WEBVTT - The Return of the Byepocalypse

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now,

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com, here's

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Jargian.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul Jarchi and my

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>co hosts today are Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Hey, guys,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>what a boys? Hey, what's better than snow football?

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh gosh, that was fun last night.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Snow football with Jamis Winston.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Nothing better, nothing better than Jameis Winston snowfootball. That was

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a blast. I love snow football. Did you guys play

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>snow football in the backyard?

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>New World? Absolutely?

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>That was like the call. That's when you went and

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>played right, it's snowing. This is when you go play football.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh and growing up, I'm thinking of like a Joe

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Montana Sports Talk football. Remember that you can control the weather.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Whenever you could control the weather, it was always snow.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 4>You're always put in snow, in.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>The snow for absolutely every time snow.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 5>I was playing that n C double A twenty five

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 5>game with my kid, put it on snow and then

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 5>realized that my jerseys were white. And then I I

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 5>can't see my receivers.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>It was a bad, bad move.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised that doesn't create more problem in real life.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it did for Pittsburgh.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>It might.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I trouble seeing some of them.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 5>The best high visibility jerseys for snow football are the browns,

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 5>the dark brown and the blaze orange. You can see

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 5>them so clear.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 4>The Seahawks might, oh, the highlighter those are the worst.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I think they retired those, thankfully, hopefully.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, but they still have the uh like as

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the third color is still the neon greens. It's just

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>not overt.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And them in the Rams had like that dirty

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 4>laundry color too, Like they're like.

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Off the Rams. It's called bone.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 4>I call it dirty long white tea shirts.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Bone.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the name of the color.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 4>What did they call it?

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Tusk? Wouldn't that be better than bone?

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, aren't tusks from your but it's that would be

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 5>horn horn, they're.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Not Walrus's still like touss cheese. Lots.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>To get to the course of this show, we're gonna

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>break down all the games. We'll give you letter grades,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and all the significant players take a chance on me.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Nine players you would not normally start will tell you

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>who they are. Three tough questions will be answered later

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in the show. And our second to last premature speculation,

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I think, or maybe third to last premature speculation. It's

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>coming to an end.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Running sweet time.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're run on time. To prematurely speculate.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>We kill it right about Thanksgiving?

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that when the last buy is over, Okay, that

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is our That is when we kill it off. Yep,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>so we got a couple more weeks of premature speculation.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive into the matchups Lions are taking on the Colts.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Matt Lions are coming off yet another dominating offensive performance

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>fifty whatever two points last week. I gotta believe it's

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty much start everybody here.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Jamiir Gibbs and David Montgomery will start with them.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 5>They're both getting a grades. The Colts have seen the

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 5>most running back touches in the league this year, with

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 5>thirty two per game, and have allowed the third most

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>combo yards at one fifty one. By the way, neither

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 5>Gibbs nor Montgomery has got to single digit PPR points,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 5>yet every game so far double digit PPR points. They're

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 5>both super reliable Sam Laporta. He's back from an injury

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 5>and I'm not afraid to do it. I'm giving Laporta

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 5>an A grade here. What Yeah, Colts are bottom ted like.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 2>A guy who has a rostered Sam Laporta all year.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I got him everywhere. Man, Come on.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 5>We talked about this on three tough questions. Colts are

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 5>bottom ten and receptions, yards and touchdowns allowed to the

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 5>tight end position, and before missing last week with a

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>shoulder injury, Laporta had scored in two of his last three,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 5>so I like him here. Aman Ross Saint Brown gets

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 5>an actual tough matchup out of the slot, and Kenny

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 5>moore More is the seventh best ranked corner by Pro

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Football Focus, but he's also allowed five touchdowns on the season,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 5>and Sun God has scored in eight straight games, so

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 5>he still gets an A grade. Jameson Williams had a

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 5>huge week last week, but he's been super inconsistent with

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 5>target totals. In his last six games. He's had target

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 5>totals that could all be seen on a single six

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 5>sided die and he's rolled each number once. They'll take

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 5>a few deep shots at him, especially when he's going

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 5>against Samuel Womack or Jaylen Jones. Both corners are seeing

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 5>a dots above twelve, So it's a C grade on

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 5>the prospect that he breaks a deep ball, and then

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Jared Goff gets an eight grade because I like his

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 5>old offense. The Colts are allowing the seventh most completions

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 5>in the fifth most yards. That seems very goffable or

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 5>goff tacular or golf pudding, whatever it is. Anthony Richardson,

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 5>it's good.

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like that. Richardson.

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 5>On the other side, should be missing his top left tackle,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Bernard Ryman, but they were missing him last week too,

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 5>and Richardson still had his best day of the season

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 5>against the Jets. Tougher test for sure against Detroit this week.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 5>The Lions have given up at least twenty nine rushing

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 5>yards to a quarterback five times already this year. Richardson

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 5>got to thirty two last week but scored twice on

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 5>the ground, and they've also allowed the tenth most passing

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 5>yards at two forty nine per game. Problem is they bend,

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 5>but they don't break. They've only allowed seven passing scorers

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 5>all season through ten games. They have fourteen interceptions. Yeah,

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 5>they have double the amount of picks as touchdown passes allowed.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think Detroit has allowed more than one

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 2>touchdown pass in any game this year. Yeah, it's all

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>about Richardson's legs in this one, I think.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 5>With the Lions favored by over a touchdown on an

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 5>over under in the fifties, game, script should still favor

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Richardson throwing end running, so he's gonna make a few mistakes.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 5>I'll give him a B grade here the receivers. When

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Richardson is the starter, Michael Pittman is his first look.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 5>In the six games that Richardson has started and finished,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 5>Pittman's target share has never dipped below twenty two percent.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Basically one in four Richardson passes is going towards Pittman,

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 5>so there should be ample volume in this game toward Pittman.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm giving him a B grade. Josh Downs also gets

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 5>a B running from the slot. He gets a meek Robertson,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.799
<v Speaker 5>who's allowed a ninety one passer rating in his coverage

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 5>and his PFF player grade is below the Kindle Vildor line, so.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 3>That's not a good thing.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Also below the Kindle Vildor line is Terry and Arnold,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 5>who matches up with Alec Pierce. He's way below the

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Villdor line and should be susceptible to a deep shot

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 5>or too, so a sea dart for Pierce if you

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>need the home run ball. And then finally, Jonathan Taylor.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 5>He only gets a C grade in this. In the

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>last three weeks against a couple of similar good run

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 5>stopping defenses, Taylor only managed forty eight yards against the

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Vikings and fifty seven yards on twenty four carries against

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 5>the Jets. The volume could dry up if Detroit gets

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 5>ahead a little bit too, so just a sea grade

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 5>on Taylor.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Terry and Arnold, the first round pick for

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the Lions and a lot of opportunity for him to

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>get better. But two picks before him in the NFL

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>draft was Quinnon Mitchell to the Eagles, and he might

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>be the rookie of the year.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Cooper Degen doesn't look too bad, looks great. Second round.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>He has turned into a shutdown slot corner also readily

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>so the Eagle.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Howie Roseman nailed it.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>He's he's so good.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Spoiler alert, there's a Cooper on Cooper breakdown. Come.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I like it, I like it.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Those corners bowed bad news, but we'll get to that later.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee takes on Houston. Brian Taj Spears ruled out of

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>this game, so Tony Pollard's going to get almost all

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the work. So does he belong in lineups?

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 4>He should get most of the work. But not a

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 4>great matchup. It wasn't a great matchup for Pollard last week.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Brutal matchup against a future defensive Player of the Year

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Van Gingle and company. And it doesn't get much

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 4>better against the Texans, who are allowing less than four

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 4>yards per carry to running back. So they've surrendered just

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>seven total touchdowns of the position. They've been out been

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 4>without Will Anderson on their front four for a while.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 4>He's going to make his return. He is elite if

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>you're not aware of will Anderson. So just to see

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 4>for Tony Pollard, even with Spears out over the receivers

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Calvin Ridley, just to see here at least eight targets

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 4>in five of his last six games. Tons of air

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>yards from Bill Levis. There's a ceiling for Ridley, for sure,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>but a very scary floor. Ridley has scored in just

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 4>two games of this season, granted one was a multi

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 4>score game, but the Texans have surrendered the second most

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver touchdowns. They haven't had their bye week yet, Houston,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 4>but they're allowing one and a half scores per game

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>to the position, So I will throw Ridley in my

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 4>lineup at temporary expectations. I will not start Nick Westbrook Keene,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 4>but I might bet him for an any time touchdown scorer.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Here's Nwi's Firstwhi's first game was in Week six, following

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee's by Here's his touchdowns by game since then. One one, one,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 4>one zero, one wow, five to six. But he's on

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 4>the bench in this matchup as his Chico Konquo at

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 4>tight end. Houston allowing just three and a half catches

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty two yards per game to tight ends, and Will

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Levis he's on the bench to no shocker there. Over

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 4>to the Texan side, Joe Mixon monster season for mixing

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 4>just a be here, though might be a little bit

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 4>of a bump in the road for Joe. The Titans

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>are allowing a measly three point seven yards per carry

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 4>to opposing running backs who are barely averaging one hundred

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 4>combo yards per game, but mixing an absolute belcow seeing

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 4>over ninety percent of the snaps on a weekly basis,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 4>absolutely insane. Tennessee is allowing one point three total touchdowns

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 4>per game to running back, so there is a game

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 4>potential for mixing, but I'll play it safe with the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 4>b for mixing this week. The Texans played it safe

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 4>with Nico Collins last week. He only ran twenty one routes.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 4>It's about half of his workload. Hopefully gets ramped up

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 4>this week, but teams do not throw on the Titans much.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee yielding just twenty eight pass attempts per game, which

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 4>is leading to less than ten catches per game from

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 4>opposing wide receiver units. You're not gonna sit in n

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Go by any means. You're starting him without a doubt,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 4>But I'm just gonna give him a CEE here. Not

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>a great matchup. We're not sure if they ramp him

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 4>up all the way, and game script probably not gonna

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 4>favor the pass passing game. That is why I tanked

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Dell on the bench as his tight end Dalton Schultz.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Only two tight ends have scored against Tennessee this year.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 4>There are better options this week, and even in the

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 4>waste and even in the bike apocalypse in the wasteland

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 4>double bad for tight ends, but I'm still benching Dalton

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Schultz and I'm close to benching CJ Stroud. I will

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 4>give him a CEE though again game script concerns, But

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 4>there is big play potential for Stroud now that Nico

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Collins is back in the lineup. Twenty three percent of

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 4>the passing plays against Tennessee have gained ten or more yards.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 4>That is the third highest clip in the league. So

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 4>if Stroud gets it done early, he is viable. But

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>just a soft sea for CJ.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys take on the Commanders. This is not good as

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 2>we've I'm to learn which part's not good, the whole

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 2>thing on the Dallas side. Oh okay, all right, let's

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>just start with the only there's only three players you

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>could possibly care about. With the Cowboys, I'm gonna start

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 2>with our bench greade on Rico dubtel even at a

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 2>sixteen bye week, I'm not starting him and it's a

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>neutral matchup. In the two Cooper rush games, rico'dowdle has

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 2>gotten ten and twelve carries. That is just not enough

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>volume to feel confident in the league's worst rushing attack.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>The Commanders giving up some big games to running backs,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>but those are all volume backs, and Doubtell doesn't get

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>enough volume. The only receiver you care about is, of

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>course Ceedee Lamb, now not fully healthy but expected to

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 2>play in this one, and through sheer repetition, Lamb has

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>been fantasy serviceable. But it's all four yard pass, six

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 2>yard pass, five yard pass. It's very short, easy, high

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>completion percentage stuff that does not yield big gains. So

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>if you are okay with like a catches for fifty yards,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>this is probably still a sea level grade for Ceedee Lamb.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington's a sneaky good pass defense. They've only allowed two

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver scores in the last seven games, including holding

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>aj Brown and DeVonta Smith to modest games last week.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Church.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I know we're going to talk a little bit about

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 5>this later on some of the wide receivers, But is

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 5>ced Lamb like maybe the most tradable guy right now

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 5>that you can just get rid of like a sabotage trade.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's funny you bring that up. Discussed that on

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>last week's show as a matter of fact, and yes,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that is we think the right thing to do is

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to try to trade CD Lamb we don't think. I

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think you're gonna get three consecutive playoff wins with

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 2>CD Lamb.

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>The other Dallas cowboy you should care about is Luke's Schoonmacher.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>It's really schoonmaker. But here's what I want to believe

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>that the Schoonmacher family, like his forefathers, were schooner builders,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>building ships designed to traverse the wild oceans. And they

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>were so good at it that they changed their name.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Like the last name was like Phillips. They're like it's

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>easy and everyone can spell it. But no, we're such

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>good schooner makers, we're going to become schoonmaker. And Luke

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>is just the last most recent generation of schoonmakers, which

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>is possible schooner makers.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to believe that to be true.

