all around the world while he's
Speaker 1: doing this. Uh, He's not doing this just based on
Speaker 1: some staff report or some newspaper article. He is really
Speaker 1: methodically trying to recognize what American needs to do to
Speaker 1: be successful, and he is learning every single day, and
Speaker 1: I think the results are starting to pay off. I
Speaker 1: had a good friend who wrote me a note I
Speaker 1: thought this morning was hysterically said, we were warned when
Speaker 1: President Trump recognized, uh, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel,
Speaker 1: that there would be people in the streets. It's if
Speaker 1: nobody told us they'd be in the streets of Iran.
Speaker 1: Now that's a good point. And what do you We
Speaker 1: now have a lot of new reports out today. We
Speaker 1: got Iranian pro testers attacking police stations and but interestingly
Speaker 1: Trump predicted us four months ago. Nobody seems to have
Speaker 1: picked that up. We'll play it on TV tonight. Um.
Speaker 1: They also armed protesters stormed an Iranian military base. You've
Speaker 1: got there's These protests are now spreading all around the country.
Speaker 1: We see video now that has emerged. Death to the
Speaker 1: Ayatollah um, and you know, you gotta war. Wonder what
Speaker 1: is this regime gonna do in light of all of this,
Speaker 1: what can they do except kill a lot of people? Well,
Speaker 1: I think that's the next phase. I mean, the in
Speaker 1: in the late nineteen eighties, they had this kind of
Speaker 1: a problem and as a result they had some eighty
Speaker 1: thousand people were killed. Um. This this is a very
Speaker 1: ruthless dictatorship and and my expectation is that the next
Speaker 1: phase is going to be uh, them trying to kill
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of people. Frankly, that's pretty scary and
Speaker 1: that could happen. I still think the biggest at least
Speaker 1: present danger we're facing is North Korea and Kim Jong
Speaker 1: un and what what his capacity for nuclear weapons will be. Um,
Speaker 1: the big question is why does he now want to
Speaker 1: negotiate with South Korea? That was an interesting development. Well,
Speaker 1: I think it may be that all these different pressures
Speaker 1: are beginning to really come to bear and that he's
Speaker 1: really faced with a situation where, um, if he doesn't
Speaker 1: find some new opening, his regime is just going to
Speaker 1: disintegrate because of the collapse of the economy. And I
Speaker 1: I took it as a very good sign for the steady,
Speaker 1: methodical increase in pressure the President Trump and his team
Speaker 1: have brought to bear that Kim Jong un is making
Speaker 1: that proposal, and I think that we should feel pretty confident.
Speaker 1: After all, their next door neighbors, and they're ethnically the
Speaker 1: same people. So if the if the South Koreans feel
Speaker 1: comfortable talking with him, I think we should say, that's terrific.
Speaker 1: We're not going to lower our guard, We're not going
Speaker 1: to count on anything. But but it's it's a good
Speaker 1: it's a good sign in the right direction. If in
Speaker 1: fact that all of a sudden Kim Jong feels he
Speaker 1: has to sit down and talk to people, what do
Speaker 1: you make a Ron hatch in Utah and he's retiring,
Speaker 1: and what appears to be a strong possibility that met Romney,
Speaker 1: who has been almost veryly anti Trump uh runs for
Speaker 1: that seat, because I would believe that if he runs,
Speaker 1: he wins it easily. I would think that Mitt would
Speaker 1: win the seat. I think he's he did a great
Speaker 1: job with the Winter Olympics years ago. Uh. He of
Speaker 1: course has huge relationships all across the state. UM. And
Speaker 1: it would be interesting in a different way because he
Speaker 1: came from Michigan, ended up as governor of Massachusetts, and
Speaker 1: would now be the Senator from from Utah. UM and
Speaker 1: I think he'd probably be a pretty pretty good senator,
Speaker 1: would be very industrious, very hard working. You know. He
Speaker 1: and I, as you know, had a very rough and
Speaker 1: tumble fight for the nomination in twelve but but I've
Speaker 1: always respected his intelligence. Uh, And I think also the
Speaker 1: world is changing. I would not assume automatically that Mitt
Speaker 1: would arrive as an anti Trump Republican. I think that
Speaker 1: he recognizes that there a number of things Trump is
Speaker 1: doing that are quite remarkable, and I suspect when he could,
Speaker 1: he would actually end up being helpful to Trump and
Speaker 1: not automatically be in a fight with him. That's scope
Speaker 1: that would be interesting because that you and I both
Speaker 1: know there are a lot of Republican senators in particular
Speaker 1: that hate him. They just they don't do. They expect
Speaker 1: him to conform into something their image of what they
Speaker 1: think of president should be. And that's not what got
Speaker 1: him elected. And that's never going to change. He's not
Speaker 1: going to be the person they want and behave the
Speaker 1: way they want, right. And I think frankly that that
Speaker 1: the people who elected him would be horrified if he
Speaker 1: spent a lot of his time trying to appease, uh,
Speaker 1: the old order and the old establishment. I mean, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's why they voted for him in
Speaker 1: the first place. So I think in that sense, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, it'll be you know, I don't think Romney
Speaker 1: would come in as a as a pro Trump person,
Speaker 1: but I don't I wouldn't automatically assume, you know, for example,
Speaker 1: I think he would have voted for the text SU's
Speaker 1: I think that that that fits sort of where he's
Speaker 1: at in terms of economics. So it would certainly be interesting.
Speaker 1: But frankly, look at some of the relationships Trump hasn't
Speaker 1: sent it now, they're all interesting too. It's just it's
Speaker 1: partly the nature of having Donald Trump as your president.
Speaker 1: He's a he's a guy who has a very strong personality,
Speaker 1: and he doesn't mind exhumining in all right, So let's
Speaker 1: go to seen was you know, one breathless report after
Speaker 1: another hysterical report. Often unnamed sources are anonymous sources about
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion. And we have the issue with Paul
Speaker 1: Manaford in general, flynt nothing had to do with Russia.
Speaker 1: Uh do you suspect as I do? Russia goes away?
Speaker 1: And if you noticed that those of us that have
Speaker 1: pointed out some corruption at the highest levels of the
Speaker 1: deep state or within the Mueller investigation. You know, we
Speaker 1: are now under attack as somehow being anti law enforcement.
Speaker 1: That seems to be the media's new narrative. Right Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, look, if you are the elite media, your
Speaker 1: whole world is falling apart. You thought you had this
Speaker 1: wonderful explanation, largely I think invented originally by the Clinton
Speaker 1: campaign to explain why they lost. Then it turned out
Speaker 1: none of us, none of us bearing up, none of
Speaker 1: it's holding water right now. Uh, And so they're floundering around.
Speaker 1: I think the fascinating thing is the damage that's been
Speaker 1: done by the the things we're learning about the FBI,
Speaker 1: the things we're learning about the crony ism, the things
Speaker 1: we're learning about the collusion, and and the the attitude
Speaker 1: of some of these people. Um, it turns out that
Speaker 1: these were not exactly neutral people in any way. These
Speaker 1: are people who despised Trump, who who thought they had
Speaker 1: a duty to block him from becoming president. Uh. And
Speaker 1: that's pretty scary. I mean, you don't want to have
Speaker 1: the phoederal brew of investigation populated by people who take
Speaker 1: it upon themselves to decide what the American people should
Speaker 1: be allowed to to know or to believe. Al Right,
Speaker 1: So the question now is now that we we know that,
Speaker 1: for example, there was an exoneration of Hillary before an
Speaker 1: investigation as it relates to Peter Struck and Jim Comey,
Speaker 1: and then it raises the questions do you go back
Speaker 1: and do you do a real investigation into Hillary? And
Speaker 1: then we know that there was collusion with Russia and
Speaker 1: that's the Hillary Clinton d n. C. Boughton paid for
Speaker 1: dossier that was designed to full of Russian lives, designed
Speaker 1: to influence the American people. And then what do you
Speaker 1: do about uranium one? When you know none of that
Speaker 1: made sense? And there was a series of of instances
Speaker 1: of bribery and kickbacks and extortion and money laundering that
Speaker 1: Muller and other people knew about, but they still allowed,
Speaker 1: you know, Russia to get a foothold in the Iranian
Speaker 1: market in this country. Do we go forward with these things?
