WEBVTT - We'll Change Your Mind About Being "Woke" 

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, their folks sit. It's Tuesday, August the fifth. I

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>got a question for you. Do you consider yourself woke?

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And do you consider woke a good thing or a

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>bad thing? In fact, is it an insult or a compliment?

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>If somebody says you're woke? Actually, let's go back a bit.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you even know what it means to be woke?

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And with that, welcome to this very woke edition of

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Amy and TJ Rope. Somebody calls you woke, you immediately

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>take that as what instinctively.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I would instinctively take it as a compliment. I'm aware

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that I am interested in things outside of my world

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and my lens that I'm saying.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Even with all that we hear about woke these days,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you still would hear it and take it as a compliment.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, it depends on who was saying it and why

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>they were saying it. Yeah, that would be an important nuance.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>But I do think generally speaking, I would consider someone

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>who is woke someone who is has been awakened, who

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>recognizes that you don't know what you don't know, and

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that there are other people and other cultures and other

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>just issues that maybe you don't consider that you've now recognized.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>So I guess in my head it's like it's a

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>cultural awakening, it's a that's kind of how I would

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 2>look at it. I understand it's thrown around in certain

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 2>ways now politically that are intended to be insulting. I

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>get that, But I still think, how is it a

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>bad thing to wake up to recognize, even if it's

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>what you don't know, How is that a bad thing?

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's not a bad thing. Obviously, the word has

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>been stolen, it's been co opted. It's been taken from us,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I should say those of us, in particular the black community.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been taken by and let's be specific, politicians, Republican politicians,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.919
<v Speaker 1>white Republican men, to be specific, is where this word

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>has and they have done a great job with their messaging,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because I don't even feel like black folks have control

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of this word anymore, because in the I would say

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>ten years, in the past ten years, at least, the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>majority of time I hear the word woke has been

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>all negative. It has been all political. In the years

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>prior to that, it was all black folks. It was

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a positive thing. It was you were almost it was

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>almost an insult. If somebody considered you not to be woke,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not where we are anymore. The word is such,

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it is thrown around as DII and it just it's

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all negative. And this came up Rover. It's probably daily,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is it not that we end up doing a morning ryme,

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we're doing our podcast, we're doing the news, and the

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>word woke comes up, and at some point sometimes I've

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>done it on the podcast in just a moment, are

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly saying to you like, I'm so sick of this,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sick of hearing the word woke. We should

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>do something on it one day, And we finally got

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>here because actually was Trump that got us to this

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>point today with a very long, confusing post that he

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>went woke and I didn't see it coming, and it's

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the Sidney Sweeney ad. We're still talking about that thing,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but that has people are celebrating that as being anti woke.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Which is I think assigning something to it that I

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>would like to believe was never the intention. But okay,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>use that again as a political hot potato and use

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>it to then push this messaging out that yes, white

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>male politicians specifically have taken over and made to actually

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>support an anti wokeness basically in a way, if that

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>makes any sense. What is anti wokeness.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Anti woke is pro white, anti wokeness is anti blackness.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It's anti diversity if you are against that, and that's

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>how it's being used.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>We can say this all day long, and we are

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not unlet We should make this clear, Robes. We are

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not trying to have a political discussion right now. We

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>are not trying to get on the sides of people

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>who think this is an ideology or not. I have

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my feelings about where it is when it comes to woke,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is not We're not trying to have a

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>political argument. All we were trying to do, Robes, And

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been begging folks to just stop for a second,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>take a beat, and examine what woke actually is and

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>don't just accept the negative definition that's being heaped on you,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're actually starting to think, and we're starting to

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>believe that if you are woke, then you are for diversity,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's bad. All. That's where the messaging now lie.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>And we talk about those robes all the freaking time.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you even know if you walk down the street,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what is woke? I just asked three kid downstairs, all

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>white under the age of twenty two, about woke, and

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>their answer was all the same. It's negative.