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a good chance.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you see so you see a bad schoon rising, No,

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 4>a good schoon good schoon rise.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So last week Jake Ferguson gets knocked out and he's

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 2>not expected to go in this game. He gets knocked

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>out like late first quarter. Schoonmaker gets ten targets in

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>three quarters, ten and it's all dump off stuff from

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Rush commanders have allowed three tight end touchdowns in

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the last three games. CE grade on Luke's schoonmaker, a

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>C grade on Ceedee Lamb, and a bench graade on

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Rico Doubtle. Full schoon, Yeah, full schoon. Okay, sure we'll

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>go with that Washington side. Let's start with the running game.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I like Brian Robinson a lot here. He's missed some

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 2>time with injury, but he's back here and should be

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>at near full health. Almost every opposing lead runners at

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>big games against Dallas, including Joe Mixon with three touchdowns

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>last week. Robinson's a powerback, and guys like Tyler Ljeer

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and David Montgomery and Derreck Henry all posted big games

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>with touchdowns. Now, Robinson doesn't catch, which is the only

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 2>reason he's not in a grade. He's a B grade here.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Dallas is the seventh most carries twenty four per game,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and Robinson's going to get the bulk of those, so

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>he comes in with a B. Austin Eckler also a bee,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>always a safe start, and he's got some unusual upside

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>this week as the Cowboys reliably give up big receiving games.

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Nine different backs of top twenty receiving yards against Dallas.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>In the last three Dallas games, Joe Mixon had forty

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>four receiving yards. B John Robinson had fifty nine receiving yards.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>All of that in recent games. All right, let's go

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to the passing side of Washington. Terry Mclaurinry McLaurin last

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>week only two targets and one catch, but a far

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>easier matchup this week against Dallas. McLaurin runs seventy seven

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of his percent of his routes. I didn't I think

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>he's the most one sided, one side of the field

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>player that there is going. Oh really this year Seon

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Ryder left. He is left side strong. Is a Trayvon

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Digs side of the f Diggs has been decent, but

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>we've also seen lapses, including his game against San Francisco

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>when he gave up two touchdowns. A little worrisome. Some

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>teams just don't bother throwing at Trayvon Diggs because the

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 2>coverage is easier on the other side of the field

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>against Josh Butler. So there's a little downside in Terry

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and he comes in with a B grade zach Ertz

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Also B grade Cowboys have been slaughtered by tight ends

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of late allowing five touchdowns in the last six games,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Ertz gets almost one hundred percent of washing It's tight

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>end looks non Artz tight ends only have nine targets

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>all year.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Nine times nine times.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>That leaves Jaden Daniels a grade. The bounce back is coming, obviously.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>The slump really a middling fantasy producer for a month,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 2>but especially the last two weeks, but that was against

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia and Pittsburgh arguably like defense one to two in

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the NFL, So the bounce back probably coming here. Dallas's

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>last four games they've given up thirty four points, twenty

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 2>seven points, thirty points, and forty seven points, so there

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 2>should be plenty of points here. The only scenario that

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>worries me is this, some teams get ahead so far

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>and so quickly on Dallas they don't bother to pass.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Two different quarterbacks this year, one quarterback at a fourteen

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>pass game and another quarterback at a fifteen pass game

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>against Dallas, so that's possible. And then the rib injury

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>looks like still a real lingering thing with Jaden Daniels,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and if they get up ahead they could just protect him.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Mariota could be in at halftime. Maybe who knows.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>So there's a smidge of downside and Jayden Daniels you

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 2>should be aware of, but he gets a A grade.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Washington likes to sweep the leg though when they play

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Dallas they hate each other.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh charge, I looked up scoon maker. Yeah, it's a

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Dutch name. You know what it translates to an English

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 5>It's kind of a cool nickname. The cleaner, no way, look,

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 5>the cleaner, spoonbucker.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I bet it's actually schoon Mocker like that. I love it.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 4>We can call him schoon man to come together with

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 4>your hands save you don't know, schoon man, spoon man.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, spoon man.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't you have no idea where Matt? Yeah, I'm I

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 3>It's not that old. I don't know.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it right now, I tell you that much.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, take a chance on me. Nine

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 2>players you would not normally start. Find out who they are?

0:17:24.040 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Would we come back? Nine players you would not only start,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>but you can this week for situations that are very

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 2>unique and special. We begin with Matt Harrison. Who is

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>your taking chance on me? Quarterback?

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 3>It's Tommy DeVito.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 5>In one week Devido the Giants removed Daniel Jones as

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 5>the starter, told everyone he'd be the third quarterback behind

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Tommy DeVito and Drew Locke, then signed another quarterback and

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 5>cut Danny times. So the cutlet king can't wait to

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 5>get back into a better matchup than ever because the

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 5>Bucks are basically bottom five in every metric against quarterbacks.

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Last year, DeVito walked into a similar matchup against a really,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 5>really horrible Washington defense, and everybody remembers how bad they

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 5>were last year.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 2>As the pack against historically bad.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 5>DeVito had his best game of his career in that game,

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 5>two hundred and forty six yards and three scores.

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Put it down. He's gonna do it again.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>All right, you're taking chance on me?

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Quarterback Brian I got a Geno Smith at home versus

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the Cardinals, who haven't been getting shredded by opposing quarterbacks

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to fantasy stats. But Arizona might be

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 4>getting lucky in that regard. The Cardinals own the fourth

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 4>worst pressure rate in the league. That'll help Gino, and

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 4>their completion rate against is nearly sixty nine percent, so

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 4>those are good underlying numbers. I just think offenses have

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 4>been falling short or coming up short at the goal

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 4>line when it comes to the receiving game, and there's

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 4>been a lot of rushing touchdowns that the Cardinals have

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 4>been giving up. So shootout potential here for Gino. And

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 4>for what it's worth, he has thrown for multiple scores

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 4>in his last three against Arizona. This is the first

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 4>meeting of the season though between these two teams.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 2>Geno Smith is your NFL passing leader.

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>He was as of last week. I'm sure he's probably

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 4>still probably still I'll take a look.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert goes up against Baltimore.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 6>The old airfare Yeah, baby, it's kind of line finally

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 6>reliably getting enough volume to be a fantasy producer.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 2>At the beginning of the year, it was just all

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>running all the time. Now he's averaging ten more passes

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>per game than he did in the first mon of

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the season as a result of the past five weeks.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Air Bear quarterbacks six over the last five weeks. Meanwhile,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore seeing the most passes per game thirty nine per game,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore has allowed the most passing yards and the fourth

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>most fantasy points to quarterbacks. Air Bear. Let's go to

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the running backs.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Matt, I've got Bucky Irving in the last three games

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 5>like it, Rashad White averaging thirty five snaps in about

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 5>twelve opportunities per game. Bucky Irving in that same time,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 5>averaging twenty five snaps in about fourteen opportunities per game.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 5>So why isn't Bucky taking over the backfield? The answer

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 5>is he's a terrible pass blocker. He's horrible at it.

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 5>In PFF's pass block ratings, he's sucky. Irving is ranked

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 5>seventy second and getting a dismal twenty four point four

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 5>grade out of one hundred in true pass sets. That's

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 5>why Rashad White is still on the field. But the

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 5>way to beat the Giants is running right through them.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 5>They're allowing our league worst five point one yards per

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 5>carry and the most combo yards, so it's looking more

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 5>like an Irving game because they don't have to pass

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 5>as much.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 3>He gets to take a chance on me.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm with you on that. Not Bucky Irving is

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>such a better runner than Rashad White. I have a

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>theory that at some point you just got it. You

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>just have to have him on the field more.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 5>They have to teach him how to pass block so

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 5>he can become that next level runner.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>The catch is Rashad White, and I haven't looked on

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 2>like a month, but back then Rashad White was like

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a running back sixty eight in pass block that.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't much. I looked it up today, you did

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty two.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Brian, you're take a chance on me running.

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Back back to Gino real quick. Fourth in yards, but

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 4>the three ahead cousins l Jacks, Burrow have played one

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 4>more game, so well then yards per game. He is

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 4>a leader. We're talking to my running back though was

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 4>going to be my premature speculation, but he's been promoted

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 4>to take a chance on me. Congratulations. Trey Benson the

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Arizona Cardinals, same game at Seattle. Before Arizona's bye last week.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Benson was getting ramped up Arizona coming off their by

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 4>in week eleven. His utilization score has basically become a

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 4>full number, which is a good thing. Dwayne McFarland's utilization

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 4>score in Fantasy Life, by the way, a great tool.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a four now before it was like point two

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>per Reference, James Connor is a seven point four. So

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 4>Benson getting work and it's a good matchup. Seattle has

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 4>been soft against the run, allowing nearly four point eight

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 4>yards per carry. They've also surrendered the seventh highest successful

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 4>run rate, and Arizona's offensive line has been plowing the opposition.

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 4>They are fourth in adjusted yards before contact per attempt. Meanwhile,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Seattle has allowed the fifth highest adjusted YBC per attempt

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 4>at two point three two. So the stars are aligning

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 4>for the whole care Cardinals backfield. So Benson will be viable.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, Two more, two quick things on that backfield

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>in Arizona. Number one, James Connor is still running great

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and God bless Oh no, no, knock on Connor. No,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I know you're not okay. Trey Benson has looked fantastic

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of games, and way better than he

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>looked at the beginning of the season, and his time's coming.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know when, because Connor is still really good,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 2>but for dynasty keeper Empire leagues, at some point Trey

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Benson's going to be good. I just don't know. Is

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>that twenty twenty five, twenty twenty six, that part is unclear.

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going deep with my take a chance on me

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 2>running back Dylan Lowby. Dylan Lowby, if you don't know

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>what team he plays for. That would be the Las

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Vegas Raiders, where Alexander Madison and Zamir White are expected

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>to miss this game, which makes Dylan Lowby in a

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>mire Abdullah as your probable starters for the Raiders. Lowbi's interesting.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the rookie you don't know much about him.

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>He can handle a bigger rushing workload than Abdullah Ken.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Abdullah's really just a third down back, but like Abdullah,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Lowby amazing receiver. That's like his best single trait as

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>a receiver. Runners have had success through the air against Denver,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>this week's opponent. Over the last month. The average game

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 2>for running backs against Denver seven catches sixty four yards,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 2>and the Broncos are an excellent pass defense, So the

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Raiders are going to have to run the ball at

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 2>least some, if only for balance, and Dylan Lowby is

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 2>probably the guy who's going to get a handful of

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>touches here. It's a desperation play, for sure, but a

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 2>plausible one. Desperate times sometimes on a sixteen by, Yeah,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>this might be desperate times.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Matt.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to your take a chance with your receiver.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 5>I've got the Giants. Darius Slayton, pairing him up with

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Tommy Cutlets.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 5>The bucks top two corners are Jamel Dean, who's on IR,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 5>and Zion McCollum, who hasn't practiced yet this week with

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 5>a hamstring injury. That leaves Josh Hayes on one side

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 5>with his one twenty six passer rating and maybe some

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 5>Tyreek Thunderburkh a name I did not make up.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he got benched a few games ago, but maybe

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe back.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 5>Well the reason he was benched. He's allowed a perfect

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 5>one point fifty eight point three passer rating in his

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 5>coverage right perfect. Based on where Slayton lines up, he'd

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 5>be on the field with both of those guys a

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Ton and in that aforementioned DeVito game against Washington last

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 5>year where DeVito went off, Slayton had eighty two yards

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 5>in a score. By the way, Malik Neighbors didn't practice

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 5>on Friday. He's a game time decision with a groin injury,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 5>so it could be all systems go for Darius slat

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 5>Darius Slayton.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I like it, Brian, your take a chance from your receiver.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 4>It's so sad that I'm using Jalen Waddle at home

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 4>versus at the Patriots. First, here are some wide receivers

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 4>having a vastly better season than Jalen Waddle.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>You have time for This is a list of all

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of the receivers.

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 4>It's abbreviated it's Truncatadory Wattle again for those who forgot.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Basically a top thirty pick in the summer too, just

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 4>arguably one of the biggest buffer overall. Yeah, Pop Douglas,

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Darius Slayton, Ray Ray McCleod better season than Jalen Wattle

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 4>right now. But he is long overdue. That's all I

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 4>can say. He's basically long overdue. And it's a decent matchup.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Patriots allowing one hundred and sixty yards in one touchdown

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 4>per game to wide receivers. If not now, when for

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Waddle, how about never? Yeah, well I'll never be

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 4>on the board if it doesn't happen. He I can't

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 4>argue if you dropped him already, but he's worth picking

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 4>up again and starting this week, yes, and clearly if

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't pay off. Yeah, even if he has a

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 4>good game, you could probably drop him, but just use

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 4>him and abuse him.

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Might take a chance from the receivers Chargers Quinton Johnston.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>He's got a great matchup against Baltimore and their corner

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Stevens. Stevens grades, we're talking about Pro Football Focus grades.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 2>He's cornerback one hundred eleven. They are only six guys

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 2>lower than Brandon Stevens. He's allowing an opposer passer rating

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred and thirteen, and the Ravens rank dead

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>last in yards and fantasy points allowed to wide receivers.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Clinton Johnston. Let's go back to the matchups, Matt Tampa

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Bay taking on the Giants. You already told us you

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>like Bucky Irving in this game, and what letter grade

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 2>do you have on Bucky Irving?

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I gotta be on him.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>What about Rashad White?

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Rashad White still getting a C in a very good matchup,

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 5>and I talked a little bit about it in the

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 5>prior segment there. So let's move on to the passing

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 5>game where Evans. He's back. He practiced in full on Thursday.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 5>He's good to go. He saw about six targets per

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 5>game this season and eight per game last year. Godwin

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 5>was seeing about eight and a half targets per game,

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 5>and by the way, in the three games that both

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Evans and Godwin were missing, Kate Oughton saw almost ten

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 5>targets per game. The rest were spread out just to

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 5>some other random dudes on their rosie.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>You can not be aware of this. We've we've gotten

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>official FFW nickname.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 3>No, I know.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 5>I was just trying to get past it really quick

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 5>because I don't know if I agree with.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 3>That for Cotten.