Speaker 1: Do we stop with these things? Does you know do
Speaker 1: people go to jail over surveillance and unmasking and leaking intelligence?
Speaker 1: So does it all end? No? I look, I don't
Speaker 1: think it can all in now because I think you've
Speaker 1: got both Congression on investigations, and you've got increasing pressure, uh,
Speaker 1: from the Congress and from the American people. I don't
Speaker 1: think you can walk off, but I don't think you
Speaker 1: want to go after any one person. What you want
Speaker 1: to say is luck. The rule of law is at
Speaker 1: the heart of the American system. The rule of law
Speaker 1: is the only thing that protects the weak from the poor,
Speaker 1: I mean, from the from the powerful. Uh. And we
Speaker 1: have a vested interest in in in insisting that our
Speaker 1: Justice Department, the FBI, and other agencies follow the law.
Speaker 1: And if there are, in fact, are sound reasons to
Speaker 1: believe that a substantial crime has been committed, then they
Speaker 1: have an obligation to go find out, you know, what happened,
Speaker 1: and and to make it public. I think, Uh, you
Speaker 1: can't clean this this swamp up by trying to cover
Speaker 1: it up and hoping it will go away. You've got
Speaker 1: to have the courage to look it in the face
Speaker 1: and to insist on real change. And that means that
Speaker 1: a lot of prominent Democrats this year should be worried
Speaker 1: about whether that they're going to get indicted. Well, I
Speaker 1: certainly think it means that the people who were close
Speaker 1: to Clinton. All have some significant level of risk. I
Speaker 1: think that's just a fact. All right, Mr Speaker, will
Speaker 1: see you tonight on Hannity. Happy New Year to you,
Speaker 1: and congratulations. I know that Callista was welcomed, I guess
Speaker 1: by the Pope officially, and she is the ambassador to
Speaker 1: the Vatican, congratulation ambassador. And I'll tell you when she
Speaker 1: had that twenty five minute private conversation just Callista and
Speaker 1: the Pope and the interpreter. Uh, it was was quite
Speaker 1: an experience for somebody from Whitehall, Wisconsin. I think she'll
Speaker 1: never forget it. All right, Thank you so for being
Speaker 1: with us. Congratulations. Eight nine one Shawn the president of
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch. Tom Fitton joins us, as well as Peter
Speaker 1: Schweitzer Greg Jarrett. What laws were broken? Now that the
Speaker 1: collusion delusion is now evaporating before our very eyes. Except
Speaker 1: for Hillary, she's in huge legal jeopardy in my view.
Speaker 1: We got time for a quick call here. We'll go
Speaker 1: to Alabama. They're gonna be in the National Championship game.
Speaker 1: What are they playing? I guess Georgia, right, and that's
Speaker 1: gonna be a big game. These are great games. Yesterday, Alicia,
Speaker 1: you're on the Sean Hannity Show, how are you, I'm fine, Sehn,
Speaker 1: Happy New Year, Happy New Year to you. Um. I've
Speaker 1: been listening to conservative area for twenty four years and
Speaker 1: I've never thought to call in before. But um, all
Speaker 1: this sexual assault stuff going on is I'm afraid we're
Speaker 1: going way down the wrong road because as someone that
Speaker 1: was severely assaulted, beat and left for dead on the
Speaker 1: side of a highway, I think that what happened to
Speaker 1: me and my word is severely devalued. Let me let
Speaker 1: me just say this in response number one, I'm sorry
Speaker 1: you ever had to go through that. That is evil
Speaker 1: in our time. But when people are paying millions for allegations,
Speaker 1: we've got a problem for innocent people that are true victims.
Speaker 1: What's your answer to those people who think gief b
Speaker 1: I inquiry, that's a big deal. Uh what do you
Speaker 1: say to them? I say what I've said now for
Speaker 1: many many months. It's a security inquiry. I always took
Speaker 1: classified materials seriously. Uh. There was never any material marked
Speaker 1: classified that was sent or received by me, and I
Speaker 1: look forward to as being wrapped up. What about people think, well,
Speaker 1: she might be president, what does she learned from this
Speaker 1: whole well, that was a mistake, and I have said
Speaker 1: that and I will say it again as often as
Speaker 1: I need to. Uh, it seemed like a convenient idea
Speaker 1: at the time that certainly wasn't and so I always
Speaker 1: take classified material seriously. There's no argument about that that
Speaker 1: I'm aware of what might with a cloth or somebody though.
Speaker 1: All right, there you have at the latest now until
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. I mean, it's now the
Speaker 1: biggest boomerang I think we've ever seen and we'll ever see.
Speaker 1: In terms of politics, Tom Fitton is with us. He's
Speaker 1: the president of Judicial Watch. Score yet another victory against
Speaker 1: you know, the correct option and the seat that has
Speaker 1: been going on in Clinton world for all these years.
Speaker 1: This time it's now Uma Aberdeen or top top confidante,
Speaker 1: and how she was complicit in the use of unsecured
Speaker 1: devices to exchange and forward documents that were in fact
Speaker 1: classified in nature, and Judicial Watch forced the hand of
Speaker 1: federal of the federal government to release these documents after
Speaker 1: the suit that they began in tw and it's just
Speaker 1: it goes on forever. Now. What's so serious about this
Speaker 1: is Aberdeen also forwarded state passwords to Yahoo before it
Speaker 1: was hacked. By foreign agents. In other words, not only
Speaker 1: did they get information, but then they got passwords to
Speaker 1: get even more information. Tom Fitton is with us. Now,
Speaker 1: how are you happy New Year? Happy New Year? Why
Speaker 1: is it so hard, you know? And why does it
Speaker 1: take so long to get Freedom of Information Act requests
Speaker 1: for filled? Because the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton took
Speaker 1: precedence for the State Department in a Justice Department in
Speaker 1: the FBI last year and they continue to stall through
Speaker 1: the administration on the release of this information. The only
Speaker 1: reason we got it because we didn't go away, you know,
Speaker 1: su hit Court. We weren't going to go away. And
Speaker 1: they ended up having to turn over the records that
Speaker 1: the FBI sound on Winners laptop that we're government records
Speaker 1: at least last year. And it only took what sixteen months,
Speaker 1: fourteen months, and they were twenty eight hundred or some
Speaker 1: twenty hundred work related documents among the documents provided by
Speaker 1: the FBI. The State Department told the court they expected
Speaker 1: to complete their review and production by December. So that's
Speaker 1: how long. That's how long the process takes. Released them
Speaker 1: on Friday last week, just after you know, before the
Speaker 1: New Year's holiday. The State Department servers crashed, but we
Speaker 1: did get the records and I showed there was classified
Speaker 1: information on Winer's laptop, which I mean just to say
Speaker 1: that Sean is ought to be infuriating to most Americans
Speaker 1: that nothing's been done about it in terms of a
Speaker 1: criminal prosecution or serious investigation in the least. Where do
Speaker 1: you see all of this now going, assuming as Amos
Speaker 1: himing that, you know, whatever else that Mueller may or
Speaker 1: may not do is not going to have anything to
Speaker 1: do with Trump Russia collusion. You know, I I think
Speaker 1: I'm actually hopeful. I think that information like this, this
Speaker 1: disclosure is it could be a tipping point in terms
Speaker 1: of pushing the Justice Department under Jeff Sessions to finally
Speaker 1: take a serious relook at the evident criminal activities by
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and Yuma Apogeine as it relates a classified information,
Speaker 1: but taking government records, the destruction of the records. You know,
Speaker 1: these these egregious violations that have gone on uninvestigated in
Speaker 1: a serious way. The American people have always wanted to
Speaker 1: go investigated. That's why President Trump was elected. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that she gets prosecuted at the end, but we
Speaker 1: just want an investigation that the American people can have
Speaker 1: faith in, and given the Clinton Lynch tarmac records meeting,
Speaker 1: at the Clinton Lynch meeting that took place on the
Speaker 1: tarmac last year, Comy's hatred for President Trump, the Peter
Speaker 1: Stroke text showing that he was pro Hillary and anti Trump.