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 2>It's an insult, which is crazy because so you've been

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>wanting to do this podcast for some time, and I

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 2>asked you to give me some of the just the

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the articles, the research that you were using to go

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>back and really take a look at that word, where

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>it began and how it basically was stolen, especially in

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 2>the last few years. And I have to say I

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>learned a heck of a lot about that word that

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I did not know, and I'm just fully admitting I

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>did not know the origins and I did not realize that.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even a few years ago, folks were saying,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and just exchange the word woke for black,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's basically what's being said, which is scary if

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>you think about it in those terms. If you just

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>replace woke with black, that's offensive as hell. With how

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it's being used right now by many politicians, it.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Just drives me crazy that anytime it comes up, it's

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>automatically it's a word, it's a catch all. It is

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a all encompassing phrase to represent anti diversity, it's this

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that any effort to be progressive, any effort to

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>be inclusive, any effort to be anything other than heterosexual

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and white, is woke. And I hate that we are

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>now using this as a word and using diversity itself,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we want to be inclusive as a negative.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>That's scary when you start to see businesses and we

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>have seen one by one by one dropping their DEAI departments,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>dropping their DEI policies. Period. It's having real life impact

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of folks, and we haven't even seen

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the reality of what that's going to look like. You know,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing these businesses make these decisions now in real

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>time over the last couple of months. But what is

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>it going to look like? What are these businesses going

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to look like? What is what are their policies going

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 2>to look like six months from now, a year from now?

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>What impact is that going to have on the people

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>who these companies are supposed to be serving?

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't look, but it's not like all these

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>companies are very diverse when it comes to their corporate

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>leadership already. So now you take away a policy or

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an idea, or at least a belief or at least

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a declaration that we want to do better, that we

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be more diverse. We are now embracing it, seems,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and yes, this Sidney Sweeney ad has a lot to

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do with it, seeming to embrace this idea of yeah,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't give a damn and we're gonna boldface, We're

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna look right in your eye and say we don't

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>give a damn about including you in our group. That

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is now where the Sidney Sweeney ad. I don't think

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's what American Eagle was trying to do. Not knocking

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Sidney Sweeney for it, but it's become a bigger part

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of a conversation. And that's okay. I'm glad we are

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about And you know what was the most encouraging

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>part of us doing this podcast right now, if nobody

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>else gets anything out of it, you just said, Wow,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I learned something I didn't know about a word you

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>hear all the time, and you hear me talk about

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and you still learn by just taking

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a beat on your own. And I think most people

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing that.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh god no, And I'm telling you right now, it

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>was another one of those kind of humbling moments where

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you hear something, you reference something, you use the word,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and then you realize, damn, I didn't know what I

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>was saying. I didn't know what I was talking about,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>what the current use of it is, and I know

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>generally what it means, obviously, but I did not realize

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the origins. And when you realize the origins, you will

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 2>think twice about how you use that word, when you

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>use that word, where you use that word, and why

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>you use that word.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It what set us off today talking about woke

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is the President put on a long statement having to

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do with Sidney Sweeney, but he took a couple of

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>swipes at other industries, not industries, other companies Jaguar and

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>bud Light in particular. Jaguar had an ad not too

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>terribly long a year ago, whole relaunch of their brand,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but they used just models that seem to be what's

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the right way to put it dressed Androgyn's stress.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess right, like non gender specific, yes, And.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It was seen as a as a woke commercial company.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He did terribly. CEO just resigned, so Trump jumped him

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for that. Bud Light, same thing. It was a year ago,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>two years ago had a campaign in which they featured

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a trans influencer. People went crazy about that. Trump jumped

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on him for that. He called Taylor Swift in the

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>same post a woke entertainer and that her career is hurting.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But the last line is the

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one that got me. Quote. The tide has seriously turned.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Being woke is for losers. Being Republican is what you

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be. Ah, that's tough. That's the president saying

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that this idea of awareness, this idea of woke, or