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 5>All right, Well, Evans instantly pops back in and he's

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 5>going to get at least eight targets per game. And

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 5>if the Bucks want to get him to his eleventh

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 5>consecutive one thousand yard season, he needs to average ninety

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 5>five yards per game. I think that they're going to

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 5>try to do it. If healthy is going to be

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 5>a monster the rest of the year. I'm giving him

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 5>an A grade here, and I mentioned Kate Oughton. He's

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 5>downgraded a ton for this game, mostly because the Giants

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 5>have been awesome. They had tight just a C grade

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 5>this week. They have the best tight end defense in

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 5>the league. Opposing tight end groups are averaging three catches

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 5>thirty three yards per game as a position. Yeah, and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 5>they've only allowed one tight end score all year. Baker Mayfield,

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm given a B grade too. The Giants don't allow

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 5>much through the air, but they haven't had an interception

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 5>since Week one, and Baker is quietly averaging nineteen rushing

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 5>yards per game this year. That's a helper, and the

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Giants have given up nineteen or more rushing yards to

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 5>a quarterback in seven of ten games, and good quarterbacks

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 5>like Mayfield are just putting up B level outings against

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 5>the Giants. He'll cobble his way to a decent day.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Going to the other side, Tommy DeVito was my take

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 5>a chance on me quarterback. Darius Slayton was my take

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 5>a chance on me wide receiver. But there's some other

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 5>guys in the offense that you might want to consider,

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 5>like Tyrone Tracy, who I'm.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Giving an A grade Tracy here.

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 5>I can't believe it either, but he's been their lead

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 5>back for almost a month. And the Bucks are not

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 5>great against opposing runners, allowing one hundred and forty two

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 5>combo yards in a score per game to the position.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 5>A vast majority of that goes to Tracy.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you like him enough to give him the trace?

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to do. The Fonzie with the ecy Tree.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 4>I can't. That's hard. It's impossible.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Actually it might not be Tree.

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I like about trade, but the Bucks

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>are getting killed through the air by running backs now,

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and Tracy's a converted wide receiver. They don't throw to

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>him nearly as much as they should. But we know

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 2>he can catch because he used to play wide receiver.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>He could see some DeVito dump offs this week.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 5>I did look back at Tommy DeVito's throwing habits to

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 5>see if he had a favorite. Last year, he spread

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 5>the ball all over top target getters in his starts

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 5>included Wandale, Jalen Hyatt, Darius Slayton, all of which are

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 5>still on the team, but he never had a Malik

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Neighbors before. If Neighbors is healthy and active, I'm gonna

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 5>give him a B grade here, but he's that game

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 5>time decision with the groin injury. Neighbors has ran a

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 5>route on ninety six percent of the pass plays in

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 5>games where he was active, and has had double digit

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 5>targets and six of his last seven. And by the way,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Wandale Robinson he's worth a seed dart as well, because

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 5>safety Tikey Smith usually covers the slot and he's just

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 5>been absolutely peppered with targets when an opponent has a

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 5>capable slot guy. So it's a decent start for Onondale

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Robinson as well.

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right, love it. That's Tampa Bay against the Giants.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, a big block of matchups for you,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>including New England at Miami. Is Drake May the quarterback

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you pivot to in a six week by sixteen by

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>week And it's possible we'll find out more about Drake

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>May when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 2>back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchy and Matt Harrison and

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Brian Johnson with you. If you haven't joined the Guillotine League.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>We're still making new ones. This is deep into the

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 2>season as we've ever been making new Guillotine leagues, and

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>lots of people are still joining them. Seven weeks of

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 2>hot chopping action left.

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 3>How many more weeks are they going to be open?

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>By all? Quite a way? So, I mean, you know,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 2>if people want to play with like four teams, we're

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna letch that.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 4>So and for those wondering, like, oh, there was a

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 4>game on Thursday night, you still draft those players? You're

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 4>only gonna want to draft Nick Chubb, but a great,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 4>great pick. It all counts. The Thursday night results count. Yeah,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 4>you can move him in and out of your starting

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 4>lineup up until lock on Sunday. So uh yeah, we

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 4>draft a new team.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 2>New England takes on Miami. Brian we teased the last segment,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Drake May has played pretty darn good ball considering he's

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 2>got he's missing six offensive linemen. You're basically going to

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>work offensive lineman seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven in this thing.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>He had the worst offensive line in.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 5>The league though, So yeah, that's is it much of

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 5>a loss?

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Drake May has more rushing yards than Zach Moss, who

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 4>is hurt. But Zach Moss played but Zack Moss played

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 4>eight games. Drake May's played like five and a half games,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and he's accumulated more rushing yard than Zach.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I think people did not realize the wheels that Drake

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>May has got and the fact that he has to

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>scramble for his life every single play. Let's talk about

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>him against Miami. A sneaky good pass defense.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 4>They are, and that's why he's borderline bench. But his

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 4>rushing floor, he's established a safe rushing floor. That's why

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I can give him a C. Had the third most

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 4>completions among all quarterbacks last week. Was might take a

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 4>chance on me quarterback. By the way, I think those

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 4>are a peacock there, But uh yeah, a tough matchup,

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 4>like you said, But the Dolphins have allowed multiple passing

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 4>scorers and three of their last four games, so I'll

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 4>give him a a C. I don't like any of

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 4>the wide receivers, as I didn't last week when I

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 4>said bench kseh on booty and you you gave me

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of crap for that charge. I said, bench

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 4>booty di Mario Douglass and Jalen Polk and guess who

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 4>scored the touchdown, Taekwon Thornton. So you don't know what

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 4>the hell you're getting with these Patriots wide receivers. They're

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 4>all on the bench for me. I do like your

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 4>booty charge, but I'm not starting him this week. I

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 4>will start Hunter Henry the we gets to see he

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 4>was quiet in the first meeting. I should have mentioned

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 4>that this is the second meeting. The first one was

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 4>a thrilling fifteen to ten victory by the Dolphins. They

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 4>were quarterbacked by Tyler Huntley in that game. By the way,

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 4>we'll get there in a second. But Henry Quiet in

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 4>the first meeting, but Drake May was not the starter

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 4>in that game. He and Henry Drake Man that is

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are clicking as of late, so Hunter is worth the start.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 4>The Dolphins have only surrendered two tight end touchdowns, but

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 4>they are allowing six catches, six catches and fifty yards

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 4>per game to the position. Lastly, for the Patriots, we'll

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 4>talk about Ramandre Stevenson. Not a great offensive line in

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 4>New England, but Stevenson is a borderline belcow. Eight point

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 4>two utilizations score last week. That is great. He's taken

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 4>more than seventy percent of the offensive snaps and four

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 4>straight games he's gotten every carry inside the five for

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 4>three straight so there will be volume. And it's a

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 4>good matchup against the Dolphins, who are allowing more than

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty five combo yards per game to

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 4>running backs and they've surrendered the sixth most total touchdowns

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 4>to the position. So again, a B for Ramandre over

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to the Dolphins side, an A for Devin a Chan.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 4>The Patriots allowing one hundred and forty convo yards and

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 4>one whole touchdown per game to opposing running backs we

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 4>could have a very big game here, could have a

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 4>big game. He left the first game early. I only

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 4>had total four touches. Got hurt in that one, but

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 4>I hopefully that does not happen again. Tyreek Hill gets

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 4>an a. The Patriots run the third most man coverage

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 4>in the league. Hill leads the Dolphins with a thirty

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 4>percent first red target share and a fifty percent air

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 4>yard share against man coverage, also averaging two point three

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 4>yards per route run. That means he's sitting on a

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>monster game here should be with two a back at

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 4>quarterback again. Again it was Tyler Huntley in the first game.

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Hill had six catches for sixty nine scoreless yards in

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 4>the first game. Very rare to not score when you

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 4>hit sixty nine. But Hill will hopefully score in this game.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully Jalen Waddle scores too. That's why US might take

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a chance with me wide receiver. And of course, loosen

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 4>your belt, charge John new Smith. You gotta talk John

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 4>new Smith.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk more about John who later in this show.

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 4>Just to see this week though he is startable. I

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 4>mentioned the man coverage bit earlier in how the Pats

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 4>deploy it at an incredibly high clip John who is

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 4>averaging two point three yards per route run against all coverage,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 4>but against man he's under a yard, so he struggles

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit against man. But I'm still starting him

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 4>in the wasteland. He was targeted first times in the

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 4>in the first meeting, had five catches for sixty two yards.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 4>That feels like a safe floor, hopefully for John Hu.

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a revenge game, too, right it is?

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 2>It is a revenge Gmail, although forty dollars, so I

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>feel pretty good about it.

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's a Patriots revenge game exactly.

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 4>And two I do like too, obviously a b for him.

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Patriots have allowed multiple passing touchdowns and three of their

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 4>last four only the bust, the ultimate bust of the

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 4>rookie quarterback class. Caleb Williams failed to hit that mark Kent.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 2>City takes on the Panthers for Travis Kelcey and Noah

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Grace stole the show last week, but Kelsey has been

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 2>very heavily involved in basically every other game since Rashid

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Rice went down. Panthers have a lot five tight end

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 2>scores in the last four games. Kelsey is an a

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 2>staying with the passing game. DeAndre Hopkins just to see here,

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>even against the Panthers, and he is touchdown dependent. He

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 2>has scored in just one Chiefs game and averaging in

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the other games. When he does not score, he's giving

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you three catches for twenty eight yards on average. That's

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 2>awful and that's how you lose games. Panthers secondary much improved.

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 2>No opposing wide receiver has scored since Week six on Carolina.

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 2>What are we even talking about here? Only one receiver's

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 2>top fifty one yards in three games against Carolina. DeAndre

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Hopkins again almost put him on the bench, but I've

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 2>got a C grade on him, a SE grade on

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Xavier Worthy, who's as volatile as any player in fantasy football.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 2>And as I just mentioned, the Panthers secondary is better

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>than you probably think. Worthy scored last week, but as

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a reminder, the prior two weeks he combined for one

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>catch for eleven yards. So Worthy super super high risk,

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 2>but I'm still throwing a C grade on him. And

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that brings us to Patrick Maho Holmes, who has become

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 2>matchup proof, but in the wrong way. No matchup is

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>too easy for Mahomes to put up an explosive game,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 2>which he never does. Anymore. He's got one start better

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 2>than QB ten this year.

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 5>The growing hate of charge against Mahomes is just every

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 5>week it's enjoyable to watch. It's gonna bite you in

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 5>the butt someday.

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 3>But you know what, I don't think it's this game.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>The explosiveness completely missing from the Chiefs offense. Patrick mahomes

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 2>average depth of target over the last month drops all

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the way down to twenty sixth in the league. He's

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 2>at about six yards. Carolina's pass defense has gotten good,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned, over the last five games. They're giving

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 2>up two hundred and twenty eight passing yards per game.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 2>That is decent. So Mahomes just a B grade here.

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Kareem Hunt locks in with an A grade because Isaiah

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Pacheco will not play in this game. This is Hunt's

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>final start right here. The Panthers are predictably bad against

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the run. Nine of ten opposing teams have had runners

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 2>score or time one hundred and fifty yards. Let's go

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>to the Carolina Sidecheba Hubbard has been fantastic this season,

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 2>but this is the toughest matchup of his year. Kansas

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>City ranks number one in rushing yards allowed to running backs,

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 2>at fifty two per game. No back has topped fifty

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 2>eight rushing yards all year, and that includes some good players,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 2>so just dud games, including James Cook being held to

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 2>twenty yards last week, although he did get rushing touchdowns

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 2>on top of everything else. Kansasity doesn't give up any

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 2>pass receptions to back, so Tuber Hubbins is not going

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 2>to help you there either. Just a C grade for him.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Segrade for Xavier Lagett, who runs from the outside, will

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 2>have some opportunities to face backup cornerback Nazi Johnson. He's

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 2>been pressed into service the past two games and he's

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 2>given up a touchdown and his seventy five percent completion rate.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Both of Kansas City's outside cornerbacks are small, and Lagett

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 2>has five inches and thirty pounds on both guys, which

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>gives him a contested catch mismatch. So Liget comes in

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>with the Sea and lastly, the last guy that you

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 2>can about, Jatavian Sanders in a six team bye week

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>is a plausible starter here. In the previous two Panthers

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 2>games before last week's by he saw a major upticking

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 2>usage and the Chiefs have been bad against the tight

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 2>end position all year. They're horrible early. They've got a

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 2>little better lately, but still in the past two games,

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Adam Krautman and Dawson Knox posted decent game, so you

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>could start Jatavian Sanders in a pinch, all right, matt Our.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Final matchup of this segment, Denver taking on the Las

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Vegas Raiders.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, bo Nicks had his first multi score game in

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Week five against these Raiders.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 2>It all changed right there for him.

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 3>It sure did.

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Since then, he's thrown multiple touchdown passes in four of

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.959
<v Speaker 5>his six games, including three, zero, seven and four last

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 5>week against the Falcons. Now he gets the Raiders again,

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 5>who've allowed multiple scores in each of the last three games.

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Let's see if I can do this in pig Latin.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh day ix nay obey x, nay e hey etsgay

0:39:58.360 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 5>and a eight.

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 3>How about that?

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>It's anay great for Bonex.

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Let me give you a quick mixed stat He leads

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the NFL in total pass attempts of twenty plus air yards.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>His turnover worthy throw rate on those deep balls is

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the lowest among twenty nine qualifiers.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that's crazy.

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 4>It's great. Yeah, Bonix Thor is.

