WEBVTT - BONUS: Listen to The Pay Check

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>M Hi. I'm Rebecca Greenfield, a reporter at Bloomberg. This

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is the first episode of the Paycheck. For the next

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, we're going to investigate a big, expensive, global mystery.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Why in women still make less money, a lot less

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>money than men. There's pretty broad agreement on the stats.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>According to the U S Census and the Bureau of

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Labor Statistics in the US, for every one dollar a

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>man makes, a woman gets about eighty cents. For women

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of color, it's even worse. Black women are in just

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty cents on the dollar. Hispanic women only fifty four cents.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 1>That's based on median hourly earnings for full time workers.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But the numbers they only get you so are because

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the gender pay gap, that's what it's called. By the way,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about the data. It's about how it plays

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out in real life. So here's one way it works

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in real life, actually my life sort of, because it's

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>about my mom. Linda Bradsky, that's my mom, was working

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as a pediatric ear nose and throat surgeon up in Buffalo,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>New York. She worked at the Children's Hospital, where she

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was the busiest surgeon in her practice. She was also

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a tenured full professor at Sunni Buffalo, a rank only

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a dozen other women had in her field. Then one

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>day she was doing some work in her department office

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and she found a document with the salaries of her

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>colleagues on it. When I saw what salaries would be

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>given out, I was appalled when I discovered that a

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>junior colleague, a man with lower rank, less seniority and

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pure responsibilities, was paid twice the stipend from the university

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as was And to make it worse, in some cases,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>my hospital colleagues were paid more than five times my

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>hospital stipend for the administrative work I performed. Even though

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I had the most busy service in the hospital. Her

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>male colleagues brought in less business, and yet they made

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>five times as much money. So she asked for a raise,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but she didn't get it. For four years, she tried

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to solve things internally, but finally in two thousand one,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>she filed a lawsuit, and for the next seven years

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>she spent most of her time outside of work fighting

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>her legal battle. She called it her third job. Even

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with a huge practice, a lot of economic security, academic standing,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of power, and my grants my research program.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It was very, very tough battle. My mom passed away

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in so there are a lot of questions. I can't

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>ask her about her legal battle. I can't ask her

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of things like trump, me too, or

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>my bad back. Those clips you heard are from a

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seminar she gave in after she sued. She still worked

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>full time as a surgeon, and I remember the nights

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and weekends she spent preparing for depositions, or reviewing discovery documents,

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or interviewing expert witnesses. I was in high school for

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time, and when I got bored,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd joined her at the kitchen table and we'd sit

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>together and sift through three ring binders full of salary information.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Her lawyer Sam, he was on speed dial. I was

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>halfway through college when she finally settled with the university.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>She got seven hundred forty thousand dollars, but she later

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>said the money wasn't enough to make up for the

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>time she spent or what it did to her career.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>She got passed over for jobs and stopped getting invitations

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to speak on panels. I remember this one time she

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>had to go to anger management because she spoke too

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>loudly during a medical emergency. I was sent to see

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a psychiatrist for anger management, and after two sessions, the

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrist wrote back to the medical staff that Dr Brawsky

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>has no anger management problem. She acted appropriately to the

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>stressors she faced. When the medical staff president called her

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and she was angry. The psychiatrist says, I think you

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have an anger management problem, but actually she was angry

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and frustrated and upset the lawsuit. It took up a

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of time and energy, but the worst part of

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it was that she didn't think it changed anything for

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>other women in medicine or any other field. YO. The

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>year my mom found out she made five times less

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>than her male colleagues was also the year Want to

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Be by the Spice Girls hit number one. That was

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the cultural moment. I grew up in a league of

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>their own. Powerpuff Girls, legally blonde like It's girl power

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>was everywhere. My mom and everyone else told me I

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>could be whatever I wanted, and I believe them. My

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>mom was a surgeon, she wore shoulder pads in a

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>funny way. The lesson I took from her lawsuit reinforced

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>all that girl power stuff. See women could be strong

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and fight for what's right. It took me a lot

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>longer to realize the other part of it, that my

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mom could be all of these amazing things and yet

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>still face discrimination. When you look at the world, you

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the population like. Where is our place like?