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at least the way they are defining is that if

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you are any way in any way supportive of progressive

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas or being diverse in any way, then you're a looser.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>The frustrating thing about it is, I think a lot

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>of people, and I'm guessing I'm gonna put Republicans and

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the folks who are behind this way of

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 2>thinking that it's if you're woke, you're a loser. They

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 2>might be going up against or fighting back or pushing

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>back against overcorrection, like overcorrection like we have to nobody

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>can say anything, or we're gonna offend somebody if we

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>don't use the right pronouns, we're gonna offend something. So

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess my point is you could still have an

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 2>argument for guys, let's everybody calm down. Let's not be

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>so quick to overcorrect and to be overly inclusive that

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 2>we end up alienating everybody. And I think a lot

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of people can understand that. But that's not what he's saying,

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 2>and that's not what a lot of folks are saying,

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 2>or even the legislation we saw in Florida is saying.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Because I could understand that, I understand it. It's tough

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>sometimes when we go out of our way to the

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>point where we are trying to include everybody, but it

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>ends up excluding a lot of other people. You can

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>go too far, is my point. And I could get

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 2>behind that. I understand that, and that would be perhaps

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe an appropriate lane to stay in. But that is

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>not the lane he's ever even been in. It's completely

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 2>all or nothing, and I don't think in any way

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 2>you operate if is that. Okay, you can't be all

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>or nothing. There has to be some middle ground. And

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>so if they're upset about overcorrection or even any conversation

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 2>about inclusion when it comes to people and wanting to

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>be a part of things, to go to the other

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 2>side of things and say, anyone who considers anyone who

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look like you, sound like you, believe what you

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>believe in, if you try to then placate them, you're

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a loser. That's ridiculous. That's so sad to me. And

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to go and point the finger at

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>them or anyone else who feels that way. But think

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>about what you're doing and what you're saying. We're right,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you're wrong, us versus them. Tribalism, it's to visit and

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 2>it's we should be about trying to be inclusive and

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>understanding and curious, but not demonizing the other side or

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>demonizing someone who thinks differently than you. And that's exactly

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>what we're seeing from this leadership.

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Was it the d D didn't they change? They took

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>John Lewis's name off of a what was it?

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, they took I know they took Harvey Milk's name

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>off of the off of the airt aircraft Carria.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>The very good example now in wanting to honor an

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>LGBTQ plus icon by who had a military background.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Whose parents were military, he was military, I.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Told myself, I didn't want to use specific examples in

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this because it's going to go sideways, but you've made

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>me think of it. There. If you just want to

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>honor this guy who had a military connection and was

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an icon for the LGBTQ plus community, that's woke.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>No, That is showing people that there's presentation for people

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>who look like you or perhaps act like you, who

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>aren't like the others. That's important. And I can say

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 2>this is as and I can say this is a

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>white woman understanding that you can speak to it in

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a way that I can't. How important it is to

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 2>see people who look like you, or act like you,

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>or feel the same way you do reflected in some way.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't mean we have to go over the top.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>It just to take it away completely is so sad

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So, folks, do you know right now? Folks, do you

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, if you had to right now give me

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a definition of woke, could you do it? Well? It

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>depends on who you ask. But today, most of the

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>time that we hear the word woke, this is the

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>definition that goes along with it. It is a negative.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's defined often by conservatives as an ideology being woke

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is to embrace progressive ideas that recognize social and racial injustices.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a negative.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>How is that negative?

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is because no, no, no, I'm not going to

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>go with into their ideas, but it's that is what

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>being woke is today, that you embrace progressive ideas. Now

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to go far their robes, and I didn't

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get into that. But the idea of you're

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>actually embracing an ideology that suggests that America is systemically

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>racist in many of its facets of society has been,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and that black folks and people of color adding a

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage from white people. If you believe that you are

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong and you are woke, and you're embracing an ideology

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that is wrong. There are many people who do want

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to view this country as one that is completely fair

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to all sides, and there are no advantages if you

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>are white and if you believe that you are woke

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and you are wrong. That is the definition. But there

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is another one, folks, that black folks have had for

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's much different, and it goes back over

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years. We continue now, folks, Robac and I

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>here we gave you a minute you had a little

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>break there. Did you come up with a definition of woke?