Speaker 1: And of course he was the number two counterintel guy
Speaker 1: in the FBI involved in the Clinton email investigation. Andrew
Speaker 1: McCabe's conflicts of interest at number two with the FBI,
Speaker 1: whose wife was getting money from a Clinton crony, and
Speaker 1: h Terry mccauliffe. You know, all of this isn't a
Speaker 1: reason to reopen the investigation. What what would be in
Speaker 1: terms of conflicts and and and ethical compromises. But if
Speaker 1: you listen to the mainstream media, they seem to be
Speaker 1: speaking with one voice, and that is wow. All of
Speaker 1: these conservatives are now attacking institutions like the FBI and
Speaker 1: the State Department. Uh. But I thought when unethical things
Speaker 1: are being done that the law that they themselves are
Speaker 1: not above the law. Or if you politicize an investigation
Speaker 1: by only hiring people that donate to Obama Clinton in
Speaker 1: the d n C to investigate Donald Trump, that would
Speaker 1: seem to be a conflict of interest or in the
Speaker 1: case of Comey, if you make an exoneration before an investigation,
Speaker 1: that would that would seem like some type of collusion,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it. Yeah, And you know, the FBI leadership was
Speaker 1: terribly corrupted. We're not allowed to call attention to that.
Speaker 1: Is this a free country or not. The left only
Speaker 1: likes the FBI when it's targeting people that it dislikes.
Speaker 1: And I thought the left was skeptical of the FBI
Speaker 1: as a federal law enforcement agency when it was targeting
Speaker 1: the left and going after the communists and the leftists
Speaker 1: and all that during the seventies and eighties. You know,
Speaker 1: the left is still obsessed with Richard Nixon. Yet we're
Speaker 1: not allowed to criticize the FBI because it can only
Speaker 1: be it can only be undermined in terms of the
Speaker 1: role of law by Republican presidents. It's ridiculous. The left
Speaker 1: is in a power play right now trying to take
Speaker 1: out President Trump, and they'll descend all sorts of lawlessness
Speaker 1: by government agencies in order to get that done. Where
Speaker 1: is the uranium one deal? Because that's also something that
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch has been active and involved in. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean We've sued for records there. We're fighting this Justice
Speaker 1: Department to get them to look at do a do
Speaker 1: a competent search. Now supposedly the Justice Department is taking
Speaker 1: out doing a review of what went on on the
Speaker 1: iranium one. I don't trust such a review that. Just
Speaker 1: need to do an investigation. Uh, you've got bureaucrats are
Speaker 1: gonna be asking other bureaucrats what they should do. Of
Speaker 1: course they're going to say nothing. That's what happened with
Speaker 1: the I R S investigation this year. Remember they went
Speaker 1: back and relooked at the Obama I R S abuses,
Speaker 1: and surprise, surprise, the Justice Department and FBI, who were
Speaker 1: involved in covering up the scandal and we're implicated, said well,
Speaker 1: you shouldn't go back and reopen this. I think that's
Speaker 1: what will happen here. We need a special counsel. We
Speaker 1: need independent, serious investigations going on, as opposed to about
Speaker 1: talking about the process of figuring out whether we're going
Speaker 1: to get a serious investigation enough of it. We need
Speaker 1: to get right to the matter, get an investigation going
Speaker 1: that the Attorney General and if he's accused, his designate
Speaker 1: should hire a special counsel. Directly. You forget about these
Speaker 1: special counsel regulations. Just hire special counsel using the powers
Speaker 1: they already have having report to them on a daily
Speaker 1: and direct basis, and get the work done. Is this
Speaker 1: the year, like, for example, was reported earlier today, the
Speaker 1: House Intel Committee is winding down the Trump Russia plow probe.
Speaker 1: What is this the year now that we begin to
Speaker 1: get answers to some significant questions involving Hillary and the
Speaker 1: email server and what appears to be obstruction of justice
Speaker 1: and violations of law? Is this the year we get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of uranium one? Is this the year
Speaker 1: now that we find out, you know, whether Comey put
Speaker 1: the fix in with Peter Struck? Uh? Do we get
Speaker 1: to the heart of of all of these varying scandals
Speaker 1: that have existed now for a while and some of
Speaker 1: the top brass within law enforcement and the FBI and
Speaker 1: the deep state and the Justice Department? Are they all
Speaker 1: going to be held accountable for their actions? Well? Many ways,
Speaker 1: it's up to the Trump administration, isn't it, Sean as
Speaker 1: the President can click as heels three times metaphorically speaking,
Speaker 1: and get all this information out there. Uh, the deep
Speaker 1: State doesn't really want to release any of it. They
Speaker 1: want to protect Hillary and Obama, they want to protect
Speaker 1: the efforts against President Trump. By withholding information about the dossier,
Speaker 1: You've got the Justice to part attacking the head of
Speaker 1: the Intelligence uh Committee on the House because he's pushing
Speaker 1: them on records about corruption involved in a FISA application
Speaker 1: targeting Team Trump. This is this is how are we
Speaker 1: going to get to the point when when do we
Speaker 1: get an answer whether or not the dossier, which we
Speaker 1: now know was Hillary Clinton and Hillary's d NC bought
Speaker 1: and paid for Russian lines, When do we get to
Speaker 1: know if that was used in a FISA court to
Speaker 1: obtain a warrant to surveil a presidential candidate, opposition party candidate,
Speaker 1: and then a president elect. I I it's up to
Speaker 1: the Trump administration, and if I were the president, I
Speaker 1: would order extreme transparency on all of this. Like we
Speaker 1: have extreme vetting, we need extreme transparency on the Clinton dossier,
Speaker 1: the spying, the unmaskings, the FISA applications. Let's get it
Speaker 1: all out there. And because the agencies themselves have been
Speaker 1: corrupted and they're not gonna they're not going to on
Speaker 1: their own admit to their corruption, they have to be
Speaker 1: forced and the president is the only one who can
Speaker 1: do this, I think at this point. All right, Tom
Speaker 1: Fitt and Judicial Watch. Let us know as you get
Speaker 1: more information. I'm sure all throughout the year we'll be
Speaker 1: following it as we watch the biggest political boomerang unfold
Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen. You watch and mark my words. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our busy phones. Michael's and Saratoga in Wyoming.
Speaker 1: What's up, Michael? How are you glad you called? Sir Hi?
Speaker 1: It's pleasure to talk with Sean. Yes, sir, um My, Uh.
Speaker 1: I've got two points if I can fit them in.
Speaker 1: First of all, considering the email investigation, Um, how did
Speaker 1: Homa Aberdeen ever get um a security clearance? And we
Speaker 1: have extreme vetting supposedly, yet with her background and her
Speaker 1: family ties, there should be no way she should work
Speaker 1: for the State Department. On top of that, she was
Speaker 1: collecting three salaries. How is she doing that? That breaks
Speaker 1: the state department rules? All true? All true? But everything
Speaker 1: you notice with the Clinton's Look, this is the great
Speaker 1: gray untold story. Is the media spent a year lying
Speaker 1: to you about a story that wasn't true, and they
Speaker 1: never had any evidence, and they breathlessly reported, made up facts,
Speaker 1: unnamed sources us to death last year. And now if
Speaker 1: they really cared about these issues, now the narrative is, well,
Speaker 1: you can this is outrageous that you're you're making charges
Speaker 1: against the FBI, etcetera. Well, we never got to the
Speaker 1: bottom of real law breaking. They don't care about truth.
Speaker 1: They care about their agenda, and their agenda is radically
Speaker 1: left wing and sehn um. As far as investigations go,
Speaker 1: we have a special Council and supposedly investigating these things.