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Where is our value? People? Real work helps to keep

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>women not on a pedestal but in a cage, and nationwide,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the median salary for men is greater than women in

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine point six of major occupations, gil power equalization

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>between the sex sees. What dudes are you won't? We

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>want to end gender inequality, and to do this we

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>need everyone involved. Bloomberg crush the numbers and found that

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is the worst when it comes to gender

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pay gaps. And here are the all male nominees. This

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is the paycheck. The gender pay gap isn't just a

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>problem for women. If you're married to a woman, she's

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>making less money for your family single mom, then you

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have less money to spend on childcare, which makes it

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to work and earn more money. What does that

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>look like when you multiply it by all the women

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, By one estimate, twenty eight trillion dollars

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>would be added to the global economy if women earned

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as men. I've been reporting on this for

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and people like to tell me women

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>earn less than men for entirely justifiable reasons. They say

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>women tend to work in lower paying jobs and fields.

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>They say women take off more time to raise kids

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>than men do. Women, they say, are also less likely

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate their salaries or ask for raises. But there

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of people who don't see it that way.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>They say women aren't given the same opportunities as men.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>They say they're discriminated against or sexually harassed out of

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>their jobs and careers. A lot of people are only

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just starting to understand how common that is. One of

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the big problems with the gender pay gap is that

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all of these things and they interact with each

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>other all the time. Women do make choices, they're also

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes discriminated against for the choices they make. There's no

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>simple explanation and there's no easy solution. This is all

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about money. So let's go where the money is, Wall Street,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically to Goldman Sachs, one of the most powerful banks.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>If you have the same responsibilities and you are just

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>as effective, then you should be equally compensated and rewarded

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for that work. That's Christina chen Austar. She went to

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>work at Goldman Sacks and over the next eight years

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>she made a lot of money, but the men working

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman they made a lot more. Goldman says that

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not about gender, it's just about individuals getting paid

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for performance. Christina has been fighting for thirteen years now,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to prove there's more to it. She talked about

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>her case for the first time with my colleagues Dune,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence and mac Abelson. A warning, the story you're about

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear contains a description of an alleged sexual assault.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Christina was born in Taiwan, but grew up outside of Chicago.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>She's the oldest of five girls and just incredibly smart.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>She graduated from m I T when she was twenty.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>She had already been working for six years in banking

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>when Goldman hired her to sell convertible bonds that's a

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bond that can be turned into a stock. Back then,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>she didn't spend much time thinking about gender discrimination. She

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was just really excited about joining Goldman Sachs. Like all

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the big banks, the ones that make billions and billions

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a year. Goldman gets high ratings and some

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>good press for things like generous maternity leave and mentoring programs.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But on Wall Street women still have to deal with

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>some shockingly bad behavior and a code of silence when

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>things go wrong. Christina found that out pretty early on

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>in Goldman. This still is not easy for her to

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Well. Um, the sexual assault happened not long

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>after I joined Goldman, Sachs. I joined in March of

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>n and then it happened in October, which was just

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seven months later. This is Christina's account from legal filings

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and inner views of what happened Goldman, as you'll hear,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>disputes most of it. She and her team had gone

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>out to dinner to celebrate someone's promotion. Then everyone went

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to a strip club. She got bored and left, but

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a colleague insisted on walking her to her boyfriend's apartment

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a few blocks away. Upstairs. Outside the apartment, he pinned

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>her against the wall and groped and kissed her. She

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>had to fight him off. The Next day she saw

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>him in the office. He pulled her aside and he apologized.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He asked her to promise not to say anything, and

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for a year and a half she didn't. When she

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>finally told her manager about the assault, it turned out

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he already knew her boss was friends with this guy.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He told them what happened, but not who it had

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>happened with. He said, oh, that was you, and so

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I was flabbergasted, and the response really disappointed me since

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very clear that something was wrong. He said,

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>now it's my duty to raise this with HR and

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and I would suggest that you not make a big

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>deal out of it, since you don't want a lawsuit.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I essentially did what he asked and then

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>reported that back to him. Christina hoped that would be

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. It wasn't. After that, she says

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>she was cut out of big areas of business. Her

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>managers didn't support her attempts to find new opportunities. Her

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>performance reviews, which fed into how much she got paid,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were assigned to colleagues she didn't even work with much.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>When you're busy and you're working hard, you just focus

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on doing a good job and doing your work, and

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't really think about it too much on a

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis. And you can ignore a lot

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of things, but you know at some point you step away,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you lift up your head, and you realize that things

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>are not right. That point for Christina came in two

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, when she returned from maternity leave. Her team

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>had been reorganized and they had moved her desk. Now

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>she was sitting with a group of administrative assistants, all women.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a very visual and visceral representation that my

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>manager did not care about my career or care about

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my prospects for contributing to the team. In eight years

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman, Christina remained a vice president and her pay

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up rising about the guy she says assaulted her,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he made managing director, then partner. Over those same years,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>his pay went up something like four In two thousand five,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>she quit and filed a complaint with the Equal Employment

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity Commission, the federal agency tasked with investigating complaints of discrimination.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to see your employer in court, in

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>most cases, this is the first step. Goldman told the

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>e e o C that Christina was paid more than

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>fairly and the firm hadn't wanted her to leave at all.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The part where she had to sit with the secretaries temperary.