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>There is another definition of woke Roabes, and it goes

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>back some one hundred plus years. And I said, the

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>way I have heard and used woke up until about

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago was all the time, you need to

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wake up, you need to be aware. You ain't woke,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You ain't on this. It was a negative if you weren't.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been in environments where if I wasn't aware of

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>something going on, I was looked at and called out

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for not being woke. How can you not know this?

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>How can you not be aware of this? That's how

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it was used against me. You remember I had a

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>show with a black TV network. That show was called

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't Sleep. And I remember the executive at the time,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to figure out what we should call

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the show. All these meetings went out he and it

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was a play on being woke. Don't Sleep.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So I knew you were on that show. And I

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 2>thought the name don't Sleep was used because it was

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 2>late night.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a play on that. But no, the idea

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is don't sleep. We're going to tell you what you

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be aware of. You need to be up on.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't sleep.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>It's about you gotta be aware. Yeah, and I'm asking

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a question as a white girl, as a white person,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the point being if you're asleep, it could be dangerous. Yes,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that was.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The origin of it. It was a warning you need

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of what's around you. In particular, we're

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get into it here in the South where

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>some boys were actually falsely accused of doing something and

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ended up on trial and convicted of a crime they

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>did not commit because they weren't aware of their surroundings.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>If you will, you wait, you and in Mississippi, you

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and Alabama, you don't know. We need to be woke,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>You need to be away in that crazy Yes, because

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that word and that thing is now being stolen, co

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>opted by somebody else, and it's not ours anymore, at

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>least in the public conversation. Because there's no way I

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>should be going down there and talking to those three

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>white kids and the only thing on their mind. Yeah,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>woke is a negative. That's terrible, it's bad. That shouldn't

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be the case. That means we are losing that.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Battle, my goodness. Yes, because when you go back and

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>look at what the origins are I It makes sense

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>now that I know, but I was shocked at how

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 2>much I didn't know. And I mean, look, you, we've

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about this a lot. Your head is always on

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>a swivel, and it always was a little perplexing to me.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I understood recently why your head was on a swivel

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 2>because there were people who were trying to take our

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 2>pictures and all of that, but I never really thought

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>about it historically from the perspective of who you are

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 2>as a black man, how you were raised, what you

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>were taught, what you needed to know, and what you

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 2>needed to do to be safe. And I never I

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>never put two and two together because I've never had

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>that experience as a woman. I've had other things, but nothing, nothing,

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 2>nothing compared to what I see you do each and

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 2>every day. And understanding that word now woke and understanding

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you a little bit better by doing this research. It's

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>it's mind blowing to me how much I don't know

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 2>and how much I haven't had to experience in the

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>same way or in any only in a very small way.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 2>And it makes sense now, but it also is just

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>incredibly gutting to me that not only has the word

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 2>been stolen and used politically, but it's being used against

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the cause, against everything that your community has desperately tried

0:19:59.119 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 2>to protect itself from.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>White folks always do this to us. I said that

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>somewhat jokingly, but white power. That phrase that scares the

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hell out of you came from black power. It was

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>taken from us. It was something that was a rallying

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>cry of black power, black lives matter, that was taken

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>from us. The same thing happened in this messaging and

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>language to where black lives matter became a negative. All

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>lives matter, Blue lives matter, So if you say black

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>lives matter, it was seen as a negative. These things happen,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have happened to us plenty, and once again

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of woke. So we're gonna go back to

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty three Marcus Garvey. Did you know that name?