Speaker 1: Yet that same special council has a completely one sided,
Speaker 1: partisan um group of investigators. And what concerns me is
Speaker 1: with all of these antics that supposedly or likely would
Speaker 1: have been covered in a Hillary Clinton presidency, UM, what
Speaker 1: are the what's the likelihood that the alert team is
Speaker 1: covering up and making things disappear. I think the Mueller
Speaker 1: team is not going to be able to do what
Speaker 1: they thought they wanted to do, and I think they're
Speaker 1: gonna try. I think they're gonna try until the last minute,
Speaker 1: but I don't think they'll accomplish what they set out
Speaker 1: to accomplish. I think their target has always been Trump.
Speaker 1: I've always believed it never never denied it for a minute.
Speaker 1: Rich as a Myrtle Beach in South Carolina. Rich high,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called gay? Happy New Year? Showing?
Speaker 1: How are anybody? I'm good. You don't sound like it
Speaker 1: from Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, sound like you're from New York. Well,
Speaker 1: I left the socialist state of Chuck Schuman. The first
Speaker 1: thing I did when I moved down, he was gonna
Speaker 1: c w p Oh really I sure did first thing.
Speaker 1: I'm fully armed and ready now you know, all right, Well,
Speaker 1: let's hope you never have to use it. What's going
Speaker 1: on as that's the whole point. But it's my right
Speaker 1: to have it, you know, they tell me the lovely
Speaker 1: ladies I was talking to then when I called in,
Speaker 1: said you're a big fisherman. Huh No, I'm not a
Speaker 1: big fisherman. I like to fish. We went on a
Speaker 1: big fishing trip this year and we caught huge, huge
Speaker 1: fish as big as me. We caught amber jackson. I
Speaker 1: mean literally the single biggest groupers you've ever seen one.
Speaker 1: They're ugly fish, but they taste great, not that I
Speaker 1: ate them or anything. All right, Well, thank you, Richard,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. Buddy, have a great new year. One
Speaker 1: Shan is a toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. All right, have
Speaker 1: Peter Schweitzer and Greg Jarrett. They're gonna break down what
Speaker 1: this boomerang I've been talking about really means and who
Speaker 1: was in legal jeopardy this year. First we get back
Speaker 1: to our busy phones. Greg is in the apparently ever
Speaker 1: growing bigger state of Idaho, and I think it's what
Speaker 1: the number one growing state or number two growing state
Speaker 1: in the entire country. How are you, sir? Glad you
Speaker 1: called very good, Sean. It's and it's a great red
Speaker 1: state to boot That's why we live here, Yes, sir,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people live there for that reason. Well,
Speaker 1: I wanted to ask you here though, because I'm so
Speaker 1: frustrated with Republicans right now. We have some courageous House
Speaker 1: members like Jim Jordan's and Ron de Santis coming out
Speaker 1: against this corruption in the Justice Department, FBI and Mueller's team,
Speaker 1: but the silence is deafening Over in the Senate. It
Speaker 1: seems that we still have Senators Graham and and Burr
Speaker 1: and others defending the Mueller investigation and I just don't
Speaker 1: understand why we don't have a chorus of Republicans now
Speaker 1: calling for this sham to be ended. Well, I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you. I mean, it's really simple, and it's really
Speaker 1: easy to get done, and that is just do your job.
Speaker 1: And the job is okay. When there's conflicts of interest,
Speaker 1: when you have people that have such obvious political biases
Speaker 1: against the president, when you have people that only donate
Speaker 1: to Obama, Clinton's the d n C, you can't have
Speaker 1: an honest investigation. And then when you have people like
Speaker 1: Andrew Weissman, who has a track record of using on
Speaker 1: savory tactics, making up laws that don't exist, a failure
Speaker 1: in terms of his convictions being overturned nine zero Supreme Court, overturned,
Speaker 1: Fifth Kirk, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, etcetera. You know,
Speaker 1: you need somebody who's gonna give a fair, honest investigation
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have equal justice under the law. Well,
Speaker 1: that means we're going to investigate the real Russia collusion,
Speaker 1: Hillary paying for sellacious lies in that dossier, and then
Speaker 1: we're gonna investigate why James Comey, you know, why was
Speaker 1: he involved in exonerating Hillary Clinton before investigating with an
Speaker 1: anti Trump pro Hillary surrogate in the FBI by the
Speaker 1: name of Peter Struck. You know that we should want
Speaker 1: equal justice, we should want fair application. We don't need
Speaker 1: abusive prosecutors using their power, you know, to indict Ham
Speaker 1: Sandwiches because they've got an agenda and they don't like
Speaker 1: the president. And that's what we've been living through. And
Speaker 1: that's what's now being exposed, especially as the quote Trump
Speaker 1: Russia collusion story appears to be debunked. At this point,
Speaker 1: has never been any evidence. That's the irony in all
Speaker 1: of this and the media is that they don't care
Speaker 1: how corrupt the system is as long as they got
Speaker 1: their prize. Their prize was to take out this duly
Speaker 1: elected president. They didn't succeed, They're not going to succeed.
Speaker 1: We can't let them succeed because if we do, we're
Speaker 1: gonna lose the country in the meantime. Alright, Shawn, is
Speaker 1: a number you want to be a part of the
Speaker 1: program quick Break News, round Up, Information Overload and who
Speaker 1: should be worried about the legal jeopardy in it's not
Speaker 1: who you think that's next? Well, I think the uranium
Speaker 1: sale to Russia and the way it was done so underhanded,
Speaker 1: with tremendous amounts of money being passed. I actually think
Speaker 1: that's Watergate modern aime. As you know, President Trump has
Speaker 1: tried to flip the script and now says the Justice
Speaker 1: Department should be investigating you. And this way we learned
Speaker 1: the Attorney in General Sessions is considering a special counsel
Speaker 1: to probe the Uranium one deal and alleged confidence with
Speaker 1: the Clinton Foundation. What's your reaction to this? You know,
Speaker 1: I regret deeply that this appears to be uh, the
Speaker 1: politicization of the Justice Department and our justice system. Um.
Speaker 1: This Uranium one story has been debunked countless times by
Speaker 1: members of the press, by independent experts. Uh, it is
Speaker 1: nothing but a you know, a false charge that the
Speaker 1: Trump administration is trying to drum up in order to
Speaker 1: avoid attention being directed at them. I mean, even trade
Speaker 1: Gaudy somebody who's hardly a fan of mine said, uh
Speaker 1: that you know, there doesn't seem to be the basis
Speaker 1: for a special counsel. Of course there isn't. But if
Speaker 1: I try to take myself out of it, which you know,
Speaker 1: it's kind of hard because it's personally offensive that they
Speaker 1: would do this, but taking myself out of it, this
Speaker 1: is such an abusive power and it goes right at
Speaker 1: the rule of law. As you know, Sean Hannity on
Speaker 1: his program has been very critical of the uranium one
Speaker 1: deal the President, saying with regard to Russia, that's the
Speaker 1: real story and all of this. What would you say
Speaker 1: to those critics, I would say, it's the same bologna
Speaker 1: they've been peddling for years and there's been no no
Speaker 1: credible evidence by anyone. In fact, it's been debunked repeatedly
Speaker 1: and will continue to be debunked. But here's what they're doing.
Speaker 1: And really I have to give them credit. You know,
Speaker 1: Trump and his allies, including Fox News, are really experts
Speaker 1: at distraction and version, the news roundup and information overload
Speaker 1: eight nine for one, Shawn or Tolfrey telephone number you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. The big
Speaker 1: media story missed last year is now that the Russia
Speaker 1: collusion investigation is going away. Well, now we we really
Speaker 1: have probably the biggest political boomerang that is now opening
Speaker 1: and evolving right before our very eyes, because there was
Speaker 1: Russia collusion in the presidential race, and now we know
Speaker 1: after a year's worth of denials. It was Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and the d n C, controlled by Clinton money, that
Speaker 1: paid for the phony Russian lies and dossier to propaganda
Speaker 1: E's mislead misinform you the American people before presidential election.
Speaker 1: And then, of course then we have all these other issues.