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Rolling over in his grave.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>It's killing him right, Yeah, sure.

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Courtland Sutton quietly wide receiver fourteen on the season, topped

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 5>six catches and seventy yards in each of the last

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 5>four games, added a couple hundred yard games in that span.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 5>He's Nick's his favorite target, facing a secondary where each

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 5>of the top three corners is on the injury report

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 5>with a questionable tag this week. The Raiders have actually

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 5>been pretty good against wide receivers, but Sutton still gets

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 5>an A grade here.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Devon Vele is an intriguing dart throw, but he's just

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 5>sharing too many targets with Lil Jordan Humphrey, Troy Franklin,

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Marvin Mims. They're all involved. There's just too many cooks

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 5>to start one of them frustratingly involved.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 2>They're just sharing evenly. We need somebody to step up

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and become the number two wide receiver in dondew.

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Vele is slowly starting to do that.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 5>He had five targets last week, so maybe it's coming.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 5>Javonte Williams and Oudric Estime, let's talk about these two.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 5>Was the Odric estimate big Week ten usage? Just a

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 5>shot across the bow at Javonte Williams might have been

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 5>It might have been Williams return to getting almost triple

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 5>the snaps his estimate, but he only led an opportunities.

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 5>That's rushing attempts plus targets fourteen to nine. It's a

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 5>decent matchup and I'd like to start one of them,

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 5>but only if there were one of them. But since

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 5>there's two of them, they're both on the bench. Dylan

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Lowby was a charge just take a chance on me runner,

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 5>and Alexander Madison is out. Zamir White is looking doubtful,

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 5>so Amir Abdullah could get some extra touches here, but

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm kind of with chart.

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 3>I like Lowby here.

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Brock Bauers has faced these Broncos before and wasn't scared

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 5>at all eight for ninety seven in a score in

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 5>his first meeting, and he's coming off sixteen targets, thirteen receptions,

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty six yards and a touchdown last week.

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 5>And he was also tackled at the one last week

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 5>as well, so it could have been two scores. He's

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 5>the best tight end in football in an A grade.

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Gardner Minshew put up decent stats last week against the

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 5>Dolphins two eighty two and two in that game. Much

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 5>of that to Bowers, but he struggled in the first

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 5>meeting with Denver, only one thirty seven in a score,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 5>and then he got pulled for Aidan O'Connell, which is

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 5>why I'm leaving Jacoby Myers and every other passing option

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 5>on the bench, including Minshew. They could have Patrick certain

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 5>just shadow Myers this time around.

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 2>They should.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 3>He didn't do it.

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 5>In Week five, last meeting, Myers was targeted nine times,

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 5>got six catches for seventy two yards in that one.

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 5>But when Cirtan has shadowed a player, it's been over.

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 5>DK Metcalf, George Pickens, Mike Evans, and Garrett Wilson all

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 5>saw about eighty percent coverage versus Cirtan. They averaged four targets,

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.720
<v Speaker 5>three receptions and twenty nine scoreless yards.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And those guys are better than Jacoby.

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 2>So back then in the first meeting, though Devanta Adams

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is still on the team.

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think he was playing at that time.

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 2>But maybe not. Yeah, maybe that was the ham string injury.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure was of dion of Adam's season.

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 5>So I'd shadow Myers with Certan and then bracket Bowers

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 5>if I was the decordinator for Denver and see if

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Trey Tucker can beat you.

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to happen. So that's it.

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 2>That is it? All right? We've got a couple of

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>minutes before we take our break. Do you believe? Oh

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, let me mention this about bon Nix.

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Both of the Raiders' starting cornerbacks have been ruled out

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of this game, Jacry and Bennett Nate Hobbs out. Bon

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Nicks is my number three ranked quarterback this week.

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Amazing.

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I would come to this for bon Nicks. He's turned

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 2>into one of the safest.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I gave him an A last week.

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 3>I gave him an A wee.

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. It's automatic as right.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Pig Latin though, so you might not have understood it.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 4>No, I didn't. I didn't. I phased that out. We

0:43:58.920 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 4>stopped listening.

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 2>There's so many amazing tools at fantasylife dot com. I

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 2>love the Utilization tool, which Brian has mentioned already. I

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 2>keep it open on my desktop all day, really, all

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>season long. Tons of stories, both free and premium. You

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:15.439
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of great guillotine content. Believe my rankings

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.439
<v Speaker 2>for guillotine specific use available at Fantasy Life as well.

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And because you listen to the show, you get to

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.439
<v Speaker 2>listen to Fantasy You get to buy the premium version

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 2>of Fantasy Life at twenty percent off. FFW twenty is

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 2>the promo code for that FFW twenty for all of

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the premium content you would like at a twenty percent discount.

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Would we come back? Three tough questions? You can play

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 2>along with our guests when we return hour number two

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Jargi and Matt Harrison, Brian

0:44:56.239 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Johnson with you. This is a game we call three

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 2>tough Question.

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Tough Question number one.

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 2>As a dynasty asset or Empire league, we love Empire.

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure as a dynasty or Empire asset, is Cincinnati running

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>back Chase Brown a top five running back, top ten

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 2>running back, Top fifteen running back or lower? We begin

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 2>with Matt Harrison.

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I looked at my own dynasty rankings and I

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 5>currently have him as RB seventeen. But he's in a

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 5>cluster with some interesting names like Josh Jacobs, Jonathan Brooks

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 5>from Andre Stevenson, and there's a couple of guys above

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 5>him that are a little older, like Joe Mixon and

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 5>David Montgomery. Maybe James Cook that I could see swapping

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 5>them with. But here's the guys I have above him

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 5>that I just like a ton better, Bijon Gibbs, CMC,

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 5>Saquon Breisee, Kyron Taylor Walker, Henry h Chan.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 3>That's ten.

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 5>So the knock the Bengals could have a new coaching

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 5>staff next year. I think it's possible Zach Moss could

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 5>return and gobble up half the carries. Again, I'll still

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 5>throw him in the top fifteen. He's right around that

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 5>thirteen to seventeen cluster of guys.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, Brian as a dynasty or empire asset, is

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Chase Brown a top five running back, top ten running back,

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 2>top fifteen running back or lower?

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I essentially had the same list of guys that

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Matt had that are ahead of Brown, So he's just

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 4>clinging inside the top fifteen. He'd be pushing the top

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 4>ten for me more. But he just wasn't like a

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 4>blue chip, elite prospect coming out of the draft last year.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 4>He's also twenty four years old, which is kind of

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 4>old for a second year running back, but he's still

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 4>young overall. I asked thor Now, no one was you

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:36.919
<v Speaker 4>know high on Chase Brown? Come out. I asked Thor

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 4>what his player comp was and he said, Miles Gaskin,

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 4>And this is at knock on Thor. I respect Thor's

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 4>opinion more than anybody, but just I don't know. The

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 4>verdicts still out on Chase Brown for me to put

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 4>him inside the top ten. But man, he looks great

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 2>So Miles Gaskin had a couple of moments.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 4>That's true. That's true.

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, but I like about Thor when he does his

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:55.879
<v Speaker 2>player comps.

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh please, I'm not knocking Thor. Don't get this run,

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 4>but I don't even texting me later all upset.

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 2>What Thori does with this player comps that I like

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is he doesn't automatically comp everybody to Hall of famers,

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 2>which is all the time in the college football industry.

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 4>But I mean in Brown, he was only at a fourth,

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 4>fifth round pick, so yeah, he wasn't an elite prospect.

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 4>A little concerned that you guys.

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Are so wrong about Chase Brown. He is good from

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>remember Week four, which was a long time ago. No,

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't Week four to today. Do you guys know

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 2>where Chase Brown is in running back scoring? Top eight,

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Top four? He's running back four since Week four, You

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 2>guys have missed the boat on this. He does not

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 2>get touchdown snipe by his quarterback. Brown plays for a

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 2>workhorse head coach Zach Taylor, who ran Joe Mixon as

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a workhorse for years, and as I can it is

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 2>there's a dynasty question. I'm not trading my twenty four

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 2>year old sophomore running back for Derrick Henry, Of course not.

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing that.

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Who said you're gonna do that?

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 3>If you're competitive right now? I don't know why you

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 3>would too old?

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm getting quarter because I'm getting running back four

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 2>out of my young guy. Why would I trade him

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 2>for guys like Derrick Henry, Saquon Barkley, Joe Mixon, Josh Jacobs,

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara, Guys with a thousand more carries, way deeper

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>into their careers that could end anytime they anytime they

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 2>at any moment, those guys could fall off the cliff.

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Here are the only players, and I've got this is

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 2>a personal question. I've got Chase Brown in our Empire League.

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 3>These are all personal questions this week.

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 2>They are this week, They're all charge questions. Here are

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the players I would accept to trade for with Chase Brown.

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 2>To give up Chase Brown off my roster, Jami or Gibbs,

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 2>b John Robinson, Kenneth Walker, Breeshall. I considered Breeshall. That's

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the only other one you considered Breas. I would consider

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Breese Hall. Okay, But who's my Jet's quarterback next year?

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Here's what I know. You said eight

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Chan No no chance, not even close. No chance I

0:48:56.080 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 2>would trade for a chant Chase Brown. Here's the thing

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I love about Chase Brown in his future.

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 4>With James Cook.

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.760
<v Speaker 2>No chance, No, absolutely not. His quarterback steals his touchdowns.

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 2>He's a part time guy, Chase Brown. I get twenty

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 2>carries and touches a game, a twenty touches a game,

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and they have a Joe Burrow led offense, it's.

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Gonna be good. He's had two games with twenty plus

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 4>carries and they've had been in the last three weeks.

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 2>The rest of the total touches, I am those are

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the guys. Top five running back, Chase Brown.

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Tough question.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Brian's leaving for the rest of the year is San

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Francisco wide receiver Juwan Jennings A wide receiver one, A

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver two, flex or bench.

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 4>We begin with Brian, you can draft Chase Brown with

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 4>a top five running back and then start up dynast

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 4>to the guy. Doubt that anyway, On to the next question.

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, Louly, you guys are well, I might not have

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 2>to because people like you try to pass on him

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna get him later.

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.479
<v Speaker 5>You asked him with the Dynasty asset value though, right, yeah,

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't have that value because he doesn't have that

0:49:59.320 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 5>name value.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't have that cache.

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 4>He's going to score those points for my team, all right,

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Jawan Jennings, Well, now we got this brock party shoulder

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 4>issue which kind of muddies the waters a little bit.

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's pretend he's okay.

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's assume that that's a one week issue, Yes, for

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 2>this week only, in that we don't have to worry

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 2>about brock Purty going forward past Sunday's game.

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, let's do that. So in the three games played

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Jennings three games played without Brandon Aiyuk or Deebo Samuel

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:24.879
<v Speaker 4>on the field, he has a forty two percent first

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 4>red target share from brock Purty. For reference, Malik Neighbors

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 4>is the only other player above a forty percent clip

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 4>in that rate, so he gets Purdy's attention a lot.

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Jennings averaging more point more PPR points per route run

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 4>than Justin Jefferson this season. My only reason I'm not

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 4>giving him a wide receiver one grade here is there

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 4>are mouths to feed still in Christian McCaffrey, George Tittle.

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I still respect Deebo Samuels, So that's the only trepidation

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I have there. So I'm saying wide receiver two for

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Jennings moving forward.

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, Matt Juwan Jennings going forward to wide receiver one,

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Wide receiver two flex or bench rest of your let's

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 2>just dumb this way way away down all good that

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'll understand it.

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 5>He's currently wide receiver twelve and PPR points per game.

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:07.959
<v Speaker 5>He's in the same neck of the woods as cdee Lamb,

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Jayden Reed, DK Metcalf, Terry McLaurin. That's a wide receiver one.

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 5>If he stays healthy the rest of the year, there's

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.879
<v Speaker 5>no reason he can't continue that target share should be there.

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 5>He's a wide receiver one the rest of the way.

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 2>My Jwan Jennings, I have Jennings rostered in so many leagues. Yeah,

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 2>that my Jwan Jennings collection is bigger than Matt Harrison's

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 2>ever growing collection of sensual beanie babies. A ninety five

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 2>percent route rate in his last two games taking over.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Since taking over, since Brandon, I'll show you later that right,

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you've got one on you, perhaps under few of them

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 2>on or under Okay, say what you want about Pro

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Football Focus. Some love it, some hate it. Right now,

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Jennings is ranked as wide receiver five by Pro Football Focus,

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 2>behind Nico Collins, AJ Brown, T Higgins, and Son God.

0:51:59.880 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>That's the people we're talking about here. Now. Jennings has

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>started three games, three full games as a starter. It

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 2>was like Week three and then then these past two weeks.

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:18.479
<v Speaker 2>His average finish there is wide receiver three on the season. Now,

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 2>some of what makes John Jennings great translates directly to

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 2>fantasy points. He's second in mistackles per reception, strong and physical,

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 2>all the contested catches. He has an eighty percent catch

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.479
<v Speaker 2>rate on balls thrown to him. He's averaging a full

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 2>touchdown per start this year. So John Jennings going forward,

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Wide receiver one.

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Tough question number three.

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Rest of year, Which Dolphin will score more Fantasy points?

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Hill.

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 4>You can't even get this ound without laughing, Johnny Smith.

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 5>When I read the third tough question, I just laughed

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 5>and I was like, charge, you need some positive reinforcement

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 5>this week?

0:52:58.200 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:52:58.640 --> 0:53:00.439
<v Speaker 3>Who was the bad man hurt?