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Saks called her alleged assault a brief and disputed

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>interaction that she was now, in the words of Goldman

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sax trying to exploit. Gina Palumbo, whoever sees employment law

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at the firm, gave us Goldman Saxes perspective. What she

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>says is this. The key issues here are that Mission

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Astars significantly delayed reporting the incident to employ your relations,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and when she did talk to employee relations, she declined

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>to provide any detail about the incident or to in

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>any way cooperate in the investigation. In two thousand ten,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the e o C gave her the green light. She

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>filed suit along with two other former Goldman employees, alleging

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that Goldman paid women less than men for the same

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>work and that the bank systematically denied women the opportunities

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they deserved. They wanted Goldman to pay for its mistakes

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and to change its policies. They also wanted to sue

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as a class, representing more than two thousand Goldmen women.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Once you say you're soon to represent a group, it

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>raises the stakes a lot. It stops being about this

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>or that individual experience. They'd have to prove Goldman is

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>systematically biased against the women who worked there. It also

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>raises the financial stakes for the women and for the bank.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>For the last eight years, they've been going back and

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>forth and back and forth. There were fights about internal documents.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Christina's team won those and attempts to divide the coalition

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of plaintiffs. Sometimes they were just unlucky. In two thousand eleven,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court issued a ruling that made it harder

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to get class status. The case has also moved from

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>judge to judge. In two thousand and fourteen, Christina's lawyers

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>were finally ready to put a number on paid discrimination

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman Sachs. Female vice presidents were paid twenty one

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>percent less than similar men, according to their analysis. Goldman

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>calls that analysis deeply flawed and maintains they pay everyone fairly. Meanwhile,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>more women have joined the suit. Here's one of them,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Alice and Gamba, a former Goldman Sachs trader. I had

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>my head on. I did everything right. I jumped through

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>every hoop, I played the game right. I did everything

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that should have got me the title that I wanted,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't get it. What do I have to lose. Now,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>if I could help them out, you know, maybe there's

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a chance that something changes in this industry.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Christina was twenty five when she started at Goldman. She

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was thirty four when she filed that ees. He complained

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this March ty nine, she turned forty seven. The next

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>day was Good Friday, and the markets were closed. She

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>took her daughter to visit a prospective middle school. The

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>very same day, the judge ruled that Christina and Allison

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>can represent a class of as many as two thousand

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>three d women and christina GE's Kelly Dermany, M hey,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's some amazing news. The court just certified. Christina didn't

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>hear her lawyer's voicemail until the next day. She was

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a Broadway theater waiting for a Saturday matinee

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of Mean Girls. A huge congratulations, just really really really

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>really happy for you. And this is not a happy ending.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's more like a happy ending to a beginning. No

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens, a settlement, a trial, you get the

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sense it's going to be big. This, after all, is

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sex. I firmly believe that eventually the truth always

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>comes out. Eventually, it's just a question of time, but

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope that things will be better and that

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we will come to a resolution before my daughter looks

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for a job. Goldman shows no signs of throwing in

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the towel. Gina Palombo told Bloomberg, we're defending the firm

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and good faith against what we believe our meritless accusations.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>She also says the plaintiffs analysis of Paya Goldman ignores

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that different roles in different teams have different

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>market values. Here's how Christina's lawyer, Kelly Dermody explains it.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what they would like to pretend that this case

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is about millions of individual decisions as opposed to a

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>system that has, you know, players that operate within the

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>guidelines of the system. A lot of big US companies

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>make some version of this claim. They do their own

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>pay gap analysis and they find little or no disparity

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>between what they pay men and women. Well, Spargo, b

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and Y, Melon City Group, Master Cards, and JP Morgan

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>have all released that information. After accounting for the different factors.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Those companies have all said their pay gap is really

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>very small. On a like for like basis, women make

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about one percent less than men. Do you heard that right?