Speaker 1: I've watched over vacation, very little TV in terms of news,
Speaker 1: but the narrative now has been set. They're not talking
Speaker 1: and reporting breathlessly and hysterically every day. Uh uh the
Speaker 1: latest on Trump Russia collusion, because that is now pretty
Speaker 1: much ended up debunked at this point and will be debunked.
Speaker 1: There's no evidence after a year, so the only thing
Speaker 1: they can say is as a result of the investigations,
Speaker 1: and this is typical democratic overreach. Well, then we've discovered
Speaker 1: a whole lot of real collusion, not just the dossier.
Speaker 1: Then you've got James Comey putting the fix in with
Speaker 1: pro Hillary, anti Trump, Peter Struck and his FBI girlfriend
Speaker 1: Lisa Page, and we know what they are involved in,
Speaker 1: and we know that they were writing an exoneration before
Speaker 1: an investigation. And then it extends out even further when
Speaker 1: you got this this guy or four doors down from
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein and and his shenanigans and what he's involved in,
Speaker 1: and his wife is actually part of the Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: dossier building team. We gotta get answers to that question
Speaker 1: and those questions. And well, Hillary can say all she
Speaker 1: wants that Uranium one has been debunked. No, it's not.
Speaker 1: There never was a good explanation why we would ever
Speaker 1: ever allow a far and entity access to America's uranium
Speaker 1: when we don't have enough uranium, And that Robert Muller
Speaker 1: and others knew in two thousand and nine, and and
Speaker 1: before Siffius signed off on that deal, including Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and Eric calder Oh, we knew about bribery, extortion, and
Speaker 1: kickbacks and money laundering that was all taking place by
Speaker 1: Russian agents, in other words, Putin's pets that we're here
Speaker 1: in America. That was all happening, and Muller and company
Speaker 1: did nothing, and then we allowed a foreign entity to
Speaker 1: in fact take control of our uranium and then all
Speaker 1: the money, with all the people associated with that deal
Speaker 1: kicking back as much as five million of the Clinton Foundation.
Speaker 1: All of this now is boomeranging back because the Russia
Speaker 1: Trump collusion stories dying. It's dead on a vine. It's withering.
Speaker 1: So the media and their desperation is now decided that
Speaker 1: anyone that talks about Oh, let's see Robert Muller and
Speaker 1: his corrupt band of merry lawyers that he put together,
Speaker 1: and all the donations that they gave to the d
Speaker 1: n C and Obama and Hillary and and Andrew Weissman,
Speaker 1: who had an overturn in the U. S. Supreme Court
Speaker 1: nine zero in the Enron case or in the Anderson
Speaker 1: accounting case, Fhip Circuit Court of Appeals, and uh that
Speaker 1: the obstruction of justice case and one was thrown out.
Speaker 1: People spent a year in jail that was thrown out
Speaker 1: and overturned. And then you have all these people that
Speaker 1: donate only the Democrats, not Republicans. And now all of
Speaker 1: this is ending up being investigated. And of course we
Speaker 1: had broken the news. It was interesting CNN breaks the
Speaker 1: news while we're on vacation. Oh, Jeff Sessions hadn't recused
Speaker 1: himself from Uranium one. I'm like, okay, we did that
Speaker 1: on November three, and we were reporting it even before that.
Speaker 1: Here to weigh in on the status of all of this.
Speaker 1: Peter Schweitzer, he got the ball rolling with Clinton cash
Speaker 1: the New York Times bestseller The Untold Story of How,
Speaker 1: How and Why Foreign governments and businesses helped make Bill
Speaker 1: and Hillary rich. Also Greg Jared is with US Fox
Speaker 1: News Legal Analysts. Is there anything, Peter that I'm missing
Speaker 1: here in terms of how this is all literally boomerang
Speaker 1: back in his team we could call the year of
Speaker 1: the Boomera? Well, No, I think I think you're exactly right, Sean. Look,
Speaker 1: you and I talked in January of last year, January
Speaker 1: before Donald Trump was inaugurated, and the issue of you know,
Speaker 1: alleged Russian collusion came up, and and my view was,
Speaker 1: investigate all of it. Investigate the stuff on the on
Speaker 1: the Trump side of the roster, look at the Clinton stuff.
Speaker 1: And what we've done now a year later, is there's
Speaker 1: been a thurtough investigation of the Trump side. There's there's
Speaker 1: really nothing there um, But there's been very little official
Speaker 1: investigation of the Clinton side of the ledger. We know
Speaker 1: that the FBI five field offices have investigated. They tried
Speaker 1: in ten to get the Obama Department of Justice to
Speaker 1: give them subpoena power and the other tools to really
Speaker 1: give it a thorough vetting. Uh, they were turned down
Speaker 1: with that request. So as it stands right now, we've
Speaker 1: only looked at one side of this question of Russia ties,
Speaker 1: the Trump side. Uh. No evidence has has developed there
Speaker 1: that's that's compelling in any way. Uh. And yet the
Speaker 1: Clinton side has not been investigated. And I think from
Speaker 1: the beginning what we wanted is consistency and looking at
Speaker 1: all the facts. Let's put all the facts on the
Speaker 1: table and see what they bear out. And you take
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett. I mean, I've got to imagine people are
Speaker 1: going to go to jail, but it's not going to
Speaker 1: be the people that Americans for a year were lied
Speaker 1: to and fold they're going to be going to jail.
Speaker 1: That's right. And Peter has put his finger on it
Speaker 1: very nicely. There is no evidence of Trump Russian collusion,
Speaker 1: but a plethora of evidence of Hillary Clinton in Democratic
Speaker 1: Russian collusion. You know, it's a crime to pay money
Speaker 1: to a foreign national for a dossier in a political campaign.
Speaker 1: That's a crime. It's a violation of two federal statutes. Um.
Speaker 1: And yet I'm seeing no movement by anyone in the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice to the FBI, and certainly not Mueller,
Speaker 1: to investigate and bring charges on that basis um. And
Speaker 1: the second part is, you know, the uranium one in
Speaker 1: Hillary in her usual vacuous excuse, So it's all been debunked.
Speaker 1: If it were debunked, then it would not now be
Speaker 1: the subject of a current criminal investigation by the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice and congressional committees. So, as I've long argued there,
Speaker 1: really I don't have a great deal of confidence in
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions. I do think there ought to be a
Speaker 1: second special counsel to investigate Hillary Democratic Russian collusion with
Speaker 1: the dossier and quid pro quo um, maybe money laundering,
Speaker 1: mail fraud, wire fraud in uranium one because the Clinton
Speaker 1: What about the investigators though? What about somebody like call
Speaker 1: me and Peter Struck that you know, I've got to
Speaker 1: believe there's a possible obstruction charts there if you're writing
Speaker 1: an exoneration and you haven't done your work, your investigation. Well,
Speaker 1: as Tacomey, he violated eighteen USC. Sixty one. He stole
Speaker 1: government documents. It's a crime. It's it's larceny. Uh. He
Speaker 1: took seven president evential memos with him. I'm told some
Speaker 1: of it contains classified information. It's a clear violation of
Speaker 1: the law and if he fixed it so Hillary would
Speaker 1: be exonerated that substruction of justice if he did it
Speaker 1: for a political reason. Together with Peter Struck, Andrew McCabe
Speaker 1: and others, what's your take, Peter in terms of now
Speaker 1: you know where this all ends up in terms of
Speaker 1: the year and how this impacts the political process. Look,
Speaker 1: you know, I spent a lot of time today talking
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump's first year and Donald Trump's successes and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's promises made and promises kept. The year ended well,
Speaker 1: especially with the economic package that the Republicans finally got
Speaker 1: done and passed. We already have seen a lot of
Speaker 1: regulations that have been taking away, but but this bill
Speaker 1: in particular gets rid of the Obama mandate and also
Speaker 1: opens up an war to drilling. That's that to me,
Speaker 1: has always been a potential source of millions of high
Speaker 1: paying career jobs. Um, does it all come down to
Speaker 1: the economy? Does this now go off into the distance,
Speaker 1: or does this get finished? Well, it's a good question, Sean,
Speaker 1: And look, I think the real question here and I
Speaker 1: would defer to Greg on the legal side of this,
Speaker 1: But look, there's a very real possibility that the Muller
Speaker 1: investigation is going to go well beyond what it was
Speaker 1: intended to. You know, the the Independent Council laws are
Speaker 1: are pretty vague in terms of what you can look into.