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:01.319
<v Speaker 2>You charge?

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 3>The last two weeks?

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:05.959
<v Speaker 5>Tyrek and John who have almost the same numbers twelve

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.880
<v Speaker 5>targets each, ten catches for Hill, nine for John O.

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Two scores apiece John who has about seventy more yards though,

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 5>but Tyreek Hill is playing through a torn ligament in

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 5>his wrist, and if the Dolphins lose two more games,

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:23.759
<v Speaker 5>they're effectively out of the playoff race. Yeah, they could

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 5>just sit Tyreek the rest of the season, but you

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 5>know who won't sit the best flag football coach in Miami,

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 5>John UJOHNU, You feel better now?

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Haven't you heard this?

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 5>He's been coaching his son's flag football team like every

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 5>stop of the way, and they won the championship. Like

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 5>everywhere he goes, he wins championships as a youth flag

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 5>football coach.

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I did not know that time. Yeah, all right, so

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 2>one answer so far, JOHNU. Smith, Let's see you can

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 2>go get two in Brian.

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is your time to shine clearly, so I'll

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 4>just tee this up for you, say, Tyreek Hill, now

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 4>take it away. Tell me why I'm wrong.

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, First of all, depending on your scoring system

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 2>right now on the season, these two are basically neck

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and neck. It depends on if your PPR, if you're

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 2>not PPR, but they're effectively tied through this point of

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the season. In terms of top ten finishes this year,

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Hill has one top ten finish. John oh has

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 2>three top thirty finishes or worse thirty finishing as thirtieth

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 2>or worse at your position. Tyreek Hill has five of those,

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:33.400
<v Speaker 2>John who only has three. Now going forward, the schedule

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>for these guys about the same. Tyreek has two strongly

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 2>positive matchups left John who's got three smash spots left. Hill,

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 2>in fairness, has had four straight decent games in these

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.399
<v Speaker 2>last four to tuas start since TUA came back. They've

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 2>all been good, good, non explosive games. Hill has been

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 2>hit and miss. The correct answer is Tyreek Hill. I

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 2>can't say I'm happy about it. There you go.

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Wait what I didn't I wasn't even paying attention anymore.

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 5>I I just figured it was it was clicked, you

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 5>double clicked on John Euan it was over.

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 4>But no, that was like an m night Shyamalan And.

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right, exactly exactly. Let's go to uh our on

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 2>one matchup we're going to do in this segment, and

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that's the Arizona Cardinals taking on the Seattle Seahawks. Brian,

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 2>you already told us you like Trey Benson. If you

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.479
<v Speaker 2>like Trey Benson at a starting level, you must love

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 2>James Connor.

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he gets an A. But I gotta throw this

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:34.359
<v Speaker 4>stat out there. I think you he's like you gotta

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 4>smash him into daily daily lineups as well. He'll be

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 4>somewhat pricey, but worth it. He's Connor been awesome this year,

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 4>ranked second and miss tackles forced per attempt nearly a

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 4>third of his carries. He's forcing at least one mistackle. Meanwhile, meanwhile,

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 4>the Seahawks own the worst clip in that category. UH

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Seattle also seventh in yards allowed before contact per attempt,

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 4>nearly two point five yards. I already mentioned how the

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.319
<v Speaker 4>O line is this road grading the opposition though a

0:56:01.800 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 4>James and as you mentioned, Benson might take a chance

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 4>on me running back back or over to the passing game.

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Another A This time for Trey McBride, Eric Salbert and

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the duo of Davis Allen in Hunter Long did little

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 4>damage to Seattle over the last two games from the

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 4>tight end position. But here are the tight ends who

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 4>faced the Seahawks prior to that. Kyle Pitts seven catches

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 4>sixty five yards, Dalton Knox, Dalton Kincaid combined for six

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:33.240
<v Speaker 4>eighty one in a touchdown. George Kittle five catches fifty

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 4>eight yards, two touchdowns. McBride certainly in that tier, if

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 4>not above, So he gets an a Marvin Harrison junior

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 4>over to the wide receivers just to see been pretty

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 4>much a bust based on expectations. But he's been one

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 4>of the most doubled wide receivers in the league this season.

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 4>And it's not like Arizona is short on weapons where

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's double right, but he is getting doubled.

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Matchup wise somewhat neutral Seattle allowing one hundred and forty

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 4>four yards per game. That's okay, but the Seahawks have

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 4>surrender surrendered eleven scores to the wide receiver position. That's

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 4>more than one per game. So Harrison is started with

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 4>the C Michael Wilson he's on the bench, though not

0:57:10.840 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 4>like him in this game. I would take a look

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 4>at him in daily though. Consider his shootout potential here.

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 4>That's why Kyler Murray gets a B. Been playing great,

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 4>but not a great matchup on paper. Seattle is not

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 4>allowed at QB one finished since week six, but there

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 4>aren't many other better options than Kyler out there, so

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you can definitely start them with confidence with a B.

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Over to the Seahawks side, starting with Kenneth Walker, he

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 4>gets an A. I mentioned that stat with James Connor,

0:57:38.560 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 4>he was second in miss tackles for US per attempt.

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Kenneth Walker is first in that category, and the Cardinals

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 4>are surrendering one hundred and fifty combo yards per game

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 4>to running backs. Enough said, easy A for Kenneth Walker too.

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 4>DK Metcalf B for him. Metcalf has scored in just

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 4>one of his last five games against the Cardinals, and

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 4>no it wasn't the most recent, but again, Metcalf a

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 4>solid start in what should be a shootout. I'm not

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 4>starting Tyler Lockett with Metcalf back in the lineup, but

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I am going to start Jackson Smith and Jigba JSN

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 4>gets a B now has two consecutive weeks as a

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 4>top ten wide receiver under his belt. One of those

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 4>games was with DK in the lineup, one was without,

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 4>So he can do it under both circumstances, it seems.

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 4>And Arizona has struggled against slot wide receivers over the

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 4>last five surrendering the seventh most PPR points per game.

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 4>So I really like JSN again with a B. And lastly,

0:58:33.480 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Gino Smith might take a chance on mean quarterback. And

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 4>if you're wondering about Ady J. Barner, you're not starting

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 4>immitate end No, I bet anyone is. No.

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Well you shouldn't anyway.

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 4>But our good friend who does the you know the

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 4>rights out every he always knocks us or leaving a

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 4>player off. So I'm making sure to remember everybody AJ

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Barner bench.

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Well next week when we have a full slight of teams.

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that. No, no, you can't do that definitely,

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Which is all right. When we come back, Vikings taking

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 2>on the Bears, and we'll tell you what to do

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 2>about the San Francisco forty nine ers without rock Party.

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Who are you going to be starting now in a

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 2>tricky matchup at Green Bay? Lots of ramifications and dominoes

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 2>that are going to fall in weird ways. With branded

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Allen's you're starting quarterback for the San Francisco forty nine ers.

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I bet they wish they still had Sam Tarnold. Stay tuned.

0:59:27.920 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 7>Fantasy Football Weekly continues in moments.

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Jarchie and Matt Harrison

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and Brian Johnson with you. The Vikings take go on

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bears on Sunday in Chicago.

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 4>When's the last time the Vikings played in Minnesota. I

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 4>know they had a quote unquote home game that was

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 4>in London, but now I don't know.

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:13.120
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's been a long time.

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:14.919
<v Speaker 3>The Detroit three weeks ago.

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Was it the Detroit game?

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 3>No, they played the Colts at home?

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, I think that was Okay, I think that

1:00:19.400 --> 1:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>was it. Vikings take on the Bears in Chicago, third

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of three straight road games for Minnesota. Let's start with

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Justin Jefferson. A fascinating matchup.

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Nor.

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously you're gonna keep starting the as an

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>A grade, but Matty Eberflus could decide that he's going

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:37.959
<v Speaker 2>to put star cornerback Jalen Johnson on Jefferson either man

1:00:37.960 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>on man or as part of a bracket, and that

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>would change Jefferson's outlook quite a bit. Now, Iberflus doesn't

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 2>normally do this, but I don't know. You made Jalen

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Johnson like the third highest paid cornerback in the league,

1:00:50.240 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>so wouldn't it be for times like this? In his coverage,

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Johnson only allows one and a half catches per game.

1:00:57.440 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Johnson gave up a sixty yard reception to Christian Watson

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>last week, but that was something involved him tripping, and

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you know there was something weird in that one, and

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that's highly unusual for him. Still, Jefferson's an a I'm

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm keeping him in a until further notice. But still

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the possibility of a down ish game is there. With

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Johnson sticking with the receivers. Jordan Addison comes in

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>with a C grade here. Again, Jalen Johnson could go

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>on Jefferson a bunch and that would put Addison on

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Stevenson and or Kyler Gordon, who are well. Kyler

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Gordon's good, Stevenson's very inconsistent, and Addison could end up

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>in a good spot. He rescored in two of the

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>last three games. But he only averages three catches per game,

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>which makes Addison very touchdown dependent, which is not ideal

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>since Chicago's only all had six touchdowns to wideouts all year.

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>That is the third fewest across the full league. So

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I've only got the C grade on Jordan Addison in

1:01:51.240 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this one. Staying with the passing game, TJ. Hockinson comes

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>in with a B grade. I tempted to make him

1:01:56.680 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>an A. He's already getting a lot of playing time

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and the injury to Josh Oliver means that he can

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>be on the field like almost every snap at this point.

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>For TJ. Hockinson. Chicago hasn't allowed a tight end score

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>since way back in Week one, but they are giving

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:14.080
<v Speaker 2>up plenty of yards, including recent big games to Evan

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Ingram zach Ertz and Austin Hooper. Be great.

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>The body's got to be ready for TJ. Right play

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 4>a full game. The body the body, primarily the knee.

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>But I like Jesse venture At, who do they call

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the body? Got you?

1:02:29.360 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? The body? TJ.

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Howkinson What Aaron Jones man? I struggled with this one

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot. It has been a rough month for Aaron Jones.

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Four straight underwhelming games. Three of those four less than

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 2>three point one yards per carry, which is not good now. Fortunately,

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Jones continues to get a very high work load, so

1:02:47.360 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities are there for Jones. Chicago's a neutral run defense,

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>although the recent loss of defensive tackle Andrew Billings has

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>made them slightly more vulnerable lately. Jones should get a

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of work. The Bears are way better pass defense

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>than they are run defense. I can only get you

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 2>to a C grade on Aaron Jones based on the

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>guy that we've seen lately. Let's go to the Bear

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>side where there's not a lot to like.

1:03:11.080 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Here, So you omitting Sam Donald does get Sam?

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>No, sorry please, Sam Donald C grade coming off his

1:03:19.120 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>best game since September, but he faces a very good

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Chicago pass defense, giving up less than one touchdown pass

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>per game. Nine of ten opposing passers have thrown zero

1:03:29.880 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>or one touchdown against Chicago. There's just not a lot

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of upside for Donald against the top five secondary and

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:40.439
<v Speaker 2>top ten pass rush that they've got as well. Thank

1:03:40.480 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you for the catch on that problem.

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 4>You know I got it, you got absolutely Donald.

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Vikings off run defense is trending towards historic levels and

1:03:49.320 --> 1:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>we're putting DeAndre Swift on the bench. He's nursing a

1:03:51.960 --> 1:03:54.120
<v Speaker 2>groin injury. We don't know for sure that he's going

1:03:54.160 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>to play in this game or that will finish this game.

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Groin injuries aggravate easily.

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I got one from the Beanie babies.

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you have right, exactly. You know what I'm talking about.

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Swift snaperaates shrunk to its lowest level of the year,

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>just fifty four percent last week. We're and talk more

1:04:08.640 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>about that in a minute. Maybe it's just a one

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>week blip, or perhaps the start of a trend. We

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know quite yet. But what we do know is

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings are brutal matchup. They rank number one in

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>run defense success rate, number one in defensive rush EPA,

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>number two in yards per carry, number two in rushing

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>yards allowed, number three in yards before contact, number three,

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and yards after contact. It's all bad news for DeAndre Swift.

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>He's on the bench this week. The guy that is

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>not on the bench DJ Moore C grade. But that's it.

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>He's the only only letter grade I've got for you

1:04:41.640 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>among all the Bears, like many of the Bears, coming

1:04:43.920 --> 1:04:47.600
<v Speaker 2>up of his best game in several weeks. Hopefully that

1:04:47.640 --> 1:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>continues here despite four prior horrifying box scores for DJ Moore,

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>more runs from all over the field. That means he's

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>going to see all the Vikings cornerbacks, and really none

1:04:57.480 --> 1:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of them are very daunting. The Vikings three starting cornerbacks

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>rank as cornerbacks forty, cornerback eighty six, and quarterback ninety

1:05:05.080 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>two in coverage by Pro Football Focus. They combine to

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:11.600
<v Speaker 2>allow six touchdowns, so there's an opportunity for DJ Moore

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to put together back to back decent games. As for

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the other receivers, Keenan Allen's basically dead. He has scored

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>in one game, has in topped forty four yards all year.

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Forty four is nothing. A Roma Dune's a nudging towards

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>fantasy viability, but he's scored in just one game, and

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he's just a dart throw in this one.

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't love him, but you could do worse in

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a six team bye week. Still, I don't have a

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>letter grade on Roma dunsday. He's on the bench, all right,

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 2>So where does that leave Caleb Williams bench grade coming

1:05:42.280 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 2>off arguably the best game of his career, which will

1:05:44.880 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 2>credit him for but that's a pretty low bar, and

1:05:47.280 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings have generally handled third tier quarterbacks like Caleb Williams.