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You may have, but he was a black nationalist, Jamaican

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>brother who was on this idea of black folks here

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in America need to go back actually to Africa. But

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he is considered a hero of the movement. But he

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was one who so many years ago started using the

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>phrase again. Nineteen twenty three is the first time he

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is attributed with saying it, but he was saying, wake

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up Ethiopia, wake up Africa. He was trying to it

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was a rallying cry. But that was one of the

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>earliest times we heard people use so nineteen twenty three,

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Garvey a rallying cry for black folks. Today it's

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a total negative.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what Marcus Garvey would be thinking right now.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean what I say, he's turning over in his grave.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>But could he have even imagined maybe he could have baby?

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>He's like, yeah, that sounds about right. He probably would

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>say that. Eh, figures I could have predicted that one.

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Sounds about right the next one. Though, we go from

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty three to nineteen thirty eight, this is the

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>first time, is believe this word woke appeared in a song.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>The song is called Scottsboro Boys. Now most of you

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>probably never heard of it, but it plays a significant

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>role because at the end of it, the singer led

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Belly goes his name, but he was speaking at the

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>end and he's said, I advise everybody to be careful

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>when they go down there, stay woke, keep your eyes open.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>The reference there was to these Scottsboro boys who had

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>been charged falsely with raping two white girls, and he

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>was speaking to them in this song, Scottsboro boys, be

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>careful when you go down there, stay woke, keep your

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes open.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:30.479
<v Speaker 2>It's well from what I understand, these boys were literally

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 2>just on a train that happened to also have white

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>women on it, and they couldn't They didn't realize that

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>they were in danger or that they could stand to

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 2>be accused of something just being in the presence of

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>white women.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, folks, stay woke. As you hear Governor

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis telling everybody, this is Florida's where woke goes to

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>die and saying it's such a negative that this was

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a warning to black boys who ended up charged with

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a crime they didn't commit because they didn't heed the

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>warning to stay woke, stay aware. It's all this was.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>You go.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Then to nineteen forty Negro mind workers in West Virginia.

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They realized they weren't getting paid the same as their

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>white counterparts. They wrote to their bosses, quote, we were asleep,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but we will stay woke from now on. Nineteen sixty

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two ropes That is the one that I think most

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people point to as the first time, maybe in print,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is the one that's credited with

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>really almost coining the phrase.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>That article was fascinating, and you can google it and

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you can read it from start to finish, and it

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is I mean, it was eye opening, and I didn't

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 2>realize he was talking about how the white beat nicks,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen sixties folks who were in the jazz scene

0:23:55.359 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 2>trying and taking on the language the music of black people,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and specifically describing how all of a sudden, white folks

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>start taking black phrases or black words, and then all

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, the black community is like, yeah, we're

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna move on and get a different word. But it's like,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the black community, they've got great music, they've

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 2>got cool ways of speaking. And then going into the

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>fact that some of this language was created among black

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>people who were slaves, enslaved so that their masters couldn't

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>understand what they were saying, and that is part of

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the history, and the fact that you've got every group

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>coming in going oh, that sounds cool. I'm going to

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 2>start saying that, I'm going to start using that phrase.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start It was wild to see this

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>written in nineteen sixty two.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you all get a chance this, please please

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>remember this. It's called if You're Woke, You dig It.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>If You're woke, You dig It. It's an essay from

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty two by author William Melvin Kelly. William Melvin Kelly,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>If You're Woke, You dig It. I beg you all

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to go check that thing out. I think it should

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be required reading. If you were going to be engaged

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in politics these days, you should read that, because woke

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is everywhere, and unfortunately, I don't think most people uttering

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it have any idea.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh they don't, they do not can I can speak

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 2>for all of those people we did not know, We

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I speak for the whites. But then in two thousand

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and eight, this was when it became I guess it

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was just a good song master teacher by Erica Bad

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was repetitive in there. Woke, woke, woke was

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>said a whole bunch in there. But then in twenty