Speaker 1: You can look into anything. And you know, what was
Speaker 1: supposed to be an investigation about the sixteen election and
Speaker 1: alleged collusion involving the campaign and Russian government entities. You
Speaker 1: now have you know, charges that have been brought in
Speaker 1: in the in the cases, uh, you know, involving um
Speaker 1: some people already that predate the seen campaign. And there
Speaker 1: are reports that you know, financial records and business transactions
Speaker 1: involving Jared Kushner, possibly involving the Trump's earlier than that
Speaker 1: are being asked for. If that is the case, Uh,
Speaker 1: it's hard to see how any of that has anything
Speaker 1: to do with So I think that, you know, anybody
Speaker 1: who hopes and thinks that Mueller is going to sort
Speaker 1: of close the book on this and say we didn't
Speaker 1: find anything related to I think he is going to
Speaker 1: feel the pressure to come up with something, and it's
Speaker 1: going to be something that's really not related to the
Speaker 1: initial purpose of the investigation to begin with. And I
Speaker 1: think that's a real cloud hanging over. But that's what
Speaker 1: he's done so far. But he's got his own issues
Speaker 1: that he's going to have to deal with. And if
Speaker 1: there's gonna be again equal justice under the law, it
Speaker 1: would seem that either other special counsels need to be
Speaker 1: appointed or he needs to he needs to follow the
Speaker 1: rule of law. But that would first mean dismantling a
Speaker 1: team of democratic UH donors that he has hired, and
Speaker 1: also people with questionable ethics and practices in past cases
Speaker 1: and a pretty abysmal track record. And as we continue,
Speaker 1: the author of the best selling book letton Cash, the
Speaker 1: Untold Story of how and why foreign governments and does
Speaker 1: this helped to make Bill and Hillary rich? Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 1: Fox News Legal Analysts, let me go to the story
Speaker 1: about Uma Aberdeen, who is crooked Hillary's top aid and
Speaker 1: now being accused of disregarding basic security protocols and putting
Speaker 1: classified passwords into the hands of foreign agents. And uh,
Speaker 1: we remember Christian Saucier, he was the guy that took
Speaker 1: six pictures aboard a submarine and he's spending a year
Speaker 1: in jail, away from his daughter and his mother and
Speaker 1: his family. The President reminds us and he said, you know,
Speaker 1: deep state Justice Department must finally act also on com
Speaker 1: and others. Is the President right to point out this
Speaker 1: lack of equal justice under the law, Greg Jarrett, Oh,
Speaker 1: I think absolutely the President is correct about that. Um
Speaker 1: And you're mentioning of um Abadant. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: the woman who told the FBI she knew nothing about
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's private email server during the entire course of
Speaker 1: four years as Secretary of State, and yet documents demonstrate
Speaker 1: she well knew it, and indeed she kept her own
Speaker 1: email account on the same private email server in the
Speaker 1: basement of Hillary Clinton's home. So I think it's fair
Speaker 1: to say that in the habitant has little credibility how
Speaker 1: she has managed to escape criminal prosects. Who are the
Speaker 1: people that should be afraid that they're in legal jeopardy
Speaker 1: as we kick off this year. I would say certainly
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton is at the top of the list for
Speaker 1: the things we've talked about. But I think all of
Speaker 1: her top aides who appear to have in some former
Speaker 1: fashion deceived the FBI and members of Congress, they're all
Speaker 1: in legal jeopardy for that. UM And I think some
Speaker 1: people at the FBI who may have for specifically this
Speaker 1: is pardon me specifically, call me McCabe, call me Peter Struck,
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe, UM, James Baker, UM. Three of those people
Speaker 1: I've mentioned have been, you know, either removed from the
Speaker 1: mother case or demoted or shifted over at the FBI.
Speaker 1: They're cleaning house over there, they're cleaning their swamp. But
Speaker 1: more needs to be done, including criminal prosecutions if appropriate.
Speaker 1: And now that we know, Peter that in fact you
Speaker 1: are right on uranium one and way ahead of the curve,
Speaker 1: I guess we've got to ask you. Now that we
Speaker 1: know the Attorney General has not recused themselves, I've got
Speaker 1: to believe that case is wide open. Yes, I think
Speaker 1: it is. I think the key question is are you
Speaker 1: going to have the Department of Justice give the FBI
Speaker 1: the tools they need to subpoena Clinton personal financial records
Speaker 1: and Clinton Foundation records, emails or correspondents related to the
Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation, Whether they're going to get access to those
Speaker 1: materials and and really, you know, right now, the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice when it comes to the Clinton issues is
Speaker 1: essentially a ghost chip. You don't really have a senior crew,
Speaker 1: a captain of the ship that has a steady hand
Speaker 1: that says we're going to go and look into this.
Speaker 1: And and that's a problem because when it comes to
Speaker 1: other matters, Uh, they have been proactive and they have
Speaker 1: been aggressive. Uh. You know, some would say overly aggressive
Speaker 1: as it relates to Trump and other issues. But for
Speaker 1: some reason there's this lack of consistency with the Clinton's. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know clearly now there are ties and relationships involving
Speaker 1: some people at the Senior d J. Uh that that
Speaker 1: explained that. Um. But but you know this is not
Speaker 1: going to go anywhere with Hillary Clinton if you don't
Speaker 1: get leadership of the Department of Justice. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: keep the scales against her or for her. I'm saying,
Speaker 1: just let the investigation. We'll leave it right there. Thank
Speaker 1: you all for being with us. Happy New Year, Greg, Jared,
Speaker 1: Peter Schweitzer. When we come back wide open telephones on
Speaker 1: this Tuesday, our first edition, Happy New Year, and we'll
Speaker 1: continue get that contact high. But well went on the
Speaker 1: other end of the gas mask. Yes, a bomb, and
Speaker 1: of course they couldn't stand to see a band that
Speaker 1: didn't have any cannabis in it. So you actually put
Speaker 1: it into you filled it up, and you don't want it.
Speaker 1: You don't want it. You have Okay, okay, so you're
Speaker 1: gonna now what now you're going to celebrate a little
Speaker 1: New Year's earlier? Was right? Okay, this I don't think
Speaker 1: this is really what a gas mask is used for.
Speaker 1: But wow, okay, this is New Year's in Denver's legal
Speaker 1: in Colorado. I know. Wow. So we are we're making
Speaker 1: our way to a puff pass and pay party running
Speaker 1: around on a pot bus in Colorado? Were legal? Brandy Hart,
Speaker 1: Oh goodness, we're just giggling down ran. Oh my god,
Speaker 1: Brandy's just kicking Andy. Andy. This is for you know,
Speaker 1: this is this is god you know? Oh my the
Speaker 1: bus thank you destroyed because here at the polls you
Speaker 1: just passed on and I'm just gonna pass and then
Speaker 1: I any test to me. It's so funny. What do
Speaker 1: you here? Everybody just puffs, passes and paint and I
Speaker 1: gotta show you something else. They have a thing are
Speaker 1: called the Incredible. I gotta show you how this works.
Speaker 1: We have a willing partessim in right here. If you
Speaker 1: thought this was nice, way do you see this? Okay,
Speaker 1: let's see how it works here. This is all part
Speaker 1: of the pass and paint. This is where they get
Speaker 1: their creativity. They just get it right there and then eat.
Speaker 1: This doesn't seem like it's amazing, It's called the incredible.
Speaker 1: And so the dieting teaches one of these warnings and
Speaker 1: paint classes till the top of the hour. How did
Speaker 1: I miss this great coverage on CNN. Oh that's right,
Speaker 1: I was asleep. I was actually tending bar at midnight
Speaker 1: on New Year's Eve. Believe it or not, it's a tradition.