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Over the last three weeks, Joe Flacco, Mac Jones will

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Levis have combined for one passing touchdown against Minnesota. The

1:05:59.040 --> 1:06:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Vikings blitz constantly, and Williams completes just seventy one percent

1:06:03.400 --> 1:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of his passes when under pressure, with an average throw

1:06:06.640 --> 1:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of just four point eight yards. Caleb's coming off a

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 2>game with a career high nine designed rushing attempts, and

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>that's promising. But Minnesota ranks number one in quarterback rushing

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>yards allowed at get this six yards per game allowed

1:06:23.240 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 2>on the ground to opposing quarterbacks. That's it. Caleb Williams

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>on the bench. Our next matchup San Francisco taking on

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the Green Bay Packers. Matt no brock perty is the

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:34.720
<v Speaker 2>headline of this game.

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Sad brock Purty out with a shoulder injury. Brandon

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:40.919
<v Speaker 5>Allen will get the start on Sunday in Green Bay.

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Allen hasn't played a game since twenty twenty one and

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 5>hasn't had meaningful playing time since twenty twenty. He had

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 5>one great game for the Bengals in week sixteen of

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:52.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty was against the Texans. He threw for three

1:06:52.200 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 5>hundred and seventy one yards and two scores, but his

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 5>other starts in the league have been lackluster, like two

1:06:57.560 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 5>seventeen and one, one point fifty three to one. And

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 5>then the Packers, they're kind of a mysterious quarterback defense.

1:07:03.480 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 5>They've let Will Levis have a career day and Trevor

1:07:06.280 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Lawrence threw for three to Zho eight and two. Then

1:07:08.800 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 5>they shut down guys like Jared Goff, CJ Stroud, and

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Kyler Murray. But I like what Kyle Shanahan does with QBS,

1:07:15.560 --> 1:07:19.240
<v Speaker 5>and I'm gonna roll with Brandon Allen as a C grade.

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 5>I just picked him up in a league where I

1:07:21.880 --> 1:07:25.040
<v Speaker 5>was going to be forced to start Caleb Williams. Okay,

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>So I'm gonna go Brandon Allen over Caleb Williams. This week,

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:31.479
<v Speaker 5>George Kittle is back. That's got to help Brandon Allen out.

1:07:31.920 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 5>The Packers can't be happy about that, because in the

1:07:34.160 --> 1:07:37.360
<v Speaker 5>last three meetings with Green Bay, he's averaging seventy nine

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 5>yards per game. The only top ten tight ends the

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:43.439
<v Speaker 5>Packers have faced this year were Trey McBride and Evan

1:07:43.600 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Ingram both topped thirteen PPR points. Probably would have been

1:07:46.920 --> 1:07:48.640
<v Speaker 5>an A for Kittle. I'll downgrade it to a B

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 5>with Allen under center, but it's still a good matchup.

1:07:52.640 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 5>I noted that Kittle had great history against green Bay.

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Deebo Samuel is the complete opposite. In five career games

1:07:59.440 --> 1:08:02.800
<v Speaker 5>against green Bay, He's averaging two point eight receptions for

1:08:02.800 --> 1:08:06.240
<v Speaker 5>forty three yards in his games against the Packers. Either

1:08:06.280 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 5>green Bay just sells up to stop him or the

1:08:08.200 --> 1:08:10.160
<v Speaker 5>Niners just have other ways to beat the Packers.

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>So just to see for debo.

1:08:12.400 --> 1:08:14.360
<v Speaker 5>But if Allen goes short a lot, Deebo could be

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 5>more involved, and they could get him involved in the

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 5>run game too. Juwan Jennings, I'm gonna leave him as

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:21.759
<v Speaker 5>an A grade though. Wow with Alan, Even with Alan

1:08:21.760 --> 1:08:24.439
<v Speaker 5>in the two games since returning ten and eleven targets,

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:27.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty eight percent target share and a pair of games

1:08:27.240 --> 1:08:31.080
<v Speaker 5>over ninety yards, plus Jayir Alexander dealing with a knee issue.

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:33.920
<v Speaker 5>He's probably gonna miss some time, so that leaves the

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:38.759
<v Speaker 5>rhyming corners of Carrington Valentine and Corey Ballentine and Keishawn

1:08:38.840 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Nixon to cover him. Those are A plus plus plus

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 5>matchups for Jennings, so he'll top one hundred and score

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:47.839
<v Speaker 5>in this game. Even with Brandon Allen. I think Christian McCaffrey,

1:08:47.840 --> 1:08:50.320
<v Speaker 5>he's an A grade nineteen and twenty three touches in

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:52.840
<v Speaker 5>his first two games back. He's back to belcow status

1:08:53.040 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 5>might even get more this week with Allen under the center.

1:08:57.160 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 4>It's a pretty incredible the workload that, I mean, we

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>all assume mccaffe was going to walk into fifty percent,

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:05.919
<v Speaker 4>right like when he came back, like Jordan Mason will.

1:09:05.720 --> 1:09:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Still be so much five point two yards per carry.

1:09:09.080 --> 1:09:11.519
<v Speaker 5>And I actually thought that they wouldn't bring him back

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 5>unless he was completely healthy, which one definitely, but they

1:09:15.680 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 5>did and now he's just their guy again.

1:09:18.439 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so he's still one game. I thought they would

1:09:21.040 --> 1:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>have rammed him up, but anyway, they did not.

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:24.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean the one game they ramped him up, they

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:28.040
<v Speaker 5>gave him nineteen touch No. I know, he's the here's

1:09:28.120 --> 1:09:30.080
<v Speaker 5>a let's go to the other side, the packer's side.

1:09:30.120 --> 1:09:32.479
<v Speaker 5>Here's how bad wide receiver is as a whole.

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 3>This year.

1:09:33.479 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 5>Jayden Reid is wide receiver seven in PPR leagues. He's

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:40.960
<v Speaker 5>averaging four point nine targets. I had three point eight

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:44.000
<v Speaker 5>receptions per game for sixty four receiving yards and he

1:09:44.040 --> 1:09:47.200
<v Speaker 5>only has five touchdowns. Yeah, that's wide receiver seven in

1:09:47.280 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 5>fantasy football. Romeo Dobbs actually averages more targets per game

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Dontavian Wicks and Christian Watson. They're not far behind in

1:09:54.000 --> 1:09:55.960
<v Speaker 5>the target share. We said at the beginning of the

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:57.720
<v Speaker 5>year the Packers wide receivers is going to be a

1:09:57.760 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 5>guessing game all year. They still are, and the nine

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:03.600
<v Speaker 5>secondary's fantastic. It got better with the return of Charvarius

1:10:03.640 --> 1:10:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Ward this week. They've only allowed three wide receiver touchdowns

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:10.760
<v Speaker 5>in their last eight games, and only three.

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Of those three.

1:10:13.320 --> 1:10:15.759
<v Speaker 5>One of them was last week against Jackson Smith in JIGBA.

1:10:16.479 --> 1:10:19.200
<v Speaker 5>He got ten for one ten. Jayden Reid runs eighty

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 5>percent of his routes from the slot. That's where JSN

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:24.760
<v Speaker 5>ran from, so he gets the c start any of

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 5>the other Packers receivers at your own risk. Tucker Craft

1:10:28.360 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 5>should remain on the bench. He threw up a goose

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:32.960
<v Speaker 5>egg in only one target last week in Chicago. Tougher

1:10:33.000 --> 1:10:35.559
<v Speaker 5>matchup this week. Niners are allowing an average of four

1:10:35.600 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 5>catches and thirty five yards to the position, and I

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:40.479
<v Speaker 5>have only allowed two tight end scores all year.

1:10:41.200 --> 1:10:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Love gets a C grade.

1:10:42.840 --> 1:10:45.120
<v Speaker 5>I didn't really like the receivers, and the Niners are

1:10:45.120 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 5>top eight in passing yards and passing scores allowed. Only

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:50.800
<v Speaker 5>two quarterbacks have hit the two to fifty yard mark

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 5>against San Francisco this year. Two have hit the two

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 5>touchdown pass mark. Not one has hit three touchdowns in

1:10:56.960 --> 1:10:59.519
<v Speaker 5>a game. The one thing Love will have going for him,

1:10:59.640 --> 1:11:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Nick will be out for this week for the Niners.

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:11:02.400 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 5>And then finally, Josh Jacobs, He's still a bellcow. Don't

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:09.400
<v Speaker 5>worry about Marshawn Lloyd looming his average. He's averaging seventeen

1:11:09.400 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 5>and a half attempts per game on the season, and

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:14.439
<v Speaker 5>it's been closer to nineteen in the last month. He's

1:11:14.479 --> 1:11:17.400
<v Speaker 5>topped one hundred combo yards in three straight. He scored

1:11:17.439 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 5>four times in his last four games, averages about three

1:11:20.280 --> 1:11:23.639
<v Speaker 5>catches per game. The Niners run defense hasn't been nearly

1:11:23.680 --> 1:11:26.080
<v Speaker 5>as scary this year. They have allowed the eleventh most

1:11:26.120 --> 1:11:28.920
<v Speaker 5>touchdowns and the tenth most running back receptions.

1:11:29.160 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 3>And Jacobs gets a B grade.

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 5>He should see a ton of usage in this game,

1:11:32.280 --> 1:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>especially in the receiving game. I think he'll have a

1:11:33.920 --> 1:11:34.439
<v Speaker 5>good day there.

1:11:34.520 --> 1:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>How about Marshaon Lloyd who comes off the injury list

1:11:38.040 --> 1:11:43.519
<v Speaker 2>same day appendicitis attack. Geez, poor guys, just like a

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:45.840
<v Speaker 2>basically a lost season, fim Marshawn Lloyd.

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Bummer.

1:11:46.439 --> 1:11:48.680
<v Speaker 2>That is a bummer, isn't it. Let's go to our

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:51.080
<v Speaker 2>final matchup of this segment, Philadelphia Eagles taking on the

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles Rams. DeVonta Smith ruled out of this game.

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Does that change you're thinking at all? On Jalen Hurts, Brian.

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>No, I didn't have I only had a C on

1:12:01.439 --> 1:12:04.000
<v Speaker 4>DeVonta Smith, so it doesn't change a whole lot for me.

1:12:04.040 --> 1:12:07.080
<v Speaker 4>On Jalen Hurtz, he was gonna get an easy A.

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I was going to start with Saquon Barkley, but the

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:12.720
<v Speaker 4>big news that Smith is out, So who I'm trying

1:12:12.760 --> 1:12:18.639
<v Speaker 4>to remember? Johan Dotson dots. I can't swap Dotson in

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 4>with the C for DeVante Smith. He's on the bench.

1:12:22.880 --> 1:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Aj Brown, though he gets an A. The Rams are

1:12:25.800 --> 1:12:28.679
<v Speaker 4>allowing the most yards per pass attempt on boundary targets.

1:12:29.080 --> 1:12:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Boundary targets, which is where Brown makes his hey. He

1:12:32.080 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 4>averages four yards per route run when lined up outside.

1:12:36.240 --> 1:12:39.080
<v Speaker 4>That is the best clip in the NFL. So an

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>A grade for Devant. I'm sorry, aj Brown a B grade,

1:12:43.120 --> 1:12:46.799
<v Speaker 4>saying with last in the passing game Dallas Goddard opposing

1:12:46.840 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 4>tight ends or averaging more than five catches and sixty

1:12:49.600 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 4>yards per game against the Rams. So you gotta like Dallas,

1:12:53.200 --> 1:12:56.280
<v Speaker 4>especially in the wasteland and especially in the by apocalypse.

1:12:57.240 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 4>And clearly you like Saquon Barkley. I'll go into some stats,

1:13:02.000 --> 1:13:04.679
<v Speaker 4>they're not needed. He gets an A. Barkley on pace

1:13:04.760 --> 1:13:08.519
<v Speaker 4>for one nine hundred and thirty three rushing yards this year,

1:13:08.560 --> 1:13:12.439
<v Speaker 4>his career high so far one three hundred and twelve.

1:13:12.560 --> 1:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Dang, he's crushing it. Yeah, good call, New York YEP,

1:13:15.720 --> 1:13:16.479
<v Speaker 2>it's a great call.

1:13:16.640 --> 1:13:19.160
<v Speaker 4>The Rams have been good against the run since they're

1:13:19.280 --> 1:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>bye in Week six, but the rubber might meet the

1:13:23.640 --> 1:13:26.639
<v Speaker 4>road for La here. The Eagles have gained nearly fifty

1:13:26.680 --> 1:13:29.719
<v Speaker 4>percent of their offensive yardage on the ground, the highest

1:13:29.800 --> 1:13:32.720
<v Speaker 4>rate in the league. That's almost unheard of, and game

1:13:32.800 --> 1:13:35.559
<v Speaker 4>script should favor Barkley in this one. I'm gonna get

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 4>to the Rams offense in a bit, but they're in

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 4>trouble against this Philadelphia defense. So in a grade for Barkley,

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>and I mentioned in a grade for Hurts, there's rarely

1:13:44.920 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 4>a situation where you're not going to give Jalen Hurts

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>a B or as C because of the of the

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:51.960
<v Speaker 4>touch push over to the.

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:54.920
<v Speaker 3>He's got nine touchdowns in the last five weeks.

1:13:55.040 --> 1:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>Insane rushing touchdowns.

1:13:56.600 --> 1:13:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Ye nine, it's crazy.