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>One percent? So how does that work? We know women

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US make less than men, and yet all

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>these companies, these major employers, they say they barely have

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a pay gap at all. My colleague Jordan Holman and

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get to the bottom of it. So

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Companies don't have to tell you anything

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about their pay gaps. The law just says it's illegal

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to discriminate in the US. Any company that's releasing a

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>number is releasing the number for presumably public relations purposes,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to inform whoever's watching that g don't come after us

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and say we're discriminating. Look, here's an analysis that shows

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>that there's no pay gap once you account for people

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>doing comparable work. That's Henry Farber. He's a professor at

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Princeton and he's an expert at measuring the gender pay gap.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I called Dr Farber and asked him about these small

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>pay gaps and how they could be so much smaller

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>than the national average, and he told me it just

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>really depends on what you measure. Well, as I understand it,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>people can use these terms however they like, but the

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>average pay gap is simply taken as a whole. For example,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>within a company, what's the average pay that men received

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and the average pay that women received, and the proportional

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>difference between those two is what might be called the

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>average pay gap. What the average tells you a lot

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time is that most of a company's highest

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>paid people are men, but it doesn't tell you if

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>men and women doing the same job are getting paid

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the same. So if you want to figure out if

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a gap between men and women doing the same work,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>then that's when you use the adjusted pay gap. And

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that calculates all of the things that go into compensation,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's lots of them, like education, experience, how long

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you've worked out a place. There's no specific formula for

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>calculating what some might call an adjusted pay gap, so

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, there's no set equation for the adjusted

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pay gap. Companies can use whatever variables they want, but

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, there are reasons companies might want to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>know both number bers they're just a pay gap helps

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>them compare apples to apples. Plus, if you aren't paying

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>men and women the same for the same work, then

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a problem. Companies say they consider variables like

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>someone's experience, job title and geography. For example, someone living

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York probably makes more than someone in Kansas

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>City because the cost of living is higher. But then

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes companies use the phrase pay philosophy. What does that mean?

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know, and they don't elaborate. Recently, when

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr Barber was looking at one company's data, he came

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>up with four different adjust to pay gap figures that

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>reigns between two point eight percent and eight point six percent.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>When the company did its own analysis, they said the

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>gap was even smaller zero point two percent. You can

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine in that the company might be able to cook

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>up an adjustment analysis. Cook up is the wrong word,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's too pejorative, but come up with an adjusted pay

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis that shows there's not much of a gap at all,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas some other analysts might look at this and say, no, no,

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you're over adjusting for some things, and in fact there

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is a substantial pay gap. But that's the problem with

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the adjusted pay gap. We don't know what variables they're

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>including and how much weight they're giving them. Maybe everyone's

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>getting paid fairly for the job they're in, but this

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>figure might not tell us that companies are just asking

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 1>us to trust them and that's a little awkward. I

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen too many companies, frankly, either talk about their

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>pay gaps or admit that they have a substantial pay

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>gap between men and women. The average pay gap tells

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 1>us who's taking home the biggest salaries at these companies,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and if men keep earning a lot more than the

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>women they work with like they do and most major

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>US companies, the average pay gap is going to stay

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty big. To change this equation, you need a more

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>balanced workforce at every single level, so like more women

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the pay scale or more men

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom, exactly. And then the question is is

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone getting a fair shot of reaching the highest paid jobs.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a word that's entered the popular lexicon recently that

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think perfectly describes what's happening. Gas lighting. Decades of

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>statistics tell us we're making less money. Our experiences tell

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>us we're being paid less. They moved Christina's desk, My

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mom saw the salaries of her coworkers. But our employers say,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to see here, just a whole lot of

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable explanations. Next week on the paycheck, we're going to

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dig into those explanations. How would did we get here?

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Why do women make less money than men in the

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>first place? The short answer sex. Thanks for listening to

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>The Paycheck. If you like our show, please head on

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>over to Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to rate, review,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe. This episode was reported by Dune, Lawrence, Max Abelson,

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and Jordan Holman. It was edited by Janet Paskin, produced

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>by Elizabeth, and hosted by me Rebecca Greenfield. We had

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>additional help from Magnus Hendrickson, Francesca Levy, and Gillian Goodman.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Our original music is by Leo Sidron. Carrie Vanderriott did

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the illustrations on our show page, which you can find

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>at bloomberg dot com slash Paycheck. Bloomberg's head a podcast

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is Francesca Levy