Speaker 1: I won't go into a long explanation of it, but
Speaker 1: that was what they were doing there in Colorado. Let's see,
Speaker 1: the reporter was putting on these these gas masks, bonds
Speaker 1: and lighting bombs for revelers out in Colorado and holding
Speaker 1: up joints and um, that was their party at CNN.
Speaker 1: Andy Cone and uh Anderson Cooper presiding over that fiasco.
Speaker 1: I never thought I'd say, bring back Kathy If you didn't,
Speaker 1: you didn't do that on New Year's Eve? Show, didn't
Speaker 1: you didn't put a big vape mask on and get busy?
Speaker 1: You know? I know everybody's like, you know, all young
Speaker 1: people seem to be really ecstatic about the legalization of pot.
Speaker 1: It's like the worst drug there is there's no worse
Speaker 1: drug that's out there. Not everybody is excited about it.
Speaker 1: Well listen, okay, man, this is the average person I
Speaker 1: know that smokes pot the just total losers. I did
Speaker 1: just they literally don't They're not total losers. I mean,
Speaker 1: there are some people who get record. I understand. I
Speaker 1: understand that people use it for recreational reasons, and they
Speaker 1: would argue it's the equivalent of having a glass of line,
Speaker 1: a beer, or a cocktail of some kind. I get it,
Speaker 1: but it's just but the average person that smokes doesn't
Speaker 1: just smoke once a week on a Friday night. There's
Speaker 1: a difference. There's a difference between people who are recreational
Speaker 1: users and exactly I mean they they're they're stoned all day, right,
Speaker 1: that's completely And the people that I know that do
Speaker 1: it all day are just like just out of them.
Speaker 1: I don't think you know that many people that do that.
Speaker 1: I mean not just taking a while. I've known a
Speaker 1: lot of people over the years that have done that.
Speaker 1: As a person who takes in Chong. By the way,
Speaker 1: I know you know you're a former bartender, so maybe
Speaker 1: maybe you know a couple, but I'm just saying you know,
Speaker 1: but you're talking. But the most people think this is
Speaker 1: the first of all the pot. First of all, it's like,
Speaker 1: what a thousand times stronger than it was five years ago?
Speaker 1: Forget about it. You can get contact high walking down
Speaker 1: to New York City. Really can I smell it in
Speaker 1: the streets of New York all the time. But I'm
Speaker 1: just if you're spending a lot of time in your
Speaker 1: life using that drug, I'm not gonna sit here like
Speaker 1: read for Madness and say you're gonna die. I am
Speaker 1: saying that it's going to take away your motivation, and
Speaker 1: but it will. It will puncture your lungs. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just like cigarettes milk. Well, I don't know what
Speaker 1: the additives are to it. I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: as bad as you know to the tobacco companies ran
Speaker 1: into the most problem as they tried to get the
Speaker 1: perfect burn of a cigarette, and that's when they started
Speaker 1: adding all those chemicals to the tobacco. The tobacco wasn't
Speaker 1: as bad itself alone, but then you I don't want
Speaker 1: to get into all of this is CNN. This is
Speaker 1: what they want to report on, and if their reporters
Speaker 1: want to light bongs hold up joints and and gas masks,
Speaker 1: and that's their way to bring in the new year.
Speaker 1: Who am I to criticize, Well, you usually have to
Speaker 1: get high to watch CNN, so maybe that's what they
Speaker 1: were trying to say. I've got to imagine if you're
Speaker 1: on a bus with Stoner working at the NN, you
Speaker 1: need to be high, clearly. But if you're on a
Speaker 1: bus with Stoner's and they're smoking in the bus, I
Speaker 1: gotta imagine a couple of hours of that reporting is
Speaker 1: not gonna be talk about a bad situation. A driver
Speaker 1: that's smoking weed. Yeah, well, or if the driver is
Speaker 1: not smoking, the contact high could be enormous. Mos likely
Speaker 1: he was probably remember when I would spray paint. There's
Speaker 1: a stuff called kills. It used to be oil based.
Speaker 1: They don't make oil based paints anymore. I remember spraying
Speaker 1: rooms with it because I just wanted to get it
Speaker 1: done and out of the way. You'd walk out of
Speaker 1: that room high as a kite, and it wasn't a
Speaker 1: good feeling. Well, I'd spray, I mean i'd use a sprayer,
Speaker 1: paint sprayer. When I was a contractor, you walk out
Speaker 1: like I It would take me days to get sober.
Speaker 1: It was ridiculous. Um, just telling the truth. How did
Speaker 1: those rooms come out? They look real nice in me?
Speaker 1: Right in those rooms A thought my usual quickness and
Speaker 1: painting slow bluey. The funny thing is is I worked
Speaker 1: a lot faster if I would just roll it on.
Speaker 1: But if you rolled it on, you still got that
Speaker 1: people left. Boy, that Hannity's creative. The problem is if
Speaker 1: you have a bad water stain on your walls and
Speaker 1: you want to get rid of it and not have
Speaker 1: the paint bleed through, which happens all the time, you
Speaker 1: gotta use that paint. And it was all oil based.
Speaker 1: That it was a power used. That was a good excuse,
Speaker 1: very believable. All right, are you done? I'm never done.
Speaker 1: And there was another paint I used to love from
Speaker 1: Benjamin More called satin imperv that oil based. But we
Speaker 1: used to look like make woodwork look like glass. It
Speaker 1: would be so smooth, really cool finish if you know
Speaker 1: how to use it right. He used to cut it
Speaker 1: with a little You have to cut it a little bit.
Speaker 1: You know. I was painting just last night. Yeah, thinking
Speaker 1: about me, I was, I was like, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do this Like Sean Hannity. But in all
Speaker 1: series it's the paint smelled like eggnog. I'm not making
Speaker 1: that up. Well now that meant everything is water based,
Speaker 1: it's not quit Do you like that? Thing? Is so disgusting,
Speaker 1: there's nothing more. My father used to drink eggnog around
Speaker 1: the holidays. How do you spike your egnog? Or no? No,
Speaker 1: not last night because I wanted my lines to be straight,
Speaker 1: unlike your Kilns moment right all right, Oh, Velma's there,
Speaker 1: Happy New year, Velma. Did the boys get my present
Speaker 1: this year? Oh? Yeah, they did. They love it. How
Speaker 1: are you doing, honey? How are you? Honey? If I
Speaker 1: say honey to you, you're gonna get in trouble. You
Speaker 1: can say honey to me all you want. You can
Speaker 1: say honey to me. To me, oh great. The guy
Speaker 1: that will never talk to me, ask your husband why
Speaker 1: he never talks to me? Had to put him on
Speaker 1: the phone. I want to talk to him. I can't
Speaker 1: put him on the phone. He's outside. Well no, no,
Speaker 1: he's not outside. He's right there next to you. Put
Speaker 1: him on the phone. Tell him Sean wants to talk
Speaker 1: to you. Call outside, Say honey, je sweetie pie, honey bunch, say,
Speaker 1: Hannay wants to talk to you. They love your gift.
Speaker 1: What did I get this year? I don't even remember
Speaker 1: anymore at all. Sort of runs together. Yeah, you got
Speaker 1: you got Anthony Xbox one, and then I got the
Speaker 1: Apple watch right from ourselves. You're not I told you
Speaker 1: not to get that baby, that expensive watch. You did
Speaker 1: it anyway? Does he like it? Oh? He does, he
Speaker 1: like it, He loves it. But I can't let him
Speaker 1: wear and well Scotter seiling, Oh my, Velma. The point,
Speaker 1: the point of the gift is to use it. What
Speaker 1: are you gonna do, Pa, What are you gonna do?
Speaker 1: Give it to him when he's fifty. I mean they'll
Speaker 1: have a new watch by that want the church Sunday? No, no, no, no, Velma.
Speaker 1: The whole point is if you give someone a gift
Speaker 1: is use the gift. What's the point? I believe in that.