1:13:58.920 --> 1:14:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Nine touchdowns. Yeah, that is insane. All right over to

1:14:02.000 --> 1:14:06.679
<v Speaker 4>the rams side. Eagles against the running backs against running

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 4>backs great as of late. So Kyn Williams, just to

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.800
<v Speaker 4>see yere. You look early on you look at all

1:14:13.800 --> 1:14:15.639
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles numbers. Early in the season, they were getting

1:14:15.640 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 4>shredded in every aspect on defense. That has changed drastically.

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:21.680
<v Speaker 4>It has since their Week five by you know.

1:14:21.680 --> 1:14:22.519
<v Speaker 2>What happened in Week six?

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:23.479
<v Speaker 4>What's up?

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Cooper went to the starting lineup as their slock cornerback

1:14:27.720 --> 1:14:30.639
<v Speaker 2>and it powered the entire pass defense for the Eagles

1:14:30.680 --> 1:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>than they are now. They're basically the best defense in

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the league run and pass.

1:14:35.320 --> 1:14:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so get this stat since they're bye in week five,

1:14:41.200 --> 1:14:44.479
<v Speaker 4>I said that the secondary insane. So the first four

1:14:44.560 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 4>games for the Eagles, I'm getting over to the wide receivers. Now,

1:14:47.120 --> 1:14:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Pukin Nakua Cooper Cup. The Eagles allowed seven wide receiver

1:14:51.160 --> 1:14:54.880
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns in their first four games wide receivers alone. That's insane.

1:14:55.120 --> 1:14:58.559
<v Speaker 4>Since then like one one, yeah, and it went to

1:14:59.280 --> 1:15:01.360
<v Speaker 4>You can take a guess the kind of player it

1:15:01.400 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 4>went to, Jamar Chase, who was targeted eleven times. He

1:15:05.360 --> 1:15:07.679
<v Speaker 4>did catch nine passes in that game for only fifty

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:10.599
<v Speaker 4>four yards, So the touchdown kind of flukey that one.

1:15:10.640 --> 1:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>So just a sea for Cooper Cup, Just a sea

1:15:14.120 --> 1:15:18.080
<v Speaker 4>for Pokin Nakuah, who should see rookie corner Quinnon Mitchell

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:20.639
<v Speaker 4>for the majority of this game, emerging as the next

1:15:20.680 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 4>great shutdown corner, second best odds to win Defensive Rookie

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:27.719
<v Speaker 4>of the Year. He has recently erased the stat lines

1:15:27.760 --> 1:15:32.759
<v Speaker 4>for Terry McLaurin, Ceedee Lamb, Brian Thomas Junior, Pookin Nakua

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:34.639
<v Speaker 4>in trouble here. Just a sea grade for him. You're

1:15:34.640 --> 1:15:37.960
<v Speaker 4>not gonna sit him, but temper your your expectations. Speaking

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:41.080
<v Speaker 4>of sitting, you're sitting the tight ends. I liked Davis

1:15:41.160 --> 1:15:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Allen last week in the matchup against the Patriots because

1:15:44.400 --> 1:15:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Colby Parkinson was dead. Colby Parkinson caught the touchdown, but

1:15:47.800 --> 1:15:50.880
<v Speaker 4>you're not starting any tight end against the Eagles, and

1:15:50.920 --> 1:15:54.599
<v Speaker 4>you're not starting Matt Stafford against the Eagles either. I'm

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 4>another stat since they're Week five by Philly allowing a

1:15:58.640 --> 1:16:02.320
<v Speaker 4>league low nine thineteen percent of their passing yards have

1:16:02.400 --> 1:16:04.439
<v Speaker 4>gone for ten or more yards against the Eagles. The

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 4>league average is twenty seven percent. They're just shutting down

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the pass. A league low four point four percent of

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>passes have gained twenty or more yards against the Eagles,

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the league average nine percent. They're essentially twice as good

1:16:18.120 --> 1:16:19.479
<v Speaker 4>as any other secondary in the league.

1:16:19.520 --> 1:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now, when we come back, we jump in the

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Football Weekly time machine for premature speculation, our final segment.

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:47.920
<v Speaker 8>When we return, final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, Thank

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:48.720
<v Speaker 8>you for joining us.

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Reminder Guillotine Leagues, new league still forming today. You can

1:16:51.920 --> 1:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>play for you can play for cash. It's totally up

1:16:54.240 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to you. Seven more weeks left of hot chopping action.

1:16:57.200 --> 1:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>As I like to say, although the chopping action is

1:17:00.400 --> 1:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>it's only hot when it happened to somebody else.

1:17:02.360 --> 1:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it happened to me last week, so sorry, so

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:06.479
<v Speaker 5>say it made it a long ways I did.

1:17:06.640 --> 1:17:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think if you make it to week eleven,

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a win. Yeah, not bad.

1:17:11.280 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 5>Thank you Baltimore Ravens for doing nothing last week.

1:17:15.120 --> 1:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll jump into the Fantasy Football Weekly time Machine for

1:17:18.200 --> 1:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>premature speculation players you want to pick up now that

1:17:21.439 --> 1:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>other people are going to try to pick up next week.

1:17:24.120 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's find out who they are. Beginning with Matt Harrison.

1:17:26.439 --> 1:17:30.519
<v Speaker 2>I've got Ad and O'Connell's Terry's brother.

1:17:30.680 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean they're both Irish, obviously, Harry. It's been

1:17:34.240 --> 1:17:38.280
<v Speaker 5>thirty days exactly since the Raiders put O'Connell on ir

1:17:38.800 --> 1:17:41.639
<v Speaker 5>with an injury. That's a four to six week injury.

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Minshew will start this week. I'm guessing he'll probably start

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:48.439
<v Speaker 5>the Black Friday game the next week against the Chiefs,

1:17:48.439 --> 1:17:51.439
<v Speaker 5>seeing as it's a short week. But we all know

1:17:51.520 --> 1:17:55.559
<v Speaker 5>Minshew's not the long term answer, and he'll O'Connor only

1:17:55.640 --> 1:17:57.960
<v Speaker 5>lost the job because he got hurt, so the Raiders

1:17:57.960 --> 1:18:00.280
<v Speaker 5>will probably want another long look at O'Connell to end

1:18:00.280 --> 1:18:02.840
<v Speaker 5>the year. By the way, this puts O'Connell back under

1:18:02.840 --> 1:18:05.840
<v Speaker 5>center in Week fourteen for a game against maybe the

1:18:05.840 --> 1:18:08.919
<v Speaker 5>worst secondary in the league, the Bucks. Then Week fifteen

1:18:08.960 --> 1:18:12.799
<v Speaker 5>against the Falcons terrible pass defense. Then Week sixteen against

1:18:12.800 --> 1:18:16.320
<v Speaker 5>the Jaguars horrible defense, then the Saints in your fantasy

1:18:16.400 --> 1:18:17.240
<v Speaker 5>championship week.

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>That's easy too.

1:18:18.320 --> 1:18:20.640
<v Speaker 5>And I'm not saying pick up O'Connell and start him

1:18:20.640 --> 1:18:22.719
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the way, but he's an insurance policy

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:25.759
<v Speaker 5>in case your starter goes down and you need somebody

1:18:25.840 --> 1:18:28.160
<v Speaker 5>for the fantasy playoffs, especially in a super flex league.

1:18:28.360 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I just stash him right now and hope you don't

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:33.160
<v Speaker 5>have to use him, but you might need to, and

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 5>it might be fine.

1:18:34.600 --> 1:18:36.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm not an AID and O'Connell guy, and O'Brien is

1:18:36.520 --> 1:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>an AID and O'Connell guy. You too like him more

1:18:38.280 --> 1:18:40.879
<v Speaker 2>than I do, but I that schedule is pretty compelling.

1:18:40.920 --> 1:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>He's going to have some hill.

1:18:42.000 --> 1:18:44.200
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't eight and O'Connell guy, but it came between

1:18:44.280 --> 1:18:47.160
<v Speaker 4>him and Gardner Minshew. I said, they're like the same person,

1:18:47.280 --> 1:18:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and I'm not like love Ado.

1:18:50.479 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 5>He's going to get to take a chance on me

1:18:51.960 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 5>grade in some one of those weeks because of the match.

1:18:54.200 --> 1:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>That is probably true.

1:18:55.200 --> 1:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Sam Donald, if you're listening, I'm a Sam Donald guy.

1:18:57.880 --> 1:18:59.320
<v Speaker 4>I am not an AID and O'Connell guy.

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Sam A big listener for you to my bay. All right, Brian,

1:19:02.520 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>you take a chance, not take a chance from your

1:19:04.080 --> 1:19:05.360
<v Speaker 2>premature speculation player.

1:19:05.680 --> 1:19:08.120
<v Speaker 4>If you're looking to stash a tight end, I'm gonna

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>go with Theo Johnson of the Giants New York coming

1:19:11.000 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 4>off of their buy. Prior to thereby, THEO was averaging

1:19:14.479 --> 1:19:17.040
<v Speaker 4>about four catches forty yards per game, had a touchdown

1:19:17.720 --> 1:19:20.640
<v Speaker 4>in three in one of his previous three games, but

1:19:20.720 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 4>he was playing through a back injury. Hopefully he's healthy

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:25.600
<v Speaker 4>coming out of the buy. We know Malik Neighbors not

1:19:25.680 --> 1:19:27.800
<v Speaker 4>too healthy right now. He's got a groin injury. So

1:19:27.840 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>if you were to miss time, THEO would earn some

1:19:30.360 --> 1:19:33.080
<v Speaker 4>extra targets and the rest of the season through Week

1:19:33.120 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 4>seventeen at least, all we care about looking pretty nice

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>for THEO. Five of his last six opponents bottom twelve

1:19:40.120 --> 1:19:43.160
<v Speaker 4>against the tight end in terms of fantasy production. Starting

1:19:43.200 --> 1:19:46.080
<v Speaker 4>this week against the Bucks, who are bottom five against

1:19:46.080 --> 1:19:48.240
<v Speaker 4>tight ends. He's got a great matchup in Week seventeen

1:19:48.560 --> 1:19:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the Colts bottom six against tight ends, and I mentioned

1:19:51.040 --> 1:19:53.400
<v Speaker 4>three other great matchups for him, so why not stash him.

1:19:53.680 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 4>One bad matchup is next week when it's a full

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Slady games and it's on Thanksgiving, so don't start him then.

1:19:58.360 --> 1:20:00.639
<v Speaker 4>But he's viable every other week on paper.

1:20:01.120 --> 1:20:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I've got another player you'll want to pick up but

1:20:03.479 --> 1:20:06.280
<v Speaker 2>not start this week in Chicago, we've got the new

1:20:06.280 --> 1:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator, Thomas Brown. We don't really know if what

1:20:10.439 --> 1:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>we saw last week is just the things that are

1:20:13.360 --> 1:20:15.559
<v Speaker 2>changing or is that just like a one week blip.

1:20:15.600 --> 1:20:20.599
<v Speaker 2>But rochan Johnson got a season high forty four percent

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 2>snap rate, a season high thirty four percent rush attempt rate.

1:20:25.200 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>He got two carries from inside the five. Rochean Johnson

1:20:29.200 --> 1:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>got a far expanded role last week. DeAndre Swift has

1:20:33.280 --> 1:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>been struggling for the last month of games. Now it's

1:20:37.040 --> 1:20:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings. As I mentioned earlier in the show brutal matchup,

1:20:40.320 --> 1:20:42.759
<v Speaker 2>you would need to get like a goal line plunge

1:20:42.760 --> 1:20:44.880
<v Speaker 2>from Roshan Johnson to get anything out of him for

1:20:44.880 --> 1:20:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this week. So I wouldn't play him this week. But downstream,

1:20:49.080 --> 1:20:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we've got more opportunities to play him.

1:20:51.120 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:20:51.280 --> 1:20:54.559
<v Speaker 2>The schedule's not easy by any means, but it's Detroit

1:20:54.600 --> 1:20:57.280
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, then another game against Minnesota, which we would

1:20:57.320 --> 1:20:59.839
<v Speaker 2>not want to play him again Detroit Seattle, so intent

1:21:00.120 --> 1:21:02.439
<v Speaker 2>there might be some opportunities, maybe a changing of the guard,

1:21:02.479 --> 1:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe DeAndre Swift's not that good. You might not even

1:21:04.720 --> 1:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>play this week.

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:07.640
<v Speaker 5>I was looking at the contract too for Swift. They

1:21:07.680 --> 1:21:09.599
<v Speaker 5>can't really get out of him next year, but they

1:21:09.600 --> 1:21:12.599
<v Speaker 5>could definitely relegate him to back up duties and it's

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:15.639
<v Speaker 5>a fine contract for that. But after that he's only

1:21:15.640 --> 1:21:19.240
<v Speaker 5>a one point three dead cap. Oh, so that's interesting.

1:21:19.600 --> 1:21:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Rochan could be taking over this job.

1:21:21.320 --> 1:21:22.599
<v Speaker 2>He could take over this job.

1:21:23.920 --> 1:21:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I did it, I did the thing. Thor was a

1:21:25.640 --> 1:21:29.559
<v Speaker 4>big Rochan guy. Yeah. I trusted Thor there. Yeah, last year, it.

1:21:29.479 --> 1:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Was a couple of years ago. Yeah, comped him to

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Marshall Fulk. I believe.

1:21:34.400 --> 1:21:38.240
<v Speaker 4>I like Rochan. Good call there.

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I like him as a straight ahead power back. You

1:21:40.880 --> 1:21:43.559
<v Speaker 2>get him moving laterally, and Roschan's not really your guy.