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>fourteen Rogues, when finally Michael Brown and Ferguson was killed,

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that's when it became more a part of a modern

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>day rallying cry. With so much we were seeing.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And the Black Lives Matter movement also around that time

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 2>as well, But it was it was interesting because it

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 2>was Erica Badou who said at this point after that song,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 2>she said, you can go ahead and replace welk with black.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And so when you're saying what you're saying, just imagine

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>if you said black instead of woke, because that's what

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 2>it feels like to us each and every time you

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>say something. And that really stood out to me.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great way to put it. And that's how

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel every time I see somebody standing at a

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>podium saying anti woke or woke agenda's bad, or we

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>won't cater to this woke agenda. It's not the right.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand politics as politics, but this one it feels

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>personal and it feels like an insult, and it doesn't

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>feel inclusive in the least bit. Look, plenty of things

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>don't feel inclusive, but this is you're looking in my

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>face and announcing we don't want you here, We don't

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to be a part of this. You are

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not a part of this. And even our products now

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>we're not even going to pretend like we want you

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to use. We don't even want you to be a

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>customer of ours that it's just it's starting to fit.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>It feels awful.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like I have a question for you.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 2>You that the woke the anti woke campaign, do you

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 2>feel like it was more directed or seems to have

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>gotten more legs based on the LGBTQ plus community, that

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>that's when it really rose to another level. When you're

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 2>talking about trans rights and you're talking about bathrooms and

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>who get like. I feel like that's when it really

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>took on a whole other level. And it wasn't even

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 2>about the black community, which is another slap in the

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>face in a way.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Anything progressive, anything that's not the norm, and the norm

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is to some all American, white, conservative, heterosexual and if

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not that, then it's not really America. I don't

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>owe your question again there.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, my question was do you think that it even

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 2>took on a whole other level with the LGBTQ plus community.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I say that, I say yes, just because it gave

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>folks another target. We have another option. First, we were just

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about you black folks. Now we can talk about

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you folks over here and you folks over here. Now

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we just got more groups we can we can actually

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>discriminate against if you will. I think that just gave

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>them another talking point and another agenda, and another and

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>another way to divide us to win elections. To be honest,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really all that wasn't just I do.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>This is not about politicians. This is not about a

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>political issue. This is not us trying to get you

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to go this way or that way. It's just trying

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to get folks to be a little more aware of

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing, what's being said to you, where it

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>comes from, why, and just and make your own call

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>about how you use that word, when you use that word,

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and how you feel when you actually hear it. It's

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not an insult to be woke, folks, It's just not God.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I hope that that actually I mean, I feel

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 2>like that resonates. Why would it ever be a bad

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>thing to not be asleep at the wheel, to be awake,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to understand, to do the research to understand history. There's

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a reason why we have history classes. The problem is

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>we're not taught history. We're taught white history. We're taught

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>very specific history. We're not given the full breadth of

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>what and how we got to where we are.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even mention the Stop Woke Act in Florida. Florida,

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they literally have passed a law to keep folks from

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>learning about some of this stuff, some diversity, because they

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you learn about how the country started, then

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the little white kid that's six years old now is

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>going to think he's privileged.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Or he's or he's a bad person because people who

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>came before him are pressed.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I just I don't. It just drives me crazy,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And I just hope folks that this came off the

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>way we wanted it to come off, which was just

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to get you to think a little more about the

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>word when you hear it, and you're going to hear

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it probably tomorrow.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe even tonight in a tweet, in a truth social post.

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 2>But it is fascinating to understand the history of it,

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to understand its origins, and to understand its actual meaning

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>versus how it's being used in politics today.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, just I'm gonna leave it

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>though there's only one word I can think of. We

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>took from white folks that they had first. And with that, folks,

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we always appreciate you taking a listen with us. I'm

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>CJ on the behalf of my pard n Amy robot,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>who has a facing her.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Hands because I know the word yes that you're referencing.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>We will, We'll see y'allsoo