Speaker 1: I believe that too, But I'm not gonna let him
Speaker 1: just wear it anyway. But most of the time he's
Speaker 1: with us anyway, So he wears and he loves it, well,
Speaker 1: then let him wear it. If he loses it, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna be mad. It will be an accident. No, no,
Speaker 1: he's not gonna lose it. Okay, so let him wear
Speaker 1: the watch, and if God forbid, one day he lost it,
Speaker 1: it'll be fine. We'll get him another one. He ain't
Speaker 1: not gonna lose it. And there's no no, that's not
Speaker 1: He's not gonna lose it if you lock it up
Speaker 1: in a closet and a safe room and not let
Speaker 1: the kid have his Christmas present because you're afraid he's
Speaker 1: gonna lose it. He does, he does, he does wear it. Well,
Speaker 1: let him wear it every day. It's okay, you's gonna
Speaker 1: wear it every day. It's his watch. Let him wear
Speaker 1: it to school. Absolutely. I don't know, Velma, what he
Speaker 1: Why are you gonna make a safe room for a watch?
Speaker 1: Who cares? It's only a watch? You know? I don't
Speaker 1: wear jewelry, Helma, I don't like to wear watches. Where
Speaker 1: his watch and he uses it, well, he loves it
Speaker 1: because you never give it to him. You gotta let
Speaker 1: the kid wear the watch. Why are you being so
Speaker 1: stubborn again? You're always being stubborn mean to me. I
Speaker 1: am not being mean to you. You're yelling at me,
Speaker 1: all right, I'll stop. How is your president? I got
Speaker 1: you a spot day. Oh my my, my day is January.
Speaker 1: Oh that's your spada I'm looking for. I think you look.
Speaker 1: I think you get the whole works. I think you
Speaker 1: get a massage of Manny Petty. I think you get
Speaker 1: a facial. I think you get your hair done whatever
Speaker 1: you want, get it done. I get my hair done too, Sure,
Speaker 1: why not? Okay, we'll see. I don't like massages. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm kind of weird that I don't like strangers touching me.
Speaker 1: I don't know why, that's what you told me. I
Speaker 1: don't people are These people are paid way out to
Speaker 1: do their job. I'm not. I'm not doubting that. But
Speaker 1: I don't know you, and you can't touch me. I
Speaker 1: don't know who you are. Yeah, really, what do you think?
Speaker 1: I don't go to spot days? Oh I love that.
Speaker 1: I love that. Uh what do you mean that? We Well,
Speaker 1: that's true. Better. I love them rubbing on my back.
Speaker 1: I love that you love your feet being rubbed? Oh yes,
Speaker 1: my leg Yeah, your legs and your feet and your
Speaker 1: back and my hands and my arms anywhere they want
Speaker 1: to run anyway, I'm not even going there. I'm not
Speaker 1: going there. I'm saying I'm saying you're right as I
Speaker 1: Sometimes I talk out of term. You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: I think I knew what you mean. Um. By the way,
Speaker 1: if if my job is I've got to touch other
Speaker 1: people's feet, I don't. I need a new job. I
Speaker 1: don't want to touch most people's feet. They're disgusting. Yeah
Speaker 1: that is so relaxing, though, I know. But you're not
Speaker 1: the one that's touching someone else's feet. We're not gonna
Speaker 1: go there without feet dirty. They're gonna be clean. Or
Speaker 1: you're gonna clean your feet before you go. Oh lord, yes,
Speaker 1: you scrub yourself. You you you, you smell good and
Speaker 1: everything you smell good before you go to the spot
Speaker 1: against cleaned up because you you know the people and
Speaker 1: I'm old. I'm old too. I really have to see good.
Speaker 1: Oh you? So what do you do to smell good?
Speaker 1: That's a great question. How do you smell good when
Speaker 1: you shower and lotion yourself down and and and put
Speaker 1: on cologne? You know how to do it. I don't
Speaker 1: do any of that. I shower, and I get out,
Speaker 1: and I call my hair, and I get dressed and
Speaker 1: wear the same clothes every day and go to work.
Speaker 1: Velma well, you always, you always? You never? I never
Speaker 1: I put on deodorant? Do you like I don't wear
Speaker 1: a cologne? You know what? As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I was gonna call Linden, asked Linden what kind of
Speaker 1: cologne did I don't wear cologne, and I don't wear watches,
Speaker 1: and I don't wear jewelry, and I don't want to
Speaker 1: get He just stinks women like good smelling me, And
Speaker 1: well I put good deodoran on. I mean it changes
Speaker 1: every day. I just pick whatever is at the store.
Speaker 1: I mean I don't really spend a lot of time
Speaker 1: thinking about it. You never, you never wear a lotion
Speaker 1: and nothing with any sin in it. Oh no, only
Speaker 1: but only during the dry months of winter. I get
Speaker 1: dried up with my old Irish skin. But short of that,
Speaker 1: I hate lotion. I hate the way that feels. Oh
Speaker 1: my lord, hates lotion. I do, But but it's two time,
Speaker 1: Conde mean to put it on? You know what? That
Speaker 1: will dry your skin out? You got you look older.
Speaker 1: I already am older. My birthday just passed. I know it,
Speaker 1: I know it. What did you do for your birthday?
Speaker 1: Played golf? And then after golf we had like a
Speaker 1: barbecue and that was and my family bought me shirts
Speaker 1: that weren't black because they don't like that. I wear
Speaker 1: black shirts all the time and you better wear them too. Oh,
Speaker 1: I can't wait to wear them. I'm gonna brand new Melmo.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna wear a blue shirt this year. The wife
Speaker 1: and kids, they get everyone's good. Thank god, you have
Speaker 1: a good new year, all right. To tell you what, Look,
Speaker 1: we we get. Yeah, we we toasted. And well, I
Speaker 1: want you to call back after the fifteenth, and I
Speaker 1: want to get a full report on your feet, your legs,
Speaker 1: your back, and your big massage. I'm gonna probably send
Speaker 1: you send some pictures out, depends on how they look.
Speaker 1: Pictures of what you know of my spo day. Oh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get pictures of you, like getting your feet
Speaker 1: rubbed and everything. I was telling my my my daughter
Speaker 1: was here for for Christmas, and I too. I took
Speaker 1: a roller there to show her what I'm gonna be it.
Speaker 1: I said, this one is where I'm gonna be, honey,
Speaker 1: And you're gonna spend the whole day at the spa.
Speaker 1: That's as long as till they put me out. Well,
Speaker 1: that's why I got you the present you wanted. So
Speaker 1: you're happy, right, I'm very happy, Sean. I'm looking forward
Speaker 1: to it. Now you're looking forward to you're so does
Speaker 1: your does your does your husband? Does your husband go
Speaker 1: and get his feet rubbed and everything to or? No?
Speaker 1: You know what he's like you now? He like alone?
Speaker 1: It's stuff because see I like alone, I like I
Speaker 1: like a man. It smell a certain weeks and I
Speaker 1: gotta run. But I wish you all God's blessings in Okay,
Speaker 1: So glad we're here together. By the way, one day
Speaker 1: this year, I want to talk to your husband. Will
Speaker 1: you make that happen. I don't know why he's I
Speaker 1: think he's jealous of me or something. You think I
Speaker 1: think he's jealous of our relationship. No, he's not. I
Speaker 1: don't know. All right, I gotta rolle Elma. Right, that's
Speaker 1: gonna wrap things up for today. Let not your heart
Speaker 1: be troubled. Hannity tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
Speaker 1: What the media won't tell you about the investigation boomerang
Speaker 1: and how this is gonna be the year Democrats. Oh,
Speaker 1: you gotta basically figure out who might be indicted. New
Speaker 1: King Rich will talk about every one of the president's
Speaker 1: accomplishments in never got credit for New King Rich John Solomon,
Speaker 1: also Sarah Carter, Peter Schweitzer. Tonight, I'll check in with
Speaker 1: Pam Bondi and Tom Fitton will join us at Michelle
Speaker 1: Malcolm tonight. That's all coming up. Set your DVR a
Speaker 1: new hand. Oh when we bring back the hate Hannity hotlines,
Speaker 1: You're back here tomorrow