1:21:43.960 --> 1:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore takes on Los Angeles. This is to be the

1:21:46.800 --> 1:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Chargers of the Los Angeles Chargers on Monday Night. Let's

1:21:50.080 --> 1:21:53.160
<v Speaker 2>talk this one through. Lamar Jackson obviously start but and

1:21:53.200 --> 1:21:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers look like a really good pass defense on paper,

1:21:56.280 --> 1:21:58.799
<v Speaker 2>and maybe they are, but they've played so many bad

1:21:58.960 --> 1:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks it's hard to get a fair read on how

1:22:01.720 --> 1:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>good the Chargers' secondary actually is. Last week, the Chargers

1:22:06.520 --> 1:22:11.559
<v Speaker 2>pace played their best opposing quarterback of the year, Joe Burrow,

1:22:11.840 --> 1:22:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and they got it viscerated by Burrow. So Jackson still

1:22:16.120 --> 1:22:18.320
<v Speaker 2>an A level start from me, But there could be

1:22:18.320 --> 1:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>some variation here if it turns out the Chargers secondary

1:22:21.160 --> 1:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>is actually okay. Staying with the passing games, A Flowers

1:22:24.360 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>gets a B grade. He has posted Fantasy relevant games

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:29.719
<v Speaker 2>in five of the last seven. I'm not too worried

1:22:29.720 --> 1:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>about this one. Chargers secondary slumping lately, allowing the eighth

1:22:33.240 --> 1:22:36.400
<v Speaker 2>most Fantasy points over the last five weeks, and that

1:22:36.439 --> 1:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>includes a league worst seven wide receiver touchdowns allowed over

1:22:40.120 --> 1:22:42.880
<v Speaker 2>those last five weeks. Flowers runs from all parts of

1:22:42.920 --> 1:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the field, so he's largely gonna miss. The Chargers one

1:22:45.840 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>really good cornerback, Christian Fulton, who mostly plays on one

1:22:49.120 --> 1:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>side of the field, So still like Flowers a lot

1:22:51.840 --> 1:22:56.439
<v Speaker 2>B great on him. Mark Andrews is a likely return

1:22:56.560 --> 1:22:59.360
<v Speaker 2>last week, and then of course Andrews responded with a

1:22:59.400 --> 1:23:02.280
<v Speaker 2>complete du two catches for twenty two yards. The thing

1:23:02.520 --> 1:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>like for Andrews every week is just a roll of

1:23:04.840 --> 1:23:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the dice, totally touchdown dependent because low volume. When he

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>does not score, Here's what you get on average from

1:23:13.280 --> 1:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Mark Andrews two catches twenty four yards. That's great and

1:23:16.840 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>an L So will Andrews score in this game. The

1:23:21.280 --> 1:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>only team in the NFL that has not allowed a

1:23:24.800 --> 1:23:27.400
<v Speaker 2>tight end touchdown is the Chargers, so.

1:23:27.360 --> 1:23:28.360
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna allow.

1:23:28.160 --> 1:23:30.439
<v Speaker 2>Three to make up for it. If you believe in

1:23:30.439 --> 1:23:32.479
<v Speaker 2>the theory of do, the Bertie Kelcher theory of do,

1:23:32.720 --> 1:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>then yes, but I've got Andrews on the bench. Derek

1:23:35.800 --> 1:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Henry comes in with an A grade. Utterally misused last week,

1:23:38.880 --> 1:23:43.519
<v Speaker 2>a horrifying game plan by the by Todd munkin which

1:23:43.520 --> 1:23:45.519
<v Speaker 2>I hated. But hopefully it's going to go back to

1:23:45.520 --> 1:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>being a workhorse back even in a tough matchup this week,

1:23:48.240 --> 1:23:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Chargers allowing the second fewest fantasy points and only one

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdown. Only one back is top seventy yards, but

1:23:54.960 --> 1:23:57.559
<v Speaker 2>it's still Derrick Henry. I can't help but give him

1:23:57.560 --> 1:23:59.519
<v Speaker 2>an A grade, even if I probably should give him

1:23:59.520 --> 1:24:03.160
<v Speaker 2>a B grade against in a very tough matchup. Let's

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:07.599
<v Speaker 2>go to the Chargers side. I like Ladd mcconkee here.

1:24:07.840 --> 1:24:09.559
<v Speaker 2>It looks like he's going to go. He's been battling

1:24:09.560 --> 1:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>injury all week, but return to practice on Friday. Ladd

1:24:12.280 --> 1:24:14.839
<v Speaker 2>has been the most consistent LA receiver, with a target

1:24:14.880 --> 1:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>share north of twenty percent in eight of ten games

1:24:18.240 --> 1:24:21.479
<v Speaker 2>opposing number one receivers, murdering the Ravens. In the last

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:26.719
<v Speaker 2>four Ravens games the opponent's top receiver, averaging eight catches,

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:30.479
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and forty three yards and one in a

1:24:30.560 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>quarter touchdowns. But where it's a little bit different for

1:24:34.080 --> 1:24:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Lad McConkie than those previous receivers to face the Falcons.

1:24:37.400 --> 1:24:39.640
<v Speaker 2>He runs from the slot, and that means he's going

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to match up most often against Marlon Humphrey, who is

1:24:42.720 --> 1:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Pro Football Focus's number one graded coverage cornerback. I've got

1:24:48.240 --> 1:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>a B grade on Lad McConkie. Let's go over to

1:24:52.920 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Quintin Johnston. He was might take a chance on me

1:24:54.880 --> 1:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver. You may recall that Justin Herbert was might

1:24:57.200 --> 1:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>take a chance on me quarterback. What about a Ryan

1:25:00.439 --> 1:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Johnson favorite, Will Disley will display opposing Why do you

1:25:05.840 --> 1:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>say it that way?

1:25:06.439 --> 1:25:09.800
<v Speaker 4>By the way it just rolls off the Scottish tongue,

1:25:09.960 --> 1:25:12.679
<v Speaker 4>will dis lay. Maybe doesn't it sound it sounds like

1:25:12.720 --> 1:25:15.519
<v Speaker 4>a guy that would have been in Braveheart Well display

1:25:15.920 --> 1:25:16.639
<v Speaker 4>that kind of does.

1:25:16.680 --> 1:25:20.519
<v Speaker 2>Actually, now they say it. It's no Luke's Luke the cleaner,

1:25:20.640 --> 1:25:22.080
<v Speaker 2>cleaner spoon mocker.

1:25:22.560 --> 1:25:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I got a nickname for Disley. Oh do you

1:25:25.000 --> 1:25:26.240
<v Speaker 4>you want to hear it? Oh? You want to hear it?

1:25:26.280 --> 1:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:25:27.080 --> 1:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>The dismissal, the dismissal, Sorry, dismissal. Opposing tight ends you

1:25:33.960 --> 1:25:36.960
<v Speaker 2>see have a decent but not explosive game against the Ravens.

1:25:37.040 --> 1:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Only two have scored touchdowns, but eight different tight ends

1:25:39.800 --> 1:25:42.679
<v Speaker 2>of top forty two yards. Disley coming off his best

1:25:42.680 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 2>game of the year, but he's actually been fairly reliable

1:25:45.520 --> 1:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>for going back a whole month with a major uptick

1:25:48.080 --> 1:25:52.679
<v Speaker 2>in usage. Since completely overtaking Hayden Hurst as the Chargers

1:25:52.720 --> 1:25:56.639
<v Speaker 2>top tight end a month ago, he's quietly been a viable,

1:25:56.880 --> 1:26:00.960
<v Speaker 2>reliable fantasy tight end. Will Disley see in this one,

1:26:01.280 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and that leaves us with the running backs.

1:26:04.800 --> 1:26:05.080
<v Speaker 4>JK.

1:26:05.200 --> 1:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins C Grade. Dobbins has a very tough assignment against

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 2>a terrific Baltimore run defense. The last time he faced

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a run defense of this caliber, it was Kansas City

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:16.679
<v Speaker 2>and they destroyed him and he only put up thirty

1:26:16.720 --> 1:26:20.439
<v Speaker 2>two scoreless yards. The Ravens rank number one in yards

1:26:20.439 --> 1:26:24.679
<v Speaker 2>per carry, number two in run defense success rate number

1:26:24.760 --> 1:26:28.360
<v Speaker 2>two in rushing yards allowed at just sixty one per game.

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:32.519
<v Speaker 2>I give Dobbins a B grade, but he's now splitting

1:26:32.560 --> 1:26:36.920
<v Speaker 2>carries with Gus Edwards gross and divving up sixty one

1:26:37.000 --> 1:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>yards per game between two guys is not great, and

1:26:39.360 --> 1:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I can only get him to a C grade here

1:26:40.800 --> 1:26:44.439
<v Speaker 2>hopefully scores touchdowns, which Dobbins has done almost every game.

1:26:44.479 --> 1:26:48.519
<v Speaker 4>They even gave Hassan Haskins a couple carries on one

1:26:48.800 --> 1:26:51.360
<v Speaker 4>wine why and he did not score good So maybe

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:51.760
<v Speaker 4>they got that.

1:26:52.640 --> 1:26:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally Gus Edwards bench grade. Since coming off of

1:26:56.280 --> 1:26:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the IR he's seen a massive uptick in usage for

1:26:58.800 --> 1:27:01.679
<v Speaker 2>reasons I do not understand. But Gus is not startable

1:27:01.680 --> 1:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>in this tough matchup that I just outlined. Look, if

1:27:04.000 --> 1:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm only giving Dobbins a C grade, I'm not giving

1:27:06.000 --> 1:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Gus Edwards a letter grade either. And by the way,

1:27:09.400 --> 1:27:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins has got virtually all I think eighty four percent.

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I think is the success is the carries inside the five.

1:27:19.120 --> 1:27:20.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, guys, we've got a couple of free minutes

1:27:20.920 --> 1:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>here at the end. Me a couple of questions for you.

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Number one Thursday Night, Nick Chubb two touchdowns Are you

1:27:27.880 --> 1:27:30.439
<v Speaker 2>more optimistic about Nick Chubb going forward or do you

1:27:30.439 --> 1:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>think that was just a factor of a snow game

1:27:33.200 --> 1:27:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and goal line carries? He only ran it three yards

1:27:36.200 --> 1:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>per carry? What do you think about Nick Chubb going forward?

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:42.600
<v Speaker 5>In my viewership of the game, I just thought he

1:27:42.680 --> 1:27:46.400
<v Speaker 5>still looked pretty slow and plotting. Maybe that would be

1:27:46.400 --> 1:27:49.599
<v Speaker 5>because he's running in a few inches of wet, slippery snow,

1:27:49.680 --> 1:27:52.800
<v Speaker 5>but it didn't look that great. He did plow through

1:27:52.840 --> 1:27:55.439
<v Speaker 5>and get a couple of scores, but it didn't feel

1:27:55.439 --> 1:27:57.280
<v Speaker 5>that great for me. And I think Jerome Ford is

1:27:57.320 --> 1:27:59.599
<v Speaker 5>still a threat to take a lot of his touches.

1:28:00.280 --> 1:28:03.400
<v Speaker 4>And what's not great is the schedule. It's not great

1:28:03.400 --> 1:28:05.840
<v Speaker 4>as an understam and it's awful for Chub moving forward

1:28:06.040 --> 1:28:08.759
<v Speaker 4>at Denver Pittsburgh again, Yeah, you had the two touchdowns,

1:28:08.760 --> 1:28:10.840
<v Speaker 4>so you said he right, Tony carries for fifty nine

1:28:10.920 --> 1:28:12.720
<v Speaker 4>yards less than three yards per carry. If I can

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 4>do that math in my head, it's scary. Then Kansas

1:28:15.320 --> 1:28:18.639
<v Speaker 4>City the best team against the run in week fifteen

1:28:18.760 --> 1:28:22.679
<v Speaker 4>at since week seventeen. Yeah, if you can sell sell

1:28:22.720 --> 1:28:25.200
<v Speaker 4>now on Nick jo job. Yeah, if your trade.

1:28:25.040 --> 1:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Does have not passed yet, Yes, for some that would

1:28:28.040 --> 1:28:31.559
<v Speaker 2>be that would be the case. Thank you for joining us. Everybody, reminder,

1:28:32.160 --> 1:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>don't play a Guillotine league tons of fun. If you're like, oh,

1:28:34.000 --> 1:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna play next year, hey go get in some

1:28:35.960 --> 1:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>reps this year, learn how it works, learn the nuances

1:28:38.920 --> 1:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of the guillotine format by playing this year. And you

1:28:40.800 --> 1:28:44.240
<v Speaker 2>can even play for free Guillotine leagues dot com. You

1:28:44.280 --> 1:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>don't have to have a bunch of friends that know

1:28:45.880 --> 1:28:47.960
<v Speaker 2>how to play. You can play strangers or play for cash.

1:28:47.960 --> 1:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>However you want to play, you can do it Guillotine

1:28:50.479 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 2>leagues dot com. Thanks for listening. Everybody a best of

1:28:53.920 --> 1:28:56.639
<v Speaker 2>luck this week. Next week all the teams are back,

1:28:56.760 --> 1:29:01.519
<v Speaker 2>no teams on buy Thanksgiving Week. Fantasy Football Weekly coming

1:29:01.600 --> 1:29:03.719
<v Speaker 2>up next week. Can't wait to talk to you then, everybody,

1:29:04.520 --> 1:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>See you later.

1:29:21.040 --> 1:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>M